DICED is UN’s Environmental Constitution for the World and our own Constitution Will Be Diced


The American Left and global Left hate President Trump and his America First agenda to the point of irrational behavior. If you are an American patriot you should ask yourself, “Why?”

 

There are undoubtedly many valid answers as to the why. Here is one extremely valid reason for Leftist irrational behavior toward President Trump: To get sovereign-minded American patriots distracted from recent United Nations action at instituting a one-world government:

The writers describe the Covenant as a “living document,” a blueprint that will be adopted by all members of the United Nations. They say that global partnership is necessary in order to achieve Sustainable Development, by focusing on “social and economic pillars.” The writers are very careful to avoid the phrase, “one world government.” Proper governance is necessary on all levels, “from the local to the global.” (p.36)

 

 

Since this Draft Covenant has a Preamble and 79 articles, it is obviously intended to be a “world constitution for global governance,” an onerous way to control population growth, re-distribute wealth, force social and “economic equity and justice,” economic control, consumption control, land and water use control, and re-settlement control as a form of social engineering.

 

The above quote is an exposé at the Canada Free Press (CFP) written by Dr. Ileana Johnson Paugh about the United Nations instituting a form of global Communism using the earth’s environment as an insidious pretext.

JRH 6/9/17

Please Support NCCR

*****************

DICED is UN’s Environmental Constitution for the World and our own Constitution Will Be Diced

 

By Dr. Ileana Johnson Paugh 

June 8, 2017

Canada Free Press

 

I am sure there are many Americans who have no idea nor care what “The Draft International Covenant on Environment and Development” (DICED) is. They should. The Draft Covenant is the “Environmental Constitution of Global Governance.”

The first version of the Covenant was presented to the United Nations in 1995 on the occasion of its 50th anniversary. It was hoped that it would become a negotiating document for a global treaty on environmental conservation and sustainable development.

 

The fourth version of the Covenant, issued on September 22, 2010, was written to control all development tied to the environment, “the highest form of law for all human activity.’

 

The Covenant’s 79 articles, described in great detail in 242 pages, take Sustainable Development principles described in Agenda 21 and transform them into global law, which supersedes all constitutions including the U.S. Constitution.

 

All signatory nations, including the U.S., would become centrally planned, socialist countries in which all decisions would be made within the framework of Sustainable Development.

In collaboration with Earth Charter and Elizabeth Haub Foundation for Environmental Policy and Law from Canada, the Covenant was issued by the International Council on Environmental Law (ICEL) in Bonn, Germany, and the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) with offices in Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK.

 

Federal agencies that are members of the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) include U.S. Department of State, Commerce, Agriculture (Forest Service), Interior (Fish and Wildlife, National Park Service), and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The same agencies are members of the White House Rural Council and the newly established White House Council on Strong Cities, Strong Communities (Executive Order, March 15, 2012).

 

The Draft Covenant is a blueprint “to create an agreed single set of fundamental principles like a ‘code of conduct’ used in many civil law, socialist, and theocratic traditions, which may guide States, intergovernmental organizations, and individuals.”

 

The writers describe the Covenant as a “living document,” a blueprint that will be adopted by all members of the United Nations. They say that global partnership is necessary in order to achieve Sustainable Development, by focusing on “social and economic pillars.” The writers are very careful to avoid the phrase, “one world government.” Proper governance is necessary on all levels, “from the local to the global.” (p.36)

 

The Covenant underwent four writings, in 1995, 2000, 2004, and 2010, influenced by the Johannesburg World Summit on Sustainable Development, by ideas of development control and social engineering by the United Nations, “leveling the playing field for international trade, and having a common basis of future lawmaking.”

 

  • Article 2 describes in detail “respect for all life forms.”

 

  • Article 3 proposes that the entire globe should be under “the protection of international law.”

 

  • Article 5 refers to “equity and justice,” code words for socialism/communism.

 

  • Article 16 requires that all member nations must adopt environmental conservation into all national decisions.

 

  • Article 19 deals with “Stratospheric Ozone.” Rex Communis is the customary international law regime applicable to areas beyond national jurisdiction: in particular to the high seas and outer space.” (p. 72)

 

  • Article 20 requires that all nations must “mitigate the adverse effects of climate change.” If we endorse this document, we must fight a non-existent man-made climate change.

 

  • Article 31, “Action to Eradicate Poverty,” requires the eradication of poverty by spreading the wealth from developed nations to developing countries.

 

  • Article 32 requires recycling, “consumption and production patterns.”

 

  • Article 33, “Demographic policies,” demands that countries calculate “the size of the human population their environment is capable of supporting and to implement measures that prevent the population from exceeding that level.” In the Malthusian model, humans were supposed to run out of food and starve to death. In a similar prediction, this document claims that the out-of control multiplication of humans can endanger the environment.

 

  • Article 34 demands the maintenance of an open and non-discriminatory international trading system in which “prices of commodities and raw materials reflect the full direct and indirect social and environmental costs of their extraction, production, transport, marketing, and where appropriate, ultimate disposal.” The capitalist model of supply and demand pricing does not matter.

 

  • Article 37 discusses “Transboundary Environmental Effects and article 39 directs how “Transboundary Natural Resources” will be conserved, “quantitatively and qualitatively.”

 

  • According to the document, “conserve means managing human-induced processes and activities which may be damaging to natural systems in such a way that the essential functions of these systems are maintained.”

 

  • Article 41 requires integrated planning systems, irrespective of administrative boundaries within a country, and is based on Paragraph 10.5 of Agenda 21, which seeks to “facilitate allocation of land to the uses that provide the greatest sustainable benefits and to promote the transition to a sustainable and integrated management of land resources.” The impact assessment procedure is developed by the World Bank.

 

“Aquifers, drainage basins, coastal, marine areas, and any areas called ecological units must be taken into account when allocating land for municipal, agricultural, grazing, forestry, and other uses.” Agricultural subsidies are discouraged, as well as subsidizing private enterprises.

“Physical planning must follow an integrated approach to land use – infrastructure, highways, railways, waterways, dams, and harbors. Town and country planning must include land use plans elaborated at all levels of government.”

“Sharing Benefits of Biotechnology” is a similar requirement to the Law of the Sea Treaty which demands that final products of research and development be used freely, no matter who develops an idea or how much it costs to bring that idea to the market.

 

  • Article 51 reveals that we will have to pay for these repressive new requirements while Article 52 shows that we must pay 0.7 percent of GDP for Official Development Assistance. This reaffirms the political commitment made in Paragraph 33.13 of Agenda 21 in 1992.

 

  • Article 69 deals with settlement of disputes by the Permanent Court of Arbitration, the International Court of Justice, and/or the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea.

 

  • Article 71 describes the amendment process, which is submitted to the Secretary-General of the United Nations. The UN Secretary-General would review the implementation of this document every five years.

 

Writers of the Draft Covenant are approximately 19 U.S. professors of Law, Biology, Natural Resources, Urban Planning, Theology, Environmental Ethics, two General Counsel Representatives from the Environmental Protection Agency, chair of the IUCN Ethics Working Group, two attorneys in private practice in the U.S., a judge from the International Court of Justice, a U.S. High Seas Policy advisor of the IUCN Global Marine Programme, foreign dignitaries, ambassadors, and 13 members of the UN Secretariat, including the Chairman, Dr. Wolfgang E. Burhenne. (2006-onwards)

Since this Draft Covenant has a Preamble and 79 articles, it is obviously intended to be a “world constitution for global governance,” an onerous way to control population growth, re-distribute wealth, force social and “economic equity and justice,” economic control, consumption control, land and water use control, and re-settlement control as a form of social engineering.

 

Article 20 is of particular interest because it forces the signatories to DICED “to mitigate the adverse effects of climate change.” When President Trump withdrew the U.S. from the Paris Climate Accord, “climatologists” from Hollywood and millennials brainwashed by their professors that CO2 is going to destroy the planet and kills us all, took to microphones and podiums to express their displeasure with such a “criminal” decision.

 

It did not matter that the President explained in a very logical manner that this accord was nothing else than an economic scheme to steal and redistribute wealth from the United States to the third world while real heavy polluters like China and India were allowed to continue to pollute until 2030 when, at that time, they could be bribed to reduce their pollution and perhaps China would install smokestack scrubbers.

 

President Trump explained how many millions of American jobs would be lost and how our energy generation is getting cleaner while we are exploring other forms of energy.  Once President Obama declared that the science has been settled, the science provided and the IPCC modeling had been adjusted to fit the globalist man made global warming agenda, so called anthropogenic.

Since none of Al Gore’s predictions of islands under water due to the melting of ice cap have turned out true, we have more ice than ever this year, the globalists changed the title of their global warming hoax to climate change. Who would object to that term? Everybody knows that climate changes but it is not because of humans spewing CO2 in the atmosphere. I don’t see any liberals who have stopped breathing and passing gas. But we do see Hollywood jet set everywhere sail in their expensive yachts, build mansions on the most beautiful beach side properties in the world, right after they chew humanity out for destroying the planet with our very existence and civilization.

How did man become the main perpetrator of climate change? How did we become so powerful that we can change climate with our very existence but, if we pay carbon taxes to the third world, we correct our guilt of existing, of breathing, and we turn climate into a favorable proposition for all – no hurricanes, no tornadoes, no droughts, no hail, no torrential rains, no earthquakes, no tsunamis, nothing but serene climate year after year.

The Club of Rome, the premier environmental think-tank, consultant to the United Nations and the alleged writer of U.N. Agenda 21’s 40 chapters, explained, “The common enemy of humanity is man. In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill. All these dangers are caused by human intervention, and it is only through changed attitudes and behavior that they can be overcome. The real enemy is the humanity itself.”

Environmentalists tell us that the science is “settled” yet 31,000 scientists have signed a petition against the theory that humans are causing climate change. There is certainly a need to reduce pollution of our oceans, rivers, soil, and air but humans are not causing climate change. Temperatures and CO2 concentrations were much higher when there was no industrial activity or even humans.

 

The Vostock ice core samples taken by a team of Russian and French scientists proved beyond any doubt that CO2 concentrations in deep ice were six times higher than they are today. There are more serious variables that affect the climate, including solar flares, volcanic activity on earth and in oceans, and oceanic currents. Then there is the deliberate government weather tampering by seeding clouds from flying airplanes with various chemicals in order to “mitigate the effects of global warming.”

Dr. David Frame, climate modeler at Oxford University said, “The models are convenient fictions that provide something very useful.” Prof. Chris Folland from the Hadley Centre for Climate Prediction and Research explained, “The data doesn’t matter. We’re not basing our recommendations on the data. We’re basing them on the climate models.”

Christine Stewart, former Canadian Minister of the Environment, also said, “No matter if the science of global warming is all phony… climate change provides the greatest opportunity to bring about social justice and equality in the world.”

Timothy Wirth, President of the U.N. Foundation, said, “We’ve got to ride this global warming issue. Even if the theory of global warming is wrong, we will be doing the right thing in terms of economic and environmental policy.”

The sad thing is that many mayors around the country have decided to disobey President Trump’s decision on the Paris Climate Accord and reported publicly that they will continue their membership even though such a move is illegal under our Constitution. Art. VI, paragraph 2, states, …”and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby; any Thing in the Constitution or Law of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.”

According to the Tennesseestar.com, the mayor of Nashville, Megan Barry, said that “The Constitution does not apply here in Nashville: ‘I am committed to meeting the goals of the Paris Agreement . . . Even if the President is not.’”

Mayor Barry, who is joined by the mayors of Knoxville, Madeline Rogero, the mayor of Chattanooga, Andy Berke, and “187 U.S. mayors, mostly Democrats, representing 52 million Americans,” have decided to ignore Article I, Section 10 of the U.S. Constitution which prohibits states governments, including towns in those states, from “entering into any treaty, alliance, and confederation.”

These dissenting mayors have not pledged their allegiance to the U.S. Constitution but to the Global Covenant of Mayors, one of the arms of implementation around the globe of U.N. Agenda 21, now morphed into Agenda 2030. Using grants from our own government, the Compact of Mayors and the European Union’s Covenant of Mayors have influenced initiatives at the local, city, and state governments, forcing their globalist agenda called “visioning” on the hapless population who are now forced to accept decisions made by mayors and boards of supervisors that are robbing them of freedom of movement, of their property rights, of the use of their cars, of farming, in the name of “transitioning to a low emission and climate resilient economy,” a pie in the sky goal. The real goal is to transform and redistribute the wealth of developed countries and to arrest their development by eventually curbing completely the use of fossil fuels and turning them into a more primitive society dependent on unreliable solar and wind power. Such a global society would have no borders, no sovereignty, no suburbia, no private property, no cars, and would be controlled by the United Nations umbrella of octopus NGOs.

There is no surprise that there is such a drive from the left to have a Convention of States (COS) in order to replace our U.S. Constitution with their own environmental constitution of the world, which is called The Draft International Covenant on Environment and Development (DICED).

James Delingpole wrote in a recent article at breitbart.com that “Global warming is a myth – so say 80 graphs from 58 peer-reviewed scientific papers published in 2017.”

The scientific “consensus” about the global warming lie, cited by the left without hesitation, is not science and President Trump was right in pulling the U.S. out of the Paris Climate agreement, an agreement based on the pretense that the massive lie of global warming is true.

India alone needs $2.5 trillion between now and 2030 to comply with the requirements of the Paris Climate agreement, a sum which would come from the largest developed countries, mainly the U.S. And there are many other third world nations that would demand such redistribution of wealth from us in order to “decarbonize” and reduce pollution.

Delingpole cites in the above article the quote given in an interview to Dr. Charles Battig on November 13, 2010. Dr. Ottmar Endenhofer, International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Co-Chair of Working Group 3, stated, “We [UN-IPCC] redistribute de facto the world’s wealth by climate policy… One has to free oneself from the illusion that international climate policy is environmental policy. This has almost nothing to do with environmental policy anymore…”

Dr. Charles Battig amply documents the advancement of Agenda 21 in the United States via ICLEI and gives successful examples of municipalities who were able to extricate themselves from the global warming hoax pushed at the local level by the International Council on Local Environmental Initiatives (ICLEI), an arm of U.N.’s many octopus Agenda 21 non-governmental organizations (NGOs) who use federal grants, mayors, and local boards of supervisors to insinuate their own plans called “visioning” onto the local community who, most of the time, has no voting rights nor input into the plans.

 

Patrick Wood wrote in LinkedIn, Exposing: AGENDA 21, “It’s time to go tell your city leaders to kill climate change initiatives. #StopTechnocracy.” It is time that American mayors follow the U.S. Constitution and not the U.N.’s environmental Constitution called D.I.C.E.D.

______________

Dr. Ileana Johnson Paugh — Bio and Archives |

 

Listen to Dr. Paugh on Butler on Business, every Wednesday to Thursday at 10:49 AM EST

 

Dr. Ileana Johnson Paugh, Romanian Conservative is a freelance writer, author, radio commentator, and speaker. Her books, “Echoes of Communism”, “Liberty on Life Support” and “U.N. Agenda 21: Environmental Piracy,” “Communism 2.0: 25 Years Later” are available at Amazon in paperback and Kindle.

 

Her commentaries reflect American Exceptionalism, the economy, immigration, and education. Visit her website, ileanajohnson.com

 

Pursuant to Title 17 U.S.C. 107, other copyrighted work is provided for educational purposes, research, critical comment, or debate without profit or payment. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for your own purposes beyond the ‘fair use’ exception, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. Views are those of authors and not necessarily those of Canada Free Press. Content is Copyright 1997-2017 the individual authors. Site Copyright 1997-2017 Canada Free Press.Com 

 

About Us — Canada Free Press

 

Canada Free Press (CFP) is a proudly independent, 24/7 news site, updating constantly throughout the day. More than 100 writers and columnists file regularly to CFP from all corners of the globe. CFP rides on credibility and is edited by a lifelong journalist.

 

Canada Free Press does not sell, loan or give out its mailing list to anyone. You will receive a confirmation email back to the email you entered. You must respond to the email in order to receive our mail out of latest news and opinion.

 

Although we have been posting to the Internet for more than 14 years, on May 15, 2012 CFP celebrated its eighth anniversary as a daily. Espousing Conservative viewpoints, cornerstone of which focuses on love of God, love of family, love of country, CFP maintains a loyal and growing readership.

 

CFP senior journalist/editor Judi McLeod tries to answer each and every letter sent to CFP by readers. CFP’s main ongoing inspiration is to provide accurate and well-researched stories for a loyal readership that are not printed or posted elsewhere.

 

CFP’s Motto: “Because without America there is no Free World” is as meaningful today as it was when first adopted. America and the Free World must READ THE REST

 

Another Examination of UN Agenda 2030


un-agenda-2030-global-marxism

John R. Houk

© January 22, 2017

 

There Left Wingers, RINOs and even duped Conservatives that will tell you Agenda 21 –  now updated to Agenda 2030 – is a good thing for the sustainability of the earth’s global population. I am not one of those willing to believe the agenda of an international body over the sovereignty of the U.S. Constitution and the unalienable rights of American individuals.

 

Unsurprisingly I had an individual try to tell me there is nothing nefarious about Agenda 21. For the most part, the dialogue between myself and Daniel James was quite civil with Mr. James taking the pro-Agenda 21 stand. I was a bit surprised someone was defending Agenda 21 on a Facebook Group entitled, “Agenda 21: Chemtrails, Depopulation, and the NWO”.

 

At first Mr. James criticized me with the accusation that I lacked the knowledge to understand that the only real power is in an unanimous vote in the UN Security Council. This point was in relation to Israel in the post “One Step Too Far” by Justin Smith. Justin began his criticism of Agenda 2030 by pointing out the UN sold out the Jewish State to Muslim haters of Israel. I pointed out that the only reason the Security Council had unanimity against Israel is because Obama instructed the American delegation to abstain.

 

Then Mr. James started on his defense of Agenda 21. You can read the entirety of the interchange between I and Mr. at this Facebook link: https://www.facebook.com/groups/591676430998114/permalink/726645970834492/

 

Mr. James questioned if I had ever read Agenda 21. I have read it but not from cover to cover.

 

“… Why don’t you read it, then come back here when you actually know what you’re talking about? It’s a simple document which outlines a fairly clear and comprehensive plan for increasing the power of citizens and bolstering democracy. And it’s probably one of the few things which might, just might, prevent humanity from annihilating itself in the 21st century.” –Daniel James

 

I implied to Mr. James Agenda 21 was akin Marxist despotism because of the anti-Liberty in the UN Agenda 21. Mr. James informed me he has read the entire document and implied the agenda was full direct democracy for all humanity. Pointing out there is no Marxist ideology in Agenda 21. I should have pointed out that Agenda 21 does not use explicit language like Marxism because the words are covered with flowery ending not mentioning the stealth wording of the means of implementation.

 

Then comes the Agenda 21 UN link that he claims is a simple document for anyone to understand. The simple to understand document is a 351 page summation the Rio de Janerio conference entitled “Sustainable Development: United Nations Conference on Environment & Development Rio de Janerio, Brazil, 3 to 14 June 1992”. I did not read the entire 351 pages but read enough to understand the words were crafted in deception to imply the good life for humanity while not being specific on how to implement this good life globally for mankind. Marx & Engels at least told his readers that the working class must rise up to end property, personal wealth and a stateless society with no borders.

 

The Marxist stateless society is unnervingly similar to Agenda 21 (2030) global utopianism.

 

Marxist Utopia:

 

In Marxist thought, communist society or communist system is the type of society and economic system postulated to emerge from technological advances in the productive forces, representing the ultimate goal of the political ideology of Communism. A communist society is characterized by common ownership of the means of production with free access[1][2] to the articles of consumption and is classless and stateless,[3] implying the end of the exploitation of labor. (Communist society; Wikipedia; Page last modified on 30 December 2016, at 13:28)

 

Look at Stateless Society Marxist style:

 

 

In MarxismMarx’s theory of the state considers that in a post-capitalist society the state, an undesirable institution, would be unnecessary and wither away.[13] A related concept is that of stateless communism, a phrase sometimes used to describe Marx’s anticipated post-capitalist society. (Stateless society: As a political ideal; Wikipedia; Page last modified on 26 December 2016, at 07:19)

 

Stateless Society Interpreted via Marx, Engels and Lenin:

 

Although Engels first introduced the idea of the withering away of the state, he attributed the underlying concept to Karl Marx; other Marxist theorists—including Vladimir Lenin—would later expand on it.[1][3] According to this concept of the withering away of the state, eventually a communist society will no longer require coercion to induce individuals to behave in a way that benefits the society.[1][2] Such a society would occur after a temporary period of the dictatorship of the proletariat.[2]

 

It proceeds from the concept of the transformation of the state in the previous stage of society called socialism. In socialism, Engels posits that, similar to the arguments made by Henri de Saint-Simon before him, that in a socialist society, public organization would become primarily concerned with technical issues such as the optimal allocation of resources and determination of production as opposed to drafting and enforcing laws, and thus the traditional state functions would gradually become irrelevant and unnecessary for the functioning of society. Engels argued that the state transforms itself from a “government of people, but the administration of things”, and thus would not be a state in the traditional sense of the term.

 

This scenario depended on Marx’s view of coercive power as a tool of those who own the means of production, i.e. certain social classes (the bourgeoisie) and the capitalist state.[2][3] In a communist society the social classes would disappear and the means of production would have no single owner; hence, such a stateless society will no longer require law, and stateless communist society will develop.[1][2][3][5]

 

The concept of the withering away of the state differentiates traditional Marxism from state socialism (which accepted the retention of the institution of the state) and antistatist anarchism (which demanded the immediate abolition of the state, with no perceived need for any “temporary”, postrevolutionary institution of the state).[2]

 

In the Soviet Marxism of the Soviet Union, Lenin supported the idea of the “withering away of the state” as seen in his The State and Revolution (1917). … (Withering away of the state: Interpretations; Wikipedia; Page last modified on 4 January 2017, at 05:28)

 

Agenda 21/2030 looks for a sovereignty, property and personal Liberty ending utopia as well. Words are changed from working class to Sustainable Development and from Dictatorship of the Proletariat to a border-free One World despotism ending National Sovereignty, personal Property Rights and personal Liberty.

 

Here’s a look at the Agenda 2030 seventeen goals analyzed as to the consequences of the nation signees to implement these goals. I am beginning with Goal 17:

 

Goal No. 17 Strengthening the procedures for executing the goals and resuming the global partnership for sustainable development.

 

On the surface, this sounds good – or does it not?… However, reality is completely different.

 

All countries on this planet are, thus, to strive to achieve 17 development goals and 169 general part goals for sustainable, global development. Let us also cast a glance at some of the 169 points:

 

These 169 points cover everything on Planet Earth. The leaders of all nations having signed this treaty, Agenda 2030, they have handed over their authority to the UN in the fields of

 

Education

 

The family

 

Property

 

Food

 

Health

 

Nourishment

 

Agriculture

 

Industry

 

Oceans, rivers and waters, including fisheries and oil The air

 

The cconomy, etc.

 

… all are to fully respect – and adhere to – the UN’s international laws.

 

Immigration is presented as something highly positive in the UN document. The UN is looking for regulated migration. The UN is calling the shots, and the nations are supposed to cooperate among themselves, and each and every country is to take care of any new immigrants.

 

YOU REALLY SHOULD READ THE ENTIRE CRITICAL ANALYSIS (Agenda 2030 for Sustainable Development; The UN’s Global Agenda Until 2030; By Abel and Bente Struksnes; EndTimes.net [English language of a Norwegian website]; PDF document)

 

SEE ALSO: UN Agenda 2030: A Recipe for Global Socialism; By Alex Newman; New American; 1/6/16)

 

Now, below is Laura Wells Facebook post. I should mention I performed a spellcheck editing and the original has no explanatory links. In a couple places in which I was clueless I added some links. If you find yourself in that situation, a search engine is your friend.

 

JRH 1/22/16

Please Support NCCR

********************

United Nations 2030 Agenda Sustainable Development Goals

un-org

UN.org

 

Laura Wells added 36 new photos.

September 7, 2016

This derived Here: https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=1278714322204302&id=247733122056817

[Blog Editor: The post I found was from All Time Conspiracy Theories. NWO, Illuminati, Secret Societies. That poster believes Laura Wells’ Facebook might fall to Facebook censorship adding these words: “Being taken down being censored being blocked!!!!”]

 

I want you all to see the true goal of the United Nations 2030 Agenda Sustainable Development Goals that world leaders including the U.S. agreed to and excepted last year in September. The post-2015 2030 agenda started January 1, 2016 and UN high level world meetings will be held in September 2016 for moving forward in the sustainable development goals (SDG) 2030 agenda.

 
(I’ll add a list of the meetings at the bottom if you would like to note them to watch for them as they come up.)

 
This 2030 agenda goal is a one world new world order. Globalization-no boarders one world governance. Police state police force- use of UN force even in us – establishment of a new international economic order. UN gun control. World dictatorship and much more.

 

About post 2015-SDG Agenda 2030

 

This consists of the loss of our national independence and freedom and the rise of global governance. Empowering dictators to help in global governance is openly touted by Agenda 2030. The document states, “We recommit to broadening and strengthening the voice and participation of developing countries [the regimes ruling those countries] — including African countries, least developed countries, land-locked developing countries, small-island developing States and middle-income countries — in international economic decision-making, norm-setting and global economic governance.”

 

Powerful Promoters
When Agenda 2030 was adopted at the 70th annual UN General Assembly in New York City on September 25, 2015 the UN plot to re-engineer civilization was ushered in with a “thunderous standing ovation” the UN Department of Public Information reported. Every one of the 193 UN member governments on the planet — from murderous communist and Islamist dictatorships to those ruling what remains of the “Free World” — vowed to help impose the UN’s controversial goals on their subjects.

 
Virtually every nation on the planet has willingly signed on to this new agenda, and you are expected to participate whether you like it or not.

 

Cost- and the goals are not what they seem.

 
“Then, the summit immediately turned to the real business of the three-day meeting — implementation of the goals, which is expected to cost $3.5 trillion to $5 trillion every year until 2030.”

 
So where will the trillions of dollars that are needed to implement these new “global goals” come from?

 
Let me give you a hint – they are not going to come from the poor nations.

 
When you read over these “global goals”, many of them sound quite good. After all, who wouldn’t want to “end hunger”?

 
The key is to look behind the language and understand what is really being said. And what is really being said is that the elite want to take their dream of a one world system to the next level.

 
I guess they decided that they needed something catchier when promoting these ideas to the general population.

 
The U.N. has stated that these new “global goals” represent a “new universal Agenda” for humanity. Remember!!

 
“Virtually every nation on the planet has willingly signed on to this new agenda, and you are expected to participate whether you like it or not.”

 

“Translating these new “global goals” into language that we can all understand”

 

Goal 1: End poverty in all its forms everywhere

* Translation: Centralized banks, IMF, World Bank, Fed to control all finances, digital one world currency in a cashless society

Goal 2: End hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture

* Translation: GMO

Goal 3: Ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all at all ages

 

* Translation: Mass vaccination, Codex Alimentarius [Blog Editor’s link]

Goal 4: Ensure inclusive and equitable quality education and promote lifelong learning opportunities for all

 

* Translation: U.N. propaganda, brainwashing through compulsory education from cradle to grave

Goal 5: Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls

 

* Translation: Population control through forced “Family Planning”

Goal 6: Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all

 

* Translation: Privatize all water sources, don’t forget to add fluoride

Goal 7: Ensure access to affordable, reliable, sustainable and modern energy for all

 

* Translation: Smart grid with smart meters on everything, peak pricing

Goal 8: Promote sustained, inclusive and sustainable economic growth, full and productive employment and decent work for all

 

* Translation: TPP, free trade zones that favor megacorporate interests

Goal 9: Build resilient infrastructure, promote inclusive and sustainable industrialization and foster innovation

 

Translation: Toll roads, push public transit, remove free travel, environmental restrictions

Goal 10: Reduce inequality within and among countries

 

* Translation: Even more regional government bureaucracy like a mutant octopus

Goal 11: Make cities and human settlements inclusive, safe, resilient and sustainable

 

* Translation: Big brother big data surveillance state

Goal 12: Ensure sustainable consumption and production patterns

 

* Translation: Forced austerity

Goal 13: Take urgent action to combat climate change and its impacts

 

* Translation: Cap and Trade, carbon taxes/credits, footprint taxes

Goal 14: Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources for sustainable development

 

* Translation: Environmental restrictions, control all oceans including mineral rights from ocean floors

Goal 15: Protect, restore and promote sustainable use of terrestrial ecosystems, sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, and halt and reverse land degradation and halt biodiversity loss

 

* Translation: More environmental restrictions, more controlling resources and mineral rights

Goal 16: Promote peaceful and inclusive societies for sustainable development, provide access to justice for all and build effective, accountable and inclusive institutions at all levels

 

* Translation: U.N. “peacekeeping” missions (ex 1, ex 2), the International Court of (blind) Justice, force people together via fake refugee crises and then mediate with more “U.N. peacekeeping” when tension breaks out to gain more control over a region, remove 2nd Amendment in USA

Goal 17: Strengthen the means of implementation and revitalize the global partnership for sustainable development

 

* Translation: Remove national sovereignty worldwide, promote globalism under the “authority” and bloated, Orwellian bureaucracy of the U.N.

 

The more you dig into the details, the more you realize just how insidious these “global goals” really are.

 

The elite want a one world government, a one world economic system and a one world religion, BUT they are not going to achieve these things by conquest. Rather, they want everyone to sign up for these new systems willingly.

 
The “global goals” are a template for a united world.

 
To many, the “utopia” that the elite are promising sounds quite promising. But for those that know what time it is, this call for a “united world” is very, very chilling.

 

Take a moment to look through the screen shots of the UN’s own documents and other news documents on UN currency and use of force in the U.S.!! Make sure to look through them!!

 

Also

 
Meetings and dates to watch for this month (September 2016) for the UN and world’s “2030 agenda sustainable development goals” which in that document they call it the “new global human order” moving forward meetings

 

September 13th is the opening of the 71st UN General assembly which they will talk about the 2030 agenda and the NWO with one document being “The role of the united Nations in promoting a new global human order” another topic being “role of united nations in promoting development in the context of globalization and independence”

 
(The process of globalization is the biggest change to the world order for 350 years. The process of change is called “globalization”. This means the erosion of national boundaries and the reduced significance of national governments. We are moving from a world with borders to one without.)

 
September 13th

 

[Blog Editor: The next words which I will embrace with brackets is a bit unintelligible for me to understand. Ergo, I am leaving the bracketed content as I found them on Facebook.]

 

[st General Debate of UN General Assembly
The General Debate of the 71st Session of the UN General Assembly (UNGA 71)
the theme of the General Debate is ‘The Sustainable Development Goals a universal push to transform our world’. (2030 NWO agenda)
September 20-30 2016]

 

September 7-9 2016

 
Global preparatory seminar for UN world data form – The Global Preparatory Seminar for the UN World Data Forum will discuss opportunities and challenges in the production and utilization of data for the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) follow-up and review processes.

 
The Seminar aims to provide countries with an opportunity to prepare their contributions for the UN Forum on Sustainable Development Data (World Data Forum), which will take place in January 2017. (2030 agenda)

 

September 8, 2016

Panel Discussion on Attaining the SDGs by 2030

 
The UN Institute for Training and Research (UNITAR) and the Sustainable Development Goals Fund (SDG-F) are organizing a panel discussion, titled ‘Attaining the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) by 2030: Business and the UN, New Partnership Models’.

 
Climate Week in NYC, which is taking place from September 19-25, 2016

 

UN Private Sector Forum: Business and the 2030 Agenda: Securing the Way Forward

 
This meeting is hosted by UN Secretary-General and organized by the UN Global Compact, in collaboration with the co-chairs of the UN General Assembly’s (UNGA) High-Level Meeting to address large movements of refugees and migrants. The forum is organized on the theme, ‘Business and the 2030 Agenda: Securing the Way Forward‘. The forum will highlight supporting refugee resettlement efforts. Around 350 leaders will take part in the forum, including chief executives, heads of state and government, UN agency heads, civil society, investors and signatories to the UN Global Compact. Attendance is by invitation only.

 
September 19, 2016

UN Paris Climate Agreement: Toward Entry into Force

 
This special event will take place at the invitation of UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon, who has asked world leaders to deposit their instruments of ratification, acceptance, approval or accession to the Paris Agreement on climate change. The event will also provide an opportunity for other countries to publicly commit to joining or ratifying the Paris Agreement by the end of 2016, and will help efforts to ensure early entry into force. The Paris Agreement will enter into force 30 days after at least 55 countries, accounting for 55% of global GHG emissions, deposit their instruments of ratification or acceptance.

 
September 21, 2016

Leaders’ Summit on Refugees

 
US President Barack Obama will host this Leaders’ Summit on the Global Refugee Crisis. The event will take place on the margins of UNGA 71 and will seek to galvanize significant new global commitments to increase funding to humanitarian appeals and international organizations, admit more refugees through resettlement or other legal pathways, and increase refugees’ self-reliance and inclusion through opportunities for education and legal work.

 
September 20, 2016
(P.S. See bottom of post for NWO agenda on this)

 

2016 International Conference on Sustainable Development

 
The fourth annual International Conference on Sustainable Development (ICSD), on the theme ‘Moving Forward: The SDGs in Practice,’ will bring together members of the research, policy, practice and business communities to share practical solutions for achieving the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) at local and national levels. The Conference will focus on four thematic areas: Innovation in Technology and Governance; Data (data systems, gaps, how to collect); The Science-Policy-Implementation Interface; and Education and Training. The main topics for discussion will be: Low Carbon Urban Development; Socially Inclusive Economic Growth; Agriculture, Food Security and Nutrition; and Disaster Resiliency and Adaptation.

 
September 21-22 2016

UNGA High-Level Segment on the Right to Development

 
This high-level event will focus on appropriate measures and required policies to promote effective international cooperation for the realization of the right to development as an integral part of all human rights and fundamental freedoms, as well as a requirement to achieving the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). The President of the UN General Assembly (UNGA) is organizing this one-day high-level segment, which will include a high-level opening segment, with high-level keynote speakers, and a general debate on measures and policies to promote and realize the right to development. Member States are invited to participate at the highest level

 
September 22, 2016

SDGs Coming to Life: Envisioning a Common and Resilient Future

 
This event will explore the role of multi-stakeholder engagement for achieving the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in countries affected by conflict or disaster-driven crises based on a report published by the UN Development Group (UNDG), titled ‘The SDGs are Coming to Life‘. The report shows how countries are beginning to implement the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.

 
September 23, 2016

UN high level meetings on refugees/migrants

 

I just want to note that Mass Migration is a Tool of the NOW.
The NWO has long included schemes of mass migration (often marketed as multiculturalism).

 
The migration of populations is another key part of the overall op. For example, in Europe, the plan involves bringing in, quickly, so many people that communities are overwhelmed, and traditions and customs are swamped and lost. In other words, create a single de facto European population that dissolves all borders and differences. You can make up your own stuff and people will follow more easier. [This bold emphasis is Blog Editor’s]

 

Forced, sudden, uncontrolled mass migration is not a celebration of diversity. It’s a deliberate attempt by world NWO manipulators to undermine certain nations and societies.

 
“The NWO agenda is all about the centralization of peoples and nations – of power – through force and coercion, and in a way which tramples upon and disregards the uniqueness of people and cultures. It is all about smashing down people to a certain level, boxing them into certain rigid beliefs and rules, and standardizing and homogenizing them like little cartons of milk so they are more easy to manage and exploit.”

 
Ultimately, the mass migration to Europe is another example of “ordo ab chao” or the order out of chaos motto of the NWO – create confusion and disorder so you can more easily mold your ideal order (worldwide dictatorship)

 

This 2030 NWO Agenda that the world excepted is not what it seems. But Don’t take my word for it, dig deeper! Research for yourself! You won’t be sorry.

 

Laura Wells
https://www.facebook.com/groups/523095264383181/

 

SHARE-SHARE-SHARE!!!!!!!!!!! — TAG everyone and share!! Get this out there!!

____________________

Another Examination of UN Agenda 2030

John R. Houk

© January 22, 2017

__________________

United Nations 2030 Agenda Sustainable Development Goals

Posted by Laura Wells on 9/7/16

 

The title is by the Blog Editor derived from the first paragraph.

 

Big Eureka Moment. Population Success Story Now Defined as Doom


in-tolerance-name-imported-intolerance

Elsa Schieder sent an email as an update from the World Truth Summit. Elsa looks at the hypocrisy and misguided thinking of population control and Muslim Refugees in the West. It is something to ponder.

 

JRH 1/15/17

Please Support NCCR

*******************

Big Eureka Moment. Population Success Story Now Defined as Doom

 

By Elsa Schieder

Sent from World Truth Summit

Sent 1/15/17 1:51 PM

 

I’m writing to you because I’ve had one of those big eureka moments, and I want to share it with you. What’s it about? The utter disconnect between the message on population from a few decades ago and now.

Here’s the idea in a nutshell. A few decades ago the message was that we must stop the population explosion or the world is doomed. Now the message is, the population in the West is stable or declining, so we must import millions upon millions, or the West is doomed. No civilization, we are warned, has ever survived population decline.

The verdict. Something rotten is happening.

Here’s more detail.

A few decades ago, we heard: The world is in crisis. There’s a ticking time bomb. What is it? The Population Explosion!! Soon we won’t have enough food and water. We’re running out of resources and space!!!

Urgently needed: population control. Fewer children per family. It’s irresponsible – it means doom – for people to have so many children.

Look at the world, the message went on. It took humans however long we’ve been around to reach a population of one billion. And now look at the population zoom upward. Two, three, four, five, six, seven billion! This must be stopped!

Everywhere I read about programs, worldwide, to lower the birth rate. Mobile vasectomy clinics in India. Birth control encouragement in Africa. China instituted a one-child policy – a horror because of the low status of females in China, leading to the murder of millions of baby girls, because the families hoped that the next child would be a boy.

In the West, the message was heard loud and clear.

Look around: many countries have a lower-than-self-renewing population rate – which, supposedly, was the goal. No famine. No epidemic. A slow population decline. Fabulous!!

But that’s not what we’re told now. Absolutely not.

Instead we hear the total opposite. What’s happening is a horror. The West is dying!! No civilization has ever survived a less-than-self-renewing population rate. Think of the Roman Empire. That’s what happened. Roman matrons refused to have many children. That caused the death of the Roman Empire.

Somehow the shenanigans of the Roman emperors – lots of murders, etc. – have become irrelevant. Also irrelevant, suddenly: the invading forces Rome had to contend with. In fact, suddenly everything is irrelevant except for those Roman matrons who had only one or two children each.

What can we do to stop the death of the West? Only one thing will do, we’re told: we must import masses of people. Millions upon millions.

Are these people who share the culture and/or general ideology? After all, isn’t the goal to keep Western civilization going?

No. Shared culture and/or ideology are utterly irrelevant. All that matters are numbers.

Why do we need the numbers? Because there will be millions upon millions of old people needing care. So we will need lots of younger people who can do it.

But is attention given to screening for people who will be ideal care-takers of Western people too old to take care of themselves? Absolutely not. It isn’t part of any criteria I’ve ever heard of.

In fact, as we all know, there isn’t even adequate screening against people who may endanger the West through acts of jihad terrorism, let alone screening in favor of people who will be excellent care-takers of aging Western seniors.

But at least, is there lots of screening of incomers in favor of those suited for jobs that Western citizens are not numerous enough to do, or are unwilling to do?

We do have some statistics. The employment rate of immigrants and refugees from different countries and religions varies (when such statistics exist). The lowest employment rate, in country after country where statistics are available, is among Islamics – incomers, and also second and even third generation. In other words, Islamic incomers are likely to be draining the economy rather than adding to it. So they are, on average, making it harder for people in the West rather than being helpful to keep the West functioning. Yet they make up a huge percentage of incomers.

There’s more than one eureka in all this.

Eureka one: it makes no sense, when we have succeeded in doing what we were massively encouraged to do – to lower the birth rate in order to lower the population – to condemn us for doing this and to claim our civilization is doomed because of this horror.

At the very worst, if it were to be discovered that population stability or increase were beneficial even at a time of a huge human population, one would think that sending out this message powerfully to citizens would be the appropriate response.

In fact, I don’t see that the West – or the world – is doomed if the population goes down. I think it makes sense to encourage smaller numbers of children, and have the population decline that way, rather than through war, famine, epidemics or government programs (like the Communist programs in Russia and China which led to the starvation of millions).

Then, eureka two. The proposed remedy is much more likely to doom the West than population decline. Having millions of incomers whose ideology is against Western values is no way to save the West. Quite the contrary. It endangers the West.

Finally, I come to something which is not a eureka. There are clearly strong forces working against the West – like Islam and the politically correct – or no one would recommend the intake into the West of people adhering to an anti-Western ideology.

Any more thoughts on the eureka re the shift from screams of horror about the population explosion, to screams of horror about population decline? I doubt if anyone in the West had any idea about Islam when there was emphasis on birth control. I also doubt that Islamic forces were behind the emphasis.

A guess. Perhaps, instead of the lowering of the birth rate being hailed as an amazing success, it has been repackaged as doom. Who might be behind this? It could be those who are for Islamic takeover.

Anyway, this is yet another wake-up call. Something has been defined as a fatal problem (population control) when it is actually a success. And something dangerous, potentially fatal (Islamic incoming, whether as immigrants or refugees) has been sold to the West by Islamics and the politically correct as the one and only solution to something which is not a problem.

As I said, eureka.

As always, all the best to all who care and dare,

Elsa 

PS. To post to Facebook or Twitter, here is the link:
http://elsasblog.com/170115-population-explosion-eureka.html

PPS. Comments welcome, as always.

elsa@worldtruthsummit.com

________________

Spellcheck editing ran by the blog Editor.

 

© Elsa Schieder

Tony Newbill Emails Beginning 7-1-13 to 7-3-13


Bald Eagle head tilt - 'Really'

Posted August 18, 2013

 

Pseudonym Tony Newbill is awesome for a different perspective on Current Event. He filters the news through the eyes of the Conspiracy Theory and yet in my opinion there are enough facts to really change the theory into a Conspiracy.

 

JRH 8/18/13

Please Support NCCR

******************************

BIG Government is all about Control and look what control in history has solved

7/1/2013 10:00 AM

 

This is a 1979 plan to control Population growth in the world and we can for sure see the similarities in what is going on today:

 

Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars

http://www.lawfulpath.com/ref/sw4qw/#forty

 

The silver value is stable, it being possible to buy the same amount with a gram of silver today as it could be bought in 1920. Human value measured in silver units changes slightly due to changes in production technology.

 

Enforcement

 

Factor I

 

As in every social system approach, stability is achieved only by understanding and accounting for human nature (action/reaction patterns). A failure to do so can be, and usually is, disastrous.

 

As in other human social schemes, one form or another of intimidation (or incentive) is essential to the success of the draft. Physical principles of action and reaction must be applied to both internal and external subsystems.

 

To secure the draft, individual brainwashing/programming and both the family unit and the peer group must be engaged and brought under control.

 

Factor II – Father

 

The man of the household must be housebroken to ensure that junior will grow up with the right social training and attitudes. The advertising media, etc., are engaged to see to it that father-to-be is pussy-whipped before or by the time he is married. He is taught that he either conforms to the social notch cut out for him or his sex life will be hobbled and his tender companionship will be zero. He is made to see that women demand security more than logical, principled, or honorable behavior.

 

By the time his son must go to war, father (with jelly for a backbone) will slam a gun into junior’s hand before father will risk the censure of his peers, or make a hypocrite of himself by crossing the investment he has in his own personal opinion or self-esteem. Junior will go to war or father will be embarrassed. So junior will go to war, the true purpose not withstanding (sic).

 

Factor III – Mother

 

The female element of human society is ruled by emotion first and logic second. In the battle between logic and imagination, imagination always wins, fantasy prevails, maternal instinct dominates so that the child comes first and the future comes second. A woman with a newborn baby is too starry-eyed to see a wealthy man’s cannon fodder or a cheap source of slave labor. A woman must, however, be conditioned to accept the transition to “reality” when it comes, or sooner.

 

As the transition becomes more difficult to manage, the family unit must be carefully disintegrated, and state-controlled public education and state-operated child-care centers must be become more common and legally enforced so as to begin the detachment of the child from the mother and father at an earlier age. Inoculation of behavioral drugs [Ritalin] can speed the transition for the child (mandatory). Caution: A woman’s impulsive anger can override her fear. An irate woman’s power must never be underestimated, and her power over a pussy-whipped husband must likewise never be underestimated. It got women the vote in 1920.

 

Factor IV – Junior

 

The emotional pressure for self-preservation during the time of war and the self-serving attitude of the common herd that have an option to avoid the battlefield – if junior can be persuaded to go – is all of the pressure finally necessary to propel Johnny off to war. Their quiet blackmailings of him are the threats: “No sacrifice, no friends; no glory, no girlfriends.”

 

Factor V – Sister

 

And what about junior’s sister? She is given all the good things of life by her father, and taught to expect the same from her future husband regardless of the price.

 

Factor VI – Cattle

 

Those who will not use their brains are no better off than those who have no brains, and so this mindless school of jelly-fish, father, mother, son, and daughter, become useful beasts of burden or trainers of the same.

 

This concludes what is available of this document. (Full post of “Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars”)

 

In the last Century 290 million people killed by Government in the world

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kgCemznb6Lc&feature=player_embedded#at=57

 

Video: Demand a Real Plan

Published on Jan 3, 2013

TheAlexJonesChannel

 

!!!!Write Your Demand In The Comments Below!!!


Sick and tired of watching celebrities who protect themselves with armed guards, calling for the government to outlaw your guns? Please forward this video to those who think they should take your guns and make you a victim.


Contact your Congress members today and tell them to stop attempting to dismantle our Constitution and steal our 2nd Amendment rights. Find out how here:

 

http://www.contactingthecongress.org/.

http://www.infowars.com

Democide: Murder by Government — University of Hawaii

 

http://www.hawaii.edu/powerkills/MURD…

Death by Gun Control — Jews for the Preservation of Firearms Ownership http://jpfo.org/filegen-a-m/deathgc.htm

 

STATISTICS OF DEMOCIDE:

 

Genocide and Mass Murder Since 1900

http://www.hawaii.edu/powerkills/NOTE5.HTM

 

In the associated volume, Death by Government [1], I described fourteen cases in which since 1900 a regime murdered or is suspected of murdering over 1,000,000 subjects and foreigners. Four of these regimes, the Soviet Union, communist China, Nationalist China, and Nazi Germany, each killed 10,000,000 or more unarmed and helpless men, women, and children.

 

I also gave some descriptive statistics on these and all 204 other cases of democide (genocide, politicide, massacres, extrajudicial executions, and other forms of mass murder) by state and quasi-state regimes, and non-state groups. These revealed democide’s incredible magnitude in this century and well showed the close relationship between the extent of a regime’s totalitarian power, or Power in short, and democide. My conclusion was that Power kills, absolute Power kills absolutely.

 

In 1986 I began this work on democide in order to … (Excerpted from above link By R.J. Rummel)

 

_____________________

Have you listened to this gal???

Mon 7/1/2013 4:20 PM

 

The Mother of all Crisis is a Currency War against the U.S. Dollar and this gal tells of how the BRICS [Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa] are doing this now.

 

WORLD BANK EXPOSED!!! WHISTLEBLOWER Former Senior Counsel Karen Hudes TELL IT ALL!!!

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L6mhwW69JZA

 

Posted by ImmaWISEbiiitch

Published on May 8, 2013

 

INTERVIEW with Karen Hudes, Former Senior Counsel to the World Bank—now turned whistle-blower! During the interview Karen indicated that the world is rapidly changing, with western power structures breaking down, economic & political influence gravitating to BRICs nations, all amid a pending currency transition which will highly favor precious metals.

 

Whistleblower Karen Hudes [Pt.1] Corruption / World Bank Exposed

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GWBogcrFGx4

 

Posted by ResistNWOrder

Published on May 24, 2013

 

Interview – OneRadioNetwork.com
kahudes.net

 

_________________________

“Benghazi”

7/2/2013 8:34 AM

 

Is this why Obama & Co. want this to go away?

 

http://shoebat.com/2013/06/30/benghazi-turning-a-blind-eye-for-the-blind-sheikh/

 

Ironclad: Egypt Involved in Benghazi Attacks

By Walid Shoebat, Ben Barrack and Keith Davies

June 30, 2013

 

A Libyan intelligence document has been produced that directly implicates Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood president Mohammed Mursi in the attacks on American installations in Benghazi on 9/11/12. Those who attempt to discredit this document run into trouble when it is coupled with real-time video we uncovered on 9/13/12. In that video, gunmen at the scene of the attack can be heard declaring that they were sent by Mursi.

 

After weeks of attempting to push the narrative that a video was responsible, the Obama administration ultimately had to concede that the attacks in Benghazi were terrorist in nature. A few months after 9/11/12, the top lawyer for the Pentagon stated that the war on terror should be waged by “law enforcement and intelligence agencies”.

 

Based on the Obama administration’s standard, the Benghazi attacks should be treated as a crime instead of as an act of war. Therefore, let us bring forth the evidence, which implicates the leader of a nation state (Egypt) in the attack and warrants a grand jury (House of Representatives) investigation to decide if administration officials should be indicted (impeached).

 

Since we’re deciding who to indict, we must look at evidence of involvement in the attack. Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood President – Mohammed Mursi – is a good place to start. Our first two exhibits are both damning but when taken together, may just constitute a ‘smoking gun’. EXHIBIT A is a video shot from a cell phone at the scene of … (READ THE REST)

 

________________________

Glenn Beck: Shocking Video

7/2/2013 3:12 PM

 

THIS Is Who We Are Helping In Syria?! SHARE WITH EVERYONE!

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZqJfFrkzf8I#at=18

 

Posted by TheDailyBeck

Published on Jun 17, 2013

 

From the June 17, 2013 edition of “Glenn Beck” on TheBlaze TV: WARNING- This video contains DISTURBING images. The Obama administration, along with PROGRESSIVE Republicans AND Democrats are OK providing assistance to the Syrian ‘rebels’…the same ‘rebels’ who have pledged allegiance to Al Qaeda and who cut the heart and liver out of their enemies and eat it. WE MUST NOT GET INVOLVED IN THIS WAR!

SHARE THIS VIDEO WITH EVERYONE!

 

__________________________

This is The Bible: This is Egypt: We are witnessing the GOD’s Word as TRUTH!!!!

7/3/2013 10:08 AM

 

This is The Bible:

 

“And I will set the Egyptians against the Egyptians: and they shall fight every one against his brother, and every one against his neighbour; city against city, [and] kingdom against kingdom.” (Isaiah 19:2)

 

This is Egypt:  

 

http://shoebat.com/2013/07/02/this-is-the-bible/

 

[Editor: There are numerous short videos on this Shoebat.com post showing Egyptians fighting Egyptians.]

 

We are witnessing the GOD’s Word as TRUTH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

_______________________

Is this something we should celebrate on the 4th of July????

7/3/2013 11:23 AM

 

Michael Savage: Janet Napolitano Deal Bringing 15,000 Russian Troops to U.S. to Help in Disasters

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=kaaGfjcrlIw

 

Posted by imitator777

Published on Jul 3, 2013

 

Aired on July 2, 2013 – The Savage Nation – Michael Savage – Janet Napolitano Signed Deal Bringing 15,000 Russian Troops to U.S. to Help in Disasters – Visit: http://www.michaelsavage.com For More Information Everyday (sic).

 

______________________

© Tony Newbill

Edited by John R. Houk

Do Obama and the Environmentalists Really want Society to have Abundance?


OWS vs. Tea Party Movement

Occupy Wall Street (OWS) promoters are becoming confident with their movement to transform America away from a Capitalistic Market Economy to a spread the wealth Marxist Economy they are beginning to admit so publically.

 

Tony Newbill touches on OWS and follows his thoughts with a link to a GlenBeck.com article exposing the intentions of OWS.

 

JRH 3/15/12

*****************************

Do Obama and the Environmentalists Really want Society to have Abundance?

 

By Tony Newbill

Sent: 3/9/2012 9:39 AM

 

Do Obama and the Environmentalists Really want Society to have Abundance in Fuel or anything else that provides for an economic capital system to Prosper and the people to prosper as well?

 

In any given day the amount of Oil in excess in world reserves is 4 Million barrels , and the world is consuming 86 million barrels a day , considering this is a Global market and the Price of fuel is reflective of the Global demand, then with 1/3rd the oil coming out of the middle east and all the volatility in that region we can see how interruption in that area’s distribution would cause a spike in the price that we in the USA could not manage to keep the free market stable enough that collapse in the market would result .

 

We need an All hands on deck approach, and I think the Algae approach with the extra resource that it produces in the Pulp for food additive in just Livestock feeds and fertilizers let alone the Fiber content this material would bring to the Fiber Industry that could be used for some many things is why the idea of this secondary material being created for No Additional Monetary Investment is a Golden Opportunity for expansion of the Overall supply-side markets.

 

The Suppression of this resource development is coming from two very opposite groups, one being the Oil Industry, and the second is from the Environmentalist side. And the resistance from the environmentalist’s side is a funny one because you world think they would be all for a Green Energy right?? The problem with this is it Empowers a Society to be more self-reliant, and more able to create abundance. These 2 factors are NOT what Environmentalists who have become Marxist Ideologues want to see as an economic Policy for society as a whole, because this in their Point of view is Destroying Earth and they would rather not have any self-reliant individual Prosperity and this is why we have a NO Growth economic recovery underway. And why the Capitalist System is slowly collapsing as the Government funds itself with Federal Reserve Bond buying programs trying to wait this out slowly sucking the cash reserves away from the private sector so that when the economy finally collapses due to No capital expansion from true supply-side expansion growth and tax revenues increasing from that. Then when the S_H_T_F they can say Capitalism failed and we are going to move to a New system. This all in the name of sustainability, but really it is all about Controlling how much people consume.

 

This is the ultimate goal of the Population control experts that make up the Global Elites Think Tanks. This is why we have No true capital growth recovery in our economy system of Capitalism.

 

Here is a story on how the OWS movement is being used to try and bring down Capitalism. OWS is a cover for the Environmentalists who control Obama and all his CZARs, The Czars are ideologues with Obama too, they are creating an environment with this envy of rich wealth Capitalists as the oppressors of society and the destroyers of earth. Along with Regulations, the Obama Administration is setting the stage for Fear to Invade the Minds of Investors who without these powers of Influence effecting their willingness to take risk investments, see these elements and actions as more and More private investors leave the markets. And this makes the Federal Reserve have to buy more and more Bonds to keep the Government funded. This sets the stage for a systematic Economic breakdown, slow and steady, like guiding the Economic ship right towards Land and beaching the Ship. Hopefully the beaching is easy enough that people don’t become unsettled to the point of civil unrest.

This is the Globalists plan to fundamentally transform the USA:

 

_____________________________

Occupy leaders admit they want to abolish capitalism

 

GlenBeck.com

Monday, Mar 5, 2012 at 11:37 AM EDT

 

GBTV VIDEO

 

There was some incredible audio released over the weekend of a meeting of several union and Occupy Wall Street leaders, including Stephen Lerner, where they pretty much admit that they are looking to bring an end to capitalism because it just can’t co-exist with democracy! Sure, it’s worked ever since America was founded and led to the rise of The United States as a superpower and beacon of hope and freedom for the rest of the world – but that’s not what Occupy Wall Street wants. They and their leaders want us to be just the same as everyone else, and this video reveals that it means an end to capitalism in order to bring about their version of true democracy…aka socialism!

 

Watch the video below, courtesy of Breitbart.com:

 

Breitbart TV VIDEO

 

In the video, Lerner says:

 

How do we give workers the confidence? … How do we create a mood in the nation where we’re occupying our workplaces, where we’re shutting down our workplaces? … Where workers are sitting in, where workers are shutting down their places of work, and when the police come, when the injunctions come, we’re all there with them, so we can really deal with part of the reason that the economy’s so screwed up … which is a few people have got all the power. Think stew, think hope, death to the Stockholm Syndrome!

 

“This is what they are now saying out loud,” Glenn said.

 

“I want you to listen to its logical conclusion.  This is exactly what we’ve been saying but being hammered for.  Anybody ‑‑ you could play games and say, ‘Oh, well, that’s not really going to…; but if you use logic and play this out to its logical conclusion, it is the end of capitalism and that’s exactly what he’s saying,” Glenn warned.

 

“Please, America, take these people at their word,” Glenn said.

 

Glenn said that they are starting to develop their own value system, one that replaces capitalism with socialism, and they are trying to impose it on the rest of the country.

 

Breitbart.com adds, “This is where the unions and the Occupy movement and the academy all come together under one big anti-capitalist umbrella. Lerner, representing labor, says that the job of labor is to shut down business; Occupy says that its job is to smash the machines of capitalism; academia provides them the forum to recruit.”

 

In March of last year, Glenn and The Blaze reported on Lerner’s call for people to take action against big banks like JP Morgan Chase. At the time, Glenn said:

 

“You can call it a conspiracy theory, but the language that he uses is already being used by labor leaders and those who are whipping people up into a frenzy in Wisconsin and wait until you see how they are going to use the state and county and local labor unions to do exactly what they did to the housing market.  It’s the same tactic, gang.  The same tactic.  And it ends with the destruction of the economic system of the United States of America.  They are bringing it on through chaos and bringing down of Wall Street and the stock market.”

 

Since then, unions have been at the forefront of the Occupy Wall Street movement and have leveraged disaffected youth in order to achieve their goals of economic chaos, collapsing capitalism, and spreading socialism. Should we be more than a little concerned about Lerner’s latest comments? After all, this time last year he basically laying out the ideas that fueled the then non-existent Occupy movement. What could be coming next?

________________________________

Do Obama and the Environmentalists Really want Society to have Abundance?

© Tony Newbill

Tony Newbill is an elusive person to know about. I believe this is his Facebook page.

_________________________

Occupy leaders admit they want to abolish capitalism

Copyright © 2012, Mercury Radio Arts, All Rights Reserved.

 

Fodder System for Livestock Means More Land for Human Consumption Crops


Verticle Farm Urban

 

Tony Newbill commented at my TCUnation blog post entitled “Let’s Bend the Mind a BIT”. This was actually a link to the larger post of the same title to the SlantRight 2.0 post which in turn is a post of a series of Tony Newbill posts. I am guessing Tony’s comment is somewhat of an addendum to the emails that I posted as one. In this case the addendum concentrates on sustainability, food production and population consumption of food. I am unilaterally making up a title for the comment. Tony’s comment is worth a post ergo here it is.

 

JRH 10/23/11

*******************************

Fodder System for Livestock Means More Land for Human Consumption Crops

 

Tony Newbill

Edited by John R. Houk

From Two Comments at my TCUnation Blog

October 16, 2011

 

I believe we can expand the Food chain with this Technology and promote freedom and Prosperity towards Peace. The Economic Promotion at the Government level all across every nation of the world should be centering on this innovation solution for a new foreign policy approach to expanding vital human needs.

 

This should be a Top Priority in Foreign Policy because of the national and international security this can bring in altering a shrinking food supply worldwide. The Math on this evolution of feed production for livestock will reduce water use in feed production by 1000 times the current use. And TODAY in the USA we use some 90 million acres of farm land for feed production to sustain the livestock feeds demand, but with this fodder system the amount of seed that would be needed to replace the current feed production can be produced off just 10,000,000 acres. So we can make available the rest of the 80 million acres of farmlands we were using for feed production for other food crops so now we can expand the overall production and stabilize the future of Inflation worldwide. Plus we can save energy use and chemical, fertilizer use, all these savings helping to lower and stabilize inflation in the economy worldwide. And if we consider taking this method and advancing it into other food groups using the same technology as is shown in this link – www.verticalfarm.com  – now we can expand supply and save resource use in the minerals groups even more and stabilize long-term future growth demands for an even bigger plea for humanitarianism in foreign policy.

 

This is a Huge breakthrough of a old technology that’s coming at a time that’s in need of Government Economic Policies that will incentively promote private capital investment into these innovations, but we cannot raise the awareness by those in Power that are on a different kind of Mission, to De Develop the USA – http://www.cnsnews.com/node/75388 – and judging by the CZARS’ backgrounds in the Obama Administration you know they are not going to promote these kinds of population growth promoting conceptions.

 

When we leave a war torn region we should have these infrastructures to advance their society then our foreign policy would benefit greatly.

 

Welcome to Fodder Solutions

 

http://www.foddersolutions.org/home

 

The world markets are telling us this by their unsustainable growth patterns over the last 12-14 years, compare these charts:

 

http://stockcharts.com/freecharts/historical/djia1900.html 

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Wheat_yields_in_developing_countries_1951-2004.png 

 

The stagnant growth in equity and supply in grain is obvious, and you cannot have sustainable growth in any durable goods unless the bread basket is growing with it. See “UP TO” 1998 all cylinders of growth were advancing together as the futures traders could see world food supplies advancing at unlimited growth projections because plant breeding was producing increased yielding grains. Also from the early 1980s till then development of arable farmland was rising worldwide but peaked in the late 1990s as the only new farmland that could be irrigated or have substantial rain fall which would affect yields that could keep up with overall demand on food supplies was in the rain forest areas of South America where timber harvested opened up these areas for food production, but this all ceased from the pressure of the environmental movement which has taken over the world economy with the leaders of these environmentalists being the Top Financial People of the world who make the Loans for the economic purposes of supply-side production and expansion.

 

So we are seeing this war of attrition bleed us out now of our primary wealth supply, as we are only seeing the Governments of the world lending out little pieces of capital funding to specific areas of industry for either political favors or the most immediate needs to keep them supplied as they rein in the control over these supplies like we saw Obama do with the Executive Order Rural Councils [SlantRight Editor: See The New American article on Obama EO’s and Agenda 21].

The Religion of Eugenics and the State [Scientific Tyranny]


NWO Caution Sign

 

It looks like Sunday will be Conspiracy Theory day. NoGuff has sent to me some links related to one of the Left’s agendas for a New World Order (NWO). In this case the agenda is Population Control. The substratum of Population Control is the focus of Eugenics.

 

NoGuff utilizes a YouTube link that is entitled, “The Religion of Eugenics and the State [Scientific Tyranny]”. This YouTube post by Goodfightlads lists a series of links dealing with the Population Control conspiracy of the NWO. I am going to take those links and post the articles behind them. I believe the story built by GoodFightLads will be fascinating to you. Remember that most Conspiracy Theories usually have an element of truth behind them. The more outrageous the theory usually means the more dubious the facts; however when the theory is built up around confirmed facts you have to decide whether the theory conclusions are valid or not.

 

JRH 10/2/11

*******************************

Personal Message from NoGuff

Sent: September 27, 2011

 

This is a conspiracy right under our noses. And no one will talk about it.

-BC

__________________________

The Religion of Eugenics and the State [Scientific Tyranny]

 

Uploaded by GoodFightLads

Uploaded: Jul 25, 2011

 

YouTube Video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6taFxHovXjE

 

The Population Control Agenda

 

The Population Control Agenda

 

By Stanley K. Monteith, M.D.

Radio Liberty

 

One of the most difficult concepts for Americans to accept is that there are human beings dedicated to coercive population control and genocide. Many readers will acknowledge that our government is helping to finance the Red Chinese program of forced abortion, forced sterilization, infanticide, and control of the numbers of live births. Most readers will accept the fact that our nation is helping to finance the United Nations’ world-wide “family planning program,” a form of population control. Most rational men and women, however, find it impossible to believe that such programs are really part of a “master plan” to kill off large segments of the world’s population.

I shall have to admit that I studied the politics of AIDS (HIV disease) for over a decade before I finally came to a horrifying conclusion. The real motivation behind efforts to block utilization of standard public health measures to control further spread of the HIV epidemic was “population control.” That was not an easy concept for me to acknowledge, despite the fact that I had long recognized that the twentieth century has been the bloodiest hundred-year period in all recorded human history.

It was not until I journeyed to Elberton, Georgia, stood within the dark shadows of the great Druid-like monument built there, and read the words engraved on the massive stone pillars of that structure that I finally came to accept the truth. At that point it became obvious that just as our Lord has given mankind Ten Commandments to guide our lives, so, too, those from “the dark side” have been given their instructions from the “one” they worship. The ten programs of the “guides” are inscribed in eight different languages on the four great granite pillars of the American Stonehenge. That message foretells a terrifying future for humanity, and explains why efforts to approach the AIDS epidemic from a logical point of view have been consistently thwarted.1

Before you scoff, and reject my suggestion as some sort of madness, check out my references, then try to disprove my conclusions. If my allegations are unfounded, you will soon recognize the deception and return to your daily activities, certain that there is no cause for concern. On the other hand, should you determine that my assessment is correct, or even partially correct, then you have a moral obligation to decide just what part you intend to play in response to the unfolding world genocide – how you will protect yourself, your loved ones, and the countless millions of helpless human beings throughout the world who have been marked for destruction.

 
You must never forget the warning recorded for posterity by Martin Niemoeller, the Lutheran minister who lived in Hitler’s Germany during the 1930s and 1940s. His words echo down to us over … READ THE REST at SlantRight 2.0.

%d bloggers like this: