Tyranny is a slow-infecting political virus infecting America. That virus became a bit more explicit in America’s 2020 Election but has been going on under the public radar before that for decades.
A part of that under the radar action is due to UNELECTED Globalists extending their tentacle of control through Treaties and Agreements which in America’s case – some ratified Constitutionally (e.g. United Nations involvements) and some by Presidential Executive Orders (which are fluid depending on whom ever sits in the Oval Office).
Since the China Virus (er…I mean COVID19) began spreading around the world the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) dominated World Health Organization (WHO) has been cryptically collecting political clout to override the sovereign authority of independent nations in all matters relating to the spread of viral diseases. Since the WHO is part of -CONTROL-THE-PEOPLE more through political science narratives rather than observable science making critical thinking decisions, CCP-style tyranny will increasingly be glaringly overt political infection of tyranny.
A couple of days ago THE EXPOSÉ examined this World-Wide WHO dictatorship emergence that culminates with a near 90-minute video under the auspices of NTD News and facilitated by Frank Gaffney. THE EXPOSÉ post is from 3/13/23 and NTD News video post was on 3/11/23.
YOU CAN ALSO SUPPORT via buying women’s menstrual health, healthy collagen, vitamin supplements/products, coffee from my Online stores: My Store (please use referral discount code 2388058): https://modere.co/3SrOHzI
Yesterday, World Health Organisation Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus announced “with great pleasure” a joint project of the IPU Parliament and WHO, “which can guide parliamentarians along the path towards health for all, including on law-making, finance, taxation and accountability.”
A few days ago, we published an article warning that the World Health Organisation (“WHO”) aims to begin installing a One World Government under the guise of global health security. If you didn’t believe us then, this latest development should convince you now.
IPU Parliament claims to “empower parliaments and parliamentarians to promote peace, democracy and sustainable development.” Out of 190 parliaments in the world, 178 national parliaments are members of IPU. The Inter-Parliamentary Union (“IPU”) began in 1889 by Englishman William Randal Cremer and Frenchman Frédéric Passy. You can read more about the history of IPU HERE.
And WHO is a private organisation, a puppet organisation that is funded by Globalist billionaires. Bill Gates, along with the organisations he controls, is, by far, the largest financial contributor to WHO. Only 13% of WHO’s budget comes from assessed contributions, which are set amounts paid by member-state governments.
All parliamentarians who want to protect citizens and their nations’ sovereignty, freedom and rights from these want-to-be global dictators should be calling for their governments to stop funding and exit the WHO. Any who aren’t, by default, are identifying themselves as Globalists and puppets of the planned One World Government.
Some have been already calling to #ExitTheWHO – based on the secretive negotiations taking place regarding amendments to the international health regulations and a proposed “pandemic treaty” – but this latest development should leave no one in any doubt of the dictators at WHO’s intentions. All parliamentarians and all citizens of all nations need to join the calls to put an end to the Globalists’ dystopian dreams of a one world totalitarian state which is under the rule of a very few.
Exit The WHO
Over the past two weeks, the US and other members of WHO have been negotiating ways to give sweeping new powers to WHO’s Director-General. Through material changes to existing international health regulations and/or a new pandemic accord, Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus would be able to declare actual or potential “public health emergencies of international concern” in any country based on privately supplied information and without the agreement of the nation(s) affected. Worse yet, he can unilaterally dictate what must be done in response.
The idea of granting WHO and its leadership such potentially fraught authorities is all the more problematic in light of their imperious, and malfeasant, conduct at the direction of the Chinese Communist Party (“CCP”) in the course of the covid-19 pandemic. But, the approval of one or both of these agreements is likely – all other things being equal – to happen when the World Health Assembly meets in May 2023. The new WHO authorities would become provisionally binding on member states, irrespective of whether or not they ultimately endorse them.
Especially troubling is the convergence of these initiatives with measures promoted by WHO to institute global digital identity cards to document and monitor vaccination status and other medical conditions. When combined with the proliferating introduction of central bank digital currencies (“CBDCs”), these “smart” IDs would facilitate efforts to monitor, control and enforce WHO’s diktats, and punish those who defy them.
First off, I’m a Trump supporter. I support Trump even though his last choice of Executive Branch appointees was abysmal (a revolving door of backstabbing RINOs and traitors some of which continued in Office right through Trump’s departure). AND for much of Trump’s America First stand, he still made some economic policies that leaned a bit more toward Globalism than America First (For Example: United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement [USMCA]).
WORST OF ALL, President Trump initiated the mRNA death-jab with Operation Warp Speed and as far as I am aware still supports the dangerous mRNA jab implementation though gratefully on a voluntary basis rather than government mandates.
Except for perhaps Governor DeSantis, I suspect Trump’s 2024 rivals for the GOP President nomination support the mRNA inundation on the gullible.
AND thinking of Election 2024 (BTW – TRUMP IN 2020!), it is my humble opinion Trump has entered the same vicious tactics of 2016 to hammer GOP rivals in 2024. I am certain many of those rivals are backstabbing RINOs; HOWEVER, I don’t believe DeSantis is in that category. It is unfortunate that DeSantis might have to engage in the same kind of viciousness as Trump in efforts to preserve a DeSantis reputation. AND as I pointed out above, if DeSantis indeed pursues a GOP nomination, DeSantis has been given plenty ammo of Trump errors to load a political vicious gun.
NEVERTHELESS, IT IS obvious to any intelligent individual not brainwashed by Dem-Marxist lies and MSM propaganda, that the 2020 (and 2022 for that matter) was one of the crookedest elections in American history – TRUMP WON!
That stated, with all of Trump’s bad choices, his very name drives Dem-Marxists into such apoplectic hysteria that has come to my attention some politically motivated District Attorneys are on the verge of unwinnable indictments against Trump to keep The Donald out of the 2024 Election Cycle. THAT KIND OF HYSTERIA MEANS I’M VOTING TRUMP!
6 Prison Choir consists of individuals who have been incarcerated as a result of their involvement in the January 6, 2021 protest for election integrity after President Donald J. Trump stated “I know that everyone here will soon be marching over to the Capitol building to peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard”. The J6PC continues to make their voices heard through the power of music and sings “The Star Spangled Banner” every evening before bed.
One of the biggest jokes of our times is not that people were informed that they live in a democracy. The biggest joke is that they believe it. In actuality, a small group of extremely wealthy, powerful, and extremely inhuman oligarchs—also known as the Deep State—control their lives and fate. These have been preparing for decades to seize control of humanity, subjugate it, and reduce it to a population they believe “sufficient” to preserve Mother Earth’s habitability. They intend to robotize, digitize, and turn the remaining survivors into a new kind of serfdom. A massive conspiracy, like George Orwell’s “1984″ and Aldous Huxley’s “Brave New World,” is being waged by this 0.001 percent against the other 99.999 percent of humanity.
The sooner the “masked” and “socially detached” understand that governments are waging war against humanity and the global nightmare they are forcing upon us, the greater the possibility we have to regain our sovereign identities. The truth is that under the guise of “corona health protection,” humanity is subject to blatantly illegal and coercive procedures that are imposed upon it. The police and military enforce the rules, which include donning masks, isolating oneself from friends and family, being quarantined, and other arbitrary punishments for disobedience.
Sadly, slice by slice, in salami tactics, the ruling “elites” have chopped out human and civil rights under false pretenses and with the assistance of relentless media propaganda, the people of the West have slowly lost their confidence, at least from the start of the neoliberal onslaught in the 1980s. The “elites” under the Corona dictatorship are getting ready to obliterate the last bits of liberty. Even the majority today, which has been inundated with all manner of propagandized dangers, pleads for more security and is willing to give up even the very last vestiges of their liberty. The globalists have unrestrainedly increased their authority under the cover of their propaganda lies and in their unbridled desire to keep multiplying their billions.
Prince Charles, Queen Elizabeth’s eldest son (I refuse to call this puppet a king), dubbed the Corona “pandemic” a “golden opportunity.” Thus, he is a member of the circle of globalists who are using the time window of the Corona crisis to remove democracy and install the totalitarian-dystopian New World Order they seek. It is unclear when …
The powerful get increasingly alarmed as more people start to wake up and go to great lengths to persuade civil employees, administrators, medical professionals, and even independent doctors to embrace and promote the official story. Nowadays, numerous individuals support the government’s lies. Governments receive “advice” from bought scientific “task teams” and justifications to tighten the screws even further.
What transpires when the “rabble” misbehaves? Job losses, medical license revocations, physical threats against family members, and additional persecution. But when they come up against informed and awakened people, the globalists’ vile deeds and influence-peddling run into a brick block.
Has anyone noticed that the flu has almost completely disappeared in the 2020/2021 winter flu season? Why? Covid-19 statistics were inflated by lying about it. The globalists’ “invisible” leadership dictates to governments the “Covid-19 quotas” that must be met, ensuring governments’ survival under the globalists’ hammer.
The Globalists’ strategy has been to divide the people for decades.
Their latest brilliant idea is to use an invisible enemy, a virus, as the foundation of fear campaigns to keep people panicked and bullied all over the world. This is reminiscent of the infamous words spoken by Rockefeller protégé Henry Kissinger more than 50 years ago:
“He who controls the food supply controls the people; he who controls energy controls whole continents; he who controls money controls the world.”
We are in the midst of a war imposed on us by globalists and their governments. This war has already wreaked havoc on our societies, tearing apart families and friendships. We will not be able to look our children and grandchildren in the eyes if we are not careful.
We could have known what was going on and what is still going on, what this small, dark power elite—the globalists—is up to. If we do not stand up for our rights, this war will continue, preparing future generations to avoid social contact. They are already indoctrinating your children to avoid friends, schoolmates, and peers, and to avoid playing in groups—this is the “New Normal.”
The reigning “elites” in finance and politics are leveraging the Corona crisis to rebuild capitalism. By maintaining the state of emergency and denying citizens their rights, they are destroying small and medium-sized enterprises, robbing them, and demolishing Western parliamentary democracies. The authorities’ goal is to create digital-financial monopolies in …
The evil masters, the pretentious crème de la crème of civilization, those same globalists, have already and continue to neoliberally transform education systems around the world to teach children and young adults that wearing masks was and may again be necessary for survival and that “social distancing” is the only way forward.
THE DESTRUCTION OF SOCIAL NETWORKS
Globalists understand that if the social network that holds a civilization together is shattered, they have won the battle—not the war because the war will last as long as the resistance exists. Their nightmare is the positive dynamic of life, of people, societies, entire nations, and continents. Without this dynamic, life on Earth would come to a halt.
They want the polar opposite: a globalist dictator controlling a small population of serfs or robotized slaves who move only when told to, own nothing, and receive a digital, blockchain-powered universal income with which they can buy food, pleasure, and comfort based on their behavior and obedience. Once the slaves are no longer useful or expendable, their electronically controlled brains are simply turned off.
THE GLOBALISTS’ VANGUARD
The vanguard of the world’s rich and super-rich all have one goal in mind: the establishment of a New World Order (NWO) or the One World Order (OWO). The World Economic Forum (WEF), the G-7, the G-20 (leaders of the world’s most powerful economies), and some lesser-known organizations such as the Bilderberg Society, the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), Chatham House, and many others are all run by obscure individuals. The World Economic Forum (WEF), founded in 1974 by CEO Klaus Schwab, is arguably the most important current vanguard.
All of these institutions and organizations share members. Even this extended vanguard represents less than 0.001% of the global population. They have all elevated themselves above sovereign, democratically elected national governments and the United Nations. They have effectively co-opted the UN to carry out their wishes. UN-Directors General, as well as the Directors General of the numerous UN: sub-organizations, are usually chosen by the US, with the approval of their European vassals, based on the candidate’s political and psychological profile. If his or her “performance” as UN Secretary-General or head of a UN sub-organization no longer corresponds to globalist ideas, his, or her days are numbered.
Furthermore, globalists have hijacked or established the following institutions or organizations: the European Union, the Bretton Woods institutions (World Bank and IMF), the World Trade Organization (WTO), and the International Criminal Court (ICC) in The Hague. The latter lacks teeth. This ensures that the law is always on the side of those who break the law. Regional development banks and similar financial institutions, in addition to the top players, the World Bank and the IMF, keep the countries in their respective regions in check. In the end, the financial or debt economy has complete control. Western neoliberal banditry has created a highly criminal system in which political disobedience is punished through economic repression or theft of national wealth in international territories. The system’s common denominator is the (still) ubiquitous US dollar.
We the People believe it is normal for unknown, unelected individuals to rule over our sovereign nations and sovereignly elected governments. We’ve turned into a herd of obedient sheep. Globalists have slowly and quietly taken over. But we didn’t notice it. Unfortunately, most only become aware of it after it is too late, and freedom, civil and human rights have vanished. The Patriot Act in the United States is an example of this. It had been planned for a long time before 9/11. Patriot legislation to ostensibly protect the people was rushed through Congress in the aftermath of 9/11 because people were clamoring for it out of fear. And, voilà, the Patriot Act permanently deprived the American people of their freedom and civil liberties.
Humanity has been enslaved by globalists. They determine when and where a pandemic will break out, as well as the conditions under which we can survive a staged pandemic. They use very skilled instruments such as a tiny invisible enemy known as a virus and a massive but also invisible monster known as fear. These two instruments take us off the street and keep us from seeing our friends or enjoying conversation, the theater, sports, or a park picnic.
If we let them, globalists will soon be deciding who lives and who dies. Another wave of pandemics, and people will be begging, yelling, and screaming for another vaccine, applauding Big Pharma’s and eugenicists’ goals. There is still time to say NO as a group. Collectively and in unity.
TRIAL RUNS AND AGENDAS
Will the people accept the agenda of the unelected World Economic Forum? As drivers of the globalization process over the last decades, the globalists will now opportunistically portray themselves as world saviors, focusing on protecting what they have left of Mother Earth. Of course, man-made CO2-based “global warming” will be at the heart of their argument. The UN Agenda 2030—which corresponds to the 17 UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)—is the instrument for protecting nature and humanity. The UN Agenda focuses on rebuilding the willfully destroyed global economy in accordance with the 17 SDGs’ “green” principles.
Keep in mind that everything is interconnected. The infamous Agenda 2021, which aligns with and supplements the (UN) Agenda 2030, was officially launched in January 2021 with the WEF’s official declaration of “The Great Reset”. Similarly, “The Great Reset” began in January 2020, with the outbreak of the Corona Pandemic. This had been in the works for decades. The Rockefeller Report of 2010 forewarned the ongoing Corona regime with its “Lockstep Scenario,” further Event 201 of October 18, 2019, in New York, which computer-simulated a Corona pandemic, with 65 million dead and a ruined economy within 18 months. Event 201 occurred just a few weeks before the actual Corona pandemic began.
The Agenda ID 2020 is the globalists’ plan to implement what is behind the UN Agenda 2030. This is a collaboration between public and private sector partners, including UN agencies and civil society. ID2020 is an electronic identification program that bases digital identity on universal immunization. Bill Gates founded and funds ID2020, as does GAVI, the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunizations. GAVI is a Big Pharma association involved in the development of coronavirus vaccines that, along with the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF), funds a large portion of the WHO budget.
The “Great Reset,” as announced by Klaus Schwab and his colleague Thierry Malleret, will undoubtedly be carried out with the assistance of Agenda ID2020. There’s more to it than meets the eye. Agenda ID2020 is even incorporated into the SDGs as SDG 16.9, which seeks to “provide legal digital identity for all by 2030, including free birth registration.” This is perfectly in line with SDG 16’s overall concept:
“Promote peaceful and inclusive societies for sustainable development, ensure equal access to justice for all, and build effective, accountable, and inclusive institutions at all levels.”
Agenda ID2020 is currently being tested on schoolchildren in Bangladesh, following the official path of the UN Agenda 2030 to achieve the SDGs. Children are given digitized ID cards as part of the process, as well as mandatory immunization programs.
All of this will drive the digitization of money and the introduction of 5G, which will necessitate the loading of personal data onto nano-chips to monitor and control the population. As a result, it’s no surprise that Agenda ID2020 is barely mentioned in the mainstream media. ID2020 is the One World Order’s ultimate control of the world population by a small elite. ID2020’s mechanism would enable tracking, control, and networking of all people on the planet, including all health data, money flows, bank accounts, and behavior in a society that I no longer want to call civilization.
Agenda ID2020 could also include “vaccination programs” to drastically reduce the global population. Eugenics is a critical component in population control around the world. All of this sounds like a conspiracy theory, but it is a massive plot unprecedented in human history.
LOCKDOWNS FOR AGENDA IMPLEMENTATION
The ruling elite employs lockdowns as a tool to carry out the aforementioned agendas. If the public knew about this, the “elites” would face massive protests. That is why they organize and finance various types of counter-demonstrations. The Ford Foundation, for example, makes no apologies for financially supporting the “Black Lives Matter” movement, which was previously dismissed as insignificant by the elites.
Total militarization of the countries is required to control the population in the United States and Europe, where the most unrest is expected. And this is in the works. According to the New York Times, at least 93,763 machine guns, 180,718 magazine cartridges, hundreds of silencers, and an unknown number of grenade launchers have been delivered to state and local police departments in the United States since 2006. This is in addition to at least 533 aircraft and helicopters, 432 MRAPs (9-foot-tall, 30-ton mine-resistant, anti-attack armored vehicles with turrets), and over 44,900 pieces of night-vision equipment that are routinely used in night raids in Afghanistan and Iraq.
This militarization is part of a larger trend. Since the late 1990s, approximately 9% of US police departments serving at least 50,000 people have used a PPU (police paramilitary unit). This figure is nearly double what it was in the mid-1980s. Even before Covid-19, approximately 15 to 20% of the US population lived at or below the poverty line. The economic devastation caused by the lockdowns will at least double that percentage, increasing the likelihood of civil unrest and clashes with authorities. This will add fuel to the fire for more justifications for militarized policing.
BRAVE NEW WORLD OF POST-COVID WORKING
The WEF has launched a new diabolical project for the post-covid working world, presenting it to the public in October 2020 as a trial balloon to see how it responds. The “Resetting the Future of Work Agenda,” a 31-page document published in July 2020, is a blueprint for how the “Great Reset” will be carried out.
I wrote about it extensively before, but I will talk about the basics again.
They call the document a “white paper,” implying that it is a draft. It does read like an executioner’s story. People would take up arms and fight against this latest totalitarian blueprint and its authors if they knew what the WEF was up to. The time frame is ten years because the UN Agenda 2021 must be implemented by 2030.
That means we are talking about a time frame of roughly 10 years until the following should be completed:
An acceleration of digitized work processes, leading to 84% of all work processes as digital, or virtual / video conferences.
Some 83% of people are planned to work remotely – i.e., no more interaction between colleagues – absolute social distancing, separation of humanity.
About 50% of all tasks are planned to be automated – in other words, human input will be drastically diminished, even while remote working.
Accelerate the digitization of upskilling / reskilling (e.g., education technology providers) — 42% of skill upgrading or training for new skills will be digitized, in other words, no human contact – all on computer via artificial intelligence (AI), algorithms.
Accelerate the implementation of upskilling / reskilling programs – 35% of skills are planned to be “re-tooled” – i.e., existing skills are planned to be abandoned – declared defunct.
Accelerate ongoing organizational transformations (e.g., restructuring) – 34% of current organizational set-ups are planned to be “restructured’ – or, in other words, existing organizational structures will be declared obsolete – to make space for new sets of organizational frameworks, digital structures that provide utmost control over all activities.
Temporarily reassign workers to different tasks – this is expected to touch 30% of the workforce. That also means entirely different pay-scales – most probably unlivable wages, which would make the also planned “universal basic income” (UBI) or “basic income” (a wage that allows you barely to survive) an obvious need. But it would make you fully dependent on the system – a digital system, where you have no control whatsoever.
Temporarily reduce the workforce – this is projected as affecting 28% of the population. It is an additional unemployment figure, disguised as “temporarily”. These people will never come back to full-time.
Permanently reduce the workforce – 13% permanently reduced workforce.
Temporarily increase the workforce – 5% – there is no reference to what type of workforce – probably unskilled labor that, eventually, will also be replaced by automation, by AI and robotization of the workplace.
No specific measures implemented – 4% – does that mean, a mere 4% will remain untouched from the algorithm and AI-directed new work places? As small and insignificant as the figure is, it sounds like “wishful thinking”, never to be accomplished.
Permanently increase the workforce – a mere 1% is projected as “permanently increased workforce”. This is of course not even cosmetics. It is a joke.
Furthermore, the “Great Reset” envisions a credit system in which all personal debts are “forgiven” in exchange for the surrender of all personal assets to an administrative body or agency—possibly the IMF. According to the ideologues, people would own nothing and be happy because all of their needs would be met.
In addition to numerous human rights violations and disasters, the “Great Reset” envisions, for example, making the use of the resources we earn dependent on our behavior—in other words, we are to be at the mercy of this cabal and subject to the wishes of the Deep State, the shadow government, this network of oligarchs that controls all 193 UN member states plus the UN. Only then can we use our money to purchase items that are still available to us. According to various WEF papers, artificially created shortages of food, health care, and other items could jeopardize the free flow of goods.
But the cabal wants even more: as briefly mentioned above, it should not occur to people to reject the system because, simultaneously, everyone has been vaccinated and given a nano-chip, allowing thoughts to be read and influenced with 5G or, soon, 6G.
DARPA, the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, as part of the Pentagon, developed this technology years ago. It is simply a matter of time before it is put into action. And if we don’t revolt, it will be implemented. Civil disobedience in large numbers is the order of the day. The longer we do nothing, the more we sleepwalk into this human disaster.
Neither “The Great Reset” nor the “Resetting the Future of Work Agenda” specify who will enforce these new, harsh rules. They appear to be the same forces that are now being trained to wage urban warfare and suppress riots and social unrest: police and military.
STRENGTHEN THE RESISTANCE
Civil disobedience organization must address the issue of how to communicate with the police and military, as well as how to educate and inform them about the purposes for which they are being misused by this small diabolical cabal. Teachers, doctors, and people in all professions must all be educated and informed about the truth.
Disinformation in the media is brutal and powerful, making it difficult for the resistance to counter without additional funds. The ruling classes’ media is doing everything they can to further divide us.
Only freedom from fear will rip “Resetting the Future of Work Agenda” and “The Great Reset” to shreds, destroying organizations such as the WEF and co-opted UN agencies such as the WHO, UNICEF, WTO, World Bank, IWE, and possibly the entire UN system.
The globalists are acting unethically and have descended to the depths of their moral dysfunctions. The time has come to indict the project’s political and economic leaders under international human rights standards or for crimes against humanity.
Since the Propaganda MSM and co-criminals in the lying U.S. Government are HUGE on lying to Americans, you might be out of the loop that not only did I-AM-THE-SCIENCE (NOT-TRUE) Fauci lied about the Wuhan Lab Leak and Gain of Function (GoF) taxpayer supported research that manufactured the China Virus (er…I mean COVID); Fauci set out to fabricate science to coverup China Virus origins.
You need to dwell on the at one time RESPECTED scientists and doctors who had their lives and professional standing ruined by the likes of science criminals such as Anthony Fauci who defamed brave dissenters of the lying science propaganda. Although I won’t touch on it now, YOU should dwell on the motives behind criminal Fauci (and criminal associates) lies. Guess hints: Pure Greed & Globalist Power.
Here are a couple of videos disdained on Youtube but thankfully retained on Bitchute of once imminent (now oft vilified) Dr. Francis Boyle on COVID ORIGINS way back in 2020. Ridiculed by propagandists but now the documentation proving Fauci is a LIAR-FOR-GAIN, must be examined again:
In this interview, the Author of the US Biowarfare Act, Professor Francis Boyle uncovers four separate studies which he claims confirm as ‘smoking gun’ evidence the Wuhan Coronavirus known as COVID19 was in fact weaponized.
Professor Boyle also discloses where he believes the true origin of the virus originated and the extent that the US government was involved.
This is a must see interview as Professor Boyle also reveals never before disclosed information.
AND NOW to some relevant cross posts on Fauci/Govt Lies. I begin with actually amounts to some musing by Attorney Tom Renz and finish a couple of more specific articles on Fauci lying on the Wuhan Lab Leak.
We’ve been talking a lot about biotech and the legitimate potential we face of a world war. We know that COVID-19 was created in the Wuhan lab and that it was made possible by our own DOD with American grants, funding, and technology. The recent Senate bill, that passed unanimously, to declassify Wuhan leak documents will show implicate China’s involvement in the creation of SARS-COV-2 but not the role of our government. It is likely this is being done to pressure China to stay out of Taiwan as well as to strongarm the CCP not to back Russia in Ukraine (the globalist piggybank). While I appreciate the intent of our elected officials on this bill the fact of the matter is that it was written in a way that will only show part of the issue and, given the millions dead from this disease and the fact that this could have implications related to a potential world war, a full and transparent accounting of EVERYONE involved MUST occur.
In related news, the good people in big pharma have now decided to reformulate all vaccines to mRNA. This is very serious and nearly inexplicable. Given the acknowledged efficacy in preventing transmission (the jabs actually increase your likelihood of getting COVID over time) and the numerous side effects (Died Suddenly, Damar Hamlin, heart issues, cancer, strokes, autoimmune issues, neurological issues, etc.) why would we change existing vaccines, that pharma has claimed have been doing their jobs for decades, to include the same active ingredient causing the issues with no benefits? Changing the formula will increase manufacturing costs for pharma with substantial risk to the business so what could be behind this?
Why do they want all childhood vaccines to change to be gene therapies for kids? Why are they putting mRNA into our food supply? Why are they changing existing vaccines? Is there a smallpox outbreak we didn’t notice because the old jabs are no longer working? Further, if this technology was so incredibly safe and effective why are they hiding their plans from the public? You don’t hide things unless you have something to hide. If Damar Hamlin didn’t have a heart attack from the jab then why aren’t we hearing what the real cause was? There’s a huge increase in deaths globally since the rollout of mRNA vaccines yet they want to double down?
The reality is that this is really the WEF, Pfizer the WHO, and the rest doubling down on their efforts to ensure every human being on this planet is injected with the mRNA gene therapy, but why? Why is it so important to these people to control our genes? Well, I cannot answer but to repeat what has been said. Klaus Schwab (head of the WEF) says the fourth industrial revolution isn’t about changing what you do, it’s about changing you. Changing you with these gene altering vaccines. He says they change who you are and his chief scientific advisor, the apparent Nazi fan-boy (yes Yuval Noah Harari appears to me to be a fan of Hitler and Stalin in light of his repeated remarks that seem to lament that those monsters did not have the tech we do) states that humans are hackable and that free will is an illusion. These people are literally promoting a future of slavery with them as the slave masters. This sounds insane to me but should I ignore their words given the power and influence they wield? Plus, what explanation is there for the above listed insanity?
If we are going to suppose that the push for mRNA has something to do with controlling genetic code the first question is whether that is even close to possible and actually it is. Gatestone Institute has a great article that was published in February of 2021 on how China has been playing with genetics over the past decade with the goal of creating super soldiers. The article, “China Is Creating a New Master Race,” lists China’s goals to obtain “biological dominance,” with little to no ethical boundaries. The experiments are described to evoke the eugenics program of the Third Reich with the goal of creating a “master race.” Interestingly enough this article also states that the genetic and biotech research was able to be conducted thanks to their relationship with the United States and other western nations. “American research labs, biotech investors, and scientists have all striven to do research and business in China’s budding biotech arena… because of the ethical standards for research… are so low,” according to Brandon Wichert. Much of China’s work in this started around the time our DoD authorized the transfer of tech and funds to China to create SARS-COV-2 through EcoHealth Alliance.
Just as importantly as anything related to making people all like Captain America is the discussion in this and similar articles about genetic programming of people to allow them to interface with tech and AI as well as limiting or eliminating human emotion. Both of these are terrible. If my genes could be altered in a way where Harari’s dream of hooking people up to the internet and where they would be dependent on that connection to survive we truly would all be slaves. Further, if any or all human emotions can be “deprogrammed” would the resulting being still even be human? It is tough to be sad or unhappy but without those emotions how can you appreciate being happy?
As I write this I find myself thinking it is absurd that any of this would even warrant a keystroke but if Adolph Hitler had told me in the 1920s that he would take control of Germany, start a world war, and kill millions of innocent Jews and others I would have probably found that statement absurd as well. It is unthinkable that the elites are actually angling to “alter and enslave humanity” but should I ignore the threat because it seems ridiculous? This question is even more poignant when you consider the above discussion which indicates that it seems possible and also like they are moving in that direction.
At the end of the day, how much more clear can the globalists and WEF be? Big pharma and the corrupt American government are pushing forward on many of these things as we speak so should we pay attention or write this off as absurd? Given the deaths already occurring, when are we going to prosecute the guilty parties within our country? After they start a world war? We already know these people don’t care if they kill so I guess we shouldn’t be shocked by any of this and the people committing these actions (especially those within our own government) are committing crimes should be in GITMO. If I have anything to say about it, Fauci and his buddies will pay for their treasonous crimes… they knew what they were doing and we have the proof.
They show he “prompted” or commissioned — and had final approval on — a scientific paper written specifically in February 2020 to disprove the theory that the virus leaked from a lab in Wuhan, China.
Eight weeks later, Fauci stood at a White House press conference alongside President Trump and cited that paper as evidence that the lab leak theory was implausible while pretending it had nothing to do with him and he did not know the authors.
“There was a study recently,” he told reporters on April 17, 2020, when asked if the virus could have come from a Chinese lab, “where a group of highly qualified evolutionary virologists looked at the sequences… in bats as they evolve and the mutations that it took to get to the point where it is now is totally consistent with a jump of a species from an animal to a human.
“So, the paper will be available. I don’t have the authors right now, but we can make it available to you.”
That paper, entitled “The Proximal Origin of SARS-CoV-2” was sent to Fauci for editing in draft form and again for final approval before it was published in Nature Medicine on Feb. 17, 2020.
It was written four days after Fauci, and his NIH boss Francis Collins, held a call with the four authors to discuss reports that COVID-19 may have leaked from the Wuhan lab and “may have been intentionally genetically manipulated”.
The House Oversight subcommittee published emails Sunday in which the paper’s co-author Dr. Kristian Andersen admits Fauci “prompted” him to write the paper with the goal of “disprove” the lab leak theory.
On February 12, 2020, Andersen submitted the paper to Nature Medicine with a cover email: “There has been a lot of speculation, fear-mongering, and conspiracies put forward in this space. [This paper was] Prompted by Jeremy Farrah [sic], Tony Fauci, and Francis Collins”.
Farrar, then head of British nonprofit, the Wellcome Trust, which has historic ties to the pharmaceutical industry and the Gates Foundation, was rewarded with the plum role of Chief Scientist at the World Health Organization last December.
On the day the “Proximal Origin” paper was published, emails show Farrar pushing through a crucial change: “Sorry to micromanage/micro edit! But would you be willing to change one sentence?”
Farrar’s change was to replace the word “unlikely” with “improbable” in a statement about the lab leak origin, so it would read: “It is improbable that SARS-CoV-2 emerged through laboratory manipulation of an existing SARS-related coronavirus.”
Improbable means having a probability too low to inspire belief; unbelievable, even ridiculous.
That’s what Fauci and friends wanted us to think of the lab leak theory that looked probable from the “get-go”, as one dissenting scientist said at the time, and looks more probable by the day.
The question of why Fauci went to such an effort to obscure the origins of COVID-19 is a major focus of the GOP-led committee.
For nearly two years, there was a complete ban on discussing the COVID-19 lab leak theory
Facebook reversed its censorship policy on the lab leak theory in June 2021. Now, mainstream media are forced to admit the pandemic was most likely caused by a lab leak
January 28, 2023, epidemiologists Colin Butler and Delia Randolph published a joint statement saying a lab leak is the most likely source of COVID-19. The two had previously authored separate reports for the United Nations Environment Program (UNEP), which commissioned them to investigate the possibility of the pandemic being the result of “humanity’s abuse of nature”
February 26, 2023, The Wall Street Journal reported that the U.S. Energy Department has now revised its assessment of the origin of SARS-CoV-2, concluding the pandemic “most likely arose from a laboratory leak”
The FBI also concluded a lab leak was the most likely scenario all the way back in 2021, yet played a central role in censoring anyone who suggested this is where COVID came from
For nearly two years, there was a complete ban on discussing the COVID-19 lab leak theory, and as noted by Robby Soave in a June 2021 Reason article,1 this is a perfect example of why banning “misinformation” is a terrible idea. Often enough, what’s labeled as “misinformation” one day has turned out to be true the next.
I first raised the lab leak theory February 4, 2020, and it wasn’t until June 2021 that Facebook finally reversed its censorship policy on this particular topic, stating, “In light of ongoing investigations into the origin of COVID-19 and in consultation with public health experts, we will no longer remove the claim that COVID-19 is man-made or manufactured from our apps.”
“Facebook’s concession that the lab leak story it once viewed as demonstrably false is actually possibly true should put to rest the idea that banning or regulating misinformation should be a chief public policy goal,” Soave wrote.2
Scientists Told to ‘Shut Up’
In a February 15, 2023, article3 in the British Express, Angus Dalgleish, a professor of oncology at St George’s, University of London, recounts how he and his Norwegian colleagues, Birger Sørensen (a virologist) and Andres Susrud (a molecular biologist), were systematically silenced.4
The trio had assessed the genetic sequence of SARS-CoV-2, concluding a bat origin was “extremely unlikely … as it had inserts around the receptor binding region … that would make it more infectious.” But no matter how they tried, they couldn’t get the paper published.
They even sent their findings to the British government and Cabinet members, only to be told “quite categorically that there was no way it could have been a laboratory escape.”
“What was to follow was a complete suppression of any debate about the origin, which would appear to have been driven by Tony Fauci from the NIAID in America,” Dalgleish writes.5
“Indeed, he was so intent on quashing any evidence of the origin that he commissioned a paper from a group of scientists, who we now know also had concerns that it may not be natural but nevertheless, they published the paper in Nature Medicine saying all the evidence showed it was completely natural and was not a laboratory leaked virus.
This paper was published in Nature Medicine and then used by Tony Fauci as absolute proof that it was not a lab leak. What was incredible was that this narrative was picked by governments throughout the world, all the mainstream media and the majority of scientists, who should have known better than to accept the narrative rather than look at the evidence …
China’s put-down was especially strong and it was so very obvious that they were covering up something as all specimens and databases were either altered or withdrawn. Very belatedly, China allowed a team of international experts to investigate the cause of COVID and a team were allowed into China to essentially come up with an official report saying that it was clearly of natural origin.
Now, more than two years later, two of the people involved with this, Professor Colin Butler from Australia and Delia Randolph from the University of Greenwich, London, have spoken out that it is clear now that all the evidence DOES support a lab leak and that there has been a suppression of the truth.
There has been secrecy and cover-up of this issue on a truly Orwellian scale … [In the] future, any new threat, infectious disease or pandemic, must be addressed with open scientific debate and not the complete suppression of the truth, secrecy and coverup …”
Evidence Supports Lab Leak and Always Did
As noted by Dalgleish, Butler and Randolph have recently spoken out about the fact that evidence for a lab leak was there from the start. That’s why Butler signed an open letter6 to the World Health Organization in March 2021 calling for a “full and unrestricted international forensic investigation into the origins of COVID-19.”
The letter was sent after the WHO’s team issued a clearly biased report dismissing the lab leak theory as unworthy of further investigation. January 28, 2023, Butler, along with Randolph, published a joint statement in the Daily Mail, noting that:7
“[The] crucial debate over Covid’s origins has been shackled … And this refusal to discuss openly what everyone suspects to be true — or at the very least strongly possible — has the disastrous consequence of eroding public trust in science.”
Butler and Randolph are now trying to set the record straight. As explained in their article, the United Nations Environment Program (UNEP) commissioned each of them in early 2020 to investigate and write reports on the possibility of the pandemic being the result of “humanity’s abuse of nature.”
Randolph’s report, which came out first, ended up not addressing the possibility of a non-natural origin, even though it was “actively considered in the drafting.” “[E]ven in early 2020, it appeared that UNEP was averse to including anything so controversial as the lab-leak theory in the report,” the pair write.
Butler authored the second UNEP report. Early on, he’d been skeptical about a lab link, but “as circumstantial evidence in support of a laboratory pathway grew, thanks to the work of a few brave scientists, internet detectives and journalists,” Butler finally concluded that the lab leak theory had to be considered. Butler’s report therefore did include an extensive discussion about the possibility of a lab leak.
‘Laboratory Pathway Seems the Most Likely’
Butler’s initial drafts were strongly criticized by internal UNEP reviewers, and as the report neared finalization, Butler started suspecting that publication was being “deliberately stalled.” According to Butler and Randolph:8
“The first report was published within weeks of completion, but the second one took ten months — and only appeared after an increasingly alarmed author contacted influential figures … It was eventually released with little publicity three months ago.
These two reports are substantial with a combined length of 152 pages, citing 387 scientific publications and with 94 reviewers. They cannot be dismissed as scientifically lightweight, nor the product of biased or naive authors.
Unlike some key players in the COVID origin debate, neither of us has been involved in ‘gain of function’ work that includes manipulation of virological structures to increase virulence. Nor do we have any history of collaboration with the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV).
Neither of us has received funds from the US National Institutes of Health, the US Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency or EcoHealth Alliance — all of which have been involved with funding work at WIV that falls within the definition of ‘gain of function.’
Nor have either of us been financially rewarded for work with the Wellcome Trust … whose director Sir Jeremy Farrar was, we believe, a key figure alongside US funding chiefs in the scandalous suppression of debate on this issue …
Most recently discovered pathogens ‘burn out’ in human populations. Some are then held in laboratories, including in Wuhan … Are some of these being experimented upon? Almost certainly, yes. Yet a pall of suspicious secrecy, deceit and conflicts of interest shroud this work …
We can see incompetence, too. A new report by the US Office of Inspector General found fault with both the National Institutes of Health, the world’s biggest public funder of biomedical research, and EcoHealth Alliance, which it was supposed to help monitor.
This report damningly noted that each organization failed to ‘understand the nature of the research conducted, identify potential problem areas and take corrective action.’ It is of critical importance that these risks are better understood, that scientists accept the dangers and that this field is better regulated.
Our view is that, on current balance of evidence, a laboratory pathway seems the most likely cause of the pandemic … Irrespective of the origin of the pandemic, however, this debate has exposed that self-regulation of ‘gain of function’ research has been a dismal failure.”
Department of Energy Report Supports Lab Leak Theory
February 26, 2023, one month after Butler and Randolph’s joint statement, The Wall Street Journal reported that the U.S. Energy Department has now revised its assessment of the origin of SARS-CoV-2, concluding the pandemic “most likely arose from a laboratory leak:”9
“The shift by the Energy Department, which previously was undecided on how the virus emerged, is noted in an update to a 2021 document by Director of National Intelligence Avril Haines’s office …
The Energy Department now joins the Federal Bureau of Investigation in saying the virus likely spread via a mishap at a Chinese laboratory …
The Energy Department’s conclusion is the result of new intelligence and is significant because the agency has considerable scientific expertise and oversees a network of U.S. national laboratories, some of which conduct advanced biological research.
The Energy Department made its judgment with ‘low confidence,’ according to people who have read the classified report. The FBI previously came to the conclusion that the pandemic was likely the result of a lab leak in 2021 with ‘moderate confidence’ and still holds to this view.”
US Intelligence Suspected Lab Leak All Along
So, in 2021, the FBI thought the lab leak theory was not only plausible but likely, yet the agency was instrumental in censoring public discussion about it. What’s more, the Energy Department reportedly prepared a study all the way back in May 2020, which concluded “that a lab-leak hypothesis was plausible and deserved further investigation.”
In other words, Big Tech was told to censor a truth that at least two different agencies within the intelligence community supported. In a February 27, 2023, Twitter thread,10 investigative journalist Paul D. Thacker also points out that not just one but two separate teams of scientists at different Energy Department labs have concluded that a lab accident was the most likely source of the pandemic. So, we really have three intel community assessments pointing in the same direction.
“The FBI concluded a lab leak was the most likely scenario all the way back in 2021, yet played a central role in censoring anyone who suggested this is where COVID came from.”
Curiously, the FBI still appears hell-bent on continuing the cover-up, even as the fabricated narrative is crumbling. As noted by Dr. Robert Malone,11 House and Senate Republicans who are investigating the origin of the pandemic have pressed the FBI for more information, in particular what kind of information made them suspect a lab leak.
But the agency is refusing to share those details, citing Justice Department policy on “preserving the integrity of ongoing investigations.” In other words, by claiming there’s an active investigation underway, the FBI doesn’t have to share any of the information Congress is requesting, which seems rather convenient.
The question is, just how long does the FBI need to conclude this supposed investigation? As noted by Malone,12 “The FBI must divulge what it knows in a timely manner. We don’t have time to wait for their endless investigations to be concluded. Three years is already too long to wait. Congress and the American public deserve answers now.”
Mainstream Puppets Trying to Get Ahead of the Bigger Story?
A string of mainstream media puppets are now reporting that a lab leak may be the most likely explanation for the pandemic.13 We’ve yet so see apologies for their former unprofessionalism, however. One reason for this U-turn might be that they’re now trying to get ahead of an even bigger story, namely the absolute confirmation that SARS-CoV-2 is an engineered virus that got unleashed on mankind.
Mainstream media need to make it look like they weren’t accessories to covering up democide (the intentional killing of unarmed civilians by government), because the lab leak theory leads directly to the intentional manipulation of viruses and government bioweapons development.
The globalist string-pullers are also starting to test out potential escape routes, from getting the public onboard with “amnesty” for COVID mistakes to pretending they’ve been the ones pushing for answers. As noted by Twitter user Clandestine:14
“We have passed into a new phase of the COVID saga. The U.S. government is starting to slowly admit SARS-CoV-2 was a human-engineered pathogen that leaked from a lab in China. This is essentially the end of the road for the COVID narrative.
This is the death knell for the Globalists. Why? Because the broader public are now emboldened to ask more questions: Who made it? Who ‘leaked’ it? Why did the MSM/Tech lie? Why did the U.S. government censor anyone who suggested this over the last 3 years?
The Biden admin are already trying to get in front of it. NSA Jake Sullivan on the origin of SARS-CoV-2 today: ‘President Biden has directed, repeatedly, every element of our intelligence community to put effort and resources behind getting to the bottom of this question.’
Anyone with a pulse can tell you Jake Sullivan is lying through his teeth. Not only has the Biden admin NOT been pursuing the answers to SARS-CoV-2’s origins, the intelligence community conspired with Big Tech to censor the people who have been saying this for three … years.
Russia and China have been formally alleging that the virus was man-made by Western Oligarchs for over a year now. They have been calling for UN Security Council investigation into the US biological network in Ukraine. The West cried ‘disinformation’ …
The Biden admin are going to begin gaslighting their sheep that they have been looking for the origins of SARS-CoV-2 this entire time. When in reality, they brainwashed the planet and violated the Constitution to silence anyone who was actually looking for the origin.”
COVID Antibodies Found in Stored Blood From September 2019
On the other side of this story, researchers have discovered COVID antibodies in blood collected and stored in European blood banks since September 2019, in the case of Italy,15 and November 2019 in the case of France.16
As noted by Stanford professor Jay Bhattacharya,17 the implications of these findings are “enormous,” because this means the lockdowns were implemented several months after the virus had already started spreading across the globe. Lockdowns have only a tiny effect, if any, in the first place, and locking everyone down after a virus has been spreading for months is less than useless.
Yet no one in government or mainstream media covered these findings, which were published in November 2020 and February 2021 respectively. If they had, it would have been clear by the end of 2020 that lockdowns were futile from the start and had to end.
Virus Engineering Is One of the Greatest Threats to Humanity
If the COVID pandemic has taught us anything, it’s that genetic engineering of viruses with pandemic potential is one of the greatest threats to humanity and must stop.
A research proposal to DARPA dating back to 2018 described plans to create a virus that sounds eerily similar, if not identical, to SARS-CoV-2,18 and while the proposal was declined, there’s no reason why it couldn’t have been done through some other program.
COVID-19 has allegedly killed nearly 6.8 million people around the world and the entire global economy has been decimated. If the kind of genetic tinkering that produced SARS-CoV-2 is allowed to continue, it’s only a matter of time before some manmade virus starts wiping out targeted populations, as they will eventually find a way to target specific genetic traits.19
The only policy that makes sense going forward is a complete ban on gain of function research, and severe punishment for violations. The industry clearly cannot regulate itself, and regulations on this kind of research always ends up creating loopholes.
Internal emails between Dr. Fauci and world health experts expose the frantic rush to respond to the growing threat of a global pandemic in early 2020 – and they reveal new evidence to support the theory that COVID-19 originated from a lab leak in Wuhan, China.
Why did the media and Big Tech work so hard to suppress the lab leak theory if the experts were actively debating it behind-the-scenes? Brian O’Shea (an intelligence operations specialist & private investigator) joins Dr. Li-meng Yan (a virologist who escaped from China) to dig in to the latest evidence, unredacted emails between Dr. Fauci in the pandemic’s earliest days, and to explore the terrifying possibility that the virus was leaked intentionally.
Brian O’Shea is an Intelligence Operations Specialist, Intelligence Analyst, Private Investigator, and Chief Operating Officer at Centurion Intelligence Partners. After serving in the military for 11 years of active-duty service, Brian worked as a Senior Consultant and Subject Matter Expert for two of the US Government’s top intelligence agencies. Find him online at https://centurionintelligence.com/ and https://twitter.com/BrianOSheaSPI.
(Viewers may also be familiar with Brian via his wife Naomi Wolf, who referenced his vast knowledge of global intelligence activity in earlier episodes)
Dr. Li-meng Yan (AKA Dr. Yan Limeng, 闫丽梦 or 閆麗夢) is a Chinese virologist known for her publications and interviews alleging that SARS-CoV-2 was made in a Chinese government laboratory. She came to the United States in 2020, where she has co-authored several preprint research papers that are intended to back up her claim. Follow Dr. Yan at https://twitter.com/DrLiMengYAN1 and listen to her show “The Voice of Dr. Yan” on America Out Loud Radio Network at https://www.americaoutloud.com/voice-of-dr-yan/
In the probable case YOUR life is about making a living and taking care of your family needs and the politics of Liberty is the furthest thing from your mind, IT MIGHT BE TIME TO PAY ATTENTION!
There is a Global Tyranny. AND that tyranny wants to control how you live, think, believe, and how you spend your money.
TODAY I am looking at how Globalists plan to utilize the World Health Organization (WHO) which is basically a fearmongering organization intent on performing the agenda of Global Elitists to control your life rather protect than protect the life of human individuals.
Some of you might be aware of the WHO’s attempt to impose a sovereignty-destroying Pandemic Treaty upon the nations of the world, BUT you probably are not aware that the WHO is working on International Health Regulations (IHR) separate but equal in tyrannical design from the Pandemic Treaty to impose international hegemony upon individuals living in independent sovereign nations.
The Exposé uses James Roguski details from his Substack Page – which is lengthy and substantive – to highlight same tyranny on this two-sided Globalist coin. Since Roguski’s is so full of substance, I won’t be cross posting it. I will be cross posting The Exposé, yet it is not a short read either. You would be wise to spend some time reading both. AT THE VERY LEAST, you can comprehend the reason to RESIST TYRANNY by non-compliance even if that non-compliance might mean legal issues.
The tyrants always wrap despotism in the illusion of law to end Liberty. Probably in the near future, even the most non-political citizen will have to weigh compliant Sheepledom to non-compliance in any form of action willing to use to RESIST TYRANNY ending individual freedom.
Last week the Working Group for the Amendments to the International Health Regulations met in Geneva. The imposition of authoritarian rules on a global scale would normally attract attention but there has been a near-complete absence of interest from corporate media perhaps giving the impression that concerns surrounding these amendments is yet another “conspiracy theory” from a disaffected fringe.
But, as Dr. David Bell explains, the World Health Organisation (“WHO”) is fairly transparent in its machinations. It should therefore be straightforward to determine whether this is a “conspiracy theory” or an attempt to implement an existential change in sovereign rights and international relations. We only need to read the draft amendments to the International Health Regulations (“IHR”).
After reading the document it becomes obvious that the proposed new powers sought by WHO, and the pandemic preparedness industry being built around it, are not hidden. The only subterfuge is the farcical approach of media and politicians in many nations who seem to pretend that the proposals do not exist.
There are Two Separate Tracks
James Roguski published an article yesterday to clarify that there are “two tracks” the World Health Organisation are implementing: amendments to the IHRs and the Pandemic Treaty. “I would like to suggest that everyone stop focusing on the proposed ‘Pandemic Treaty’ and pay closer attention to the proposed amendments to the International Health Regulations,” he wrote.
The covid-sceptic world has been claiming that the World Health Organisation (“WHO”) plans to become some sort of global autocratic government, removing national sovereignty and replacing it with a totalitarian health state. The near-complete absence of interest from mainstream media would suggest, to the rational observer, that this is yet another ‘conspiracy theory’ from a disaffected fringe.
The imposition of authoritarian rules on a global scale would normally attract attention, and WHO is fairly transparent in its machinations. It should therefore be straightforward to determine whether this is all misplaced hysteria, or an attempt to implement an existential change in sovereign rights and international relations. We would just need to read the document. Firstly, it is useful to put the amendments in context.
The changing role of WHO
WHO was set up after the Second World War as the health arm of the United Nations, to support efforts to improve population health globally. Based on the concept that health went beyond the physical and encompassed “physical, mental and social well-being”, its constitution was premised on the concept that all people were equal and born with basic inviolable rights. The world in 1946 was emerging from the brutality of colonialism and international fascism, the results of overly centralised authority and of regarding people to be fundamentally unequal. The WHO constitution was intended to put populations in charge of their health.
In recent decades, WHO’s core funding model has changed. Originally, its support base of core funding was allocated by countries based on GDP, but this has evolved into a model where most funding is directed to specified uses, and much is provided by private and corporate interests. [Blog Editor Bold Text Emphasis] The priorities of WHO have evolved accordingly, moving away from community-centred care to a more vertical, commodity-based approach. This inevitably follows the interests and self-interests of these funders. Understanding these changes is important in order to put the proposed amendments to the existing International Health Regulations (“IHR”) in context. More detail on this evolution can be found elsewhere.
Of equal importance, WHO is not alone in the international health sphere. While certain organisations such as Unicef (originally intended to prioritise child health and welfare), private foundations, and non-governmental organisations have long partnered with WHO, the past two decades have seen a burgeoning of the global health industry, with multiple organisations, particularly ‘public-private partnerships’ (“PPPs”) growing in influence. In some respects, these organisations are rivals, and in some respects they are partners of WHO.
Notable among PPPs are Gavi – the Vaccine Alliance (focused specifically on vaccines), and CEPI, an organisation set up at the World Economic Forum meeting in 2017 by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Wellcome Trust and the Norwegian Government specifically to manage pandemics. Gavi and CEPI, along with others such as Unitaid and the Global Fund, include representatives of corporate and private interests directly on their boards. The World Bank and G20 have also increased their involvement in global health, and especially pandemic preparedness. Even though WHO has stated that pandemics occurred just once per generation over the past century and killed a fraction of those who died from endemic infectious diseases, they have nonetheless attracted much of this corporate and financial interest.
WHO is primarily a bureaucracy, not a body of experts. Recruitment is based on various factors, including technical competency, but also country and other equity-related quotas. These quotas serve a purpose of reducing the power of specific countries to dominate the organisation with their own staff, but in doing so they require the recruitment of staff who may have far less experience or expertise. Recruitment is also heavily influenced by internal WHO personnel, and the usual personal influences that come with working and needing favours within countries.
Once recruited, the payment structure strongly favours those who stay for long periods, militating against rotation to new expertise as roles change. A WHO staffer must work 15 years to receive their full pension, with earlier resignation resulting in removal of all or part of WHO’s contribution to their pension. Coupled with large rental subsidies, health insurance, generous education subsidies, cost of living adjustments, and tax-free salaries, this creates a structure within which protecting the institution (and thus one’s benefits) can far outlive the staffer’s initial altruistic intent.
The Director-General (“DG”) and Regional Directors (“RDs”), of which there are six, are elected by member states in a process subject to heavy political and diplomatic manoeuvring. The current DG is TedrosAdhanom Ghebreyesus, an Ethiopian politician with a chequered past during the Ethiopian civil war. The amendments proposed would allow Tedros to independently make all the decisions required within the IHR, consulting a committee at will but not being bound by it. Indeed, he can do this now, having declared monkeypox a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC), after just five deaths globally, against the advice of his emergency committee.
Like many WHO employees, I personally witnessed and am aware of examples of seeming corruption within the organisation, from RD elections, to building renovations and importation of goods. Such practices can occur within any large organisation that has lived a generation or two beyond its founding. This, of course, is why the principle of the separation of powers commonly exists in national governance: those making rules must answer to an independent judiciary according to a system of laws to which all are subject. As this cannot apply to UN agencies, they should automatically be excluded from direct rulemaking over populations. WHO, like other UN bodies, is essentially a law unto itself.
WHO’s new pandemic preparedness and health emergency instruments
WHO is currently working on two agreements that will expand its powers and role in declared health emergencies and pandemics. These also involve widening the definition of “health emergencies” within which such powers may be used. The first agreement involves proposed amendments to the existing IHR, an instrument with force under international law that has been in existence in some form for decades, and was significantly amended in 2005 after the 2003 SARS outbreak. The second is a new “treaty” that has similar intent to the IHR amendments. Both are following a path through WHO committees, public hearings and revision meetings, to be put to the World Health Assembly (“WHA”) – the annual meeting of all country members or “States Parties” of WHO – probably in 2023 and 2024 respectively.
The discussion here concentrates on the IHR amendments, as they are the most advanced. Being amendments to an existing treaty mechanism, they only require approval of 50% of countries to come into force (subject to ratification processes specific to each member State). The new “treaty” will require a two-thirds vote of the WHA to be accepted. The WHA’s “one country, one vote” system gives countries like Niue, with fewer than two thousand residents, equal voice to countries with hundreds of millions (e.g., India, China and the USA), though diplomatic pressure tends to corral countries around their beneficiaries.
The IHR amendment process within WHO is relatively transparent. There is no conspiracy to be seen. The amendments are ostensibly proposed by national bureaucracies and collated on the WHO website. WHO has gone to unusual lengths to open hearings to public submissions. The intent of the IHR amendments – which is to change the nature of the relationship between countries and WHO (i.e., a supra-national body ostensibly controlled by them), and fundamentally change the relationship between people and this centralised, supra-national authority – is open for all to see.
Proposed major amendments to the IHR
The amendments to the IHR are intended to fundamentally change the relationship between individuals, their countries’ governments, and WHO. They place WHO as having rights that override the rights of individuals, erasing the basic principles developed after World War Two regarding human rights and the sovereignty of States. In doing so, they signal a return to a colonialist and feudalist approach that is fundamentally different to that to which people in relatively democratic countries have become accustomed. [Blog Editor Bold Text Emphasis] The lack of major push-back by politicians, the lack of concern in the media, and the consequent ignorance of the general public, are therefore both strange and alarming.
Aspects of the amendments involving the largest changes to the workings of society and international relations are discussed below. Following this are annotated extracts from the WHO document. Provided on the WHO website, this document is currently under revision to address obvious grammatical errors and improve clarity.
Resetting international human rights to a former, authoritarian model
The Universal Declaration of Human Rights was agreed upon by the UN in 1948, in the aftermath of World War Two and in the context of much of the world emerging from the colonialist yoke. It is predicated on the concept that all humans are born with equal and inalienable rights, conferred by the simple fact of their birth. The Declaration was intended to codify these rights to prevent a return to inequality and totalitarian rule. The equality of all individuals is expressed in Article 7:
All are equal before the law and are entitled without any discrimination to equal protection of the law. All are entitled to equal protection against any discrimination in violation of this Declaration and against any incitement to such discrimination.
This understanding underpins the WHO constitution, and forms a basis for the modern international human rights movement and international human rights law.
The concept of States being representative of their people, and having sovereignty over territory and the laws by which their people were governed, was closely allied with this. As peoples emerged from colonialism, they would assert their authority as independent entities within boundaries that they would control. International agreements, including the existing IHR, reflected this. WHO and other international agencies would play a supportive role and give advice, not instructions.
The proposed IHR amendments reverse these understandings. WHO proposes that the term “with full respect for the dignity, human rights and fundamental freedoms of persons” be deleted from the text and replaced with the vague terms: “equity, coherence, inclusivity.” The applications of these terms are then specifically differentiated in the text according to levels of social and economic development. The underlying equality of individuals is removed, and rights become subject to a status determined by others and based on a set of criteria that they define. This entirely upends the prior understanding of the relationship of all individuals to authority, at least in non-totalitarian states.
This is a totalitarian approach to society, within which individuals may act only on the sufferance of others who wield power outside of legal sanction; specifically, it is a feudal relationship, or one of monarch-subjects without an intervening constitution. It is difficult to imagine a greater issue facing society, yet the same media calling for reparations for past slavery are silent on a proposed international agreement that is consistent with its reimposition.
Giving WHO authority over member States
This authority is seen as being above States (i.e., elected or other national governments), with the specific definition of “recommendations” being changed from “non-binding” (by deletion) to “binding,” in a specific statement that States will undertake to follow (rather than “consider”) the recommendations of WHO. States will accept WHO as “the authority” in international public health emergencies, elevating it above their own ministries of health. Much hinges on what a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (“PHEIC”) is, and who defines it. As explained below, these amendments will widen the PHEIC definition to include any health event that a particular individual in Geneva (the DG of WHO) personally deems to be of actual or potential concern.
Powers to be ceded by national governments to the DG include quite specific examples that may require changes within national legal systems. These include detention of individuals, restriction of travel, the forcing of health interventions (e.g., testing, inoculation), and the requirement to undergo medical examinations. [Blog Editor Bold Text Emphasis]
Unsurprising to observers of the covid-19 response, the proposed restrictions on individual rights, which are at the DG’s discretion, include freedom of speech. WHO will have power to designate opinions or information as “misinformation” or “disinformation,” and require country governments to intervene and stop such expression and dissemination. [Blog Editor Bold Text Emphasis] This will likely clash with some national constitutions (e.g., the USA) but will be a boon to many dictators and one-party regimes. It is, of course, incompatible with the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, but these seem no longer to be guiding principles for WHO.
After self-declaring an emergency, the DG will have power to instruct governments to provide WHO and other countries with resources, including funds and commodities. This will include direct intervention in manufacturing to increase production of certain commodities produced within their borders.
Countries will cede power over patent law and intellectual property (“IP”) to WHO, including control of manufacturing knowhow, of those commodities that the DG considers to be relevant to the potential or actual health problem he/she deems to be of interest. This IP and manufacturing know-how may be then passed on to commercial rivals at the DG’s discretion. [Blog Editor Bold Text Emphasis] These provisions seem to reflect a degree of stupidity and, unlike the basic removal of fundamental human rights, vested interests may well insist on the removal of these amendments from the IHR draft. Rights of people should of course be paramount, but with most media absent from the discussion, it is likely that less effort will be applied to reversing provisions that impact human rights, compared to those that threaten commercial interests.
Providing the WHO DG with unfettered power, and ensuring it will be used
WHO has previously developed processes that ensure at least a semblance of consensus, and evidence-based decision-making. Their process for developing guidelines requires, at least on paper, a range of expertise to be sought and documented, and a range of evidence to be weighed for reliability. The 2019 guidelines on management of pandemic influenza are an example, laying out recommendations for countries in the event of such a respiratory virus outbreak. Weighing this evidence resulted in WHO strongly recommending against contact tracing, quarantining of healthy people, and border closures. The evidence had shown that these were expected to cause more overall harm to health in the long term than any benefit gained from slowing the spread of a virus. These guidelines were ignored when an emergency was declared for covid-19 and authority was switched to an individual, the DG of WHO.
The IHR amendments further strengthen the ability of the DG to ignore any such evidence-based procedures. Working on several levels, they provide the DG, and those delegated by him/her, with exceptional and arbitrary power, and put in place measures that make the wielding of such power inevitable. [Blog Editor Bold Text Emphasis]
Firstly, the requirement for an actual health emergency, in which people are experiencing measurable harm or risk of harm, is removed. The wording of the amendments specifically removes the requirement of harm to trigger the DG assuming power over countries and people. [Blog Editor Bold Text Emphasis] The need for a demonstrable “public health risk” is removed, and replaced with a “potential” for public health risk.
Secondly, as discussed also in the pandemic preparedness documents of the G20 and World Bank, under these amendments a surveillance mechanism will be set up in every country and within WHO. It will identify new variants of viruses, which constantly arise in nature. All of these, in theory, could be presumed to pose a potential risk of outbreak until proven not to. The global workforce running this surveillance network, which will be considerable, will have no reason for existence except to identify yet more viruses and variants. Much of their funding will originate from private and corporate interests that stand to gain financially from the vaccine-based responses they envision to infectious disease outbreaks. [Blog Editor: Think – Pfizer purposefully mutating viruses (Gain of Function er-I-mean “Directed Evolution”) for profit. James O’Keefe probably fired by Pfizer request for that exposé.]
Thirdly, the DG has sole authority to declare any event related or potentially related to health an “emergency.” The six WHO RDs will also have this power at a Regional level. As seen with the monkeypox outbreak, the DG can already ignore the committee set up to advise on emergencies. The proposed amendments will remove the need for the DG to gain consent from the country in which a potential or perceived threat is identified. In a declared emergency, the DG can vary the Framework of Engagement with Non-State Actors (“FENSA”) rules on dealing with private (e.g., for-profit) entities, allowing him/her to share a State’s information not only with other States but also with private companies.
The surveillance mechanisms being required of countries and expanded within WHO will ensure that the DG and RDs will have a constant stream of potential public health risks crossing their desks. In each case, they will have power to declare such events a health emergency of international or regional concern. This will enable them to issue orders, supposedly binding under international law, to restrict movement, detain, inject on a mass scale, yield IP and know-how, and provide resources to WHO and to other countries that the DG deems may require them. Even a DG uninterested in wielding such power will face the reality that they put themselves at risk of being the one who did not try to “stop” the next pandemic, while being pressured by corporate interests with hundreds of billions of dollars at stake, and huge media sway. This is why sane societies never create such situations.
What happens next?
If these amendments are accepted, the people taking control over the lives of others will have no real legal oversight as they have diplomatic immunity from all national jurisdictions. The salaries of many will be dependent on sponsorship from private individuals and corporations with direct financial interests in the decisions they will make. These decisions by an essentially unaccountable official will create mass markets for commodities, or provide know-how to commercial rivals. [Blog Editor Bold Text Emphasis] The covid-19 response illustrated the corporate profits that such decisions will enable. This situation is obviously unacceptable in any democratic society.
While the WHA has overall oversight of WHO policy, with an executive board comprising WHA members, these operate in an orchestrated way. Many delegates have little depth of understanding of the proceedings, whilst bureaucrats draft and negotiate policy. Countries not sharing the values enshrined in the constitutions of more democratic nations have equal votes on policy. Whilst it is correct that sovereign States have equal rights, the human rights and freedoms of one nation’s citizens cannot be ceded to the governments of others, nor to a non-State entity placing itself above them.
Many nations have developed checks and balances over centuries, based on an understanding of fundamental values. These have been designed specifically to avoid the sort of situation we now see arising where one group, which is law unto itself, can arbitrarily remove and control the freedom of others. Free media developed as a further safeguard, based on principles of freedom of expression and an equal right to be heard. Just as these values are necessary for democracy and equality, their removal is necessary in order to introduce totalitarianism and a structure based on inequality. The proposed amendments to the IHR are designed explicitly to do this. [Blog Editor Bold Text Emphasis]
The proposed new powers sought by WHO, and the pandemic preparedness industry being built around it, are not hidden. The only subterfuge is the farcical approach of media and politicians in many nations who seem to pretend that the proposals do not exist or, if they do, will not fundamentally change the nature of the relationship between people and centralised non-State powers. The people who will become subject to these powers, and the politicians who are on track to cede them, should start paying attention. We must all decide whether we wish to cede so easily that which has taken centuries to achieve, to assuage the greed of others.
You can find a copy of the proposed amendments as well as a summary of significant clauses in the IHR amendments as prepared by Dr. Bell at the bottom of the original article published by PANDA HERE.
About the Author
Dr. David Bell[The link is a list of Panda experts that includes Dr. Bell] is a clinical and public health physician with a PhD in population health and background in internal medicine, modelling and epidemiology of infectious disease. Previously, he was Director of the Global Health Technologies at Intellectual Ventures Global Good Fund in the USA, Programme Head for Malaria and Acute Febrile Disease at FIND in Geneva, and coordinating malaria diagnostics strategy with the World Health Organisation.
Today I’m sharing a look at the World Economic Forum (WEF) tentacles upon the World Health Organization (WHO) through the analysis of Dr. Joseph Mercola. The focus is the sovereignty destroying WHO Treaty and essentially One World Government designs of UN Agenda 21 (these days 2030). Dr. Mercola uses a Jimmy Dore video (which unfortunately is laced with F-Bombs) from 5/17/22 as the launching point for his informative analysis posted on 1/24/23.
Attendees at the exclusive January 2023 World Economic Forum (WEF) meeting in Davos, Switzerland, included FBI director Chris Wray, MI6 chief Richard Moore, Secretary-General of NATO Jens Stoltenberg, the CEOs of Amazon, BlackRock and Pfizer (just to name a few), Gates Foundation executives and Cybernetics School director Genevieve Bell
The publisher of The New York Times and CNN anchor Fareed Zakaria were also in attendance, as were Ukrainian President Zelensky and a long list of other presidents, prime ministers, ministers, senators, House representatives, commissioners, governors, mayors, bankers, royalty, officials from the UN and Red Cross, as well as military, customs and space agency officials
The people gathering at this meeting, which is by invitation only, are among the ones deciding how the rest of us are going to live our lives, what rights we’ll have regardless of local constitutions, and how the world is to be run
The WEF works closely with the World Health Organization and the United Nations to make sure the UN’s sustainable development goals are met. The sustainable development goals are the foundation upon which the WEF’s Great Reset agenda is built
The WEF is also helping the WHO seize power through its pandemic treaty. If enacted, member states will surrender their sovereignty to the WHO, making it a de facto one world governing body
As reviewed by comedian Jimmy Dore of “The Jimmy Dore Show” in the video above, the World Health Organization began drafting a global pandemic treaty in mid-2022, which would grant it the sole power to make decisions relating to global biosecurity, including but not limited to the implementation of a global vaccine passport/digital identity, mandatory vaccinations, travel restrictions and standardized medical care.
As noted by Dore, “Then they can just shut your bank account down when you do something they don’t like, like protesting.” Indeed, in 2022, the Canadian government seized the bank accounts of people who had donated money to the trucker convoy, and this was basically a preview of the kind of power the WHO would have.
Treaty Members Will Surrender Their Sovereignty
Even if centralizing biosecurity were a good idea, which it’s not, the WHO would not be at the top of the list of organizations to be charged with this task. In his monologue, Dore quotes my May 2022 article, “What You Need to Know About the WHO Pandemic Treaty,” which was republished by The Defender:1
“As just one example, the WHO didn’t publicly admit SARS-CoV-2 was airborne until the end of December 2021, yet scientists knew the virus was airborne within weeks of the pandemic being declared. The WHO also ignored early advice about airborne transmission.
So, it seems clear that the effort to now hand over more power to the WHO is about something other than them being the most qualified to make health decisions that benefit and protect everyone. With this treaty in place, all member nations will be subject to the WHO’s dictates … even if the people have rejected such plans using local democratic processes.”
In short, every country that signs onto the WHO’s pandemic treaty will voluntarily give up its sovereignty and the bodily autonomy of all its citizens. Making matters worse, we aren’t even told exactly who the people are who will make this decision, so we, the people, don’t know who to contact to make our voices heard.
How the Globalist Cabal Infiltrated Governments Worldwide
This is all happening outside the democratic process, and that’s intentional. The globalist cabal realized they could not convince billions of people into giving up their rights and freedoms. Instead, they focused on installing their own people in key positions around the world, so they could then make decisions that benefited the cult.
A key player in this global takeover plan is the World Economic Forum (WEF), founded in 1971. A great number of the installed globalists are graduates of the WEF’s Forum of Young Global Leaders,2 (formerly the Global Leaders for Tomorrow school3), where they’re indoctrinated in technocratic ideals such as transhumanism which, whether they realize it or not, is nothing but eugenics rebranded.
Transhumanism, like eugenics, is about creating a superior race; in this case, a race augmented by and through technology rather than selective breeding. As of the end of 2022, the Young Global Leaders community had more than 1,400 members from 120 nations, and in addition to political leaders, alumni also include “civic and business innovators, entrepreneurs, technology pioneers, educators, activists, artists [and] journalists.”
The Young Global Leaders forum is not the only incubator of technocrats, but it’s one of the most well-recognized. WEF founder Klaus Schwab has openly bragged about the number of Young Global Leaders alumni that have successfully infiltrated governments around the world, including Canada, where more than 80% of Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s cabinet are former WEF students.
Trudeau himself is also a Young Global Leader graduate. In a 2017 interview (video below), Schwab stated:4
“This notion to integrate young leaders is part of the World Economic Forum since many years … What we are really proud of now is young generation leaders like Prime Minister Trudeau … We penetrate the cabinets. I was at a reception for Prime Minister Trudeau and I know that half of his cabinet, or even more than half of his cabinet, are actually Young Global Leaders.”
The Young Global Leaders school was founded in 1992, the same year Agenda 21 was introduced. This makes sense, as they’re part of the same plan. Agenda 21 is the actual action agenda for the United Nations’ sustainable development plans, while the WEF trains propagandists and implementers.
While the UN and WEF have clearly worked hand in hand since 1992, in June 2019, they signed a strategic partnership agreement to accelerate the implementation of the UN’s 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development by further strengthening collaboration and coordination between the two organizations.5
Hundreds of Organizations Condemn WEF-UN Partnership
In a September 2019 open letter6 to UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres, more than 400 civil society organizations and 40 international networks condemned the partnership, calling it a “corporate capture of global governance,” and called on Guterres to end it.
“We are very concerned that this WEF-UN partnership agreement will de-legitimize the United Nations and provide transnational corporations preferential and deferential access to the UN System,” the letter states.
“The UN system is already under a big threat from the US Government and those who question a democratic multilateral world. However, this corporatization of the UN poses a much deeper long-term threat, as it will reduce public support for the UN system in the South and the North.
It is our strong belief that this agreement is fundamentally at odds with the UN Charter and with intergovernmental decisions on sustainable development, the climate emergency, and the eradication of poverty and hunger.
This public-private partnership will permanently associate the UN with transnational corporations, some of whose core essential activities have caused or worsened the social and environmental crises that the planet faces. This is a form of corporate capture.
We know that agribusiness destroys biodiversity and sustainable and just food systems, oil and gas corporations endanger the world’s climate, Big Pharma weakens access to essential medications, extractive corporations leave lasting damage to countries’ ecologies and peoples, and arms manufacturers profit from local and regional wars as well as repression of social movements.
All these sectors are significant actors within the World Economic Forum. The provisions of the strategic partnership effectively provide that corporate leaders will become ‘whisper advisors’ to the heads of UN system departments, using their private access to advocate market-based profit-making ‘solutions’ to global problems while undermining real solutions embedded in public interest and transparent democratic procedures …
The UN’s acceptance of this partnership agreement moves the world toward WEF’s aspirations for multistakeholderism becoming the effective replacement of multilateralism.
WEF in their 2010 The Global Redesign Initiative argued that the first step toward their global governance vision is ‘to redefine the international system as constituting a wider, multifaceted system of global cooperation in which intergovernmental legal frameworks and institutions are embedded as a core, but not the sole and sometimes not the most crucial, component.
The goal was to weaken the role of states in global decision-making and to elevate the role of a new set of ‘stakeholders’, turning our multilateral system into a multistakeholder system, in which companies are part of the governing mechanisms.
This would bring transnational corporations, selected civil society representatives, states and other non-state actors together to make global decisions, discarding or ignoring critical concerns around conflicts of interest, accountability and democracy.”
The WEF Actively and Intentionally Undermines Democracy
In mid-January 2023, WEF members, Young Leaders alumni and other VIPs gathered in Davos, Switzerland, for their annual get-together. As reported by UnHerd columnist Thomas Fazi:7
“Alongside heads of state from all over the world, the CEOs of Amazon, BlackRock, JPMorgan Chase, Pfizer and Moderna will gather, as will the President of the European Commission, the IMF’s Managing Director, the secretary general of Nato, the chiefs of the FBI and MI6, the publisher of The New York Times, and, of course, the event’s infamous host — founder and chairman of the WEF, Klaus Schwab …
Founded in 1971 … the WEF is ‘committed to improving the state of the world through public-private cooperation,’ also known as multistakeholder governance.
The idea is that global decision-making should not be left to governments and nation-states — as in the post-war multilateralist framework enshrined in the United Nations — but should involve a whole range of non-government stakeholders: civil society bodies, academic experts, media personalities and, most important, multinational corporations …
While this may sound fairly benign, it neatly encapsulates the basic philosophy of globalism: insulating policy from democracy by transferring the decision-making process from the national and international level, where citizens theoretically are able to exercise some degree of influence over policy, to the supranational level, by placing a self-selected group of unelected, unaccountable ‘stakeholders’ — mainly corporations — in charge of global decisions concerning everything from energy and food production to the media and public health …
[There] is little doubt as to which interests Schwab’s brainchild is actually promoting and empowering: the WEF is itself mostly funded by around 1,000 member companies … which include some of the world’s biggest corporations in oil (Saudi Aramco, Shell, Chevron, BP), food (Unilever, The Coca-Cola Company, Nestlé), technology (Facebook, Google, Amazon, Microsoft, Apple) and pharmaceuticals (AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Moderna).
The composition of the WEF’s board is also very revealing, including Laurence D. Fink, CEO of Blackrock, David M. Rubenstein, co-chairman of the Carlyle Group, and Mark Schneider, CEO of Nestlé.
There’s no need to resort to conspiracy theories to posit that the WEF’s agenda is much more likely to be tailored to suit the interests of its funders and board members — the world’s ultra-wealthy and corporate elites — rather than to ‘improving the state of the world,’ as the organization claims.”
The Goal of the 0.0001% Is to Rule Over the Rest of Us
Considering how proud Schwab is of his WEF members, one wonders why the attendance list to his annual Davos meeting is confidential. Whatever the reason for that might be, The Dossier recently acquired a copy of that list.8
Attendees at the exclusive January 2023 meeting included FBI director Chris Wray, MI6 chief Richard Moore, Secretary-General of NATO Jens Stoltenberg, the CEOs of Amazon, BlackRock and Pfizer (just to name a few), Gates Foundation executives and Cybernetics School director Genevieve Bell.
The publisher of The New York Times and CNN anchor Fareed Zakaria were also in attendance, as were Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and a long list of other presidents, prime ministers, ministers, senators, House representatives, commissioners, governors, mayors, bankers, royalty, officials from the UN and Red Cross, as well as military, customs and space agency officials.
The people gathering at this meeting, which is by invitation only, are among the ones deciding how the rest of us are going to live our lives, what rights we’ll have, regardless of local constitutions, and how the world is to be run. The rest of us have no say in the matter.
“[The WEF’s] power is simply a manifestation of the power of the ‘superclass’ it represents — a tiny group amounting, according to researchers,9 to no more than 6,000 or 7,000 people, or 0.0001% of the world’s population. ~ UnHerd”
As noted by UnHerd:10
“… there is no denying that the WEF wields immense power, which has cemented the rule of the transnational capitalist class to a degree never before seen in history.
But it is important to recognize that its power is simply a manifestation of the power of the ‘superclass’ it represents — a tiny group amounting, according to researchers,11 to no more than 6,000 or 7,000 people, or 0.0001% of the world’s population, and yet more powerful than any social class the world has ever known …
It was only a matter of time before these aspiring cosmocrats developed a tool through which to fully exercise their dominion over the lower classes — and the WEF proved to be the perfect vehicle to do so.”
The Globalist Cult
One insider has described the WEF’s Davos gathering as “a Ponzi scheme” and “a cult,” according to investigative journalist Michael Shellenberger, who wrote about the WEF in a January 15, 2023, Substack post.12 Apparently, the WEF is getting concerned about the fact that more and more people are starting to realize what they’re actually up to.
“The World Economic Forum … is fighting back against conspiracy theorists who say it and its founder Klaus Schwab are seeking global domination through a ‘great reset’ aimed at stripping the masses of their private property, de-industrializing the economy, and making everybody eat bugs.
”Own nothing, be happy’ — you might have heard the phrase,’ wrote World Economic Forum (WEF) Managing Director Adrian Monck last August. ‘It started life as a screenshot, culled from the Internet by an anonymous anti-semitic account on the image board 4chan …
But what Monck claimed was inaccurate. The phrase, ‘Own nothing, be happy,’ hadn’t originated on 4chan; it originated on WEF’s website.”
Indeed, for some reason, these globalists are continuously describing their plans in reports, white papers, on websites, in videos (such as the one above) and at meetings. Yet when people put the puzzle pieces together, they cry “conspiracy theory.” The WEF’s plan may rightly be called a conspiracy, but none of it is theoretical because they’ve described it in black and white. Schwab even published a book about The Great Reset that anyone can peruse.
In the final analysis, what they’re really objecting to and are trying to draw attention away from is the fact that people don’t like their plan and are calling it for what it is — a global coup d’état, a power grab by cultists who are unsuited to rule because their ideology13 is based on eugenics, depopulation and undemocratic top-down authoritarianism. Even in the face of collapsing birth rates, the WEF still insists overpopulation is a dire threat.14
The WEF has announced and delineated the cabal’s intentions for a Great Reset, which will fundamentally change how we live and erase foundational human freedoms.
Trained WEF leaders have and continue to infiltrate governments worldwide. Trained supporting actors are also spread across business, media, entertainment and nongovernmental organizations (NGOs), where they help shape public opinion.
WEF Young Global Leader graduate Bill Gates is the largest funder of the WHO, which is now trying to get member nations to surrender their sovereignty through a pandemic treaty.
The WEF and Gates have prepared the ground for a biosecurity-based One World Government for several years. In 2017, Gates launched the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI) at that year’s WEF meeting in Davos. Then, in October 2019, just two months before the WHO declared COVID-19 a pandemic, the WEF and Gates cohosted Event 201, which featured a fictional outbreak of a novel coronavirus. The exercise focused solely on how to direct and control public discourse about the pandemic rather than how to ensure effective treatments would be discovered and shared. In late January 2020, CEPI met with Moderna to discuss plans for a COVID-19 “vaccine,” and later that year, CEPI and the WHO jointly created the COVID-19 Vaccines Global Access (COVAX) program to ensure everyone would have access to the forthcoming shots — a program that failed to achieve its intended goal,15 by the way.
The WEF works in close collaboration with the UN, which laid the foundation for The Great Reset with its sustainable development goals. The strategic partnership agreement between the UN and the WEF is the official acceleration of the globalist takeover plan.
In November 2019, the WEF also joined forces with the WHO “to accelerate progress in health and development” to deliver the global goals of the UN.16
Billionaires Plotting How to Depopulate
As mentioned, one of the reasons I believe the 0.0001% are unfit to rule the world is because of their anti-human ideology. Billionaires have held many secret meetings over the years to figure out the best way to depopulate.
In a January 8, 2023, Substack article,17 the Naked Emperor describes the “Good Club,” which first met in 2009. The meeting, which was funded and attended by Bill Gates, included George Soros, Warren Buffett, David Rockefeller, Ted Turner, Eli and Edythe Broad, Michael Bloomberg, Oprah Winfrey, Peter Peterson, Julian Robertson Jr., John and Tashia Morgridge, and Patty Stonesifer.
The meeting was held at the home of Sir Paul Nurse, then-president of the Rockefeller University. Nurse is now the director of the Francis Crick Institute, which was founded by a eugenicist. Crick’s intention behind the Institute was to rehabilitate eugenics and “make it respectable again.”
As recently as 1970, Crick stated that “evidence for the equality of different races did not really exist.” That same year he also wrote that sterilization through bribery was the only answer to rid the world of people with poor genes. Depopulation and eugenics were also on the agenda for the 2009 “Good Club” meeting. Each participant was given 15 minutes to present their case, and while several issues were brought up, all agreed that depopulation was a priority.
They also agreed that whatever strategy was employed it needed to be independent of government, as government agencies were deemed unable to head off the looming disaster of overpopulation.
As noted by the Naked Emperor, “if all they were doing was planning on how to save the world, they would be transparent and encourage everyone to help them on their mission.” But that’s not what they’re doing.
Is that because their ideas might be considered abominable by the average person? Sure, it’s easy to decree that people of a certain class don’t deserve to live — if you’re not in that class!
Ask parents of autistic children if they would be willing to euthanize their kids, for example, and I’m sure you’d get an earful. Or ask people over 65 to submit to automatic euthanasia and see how many takers you get. People work their entire lives just to enjoy the leisure of that last decade or two.
The Rise of Anthropocene Anti-Humanism
The idea of billionaires plotting to get rid of other people, but not themselves or their own families, is repugnant to most. But it might be even worse than that. Remarkably, as reported by the Naked Emperor, we’re now seeing the emergence of a cult that embraces the total annihilation of ALL mankind.
“The revolt against humanity is still new enough to appear outlandish, but it has already spread beyond the fringes of the intellectual world,” he writes.18
“This is called Anthropocene anti-humanism, ‘inspired by revulsion at humanity’s destruction of the natural environment.’ For all we know, these billionaires could be part of this cult and influencing policies based on these views.
In the 21st century, Anthropocene anti-humanism offers a much more radical response to a much deeper ecological crisis. It says that our self-destruction is now inevitable, and that we should welcome it as a sentence we have justly passed on ourselves.
Some anti-humanist thinkers look forward to the extinction of our species, while others predict that even if some people survive the coming environmental apocalypse, civilization as a whole is doomed. Like all truly radical movements, Anthropocene anti-humanism begins not with a political program but with a philosophical idea …”
Is Anti-Humanism or Transhumanism Driving the Globalists?
Do the 0.0001% ascribe to anthropocene anti-humanism, or are they transhumanists at heart? As explained by the Naked Emperor:
“Transhumanism, by contrast, glorifies some of the very things that anti-humanism decries — scientific and technological progress, the supremacy of reason. But it believes that the only way forward for humanity is to create new forms of intelligent life that will no longer be Homo sapiens.
Some transhumanists believe that genetic engineering and nanotechnology will allow us to alter our brains and bodies so profoundly that we will escape human limitations such as mortality and confinement to a physical body.
Others await … the invention of artificial intelligence infinitely superior to our own. These beings will demote humanity to the rank we assign to animals — unless they decide that their goals are better served by wiping us out completely.”
Judging by the planned direction the WEF is taking us, I’m convinced transhumanist philosophy underpins its political agendas. Schwab also has not been shy about the WEF’s transhumanist ideals.
He even coined the term “Fourth Industrial Revolution” to describe the planned merger of man with machine. Such a merger, in turn, allows for the direct control of each individual from the outside. Just like you can remote control a computer, so would you be able to remote control an individual whose brain was connected to the cloud.
Technocracy Is Here
In 1975, Sen. Frank Church (video above) warned that the technological advancements of that time already posed a direct threat to the citizens of the United States, and that were a dictator to infiltrate or take control of the country, there would be no escape from the tyranny.
Fast-forward to today, and his words are more than a little prescient. As noted by Robert F. Kennedy Jr., “We now live in this abyss!”19 The question is, how do we get out of this abyss, which was intentionally created for us by the 0.0001%?
I believe the only way out is by rejecting surveillance technologies such as Google and Google-based devices while simultaneously building parallel economies, industries and communities that operate outside of their control system. None of that is easy, but we have no other choice. If you accept their system, you accept enslavement.
World Economic Forum (WEF) NWO One World Government Marxist-Fascist-Corporatist Elitists are having their 53rd Davos meeting (1/16 to 1/20/23) to make plans for global tyranny for the world’s masses who will be programmed to be happy with their restricted lives, restricted thoughts and no freedoms.
Since most people who still pay attention to news information still receive said news from MSM propaganda machines, I am guessing way too many people have zero idea of the controlled-lives-plan coming their way thanks largely to the tentacles of the WEF.
BELOW are a series of videos and articles more in order of my interest than date posted. Will the masses be happy?
I begin with a Newsmax snapshot:
The event, which begins Monday and goes to Friday, sports a high-profile guest list of names, including FBI Director Christopher Wray; CEOs of BlackRock, Amazon, and Pfizer; officials from the Gates Foundation and Soros network; and the heads of The New York Times and NBC.
Tesla CEO Elon Musk took to his newly acquired social media platform over the weekend to make a series of quips aimed at the global organization, the World Economic Forum (WEF).
The WEF’s annual meeting in Davos, Switzerland—which features a host of international leaders, central bankers, Wall Street executives, and celebrities—began on Monday and will continue throughout the week.
“I guess there’s value to having a mixed government & commercial forum of some kind. WEF does kinda give me the willies though, but I’m sure everything is fine…” Musk said via Twitter on Sunday evening, responding to a Substack article co-written by independent journalists Michael Shellenberger and Izabella Kaminska.
The WEF has been the subject of considerable scorn and criticism for its 2016 ad campaign, which stated, “Welcome to 2030. I own nothing, have no privacy, and life has never been better.”
Many took issue with the organization’s attempt to frame a lack of personal ownership and privacy as a positive.
Initially accompanied by a promotional video and several articles, much of the campaign’s content has since been removed from the web. A tweet by the WEF remains up, however.
In their article, Shellenberger and Kaminska called out WEF Managing Director Adrian Monck, who blamed the uproar surrounding the ad on the right-wing message board 4chan.
Monck penned an opinion piece in the Canadian outlet The Globe and Mail last August, calling the backlash a “misinformation campaign that targeted the World Economic Forum.”
“The story of ‘you’ll own nothing and be happy’ is anything but trivial and offers valuable insights into how misinformation is created and why it’s essential not to perpetuate its spread,” Monck wrote, adding that many criticisms were racist and anti-semitic.
Shellenberger and Kamiska, linking to the now-deleted WEF content, refuted Monck’s claims. “What Monck claimed was inaccurate. The phrase ‘Own nothing, be happy,’ hadn’t originated on 4chan; it originated on WEF’s website,” they wrote.
Musk continued to crack jokes about the organization. “There should be a game show: “4Chan or Davos, who said it?” he said via Twitter on Monday afternoon.
Allegiance to ESG
The authors also highlighted the organizations’ lack of transparency and declared commitment to the environmental, social, and governance (ESG) agenda. The WEF is outspoken in its allegiance to the ESG movement.
“Recent events have only increased the business world’s focus on ESG,” reads a statement from the WEF website. “Worker wellness has become a major concern during the COVID-19 pandemic; social justice protests have drawn attention to gaps in diversity, equity, and inclusion; and the impacts of climate change and the importance of environmental sustainability are becoming harder, if not impossible, to ignore.”
Despite founding the world’s largest electric vehicle company, Musk is not a fan of ESG.
“The S in ESG stands for Satanic,” tweeted Musk in response. It is not the billionaire’s first comparison of this nature, he referred to the movement as “the devil” back in November.
In 2008, WEF listed Musk among its “Young Global Leaders” — which the organization classifies as a “membership” program — though it is unclear whether Musk participated in this arrangement. “I was invited to WEF, but declined,” he said via Twitter in December, responding to allegations that he had a relationship with the international group.
The Twitter CEO also responded to a video, featuring a speech by WEF founder Klaus Schwab, in which Schwab warns that a global cyberattack could disrupt supply chains and make the COVID-19 crisis look like “a small disturbance” in comparison.
The WEF founder warned that such an attack “would bring a complete halt to the power supply, transportation, hospital services, our society as a whole.”
Accompanied by daunting music and provocative imagery, the cinematic clip caught the attention of Musk. “This movie writes itself,” Musk responded with a popcorn emoji.
Schellenberger emphasized that Schwab is more than a figurehead. “Schwab has become, without question, one of the most influential men alive,” tweeted the journalist while promoting his article.
Schwab has been criticized for his book COVID-19: The Great Reset, which advocated for governments around the globe to use the pandemic as an opportunity to “reimagine capitalism.”
The WEF has also been heavily criticized for promoting insects as a potential dietary source. A February article by the organization titled “5 reasons why eating insects could reduce climate change” attempts to dispel commonly held stigmas about eating bugs.
“Before you say ‘yuck,’ hear us out,” the article reads.
Liam Cosgrove works as a freelance journalist covering business, markets, and finance. He received his bachelor’s degree in mathematics from the University of California–Santa Barbara.
During a sidebar conversation with those rare elites who wax philosophically about their magnanimous ability to protect the vulgarian eaters, former Secretary of State and current Climate Czar John Kerry, praises the audience for their unique traits and gifted high-mindedness that will protect all humanity.
While the lizard tongue darts, the grand pontifications are espoused. The audience oohs and ahhs, at the nature of their entitled superiority. They are so good, so magnanimous, so altruistic in their disposition, according to Kerry they are literally “extraterrestrial,” which is to say out of this world. WATCH:
The US will “soon” have “illegal hate speech laws” to punish anyone spreading “polluting” the internet with “disinformation,” according to World Economic Forum affiliate and European Union official Vera Jourova.
Jourova participated in Tuesday’s WEF panel on “the clear and present danger of disinformation,” alongside former CNN Host Brian Stelter, Massachusetts Democratic Rep. Seth Moulton, New York Times publisher Arthur Sulzberger and media executive Jeanne Bourgault.\
“For hate speech, we need the people who understand the language and the case law in the country, because what qualifies as hate speech, illegal hate speech, which you will have soon also in the U.S., we have a strong reason why we have this in the criminal law,” Jourova said 36 minutes into the panel.
Yuval Noah Harari, Klaus Schwab’s lead advisor at the Word Economic Forum, has announced that human beings are no better than “viruses or bananas” and the WEF has now reached the point where they can “hack humanity.”
According to Harari, the idea that humans have free will is over, and for those who oppose, there will be no escaping what Harari refers to as the “Secret Police.”
The messaging coming out of the WEF is becoming increasingly sinister, with Klaus Schwab taking on the role of terrorist group leader, using communications channels to issue ultimatums to humanity. Do what I say, or else.
According to Schwab, the new internet will only be available to those who submit to the WEF’s biometric digital ID.]
“We need the platforms to simply work with the language and identify such cases. The AI [artificial intelligence] would be too dangerous,” Jourova added. She was answering a question from the crowd about making the “truth” as “attractive and compelling” as the “lies” people consume.
DailyCaller report: The panel was addressing the ways for the public, regulators and social media companies to tackle “disinformation” as “information pollution” spreads at an “unprecedented speed and scale,” the WEF website says. It’s unclear how the panel defines “disinformation” online and how it measures the spread of perceived disinformation.
Earlier in the panel, Moulton said Americans learn in grade school that “crying fire in a crowded theater” is not protected free speech. Moulton’s statement distinguishing forms of protected speech is misleading, according to non-partisan free speech group FIRE.
Stelter was fired by CNN in August and his Sunday talk show “Reliable Sources” was cancelled. He joined Harvard’s Kennedy School as a Shorenstein Center Fellow in September to host discussions about democracy on campus.
The World Economic Forum’s annual meeting is taking place in Davos, Switzerland, from Jan. 16-20. The forum brings global elites together from politics, business, entertainment, civil society and the young generations.
Devious media operators of the day keep running about in circles asking, “Who is WEF chief Klaus Schwab?”
Some describe him as a dead ringer for “Dr. Evil” in James Bond movies. But Dr. Evil and other Bond characters are only Hollywood ‘entertainment’, while the WEF “Dr. Evil” is threatening all of humanity in real life—and openly bragging about it!
The WEF “Dr. Evil” reminds us that when he reconstructs the world by “building back better” that everyone in the masses “will have nothing but be happy”.
That’s because Klaus Schwab is a full-blown narcissist, and narcissists have no conscience or any concerns at all for others.
What kind of people were attracted to Davos 2023, which openly provides sexual services from high end prostitutes? Government ‘leaders’ and business CEOs who must have sexual services when only the better part of a week away from home!
In other words, Davos 2023 is now attended by all those who knew about the sexual services provided by a group unable to define what a woman is!
On Day 2, this is what Davos attendees were doing:
“Today, the World Economic Forum, in partnership with Accenture and Microsoft, has launched its Global Collaboration Village. (WEFORUM, Jan17, 2023)
“80 organizations have also joined as Village Partners and will drive the development of a purpose-driven metaverse bringing people together to learn about, create solutions for, and take action on the world’s most pressing challenges.”
Why, oh why is Davos 2023 bringing back a failing Mark Zuckerberg back to the fore.
Yesterday Ukraine First Lady Olena Zelenska took the floor, emphasizing in her Davos address the human cost of the war in her country.
‘Everyone has a right to life,’ she said.
Every one that is, except millions of innocent babies killed in their mothers’ wombs in many countries, Mrs. Zelensky.
Ukraine’s First Lady is not the only ‘Mrs.’ out there advocating for the destructive so-called “Great Reset”.
Thanks to the savvy of courageous Remnant Editor Michael J. Matt, we now know that WEF-obsessed Klaus Schwab has recently brought his wife to the fore to help spread his insane, akin to manure Great Reset dreams.
Since there are few, if any media reports of the Schwabs doubling down, against the Free World, it’s Kudos to Matt for bringing them into antiseptic sunlight.
Hilde Schwab (seen above) is no ordinary ‘little Mrs.’, and it’s all but impossible to tell which of these two is really “the better half”.
Hildegard (Hilde) Schwab (born June 3, 1946 in Switzerland) (née Stoll) is a Swiss entrepreneur in the field of event marketing and founder.(Wikipedia)
Hilde Stoll, originally from Aarburg, met Klaus Schwab, a German living in Switzerland, in 1970 through a job advertisement. Schwab hired Stoll, she was his first employee. They founded the beginning of 1971 together the “European Management Symposium”, which later became the World Economic Forum (WEF) in Davos in the canton of Graubünden. In 1972 they married. In 1998, together with Klaus Schwab, she founded the Schwab Foundation for Social Entrepreneurship, of which she is the chair. In this capacity, she is a member of the Patronage Committee of the Kirchner Museum Davos, for example.
The couple has two adult children and lives in Cologny in the canton of Geneva.
That was the Schwabs back in the hippy days of the 1970s. In 2023, they work to take over the entire world.
While Klaus Schwab warns the adult world “You will have nothing and be happy”, Hilda spends activist time addressing little children.
Imagine the nauseating hypocrisy of raving lunatic Klaus Schwab, who aims to take over the entire world, and whose stifling rules reflect those of the woke crowd already running it who won’t—or can’t—define what a woman is, claiming for himself unelected and unsolicited world leadership!
Pretending not to know what a woman is, is flat out denying that women even exist.
It’s ‘Do or Die 2023’.
WEF world control means no private property, no cars, no farms providing food, and eating bugs rather than meat and vegetables.
In Schwab’s own words it also means the ability of self-appointed lunatics going about sticking microchips under your skin!
According to narcissist Schwab you will not only like it, but there’s no way around him sticking them there!
That’s the Great Reset plans of Mr. and Mrs. Schwab, Bill Gates, and the rest of their delusional, control-crazed supporters, including the Prime Minister of Canada, who was somehow not in attendance at Davos 2023.
While their minions are out there pretending that abortion’s not murder, that men can have babies, that integrity would now include transgendering kids at school, WEF’ers are currently meeting again in Davos, with the media and world governments pretending it isn’t happening.
It’s high time all who care about freedom to tell the Schwabs and their acolytes to shove off.
They should be packed onto a boat ready to sail them to the Antarctic, where they can pipe dream in snow and ice, teaching penguins how to avoid a Global Warming/Climate Change that doesn’t exist.
They keep yammering on about “building back better”. We can build way back better without the repulsive overbearing influence of Klaus and Hilde Schwab whose policies would swallow the Free World whole!
Judi McLeod, Founder, Owner and Editor of Canada Free Press, is an award-winning journalist with more than 30 years’ experience in the print and online media. A former Toronto Sun columnist, she also worked for the Kingston Whig Standard. Her work has appeared throughout the ‘Net, including on Rush Limbaugh and Fox News.
Globalists and their useful idiots are converging in Davos for the World Economic Forum to design a “New System” for work, care, employment, and much more in the face of what the organizations leaders are referring to the “polycrisis” hitting humanity, warns The New American magazine’s Alex Newman in this episode of Behind The Deep State. Numerous global leaders, as well as key U.S. policymakers from both sides of the aisle, are meeting with business tycoons at the summit to advance the “Great Reset,” too. In this episode, Alex goes through the agenda and the key players and offers tips on how to stop the destruction of liberty that is envisioned.
On Tuesday, a lawsuit was filed against the Biden administration and Secretary of State Antony Blinken, accusing them of supplying money to the Palestinians who pay terrorists and their families for killing Israelis and Americans. Biden and Blinken gave the Palestinians $500 million dollars. According to a Palestinian source, the government paid out the same year, $181 million was paid out to terrorists and their families for committing terrorist attacks against Israelis and Americans.
President Trump halted all aid to the Palestinians until they ended their “Pay to Slay” program for terrorists. Taylor Force, a 28-year-old U.S. Army veteran, was murdered by Palestinian terrorists while he was on a study program in Israel. Former President Donald Trump and Congress passed the Taylor Force Act in 2017. That act prevents the United States from sending money to the Palestinians used to reward terrorists. Biden and Blinken knew giving the money was illegal, but since they are Democrats, they figured being illegal doesn’t matter.
Taylor Force’s father said:
“Our role in the lawsuit is as it was in our efforts to enact the original Taylor Force Act – to put a human face on the horrific effects of the Palestinian Authority’s Pay for Slay policy. Multiply the devastating loss of our beloved son Taylor by the hundreds of Israeli families that have also been impacted by this inhumane atrocity of Pay for Slay and you will understand why we are committed to ending the flow of US dollars to the PA.”
“If [Biden and Blinken] understood what motivates Israel’s enemies, the elimination of the State of Israel, I would think they would stop any funding that could possibly find its way into the wrong hands. Aside from the increased rocket barrages, tunnel construction, and increased frequency of attacks on innocent civilians when ‘foreign aid’ increases, the money is used in its widespread PR campaign to incite violence and foment hatred of Israel and the United States.”
The complaint stated:
“The defendants took power on January 20, 2021, with a new plan: Transfer hundreds of millions of dollars from U.S. taxpayers to the Palestinian Authority despite Pay to Slay and contrary to the Taylor Force Act. Contrary to law, they have transferred nearly half a billion American taxpayer dollars to directly benefit and subsidize the Palestinian Authority.”
The lawsuit, which was filed by America First Legal Foundation, argued that the Biden administration sent large sums of money to the Palestinian Authority, a government that has supported paying terrorists who commit acts of violence against Israelis via the PA Martyrs Fund. The program, also referred to as “Pay to Slay,” is responsible for the deaths of hundreds of U.S. and Israeli citizens.
Taylor Force, a 28-year-old U.S. Army veteran, was murdered by Palestinian terrorists while on a graduate program trip to Israel. In response to the atrocity, former President Donald Trump and Congress passed the Taylor Force Act in 2017, which prevents U.S. taxpayer dollars from going to the PA until the regime ends its “Pay to Slay” policy.
The lawsuit argues that the Biden administration has continued to send funds despite the legislation. After announcing in May 2020 that he planned to restore funding to the PA, Biden signed off on over $360 million to the PA the following year.
A State Department spokesperson told the DCNF, “As a matter of practice, we do not comment on pending litigation.”
The White House did not respond to a request for comment, the DCNF reported.
Steven Ahle: My investigation into a DHS program that instructed law enforcement to treat Christians as terrorists won me the 2014 CJN Journalist of the Year award. Here is a video of Glenn Beck reading my article on his program: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7y6asmOkdNE&t=282s I am a troll bridge. You can cross me, but you will pay a price.
First half of this video are the very words of Yuval Noah Harari (WEF Chief Advisor) which at the very least makes a candidate for the Antichrist’s False Prophet (there are plenty of at worst scenarios for this man – of which you could add Covenant Breaker to his Jewish heritage). The second half of this video Big Pharma controlling lives for profit not human beneficial health with a dose of WEF-Globalist-Government corruption at the end:
The information is consistent, but I can’t vouch for it being the Vigilant Fox post Berkovich. Evidently this Berkovich fella has enough clout to get the attention of Dr. Naomi Wolf and Steve Bannon with whom the Berkovich letter to 13 Attorney Generals.
I don’t have a lot a confidence much action will take place with the occurrence of CDC criminal investigation, because it is my opinion the current state of government is irredeemably corrupt through the current legal channels in operation. NEVERTHELESS, it is gratifying to hear more and more people are stepping to be a thorn in the side of government corruption. KEEP THE RESISTANCE GROWING!
Attorney Edward A. Berkovich recently sent letters to the attorneys general for Wyoming, New Hampshire, Kentucky, Kansas, Texas, Indiana, Alaska, Alabama, Arizona, Tennessee, Montana, Florida, and Utah, encouraging them to consider state-level action to investigate and prosecute Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) officials for reckless endangerment or similar state crimes for CDC’s three-month delay in reporting the first statistically significant signal of myocarditis incidence following mRNA COVID-19 vaccination.
“Dr. Flowers broke the story that that there was knowledge with the FDA and with Pfizer of myocarditis four months before they made a press announcement to the parents of America. Four months previously, they knew that 35 teenagers sustained heart damage a week after being injected with his material, and they kept going. They kept going with the influencers. They kept going with the cute pictures on Instagram with a little band-aid. They kept aiming their campaign at young adults, at teenagers, at parents to get these kids injected. So that’s fraud! And it’s also reckless endangerment and similar crimes that Mr. Berkovich identifies. So this is incredibly important,” she stressed.
RE: State criminal investigation of Centers for Disease Control (CDC) officials for reckless endangering under WY Stat. § 6-2-504(a)
Dear Attorney General Hill:
I support your signing the Section 553(e) Petition for Rulemaking sent to Secretary Becerra & Administrator Brooks-LaSure on November 17, 2022.
There may be reasonable suspicion to investigate CDC officials for recklessly endangering Wyoming residents, as follows:
The enclosed article asserts:
[T]he CDC delayed reporting the incidence of myocarditis to the general public for three months after the first statistically significant signal appeared in the VAERS database. The delay kept about 120,000,000 Americans in the dark until after they had already unknowingly exposed themselves to one or more doses of the COVID-19 injections that were, according to the analysis presented here, in all probability, the proximate cause of the increased incidence of myocarditis, especially in young male Americans from 8 to 21 years of age.
If that assertion is correct, that level of omission may provide reasonable suspicion to investigate CDC officials for “recklessly engaging in conduct [omitting to warn of the safety signal] which place[d] [Wyoming residents] in danger of death or serious bodily injury[,] under WY Stat. § 6-2- 504(a).
Wyoming residents acting in reliance on CDC information, either directly or vicariously via state and county health agency recommendations (agencies that likely rely on CDC), may have decided not to get vaccinated if CDC had warned of the myocarditis risk it knew about. This is especially problematic considering emerging data about post-Covid-19 vaccination myocarditis.
There cannot be “informed consent” without being “informed.”
Also, CDC’s recent decision to recommend new omicron boosters for children as young as five years old, a recommendation reportedly made without even convening a meeting of CDC’s panel of vaccine experts, similarly may give rise to reasonable suspicion to investigate for reckless endangering, because Wyoming residents may (again?) directly or vicariously rely on CDC’s recommendation and get their children vaccinated without full data.
As you are aware, federal officials do not have absolute Supremacy Clause immunity from state law prosecution. See, e.g., Wyoming v. Livingston, 443 F.3d 1211 (10th Cir. 2006) (discussing Supremacy Clause, removal, and “reasonable and necessary”).
I encourage your office to consider whether investigating federal officials for state law offenses is warranted for either the actions above or other pandemic response actions. While there is ongoing discussion of more comprehensive prosecutions related to the pandemic, there may be value in thinking smaller and starting somewhere.
I’ve recently sent similar letters to my home state’s attorney general, some other state attorneys general, and to Mr. Skoric in Park County, because of his work on Livingston.
/s/ Edward A. Berkovich
Attorney at Law, Utah Bar. No. 6180
Steve Bannon summarizes the significance of the letter.
“This guy is telling state attorneys general, ‘I want you to get off your duff and look at the data, and I want criminal charges filed because the CDC knew for 90 days that this was a problem, and they not only did nothing, they continue to spin about these vaccines.’ Is that the general direction of where this is going?” he asked.
“Yeah!” confirmed Naomi. “Let me give you the exact wording, ‘encouraging them to consider state-level action to investigate and prosecute Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.’ CDC officials, meaning Dr. Walensky and her colleagues, ‘for reckless endangerment or similar state crimes for CDC’s three-month delay in reporting [the] first statistically significant signal of myocarditis incidence following mRNA COVID-19 vaccination.’ So yes! He’s saying, ‘Prosecute the officials who covered it up. Prosecute the officials who knew.’”
In summary, “This crime, according to Mr. Berkovich, is reckless endangerment and other similar crimes. And I say similar crimes because state legal codes vary right state by state,” explained Dr. Wolf. “But basically, these people are criminals, and they hurt people by concealing the evidence that this was a dangerous injection.”
As Naomi expressed earlier, “All of this audience’s donations have been put to good use. We have [around] six different lawsuits underway now.”
So, if you want to put your money where there’s a good chance it could make a big difference, consider donating to Dr. Wolf and the Daily Clout team.
The Vigilant Fox is a citizen journalist with 12 years of healthcare experience, focused on The Great Reset, world protests, and COVID-19. After being deeply disturbed by COVID measures, mandates, and medical discrimination, he has dedicated his free time and effort to making short, informative clips, featuring top doctors, scientists, and thought leaders from around the world. You can follow his social media profiles here: https://vigilantfox.id
Cardiologist Dr. Aseem Malhotra shares data on the Big Pharma takeover of modern medicine
Due to Big Pharma’s stronghold over health care, we’re facing what Malhotra calls a pandemic of misinformed doctors and unwittingly harmed and misinformed patients
Drug companies and medical device manufacturers aren’t in business to make patients happy; they’re beholden to their shareholders, for whom they have a financial obligation to produce a profit
Malhotra shares data showing why he believes COVID-19 shots should be suspended
Malhotra notes that political involvement and policy advocacy, combined with social participation and social movements, can together lead to the creation of relevant knowledge to protect public health
Fear inhibits your ability to think critically. This is a central point made by cardiologist Dr. Aseem Malhotra in his London presentation November 14, 2022. Many people were gripped by unprecedented fear during the COVID-19 pandemic, which shaped attitudes about the pharmacological interventions offered.
Willful blindness is another phenomenon to be aware of. It’s when people turn a blind eye to the truth. Also known as conscious avoidance, this tactic has historically been used in legal trials to avoid criminal liability by ignoring or purposely staying unaware of key facts.
However, Malhotra notes, people also engage in willful blindness in order to feel safe, avoid conflict, reduce anxiety and to protect prestige or, in some cases, “precious, fragile egos.”1
The Illusion of Knowledge Is Worse Than Ignorance
Malhotra quoted the late Stephen Hawking, who stated, “The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge.”2 In terms of health care, evidence-based medicine has been hijacked by Big Pharma; it’s now an illusion. There’s also an illusion that we’re at the forefront of medicine, with prestigious organizations leading the helm, when in reality multiple health crises are upon us.
The World Health Organization’s (WHO) definition of health is a “state of complete physical, mental and social well-being and not merely the absence of disease or infirmity.”3 Public health, too, is not only about preventing disease, but also promoting health and prolonging life, while helping populations reach the highest possible level of well-being. But are public health agencies actually helping to achieve these goals?
Malhotra, a cardiologist trained by the U.K.’s National Health Service (NHS), as well as a visiting professor of evidence based medicine at Bahiana School of Medicine and Public Health in Salvador, Brazil,4 cited a 2020 study published in the British Medical Bulletin.5
It used data from the U.K.’s Office for National Statistics from 2010 to 2020, which showed a “dramatic slowdown in life expectancy and diverging trends in infant mortality in the UK as a whole and England and Wales, respectively.” Health trends in the U.K., the study concluded, “are worrying and raise important questions about government policies.”6
Throughout his career, Malhotra has tried to call attention to failures in treating heart disease. “Despite so-called modern science,” heart disease remains the No. 1 cause of death globally.7 “So clearly there’s something that we’ve done wrong on that front,” Malhotra said.8
More recently, he’s focused on using real evidence-based medicine to share the truth about COVID-19 mRNA vaccines. His two-part paper on the topic was published in the Journal of Insulin Resistance, specifically,9,10 because this journal does not accept money from the pharmaceutical industry.11
A Pandemic of Misinformed Doctors and Patients
Due to Big Pharma’s stronghold over health care, we’re facing what Malhotra calls a pandemic of misinformed doctors and unwittingly harmed and misinformed patients. This misinformation comes from a variety of sources, including:12
Biased funding of research — Research funded because it’s likely to be profitable, not because it’s likely to be better for patients
Biased reporting in medical journals
Biased patient pamphlets
Biased reporting in the media
Commercial conflicts of interest
Medical curricula that fail to teach doctors how to comprehend and communicate health statistics
Malhotra describes John Ioannidis, professor of medicine and professor of epidemiology and population health at Stanford University, as the “Stephen Hawking of medicine.”13 Ioannidis cowrote a paper in 2017 titled, “How to Survive the Medical Misinformation Mess.”14 At the time, he described four key problems:
1. Much published research is unreliable, offers no benefit to patients or is not useful to decision makers
2. Most health care professionals are not aware of this problem with published research
3. Health care professionals lack the necessary skills to evaluate the reliability of medical evidence
4. Patients and families lack accurate medical evidence and skilled guidance when they need to make medical decisions
The solution, according to Ioannidis, involves focusing efforts on “making health care professionals more sensitive to the limitations of the evidence, training them to do critical appraisal, and enhancing their communication skills so that they can effectively summarize and discuss medical evidence with patients to improve decision-making.”15
Ioannidis also wrote a 2005 paper about why most published research findings are false. Not surprisingly, one factor that makes a research finding less likely to be true is “greater financial and other interest and prejudice.”16
Drug Companies Are Beholden to Their Shareholders
Drug companies and medical device manufacturers aren’t in business to make patients happy; they’re beholden to their shareholders, for whom they have a financial obligation to produce a profit.17 There’s no legal requirement for them to offer patients the “best” treatment.
Further, regulators regularly fail at their duty to prevent industry misconduct, while doctors and medical journals — which do have a responsibility to put patients’ interests and scientific integrity first — collude with industry for financial gain.18
Recently, Malhotra was heavily involved in campaigning to end NHS COVID-19 shot mandates. But prior to this he spoke to the European Parliament in 2018 to warn them of the epidemic of misinformed doctors and patients, stating, “Honest doctors can no longer practice honest medicine. We have a complete health care system failure …”19
In fact, in 2016, Dr. Peter C. Gotzsche, cofounder of the Cochrane Collaboration and the Institute for Scientific Freedom, stated prescription drugs are the third leading cause of death — most of them preventable.20 “The reason for that,” Malhotra said, “is the information that comes from drug companies — essentially the results of clinical trials — exaggerate the benefits and the safety of the drugs.”21
Corporate crime and fraud are also rampant — from 2009 to 2014, Gotzsche noted that most of the top 10 drug companies committed fraud, totaling about $14 billion, including hiding data on drug harms and illegally marketing drugs.
Yet, the fines the drug companies had to pay for their crimes were miniscule in comparison to the profits they made from the drugs. Since then, however, nobody was fired and “nothing has changed to stop them from committing these crimes again.”22
Tobacco Tactics Revisited During COVID Pandemic
Malhotra is among those who early on during the pandemic that poor diet can increase your risk of dying from COVID-19, by increasing obesity risk, chronic disease and disrupting your gut microbiome.23 In April 2020, he tweeted, “The government and public health England are ignorant and grossly negligent for not telling the public they need to change their diet now.”24
Not only did they not publicly share the importance of healthy weight and diet to ward off COVID-19, but they glamorized and encouraged junk food consumption via their official social media channels. At one point during the pandemic, Royal Free Hospital, which is part of the Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, tweeted the following along with a photo showing dozens of doughnut boxes:25
“You guys at @krispykremeUK Enfield sure know how to put a smile on our staff’s faces!1,500 doughnuts delivered to our staff at Barnet Hospital-#glazeamaze.”
“I’ve got nothing against people having a treat,” Malhotra said. “But hospitals shouldn’t be promoting … and essentially advertising the fact that we are giving 1,000 free Krispy Kreme doughnuts to nurses in the middle of the pandemic. I don’t think that was very productive considering what we know about the influence on COVID.”26
That hospitals were promoting junk food and junk food companies instead of healthy food is reminiscent of Big Tobacco’s tactics, which not only suppressed the harmful effects of cigarettes but also recruited doctors to promote them, using slogans such as, “More Doctors Smoke Camels Than Any Other Cigarette.”
“We see the same tactics repeating themselves,” Malhotra continued. “What Krispy Kreme is doing is using the NHS as a branding opportunity for what are essentially addictive, toxic foods that should just be treats but not part of the regular diet.”27
How COVID Shots Were Oversold
Malhotra was one of the first to take Pfizer’s COVID-19 shot, and he’s double-jabbed. Initially, he was in favor of the shots but a study published in Circulation, which found an increased incidence of inflammatory markers linked to heart attacks in people who’d received mRNA COVID-19 shots,28 gave him pause.
Then, a whistleblower from a prestigious British institution contacted him and said a group of researchers had found inflammation of coronary arteries after the mRNA shot. However, the researchers had a meeting and decided not to share their findings because it might affect their funding from the drug industry.29 He then learned of data from Scotland that showed an unexplained 25% increase in heart attacks.
He went to the media, armed with data, to share his concerns in October 2021, calling for an investigation. It received a lot of attention, but Malhotra was soon targeted by anonymous complaints to a medical organization, which put his medical license at risk. At that point, he decided to gather other experts and critically review the data — then publish the truth.
In November 2020, Pfizer claimed their COVID-19 shot was 95% effective against COVID-19, but this was highly misleading and, according to Malhotra, based on flawed methodology:30
“‘Relative risk reduction is a way of exaggerating the benefits of any intervention … which would be in the interest of people trying to sell you something — in this case, the pharmaceutical industry.
So if, for example, you have 1,000 people in a trial that didn’t have the vaccine versus 1,000 people that did in the placebo group … you may have two people dying. And in the intervention group, you may have just one person dying. And that’s a reduction of 50%. One over two is a 50% relative risk reduction. But actually, you’ve only saved one life out of 1,000.
So, the absolute risk reduction is only 1 in 1,000. It’s a big difference. The guidance has been for many years that we must always use absolute risk reduction in conversations with patients, not just relative risk reduction alone; otherwise, it’s considered unethical,’ Malhotra said.
The accusation is that governments acted on Pfizer’s relative risk figure of 95% efficacy, when the absolute risk was a mere 0.84%. In other words, you’d have to vaccinate 119 people to prevent just one from catching COVID. ‘So we were basically sold on something that ultimately, and in retrospect now, was very, very misleading.'”
Big Pharma Provides Majority of Budget for Leading Regulators
If there were ever any doubt that regulatory agencies are captured by industry, consider that significant portions of regulatory agencies’ budgets come from the pharmaceutical industry that these agencies are supposed to regulate. For instance:31
Australia’s Therapeutic Goods Administration — 96% of budget derived from industry
Europe’s EMA — 89%
U.K.’s MHRA — 86%
Japan’s Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency — 85%
U.S. FDA — 65%
Health Canada — 50.5%
Data and health advice from these agencies cannot be considered independent or trustworthy when it’s clouded by vested interests. What did one study32 — conducted by people who do not take money from the drug industry — find?
It reanalyzed data that led to the original approval of the shots, and subsequent shot mandates, revealing people were more likely to suffer a serious adverse, disability, hospitalization or life-changing event after receiving an mRNA COVID-19 shot than be hospitalized with COVID.33 Malhotra shared additional facts about COVID-19 shots that are now known based on the best available evidence:34
COVID-19 shots offer no protection against infection now
No reduction in COVID mortality
Natural immunity is very protective
Shot side effects are nearly three times more likely if you get the shot after having COVID-19
Unprecedented harms have been reported from the shots
“We have pulled vaccines in the past for much less,” Malhotra said. “… This vaccine needs to be suspended completely, pending an inquiry.”35 So why haven’t you heard about this? It’s clear that willful blindness has taken over. Malhotra notes that political involvement and policy advocacy, combined with social participation and social movements can together lead to the creation of relevant knowledge.
“We need to make sure we’ve got clear, relevant, concrete knowledge in a way that can be disseminated and understandable to the public.”
Toward that end, Malhotra states that it’s crucial for the integrity of public health for the facts to be acknowledged and for regulators to state that they’ve changed their minds too. Moving forward, in order to ensure access to real, evidence-based medicine, key changes need to be made, according to Malhotra, including:
Drug industry should play no role in testing drugs
Drug industry should not be able to hide raw data from trials
All results of all trials in humans must be made publicly available
Regulators such as the FDA and MHRA should not get any money from the drug industry
What Can You Do to Help?
To help enact change, Malhotra is calling for citizen power in the U.K. to use social media, calling for the suspension of mRNA shots. Specifically, he suggests tweeting and sharing the following, which can be tweaked depending on your location:
“My name is … and I call on the Secretary of State for Health, @SteveBarclay to #SuspendTheMRNAjabsnow until the raw data is released for independent analysis.”
Further, in order to beat the psychopathic corporate tyranny that has taken over, we must act virtuously, which involves embracing the following to keep moving forward:
On a world-wide scale, there are people with tyrannical-despotic intent to end Liberty and individual Freedom to be replaced by UNGODLY rule devoid of Biblical Morality. When the wicked control the voting apparatus elections have little credibility. Alternative measures to counter the tentacles of tyranny when the Constitutional Rule of Law is tainted by a Bureaucratic Oligarchy that has near zero accountability.
24 He who says to the wicked, You are righteous and innocent—peoples will curse him, nations will defy and abhor him.
25 But to those [upright judges] who rebuke the wicked, it will go well with them and they will find delight, and a good blessing will be 3.
11 Take no part in and have no fellowship with the fruitless deeds and enterprises of darkness, but instead [let your lives be so in contrast as to] [a]expose and reprove and convict them.
12 For it is a shame even to speak of or mention the things that [such people] practice in secret.
13 But when anything is exposed and reproved by the light, it is made visible and clear; and where everything is visible and clear there is light.
People can continue to sit on their hands as if nothing is happening to their Liberty – OR – People can begin activism by putting their hands together in prayer to the Creator God Almighty in the name of Jesus the Son of God. THEN add Righteous action by organizing locally (the current national leadership is too status quo for trustworthy action).
History shows that complacency leads to loaded trains to concentration camps with ill-fated ends. Americans have no Pattons, Bradleys or Eisenhowers bring freedom to concentration camp residents. PRAY!
There is an agenda to normalize tyranny. Part of that agenda is to disappear dissent to the tyrants. The tyrants don’t even care to hide their plans to transform society – or else. Below are the cross posts of proof.
The World Economic Forum’s leader, Klaus Schwab, let the mask slip last week when he stated in an interview which nation he believes is a “role model” for the rest of the world.
According to Fox News, in an interview with Chinese state-affiliated media during last week’s APEC CEO Summit in Bangkok, Schwab says he sees the Chinese system as a “role model” for other nations.
“I think it’s a role model for many countries,” he said. While clarifying that each country needs to make its own decisions, Schwab did say that “the Chinese model is certainly a very attractive model for quite a number of countries.”
Exactly what part of the Chinese system Schwab admired was not stated, which naturally leads one to wonder exactly what it is about the Chinese model that prompts his admiration.
Frankly, there should be nothing appealing to Americans about living under a Chinese-style system. China is a one-party communist state with absolutely no basic freedoms whatsoever.
For instance, in the past few years, the Chinese Communist Party has introduced an onerous social credit score system, which rewards citizens for what they deem as “good behavior” and hands out harsh punishments for even minor offenses. This system has prevented millions of Chinese people from being allowed to travel due to their low social credit scores.
China has also cracked down harshly on religious and ethnic minorities and recent years. The most prominent instance comes from the western province of Xinjiang, where thousands of Uyghur Muslims have been arrested and sent to concentration camps. Also, let’s not forget the oppression of Tibetans under Chinese rule.
The government has also instituted a draconian “zero-COVID” policy, which has seen its citizens put under virtual house arrest, unable to even go out and buy food, as the country attempts to eliminate COVID.
Essentially, the Chinese system is designed to create a society of communist drones that will not challenge the communist authorities and will swear absolute loyalty to the CCP.
This thus begs the question, why would Klaus Schwab want the rest of the world to look to a country that oppresses its own citizens and is actively trying to eliminate minorities as a “role model” for the rest of the world? What could this system possibly have that Schwab and the WEF admire?
Unfortunately, this may have something to do with the fact that Schwab is really no different than the totalitarian tyrants he idolizes. Schwab and the WEF also want total control over society.
This is the group that has spent the last two years pushing a “great reset,” a plan to completely remake the global economy following the COVID pandemic. The promotion of the “great reset” had the infamous line “You will own nothing, and be happy.”
If this sounds like the implementation of global communism, you would be correct.
The WEF has also ceaselessly pushed for a global transition to “green energy”, in some ways seeing it as the only way to defend democracy. However, as everyone is now seeing, this push for unsustainable green energy is now part of the reason that Europe is facing a severe energy crisis in the coming winter.
This is also the group that wants to institute a one-world government, in which nations would be abolished and a supranational body would control the lives of all people in the world. If that last sentence didn’t paint Schwab and the WEF as a veritable cabal of super-villains, nothing will.
So now it makes sense why Schwab would point to the Chinese system as a “role model.” Schwab, like the Chinese, wants to have complete control over the lives of ordinary people, and they want to punish anyone who resists.
There is no reason why anyone should admire or want to replicate the Chinese system and the fact that Schwab openly praises it gives a terrifying idea of what the WEF may have planned.
It may seem as if the COVID pandemic is over but for the political and corporate leaders who gathered in Bali for the November 2022 G20 summit, it is anything but. In fact, they’re already planning the next one, which is why they’re calling for preemptive global lockdown measures.
In this edition of The Remnant Underground, Michael Matt returns to the theme of waking the masses to what the Global Elites are up to, which includes war on God. In fact, Klaus Schwab advisor, Yuval Noah Harari came right out and admitted it: “The whole idea of Jesus Christ and the Resurrection – this is fake news!”
Plus, more on Governor Ron DeSantis’ decision to tell Klaus Schwab to pound sand, Tony Fauci steps down, and Traditional Catholics take their formal resistance to Pope Francis into the pages of the New York Times.
Finally, how do you like your Tesla so far? Enjoy it while it lasts because California is running out of power and the Global Elite are getting ready to ration energy worldwide.
This madness doesn’t have to become our reality. There is a way out. Michael Matt explains.
L. Goudsmit. This is another impressive address by the incomparable and courageous Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano. I completely agree with the Archbishop’s political analysis, even though I don’t personally embrace its religious foundation. I believe the entire Covid19 debacle is a crime against humanity, designed by globalist sociopaths and megalomaniacs, to enslave the world population, achieve totalitarian planetary control, and create a transhumanist future and eternal life for themselves. I believe there is good and evil, I believe there is right and wrong, and I believe that religion has played an important role in defining these ethical concepts. I just don’t believe it is the ONLY way to define what is good, moral, and ethical. I’m just sayin .
‘There can be no neutrality, because when there is a clash between two armies, those who choose not to fight are also making a choice that affects the outcome of the battle.’
Allow me first of all to thank Doctor Stephen Frost for the invitation he has extended to me to speak to you. Along with Doctor Frost I also thank all of you: your commitment to fighting the psychopandemic propaganda is commendable.
I am well aware of the difficulties you have had to face in order to remain consistent with your principles, and I hope that the damage you have suffered can be adequately repaired by those who have discriminated against you, depriving you of work and salary and labeling you as dangerous no-vaxxers.
I am pleased to be able to speak and share with you my thoughts about the current global crisis. A crisis that we can consider to have begun with the pandemic emergency, but that we know has been planned for decades with very specific purposes by well-known personalities.
Stopping at the pandemic alone would in fact be a serious mistake, because it would not allow us to consider the events in their full coherence and inter-connectedness, thus preventing us from understanding them and above all from identifying the criminal intentions behind them.
You too – each with your own expertise in the medical, scientific, legal or other fields – will agree with me that limiting yourselves to your own discipline, which in some cases is extremely specific, does not fully explain the rationale for certain choices that have been made by governments, international bodies, and pharmaceutical agencies.
For example, finding “graphene-like” material in the blood of people who have been inoculated with experimental serums makes no sense for a virologist, but it does made sense for an expert in nanomaterials and nanotechnology who understands what graphene can be used for.
It also makes sense for an expert in medical patents, who immediately identifies the content of the invention and relates it to other similar patents. It also makes sense for an expert in war technologies who knows about studies on the enhanced man (a document of the British Ministry of Defense calls him “augmented man” in transhumanistic terms) and is therefore able to recognize in graphene nanostructures the technology that enables the augmentation of the war performance of military personnel. And a telemedicine expert will be able to recognize in those nanostructures the indispensable device that sends biomedical parameters to the patient control server and also receives certain signals from it.
Once again: the assessment of events from a medical point of view should take into account the legal implications of certain choices, such as the imposition of masks or, even worse, mass “vaccination,” made in violation of the fundamental rights of citizens. And I am sure that in the field of health governance the manipulations of the classification codes of diseases and therapies will also emerge, which have been designed to make the harmful effects of measures taken against COVID-19 untraceable, from placing people on respirators in intensive care to watchful waiting protocols, to say nothing of the scandalous violations of regulations by the European Commission which – as you know – has no delegation from the European Parliament in the field of Health, and that is not a public institution but rather a private business consortium.
Just in the past few days, at the G-20 Bali summit, Klaus Schwab instructed heads of government – almost all coming from the Young Global Leaders for Tomorrow program of the World Economic Forum – about the future steps to be taken in view of establishing a world government. The president of a very powerful private organization with enormous economic means exercises undue power over world governments, obtaining their obedience from political leaders who have no popular mandate to subject their nations to the delusions of power of the elite: this fact is of unprecedented gravity. Klaus Schwab said:
“In the fourth industrial revolution the winners will take it all, so if you are a World Economic Forum first mover, you are the winners” (here).
These very serious statements have two implications: the first is that “the winners will take it all” and will be “winners” – it is not clear in what capacity and with whose permission. The second is that those who do not adapt to this “fourth industrial revolution” will find themselves ousted and will lose – they will lose everything, including their freedom. In short, Klaus Schwab is threatening the heads of government of the twenty most industrialized nations in the world to carry out the programmatic points of the Great Reset in their nations.
This goes far beyond the pandemic: it is a global coup d’état, against which it is essential that people rise up and that the still healthy organs of states start an international juridical process. The threat is imminent and serious, since the World Economic Forum is capable of carrying out its subversive project and those who govern nations have all become either enslaved or blackmailed by this international mafia.
In light of these statements – and those of others no less delusional than Yuval Noah Harari, Schwab’s adviser – we understand how the pandemic farce served as a trial balloon for imposing controls, coercive measures, curtailing individual freedoms, and increasing unemployment and poverty. The next steps will have to be carried out by means of economic and energy crises, which are instrumental to the establishment of a synarchic government in the hands of the globalist elite.
And here, dear friends, allow me to speak as a bishop. Because in this series of events that we are witnessing and will continue to witness, your commitment could risk being thwarted or limited by the fact of not being able to see its essentially spiritual nature. I know that two centuries of Enlightenment thought, revolutions, atheistic materialism and anticlerical liberalism have accustomed us to thinking of Faith as a personal matter, or that there is not an objective Truth to which we all must conform. But this is the fruit of a propaedeutic indoctrination, one that happened long before what is happening today, and it would be foolish to believe that the anti-Christian ideology that drove the secret sects and Masonic groups of the eighteenth century had nothing to do with the anti-Christian ideology that today drives people like Klaus Schwab, George Soros, and Bill Gates. The driving principles are the same: rebellion against God, hatred for the Church and humanity, and destructive fury aimed against Creation and especially against man because he is created in the image and likeness of God.
If you start from this evidence, you will understand that it is not possible to pretend that what is happening before our eyes is solely the result of profit-seeking or the desire for power. Certainly, the economic part cannot be disregarded, considering how many people have collaborated with the World Economic Forum. And yet, beyond profit, there are unstated purposes that stem from a “theological” vision – one that is turned upside-down, it’s true, but still theological – a vision that sees two opposing sides: the side of Christ and the side of the Antichrist.
There can be no neutrality, because when there is a clash between two armies, those who choose not to fight are also making a choice that affects the outcome of the battle. On the other hand, how is it possible to recognize in your noble and high professions the admirable order that the Creator has placed in nature (from the constellations of stars to the particles of the atom) and then deny that man is also part of this order, with his moral sense, his laws, his culture, and his discoveries? How can man, who is God’s creature, presume to not be subject himself to eternal and perfect laws?
Our battle is not against creatures made of flesh and blood, but against the Principalities and Powers, against the rulers of this world of darkness, against the spirits of evil that dwell in the heavenly places (Eph 6:12).
On the one hand, there is the City of God – the one Saint Augustine writes about – and on the other hand there is the city of the devil. We can say that in this era the city of the devil is clearly identifiable in neo-Malthusian globalism, the New World Order, the United Nations, the World Economic Forum, the European Union, the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund, and in all those so called “philanthropical foundations” that follow an ideology of death, disease, destruction, and tyranny. And also in those forces that have infiltrated the institutions, which we call the deep state and the deep church.
On the other front, we must recognize that the City of God is more difficult to identify. Even the religious authorities appear to have betrayed their role of giving guidance to the faithful, preferring to serve power and propagate their lies. The very people who ought to be protecting and sanctifying souls are scattering and scandalizing them, calling good Christians rigid fundamentalists. As you can see, the attack is on several fronts, and thus it is a mortal threat for humanity, striking at both the body and the soul.
And yet, precisely at a time when it is difficult to find authoritative points of reference – both in the religious sphere as well as the temporal one – we see an ever-increasing number of those who are understanding, opening their eyes, and recognizing the criminal mind behind the evolution of events. It is now clear that everything is linked together, without having to dismiss those who say so as “conspiracy theorists.” The conspiracy is already there: we are not inventing it, we are simply denouncing it, hoping that people wake up from this suicidal narcosis and demand that someone put an end to the global coup.
The operations of social engineering and mass manipulation have demonstrated beyond any doubt that this crime was premeditated, and how it is consistent with a “spiritual” vision of the conflict that is now unfolding: it is necessary to take sides and fight, without giving in. The Truth – which is an attribute of God – cannot be cancelled by error, and Life cannot be defeated by death: remember that the Lord, who has said of Himself, “I am the Way, the Truth, and the Life,” has already defeated Satan, and what remains of the battle serves only to give us the opportunity to make the right choice, to choose to do those actions which place us under the banner of Christ, on the side of Good.
I trust that this great work you are undertaking will soon bear its expected fruits, putting an end to a time of trial in which we see how the world will become if we do not turn to Christ, if we continue to think that we can coexist with evil, lying, and self-worship. After all, the City of God is the model of those who live in God’s love, self-control, and contempt for the world; the city of the devil is the model of those who live in self-love, conforming to the world and despising God.
I thank you and bless you all.
Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò was born on January 16, 1941 in Varese, Italy. He was ordained a priest on March 24, 1968 and incardinated in the Diocese of Pavia (Italy). He has a Doctorate in both Canon and Civil Law (Utroque Iure).
His Excellency started his service in the Diplomatic Corps of the Holy See as Attaché in 1973 in Iraq and Kuwait. In 1976 he was transferred to the Apostolic Nunciature in Great Britain. From 1978 until 1989 he worked at the Secretariat of State of Vatican City. On April 4, 1989 he was nominated Special Envoy with the functions of Permanent Observer to the European Council in Strasbourg.
He was elected Archbishop on April 3, 1992. On April 26, 1992 he was consecrated and made Titular Archbishop of Ulpiana. He was nominated Apostolic Pro-Nuncio in Nigeria, on April 3, 1992. On April 4, 1998 he was nominated Delegate for the Pontifical Representations.
Archbishop Viganò served as Secretary General of the Governorate of the Vatican City State from July 16, 2009 until September 3, 2011. On October 19, 2011 Pope Benedict XVI appointed him Apostolic Nuncio to the United States.
DEPOPULATION is not a novel or new concept. The Depopulation ideology as a concept for the good of the planet has been around at least since Thomas Malthus began his oft proven erroneous predictions with his first publication in 1798. In the 20th and 21st centuries Global Leftists have adopted the Malthus theories on overpopulation and lean on depopulating humans from the Earth to maintain a sustainable food paradigm for the living. OF COURSE these same Global Leftists ALSO use erroneous climate science to preserve the Earth for the Elites enjoyment and damn the masses who only exist to serve the Elites. Four critical posts of the Malthus ideology:
The premise behind these four criticisms of Malthus, is Malthus failed to consider the variable of technological innovations that increase food production to match population growth. ERGO, Depopulation-minded Left-Wing Globalists decided to help Malthus along by destroying technology/industry that is involved in food production (Take note food processing plants mysteriously burning to the ground globally, Bidenflation shutting down fertilizer plants, steel mills etc. and so on). AND SHAZZAM! The cabal of Left-Wing Globalists (an odd combination Fascist-Corporatist-Marxist-Globalist eclectic principles) create the conditions that transform Thomas Malthus from a dunderhead to a genius.
Unsurprisingly, a depopulated Earth is an easier to control the people Earth to maintain the Elitist Utopia of ecological-societal transformation.
Here are some articles and videos that tap into the words and/or writings of the Elites’ desires to rule whether humanity likes it or not.
A relatively small entourage of self-appointed globalist elites are using engineered famine, engineered pandemics, vaccines, and World War III to accomplish their long-stated goal of depopulation.
That’s why we call them global predators. These globalists are in the final phase, the kill phase, of destroying the post-World War II liberal world order, which must be accomplished before they can implement a new world order based on a cashless digital economy tied to a digital ID that tracks every person and assigns them a social credit score.
Before you can “build back better,” you must eliminate every trace of the old world order. Burn it all down. Destroy families. Destroy economies. Destroy currencies. Make people suffer.
And the most critical component of their deconstruction plan is depopulation.
Everything you see going on in geo-politics today is meant to drive depopulation. From LGBTQ mania (they don’t reproduce) and food shortages to endless genetically engineered viruses and the fanatical religious fervor for ever-expanding abortion rights, and the introduction of deadly “vaccines” — it all points toward one thing – more death.
And now we have found yet another smoking gun comment from a key globalist figure, Dennis Meadows.
Meadows authored the 1972 book Limits to Growth, which was endorsed by the Club of Rome and is still sold on its website today. The Club of Rome was the originator of the goals contained in United Nations Agenda 21 Sustainable Development, and chief among those goals was the need for fewer human beings on planet Earth. Meadows argued in his book for a drastic depopulation program.
Two years later, in 1974, Henry Kissinger authored the Kissinger Report, which followed up on the same theme put forth by Meadows, advocating a systematic reduction of the population of Third World countries through the introduction of birth control (including abortion), fomenting civil wars and orchestrated famine. Now those same strategic weapons are being turned inward on the United States and the West, with the addition of poisonous medical treatments disguised as “vaccines.”
Bill Gates, Klaus Schwab and all of the global predators of today are committed to this same agenda.
That’s why Schwab told us last year that “nobody is safe unless everyone is vaccinated.” On its face, such a statement makes no sense. Why would no one be safe unless everyone is vaccinated? If it’s a true vaccine, each individual who receives it should be inoculated, right? Until you understand that these vaccines were never intended to save lives but to destroy them, you can’t make sense of what these psychopaths are saying. It’s not about your health, it’s about killing some and making others sterile. That’s why they say you MUST get them. To refuse them makes you no better than a criminal. No other vaccine has ever been marketed with that kind of all-or-nothing bravado.
Bill Gates, in his 2010 TED Talk, also revealed his overriding agenda when he said the key to achieving “net zero” carbon emissions, was depopulation.
“So you’ve got a thing on the left, CO2, that you want to get to zero, and that’s going to be based on the number of people, the services each person is using on average, the energy, on average, for each service, and the CO2 being put out per unit of energy. So let’s look at each one of these, and see how we can get this down to zero. Probably, one of these numbers is going to have to get pretty near to zero.
“First, we’ve got population. The world today has 6.8 billion people. That’s headed up to about 9 billion. Now, if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that by, perhaps, 10 or 15 percent.”
So it’s not like we needed another confession, another confirmation, from yet another globalist insider. We already had Kissinger, Gates, Schwab, King Charles and many others. But in case you did need another, here is Dennis Meadows spilling his guts and shedding crocodile tears while saying how badly he wants the vast majority of us dead.
[Blog Editor: The below twitter link functioned yesterday. The Twitter-tyrants claim it cannot be viewed for this reason: “You’re unable to view this Tweet because this account owner limits who can view their Tweets. Learn more“]
It’s truly amazing how these monsters speak in such warm and friendly tones as they’re telling their fellow human beings they need to die.
Meadows says the world’s population needs to be reduced from 7.5 billion down to 1 billion, but he “hopes” that we will all just agree to somehow be eliminated without becoming violent!
He knows damn well there’s no way to achieve that level of depopulation, we’re talking 87 percent, without spilling a lot of blood, on top of the blood that’s already being spilled on a daily basis through abortion and Big Pharma poisons.
As horrific as the abortion and Big Pharma industries have become, they can’t, on their own, get the global population down to 1 billion. They must trigger the next Great War. The preliminary phase of that war was kicked off when they released the deadly mRNA “vaccines” and pressured everyone to get them. It’s very telling that China isn’t giving its people the mRNA shots.
No, they are keeping their population strong while watching the Western nations weaken themselves. When we are sufficiently weakened by repeated jabs, look for China to make its move. Russia will draw us into war first, in Ukraine, and when enough of our military is deployed over there, that’s when China will make its move against Taiwan and possibly more.
They know the U.S., even before the shots were introduced and mandated on our military, was not prepared to fight on two fronts.
The runup to World War III will be gradual, collapsing our already weakened economy in the process. But civil war could break out sooner than world war, as it seems the U.S. deep state is already laying a narrative to accuse somebody, either the Russians or the Republicans, of somehow stealing the November 8 midterm elections.
So while many are predicting nuclear holocaust and World War III, I’m of the belief that civil war and economic collapse could come first.
Regardless of the order, most Americans today, unlike in the Great Depression, lack the resourcefulness and the skills to survive during an extended period of extreme economic hardship.
A friend who is an Iraq War veteran once told me that the one thing he learned in a war zone was that folks you thought were friends could turn on you overnight if it meant taking something you have in order to feed their starving children.
In the meantime, remember that we are the resistance to the Great Reset (aka global slave state). No politician, police force, no military unit is going to ride to our rescue. We defeat them through prayer, networking together and dedicated civil disobedience. [Blog Editor Bold Emphasis]
What do I mean by civil disobedience? Everything you hear the establishment “authorities” telling us to do through their mouthpieces in the mainstream media, do the opposite.
They say that to save grandma you must get another shot. Refuse.
They say cover your face with a mask. Refuse.
They say that to save the planet it’s time to trade in your gasoline-fueled car for an electric car. Refuse.
They say it’s better to buy things online, so buy in person whenever possible.
They say it’s more sustainable to eat bugs for protein. Refuse.
They say it’s time to give up control over your thermostat. Refuse.
They say it’s time to give up your right to defend yourself and your family with firearms and only the “authorities” should have guns. Refuse and take responsibility for your own security.
They say burning wood is bad, so fill your woodshed and burn baby burn.
They say it’s time to sell your land in the country and move into a smart city. Refuse.
They say it’s time to trade paper dollars for digital dollars. Refuse.
They say it’s time to get that digital health passport on your cellphone. Refuse.
Above all, refuse to remain silent. Speak truth to power in whatever circles you run.
You get the picture. We must become the refusniks of the 21st century.
Refuse their techno-totalitarian digital dark age, where they have told us that we will own nothing, not even our own bodies, and somehow learn to like it.
So prepare accordingly. And pray for a breakthrough that will get the world off this collision course it’s currently on, where both sides seem to want war.
And remember: We are not each other’s enemy. Your Democrat neighbor is not your enemy.
The enemy is the globalist predators driving a wedge between you and your neighbor. Because they are so few, they can only win if they divide us off from each other and get us to start killing each other. Don’t take the bait. Help your neighbors. Love your neighbors.
The fact is, these elites know they can never fully control 7.5 billion people. They need fewer of us and what better way to eliminate the freedom fighters – those who’ve adopted a physical, mental, emotional and spiritual warrior mentality – than to poison them with vaccines and send them to the front lines of the next big war.
Fear not. Our God laughs at the futility of those who think themselves greater than He, the one and only, the Almighty.
LeoHohmann.com is 100 percent reader supported, meaning we don’t accept any corporate ads or sponsorships, which is why we can independently bring you the real news, along with useful analysis. To help keep us going, you may send donations of any size c/o Leo Hohmann, P.O. Box 291, Newnan, GA 30264, or electronically HERE [Blog Editor: If the donation link does not work on blog, it will work on Leo Hohmann’s website].
The World Has Been Witnessing & Will Continue To Witness The Reincarnation Of How The Nazis Targeted The Disabled – Unless It Is Stopped (Videos)
Over the past few years, we have seen how what masquerades as American government has targeted the elderly and the disabled. We’ve witnessed a holocaust dwarfing anything that happened in Europe with the murder of the unborn in the US. However, these things are not new. They are some of the oldest sins in human history only devised with new means of committing them. Consider just the targeting of the disabled during CONvid-1984. Remember, the first victims of the CONvids, after the truth of course, were the elderly in nursing homes and many who were disabled.
In 2021, 19-year-old Grace Schara was targeted because she had Down Syndrome. To gain some insight into Grace’s story, Scott Schara came on The Sons of Liberty radio with me. In our first interview, he laid out what happened and had suspicions of premeditated murder. He soon gathered enough documentation to know that the doctors and nurses in charge of caring for Grace were actually her executioners. Later, he would join up with Holocaust survivor Vera Sharav.
Alex Jones breaks down the globalist plan to eradicate humanity and become AI gods as Noah Yuval Harari [Blog Editor: It’s actually Yuval Noah Harari, but for the “Noah’s Ark” analogy; I suspect the first and middle names were purposely transposed.] recently claimed that a digital ‘Noah’s Ark’ will replace human consciousness after eradication of the population.
Former Australian politician George Christensen — now editor of NationFirst.substack.com — outlines the globalist ‘elite’ agenda for the depopulation of humanity. It’s all part of the Great Reset being pushed by Klaus Schwab and his World Economic Forum minions.