Margaret Anna Alice (Uncertain if actual name or pseudonym – perhaps you know) is credited with an awesome poem that essentially is an indictment on the creators (or is it perpetrators?) of COVID. As you listen and/or read the poem, the mRNA Jab comes to mind for me. My guess is M.A.A. is focusing more on COVID. Either way, WAKE UP! Those in political control are in the process of culling the population. YOUR burning self-preservation question should be, “WHY!?”
Below is THE EXPOSÉ reporting on the poem that includes a video reading by Dr. Tess Lawrie and the poem transcript has embedded links that function as exposing Elitist plans. I am actually uncertain which Rumble version of the video THE EXPOSÉ used because they just have the embed of the video and not the link. I am using the Rumble Channel Margaret Anna Alice Through the Looking Glass version and as a quote, including a portion of the description.
Thank you to those who have stepped up!
READER SUPPORTED! I need Readers willing to chip in $5 – $10 – $25 – $50 – $100. PLEASE YOUR generosity is appreciated. PLEASE GIVE to Help me be a voice for Liberty:
YOU CAN ALSO SUPPORT via buying women’s menstrual health, healthy collagen, vitamin supplements/products, coffee from my Online stores: My Store (please use referral discount code 2388058): https://modere.co/3SrOHzI
Big Tech Censorship is pervasive – Share voluminously on all social media platforms!
Mistakes were not made; The Great Democide of the 2020s was not a mistake
“The following poem was inspired by a conversation with Mike Yeadon. We have both independently noticed the increasing use of terms like ‘bungled’ and ‘blunder’ to describe the crimes against humanity perpetrated under the cloak of covid. Even well-meaning people who share similar values and goals sometimes fall into this trap being set by those preparing their parachute jump from culpability.
“This Anthem for Justice is my attempt to succinctly chronicle the calculated intentionality underlying the covid tyranny, and I ask your help in spreading the clear message that #MistakesWereNOTMade. Please share this poem and keep it handy for the next time anybody uses verbiage to gloss over the atrocities committed. Let’s make 2023 the Year of Accountability so none dare repeat such acts in the future.” – Margaret Anna Alice, 1 January 2023
In the video below, the poem ‘Mistakes Were NOT Made: An Anthem for Justice’ written by Margaret Anna Alice is read by Dr. Tess Lawrie:
I am profoundly honored to share Dr. Tess Lawrie’s exquisitely poignant reading of my “Mistakes Were Not Made: Anthem for Justice” poem. It was masterfully filmed by Mark Lawrie, director of “A Letter to Dr Andrew Hill,” my #1 red-pilling video.
I don’t really follow the typical news broadcasts any longer because I consider them to be propaganda mouthpieces for the Dem-Marxist/Globalist agenda. Like many of you, I get much of my news from Online sources I trust and Social Media (which I verify before trusting).
That being said, I’ve read that the legit-elected President Trump expects to be indicted/arrested on Tuesday. After all the ballyhoo, I would not be surprised if that prospect is delayed or even abandoned.
I’ve also read that President Trump has called for a protest if such a police-state injustice occurs. I SAY, “Indeed, protest the injustice! BUT take a page from 1960s Civil Rights Days and learn from the J6 agitation and framing of peaceful protestors.
LOOK FOR bad actor agitators (e.g.: FBI, Trump-hating local police, Antifa, BLM and so on …) and overt Police/DOJ brutality. THEN respond with hands up or sit down EVEN as the brutality ensues against peaceful protestors. THAT IS HOW 1960s Activists achieve Civil Rights goals as Americans witnessed and sympathized with the peaceful protestors.
In full disclosure, I have issues with some of President Trump’s policies while he was in Office, BUT NONE of those had anything to do with the LIES Dem-Marxists, Never-Trumper RINOs, GOP Betrayers, OR MSM Propagandists tried to use to paint the legitimately elected Trump as a criminal in bad impeachments.
Indeed, I actually began to waver a bit in my Trump support for his seemingly unwavering support mRNA injurious/death Jabs (although I have heard him recently call for an end to mRNA Mandates and Lockdowns). BUT I GOTTA TELL YA! The Police State vitriol being poured upon legitimately elected President Trump and his voting supporters, HAS ENDED ANY WAVERING I ONCE FELT!
So, thanks to Natasha Owens take some TRUMP WON AND YOU KNOW IT! (Bitchute version Youtube ventures into censorship):
President Donald J. Trump explains the difference between the globalist establishment class, and those who are truly committed to stopping the Ukraine war and dismantling the entire neo-con nation-building industrial complex in Washington, D.C.
In the latest Agenda47 announcement, President Trump slams the corrupt globalist class for dragging our country through endless foreign wars, while destroying our homeland.
“These globalists want to squander all of America’s strength, blood and treasure, chasing monsters and phantoms overseas—while keeping us distracted from the havoc they’re creating right here at home. These forces are doing more damage to America than Russia and China could ever have dreamed.”
YOU CAN ALSO SUPPORT via buying women’s menstrual health, healthy collagen, vitamin supplements/products, coffee from my Online stores: My Store (please use referral discount code 2388058): https://modere.co/3SrOHzI
Big Tech Censorship is pervasive – Share voluminously on all social media platforms!
The Media ALWAYS Muffles The Message
Meanwhile, if anybody should be led away from society in shackles, it’s George Soros and his heavily funded Manhattan District Attorney’s Office
The real message utterly missed by the majority of news outlets is that control freak George Soros now runs the Manhattan District Attorney’s office, having allegedly bought and paid for its radical DA.
It wasn’t good enough for the Left getting away with counting votes for Donald Trump for Joe Biden in the 2020 Election, they need a picture of last-man-standing Trump being led away in shackles to run—worldwide.
Canada Free Press (CFP) called it right back on August 9, 2022:
“Last-Man-Standing Donald Trump being led away in shackles—a horrific, nightmarish image meant to last more than a lifetime
“Yesterday’s shocking FBI raid on President Donald Trump’s private residence at Mar-a-Lago was not only historically unprecedented, it was delivered straight out of the murky blue with the draw-dropping bully message: “Do not question the narrative!” Make ready for what’s inexorably coming, which will happen even as civil society is still reeling in shock: What’s coming next is Donald Trump being led away in shackles because that’s the image that the Democrats and their Great Reset oligarch masters not only want but desperately need. The image of a shackled Trump being led away, signed, sealed and delivered is necessary to portray him as “a forever criminal”.
“Trump’s Biggest Crime is his unflinching love of America”
“That’s the message they want delivered to world masses–a message that comes from their knowing how well propaganda really works. Trump’s Biggest Crime that led to a reported over 30 FBI operatives forcing their way into his home far away from corrupt Washington, D.C., had nothing to do with the Jan. 6 so called Insurrection that is, in reality, their 3rd Impeachment attempt. Trump’s Biggest Crime is his unflinching love of America—an independent America in a world where unelected power brokers now work feverishly to deny nation sovereignty.
Their blunt and unfurled message to all patriots and truth seekers? If you love America, you are an insurrectionist that must be thrown into the same jail where all Jan. 6 political prisoners are still detained while embittered Liz Cheney toys with their fate. It’s taking place in an era where life became cheap with Covid. Bitter beyond belief, that they couldn’t Impeach Trump after two tries, the Democrats shifted priorities to drive their Enemy Number 1 into eternal Pariah-Hood instead.”
Here they are back at it nearly eight months later:
‘Calls Grow on the Left for Trump to Be Held Without Bail – For a Misdemeanor- (Gateway Pundit, March 18, 2023)
“The left is salivating at the idea that finally Orange Man Bad will be arrested and perp walked in front of the media next week. But that is not enough for them. Calls have gone out on Saturday for President Trump to be held without bail because they say he is a danger to the country over his call for supporters to protest should he be arrested. The liberals are saying this is an incitement to another January 6 and therefore Trump should be kept behind bars where he could not post calls for protests on social media.
“New York has extremely lax bail laws, making bail non-existent for most of those charged. However, the liberals think an exception should be made for Trump.
“Leading the parade is former federal prosecutor Glenn Kirschner, who appeared on MSNBC on Saturday to raise the specter of a judge denying Trump bail. “I would slap a government exhibit sticker on this post and introduce it at his criminal trial.” Glenn Kirschner reacts to the breaking news of President Trump’s Truth Social post indicating that he expects to be arrested Tuesday — The Katie Phang Show (@katiephangshow) March 18, 2023 “For those who can stomach it, Kirschner also posted another video of him further commenting on Trump’s expected arrest, “Trump says he’ll be ARRESTED on Tuesday; tells his supporters to come to Manhattan for his arrest to “TAKE OUR NATION BACK!” When it comes to inciting imminent lawless conduct, Donald Trump has priors.” — Glenn Kirschner (@glennkirschner2)March 18, 2023
Sirius/XM host and former attorney Dean Obeidallah, “Donald Trump should NOT get bail. There is no conditions that can be imposed that “would reasonably assure the safety of the community” if Trump was released on bail. He will 100% incite violence. Plus he’s a flight risk-esp since he owns a plane. #NoBailForTrump” — DeanObeidallah (@DeanObeidallah) March 18, 2023
Cable commentator and former New York state civil prosecutor Tristan Snell, “Donald Trump should be denied bail — he has a history of inciting violent unrest and is calling it for now again. He cannot remain free while awaiting trial.” — Tristan Snell (@TristanSnell) March 18, 2023
Occupy Democrats’ Grant Stern, “This is a clear reason to lock him up without bail.” — Grant Stern (@grantstern) March 18, 2023
“Former prosecutor Mark Romano (a Democrat voting ‘constitutional conservative’), “This is Donald Trump’s way of begging his supporters to get violent. He is too stupid to realize that this strategy is only going to end up with him arrested and jailed without bail. No trial judge will allow an indicted defendant to do this kind of crap.” — Mark Romano (@DLPodcaster) March 18, 2023
Democrat activist Erica Marsh, “Once indicted on Tuesday, Donald Trump should not be given bail. He should be held in jail until his trial. Not only is he a flight risk, but he will likely commit even more crimes if released. Do you agree?” — Erica Marsh (@ericareport) March 18, 2023
Liberal activist Molly Ploofkins, “Donald Trump should be denied bail for his post calling for protests. #LockHimUp” — Molly Ploofkins™ (@Mollyploofkins) March 18, 2023
Obeidallah observed that there is an extremely high standard for having bail set in New York, “Sadly it looks like Trump will get bail in New York because “New York is the only state without a so-called dangerousness standard.” Meaning the judge can’t deny bail because Trump is a danger to the public if released–and he 100% is.”— DeanObeidallah (@DeanObeidallah) March 18, 2023
While not calling for no bail, Rep. Eric Swalwell (D-CA) hit ten on the hysteria meter, “It was Donald Trump who broadcasted to the world the FBI raided his home to retrieve top secret documents. And it’s Donald Trump who has broadcasted to the world that he’ll soon be arrested. His goal is acts of violence in his name. And we must be prepared to protect against it.” — Rep. Eric Swalwell (@RepSwalwell) March 18, 2023
Meanwhile, if anybody should be led away from society in shackles, it’s George Soros and his heavily funded Manhattan District Attorney’s Office.
This time, the Easter Bunny is jumping all the way down into the rabbit hole.
Judi McLeod — Bio and Archives — Judi McLeod, Founder, Owner and Editor of Canada Free Press, is an award-winning journalist with more than 30 years’ experience in the print and online media. A former Toronto Sun columnist, she also worked for the Kingston Whig Standard. Her work has appeared throughout the ‘Net, including on Rush Limbaugh and Fox News.
Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg reportedly offered a private response on Saturday to remarks made by former President Donald Trump, who urged supporters to protest after claiming that he would be arrested on Tuesday.
Trump’s remarks come after a report from NBC News said federal, state, and local law enforcement agencies were analyzing security assessments and making plans to prepare for the possibility that Trump could be indicted next week, although no date is given in the report. A spokesperson for Trump later said that Trump has been given “no notification” that there will be an arrest next week.
“PROTEST, TAKE OUR NATION BACK!” Trump wrote at the end of one social media post, while adding in another: “WE JUST CAN’T ALLOW THIS ANYMORE. THEY’RE KILLING OUR NATION AS WE SIT BACK & WATCH. WE MUST SAVE AMERICA! PROTEST, PROTEST, PROTEST!!!”
Bragg, who has been accused of leading a politically-motivated case against the former president, reportedly wrote in an email to employees that was obtained by POLITICO: “I’m sure you have seen the ongoing press attention and public comments surrounding an ongoing investigation by this office.”
“Please know that your safety is our top priority,” Bragg continued. “We have full confidence in our outstanding security staff and investigators, along with our great OCA and NYPD colleagues, and will continue to coordinate with all of them. We do not tolerate attempts to intimidate our office or threaten the rule of law in New York. Our law enforcement partners will ensure that any specific or credible threats against the office will be fully investigated and that the proper safeguards are in so all 1,600 of us have a secure work environment.”
“This office is full of the finest public servants in the country. I am committed to maintaining a safe work environment where everyone is able to continue to serve the public with the same diligence and professionalism that make this institution so renowned,” Bragg concluded. “In the meantime, as with all of our investigations, we will continue to apply the law evenly and fairly, and speak publicly only when appropriate.”
The case involves an alleged payment that former Trump attorney Michael Cohen admits he made to Daniels during the presidential race to keep quiet about an alleged 2006 tryst between Trump and Daniels. Cohen pleaded guilty to related charges and served time in prison.
Although non-disclosure agreements are legal, the potential problem for Trump centers around how his company reimbursed Cohen. The payment was listed as a legal expense and the company cited a retainer agreement with Cohen. The retainer agreement did not exist and the reimbursement was not related to any legal services from Cohen, thus setting up a potential misdemeanor criminal charge of falsifying business records. The report said that Trump personally signed several of the checks to Cohen while he was serving as president.
Prosecutors can elevate the misdemeanor to a felony if they can prove that Trump’s “‘intent to defraud’ included an intent to commit or conceal a second crime.”
Prosecutors argue that the second crime is that the alleged $130,000 hush payment was an improper donation to the Trump campaign because the money was used to stop a story for the purpose of benefiting his presidential campaign.
Tyranny is a slow-infecting political virus infecting America. That virus became a bit more explicit in America’s 2020 Election but has been going on under the public radar before that for decades.
A part of that under the radar action is due to UNELECTED Globalists extending their tentacle of control through Treaties and Agreements which in America’s case – some ratified Constitutionally (e.g. United Nations involvements) and some by Presidential Executive Orders (which are fluid depending on whom ever sits in the Oval Office).
Since the China Virus (er…I mean COVID19) began spreading around the world the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) dominated World Health Organization (WHO) has been cryptically collecting political clout to override the sovereign authority of independent nations in all matters relating to the spread of viral diseases. Since the WHO is part of -CONTROL-THE-PEOPLE more through political science narratives rather than observable science making critical thinking decisions, CCP-style tyranny will increasingly be glaringly overt political infection of tyranny.
A couple of days ago THE EXPOSÉ examined this World-Wide WHO dictatorship emergence that culminates with a near 90-minute video under the auspices of NTD News and facilitated by Frank Gaffney. THE EXPOSÉ post is from 3/13/23 and NTD News video post was on 3/11/23.
YOU CAN ALSO SUPPORT via buying women’s menstrual health, healthy collagen, vitamin supplements/products, coffee from my Online stores: My Store (please use referral discount code 2388058): https://modere.co/3SrOHzI
Yesterday, World Health Organisation Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus announced “with great pleasure” a joint project of the IPU Parliament and WHO, “which can guide parliamentarians along the path towards health for all, including on law-making, finance, taxation and accountability.”
A few days ago, we published an article warning that the World Health Organisation (“WHO”) aims to begin installing a One World Government under the guise of global health security. If you didn’t believe us then, this latest development should convince you now.
IPU Parliament claims to “empower parliaments and parliamentarians to promote peace, democracy and sustainable development.” Out of 190 parliaments in the world, 178 national parliaments are members of IPU. The Inter-Parliamentary Union (“IPU”) began in 1889 by Englishman William Randal Cremer and Frenchman Frédéric Passy. You can read more about the history of IPU HERE.
And WHO is a private organisation, a puppet organisation that is funded by Globalist billionaires. Bill Gates, along with the organisations he controls, is, by far, the largest financial contributor to WHO. Only 13% of WHO’s budget comes from assessed contributions, which are set amounts paid by member-state governments.
All parliamentarians who want to protect citizens and their nations’ sovereignty, freedom and rights from these want-to-be global dictators should be calling for their governments to stop funding and exit the WHO. Any who aren’t, by default, are identifying themselves as Globalists and puppets of the planned One World Government.
Some have been already calling to #ExitTheWHO – based on the secretive negotiations taking place regarding amendments to the international health regulations and a proposed “pandemic treaty” – but this latest development should leave no one in any doubt of the dictators at WHO’s intentions. All parliamentarians and all citizens of all nations need to join the calls to put an end to the Globalists’ dystopian dreams of a one world totalitarian state which is under the rule of a very few.
Exit The WHO
Over the past two weeks, the US and other members of WHO have been negotiating ways to give sweeping new powers to WHO’s Director-General. Through material changes to existing international health regulations and/or a new pandemic accord, Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus would be able to declare actual or potential “public health emergencies of international concern” in any country based on privately supplied information and without the agreement of the nation(s) affected. Worse yet, he can unilaterally dictate what must be done in response.
The idea of granting WHO and its leadership such potentially fraught authorities is all the more problematic in light of their imperious, and malfeasant, conduct at the direction of the Chinese Communist Party (“CCP”) in the course of the covid-19 pandemic. But, the approval of one or both of these agreements is likely – all other things being equal – to happen when the World Health Assembly meets in May 2023. The new WHO authorities would become provisionally binding on member states, irrespective of whether or not they ultimately endorse them.
Especially troubling is the convergence of these initiatives with measures promoted by WHO to institute global digital identity cards to document and monitor vaccination status and other medical conditions. When combined with the proliferating introduction of central bank digital currencies (“CBDCs”), these “smart” IDs would facilitate efforts to monitor, control and enforce WHO’s diktats, and punish those who defy them.
A couple of days ago the pseudonymous Sundance of The Conservative Treehouse (I still like “The Last Refuge” better) posted, “The Parliamentary Motive Behind the J6 Fedsurrection”. The premise of the post is to expose the fact that brainwashed Americans have failed to grasp. Specifically, Election 2020 was a Dem-Marxist Coup AND the January 6 Protest of that Coup was massaged to appear as a riot/insurrection to create a crisis TO PREVENT a Congressional Challenge to the 2020 Election Coup. AND FURTHERMORE, not only were Dem-Marxists part-and-parcel to fabrication this crisis, BUT ALSO the traitors known as RINOs and members of the Trump Cabinet were in on the fabricated crisis.
A couple of other posts you might read after this for a little more context:
THAT IS THE FEAR behind Tucker Carlson releasing hidden footage that contradicts the manufactured crisis that ENDED a Congressional challenge to a DIRTY ELECTION. And that is the reason YOU should READ this post!
YOU CAN ALSO SUPPORT via buying women’s menstrual health, healthy collagen, vitamin supplements/products, coffee from my Online stores: My Store (please use referral discount code 2388058): https://modere.co/3SrOHzI Big Tech Censorship is pervasive – Share voluminously on all social media platforms!
The Parliamentary Motive Behind the J6 Fedsurrection
The Ring of Truth – “I am too well accustomed to the taking of evidence not to detect the ring of truth.” 1908, Edith Wharton
Much has been made of the events of January 6, 2021, and with the latest broadcast of CCTV video from inside the Capitol Hill complex, more questions have been raised.
Within the questions: the FBI and government apparatus had advanced knowledge of the scale of the J6 mall assembly yet doing nothing? Why were the Capitol Hill police never informed of the FBI concerns? Why didn’t House Speaker Nancy Pelosi secure the Capitol Hill complex, and why did she deny the request by President Trump to call up the national guard for security support? Why did the FBI have agent provocateurs in the crowd, seemingly stimulating rage within a peaceful crowd to enter the Capitol building? There have always been these nagging questions around ‘why’?
Long time CTH reader “Regitiger” has spent a great deal of time reviewing the entire process, looking at the granular timeline and then overlaying the bigger picture of the constitutional and parliamentary process itself. What follows below is a brilliant analysis of the federal government motive to create a J6 crisis that permitted House Speaker Nancy Pelosi to trigger an emergency session and avoid the 2020 election certification challenges.
Those congressional floor challenges, known and anticipated well in advance of the morning of January 6, 2021, would have formed a legal and constitutional basis for ‘standing’ in judicial challenges that would have eventually reached the Supreme Court. The certification during “emergency session” eliminated the problem for Washington DC.
I think most, not all, but a large number of people, are totally missing what happened; and why this happened on Jan 6th. I am going to try my best to outline the events that day, blast past the commonly held assumptions and get right down to the core corruption.
I will present this as a series of questions and answers.
♦ Q1: How do you prevent congress from delaying the certification of state electoral votes?
A: It requires a crisis. A crisis that creates an “emergency” …An “emergency” that invokes special house rules.
FACTS: Remember carefully, focus please. Just moments, literally 3 minutes before two representatives issued a vote for motions to suspend the certification, the House members were “informed” by capitol police and other “agents” that a protest was about to breach the chambers. It was at this time that key people: Pence, Pelosi, Schumer, McConnell can be seen being walked out and escorted from the chamber. This effectively halted the Entire Chamber Process.
♦ Q2: Why was it necessary to halt the chamber process?
A: The crisis was created to eliminate the motion challenges to halt the certification and to begin voting to look into voting irregularities and fraud
FACTS: The two motions were completely legal and constitutional under at least two constitutionally recognized procedures… procedures that would REQUIRE the house to pause the certification and then vote to determine whether the motions of suspend could move forward.
♦ Q3: What was so important to refuse this motion and the subsequent votes to suspend the electoral certification?
A: It was important to remove that process entirely and continue the fraud and certify the fraud with no detractors on record. This effectively gives no standing for a SCOTUS ruling appeal! Understand this. If those two motions, even just one had successfully been voted EVEN IF THE MOTIONS were DENIED IN VOTE, this gives those who presented them with STANDING FOR A CONSTITUTIONAL LEGAL ARGUMENT BEFORE SCOTUS.
♦ Q4: Could this have been done some other way other than creating a crisis/protest?
A: Unlikely. In order to prevent those two motions, requires that speaker of the house, minority leaders, and the president of the congress (vice president of the United States: Pence), to NOT BE PRESENT IN THE CHAMBERS.
Once the capitol police and other “law enforcements agents” informed the speaker and these three other individuals, Pelosi UNILATERALLY UNDER EMERGENCY RULES, suspended the business of the congress. This protest was necessary. The crisis was created because there is no other way to suspend the business of certification UNILATERALLY. By creating a crisis invokes emergency procedures. No other circumstances other than war or mass simultaneous explosive diarrhea can create such unilateral speaker delivered suspension of the certification.
♦ Q5: Why did the motions, once that the speaker RECONVENED congress, move forward back again to the floor for votes? Why were members disallowed to even consider putting forward ANY motions to the floor in when the chamber business was reopened?
A: The Speaker initiated the NEW sessions under special emergency rules. These rules abandon and make it clear that the ONLY purpose of the new session was to EXPEDITE the certification and dismiss all prior regular session procedural rules. This is why those two motions to table votes to consider a debate and pause to the certifications of state vote electors never happened later that evening when the house business was reconvened!
♦ Q6: Other than new rules, emergency rules, what other peculiar things occurred when the speaker reconvened?
A: Members were allowed to “vote” in proxy, remotely, not being present. You can use your imagination about what conditions were placed on ALL members during this time to prevent anyone from “getting out of line”.
Also clearly, it was at THIS NEW SESSION that VP Pence, President of Congress, would also have no ability to even consider pausing the electoral certification, because there were no motions of disagreements on the matter. So, in a technical legal claim, he is correct that he had no constitutional authority to address any issues of fraud or doubts about electoral irregularities. But this completely dismisses the FACT that congress created rules in this crisis/emergency that never allowed them to be floored!
Understand what happened in Jan 6, 2021. Don’t get hung up on Viking impostors, stolen Pelosi computers, podium heists, and complicit capitol police. Understand the process and what happened and what WAS NOT ALLOWED TO HAPPEN.
This was a coup….it was a very organized and carefully planned coup. VP Pence without a doubt as well as most members of the house were quite aware of how the certification was going to be MANAGED. It would require new rules to prevent the debate clause from occurring! New rules that ONLY AN EMERGENCY CRISIS COULD CREATE! So, they created an emergency.
•NOTED: I understand why many people have great interest in debunking the j6 event. I get that. I think it is important to dissect and examine the events of that day but please, step back and understand WHY these things happened. Examine the chain of events in congress. Why those two motions that would have at least paused the certification THAT WOULD GIVE VP PENCE THE CONSTITUTIONALLY RECOGNIZED POWER TO MOVE TO SUSPEND THE ELECTORAL CERTIFICATION AND THEN EXAMINE THE IRREGULARITIES AND CLAIMS OF FRAUD! [Bold Emphasis is Blog Editor’s]
At the very center of this coup stands Mike Pence, the same individual who also spoiled President Trump’s first opportunities in the earlies hours of his Presidency just 4 years prior, when he created and facilitated the removal of Lt General Michael Flynn. I will not spend much time on this thread explaining why Lt Gen Flynn was so important to President Trump and why the IC was so afraid he would have advisory power to the President. That I will leave for another day, another time. But understand this clearly: MIKE PENCE WAS AND IS WORKING FOR THE MOST CORRUPT CRIMINAL TREASONOUS PEOPLE IN GOVERNMENT. [Bold Emphasis is Blog Editor’s]
•PRO TIP: If you really want to get a true understanding of this matter videos of protesters walking in the capitol is not going to address them. Actual video and timeline records of events and the specific actions taken by the speaker just moments before TWO MAJOR ELECTORAL ALTERING MOTIONS WERE ABOUT TO BE FLOORED.
This crisis was developed just in time with a precise coordination to prevent those two motions to be entered into the chamber record. The two motions do not exist. The emergency powers established in the new session made sure they never could be entered. The emergency powers could never happen without a crisis.
Note from Author: “I started this effort years ago. To date, no one and I mean no one has replied. It’s as if everyone that can expose it that has a larger platform is either disinterested, or suspiciously withdrawn from the issue. I made several comments about this over the years right here at CTH, on article threads that are relevant to the topic.
I was watching the certification live that day. I recorded it ALL on every channel. I was doing this because no matter what happened that day, I KNEW IT WOULD BE A PROFOUND AND SIGNIFICANT EVENT TO REMEMBER. I never in my wildest imagination (and I have a pretty vivid imagination, always have), expected to see the unmistakable perfectly timed “coincidences” that occurred.
One member raises a motion (with another in waiting for his turn) those two motions were well known and advertised. These were motions to vote for a pause in the certification to examine electoral vote fraud and irregularities. I can’t speak to the veracity and substance of those motions. They were never allowed to even be floored. it was at that exact moment that the house chambers were suspended and 4 of the key members, Pence, Pelosi, Schumer and McConnell were escorted OUT right after initiating the end of the session.
Effectively, this resulted in that motion never being floored at all. Then, when reconvened under special emergency rules, inexplicably those two motions (and perhaps more – we will never know – or will we?) were not even attempted to be motioned. That was not just peculiar to me.
It all started to make more sense when I did some study on constitutional law AND THE HISTORY of specific special authorities given to president of the congress, Pence in this case. Not only did he have the authority and power to suspend the certification, but the duty to address the motion in the same sense that it becomes vital to the debate clause.
There really is no higher significance of weight given to the debate clause than the certification of the votes. This was more than odd to me the way that the media and pence framed their narrative: Pence would not have the constitutional power to suspend certification. Then it hit me, like the obvious clue that was there all the time. He was right. But the reason he is right, is because there WAS NO MOTION ON THE FLOOR TO CAUSE HIM TO SUSPEND!
Understanding this, happened for me about 4 or 5 months after this Jan 6 day. I took me this long to examine the facts, look at the video again, compare it to the arguments made by several leading constitutional academics, and again, inexplicably even some that I respect seemed to dodge that central reality. The motions were never allowed to be floored in the re-convened house rules later that evening. Most would not even venture to address the exotically coincidence that the moment those two members would stand to place the motion before the house, that the House Speaker Pelosi AND Pence ended the session, effectively blocking the motions from being heard in normal house rules.
It’s been a journey for me. A journey that was initiated because I am just a simple but curious person. Perhaps even to a point where I get obsessive in those efforts. Many days and nights combing over the details. praying and trying to make sense of what makes little sense. With over 6 states having serious well known and obvious defects in the voting process, some more credible to believe – some less, but one would not expect the house would be so deliberate in marching past the motions that were definitely going to be present to slow this process down and take the time to get it right. Even IF the claims never reached an intersection that would change the outcome.
There are two possibilities: Millions of people, against all the odds, hitting all-time records even past Obama and Clinton, voted for a naval gazing ambulatory pathological racist moron. And chose Joe Malarkey as their leader. Or this was a coup, a conspiracy, and a treasonous manipulation regime change because President Trump could not be controlled by the deep state and globalists who OWN AND OPERATE WASHINGTON DC. [Bold Emphasis is Blog Editor’s]
BOTH POSSIBILITIES ARE TERRIFYING.
The only way for THE PEOPLE to gain power in this country is to force the transfer of it. If truth isn’t the fuel and vehicle, we will just be replacing deck chairs and hitting the next series of expected ice bergs.
Knowing the truth is not enough; however, it is truth that makes it a righteous cause.
Julie Kelly – […] Just as the first wave of protesters breached the building shortly after 2 p.m., congressional Republicans were poised to present evidence of rampant voting fraud in the 2020 presidential election. Ten incumbent and four newly-elected Republican senators planned to work with their House colleagues to demand the formation of an audit commission to investigate election “irregularities” in the 2020 election. Absent an audit, the group of senators, including Ted Cruz (R-Texas) and Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) pledged to reject the Electoral College results from the disputed states.
The Hail Mary effort was doomed to fail; yet the American people would have heard hours of debate related to provable election fraud over the course of the day.
And no one opposed the effort more than ex-Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.).
During a conference call on December 31, 2020, McConnell urged his Republican Senate colleagues to abandon plans to object to the certification, insisting his vote to certify the 2020 election results would be “the most consequential I have ever cast” in his 36-year Senate career.
From the Senate floor on the afternoon of January 6, McConnell gave a dramatic speech warning of the dire consequences to the country should Republicans succeed in delaying the vote. He downplayed examples of voting fraud and even mocked the fact that Trump-appointed judges rejected election lawsuits.
“The voters, the courts, and the States have all spoken,” McConnell insisted. “If we overrule them, it would damage our Republic forever. If this election were overturned by mere allegations from the losing side, our democracy would enter a death spiral.”
Roughly six hours later, McConnell got his way. Cowed by the crowd of largely peaceful Americans allowed into the building by Capitol police, most Republican senators backed off the audit proposal. McConnell, echoing hyperbolic talking points about an “insurrection” seeded earlier in the day by Democratic lawmakers and the news media, gloated. “They tried to disrupt our democracy,” he declared on the Senate floor after Congress reconvened around 8 p.m. “This failed attempt to obstruct Congress, this failed insurrection, only underscores how crucial the task before us is for our Republic.”
Congress officially certified the Electoral College results early the next day. (read more)
First off, I’m a Trump supporter. I support Trump even though his last choice of Executive Branch appointees was abysmal (a revolving door of backstabbing RINOs and traitors some of which continued in Office right through Trump’s departure). AND for much of Trump’s America First stand, he still made some economic policies that leaned a bit more toward Globalism than America First (For Example: United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement [USMCA]).
WORST OF ALL, President Trump initiated the mRNA death-jab with Operation Warp Speed and as far as I am aware still supports the dangerous mRNA jab implementation though gratefully on a voluntary basis rather than government mandates.
Except for perhaps Governor DeSantis, I suspect Trump’s 2024 rivals for the GOP President nomination support the mRNA inundation on the gullible.
AND thinking of Election 2024 (BTW – TRUMP IN 2020!), it is my humble opinion Trump has entered the same vicious tactics of 2016 to hammer GOP rivals in 2024. I am certain many of those rivals are backstabbing RINOs; HOWEVER, I don’t believe DeSantis is in that category. It is unfortunate that DeSantis might have to engage in the same kind of viciousness as Trump in efforts to preserve a DeSantis reputation. AND as I pointed out above, if DeSantis indeed pursues a GOP nomination, DeSantis has been given plenty ammo of Trump errors to load a political vicious gun.
NEVERTHELESS, IT IS obvious to any intelligent individual not brainwashed by Dem-Marxist lies and MSM propaganda, that the 2020 (and 2022 for that matter) was one of the crookedest elections in American history – TRUMP WON!
That stated, with all of Trump’s bad choices, his very name drives Dem-Marxists into such apoplectic hysteria that has come to my attention some politically motivated District Attorneys are on the verge of unwinnable indictments against Trump to keep The Donald out of the 2024 Election Cycle. THAT KIND OF HYSTERIA MEANS I’M VOTING TRUMP!
6 Prison Choir consists of individuals who have been incarcerated as a result of their involvement in the January 6, 2021 protest for election integrity after President Donald J. Trump stated “I know that everyone here will soon be marching over to the Capitol building to peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard”. The J6PC continues to make their voices heard through the power of music and sings “The Star Spangled Banner” every evening before bed.
One of the biggest jokes of our times is not that people were informed that they live in a democracy. The biggest joke is that they believe it. In actuality, a small group of extremely wealthy, powerful, and extremely inhuman oligarchs—also known as the Deep State—control their lives and fate. These have been preparing for decades to seize control of humanity, subjugate it, and reduce it to a population they believe “sufficient” to preserve Mother Earth’s habitability. They intend to robotize, digitize, and turn the remaining survivors into a new kind of serfdom. A massive conspiracy, like George Orwell’s “1984″ and Aldous Huxley’s “Brave New World,” is being waged by this 0.001 percent against the other 99.999 percent of humanity.
The sooner the “masked” and “socially detached” understand that governments are waging war against humanity and the global nightmare they are forcing upon us, the greater the possibility we have to regain our sovereign identities. The truth is that under the guise of “corona health protection,” humanity is subject to blatantly illegal and coercive procedures that are imposed upon it. The police and military enforce the rules, which include donning masks, isolating oneself from friends and family, being quarantined, and other arbitrary punishments for disobedience.
Sadly, slice by slice, in salami tactics, the ruling “elites” have chopped out human and civil rights under false pretenses and with the assistance of relentless media propaganda, the people of the West have slowly lost their confidence, at least from the start of the neoliberal onslaught in the 1980s. The “elites” under the Corona dictatorship are getting ready to obliterate the last bits of liberty. Even the majority today, which has been inundated with all manner of propagandized dangers, pleads for more security and is willing to give up even the very last vestiges of their liberty. The globalists have unrestrainedly increased their authority under the cover of their propaganda lies and in their unbridled desire to keep multiplying their billions.
Prince Charles, Queen Elizabeth’s eldest son (I refuse to call this puppet a king), dubbed the Corona “pandemic” a “golden opportunity.” Thus, he is a member of the circle of globalists who are using the time window of the Corona crisis to remove democracy and install the totalitarian-dystopian New World Order they seek. It is unclear when …
The powerful get increasingly alarmed as more people start to wake up and go to great lengths to persuade civil employees, administrators, medical professionals, and even independent doctors to embrace and promote the official story. Nowadays, numerous individuals support the government’s lies. Governments receive “advice” from bought scientific “task teams” and justifications to tighten the screws even further.
What transpires when the “rabble” misbehaves? Job losses, medical license revocations, physical threats against family members, and additional persecution. But when they come up against informed and awakened people, the globalists’ vile deeds and influence-peddling run into a brick block.
Has anyone noticed that the flu has almost completely disappeared in the 2020/2021 winter flu season? Why? Covid-19 statistics were inflated by lying about it. The globalists’ “invisible” leadership dictates to governments the “Covid-19 quotas” that must be met, ensuring governments’ survival under the globalists’ hammer.
The Globalists’ strategy has been to divide the people for decades.
Their latest brilliant idea is to use an invisible enemy, a virus, as the foundation of fear campaigns to keep people panicked and bullied all over the world. This is reminiscent of the infamous words spoken by Rockefeller protégé Henry Kissinger more than 50 years ago:
“He who controls the food supply controls the people; he who controls energy controls whole continents; he who controls money controls the world.”
We are in the midst of a war imposed on us by globalists and their governments. This war has already wreaked havoc on our societies, tearing apart families and friendships. We will not be able to look our children and grandchildren in the eyes if we are not careful.
We could have known what was going on and what is still going on, what this small, dark power elite—the globalists—is up to. If we do not stand up for our rights, this war will continue, preparing future generations to avoid social contact. They are already indoctrinating your children to avoid friends, schoolmates, and peers, and to avoid playing in groups—this is the “New Normal.”
The reigning “elites” in finance and politics are leveraging the Corona crisis to rebuild capitalism. By maintaining the state of emergency and denying citizens their rights, they are destroying small and medium-sized enterprises, robbing them, and demolishing Western parliamentary democracies. The authorities’ goal is to create digital-financial monopolies in …
The evil masters, the pretentious crème de la crème of civilization, those same globalists, have already and continue to neoliberally transform education systems around the world to teach children and young adults that wearing masks was and may again be necessary for survival and that “social distancing” is the only way forward.
THE DESTRUCTION OF SOCIAL NETWORKS
Globalists understand that if the social network that holds a civilization together is shattered, they have won the battle—not the war because the war will last as long as the resistance exists. Their nightmare is the positive dynamic of life, of people, societies, entire nations, and continents. Without this dynamic, life on Earth would come to a halt.
They want the polar opposite: a globalist dictator controlling a small population of serfs or robotized slaves who move only when told to, own nothing, and receive a digital, blockchain-powered universal income with which they can buy food, pleasure, and comfort based on their behavior and obedience. Once the slaves are no longer useful or expendable, their electronically controlled brains are simply turned off.
THE GLOBALISTS’ VANGUARD
The vanguard of the world’s rich and super-rich all have one goal in mind: the establishment of a New World Order (NWO) or the One World Order (OWO). The World Economic Forum (WEF), the G-7, the G-20 (leaders of the world’s most powerful economies), and some lesser-known organizations such as the Bilderberg Society, the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), Chatham House, and many others are all run by obscure individuals. The World Economic Forum (WEF), founded in 1974 by CEO Klaus Schwab, is arguably the most important current vanguard.
All of these institutions and organizations share members. Even this extended vanguard represents less than 0.001% of the global population. They have all elevated themselves above sovereign, democratically elected national governments and the United Nations. They have effectively co-opted the UN to carry out their wishes. UN-Directors General, as well as the Directors General of the numerous UN: sub-organizations, are usually chosen by the US, with the approval of their European vassals, based on the candidate’s political and psychological profile. If his or her “performance” as UN Secretary-General or head of a UN sub-organization no longer corresponds to globalist ideas, his, or her days are numbered.
Furthermore, globalists have hijacked or established the following institutions or organizations: the European Union, the Bretton Woods institutions (World Bank and IMF), the World Trade Organization (WTO), and the International Criminal Court (ICC) in The Hague. The latter lacks teeth. This ensures that the law is always on the side of those who break the law. Regional development banks and similar financial institutions, in addition to the top players, the World Bank and the IMF, keep the countries in their respective regions in check. In the end, the financial or debt economy has complete control. Western neoliberal banditry has created a highly criminal system in which political disobedience is punished through economic repression or theft of national wealth in international territories. The system’s common denominator is the (still) ubiquitous US dollar.
We the People believe it is normal for unknown, unelected individuals to rule over our sovereign nations and sovereignly elected governments. We’ve turned into a herd of obedient sheep. Globalists have slowly and quietly taken over. But we didn’t notice it. Unfortunately, most only become aware of it after it is too late, and freedom, civil and human rights have vanished. The Patriot Act in the United States is an example of this. It had been planned for a long time before 9/11. Patriot legislation to ostensibly protect the people was rushed through Congress in the aftermath of 9/11 because people were clamoring for it out of fear. And, voilà, the Patriot Act permanently deprived the American people of their freedom and civil liberties.
Humanity has been enslaved by globalists. They determine when and where a pandemic will break out, as well as the conditions under which we can survive a staged pandemic. They use very skilled instruments such as a tiny invisible enemy known as a virus and a massive but also invisible monster known as fear. These two instruments take us off the street and keep us from seeing our friends or enjoying conversation, the theater, sports, or a park picnic.
If we let them, globalists will soon be deciding who lives and who dies. Another wave of pandemics, and people will be begging, yelling, and screaming for another vaccine, applauding Big Pharma’s and eugenicists’ goals. There is still time to say NO as a group. Collectively and in unity.
TRIAL RUNS AND AGENDAS
Will the people accept the agenda of the unelected World Economic Forum? As drivers of the globalization process over the last decades, the globalists will now opportunistically portray themselves as world saviors, focusing on protecting what they have left of Mother Earth. Of course, man-made CO2-based “global warming” will be at the heart of their argument. The UN Agenda 2030—which corresponds to the 17 UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)—is the instrument for protecting nature and humanity. The UN Agenda focuses on rebuilding the willfully destroyed global economy in accordance with the 17 SDGs’ “green” principles.
Keep in mind that everything is interconnected. The infamous Agenda 2021, which aligns with and supplements the (UN) Agenda 2030, was officially launched in January 2021 with the WEF’s official declaration of “The Great Reset”. Similarly, “The Great Reset” began in January 2020, with the outbreak of the Corona Pandemic. This had been in the works for decades. The Rockefeller Report of 2010 forewarned the ongoing Corona regime with its “Lockstep Scenario,” further Event 201 of October 18, 2019, in New York, which computer-simulated a Corona pandemic, with 65 million dead and a ruined economy within 18 months. Event 201 occurred just a few weeks before the actual Corona pandemic began.
The Agenda ID 2020 is the globalists’ plan to implement what is behind the UN Agenda 2030. This is a collaboration between public and private sector partners, including UN agencies and civil society. ID2020 is an electronic identification program that bases digital identity on universal immunization. Bill Gates founded and funds ID2020, as does GAVI, the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunizations. GAVI is a Big Pharma association involved in the development of coronavirus vaccines that, along with the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF), funds a large portion of the WHO budget.
The “Great Reset,” as announced by Klaus Schwab and his colleague Thierry Malleret, will undoubtedly be carried out with the assistance of Agenda ID2020. There’s more to it than meets the eye. Agenda ID2020 is even incorporated into the SDGs as SDG 16.9, which seeks to “provide legal digital identity for all by 2030, including free birth registration.” This is perfectly in line with SDG 16’s overall concept:
“Promote peaceful and inclusive societies for sustainable development, ensure equal access to justice for all, and build effective, accountable, and inclusive institutions at all levels.”
Agenda ID2020 is currently being tested on schoolchildren in Bangladesh, following the official path of the UN Agenda 2030 to achieve the SDGs. Children are given digitized ID cards as part of the process, as well as mandatory immunization programs.
All of this will drive the digitization of money and the introduction of 5G, which will necessitate the loading of personal data onto nano-chips to monitor and control the population. As a result, it’s no surprise that Agenda ID2020 is barely mentioned in the mainstream media. ID2020 is the One World Order’s ultimate control of the world population by a small elite. ID2020’s mechanism would enable tracking, control, and networking of all people on the planet, including all health data, money flows, bank accounts, and behavior in a society that I no longer want to call civilization.
Agenda ID2020 could also include “vaccination programs” to drastically reduce the global population. Eugenics is a critical component in population control around the world. All of this sounds like a conspiracy theory, but it is a massive plot unprecedented in human history.
LOCKDOWNS FOR AGENDA IMPLEMENTATION
The ruling elite employs lockdowns as a tool to carry out the aforementioned agendas. If the public knew about this, the “elites” would face massive protests. That is why they organize and finance various types of counter-demonstrations. The Ford Foundation, for example, makes no apologies for financially supporting the “Black Lives Matter” movement, which was previously dismissed as insignificant by the elites.
Total militarization of the countries is required to control the population in the United States and Europe, where the most unrest is expected. And this is in the works. According to the New York Times, at least 93,763 machine guns, 180,718 magazine cartridges, hundreds of silencers, and an unknown number of grenade launchers have been delivered to state and local police departments in the United States since 2006. This is in addition to at least 533 aircraft and helicopters, 432 MRAPs (9-foot-tall, 30-ton mine-resistant, anti-attack armored vehicles with turrets), and over 44,900 pieces of night-vision equipment that are routinely used in night raids in Afghanistan and Iraq.
This militarization is part of a larger trend. Since the late 1990s, approximately 9% of US police departments serving at least 50,000 people have used a PPU (police paramilitary unit). This figure is nearly double what it was in the mid-1980s. Even before Covid-19, approximately 15 to 20% of the US population lived at or below the poverty line. The economic devastation caused by the lockdowns will at least double that percentage, increasing the likelihood of civil unrest and clashes with authorities. This will add fuel to the fire for more justifications for militarized policing.
BRAVE NEW WORLD OF POST-COVID WORKING
The WEF has launched a new diabolical project for the post-covid working world, presenting it to the public in October 2020 as a trial balloon to see how it responds. The “Resetting the Future of Work Agenda,” a 31-page document published in July 2020, is a blueprint for how the “Great Reset” will be carried out.
I wrote about it extensively before, but I will talk about the basics again.
They call the document a “white paper,” implying that it is a draft. It does read like an executioner’s story. People would take up arms and fight against this latest totalitarian blueprint and its authors if they knew what the WEF was up to. The time frame is ten years because the UN Agenda 2021 must be implemented by 2030.
That means we are talking about a time frame of roughly 10 years until the following should be completed:
An acceleration of digitized work processes, leading to 84% of all work processes as digital, or virtual / video conferences.
Some 83% of people are planned to work remotely – i.e., no more interaction between colleagues – absolute social distancing, separation of humanity.
About 50% of all tasks are planned to be automated – in other words, human input will be drastically diminished, even while remote working.
Accelerate the digitization of upskilling / reskilling (e.g., education technology providers) — 42% of skill upgrading or training for new skills will be digitized, in other words, no human contact – all on computer via artificial intelligence (AI), algorithms.
Accelerate the implementation of upskilling / reskilling programs – 35% of skills are planned to be “re-tooled” – i.e., existing skills are planned to be abandoned – declared defunct.
Accelerate ongoing organizational transformations (e.g., restructuring) – 34% of current organizational set-ups are planned to be “restructured’ – or, in other words, existing organizational structures will be declared obsolete – to make space for new sets of organizational frameworks, digital structures that provide utmost control over all activities.
Temporarily reassign workers to different tasks – this is expected to touch 30% of the workforce. That also means entirely different pay-scales – most probably unlivable wages, which would make the also planned “universal basic income” (UBI) or “basic income” (a wage that allows you barely to survive) an obvious need. But it would make you fully dependent on the system – a digital system, where you have no control whatsoever.
Temporarily reduce the workforce – this is projected as affecting 28% of the population. It is an additional unemployment figure, disguised as “temporarily”. These people will never come back to full-time.
Permanently reduce the workforce – 13% permanently reduced workforce.
Temporarily increase the workforce – 5% – there is no reference to what type of workforce – probably unskilled labor that, eventually, will also be replaced by automation, by AI and robotization of the workplace.
No specific measures implemented – 4% – does that mean, a mere 4% will remain untouched from the algorithm and AI-directed new work places? As small and insignificant as the figure is, it sounds like “wishful thinking”, never to be accomplished.
Permanently increase the workforce – a mere 1% is projected as “permanently increased workforce”. This is of course not even cosmetics. It is a joke.
Furthermore, the “Great Reset” envisions a credit system in which all personal debts are “forgiven” in exchange for the surrender of all personal assets to an administrative body or agency—possibly the IMF. According to the ideologues, people would own nothing and be happy because all of their needs would be met.
In addition to numerous human rights violations and disasters, the “Great Reset” envisions, for example, making the use of the resources we earn dependent on our behavior—in other words, we are to be at the mercy of this cabal and subject to the wishes of the Deep State, the shadow government, this network of oligarchs that controls all 193 UN member states plus the UN. Only then can we use our money to purchase items that are still available to us. According to various WEF papers, artificially created shortages of food, health care, and other items could jeopardize the free flow of goods.
But the cabal wants even more: as briefly mentioned above, it should not occur to people to reject the system because, simultaneously, everyone has been vaccinated and given a nano-chip, allowing thoughts to be read and influenced with 5G or, soon, 6G.
DARPA, the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, as part of the Pentagon, developed this technology years ago. It is simply a matter of time before it is put into action. And if we don’t revolt, it will be implemented. Civil disobedience in large numbers is the order of the day. The longer we do nothing, the more we sleepwalk into this human disaster.
Neither “The Great Reset” nor the “Resetting the Future of Work Agenda” specify who will enforce these new, harsh rules. They appear to be the same forces that are now being trained to wage urban warfare and suppress riots and social unrest: police and military.
STRENGTHEN THE RESISTANCE
Civil disobedience organization must address the issue of how to communicate with the police and military, as well as how to educate and inform them about the purposes for which they are being misused by this small diabolical cabal. Teachers, doctors, and people in all professions must all be educated and informed about the truth.
Disinformation in the media is brutal and powerful, making it difficult for the resistance to counter without additional funds. The ruling classes’ media is doing everything they can to further divide us.
Only freedom from fear will rip “Resetting the Future of Work Agenda” and “The Great Reset” to shreds, destroying organizations such as the WEF and co-opted UN agencies such as the WHO, UNICEF, WTO, World Bank, IWE, and possibly the entire UN system.
The globalists are acting unethically and have descended to the depths of their moral dysfunctions. The time has come to indict the project’s political and economic leaders under international human rights standards or for crimes against humanity.
On the March 6 episode of Tucker Carlson Tonight, Carlson spent a majority of the time showing January 6 footage LYING Democrats and a LYING MSM did not want you to watch. WHY!?
Because the TRUTH shows there was NO armed insurrection – NO police killed by J6 Protestors (lyingly dubbed rioters by Dem-Marxists) – PLANTS (by FBI or DOJ or Capitol Police) guiding or goading Protesters to be violent and many more lies exposed.
After watching the episode, I discovered Tucker Carlson intends more coverage for Tuesday March 7. By the time you read and watch this post, that Tuesday episode will have aired. I only watch Tucker as video clips become available Online. I long ago have forsaken Fox News. The March 6 airing is so very informative!
By now you may have heard the lying Dem-Marxists, RINOs, and Propaganda MSM claim Tucker Carlson distorted his report by claiming he did what the J6 Committee ACTUALLY DID! Which is distort the truth with cherrypicking. A good example of Leftist & RINO boohooing can be read in this Leftist Politico article from 3/7: “House GOP faces a new Jan. 6 headache, courtesy of Tucker Carlson: The Capitol Police chief and Republican senators slammed the Fox News host for falsely characterizing the violent riot — using footage Speaker Kevin McCarthy provided him.”
I am convinced the gullible will believe what they are told to believe. THE NON-GULLIBLE understands that the Tucker Carlson truth is timestamped SHOWING:
Capitol Police Officer Brian Sicknick WAS NOT murdered by J6 Protestors
QAnon Shaman (Jacob Chansley) was led and guided peacefully around by Capitol Police
Ray Epps LIED under oath
AND MORE – WATCH THE VIDEO!
DEAR GOD IN HEAVEN WAKE UP! Your Government and MSM are lying to YOU. If and/or When YOU wake up, YOU should ask yourself, “WHAT IS THE REASON BEHIND THE LIES?” A little honest guessing should lead any person to a state of indignant infuriation.
The Patriot Chronicles has a bit shorter coverage with three Twitter embeds which I will cross post as a kind text commentary to Carlson’s March 6 episode after the Full Video of Tucker Carlson Tonight.
The Dem-Marxists and MSM are going nuts their narrative is being refuted that alone should inspire you to watch the truth.
Tucker Carlson recently uncovered shocking footage from the January 6 Capitol riot that is shaking the foundations of the mainstream media’s narrative of what happened that day.
The new evidence shows two Capitol police officers escorting Jacob Chansley, the infamous “QAnon Shaman,” throughout the building, and footage of Capitol Police Officer Brian Sicknick walking around the Capitol after the media reported that he had been killed outside.
In addition, Carlson found evidence that Ray Epps lied under oath when he told investigators he was at his hotel when he texted his nephew he “orchestrated” protests at the Capitol.
This new evidence is a direct challenge to the narrative that the mainstream media and the Democrats have been pushing for years, which is that the Capitol riot was an armed insurrection and that the rioters were violent and evil. But Carlson’s new footage shows that the Capitol police were escorting people throughout the building, and that not all of the people involved in the riot were armed.
This raises serious questions about what really happened that day, as well as the level of corruption and bias in the mainstream media. For months, they have been pushing a narrative that fits their own political agenda and does not reflect the reality of what happened.
It also raises questions about the Capitol police’s handling of the situation. If they were escorting Chansley and not arresting him, why did they not arrest him? Why did they allow him to roam freely throughout the building? And why did they not arrest Ray Epps if he was clearly lying to investigators?
It’s clear that the J6 committee heads were all liars, and that the media and the Biden administration have been pushing a false narrative about the Capitol riot. The new footage uncovered by Carlson shows that the truth is very different from what they are claiming, and that the Capitol police were not doing their job that day.
This should be a wake-up call for the American people, who need to stand up and demand that the truth be exposed. Political corruption must be rooted out, and the liberal media must be held accountable for their lies and misrepresentations. The Biden administration must also be held to account for their attempts to rewrite history and whitewash what really happened on January 6.
We must never forget what happened that day, and we must continue to demand the truth. We owe it to ourselves and to our children to make sure that the truth is heard loud and clear. Only then can we move forward, and only then can we ensure that justice is served.
Since the Propaganda MSM and co-criminals in the lying U.S. Government are HUGE on lying to Americans, you might be out of the loop that not only did I-AM-THE-SCIENCE (NOT-TRUE) Fauci lied about the Wuhan Lab Leak and Gain of Function (GoF) taxpayer supported research that manufactured the China Virus (er…I mean COVID); Fauci set out to fabricate science to coverup China Virus origins.
You need to dwell on the at one time RESPECTED scientists and doctors who had their lives and professional standing ruined by the likes of science criminals such as Anthony Fauci who defamed brave dissenters of the lying science propaganda. Although I won’t touch on it now, YOU should dwell on the motives behind criminal Fauci (and criminal associates) lies. Guess hints: Pure Greed & Globalist Power.
Here are a couple of videos disdained on Youtube but thankfully retained on Bitchute of once imminent (now oft vilified) Dr. Francis Boyle on COVID ORIGINS way back in 2020. Ridiculed by propagandists but now the documentation proving Fauci is a LIAR-FOR-GAIN, must be examined again:
In this interview, the Author of the US Biowarfare Act, Professor Francis Boyle uncovers four separate studies which he claims confirm as ‘smoking gun’ evidence the Wuhan Coronavirus known as COVID19 was in fact weaponized.
Professor Boyle also discloses where he believes the true origin of the virus originated and the extent that the US government was involved.
This is a must see interview as Professor Boyle also reveals never before disclosed information.
AND NOW to some relevant cross posts on Fauci/Govt Lies. I begin with actually amounts to some musing by Attorney Tom Renz and finish a couple of more specific articles on Fauci lying on the Wuhan Lab Leak.
We’ve been talking a lot about biotech and the legitimate potential we face of a world war. We know that COVID-19 was created in the Wuhan lab and that it was made possible by our own DOD with American grants, funding, and technology. The recent Senate bill, that passed unanimously, to declassify Wuhan leak documents will show implicate China’s involvement in the creation of SARS-COV-2 but not the role of our government. It is likely this is being done to pressure China to stay out of Taiwan as well as to strongarm the CCP not to back Russia in Ukraine (the globalist piggybank). While I appreciate the intent of our elected officials on this bill the fact of the matter is that it was written in a way that will only show part of the issue and, given the millions dead from this disease and the fact that this could have implications related to a potential world war, a full and transparent accounting of EVERYONE involved MUST occur.
In related news, the good people in big pharma have now decided to reformulate all vaccines to mRNA. This is very serious and nearly inexplicable. Given the acknowledged efficacy in preventing transmission (the jabs actually increase your likelihood of getting COVID over time) and the numerous side effects (Died Suddenly, Damar Hamlin, heart issues, cancer, strokes, autoimmune issues, neurological issues, etc.) why would we change existing vaccines, that pharma has claimed have been doing their jobs for decades, to include the same active ingredient causing the issues with no benefits? Changing the formula will increase manufacturing costs for pharma with substantial risk to the business so what could be behind this?
Why do they want all childhood vaccines to change to be gene therapies for kids? Why are they putting mRNA into our food supply? Why are they changing existing vaccines? Is there a smallpox outbreak we didn’t notice because the old jabs are no longer working? Further, if this technology was so incredibly safe and effective why are they hiding their plans from the public? You don’t hide things unless you have something to hide. If Damar Hamlin didn’t have a heart attack from the jab then why aren’t we hearing what the real cause was? There’s a huge increase in deaths globally since the rollout of mRNA vaccines yet they want to double down?
The reality is that this is really the WEF, Pfizer the WHO, and the rest doubling down on their efforts to ensure every human being on this planet is injected with the mRNA gene therapy, but why? Why is it so important to these people to control our genes? Well, I cannot answer but to repeat what has been said. Klaus Schwab (head of the WEF) says the fourth industrial revolution isn’t about changing what you do, it’s about changing you. Changing you with these gene altering vaccines. He says they change who you are and his chief scientific advisor, the apparent Nazi fan-boy (yes Yuval Noah Harari appears to me to be a fan of Hitler and Stalin in light of his repeated remarks that seem to lament that those monsters did not have the tech we do) states that humans are hackable and that free will is an illusion. These people are literally promoting a future of slavery with them as the slave masters. This sounds insane to me but should I ignore their words given the power and influence they wield? Plus, what explanation is there for the above listed insanity?
If we are going to suppose that the push for mRNA has something to do with controlling genetic code the first question is whether that is even close to possible and actually it is. Gatestone Institute has a great article that was published in February of 2021 on how China has been playing with genetics over the past decade with the goal of creating super soldiers. The article, “China Is Creating a New Master Race,” lists China’s goals to obtain “biological dominance,” with little to no ethical boundaries. The experiments are described to evoke the eugenics program of the Third Reich with the goal of creating a “master race.” Interestingly enough this article also states that the genetic and biotech research was able to be conducted thanks to their relationship with the United States and other western nations. “American research labs, biotech investors, and scientists have all striven to do research and business in China’s budding biotech arena… because of the ethical standards for research… are so low,” according to Brandon Wichert. Much of China’s work in this started around the time our DoD authorized the transfer of tech and funds to China to create SARS-COV-2 through EcoHealth Alliance.
Just as importantly as anything related to making people all like Captain America is the discussion in this and similar articles about genetic programming of people to allow them to interface with tech and AI as well as limiting or eliminating human emotion. Both of these are terrible. If my genes could be altered in a way where Harari’s dream of hooking people up to the internet and where they would be dependent on that connection to survive we truly would all be slaves. Further, if any or all human emotions can be “deprogrammed” would the resulting being still even be human? It is tough to be sad or unhappy but without those emotions how can you appreciate being happy?
As I write this I find myself thinking it is absurd that any of this would even warrant a keystroke but if Adolph Hitler had told me in the 1920s that he would take control of Germany, start a world war, and kill millions of innocent Jews and others I would have probably found that statement absurd as well. It is unthinkable that the elites are actually angling to “alter and enslave humanity” but should I ignore the threat because it seems ridiculous? This question is even more poignant when you consider the above discussion which indicates that it seems possible and also like they are moving in that direction.
At the end of the day, how much more clear can the globalists and WEF be? Big pharma and the corrupt American government are pushing forward on many of these things as we speak so should we pay attention or write this off as absurd? Given the deaths already occurring, when are we going to prosecute the guilty parties within our country? After they start a world war? We already know these people don’t care if they kill so I guess we shouldn’t be shocked by any of this and the people committing these actions (especially those within our own government) are committing crimes should be in GITMO. If I have anything to say about it, Fauci and his buddies will pay for their treasonous crimes… they knew what they were doing and we have the proof.
They show he “prompted” or commissioned — and had final approval on — a scientific paper written specifically in February 2020 to disprove the theory that the virus leaked from a lab in Wuhan, China.
Eight weeks later, Fauci stood at a White House press conference alongside President Trump and cited that paper as evidence that the lab leak theory was implausible while pretending it had nothing to do with him and he did not know the authors.
“There was a study recently,” he told reporters on April 17, 2020, when asked if the virus could have come from a Chinese lab, “where a group of highly qualified evolutionary virologists looked at the sequences… in bats as they evolve and the mutations that it took to get to the point where it is now is totally consistent with a jump of a species from an animal to a human.
“So, the paper will be available. I don’t have the authors right now, but we can make it available to you.”
That paper, entitled “The Proximal Origin of SARS-CoV-2” was sent to Fauci for editing in draft form and again for final approval before it was published in Nature Medicine on Feb. 17, 2020.
It was written four days after Fauci, and his NIH boss Francis Collins, held a call with the four authors to discuss reports that COVID-19 may have leaked from the Wuhan lab and “may have been intentionally genetically manipulated”.
The House Oversight subcommittee published emails Sunday in which the paper’s co-author Dr. Kristian Andersen admits Fauci “prompted” him to write the paper with the goal of “disprove” the lab leak theory.
On February 12, 2020, Andersen submitted the paper to Nature Medicine with a cover email: “There has been a lot of speculation, fear-mongering, and conspiracies put forward in this space. [This paper was] Prompted by Jeremy Farrah [sic], Tony Fauci, and Francis Collins”.
Farrar, then head of British nonprofit, the Wellcome Trust, which has historic ties to the pharmaceutical industry and the Gates Foundation, was rewarded with the plum role of Chief Scientist at the World Health Organization last December.
On the day the “Proximal Origin” paper was published, emails show Farrar pushing through a crucial change: “Sorry to micromanage/micro edit! But would you be willing to change one sentence?”
Farrar’s change was to replace the word “unlikely” with “improbable” in a statement about the lab leak origin, so it would read: “It is improbable that SARS-CoV-2 emerged through laboratory manipulation of an existing SARS-related coronavirus.”
Improbable means having a probability too low to inspire belief; unbelievable, even ridiculous.
That’s what Fauci and friends wanted us to think of the lab leak theory that looked probable from the “get-go”, as one dissenting scientist said at the time, and looks more probable by the day.
The question of why Fauci went to such an effort to obscure the origins of COVID-19 is a major focus of the GOP-led committee.
For nearly two years, there was a complete ban on discussing the COVID-19 lab leak theory
Facebook reversed its censorship policy on the lab leak theory in June 2021. Now, mainstream media are forced to admit the pandemic was most likely caused by a lab leak
January 28, 2023, epidemiologists Colin Butler and Delia Randolph published a joint statement saying a lab leak is the most likely source of COVID-19. The two had previously authored separate reports for the United Nations Environment Program (UNEP), which commissioned them to investigate the possibility of the pandemic being the result of “humanity’s abuse of nature”
February 26, 2023, The Wall Street Journal reported that the U.S. Energy Department has now revised its assessment of the origin of SARS-CoV-2, concluding the pandemic “most likely arose from a laboratory leak”
The FBI also concluded a lab leak was the most likely scenario all the way back in 2021, yet played a central role in censoring anyone who suggested this is where COVID came from
For nearly two years, there was a complete ban on discussing the COVID-19 lab leak theory, and as noted by Robby Soave in a June 2021 Reason article,1 this is a perfect example of why banning “misinformation” is a terrible idea. Often enough, what’s labeled as “misinformation” one day has turned out to be true the next.
I first raised the lab leak theory February 4, 2020, and it wasn’t until June 2021 that Facebook finally reversed its censorship policy on this particular topic, stating, “In light of ongoing investigations into the origin of COVID-19 and in consultation with public health experts, we will no longer remove the claim that COVID-19 is man-made or manufactured from our apps.”
“Facebook’s concession that the lab leak story it once viewed as demonstrably false is actually possibly true should put to rest the idea that banning or regulating misinformation should be a chief public policy goal,” Soave wrote.2
Scientists Told to ‘Shut Up’
In a February 15, 2023, article3 in the British Express, Angus Dalgleish, a professor of oncology at St George’s, University of London, recounts how he and his Norwegian colleagues, Birger Sørensen (a virologist) and Andres Susrud (a molecular biologist), were systematically silenced.4
The trio had assessed the genetic sequence of SARS-CoV-2, concluding a bat origin was “extremely unlikely … as it had inserts around the receptor binding region … that would make it more infectious.” But no matter how they tried, they couldn’t get the paper published.
They even sent their findings to the British government and Cabinet members, only to be told “quite categorically that there was no way it could have been a laboratory escape.”
“What was to follow was a complete suppression of any debate about the origin, which would appear to have been driven by Tony Fauci from the NIAID in America,” Dalgleish writes.5
“Indeed, he was so intent on quashing any evidence of the origin that he commissioned a paper from a group of scientists, who we now know also had concerns that it may not be natural but nevertheless, they published the paper in Nature Medicine saying all the evidence showed it was completely natural and was not a laboratory leaked virus.
This paper was published in Nature Medicine and then used by Tony Fauci as absolute proof that it was not a lab leak. What was incredible was that this narrative was picked by governments throughout the world, all the mainstream media and the majority of scientists, who should have known better than to accept the narrative rather than look at the evidence …
China’s put-down was especially strong and it was so very obvious that they were covering up something as all specimens and databases were either altered or withdrawn. Very belatedly, China allowed a team of international experts to investigate the cause of COVID and a team were allowed into China to essentially come up with an official report saying that it was clearly of natural origin.
Now, more than two years later, two of the people involved with this, Professor Colin Butler from Australia and Delia Randolph from the University of Greenwich, London, have spoken out that it is clear now that all the evidence DOES support a lab leak and that there has been a suppression of the truth.
There has been secrecy and cover-up of this issue on a truly Orwellian scale … [In the] future, any new threat, infectious disease or pandemic, must be addressed with open scientific debate and not the complete suppression of the truth, secrecy and coverup …”
Evidence Supports Lab Leak and Always Did
As noted by Dalgleish, Butler and Randolph have recently spoken out about the fact that evidence for a lab leak was there from the start. That’s why Butler signed an open letter6 to the World Health Organization in March 2021 calling for a “full and unrestricted international forensic investigation into the origins of COVID-19.”
The letter was sent after the WHO’s team issued a clearly biased report dismissing the lab leak theory as unworthy of further investigation. January 28, 2023, Butler, along with Randolph, published a joint statement in the Daily Mail, noting that:7
“[The] crucial debate over Covid’s origins has been shackled … And this refusal to discuss openly what everyone suspects to be true — or at the very least strongly possible — has the disastrous consequence of eroding public trust in science.”
Butler and Randolph are now trying to set the record straight. As explained in their article, the United Nations Environment Program (UNEP) commissioned each of them in early 2020 to investigate and write reports on the possibility of the pandemic being the result of “humanity’s abuse of nature.”
Randolph’s report, which came out first, ended up not addressing the possibility of a non-natural origin, even though it was “actively considered in the drafting.” “[E]ven in early 2020, it appeared that UNEP was averse to including anything so controversial as the lab-leak theory in the report,” the pair write.
Butler authored the second UNEP report. Early on, he’d been skeptical about a lab link, but “as circumstantial evidence in support of a laboratory pathway grew, thanks to the work of a few brave scientists, internet detectives and journalists,” Butler finally concluded that the lab leak theory had to be considered. Butler’s report therefore did include an extensive discussion about the possibility of a lab leak.
‘Laboratory Pathway Seems the Most Likely’
Butler’s initial drafts were strongly criticized by internal UNEP reviewers, and as the report neared finalization, Butler started suspecting that publication was being “deliberately stalled.” According to Butler and Randolph:8
“The first report was published within weeks of completion, but the second one took ten months — and only appeared after an increasingly alarmed author contacted influential figures … It was eventually released with little publicity three months ago.
These two reports are substantial with a combined length of 152 pages, citing 387 scientific publications and with 94 reviewers. They cannot be dismissed as scientifically lightweight, nor the product of biased or naive authors.
Unlike some key players in the COVID origin debate, neither of us has been involved in ‘gain of function’ work that includes manipulation of virological structures to increase virulence. Nor do we have any history of collaboration with the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV).
Neither of us has received funds from the US National Institutes of Health, the US Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency or EcoHealth Alliance — all of which have been involved with funding work at WIV that falls within the definition of ‘gain of function.’
Nor have either of us been financially rewarded for work with the Wellcome Trust … whose director Sir Jeremy Farrar was, we believe, a key figure alongside US funding chiefs in the scandalous suppression of debate on this issue …
Most recently discovered pathogens ‘burn out’ in human populations. Some are then held in laboratories, including in Wuhan … Are some of these being experimented upon? Almost certainly, yes. Yet a pall of suspicious secrecy, deceit and conflicts of interest shroud this work …
We can see incompetence, too. A new report by the US Office of Inspector General found fault with both the National Institutes of Health, the world’s biggest public funder of biomedical research, and EcoHealth Alliance, which it was supposed to help monitor.
This report damningly noted that each organization failed to ‘understand the nature of the research conducted, identify potential problem areas and take corrective action.’ It is of critical importance that these risks are better understood, that scientists accept the dangers and that this field is better regulated.
Our view is that, on current balance of evidence, a laboratory pathway seems the most likely cause of the pandemic … Irrespective of the origin of the pandemic, however, this debate has exposed that self-regulation of ‘gain of function’ research has been a dismal failure.”
Department of Energy Report Supports Lab Leak Theory
February 26, 2023, one month after Butler and Randolph’s joint statement, The Wall Street Journal reported that the U.S. Energy Department has now revised its assessment of the origin of SARS-CoV-2, concluding the pandemic “most likely arose from a laboratory leak:”9
“The shift by the Energy Department, which previously was undecided on how the virus emerged, is noted in an update to a 2021 document by Director of National Intelligence Avril Haines’s office …
The Energy Department now joins the Federal Bureau of Investigation in saying the virus likely spread via a mishap at a Chinese laboratory …
The Energy Department’s conclusion is the result of new intelligence and is significant because the agency has considerable scientific expertise and oversees a network of U.S. national laboratories, some of which conduct advanced biological research.
The Energy Department made its judgment with ‘low confidence,’ according to people who have read the classified report. The FBI previously came to the conclusion that the pandemic was likely the result of a lab leak in 2021 with ‘moderate confidence’ and still holds to this view.”
US Intelligence Suspected Lab Leak All Along
So, in 2021, the FBI thought the lab leak theory was not only plausible but likely, yet the agency was instrumental in censoring public discussion about it. What’s more, the Energy Department reportedly prepared a study all the way back in May 2020, which concluded “that a lab-leak hypothesis was plausible and deserved further investigation.”
In other words, Big Tech was told to censor a truth that at least two different agencies within the intelligence community supported. In a February 27, 2023, Twitter thread,10 investigative journalist Paul D. Thacker also points out that not just one but two separate teams of scientists at different Energy Department labs have concluded that a lab accident was the most likely source of the pandemic. So, we really have three intel community assessments pointing in the same direction.
“The FBI concluded a lab leak was the most likely scenario all the way back in 2021, yet played a central role in censoring anyone who suggested this is where COVID came from.”
Curiously, the FBI still appears hell-bent on continuing the cover-up, even as the fabricated narrative is crumbling. As noted by Dr. Robert Malone,11 House and Senate Republicans who are investigating the origin of the pandemic have pressed the FBI for more information, in particular what kind of information made them suspect a lab leak.
But the agency is refusing to share those details, citing Justice Department policy on “preserving the integrity of ongoing investigations.” In other words, by claiming there’s an active investigation underway, the FBI doesn’t have to share any of the information Congress is requesting, which seems rather convenient.
The question is, just how long does the FBI need to conclude this supposed investigation? As noted by Malone,12 “The FBI must divulge what it knows in a timely manner. We don’t have time to wait for their endless investigations to be concluded. Three years is already too long to wait. Congress and the American public deserve answers now.”
Mainstream Puppets Trying to Get Ahead of the Bigger Story?
A string of mainstream media puppets are now reporting that a lab leak may be the most likely explanation for the pandemic.13 We’ve yet so see apologies for their former unprofessionalism, however. One reason for this U-turn might be that they’re now trying to get ahead of an even bigger story, namely the absolute confirmation that SARS-CoV-2 is an engineered virus that got unleashed on mankind.
Mainstream media need to make it look like they weren’t accessories to covering up democide (the intentional killing of unarmed civilians by government), because the lab leak theory leads directly to the intentional manipulation of viruses and government bioweapons development.
The globalist string-pullers are also starting to test out potential escape routes, from getting the public onboard with “amnesty” for COVID mistakes to pretending they’ve been the ones pushing for answers. As noted by Twitter user Clandestine:14
“We have passed into a new phase of the COVID saga. The U.S. government is starting to slowly admit SARS-CoV-2 was a human-engineered pathogen that leaked from a lab in China. This is essentially the end of the road for the COVID narrative.
This is the death knell for the Globalists. Why? Because the broader public are now emboldened to ask more questions: Who made it? Who ‘leaked’ it? Why did the MSM/Tech lie? Why did the U.S. government censor anyone who suggested this over the last 3 years?
The Biden admin are already trying to get in front of it. NSA Jake Sullivan on the origin of SARS-CoV-2 today: ‘President Biden has directed, repeatedly, every element of our intelligence community to put effort and resources behind getting to the bottom of this question.’
Anyone with a pulse can tell you Jake Sullivan is lying through his teeth. Not only has the Biden admin NOT been pursuing the answers to SARS-CoV-2’s origins, the intelligence community conspired with Big Tech to censor the people who have been saying this for three … years.
Russia and China have been formally alleging that the virus was man-made by Western Oligarchs for over a year now. They have been calling for UN Security Council investigation into the US biological network in Ukraine. The West cried ‘disinformation’ …
The Biden admin are going to begin gaslighting their sheep that they have been looking for the origins of SARS-CoV-2 this entire time. When in reality, they brainwashed the planet and violated the Constitution to silence anyone who was actually looking for the origin.”
COVID Antibodies Found in Stored Blood From September 2019
On the other side of this story, researchers have discovered COVID antibodies in blood collected and stored in European blood banks since September 2019, in the case of Italy,15 and November 2019 in the case of France.16
As noted by Stanford professor Jay Bhattacharya,17 the implications of these findings are “enormous,” because this means the lockdowns were implemented several months after the virus had already started spreading across the globe. Lockdowns have only a tiny effect, if any, in the first place, and locking everyone down after a virus has been spreading for months is less than useless.
Yet no one in government or mainstream media covered these findings, which were published in November 2020 and February 2021 respectively. If they had, it would have been clear by the end of 2020 that lockdowns were futile from the start and had to end.
Virus Engineering Is One of the Greatest Threats to Humanity
If the COVID pandemic has taught us anything, it’s that genetic engineering of viruses with pandemic potential is one of the greatest threats to humanity and must stop.
A research proposal to DARPA dating back to 2018 described plans to create a virus that sounds eerily similar, if not identical, to SARS-CoV-2,18 and while the proposal was declined, there’s no reason why it couldn’t have been done through some other program.
COVID-19 has allegedly killed nearly 6.8 million people around the world and the entire global economy has been decimated. If the kind of genetic tinkering that produced SARS-CoV-2 is allowed to continue, it’s only a matter of time before some manmade virus starts wiping out targeted populations, as they will eventually find a way to target specific genetic traits.19
The only policy that makes sense going forward is a complete ban on gain of function research, and severe punishment for violations. The industry clearly cannot regulate itself, and regulations on this kind of research always ends up creating loopholes.
Internal emails between Dr. Fauci and world health experts expose the frantic rush to respond to the growing threat of a global pandemic in early 2020 – and they reveal new evidence to support the theory that COVID-19 originated from a lab leak in Wuhan, China.
Why did the media and Big Tech work so hard to suppress the lab leak theory if the experts were actively debating it behind-the-scenes? Brian O’Shea (an intelligence operations specialist & private investigator) joins Dr. Li-meng Yan (a virologist who escaped from China) to dig in to the latest evidence, unredacted emails between Dr. Fauci in the pandemic’s earliest days, and to explore the terrifying possibility that the virus was leaked intentionally.
Brian O’Shea is an Intelligence Operations Specialist, Intelligence Analyst, Private Investigator, and Chief Operating Officer at Centurion Intelligence Partners. After serving in the military for 11 years of active-duty service, Brian worked as a Senior Consultant and Subject Matter Expert for two of the US Government’s top intelligence agencies. Find him online at https://centurionintelligence.com/ and https://twitter.com/BrianOSheaSPI.
(Viewers may also be familiar with Brian via his wife Naomi Wolf, who referenced his vast knowledge of global intelligence activity in earlier episodes)
Dr. Li-meng Yan (AKA Dr. Yan Limeng, 闫丽梦 or 閆麗夢) is a Chinese virologist known for her publications and interviews alleging that SARS-CoV-2 was made in a Chinese government laboratory. She came to the United States in 2020, where she has co-authored several preprint research papers that are intended to back up her claim. Follow Dr. Yan at https://twitter.com/DrLiMengYAN1 and listen to her show “The Voice of Dr. Yan” on America Out Loud Radio Network at https://www.americaoutloud.com/voice-of-dr-yan/
The last minute & half of the Reese video is pay-the-bills information which we should all be able to relate to. The theme is setting up “Safety Committees” on a local or County level to begin RESISTING government tyranny from a power-grabbing lying government. Reese briefly uses the example of the American Revolution became instituted on a local level against British Tyranny. Reese correctly points out that day’s tyrants are the infiltrating long arm of Globalist-Elitists. (But being a bit if a history buff, the term “Safety Committee” reminds more of how the French Revolution brought power to anti-Monarchists leading to mass executions which ironically evolved into the absolute power of Emperor Napoleon Bonaparte. Just saying, be careful with whom you trust with power.)
Regardless, of how “Safety Committees” pan out, it actually might be the best RESISTANCE Movement to America’s apparently long-time Globalist-Marxist-Corporatist-Fascist political infection. It is my current humble opinion that ALL facets Constitutionally separated government powers (Executive, Legislative and Judiciary) have become infected with corruption for any sort of balanced protection for WE THE PEOPLE to manifest as our Founding Fathers intended with the U.S. Constitution.
That is the-WHY and the-HOW myths and the lies propagandized as facts and truth by a lying government has become so accepted by a gullible populace that probably STILL has zero idea how they are being manipulates like SHEEP.
I have truthful cross posts that will appear below on the facts derided as Myths and Conspiracy Theories when it is proven everyday even by the Left the truth was covered up from NewsTarget and the Activist Post:
AND SERIOUSLY, Jeffrey Epstein did notkill himself BUT the China Virus (er…I mean COVID) DID COME FROM WUHAN CHINESE LAB. The speculation for why many on the Left are admitting the LAB-LEAK below the first two cross posts. HINT: Might have something to do with Ukraine and the nothing to see here demand.
Thank you to those who have stepped up!
READER SUPPORTED! I need Readers willing to chip in $5 – $10 – $25 – $50 – $100. PLEASE I need your PayPal generosity. PLEASE GIVE to Help me be a voice for Liberty:
Misinformation about the Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) continues to run rampant as government officials and public health “experts” refuse to admit they were wrong about pretty much everything.
Almost nothing people were ordered to do, from testing to masking to “vaccinating,” produced positive outcomes because all of it was based on covid myths that have since been debunked. Here are the top 10 most prominent covid myths that are still spreading as “facts:”
1) Natural immunity offers little protection compared to “vaccine immunity”
A study published in The Lancet that looked at 65 major studies from 19 different countries shows that natural immunity, meaning unvaccinated immunity, is at least as effective as the fake “immunity” produced by the primary round of covid shots.
Facebook banned the study, naturally, but it shows that the best way to stay protected against covid is to rely on your own God-given immune system rather than Big Pharma’s experimental chemical offerings.
2) Masks prevent covid transmission
This myth led to tens of millions of people being forced into face muzzles that suffocated them, and in some cases led to the spread of more disease. Esteemed Oxford researchers recently confirmed that masks are medically useless, often causing more harm than good.
3) Closing schools reduces covid transmission
The only thing keeping children at home did during covid was isolate them from their friends and teachers, leading to mental illness and other health problems, and compromised their education.
4) Myocarditis caused by the jabs is exceedingly rare
It turns out that covid jabs are a much more prominent cause of myocarditis than infection with “covid,” a virus that has never been isolated, by the way.
5) Young people can benefit from getting covid “boosted”
Even worse than the primary round of covid injections are the “boosters” that the Biden regime and others have been aggressively pushing. There is zero evidence that getting boosted does anything other than produce vaccine-induced AIDS (VAIDS), research shows.
The entire covid scamdemic was based on myths and deception
Another common covid myth, orNo. 6, is the idea that forcing people to get “vaccinated” helped to increase vaccination rates, and thus reduce the number of infections, illnesses, and deaths.
“The mandate was based on the theory that vaccination reduced transmission rates – a notion later proven to be false,” reported the New York Post.
7) It is a conspiracy theory to suggest that covid came from a Wuhan lab
There is still zero evidence to suggest that covid was a natural occurrence, but this has not stopped the powers that be from claiming that anyone citing the lab origin theory is spreading conspiracy lies.
8) People must get the second jab dose three or four weeks after the first one
Early on, everyone was told that the two-dose injection regimen must be taken no more than one month apart. This is despite the fact that data suggests a longer in-between spacing period of at least three months.
9) The “bivalent booster” is backed by “crystal clear” science
The only data backing the so-called “bivalent booster” shot for the latest covid variants is a pathetic animal study involving just eight mice. To this day, there has not been a single randomized controlled trial of the bivalent booster to suggest that it is anything other than snake oil for the gullible.
10) One in five people contract “long” covid
We were told by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) that 20 percent of covid infections will lead to long covid. Because of this, the federal agency wants everyone to get injected again and again and again.
The truth is that only three percent of covid patients, according to a U.K. study, suffer covid symptoms lasting longer than 12 weeks.
Preppers get called conspiracy theorists a lot. It’s supposed to be demeaning, but considering how many conspiracy theories have been proven correct lately, I no longer consider it an insult. The more time goes by, the more “conspiracy theorists” just seem ahead of the game.
Quite a few “conspiracy theories” have recently come to light as actual facts in 2023 already. And it’s only the beginning of March.
Let’s look at a recent batch of “conspiracy theories” that aren’t really theories any more.
This is particularly problematic for anyone with fairly new models. Newer appliances are made to break down within about ten years. Anyone who’s been a homeowner for more than a decade knows this. If appliances are made to only last ten years or so, the government doesn’t need to conduct some dramatic midnight raid to steal your stove. All they have to do is wait. Within ten years, most people will have to replace their stoves anyway, and at that point, very few, if any, gas stoves will still be on the market.
Nope, it’s not just a theory. They really do want to get rid of gas stoves.
And in other Department of Energy news, the agency recently came to the conclusion that Covid probably did come from a lab. The findings were part of a classified report, which the government agency shared with theWall Street Journal last weekend.
Back in 2021, the FBI had been the only federal agency to state with “moderate confidence” that Covid came from a lab. At the time, their finding mostly went ignored. However, with another agency admitting it, and WSJ covering the story, it becomes more difficult to brush aside.
The Covid lab leak theory is slowly but surely looking less like a theory, and more like an established fact.
The Covid vaccine?
This is hardly the only situation in which Covid dissidents have been proven correct. There has been a small contingent of people from the beginning who were reluctant to participate in the trial of a novel medical product. Considering the many criminal payoutsBig Pharma has had to make over the years, wanting long-term studies before trying a novel pharmaceutical product shouldn’t be controversial.
The cost (injecting a poorly-tested novel substance) did not match up with the benefit (avoiding a not-particularly dangerous disease that many of us had a natural immunity to anyway). Plenty of well-informed people had perfectly rational reasons for vaccine hesitancy.
Were our concerns taken seriously? No. The Othering was vicious and relentless. Daisy wrote an article about it here. Family relationships were stressed and sometimes broken. Careers were ended. Opportunities were denied. Reputations were ruined.
And meanwhile, the “safe and effective” drumbeat resounded. Anyone who wanted real answers about what was happening, who wanted to wait for long-term studies, was dismissed as a conspiracy theorist.
So, who was right? Were the shots safe and effective? Or were the conspiracy theorists the reasonable ones?
I’m not a doctor or statistician. All I can do is point at actual numbers. And even the most pro-vax publications cannot hide the non-Covid excess mortality of the past two years. Young, formerly healthy people have been dying at far higher rates than they used to, and it’s not from Covid. As of right now, no one can prove that jabs are responsible, because no one wants to look that closely. But we can’t prove they’re not responsible, either. Safe? I’m not convinced, and neither are a lot of vastly more qualified people. Just look at Ed Dowd’s meticulously researched book, Cause Unknown.
And even Tony “The Science” Fauci recently admitted that the shots don’t really work at preventing transmission or infection. So, nope, these jabs aren’t effective either.
Were the conspiracy theorists right to be cautious about the new shots? Yeah, I think so.
And what about the masks? We got mixed signals about masks from the beginning. In March 2020, Dr. Fauci said they didn’t work, then he later changed his tune. Many people around the country had to deal with mask mandates for over a year.
Well, the experts at the Cochrane Library recently published a huge meta-analysis of the effectiveness of physical barriers (like masks) at preventing respiratory viruses (like Covid). They can’t find any strong links between masking and disease prevention. Cochrane studies are the gold standard. They’re very conservative, they rarely make hard and fast statements, but once they do, people typically stop arguing.
The mask debate is one that really smacks us at the OP because, back in 2021, NewsGuard cited our questioning of the mask narrative as a reason to downgrade us, which really hurt our income stream. Daisy goes into the whole story here. She cited studies with a variety of outcomes regarding masks, and NewsGuard saw the variety of viewpoints as reason enough to downgrade us.
The journalism majors working at NewsGuard don’t seem to understand that letting multiple educated people argue is more true to the scientific ideal than top-down authoritarian mandates.
I’m not the only person saying this. Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, a Stanford professor and MD, said as much in arecent interview with Jordan Peterson. At 5:26, he talks about public perception during the pandemic:
There was this sort of uni-vocal conclusion that you had to do lockdowns, you had to wear masks, you had to socially distance, you had to put plastic barriers up, you had to close schools, you had to do all of these things; that the vaccines would stop transmission of the disease, that therefore it was warranted that people would lose their jobs over them. All of these ideas were sold as if there was a scientific consensus in favor of them. That was a lie. There was never a scientific consensus on almost any of the topics; and as you say on masks, in fact, the preexisting narrative, the preexisting idea of most scientists before the pandemic, was in quite the opposite direction.
Dr. Bhattacharya’s not the only highly qualified doctor speaking out, either. In fact, so many of the various Covid narratives have been proven wrong, that Dr. Marty Makary, chief of Islet Transplant Surgery at Johns Hopkins medical school, recently published an article February 27 titled “10 myths told by covid experts—and now debunked.”
“Masks prevent transmission” is #2 on the list. I guess if NewsGuard still thinks Daisy is a conspiracy theorist over this one, she’s got some pretty kick-ass company.
But in all seriousness, thank God (or whoever you pray to) for doctors like Dr. Bhattacharya and Dr. Makary for not treating the public like we’re mentally impaired rodents. There are still a few true medical experts out there who genuinely want to educate the public, and give us real answers.
The air and water in East Palestine?
In the meantime, I wonder if the EPA will find any real experts. That agency keeps insisting that the air and water in East Palestine are perfectly safe, despite the derailment and subsequent disaster going on a few weeks ago.
The EPA says they’ve been testing for everything and that the numbers indicate everything looks good; professional chemists aren’t so sure. “They should be testing for individual compounds, and if they are testing for total VOCs [volatile organic compounds] as a screen, they need to have very sensitive instruments because some VOCs are much more toxic than others,” says Ted Schettler, MD, and science director at the nonprofit Science and Environmental Health network. The fact that East Palestine residents are still smelling off-odors suggests that the EPA is not using sensitive enough equipment. [Blog Editor: That was a compassionate guess by author Marie Hawthorne, I think a better suggestion is government lying and coverup.]
And the EPA hasn’t started testing for the myriad other substances that formed when the known chemicals in the train were burned. When you mix chemicals together and burn them, new chemicals form, and this hasn’t even been talked about much yet.
It’s probably going to be a long time before we have a good picture of the damage caused by this derailment. But, what do we know?
We know that the people of East Palestine are still suffering from bizarre symptoms. Rashes, shortness of breath, and a burning sensation while breathing are common. Some people have had voice changes, loss of taste and smell, and random infections. Because East Palestine is such a low-income area, doctors can’t do the tests they need to, though they all agree that the citizens are in real pain.
And yet EPA Administrator Michael Regan states, “Nothing is coming back that shows adverse health impacts.” [YUP, Govt Lying!]
Government officials are not helping themselves by insisting there’s “nothing to see here!” Distrusting the federal government has traditionally been in the realm of conspiracy theorists, but once again, which group of people seems more reasonable?
The Twitter Files?
I’ve spent a lot of time wondering if I’m too cynical, too eager to see ill intent.
Then came the Twitter Files.
We’ve written about them before on this site. When Elon Musk bought Twitter, he handed over internal documents to independent journalists Bari Weiss, Matt Taibbi, Michael Shellenberger, and Lee Feng to peruse.
Many figures in alternative media had suspected they were being shadow-banned, or having a hard time reaching followers. The Twitter Files confirmed everyone’s worst suspicions: the federal government does spend millions of dollars policing online content, and much of it targets law-abiding citizens with inconvenient opinions, rather than real criminals. Many of the people that had their accounts locked or frozen weren’t even big media presences, just people with a few dozen followers with an annoying sense of humor, or who got snarky about the wrong things.
Five years ago, anyone convinced the Feds were watching their every online move would have been labeled a crazy conspiracy theorist.
Well, yet again, the conspiracy theorists have been proven correct.
The gaslighting continues.
If you’ve ever been in an abusive relationship, you probably know what it’s like to have someone trying to convince you you’re crazy. The only way to survive gaslighting like that is to constantly remind yourself of things you know are true. That’s why it’s so important to keep track of whatever narratives we’re supposed to swallow and constantly check them against our preexisting knowledge base. It’s important to hold purveyors of false narratives to account; it’s important to point to tangible facts and to be able to discuss them.
I think we’re going to keep seeing more of this for a while. Universal Basic Income, digital currencies, AI tech, there are so many new things happening right now.
What about you? How have you been proven correct? Are there any “theories” you’re just waiting to see evidence of on the mainstream? What theories have you seen mocked, then proven true? Let’s talk about it in the comments.
Marie Hawthorne is a lover of novels and a cultivator of superb apple pie recipes, Marie spends her free time writing about the world around her.
ACTIVIST POST – ALTERNATIVE INDEPENDENT NEWS – CREATIVE COMMONS 2019
[Blog Editor: An INFOWARS post begins with a video of Owen Shroyer on The Alex Jones Show going over Leftist hypocrites poohing-poohing the Wuhan Lab Leak but now three years later the same Leftists are saying, “YUP! Wuhan Lab Leak!” The speculation is because the CCP is aligning with Putin’s Russia to battle the Globalist West (viz., USA and NATO Nations). The INFOWARS post then goes over a history of how Gain of Function (GoF) research went from a USA university to Wuhan and probably Ukraine bio-war labs in Ukraine. BELOW I am just embedding the link to the INFOWARS title for you to read, THEN I am cross posting three Bitchute versions of BANNED.VIDEO focusing Wuhan Lab Leak, the CCP and Ukraine. If a WWIII erupts this geopolitical idiocy will be the reason AND ALL the geopolitical players (USA, NATO, Russia, Ukraine, Communist China and any delusional alliances) will be the bad guys and the people of the world will be the gullible losers.]
Owen Shroyer breaks down clips of top leftist propagandists Jimmy Kimmel and the cast of The View having trouble co9ming to terms with the fact that they were wrong about dismissing the Wuhan COVID lab leak.
In the probable case YOUR life is about making a living and taking care of your family needs and the politics of Liberty is the furthest thing from your mind, IT MIGHT BE TIME TO PAY ATTENTION!
There is a Global Tyranny. AND that tyranny wants to control how you live, think, believe, and how you spend your money.
TODAY I am looking at how Globalists plan to utilize the World Health Organization (WHO) which is basically a fearmongering organization intent on performing the agenda of Global Elitists to control your life rather protect than protect the life of human individuals.
Some of you might be aware of the WHO’s attempt to impose a sovereignty-destroying Pandemic Treaty upon the nations of the world, BUT you probably are not aware that the WHO is working on International Health Regulations (IHR) separate but equal in tyrannical design from the Pandemic Treaty to impose international hegemony upon individuals living in independent sovereign nations.
The Exposé uses James Roguski details from his Substack Page – which is lengthy and substantive – to highlight same tyranny on this two-sided Globalist coin. Since Roguski’s is so full of substance, I won’t be cross posting it. I will be cross posting The Exposé, yet it is not a short read either. You would be wise to spend some time reading both. AT THE VERY LEAST, you can comprehend the reason to RESIST TYRANNY by non-compliance even if that non-compliance might mean legal issues.
The tyrants always wrap despotism in the illusion of law to end Liberty. Probably in the near future, even the most non-political citizen will have to weigh compliant Sheepledom to non-compliance in any form of action willing to use to RESIST TYRANNY ending individual freedom.
Last week the Working Group for the Amendments to the International Health Regulations met in Geneva. The imposition of authoritarian rules on a global scale would normally attract attention but there has been a near-complete absence of interest from corporate media perhaps giving the impression that concerns surrounding these amendments is yet another “conspiracy theory” from a disaffected fringe.
But, as Dr. David Bell explains, the World Health Organisation (“WHO”) is fairly transparent in its machinations. It should therefore be straightforward to determine whether this is a “conspiracy theory” or an attempt to implement an existential change in sovereign rights and international relations. We only need to read the draft amendments to the International Health Regulations (“IHR”).
After reading the document it becomes obvious that the proposed new powers sought by WHO, and the pandemic preparedness industry being built around it, are not hidden. The only subterfuge is the farcical approach of media and politicians in many nations who seem to pretend that the proposals do not exist.
There are Two Separate Tracks
James Roguski published an article yesterday to clarify that there are “two tracks” the World Health Organisation are implementing: amendments to the IHRs and the Pandemic Treaty. “I would like to suggest that everyone stop focusing on the proposed ‘Pandemic Treaty’ and pay closer attention to the proposed amendments to the International Health Regulations,” he wrote.
The covid-sceptic world has been claiming that the World Health Organisation (“WHO”) plans to become some sort of global autocratic government, removing national sovereignty and replacing it with a totalitarian health state. The near-complete absence of interest from mainstream media would suggest, to the rational observer, that this is yet another ‘conspiracy theory’ from a disaffected fringe.
The imposition of authoritarian rules on a global scale would normally attract attention, and WHO is fairly transparent in its machinations. It should therefore be straightforward to determine whether this is all misplaced hysteria, or an attempt to implement an existential change in sovereign rights and international relations. We would just need to read the document. Firstly, it is useful to put the amendments in context.
The changing role of WHO
WHO was set up after the Second World War as the health arm of the United Nations, to support efforts to improve population health globally. Based on the concept that health went beyond the physical and encompassed “physical, mental and social well-being”, its constitution was premised on the concept that all people were equal and born with basic inviolable rights. The world in 1946 was emerging from the brutality of colonialism and international fascism, the results of overly centralised authority and of regarding people to be fundamentally unequal. The WHO constitution was intended to put populations in charge of their health.
In recent decades, WHO’s core funding model has changed. Originally, its support base of core funding was allocated by countries based on GDP, but this has evolved into a model where most funding is directed to specified uses, and much is provided by private and corporate interests. [Blog Editor Bold Text Emphasis] The priorities of WHO have evolved accordingly, moving away from community-centred care to a more vertical, commodity-based approach. This inevitably follows the interests and self-interests of these funders. Understanding these changes is important in order to put the proposed amendments to the existing International Health Regulations (“IHR”) in context. More detail on this evolution can be found elsewhere.
Of equal importance, WHO is not alone in the international health sphere. While certain organisations such as Unicef (originally intended to prioritise child health and welfare), private foundations, and non-governmental organisations have long partnered with WHO, the past two decades have seen a burgeoning of the global health industry, with multiple organisations, particularly ‘public-private partnerships’ (“PPPs”) growing in influence. In some respects, these organisations are rivals, and in some respects they are partners of WHO.
Notable among PPPs are Gavi – the Vaccine Alliance (focused specifically on vaccines), and CEPI, an organisation set up at the World Economic Forum meeting in 2017 by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Wellcome Trust and the Norwegian Government specifically to manage pandemics. Gavi and CEPI, along with others such as Unitaid and the Global Fund, include representatives of corporate and private interests directly on their boards. The World Bank and G20 have also increased their involvement in global health, and especially pandemic preparedness. Even though WHO has stated that pandemics occurred just once per generation over the past century and killed a fraction of those who died from endemic infectious diseases, they have nonetheless attracted much of this corporate and financial interest.
WHO is primarily a bureaucracy, not a body of experts. Recruitment is based on various factors, including technical competency, but also country and other equity-related quotas. These quotas serve a purpose of reducing the power of specific countries to dominate the organisation with their own staff, but in doing so they require the recruitment of staff who may have far less experience or expertise. Recruitment is also heavily influenced by internal WHO personnel, and the usual personal influences that come with working and needing favours within countries.
Once recruited, the payment structure strongly favours those who stay for long periods, militating against rotation to new expertise as roles change. A WHO staffer must work 15 years to receive their full pension, with earlier resignation resulting in removal of all or part of WHO’s contribution to their pension. Coupled with large rental subsidies, health insurance, generous education subsidies, cost of living adjustments, and tax-free salaries, this creates a structure within which protecting the institution (and thus one’s benefits) can far outlive the staffer’s initial altruistic intent.
The Director-General (“DG”) and Regional Directors (“RDs”), of which there are six, are elected by member states in a process subject to heavy political and diplomatic manoeuvring. The current DG is TedrosAdhanom Ghebreyesus, an Ethiopian politician with a chequered past during the Ethiopian civil war. The amendments proposed would allow Tedros to independently make all the decisions required within the IHR, consulting a committee at will but not being bound by it. Indeed, he can do this now, having declared monkeypox a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC), after just five deaths globally, against the advice of his emergency committee.
Like many WHO employees, I personally witnessed and am aware of examples of seeming corruption within the organisation, from RD elections, to building renovations and importation of goods. Such practices can occur within any large organisation that has lived a generation or two beyond its founding. This, of course, is why the principle of the separation of powers commonly exists in national governance: those making rules must answer to an independent judiciary according to a system of laws to which all are subject. As this cannot apply to UN agencies, they should automatically be excluded from direct rulemaking over populations. WHO, like other UN bodies, is essentially a law unto itself.
WHO’s new pandemic preparedness and health emergency instruments
WHO is currently working on two agreements that will expand its powers and role in declared health emergencies and pandemics. These also involve widening the definition of “health emergencies” within which such powers may be used. The first agreement involves proposed amendments to the existing IHR, an instrument with force under international law that has been in existence in some form for decades, and was significantly amended in 2005 after the 2003 SARS outbreak. The second is a new “treaty” that has similar intent to the IHR amendments. Both are following a path through WHO committees, public hearings and revision meetings, to be put to the World Health Assembly (“WHA”) – the annual meeting of all country members or “States Parties” of WHO – probably in 2023 and 2024 respectively.
The discussion here concentrates on the IHR amendments, as they are the most advanced. Being amendments to an existing treaty mechanism, they only require approval of 50% of countries to come into force (subject to ratification processes specific to each member State). The new “treaty” will require a two-thirds vote of the WHA to be accepted. The WHA’s “one country, one vote” system gives countries like Niue, with fewer than two thousand residents, equal voice to countries with hundreds of millions (e.g., India, China and the USA), though diplomatic pressure tends to corral countries around their beneficiaries.
The IHR amendment process within WHO is relatively transparent. There is no conspiracy to be seen. The amendments are ostensibly proposed by national bureaucracies and collated on the WHO website. WHO has gone to unusual lengths to open hearings to public submissions. The intent of the IHR amendments – which is to change the nature of the relationship between countries and WHO (i.e., a supra-national body ostensibly controlled by them), and fundamentally change the relationship between people and this centralised, supra-national authority – is open for all to see.
Proposed major amendments to the IHR
The amendments to the IHR are intended to fundamentally change the relationship between individuals, their countries’ governments, and WHO. They place WHO as having rights that override the rights of individuals, erasing the basic principles developed after World War Two regarding human rights and the sovereignty of States. In doing so, they signal a return to a colonialist and feudalist approach that is fundamentally different to that to which people in relatively democratic countries have become accustomed. [Blog Editor Bold Text Emphasis] The lack of major push-back by politicians, the lack of concern in the media, and the consequent ignorance of the general public, are therefore both strange and alarming.
Aspects of the amendments involving the largest changes to the workings of society and international relations are discussed below. Following this are annotated extracts from the WHO document. Provided on the WHO website, this document is currently under revision to address obvious grammatical errors and improve clarity.
Resetting international human rights to a former, authoritarian model
The Universal Declaration of Human Rights was agreed upon by the UN in 1948, in the aftermath of World War Two and in the context of much of the world emerging from the colonialist yoke. It is predicated on the concept that all humans are born with equal and inalienable rights, conferred by the simple fact of their birth. The Declaration was intended to codify these rights to prevent a return to inequality and totalitarian rule. The equality of all individuals is expressed in Article 7:
All are equal before the law and are entitled without any discrimination to equal protection of the law. All are entitled to equal protection against any discrimination in violation of this Declaration and against any incitement to such discrimination.
This understanding underpins the WHO constitution, and forms a basis for the modern international human rights movement and international human rights law.
The concept of States being representative of their people, and having sovereignty over territory and the laws by which their people were governed, was closely allied with this. As peoples emerged from colonialism, they would assert their authority as independent entities within boundaries that they would control. International agreements, including the existing IHR, reflected this. WHO and other international agencies would play a supportive role and give advice, not instructions.
The proposed IHR amendments reverse these understandings. WHO proposes that the term “with full respect for the dignity, human rights and fundamental freedoms of persons” be deleted from the text and replaced with the vague terms: “equity, coherence, inclusivity.” The applications of these terms are then specifically differentiated in the text according to levels of social and economic development. The underlying equality of individuals is removed, and rights become subject to a status determined by others and based on a set of criteria that they define. This entirely upends the prior understanding of the relationship of all individuals to authority, at least in non-totalitarian states.
This is a totalitarian approach to society, within which individuals may act only on the sufferance of others who wield power outside of legal sanction; specifically, it is a feudal relationship, or one of monarch-subjects without an intervening constitution. It is difficult to imagine a greater issue facing society, yet the same media calling for reparations for past slavery are silent on a proposed international agreement that is consistent with its reimposition.
Giving WHO authority over member States
This authority is seen as being above States (i.e., elected or other national governments), with the specific definition of “recommendations” being changed from “non-binding” (by deletion) to “binding,” in a specific statement that States will undertake to follow (rather than “consider”) the recommendations of WHO. States will accept WHO as “the authority” in international public health emergencies, elevating it above their own ministries of health. Much hinges on what a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (“PHEIC”) is, and who defines it. As explained below, these amendments will widen the PHEIC definition to include any health event that a particular individual in Geneva (the DG of WHO) personally deems to be of actual or potential concern.
Powers to be ceded by national governments to the DG include quite specific examples that may require changes within national legal systems. These include detention of individuals, restriction of travel, the forcing of health interventions (e.g., testing, inoculation), and the requirement to undergo medical examinations. [Blog Editor Bold Text Emphasis]
Unsurprising to observers of the covid-19 response, the proposed restrictions on individual rights, which are at the DG’s discretion, include freedom of speech. WHO will have power to designate opinions or information as “misinformation” or “disinformation,” and require country governments to intervene and stop such expression and dissemination. [Blog Editor Bold Text Emphasis] This will likely clash with some national constitutions (e.g., the USA) but will be a boon to many dictators and one-party regimes. It is, of course, incompatible with the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, but these seem no longer to be guiding principles for WHO.
After self-declaring an emergency, the DG will have power to instruct governments to provide WHO and other countries with resources, including funds and commodities. This will include direct intervention in manufacturing to increase production of certain commodities produced within their borders.
Countries will cede power over patent law and intellectual property (“IP”) to WHO, including control of manufacturing knowhow, of those commodities that the DG considers to be relevant to the potential or actual health problem he/she deems to be of interest. This IP and manufacturing know-how may be then passed on to commercial rivals at the DG’s discretion. [Blog Editor Bold Text Emphasis] These provisions seem to reflect a degree of stupidity and, unlike the basic removal of fundamental human rights, vested interests may well insist on the removal of these amendments from the IHR draft. Rights of people should of course be paramount, but with most media absent from the discussion, it is likely that less effort will be applied to reversing provisions that impact human rights, compared to those that threaten commercial interests.
Providing the WHO DG with unfettered power, and ensuring it will be used
WHO has previously developed processes that ensure at least a semblance of consensus, and evidence-based decision-making. Their process for developing guidelines requires, at least on paper, a range of expertise to be sought and documented, and a range of evidence to be weighed for reliability. The 2019 guidelines on management of pandemic influenza are an example, laying out recommendations for countries in the event of such a respiratory virus outbreak. Weighing this evidence resulted in WHO strongly recommending against contact tracing, quarantining of healthy people, and border closures. The evidence had shown that these were expected to cause more overall harm to health in the long term than any benefit gained from slowing the spread of a virus. These guidelines were ignored when an emergency was declared for covid-19 and authority was switched to an individual, the DG of WHO.
The IHR amendments further strengthen the ability of the DG to ignore any such evidence-based procedures. Working on several levels, they provide the DG, and those delegated by him/her, with exceptional and arbitrary power, and put in place measures that make the wielding of such power inevitable. [Blog Editor Bold Text Emphasis]
Firstly, the requirement for an actual health emergency, in which people are experiencing measurable harm or risk of harm, is removed. The wording of the amendments specifically removes the requirement of harm to trigger the DG assuming power over countries and people. [Blog Editor Bold Text Emphasis] The need for a demonstrable “public health risk” is removed, and replaced with a “potential” for public health risk.
Secondly, as discussed also in the pandemic preparedness documents of the G20 and World Bank, under these amendments a surveillance mechanism will be set up in every country and within WHO. It will identify new variants of viruses, which constantly arise in nature. All of these, in theory, could be presumed to pose a potential risk of outbreak until proven not to. The global workforce running this surveillance network, which will be considerable, will have no reason for existence except to identify yet more viruses and variants. Much of their funding will originate from private and corporate interests that stand to gain financially from the vaccine-based responses they envision to infectious disease outbreaks. [Blog Editor: Think – Pfizer purposefully mutating viruses (Gain of Function er-I-mean “Directed Evolution”) for profit. James O’Keefe probably fired by Pfizer request for that exposé.]
Thirdly, the DG has sole authority to declare any event related or potentially related to health an “emergency.” The six WHO RDs will also have this power at a Regional level. As seen with the monkeypox outbreak, the DG can already ignore the committee set up to advise on emergencies. The proposed amendments will remove the need for the DG to gain consent from the country in which a potential or perceived threat is identified. In a declared emergency, the DG can vary the Framework of Engagement with Non-State Actors (“FENSA”) rules on dealing with private (e.g., for-profit) entities, allowing him/her to share a State’s information not only with other States but also with private companies.
The surveillance mechanisms being required of countries and expanded within WHO will ensure that the DG and RDs will have a constant stream of potential public health risks crossing their desks. In each case, they will have power to declare such events a health emergency of international or regional concern. This will enable them to issue orders, supposedly binding under international law, to restrict movement, detain, inject on a mass scale, yield IP and know-how, and provide resources to WHO and to other countries that the DG deems may require them. Even a DG uninterested in wielding such power will face the reality that they put themselves at risk of being the one who did not try to “stop” the next pandemic, while being pressured by corporate interests with hundreds of billions of dollars at stake, and huge media sway. This is why sane societies never create such situations.
What happens next?
If these amendments are accepted, the people taking control over the lives of others will have no real legal oversight as they have diplomatic immunity from all national jurisdictions. The salaries of many will be dependent on sponsorship from private individuals and corporations with direct financial interests in the decisions they will make. These decisions by an essentially unaccountable official will create mass markets for commodities, or provide know-how to commercial rivals. [Blog Editor Bold Text Emphasis] The covid-19 response illustrated the corporate profits that such decisions will enable. This situation is obviously unacceptable in any democratic society.
While the WHA has overall oversight of WHO policy, with an executive board comprising WHA members, these operate in an orchestrated way. Many delegates have little depth of understanding of the proceedings, whilst bureaucrats draft and negotiate policy. Countries not sharing the values enshrined in the constitutions of more democratic nations have equal votes on policy. Whilst it is correct that sovereign States have equal rights, the human rights and freedoms of one nation’s citizens cannot be ceded to the governments of others, nor to a non-State entity placing itself above them.
Many nations have developed checks and balances over centuries, based on an understanding of fundamental values. These have been designed specifically to avoid the sort of situation we now see arising where one group, which is law unto itself, can arbitrarily remove and control the freedom of others. Free media developed as a further safeguard, based on principles of freedom of expression and an equal right to be heard. Just as these values are necessary for democracy and equality, their removal is necessary in order to introduce totalitarianism and a structure based on inequality. The proposed amendments to the IHR are designed explicitly to do this. [Blog Editor Bold Text Emphasis]
The proposed new powers sought by WHO, and the pandemic preparedness industry being built around it, are not hidden. The only subterfuge is the farcical approach of media and politicians in many nations who seem to pretend that the proposals do not exist or, if they do, will not fundamentally change the nature of the relationship between people and centralised non-State powers. The people who will become subject to these powers, and the politicians who are on track to cede them, should start paying attention. We must all decide whether we wish to cede so easily that which has taken centuries to achieve, to assuage the greed of others.
You can find a copy of the proposed amendments as well as a summary of significant clauses in the IHR amendments as prepared by Dr. Bell at the bottom of the original article published by PANDA HERE.
About the Author
Dr. David Bell[The link is a list of Panda experts that includes Dr. Bell] is a clinical and public health physician with a PhD in population health and background in internal medicine, modelling and epidemiology of infectious disease. Previously, he was Director of the Global Health Technologies at Intellectual Ventures Global Good Fund in the USA, Programme Head for Malaria and Acute Febrile Disease at FIND in Geneva, and coordinating malaria diagnostics strategy with the World Health Organisation.
Today I’ve decided to share a series if videos that focus on Technocracy Tyranny and Artificial Intelligence (AI) Tyranny. Those videos are from the Next News Network and Bannon’s War Room both Bitchute versions. (I’m using a Bitchute version of Banned.Video above as a bit of an intro – forgive me their ad and understand everyone has bills to pay.)
I guess it sounds too way out there for people to embrace that Technocracy and the imposition of Artificial Intelligence is a clear and present danger to lives individually and to the concept of American Liberty in general. A post I presented on 2/19 had a disappointing amount if read-hits which as of this typing is still a little less than a hundred: “Paul Revere Might Warn, ‘The Terminator-AI is Coming!’” I might be a lone wolf crying in the wilderness, but I found the information that post threatening. The videos I am sharing are along the lines of that post:
As we navigate our way through the uncertainty of this era, one person has come to lead the charge for full government control. Klaus Schwab, founder and executive chairman of the World Economic Forum, is advocating for a “Great Reset,” and his latest suggestion for governments to control their people is downright bone chilling to think about.
As you might have noticed, some of these videos had their version of pay-the-bills or sponsored ads. I TOO – as you do also – have to pay the bills.
My wife Diana and I have joined a store which when products are purchased we get a cut. Actually Diana is the business operator, I’m along for the ride. BELOW is the store’s latest project launch aimed at the gals health. I wrote a little male’s view on the product. After that video, I’m including a business video that should be informative for those who to join the store. I’m including Diana’s contact and referral code info in case you want to manage your Online Store.
This video highlighting Modere’s latest product line is all over Youtube. I borrowed from a user (who in turn borrowed the video) that that effectively highlights the PRODUCT BENEFITS of Modere’s Project 23 Menstrual Formula.
I’ll be honest. I’m a 66 year old senior citizen male. So you might ask, “What are you thinking hawking a woman’s menstrual cycle product?”
Well, let me tell ya.
My wife and I came together as a Brady-Bunch family in 1990. Between us we have 3 boys and two girls (ALL adults now). Imagine us males in the family enduring the PMS cycle of wife/mom and two daughters/sisters. At times it was brutal. You’d think these gals would at least PMS at the same time…BUT NO. The long ago memory seems to dredge up PMS overlap – OUCH for males trying to be understanding.
Project 23 Menstrual Formula (official name will be revealed at product unveiling in March 2023) is designed to help menstruating women sync their cycle without hormones. Product insiders who got to start using this Formula already are reporting that it lives up to its claims. This “first in the world” category of intuitive nutrition allows women to take ownership of their health and be part of this next evolution in women’s’ health.