Tag: John Kerry

Become Aware of Tyranny’s Designs


ONLY LOCAL ACTIVISM WILL STOP NATIONAL GOVERNMENT CORRUPTION!

By John R. Houk, Blog Editor

© June 1, 2023

There is an axiom you can count on from members & propagandists for America’s Democratic Party – Dems Lie. And since this is not your grandparent’s Dem Party, YOU can be certain that political party has been taken over by the Globalist-Marxist-Fascist-Corporatist (GMFC) Elitists desiring a world-wide societal transformation in which the masses ONLY exist to serve the interests of the wealthy GMFC few.

THAT MEANS if there are members of the masses that refuse the GMFC Agenda or DO NOT fit the GMFC designs they must be CULLED from the world’s general population.

With that opinion – take it or leave it – Believe or Disbelieve – THE EXPOSÉ highlights a prominent Dem-Marxist liar in John Kerry’s remarks on Climate Change (he re-dubs Climate Crisis to demand transformative changes harmful to the masses) using deception to imply a greater good, but in reality ONLY benefits the imagined utopia of the few.  

Although Dem propagandists try to debunk the Swift Boat Vets criticism of Kerry’s Vietnam War military medals, closer examination shows more an Establishment support for Kerry’s accounts to be a bit fishy. The only thing that is clear is one group of eyewitnesses or another are lying. And since I already demonstrated in my opinion – Dems Lie, I lean toward the Establishment lying to protect Kerry. Here are two links reporting on the fishy accounts you can wade through and form your own opinion:

Essentially Kerry wants to do to the American farmers what the EU (Netherlands in particular) is doing to its farmers. END SMALL FARM practices in the name of saving the planet. THE EXPOSÉ roughly begins with Kerry’s Climate tyranny speech (begins at about 21-minute mark of nearly a 3-hour Youtube video) then breaks down the UN Agenda 2030-Rockefeller-WEF connection to Kerry’s essentially depopulation proposals.

Just because the Smart City tyranny is part of this Green-Climate tyranny for the masses, following THE EXPOSÉ post I’m adding an exposé on Smart Cities from Stop World Control (I can’t locate a post date but found it in a 5/30/23 email). That’s going to make this a lengthy post yet a worth your time post if you are interested in “THE-WHY” that your Liberty is slowly disappearing. HOPEFULLY, you will abandon Sheepledom and become involved in some local activism because there will be no national deliverance from a corrupt government. ONLY LOCAL ACTIVISM WILL NATIONAL GOVERNMENT CORRUPTION!

JRH 6/1/23

READER SUPPORTED!

Thank you to those who have stepped up! I need Readers willing to chip in $5 – $10 – $25 – $50 – $100. PLEASE YOUR generosity is appreciated. PLEASE GIVE to Help me be a voice for Liberty:

Please Support CPCR

YOU CAN ALSO SUPPORT via buying women’s menstrual health, healthy collagen, vitamin supplements/products, coffee from my Online store: My Store (please use referral discount code 3917004): https://modere.co/3f9x6xy

Big Tech Censorship is pervasive – Share voluminously on all social media platforms!

**********************

Destruction of farming is front and centre in the fight against climate change, John Kerry says

John Kerry – THE EXPOSÉ  photo

By RHODA WILSON 

May 31, 2023

THE EXPOSÉ

John Kerry, the multi-millionaire climate doomsday cultist and US Special Presidential Envoy for Climate, recently admitted that the destruction of the agriculture industry, livestock farming in particular, is essential to achieve “Net Zero.”

“Agriculture contributes about 33% of all the emissions of the world … And we can’t get to net zero – we don’t get this job done – unless agriculture is front and centre as part of the solution.”

“[A warmer climate] could result in an additional 600 million people not getting enough to eat and you just can’t continue to both warm the planet while also expecting to feed. It doesn’t work”

Kerry’s narrative to starve people by cutting off their food supplies to save people from starving seems bizarre. But that’s because the agenda he’s promoting uses climate and greenhouse gas emissions as a smokescreen.

Youtube VIDEO [2:57:10 – The Exposé link begins at 21:10 mark]: AIM for Climate Summit – May 10

[Posted by We Don’t Have Time

Posted on May 11, 2023

… MORE DESCRIPTION]

Kerry is obsessed with three things: money, natural resources and disenfranchising people from both.  The same obsessions as the Globalists. This shouldn’t come as a surprise. He was accused as far back as 2011 of being the US Senate’s “most globalist-oriented insider” when he was named as one of 12 members of the newly formed “Super Congress.”

Setting the Scene

The Agriculture Innovation Mission for Climate (“AIM for Climate” or “AIM4C”) Summit brought together partners worldwide to drive rapid and transformative climate action.  AIM4C is a joint initiative by the United States (“US”) and the United Arab Emirates (“UAE”).

The Summit is a premier global event ‘for the partners, by the partners’ that will provide a game-changing platform for AIM for Climate partners to raise ambition and amplify their work in climate-smart agriculture and food systems innovation.”

AIM for Climate Summit, 8-10 May 2023

It was supported by the Foundation for Food and Agricultural Research (“FFAR”), a partner of AIM4C. FFAR was established by the US Congress in 2014. The creation of FFAR was announced by the US Department of Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack.

AIM4C’s private partners include Bill & Melinda Gates Agricultural Innovations and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. Another AIM4C partner is Alliance for a Green Revolution in Africa (AGRA), a Gates-Rockefeller-Big Ag monstrosity which looked to “elevate the single coordinated African voice” at the 2021 UN Food Systems Summit.

However, the Alliance for Food Safety in Africa (“AFSA”) and dozens of other groups pointed out that the AGRA-promoted approach to farming – monocultural commodity production heavily reliant on chemical inputs – is great for the big agribusiness corporations that make up the AGRA alliance but terrible for African farmers.

Related: Report details how a handful of Corporations are taking control of the World’s Food Supply

Other private partners of AIM4C are the United Nations (“UN”) Food and Agriculture Organisation, UN Foundation, UN International Fund for Agricultural Development, UN Global Alliance for Climate Smart Agriculture and The World Bank.

The UN is a non-governmental organisation (“NGO”) which the Rockefellers were instrumental in establishing in 1946.  As independent researcher and author Jacob Nordangård said: “They view [the UN] as their own little club or organisation.”

Even though it appears they are not the UN’s major funders – in 2022, for example, The Rockefeller Foundation gave US$1.95 million to the UN Foundation while the total funding of the UN is in the region of US$66 billion per annum – the UN acknowledged in 2012 that the Rockefeller family had provided immense support for the League of Nations and the United Nations over the years. The UN library is named after John D. Rockefeller and David Rockefeller gifted a painting of John to the UN saying “he hoped it would serve as a reminder of his father’s generosity.”

Further reading:

AIM4C is not the first time Kerry has partnered with the UN. In April 2021, Kerry, along with Janet Yellen and Mark Carney, launched Glasgow Financial Alliance for Net Zero (“GFANZ”). GFANZ is an “industry-led and UN-convened” alliance of private banking and financial institutions to overhaul the role of global and regional financial institutions, including the World Bank and IMF, as part of a broader plan to “transform” the global financial system.

GFANZ is led by a Principals Group comprising CEOs from financial institutions, representative(s) from the UN, chairs of the GFANZ regional networks and the GFANZ Leadership Team. Principals of GFANZ, including BlackRock’s Larry Fink who is also on WEF’s Board of Trustees, have long been enthusiastic about the prospects of Natural Asset Corporations and other related efforts to financialise the natural world and he has also played a key role in marketing such financialisation as necessary to combat climate change.

Additional links between Kerry, the Rockefellers and the UN are under the guise of “energy transition.” At COP27 last November, John Kerry extolled the virtues of the Energy Transition Accelerator (“ETA”). This is a global public-private partnership (“G3P”) between the US State Department, the Rockefeller Foundation and the Bezos Earth Fund.   ETA is part of a $4.2 trillion capital investment initiative that exploits Target 7.b of the UN Sustainable Development Goals which specifies the Global South as the pilot region for the worldwide transformation of energy markets.   The result of this exploitation is that poorer nations, through G3P initiatives like the ETA and global investment strategies like GFANZ, will be forced to accept practically useless renewables.

A further link to Globalists is Kerry’s involvement with the NGO, the World Economic Forum (“WEF”).  Kerry is listed as a WEF agenda contributor and author.  Since 2007, he has attended 10 out of the 17 of WEF’s annual meetings.  During a Davos 2023 session titled ‘Philanthropy: A Catalyst for Protecting Our Planet’, Kerry revealed his god complex.  He said “[that] we, a select group of human, beings” can come together to talk about saving the planet is “almost extra-terrestrial.”

Further resources: Meet John Kerry, Skull and Bones Ambassador, The Corbett Report, 25 May 2013 (Video and Show notes HERE).

John Kerry’s Speech Minus the Fear Mongering and Lies

With the above in mind, below are excerpts from Kerry’s 22-minute speech at the AIM4C Summit. We have added some brief commentary to give his remarks some context. For clarity we have italicised remarks made by Kerry at the Summit, the numbers in [square brackets] denote the timestamp of his remark in the video above.

AIM4C was launched in November 2021 as part of the World Leaders’ Summit at the 26th UN Climate Change Conference (“COP26”). The initiative is led by the UAE and the US with the support of over 30 governments.

The announcement was made by: Mariam bint Mohammed Almheiri, UAE Minister of Climate Change and Environment; Tom Vilsack, US Agriculture Secretary; Dr. Sultan Ahmed Al Jaber, UAE Special Envoy for Climate Change and UAE Minister of Industry and Advanced Technology; and, John Kerry.

Kerry said at its launch that AIM4C had an impressive start as it had already garnered $4 billion in investment in climate smart agriculture and food systems innovation.

“[Mariam Almheiri has] been with us since the very beginning when Tom Vilsack and I were privileged to join the UAE, together with Dr. Sultan Ahmed Al Jaber and Sheikh Abdullah, and we made the announcement about this concept of an innovation mission for agriculture [AIM4C].” [22:17]

Kerry was one of the three who in April 2021 launched GFANZ as part of a plan to transform the global financial system.  Six months later COP26 was held in Glasgow.

“Together we all made this announcement in Glasgow that we were going to supercharge investment into climate smart agriculture, into innovation. And that is exactly what we have succeeded in doing.” [25:54].

According to the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (“UNIFCCC”), climate smart agriculture encompasses the three main dimensions of sustainable development: economic, social and environmental.  In other words, “sustainably increasing agricultural productivity and incomes; adapting and building resilience to climate change; and reducing and/or removing greenhouse gas emissions.”

One of the institutions leading the adoption of climate smart agriculture is the UN’s International Atomic Energy Agency (“IAEA”). IAEA, in cooperation with the UN’s Food and Agriculture Organisation (“FAO”), supports this integrated approach to addressing the causes and effects of climate change.

“In Glasgow, we challenged AIM partners to double the funding for climate smart agriculture innovation. And that’s exactly what we did … [in] Sharm El Sheikh last year we set our aims high again. The goal was to surpass 10 billion dollars in new collective investment. And AIM partners have actually eclipsed that target, yet again, unlocking not 10 but 13 billion in investment in climate smart agriculture and innovation.” [26:36]

COP27 was hosted by Egypt in Sharm El-Sheikh in November 2022. It was at COP27 that Kerry extolled the virtues of ETA which, through UN Sustainable Development Goals, exploits the poorer nations, particularly in the Global South.

“AIM now has over 50 government partners [and] 500 individual partners from around the world and growing.” [27:26]

Earlier in this article we highlighted a few of AIM4C’s partners. You can view a full list HERE.  We have searched AIM4C’s website for a list of who has invested and with how much but no such information is available.

“We [at the Summit] are 33% of emissions represented in this sort of gathering [of Agricultural Ministers] and more, in some ways, because of transportation, because of heavy industry, because of all the other components of the food chain – literally food chain, supply chain” [30:54]

“Emissions from the food system alone are projected to cause another half a degree of warming by mid-century” [33:07]

“A [2oC] future could result in an additional 600 million people not getting enough to eat and you just can’t continue to both warm the planet while also expecting to feed. It doesn’t work” [33:52]

“So, we need the innovation to, obviously, limit livestock production contributions to our emissions and to come up with novel feed additives and other ways of dealing with it. We need innovation to get plants the nutrients that they require without the high environmental and climate costs of nitrous oxide emissions and fossil fuel-based fertilizers” [36:07]

“Looking ahead: We’ve built a foundation, now we have to come to COP28 which already has three automatic outcomes. There will be a stock take, global stocktake, we can just read the IPCC report of a few weeks ago and you understand where that’s going to be not great news. Then we have the adaptation report and we have to double the amount of money – because we promised to do that in Sharm El-Sheikh, in Glasgow – on adaptation. And we will have the loss and damage fund to try to give life to it and begin to build legitimate faith and trust with the Global South of the world which contributes so little to this problem” [36:57]

It has to be said again. At COP27 Kerry extolled the virtues of ETA which, through UN Sustainable Development Goals, exploits the poorer nations, particularly in the Global South.

Also, how does he expect to build faith and trust with the Global South while continuing on the trajectory of using false IPCC reports? The world has woken up to the UN’s climate agenda using biodiversity, for example, as a cover for the biggest land grab in history and to implement harmful instruments and false solutions to the benefit of private interests.

Further reading: Why and How the IPCC Demonised CO2 with Manufactured Information, Watts Up With That? 13 November 2013

“I invite you to join a list of 12 countries – including Spain, Chile, Australia and, yesterday, Brazil – signed up to a joint declaration to address the challenge of methane emissions from food production” [37:56]

“I hope we can work together to bring new levels of investment to agricultural adaptation through the PREPARE programme which President Biden announced.” [38:08]

At COP26, Biden announced a plan – the President’s Emergency Plan for Adaptation and Resilience (“PREPARE”) – to help poorer countries adapt to climate change that he hopes will provide $3 billion in financing per year by fiscal 2024.

“Here at the Summit, we’ve announced mobilising 140 million in collective investment, towards a goal of 200 million, to provide innovative solutions to deal with the challenge of livestock. But we’re making progress there. It’s rather remarkable what is happening with diet and other inputs” [39:41]

“We know exactly what we have to do. The IAEA has been clear about how we get to the goal of 2030 – which is a 45% reduction in emissions by 2030 and then continue down to Net Zero by 2050. That’s what we have to do to keep 1.5 degrees.” [41:48]

“We need every single person here to be pushing this narrative of the way in which agriculture is going to contribute [to global warming] … so that we … get the job done.” [42:50]

THE EXPOSÉ HOMEPAGE

SUPPORT THE EXPOSÉ

++++++++++++++++++

Further John Kerry Reading:

++++++++++++++++++

How Smart Cities will lock up humanity inside open air concentration camps

Stop World Control

No Date

Smart City Photo

A Smart City is an urban environment with omnipresent surveillance and data harvesting technologies that will monitor and record even the most intimate, personal details of everyone.

The goal is to know everything about everybody: what you eat and drink, where you go, what you buy, who you meet, what you think, how you feel, your opinions, your habits, your health and vaccination status, and so on. Every. Little. Detail. The justification for this all-encompassing surveillance is that it is supposedly essential to “save the planet” from climate change. They also guarantee it will make your life more connected, safer and healthier.

Every aspect of life in a Smart City will be monitored by a wide variety of data harvesting technologies:  SMART Lights, SMART Poles, SMART Cars, SMART Neighborhoods, SMART Homes, SMART Appliances, SMART Energy, SMART Transportation and many other SMART technologies. Together they will form an omnipresent surveillance grid, continually collecting all information about every little detail of the life of the people.

Smart Cities create the Internet of Bodies

Internet of Bodies Photo

These external SMART devices are being synchronized with devices that are directly connected to the human body, like SMART watches on our wrists or SMART phones in our hands. These devices are able to gather information about what is happening inside our body and even have the ability to alter functions of the human body. In the near future, they will be implanted inside the human body to collect even more data and have a lot more influence on what happens inside of us.

The personal information gathered by these billions of devices worldwide form a network called the Internet of Bodies, or in short, IoB. Currently we are all familiar with the Internet of Things (IoT), which allows us to access unlimited information about everything. The Internet of Bodies will essentially be the same, except it will gather all the personal, most intimate information about everybody. This data will be in the hands of global corporations, governments, banking imperiums, etc.

A Smart City limits your movement

Smart City Surveillance Photo

In order to make sure that everyone remains within the perimeter of data harvesting, movement in Smart Cities will be limited to 15 – 20 minutes from home. This concept has coined the phrase “15 Minute Cities” and is being promoted as the best idea ever for saving the planet from climate change. Everything you need will be made available within a short distance, so no one ever needs to go beyond that perimeter. For longer distances, a permit will be required.

On top of this, 30% of all wilderness areas will be closed off as an encouragement for people to seek their happiness inside the Smart Cities instead of venturing into the majestic outdoors. Virtual realities are being created as an alternative to spending time in nature. Examples are the MetaVerse and all its alternatives. Again, a “wonderful idea to save the planet”: lock the world population up inside Smart Cities, where they “enjoy life” in a virtual realm.

There is zero privacy in a Smart City

Smart City Privacy Photo

The World Economic Forum wrote an article on Forbes.com that describes the experience of a citizen inside a Smart City, who praises it as heaven on earth: “How come we never thought of this before?” One of the characteristics will be that no one will own anything. Everything will be shared: homes, cars, tools, cars, even clothes. At the end of the post, the citizen expresses one concern about life in a Smart City:

“Once in a while I get annoyed about the fact that I have no real privacy. Nowhere I can go and not be registered. I know that somewhere, everything I do, think and dream of is recorded. I just hope that nobody will use it against me. All in all, it is a good life.”

The central nervous system of Smart Cities will be 5G. According to former Chilean president Sebastián Piñera, 5G is not only able to read our thoughts, but can also insert thoughts and emotions into everyone. He stated that it will become the central nervous system of society, and he guaranteed that they will make sure it reaches every home in the country. Interestingly, all streetlights in Smart Cities are also concealed 5G antennas.

Smart Cities harvest everyone’s data

Smart City Surveillance Data Harvesting Photo

Why do they want everyone to live in Smart Cities, and what is their motivation behind recording every little detail about all of us? The answer is given by Israeli professor Yuval Noah Harari, who is an advisor to the World Economic Forum. He explains:

“The new masters of the world will be those that own the data.”

The wealth of today is no longer gold or oil. It is data. The more data a corporation, government, or banking imperium has about the population, the more power it affords them. Smart Cities will be an unprecedented way to use humanity as one massive herd of data cows.

Personal data will be milked from us all day long, and even while we sleep.

Apart from gathering tremendous amounts of data, these technologies also allow for levels of control that are unheard of in previous civilizations. A former Silicon Valley engineer, Aman Jabbi, is sounding the alarm that Smart Cities will essentially be open concentration camps:

“By giving them your data, you give them the ability to monitor and assess your behavior, which can now be converted into a social credit score. That score is then used to determine what privileges you qualify for and which ones you don’t in the new slave society.”

This social credit score is already being deployed in China, and during the 2020 pandemic, many nations implemented the first steps toward this system of control. Digital IDs and digital currencies will be at the center of this grid. When people disobey, or criticize the system, their spending will be curtailed, and access to basic aspects of society will be blocked. Again, this is happening already in China, which is the testing ground for the rest of the world.

Will Smart Cities edit the human genome?

Smart City LED Lights Photo

A concerning fact about Smart Cities is that all streetlights are LED lights, which have the ability to manipulate the human genome. Gene expression can be turned off or on with LED lights, which can also activate mRNA inside the human body. Scientific studies documenting these facts abound online.  Which begs the question: is this why authorities insist on injecting all of humanity with mRNA technologies that can be activated through LED light?

Humanity-mRNA-LED Lights screen capture

Klaus Schwab, founder of the World Economic Forum, promotes the agenda of human gene editing. He openly says it will change what it means to be human. WEF advisor Yuval Harari even goes as far as to state that financial elites will split from humanity, as they will be genetically edited to become far superior to normal people. Economic inequality will become biological inequality. Harari says elites will become “Homo Deus”: divine beings, or gods.

Cyborg Superhuman Transhumanist Gene Edited Elitist Photo

If all these ideas weren’t being promoted worldwide by people and groups such as Bill Gates, Barak Obama, CNN, Facebook, the United Nations, the World Economic Forum, and countless other outlets of the elites – we would surely think it’s the script of a science fiction movie!  But it’s a horrific reality being pushed at a tremendous scale. During a recent World Government Summit in Dubai, Klaus Schwab stated that these developments are no longer in the future, but are being developed right now. His exact words were:

“They will come like a tsunami”.

And indeed, it is being rolled out at full speed. In Rio De Janeiro, for example, 450,000 streetlights are being replaced with 5G-equipped LED lights. The chart below shows how major cities in Latin America are being turned into Smart Cities.

Smart Cities Latin America Chart Photo

The same is happening in London, Paris and every other major city in the world. Millions upon millions of LED 5G streetlights are being positioned every few meters in every street of every city. Bill Gates has even invested into the building of a new Smart City in Arizona that can house 80,000 people, all centered around massive data centers.

Destroying 3,000 farms for a mega Smart City

Nederland Photo

In the Netherlands, the government recently announced the destruction of 3,000 farms in order to make room for a monstrous Smart City called the TriState City Network, which will house 40 million people from Belgium, Germany and The Netherlands. Their ‘logic’ for seizing the land and destroying the animals of 3,000 farms is that they “emit too much CO2”, which is “destroying the planet”. And yet, replacing green pastures with a monstrous Smart City is good for the environment?! Currently, most of the Netherlands is beautiful countryside with green pastures, windmills, creeks and historic farms. Unique in the world, truly beautiful and full of history.

The government wants to transform all of that beautiful scenic countryside into one massive Smart City called Holland City.

Holland Tristate City Network Photo

In Australia, the government has passed a law that allows residents of rural areas to be forcefully moved to Smart Cities when their area has been contaminated with dangerous toxins. With the Ohio train derailment, we have seen how easy it is for a vast area to be contaminated.  Are we seeing a precedent here?  With the organization of a few train crashes, millions could be removed from the rural areas and forced into Smart Cities.

Humanity must wake up

Head in Sand Photo

The sheer evil of this agenda is indescribable.  But what is even worse is the persistent unwillingness of the public to acknowledge something that is threatening their very existence. They insist on keeping their eyes closed, only caring for superficial entertainment. Staying dumb and blind at all costs, since “ignorance is bliss”.

If we remain in this blatant state of foolishness, we will go down into the most horrendous nightmare this world has ever seen.

If there ever was a time in the history of the world to open our eyes, it surely is now. We no longer have the luxury of hiding our heads in the sand. This is no conspiracy theory, as it is being rolled out worldwide at unfathomable speed. Under cover of the pandemic, millions of 5G towers were erected in every country of the world. LED lights are being installed everywhere. All vaccines are now set to become mRNA, even though Mark Zuckerberg, CEO of Facebook, was recorded during a zoom meeting with his staff, saying that mRNA vaccines indeed modify the human DNA and RNA, and that proponents have no idea what other mutations or risks may exist for the long term.

The elites’ agenda is to ensure regular injections with mRNA technology for the entire world population for the rest of our lives. That’s why vaccine statuses will be connected to our digital currencies and digital ID. Missing one injection could block access to society and banking.

What can we do to stop this madness?

No Photo

Is there a way to stop this insanity?  Yes. First and foremost, we must educate the people in our communities. The sole reason tyrants are able to pull this off is the ignorance of the masses. People haven’t got the slightest clue what is looming over their heads. They go along unquestioningly with anything that directs them toward this dystopian nightmare. It is our duty to inform them in any way we can.

Please share this post widely. Send it to your contacts through email, post it on social media and send it to local authorities in your community. Spread it far and wide.

We are the 99%, the tyrants are only the 1%. But the problem is that most of us are doing nothing. The majority even refuse to see what is right in front of their noses. They have the needles in their arms, the smart phones in their hands, the LED lights in their streets, the smart meters in their homes, the smart technology in their cars… and still they say “it’s all a conspiracy theory”. The insanity of this refusal to see reality is nothing less than downright psychosis.

We must open our eyes.  Not tomorrow, but TODAY.

Check out our guide “10 Ways to Stop The New World Order” where you will find an overview of practical steps we can all take to protect our lives and our future.

This is not a time to sit back.  We must stand up and act.  Please use the buttons below to share this post and help awaken people far and wide. 

CRITICAL INFORMATION FOR HUMANITY – FURTHER READING AT END OF PAGE

Copyright 2023 Stop World Control, All rights reserved.

WEF – Will the Masses be HAPPY?


John R. Houk, Blog Editor

© January 18, 2023

World Economic Forum (WEF) NWO One World Government Marxist-Fascist-Corporatist Elitists are having their 53rd Davos meeting (1/16 to 1/20/23) to make plans for global tyranny for the world’s masses who will be programmed to be happy with their restricted lives, restricted thoughts and no freedoms.

Since most people who still pay attention to news information still receive said news from MSM propaganda machines, I am guessing way too many people have zero idea of the controlled-lives-plan coming their way thanks largely to the tentacles of the WEF.

BELOW are a series of videos and articles more in order of my interest than date posted. Will the masses be happy?

I begin with a Newsmax snapshot:

The event, which begins Monday and goes to Friday, sports a high-profile guest list of names, including FBI Director Christopher Wray; CEOs of BlackRock, Amazon, and Pfizer; officials from the Gates Foundation and Soros network; and the heads of The New York Times and NBC.

The summit is also scheduled to hold a virtual appearance from Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, who reportedly will discuss a postwar loan with BlackRock’s Larry Fink. (World Economic Forum: ‘The Most Consequential Davos in 24 Years’; By Nick Koutsobinas; Newsmax; 1/15/23 09:59 PM EST)

For context on the evil that is the WEF, take the time to read:

THE CROSS POSTS:

JRH 1/18/23

Thank you to those who have stepped up!

READER SUPPORTED! I need Readers willing to chip in $5 – $10 – $25 – $50 – $100. PLEASE I need your generosity. PLEASE GIVE to Help me be a voice for Liberty:

Please Support CPCR

YOU CAN ALSO SUPPORT via buying healthy supplements/products from Online stores (mine & my Honey):

My Store (please use referral code 2388058): https://modere.co/3SrOHzI

My Better Half’s Store (please use referral code 3917004): https://dianahouk.shiftingretail.com/  

Big Tech Censorship is pervasive – Share voluminously on all social media platforms!

*************************

Bitchute VIDEO: YUVAL NOAH HARRARI [sic]: BIOMETRIC SURVEILLANCE

Posted by In4mation

First Published January 17th, 2023 00:55 UTC

++++++++++++++++++++

Elon Musk Mocks WEF as Global Elite Gather in Davos

World Economic Forum (WEF) founder Klaus Schwab delivers a speech during the “Crystal Award” ceremony at the WEF annual meeting in Davos, on Jan. 16, 2023. (Fabrice Coffrini/AFP via Getty Images)

By Liam Cosgrove

January 16, 2023 Updated: January 17, 2023

The Epoch Times

Tesla CEO Elon Musk took to his newly acquired social media platform over the weekend to make a series of quips aimed at the global organization, the World Economic Forum (WEF).

The WEF’s annual meeting in Davos, Switzerland—which features a host of international leaders, central bankers, Wall Street executives, and celebrities—began on Monday and will continue throughout the week.

“I guess there’s value to having a mixed government & commercial forum of some kind. WEF does kinda give me the willies though, but I’m sure everything is fine…” Musk said via Twitter on Sunday evening, responding to a Substack article co-written by independent journalists Michael Shellenberger and Izabella Kaminska.

The WEF has been the subject of considerable scorn and criticism for its 2016 ad campaign, which stated, “Welcome to 2030. I own nothing, have no privacy, and life has never been better.”

Many took issue with the organization’s attempt to frame a lack of personal ownership and privacy as a positive.

Initially accompanied by a promotional video and several articles, much of the campaign’s content has since been removed from the web. A tweet by the WEF remains up, however.

In their article, Shellenberger and Kaminska called out WEF Managing Director Adrian Monck, who blamed the uproar surrounding the ad on the right-wing message board 4chan.

Monck penned an opinion piece in the Canadian outlet The Globe and Mail last August, calling the backlash a “misinformation campaign that targeted the World Economic Forum.”

“The story of ‘you’ll own nothing and be happy’ is anything but trivial and offers valuable insights into how misinformation is created and why it’s essential not to perpetuate its spread,” Monck wrote, adding that many criticisms were racist and anti-semitic.

Shellenberger and Kamiska, linking to the now-deleted WEF content, refuted Monck’s claims. “What Monck claimed was inaccurate. The phrase ‘Own nothing, be happy,’ hadn’t originated on 4chan; it originated on WEF’s website,” they wrote.

Musk continued to crack jokes about the organization. “There should be a game show: “4Chan or Davos, who said it?” he said via Twitter on Monday afternoon.

Allegiance to ESG

The authors also highlighted the organizations’ lack of transparency and declared commitment to the environmental, social, and governance (ESG) agenda. The WEF is outspoken in its allegiance to the ESG movement.

“Recent events have only increased the business world’s focus on ESG,” reads a statement from the WEF website. “Worker wellness has become a major concern during the COVID-19 pandemic; social justice protests have drawn attention to gaps in diversity, equity, and inclusion; and the impacts of climate change and the importance of environmental sustainability are becoming harder, if not impossible, to ignore.”

Despite founding the world’s largest electric vehicle company, Musk is not a fan of ESG.

“The S in ESG stands for Satanic,” tweeted Musk in response. It is not the billionaire’s first comparison of this nature, he referred to the movement as “the devil” back in November.

Tesla CEO Elon Musk gives interviews as he arrives at the Offshore Northern Seas 2022 (ONS) meeting in Stavanger, Norway, on Aug. 29, 2022. (Carina Johansen/NTB/AFP via Getty Images)

Declined WEF Invite

In 2008, WEF listed Musk among its “Young Global Leaders” — which the organization classifies as a “membership” program — though it is unclear whether Musk participated in this arrangement. “I was invited to WEF, but declined,” he said via Twitter in December, responding to allegations that he had a relationship with the international group.

The Twitter CEO also responded to a video, featuring a speech by WEF founder Klaus Schwab, in which Schwab warns that a global cyberattack could disrupt supply chains and make the COVID-19 crisis look like “a small disturbance” in comparison.

The WEF founder warned that such an attack “would bring a complete halt to the power supply, transportation, hospital services, our society as a whole.”

Accompanied by daunting music and provocative imagery, the cinematic clip caught the attention of Musk. “This movie writes itself,” Musk responded with a popcorn emoji.

Schellenberger emphasized that Schwab is more than a figurehead. “Schwab has become, without question, one of the most influential men alive,” tweeted the journalist while promoting his article.

Schwab has been criticized for his book COVID-19: The Great Reset, which advocated for governments around the globe to use the pandemic as an opportunity to “reimagine capitalism.”

The WEF has also been heavily criticized for promoting insects as a potential dietary source. A February article by the organization titled “5 reasons why eating insects could reduce climate change” attempts to dispel commonly held stigmas about eating bugs.

“Before you say ‘yuck,’ hear us out,” the article reads.

Liam Cosgrove works as a freelance journalist covering business, markets, and finance. He received his bachelor’s degree in mathematics from the University of California–Santa Barbara.

Copyright © 2000 – 2023. THE EPOCH TIMES

+++++++++++++++++++++

Bitchute VIDEO: ELON MUSK UNLOADS: CALLS WEF ‘OMINOUS’ & CONDEMNS KLAUS SCHWAB’S ‘MASTER’ PLAN!

Posted by Next News Network

First Published January 18th, 2023 01:35 UTC

… MORE DESCRIPTION

+++++++++++++++++++++++

John Kerry Pontificates About the Extraordinary Ability of a “Select Group of Humans” at the World Economic Forum, Who Will Save The Planet for the Eaters and Serfs

By sundance

January 17, 2023

The Conservative Treehouse

During a sidebar conversation with those rare elites who wax philosophically about their magnanimous ability to protect the vulgarian eaters, former Secretary of State and current Climate Czar John Kerry, praises the audience for their unique traits and gifted high-mindedness that will protect all humanity.

While the lizard tongue darts, the grand pontifications are espoused.  The audience oohs and ahhs, at the nature of their entitled superiority. They are so good, so magnanimous, so altruistic in their disposition, according to Kerry they are literally “extraterrestrial,” which is to say out of this world.  WATCH:

Youtube VIDEO: John Kerry At World Economic Forum: “Extraordinary” For “Select Group” To Discuss Green Mandates

[Posted by GOP War Room

Jan 17, 2023

… MORE DESCRIPTION]

… MORE TO READ & a couple photos

© 2023 The Conservative Treehouse

++++++++++++++++++++

WEF Declares US Will ‘Soon’ Have ‘Hate Speech Laws’ To Deal With ‘Information Pollution’

Brian Stelter & Vera Jourova at WEF-Davos 2023

Posted by Morgan

January 17, 2023

Daily Street News

The US will “soon” have “illegal hate speech laws” to punish anyone spreading “polluting” the internet with “disinformation,” according to World Economic Forum affiliate and European Union official Vera Jourova.

Jourova participated in Tuesday’s WEF panel on “the clear and present danger of disinformation,” alongside former CNN Host Brian Stelter, Massachusetts Democratic Rep. Seth Moulton, New York Times publisher Arthur Sulzberger and media executive Jeanne Bourgault.\

“For hate speech, we need the people who understand the language and the case law in the country, because what qualifies as hate speech, illegal hate speech, which you will have soon also in the U.S., we have a strong reason why we have this in the criminal law,” Jourova said 36 minutes into the panel.

Rumble VIDEO: WEF Declares ‘Humans Are a Plague’ and ‘AI Is the Cure’

[Posted by The People’s Voice

Published January 16, 2023

Yuval Noah Harari, Klaus Schwab’s lead advisor at the Word Economic Forum, has announced that human beings are no better than “viruses or bananas” and the WEF has now reached the point where they can “hack humanity.”

According to Harari, the idea that humans have free will is over, and for those who oppose, there will be no escaping what Harari refers to as the “Secret Police.”

The messaging coming out of the WEF is becoming increasingly sinister, with Klaus Schwab taking on the role of terrorist group leader, using communications channels to issue ultimatums to humanity. Do what I say, or else.

According to Schwab, the new internet will only be available to those who submit to the WEF’s biometric digital ID.]

“We need the platforms to simply work with the language and identify such cases. The AI [artificial intelligence] would be too dangerous,” Jourova added. She was answering a question from the crowd about making the “truth” as “attractive and compelling” as the “lies” people consume.

DailyCaller report: The panel was addressing the ways for the public, regulators and social media companies to tackle “disinformation” as “information pollution” spreads at an “unprecedented speed and scale,” the WEF website says. It’s unclear how the panel defines “disinformation” online and how it measures the spread of perceived disinformation.

Earlier in the panel, Moulton said Americans learn in grade school that “crying fire in a crowded theater” is not protected free speech. Moulton’s statement distinguishing forms of protected speech is misleading, according to non-partisan free speech group FIRE.

Stelter was fired by CNN in August and his Sunday talk show “Reliable Sources” was cancelled. He joined Harvard’s Kennedy School as a Shorenstein Center Fellow in September to host discussions about democracy on campus.

The World Economic Forum’s annual meeting is taking place in Davos, Switzerland, from Jan. 16-20. The forum brings global elites together from politics, business, entertainment, civil society and the young generations.

Source: News Punch

Copyright. All Rights Reserved. Daily Street News

++++++++++++++++++

Davos —‘Do or Die 2023’

We can build way back better without the repulsive overbearing influence of Klaus and Hilde Schwab whose policies would swallow the Free World whole!

Klaus & Hilde Schwab at WEF-Davos 2023

By Judi McLeod 

January 18, 2023

Canada Free Press

Devious media operators of the day keep running about in circles asking, “Who is WEF chief Klaus Schwab?”

Some describe him as a dead ringer for “Dr. Evil” in James Bond movies.  But Dr. Evil and other Bond characters are only Hollywood ‘entertainment’, while the WEF “Dr. Evil” is threatening all of humanity in real life—and openly bragging about it!

The WEF “Dr. Evil” reminds us that when he reconstructs the world by “building back better” that everyone in the masses “will have nothing but be happy”.

That’s because Klaus Schwab is a full-blown narcissist, and narcissists have no conscience or any concerns at all for others.

What kind of people were attracted to Davos 2023, which openly provides sexual services from high end prostitutes? Government ‘leaders’ and business CEOs who must have sexual services when only the better part of a week away from home!

In other words, Davos 2023 is now attended by all those who knew about the sexual services provided by a group unable to define what a woman is!

On Day 2, this is what Davos attendees were doing:

“Today, the World Economic Forum, in partnership with Accenture and Microsoft, has launched its Global Collaboration Village. (WEFORUM, Jan17, 2023)

“80 organizations have also joined as Village Partners and will drive the development of a purpose-driven metaverse bringing people together to learn about, create solutions for, and take action on the world’s most pressing challenges.”

Why, oh why is Davos 2023 bringing back a failing Mark Zuckerberg back to the fore.

Yesterday Ukraine First Lady Olena Zelenska took the floor,  emphasizing in her Davos address the human cost of the war in her country.

‘Everyone has a right to life,’ she said.

Every one that is, except millions of innocent babies killed in their mothers’ wombs in many countries, Mrs. Zelensky.

Ukraine’s First Lady is not the only ‘Mrs.’ out there advocating for the destructive so-called “Great Reset”.

Thanks to the savvy of courageous Remnant Editor Michael J. Matt, we now know that WEF-obsessed Klaus Schwab has recently brought his wife to the fore to help spread his insane, akin to manure Great Reset dreams.

Since there are few, if any media reports of the Schwabs doubling down, against the Free World, it’s Kudos to Matt for bringing them into antiseptic sunlight.

Hilde Schwab (seen above)  is no ordinary ‘little Mrs.’, and it’s all but impossible to tell which of these two is really “the better half”.

Hildegard (Hilde) Schwab (born June 3, 1946 in Switzerland) (née Stoll) is a Swiss entrepreneur in the field of event marketing and founder.(Wikipedia)

Hilde Stoll, originally from Aarburg, met Klaus Schwab, a German living in Switzerland, in 1970 through a job advertisement. Schwab hired Stoll, she was his first employee. They founded the beginning of 1971 together the “European Management Symposium”, which later became the World Economic Forum (WEF) in Davos in the canton of Graubünden. In 1972 they married. In 1998, together with Klaus Schwab, she founded the Schwab Foundation for Social Entrepreneurship, of which she is the chair. In this capacity, she is a member of the Patronage Committee of the Kirchner Museum Davos, for example.

The couple has two adult children and lives in Cologny in the canton of Geneva.

That was the Schwabs back in the hippy days of the 1970s.  In 2023, they work to take over the entire world.

While Klaus Schwab warns the adult world “You will have nothing and be happy”, Hilda spends activist time addressing little children.

Imagine the nauseating hypocrisy of raving lunatic Klaus Schwab, who aims to take over the entire world, and whose stifling rules reflect those of the woke crowd already running it who won’t—or can’t—define what a woman is, claiming for himself unelected and unsolicited world leadership!

Pretending not to know what a woman is, is flat out denying that women even exist.

It’s ‘Do or Die 2023’.

WEF world control means no private property, no cars, no farms providing food, and eating bugs rather than meat and vegetables.

In Schwab’s own words it also means the ability of self-appointed lunatics going about sticking microchips under your skin!

According to narcissist Schwab you will not only like it, but there’s no way around him sticking them there!

That’s the Great Reset plans of Mr. and Mrs. Schwab, Bill Gates, and the rest of their delusional, control-crazed supporters, including the Prime Minister of Canada, who was somehow not in attendance at Davos 2023.

While their minions are out there pretending that abortion’s not murder, that men can have babies, that integrity would now include transgendering kids at school, WEF’ers are currently meeting again in Davos, with the media and world governments pretending it isn’t happening.

It’s high time all who care about freedom to tell the Schwabs and their acolytes to shove off.

They should be packed onto a boat ready to sail them to the Antarctic, where they can pipe dream in snow and ice, teaching penguins how to avoid a Global Warming/Climate Change that doesn’t exist.

They keep yammering on about “building back better”.  We can build way back better without the repulsive overbearing influence of Klaus and Hilde Schwab whose policies would swallow the Free World whole!

Judi McLeod, Founder, Owner and Editor of Canada Free Press, is an award-winning journalist with more than 30 years’ experience in the print and online media. A former Toronto Sun columnist, she also worked for the Kingston Whig Standard. Her work has appeared throughout the ‘Net, including on Rush Limbaugh and Fox News.

Site Copyright 1997-2022 Canada Free Press.Com

+++++++++++++++++

Bitchute VIDEO: CITING “POLYCRISIS,” GLOBALISTS IN DAVOS PLAN “NEW SYSTEM” FOR … EVERYTHING!

Posted by The New American

First Published January 17th, 2023 14:48 UTC

Globalists and their useful idiots are converging in Davos for the World Economic Forum to design a “New System” for work, care, employment, and much more in the face of what the organizations leaders are referring to the “polycrisis” hitting humanity, warns The New American magazine’s Alex Newman in this episode of Behind The Deep State. Numerous global leaders, as well as key U.S. policymakers from both sides of the aisle, are meeting with business tycoons at the summit to advance the “Great Reset,” too. In this episode, Alex goes through the agenda and the key players and offers tips on how to stop the destruction of liberty that is envisioned.

+++++++++++++++++++++

Bitchute VIDEO: DAVOS 2023: THE MASTERS OF CRINGE!

Posted by Computing Forever

First Published January 18th, 2023 12:19 UTC 

… MORE DESCRIPTION

KERRY STATE DEPARTMENT PROMOTED STEELE DOSSIER AND RUSSIA COLLUSION FANTASY


Regardless of any claims to the contrary by former VP Biden and former President Obama, you have to be amazed on how corrupt and crooked the Obama Administration actually was! Thanks to Judicial Watch, more poop on what should be prosecutable corruption comes to light.

 

JRH 6/17/19

Your generosity is always appreciated:

Please Support NCCR

*******************

KERRY STATE DEPARTMENT PROMOTED STEELE DOSSIER AND RUSSIA COLLUSION FANTASY

“Let’s do a movie about this!”

 

By Lloyd Billingsley

June 17, 2019

FrontPageMag

 

Dept. of State

 

One day before the FBI launched its Trump-Russia investigation, Sovietophile academic Nellie Ohr, wife of DOJ boss Bruce Ohr and an employee of Fusion GPS, met with former British spy Christopher Steele. The upper reaches of the FBI and DOJ – Ohr, McCabe, Comey, Strzok, Page and such – have drawn the most attention in the fake Russia collusion story. It now emerges that the elusive Steele also deployed collaborators at the U.S. Department of State.

 

As 43 pages of documents obtained by Judicial Watch explain, “State Department ‘Special Coordinator for Libya’ Jonathan Winer played a key role in facilitating dossier author Christopher Steele’s access to other top government officials,” and “prominent international business executives.”

 

According to the Middle East Institute, Jonathan M. Winer was “deputy assistant secretary of state for international law enforcement, and counsel to United States Senator John Kerry.” Winer has written and lectured widely on, among other things, “corruption, and U.S.-Russia issues,” which seems somewhat removed from the Yale alum’s background.

 

In November of 2014, Winer sought to hook up Steele with Nelson Cunningham, president of McLarty Associates, a consulting firm co-founded by former Clinton White House Counselor Thomas ‘Mack’ McLarty. Winer’s email describes Steele as “an old friend of mine,” and “a former senior British intelligence officer focusing on former Soviet Union with a number of US and European private sector clients these days…”

 

In November of 2014, Winer “openly acts as a liaison for Steele,” attempting to set up meetings for “Chris” and referencing “Three Orbis Reports” in the subject line of the email. That same month Winer set up Steele with Ariuna Namsrai of ACPO “one of the world’s leading advisory and advocacy communications consultancies.”

 

Jumping ahead to January of 2017, movie producer Eric Hamburg forwards an article on the Steele dossier to Winer, proclaiming “Let’s do a movie about this!” Hamburg is the producer of the 1995 Nixon, starring Anthony Hopkins and directed by Oliver Stone. As it happens, Hamburg’s IMDB profile shows him posing with Hillary Clinton.

 

In February of 2018, Winer wrote an op-ed in the Washington Post claiming that Steele told him in 2016 he had “learned of disturbing information regarding possible ties between Donald Trump, his campaign and senior Russian officials.” Steele and Clinton factotum Sidney Blumenthal approached Winer with “separate dossiers.” No word whether the DNC also paid for Blumenthal’s dossier and whether his high concept featured any Russian whores urinating on a bed. Scenarios like that doubtless had Eric Hamburg panting to produce a movie.

 

“These documents show that Fusion GPS and Clinton spy Christopher Steele had a close relationship with the Obama State Department,” said a statement from Judicial Watch president Tom Fitton. “The State Department under John Kerry is emerging as another center of the Spygate conspiracy against President Trump.” That should come as no surprise.

 

Kerry once testified that U.S. actions in Vietnam were “reminiscent of Genghis Khan.” Kerry said the 2015 Charlie Hebdo terrorist attack in France had a “sort of particularized focus and perhaps even a legitimacy” and “a rationale that you could attach yourself to.” Kerry described the terrorist attack as obscurantisme, which even in French fell a bit short. The performance prompted Sen. John McCain to call Kerry, “the most inept secretary of state, certainly in my lifetime.” And when no longer Secretary of State, Kerry still acted like one.

 

After President Trump nixed the Iran deal, Kerry duly showed up in Iran for back-channel talks. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo blasted Kerry for “actively undermining” administration’s policy toward the Islamic Republic.

 

For his part, Jonathan Winer was a State Department “Special Coordinator” for Libya, but what he managed to coordinate there remains unclear. For Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, the murder of four Americans was all about some internet video, and after all, what did it matter?

 

As the State Department emails obtained by Judicial Watch show, Jonathan Winer was, in effect, Steele’s personal agent with the State Department, the Clinton propaganda machine, and even the entertainment industry. So Winer qualifies as an associate producer of the Russia collusion show, which the Democrat-media axis shows no sign of abandoning. It’s the biggest production on the left since Barry Soetoro teamed with David Axelrod on Dreams from My Father, which official biographer David Garrow called a novel, and the author a “composite character.”

 

Meanwhile, Attorney General William Barr is aiming at a broad-based, multifaceted investigation of the Russia collusion story’s origins. As other emails obtained by Judicial Watch reveal, the DOJ’s Bruce Ohr, Nellie’s husband, grabbed bonuses while that was going on, and bagged a pay raise after he lost his job as Associate Deputy Attorney General.

 

Prosecutor John Durham should find out if that was a reward for the Ohrs’ role in the illicit targeting of President Trump. In similar style, Durham might have a look at State Department records, and what they reveal about the multifaceted Jonathan Winer.

 

Curious observers might note that the State Department did not volunteer the material about Winer’s connections with Christopher Steele. Likewise, no congressional committee and nobody in the establishment media came up with the documents. The revelation resulted from legal action by Judicial Watch, whose motto is “because no one is above the law!” Other pertinent Judicial Watch revelations can be found at this link.

___________________

Lloyd Billingsley is the author of  Barack ‘em Up: A Literary Investigation and, most recently, Sexual Terrorist, about the Golden State Killer.  Lloyd’s work has appeared in City Journal, the Wall Street Journal, Washington Times, California Globe, and many other publications. Bill of Writes: Dispatches from the Political Correctness Battlefield is a collection of his journalism. His crime books include A Shut and Open Case, about a double murder in Davis, California.

 

© COPYRIGHT 2019, FRONTPAGEMAG.COM

 

Trump Nixes Iran Nuke Deal


VIDEO: Trump Announces U.S. Withdrawal From Iran Nuclear Deal

 

Posted by Washington Free Beacon

Published on May 8, 2018

 

John R. Houk, Blog Editor

© May 9, 2018

 

Yesterday President Trump did a magnificent thing. He ended former President Obama’s (the next Benedict Arnold at worst or Aaron Burr at best) so-called Iran Nuke Deal that only delayed a nuclear armed Iran. Obama’s lie: the deal prevented a nuclear armed Iran.

 

Traitors: Benedict Arnold, Aaron Burr & Obama

 

President Trump’s election mandate from my perspective is to unravel all the damning acts Obama’s designs to fundamentally transform America into a State supremacist Socialist nation where the People are told how to think rather than the People telling the government how to act.

 

Stopping to put trust in Iran’s criminal Islamofascist Shi’ite ruling elite is not only a great thing for American National Interests, but also for the people of Western Nations that have benefitted from actual free elections deciding their national path.

 

ONE THING to keep in mind: The Iran Nuke Deal was NOT a treaty ratified by the Senate. Obama chose to circumvent the Constitution (as he had done so many times) and sign an agreement with Iran as an Executive Order. An EO is easily undone by the next President’s EO action. Thank you President Trump.

 

Below are a series of articles about President Donald Trump’s decision with a few titles that may be of interest.

 

JRH 5/9/18

Please Support NCCR

****************************

Promise Kept — Trump Nukes Iran Deal

Yet another pillar of Barack Obama’s horrible legacy crumbles at Trump’s hands.

 

By National Security Desk

May 9, 2018

The Patriot Post

 

Trump Caption: I Undid his (BHO) deal & Legacy. Patriot Post

 

Keeping his promise, President Donald Trump announced Tuesday that the United States will withdraw from the “horrible” Iran nuclear deal (the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action) and reinstate sanctions that were suspended as part of the deal. “We will not allow American cities to be threatened with destruction. We will not allow a regime that chants ‘Death to America’ to gain access to the most deadly weapons on earth,” Trump declared. “Today’s action sends a critical message: The United States no longer makes empty threats. When I make promises I keep them.”

 

Despite attempts by the Europeans to dissuade Trump, despite John Kerry’s smoke-filled-backroom efforts to save the deal, and despite Iran warning that it would be “a historic mistake” to withdraw, the president reiterated what he has said all along: “We cannot prevent an Iranian nuclear bomb under the decaying and rotten structure of the current agreement.” Trump reportedly remains open to improving the deal, and he will now have economic leverage to persuade Iran and the Europeans to do just that.

 

Barack Obama, who paid the Iranians $1.7 billion in ransom cash loaded on pallets as well as hundreds of billions more in sanctions relief, predictably criticized the decision to withdraw — which is tantamount to an endorsement in our book. “Walking away from the JCPOA turns our back on America’s closest allies,” Obama admonished, adding that it’s “a serious mistake.” But the biggest mistake was made by Obama and his feckless secretary of state, Kerry, caving in to one Iranian demand after another and agreeing to the deal. As we said at the time, “You want it bad, you’ll get it bad.”

 

Obama was so desperate for a foreign policy “victory” that getting a deal was more important than the content of the deal. Having agreed to a deal that he knew would never pass the Senate as a treaty, the minute the ink was dry Obama instead ran to the United Nations, which passed a Security Council Resolution establishing the deal’s terms. But only laws passed by the U.S. Congress, or treaties approved by the Senate, are binding on the actions of the United States. And as “constitutional scholar” Obama and long-time Senator Kerry undoubtedly knew, any deal that really was in the United States’ best interest would have been able to pass muster in the Senate and gain the two-thirds votes needed to ratify a treaty.

 

Obama and his various minions told us time after time that the deal would moderate Iran’s behavior and help bring it back into the community of nations, but a quick survey of recent events shows the spectacular deception of that claim.

 

Iran is fighting a proxy war in Syria to keep Bashar al-Assad’s murderous regime in power, and it probably has more troops on the ground than any group other than the Syrian Army. It continues flying military equipment into Syria via Iraq, attracting the occasional Israeli airstrike (including one just last night) and risking major escalation of the fighting there. Its proxies in Yemen have fired Iranian-made weapons at U.S. Navy ships in the Red Sea, as well as used one of Iran’s signature weapons, the explosive boat, to hit and severely damage a Saudi warship. Its ballistic missile activity has continued unabated, despite UN Security Council Resolution 2231’s prohibitions on such activity. In addition to missile testing, Iran has actually fired ballistic missiles at targets in Syria, and its Yemeni proxies have fired Iranian-made missiles into Saudi Arabia.

 

Needless to say, we don’t see much moderating in Iran’s behavior. Worse, Obama helped fund Iran’s increased terror sponsorship.

 

In the coming days and weeks we expect the various actors that supported the deal — Democrats, the Leftmedia, the Europeans, the Iranians — will all make the most of the opportunity to paint President Trump as a bumptious and warmongering rube. The Europeans will follow Obama’s cue and decry the undiplomatic behavior of withdrawing from a gentlemen’s agreement. The Iranians will shout about the untrustworthy nature of the United States. We even expect Rep. Maxine Waters will ascribe racism to President Trump’s decision, claiming it is an act of spite against his African-American predecessor.

 

But all the wailing and teeth-gnashing among various Europeans, Iranians, Democrats (and even some short-sighted Republicans) will merely serve to demonstrate the double injury Obama inflicted when he accepted the deal. The first injury was the deal itself. The second, as we said at the time, was that some future president would have to withdraw and harm our standing with friends and foes alike.

 

That day has now come, and our standing with our European allies may indeed suffer temporarily. Iran may try to create even more mischief around the Middle East. Oil markets and the U.S. and world economies may feel some pain as Iran’s oil market is squeezed.

 

But the undeniable fact is that the existing nuclear agreement merely kicked the can down the road for a decade, ensuring that Iran would emerge with a full, UN-approved nuclear fuel cycle that would enable very rapid nuclear breakout in the future. Dealing with this problem now, even if painful, is vastly better than dealing with it later, when it may not only be painful but also deadly. Withdrawing from the nuclear deal is a first step in the right direction.

 

On a final note, North Korea’s Kim Jong-un should take note that Trump isn’t messing around. Perhaps he already has, as Secretary of State Mike Pompeo returns home today from Pyongyang with three released American hostages.

++++++++++++++++++

Donald Trump Ends the Obama Mirage

The Iran nuclear deal, 2015-2018

 

By Matthew Continetti
May 8, 2018 3:03 pm

Washington Free Beacon

 

President Trump announced that the United States would withdraw from the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), aka the Iran nuclear deal, on the afternoon of May 8. The deal, announced to such fanfare in July 2015, did not live to see its third birthday. And for that, I am grateful.

 

Why? Because the president said not only that America will be leaving the accord. He declared that the period of waxing Iranian influence in the Middle East is at an end. The deal financed several years of Iranian expansion through Shiite proxies in Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, and Yemen. By reimposing sanctions, President Trump will weaken an already ailing Iranian economy. The Iranian currency, the rial, has plummeted in recent weeks. Inflation is rampant. The financial system is corrupted, dysfunctional. Strikes are proliferating, and often turn into displays against the government. This is a situation the United States should seek not to mitigate but to exacerbate.

 

Removing ourselves from the deal puts Iran on the defensive. Its people and government are divided and uncertain how to respond. Its leverage is minimal. Iranian citizens have seen their leaders use the money from the deal not to improve the economic lot of the average person but to fund the military, IRGC, and other instruments of foreign adventurism. Implicit in the deal was recognition of the Islamic regime as a legitimate member of the so-called “international community.” President Trump has rescinded that recognition and the standing that came with it. The issue is no longer Iranian compliance with an agreement that contained loopholes through which you could launch a Fateh-110 heavy missile. The issue is whether Iran chooses to become a responsible player or not, whether it curbs its imperial designs, cuts off its militias, abandons terrorism, opens its public square, and ceases its threats to and harassment of the United States and her allies. That choice is not Donald Trump’s to make. It is the Iranian regime’s.

 

Trump has made his choice. Like he did with the Supreme Court, the Paris Climate Accord, and the U.S. embassy in Jerusalem, Trump kept a promise made many times throughout the campaign. In truth, anyone who has listened to Trump over the last several years should not be surprised by his decision. From the beginning, he understood that any deal which gives the weaker party benefits up front in exchange for minimal temporary concessions is not a deal worth taking. And since he does not accept the worldview that inspired the deal, there is no reason for Trump to remain in it.

 

The worldview Trump opposes privileges therapy and dialogue over realism and hard decisions. It imagines that the Iranian theocracy is a reliable or trustworthy hedge against Sunni power and will liberalize gradually as the arc of justice progresses. These are the ideas that motivated the presidency of Barack Obama. The Iran deal was the signature achievement of Obama’s second term, and it is now gone. In truth, though, Obama’s legacy was disappearing long before Trump made his announcement. Obama’s legacy, like much of his self-presentation, was a mirage, a pleasing and attractive image that, upon closer inspection, loses coherence.

 

Because he governed so extensively through executive order and administrative fiat, because he was so contemptuous of criticism and had a “my way or the highway” approach to negotiations with Republicans (though not with Iranians), the longevity of Obama’s agenda depended heavily on his party winning a third consecutive term in the White House. As Tom Cotton warned the Iranians years ago, an agreement entered into by a president and not submitted to the Senate as a treaty can be abrogated by the next man who holds the office. Hillary Clinton’s failure doomed the Iran deal and the reputations it had established. It was Barack Obama and John Kerry who allowed Donald Trump to exit the deal by rejecting longstanding procedure. Perhaps it was knowledge of this fact that inspired Kerry in his desperate attempt to preserve the agreement.

 

Trump has spent much of his time in office reversing Obama policies that were made outside of, or in opposition to, America’s constitutional framework. He has had the hardest time repealing Obamacare, for the very reason that the Affordable Care Act was passed by the Congress and upheld by the Supreme Court. That is a lesson for any president: To have a long-lasting influence on American life, work within the system bequeathed to us by the Founders.

 

Because Republicans widely shared a negative attitude toward the Iran deal, many people assume that President Trump is doing what any other GOP president would do. But I am not sure. Another Republican president who had come up through the political system, or been enmeshed in the foreign policy establishment, or held elite opinion in esteem may well have given in to pressure to remain in the Paris accord, keep the U.S. embassy in Tel Aviv, and stay, at least partly, in the JCPOA. Trump’s outsider status and independence give him the freedom not only to flout political correctness but to repudiate the international and domestic consensus in ways his supporters love.

 

It took a small boy to say the emperor had no clothes. And it took Donald Trump to say that Barack Obama’s foreign policy legacy was a superficial and dangerous mirage.

 

Matthew Continetti is the Editor in Chief of the Washington Free Beacon. He can be reached at comments@freebeacon.com.

+++++++++++++++++++

Defying world, Trump says US withdrawing from Iran nuclear deal

Citing Israeli intelligence, president slams ‘defective’ pact, promises ‘highest level of economic sanction’ on Tehran

 

By ERIC CORTELLESSA

8 May 2018, 9:46 pm

Times of Israel

 

US President Donald Trump announces his decision on the Iran nuclear deal in the Diplomatic Reception Room at the White House in Washington, DC, on May 8, 2018. (AFP PHOTO / SAUL LOEB)

 

WASHINGTON — President Trump announced the US was withdrawing from the Iran nuclear deal on Tuesday, following through on a campaign promise and defying European allies who implored him to maintain an agreement that international agencies have said Tehran is honoring.

 

In a highly anticipated address from the White House’s Diplomatic Reception Room, Trump cast the landmark agreement forged under predecessor Barack Obama as “defective” and unable to rein in Iranian behavior or halt the Islamic Republic’s quest to develop nuclear weapons.

 

“I’m announcing today that the United States will withdraw from the Iran nuclear deal,” he said, adding that his administration “will be instituting the highest level of economic sanction.”

 

Trump said the 2015 agreement, which included Germany, France, Russia, China and Britain, was a “horrible one-sided deal that should never ever have been made.”

 

His remarks came ahead of his self-imposed May 12 deadline to walk away from the deal; that date is when the president would be required to renew waivers on sanctions against Iran’s nuclear program as required under the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, as the deal is formally called.

 

Trump emphasized that sanctions would also apply to other nations that did business with Iran, meaning that the United States could very well apply sanctions on its closest European allies. “America will not be held hostage to nuclear blackmail,” Trump said.

 

However, officials said European companies would have several months to pull out of the Iranian market.

 

Trump said that his explosive move would signal “the United States no longer makes empty threats” on the world stage. “When I make promises, I keep them,” he said.

 

Responding to the move, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who has lobbied against the deal, said he offered his full support for Trump’s “bold move.”

 

In Iran, President Hassan Rouhani said Tehran would remain in the deal, but his country could resume nuclear activity if need be.

 

European signatories vowed to stick by the agreement.

 

In January, Trump waived sanctions for the third time in his presidency, but said he wouldn’t take that action again unless Congress and European allies amended the pact.

 

US President Donald Trump signs a document reinstating sanctions against Iran after announcing the US withdrawal from the Iran Nuclear deal, in the Diplomatic Reception Room at the White House in Washington, DC, on May 8, 2018. (AFP PHOTO / SAUL LOEB)

 

Since then, international negotiators have unsuccessfully sought to make changes to the deal — and Tehran has refused to accept any alterations to its terms.

 

One official briefed on the decision said Trump would move to reimpose all sanctions on Iran that had been lifted under the 2015 deal, not just the ones facing an immediate deadline.

 

As administration officials briefed congressional leaders about Trump’s plans Tuesday, they emphasized that just as with a major Asia trade deal and the Paris climate pact that Trump has abandoned, he remains open to renegotiating a better deal, one person briefed on the talks said.

 

The Iran agreement, struck in 2015 by the United States, other world powers, and Iran, lifted most US and international sanctions against the country. In return, Iran agreed to restrictions on its nuclear program making it impossible to produce a bomb, along with rigorous inspections.

 

Over the last several weeks, leaders from France, Britain, and Germany have all lobbied the president not to abscond from the accord, while Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu campaigned assiduously to discredit the deal.

 

Last week, he gave a PowerPoint presentation detailing a trove of documents the Mossad scooped that outline Iran’s covert attempts at developing a nuclear arsenal. Trump cited the trove and said the documents proved he was “100 percent right” in his skepticism and antipathy to the deal.

 

Trump has long cast the JCPOA as “worst deal ever negotiated” and a symbol of American weakness.

 

Trump signaled hours before his announcement an intention to undo the Obama administration’s signature foreign policy achievement.

 

Responding to recent reports that former secretary of state John Kerry recently met with Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif to try and salvage the deal, Trump tweeted: “John Kerry can’t get over the fact that he had his chance and blew it! Stay away from negotiations John, you are hurting your country!”

 

Hours before the announcement, European countries met to underline their support for the agreement. Senior officials from Britain, France, and Germany met in Brussels with Iran’s Deputy Foreign Minister for Political Affairs, Abbas Araghchi.

 

If the deal collapses, Iran would be free to resume prohibited enrichment activities, while businesses and banks doing business with Iran would have to scramble to extricate themselves or run afoul of the US American officials, who were dusting off plans for how to sell a pullout to the public and explain its complex financial ramifications.

 

In Iran, many were deeply concerned about how Trump’s decision could affect the already struggling economy.

 

In Tehran earlier Tuesday, President Hassan Rouhani sought to calm nerves, smiling as he appeared at a petroleum expo. He didn’t name Trump directly, but emphasized that Iran continued to seek “engagement with the world.”

 

“It is possible that we will face some problems for two or three months, but we will pass through this,” Rouhani said.

 

From left, US Secretary of Energy Ernest Moniz, US Secretary of State John Kerry, and US Under Secretary for Political Affairs Wendy Sherman meet with Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif, second from right, at a hotel in Vienna, Austria, Saturday, June 27, 2015. (Carlos Barria/Pool via AP)

 

Members of the Obama administration who helped solidify the international agreement told reporters before Trump’s announcement that the consequences of blowing up the deal could be cataclysmic.

 

“Iran could start on its way back to getting a nuclear weapon,” said Wendy Sherman, a former State Department official in the Obama administration who was the chief US negotiator of the agreement. “It raises risk of conflict in the Middle East. It could potentially put our forces at risk everywhere. It also puts Americans being held in Iran more at risk. It will weaken our alliances with Europe, and for that matter Russia and China, who are important to the North Korea negotiation. This is a crisis that Trump is precipitating himself.”

 

In his speech, Trump said “a constructive deal could easily been struck at the time, but it wasn’t.” The ensuing deal was “a great embarrassment to me as a citizen and all citizens of the United States.”

 

As he has in the past, he cast the deal’s sunset provisions, which allow certain restrictions on Tehran’s nuclear program to expire over time, as unacceptable. He said Tuesday, however, that they led Iran to “the nuclear brink” and that, “If I allowed this deal to stand, there would soon be a nuclear arms race in the Middle East.”

 

He further portrayed the accord as one that would lead to Iran crossing the nuclear threshold, not one that would prevent that.

 

“It is clear to me that we cannot prevent an Iranian nuclear bomb under the decaying and rotten structure of the current agreement,” he said. “The Iran deal is defective at its core. If we do nothing, we know exactly what will happen.”

 

He also said that Iran would ultimately want to re-negotate another deal that fully meets Trump’s demands — something Iran itself has said it would not do. “The fact is they are going to want to make a new and lasting deal,” Trump said.

 

Anthony Blinken, a former deputy secretary of state in the Obama administration, warned this move will give hardliners in Iran an excuse to restart their pursuit of nuclear weapons, but without a united international coalition to oppose them, or inspectors on the ground to expose them.” He said that meant, “we would get to the point where we would have to live with an Iranian nuclear weapon or get into a conflict.”

 

He also surmised that if Iran and Europe decide to stick with the deal, despite Trump’s refusal to renew the sanction waivers, that will “at some point force the administration to sanction our closest allies to stop them from doing business with Iran.”

 

“So we’re on a collision course in two directions,” he added.

 

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

+++++++++++++++++++

Posts of possible interest:

 

 

 

__________________________

Trump Nixes Iran Nuke Deal

John R. Houk, Blog Editor

© May 9, 2018

__________________________

Promise Kept — Trump Nukes Iran Deal

 

Copyright © 2018 The Patriot Post.

 

Support The Patriot Post

_______________

Donald Trump Ends the Obama Mirage

 

©2018 All Rights Reserved 

 

About Washington Free Beacon

______________________

Defying world, Trump says US withdrawing from Iran nuclear deal

 

The Times of Israel homepage

 

Anonymous Releases Chilling Video of Huma Abedin


Robin Rosenblatt at the G+ Community United We Stand!! Posted an interesting video attributed to “Anonymous” that shows a strong argument that there is a enough evidence to investigate and probably prosecute members of the Obama Administration. It begins with Huma Abedin following through many alleged Dem Party probable crimes which includes one of the most under-reported stories by MSM on the Seth Rich murder cover-up.

 

A bonus video is The Next News Network comments on Judicial Watch’s Tom Fitton talking about Obama corruption (Hat Tip: Cynthia Derrick Juengel).

 

JRH 6/30/17

Please Support NCCR

*************

VIDEO: Anonymous Releases Chilling Video of Huma Abedin

 

Posted by The Hill Gossip

Published on Jun 23, 2017

 

Anonymous Releases Chilling Video of Huma Abedin

 

+++

VIDEO: AFTER OBAMA TRIED TO HIDE HIS CRIMES TRUMP JUST GOT AMAZING NEWS THAT COULD PUT BARACK IN JAIL!

 

Posted by The Next News Network

Published on Jun 25, 2017

 

Sub for more: http://nnn.is/the_new_media | Cristina Laila for the Gateway Pundit reports, as was previously reported, Judicial Watch announced that the National Security Council (NSC) on May 23, 2017, informed it by letter that the materials regarding the unmasking by Obama National Security Advisor Susan Rice of “the identities of any U.S. citizens associated with the Trump presidential campaign or transition team” were removed from government possession.

ENTER TO WIN THE NOBLE GOLD GIVEAWAY!
How? Visit http://Patreon.com/NextNews Pledge $20 minimum

One lucky Next News Patron will be randomly selected by … MORE TO READ

A Betrayal at the Wailing Wall


Justin Smith provides a stellar editorial on the Obama/Kerry backstab of Israel!

 

JRH 1/6/17

Please Support NCCR

******************

A Betrayal at the Wailing Wall

 

By Justin O. Smith

Sent 1/5/2017 12:28 PM

 

“Every Jew comes to Eretz Yisrael, every tree that is planted in the soil of Israel, every soldier added to the army of Israel, constitutes another spiritual stage, literally; another stage in the process of redemption.” — Rabbi Zvi Yehuda

 

No strangers to treachery and betrayal, the Jewish people of Israel were betrayed once more on December 23rd, 2016 by a hostile United Nations and a 14-0 Security Council vote on Resolution 2334, that malevolently states the Wailing Wall, Israel’s holiest site, is illegal in international law. This betrayal was only possible due to President Obama’s anti-Semitic and anti-Israel policies based on lies and false assumptions and premises, along with his orders to have the U.S. abstain from the vote. And now, the Jewish people’s fierce life and death struggle for the survival of their nation has a new sense of urgency unseen since May 14th, 1948 and Ben Gurion’s declaration of independence for the sovereign Jewish State of Israel.

 

Many Americans were already well aware of Obama’s anti-Israel sentiments, from the days he pushed Israel to retreat to pre-1967 borders, which are completely indefensible and would have ensured Israel’s death as a nation. He now has attempted to rebuke Israel for building settlements on land it has a historical and a legal right to possess and keep in East Jerusalem and the West Bank. Obama, who assured the world in 2009 that he “had Israel’s back”, has just plunged the knife of betrayal deep into Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s back and Israel’s heart.

 

Read Genesis 15, Genesis 26 and Genesis 28 and God’s promise to Abraham that is reiterated in Deuteronomy 1:8, stating: “See, I have set the land before You; go in and possess the land which the Lord swore to your fathers — to Abraham, Isaac and Jacob — to give to them and their descendants after them.”

 

Since 638 AD, the Muslims have been considered invaders and usurpers by the Jews of Jerusalem and Israel, because this area was never completely abandoned by the Jews, nor did they relinquish their sovereign rights that were given them by God. The Dome of the Rock Islamic mosque sits atop the Jews’ Temple Mount, thought to be the site of the Temple built by King Solomon; and, the Wailing Wall [Western Wall], just below the Dome of the Rock, has been the single most sacred place in the Jewish world, the last relic of the Temple built by King Herod in the first century AD. And yet, the United Nations declared Jerusalem an “international zone” in 1947.

 

It’s bad enough that half the land provided for the Jews under the Balfour Treaty of 1917 was given to the so-called “palestinians”/Arabs to create the nation of Jordan in 1922, but even worse, the UN voted to partition the remaining territory between a Jewish Israel and an Arab/Muslim Palestine in November of 1947, creating the “two-state solution”. This two-state solution is marked by 70 years of failure, because the Islamofascist “palestinians” refuse to recognize Israel’s right to exist as a Jewish state in the middle of a predominantly Islamic region, and Palestinian propaganda has never stopped depicting “Palestine” as all of the territory between the Mediterranean Sea and the Jordan River.

 

The Israeli Defense Force reclaimed and annexed Jerusalem and the Old City from Jordan after Israel was attacked in 1967 by the surrounding Islamic nations during the Six Day War. But even so, the areas of Jerusalem Secretary of State John Kerry called “occupied” during his unhinged speech a few days after Obama’s 11th hour betrayal of Israel, including the Wailing Wall and Jewish sectors, were acknowledged to belong to Israel in the 1949 Armistice Agreement.

 

The only “occupiers” are the Muslim Arabs of Gaza and the West Bank — Muslims masquerading as the mythical “palestinians” who were unknown prior to 1948 and are a creation of Israel’s enemies. Look to Shechem on the West Bank, a biblical city sacred to the Jews and associated with Jacob and Joshua, and one finds a city renamed Nablus controlled by Muslims.

 

John Kerry’s unconscionable, detestable and wretched December 28th speech maligned Israel for its settlements in Jerusalem and the West Bank. Kerry used the terms “settlements” and “settlers” 62 times in 72 minutes, and he mentioned “terrorism” only 14 times. He failed to mention that the Palestinian government is a tripartite government controlled by Islamic Jihad, Fatah and Hamas — all terrorist groups — who have launched deadly suicide bombings and tens of thousands of rockets against Israel over the decades, wounding approximately 602 and killing 42 Israelis in just this past year.

 

One has only to review Israeli former Prime Minister Ehud Olmert’s 2008 offer to the Palestinians to throw light on the lie in Kerry’s assertion that the Palestinians simply seek peace and their own homeland. Olmert offered 94 percent of Judea and Samaria plus another 6 percent of Israel and a link to the Gaza Strip, withdrawal from East Jerusalem’s “Arab” neighborhoods [read “Muslim”] and the placement of the Old City under international control. Palestinian PM Mahmoud Abbas rejected it all.

 

The “palestinians”/Muslims attack the Israelis because they hate them. They indoctrinate their children to hate and kill Jews, and the destruction of Israel is a main point in Hamas’s charter and in their holy book, the Koran. And at its root, this is a religious war waged by Muslims who seek a world where Jews no longer exist.

 

Obama has emboldened the terrorists and those who de-legitimize Israel at every turn, showing his true colors, as he prepares to leave office standing beside Israel’s sworn enemies. Even more troubling, the Israelis claim to have irrefutable evidence that Obama led the charge on preparing this despicable UN Resolution 2334.

 

Israeli Ambassador to the United States Ron Dermer stated: “What is outrageous is that the United States was actually behind [Resolution 2334]. … it was a very sad day and a really shameful chapter in U.S.-Israel relations … We have clear evidence of it.”

 

Senator Chuck Schumer (D-NY) angrily denounced the failure to veto the resolution, calling it “frustrating, disappointing and confounding”. Schumer said, “The UN has been a fervently anti-Israel body since the days [it said] ‘Zionism is racism’ and that fervor has never diminished.”

 

United Nations Resolution 2334 shows Israel it can never really trust any nation for its security, and it reminds them of the certainty that the Islamofascist “palestinians” will never accept Israel within any boundaries, just as the Yom Kippur War in October 1973 reminded them that they were surrounded by enemies dedicated to their destruction. This, in conjunction with thousands of past Palestinian orchestrated acts of terrorism and ongoing violence, will surely move PM Benjamin Netanyahu and Israel’s Knesset to annex the West Bank and Gaza, repudiate the Oslo Accords and pursue a one state solution and the expulsion of all Palestinians and non-citizen Arabs, in defiance of the United Nations: The Palestinians are to Jews what darkness is to light.

 

By Justin O Smith

___________________

Edited by John R. Houk

Source links are by the Editor.

 

© Justin O. Smith

Brigitte Gabriel’s Israel Response to John Kerry


In a video released yesterday, ACT for America’s Brigitte Gabriel roasts Secretary of State John Kerry for his anti-Israel speech and the Obama Administration support for the UN Resolution that condemns Israel for Jewish Settlements in the land of Jewish heritage.

 

The video was sent by email for some end of the year support for ACT for America and the organization’s agenda to educate Americans about the dark side of Islam and Islamic terrorism. Here is the email link if you choose to SUPPORT ACT for America.

 

JRH 12/31/16

Please Support NCCR

******************

VIDEO: Brigitte Gabriel’s Israel Response to John Kerry

 

Posted by Brigitte Gabriel

Published on Dec 30, 2016

John Kerry Lies to Support Leftist Worldview


John R. Houk

© December 29, 2016

 

We know that John Kerry has a sketchy past as an American Patriot. Although the U.S. Navy sticks to the official records on Kerry’s medals and service in Vietnam. There seems to be some flaws in both the official record and anti-Kerry eyewitness accounts of faked Kerry heroism.

 

…

 

Kerry became the leader of Vietnam Veterans Against the War after being discharged, the Post reported. In testimony to Congress, he relayed accounts by his VVAW comrades of having “personally raped, cut off ears, cut off heads … razed villages in a fashion reminiscent of Genghis Khan …”

 

Later, it was shown that many of the stories on which Kerry based this testimony were false, some told by people who had stolen the identities of real GIs, the Post printed on Aug. 24, 2004. Kerry was not implicated.

 

As for claims in the viral email about his military record, much of this was discussed during the campaign after the group Swift Boat Veterans for Truth questioned Kerry’s accounts and whether he deserved any of the commendations he received.

 

But the veterans who accused Kerry were contradicted by numerous former crewmen of Kerry’s, and by Navy records, according to FactCheck.org, a nonpartisan [Blog Editor: Link is by Editor and explains reliability fact checking websites] fact-finding project of the Annenberg Public Policy Center at the University of Pennsylvania, which researched the claims back in 2004.

 

…

 

Kerry received a Purple Heart after being wounded in December 1968 when he got hit by shrapnel. The Boston Globe quoted William Schachte, who oversaw the mission, as saying it “was not a very serious wound.”

 

…

 

In an affidavit, physician Lewis Letson said he treated Kerry and said Kerry’s wound was self-inflicted when his gun jammed and he threw a grenade at an object, which sprayed the area with shrapnel. Kerry’s medical records show that he was treated by J.C. Carreon (who has since died). Letson said it common practice for medics to sign the paperwork for the attending physician.

 

Letson said in his affidavit that “the crewman with Kerry told me there was no hostile fire, and that Kerry had inadvertently wounded himself with an M-79 grenade.” But the crewmen with Kerry that day deny ever talking to Letson, FactCheck.org reported.

 

…

 

Kerry earned his Silver Star later in February when he jumped onto the beach from his boat to chase and shoot a guerrilla who had a rocket launcher and who, Kerry thought, was about to fire a rocket at Kerry’s boat. According to the Boston Globe, another member of the crew on Kerry’s boat — Frederic Short, with whom Kerry had not talked for 34 years until being contacted by the Globe reporter — confirmed the account and said there was no doubt Kerry’s action saved the boat and crew.

 

…

 

Although Snopes.com labels attacks on Kerry’s medals being earned under “fishy” circumstances as “false,” FactCheck.org said in 2004, “at this point, 35 years later and half a world away, we see no way to resolve which of these versions of reality is closer to the truth.” — READ ENTIRETY  (Fact Check: John Kerry’s war accounts and whether he deserved commendations still being called into question; By Carole Fader; Jacksonville.com; 1/3/13 05:05 pm)

 

And so, Kerry won some medals fraudulently and for actual acts of heroism. A LIE IS STILL A LIE!

 

Kerry then went to disrespect those medals fraudulently or correctly earned by trashing his nation by painting a picture that the entire U.S. Military as a band of murderers and rapists. I can confidently speculate some of this nefarious stuff Kerry preached against America happened, but I can also confidently speculate the Viet Cong and North Vietnamese Regulars committed more and worse atrocities than any group of U.S. Military fellows. War is war and unfortunately vengeance is a part of war on the affected individual soldier.

 

The point is John Kerry is a Left Winger willing to say or do anything to support his idiotic worldview. With that in mind, read Ben Shapiro’s “10 Lies Secretary of State Kerry Told …” in the Obama Administration’s betrayal of Israel.

 

JRH 12/29/16

Please Support NCCR

***************

10 Lies Secretary of State Kerry Told During His Big Middle East Peace Speech

 

By BEN SHAPIRO

DECEMBER 28, 2016

Daily Wire

 

On Wednesday, Secretary of State John Kerry gave a speech on his proposed plan for peace between Israelis and Arabs. His plan: blame the Jews, pretend that Palestinian terrorism and incitement isn’t representative of the actual Palestinian government, and then blather for 69 more minutes. His speech razed facts to the ground in a fashion reminiscent of Genghis Khan.

 

Here were ten of the worst lies and lies-by-omission Kerry purveyed in his ode to lying and self-indulgence:

 

  1. Equating Jewish Settlements and Palestinian Terrorism.Israel has been wracked by a wave of stabbings and shootings and rocket attacks from Palestinian terrorists over the last two years. Kerry spent a few minutes on that, but only in order to draw moral equivalence with Jews building additional bathrooms in East Jerusalem, the capital of Israel. “The truth is that trends on the ground, violence, terrorism, settlement expansion, and the seemingly endless occupation, they are combining to destroy hopes for peace on both sides,” Kerry said. This is nonsense. Before there were anyJewish settlements – when Israel did not control Judea, Samaria, or Gaza – the Palestine Liberation Organization called for the “liberation” of Palestine, meaning the complete destruction of Israel. The problem isn’t people building homes. It’s Palestinians murdering Jews, and refusing to accept that any home built by a Jew ought to exist in the Middle East. [Bold text last sentence is Editor’s]

 

  1. “If The Choice Is One State, Israel Can Either Be Jewish Or Democratic. It Cannot Be Both.” This is patently absurd. There has been one state in the area between the Jordan and the Mediterranean for some 50 years. That state has been democratic. This lie rests on two absurd contentions: first, that if Israel were to annex all Judea and Samaria, Jews would be outnumbered by Arabs; second, that if Israel were to annex all lands, Israel would have to grant all Palestinian Arabs full citizenship or face status as an apartheid state. The first claim is simply false – Jews outnumber Palestinian Arabs outside of the Gaza Strip by a factor of two-to-one, and Jews now have the equivalent birth rate of Palestinian Arabs, and will soon have a higher birth rate, as Caroline Glick points out, meaning that Jewish majority status will increase, not decrease. Second, the United States does not offer citizenship to all the people living within its borders, or over territories over which it has sovereignty. Puerto Rico is governed semi-autonomously, but citizens of Puerto Rico cannot vote in presidential elections in the United States. Israel could easily grant green cards to Palestinian residents while also giving them local control of their governance without a national vote.

 

  1. Peace Will Only Be Realized With a Palestinian Terror State.The notion that peace depends on the establishment of a Palestinian terror state – and that’s what will be established, given that the unity government of the Palestinians now includes Hamas and Islamic Jihad alongside Fatah – is asinine. Israel has had to blockade Gaza because Hamas controls it, and is attempting to take military shipments from Iran. Adding another Iran-backed terror proxy state to the Middle Eastern map is a great way to encourage a two-front war against Israel, given the presence of Hezbollahstan on Israel’s northern border.

 

  1. “No American Administration Has Done More For The Security of Israel Than Barack Obama’s.” To put it mildly, LOL. LOLOLOLOLOL. [Bold text after 1st line is Editor’s] Funny guy, this Kerry. Here’s a timeline of Obama’s “support” for Israel. That timeline doesn’t even include the Iran nuclear deal or the current UN resolution hubbub.

 

  1. Israeli Intransigence Is The Problem.Nope. Not even close. In 2008, Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert offered 94.2 percent of Judea and Samaria to the Palestinians, a corridor that would link that territory to the Gaza Strip, land swaps that would increase Palestinian land holdings, a formula for division of Jerusalem. Abbas refused the deal. In 2000, Prime Minister Ehud Barak offered a similar deal. Yassar Arafat refused it. Palestinians have never accepted any deal offered by the Israelis. [Bold text this line is Editor’s] Israelis continue to offer. But the problem is clearly the mean, nasty Israelis. And by the way, that awful Netanyahu fellow offered to freeze settlements early in the Obama administration, and the Palestinians responded with violence.

 

  1. Settlements Are Illegal.No, they aren’t. Kerry declared over and over that Israelis settling east of the so-called green line are living there illegally. That’s patent nonsense. He also suggested that no Jews would be allowed to live inside a new Palestinian state, because Jews would object – ignoring, of course, that Palestinians would quickly murder any Jew remaining in a Palestinian state, and Jews have a slight objection to being murdered. Right now, over a million Arabs live inside Israel. Virtually no Jews live in the Muslim world because they were expelled, and quickly absorbed into Israel.

 

  1. Equating Palestinian Government With Israeli Government.Perhaps the most insane spectacle was Kerry suggesting that the Netanyahu government is beholden to the “most extreme elements” in Israeli politics, while pooh-poohing Palestinian government support for terrorism. Kerry suggested that Hamas was a troublesome rogue group as opposed to an integral part of the Palestinian unity government.

 

  1. Israel As Purported Burden To The United States.Kerry spent serious time talking about how the United States had subsumed its own interests in order to give military aid to Israel. Of course, the Obama administration has also given aid to the Palestinian unity terror government, and attempted to block weapons shipments in the middle of the Gaza terror war. And even the Obama administration says that such aid is good for the United States defense industry; a huge percentage of American aid to Israel is a subsidy to domestic defense contractors. Israel is America’s only democratic ally in the region.

 

  1. The UN Resolution Changed Nothing. Kerry kept stating that the UN resolution didn’t do much to change the status quo. That’s false. This UN resolution said that all territories outside the 1949 Israel armistice lines – the “Auschwitz borders” – are occupied, including Jerusalem and holy sites like the Western Wall. It calls for all settlements in those areas “flagrant” violations of international law. There’s a reason Kerry pushed this thing through: of courseit changes things.

 

  1. The Obama Administration’s Maneuvers Help Peace.This is the opposite of the truth. America’s position for two decades has been that it would not cram down a peace deal on the Israelis and Palestinians – all issues would have to be resolved through bilateral negotiations. By placing the onus for all concessions on Israel and making Israel subject to the possibility of blowback from the International Court of Justice, Obama just allowed Palestinians to abandon any pretense at negotiations and stand on their newfound “rights.” [Bold text last line is Editor’s]

 

Kerry’s speech was chock full of lies. [This bold text is Editor’s] But here’s the good news: nobody will remember it a month from now, just as nobody will remember John Kerry’s legacy beyond his slander of American soldiers in Vietnam.

_________________

John Kerry Lies to Support Leftist Worldview

John R. Houk

© December 29, 2016

_______________

10 Lies Secretary of State Kerry Told During His Big Middle East Peace Speech

 

© COPYRIGHT 2016, THE DAILY WIRE

 

Answering John Kerry


Intro to Glick’s ‘Answering John Kerry’

Edited by John R. Houk

12/13/15

Caroline Glick posted an essay about John Kerry’s speech at the Brooking Institute’s Saban Forum. This is the same forum that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu video streamed a speech to the Saban Forum from Jerusalem. To comprehend just how idiotic Secretary of State John Kerry is (and by extension President Barack Hussein Obama), let me share some excerpts from Netanyahu’s speech that addresses Islamic terrorism internationally and the terrorism of Arabs calling themselves Palestinians who refuse to accept the existence of the Jewish State of Israel:

I want to thank my friend Haim for giving me the opportunity to address you. This comes at a time when the United States has experienced a terrible and savage attack in San Bernardino, and I wish to offer the condolences of the people of Israel to the families, the aggrieved families, and of course send our wishes for a speedy recovery to the wounded. [Blog Editor: a sentiment rarely shared from Obama and Kerry to Israeli-Jewish victims of Palestinian Islamic terrorism.]

…

And these values are what makes the bond between Israel and the United States, the American people and the people of Israel, so strong. It’s that identity of values, those very values that are under such fierce attack today. …

…

Insofar as the Palestinian-Israeli conflict is concerned, I think there is another misunderstanding. People have long said that the core of this conflict is the acquisition of territories by Israel in the 1967 War. That’s an issue that needs to be addressed in any peace process, as is the question of settlements, but it’s not the core of the conflict. In Gaza, nothing changed. In fact, instead of getting peace, we gave territory and got 15,000 rockets on our heads. We took out all the settlements; we disinterred people from their graves; and did we get peace? No. We got the worst terror possible.

… Why has this conflict not been resolved for a hundred years? Why has it not been resolved after successive Israeli prime ministers, six in fact after the Oslo Agreement, have offered to make peace, have offered the Palestinians the possibility of building a state next to Israel – it’s because the Palestinians have not yet been willing to cross that conceptual bridge, that emotional bridge, of giving up the dream not of a state next to Israel, but a state instead of Israel.

And that’s why they persistently refuse – not only Hamas in Gaza, but the PA – they consistently refuse to accept that in a final peace settlement, they will recognize the Jewish state, they will recognize a nation-state for the Jewish people. They ask that we recognize a nation-state for the Palestinian people, but refuse to accord that same right to us. I have said and I continue to say it, that ultimately the only workable solution is not a unitary state, but a demilitarized Palestinian state that recognizes the Jewish state. That’s the solution. But the Palestinians have to recognize the Jewish state and they persistently refuse to do so. They refuse to recognize a nation-state for the Jewish people in any boundary. That was and remains the core of the conflict. Not this or that gesture or the absence of this or that gesture, but the inability or unwillingness of the Palestinian leadership to make the leap.

You got a hint of that the other day when Abu Mazen spoke about the “occupation of Palestinian lands for the last 67 years”. Did you hear that? Occupation of Palestinian lands? For the last 67 years? Sixty-seven years ago was 1948. That’s when the State of Israel was established. Does Abu Mazen mean that Tel Aviv is occupied Palestinian territory? Of Haifa? Or Beer Sheba? He refuses to fess up to his people and say it’s over, from their point of view what they say are the borders they wish, the final borders they wish. They refuse to recognize that they will have no more claim on the territory of the Jewish state, that they will not try in any way to flood it with the descendants of refugees. After all, we in Israel took in an equal and even larger number of Jewish refugees from Arab lands. You should READ the ENTIRE Speech (Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s Remarks to the Saban Forum; By PM Benjamin Netanyahu; Release by Israel GPO posted at SlantRight 2.0; posted 12/7/15)

Now as you read Glick’s essay you will notice that Secretary Kerry acts like he is completely deaf and blind about the intentions of the Arabs that call themselves Palestinians to not only establish a state out of some territory of Jewish heritage but also the complete destruction of Israel to be replaced by an Arab State. In case you haven’t been paying attention to what ISIS is doing to the Christians that have lived in Syria and Iraq that means a brutal genocide against the Jews of Israel.

JRH 12/13/15

Please Support NCCR

********************

Answering John Kerry

By Caroline Glick

December 11th, 2015

CarolineGlick.com

On Saturday, US Secretary of State John Kerry gave a speech before the Brookings Institute’s Saban Forum. Kerry focused on the Palestinian conflict with Israel and sought to draw a distinction between the two-state policy model, which he supports, and the one-state policy model, which he rejects.

To justify his rejection of a policy based on Israeli sovereignty over areas beyond the 1949 armistice lines, Kerry raised a series of questions about what a one-state policy would look like.

I answered all of his questions, as well as many others, in great detail in my book The Israeli Solution: A One- State Plan for Peace in the Middle East. I will do so again here, albeit with the requisite brevity.

But before discussing the specific questions Kerry raised with regard to the one-state model, it is important to discuss the nature of the policies Kerry described in his speech.

Kerry argued Israel should deny civil and property rights to Jews beyond the 1949 armistice lines, and ignore the building and planning laws of both Israel and the military government in Judea and Samaria in order to allow unrestricted Arab construction in Judea, Samaria and Jerusalem.

Such steps, he argued, will advance the cause of peace because they will pave the way for an Israeli withdrawal from the vast majority of these areas. Such a withdrawal in turn will bring about the desired two-state solution.

Since the two-state solution is supported by the whole world, Kerry argued that once Israel withdraws from the areas, it will gain the support of the world, peace with its Arab neighbors as well as the Palestinians, and become more prosperous and happy than it is today. It will also secure its democracy.

On the other hand, Kerry argued, if Israel respects the civil and property rights of Jews and continues to enforce the law toward Arabs as well as Jews, and if it eventually applies its laws to any or all of Judea and Samaria, Israel will enter a state of perpetual war with the Palestinians and the wider Arab world. Israel will cease to be a democracy. Israel will be impoverished.

Israel will be isolated internationally even more than it is today.

If Kerry’s options were real options, then Israel would have a clear and easy choice, just as he argues it has.

But unfortunately, they aren’t real options. They are fantasies.

Today Israel has three options. As Kerry advocates, it can withdraw from Judea and Samaria and partition Jerusalem. But if it does so, there is no reason to believe that the outcome will be a Palestinian state, let alone peace.

Rather, it is far more likely that an Israeli withdrawal will lead to the establishment of a second independent Palestinian enclave that the Palestinians and the international community will insist is still under occupation, just as the Palestinians and the international community insist that Gaza remains under Israeli occupation 10 years after Israel vacated the Gaza Strip entirely.

Without Jerusalem, Judea and Samaria, Israel will become a strategic basket case in an increasingly chaotic region. It will invite aggression from the Palestinians and from the east that it will be hard pressed to defend against.

Just as Israel is condemned for every action it has taken to defend against Palestinian aggression from Gaza, so it will be condemned for the actions it will be forced to take to defend itself from Palestinian aggression in Judea, Samaria, Jerusalem and beyond.

In other words, the so-called “two-state solution” is a recipe for war and expanded international isolation for the Jewish state.

The second option for Israel is to maintain the status quo. Today, Israel shares governing power in Judea and Samaria with the PLO. Sometimes the PLO cooperates with Israeli security forces, and sometimes it cooperates with terrorist groups.

The PLO rejects Israel’s right to exist. It uses every available platform to undermine Israel’s legitimacy and wage economic and political war against the Jewish state.

The advantage of the status quo is that under it, Israel has security control over Judea and Samaria. Consequently, it is able to prevent Judea and Samaria and Jerusalem from becoming strategically indistinguishable from Gaza, where Hamas is now openly collaborating with Islamic State forces in Sinai.

Israel’s third option is to apply its laws over all or parts of Judea and Samaria. The first benefit of this option is that it maintains Israel’s ability to defend itself against security threats emanating from the Palestinians and from the east.

Beyond that, under Israeli law, the civil rights of Palestinians and Jews in Judea and Samaria will be vastly improved. Israel’s liberal legal code is superior to both the military code governing the Jews and the Palestinian Authority’s law of the jackboot which governs the Palestinians.

Whereas the status quo invites and engenders politicization of Israel’s military commanders who serve as the governing authorities of the areas, the third option would end the politicization of the IDF. Generals would take a backseat to elected leaders and government ministries. Police would be responsible for law enforcement. Rather than deploy regular and reserve units to dispel rioters, police, who are better trained for such events, would be judiciously deployed in areas where they are most needed. The IDF’s operations would be limited to counterterrorism.

None of Israel’s actual three options will necessarily enhance its international standing. This is the case because, as we have seen, Israel’s international standing has little to do with anything Israel does.

But then again, by exhibiting strength, and forcefully asserting its rights, Israel may find itself winning the respect of some foreign governments that currently view it is weak and open to blackmail.

This brings us to Kerry’s questions about a one-state model.

Kerry asked, “How does Israel possibly maintain its character as a Jewish and democratic state when from the river to the sea there would not even be a Jewish majority?” The answer is easily. Israel will retain its strong Jewish majority, and its commitment to democracy, after it applies its laws to Judea and Samaria.

Kerry asked, “Would millions of Palestinians be given the basic rights of Israeli citizens including the right to vote, or would they be relegated to a permanent underclass?” The answer is yes, they would be given the basic rights of Israeli citizens, including the right to vote, and no, they would not be relegated to a permanent underclass.

Kerry asked, “Would the Israelis and Palestinians living in such close quarters have segregated roads and transportation systems with different laws applying in the Palestinian enclaves?” The answer is, no.

Kerry asked, “Would anyone really believe they were being treated equally?” The answer is that, as we have seen repeatedly, no matter what Israel does, and no matter what the Palestinians do, people like Kerry will always claim that Israel is mistreating the Palestinians.

Kerry asked, “What would the international response be to that, my friends, or to a decision by Israel to unilaterally annex large portions of the West Bank?” The answer, again, is that the international response to such a move would be about the same as the international response to the continuation of the status quo or to an Israel withdrawal. To wit, the response will be hostile to Israel.

Kerry asked, “How could Israel ever have true peace with its neighbors, as the Arab Peace Initiative promises and as every Arab leader I have met with in the last year reinforces to me as recently as in the last month that they are prepared to do?” The answer is that Israel can have true peace with the Arab world when the Arab world accepts the legitimacy and permanence of the Jewish state.

Kerry asked, “How will [Arab states make peace]… if there is no chance for a two-state solution?” The answer is that they will make peace when they decide they want peace and they rid their societies of Jew hatred.

Kerry asked, “How will the Arab street in today’s world let… [the two-state solution] go by?” The answer is that the Arab street doesn’t believe in the “two-state solution.” The Arab street wants the dissolution of Israel.

Finally, Kerry asked, “And wouldn’t Israel risk being in perpetual conflict with millions of Palestinian living in the middle of a state?” The answer is that Israel is at risk of perpetual conflict with the Palestinians and the Arab world as a whole for as long as the Arabs hate Jews. The millions of Palestinians living within Israel’s borders constitute a far smaller strategic danger to Israel than the millions of Jew-hating Arabs, who have terrorist armies, perched on its international borders.

At the outset of his remarks, Kerry explained that as far as US Middle East policy is concerned, “Our goal, our strategy is to help ensure that the builders and the healers throughout the region have the chance that they need to accomplish their tasks.”

Sadly, this is neither a goal nor a strategy. It is the sort of platitude you’re likely to find inside a Chinese fortune cookie.

If Kerry is interested in an actual strategy, he can fork out 20 bucks and buy my book.

Originally published in The Jerusalem Post.

____________________

All right reserved, Caroline Glick. 2015

About Caroline B. Glick

MAF – Stop Obama’s Iran Deal!


Move America Forward (MAF) and a number of Conservative websites and Conservative fund raisers are promoting what is billed as a David Zucker ad lambasting the Iran Nuke Deal pushed by President Barack Hussein Obama and his Secretary of State John Kerry. The ad parody is quite humorous and only a minute and a half or so long.

I have no doubt many Conservatives and Conservative organization will use the anti-Iran Nuke Deal parody as a fund raiser. Whether or not any particular organization is actually fronting money for paid ad time is irrelevant. This parody is truth in ironic smiles. In the case of MAF, this organization does great work in taking care of our military men and women fighting Islamic terrorists and defending the USA in general overseas with essential needs care packages. MAF is a worthy organization to donate toward.

EVEN IF YOU HAVE HEARD Obama/Kerry’s nefarious selling out America and Israel is a done deal. It is worthy to resist right up to any Congressional votes against the deal or any veto override votes that will take place. Even after the obvious damage to our National Security occurs, our American dislike will make it easier for the next President of the United States of America to undo Obama’s Executive Order by-passing the Constitution’s Treaty process.

Interesting Interview with David Zucker at the Weekly Standard – “Hollywood Takes on the Left” 8/11/08

JRH 9/15/15

Please Support NCCR

***********************

Stop Obama’s Iran Deal!

Sent from: Move America Forward

Sent: 9/15/2015 10:09 AM

New Anti-Iran Nuclear Deal Ad “Side Effects”!
We need your help to spread the word

We are continuing the fight against President Obama’s suicidal Nuclear deal with Iran. The latest phase is now underway, as we are partnering with our friends at IranSideEffects.Com who have just come out with a new ad directed by famed Hollywood comedic director David Zucker (Airplane, The Naked Gun, An American Carol.)

The new ad aims to break through the traditional political chatter and offer a fresh view on Obama’s Iran deal by using Zucker’s satire skills to show how the “side effects” of Obama’s Iran deal are too much of a bitter pill to swallow.

Click here to view the new ad “Side Affects”

[Blog Editor: VIDEO: Side Effects – From David Zucker

Published by Iran Side Effects

Published on Sep 10, 2015

Hollywood comedy legend David Zucker (“Airplane,” “Scary Movie,” “Naked Gun” films among many others) has written and produced this hilarious spoof on the disastrous Iran Nuclear Deal. In his trademark style, Zucker skewers the deal’s primary architects – President Obama, Hillary Clinton and John Kerry warns of the possible “Side Effects” that may result from the absurd agreement.]

 

This is a bad-to-worse deal that we MUST STOP. The Iranian deal represents a monumental shift in foreign policy and it’s a gamble that could go down in history as the single greatest national security blunder ever made by an American President.

Obama’s deal with Iran is dangerous and must be stopped! Here are just some of the negative “side effects”

Removes all the economic sanctions that forced Iran to the negotiating table in the first place
Gives $150 billion in cash assistance and from freeing up frozen Iranian assets to Iran’s extremist government.
No stipulations on how funds are spent. Iran will be able to sponsor more terror attacks through groups they support and fund.
Iran provides their own inspectors to monitor their own facilities and they choose which samples to provide.
International inspectors have no access to Iran’s military facilities which could hide nuclear material.
Iran can delay any scheduled inspections for up to 24 days, plenty of time to hide incriminating evidence.
No plan is in place to re-impose sanctions if Iran does not comply with their end of the bargain.
US is forced to “…strengthen Iran’s ability to protect against and respond to nuclear security threats including sabotage…”

(quoted directly from the Iran-Obama Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action)

We need your help to spread the message of his ad and get it out on the web and help to help build opposition to Obama’s dangerous deal with Iran!


Please make a donation to help keep our efforts going!

All Donations are Tax Deductible
Please make all checks payable to “Move America Forward”

Donations by Check Can be Sent To:
ATTN: Scott Raab
Move America Forward
8795 Folsom Blvd. Suite 103
Sacramento, CA 95826

To sign up a deployed service member to receive a care package or
to request care packages if you are a deployed service member, visit
www.moveamericaforward.org or call (916) 441-6197

++++++++++++++++

Blog Editor: The “Side Effects” link in the MAF email has much of the same info in this email. Except the link has a series of photos that include Democrat Senators, Barack Hussein Obama, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and Secretary of State John Kerry. Each photo has click and contact to either email or Twitter or both. And below those photos is a paragraph excerpt of the “Side Effects” press release with a continued reading link below that paragraph. Below is that Press Release.

+++++++++++++++++++

Never David Zucker Video Lambastes Iran Deal

Hollywood Comedy Legend Warns of Deal’s Dangerous “Side Effects”

For Immediate Release

September 15, 2015

Contact: Brent Lowder

(310) 720-3470

brentjlowder@gmail.com

Los Angeles – Hollywood legend David Zucker (“Airplane,” “Scary Movie,” “Naked Gun” films, among many other others) a new video that spoofs the Iran Nuclear Deal and its primary architects – President Obama, Hillary Clinton and John Kerry. Zucker’s latest political piece warns of the “Side Effects” that surely could result from the absurd agreement opposed by congressional majorities and a majority of Americans.

“While the President, Secretary Kerry and Hillary Clinton are committed to this deal long term, even with clear majorities of Americans and members of Congress opposing it, it’s time to focus on the side effects we’ll experience as a result” said Zucker. “There’s no shortage of serious ads explaining how horrible the deal is, so maybe injecting some satire will engage a broader audience and ensure the leadership allowing this deal to happen is held responsible for the inevitable dangerous side effects.”

The Zucker piece entitled, “Side Effects” spoofs the popular prescription drug advertisement formats which include a litany of possible drug side effects. Vision for America (VFA) is releasing the video as part of a national advocacy effort to highlight misguided efforts of Democrat leaders and their policies. VFA will ensure public awareness of the negative side effects of the deal and drive national policies and leadership in a safer, more secure direction in 2016.

See the video at IranSideEffects.com.

“We are proud to work with David on this important issue while looking for smarter, more engaging ways to build wider public support for conservative policies and leadership” said Eric Beach, Executive Director VFA. “We share David’s view that humor and satire are rare in today’s hyper-negative political environment, and we look forward to build on this effort, which will ensure a broader audience engages in these important national issue debates in 2016 and beyond.”

David Zucker is an American film director, producer and screenwriter. A master of parody comedies, Zucker wrote and directed the critically acclaimed “Airplane!” film, created “The Naked Gun” franchise, and helped create many other fan favorites such as “Ruthless People”, “Scary Movie 3 and 4”, “Top Secret” and “BASEketball”.

Vision for America is a non-profit organization founded in 2012; their mission is promote principles of fiscal responsibility, constitutionally limited government and free markets through grassroots education, mobilization and advocacy.

___________________________

About Move America Forward

 

History

 

Move America Forward was initially formed in response to concerns raised by U.S. troops that the news media was frequently presenting inaccurate coverage that often ignored the success of their missions and accomplishments in the War on Terror.

 

MAF began holding rallies to support the troops where patriots could display their flags and it quickly transformed into a year round care package program. Conducting national bus tours, sending delegations overseas, working with military servicemen and women, pro troop companies, service organizations, and many other supporters from all across the nation to benefit our troops.

 

About

 

Move America Forward (MAF) is a military charity and the nation’s largest grassroots pro-troop organization, MAF is dedicated to supporting the brave men and women of our Armed Forces and their missions to defeat terrorism.  MAF is supported by hundreds of thousands of pro-troop activists, veterans, and military families all across the nation who share in our unwavering support.

 

We work with other non-profits, military service organizations, corporate sponsors, community networks and private citizens to support our Military and demonstrate affirmatively our appreciation and admiration for their service to America.

 

It is our strong belief that American citizens must be enlisted in the effort to let our troops know that they are in our hearts and prayers and that we will defend their service and honor them here on the homefront while they protect America on the frontlines overseas.

 

LEARN MORE AND SUPPORT THE TROOPS TODAY

 

  • MAF’s Care Package Program has delivered over 315 tons of care packages to the front lines of Afghanistan and Iraq. In partnership with our supporters each Care Package comes with a wide array of popular items requested by our troops. Most importantly they include a personal message from the person who donated the care package. To find out more about other Care Package features like the “Candy Diplomacy” program with our partner the Jelly Belly Candy Company and the other great items in please visit our Troop Care Package Page or see the latest on our Home Page.

 

  • Troopathon – Is an annual eight-hour event we hold every year to … READ THE REST