WEF – Will the Masses be HAPPY?


John R. Houk, Blog Editor

© January 18, 2023

World Economic Forum (WEF) NWO One World Government Marxist-Fascist-Corporatist Elitists are having their 53rd Davos meeting (1/16 to 1/20/23) to make plans for global tyranny for the world’s masses who will be programmed to be happy with their restricted lives, restricted thoughts and no freedoms.

Since most people who still pay attention to news information still receive said news from MSM propaganda machines, I am guessing way too many people have zero idea of the controlled-lives-plan coming their way thanks largely to the tentacles of the WEF.

BELOW are a series of videos and articles more in order of my interest than date posted. Will the masses be happy?

I begin with a Newsmax snapshot:

The event, which begins Monday and goes to Friday, sports a high-profile guest list of names, including FBI Director Christopher Wray; CEOs of BlackRock, Amazon, and Pfizer; officials from the Gates Foundation and Soros network; and the heads of The New York Times and NBC.

The summit is also scheduled to hold a virtual appearance from Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, who reportedly will discuss a postwar loan with BlackRock’s Larry Fink. (World Economic Forum: ‘The Most Consequential Davos in 24 Years’; By Nick Koutsobinas; Newsmax; 1/15/23 09:59 PM EST)

For context on the evil that is the WEF, take the time to read:

THE CROSS POSTS:

JRH 1/18/23

Thank you to those who have stepped up!

READER SUPPORTED! I need Readers willing to chip in $5 – $10 – $25 – $50 – $100. PLEASE I need your generosity. PLEASE GIVE to Help me be a voice for Liberty:

Please Support CPCR

YOU CAN ALSO SUPPORT via buying healthy supplements/products from Online stores (mine & my Honey):

My Store (please use referral code 2388058): https://modere.co/3SrOHzI

My Better Half’s Store (please use referral code 3917004): https://dianahouk.shiftingretail.com/  

Big Tech Censorship is pervasive – Share voluminously on all social media platforms!

*************************

Bitchute VIDEO: YUVAL NOAH HARRARI [sic]: BIOMETRIC SURVEILLANCE

Posted by In4mation

First Published January 17th, 2023 00:55 UTC

++++++++++++++++++++

Elon Musk Mocks WEF as Global Elite Gather in Davos

World Economic Forum (WEF) founder Klaus Schwab delivers a speech during the “Crystal Award” ceremony at the WEF annual meeting in Davos, on Jan. 16, 2023. (Fabrice Coffrini/AFP via Getty Images)

By Liam Cosgrove

January 16, 2023 Updated: January 17, 2023

The Epoch Times

Tesla CEO Elon Musk took to his newly acquired social media platform over the weekend to make a series of quips aimed at the global organization, the World Economic Forum (WEF).

The WEF’s annual meeting in Davos, Switzerland—which features a host of international leaders, central bankers, Wall Street executives, and celebrities—began on Monday and will continue throughout the week.

“I guess there’s value to having a mixed government & commercial forum of some kind. WEF does kinda give me the willies though, but I’m sure everything is fine…” Musk said via Twitter on Sunday evening, responding to a Substack article co-written by independent journalists Michael Shellenberger and Izabella Kaminska.

The WEF has been the subject of considerable scorn and criticism for its 2016 ad campaign, which stated, “Welcome to 2030. I own nothing, have no privacy, and life has never been better.”

Many took issue with the organization’s attempt to frame a lack of personal ownership and privacy as a positive.

Initially accompanied by a promotional video and several articles, much of the campaign’s content has since been removed from the web. A tweet by the WEF remains up, however.

In their article, Shellenberger and Kaminska called out WEF Managing Director Adrian Monck, who blamed the uproar surrounding the ad on the right-wing message board 4chan.

Monck penned an opinion piece in the Canadian outlet The Globe and Mail last August, calling the backlash a “misinformation campaign that targeted the World Economic Forum.”

“The story of ‘you’ll own nothing and be happy’ is anything but trivial and offers valuable insights into how misinformation is created and why it’s essential not to perpetuate its spread,” Monck wrote, adding that many criticisms were racist and anti-semitic.

Shellenberger and Kamiska, linking to the now-deleted WEF content, refuted Monck’s claims. “What Monck claimed was inaccurate. The phrase ‘Own nothing, be happy,’ hadn’t originated on 4chan; it originated on WEF’s website,” they wrote.

Musk continued to crack jokes about the organization. “There should be a game show: “4Chan or Davos, who said it?” he said via Twitter on Monday afternoon.

Allegiance to ESG

The authors also highlighted the organizations’ lack of transparency and declared commitment to the environmental, social, and governance (ESG) agenda. The WEF is outspoken in its allegiance to the ESG movement.

“Recent events have only increased the business world’s focus on ESG,” reads a statement from the WEF website. “Worker wellness has become a major concern during the COVID-19 pandemic; social justice protests have drawn attention to gaps in diversity, equity, and inclusion; and the impacts of climate change and the importance of environmental sustainability are becoming harder, if not impossible, to ignore.”

Despite founding the world’s largest electric vehicle company, Musk is not a fan of ESG.

“The S in ESG stands for Satanic,” tweeted Musk in response. It is not the billionaire’s first comparison of this nature, he referred to the movement as “the devil” back in November.

Tesla CEO Elon Musk gives interviews as he arrives at the Offshore Northern Seas 2022 (ONS) meeting in Stavanger, Norway, on Aug. 29, 2022. (Carina Johansen/NTB/AFP via Getty Images)

Declined WEF Invite

In 2008, WEF listed Musk among its “Young Global Leaders” — which the organization classifies as a “membership” program — though it is unclear whether Musk participated in this arrangement. “I was invited to WEF, but declined,” he said via Twitter in December, responding to allegations that he had a relationship with the international group.

The Twitter CEO also responded to a video, featuring a speech by WEF founder Klaus Schwab, in which Schwab warns that a global cyberattack could disrupt supply chains and make the COVID-19 crisis look like “a small disturbance” in comparison.

The WEF founder warned that such an attack “would bring a complete halt to the power supply, transportation, hospital services, our society as a whole.”

Accompanied by daunting music and provocative imagery, the cinematic clip caught the attention of Musk. “This movie writes itself,” Musk responded with a popcorn emoji.

Schellenberger emphasized that Schwab is more than a figurehead. “Schwab has become, without question, one of the most influential men alive,” tweeted the journalist while promoting his article.

Schwab has been criticized for his book COVID-19: The Great Reset, which advocated for governments around the globe to use the pandemic as an opportunity to “reimagine capitalism.”

The WEF has also been heavily criticized for promoting insects as a potential dietary source. A February article by the organization titled “5 reasons why eating insects could reduce climate change” attempts to dispel commonly held stigmas about eating bugs.

“Before you say ‘yuck,’ hear us out,” the article reads.

Liam Cosgrove works as a freelance journalist covering business, markets, and finance. He received his bachelor’s degree in mathematics from the University of California–Santa Barbara.

Copyright © 2000 – 2023. THE EPOCH TIMES

+++++++++++++++++++++

Bitchute VIDEO: ELON MUSK UNLOADS: CALLS WEF ‘OMINOUS’ & CONDEMNS KLAUS SCHWAB’S ‘MASTER’ PLAN!

Posted by Next News Network

First Published January 18th, 2023 01:35 UTC

MORE DESCRIPTION

+++++++++++++++++++++++

John Kerry Pontificates About the Extraordinary Ability of a “Select Group of Humans” at the World Economic Forum, Who Will Save The Planet for the Eaters and Serfs

By sundance

January 17, 2023

The Conservative Treehouse

During a sidebar conversation with those rare elites who wax philosophically about their magnanimous ability to protect the vulgarian eaters, former Secretary of State and current Climate Czar John Kerry, praises the audience for their unique traits and gifted high-mindedness that will protect all humanity.

While the lizard tongue darts, the grand pontifications are espoused.  The audience oohs and ahhs, at the nature of their entitled superiority. They are so good, so magnanimous, so altruistic in their disposition, according to Kerry they are literally “extraterrestrial,” which is to say out of this world.  WATCH:

Youtube VIDEO: John Kerry At World Economic Forum: “Extraordinary” For “Select Group” To Discuss Green Mandates

[Posted by GOP War Room

Jan 17, 2023

MORE DESCRIPTION]

MORE TO READ & a couple photos

© 2023 The Conservative Treehouse

++++++++++++++++++++

WEF Declares US Will ‘Soon’ Have ‘Hate Speech Laws’ To Deal With ‘Information Pollution’

Brian Stelter & Vera Jourova at WEF-Davos 2023

Posted by Morgan

January 17, 2023

Daily Street News

The US will “soon” have “illegal hate speech laws” to punish anyone spreading “polluting” the internet with “disinformation,” according to World Economic Forum affiliate and European Union official Vera Jourova.

Jourova participated in Tuesday’s WEF panel on “the clear and present danger of disinformation,” alongside former CNN Host Brian Stelter, Massachusetts Democratic Rep. Seth Moulton, New York Times publisher Arthur Sulzberger and media executive Jeanne Bourgault.\

“For hate speech, we need the people who understand the language and the case law in the country, because what qualifies as hate speech, illegal hate speech, which you will have soon also in the U.S., we have a strong reason why we have this in the criminal law,” Jourova said 36 minutes into the panel.

Rumble VIDEO: WEF Declares ‘Humans Are a Plague’ and ‘AI Is the Cure’

[Posted by The People’s Voice

Published January 16, 2023

Yuval Noah Harari, Klaus Schwab’s lead advisor at the Word Economic Forum, has announced that human beings are no better than “viruses or bananas” and the WEF has now reached the point where they can “hack humanity.”

According to Harari, the idea that humans have free will is over, and for those who oppose, there will be no escaping what Harari refers to as the “Secret Police.”

The messaging coming out of the WEF is becoming increasingly sinister, with Klaus Schwab taking on the role of terrorist group leader, using communications channels to issue ultimatums to humanity. Do what I say, or else.

According to Schwab, the new internet will only be available to those who submit to the WEF’s biometric digital ID.]

“We need the platforms to simply work with the language and identify such cases. The AI [artificial intelligence] would be too dangerous,” Jourova added. She was answering a question from the crowd about making the “truth” as “attractive and compelling” as the “lies” people consume.

DailyCaller report: The panel was addressing the ways for the public, regulators and social media companies to tackle “disinformation” as “information pollution” spreads at an “unprecedented speed and scale,” the WEF website says. It’s unclear how the panel defines “disinformation” online and how it measures the spread of perceived disinformation.

Earlier in the panel, Moulton said Americans learn in grade school that “crying fire in a crowded theater” is not protected free speech. Moulton’s statement distinguishing forms of protected speech is misleading, according to non-partisan free speech group FIRE.

Stelter was fired by CNN in August and his Sunday talk show “Reliable Sources” was cancelled. He joined Harvard’s Kennedy School as a Shorenstein Center Fellow in September to host discussions about democracy on campus.

The World Economic Forum’s annual meeting is taking place in Davos, Switzerland, from Jan. 16-20. The forum brings global elites together from politics, business, entertainment, civil society and the young generations.

Source: News Punch

Copyright. All Rights Reserved. Daily Street News

++++++++++++++++++

Davos —‘Do or Die 2023’

We can build way back better without the repulsive overbearing influence of Klaus and Hilde Schwab whose policies would swallow the Free World whole!

Klaus & Hilde Schwab at WEF-Davos 2023

By Judi McLeod 

January 18, 2023

Canada Free Press

Devious media operators of the day keep running about in circles asking, “Who is WEF chief Klaus Schwab?”

Some describe him as a dead ringer for “Dr. Evil” in James Bond movies.  But Dr. Evil and other Bond characters are only Hollywood ‘entertainment’, while the WEF “Dr. Evil” is threatening all of humanity in real life—and openly bragging about it!

The WEF “Dr. Evil” reminds us that when he reconstructs the world by “building back better” that everyone in the masses “will have nothing but be happy”.

That’s because Klaus Schwab is a full-blown narcissist, and narcissists have no conscience or any concerns at all for others.

What kind of people were attracted to Davos 2023, which openly provides sexual services from high end prostitutes? Government ‘leaders’ and business CEOs who must have sexual services when only the better part of a week away from home!

In other words, Davos 2023 is now attended by all those who knew about the sexual services provided by a group unable to define what a woman is!

On Day 2, this is what Davos attendees were doing:

“Today, the World Economic Forum, in partnership with Accenture and Microsoft, has launched its Global Collaboration Village. (WEFORUM, Jan17, 2023)

80 organizations have also joined as Village Partners and will drive the development of a purpose-driven metaverse bringing people together to learn about, create solutions for, and take action on the world’s most pressing challenges.”

Why, oh why is Davos 2023 bringing back a failing Mark Zuckerberg back to the fore.

Yesterday Ukraine First Lady Olena Zelenska took the floor,  emphasizing in her Davos address the human cost of the war in her country.

‘Everyone has a right to life,’ she said.

Every one that is, except millions of innocent babies killed in their mothers’ wombs in many countries, Mrs. Zelensky.

Ukraine’s First Lady is not the only ‘Mrs.’ out there advocating for the destructive so-called “Great Reset”.

Thanks to the savvy of courageous Remnant Editor Michael J. Matt, we now know that WEF-obsessed Klaus Schwab has recently brought his wife to the fore to help spread his insane, akin to manure Great Reset dreams.

Since there are few, if any media reports of the Schwabs doubling down, against the Free World, it’s Kudos to Matt for bringing them into antiseptic sunlight.

Hilde Schwab (seen above)  is no ordinary ‘little Mrs.’, and it’s all but impossible to tell which of these two is really “the better half”.

Hildegard (Hilde) Schwab (born June 3, 1946 in Switzerland) (née Stoll) is a Swiss entrepreneur in the field of event marketing and founder.(Wikipedia)

Hilde Stoll, originally from Aarburg, met Klaus Schwab, a German living in Switzerland, in 1970 through a job advertisement. Schwab hired Stoll, she was his first employee. They founded the beginning of 1971 together the “European Management Symposium”, which later became the World Economic Forum (WEF) in Davos in the canton of Graubünden. In 1972 they married. In 1998, together with Klaus Schwab, she founded the Schwab Foundation for Social Entrepreneurship, of which she is the chair. In this capacity, she is a member of the Patronage Committee of the Kirchner Museum Davos, for example.

The couple has two adult children and lives in Cologny in the canton of Geneva.

That was the Schwabs back in the hippy days of the 1970s.  In 2023, they work to take over the entire world.

While Klaus Schwab warns the adult world “You will have nothing and be happy”, Hilda spends activist time addressing little children.

Imagine the nauseating hypocrisy of raving lunatic Klaus Schwab, who aims to take over the entire world, and whose stifling rules reflect those of the woke crowd already running it who won’t—or can’t—define what a woman is, claiming for himself unelected and unsolicited world leadership!

Pretending not to know what a woman is, is flat out denying that women even exist.

It’s ‘Do or Die 2023’.

WEF world control means no private property, no cars, no farms providing food, and eating bugs rather than meat and vegetables.

In Schwab’s own words it also means the ability of self-appointed lunatics going about sticking microchips under your skin!

According to narcissist Schwab you will not only like it, but there’s no way around him sticking them there!

That’s the Great Reset plans of Mr. and Mrs. Schwab, Bill Gates, and the rest of their delusional, control-crazed supporters, including the Prime Minister of Canada, who was somehow not in attendance at Davos 2023.

While their minions are out there pretending that abortion’s not murder, that men can have babies, that integrity would now include transgendering kids at school, WEF’ers are currently meeting again in Davos, with the media and world governments pretending it isn’t happening.

It’s high time all who care about freedom to tell the Schwabs and their acolytes to shove off.

They should be packed onto a boat ready to sail them to the Antarctic, where they can pipe dream in snow and ice, teaching penguins how to avoid a Global Warming/Climate Change that doesn’t exist.

They keep yammering on about “building back better”.  We can build way back better without the repulsive overbearing influence of Klaus and Hilde Schwab whose policies would swallow the Free World whole!

Judi McLeod, Founder, Owner and Editor of Canada Free Press, is an award-winning journalist with more than 30 years’ experience in the print and online media. A former Toronto Sun columnist, she also worked for the Kingston Whig Standard. Her work has appeared throughout the ‘Net, including on Rush Limbaugh and Fox News.

Site Copyright 1997-2022 Canada Free Press.Com

+++++++++++++++++

Bitchute VIDEO: CITING “POLYCRISIS,” GLOBALISTS IN DAVOS PLAN “NEW SYSTEM” FOR … EVERYTHING!

Posted by The New American

First Published January 17th, 2023 14:48 UTC

Globalists and their useful idiots are converging in Davos for the World Economic Forum to design a “New System” for work, care, employment, and much more in the face of what the organizations leaders are referring to the “polycrisis” hitting humanity, warns The New American magazine’s Alex Newman in this episode of Behind The Deep State. Numerous global leaders, as well as key U.S. policymakers from both sides of the aisle, are meeting with business tycoons at the summit to advance the “Great Reset,” too. In this episode, Alex goes through the agenda and the key players and offers tips on how to stop the destruction of liberty that is envisioned.

+++++++++++++++++++++

Bitchute VIDEO: DAVOS 2023: THE MASTERS OF CRINGE!

Posted by Computing Forever

First Published January 18th, 2023 12:19 UTC 

MORE DESCRIPTION

WEF Advisor Yuval Harari Explains Why He’ll Worship Antichrist Instead of GOD


Geri Ungurean found this nearly four week old video by Nelson Walters (prominent of Last Days Overcomers) on Yuval Noah Harari what I consider a good candidate for the False Prophet found in the New Testament’s Book of Revelation. Ungurean’s intro is short so I’ll run with her website post of the video.

JRH 12/14/22

Thank you to those who have stepped up!

READER SUPPORTED! I need Readers willing to chip in $5 – $10 – $25 – $50 – $100. PLEASE I need your generosity. PLEASE GIVE to Help me be a voice for Liberty:

Please Support CPCR

YOU CAN ALSO SUPPORT via buying healthy supplements/products from Online stores (mine & my Honey):

My Store: https://modere.co/3SrOHzI

My Better Half’s Store: https://dianahouk.shiftingretail.com/  

Big Tech Censorship is pervasive – Share voluminously on all social media platforms!

****************************

WEF Advisor Yuval Harari Explains Why He’ll Worship Antichrist Instead of GOD

Antichrist Web Capture

Posted by GERI UNGUREAN

December 14, 2022

Absolute Truth from the Word of God

World Economic Forum Advisor Yuval Harari explains why he’ll worship the Antichrist instead of God Almighty. Harari is the same transhumanist that famously said corporations and governments were now ready to “hack” humans, in other words, change their genetics. Why does he reject the one true God? What does he think should be done with Christians? Watch this Nelson Walters video to find out.

Youtube VIDEO: WEF Advisor Yuval Harari Explains Why He’ll Worship Antichrist Instead of God

[Posted by Nelson Walters

Posted Nov 23, 2022

World Economic Forum Advisor Yuval Harari explains why he’ll worship the Antichrist instead of God Almighty. Harari is the same transhumanist that famously said corporations and governments were now ready to “hack” humans, in other words, change their genetics. Why does he reject the one true God? What does he think should be done with Christians? Watch this Nelson Walters video to find out.

Last Days Overcomers website: https://lastdaysovercomer.org/]

Harari says that we know NOTHING about God Whom he calls a fantasy! Maybe he has not picked up the Bible to see how much we really DO know about the Creator of the Universe!

HOW CAN I BE SAVED?

MARANATHA!

Ye old snail-mail path to SUPPORT Geri Ungurean

Absolute Truth from the Word of God HOMEPAGE

Government is Evil – There are Reasons NOT to Trust


John R. Houk, Blog Editor

© December 10, 2022

First half of this video are the very words of Yuval Noah Harari (WEF Chief Advisor) which at the very least makes a candidate for the Antichrist’s False Prophet (there are plenty of at worst scenarios for this man – of which you could add Covenant Breaker to his Jewish heritage). The second half of this video Big Pharma controlling lives for profit not human beneficial health with a dose of WEF-Globalist-Government corruption at the end:

Bitchute VIDEO: THIS VIDEO HAS BEEN BANNED BY YOUTUBE 3 TIMES!! WATCH WITHIN 24 HOURS!!

Posted by 99Percent

First Published December 10th, 2022 08:15 UTC 

SHARE THIS WITH EVERYONE

The above is merely a smattering of info that should lead a person to comprehend the current power or powers controlling the levers of government are completely UNTRUSTWORTHY.

The pseudonymous Vigilant Fox has posted about an attorney Edward A. Berkovich urging Attorney Generals from thirteen different States to conduct criminal investigations into CDC purposefully holding back information on the dangers of the mRNA Jab.

Who is Attorney Berkovich? I have no idea. A cursory search turned up this:

The information is consistent, but I can’t vouch for it being the Vigilant Fox post Berkovich. Evidently this Berkovich fella has enough clout to get the attention of Dr. Naomi Wolf and Steve Bannon with whom the Berkovich letter to 13 Attorney Generals.

I don’t have a lot a confidence much action will take place with the occurrence of CDC criminal investigation, because it is my opinion the current state of government is irredeemably corrupt through the current legal channels in operation. NEVERTHELESS, it is gratifying to hear more and more people are stepping to be a thorn in the side of government corruption. KEEP THE RESISTANCE GROWING!

THEN I ran into a Dr. Mercola post from December 9 highlighting Big Pharma GREED over actual scientific research which uses an over hour long video presentation by Dr. Aseem Malhotra about Big Pharma corruption as the basis for the Dr. Mercola analysis.

JRH 12/10/22

Thank you to those who have stepped up!

READER SUPPORTED! I need Readers willing to chip in $5 – $10 – $25 – $50 – $100. PLEASE I need your generosity. PLEASE GIVE to Help me be a voice for Liberty:

Please Support CPCR

YOU CAN ALSO SUPPORT via buying healthy supplements/products from Online stores (mine & my Honey):

My Store: https://modere.co/3SrOHzI

My Better Half’s Store: https://dianahouk.shiftingretail.com/  

Big Tech Censorship is pervasive – Share voluminously on all social media platforms!

***************************

Attorney Edward A. Berkovich Urges 13 AGs to Investigate & Prosecute the CDC for Criminal Charges

Prosecute the officials who covered it up.”

Dr. Walensky Reckless Endangerment (web capture)

By VIGILANT FOX
DECEMBER 10, 2022

Red Voice Media

“We’re suing the CDC,” announced Dr. Naomi Wolf on Steve Bannon’s War Room. “We’re suing Twitter. We’re going after the FDA. All of those are underway with the best lawyers in the country.”

But the CDC lawsuit is particularly interesting because it is based on criminal charges — specifically “reckless endangerment or similar crimes.”

Rumble VIDEO: Attorney Edward A. Berkovich Urges 13 AGs to Investigate & Prosecute the CDC for Criminal Charges

[Posted by Red Voice Media

Published December 10, 2022

MORE DESCRIPTION]

[Daily Clout:] Letters to 13 State Attorneys General to Consider Investigating and Prosecuting CDC Officials for Reckless Endangerment or Similar Crimes

Attorney Edward A. Berkovich recently sent letters to the attorneys general for Wyoming, New Hampshire, Kentucky, Kansas, Texas, Indiana, Alaska, Alabama, Arizona, Tennessee, Montana, Florida, and Utah, encouraging them to consider state-level action to investigate and prosecute Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) officials for reckless endangerment or similar state crimes for CDC’s three-month delay in reporting the first statistically significant signal of myocarditis incidence following mRNA COVID-19 vaccination.

Dr. Naomi Wolf elaborates:

Naomi Wolf on War Room

“Dr. Flowers broke the story that that there was knowledge with the FDA and with Pfizer of myocarditis four months before they made a press announcement to the parents of America. Four months previously, they knew that 35 teenagers sustained heart damage a week after being injected with his material, and they kept going. They kept going with the influencers. They kept going with the cute pictures on Instagram with a little band-aid. They kept aiming their campaign at young adults, at teenagers, at parents to get these kids injected. So that’s fraud! And it’s also reckless endangerment and similar crimes that Mr. Berkovich identifies. So this is incredibly important,” she stressed.

Here’s Berkovich’s letter to Attorney General Bridget Hill of Wyoming.

She is one of the thirteen attorneys general to whom he sent a similar letter.

Berkovich Letterhead to AG Bridget Hill of WY

RE: State criminal investigation of Centers for Disease Control (CDC) officials for reckless endangering under WY Stat. § 6-2-504(a)

Dear Attorney General Hill:

I support your signing the Section 553(e) Petition for Rulemaking sent to Secretary Becerra & Administrator Brooks-LaSure on November 17, 2022.

There may be reasonable suspicion to investigate CDC officials for recklessly endangering Wyoming residents, as follows:

The enclosed article asserts:

[T]he CDC delayed reporting the incidence of myocarditis to the general public for three months after the first statistically significant signal appeared in the VAERS database. The delay kept about 120,000,000 Americans in the dark until after they had already unknowingly exposed themselves to one or more doses of the COVID-19 injections that were, according to the analysis presented here, in all probability, the proximate cause of the increased incidence of myocarditis, especially in young male Americans from 8 to 21 years of age.

If that assertion is correct, that level of omission may provide reasonable suspicion to investigate CDC officials for “recklessly engaging in conduct [omitting to warn of the safety signal] which place[d] [Wyoming residents] in danger of death or serious bodily injury[,] under WY Stat. § 6-2- 504(a).

Wyoming residents acting in reliance on CDC information, either directly or vicariously via state and county health agency recommendations (agencies that likely rely on CDC), may have decided not to get vaccinated if CDC had warned of the myocarditis risk it knew about. This is especially problematic considering emerging data about post-Covid-19 vaccination myocarditis.

There cannot be “informed consent” without being “informed.”

Also, CDC’s recent decision to recommend new omicron boosters for children as young as five years old, a recommendation reportedly made without even convening a meeting of CDC’s panel of vaccine experts, similarly may give rise to reasonable suspicion to investigate for reckless endangering, because Wyoming residents may (again?) directly or vicariously rely on CDC’s recommendation and get their children vaccinated without full data.

As you are aware, federal officials do not have absolute Supremacy Clause immunity from state law prosecution. See, e.g., Wyoming v. Livingston, 443 F.3d 1211 (10th Cir. 2006) (discussing Supremacy Clause, removal, and “reasonable and necessary”).

I encourage your office to consider whether investigating federal officials for state law offenses is warranted for either the actions above or other pandemic response actions. While there is ongoing discussion of more comprehensive prosecutions related to the pandemic, there may be value in thinking smaller and starting somewhere.

I’ve recently sent similar letters to my home state’s attorney general, some other state attorneys general, and to Mr. Skoric in Park County, because of his work on Livingston.

Sincerely,

/s/ Edward A. Berkovich

Attorney at Law, Utah Bar. No. 6180

Enc.

Steve Bannon summarizes the significance of the letter.

Steve Bannon – Naomi Wolfe

“This guy is telling state attorneys general, ‘I want you to get off your duff and look at the data, and I want criminal charges filed because the CDC knew for 90 days that this was a problem, and they not only did nothing, they continue to spin about these vaccines.’ Is that the general direction of where this is going?” he asked.

“Yeah!” confirmed Naomi. “Let me give you the exact wording, ‘encouraging them to consider state-level action to investigate and prosecute Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.’ CDC officials, meaning Dr. Walensky and her colleagues, ‘for reckless endangerment or similar state crimes for CDC’s three-month delay in reporting [the] first statistically significant signal of myocarditis incidence following mRNA COVID-19 vaccination.’ So yes! He’s saying, ‘Prosecute the officials who covered it up. Prosecute the officials who knew.’”

In summary, “This crime, according to Mr. Berkovich, is reckless endangerment and other similar crimes. And I say similar crimes because state legal codes vary right state by state,” explained Dr. Wolf. “But basically, these people are criminals, and they hurt people by concealing the evidence that this was a dangerous injection.”

As Naomi expressed earlier, “All of this audience’s donations have been put to good use. We have [around] six different lawsuits underway now.”

So, if you want to put your money where there’s a good chance it could make a big difference, consider donating to Dr. Wolf and the Daily Clout team.

SUPPORTRed Voice Media

© 2022 Red Voice Media – ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

The Vigilant Fox is a citizen journalist with 12 years of healthcare experience, focused on The Great Reset, world protests, and COVID-19. After being deeply disturbed by COVID measures, mandates, and medical discrimination, he has dedicated his free time and effort to making short, informative clips, featuring top doctors, scientists, and thought leaders from around the world. You can follow his social media profiles here: https://vigilantfox.id

++++++++++++++++++++

Has Big Pharma Hijacked Evidence-Based Medicine?

Analysis by Dr. Joseph Mercola

December 9, 2022

Mercola.com

[Blog Editor: I suggest read the Dr. Mercola analysis first then watch Dr. Malhotra.]

Youtube VIDEO: Has Big Pharma Hijacked Evidence Based Medicine?

[Posted by Aseem Malhotra

Posted on 11/23/22

MORE DESCRIPTION]

STORY AT-A-GLANCE

  • Cardiologist Dr. Aseem Malhotra shares data on the Big Pharma takeover of modern medicine
  • Due to Big Pharma’s stronghold over health care, we’re facing what Malhotra calls a pandemic of misinformed doctors and unwittingly harmed and misinformed patients
  • Drug companies and medical device manufacturers aren’t in business to make patients happy; they’re beholden to their shareholders, for whom they have a financial obligation to produce a profit
  • Malhotra shares data showing why he believes COVID-19 shots should be suspended
  • Malhotra notes that political involvement and policy advocacy, combined with social participation and social movements, can together lead to the creation of relevant knowledge to protect public health

Fear inhibits your ability to think critically. This is a central point made by cardiologist Dr. Aseem Malhotra in his London presentation November 14, 2022. Many people were gripped by unprecedented fear during the COVID-19 pandemic, which shaped attitudes about the pharmacological interventions offered.

Willful blindness is another phenomenon to be aware of. It’s when people turn a blind eye to the truth. Also known as conscious avoidance, this tactic has historically been used in legal trials to avoid criminal liability by ignoring or purposely staying unaware of key facts.

However, Malhotra notes, people also engage in willful blindness in order to feel safe, avoid conflict, reduce anxiety and to protect prestige or, in some cases, “precious, fragile egos.”1

The Illusion of Knowledge Is Worse Than Ignorance

Malhotra quoted the late Stephen Hawking, who stated, “The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge.”2 In terms of health care, evidence-based medicine has been hijacked by Big Pharma; it’s now an illusion. There’s also an illusion that we’re at the forefront of medicine, with prestigious organizations leading the helm, when in reality multiple health crises are upon us.

The World Health Organization’s (WHO) definition of health is a “state of complete physical, mental and social well-being and not merely the absence of disease or infirmity.”3 Public health, too, is not only about preventing disease, but also promoting health and prolonging life, while helping populations reach the highest possible level of well-being. But are public health agencies actually helping to achieve these goals?

Malhotra, a cardiologist trained by the U.K.’s National Health Service (NHS), as well as a visiting professor of evidence based medicine at Bahiana School of Medicine and Public Health in Salvador, Brazil,4 cited a 2020 study published in the British Medical Bulletin.5

It used data from the U.K.’s Office for National Statistics from 2010 to 2020, which showed a “dramatic slowdown in life expectancy and diverging trends in infant mortality in the UK as a whole and England and Wales, respectively.” Health trends in the U.K., the study concluded, “are worrying and raise important questions about government policies.”6

Throughout his career, Malhotra has tried to call attention to failures in treating heart disease. “Despite so-called modern science,” heart disease remains the No. 1 cause of death globally.7 “So clearly there’s something that we’ve done wrong on that front,” Malhotra said.8

More recently, he’s focused on using real evidence-based medicine to share the truth about COVID-19 mRNA vaccines. His two-part paper on the topic was published in the Journal of Insulin Resistance, specifically,9,10 because this journal does not accept money from the pharmaceutical industry.11

A Pandemic of Misinformed Doctors and Patients

Due to Big Pharma’s stronghold over health care, we’re facing what Malhotra calls a pandemic of misinformed doctors and unwittingly harmed and misinformed patients. This misinformation comes from a variety of sources, including:12

Biased funding of research — Research funded because it’s likely to be profitable, not because it’s likely to be better for patientsBiased reporting in medical journals
Biased patient pamphletsBiased reporting in the media
Commercial conflicts of interestDefensive medicine
Medical curricula that fail to teach doctors how to comprehend and communicate health statistics

Malhotra describes John Ioannidis, professor of medicine and professor of epidemiology and population health at Stanford University, as the “Stephen Hawking of medicine.”13 Ioannidis cowrote a paper in 2017 titled, “How to Survive the Medical Misinformation Mess.”14 At the time, he described four key problems:

1. Much published research is unreliable, offers no benefit to patients or is not useful to decision makers

2. Most health care professionals are not aware of this problem with published research

3. Health care professionals lack the necessary skills to evaluate the reliability of medical evidence

4. Patients and families lack accurate medical evidence and skilled guidance when they need to make medical decisions

The solution, according to Ioannidis, involves focusing efforts on “making health care professionals more sensitive to the limitations of the evidence, training them to do critical appraisal, and enhancing their communication skills so that they can effectively summarize and discuss medical evidence with patients to improve decision-making.”15

Ioannidis also wrote a 2005 paper about why most published research findings are false. Not surprisingly, one factor that makes a research finding less likely to be true is “greater financial and other interest and prejudice.”16

Drug Companies Are Beholden to Their Shareholders

Drug companies and medical device manufacturers aren’t in business to make patients happy; they’re beholden to their shareholders, for whom they have a financial obligation to produce a profit.17 There’s no legal requirement for them to offer patients the “best” treatment.

Further, regulators regularly fail at their duty to prevent industry misconduct, while doctors and medical journals — which do have a responsibility to put patients’ interests and scientific integrity first — collude with industry for financial gain.18

Recently, Malhotra was heavily involved in campaigning to end NHS COVID-19 shot mandates. But prior to this he spoke to the European Parliament in 2018 to warn them of the epidemic of misinformed doctors and patients, stating, “Honest doctors can no longer practice honest medicine. We have a complete health care system failure …”19

In fact, in 2016, Dr. Peter C. Gotzsche, cofounder of the Cochrane Collaboration and the Institute for Scientific Freedom, stated prescription drugs are the third leading cause of death — most of them preventable.20 “The reason for that,” Malhotra said, “is the information that comes from drug companies — essentially the results of clinical trials — exaggerate the benefits and the safety of the drugs.”21

Corporate crime and fraud are also rampant — from 2009 to 2014, Gotzsche noted that most of the top 10 drug companies committed fraud, totaling about $14 billion, including hiding data on drug harms and illegally marketing drugs.

Yet, the fines the drug companies had to pay for their crimes were miniscule in comparison to the profits they made from the drugs. Since then, however, nobody was fired and “nothing has changed to stop them from committing these crimes again.”22

Tobacco Tactics Revisited During COVID Pandemic

Malhotra is among those who early on during the pandemic that poor diet can increase your risk of dying from COVID-19, by increasing obesity risk, chronic disease and disrupting your gut microbiome.23 In April 2020, he tweeted, “The government and public health England are ignorant and grossly negligent for not telling the public they need to change their diet now.”24

Not only did they not publicly share the importance of healthy weight and diet to ward off COVID-19, but they glamorized and encouraged junk food consumption via their official social media channels. At one point during the pandemic, Royal Free Hospital, which is part of the Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, tweeted the following along with a photo showing dozens of doughnut boxes:25

“You guys at @krispykremeUK Enfield sure know how to put a smile on our staff’s faces!1,500 doughnuts delivered to our staff at Barnet Hospital-#glazeamaze.”

“I’ve got nothing against people having a treat,” Malhotra said. “But hospitals shouldn’t be promoting … and essentially advertising the fact that we are giving 1,000 free Krispy Kreme doughnuts to nurses in the middle of the pandemic. I don’t think that was very productive considering what we know about the influence on COVID.”26

That hospitals were promoting junk food and junk food companies instead of healthy food is reminiscent of Big Tobacco’s tactics, which not only suppressed the harmful effects of cigarettes but also recruited doctors to promote them, using slogans such as, “More Doctors Smoke Camels Than Any Other Cigarette.”

“We see the same tactics repeating themselves,” Malhotra continued. “What Krispy Kreme is doing is using the NHS as a branding opportunity for what are essentially addictive, toxic foods that should just be treats but not part of the regular diet.”27

How COVID Shots Were Oversold

Malhotra was one of the first to take Pfizer’s COVID-19 shot, and he’s double-jabbed. Initially, he was in favor of the shots but a study published in Circulation, which found an increased incidence of inflammatory markers linked to heart attacks in people who’d received mRNA COVID-19 shots,28 gave him pause.

Then, a whistleblower from a prestigious British institution contacted him and said a group of researchers had found inflammation of coronary arteries after the mRNA shot. However, the researchers had a meeting and decided not to share their findings because it might affect their funding from the drug industry.29 He then learned of data from Scotland that showed an unexplained 25% increase in heart attacks.

He went to the media, armed with data, to share his concerns in October 2021, calling for an investigation. It received a lot of attention, but Malhotra was soon targeted by anonymous complaints to a medical organization, which put his medical license at risk. At that point, he decided to gather other experts and critically review the data — then publish the truth.

In November 2020, Pfizer claimed their COVID-19 shot was 95% effective against COVID-19, but this was highly misleading and, according to Malhotra, based on flawed methodology:30

“‘Relative risk reduction is a way of exaggerating the benefits of any intervention … which would be in the interest of people trying to sell you something — in this case, the pharmaceutical industry.

So if, for example, you have 1,000 people in a trial that didn’t have the vaccine versus 1,000 people that did in the placebo group … you may have two people dying. And in the intervention group, you may have just one person dying. And that’s a reduction of 50%. One over two is a 50% relative risk reduction. But actually, you’ve only saved one life out of 1,000.

So, the absolute risk reduction is only 1 in 1,000. It’s a big difference. The guidance has been for many years that we must always use absolute risk reduction in conversations with patients, not just relative risk reduction alone; otherwise, it’s considered unethical,’ Malhotra said.

The accusation is that governments acted on Pfizer’s relative risk figure of 95% efficacy, when the absolute risk was a mere 0.84%. In other words, you’d have to vaccinate 119 people to prevent just one from catching COVID. ‘So we were basically sold on something that ultimately, and in retrospect now, was very, very misleading.'”

Big Pharma Provides Majority of Budget for Leading Regulators

If there were ever any doubt that regulatory agencies are captured by industry, consider that significant portions of regulatory agencies’ budgets come from the pharmaceutical industry that these agencies are supposed to regulate. For instance:31

Australia’s Therapeutic Goods Administration — 96% of budget derived from industryEurope’s EMA — 89%
U.K.’s MHRA — 86%Japan’s Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency — 85%
U.S. FDA — 65%Health Canada — 50.5%

Data and health advice from these agencies cannot be considered independent or trustworthy when it’s clouded by vested interests. What did one study32 — conducted by people who do not take money from the drug industry — find?

It reanalyzed data that led to the original approval of the shots, and subsequent shot mandates, revealing people were more likely to suffer a serious adverse, disability, hospitalization or life-changing event after receiving an mRNA COVID-19 shot than be hospitalized with COVID.33 Malhotra shared additional facts about COVID-19 shots that are now known based on the best available evidence:34

  • COVID-19 shots offer no protection against infection now
  • No reduction in COVID mortality
  • Natural immunity is very protective
  • Shot side effects are nearly three times more likely if you get the shot after having COVID-19
  • Unprecedented harms have been reported from the shots

“We have pulled vaccines in the past for much less,” Malhotra said. “… This vaccine needs to be suspended completely, pending an inquiry.”35 So why haven’t you heard about this? It’s clear that willful blindness has taken over. Malhotra notes that political involvement and policy advocacy, combined with social participation and social movements can together lead to the creation of relevant knowledge.

“We need to make sure we’ve got clear, relevant, concrete knowledge in a way that can be disseminated and understandable to the public.”

Toward that end, Malhotra states that it’s crucial for the integrity of public health for the facts to be acknowledged and for regulators to state that they’ve changed their minds too. Moving forward, in order to ensure access to real, evidence-based medicine, key changes need to be made, according to Malhotra, including:

  • Drug industry should play no role in testing drugs
  • Drug industry should not be able to hide raw data from trials
  • All results of all trials in humans must be made publicly available
  • Regulators such as the FDA and MHRA should not get any money from the drug industry

What Can You Do to Help?

To help enact change, Malhotra is calling for citizen power in the U.K. to use social media, calling for the suspension of mRNA shots. Specifically, he suggests tweeting and sharing the following, which can be tweaked depending on your location:

“My name is … and I call on the Secretary of State for Health, @SteveBarclay to #SuspendTheMRNAjabsnow until the raw data is released for independent analysis.”

Further, in order to beat the psychopathic corporate tyranny that has taken over, we must act virtuously, which involves embracing the following to keep moving forward:

1. Wisdom

2. Courage

3. Moderation

4. Justice

 Sources and References

1 YouTube, Aseem Malhotra, Has Big Pharma Hijacked Evidence Based Medicine? November 23, 2022, 2:43

2 YouTube, Aseem Malhotra, Has Big Pharma Hijacked Evidence Based Medicine? November 23, 2022, 3:20

3 YouTube, Aseem Malhotra, Has Big Pharma Hijacked Evidence Based Medicine? November 23, 2022, 3:41

4 Dr. Aseem Malhotra, Biography

5, 6 Br Med Bull. 2020 May 15;133(1):4-15. doi: 10.1093/bmb/ldz041

7 World Health Organization, Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs)

8 YouTube, Aseem Malhotra, Has Big Pharma Hijacked Evidence Based Medicine? November 23, 2022, 5:30

9 Journal of Insulin Resistance. 2022; 5(1): a71

10 Journal of Insulin Resistance. 2022; 5(1): 72

11 YouTube, Aseem Malhotra, Has Big Pharma Hijacked Evidence Based Medicine? November 23, 2022, 6:20

12 YouTube, Aseem Malhotra, Has Big Pharma Hijacked Evidence Based Medicine? November 23, 2022, 8:50

13 YouTube, Aseem Malhotra, Has Big Pharma Hijacked Evidence Based Medicine? November 23, 2022, 9:33

14, 15 Eur J Clin Invest. 2017 Nov;47(11):795-802. doi: 10.1111/eci.12834. Epub 2017 Sep 28

16 PLOS Medicine August 30, 2005

17 YouTube, Aseem Malhotra, Has Big Pharma Hijacked Evidence Based Medicine? November 23, 2022, 12:31

18 YouTube, Aseem Malhotra, Has Big Pharma Hijacked Evidence Based Medicine? November 23, 2022, 12:52

19 YouTube, Aseem Malhotra, Has Big Pharma Hijacked Evidence Based Medicine? November 23, 2022, 13:18

20 The BMJ Opinion June 16, 2016

21 YouTube, Aseem Malhotra, Has Big Pharma Hijacked Evidence Based Medicine? November 23, 2022, 13:45

22 YouTube, Aseem Malhotra, Has Big Pharma Hijacked Evidence Based Medicine? November 23, 2022, 14:29

23 Science Daily May 29, 2019

24 Twitter, Dr Aseem Malhotra

25 Twitter, Royal Free London April 21, 2020

26 YouTube, Aseem Malhotra, Has Big Pharma Hijacked Evidence Based Medicine? November 23, 2022, 35:00

27 YouTube, Aseem Malhotra, Has Big Pharma Hijacked Evidence Based Medicine? November 23, 2022, 36:00

28 Circulation November 8, 2021

29 YouTube, Aseem Malhotra, Has Big Pharma Hijacked Evidence Based Medicine? November 23, 2022, 38:50

30 Rumble, Safe and Effective: A Second Opinion September 28, 2022, 15:11

31 YouTube, Dr. John Campbell, WHO, YouTube and funding November 7, 2022, 10:34

32 Vaccine. 2022 Sep 22;40(40):5798-5805. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.08.036. Epub 2022 Aug 31

33 YouTube, Aseem Malhotra, Has Big Pharma Hijacked Evidence Based Medicine? November 23, 2022, 49:28

34 YouTube, Aseem Malhotra, Has Big Pharma Hijacked Evidence Based Medicine? November 23, 2022, 52:15

35 YouTube, Aseem Malhotra, Has Big Pharma Hijacked Evidence Based Medicine? November 23, 2022, 52:23

© 1997-2022 Dr. Joseph Mercola. All Rights Reserved.

Complacency Will End Liberty


John R. Houk, Blog Editor

© November 27, 2022

Photo from NOT OUR FUTURE  – Sign the PLEDGE

On a world-wide scale, there are people with tyrannical-despotic intent to end Liberty and individual Freedom to be replaced by UNGODLY rule devoid of Biblical Morality. When the wicked control the voting apparatus elections have little credibility. Alternative measures to counter the tentacles of tyranny when the Constitutional Rule of Law is tainted by a Bureaucratic Oligarchy that has near zero accountability.

Proverbs 24: 24-25; Ephesians 5: 11-13 AMPC:

Proverbs 24

24 He who says to the wicked, You are righteous and innocent—peoples will curse him, nations will defy and abhor him.

25 But to those [upright judges] who rebuke the wicked, it will go well with them and they will find delight, and a good blessing will be 3.    

Ephesians 5

11 Take no part in and have no fellowship with the fruitless deeds and enterprises of darkness, but instead [let your lives be so in contrast as to] [a]expose and reprove and convict them.

12 For it is a shame even to speak of or mention the things that [such people] practice in secret.

13 But when anything is exposed and reproved by the light, it is made visible and clear; and where everything is visible and clear there is light.

People can continue to sit on their hands as if nothing is happening to their Liberty – OR – People can begin activism by putting their hands together in prayer to the Creator God Almighty in the name of Jesus the Son of God. THEN add Righteous action by organizing locally (the current national leadership is too status quo for trustworthy action).

History shows that complacency leads to loaded trains to concentration camps with ill-fated ends. Americans have no Pattons, Bradleys or Eisenhowers bring freedom to concentration camp residents. PRAY!

Youtube VIDEO: General Patton being witness at the horrors of concentration camp Ohrdruf 12.04.1945

[Posted by Michel Dieleman

Posted on 12/16/13

MORE DESCRIPTION]

There is an agenda to normalize tyranny. Part of that agenda is to disappear dissent to the tyrants. The tyrants don’t even care to hide their plans to transform society – or else. Below are the cross posts of proof.

JRH 11/27/22

Thank you to those who have stepped up!

READER SUPPORTED! I need Readers willing to chip in $5 – $10 – $25 – $50 – $100. PLEASE I need your generosity. PLEASE GIVE to Help me be a voice for Liberty:

Please Support CPCR

YOU CAN ALSO SUPPORT via buying healthy supplements/products from Online stores (mine & my Honey):

Mine: https://modere.co/3SrOHzI

My Better Half: https://valentus.com/dianahouk  

Big Tech Censorship is pervasive – Share voluminously on all social media platforms!

***************************

Klaus Schwab Reveals Who He Really Is as He Introduces New ‘Role Model’ for Countries

By Peter Partoll, The Western Journal
Published November 26, 2022 at 2:15pm

The Federalist Papers

The World Economic Forum’s leader, Klaus Schwab, let the mask slip last week when he stated in an interview which nation he believes is a “role model” for the rest of the world.

According to Fox News, in an interview with Chinese state-affiliated media during last week’s APEC CEO Summit in Bangkok, Schwab says he sees the Chinese system as a “role model” for other nations.

“I think it’s a role model for many countries,” he said. While clarifying that each country needs to make its own decisions, Schwab did say that “the Chinese model is certainly a very attractive model for quite a number of countries.”

Exactly what part of the Chinese system Schwab admired was not stated, which naturally leads one to wonder exactly what it is about the Chinese model that prompts his admiration.

Frankly, there should be nothing appealing to Americans about living under a Chinese-style system. China is a one-party communist state with absolutely no basic freedoms whatsoever.

For instance, in the past few years, the Chinese Communist Party has introduced an onerous social credit score system, which rewards citizens for what they deem as “good behavior” and hands out harsh punishments for even minor offenses. This system has prevented millions of Chinese people from being allowed to travel due to their low social credit scores.

China has also cracked down harshly on religious and ethnic minorities and recent years. The most prominent instance comes from the western province of Xinjiang, where thousands of Uyghur Muslims have been arrested and sent to concentration camps. Also, let’s not forget the oppression of Tibetans under Chinese rule.

The government has also instituted a draconian “zero-COVID” policy, which has seen its citizens put under virtual house arrest, unable to even go out and buy food, as the country attempts to eliminate COVID.

Essentially, the Chinese system is designed to create a society of communist drones that will not challenge the communist authorities and will swear absolute loyalty to the CCP.

This thus begs the question, why would Klaus Schwab want the rest of the world to look to a country that oppresses its own citizens and is actively trying to eliminate minorities as a “role model” for the rest of the world? What could this system possibly have that Schwab and the WEF admire?

Unfortunately, this may have something to do with the fact that Schwab is really no different than the totalitarian tyrants he idolizes. Schwab and the WEF also want total control over society.

This is the group that has spent the last two years pushing a “great reset,” a plan to completely remake the global economy following the COVID pandemic. The promotion of the “great reset” had the infamous line “You will own nothing, and be happy.”

Youtube VIDEO: What is the Great Reset? Victor Davis Hanson Explains

[Posted by Dylan Nolan

Posted on 9/26/21

MORE DESCRIPTION]

If this sounds like the implementation of global communism, you would be correct.

The WEF has also ceaselessly pushed for a global transition to “green energy”, in some ways seeing it as the only way to defend democracy. However, as everyone is now seeing, this push for unsustainable green energy is now part of the reason that Europe is facing a severe energy crisis in the coming winter.

This is also the group that wants to institute a one-world government, in which nations would be abolished and a supranational body would control the lives of all people in the world. If that last sentence didn’t paint Schwab and the WEF as a veritable cabal of super-villains, nothing will.

So now it makes sense why Schwab would point to the Chinese system as a “role model.” Schwab, like the Chinese, wants to have complete control over the lives of ordinary people, and they want to punish anyone who resists.

There is no reason why anyone should admire or want to replicate the Chinese system and the fact that Schwab openly praises it gives a terrifying idea of what the WEF may have planned.

This article appeared originally on The Western Journal.

The Federalist Papers HOMEPAGE

The Federalist Papers ABOUT PAGE

+++++++++++++++++++

WHAT’S NEXT? (The G20 Summit & Future Lockdowns)

By News on the Net 

November 26, 2022

Canada Free Press

It may seem as if the COVID pandemic is over but for the political and corporate leaders who gathered in Bali for the November 2022 G20 summit, it is anything but. In fact, they’re already planning the next one, which is why they’re calling for preemptive global lockdown measures.

In this edition of The Remnant Underground, Michael Matt returns to the theme of waking the masses to what the Global Elites are up to, which includes war on God. In fact, Klaus Schwab advisor, Yuval Noah Harari came right out and admitted it: “The whole idea of Jesus Christ and the Resurrection – this is fake news!”

Remnant TV VIDEO: WHAT’S NEXT? (The G20 Summit & Future Lockdowns)

[Blog Editor: CFP uses the Remnant TV links. For embed purposes, I’m using the Rumble platform]

Rumble VIDEO: WHAT’S NEXT? (The G20 Summit & Future Lockdowns)

Plus, more on Governor Ron DeSantis’ decision to tell Klaus Schwab to pound sand, Tony Fauci steps down, and Traditional Catholics take their formal resistance to Pope Francis into the pages of the New York Times.

Finally, how do you like your Tesla so far? Enjoy it while it lasts because California is running out of power and the Global Elite are getting ready to ration energy worldwide.

This madness doesn’t have to become our reality. There is a way out.  Michael Matt explains.

Site Copyright 1997-2022 Canada Free Press.Com

+++++++++++++++++++

Arch. Carlo Maria Viganò: The COVID Pandemic Farce Served as a Trial Balloon for the New World Order

Posted November 26, 2022

ISRAPUNDIT

L. Goudsmit.  This is another impressive address by the incomparable and courageous Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano. I completely agree with the Archbishop’s political analysis, even though I don’t personally embrace its religious foundation. I believe the entire Covid19 debacle is a crime against humanity, designed by globalist sociopaths and megalomaniacs, to enslave the world population, achieve totalitarian planetary control, and create a transhumanist future and eternal life for themselves. I believe there is good and evil, I believe there is right and wrong, and I believe that religion has played an important role in defining these ethical concepts. I just don’t believe it is the ONLY way to define what is good, moral, and ethical. I’m just sayin .

‘There can be no neutrality, because when there is a clash between two armies, those who choose not to fight are also making a choice that affects the outcome of the battle.’

Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò’s address to Medical Doctors for Covid Ethics International (MD4CE International). 

Dear and distinguished friends,

Allow me first of all to thank Doctor Stephen Frost for the invitation he has extended to me to speak to you. Along with Doctor Frost I also thank all of you: your commitment to fighting the psychopandemic propaganda is commendable.

I am well aware of the difficulties you have had to face in order to remain consistent with your principles, and I hope that the damage you have suffered can be adequately repaired by those who have discriminated against you, depriving you of work and salary and labeling you as dangerous no-vaxxers.

I am pleased to be able to speak and share with you my thoughts about the current global crisis. A crisis that we can consider to have begun with the pandemic emergency, but that we know has been planned for decades with very specific purposes by well-known personalities.

Stopping at the pandemic alone would in fact be a serious mistake, because it would not allow us to consider the events in their full coherence and inter-connectedness, thus preventing us from understanding them and above all from identifying the criminal intentions behind them.

You too – each with your own expertise in the medical, scientific, legal or other fields – will agree with me that limiting yourselves to your own discipline, which in some cases is extremely specific, does not fully explain the rationale for certain choices that have been made by governments, international bodies, and pharmaceutical agencies.

For example, finding “graphene-like” material in the blood of people who have been inoculated with experimental serums makes no sense for a virologist, but it does made sense for an expert in nanomaterials and nanotechnology who understands what graphene can be used for.

It also makes sense for an expert in medical patents, who immediately identifies the content of the invention and relates it to other similar patents. It also makes sense for an expert in war technologies who knows about studies on the enhanced man (a document of the British Ministry of Defense calls him “augmented man” in transhumanistic terms) and is therefore able to recognize in graphene nanostructures the technology that enables the augmentation of the war performance of military personnel. And a telemedicine expert will be able to recognize in those nanostructures the indispensable device that sends biomedical parameters to the patient control server and also receives certain signals from it.

Once again: the assessment of events from a medical point of view should take into account the legal implications of certain choices, such as the imposition of masks or, even worse, mass “vaccination,” made in violation of the fundamental rights of citizens. And I am sure that in the field of health governance the manipulations of the classification codes of diseases and therapies will also emerge, which have been designed to make the harmful effects of measures taken against COVID-19 untraceable, from placing people on respirators in intensive care to watchful waiting protocols, to say nothing of the scandalous violations of regulations by the European Commission which – as you know – has no delegation from the European Parliament in the field of Health, and that is not a public institution but rather a private business consortium.

Just in the past few days, at the G-20 Bali summit, Klaus Schwab instructed heads of government – almost all coming from the Young Global Leaders for Tomorrow program of the World Economic Forum – about the future steps to be taken in view of establishing a world government. The president of a very powerful private organization with enormous economic means exercises undue power over world governments, obtaining their obedience from political leaders who have no popular mandate to subject their nations to the delusions of power of the elite: this fact is of unprecedented gravity. Klaus Schwab said:

“In the fourth industrial revolution the winners will take it all, so if you are a World Economic Forum first mover, you are the winners” (here).

These very serious statements have two implications: the first is that “the winners will take it all” and will be “winners” – it is not clear in what capacity and with whose permission. The second is that those who do not adapt to this “fourth industrial revolution” will find themselves ousted and will lose – they will lose everything, including their freedom. In short, Klaus Schwab is threatening the heads of government of the twenty most industrialized nations in the world to carry out the programmatic points of the Great Reset in their nations.

This goes far beyond the pandemic: it is a global coup d’état, against which it is essential that people rise up and that the still healthy organs of states start an international juridical process. The threat is imminent and serious, since the World Economic Forum is capable of carrying out its subversive project and those who govern nations have all become either enslaved or blackmailed by this international mafia.

In light of these statements – and those of others no less delusional than Yuval Noah Harari, Schwab’s adviser – we understand how the pandemic farce served as a trial balloon for imposing controls, coercive measures, curtailing individual freedoms, and increasing unemployment and poverty. The next steps will have to be carried out by means of economic and energy crises, which are instrumental to the establishment of a synarchic government in the hands of the globalist elite.

And here, dear friends, allow me to speak as a bishop. Because in this series of events that we are witnessing and will continue to witness, your commitment could risk being thwarted or limited by the fact of not being able to see its essentially spiritual nature. I know that two centuries of Enlightenment thought, revolutions, atheistic materialism and anticlerical liberalism have accustomed us to thinking of Faith as a personal matter, or that there is not an objective Truth to which we all must conform. But this is the fruit of a propaedeutic indoctrination, one that happened long before what is happening today, and it would be foolish to believe that the anti-Christian ideology that drove the secret sects and Masonic groups of the eighteenth century had nothing to do with the anti-Christian ideology that today drives people like Klaus Schwab, George Soros, and Bill Gates. The driving principles are the same: rebellion against God, hatred for the Church and humanity, and destructive fury aimed against Creation and especially against man because he is created in the image and likeness of God.

If you start from this evidence, you will understand that it is not possible to pretend that what is happening before our eyes is solely the result of profit-seeking or the desire for power. Certainly, the economic part cannot be disregarded, considering how many people have collaborated with the World Economic Forum. And yet, beyond profit, there are unstated purposes that stem from a “theological” vision – one that is turned upside-down, it’s true, but still theological – a vision that sees two opposing sides: the side of Christ and the side of the Antichrist.

There can be no neutrality, because when there is a clash between two armies, those who choose not to fight are also making a choice that affects the outcome of the battle. On the other hand, how is it possible to recognize in your noble and high professions the admirable order that the Creator has placed in nature (from the constellations of stars to the particles of the atom) and then deny that man is also part of this order, with his moral sense, his laws, his culture, and his discoveries? How can man, who is God’s creature, presume to not be subject himself to eternal and perfect laws?

Our battle is not against creatures made of flesh and blood, but against the Principalities and Powers, against the rulers of this world of darkness, against the spirits of evil that dwell in the heavenly places (Eph 6:12).

On the one hand, there is the City of God – the one Saint Augustine writes about – and on the other hand there is the city of the devil. We can say that in this era the city of the devil is clearly identifiable in neo-Malthusian globalism, the New World Order, the United Nations, the World Economic Forum, the European Union, the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund, and in all those so called “philanthropical foundations” that follow an ideology of death, disease, destruction, and tyranny. And also in those forces that have infiltrated the institutions, which we call the deep state and the deep church.

On the other front, we must recognize that the City of God is more difficult to identify. Even the religious authorities appear to have betrayed their role of giving guidance to the faithful, preferring to serve power and propagate their lies. The very people who ought to be protecting and sanctifying souls are scattering and scandalizing them, calling good Christians rigid fundamentalists. As you can see, the attack is on several fronts, and thus it is a mortal threat for humanity, striking at both the body and the soul.

And yet, precisely at a time when it is difficult to find authoritative points of reference – both in the religious sphere as well as the temporal one – we see an ever-increasing number of those who are understanding, opening their eyes, and recognizing the criminal mind behind the evolution of events. It is now clear that everything is linked together, without having to dismiss those who say so as “conspiracy theorists.” The conspiracy is already there: we are not inventing it, we are simply denouncing it, hoping that people wake up from this suicidal narcosis and demand that someone put an end to the global coup.

The operations of social engineering and mass manipulation have demonstrated beyond any doubt that this crime was premeditated, and how it is consistent with a “spiritual” vision of the conflict that is now unfolding: it is necessary to take sides and fight, without giving in. The Truth – which is an attribute of God – cannot be cancelled by error, and Life cannot be defeated by death: remember that the Lord, who has said of Himself, “I am the Way, the Truth, and the Life,” has already defeated Satan, and what remains of the battle serves only to give us the opportunity to make the right choice, to choose to do those actions which place us under the banner of Christ, on the side of Good.

I trust that this great work you are undertaking will soon bear its expected fruits, putting an end to a time of trial in which we see how the world will become if we do not turn to Christ, if we continue to think that we can coexist with evil, lying, and self-worship. After all, the City of God is the model of those who live in God’s love, self-control, and contempt for the world; the city of the devil is the model of those who live in self-love, conforming to the world and despising God.

I thank you and bless you all.

Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò was born on January 16, 1941 in Varese, Italy.  He was ordained a priest on March 24, 1968 and incardinated in the Diocese of Pavia (Italy). He has a Doctorate in both Canon and Civil Law (Utroque Iure).

His Excellency started his service in the Diplomatic Corps of the Holy See as Attaché in 1973 in Iraq and Kuwait. In 1976 he was transferred to the Apostolic Nunciature in Great Britain. From 1978 until 1989 he worked at the Secretariat of State of Vatican City. On April 4, 1989 he was nominated Special Envoy with the functions of Permanent Observer to the European Council in Strasbourg.

He was elected Archbishop on April 3, 1992. On April 26, 1992 he was consecrated and made Titular Archbishop of Ulpiana. He was nominated Apostolic Pro-Nuncio in Nigeria, on April 3, 1992. On April 4, 1998 he was nominated Delegate for the Pontifical Representations.

Archbishop Viganò served as Secretary General of the Governorate of the Vatican City State from July 16, 2009 until September 3, 2011. On October 19, 2011 Pope Benedict XVI appointed him Apostolic Nuncio to the United States.

He speaks Italian, French, Spanish and English

ISRAPUNDIT HOMEPAGE

DEPOPULATION: The Will of the Elite


John R. Houk, Blog Editor

© October 28, 2022

DEPOPULATION is not a novel or new concept. The Depopulation ideology as a concept for the good of the planet has been around at least since Thomas Malthus began his oft proven erroneous predictions with his first publication in 1798. In the 20th and 21st centuries Global Leftists have adopted the Malthus theories on overpopulation and lean on depopulating humans from the Earth to maintain a sustainable food paradigm for the living. OF COURSE these same Global Leftists ALSO use erroneous climate science to preserve the Earth for the Elites enjoyment and damn the masses who only exist to serve the Elites. Four critical posts of the Malthus ideology:

The premise behind these four criticisms of Malthus, is Malthus failed to consider the variable of technological innovations that increase food production to match population growth. ERGO, Depopulation-minded Left-Wing Globalists decided to help Malthus along by destroying technology/industry that is involved in food production (Take note food processing plants mysteriously burning to the ground globally, Bidenflation shutting down fertilizer plants, steel mills etc. and so on). AND SHAZZAM! The cabal of Left-Wing Globalists (an odd combination Fascist-Corporatist-Marxist-Globalist eclectic principles) create the conditions that transform Thomas Malthus from a dunderhead to a genius.

Unsurprisingly, a depopulated Earth is an easier to control the people Earth to maintain the Elitist Utopia of ecological-societal transformation.

Here are some articles and videos that tap into the words and/or writings of the Elites’ desires to rule whether humanity likes it or not.

I for one say, “NOT!”

JRH 10/28/22

Thank you to those who have stepped up!

READER SUPPORTED! I need Readers willing to chip in $5 – $10 – $25 – $50 – $100. PLEASE I need your generosity. PLEASE GIVE to Help me be a voice for Liberty:

Please Support CPCR

Big Tech Censorship is pervasive – Share voluminously on all social media platforms!

**************************

Globalists making final push for depopulated one-world order: How do we resist?

Global Depopulation Eugenics Agendas

By Leo Hohmann

October 25, 2022

LeoHohmann.com

  • Are you still trying to make sense of all the insanity in the world, or maybe trying to help a friend or family member make sense of it?
  • Drag queens in schools, libraries, even churches and other settings targeting children and families.
  • The seemingly unhinged attacks on everything that is good and necessary for a healthy society and the celebration of everything that is evil.
  • Food prices rising out of control, with whispers of famine on the horizon (See herehere and here).
  • The suicidal war on so-called “fossil fuels” like coal, oil and natural gas, when it’s becoming obvious (look at Europe) that no nation can survive without them.
  • The fact that the U.S.-led NATO and Russia-China are on a collision course toward World War III, with both sides threatening nuclear strikes.

For answers, consider reading and sharing my post from back on May 26, “Globalists have entered the kill phase of the Great Reset.”

A relatively small entourage of self-appointed globalist elites are using engineered famine, engineered pandemics, vaccines, and World War III to accomplish their long-stated goal of depopulation.

That’s why we call them global predators. These globalists are in the final phase, the kill phase, of destroying the post-World War II liberal world order, which must be accomplished before they can implement a new world order based on a cashless digital economy tied to a digital ID that tracks every person and assigns them a social credit score.

Before you can “build back better,” you must eliminate every trace of the old world order. Burn it all down. Destroy families. Destroy economies. Destroy currencies. Make people suffer.

And the most critical component of their deconstruction plan is depopulation.

Everything you see going on in geo-politics today is meant to drive depopulation. From LGBTQ mania (they don’t reproduce) and food shortages to endless genetically engineered viruses and the fanatical religious fervor for ever-expanding abortion rights, and the introduction of deadly “vaccines” — it all points toward one thing – more death.

And now we have found yet another smoking gun comment from a key globalist figure, Dennis Meadows.

Meadows authored the 1972 book Limits to Growth, which was endorsed by the Club of Rome and is still sold on its website today. The Club of Rome was the originator of the goals contained in United Nations Agenda 21 Sustainable Development, and chief among those goals was the need for fewer human beings on planet Earth. Meadows argued in his book for a drastic depopulation program.

Two years later, in 1974, Henry Kissinger authored the Kissinger Report, which followed up on the same theme put forth by Meadows, advocating a systematic reduction of the population of Third World countries through the introduction of birth control (including abortion), fomenting civil wars and orchestrated famine. Now those same strategic weapons are being turned inward on the United States and the West, with the addition of poisonous medical treatments disguised as “vaccines.”

Bill Gates, Klaus Schwab and all of the global predators of today are committed to this same agenda.

That’s why Schwab told us last year that “nobody is safe unless everyone is vaccinated.” On its face, such a statement makes no sense. Why would no one be safe unless everyone is vaccinated? If it’s a true vaccine, each individual who receives it should be inoculated, right? Until you understand that these vaccines were never intended to save lives but to destroy them, you can’t make sense of what these psychopaths are saying. It’s not about your health, it’s about killing some and making others sterile. That’s why they say you MUST get them. To refuse them makes you no better than a criminal. No other vaccine has ever been marketed with that kind of all-or-nothing bravado.

Bill Gates, in his 2010 TED Talk, also revealed his overriding agenda when he said the key to achieving “net zero” carbon emissions, was depopulation.

Gates said:

“So you’ve got a thing on the left, CO2, that you want to get to zero, and that’s going to be based on the number of people, the services each person is using on average, the energy, on average, for each service, and the CO2 being put out per unit of energy. So let’s look at each one of these, and see how we can get this down to zero. Probably, one of these numbers is going to have to get pretty near to zero.

“First, we’ve got population. The world today has 6.8 billion people. That’s headed up to about 9 billion. Now, if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that by, perhaps, 10 or 15 percent.”

So it’s not like we needed another confession, another confirmation, from yet another globalist insider. We already had Kissinger, Gates, Schwab, King Charles and many others. But in case you did need another, here is Dennis Meadows spilling his guts and shedding crocodile tears while saying how badly he wants the vast majority of us dead.

[Blog Editor: The below twitter link functioned yesterday. The Twitter-tyrants claim it cannot be viewed for this reason: “You’re unable to view this Tweet because this account owner limits who can view their Tweets. Learn more“]

https://twitter.com/GlobalFreedomM/status/1516082366372098048

It’s truly amazing how these monsters speak in such warm and friendly tones as they’re telling their fellow human beings they need to die.

Meadows says the world’s population needs to be reduced from 7.5 billion down to 1 billion, but he “hopes” that we will all just agree to somehow be eliminated without becoming violent!

He knows damn well there’s no way to achieve that level of depopulation, we’re talking 87 percent, without spilling a lot of blood, on top of the blood that’s already being spilled on a daily basis through abortion and Big Pharma poisons.

As horrific as the abortion and Big Pharma industries have become, they can’t, on their own, get the global population down to 1 billion. They must trigger the next Great War. The preliminary phase of that war was kicked off when they released the deadly mRNA “vaccines” and pressured everyone to get them. It’s very telling that China isn’t giving its people the mRNA shots.

No, they are keeping their population strong while watching the Western nations weaken themselves. When we are sufficiently weakened by repeated jabs, look for China to make its move. Russia will draw us into war first, in Ukraine, and when enough of our military is deployed over there, that’s when China will make its move against Taiwan and possibly more.

They know the U.S., even before the shots were introduced and mandated on our military, was not prepared to fight on two fronts.

The runup to World War III will be gradual, collapsing our already weakened economy in the process. But civil war could break out sooner than world war, as it seems the U.S. deep state is already laying a narrative to accuse somebody, either the Russians or the Republicans, of somehow stealing the November 8 midterm elections.

So while many are predicting nuclear holocaust and World War III, I’m of the belief that civil war and economic collapse could come first.

Regardless of the order, most Americans today, unlike in the Great Depression, lack the resourcefulness and the skills to survive during an extended period of extreme economic hardship.

A friend who is an Iraq War veteran once told me that the one thing he learned in a war zone was that folks you thought were friends could turn on you overnight if it meant taking something you have in order to feed their starving children.

In the meantime, remember that we are the resistance to the Great Reset (aka global slave state). No politician, police force, no military unit is going to ride to our rescue. We defeat them through prayer, networking together and dedicated civil disobedience. [Blog Editor Bold Emphasis]

What do I mean by civil disobedience? Everything you hear the establishment “authorities” telling us to do through their mouthpieces in the mainstream media, do the opposite.

  • They say that to save grandma you must get another shot. Refuse.
  • They say cover your face with a mask. Refuse.
  • They say that to save the planet it’s time to trade in your gasoline-fueled car for an electric car. Refuse.
  • They say it’s better to buy things online, so buy in person whenever possible.
  • They say it’s more sustainable to eat bugs for protein. Refuse.
  • They say it’s time to give up control over your thermostat. Refuse.
  • They say it’s time to give up your right to defend yourself and your family with firearms and only the “authorities” should have guns. Refuse and take responsibility for your own security.
  • They say burning wood is bad, so fill your woodshed and burn baby burn.
  • They say it’s time to sell your land in the country and move into a smart city. Refuse.
  • They say it’s time to trade paper dollars for digital dollars. Refuse.
  • They say it’s time to get that digital health passport on your cellphone. Refuse.
  • Above all, refuse to remain silent. Speak truth to power in whatever circles you run.

You get the picture. We must become the refusniks of the 21st century.

Refuse their techno-totalitarian digital dark age, where they have told us that we will own nothing, not even our own bodies, and somehow learn to like it.

So prepare accordingly. And pray for a breakthrough that will get the world off this collision course it’s currently on, where both sides seem to want war.

And remember: We are not each other’s enemy. Your Democrat neighbor is not your enemy.

The enemy is the globalist predators driving a wedge between you and your neighbor. Because they are so few, they can only win if they divide us off from each other and get us to start killing each other. Don’t take the bait. Help your neighbors. Love your neighbors.

The fact is, these elites know they can never fully control 7.5 billion people. They need fewer of us and what better way to eliminate the freedom fighters – those who’ve adopted a physical, mental, emotional and spiritual warrior mentality – than to poison them with vaccines and send them to the front lines of the next big war.

Fear not. Our God laughs at the futility of those who think themselves greater than He, the one and only, the Almighty.

LeoHohmann.com is 100 percent reader supported, meaning we don’t accept any corporate ads or sponsorships, which is why we can independently bring you the real news, along with useful analysis. To help keep us going, you may send donations of any size c/o Leo Hohmann, P.O. Box 291, Newnan, GA 30264, or electronically HERE [Blog Editor: If the donation link does not work on blog, it will work on Leo Hohmann’s website].

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

The World Has Been Witnessing & Will Continue To Witness The Reincarnation Of How The Nazis Targeted The Disabled – Unless It Is Stopped (Videos)

By Tim Brown

October 25, 2022

The Washington Standard

Over the past few years, we have seen how what masquerades as American government has targeted the elderly and the disabled. We’ve witnessed a holocaust dwarfing anything that happened in Europe with the murder of the unborn in the US. However, these things are not new. They are some of the oldest sins in human history only devised with new means of committing them. Consider just the targeting of the disabled during CONvid-1984. Remember, the first victims of the CONvids, after the truth of course, were the elderly in nursing homes and many who were disabled.

In 2021, 19-year-old Grace Schara was targeted because she had Down Syndrome. To gain some insight into Grace’s story, Scott Schara came on The Sons of Liberty radio with me. In our first interview, he laid out what happened and had suspicions of premeditated murder. He soon gathered enough documentation to know that the doctors and nurses in charge of caring for Grace were actually her executioners. Later, he would join up with Holocaust survivor Vera Sharav.

Were Hospital Protocols Responsible For Murder Of This Man’s Teen Daughter?

Rumble VIDEO: Were Hospital Protocols Responsible For Murder Of This Man’s Teen Daughter?

Documents Indicate Premeditated Murder Of Teen Daughter With Down Syndrome By Wisconsin Hospital (Video)

Rumble VIDEO: Documents Indicate Premeditated Murder Of Teen Daughter With Down Syndrome By Wisconsin Hospital

From Nazi Germany To The World: The Fight Against The New Holocaust (Video)

Rumble VIDEO: From Nazi Germany To The World: The Fight Against The New Holocaust

Now, compare what Scott presented with what Vera presented and then consider the following two videos that deal with that targeting of the disabled in Nazi Germany.

Disability Awareness Month: Remembering the Nazis’ First Victims of Mass Murder

Youtube VIDEO: Disability Awareness Month: Remembering the Nazis’ First Victims of Mass Murder

Youtube VIDEO: Hitler’s Extermination Program for the Disabled – Aktion T4 | Professor Graeme Yorston

Tim Brown is an author and Editor at FreedomOutpost.comSonsOfLibertyMedia.comGunsInTheNews.com and TheWashingtonStandard.com. He is husband to his “more precious than rubies” wife, father of 10 “mighty arrows”, jack of all trades, Christian and lover of liberty. He resides in the U.S. occupied Great State of South Carolina. . Follow Tim on Twitter. Also check him out on GabMindsMeWeSpreelyMumbl It and Steemit

COPYRIGHT © THE WASHINGTON STANDARD, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. OUR POSTS CONTAIN AFFILIATE LINKS AND WE EARN A SMALL COMMISSION FROM THOSE LINKS. THIS IS HOW WE HELP TO MAKE MONEY SO WE CAN CONTINUE TO BRING YOU AMAZING CONTENT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR SUPPORT.

+++++++++++++++++

Bitchute VIDEO: FIXED: MARGARET SANGER’S “HUMAN WEEDS” GENOCIDE WITH STERILIZATION AND ABORTION (ROCKEFELLER FUNDED)

Posted by Tim Truth

First Published October 25th, 2022 18:10 UTC 

I somehow lost some info about the Rockefeller funding of Sanger which has now been included in the first 5 minutes of this updated version.

MORE DESCRIPTION

++++++++++++++++++++

Bitchute VIDEO: WEF HIGH PRIEST REVEALS GLOBALIST PLAN TO ESCAPE ENGINEERED COLLAPSE, EMERGE AS GODS!

Posted by BANNED.VIDEOInfowars

First Published October 27th, 2022 07:44 UTC

Alex Jones breaks down the globalist plan to eradicate humanity and become AI gods as Noah Yuval Harari [Blog Editor: It’s actually Yuval Noah Harari, but for the “Noah’s Ark” analogy; I suspect the first and middle names were purposely transposed.] recently claimed that a digital ‘Noah’s Ark’ will replace human consciousness after eradication of the population.

See the original tweeted video here: https://twitter.com/Resist_05/status/1585080574712373250?s=20

MORE DESCRIPTION

++++++++++++++++++++++

Rumble VIDEO: The Depopulation Agenda UNCENSORED

Posted by George Christensen

Published October 14, 2022

Former Australian politician George Christensen — now editor of NationFirst.substack.com — outlines the globalist ‘elite’ agenda for the depopulation of humanity. It’s all part of the Great Reset being pushed by Klaus Schwab and his World Economic Forum minions.

MORE DESCRIPTION

WEF-Great Reset Conceived Evil


John R. Houk, Blog Editor

© August 22, 2022

The World Economic Forum (WEF) and its Marxist-Fascist-Elitist supporters are an evil blight upon the U.S. Constitution, U.S. Sovereignty, Individual Liberty and Biblical Christian faith in general.

Unless you are a Dem-Marxist Sheeple wholly subscribed to the WEF’s One World Order, you should subscribe to the Thrivetime Show’s WEF exposé videos labeled The ReAwakening versus The Great Reset on Rumble. Most of the videos are short using WEF’ers own words to demonstrate their insidious evil agenda. Some longer videos are made with a Documentary impact.

Here is a series of short Thrivetime videos from August 22 (YOU should really take the time to view some of the longer Documentary/News-byte videos):

Rumble VIDEO: Yuval Noah Harari | “We Just Don’t Need the Vast Majority of the Population.”

VIDEO DESCRIPTION

+++

Rumble VIDEO: COVID-19 Tests | Is the Purpose of COVID-19 Tests Linked to Human Cloning Experiments?

VIDEO DESCRIPTION

+++++++++++++++++++++

Rumble VIDEO: The Great Reset | Did the World Economic Forum Just Recommend Killing 94% of the Earth’s Population??!!

VIDEO DESCRIPTION

+++++++++++++++++++++++++

Rumble VIDEO: The Great Reset | Klaus Schwab Says, “When You See the Book of Professor Harari Homo Deus..The New Technologies Will Change (Humans) Us. It Is the Fusion of the Physical, Biological and Digital Worlds.”

VIDEO DESCRIPTION

+++++++++++++++++

And the video that was in my inbox from 8/20:

Rumble VIDEO: Klaus Schwab | “The Difference of This Fourth Industrial Revolution Is That It Changes YOU If You Take the Genetic Editing.”

VIDEO DESCRIPTION

+++++++++++++++++

The above videos is only a small sampling of the Thrivetime Show exposing just how evil the WEF-Great Reset coupled with ALL who subscribe to that nefarious agenda truly is. Dementia Biden/Dem-Marxism is absolutely on board with this evil transformation not just America but for every single human being on planet earth.

One last share. I ran into an Activist Post article showing the WEF has big plans to control YOUR children by microchipping them. “The title: World Economic Forum Suggests There Are “rational” Reasons to Microchip Your Child.”

JRH 8/22/22

Thank you to those who have stepped up!

READER SUPPORTED! I need Readers willing to chip in $5 – $10 – $25 – $50 – $100. PLEASE I need your generosity. PLEASE GIVE to Help me be a voice for Liberty:

Please Support SlantRight 2.0

Big Tech Censorship is pervasive – Share voluminously on all social media platforms!

***********************

World Economic Forum Suggests There Are “rational” Reasons to Microchip Your Child

Schwab & Microchipping Kids

By Didi Rankovic

August 20, 2022

Activist Post

The latest highly controversial technology/policy that the World Economic Forum (WEF) has set out to normalize is the idea of implanting tracking chips into humans.

It wasn’t that long ago that those speculating on a future where this is happening would get dismissed as conspiracy theorists, but now the world elites’ most vocal outlet is predicting that chip implants will eventually become just a commodity.

And the WEF makes a case that implanting chips into children could be viewed by parents as a “solid, rational” move. All of this crops up in a blog post on the organization’s website dedicated to the future of augmented reality (AR), and what is referred to as “an augmented society.”

Like in many of WEF’s other takes on the future of various types of technology, the emphasis is put on inserting the “right,” i.e., its own “vision” in the direction these should be developing, with the inevitable mention of undefined society stakeholders who will hold the key to the ethics issue of it all.

The WEF is talking up the allegedly broad usefulness of AR going forward in fields such as healthcare, education, and professional settings, with the underpinning notion of providing guidelines as to how to “ethically” regulate this vast potential power – and therefore, when all’s said and done, control it.

The WEF calls AR and similar tech transformative – but in need of “the right support, vision, and audacity.”

Once again it isn’t at all clear why “audacity” is thrown in, unless it is a euphemism to sell some pretty outrageous “visions” that the WEF is expressing, such as replacing drugs with brain implants that will manipulate the body with electrical pulses, and pairing all sorts of chips put into humans through surgery, with sensors one might find in a chair.

And so, with the human and the chair “seamlessly integrated,” the quality of life across the board shoots up, the Davos-based group promises.

“As scary as chip implants may sound, they form part of a natural evolution that wearables once underwent. Hearing aids or glasses no longer carry a stigma,” the blog post reads. “They are accessories and are even considered a fashion item. Likewise, implants will evolve into a commodity.”

But critics of these trends say their opposition has nothing to do with “stigmas” – rather with serious concerns about civil rights, privacy, and the very concept of human autonomy.

If you’re tired of censorship, cancel culture, and the erosion of civil liberties subscribe to Reclaim The Net.

Source: Reclaim the Net

ACTIVIST POST – ALTERNATIVE INDEPENDENT NEWS – CREATIVE COMMONS 2019

Are YOU Ready for the Transhumanist Collective?


John R. Houk, Blog Editor

© May 4, 2022

It is bad enough to live in a world in which YOU are told what to think, what to believe, to have government only paths to prosper, how to govern your own health or when and where your Church is available – YES, THAT IS BAD ENOUGH!

I’m a Baby Boomer. I still remember freedom of choice free   government interference. I grew up in a time when outdoor entertainment such as neighborhood baseball (think of the movie The Sandlot), other outdoor sports, swimming in the lake, camping and so on were way more important than staying home. Granted, I grew up where it got very cold in the Winter and got weary of freezing snowball fights quicker than most. So I was glued to a lot of sixties TV in those days.

Today in the 21st century I see my grandkids more interested to entertainment on their smartphone than healthy outdoor activity. I began to wonder if these kids would find happiness with their brains being directly connected to their smartphone in some way.

THEN I began to discover the aspirations of the World Economic Forum (WEF). It is bad enough the WEF wants a non-representative ONE-World government that defines what is culturally acceptable and what is unacceptable for WEF-defined Global Peace. I discovered the WEF Agenda includes a Transhumanist Global Transformation.

Transhumanism is marketed as a path to enhance human living for the better. It is the merging of biology with high-tech mechanisms. The high-tech focus is wiring the brain wirelessly to some computer. The marketing is clarity of mind, quicker thinking, better health (including life longevity). WHAT COULD THE MARKETING BE NOT TELLING YOU?

Once one’s brain is wirelessly connected, it will also be susceptible digital commands from whom ever or whatever controls the computer.

At this point forget The Sandlot and pick up The Terminator movie series or Star Trek’s concepts of The Borg off the top of my head. Essentially Transhumanism is whoever controls the Collective controls YOU or seeks to eliminate YOU.

The WEF has brought Science Fiction to the cusp of science reality with stated and documented goals to implement this agenda. The WEF has such confidence, those Elitists appear to have no concern about who knows. AND something to ponder –  For those Conservatives elated Elon Musk bought Twitter to restore Free Speech, YOU will discover Musk is a huge promoter of Transhumanism. Liberty-lovers need to wonder about Musk motives and plans.

JRH 5/4/22

READER SUPPORTED! I need Readers willing to chip in $5 – $10 – $25 – $50 – $100. I need your generosity. PLEASE GIVE to overcome research expenses:

Please Support NCCR

Big Tech Censorship is pervasive – Share voluminously on all social media platforms!

*************************

TRANSHUMANISM: THE EVIL FORCE BEHIND THE NEW WORLD ORDER

Great Reset – WEF & Gates Foundation

By Jonathan C. Brentner

April 28, 2022

JonathanBrentner.com

Klaus Schwab – WEF

It really shouldn’t have surprised me, but I must confess that it did.

Wikipedia’s description of the New World Order (NWO), quoted below, amazed me when I read it the first time:

The New World Order (NWO) is a conspiracy theory which hypothesizes a secretly emerging totalitarian world government.

How stupid do they think we are!? The days are long past when the Luciferian globalists of our day remain silent about their plans to bring about this evil agenda. The world government proposed by the UN’s Agenda 2030 and the Great Reset of the World Economic Forum (WEF) are open, public declarations of their united effort to usher in a NWO that is “totalitarian” and Marxist. In March of this year, President Biden talked about the need to commit America to the NWO. It’s not secret nor is it a “conspiracy theory!”

They are also no longer quiet about their transhumanism goals, which lie at the heart of their plans to bring in the NWO.

One might ask, “What does transhumanism have to do with their plans for a Communistic world government?” Everything, they cannot force allegiance to the Great Reset without it. The two go hand-in-hand.

KLAUS SCHWAB: THE DRIVING FORCE OF THE GREAT RESET

Transhumanism, along with the push for world governance, finds its most fervent support with Klaus Schwab, the founder and head of the WEF. His position of influence over the governments of the world is immense. Since 1992, he has run a school to indoctrinate future global leaders and the majority of all the presidents and leaders of nations today have gone through his training.

Here is quote from a blog post written by Leo Hohmann, investigative reporter and blogger, regarding this elite training given to up-and-coming leaders of the world:

“In 1992, Klaus Schwab and World Economic Forum launched a program initially called Global Leaders of Tomorrow. In 2004, this program was turned into the Forum for Young Global Leaders . . . –  a 5-year program of indoctrination into WEFs principles and goals. The aim was – and is – to find suitable future leaders for the emerging global society. The program has since its inception has included politicians, business leaders, royalty, journalists, performers and other cultural influencers who have excelled in their fields but have not yet turned 40 years of age (originally 43 in order to include Angela Merkel). It has since grown into an extensive global network of dedicated leaders with enormous resources and influence, all working to implement the technocratic plans of the World Economic Forum in their respective nations and fields.

“The network creates a force for worldwide influence through the combination of the individual skills and resources of its members.”[i]

The school enables Schwab to thoroughly instill in these leaders his vision for a one-world government, the Great Reset. Once thoroughly brainwashed in the agenda of the WEF and devoted to its ideals, they go out into the world as leaders of both governments and commerce.

Klaus Schwab is also a key motivating force behind the push for transhumanism, which he calls the “Fourth Industrial Revolution,” his term for transhumanism. Schwab talks often about the merging “the physical, digital and biological worlds,” the combining of people with machines.

This is not surprising as the most influential and cherished advisor to Klaus Schwab and is also the leading proponent of transhumanism in the world, Yuval Noah Harari.

YUVAL NOAH HARARI: THE MAN BEHIND THE CURTAIN

Harari is an Israeli public intellectual, historian, best-selling author, and a professor in the Department of History at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem. His main claim to fame is that he’s the key advisor to Klaus Schwab of the WEF. As his righthand man, Harari’s input to the ideals held by government and business leaders around the world is profound.

Yuval Noah Harari

When one goes to Harari’s official website (https://www.ynharari.com), one immediately sees this quote on the home page, “History began when humans invented gods, and will end when humans become gods.”

Leo Hohmann also wrote the following quote concerning Harari from his interview with Patrick Wood, editor in chief at Technocracy News and Trends. Not only is Harari the key advisor to the head of the WEF, “he has millions of devoted followers.”

“He is your model transhumanist who thinks he can become god,” Wood told me. “He is the chief philosophical adviser to the World Economic Forum and one of the premiere authorities in WEF circles. They just hang on his every word.” (quote from Patrick Wood)

The level of evil we are dealing with here is so intense that most Christians and conservatives have no idea how deep it goes and will frankly have trouble believing it. No politician is going to be able to save us from this evil, only Jesus Christ.

Another thing worth noting is that Harari is not only tied in with Schwab. He has a large following among Western elites. One of Harari’s admirers is Barack Obama, the man who has the ear of Joe Biden. In fact, Obama has called Harari his favorite author.[ii]

Yuval Noah Harari is the man behind the curtain. He’s the driving force behind transhumanism, a key component of Schwab’s Great Reset.

TRANSHUMANISM RESTS ON ATHEISTIC EVOLUTION

The elite regard transhumanism as the next step in the human evolutionary process. While all the other development advancements happened to us, they say, now we get to have a say in the future enhancements of our race. The combining of humans with machines is but another step in the continuing evolutionary progression of mankind.

Transhumanists are avid atheists who see themselves as aiding the evolution of humanity.

Do not let the proponents of the NWO or the Great Reset deceive you; they all accept transhumanism is an essential step to convince people of the need for world governance. Some of these globalists may profess a belief in God or allegiance to a church, but they are lying. They are all staunch atheists who reject all that Scripture says about creation, especially Genesis 1:27, “God created man in his own image.”

TRANSHUMANISM DEVALUES HUMAN LIVE

If there is one verse to keep in mind when thinking about the transhumanists, it’s John 8:44. In this verse, Jesus is confronting the Jews who opposed Him:

“You are of your father the devil, and your will is to do your father’s desires. He was a murderer from the beginning, and does not stand in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he lies, he speaks out of his own character, for he is a liar and the father of lies.”

The proponents of the NWO are all Luciferian transhumanists that lack all respect for human life. They have already deceived a great many people with their lies.

Here are some quotes from Yuval Noah Harari that I took from interview clips Jan Markell’s bi-monthly Understanding the Times conference in Minneapolis on April 21, 2022. This event also featured Pastor Brandon Holthaus and Pastor Mark Henry. In these videos we watched Harari say the following:

Humans are now hackable animals that will be re-engineered.

Previously, government surveillance was above the skin, now it’s going under the skin.”

The free will to choose who we vote for or what we buy in the supermarket, human free will, That’s over! (my emphasis)

Can you see the devaluation of human life bubbling to the top in these quotes? Previously, I have written at length about how we see this in abortion, infanticide, and the war in Ukraine. Now with Harari, we see the same murderous agenda and deception that Jesus talked about in John 8:44.

The transhumanists see us as “hackable animals” that they hope to enslave and totally control.

Harari also said this, which at first seems contradictory to his other declarations:

Humans are acquiring divine powers . . . and the power to re-engineer life.

So yes, he says that “humans are acquiring divine powers,” but perhaps it’s only for those in power rather than those that the elite hope to control. Transhumanism is about the masses worshipping them as gods. Is this not preparing the world for the coming “man of lawlessness” that Paul wrote about in 2 Thessalonians 2:3-4?

Let no one deceive you in any way. For that day will not come, unless the rebellion comes first, and the man of lawlessness is revealed, the son of destruction, who opposes and exalts himself against every so-called god or object of worship, so that he takes his seat in the temple of God, proclaiming himself to be God.

The spirit of the antichrist is alive and well in Harari. In one of the interviews that I referenced earlier, Harari referred to Jesus’ resurrection from the dead and His claim to be the Son of God as “fake news.”

JESUS IS OUR ONLY HOPE

Leo Hohmann is correct, we are dealing with a force that’s far more evil, and I might add deadlier, than anything we can imagine. Jesus is our only hope for the time in which we live.

The Luciferian globalists are far along in their plans to bring about the NWO. It does not matter what the majority of people want, they have the power necessary to assert their control over our will. This happened with 2020 Presidential Election in America. It happened in 2021 with vaccine mandates that resulted in the deaths of a great many people. The riots that took place all through Paris on April 24, 2022, were in response to the reelection of Emanuel Macron, who many Parisians did not believe really won the election.

Once the elite put digital currencies in place across the world, it will be game over. They will have the control they need to begin tightening their stranglehold on humanity, which will lead to the beast government of the Tribulation period. As Harari stated as the goal of transhumanism, the will of the people no longer matters, “that’s over!”

Now for the good news, the future tense of the Gospel: Scripture assures us that Jesus is coming to take us home to heaven before God’s wrath falls on this evil Christ-rejecting world (2 Thessalonians 5:1-11). We will be out of here long before the antichrist exerts his control over the coming NWO.

In contrast to what the world tells us is “fake news,” we indeed serve a risen Savior whose words are true and certain. He is the true Son of God and He’s coming very soon to take us to the place He’s preparing for us (John 14:2-3). We can be absolutely certain of this.

Our hope rests on a sure foundation: Jesus!!

If you desire greater confidence regarding the pretribulation Rapture, please consider purchasing my book, The Triumph of the Redeemed-An eternal Perspective that Calms Our Fears in Perilous Times. I spent over a thousand hours studying and researching the basis for our imminent hope so I could present a solid, biblical case for the pretribulation Rapture. You can find my book on Amazon. Thanks!!

Never forget: Jesus’ imminent appearing to take us home is the solid foundation of our hope in these perilous times.

Jonathan C. Brentner

Website: Our Journey Home

FOOT NOTES:

[i] Leo Hohmann, Klaus Schwab’s puppet ‘Young Global Leaders’ revealed — Trudeau in Canada, Buttigieg in U.S., Macron in France, and many more, on his blog @ https://leohohmann.com/2022/02/10/klaus-schwabs-puppet-young-global-leaders-revealed-trudeau-in-canada-buttigieg-in-u-s-macron-in-france-and-many-more/#more-8956

[ii] Leo Hohmann, Who influences the influencers? Meet Klaus Schwab’s chief adviser, March 15, 2022 on His blog.

+++++++++++++++++++++

Warning: Elon ‘Iron Man’ Musk is Supplying Globalists With the Technology to Control Our Minds (Watch)

Musk Neuralink Tweet screen Grab

Posted by Constitutional Nobody

Authored by Amy Mek

April 28, 2022

USSA News

During a 2017 World Economic Forum (WEF) meeting, Klaus Schwab asked Evil Google co-founder Sergey Brin if he could envision a future where everyone has a brain chip.

Big Data digital tools are developing rapidly, said the founder of the WEF. “Can you imagine that in 10 years, when we are sitting here, we have an implant in our brains, and you all will have implants – we can measure your brain waves, and I can immediately tell how people react, or I can feel how people react to your answers? Is that imaginable?”

“That’s imaginable,” Brin replied, then sketched a transhumanist future where consciousness is shifted to machines.

“You’re basically transplanted to the internet to live forever in the digital world,” he said. “In your biological incarnation, you can then become very old.”

Brin added that the direction of technological development is impossible to predict.

Rumble VIDEO: Klaus Schwab in 2017: ‘Can you imagine that in 10 years we will have a brain chip?’

[Posted by RAIRFoundationUSA

Published April 28, 2022

Read the full story at RAIR Foundation USA:

Pentagon’s Research Arm is Experimenting on Hacking Human Minds as Globalists Rejoice (Video) https://rairfoundation.com/pentagons-research-arm-is-experimenting-on-hacking-human-minds-as-globalists-rejoice-video/]

World Economic Forum

Connecting the human brain to computers is a goal of all globalists and their organizations. Watch the World Economic Forum leader and “transhumanism” enthusiast Klaus Schwab casually discuss a future where chips will be implanted in people’s brains from this 2016 interview,

Rumble VIDEO: Klaus Schwab: Great Reset Will “Lead to a Fusion of Our Physical, Digital and Biological Identity”

[Posted by RAIRFoundationUSA

Published August 1, 2021 

This video is part of a larger story at RAIR Foundation USA: https://rairfoundation.com/epic-smackdown-conservative-mp-exposes-dutch-prime-minister-as-a-great-reset-globalist-must-watch/

Original video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iru9oVn0wI8]

Schwab explains that these chips could be a “direct communication between our brains and the digital world.” He believes what we will see is a kind of “fusion of the physical, digital and biological world,” in other words, transhumanism.

Rumble VIDEO: Klaus Schwab chip

[Posted by RAIRFoundationUSA

Published May 3, 2021

MORE DESCRIPTION]

In his book “Shaping the Fourth Industrial Revolution,” Schwab advocates for a future in which authorities will be able to utilize the blending of technology with the human body to “intrude into the hitherto private space of our minds, reading our thoughts and influencing our behavior.”

Transhumanist Elon ‘Iron Man’ Musk

Transhumanist Elon ‘Iron Man’ Musk will be supplying Globalists with the technology they need to invade our brains, leading to mass enslavement and mind control.

In 2016, Elon ‘Iron Man’ Musk founded Neuralink, a company whose goal is to connect the human brain to a computer. The company is developing an ultra-high bandwidth brain chip to connect humans, computers, and artificial intelligence, what Musk refers to as “a Fitbit in your skull with tiny wires.”

In 2017, Musk expressed the same sentiments as Globalist WEF Founder Klaus Schwab. During the 2017 World Government Summit in Dubai, Musk explained that Artificial Intelligence was progressing so rapidly that humans would have to merge with digital intelligence to become a sort of AI-human hybrid. “Over time, we will probably see a closer merger of biological intelligence and digital intelligence.”

“Some high bandwidth interface to the brain will be something that helps achieve a symbiosis between human and machine intelligence and maybe solves the control problem and the usefulness problem,” said the billionaire futurist.

In 2020, Musk and Neuralink demonstrated their success with implanting just such a chip in pigs, with humans being their next target.

Rumble VIDEO: Elon Musk Implants Brain Chip in Pigs – Humans Are Next

[Posted by RAIRFoundationUSA

Published February 7, 2022

In 2020, Elon Musk and Neuralink demonstrated their success with implanting brain chips in pigs… with humans being their next target.

The Great ‘Transhumanism’ Reset: ‘Smart Dust’ Spying on Your Brain, Human Microchipping (Video) https://rairfoundation.com/the-great-transhumanism-reset-smart-dust-spying-on-your-brain-human-microchipping-video/]

Musk bragged that Neuralink could one day allow people to upload, store, and retrieve memories between bodies and devices. “In the future, you will be able to save and replay memories,” said Musk.

“This is obviously sounding increasingly like a Black Mirror episode […] but essential if you have a whole-brain interface, everything that’s encoded in memory, you could upload. So you could basically store your memories as a backup and restore the memories.

“Then ultimately, you could potentially download them into a new body or into a robot body.”

The fourth industrial revolution will make no distinction between your digital, physical, or biological self.

If a memory can be downloaded and uploaded to a new body, it can most certainly be erased or otherwise altered, and the victim would never know the difference.

In 2021, he touted Neuralink’s progress in a new video in which he claims a 9-year-old macaque monkey is playing ping-pong with his mind. Neuralinks were placed on each side of Pager’s brain, according to the video. The links track the parts of the brain focused on hand and arm movements and record the neural activity.

Rumble VIDEO: Mind Control: Elon Musk’s Neuralink – Monkey is playing Pong with his Mind after 

[Posted by RAIRFoundationUSA

Published February 7, 2022

This video is part of a larger story at RAIR Foundation USA, read here:

The Great ‘Transhumanism’ Reset: ‘Smart Dust’ Spying on Your Brain, Human Microchipping (Video) https://rairfoundation.com/the-great-transhumanism-reset-smart-dust-spying-on-your-brain-human-microchipping-video/]

Elon ‘Iron Man’ Musk has confirmed that he will start testing brain implants in humans by the end of this year. 

As Yuval Noah Harari, chief advisor to the World Economic Forum’s leader, Klaus Schwab, recently stated, “Dictators always dreamt about eliminating privacy, monitoring everyone, knowing everything you do, think, and feel…It is now possible.” However, he forgot to mention is it “possible” because of men like Elon ‘Iron Man’ Musk and his company Neuralink.

Rumble VIDEO: Chief Advisor of WEF Boasts How Dreams of Dictators Will Become Possible

[Posted by RAIRFoundationUSA

Published April 24, 2022

MORE DESCRIPTION]

This content is courtesy of, and owned and copyrighted by, https://rairfoundation.com and its author. This content is made available by use of the public RSS feed offered by the host site and is used for educational purposes only. If you are the author or represent the host site and would like this content removed now and in the future, please contact USSANews.com using the email address in the Contact page found in the website menu.

©2022 USSA News

+++++++++++++++

The Useless Class

By Martin Armstrong

April 28, 2022

Armstrong Economics

Youtube VIDEO: Yuval Noah Harari: Workplace Automation & the “Useless Class”

[Posted by Carnegie Council for Ethics in International Affairs

Posted Mar 13, 2017

MORE DESCRIPTION]

Yuval Noah Harari, a self-described historian and one of Schwab’s loudest mouthpieces, believes that we will see the rise of the “useless class.” Harari noted how during the industrial revolution, people went from working on the farm to working in a car factory. He described it as transferring from one low-skilled job to another low-skilled job.

Since automation is leading the new world, future job prospects in 20 to 30 years are unknown. Harari believes it is impossible to know what to teach children today to make them productive citizens in the future. There will be “a new massive useless class that has no military or economic usefulness, and therefore no political power,” he stated. This is another push toward the World Economic Forum’s goal of government control – you need us but we don’t need you.

WEF Totalitarian Empire

History tells us that farming is certainly not a low-skill profession. Look at what happened when Mao killed off all the farmers in China. A low-paying profession does not mean it is low-skilled. Our society could not function without farmers or automotive workers. Additionally, he does not take into account the beauty of creative destruction cited by Schumpeter. The brick and mortar retail stores may be gone in 20 years, but new positions will arise and people will develop skills and adapt to those roles. As for education, schools can begin by teaching children to think independently and question everything (not their gender). Claiming that there will be countless people out of work, “useless” to society, opens the door to government welfare programs becoming commonplace.

I cannot help but to be reminded of Hitler’s classified “useless eaters.” Like those at the WEF, Hitler believed there was a class of humans among society who simply consumed but did not contribute. Instead of hoping they’d rely on government aid, he simply murdered them. Be on high alert when a global agency begins referring to portions of the population as “useless.”

© 2022 Armstrong Economics

++++++++++++++++++

[Blog Editor: This Sociable post is quite lengthy! I am cross posting about half and that half is long. To be informed what the WEF New World Order intends for YOU via Transhumanism, I recommend you read it in entirety.]

The great reset & the great narrative: programming people to comply with unelected globalist agendas

The great narrative for the great reset is about manipulating human behavior to benefit unelected globalist agendas: perspective

Klaus Schwab

By Tim Hinchliffe

March 2022

The Sociable

The great narrative for the unelected globalists’ great reset agenda is about manipulating human behavior to benefit their own policies that merge corporation and state power while eroding individual rights and liberties.

There isn’t one single great narrative in Klaus Schwab and Thierry Malleret’s book, “The Great Narrative.”

Instead, there are a series of five interconnecting narratives surrounding technology, society, economy, geopolitics/governments, and ecology/climate change.

These narratives are geared towards manipulating human behavior through pride, fear, shame, guilt, and greed in order to coerce private citizens (while incentivizing governments and corporations) into accepting the unelected globalists’ agenda for a great reset of society and the global economy.

“Narratives shape our perceptions, which in turn form our realities and end up influencing our choices and actions” — The Great Narrative, Klaus Schwab & Thierry Malleret, 2022

All solutions in the “you’ll own nothing and you’ll be happy” mindset require public-private collaborations — a closer merger of corporation and state — which blurs the line between elected and unelected decision making over the future of humanity.

First came the great reset launch in June, 2020, which called for new social contracts, stronger governments, and a different form of capitalism that would make stakeholders richer and more powerful while people like you and I would own nothing and be powerless.

Now comes the great narrative for humankind, which is an attempt to legitimize the unelected globalists’ technocratic agenda for a great reset of society and the global economy, and they can do this without ever having to reference any real-world data to back it up.

Why?

Because, “In the battle for hearts and minds of human beings, narrative will consistently outperform data in its ability to influence human thinking and motivate human action,” according to the WEF’s own blog post from 2015, which adds, “A good narrative soundly beats even the best data.”

“In the battle for hearts and minds of human beings, narrative will consistently outperform data in its ability to influence human thinking and motivate human action” — Davos Agenda, 2015

Similarly, Schwab and Malleret’s great narrative book argues, “Narratives shape our perceptions, which in turn form our realities and end up influencing our choices and actions.”

Here, we see two major takeaways for understanding the great narrative for what it is:

1. The great narrative doesn’t have to be based on any hard data, facts, or truth, but rather an unelected globalist belief system

2. The purpose of the great narrative is to influence and manipulate human behavior

But what is a great narrative?

The idea of a great narrative is something that the French philosopher Jean-Francois Lyotard called a “grand narrative,” (aka “metanarrative“) which, according to Philo-Notes, “functions to legitimize power, authority, and social customs” — everything that the great reset is trying to achieve.

“A grand narrative functions to legitimize power, authority, and social customs

Authoritarians use great narratives to legitimize their own power, and they do this by claiming to have knowledge and understanding that speaks to a universal truth.

At the same time, authoritarians use these grand narratives in an “attempt to translate alternative accounts into their own language and to suppress all objections to what they themselves are saying.”

Marxism creates “a society in which all individuals can develop their talents to the fullest” is one example of a grand narrative.

“We must be prepared to change ourselves at the micro level and to have enough selflessness to accept new policies (in the broadest possible sense of the word) at the macro level” — The Great Narrative, Klaus Schwab & Thierry Malleret, 2022

The last paragraph of Schwab and Malleret’s book gives a fair summation of what the unelected globalists are really trying to achieve with their great narrative for their great reset:

In the broadest possible sense of which word? Change? Micro? Selflessness? Accept? Macro?

“The coming convergence of the physical, digital, and biological worlds [is] the defining feature of the Fourth Industrial Revolution” — The Great Narrative, Klaus Schwab & Thierry Malleret, 2022

To change oneself at the micro level can mean many things, such as changing your mind, beliefs, attitude, behaviors, and values, etc.

One the other hand, it can also mean changing who you are at the biological and physical level through synthetic biology and devices connected the Internet of Bodies (IoB) through technologies emerging from the so-called fourth industrial revolution.

“What the Fourth Industrial Revolution will lead to is a fusion of our physical, our digital, and our biological identities” — Klaus Schwab, 2019

Youtube VIDEO: World Economic Forum Founder Klaus Schwab on the Fourth Industrial Revolution [Embedded link takes one to 15:13 mark of a 56:23 long video]

[Posted by Chicago Council on Global Affairs

Posted May 13, 2019

MORE DESCRIPTION]

“We humans should get used to the idea that we are no longer mysterious souls; we are now hackable animals” — Yuval Harari, Davos, 2020

But what does it mean to blend our physical, digital, and biological identities?

In a word, transhumanism, which can be achieved through synthetic biology or devices connected to the human body via wearables, consumables, or implants.

Speaking at the World Economic Forum’s annual meeting in Davos in 2020, historian Yuval Harari warned that the technologies and devices coming out of the fourth industrial revolution will be able to collect and process enough biological data in real-time that governments and corporations will soon be able to hack human beings to the point they know more about you than you know yourself.

“The ability to hack humans might still undermine the very meaning of human freedom” — Yuval Harari, Davos, 2020

Youtube VIDEO: How to Survive the 21st Century | DAVOS 2020 [Embedded link begins about the 9:59 mark of a 49:53 video]

[Posted by World Economic Forum

Posted Jan 23, 2020

MORE DESCRIPTION]

All that is needed to hack human beings, according to Harari’s “Danger Formula,” is “Biological knowledge multiplied by Computing power multiplied by Data equals the Ability to Hack Humans” — B x C x D = AHH.

Governments and corporations already have the biological knowledge and the computing power.

The only thing that’s missing is your most intimate data to complete the equation, and the best way to get that data is through the Internet of Bodies.

The Internet of Bodies “might trigger breakthroughs in medical knowledge […] Or it might enable a surveillance state of unprecedented intrusion and consequence” — RAND Corporation, 2020

IoB Examples, RAND Corporation

“It’s now time for the Internet of Bodies […] This means collecting our physical data via devices that can be implanted, swallowed or simply worn, generating huge amounts of health-related information” — Xiao Liu, Davos Agenda, 2020

With its networking capabilities and abundance of sensors, the growing ecosystem known as the Internet of Bodies runs on the same principles as the Internet of Things (IoT), but for people.

“After the Internet of Things, which transformed the way we live, travel and work by connecting everyday objects to the Internet, it’s now time for the Internet of Bodies,” wrote Xiao Liu, Fellow at the World Economic Forum’s Center for the Fourth Industrial Revolution, in June, 2020.

“This means collecting our physical data via devices that can be implanted, swallowed or simply worn, generating huge amounts of health-related information.”

With the coming IoB, the great reset, and the great narrative, what we are seeing is the final deathblow to privacy. 

“Technology is making our every gesture easy to track, and we must therefore come to terms with the notion that privacy no longer exists” — The Great Narrative, Klaus Schwab & Thierry Malleret, 2022

“The Great Narrative” welcomes the idea of zero privacy because, in the unelected globalist mindset, zero privacy means more transparency.

“Technology is making our every gesture easy to track, and we must therefore come to terms with the notion that privacy no longer exists: our personal and professional data are progressively becoming fully monitored, visible to many, and as such transparent,” write Schwab and Malleret.

“By providing access to relevant information and sometimes revealing the truth, transparency (fostered by whistleblowers) makes the public and, in particular, the young generation more sensitive to the issues of inequality and more aware of ‘misbehaving’ on the part of some public leaders, corporate titans, and wealthy individuals.”

The authors also add, “Brain-net [when the human mind is merged with computers] will take a few decades to get off the ground, but investors are already jumping into it.”

“In the future, you will be able to save and replay memories. Then ultimately, you could potentially download them into a new body or into a robot body” — Elon Musk, Neuralink, 2020

Elon Musk’s Neuralink is a prime example of an IoB “brain-net” currently in development.

During a Neuralink demonstration in September, 2020, Musk predicted, “In the future, you will be able to save and replay memories.”

“Then ultimately, you could potentially download them into a new body or into a robot body. The future’s gonna be weird,” he added.

Ask yourself, who are you without your memories?

The fourth industrial revolution will make no distinction between your digital, physical, or biological self.

If a memory can be downloaded and uploaded to a new body, it can most certainly be erased or otherwise altered, and the victim would never know the difference.

“Widespread IoB use might increase the risk of physical harm, espionage, and exploitation of data by adversaries” — RAND Corporation, 2020

IoB Risks

“Brain-net [when the human mind is merged with computers] will take a few decades to get off the ground, but investors are already jumping into it” — The Great Narrative, Klaus Schwab & Thierry Malleret, 2022

With respect to the IoB, the great narrative of “changing ourselves at the micro level” takes on a whole new meaning. … WAY MORE TO READ

Intro Remarks on Dr. Yeadon, ‘The Covid Lies’


John R. Houk, Blog Editor

© April 13, 2022

On Telegram I subscribe to Doctors For Covid Ethics. Yesterday that Telegram Channel shared links to a Dr. Mike Yeadon PDF entitled, “The Covid Lies.” The PDF is dated 4/10/22. The PDF is lengthy AND informative ergo well worth the read even if you have to back to it to complete your reading.

In PDF format the length is 31-pages. In order to cross post on blog I used a PDF-to-Word converter. The Word version is even longer. You should be aware converters are not perfect. If you find an unintelligible word, number or broken link; it will because I missed it in the editing process. I hope Dr. Yeadon and you forgive me.

The PDF is actually two essays that begins with “The Covid Lies,” but about half way through another essay emerges on how Dr. Yeadon came to his scientific conclusions entitled, “How Much of the Covid-19 Narrative Was True? Additional Reflections.”

The Telegram Doctors For Covid Ethics links to a Doctors For Covid Ethics webpage which serves as an introduction to the PDF and then has a download link. The intro page is dated 4/12/22 (actually in the British style in listing day-month-year thus appearing “12/04/2022.” Indeed the entire document is in the British grammatical style.)

This cross post will include the Doctors For Covid Ethics intro followed by the Dr. Yeadon document. As a bonus I am including three videos that I believe are related to Dr. Yeadon’s thoughts in “The Covid Lies” which are:

There is a lot to mentally digest if you are willing to believe actual empirical science as opposed to control-the-masses fearmongering science – GOD BE WITH YOU.

JRH 4/13/22

I need your generosity. PLEASE GIVE to overcome research expenses:

Please Support NCCR

Big Tech Censorship is pervasive – Share voluminously on all social media platforms!

***************************

The Covid Lies

DFCE Intro

4/12/22

Doctors For Covid Ethics

In this comprehensive review, Dr. Yeadon argues that all the main narratives about SARS-CoV-2 and imposed “measures” are lies.

Given the foregoing, it is no longer possible to view the last two years as well- intentioned errors. Instead, the objectives of the perpetrators are most likely to be totalitarian control over the population by means of mandatory digital IDs and cashless central bank digital currencies (CBDCs).

The-Covid-Lies: DOWNLOAD

In the first part of the article (The Covid Lies), Dr. Yeadon counters the 12 widespread Covid narratives with the following arguments:

1. The infection fatality rate of SARS-CoV-2 is 0.1 – 0.3%, which is not significantly different from some seasonal influenza epidemics.

2. Based on the peer-reviewed articles, at least 30 to 50% of the population has prior cross-immunity.

3. SARS-CoV-2 does discriminate. “The lethality of this virus, as is common with respiratory viruses, is 1000X less in young, healthy people than in elderly people with multiple comorbidities.”

4. Asymptomatic transmission is the “central conceptual deceit” used to “underscore almost every intrusion: masking, mass testing, lockdowns, border restrictions, school closures, even vaccine passports.”

5. PCR test is “the central operational deceit.”

6. Neither cloth nor surgical masks prevent respiratory virus transmission.

7. Lockdown is “epidemiologically irrelevant” and never works. “Only “stay home if you’re sick” works.”

8.Covid-19 is the most treatable respiratory viral illness ever”. Safe and effective early treatments are available.

9. Based on the peer-reviewed articles, very few clinically significant reinfections of SARS-Cov-2 have ever been confirmed.

10. SARS-CoV-2 mutates slowly, and no variant is even close to escaping naturally-acquired immunity. However, there is the possibility that the so-called vaccines prevent the establishment of immune memory, leading to the repeated infections, which would be a form of acquired immune deficiency.

11. Safety is the top priority in a public health mass intervention, even more than effectiveness. “It was NEVER appropriate to attempt to “end the pandemic” with a novel technology vaccine.”

12. The four gene-based “vaccines” are toxic. The basic rules of selecting vaccine candidates are: 1) the agent has no inherent biological action (non-toxic); 2) the agent should be the genetically most stable part of the virus; 3) the agent should be most different from human proteins. Spike protein as the vaccine does not fit any of the above criteria.

In the second part of the article (How Much of the Covid-19 Narrative Was True? Additional Reflections), Dr. Yeadon further stresses his contention on the Covid-19 narratives on:

In the second part of the article (How Much of the Covid-19 Narrative Was True? Additional Reflections), Dr. Yeadon further stresses his contention on the Covid-19 narratives on:

  • Unprecedented Pronouncements by the senior scientific and medical advisers, such as “Everyone is vulnerable.”
  • Instigating Fear
  • Using Mass Testing to Promote Fear
  • One Dominant Narrative
  • More Vaccine Lies
  • The Question of Motive

At the end of the article, Dr. Yeadon also provides a list of extra supplemental points to support his conclusions.

About the author:

Dr. Michael YEADON PhD was Formerly Vice President & Chief Scientific Officer Allergy & Respiratory at Pfizer Global R&D. He holds Joint Honours in Biochemistry and Toxicology and a PhD in Respiratory Pharmacology. He is an Independent Consultant and Co-founder & CEO of Ziarco Pharma Ltd.

ABOUT Doctors for COVID Ethics

++++++++++++++++

The Covid Lies

By Dr. Mike Yeadon

Working Draft [Originally PDF Format], April 10, 2022

Doctors for COVID Ethics – PDF Download

PDF converted to Word format

Summary

I contend that all the main narrative points about the coronavirus named SARS-CoV-2 are lies. Furthermore, all the “measures” imposed on the population are also lies. In what follows, I support these claims scientifically, mostly by reference to peer-reviewed journal articles. In 2019, World Health Organization (WHO) scientists reviewed the evidence for the utility of all non-pharmaceutical interventions, concluding that they are all without effect.

Given the foregoing, it is no longer possible to view the last two years as well-intentioned errors. Instead, the objectives of the perpetrators are most likely to be totalitarian control over the population by means of mandatory digital IDs and cashless central bank digital currencies (CBDCs).

There is no medical or public health emergency. We can and should take back our freedoms with immediate effect. Testing healthy people stops. If you’re sick, please stay home. Masks belong in the trash. The Covid-19 gene-based injections are not recommended and must not be coerced or mandated. Crucially, the vaccine passports database must be destroyed. Economic rectitude is recommended.

Serious crimes have obviously been committed. It is not the purpose of this document to accuse anyone or to assemble the evidence against them at this time. However, when this is all resolved, We The People are strongly recommended to pay much more attention to Washington than previously.

TABLE OF CONTENTS [Blog Editor: The page numbers though helpful in the PDF will only be helpful as a guess in this post]

  • The Covid Lies  —- pages 2–15
  • How Much of the Covid-19 Narrative Was True? Additional Reflections — pages 19–28
  • About Dr. Mike Yeadon —  page 29

1. SARS-CoV-2 has such a high lethality that every measure must be taken to save lives.

Note: Covid-19 is the disease resulting from infection with the virus, SARS-CoV-2. They are often used interchangeably. Sometimes it doesn’t much matter, but the confusion was sowed deliberately.

IMPORTANCE

Essential to claim high lethality in order that unprecedented responses may seem justified. To “pep up” the claim, recall “falling man” in Wuhan? The person was allegedly sick but walking about, before falling dead on his face. That was never real. It was theatre.

THE REALITY

Early estimates of lethality were very high with, in some reports, an “infection fatality rate” (IFR) of 3%. Seasonal influenza is generally considered to have a typical IFR of 0.1%. That means some seasons, IFR for flu may be 0.3% and other times, 0.05% or lower.

In practise, and this was usual, estimates of IFR for Covid-19 were revised downwards repeatedly and now are generally recognised as in the range of 0.1–0.3%. It cannot now be argued that it is significantly different from some seasonal influenza epidemics. Why, then, have we all but destroyed the modern world over it?

CONCLUSION AND VERDICT

-FALSE-

  • The perpetrators knew that lethality estimates of new respiratory viral illnesses ALWAYS start high and reduce. This is because, early on, we do not have any estimate of the number of people infected but not seriously ill and the number infected with no symptoms at all.
  • They created the impression of extreme danger, which was never true. This is such a crucial point, for once one sees it for what it is, the rest of the narrative is superfluous.
  • Dr. John Ioannidis is one of the world’s most-published epidemiologists and he has been scathing about the inappropriate responses to a novel virus of not particularly unusual lethality. Like most respiratory viruses, SARS-CoV-2 represents no serious health threat to those under 60 years of age, certainly not children, and is a serious threat only to those nearing the end of their lives by virtue of age and multiple comorbidities.¹
  • Dr. Ioannidis’s current estimate of global IFR is around 0.15%. For reference, a typical seasonal influenza outbreak has a typical IFR of around 0.1%, but can be markedly worse in bad winters.²

2. Because this is a new virus, there will be no prior immunity

in the population.

IMPORTANCE

Seems reasonable, doesn’t it? This remark, made repeatedly early on, aimed to squash any notion that there was a degree of “prior immunity” in the population. Prior immunity and natural immunity are only now, two years in, not considered “misinformation”.

THE REALITY

Within a few months, multiple publications showed that a large minority (ranging from 30%–50%, some later said even more) of the population had T-cells in their blood which recognised various pieces of the viral protein (synthesised, as no one seemed to have any real virus isolates to use).

While some people argued that recognition by T-cells didn’t mean functional immunity, really it does.

We were prevented from learning that we already knew of six coronaviruses, four of which cause “common colds,” which in elderly and infirm people can cause death.

CONCLUSION AND VERDICT

-FALSE-

  • This was a straight lie. It’s pretty much never true that there’s no prior immunity in a population. This is because viruses are each derived from earlier viruses and some of the population had already defeated its antecedents, giving them either immunity or a big head start in defeating the new virus. Either way, a sizeable proportion of the population never had cause to worry.
  • This article includes all the important peer-reviewed articles to mid-2020, with many showing at least 30%–50% having prior immunity (it depends upon the measure used to assess it).³

3. This virus does not discriminate. No one is safe until everyone is safe.

IMPORTANCE

Intention was to minimise the numbers who might reason they’re not “at risk” people.

THE REALITY

This claim was always absurd. The lethality of this virus, as is common with respiratory viruses, is 1000X less in young, healthy people than in elderly people with multiple comorbidities.

CONCLUSION AND VERDICT

-FALSE-

  • In short, almost no one who wasn’t close to the end of their lives was at risk of severe outcomes and death. In middle-aged individuals, obesity is a risk factor, as it is for a handful of other causes of death.
  • This intriguing review details how the initial modelling induced fear and provided the excuse for heavy-handed measures, especially “lockdowns”.ª It was, however, just that: an excuse. All experienced public health experts knew that lockdowns were absurd, ineffective, and hugely destructive. There’s no way to sugar-coat this. It was wrong before it was ordered, and it’s necessary to examine why those who knew did not protest. It’s almost as if they were complicit.

4. People can carry this virus with no signs and infect others: asymptomatic transmission.

IMPORTANCE

This is the central conceptual deceit. If true, then anyone might infect and kill you. Falsely claimed asymptomatic transmission underscores almost every intrusion: masking, mass testing, lockdowns, border restrictions, school closures, even vaccine

passports.

THE REALITY

The best evidence comes from a meta-analysis of a larger number of good studies, examining how often a person testing positive went on to infect a family member (they compared as potential sources of infection people who had symptoms with those who did not have symptoms). ONLY those WITH symptoms were able to infect a family member at any rate that mattered.‘

CONCLUSION AND VERDICT

-FALSE-

  • Asymptomatic transmission is epidemiologically irrelevant. It’s not necessary to argue it never happens; it’s enough to show that if it occurs at all, it is so rare as not to be worth measuring.
  • In this video, we also have Fauci and a WHO doctor telling us exactly this.ª Also, I show why it is like it is. It’s very clear.

5. The PCR test selectively identifies people with clinical infections.

IMPORTANCE

This is the central operational deceit. If true, we could detect risky people and isolate them. We could diagnose accurately and also count the number of deaths.

Polymerase chain reaction (PCR), at its best, can confirm the presence of genetic information in a clean sample and is useful in forensics for that reason. It involves cycle after cycle of amplification, copying the starting material at the beginning of each cycle. The inventor of the PCR test, Kary Mullis, won a Nobel Prize for it and often criticised Fauci for misusing that test to diagnose AIDS patients, which Mullis insisted was inappropriate.

THE REALITY

In a “dirty” clinical sample, there is more than a possible piece of, or a whole, virus which might replicate. There are bacteria, fungi, other viruses, human cells, mucus, and more. It’s not possible unequivocally to know, if a test is judged “positive” after many cycles, what it was that was amplified to give the signal at the end that we call “positive”.

In mass testing mode, commonly used, no one ever runs so-called “positive controls” through the chain of custody. That’s diagnostic testing 101. It’s a deception.

Every test has an “operational false positive rate” (oFPR), where some unknown percent of samples turns positive, even if there is no virus present. A good oFPR would be less than 1%, but is it 0.8% or 0.1%? If you test 100,000 samples daily, and the oFPR is 0.8%, you will get 800 positive tests or “cases,” even if there is no virus in the entire community. Often, the “positivity,” the fraction of tests that are positive, is in that range, sub-1% or low-single-digit percent. I believe much or all of that can be caused by false positives. Note, criminals can manipulate the content of the test kits because there are very few providers in a territory, often just one. The conditions for running the test are also subject to variation by the authorities, like the CDC.

CONCLUSION AND VERDICT

-FALSE-

  • You can be genuinely positive, yet not ill. There is no lower limit of true detection below which you’d be declared to have some copies of the virus, but declared clinically well. It’s an absurd idea.
  • You can have no virus yet test positive (with or without symptoms). All of these are swept together and called “confirmed Covid-19 cases”. If you die in the next 28 days, you’re said to be a “Covid death,” no matter what the cause.
  • Those using the test kits provided commercially are what are called “black box”. They are unable to say what is in the kit, because this is proprietary. The original “methods paper” was published in 48 hours, making a mockery of claimed peer review, by a Berlin lab headed by Professor Christian Drosten, scientific advisor to Angela Merkel of Germany. The paper was comprehensively rebutted by an international team.’
  • The WHO released a series of guidance notes on PCR,8 and it was clear that their technical staff did not approve of mass testing the population, because it’s possible to return wholly false positives. Indeed, at times of low genuine prevalence, that’s all they can be.
  • I often wonder if this 2007 real-life example of a PCR-based testing system which returned 100% false positives, yet convinced a major hospital that they had a huge disease outbreak for weeks, might have been the inspiration for the untrustworthy methods used in the Covid-19 deception?ª
  • Drosten also led the TV publicity around the idea of asymptomatic transmission. One lucky scientist is at the centre of the two most important deceptions in the entire Covid-19 event!
  • Professor Norman Fenton here presents a multi-part lecture with two main elements.¹º First, he describes how mass testing of people with no symptoms unavoidably drives up the proportion of positive PCR test results that are false. The second part deals with the possibility that data fraud entirely accounts for the apparent efficacy of the vaccines, while attempting to hide vaccine deaths, by classifying them as unvaccinated for 14 days after injection.

6. Masks are effective in preventing the spread of this virus.

IMPORTANCE

This is mostly used to maintain the illusion of danger. You see others’ masks and feel afraid. Complying is also a measure of whether you do what you’re told, even if the measure is useless.

THE REALITY

We have known for decades that surgical masks worn in medical theatres do not stop respiratory virus transmission. Masks were tested across a series of operations by doctors at the Royal College of Surgeons (UK). No difference in post-operative infection rate was seen by mask use.

Cloth masks definitely don’t stop respiratory virus transmission as shown by several large, randomised trials. If anything, they increase risk of lung infections. The authorities have mostly conceded on cloth masks.

Some people speak of “source control,” catching droplets. Problem is, there is no evidence that transmission takes place via droplets. Equally, there is no evidence it occurs via fine aerosols. No one finds it on masks, or on air filters in hospital wards of Covid patients, either. Where is the virus?

CONCLUSION AND VERDICT

-FALSE-

  • It’s not necessary to use up time on this topic. It was known long before Covid-19 that face masks don’t do anything.
  • Many don’t know that blue medical masks aren’t filters. Your inspired and expired air moves in and out between the mask and your face. They are splashguards, that’s all.
  • This is a good review of the findings with masks in respiratory viruses by a recognised expert in the field. No effect.¹¹
  • Neither masks nor lockdowns prevented the spread of the virus. This review summarizes 400 papers.¹²

7. Lockdowns slow down the spread and reduce the number of cases and deaths.

IMPORTANCE

The most impactful yet wasteful intervention, accomplishing nothing useful. Useful to the perpetrators, however, wishing to damage the economy and reduce interpersonal contacts. This measure was surprisingly tolerated in many wealthy countries, because “furlough” schemes were put in place, compensating many people for not working, or requiring them to work from home.

THE REALITY

The measure, though among the most repressive acts ever imposed on citizens in a democracy, was intuitively reasonable to many. This is an example of how far off-course uninformed intuition can be.

The core idea was simple. Respiratory viruses are transmitted from person to person. Reducing the average number of contacts surely reduces transmission? Actually, it doesn’t, because the transmission concept is wrong. Transmission is from a SYMPTOMATIC person to a susceptible person. Those with symptoms are UNWELL.

They remain at home in most cases with no action from the government. Transmission occurred mostly in institutions where sick people and susceptible people were forced into contact: hospitals, care homes, and domestic settings.

CONCLUSION AND VERDICT

-FALSE-

  • A general lockdown had no detectable impact on epidemic spreading, cases, hospitalisations, or deaths.
  • This is now widely accepted, after a meta-analysis by Johns Hopkins University (interestingly, as the JHU repeatedly features as an actor in a documentary about pandemic-related fraud by German journalist Paul Schreyer).¹³
  • This is because those involved in the vast bulk of human-to-human contacts are fit and well and such contacts didn’t result in transmission. Essentially, if you’re fooled by the “asymptomatic transmission” lie, then lockdown might make sense. However, since it is epidemiologically irrelevant, lockdowns can never work, and of course, all the voluminous literature confirms this.
  • This concept is unequivocally known to multiple public health scientists and doctors. This is why “lockdown” had never been tried before.
  • Importantly, WHO scientists drafted a detailed reviewof all the non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) in 2019 and distributed copies of the report to all member states.¹4
  • This means that ALL member states already knew, late in 2019, that masks, lockdowns, border restrictions, and business or school closures were futile. Only “stay home if you’re sick” works at all, and people don’t need to be told this, for they are too unwell to go out.

8. There are unfortunately no treatments for Covid beyond support in hospital.

IMPORTANCE

Reinforced the idea that it was vital to avoid catching the virus.

Legally, it was essential for the perpetrators bringing forward novel vaccines that there be no viable treatments. Had there been even one, the regulatory route of Emergency Use Authorisation would not have been available.

THE REALITY

In my opinion, while all these measures were destructive and cruel, active deprivation of access to experimentally applied but otherwise known safe and effective early treatments led directly to millions of avoidable deaths worldwide. In my mind, this is a policy of mass murder.

Contrasting with the official narrative, the therapeutic value of early treatment was already understood and demonstrated empirically during spring 2020. Since then, a sizeable handful of well-understood, off-patent, low-cost and safe oral treatments have been characterised.

CONCLUSION AND VERDICT

-FALSE-

  • The official position was that the disease Covid-19 could not be treated and the patient only “supported,” often by mechanical ventilation. Ventilation is wholly inappropriate because Covid-19 is rarely an obstructive airway disease, yet has a high associated morbidity and mortality. An oxygen mask is greatly preferred.
  • In my view, due to the very large amount of empirical treatment and good communication, Covid-19 is the most treatable respiratory viral illness ever. We knew in the first three months of 2020 that hydroxychloroquine, zinc, and azithromycin were empirically useful, provided treatment was started early and tackled rationally.¹5
  • It’s very important to note that it has been known for a decade and more that elevating intracellular zinc acts to suppress viral replication.¹6
  • There is no question that senior advisors to a range of governments knew that so-called “zinc ionophores,” compounds which open channels to allow certain dissolved minerals to cross cell membranes, were useful in severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) in 2003 and should be expected also to be therapeutically useful in SARS-CoV-2 infection.
  • This is a starting point for all of the clinical trials in Covid-19,¹7 including especially ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine (which are zinc ionophores).¹8
  • It should be noted that using known safe agents for experimental purposes as a priority has always been an established ethical medical practice and is known as “off-label prescribing”.

9. It’s not certain if you can get the virus more than once.

IMPORTANCE

The idea of natural immunity was flatly denied and the absurd idea that you might get the same virus twice was established. This ramped up the fear, which might otherwise have passed swiftly.

THE REALITY

Those with even a basic grasp of mammalian immunology knew that senior advisors to government, speaking in uncertain terms on this question, were lying. Certainly, in the author’s case, it was a pivotal point. I shared a foundational education in UK universities at the same time as the UK government’s Chief Scientific Advisor. This shared education meant we’d have had the same set texts. I reasoned that he knew what I knew and vice versa. I was as sure as it is possible to be that it wouldn’t be possible to get clinically unwell twice in response to the same virus, or close-in variants of it. I was right. He was lying.

CONCLUSION AND VERDICT

-FALSE-

  • There have been scoresof peer-reviewed journal articles on this topic.¹9 Very few clinically important reinfections have ever been confirmed.
  • Beating off a respiratory virus infection leaves almost everyone with acquired immunity, which is complete, powerful, and durable.
  • You wouldn’t know it for the misdirection around antibodies in blood, but such antibodies are not considered pivotally important in host immunity. Secreted antibodies in airway surface liquid of the IgA isotype certainly are, but most important are memory T-cells0
  • Those infected with SARS in 2003 still had clear evidence of robust, T-cell mediated immunity 17 years later.²¹

10. Variants of the virus appear and are of great concern.

IMPORTANCE

I believe the purpose of this fiction was to extend the apparent duration of the pandemic—and the fear—for as long as the perpetrators wished it. While there is controversy on this point, with some physicians believing reinfection by variants to be a serious problem, I think untrustworthy testing and other viruses entirely is the parsimonious explanation.

THE REALITY

I come at it as an immunologist. From that vantage point, there is very strong precedent indicating that recovery after infection affords immunity extending beyond the sequence of the variant that infected the patient to all variants of SARS-CoV-2.

The number of confirmed reinfections is so small that they are not an issue, epidemiologically speaking.

We have good evidence from those infected by SARS in 2003: they not only have strong T-cell immunity to SARS, but cross-immunity to SARS-CoV-2. This is very important because SARS-CoV-2 is arguably a variant of SARS, there being around a 20% difference at the sequence level.

Consider this: if our immune systems are able to recognise SARS-CoV-2 as foreign and mount an immune response to it, despite never having seen it before, because of prior immunity conferred by infection years ago by a virus which is 20% different, it’s logical that variants of SARS-CoV-2, like delta and omicron, will not evade our immunity.

No variant of SARS-CoV-2 differs from the original Wuhan sequence by more than 3%, and probably less.

CONCLUSION AND VERDICT

-FALSE-

  • Normal rules of immunology apply here.²² Despite the publicity to the contrary, SARS-CoV-2 mutates relatively slowly and no variant is even close to evading immunity acquired by natural infection.
  • This is because the human immune system recognises 20–30 different structural motifs in the virus, yet requires only a handful to recall an effective immune memory.²³
  • The variants story fails to note “Muller’s Ratchet,” the phenomenon in which variants of a virus, formed in an infected person during viral replication (in which “typographical errors” are made and not corrected) trend to greater transmissibility but lesser lethality. If this was not the case, at some point in human evolution, we would have expected a respiratory viral pandemic to have killed off a substantial proportion of humanity. There is no historical record for such an event.
  • I do not rule out the possibility that the so-called vaccines are so badly designed that they prevent the establishment of immune memory. If that is true, then the vaccines are worse than failures, and it might be possible to be repeatedly infected. This would be a form of acquired immune deficiency.

11. The only way to end the pandemic is universal vaccination.

IMPORTANCE

This, I believe, was always the objective of the largely faked pandemic. It’s NEVER been the way prior pandemics have ended, and there was nothing about this one that should have led us to adopt the extreme risks that were taken and which have resulted in hundreds of thousands, probably millions, of wholly avoidable deaths.

THE REALITY

The interventions imposed on the population didn’t prevent spread of the virus. Only individual isolation for an open-ended period could do that, and that’s clearly impossible (hospital patients and residents of care homes have to be cared for at very least and additionally, the nation has to be supplied with food and medicines).

All the interventions were useless and hugely burdensome.

Yet we have reached the end of the pandemic, more or less. We would have done so faster and with less suffering and death had we adopted measures along the lines proposed in the Great Barrington Declaration and used pharmaceutical treatments as they were discovered, plus general improvements to public health, such as encouraging vitamin supplements.

CONCLUSION AND VERDICT

-FALSE-

  • It was NEVER appropriate to attempt to “end the pandemic” with a novel technology vaccine. In a public health mass intervention, safety is the top priority, more so even than effectiveness, because so many people will receive it.
  • It’s simply not possible to obtain data demonstrating adequate longitudinal safety in the time period any pandemic can last.
  • Those who pushed this line of argument and enabled the gene-based agents to be injected needlessly into billions of innocent people are guilty of crimes against humanity.
  • It quickly became apparent that natural immunitywas stronger than any protection from vaccination,²4 and most people were not at risk of severe outcomes if infected.²5
  • Even children who were immunocompromisedare not at elevated risk from Covid-19, so advice that such children should be vaccinated is lethally flawed.²6

12. The new vaccines are safe and effective.

IMPORTANCE

I feel particularly strongly about this claim. Both components are lies. I outline the inevitability of the toxicity of all four gene-based agents below.

Separately, the clinical trials were wholly inadequate. They were conducted in people not most in need of protection from safe and effective vaccines. They were far too short in duration. The endpoints only captured “infection” as measured by an inadequate PCR test and should have been augmented by Sanger sequencing to confirm real infection. Trials were underpowered to detect important endpoints like hospitalization and death.

There’s evidence of fraud in at least one of the pivotal clinical trials. I think there is also clear evidence of manufacturing fraud and regulatory collusion. They should never have been granted emergency use authorisations (EUAs).

THE REALITY

The design of the agents called vaccines is very bothersome. Gene-based agents are new in a public health application. Had I been in a regulatory role, I would have informed all the leading R&D companies that I would not approve these without extensive

longitudinal studies, meaning they could not receive EUA before early 2022 at the earliest. I would have outright denied their use in children, in pregnancy, and in the infected-recovered. Point blank. I’d need years of safe use before contemplating an alteration of this stance.

The basic rules of this new activity, gene-based component vaccines, are: (1) to select part of the virus that has no inherent biological action—that rules out spike protein, which we inferred would be very toxic, before they’d even started clinical trials;²8 (2) select the genetically most stable parts of the virus, so we could ignore the gross misrepresentations of variants so slight in difference from the original that we were being toyed with via propaganda—again, this rules out spike protein; (3) choose parts of the virus which are most different from any human proteins. Once more, spike protein is immediately deselected, otherwise unnecessary risks of autoimmunity are carried forward.

That all four leading actors chose spike protein, against any reasonable selection criteria, leads me to suspect both collusion and malign intent.

Finally, let nature guide us. Against which components of the virus does natural immunity aim? We find 90%of the immune repertoire targets NON-spike protein responses.²9 I rest my case.

CONCLUSION AND VERDICT

-FALSE-

  • These agents were always going to be toxic. The only question was, to what degree? Having selected spike protein to be expressed, a protein which causes blood clotting to be initiated, a risk of thromboembolic adverse events was burned into the design.
  • Nothing at all limits the amount of spike protein to be made in response to a given dose. Some individuals make a little and only briefly. The other end of a normal range results in synthesis of copious amounts of spike protein for a prolonged period. The locations in which this pathological event occurred, as well as where on the spectrum, in my view played a pivotal role in whether the victim experienced adverse events, including death.
  • There are many other pathologies flowing from the design of these agents, including, for the mRNA “vaccines,” that lipid nanoparticle (LNP) formulations leave the injection site and home to the liver and ovaries0 among other organs,³¹ but this evidence is enough to get started.
  • See this interview for evidence of clinical trial and other fraud, publicised by Edward Dowd, a former BlackRock investment analyst.³²
  • See this video for evidence of official data fraud (UK Office of National Statistics): especially at 2min 45sec for the heart of the matter.³³
  • See here for evidence of manufacturing fraud.³4 The same methodology was used to obtain regulatory authorisations, and so it is my contention that there is also regulatory fraud.
  • In the Pfizer clinical trial briefing document to FDA, which was used for issuing the EUA (on p. 40 or thereabout), there is a paragraph stating that there were approximately 2,000 “suspected unconfirmed Covid cases”—meaning people were sick with symptoms but were not tested (otherwise, it would be stated that the tests were negative). Of these, in the first seven days after injection, there were 400 in the vaccine arm and 200 in placebo. These subjects were excluded from the dataset used to assess efficacy. It’s as clear evidence of fraud as you can get; they admit to it in the FDA briefing! Nobody paid any attention to this that I am aware of.
  • There’s also evidence of data fraud in that clinical trial as summarised by Dr. Peter Doshi, associate editor of The BMJ (formerly called the British Medical Journal).
  • Though many people refuse to accept or even look at the evidence, it is clear that the number of adverse events and deaths soon after Covid-19 vaccination is astonishing and far in excess, in 2021 alone, than all adverse effects and deaths reported to the U.S. Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) in the previous 30 years. Here is a simplified view of Covid vaccine-related mortality reports from VAERS.³5
  • This excellent presentation by a forensic statistician, well used to presenting analyses for court purposes, dismantles the claims that the vaccines are effective and shows how toxicity is hidden (see the second half of the recording).¹0
  • Another paper published by the same group questions vaccine efficacy.³6

References

1. Ioannidis JPA, Axfors C, Contopoulos-Ioannidis DG. Population-level COVID-19 mortality risk for non-elderly individuals overall and for non-elderly individuals without underlying diseases in pandemic epicenters. Environ Res. 2020 Sep;188:109890.

2. Ioannidis JPA. Reconciling estimates of global spread and infection fatality rates of COVID-19: an overview of systematic evaluations. Eur J Clin Invest. 2021 May;51(5):e13554.

3. Doshi P. Covid-19: Do many people have pre-existing immunity? BMJ. 2020;370:m3563.

4. Joffe AR. COVID-19: Rethinking the lockdown groupthink. Front Public Health. 2021 Feb 26;9:625778.

5. Madewell ZJ, Yang Y, Longini Jr IM, Halloran ME, Dean NE. Household transmission of SARS-Cov-2: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Dec 1;3(12):e2031756.

6. “Exposing the lie of asymptomatic transmission, once and for all.” May 10, 2021. https://www.bitchute.com/video/lIj22KttYq7z/

7. https://cormandrostenreview.com/

8. World Health Organization. Diagnostic testing for SARS-CoV-2. Interim guidance, Sep. 11, 2020. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/334254/WHO-2019-nCoV-laboratory-2020.6-eng.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

9. Kolata G. Faith in quick test leads to epidemic that wasn’t. New York Times, Jan. 22, 2007. Available at https://eumeswill.wordpress.com/2020/08/11/faith-in-quick-test-leads-to-epidemic-that-wasnt/

10. “Prof. Norman Fenton – Open science sessions: How flawed data has driven the narrative.” PANDA, Feb. 3, 2022. https://rumble.com/vtxi1h-open-science-sessions-how-flawed-data-has-driven-the-narrative.html

11. Jefferson T, Del Mar CB, Dooley L, et al. Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Nov 20;11(11):CD006207.

12. Alexander PE. More than 400 studies on the failure of compulsory Covid interventions (lockdowns, restrictions, closures). Brownstone Institute, Nov. 30, 2021. https:// brownstone.org/articles/more-than-400-studies-on-the-failure-of-compulsory-covid-interventions/

13. Dinerstein C. The Johns Hopkins lockdown analysis. American Council on Science and Health, Feb. 16, 2022. https://www.acsh.org/news/2022/02/16/johns-hopkins-lockdown-analysis-16135

14. World Health Organization. Non-pharmaceutical public health measures for mitigating the risk and impact of epidemic and pandemic influenza: annex: report of systematic literature reviews. World Health Organization, 2019. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/ 10665/329439. License: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO

15. McCullough PA, Kelly RJ, Ruocco G, et al. Pathophysiological basis and rationale for early outpatient treatment of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) infection. Am J Med. 2021 Jan;134(1):16-22.

16.     Te Velthuis AJW, van den Worm SHE, Sims AC, Baric RS, Snijder EJ, van Hemert MJ. Zn(2+) inhibits coronavirus and arterivirus RNA polymerase activity in vitro and zinc ionophores block the replication of these viruses in cell culture. PloS Pathog. 2010 Nov 4;6(11):e1001176.

17.     COVID-19 early treatment: real-time analysis of 1,609 studies. Retrieved Apr. 4, 2022 from https://c19early.com/.

18.     Bryant A, Lawrie TA, Dowswell T, et al. Ivermectin for prevention and treatment of COVID-19 infection: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and trial sequential analysis to inform clinical guidelines. Am J Ther. 2021 Jun 21;28(4):e434-e460.

19.     Alexander PE. How likely is reinfection following Covid recovery? Brownstone Institute, Dec. 29, 2021. https://brownstone.org/articles/how-likely-is-reinfection-following-covid-recovery/

20.    Wyllie D, Mulchandani R, Jones HE, et al. SARS-CoV-2 responsive T cell numbers are associated with protection from COVID-19: a prospective cohort study in keyworkers. MedRxiv, Nov. 4, 2020.

21.     Le Bert N, Tan AT, Kunasegaran K, et al. SARS-CoV-2-specific T cell immunity in cases of COVID-19 and SARS, and uninfected controls. Nature. 2020 Aug;584(7821):457-462.

22.    Tarke A, Sidney J, Methot N, et al. Negligible impact of SARS-CoV-2 variants on CD4+ and CD8+ T cell reactivity in COVID-19 exposed donors and vaccinees. BioRxiv, Mar. 1, 2021.

23.    Tarke A, Sidney J, Kidd CK, et al. Comprehensive analysis of T cell immunodominance and immunoprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 epitopes in COVID-19 cases. BioRxiv, Dec. 9, 2020.

24.    Gazit S, Shlezinger R, Perez G, et al. Comparing SARS-CoV-2 natural immunity to vaccine-induced immunity: reinfections versus breakthrough infections. MedRxiv, Aug. 25, 2021.

25.    Alexander PE. 150 plus research studies affirm naturally acquired immunity to Covid-19: documented, linked, and quoted. Brownstone Institute, Oct. 17, 2021. https://brownstone.org/articles/79-research-studies-affirm-naturally-acquired-immunity-to-covid-19-documented-linked-and-quoted/

26.    Chappell H, Patel R, Driessens C, et al. Immunocompromised children and young people are at no increased risk of severe COVID-19. J Infect. 2022 Jan;84(1):31-39.

27.    Alexander PE. 46 efficacy studies that rebuke vaccine mandates. Brownstone Institute, Oct. 28, 2021. https://brownstone.org/articles/16-studies-on-vaccine-efficacy/

28.    Grobbelaar LM, Venter C, Vlok M, et al. SARS-CoV-2 spike protein S1 induces fibrin(ogen) resistant to fibrinolysis: implications for microclot formation in COVID-19. MedRxiv, Mar. 8, 2021.

29.    Ferretti AP, Kula T, Wang Y, et al. Unbiased screens show CD8+ T cells of COVID-19 patients recognize shared epitopes in SARS-CoV-2 that largely reside outside the spike protein. Immunity. 2020 Nov 17;53(5):1095-1107.

30.    Schädlich A, Hoffmann S, Mueller T, et al. Accumulation of nanocarriers in the ovary: a neglected toxicity risk? J Control Release. 2012 May 30;160(1):105-112.

31. https://www.docdroid.net/xq0Z8B0/pfizer-report-japanese-government-pdf#page=14

32.    “Edward Dowd interview portion on Steve Bannons War Room Ep #1602.” https://www.onenewspage.com/video/20220204/14277521/Edward-Dowd-Interview-portion-on-Steve-Bannons-War.htm

33.    “Norman Fenton interviewed by Majid Nawaz, LBC Radio 4 Dec 2021.” Truth Archive 2030, Feb. 21, 2022. https://www.bitchute.com/video/KApFxhjiWLqI/

34.    “COVID vax variability between lots – independent research by international team.” Craig-Paardekooper, Dec. 15, 2021. https://www.bitchute.com/video/4HlIyBmOEJeY/

35.        https://openvaers.com/covid-data/mortality

36.    Neil M, Fenton NE, Smalley J, et al. Latest statistics on England mortality data suggest systematic mis-categorisation of vaccine status and uncertain effectiveness of Covid-19 vaccination. ResearchGate, December 2021. DOI:10.13140/RG.2.2.14176.20483

How Much of the Covid-19 Narrative Was True? Additional Reflections

Introduction

The purpose of this document is to demonstrate that all of the key narrative points about the SARS-CoV-2 virus said to cause the disease Covid-19 and the measures imposed to control it are incorrect. Given that the sources of these points are scientists, doctors, and public health officials, it is evident that they were not simply mistaken. Instead, they have lied in order to mislead. I believe the motivations of those who I call “the perpetrators” become clear, once it is internalised that the entire event is based on lies.

In recent days, breaking news indicates that coronavirus antibodies are present in blood stored in European blood banks from 2019.¹ The implications are momentous.

Unprecedented Pronouncements

In the first three months of the Covid event, I started noticing senior scientific and medical advisors on UK television saying things that I found disturbing. It was hard to put my finger on the specifics, but they included remarks like:

  • “Because this is a new virus, there won’t be any immunity in the population”.
  • “Everyone is vulnerable”.
  • “In view of the very high lethality of the virus, we are exploring how best to protect the population”.

I had been reading extensively about the apparent spread of SARS-CoV-2 in China and beyond, and had already arrived at a number of important conclusions. Essentially, I was sure that, objectively, we weren’t going to experience a major event. I based some of my conclusions on the Diamond Princess cruise ship experience. Note that no crew members died, and only a minority on the ship even got infected, suggesting substantial prior immunity, a steep age-lethality relationship, and an infection fatality ratio (IFR) not much different, if at all, from prior respiratory virus infections. But what was happening was that, in my view, senior people were acting a lot more frightened than seemed appropriate.

It was with this heightened interest that I began to closely examine all aspects of the alleged pandemic. I suspected something very bad was happening when the Imperial College released its modelling paper by Neil Ferguson. This claimed that over 500,000 people in the UK would die unless severe “measures” were put in place. Ferguson had over-projected all of the last five disease-related emergencies in the UK and had been responsible for the destruction of the beef herd through his modelling of the spread of foot-and-mouth disease.

I had also been reading about all sorts of “non-pharmaceutical interventions” (NPIs), and what this had taught me was that there was absolutely no experimental literature around any of the NPIs being spoken of, except masks—which were clearly ineffective in blocking respiratory virus transmission. Moreover, the non-experts in the mainstream media drew on a very limited group of experts, and I noticed that none were immunologists.

I had, in parallel, watched the evolving scene in Sweden and was pleased to note that the Swedes’ chief epidemiologist, Anders Tegnell, seemed to know what he was doing and had dismissed the panic. I knew he had been the deputy of his predecessor, Johan Gieseke, who was still around in an emeritus role. Gieseke was also reassuringly calm.

The final straw was when on March 23, 2020, the British prime minister initiated the first “lockdown”. This was wholly without precedent. I knew Sweden had rejected lockdown measures as wholly unnecessary and extremely damaging.

Instigating Fear

From that day forward, the team from the UK Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (SAGE) put up one or more members every day to appear alongside the prime minister or the health minister. These press conferences were meandering affairs, and it wasn’t clear what their purpose was. The questions asked never sought to place things in context, but instead seemed to always explore the outer edges of possible outcomes and then follow up with remarks that didn’t seem adequately prepared.

In retrospect, I think the aim was to make the press conferences the only “must watch” thing on TV, and with such a large, captive audience, a form of fear-based hypnosis was instigated. Much later, Belgian professor and clinical psychologist Mattias Desmet informed us that this was indeed the aim, calling the process “mass formation”.² This process can become malignant, as have past beliefs in events that were later conceded to have been episodes of societal madness, like the Salem witch trials, satanic abuse of children, and other delusions.

Some experts believe that modern societies are more—and not less—susceptible to mass panics because of the ubiquity of easily-controlled messaging (properly termed “propaganda,” since it was completely deliberate and carefully planned). An August 2021 animated video titled “Mass Psychosis – How an Entire Population Becomes Mentally Ill” illustrates this phenomenon; despite the animation format, the film leans heavily on academic research from luminaries such as Gustave Le Bon, Sigmund Freud, Edward Bernays, Stanley Milgram, and Solomon Asch, as well as later researchers and studies.³

It is important to be cautious about the purported importance of “mass formation,” however. In a sense, it might be seen as wholly impersonal and something that is thrown at the population and lands more or less effectively on people at random.

Worse, it comes with the notion that, if you are susceptible, it cannot be resisted. There is a contrasting school of thought that holds that information technology (IT), data, and artificial intelligence (AI) are capable of assembling a “digital prison” that is tailored to each individual and shaped over time by choices that we each make.4 The outcome isn’t in any way preordained. However, incentives and deterrents are associated with innumerable decisions we make, such as how to pay for something, whether we sell our data for tiny rewards, whether we consciously decide to open links suggested for us, whether we leave location services running permanently, and more.5

Using Mass Testing to Promote Fear

As soon as the UK lockdown was initiated, the focus turned full force onto mass testing, and especially on testing people without symptoms. I knew this didn’t make any sense, because if a large enough number of people are tested daily, without knowledge of the false-positive rate, it could certainly very quickly panic people into thinking there were lots of people walking around with the virus, unaware they had it and allegedly spreading it to others.

Once the lockdown was in place, in addition to testing, the press conferences focused on numbers in hospital, numbers on ventilators, and ultimately, the daily deaths “with Covid”. Early treatments and improved lifestyle were never spoken of. The first lockdown lasted 12 weeks, with most office staff told to work from home while being paid “furlough” (a word never before used in Britain). The “fear porn” continued all the way into high summer, long after daily Covid deaths had reached approximately zero. The introduction of mandatory masking in all public areas in the heat of summer, when they had never been required before, was the last straw for me. It was all theatre.

At that point, I set out to investigate a couple of core concepts: the “PCR test” and “asymptomatic transmission”. I’m embarrassed to say, however, that it wasn’t until the autumn of 2020 that I had clear in my mind, with mounting horror, that the entire event, if not completely manufactured, was being grossly exaggerated, with the intent of deceiving the entire “liberal democratic West”. Scores of countries were economically being squeezed to death. I knew that from a financial perspective, borrowing or printing enough money to subsidize tens of millions to remain at home could not be long sustained without destroying the sovereign currency. Strangely, exchange rates didn’t move much—another clue that powerful forces were managing this event as well as its consequences. Around this time, country leaders started talking about “Build Back Better,” and Klaus Schwab’s book, COVID-19: The Great Reset, appeared.

All of this contributed to my developing the idea of “The Covid lies”. It seemed to me that everything we had been told about the virus wasn’t true, and also that all the NPIs imposed upon us couldn’t work, and so were for nothing more than show.

One Dominant Narrative

As already mentioned, repetition and fear were key to instigating “mass formation” as described by Mattias Desmet.² This narrowing of focus, according to Desmet, means those “in the mass” (crowd) literally are incapable of hearing anything that challenges the narrative of which they’ve been convinced. Any explanation other than the truth is marshalled to dismiss rational counter-arguments. And indeed we saw that anyone challenging the dominant narrative was attacked, smeared, censored, and cancelled on social media, and no reasonable and independent voices were ever seen or heard on TV or radio.

Desmet argues that mass formation, to be successful, requires that certain conditions be in place: high levels of free-floating anxiety; a strong degree of social isolation (where devices replace real human interactions); and finally, low levels of “sense-making,” that is, many things do not make sense to many people. When a crisis is dropped into a population where these conditions obtain and is repeated ad nauseam, it is possible in effect to hypnotise them.

When the narrative has taken hold, what happens next?

  • Now, the population’s anxiety has an obvious focus, which is felt as a relief.
  • The routines—masking, lockdowns, testing, hand sanitizing—become for some a ritual, which provides daily meaning.
  • Finally, so many people are acting the same way and echoing the same lines (the lines they’ve heard time and again on TV, radio, newspapers, and their devices), that people can feel part of a national effort in a way they’ve not felt before.
  • This combination, coupled with visible and strong punishment for anyone who questions the narrative or simply refuses to comply, reinforces the groupthink.

It is, according to crowd psychology experts, nearly impossible to extract those who are this deeply “in the mass”. However, there is always another group of individuals who never fall for such tricks. Outwardly pleasant and easygoing, these individuals typically are sceptical and go along with things only if they make sense to them personally, and not because an authority figure tells them to.

There is also a third group in the middle—individuals who often sense that something is wrong but lack the courage of their own convictions and tend to side with whatever they’re told to do, rather passively. They are not hypnotised, but to third parties, they can seem to be.

Crowd psychology experts encourage those who’ve seen through the lies (the second group) to speak out and continue to do so. This legitimises speaking out by all others not persuaded by the narrative and might even extract some from the middle group. Even those in the “mass” group will be prevented from sinking yet more deeply into the narrative, from where those orchestrating events can otherwise prompt such people to commit atrocities.

Vaccine Lies

In the second half of 2020, the conversation turned to the oncoming vaccines. Having spent 32 years in pharmaceutical research and development (R&D), I knew that what we were being told about vaccines was just lies. It’s not possible to bypass a dozen years of careful work or to compress it into a few months. The product that was to emerge was almost certain, to my mind, to be very dangerous. And after I began reading my way into this area, I grew more concerned still.

In my “Covid Lies” comments, I isolate ONLY the major narrative points themselves and show that none of them are true. In other words, this was not just a little lying here and there—no, the entire construct was false. After I describe all the main lies, I show how the perpetrators were able to get away with it. At the conclusion, I believe the reader will share my view that the whole event was manufactured or exaggerated from a mild situation.

Remember, no alternative views were permitted in the “public square”. In fact, in July 2019—well before the declared pandemic—a group of powerful media organisations had already assembled and founded the Trusted News Initiative (TNI). The purpose of TNI was both to control mass media messages and crush alternative voices from any direction.6

Again, all of the Covid narrative was lies. Not mistakes. Many of the politicians who repeated others’ lines might try to offer as defence that they relied on experts to inform them. U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) director Rochelle Walensky recently did just that when she said that the CDC made vaccination recommendations because CNN published Pfizer’s press release saying that their Covid-19 vaccine was 95% effective. (You can’t make this up.) However, the true subject matter experts who promoted the false narrative from the public health departments— such as Chief Scientific Advisor Sir Patrick Vallance in the UK and National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) director Dr. Anthony Fauci in the U.S.—knew their statements were untrue.

The Question of Motive

The question of motive has to arise. What possible motive might there have been to create this state of fear? Who must have been involved to have granted authorisation to do it?

I have tried to find benign explanations and have failed to do so. The logical conclusions I’m drawn to make for very disturbing reading. I look forward to discussing them with you and indeed with anyone. Although it’s unlikely I am correct on every point, what I am sure of is that the overall picture is one of extreme deception and a highly-organised fraud. Moreover, I am not alone in reaching this view. For example, in an essay titled “if I were going to conquer you,” one author walks us through what the perpetrators would do in order to take over the world through a simultaneous “coup d’état” of the liberal democracies.7 Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. summarised a plausible explanation in a speech in Milan in November 2021.8

I appear to be the ONLY former executive-level scientist from big pharma anywhere in the world speaking out. I have invested two years pro bono in identifying the key elements of the fraud, in the sincere hope I can connect with upright individuals who can help bring this to wider attention and, ultimately, to a halt and to justice. As a result of these efforts, I can describe a global fraud operating for two years at tremendous cost in lives, the economy, and the very structure of human societies, which could only have been undertaken by powerful people, organised for a purpose that is not to the benefit of ordinary people.

Additional Observations

Though not all central, there are a large number of ancillary points that reinforce my conclusions. I have assembled some of them below. This list is not exhaustive and may be added to.

Fraud Assessed

In a series of five short videos,9 you will find remarkable similarities in a Canadian team’s interpretation of the same fraud. Note, in particular, the second film (3.5 minutes) on non-pharmaceutical interventions.¹0

Fraud Rehearsed

German investigative journalist Paul Schreyer shows that this fraud was rehearsed for many years, increasingly, with all the stakeholders now running the alleged Covid-19 fraud.¹¹

Autopsies

Why were autopsies strongly discouraged worldwide in 2020 and still today? My conclusion is that this was to cover up the lack of Covid-19 deaths. After vaccination, a large fraction of deaths have been judged to be due to the vaccines, and the lack of autopsies covers them up, too.¹²

PCR Test

The Nobel-prize-winning inventor of the PCR test, Dr. Kary Mullis, stated definitively that PCR must not be used to diagnose viral illnesses.¹³ On what basis, therefore, were “cases” determined purely by the results of this one test, much disputed as to its appropriateness?

Cause of Death

A death from any cause, within 28 days of a positive test for SARS-CoV-2, is recorded as a “Covid death”. It’s absurd—we have never assigned cause of death like this before, ever. The effect of untrustworthy PCR tests and the arbitrary assignment of a dubious “positive” as somehow causative of death has been a very effective way to fool and frighten people. Most do not know that there are literally scores of viruses, even common cold viruses, which can infect human airways, some of which—in elderly and infirm people—can give rise to severe illness.

Hospital Protocols

Hospital treatment protocols, where I have explored them, look designed to kill:

  • In the UK, the pathway starts with everyone being tested with untrustworthy PCR tests, which are applied repeatedly for an inpatient. Given that 2% of hospital admissions end in a hospital death, repeated poor testing guarantees a lot of “Covid deaths”.
  • A patient “diagnosed” as “positive” Covid is then placed in isolation, and visitors are not allowed until the patient is moribund.
  • A standard treatment involves intravenous midazolam (a benzodiazepine used for sedation) and morphine from a syringe driver, at doses up to 10 times greater than advisable for a patient capable of breathing unaided. This often results in respiratory failure and either immediate death or mechanical ventilation, accompanied by withdrawal of all care; of course, these patients then expire. It’s murder.

In the UK, we have documentary evidence that the UK National Health Service (NHS) stockpiled a year’s supply of midazolam by ordering it normally but banning 2019 prescriptions. By April 2020—over no more than two months—the entire supply was exhausted. Another year’s supply was then bulk-purchased from a generics company in France, cleaning out their stock.

Something similar occurred in U.S. hospitals, with ramped-up cash bonuses for each stage passed, up to and including mechanical ventilation.

Mechanical ventilation is rarely appropriate, because Covid-19 is NOT an obstructive lung disorder. Blood oxygen desaturation is best addressed using non-invasive masks with elevated oxygen levels. When hospitals tried this in Italy in February 2020, they ceased mechanical ventilation within a week, so stark were the differences in outcomes; that is, most ventilated patients died, while most masked patients survived. Apparently, the method of treatment the Italian health care providers had been given from “colleagues in Wuhan” was what they called “the Wuhan protocol”. In this, the guidance given was that the sooner they sedated and ventilated an agitated patient, the better the patient’s chances. This was a lie. Panicked patients needed anxiolytics (anti-anxiety drugs) and an oxygen mask, but instead, they were killed.

Experimental Vaccines

I have been incensed by the misuse of novel, experimental “vaccines,” particularly in Covid-recovered individuals, pregnant women, and children.

  • Recovered individuals are immune, and the risks of adverse events are greatly increased because the body is already poised to attack any cells expressing spike protein.
  • Pregnant women are not at greatly elevated risks from Covid-19 because they tend to be young and healthy. NEVER, since thalidomide (1956–1962), have we approved the use of experimental agents in pregnant women, and certainly not without reproductive toxicology studies. None of the vaccines have a completed “Reprotox” package (summaries on the reproductive effects of chemicals, medications, physical agents, or biologics). I filed a short expert opinion in court with America’s Frontline Doctors (AFLDS) on this topic.¹4 The vaccine makers also didn’t complete something called an ADME-Tox (Absorption Distribution Metabolism Excretion- Toxicity) package. Documents obtained in March 2022 through Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests show that Pfizer was “planning to study” vaccination in maternity as of April 30, 2021—that is, after they had already manufactured and shipped close to 100 million doses.
  • The misuse of these agents in healthy children has, without question, reverse risk/ benefit: the injections kill far more children than the virus could.

The whole thing stinks of a purpose different from public health, because if it was a legitimate public health effort, we definitely would NOT do any of these things. When I co-authored the world’s first treatise explaining some of these concerns, officials lied on the nationally broadcast BBC and other media outlets, smearing me and others like me who were raising questions. Note that the petition in question, filed with the European Medicines Agency (EMA), was co-authored by Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg, the public health doctor and minor politician from Germany who stopped the fraudulent “swine flu pandemic” in 2009.¹5

Revised Definitions

I observed two strange occurrences. First, the WHO altered the definition of “immunity” from “that obtained after natural infection or vaccination,” only mentioning vaccination and excluding “natural immunity”.¹6 That meant that only vaccination could accomplish the goal. They eventually changed this back, but for many, the damage was done, leaving non-experts not trusting natural immunity, even though it is superior to that from vaccination because the body has been exposed to all parts of the virus and will, therefore, respond to any part of it if reinfected. The

definition of a “vaccine” was also changed, so that it wasn’t necessary to prevent infection or transmission, whereas traditional vaccines almost always do this. They do so because they prevent the development of clinical illness and, in the case of respiratory viruses at least, lack of symptoms renders the person all but incapable of infecting anyone else.

In addition, the WHO changed the definition of “pandemic.” Previously, “pandemic” meant the simultaneous spreading across many countries of a pathogen, causing many cases and deaths. The definition was changed to eliminate the need for many deaths. (See Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg [at 45 min, 50 sec], interviewed on UK TV in 2010 after the exaggerated swine flu pandemic, which I now believe was something of a rehearsal for the 2020 Covid-19 pandemic.)¹7

This is a critical point, because PCR can be designed against any pathogen, and protocols can be adopted such that a large number of false positives appear. This grants bad actors the ability, relatively easily, to create the illusion of a pandemic, almost to order. Dr. Wodarg recaps his 2009 experiences and shows interesting similarities with recent events in an January 2021 interview.¹8

Many people simply don’t believe experts when they talk of a “very high fraction of positive test results being false positives”. I assure you, however, there have genuinely been a number of events where the entire suspected epidemic was an illusion, and 100% of positives were false positives. In 2007, the New York Times reported on an example of “an epidemic that wasn’t” which, when I first read it, gave me a crawling sensation.¹9 I wonder if it was this genuine event—a false alarm in which experts admitted placing “too much faith in a quick and highly sensitive molecular test that led them astray”— that birthed the method for exaggerating (or even fully faking) a pandemic such as the one we are currently living?

Bizarre Statements

I noticed early on that Bill Gates said, “We won’t return to normal until pretty much the whole planet has been vaccinated”. This is a bizarre statement from a person with no medical or scientific training (or indeed a college degree in anything). It is never necessary to vaccinate the entire population, when only the elderly and infirm are at serious risk of death if infected. Note, too, that the median age of deaths from/with Covid was the same or even older than the median age of death due to all causes.

For his part, former UK prime minister Tony Blair insisted that vaccine passports would be essential to restore confidence. Again, this was absurd, especially once we learned that these vaccines do not prevent transmission. Once this became clear, the case for coerced vaccination vanished, and this is still the present position. Yet, my unvaccinated relatives may not enter the U.S. If you fear infection, the safest person to be around isn’t a vaccinated person but a person who is fit and well, with no respiratory symptoms.

Boosters and Antibodies

The practise of “boosting”—giving people dose after dose of poorly-designed agent, ostensibly to reinforce their immunity—has no immunological basis. No genuine immunity wanes in a few months, or sometimes even in a few weeks. The perpetrators have exploited the public’s understanding of the annual influenza vaccine to somehow normalise something that is both dangerous and ineffective.

I also noticed that early on, in discussing immunity, antibodies were the discussion topic, whereas T-cells were an “extremist plot”. This is another absurdity. I can assemble expert witnesses who will attest alongside me that blood-based antibodies are relatively unimportant, potentially irrelevant to infection by respiratory viruses. This is because the virus infects the air side of the airways and blood-based antibodies cannot leave the blood and enter this “compartment”. Blood antibodies and respiratory viruses never meet except under unusual circumstances. On the contrary, T-cells leave the blood and migrate through infected airway tissue, removing infected cells.

Ferguson Track Record

Professor Neil Ferguson at Imperial College has a poor record of modelling and predictions.²0

Prescient Testimony

A former WHO staffer, Jane Bürgermeister, shared frighteningly prescient testimony in 2010. Her understanding was that respiratory virus pandemics will be used to force near universal vaccination and that this had sinister motives.²¹ I dismissed this the first time I saw it. Many of us turn away instinctively from evil because we cannot or do not want to believe that other humans are capable of that which our logic tells us is happening. I now no longer reject it. It fits far too well with the totally independent Paul Schreyer documentary.¹¹

More Prescient Testimony

Another doctor, Dr. Rima Laibow, made similar claims.²² This testimony speaks of population rejection, and like Jane Bürgermeister, locates the fraud in a conceptual world government. Again, one can reject it, or consider it alongside other pieces of information.

Conclusions

I think it’s worth developing the theme of turning away from evidence of sheer evil, and I have to say more, because it is THE pressing issue today. The evidence I set forth makes it perfectly plain that the entire world is being lied to in ways that led— predictably—to huge suffering and death. Given that none of the “measures” imposed could have mitigated illness and death from a respiratory virus, the only outcome was to be the fracturing of civil society and damage, potentially fatal, to the economy and financial system. I emphasise again here that WHO scientists had conducted a detailed review of control measures for respiratory virus epidemics and pandemics as recently as 2019, and they concluded that no imposed NPI measures make any difference at all.²³ The claims made for control in Wuhan are not credible.

The stakeholders who must have approved this action own or control the majority of the world’s capital and assets. Their motivation cannot be for money, for they stand astride the money-creating apparatus in the central and private banks. Equally, it cannot be to obtain gross control over the population, since they already demonstrably have that. This is what leads me inexorably to propose that the motives behind this are terrible—at the very least, to secure totalitarian control through mandatory, digital IDs (in the guise of useless “vaccine passports,” useless because none of these so-called vaccines reduce transmission, the only possible justification for them). Add to this a “financial great reset” with withdrawal of cash and introduction of central bank digital currencies (CBDCs), and we have a wholly controlled population, controlled automatically without human intervention on the ground. All that’s needed is to require the population to show their health passport or else they will not be allowed to cross a regulated threshold, like accessing a food store, or make a transaction using digital money unless the AI algorithm permits it. If those operating this takeover of humanity wished then to eliminate a portion of the population, with plausible deniability, I doubt a more propitious starting point could be had.

I do not believe it’s a fault in those who fall for the narrative that they cannot see the lies. People want to believe that governments and experts, for all their well-known flaws and occasionally uncovered corruption, are trying to do the best they can. They cannot accept the truth, that there is a group of powerful people who regard the ordinary members of the public as surplus to requirements. They want to deny evil because it makes them feel bad, sad, and uncomfortable to think about the world this way. They want to deny reality; that’s their coping mechanism, which is being exploited by the perpetrators of evil. It gives a cloak of invisibility to those who want to commit mass murder, quite literally, since so many people are so willing to imagine that it is not happening.

It is not clear to me what to do with the information I’ve gathered here. I believe that a calm review of the summary that I call “The Covid Lies” will result in any open-minded person agreeing that we all have been subjected to a monstrous fraud with lethal consequences, and that there is overwhelming evidence of long-term planning and deliberately injurious acts. There is no easy way to say that, but it could be represented objectively and taught, in the manner of a workshop, so that participants get to derive their own conclusions (albeit being led by the evidence).

I doubt just talking to a group of people who hold the dominant narrative view as “true” would respond at all well to this, delivered as a lecture. Nobody wants to accept that they’ve been fooled, even if the blow is softened by telling them that this has been brought about by highly experienced professionals in the covert services and has required huge amounts of money to buy off several groups. On the positive side, an increasing number of people have detected that fraud is ongoing. A particularly good example comes from the financial analyst community and refers to life insurance claims among many other pieces of evidence of wrong-doing.²4

Ignoring this and hoping it will go away is naïve and very dangerous for us all. The perpetrators have not gone away and will likely return in the fall. I expect this year or the next will see them assume totalitarian tyranny, if we have not, before then, “inoculated” important stakeholder groups to understand what has happened so far and cautioned them to be alert to the many potential presentations of the next fear-provoking episode.

Best wishes and thanks for reading.

About Dr. Mike Yeadon

I am an experienced life sciences R&D professional, with 32 years in commercial R&D. There is no reason for me to be saying the things I do, other than that I believe them to be true. I have never campaigned for or against anything in my life, and I had never made public comment on anything outside the narrow confines of my professional roles, prior to Covid-19.

I hugely enjoyed my years with Pfizer. They were a good employer, and I left on excellent terms as they shuttered their UK R&D base. Evidence of this is that I formed a business partnership with Pfizer the year after I left (2012), and we worked together on an ultimately successful venture, which concluded profitably for all in 2017.²5

I am the most highly- and broadly-qualified scientist speaking out about this alleged fraud. I have no financial or other conflicts of interest, unlike most of those who I assert are deceiving the public, everywhere.

Professional Profile

  • Currently Chief Scientific Advisor to America’s Frontline Doctors and to the Truth For Health Foundation.
  • Former founder and CEO of Ziarco, a biotech acquired by Novartis (2017).
  • Former VP and worldwide head of Allergy & Respiratory Diseases research at Pfizer, UK (1995–2011).
  • Independent consultant to over 30 biotech companies, mostly U.S. (2011–2021).
  • PhD in respiratory pharmacology (1988) and double 1st class honours degree in biochemistry and toxicology (1985).

Endnotes

1. https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1503112014700285953.html

2.      Max Blumental. “Foreign Agents #10 – Covid and mass hypnosis w/Dr. Mattias Desmet.” https://rokfin.com/stream/9705/Foreign-Agents-10–Covid-and-Mass-Hypnosis

3.      “Mass psychosis – How an entire population becomes mentally ill.” After Skool and Academy of Ideas, Aug. 14, 2021. https://rumble.com/vl52me-mass-psychosis-how-an-entire-population-becomes-mentally-ill-by-after-skool.html

4.      Catherine Austin Fitts. “Control & freedom happen one person at a time with Catherine & Ulrike Granögger.” The Solari Report, Feb. 11, 2022. https://home.solari.com/deep-state-tactics-101-part-i-with-catherine-austin-fitts/

5.       Catherine Austin Fitts. “Deep state tactics 101 Part I with Catherine Austin Fitts.” The Solari Report, May 18, 2019. https://home.solari.com/deep-state-tactics-101-part-i-with-catherine-austin-fitts/

6.      “The Trusted News Initiative – A BBC led organisation censoring public health experts who oppose the official narrative on Covid-19.” The Exposé, Aug. 29, 2021. https://dailyexpose.uk/2021/08/29/the-trusted-news-initiative-a-bbc-led-organisation-censoring-public-health-experts-who-oppose-the-official-narrative-on-covid-19/

7.       el gato malo. “If I were going to conquer you.” Bad cattitude (SubStack), Mar. 4, 2022. https://boriquagato.substack.com/p/if-i-were-going-to-conquer-you

8.      “Robert F. Kennedy Jr., son of Robert Kennedy, delivers a great speech in Milan 13 Nov 2021.” truth.exposed123, Nov. 23, 2021. https://www.bitchute.com/video/wyFtd4mshFO8/

9. https://www.canadiancovidcarealliance.org/media-resources/pandemic-alternative/

10.    “Non-pharmaceutical Interventions (NPIs).” https://rumble.com/vv3xn6-non-pharmaceutical-interventions-npis.html

11.     “Paul Schreyer: Pandemic simulation games – Preparation for a new era?” https://wissen-ist-relevant.de/vortrage/paul-schreyer-pandemic-simulation-games-preparation-for-a-new-era/  

12.     Bhakdi S, Burkhardt A. “On COVID vaccines: why they cannot work, and irrefutable evidence of their causative role in deaths after vaccination.” Doctors for COVID Ethics, Dec. 15, 2021. https://doctors4covidethics.org/on-covid-vaccines-why-they-cannot-work-and-irrefutable-evidence-of-their-causative-role-in-deaths-after-vaccination/

13.     “Kary Mullis explains why his PCR test is not a diagnostic test.” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rXm9kAhNj-4

14.          https://home.solari.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/Declaration-of-MikeYeadon-fertility-signed.pdf

15.     “Dr Yeadon’s (former Pfizer VP) coronavirus vaccine safety petition.” Dryburgh.com, Dec. 4, 2020. https://dryburgh.com/mike-yeadon-coronavirus-vaccine-safety-concerns-petition/

16.     “WHO changes definition of herd immunity.” Peter Byel [blog], n.d. https://peterlegyel.wordpress.com/2021/01/15/who-changes-definition-of-herd-immunity/

17.     “W.H.O. / Governments working in collusion with big pharma? | A necessary look back at the swine flu pandemic.” https://www.expandingawarenessrelations.com/tag/wolfgang/  

18.     “A conversation with Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg.” Pandacast, Jan. 2, 2021. https://www.pandata.org/wolfgang-wodarg/

19.     Silviu “Silview” Costinescu. “NYT 2007: Faith in quick test leads to epidemic that wasn’t.” Silview, Dec. 26, 2020. https://silview.media/2020/12/26/nyt-2007-faith-in-quick-test-leads-to-epidemic-that-wasnt/

20.    Don Via, Jr. “Neil Ferguson’s latest faux pas in a long line of fear-driven predictions.” COVID-19 Up, Aug. 18, 2021. https://covid19up.org/neil-ferguson-fear-driven-predictions/

21.     “Jane Bürgermeister | Forced vax warning – February 15, 2010.” https://brandnewtube.com/watch/jane-bu-rgermeister-forced-vax-warning-february-15-2010_Con7FXMOCvgW8Or.html  

22.    “Jesse Ventura meets Dr. Rima Laibow.” https://www.brandnewtube.com/watch/jesse-ventura-meets-dr-rima-laibow_kL2AlRqtejqXMr1.html

23.    World Health Organization. Non-pharmaceutical public health measures for mitigating the risk and impact of epidemic and pandemic influenza: annex: report of systematic literature reviews. World Health Organization, 2019. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/329439. License: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO

24.    “Bombshell: Naomi Wolf interviews Edward Dowd about Pfizer fraud & criminal ramifications.” https://rumble.com/vwjmjm-bombshell-naomi-wolf-interviews-edward-dowd-about-pfizer-fraud-and-criminal.html

25.    John LaMattina. “Turning Pfizer discards into Novartis gold: The story of Ziarco.” Forbes, Mar. 15, 2017. https://www.forbes.com/sites/johnlamattina/2017/03/15/turning-pfizer-discards-into-novartis-gold-the-story-of-ziarco/?sh=1ce601c57572   

++++++++++++++++++++++

Bitchute VIDEO: REINER FUELLMICH: THIS GENOCIDE IS NOT BY ACCIDENT

Posted by The-Truth-Seeker

First Published April 11th, 202220:25 UTC

All Credit To The Whistle-blower News Room

++++++++++++++++

Rumble VIDEO: WATCH THE WATER: Dr. Bryan Ardis Unmasks What’s Behind CONVID-1984

Posted by SettingBrushfires

Published April 11, 2022

The plandemic continues, but its origins are still a nefarious mystery. How did the world get sick, how did Covid really spread, and did the Satanic elite tell the world about this bioweapon ahead of time? Dr. Bryan Ardis (www.ardisantidote.com) has unveiled a shocking connection between this pandemic and the eternal battle of good and evil which began in the Garden of Eden.

In this Stew Peters Network exclusive, Director Stew Peters, award winning filmmaker Nicholas Stumphauzer and Executive Producer Lauren Witzke bring to light a truth satan himself has fought to suppress.

Visit http://ardisantidote.com/ to learn how to protect you and your loved ones during this biological war.

Originally posted here: https://rumble.com/v10mnew-live-world-premiere-watch-the-water.html

+++++++++++++++++++++

Bitchute VIDEO: DR. YUVAL NOAH: FREEWILL IS OVER

Posted by Conservative Politics,anti-NWO,anti-left/socialistStarblazer692003

 First Published April 11th, 2022 10:54 UTC

MORE DESCRIPTION

“When Humans Become Cyborgs.” A Glimpse Into the World Economic Forum’s Transhumanist Agenda


Transhuman Evil

It is unsurprising Leftists (by any Socialist-like appellation) are supportive of ONE-WORLD Government – WEF – New World Order idiotic anti-Liberty and anti-American ideology. It is sad that even RINO and Establishment Conservatives wittingly or unwittingly are gravitating toward such idiotic ideology.

Ukraine’s Zelenskyy is a card-carrying WEF’er. Supporting Zelenskyy places one on board to end the America our Founding Fathers formed.

WITH THAT IN MIND!

A couple of days ago I ran into a We Love Trump website post on Transhumanism which is a part of the WEF vision for a New World Order (NWO) society. Here is that post.

JRH 3/16/22

I need your generosity. PLEASE GIVE to overcome research expenses:

Please Support NCCR

Big Tech Censorship is pervasive – Share voluminously on all social media platforms!

******************************

“When Humans Become Cyborgs.” A Glimpse Into the World Economic Forum’s Transhumanist Agenda

Brain-Computer Interfaces

By daniel_g

March 14, 2022

I Love Trump

The World Economic is the anti-human, techno-fascist scum of the Earth. 

WEF founder Klaus Schwab and his minions are the enemies of humanity and freedom for the global population. 

Last week, I introduced WeLoveTrump readers to Yuval Noah Harari, Schwab’s top advisor. If you haven’t heard of this transhumanist, I recommend viewing his creepy presentations.

Who is Professor Yuval Noah Harari, Klaus Schwab’s Top Advisor?

Yuval Noah Harari

But I want to shine awareness on another sickening aspect of the World Economic Forum’s transhumanist agenda.

What is transhumanism?

Per Wikipedia:

Transhumanism is a philosophical and intellectual movement which advocates for the enhancement of the human condition by developing and making widely available sophisticated technologies that can greatly enhance longevity and cognition. It also predicts the inevitability of such technologies in the future.[1][2]

Transhumanist thinkers study the potential benefits and dangers of emerging technologies that could overcome fundamental human limitations as well as the ethics[3] of using such technologies. Some transhumanists believe that human beings may eventually be able to transform themselves into beings with abilities so greatly expanded from the current condition as to merit the label of posthuman beings.

In simpler terms, transhumanism is merging humans and machines through artificial intelligence.

So, I’m not joking when saying Klaus Schwab wants to turn you into a cyborg.

It’s a legitimate presentation given by these anti-human globalists.

[Blog Editor: The article links to a Reece Head tweet. Below is the embed:]

As stated by the WEF:

Recent advances in brain-computer interfaces are blurring the lines between mind and machine. What steps do leaders need to take now to ensure the ethical and responsible application of human enhancement?

Join an in-depth discussion that explores the principles and priorities for governing disruptive technologies.

One of the speakers at “When Humans Become Cyborgs” is Victor Dzau, President of the U.S. National Academy of Medicine (NAM).

Dzau is also the President of the Global Preparedness Monitoring Board (GPMB).

The Global Preparedness Monitoring Board (GPMB) is an independent monitoring and accountability body to ensure preparedness for global health crises. Co-convened by the Director-General of the World Health Organization and the President of the World Bank, the GPMB is comprised of political leaders, agency principals and world-class experts. It is tasked with providing an independent and comprehensive appraisal for policy makers and the world about progress towards increased preparedness and response capacity for disease outbreaks and other emergencies with health consequences. In short, the work of the GPMB is to chart a roadmap for a safer world.

Guess who’s a former Board member of the GPMB?

Anthony Fauci.

Get an understanding of the God-complex these transhumanists possess by watching “When Humans Become Cyborgs.”

Youtube VIDEO: When Humans Become Cyborgs | DAVOS 2020 [48-minutes]

[Posted by World Economic Forum

Feb 20, 2020

Recent advances in brain-computer interfaces are blurring the lines between mind and machine. What steps do leaders need to take now to ensure the ethical and responsible application of human enhancement?

Join an in-depth discussion that explores the principles and priorities for governing disruptive technologies.

Speakers: Ronaldo Lemos, Hiromi “Sputniko!” Ozaki, Victor Dzau, Ilina Singh

The World Economic Forum is the International Organization for Public-Private Cooperation. The Forum engages the foremost political, business, cultural and other leaders of society to shape global, regional and industry agendas. We believe that progress happens by bringing together people from all walks of life who have the drive and the influence to make positive change.

MORE DESCRIPTION]

As a reminder, Klaus Schwab has bragged about infiltrating world governments to insert these types of individuals into positions of power.

VIDEO FOUND: Klaus Schwab Admits To “Penetrating The Cabinets” Of Most World Governments

Klaus Schwab

[Blog Editor: The video of Klaus Schwab referenced in the above link but not shown on this post:

Rumble VIDEO: Klaus Schwab Brags Of Penetrating Most Major World Governments…

Posted by WeLoveTrump…by NOAH

Published January 29, 2022

MORE TO READ]

© 2022 All Rights Reserved. We Love Trump

%d bloggers like this: