Tag: Emailgate

Hillary More Crooked than Anyone Realizes


I'm Not Crook Hillary toon

Here is a compilation of comments from Tony Newbill on the NCCR post “The essential guide to Hillary’s high crimes, misdemeanors”. Newbill demonstrates Hillary Clinton indeed is as crooked and corrupt as a nefarious person can be.

 

JRH 5/19/16

Please Support NCCR

*******************

Hillary More Crooked than Anyone Realizes

 

By Tony Newbill

 

n3angus

May 16, 2016 at 2:23 PM

 

https://www.fbi.gov/about-us/investigate/counterintelligence/economic-espionage

 

Economic Espionage

 

Economic espionage is a problem that costs the American economy hundreds of billions of dollars per year and puts our national security at risk. While it is not a new threat, it is a growing one, and the theft attempts by our foreign competitors and adversaries are becoming more brazen and more varied in their approach. The FBI estimates that hundreds of billions of U.S. dollars are lost to foreign competitors every year. These foreign competitors deliberately target economic intelligence in advanced technologies and flourishing U.S. industries.

 

Definition

 

According to the Economic Espionage Act (EEA), Title 18 U.S.C., Section 1831, economic espionage is (1) whoever knowingly performs targeting or acquisition of trade secrets to (2) knowingly benefit any foreign government, foreign instrumentality, or foreign agent. And Theft of Trade Secrets, Title 18 U.S.C., Section 1832, is (1) whoever knowingly misappropriates trade secrets to (2) benefit anyone other than the owner.

 

Historically, economic espionage has been leveled mainly at defense-related and high-tech industries. But recent FBI cases have shown that no industry, large or small, is immune to the threat. Any company with a proprietary product, process, or idea can be a target; any unprotected trade secret is ripe for the taking by those who wish to illegally obtain innovations to increase their market share at a victim company’s expense.

 

The FBI’s role

 

Economic espionage falls under the Bureau’s Counterintelligence Program, designated by the FBI Director as the Bureau’s number two investigative priority—second only to terrorism.

 

In terms of our operational efforts, the FBI:

 

  • Conducts an increasing number of investigations into suspected acts of economic espionage using our full arsenal of lawful tools and techniques.

 

  • Takes part in the DOJ’s Intellectual Property Task Force, which seeks to support prosecutions in priority areas, promote innovation through heightened civil enforcement, achieve greater coordination among federal, state, and local law enforcement partners, and increase focus on international law enforcement efforts, including reinforcing relationships with key foreign partners and U.S. industry leaders.

 

  • Participates in the multiagency National Intellectual Property Rights Coordination Center, which facilitates the exchange of intellectual property theft information, plans and coordinates joint domestic and international law enforcement operations, generates investigative leads from industry and the public, provides law enforcement training, and works closely with industry partners on intellectual property crime.

 

Beyond its investigative activity, the FBI works to counter the economic espionage threat by raising public awareness and … READ THE REST

Clintons make Mockery of FBI & Land of LAWS that DO NOT APPLY to Monarchy? #clintoneconomicespionagescandal
http://tinyurl.com/gqd8xv5

 

BOMBSHELL REPORT: CROOKED HILLARY TOOK $100 MILLION FROM MIDDLE EAST REGIMES: “MASSIVE CONFLICTS OF INTEREST”

 

How much more of Hillary Clinton’s scandals can America take?

 

A bombshell report from The Daily Caller says the Clinton Foundation, a purported not-for-profit charity headed by Bill, Hillary and daughter Chelsea, has reportedly amassed a fortune from oil-rich mid east nations to the tune of $100 million.

 

 

National Security Analyst Patrick Poole says the amount of cash donated to the Clintons is “simply unprecedented.”

 

“These regimes are buying access. You’ve got the Saudis. You’ve got the Kuwaitis, Oman, Qatar and the UAE. There are massive conflicts of interest. It’s beyond comprehension,” Poole told The Daily Caller.

 

A Daily Caller News Foundation investigation reveals that Bill and Hillary Clinton received at least $100 million from autocratic Persian Gulf states and their leaders, potentially undermining Democratic presidential candidate Hillary’s claim she can carry out independent Middle East policies.

 

The benefits for mid east oil producers amount to billions of dollars in oil trade, and as you might expect, Hillary Clinton is more than happy to oblige – at the expense of American energy companies and … READ THE REST (BOMBSHELL REPORT: CROOKED HILLARY TOOK $100 MILLION FROM MIDDLE EAST REGIMES: “MASSIVE CONFLICTS OF INTEREST”; By MAC SLAVO; The Daily Sheeple; 5/12/16)

 

FBI made a Mockery over #ClintonEconomicEspionageScandal
http://tinyurl.com/z87pt84 

 

Major Hillary Clinton Donor Caught Up in Fresh Panama Papers Scandal

 

The new leaks name hedge fund manager Donald Sussman, who has contributed millions to Clinton’s campaign.

 

A major donor to Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton’s is featured in the International Consortium of Investigative Journalist’s records on offshore bank accounts.

 

A major donor to Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton’s is featured in the International Consortium of Investigative Journalist’s records on offshore bank accounts.

 

Sussman heads the Paloma Partners, a holding company that provides security brokerage, investment and management consultancy services. According to OpenSecrets.org, Paloma Partners has donated $4,007,900 to Clinton’s campaign during the 2016 election cycle…

 

Sussman is linked to two offshore holdings by ICIJ’s Offshore Leaks: Simply Radiant, Limited and New China Technology Licensing, Inc. According to ICIJ, Sussman is director of British Virgin Islands-based Simply Radiant, which was founded in 1994 but which no longer operates. Paloma Partners is also a Simply Radiant shareholder. Sussman is also named director of China Technology Licensing, Inc., started in 2002 but … READ THE REST (Major Hillary Clinton Donor Caught Up in Fresh Panama Papers Scandal; teleSur; 5/10/16)

 

http://tinyurl.com/hhkqfl9

 

Shocked face: Hillary helps out Swiss bank UBS and then UBS donates $600K to the Clinton Foundation, pays Bill $1.5M

 

More problems for Hillary Clinton? Could be…

 

Today’s Wall Street Journal has a new report out on Hillary Clinton’s time as Secretary of State and potential conflicts of interest with donors to the Clinton Foundation. In summary, Hillary helped Swiss banking giant UBS negotiate a favorable deal with the IRS regarding an investigation into Americans who had secret accounts at the bank and then — surprise, surprise — donations from UBS poured into the Clinton Foundation as well as $1.5 million paid to Bill Clinton in … READ THE REST (Shocked face: Hillary helps out Swiss bank UBS and then UBS donates $600K to the Clinton Foundation, pays Bill $1.5M; Posted by Greg P.; Twitchy; 7/30/15 7:53 am)

 

http://tinyurl.com/j3f6gh9

 

The Clintons: is the Oregon standoff really about uranium?

 

(To read about Jon’s mega-collection, Power Outside The Matrix, click here.)

 

Note: This article was written before the Oregon shootout in which one man was killed and another wounded.

 

Is uranium at the heart of the Oregon Malheur federal-protestor standoff? That’s the question I’m asking. It isn’t a flippant question.

 

I realize there are many other issues swirling around this event. The Hammonds, the Bundys, militias, the feds, cattle grazing on federal lands, federal land grabs, and so on. This article isn’t meant to take apart those matters.

 

It’s meant to follow up on my previous article, in which I present a circumstantial case for the Clintons’ heavy involvement in a scheme that’s transferred 20% of US uranium production to Putin and Russia. And the key company in that piece is Uranium One. Remember the name. It’s apparently a major clue in what I’m about to discuss.

 

I also want to say … READ THE REST (The Clintons: is the Oregon standoff really about uranium? By Jon Rappoport; Jon Rappoport’s Blog; 1/27/16)

 

Caught! Clinton taking cash from DoJ 

 

http://tinyurl.com/zt8yosn

 

[Blog Editor: The tinyurl is actually to a comment to “Caught! Clinton taking cash from DoJ.” The comment itself links to a petition which is the title below.]

 

Assign Special Prosecutor 2 Clinton Investigation DOJ holds conflict of interest

 

https://wh.gov/ioMdt

 

Created by S.Z. on May 10, 2016

 

Should the FBI move to prosecute Hillary Clinton due to her use of a private email/server, a special prosecutor should be assigned. The DOJ employs a sizeable number of individuals who’ve donated to the Clinton Campaign. Many of them have donated the maximum allowable amount of $2,700 -(http://www.opensecrets.org/) Loretta Lynch is affiliated with Hillary Clinton via Bill Clinton; who appointed her the U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of New York in 1999. Objectively speaking, Loretta Lynch and her history with the Clintons could potentially cause a conflict of interest. To allow Loretta Lynch and the DOJ to handle this is not in the best interests of the American People. We, The American People, demand that this case is handled in a manner in which true justice is the priority.

 

GO HERE to sign Petition

 

n3angus

May 16, 2016 at 2:24 PM

 

What Kinda Police State would we have with Hillary????

 

https://twitter.com/mtoneyshae/status/731261113845747713

 

#BLACKS FOR TRUMP!!!‏

@mtoneyshae

 

#HILLARY BLACK PEOPLE ARE JUST PREDATORS FIRST WE HAVE TO BRING THEM TO HEEL.

 

#CROOKED HILLARY 2016

 

#TRUMP2016

 

#MAGA

 

TWITTER VIDEO of Crooked Hillary in 1996

 

 

//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

 

Bill Clinton was frequent flier on pedophile’s private jet

 

http://tinyurl.com/hdw2cxn

 

Bill Clinton was frequent flier on pedophile’s private jet ‘Lolita Express’

 

Newly released flight logs show former US president Bill Clinton flew on convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein’s infamous “Lolita Express” jet at least 26 times.

 

Initial reports in January suggested Clinton was on board the billionaire’s Boeing 727 on “only”11 occasions, but documents obtained by Fox News show he flew with Epstein more than two dozen times.

 

… READ THE REST (Bill Clinton was frequent flier on pedophile’s private jet ‘Lolita Express’; RT.com/usa; 5/14/16 15:48)

 

n3angus

May 16, 2016 at 2:31 PM

 

http://absoluterights.com/are-hillary-clintons-china-ties-behind-a-dropped-espionage-investigation/

 

Are Hillary Clinton’s China ties behind a dropped espionage investigation?

 

  • It’s always a possibility that cases are dropped because of national security concerns regarding other operations that are ongoing, but sometimes the U.S. government makes decisions based purely on political considerations, especially when it comes to China

 

Few Americans could fathom the notion that the United States is so indebted to China that one of Beijing’s spies could get away with espionage – especially with an White House in love with espionage prosecutions. But that might be the only reasonable explanation for the Obama administration’s decision to pass on prosecuting a State Department contractor who was allegedly paid thousands of dollars to someone believed to be a Chinese agent seeking information on Americans.

 

According to Fox News, a November 2014 FBI affidavit that was filed in U.S. district court in Maryland indicates that the FBI launched a probe into the matter but that the Justice Department eventually decided not to prosecute.

 

The affidavit shows that the FBI investigated the contractor after she admitted she was in contact with individuals she believed were Chinese intelligence officers. Fox News further reported:

 

The affidavit from agent Timothy S. Pappa states the translator, Xiaoming Gao, was paid “thousands of dollars to provide information on U.S. persons and a U.S. government employee.”

 

According to the documents, she admitted these meetings took place in hotel rooms in China for years, where she reported on her “social contacts” in the U.S. to an individual who went by the name of “Teacher Zhao.”

 

The affidavit, which was quite detailed, even says that translator lived briefly “for free” with a State Department employee who held a top-secret clearance and at the time designed high-security embassies, including the U.S. compound in Islamabad, Pakistan (which is a client state of China’s).

 

The State Department employee was not named in the affidavit, Fox News reported, but he initially told the FBI he had not discussed his job with Gao, only to later change that statement.

 

The documents also note that Gao told the FBI during interviews in 2013 that she once informed “Teacher Zhao” about travel plans regarding an American and ethnic …

 

…

 

But sometimes the U.S. government makes decisions based purely on political considerations, especially when it comes to China, and here is where this unusual decision deserves more scrutiny:

 

— In recent days International Business Times reported that Hillary Clinton, as secretary of state (and head of the State Department), threw tech company Cisco “a lifeline” in 2009 shortly after the company had undergone a high profile Senate hearing regarding its Chinese operations. It seems Cisco had a large part in developing China’s “Great Firewall that helps China’s authoritarian regime censor information and surveil its citizens.”

 

… as IBT noted:

 

Cisco was honored as a finalist for the State Department’s award for “outstanding corporate citizenship, innovation and democratic principles.” The next year, the company won the award. While the honors were for the company’s work in the Middle East, they gave Cisco a well-timed opportunity to change the subject and present itself as a champion of human rights.

 

The company’s ties to Clinton?

 

What Clinton did not say at the State Department award ceremonies was that Cisco had been pumping money into her family’s foundation. Though the foundation will not release an exact timeline of the contributions, records reviewed by International Business Times show that Cisco had by December 2008 donated from $500,000 to $1 million to the foundation.

 

…

 

There are other potential Clinton-China ties as well. In March CBS News reported that a Chinese firm with ties to North Korea had donated heavily to the Clinton Foundation:

 

Rilin Enterprises- pledged $2 million in 2013 to the Clinton Foundation’s endowment. The company is a privately-held Chinese construction and trade conglomerate and run by billionaire Wang Wenliang, who is also a delegate to the Chinese parliament. Public records show the firm has spent $1.4 million since 2012, lobbying Congress and the State Department. The firm owns a strategic port along the border with North Korea and was also one of the contractors that built the Chinese embassy in Washington.

 

…

 

— Then there is the little-known 100,000 Strong Foundation, which was launched by Clinton at the State Department during her final weeks there. The program focuses on sending American students abroad to “study” in China, a program Clinton touted as essential to improving future relations between both countries.

 

…

 

During her tenure as the nation’s chief diplomat, Hillary Clinton seems to have had China’s support – and China’s back. READ ENTIRE ARTICLE – Crooked Clinton is running POTUS election 2016 (Are Hillary Clinton’s China ties behind a dropped espionage investigation? By Jon Dougherty; Absolute Rights; 4/23/15)

 

n3angus

May 16, 2016 at 2:36 PM

 

http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2016/03/hillary_and_the_espionage_act_of_1917.html

 

Hillary and the Espionage Act of 1917

 

Last week I asked about Hillary Clinton’s email practices, Is it Espionage?  Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton insisted that she “had broken no rules” to conduct government business through the use of a private email service in lieu of the U.S. government’s unclassified system, the Non-classified Internet Protocol (IP) Router Network (abbreviated as NIPRNet) and the Secret Internet Protocol Router Network (SIPRNet).  These are a system of interconnected computer networks used by the U.S. Department of Defense and the U.S. Department of State to transmit classified information.

 

…

 

The Democratic Presidential candidate under investigation by the FBI has disclosed that her aides had deleted more than 30,000 emails that she deemed personal.  30,000 emails printed out represents a stack of 60 reams of paper, a stack 10 feet tall. …

 

Attorneys fresh out of law school are familiar with the legal issue known as “spoliation of evidence.”  When parties fail to produce relevant evidence within their span of control, evidence which they are otherwise naturally expected to possess, the U.S. legal system allows and even mandates that unfavorable presumptions be drawn against them.  So when some item of relevant evidence — whether documents, physical objects or data relevant to an ongoing legal matter — is destroyed, discarded or modified in some way, the U.S. legal system allows us to presume that the missing evidence was unfavorable to that party and allows us to draw conclusions accordingly. …

 

Spoliation of evidence is prohibited by an array of laws and regulations.  Also, anyone who destroys relevant evidence or assists in such destruction is subject to criminal prosecution, civil fines, tort liability, exclusion of testimony and dismissal of claims, as well as adverse evidentiary inferences.  Intentional destruction or negligent loss of evidence suggests that the party in possession believed that it was harmful to them, and that consciousness of guilt led them to destroy, hide or lose it.

 

…

 

… Emails now released reveal that her State Department minions were directed to strip off the classification headers and footers off classified documents and input those documents, or even essential information that would make the information classified.  Whether she directed others to do it or she performed the action herself, the FBI has reported thousands of cases exist where classified information was moved to an unsecured email server.

 

Seventy years ago, senior State Department official Alger Hiss found a way to remove classified information from State Department offices.  Hillary Clinton found a way to remove classified information from State Department offices.  The essence of espionage is to get classified documents out of a Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility, a SCIF, and into the hands of “someone not authorized to receive them.”

 

Among those charged under the Espionage Act of 1917 were … READ ENTIRETY (Hillary and the Espionage Act of 1917; By Mark A. Hewitt; American Thinker; 3/4/16)

 

n3angus

May 17, 2016 at 8:50 AM

 

How the American People get left out of their Political Process and LOSE their Liberties: http://www.opensecrets.org/news/2016/05/hedge-fund-megadonors-capitalize-on-offshore-opportunities/

 

Hedge fund megadonors capitalize on offshore opportunities

 

On the list of the largest U.S. companies by market value, those in the $30 billion to $45 billion range are household names: Capital One Financial, DirecTV, Phillips 66, Yahoo.

 

But far fewer people know much, if anything, about Citadel Multi-Strategy Equities Master Fund Ltd., with a gross asset value of $33 billion, or Elliott International, L.P., at $30.8 billion, or AQR Style Premia Master Account, valued at $16.6 billion. All are hedge funds organized under the laws of the Cayman Islands.

 

They’re also just a handful of the funds under the control of some of the biggest political donors in the nation: Kenneth C. Griffin, Paul Singer and Cliff Asness.

 

…

 

(The fund once managed by George Soros, another major industry donor, is now a family office and has no SEC Form ADV on file.)

 

The release of the Panama Papers has brought fresh reminders of the stunning amount of wealth held offshore, but that’s a world these donors and their firms navigate routinely as part of a rarefied investment community far more wealthy and sophisticated than the market to which most people have access.

 

…

 

All told, the value of their 151 hedge funds is as high as $390 billion. Most of that is in the funds based overseas, mostly in the Cayman Islands. Of the 151 funds in the firms’ SEC reports, 67 are organized under the laws of the Caymans, where the firms manage some $282 billion in current asset value. About $103 billion of the wealth is held in Delaware-based hedge funds.

 

…

 

A quarter of the funds report greater than 50 percent ownership by non-U.S. investors (which could include offshore holding companies and other entities), and foreign investors own at least part of 41 percent of the funds. By far, most of the funds catering to these offshore entities are organized in the Cayman Islands.

 

In the presidential contest, hedge fund managers have played an enormous role in plumping up the coffers of several candidates’ super PACs. Sussman, for instance, who has given out more than $7 million this cycle in all, has contributed $4 million to Priorities USA Action, the group backing presumptive Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton. Sussman and Simons combined have given Priorities $16 million in the past two cycles. (Priorities supported President Barack Obama’s second campaign for the White House before it pivoted to Clinton.)

 

Mercer, who socked $13 million into Keep the Promise I, one of the super PACs supporting Sen. Ted Cruz‘s (R-Texas) recently … READ ENTIRETY (Hedge fund megadonors capitalize on offshore opportunities; By Will Tucker; OpenSecrets.org; 5/12/16)

 

_______________________

Edited by John R. Houk

Arbitrary title by the Editor.

 

Compiled by Tony Newbill

 

More Hillary/Bill Clinton Scandals


(Thanks to The Patriot Post – Support The Patriot Post)

Edited by John R. Houk

Posted January 21, 2016

Hillary Clinton is a crook. Her husband is a skirt chasing part time rapist who undoubtedly has his share of cover-ups that I can confidently say, “He’s crook too.” AND YET Dem-loving voters are still enamoured by Hillary Clinton even though she is a crook. Hillary, Slick Willy and the majority of Dems will say or tell you to prove she is a crook. Her history (and Bill’s) does not have any convictions; however, the length of investigations against Hillary has enough political clout to bury the evidence and successfully obfuscate investigators demonstrating that political power creates criminal Teflon.

With Hillary’s obvious to me criminality, I going to post some articles about Hillary that will crisscross often with Slick Willy’s own Teflon criminality.

JRH 1/21/16

Please Support NCCR

************************

Clinton emails may have been classified above top secret

By SARAH WESTWOOD

1/19/16 2:40 PM

Washington Examiner

Hillary Clinton’s private emails may have contained information classified above “top secret.”

A Jan. 14 letter from Charles McCullough, inspector general for the intelligence community, indicated “several dozen” private emails contained information ranging from “confidential” to “special access programs,” or SAP, a unique kind of intelligence that is considered more sensitive than top secret.

Access to SAP is highly restricted and fiercely protected by the intelligence community.

Officials from an unnamed intelligence agency must now work with the State Department to decide how the SAP emails will be handled in an open Freedom of Information Act lawsuit that will require State to publish all of Clinton’s emails by Jan. 29.

McCullough sent the letter to lawmakers last week after receiving a sworn declaration from intelligence officials involved in the process of screening emails for release through the high-profile FOIA case. One official told NBC News that McCullough and members of his staff had to receive a higher security clearance just to read the declaration given its high level of classification.

The discovery of such sensitive material on Clinton’s private server may heighten scrutiny in an already high-profile security probe of the personal network Clinton established while serving as secretary of state.

McCullough said his office’s recommendation to the State Department that the emails be handled on a secret-level server, given the presence of information classified at that level and above, “remains unresolved.”

While the letter was addressed to the chairmen of both the Senate Intelligence Committee and the Foreign Relations Committee, several other congressional committees received a copy, as did the State Department inspector general and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence.

++

Officials: Clinton e-mails contained info beyond top secret

America’s Newsroom – Fox News

Catherine Herridge reports from Washington, D.C.

Jan. 21, 2016 – 3:24 [minutes]

VIDEO Fox News

http://video.foxnews.com/v/embed.js?id=4715070584001&w=466&h=263Watch the latest video at video.foxnews.com
++

Rudy Giuliani: Hillary Can’t Avoid Indictment in Email Scandal

By Sandy Fitzgerald

20 Jan 2016 11:17 AM

Newsmax

VIDEO from Fox Friends [top of Newsmax Article]
http://video.foxnews.com/v/embed.js?id=4713296302001&w=466&h=263Watch the latest video at video.foxnews.com
Former New York City Mayor and U.S. Attorney Rudy Giuliani said Wednesday he doesn’t think there is any way Hillary Clinton should be able to avoid facing an indictment for the “secretive and highly classified” government information found on the private email server she used while secretary of state.

“[There are] 13 violations of federal law that she arguably committed,” Giuliani told Fox News’ “Fox & Friends” program. “This is about as clear as it gets. It is a crime to negligently handle top secret material.”

Giuliani said … READ THE REST

+++

Woman Steps Forward With Bombshell Claim: AFTER Clinton Raped Me He Had ‘The Audacity To…’

“I can’t take this.”

By Jack Davis

January 18, 2016 at 12:30pm

Western Journalism

A woman who has accused former President Bill Clinton of rape said Sunday night that Clinton was trying to strike up a date with her weeks after he had sexually assaulted her. She also described an interaction with Hillary Clinton that she interpreted meant Hillary Clinton knew about the incident and was covering it up.

Juanita Broaddrick, who said Clinton raped her in 1978, recounted the incident on Aaron Klein Investigative Radio. She has said that the rape took place in the spring of 1978, when she met him at a Little Rock, Ark., event while he was running for governor of Arkansas. She has gone public with her story again as Clinton has emerged to play a role in the campaign of his wife, Hillary Clinton, as she pursues the Democratic nomination for president.

On Sunday, she disclosed for the first time that after the rape, Bill Clinton called her to get together again.

“He called the nursing home that I owned and they patched the call through to my office and I didn’t know that it was him. And he immediately said, ‘Hi, this is Bill Clinton. I was just wondering when you were coming back to Little Rock again,’” she said.

“This just caught me so off guard. I had not expected anything like this at all. And I told him I would not be coming back to Little Rock again and definitely would not ever be seeing him again. And I hung up,” she said.

Apparently, Clinton did not give up. Broaddrick said Clinton placed several calls to her over the next six months, and that she had her staff field them and tell Clinton she was not available.

“I think he thought, well this is just a usual occurrence. I probably was with him and I am wondering whether I can get with this woman again. I was shocked to say the least that he would have the audacity to call me after what he did to me,” she said.

Klein said that two other women who have accused Clinton of sexual assault said they also continued to receive calls after their assaults.

Hillary Clinton’s role as an enabler of Bill Clinton’s behavior is an issue that has been raised by Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump. On that point, Broaddrick Sunday night recounted an interaction with Hillary Clinton that took place three weeks after the alleged sexual assault.

Broaddrick said Hillary Clinton approached her “and said, ‘It’s so nice to meet you’ and all of the niceties she was trying to say at the time. And said, ‘I just want you to know how much Bill and I appreciate the things you do for him.’ And I just stood there … . I was sort of you might say shell-shocked. “And she said, ‘Do you understand. Everything you do,’” Broaddrick said.

“She tried to take a hold of my hand and I left. I told the girls, ‘I can’t take this. I’m leaving.’ So I immediately left,” she said.

“What really went through my mind at that time is ‘She knows. She knew. She’s covering it up and she expects me to do the very same thing,’” Broaddrick said.

h/t: Breitbart

+++

LINDA TRIPP: I SAVED MONICA FROM BEING KILLED

Claims Bill Clinton ‘had thousands of women’

January 18, 2016

WND

Monica Lewinsky in the May 8, 2014, online issue of Vanity FairBill

Clinton’s affairs numbered in the “thousands,” and Hillary Clinton’s responsewas to “disseminate information and destroy the women with whom he dallied,” according to Linda Tripp, a key figure in the Monica Lewinsky scandal.

“Everyone knew within the West Wing, particularly those who spent years with him, of the thousands of women,” Tripp told Breitbart.com’s Aaron Klein in a an interview Sunday night on “Aaron Klein Investigative Radio.”

“But as to the hundreds or thousands, remember I worked closely with the closest aides to the president,” she said. “And it was a loosey-goosy environment so there was not a lot of holding back. So it was common knowledge, let’s put it this way, within the West Wing that he had this problem. It was further common knowledge that Hillary was aware of it.”

Listen to Linda Tripp’s interview with Aaron Klein:

Aaron Klein – Linda Trip Interview Parts 1-4

[Blog Editor: You will have to click above link to listen to the audio at WND]

Tripp, wkho secretly recorded telephone calls from Lewinsky regarding her meetings with Bill Clinton, said she knew of another White House staffer who was having an affair with Clinton.

Klein previously interviewed Juanita Broaddrick, who alleges she was raped by Clinton while he was attorney general in Arkansas.

Tripp cited some of the many Clinton scandals during the 1990s, “Filegate, Travelgate, Whitewater, Vince Foster,” noting the Clintons handled them all.

Hillary for prosecution, not president! Join the sizzling campaign to put Mrs. Clinton where she really belongs

“I watched a lying president and a lying first lady present falsehoods to the American people,” she said. “So my dismay predated the January 1998 period when the Monica Lewinsky scandal surfaced. To me it was very important that the American people see what I was seeing. My years with the Clintons were so disturbing on so many levels.”

She said Hillary Clinton “personally” targeted Bill’s women and accusers.

“In my case, for instance, right after the Lewinsky story broke, she was heard directing her staff to get anything and everything on Linda Tripp. So the defamation of character and the absolute assurance that my credibility would be destroyed began right away. And it happens with any woman who is involved in any way, either with him in a physical relationship or an assault or anything that can endanger their political viability,” she said in the interview.

When the Lewinsky escapade became public knowledge, she said she feared for her life and Lewinsky’s.

“I say today and I will continue to say that I believe Monica Lewinsky is alive today because of choices I made and action I took. That may sound melodramatic to your listeners. I can only say that from my perspective I believe that she and I at the time were in danger, because nothing stands in the way of these people achieving their political ends,” she said on the radio interview. “I think that had it not become public when it did, particularly in light of the Paula Jones lawsuit, which was coming to a head with President Clinton’s deposition, that we may well have met with an accident. It’s a situation where unless you lived it as I did you would have no real framework of … READ THE REST

+++

HERE THEY ARE: HILLARY’S 22 BIGGEST SCANDALS EVER

Does America really want ‘2 Clintons for price of 1’ back in White House?

05/18/2015 at 7:57 PM

WND

During his 1992 campaign for the presidency, Bill Clinton was fond of promising America, “You get two for the price of one,” indicating Hillary Clinton would act as his co-president.

But the nation got much more than it bargained for, as the top power couple brought a load of baggage with them into the White House from their days in Arkansas.

After the Clintons moved into the presidential mansion, the political scandals multiplied – from use of the IRS and FBI to target political opponents to stalking and harassing subjects of Bill Clinton’s sexual advances and even attempts to loot taxpayer-funded items from the White House. Americans also witnessed capers such as Travelgate, Chinagate, Filegate and Pardongate.

Bill Clinton’s sexual escapades and subsequent impeachment by the U.S. House of Representatives on charges of perjury and obstruction of justice consumed more than a year of American public life and bitterly divided the nation.

In the years since the memorable Clinton presidency, Hillary has brought America Emailgate and the Benghazi scandal, among others. New developments in the Clinton Foundation scandals emerges almost daily.

Now, it’s Hillary’s “turn” to be president, according to her Democrat supporters.

What do YOU think? Is Hillary fit to be president? Sound off in today’s WND poll!

But in 2015, America is still apparently suffering from “Clinton fatigue.” Results from a Quinnipiac poll published in April revealed between 49 and 56 percent of voters in three significant swing states – Colorado, Virginia and Iowa – believe Hillary is neither honest nor trustworthy.

…

Rubio told Fox News Sunday, “Unfortunately, both under her husband’s presidency, her time in the Department of State, her campaign for the president last time and even now, there seems to be this cloud of constant scandal and things that distract us from the core issues of the moment.”

Hillary’s “drama” could become a distraction, Rubio warned, at a time when the stakes are high for America in the 2016 election.

“I just think that at this hinge moment in our history, where we are asked to make a transition from the past into this new future, with all the challenges and the opportunities of our time that we really – the American people are not at a point now where they are going to be supportive of more drama surrounding the political process,” he said.

…

With Hillary making another run for president, don’t get caught up in the lies and spin! In “Hillary Unhinged: In Her Own Words,” find out who the true Hillary is with this raw and humorous collection of quotes that pitilessly underscores her hypocrisy

With the prospect of another “two-for-one” Clinton presidency looming, is America ready for a repeat of the Bill and Hillary “drama” in the White House?

If, as psychologists say, “The best predictor of future behavior is past behavior,” then a fresh look at the top 20 scandals involving Hillary is in order.

1) Clintons turn IRS into ‘gestapo’

Few federal agencies are more feared and loathed by Americans than the Internal Revenue Service – especially when corrupt presidents abuse the power of the IRS to harass and exact revenge on political enemies. As WND has reported, during Bill Clinton’s terms in office, IRS audits were conducted against individuals and groups who caused problems for the administration. Several prominent conservative groups found themselves facing IRS audits following their criticism of the president and his policies. Among the conservative groups targeted for audits were the Heritage Foundation, the National Rifle Association, Concerned Women of America, Citizens Against Government Waste, National Review, American Spectator (which was burglarized three times), the National Center for Public Policy Research, the American Policy Center, American Cause, Citizens for Honest Government, Progress and Freedom Foundation, David Horowitz’s Center for the Study of Popular Culture and the Western Journalism Center.

Individuals singled out for audits during the administration included Clinton paramours Gennifer Flowers and Liz Ward Gracen, sexual assault accusers Paula Jones and Juanita Broaddrick, fired White House Travel Office Director Billy Dale and attorney Kent Masterson Brown. Fox News’ Bill O’Reilly, an outspoken critic of both Bill and Hillary Clinton, said he was audited three times during the Clinton presidency.

A 1996 survey by the Washington Times could not identify a single liberal public policy organization that had been audited during the entire Clinton administration.

2) Covering Bill’s dirty deeds

The Clintons have been accused of hiring private investigators to not only dig up dirt on perceived adversaries – such as Juanita Broaddrick, the woman allegedly raped by Bill, and other abused women such as Gennifer Flowers, Kathleen Willey and Paula Jones – but to stalk, scare and threaten them. Willey asserts Hillary was behind a campaign of intimidation and harassment against her that fit a pattern employed against numerous other women whose claims of sexual impropriety or assault by Bill Clinton threatened the couple’s political fortunes.

As WND reported,Willey and her husband, Ed, were Democratic activists who founded Virginians for Clinton and helped send Bill and Hillary to the White House in 1992. While serving as a volunteer in the White House and facing financial hard times, Willey says she met with Bill Clinton in the Oval Office to request a paying position. But instead of getting help, she says, she was subjected to “nothing short of serious sexual harassment.” Distraught, Willey fled Clinton’s presence, only to discover that her husband Ed had committed suicide that same tragic afternoon. Later, she … READ ENTIRETY

__________________________

Clinton emails may have been classified above top secret

 

About Washington Examiner
__________________

Officials: Clinton e-mails contained info beyond top secret

 

Fox News On Air

____________________

Rudy Giuliani: Hillary Can’t Avoid Indictment in Email Scandal

 

NEWSMAX.COM America’s News Page © 2016 Newsmax Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved

___________________

Woman Steps Forward With Bombshell Claim: AFTER Clinton Raped Me He Had ‘The Audacity To…’

 

About Western Journalism

__________________

LINDA TRIPP: I SAVED MONICA FROM BEING KILLED

 

And

 

HERE THEY ARE: HILLARY’S 22 BIGGEST SCANDALS EVER

 

© Copyright 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved. WND.com.

Clinton’s Infamous Legacy


If you listened to Hillary Clinton’s testimony before the House Benghazi Committee last week you may have come away thinking that a calm Hillary, the Committee Dem Party members and the Left oriented Press put to bed that Hillary had done anything wrong. The reality is if you look at Hillary’s assertions and obfuscations then compare them to what the public has gained access as the truth, YOU then know the former Secretary of State and Dem Party POTUS candidate lied through her teeth about Benghazi.

Justin Smith lays it out for you!

JRH 10/25/15

Please Support NCCR

**********************

Clinton’s Infamous Legacy

In the Wake of Benghazi

By Justin O. Smith

Sent: 10/24/2015 1:45 PM

“Hillary Clinton is a congenital liar.” – Michael Ingmire, Foreign Service Officer Sean Smith’s uncle (October 22nd 2015)

The Benghazi Committee hearing on October 22, 2015 spotlighted former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s continued predilection to prevaricate and obfuscate and obstruct the truth on anything, especially regarding the attacks on the U.S. Consulate at Benghazi. Between Clinton’s lies and Obama’s facilitation of the cover-up and top Democrats’ willingness to place their imprimatur on gross negligence, incompetence and treason, Americans are still far away from receiving the full, unadulterated truth on this horrible and despicable episode of the Obama/Clinton Middle East Doctrine; however, from all the available evidence, Hillary Clinton is damned and unfit for any public office, much less the Office of the President.

Three years after the attacks on our U.S. Consulate and hundreds of FOIA requests later, Chairman Trey Gowdy (R-S.C.) has only just now (Oct 20th) received approximately 1400 pages of Ambassador Chris Stevens’ emails. These emails verify, among other things, Clinton knew for a fact and within minutes that a terror attack was unfolding, not a “spontaneous protest.” Also bearing witness against Clinton, over 600 emails from Ambassador Stevens requesting added security were ignored and supposedly never reached Clinton’s desk, according to Clinton’s own highly questionable testimony.

A good bit of acrimony arose during the hearing over the pertinence of Clinton’s email communications with Sydney Blumenthal, a longtime friend, employee and paid consultant for the Clinton Foundation, to which Rep. Trey Gowdy answered: “It’s relevant because our Ambassador [Stevens] was asked to read and respond to Sydney Blumenthal’s drivel. And yet, there was not a single response to Ambassador Stevens regarding his multiple requests for added security.”

However, when Huma Abedin emailed Clinton that the Libyan people were in dire need of food, milk, gasoline and diesel fuel, Clinton answered her within four minutes.

In incredibly ill-advised fashion, Clinton followed Blumenthal’s advice on Libya, even though he knew nothing about Libya. She did so for financial gain that Blumenthal suggested would arrive, if she helped retired Lt General Grange, the Osprey Group, a CIA agent and other partners gain entry into the Libyan economy; and, she did so in order to take credit for Blumenthal’s determination that the fall of Gaddafi would serve as a model for removing Middle Eastern dictators, blind to the bulwark that these Baathist dictators, like Sadam Hussein and Bashar Assad, provided secularists, Christians and other religious minorities against the islamofascists.

Even though Blumenthal had been refused a position at the State Department by Obama’s aides, his direct line to Hillary Clinton gave him an inordinate amount of influence that circumvented proper procedures for assessing “intelligence”, and this bled into President Obama’s policy decisions. Not only did Clinton strongly recommend military action in Libya to Obama, she also promoted regime change at NATO and played a key role in holding the entire coalition of Western nations together, according to one close advisor.

Significantly, it is apparent from emails sent to Clinton and three members of the Joint Chiefs of Staff on March 18, 2011 at 7:27 EST, that Saif Gaddafi, Muammar’s son, sought a face-to-face meeting or a Skype/teleconference in order to arrive at a peaceful solution. Clinton instructed Lt. Gen. Charles Jacoby, who was directing plans for the coalition and NATO, not to take any calls from Saif; the following day U.S. airstrikes began on Libya.

On March 11, 2011, the ‘Washington Post’ ran an op-ed by Clinton’s “old friend”, retired General Wesley Clark that warned against the Libyan intervention. Four days later, the ‘Ottawa Citizen‘ published [link] the Canadian report submitted to NATO that stated Gaddafi’s removal would create a long-term civil war, but Clinton ignored all warnings.

In the days that followed, Muammar Gaddafi was killed, and rather than a new democratic Libyan state led by “moderates”, a new Islamic hell-hole emerged. AFRICOM issued 4500 pages of intelligence between January 2012 and Sept 11, 2012 that described the increase in terrorist activity. A Defense Intelligence Agency report from August 2012 indicated that weapons from Libya’s military stockpile – rifles, RPGs, 125mm and 155mm howitzer ammo – were moving from the port of Benghazi to Banias and Borj Islam, Syria and into the hands of Salafists, the Muslim Brotherhood and AQI, the main forces behind the insurgency in Syria [Judicial Watch is a corroborating source of documentation].

In the District Court of Arizona on May 5th 2015, experienced CIA officer David Manners offered this sworn statement: “It was then, and remains now, my opinion that the United States did participate, directly or indirectly, in the supply of weapons to the Libyan Transitional National Council.” [Fox Business by Catherine Herridge]

Hillary Clinton’s State Dept. illegally armed the islamofascists of Libya and Syria (Fox News [Link and Link]), as shown in federal court documents from May 5th 2015, by awarding contracts approaching $300 million to defense contractors, like Marc Turi, in March 2011, for the purpose of arming the Libyan Transitional National Council and the Libyan rebels, who were not formally recognized at the time. This same action makes both Clinton and Pres. Obama culpable in the murders of Ambassador Chris Stevens, Sean Smith, Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty, since these same weapons were used by these same Libyan “rebels”/ islamofascists approximately eighteen months later: Both Clinton and Obama should be behind bars for treason.

Clinton stated this past Thursday – Oct. 22nd – that “there was no credible, actionable threat described to our compound and our diplomatic group”, which is inaccurate and simply false. On June 10th 2011, Clinton’s deputy chief of staff, Jake Sullivan, emailed information of a “credible threat … against the hotel that our [diplomatic] team is using.” Chris Stevens had also requested more security for this same hotel two months before the Sullivan communique.

Seven previous Congressional investigations have failed to interview a single person who was actually on the ground at Benghazi on September 11, 2012 — no Diplomatic Security Command Center personnel and no CIA agents or paid operatives. So, America has witnessed seven incomplete investigations, hindered by the Obama administration’s slow response to FOIA requests, which Chairman Gowdy hopes to rectify and complete through an additional twenty witnesses’ testimony.

“Ambassador Stevens, Foreign Service Officer Sean Smith, and former SEALs Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty served this country with honor. It is important to learn how these four men died … We owe them and ourselves the truth about Benghazi and Libya … There is no statute of limitations on the truth.” – Rep. Trey Gowdy

Questions linger, such as, what was happening in Libya that required a diplomatic presence despite the escalating violence?

Why were our military contractors and our diplomatic team left to defend themselves for approximately nine hours, when the 173rd Airborne Infantry was in Italy, only two hours away by C-130?

Obama and Hillary Clinton created the situation that has turned Libya and Syria into mass graves, claiming four of America’s finest early on. With characters devoid of honor and integrity, these two have left America with a memory of a despicable and treacherous act of terrorism, yet to see any retribution extracted. They leave a legacy of infamy and failure in the wake of Benghazi: A day of reckoning is certainly on its way for both, and Clinton’s reckoning should include prison, not the U.S. Presidency.

By Justin O. Smith

___________________________

Edited by John R. Houk

Text or links enclosed by brackets are by the Editor.

 

© Justin O. Smith

The Difference Between Lies and the Truth


Mark Alexander looks at the lies told by Hillary Clinton on the 10/13 CNN debate. Incidentally lies that Bernie Sanders says he is weary of listening to. Not because he has heard too many lies but implying Hillary’s lies are either the truth or not proven ergo irrelevant. Sanders was tired of hearing about those “damn” emails, as if the Hillary-email idiocy was a hoax. I guess if the Dems get away with this line reasoning, the Dem voters are as moronic as the Dem Party believes.

JRH 10/14/15

Please Support NCCR

********************

The Difference Between Lies and the Truth

By Mark Alexander

October 14, 2015

The Patriot Post

“[She] who permits [herself] to tell a lie once, finds it much easier to do it a second and a third time, till at length it becomes habitual; [she] tells lies without attending to it, and truths without the world’s believing [her]. This falsehood of the tongue leads to that of the heart, and in time depraves all its good disposition.” —Thomas Jefferson (1785)

Democrats Explained in Logos

Patriots, I am away this week with my hero — my father, who is critically ill. As always, our able editors remain on station!

Nate Jackson provided analysis of the few substantive remarks from the Demo-Debate Tuesday night, particularly assertions from Hillary Clinton regarding her email server subterfuge.

For more than a year, Clinton has endeavored to escape accountability for unlawfully maintaining all of her official communications outside of official networks when she was secretary of state. Clearly, this was an effort to protect her 2016 presidential bid from the plethora of nefarious activities reflected in those emails.

Unfortunately, careless remarks by House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy two weeks ago bolstered Clinton’s claims that the Benghazi investigation was just political. In fact, the business of that committee is deadly serious.

In the debate, Clinton claimed, “[The Benghazi] committee is basically an arm of the Republican National Committee. It is a partisan vehicle, as admitted by the House Republican majority leader, Mr. McCarthy, to drive down my poll numbers. Big surprise. And that’s what they have attempted to do.”

Further, regarding her electronic communication charade, Clinton insisted, “I’ve been as transparent as I know to be.” That vacuous remark is completely meaningless.

Her evasive efforts notwithstanding, there are two things that need to remain front and center about Clinton’s felonious email communications — and her subsequent cover-up efforts.

First, her emails show her complicity in formulating the political lie about the murder of our personnel in Benghazi — Christopher Stevens, his aide Sean Smith, and two diplomatic security officers, former Navy SEALs Glen Doherty and Tyrone Woods. Her Benghazi lie was an effort by Clinton and others in the State Department to provide Obama political cover for his “al-Qa’ida on the run” campaign theme just weeks ahead of the 2012 presidential election.

So determined was Clinton to propagate this lie that she shamefully stood in front of those four flag-draped caskets and declared to the families of the dead, “We’ve seen rage and violence directed at American embassies over an awful Internet video that we had nothing to do with.”

Second, despite Clinton’s claims, “I did not email any classified material to anyone” and “There is no classified material,” it is now apparent that hundreds and perhaps thousands of her unsecured email communications contained significant classified content. Transmitting that content is a felony.

But not only was her arrogant “above the law” use of unsecured email illegal, it was deadly dangerous because it exposed policy directives and the names of covert operatives. And only the most naïve Clintonista would insist that Russia and China did not have access to all of her unsecured communication.

Last weekend, Barack Obama declared, “I can tell you that [Clinton’s unsecured email server] is not a situation in which America’s national security was endangered.” His minions are now walking back that absurd assertion.

Fact is, the greatest threat to America’s national security has been, and remains, Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton.

In an address to the nation in 2010, Barack Obama declared, “The only people who don’t want to disclose the truth are people with something to hide.”

Obama and Clinton have avoided the truth as if their political lives depended on it — which of course, they do.

Share

Pro Deo et Constitutione — Libertas aut Mors
Semper Vigilans Fortis Paratus et Fidelis

*PUBLIUS*

__________________________

The Patriot Post is protected speech pursuant to the “unalienable rights” of all men, and the First (and Second) Amendment to the Constitution of the United States of America. In God we trust. Copyright © 2015 The Patriot Post. All Rights Reserved.

 

REPRINTING, FORWARDING AND POSTING: Subscribers may reprint, forward or post original content from The Patriot Post, in whole or part, in accordance with our Terms of Use, with the following citation: “The Patriot Post (http://patriotpost.us/subscribe/)”

 

Defend Liberty! – Support The Patriot Post

Hillary Clinton’s Record of Malfeasance


Reputable journalist Mark Alexander exposes Hillary Clinton’s nefarious involvements that have a lot of smoke. Normally where there is smoke there is fire; however in Bill and Hillary’s smoke, the fire always seems to disappear. Indeed, Alexander ends quite a few paragraphs with the question, “Sound familiar?”

JRH 8/27/15

Please Support NCCR

**************************

Hillary Clinton’s Record of Malfeasance

From Little Rock to Chappaqua — Will Any Scandal Stick?

By Mark Alexander

August 26, 2015

Email Alert Sent: 8/26/2015 1:21 PM

The Patriot Post

“[She] who permits [herself] to tell a lie once, finds it much easier to do it a second and a third time, till at length it becomes habitual; [she] tells lies without attending to it, and truths without the world’s believing [her]. This falsehood of the tongue leads to that of the heart, and in time depraves all its good disposition.” —Thomas Jefferson (1785)

Long before the Great Prevaricator Bill Clinton and his chief administrator Hillary duped their way to 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, their tenure in Arkansas was defined by relationships with radicals, real-estate shenanigans, drug dealing associates, Ponzi schemes and “lucky investment returns” such as Hillary’s one-in-31-trillion cattle futures profits. However, none of that corruption stuck to the Teflon couple.

What follows is a concise record of Hillary and Bill Clinton’s deceptions, obfuscations and subterfuges, from Little Rock to Chappaqua. Given that Hillary is (for the moment) the national frontrunner for the 2016 Democrat presidential nomination, I’ve compiled some of the more ignoble examples of her abject corruption from the Clintons’ White House “co-presidency” years (recall that Bill promised “You get two for the price of one”) — and the years since. (For a complete chronological listing of our Clinton campaign coverage, check out the Clinton tags.) But don’t delay — the terminus of Hillary’s political aspirations may come sooner than she expected — if her email server lies results in felony indictments.

If I had to choose just one quote that best defines the Clintons’ philosophy on governing, it would be these recent words from Hillary: “I don’t believe you change hearts. I believe you change laws, you change allocation of resources, you change the way systems operate.” This is the re-warmed doctrine of Karl Marx and the mantra of today’s Democratic Party statists.

1993: After the suicide of Hillary’s longtime friend and White House counsel Vince Foster, files “disappear” from his office, impeding the investigation into his death — files that would most assuredly have shown the Clintons’ fingerprints to be on various nefarious enterprises. (Sound familiar?)

1993-94: The Clintons’ White House “security director,” Craig Livingstone, a former bar bouncer and Clinton political hack, is caught with more than 900 classified FBI background files that he’d requested on leading Republicans from the Reagan and Bush administrations. Hillary lied in her testimony about the files.

1993-96: Hillary convenes illegal secret panels to create a socialized health care plan, which was exposed by Republican House investigators and subsequently went down in flames. Her ClintonCare proposal was thus shelved until Barack Obama became president, but she is without question the grande dame of what eventually became ObamaCare.

1993-97: The Clintons turn the IRS into their personal attack dog, and the agency went after every major conservative group in the nation, including The Heritage Foundation, the National Rifle Association, Concerned Women of America, the National Center for Public Policy Research, the American Policy Center, American Cause, Citizens for Honest Government, Progress and Freedom Foundation, and Citizens Against Government Waste. Not even conservative publications such as National Review and American Spectator were spared. In 1996, The Washington Times researched the targeting of these organizations and could not identify a single liberal advocacy organization that had been audited during Bill’s first term. (Sound familiar?)

1994: Hillary’s Rose Law Firm billing records related to the 1980s Whitewater Development bankruptcy mysteriously disappear — but then inexplicably reappear a year later after having been “scrubbed” of any incriminating evidence linking Hillary with key partners in that fraud. (Sound familiar?)

1995: Bill Clinton signs legislation making it easier for minority constituents with bad credit to obtain mortgages. His Treasury Secretary, Robert Rubin, rewrote the lending rules for the ill-conceived Community Reinvestment Act (which had been signed into law by none other than Jimmy Carter), opening the floodgates of Fannie Mae (Federal National Mortgage Association) and Freddie Mac (Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation) subprime loans. Clinton’s legislation applied affirmative action to the lending industry, sowing the seeds for the massive deflation of home prices and for the near-total collapse of the American financial markets 10 years later. Bill Clinton admitted in 2008, “I think the responsibility that the Democrats have may rest more in resisting any efforts by Republicans in the Congress … to put some standards and tighten up a little on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.” Indeed.

Democrat Rep. Artur Davis was a bit more direct: “Like a lot of my Democratic colleagues, I was too slow to appreciate the recklessness of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. In retrospect I should have heeded the [Republican] concerns in 2004. Frankly I wish my Democratic colleagues would admit that, when it comes to Fannie and Freddie, we were wrong.”

1995-96: Hillary confidant John Huang is appointed to the DNC and raised large illegal donations from foreign sources. (Sound familiar?) Charlie Trie also raised major illegal donations from foreign sources. His $450,000 contribution to Clinton’s legal defense fund was a pass-through from Asian special interests. According to Judicial Watch founder Larry Klayman, those interests included the Red Chinese government.

1996: The Clintons trade Commerce Department positions and Lincoln Bedroom lodging for big campaign donations. Then-Vice President Al Gore repeatedly and infamously insisted, “There is no controlling legal authority,” after it was determined that the Clintons were operating a major fundraising call center in the White House.

1997: Six years into Bill Clinton’s tenure of national security malfeasance, one of Osama bin Laden’s well organized al-Qa’ida terrorist cells crafts a plan to settle into American suburbs and prepare a strike on our homeland. Four years had passed from the time of the first World Trade Center attack under Clinton’s watch until preparations began for the devastating attacks of September 11, 2001. In 1998, the Clinton administration refused an FBI field agent’s efforts to open a case file on Arab nationals who were, curiously, training to fly commercial aircraft, but not training for takeoffs or landings. The stated reason for the case file denial was to avoid the appearance of any presumption of an Islamic threat — precisely why, to this day, Democrats refuse to use the words “Islamic” and “terrorism” in the same context. During his eight years in office, Clinton had numerous opportunities to capture or kill bin Laden, but refused. Air Force Lt. Col. Robert Patterson, who carried the “nuclear football” codes for the Clinton administration, notes, “[W]e could have prevented the bombing of the U.S.S. Cole, we could have prevented 9/11 and we could have prevented the bombings of the embassies in Africa if President Clinton had taken one of these opportunities. … We had eight chances at least to either nab bin Laden or to kill him.” Michael Scheuer, former CIA chief of the team responsible for hunting bin Laden, confirmed that prior to 9/11 SpecOps had two opportunities when Osama was literally in their sights, but Clinton pulled the plug on both operations.

1998: Bill Clinton is impeached for perjury and obstruction of justice after falsely insisting he “did not have sexual relations” with a 22-year-old female White House intern. Hillary had established a long record of defending her husband against charges ranging from sexual impropriety to rape (in order to ensure her own political aspirations), including but not limited to charges brought by Juanita Broaddrick, Gennifer Flowers, Kathleen Willey and Paula Jones. Hillary perfected the practice of “blaming the victim,” and she insisted that the Monica Lewinsky sex scandal was fabricated by a “vast right-wing conspiracy that has been conspiring against my husband since the day he announced for president.”

Americans learned a lot about DNA evidence, and the Clintons should be credited with the popularity of all the cold case and forensic file TV shows that followed. We also learned that, unlike Richard Nixon, who had the decency to resign instead of putting the nation through an impeachment proceeding, the Clintons knew that Senate Democrats would never join with Republicans to achieve the two-thirds majority vote required to convict the Philanderer in Chief.

2000: Bill Clinton issues executive pardons to big donors and other convicted felons, some doing time related to Clinton scandals. Recall that among all those last-minute political pardons, one was for his former CIA director, John Deutch, who, it was discovered in 1996, stored classified documents on an unsecure laptop at his residence.

2001: According to Hillary, she and Bill depart the White House “dead broke” after vandalizing the executive residence before the Bush family arrived and loading up $190,000 in gifts and furnishings. However penniless (despite six-figure taxpayer-funded salaries and an $8 million book deal), they managed to buy a Chappaqua, New York, country house for $1.7 million in 1999 in order to establish residency for Hillary’s carpet-bagging Senate run in 2000. They also acquired a seven-bedroom house in DC for $2.85 million so Hillary would have a place to stay while the Senate was in session.

So, what are the two most notable lessons from the Clinton White House years?

First, never select an old establishment Republican like George Bush or Bob Dole to run against a young, charismatic narcissist. (Apparently Republicans forgot that lesson in both 2008 and 2012.)

Second, virtually nothing sticks to the Teflon Clintons. They have perfected the art of the BIG Lie and the basic tenets of obfuscation: Admit nothing, deny everything and make counter-allegations.

2001-2009: Bill and the then-junior senator from New York amass hundreds of millions of dollars in personal wealth from fees charged to those who were betting on Hillary’s political future. What she did not amass, however, is any record of accomplishment as a senator — no piece of legislation was advanced under her name.

2009: After Hillary’s unsuccessful 2008 presidential primary bid against Barack Obama, he hushes her up and keeps her close with an appointment as secretary of state, an office she held from 2009-2013. While Bill and their “family foundation” continued to amass millions in speaking fees and donations, Hillary compiled an even less impressive but much more lethal record as secretary of state than she had as a senator. She visited 112 countries, and, though she falsely claimed having been shot at by snipers in at least one of them, she can claim no treaty, no accord or even a meaningful summit success. Hillary does claim that she “restored America’s reputation,” but what she actually did was advance Obama’s failed foreign policies to the extent that America now suffers its weakest world standing since the Jimmy Carter era.

2012: Hillary crafts and propagates the Benghazi cover-up after the death of four Americans, including our ambassador to Libya. She lied about the attack, claiming it was inspired by an obscure Internet video rather than a well-planned and executed al-Qa’ida assault on the anniversary of 9/11. She did so to protect Obama’s 2012 election, thus ensuring her own 2016 ambitions. Recall that at that time Obama was continuously crowing about how al-Qa’ida was “on the run.” Given that his domestic economic and social policies had been an abject failure, all he had to frame his 2012 campaign upon were the patently false claims of victory in Iraq and the defeat of al-Qa’ida.

2014: While Hillary was secretary of state, the Bill, Hillary and Chelsea Clinton Foundation took in hundreds of millions of dollars from foreign governments, corporations and individuals, who were currying favor with Hillary as secretary of state and as a potential future president. Peter Schweizer’s book, “Clinton Cash,” provides a sobering outline of the abuse.

2015: In March, Hillary admits that she illegally maintained a “private email server” for official State Department communications — in violation of federal law, and had failed to acknowledge those records in congressional testimony regarding the Benghazi attack and cover-up. In April, Clinton officially announces her presidential candidacy. But Clinton’s self-spun web of lies about keeping her communications out of the public record may yet ensnare her, and end her 2016 presidential aspirations. It’s not likely that she’ll withdraw without a fight, but she is, clearly, in trouble. (Read our comprehensive account of Clinton’s email cover-up lies.)

Thus far, from Little Rock to Chappaqua, Hillary’s non-stick surface has proven effective at avoiding criminal charges. Indeed, she learned a lot from her slippery spouse. But she may have finally met her match in South Carolina Rep. Trey Gowdy, a former federal prosecutor who now heads the House Select Committee on Benghazi.

If he pins Clinton with felony charges related to her email server subterfuges, those charges will stick.

Indeed, it is now increasingly likely that Clinton, having deleted more than 30,000 emails from her communications server, will face criminal charges. Those charges range from perjury and felony possession and dissemination of classified documents to obstruction of justice. The latter could result in felony charges, as Clinton directed the erasure of all those emails even though she was fully aware that all documents pertaining to her tenure as secretary of state were subject to subpoena by the House Select Committee on Benghazi.

Though Clinton claimed, “I’ve never had a subpoena,” Rep. Gowdy corrected the record, noting, “[S]he was personally subpoenaed the moment the Benghazi Committee became aware of her exclusive use of personal email and a server, and that the State Department was not the custodian of her official record. For more than two years, Clinton never availed herself of the opportunity, even in response to a direct congressional inquiry, to inform the public of her unusual email arrangement designed to evade public transparency.”

In regard to felony possession and dissemination of classified documents, recall if you will the recent prosecution of Gen. David Petraeus, Obama’s former CIA director. Gen. Petraeus admitted to security violations after he inadvertently made classified material available to his biographer, with whom he was having an adulterous affair. Though that biographer, former Army Major Paula Broadwell, held security clearances and none of the classified material was compromised, it was still a serious breach of security protocols. Petraeus avoided a felony conviction by pleading guilty, and he was sentenced to two years’ probation and required to pay a $100,000 fine.

And regarding the statute pertaining to obstruction of justice, 18 U.S.C. § 1519, it specifies felony charges for anyone who “knowingly alters, destroys, mutilates, conceals, covers up, falsifies, or makes a false entry” in any official account or record “with the intent to impede, obstruct, or influence the investigation or proper administration of any matter.” Notably, it further specifies, “or in relation to or contemplation of any such matter or case,” which is precisely why Clinton maintained that private server.

That statute, part of the 2002 Sarbanes-Oxley Act, for which then-Senator Hillary Clinton voted “yes,” includes penalties of up to 20 years in prison.

Felony counts may be coming, despite her claims that “I did not email any classified material to anyone on my email,” and “There is no classified material,” now that another 300 emails have been recovered from “lost” State Department servers that appear to have classified content.

As for where the Benghazi investigation will lead, Clinton concludes, “We’ll see how this all plays out.”

Indeed we will… At present, the best evidence that felony charges will be filed is Obama’s pseudo-endorsement of Vice President Joe Biden’s presidential candidacy, by way of his spokesman Josh Earnest.

According to Earnest, “The president has indicated that his view that the decision that he made … to add Joe Biden to the ticket as his running mate was the smartest decision that he has ever made in politics. And I think that should give you some sense into the president’s view into the vice president’s aptitude for the top job.” Earnest added, “The vice president is somebody who has already run for president twice. So I think you could probably make the case that there is no one in American politics today who has a better understanding of exactly what is required to mount a successful national presidential campaign.”

While Earnest also expressed Obama’s “appreciation, respect and admiration” for Hillary Clinton, it’s hard to overestimate the importance of his statements on Biden in light of Hillary’s mounting troubles.

And that statement came a day after Biden met with Sen. Elizabeth “Honest Injun” Warren. No doubt that meeting was to reach an accord that he would serve one term with her as his veep, if she stayed out of the 2016 primary. Indeed, a Biden/Warren ticket would be far more competitive than either Clinton or Sanders at the top of a ticket.

Recall that in February, Biden advocated for an Obama third term: “I call it sticking with what works!” By “what works,” he must have meant duping voters in presidential campaigns, because in both the 2010 and 2014 midterm elections, Obama’s Democratic Party policies suffered resounding defeat. That notwithstanding, in July, Obama himself asserted: “I cannot run again. I actually think I’m a pretty good president. I think if I ran I could win. But I can’t.”

Make no mistake, a Biden/Warren ticket is a third Obama term!

And I noted that Bill Clinton was vacationing with the now-rich and famous Obamas at their exclusive Martha’s Vineyard in mid August. The White House press corps released photos of Bill and Barack golfing — which I’m sure Clinton hoped would be a subtle shot over Biden’s bow to keep clear of Hillary’s ‘16 campaign.

Or… perhaps he was cutting a deal for another executive pardon similar to the one he gave John Deutch in 2000, as noted above. However, in this case, it would be Hillary who was keeping classified documents on an unauthorized server in her home.

(For a complete chronological listing of our Clintons campaign coverage see the Clinton tags. For our comprehensive account of her email cover-up lies, click here.)

____________________

*PUBLIUS*

The Patriot Post is protected speech pursuant to the “unalienable rights” of all men, and the First (and Second) Amendment to the Constitution of the United States of America. In God we trust. Copyright © 2015 The Patriot Post. All Rights Reserved.

REPRINTING, FORWARDING AND POSTING: Subscribers may reprint, forward or post original content from The Patriot Post, in whole or part, in accordance with our Terms of Use, with the following citation: “The Patriot Post

(http://patriotpost.us/subscribe/)”

The Patriot Post
PO Box 507
Chattanooga, TN 37401

 

Donate to The Patriot Post

Intro: Jim Kouri Writing about Hillary


Editor John R. Houk

July 2, 2015

VIDEO: Carly Fiorina For President Video

I don’t know if I’m a Carly Fiorina supporter yet, but what I do know is I’m loving Ms. Fiorina’s castigation of the Benghazigate liar Hillary Clinton. Jim Kouri wrote a post yesterday about Fiorina’s criticism of candidate Hillary.

In reading Kouri’s article I discovered he also wrote a piece on Taya Kyle’s awesome criticism of Hillary’s aspiration on being a Liar-in-Chief successor to President Barack Hussein Obama.

JRH 7/2/15

Please Support NCCR

**************************

Carly Fiorina to GOP: Keep bashing Clinton over her Benghazi cover up

 

By Jim Kouri

July 1, 2015 5:52 PM MST

Examiner.com

The only female presidential candidate running for the GOP nomination, the former CEO of Hewlitt(sic)-Packard, Carly Fiorina told the nationally-syndicated radio host Hugh Hewitt on Tuesday that the GOP’s eventual nominee in 2016 should stop listening to commentators and drive home the facts regarding the deadly terror attack in Benghazi “over and over and over.”

Almost three years after the Sept. 11, 2012, massacre at a U.S. diplomatic mission in the large Libyan city, and government watchdogs, inspectors general and lawmakers in both houses of Congress are still trying to obtain documents from then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, the Department of State, the Obama White House and others in order to understand the “who, what, when, where, how, and why” of the slaughter.

For example, it was recently discovered that the one of the Clinton family “lackeys,” Sidney Blumenthal, was emailing then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton advice on diplomatic matters in Libya much earlier than she first claimed. Clinton had used him as a member of the staff from her and Bill Clinton’s charity, the Clinton Foundation. She used him even after the White House was on record blocking Blumenthal from becoming a part of her staff, according to emails released late Tuesday by the State Department.

Fiorina appearing with radio host Hugh Hewitt said that the Benghazi Islamist attack’s aftermath looked like a cover up was taking place especially with the emails between President Barack Obama and then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton having been extensively redacted.

The public-interest watchdog Judicial Watch reported this week that Mrs. Clinton and President Obama on the night of the Benghazi attack and murders were exchanging emails which had not been turned over to the Oversight Committee, and which have in fact been redacted.

“[I]t certainly appears that Mrs. Clinton and President Obama — Secretary of State Clinton and President Obama — knew immediately that these were terrorist attacks, that they had been preplanned, that this was not a casual demonstration. And yet, both of them… stood over coffins and told the American people for many weeks following that, that this was a demonstration, that we couldn’t have predicted this,” Fiorina told Hewitt.

Fiorina reminded the listening audience that Clinton angrily exclaimed during a congressional hearing, “What possible difference could it make why or how these Americans were murdered.” Fiorina said many thought in 2012 that the Benghazi tragedy and the cover up were going to derail the Obama campaign. “[I thought it would] be Obama’s great Achilles’ heel in the 2012 election. It turned out not to be the case,” she said.

Fiorina then placed the blame on the GOP’s 2012 candidate, Mitt Romney, for not pushing this case of an executive branch cover up. “Our nominee wouldn’t drive the point home, which is why no matter how bad Benghazi looks now, we’d better have a nominee next summer who will drive this point home over and over and over in the debates, because otherwise, I fear Mrs. Clinton will get away with Benghazi just as President Obama did,” Fiorina said.

+++

‘American Sniper’ widow Taya Kyle blasts Hillary Clinton’s leadership, morality

 

By Jim Kouri

June 29, 2015 11:23 AM MST

Examiner.com

The widow of the iconic the American warrior and subject of a blockbuster motion picture, Chris Kyle, unlike too many so-called conservative commentators, has been quite blunt in describing her thoughts and feelings about the media darling and presidential heir apparent, Hillary Clinton. For example, on a radio talk show appearance on Friday, Taya Kyle tore into Mrs. Clinton, especially about her role in the Benghazi massacre and her actions and statements in the aftermath of that Islamic terrorist attack, that displayed Clinton’s lack of leadership and her moral deficiency.

The visibly angry and disgusted wife of the man known as “American Sniper” blasted the former First Lady, U.S. Senator and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s inadequacies for the position of Commander in Chief, especially in light of her responses to the Benghazi attack. Mrs. Clinton — who, unlike Taya, is married to a draft-dodger — began her alleged cover up by first blaming an obscure anti-Muslim Internet video, but then admitted the attackers were Islamic terrorists days after just about everyone else in Washington, D.C., knew it was a planned terrorist ambush.

Born April 8, 1974, in Odessa, Texas, Christopher Scott Kyle signed up with the U.S. Navy soon after watching the events following two terrorist attacks on U.S. Embassies in 1998. A crack shot since a young boy he was quickly assigned to the Navy’s elite SEALs unit. As a Navy SEAL, Kyle served four one-year tours of duty in Iraq as a sniper and was credited with killing 160 enemy fighters thereby saving countless American lives. His own story, American Sniper, became a bestselling book that was turned into a big-budget Hollywood film by another American icon, Clint Eastwood.

Among terrorists and insurgents he was called “The Devil of Ramadi.” Al-Qaida in Iraq also placed a $20,000 bounty on his head. Kyle’s earned two Silver Stars and five Bronze Stars. His murder — by a former Marine whom he was attempting to help with his Post-Traumatic-Stress Disorder — drew an enormous outpouring of support, especially in Texas, where an estimated 7,000 people attended a public service for the late SEAL at Cowboys Stadium in Arlington. Sadly, President Barack Obama did not attend Kyle’s memorial.

During the Herald Radio interview on Friday, Taya Kyle discussed the subject of Benghazi and what she believes is a grand cover up. She told the listening audience she was “appalled that [Hillary] Clinton had the audacity to sit there and say, ‘Look people die in America every day, what’s the big deal.’ It’s almost like the real world doesn’t apply to her anymore, it doesn’t affect her, she doesn’t care.”

“The fact that we’re talking about Hillary Clinton doing anything, especially leading our country, is so frustrating to me, because of her lack of morality, because of her lack of concern and compassion… God forbid if she got elected [President of the United States],” said Taya. She also sounded disgusted that the U.S. government failed to send in help during the Benghazi attack. But to Mrs. Kyle’s sensibility the worst offense is Clinton’s handling of the situation. “Maybe [Hillary Clinton] has been in the system so long that she’s lost sight of it,” Taya said.

Taya Renae Kyle was born September 4, 1974, the same year as her beloved husband Kyle. She is now an author and veteran family activist. In the movie by Clinton Eastwood, she is portrayed by actress Sienna Miller. Kyle’s first book, “American Wife: A Memoir of Love, Service, Faith, and Renewal” is a bestseller.

______________________

Edited by John R. Houk

 

Carly Fiorina to GOP: Keep bashing Clinton over her Benghazi cover up

 

‘American Sniper’ widow Taya Kyle blasts Hillary Clinton’s leadership, morality

 

© 2006-2015 AXS Digital Group LLC d/b/a Examiner.com 

 

ABOUT Examiner.com

 

Launched in 2008, Examiner.com is a dynamic entertainment, news and lifestyle network that serves more than 20 million monthly readers across the U.S. and around the world.


Real People. Real Knowledge.

 

Examiner.com is fully powered by Examiners, thousands of writers who are self-motivated independent contributors. Each Examiner is able to express through words and photos a deep expertise in a topic. Their knowledge is enhanced by a viewpoint unique to their experiences and oftentimes, their location.

 

Ready? Here are the qualifications we expect of Examiners, and of you as … READ THE REST

 

About Jim Kouri

 

Jim Kouri, CPP, the fifth Vice President and Public Information Officer of the National Association of Chiefs of Police, has served on the National Drug Task Force and trained police and security officers throughout the country. Contact Jim. What others are saying about Jim Kouri: Semana.com picked up an article Jim wrote about the FARC guerrillas being charged with conspiracy.

What Kind of Idiots Vote for Hillary?


Hillary Clinton

John R. Houk

© April 15, 2015

 

Former Secretary of State and Dem candidate for President in the November 2016 election has repeatedly (along with her acolytes) justified her use of private email servers with: “… Because past State Department Secretaries used private servers ergo she did nothing wrong in doing so.” (A rough from memory paraphrased quote of Hillary and  

 

The reason this is important is due to a host of past scandals up to and including Clinton’s days as First Lady, her thoughts on the Benghazi massacre on September 11, 2012 and high probability of using her private servers for State Department sensitive work – some of which may have been classified.

 

Hillary’s Past Scandals

 

Both Slick Willie and Hillary have their scandal demons from the past. This post is not about Uncle Bill’s scandals though numerous with only one proven legally in which he skated away largely because Dem Party Senators refused to convict him after the House impeached him.

 

Hillary’s early scandals in which she has a direct link are often intertwined with her husband the former President. Nonetheless, even without the tarnish of any criminal convictions, Hillary undoubtedly had direct culpability with her husband Bill. Hillary and Bill have led a criminal Teflon life largely because evidence against has mysteriously disappeared, witnesses mysteriously changed testimony or just plain died under mysterious circumstances. The lack of convictions apparently is no ethical problem for Dems of either the Party elite or Party rack-and-file. Even with scandals both the President and Hillary have received favorable election results. In Hillary’s case she won a New York state Senate seat and finished behind Obama in the 2008 Dem nomination for President. In a side thought, voter favoritism is a demonstration of a lack ethics and intelligence especially among Dems but one has to include the large amount of gullible independent voters that join Dems.

 

Do you recall the slime that was Whitewater, in which the Clintons dissembled and lied while their former business partners went to jail?  Do you remember Mrs. Clinton earning $100,000 in profit in 1979 on a $1,000 investment over the course of only 9 months in volatile cattle futures, about which she knew nothing, thanks to help from a highly placed Tyson Foods connection?  Tyson profited handsomely in Arkansas, with state loans and appointments.  We are to believe that Clinton studied the Wall Street Journal to achieve a feat against which the odds were one in 250 million.  Do you recall the Rose Law Firm billing records that magically appeared in Mrs. Clinton’s White House office, years after they had been subpoenaed?  Or the death of Vince Foster under rather extraordinary and inexplicable circumstances, and the lies and cover-up that followed?  Do you recall that while testifying before congressional investigators as first lady, she answered “I don’t know” or “I don’t remember” 250 times?

 

Do you recall Travelgate, in which the Clintons destroyed reputations and careers to reward campaign donors?  What about the endless parade of women, long known to Mrs. Clinton and laughably passed off by her as “ministering” to a troubled young woman in the matter of Miss Lewinsky?  Nevertheless, when the truth came out, she was entirely happy to exploit the illusion of victimhood for her own martyrdom in the cause of political advancement.

 

Wherever Mrs. Clinton goes, destruction follows.  Of course, like the current president, nothing is ever her fault.  She knows nothing.  She is the innocent victim of all around her, endlessly bemoaning her fate as the victim of a vast right-wing conspiracy that somehow has directed the events of her life even before there was a vast right-wing conspiracy. (Hillary Clinton’s Legacy of Scandal; By Jeffrey T. Brown; American Thinker; 6/15/13)

 

Other sources: THE HILLARY CLINTON SCANDALS: VOLUME 1 and Reports: Clinton email practices violated clear State Dept. rules, Clinton’s own directives

 

Hillary Clinton’s Part in Benghazi Scandal

 

“Americans are divided down the middle, in a foul mood and think the country’s going to hell in a handbasket. Hillary’s greatest strength is her experience, but every one of her opponents will try to use that experience against her,” said Mr. Varoga. “The candidate who eventually wins in November 2016 will be the one who does the best job of showing that he or she has the experience to be steady and strong, but also has the temperament to take the country in a new direction.”

 

Indeed, many of the questions swirling around Mrs. Clinton arose from her four years as American’s top diplomat under President Obama.

 

She remains a key figure in the probe by the House Select Committee on Benghazi, which is investigating the 2012 terrorist attacks on a U.S. diplomatic compound in Libya that killed U.S. Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens and three other Americans.

 

The attacks, and the Obama administration’s response to them — including initially blaming them on a spontaneous riot over an anti-Islam YouTube video — left an indelible black mark on Mrs. Clinton’s record as secretary of state. She could be called to publicly testify before the Benghazi committee in the middle of the campaign and answer questions about her role in the episode, as well as her secretive handling of emails. (Clinton to face tough questions on Benghazi, email scandal with 2016 bid; By S.A. Miller; Washington Times; 4/12/15)

 

Hillary’s Private Email Server a Threat to National Security

 

Investor’s Business Daily published a long article on Tuesday night, collecting the opinions of current and former intelligence officials about the national security threat posed by Hillary Clinton’s private email server.

 

It feels like a floodgate bursting open.  These experts are absolutely beside themselves over Clinton’s irresponsible conduct as Secretary of State.  Former NSA officer John Schindler called it “a counterintelligence disaster of truly epic proportions.”

 

“She may have deleted 30,000 emails before turning her files over to the State Department,” observed former U.S. National Counterintelligence Executive Michelle Van Cleave, “but that doesn’t mean that the Russians and the Chinese don’t have them.”

 

…

 

“It’s a disaster for U.S. policy.  It’s a huge boon for the former KGB and the Iranians,” said a veteran intelligence officer who spoke to IBD anonymously.  The officer found Clinton’s claims that she never handled classified information through her private server laughable — “how the hell could she do her job without it?” (INTEL EXPERTS: HILLARY CLINTON’S EMAIL SERVER ‘A COUNTERINTELLIGENCE DISASTER OF TRULY EPIC PROPORTIONS’; By JOHN HAYWARD; Breitbart.com; 4/8/15)

 

Focusing on the Hillary email cover-up, does anyone realize that she broke government rules and thus against the law? In an investigation by Rep. Darrel Issa examining the Obama Administration usage of “personal email.” In that examination Rep. Issa sent a letter officially asking the Secretary of State Hillary asking if she conducted official business with a personal email account:

 

“Have you or any senior agency official ever used a personal email account to conduct official business?” Mr. Issa wrote to Mrs. Clinton. “If so, please identify the account used.”  (Hillary Clinton Was Asked About Email 2 Years Ago; By MICHAEL S. SCHMIDT; NY Times; 4/14/15)

 

That Issa letter was sent circa December 2012. Ironically this is around three months after the Benghazi massacre. The NY Times reports that Secretary of Hillary Clinton did not even respond to the official Issa letter! Hillary ended her position as Secretary of State on February 1, 2013. On March 27, 2013 the State Department responded to the official Issa query:

 

‘…all he got was a description of the department’s email policies. According to the letter, any employee using a personal account “should make it clear that his or her personal email is not being used for official business.”’ (Ibid.)

 

Can you say cover-up? Hot Air uses Politico data to demonstrate that Secretary Clinton was fully aware that using a private email server was a violation way back in 2005:

 

… Hillary Clinton’s tenure as secretary of state that appears to be at odds with her reliance on a private email for agency business, POLITICO has learned.

 

The policy, detailed in a manual for agency employees, adds clarity to an issue at the center of a growing controversy over Clinton’s reliance on a private email account. Aides to Clinton, as well as State Department officials, have suggested that she did nothing inappropriate because of fuzzy guidelines and lack of specific rules on when and how official documents had to be preserved during her years as secretary.

 

But the 2005 policy was described as one of several “clear cut” directives the agency’s own inspector general relied on to criticize the conduct of a U.S. ambassador who in 2012 was faulted for using email outside of the department’s official system.

 

“It is the Department’s general policy that normal day-to-day operations be conducted on an authorized [Automated Information System], which has the proper level of security control to provide nonrepudiation, authentication and encryption, to ensure confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the resident information,” the Department’s Foreign Affairs Manual states.

 

The Clintonista line, when it hasn’t been the utterly preposterous notion that Clinton is being extra-special transparent by hiding her e-mails in a private account, has relied on the idea that there was technically no prohibition on conducting business on an outside email account. This is almost equally preposterous, for reasons I laid out last night, but new reports from both Politico and Fox’s Catherine Herridge demolish it. Clinton herself told personnel to avoid personal email in 2011. You know, right before she canned an ambassador for doing it.

 

Fox News has exclusively obtained an internal 2011 State Department cable that shows Secretary of State Clinton’s office told employees not to use personal email for security reasons, while at the same time, HRC conducted all government business on a private account. Sent to Diplomatic and Consular Staff in June 2011, the unclassified cable, with Clinton’s electronic signature, makes clear to “avoid conducting official Department from your personal e-mail accounts” and … READ ENTIRETY (Reports: Clinton email practices violated clear State Dept. rules, Clinton’s own directives; By MARY KATHARINE HAM; Hot Air; 3/5/15)

 

I wonder how stupid America’s voters are if Hillary even wins a Democrat Party Primary?

 

JRH 4/15/15

Please Support SlantRight 2.0

******************************

Hillary Clinton Was Asked About Email 2 Years Ago

 

By MICHAEL S. SCHMIDT

APRIL 14, 2015

New York Times

 

WASHINGTON — Hillary Rodham Clinton was directly asked by congressional investigators in a December 2012 letter whether she had used a private email account while serving as secretary of state, according to letters obtained by The New York Times.

 

But Mrs. Clinton did not reply to the letter. And when the State Department answered in March 2013, nearly two months after she left office, it ignored the question and provided no response.

 

The query was posed to Mrs. Clinton in a Dec. 13, 2012, letter from Representative Darrell Issa, the Republican chairman of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform. Mr. Issa was leading an investigation into how the Obama administration handled its officials’ use of personal email.

 

“Have you or any senior agency official ever used a personal email account to conduct official business?” Mr. Issa wrote to Mrs. Clinton. “If so, please identify the account used.”

 

Mr. Issa also asked Mrs. Clinton, “Does the agency require employees to certify on a periodic basis or at the end of their employment with the agency they have turned over any communications involving official business that they have sent or received using nonofficial accounts?”

 

Mr. Issa’s letter also sought written documentation of the department’s policies for the use of personal email for government business. Mrs. Clinton left the State Department on Feb. 1, 2013, seven weeks after the letter was sent to her.

 

When Mr. Issa received a response from the State Department on March 27, all he got was a description of the department’s email policies. According to the letter, any employee using a personal account “should make it clear that his or her personal email is not being used for official business.”

 

Mrs. Clinton acknowledged last month that she had exclusively used a personal email account, which was housed on a server that had been specially set up for her, when she was secretary of state. She said that she used the private account for convenience purposes because she did not want to carry more than one electronic device. By using the private account, many of her emails were shielded from inquiries by Congress, the news media and government watchdogs.

 

The revelation has set off the first major test of her early presidential campaign, as she seeks to assure the public and the news media that she was not seeking to hide her correspondence.

 

A congressional official provided The Times with a copy of Mr. Issa’s letter and the response from the State Department on the condition of anonymity because the official did not want to jeopardize his access to such information.

 

A spokesman for the State Department declined on Tuesday to answer questions about why it had not addressed Mr. Issa’s question about whether Mrs. Clinton or senior officials used personal email accounts.

 

“The department responds to thousands of congressional inquiries and requests for information each year,” said the spokesman, Alec Gerlach. “In its March 2013 letter, the department responded to the House Oversight Committee’s inquiry into the department’s ‘policies and practices regarding the use of personal email and other forms of electronic communications’ with a letter that described those policies in detail.”

 

An aide to Mrs. Clinton said in a statement Tuesday that “her usage was widely known to the over 100 department and U.S. government colleagues she emailed, as her address was visible on every email she sent.”

 

Mr. Issa had sent letters to the State Department and other executive agencies after it was discovered that some administration and Environment Protection Agency officials had used private accounts to conduct government business.

 

In the State Department’s letter back to Mr. Issa, Thomas B. Gibbons, the acting assistant secretary for legislative affairs, described the department’s records management policies and guidelines.

 

He said “employees may use personal email on personal time for matters not directly related to official business, and any employee using personal email ‘should make it clear that his or her personal email is not being used for official business.’ ”

 

The State Department offered training on its record management programs to its employees, he said.

___________________________

What Kind of Idiots Vote for Hillary?

John R. Houk

© April 15, 2015

___________________________

Hillary Clinton Was Asked About Email 2 Years Ago

 

A version of this article appears in print on April 15, 2015, on page A15 of the New York edition with the headline: Mrs. Clinton Was Asked About Email 2 Years Ago. Order Reprints | Today’s Paper | Subscribe

 

© 2015 The New York Times Company

America Demands the Truth


Clinton on a C-17, with blackberry in hand

Clinton on a C-17, with blackberry in hand – Where’s the missing email?
 
So, is it credible that Hillary Clinton did not use her personal email server for government business? Is it not more plausible that the thousands of emails deleted from her servers had incriminating evidence of either scandalous decision making, illegal usage or both? Justin Smith lays out his position on Hillary’s non-government probably unsecured private email servers.
 
JRH 3/22/15

Please Support NCCR

***************************
America Demands the Truth
 
By Justin O. Smith
Sent: 3/21/2015 8:11 PM
 
Orchestrating lawless secrecy, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, prevaricator extraordinaire, broke U.S. law and compromised national security by diverting State Department records to Bill Clinton’s private and unsecured email server and by also exposing classified secrets to enemies of the United States. She didn’t want anyone in the government or the public to see her records, which she knew would contain damning evidence that would derail any successful run for the U.S. Presidency.
 
Although the Federal Records Act of 1950 makes it clear that all records received and generated by any employee of the federal government belong to the government, Hillary Clinton and her aides decided not to preserve her emails on State Department servers, during her four years as Secretary of State. They also performed their own review of these emails, in order to determine which ones to return and which ones to destroy, turning the law on its head and illegally destroying 33,000 emails.
 
“I can recall no instance in my time at the National Archives when a high-ranking official at an executive branch solely used a personal email account for the transaction of government business,” observed Jason Baron, a former National Archives director of litigation (2000 – 2013).
 
On March 3rd, Judge Andrew Napolitano asserted that Clinton committed a felony by using her personal email address, which essentially concealed the government documents she generated from the U.S. government. This is an offense punishable by three years in prison and permanent disqualification from holding office. And holding classified secrets in a non-secure facility outside the government’s control is punishable by a large fine and a year in jail.
 
Since the story broke (NYT) on March 2nd, Clinton has argued that she turned over all the proper documents, but she just did it two years after leaving office; however, the State Dept. Records Management Handbook explains that officials who fail to turn over documents can face “fines, imprisonment or both for the willful and unlawful removal or destruction of records as stated in the U.S. Criminal Code.”
 
DOJ attorney Shannen Coffin told viewers on the Kelly File, “State Department regulations also say that departing officials have to make sure that all their official records are in the files of the Dept. of State upon departure. That couldn’t be any clearer.”
 
Will the Obama administration’s Dept. of Justice prosecute Clinton for keeping four years of classified records on her non-secure server after she left office, just as Eric Holder prosecuted Gen. David Petraeus, who kept 15 months of classified records in his home in a desk after he left office?
 
Michael Steel, spokesman for Speaker Boehner, noted that Hillary Clinton didn’t hand over 55,000 emails “out of the goodness of her heart” last year. Steel recently stated, “She was forced to by smart, determined and effective oversight … The American people deserve the truth.”
 
The existence of Clinton’s personal email account was discovered by the House Select Committee on Benghazi, as it investigated the attack on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi and sought correspondence between Clinton and her aides about the attack. Clinton’s correspondence could provide pivotal clues concerning the terrorist attacks and the following days, whether Clinton wants it to or not.
 
A review of approximately 300 emails in February made Rep. Trey Gowdy realize that the State Dept. records were seriously incomplete. He explained to Chris Wallace (Fox News) that “huge gaps” existed in Clinton’s email records, and this was debilitating the House Select Committee’s efforts to get to the bottom of the attacks on the U.S. Consulate at Benghazi.
 
These huge gaps became apparent in light of the photograph ofHillary Clinton Changes Twitter Photo That Got Second Life in E-mail Controversy 2 toon Clinton on a C-17, with blackberry in hand, [Hillary Clinton still hasn’t handed over any email records from day famous photo of her on Blackberry was taken: lawmaker] and on her way to Libya to discuss Libyan policy. There are not any emails for several weeks on either side of that trip, including the trip itself, according to Rep. Gowdy.
 
Can anyone actually believe that such a trip wouldn’t have generated a single document?
 
It is also of the utmost importance to find any existing emails between Hillary Clinton and Huma Abedin, her top aide and confidant, since it has long been known that Abedin’s family is closely associated with the Muslim Brotherhood and Al Qaeda. Huma’s mother, Dr. Saleha Abedin, still edits the Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs, which was founded by an associate of Osama bin Laden’s, Abdullah Omar Naseef, who was the secretary of the Muslim World League, a front for financing terrorism. Huma worked for JMMA from 1996 to 2008.
 
How did Huma Abedin [See HERE and HERE] receive a security clearance to work at the State Dept., which allowed her access to top-secret documents?
 
The Abedins were deeply involved in plans to use the Muslim Minority Affairs to create a fiery cauldron of Islamic revolution, and it was while Huma Abedin was advising Hillary that the State Dept. dropped its “terrorist” designator for the Muslim Brotherhood and its policy of refusing to deal with the Muslim Brotherhood. One must wonder how many top-secret files Huma Abedin transferred to various Islamic nations, not necessarily our friends, such as Qatar, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates.
 
Clinton’s top two aides, Huma Abedin and Cheryl Mills, used personal emails while working for Clinton at the State Dept. Were they all transmitting sensitive, classified State Dept. information and information about Benghazi on their personal emails?
 
The foreign policy implications surrounding former Sec. of State Clinton’s emails are significant, especially once one reviews El-Mogaz News reports (Aug 2014) that Nagla Mahmoud [See HERE and HERE], wife of ousted Egyptian President Morsi, was “threatening to expose the special relationship between her husband and Hillary Clinton,” through letters in her possession. One email sent to Clinton, by former Clinton White House staffer Sidney Blumenthal, quotes an intelligence source asserting that the attack on the U.S. Consulate at Benghazi was funded by “wealthy Sunni Islamists in Saudi Arabia.” [See HERE]
 
On March 20th, Chairman Trey Gowdy gave Hillary Clinton until April 3rd to respond to the following formal request in a letter to her lawyer, David Kendall, or face a subpoena: “I am asking Secretary Clinton to relinquish her server to a neutral, detached and independent third-party, such as the Inspector General for the State Department, for review and independent accounting of any records contained on the server ….”
 
America demands answers for the families of the four brave Americans who perished horribly in the attacks in Benghazi. They deserve the truth surrounding the decision to leave them to die, and the answers must be mercilessly retrieved from Clinton’s emails by Congress, the independent third-party and a Special Prosecutor. Other truths are certain to come to light concerning the ObamaObanded Benghazi Victims administration’s numerous Middle East policy failures. But the terrible images of our fallen Americans, unnecessary deaths, remain fresh, and Obama and Clinton must be held accountable for this one betrayal and act of treason, if nothing else: America demands the truth.
 
By Justin O. Smith
____________________________
Edited by John R. Houk
Links and text enclosed by brackets are by the Editor.
 
© Justin O. Smith

Video Thoughts on Hillary’s Emailgate


Hillary Clinton emailgate schmoozing


Tony Newbill found two Youtube videos that exposes the nefariousness of Hillary Clinton’s Emailgate. This was originally placed as a comment to the post “SlantRight 2.0: Benghazigate, Gowdy, Hillary and Obama”.
 
JRH 3/13/15

Please Support NCCR

***********************
Video Thoughts on Hillary’s Emailgate
tony newbill
3/12/15 10:04 AM
 
Oh these are REALLY GOOD on Hilary:
 
VIDEO: Hillary’s Email Evolution
 
Published by StopHillary PAC
Published on Mar 10, 2015
 
Watch Hillary Clinton’s email lies unravel. #MISSING
fb.com/stophillarypac | www.stophillarypac.org
 
VIDEO: Chris Wallace GRILLS Lanny Davis Over Clinton Emails on Fox News Sunday
 
 
Published by Les Grossman NEW OFFICIAL CHANNEL
Published on Mar 8, 2015
 
Chris Wallace GRILLS Lanny Davis Over Clinton Emails on Fox News Sunday Fox News Sunday host Chris Wallace conducted a borderline-contemptuous interview Sunday morning with longtime Clinton defender Lanny Davis, who probably has his own office at Fox News by now. Davis has defended Hillary Clinton’s use of a personal email account as Secretary of State as not only not illegal but not wrong. Lanny Davis said that Clinton’s use of personal emails was in line with the behavior of previous Secretaries of State, to which Wallace responded that the rules for archiving electronic correspondence had changed before Clinton’s tenure. (There’s widespread confusion on this matter, as Mediaite covered here.) “You, Chris Wallace, might have a subjective view of what might have happened — I hear the word ‘may’ — I’m talking about what is the case,” Davis said. “The fact is, nobody says it’s illegal. She’s turned over all of her emails — the first secretary of state to do that. And going forward, they’re available for access.”
Things became particularly heated when Davis brought up a “double standard” over Florida Governor Jeb Bush. “I’ve heard you play this Jeb Bush game before,” Wallace said. “It’s like the Republicans during Watergate saying, ‘Well, Lyndon Johnson wiretapped people, too.’ It’s completely irrelevant. Let’s not play that game.”
Wallace also lost it when Davis seemed to congratulate Clinton for the “unprecedented move” of volunteering her emails. “She did volunteer to release all of those emails,” Davis said. “She’s the only secretary to openly ask the public to look at all those emails and wants them published right now.”
“She didn’t volunteer!” Wallace objected. “She had to negotiate for four months with the State Department lawyers before she turned them over.”
Finally: “Do you ever get tired of cleaning up after the Clintons?” Wallace asked.
Davis naturally didn’t think of it as “cleaning up” and said he was proud to work with the Clintons. “There have been mistakes, but the last time you got very heated about the Clintons was Whitewater,” Davis said, though Wallace denied having covered Whitewater. “This is another bogus ‘scandal.’”
“Bill Clinton left with a 65% approval rating,” Davis continued. “Hillary Clinton today is the most popular politician in the country. And you’re discussing a non-scandal…It’s all politics.”
Watch the clip below, via Fox News: http://www.mediaite.com/tv/foxs-wallace-grills-lanny-davis-do-you-ever-get-tired-of-cleaning-up-after-the-clintons/ I’ll discuss the Clinton controversy, and what it could mean for her 2016 chances, exclusively with Lanny Davis Presumptive Democratic presidential front-runner Hillary Clinton is in the spotlight this week, after reports that she used a private email account during her time as Secretary of State. Critics say it’s a potential violation of federal law, and have raised questions over Clinton’s motives in keeping emails off of government servers. In her first response since the scandal broke, Clinton says she’s asked the State Department to make thousands of those personal emails public. Sunday We’ll discuss the Clinton controversy, and what it could mean for her 2016 chances, Chris Wallace spars with Lanny David. Presumptive Democratic presidential front-runner Hillary Clinton is in the spotlight this week, after reports that she used a private email account during her time as Secretary of State. Critics say it’s a potential violation of federal law, and have raised questions over Clinton’s motives in keeping emails off of government servers. In her first response since the scandal broke, Clinton says she’s asked the State Department to make thousands of those personal emails public.
 
_____________________________
Edited by John R. Houk
The Youtube description text was edited with spellcheck.
 

Benghazigate, Gowdy, Hillary and Obama


Gowdy vs Hillary

John R. Houk

© March 6, 2015

 

Rep. Trey Gowdy (SC-R) is the Chairman on the Select Committee on Benghazi (Benghazigate). In previous hearings in Congress I recall Gowdy reading the riot act to stupid answers and obvious answer obfuscations. So when Boehner FINALLY Ok’d a Special Investigation in an obvious Obama Administration cover-up, I was a bit excited. Of course the Dems and the Leftstream Media were extremely critical and whining that a Special Investigative Committee was even formed. SO you know there is something to hide when Obama acolytes start pitching their prevaricating two-cents.

 

The email below from Senator Ted Harvey which is leading the Stop Hillary PAC, he brings up the media vilification of Rep. Gowdy. AND that is the primary reason I am sharing this email. Another reason has to do with conducting private business on government emails and using private email servers apart from official secured emails that were hacked. The in-the-tank-Obama media is actually reporting on the scandalous and probably criminal usage and withholding of emails from Hillary Clinton’s private Internet servers.

 

Now I am reading of suspicions that the Obama White House is leaking about the private servers to derail a future presidential campaign:

 

Or to put the question another way, why did Hillary Clinton become the Obama administration’s bête noire this very week, the same one during which Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu pulled all of the world’s focus onto the issue of the administration’s negotiations with Iran?

 

The answer is because the two are related: This week’s tarring of Hillary Clinton is part of the White House’s political campaign to shut off debate about its hoped-for deal. It’s not hard to see why they’re anxious. With Netanyahu’s speech forcing lawmakers and editorial writers to face up to the proposed agreement’s manifest problems, the administration fears the prospect of Democrats jumping ship and signing on to Kirk-Menendez sanctions legislation that also would give Congress oversight on the deal. So far, the White House has managed to keep Democratic lawmakers in line, no matter how much they seem to question the wisdom of the proposed deal. Hillary Clinton, gearing up for a 2016 run in which she is likely to put some distance between herself and Obama’s dubious Middle East policies, is the one major national Democratic figure who can give Democrats in Congress cover.

 

… Secretary of State John Kerry, told reporters Thursday during a trip to Saudi Arabia that the State Department will move immediately to review the emails. … Nonetheless, Kerry warned, the process of sorting through and releasing Hillary Clinton’s personal and work-related emails will take time—presumably about the amount of time it will take to make sure the Iran deal gets through unobstructed. (Did the White House expose Hillary’s e-mails this week to protect their deal with Iran? By Allahpundit; HotAir.com; 3/6/15 1:21 pm)

 

More Obama throwing Hillary under the bus speculation:

 

… However, the scandal surrounding the former secretary of state’s use of a private, unsecured email account to conduct official business has only deepened. More importantly, signs exist that the Obama administration is trying to throw Hillary under the bus. Clinton is, of course, trying to return the favor.

 

Hillary Clinton has caused and weathered so many scandals before, ranging from Whitewater to Benghazi, that she evidently believes that Emailgate is just one more speed bump on her way to the Oval Office. One difference exists, however, between the current dust up and all the others. Hillary’s husband was president of the United States during most of the other scandals. The only reason she survived Benghazi is that it had to be swept under the rug to ensure Barack Obama’s reelection in 2012.

 

Now Clinton is in private life and the president of the United States, by all accounts, detests her and her husband. The White House is distancing itself from the former secretary of state, claiming that it just found out about her email practices along with everyone else. It does not pass the laugh test, but that is the official story. (Obama throwing Hillary Clinton under the bus over Emailgate; By Mark Whittington; Examiner.com; 3/5/15 10:17 AM MST)

 

 

Hillary-BHO insincere embrace toon

 

As wickedly Leftist that both Obama and Hillary are neither are stupid. I suspect if Obama is clandestinely throwing Hillary under the bus then I also suspect Hillary isn’t simply going to the middle of the street for the bus to run her over. Mr. and Mrs. Clinton have managed to dodge as many scandals as Obama if not even more. If you think the Clintons are merely lucky or actually clean from the multiple scandals you would be greatly mistaken. If Hillary goes down, you know she’ll pull Obama under the bus with her or even twist around to become Teflon like her hubby and still throw Obama under the bus.

 

As to the email below highlighting the obstructions and walls set up by Dems and the Leftstream media, Rep. Gowdy probably has his bestGowdy- Search Everywhere toon opportunity to crack Benghazigate open due to the dissension among the pack of Leftist hyenas.

 

Now allow me to warn you about this email. As informative as it is it appears to me that the Stop Hillary PAC feels the need to ramp-up some fund raising. Every single link in the email story itself collects your email and then sends you to a donation web page. On a personal level I would love to chip in some do to the worthy cause to derail Hillary; however I am one lonely blogger that can’t spare the extra dough at the moment. If you are in my boat you may wish to not click any of the ten links that eventually leads you to a donation page. BUT Senator Harvey’s message is very valid. Trust me, both the Obama acolytes and the Hillary acolytes do not want any success from the GOP managed House Select Committee on Benghazi. So if you don’t trust the Stop Hillary PAC, find a group – social or political – to either donate money or time in spreading the support for answers exposing the cover-up.

 

Trey Gowdy - Remember Benghazi

 

JRH 3/6/15

Please Support NCCR

****************************

Support Trey Gowdy

Emergency Update — Trey Gowdy 

 

By Senator Ted Harvey

Sent: 3/6/2015 11:57 AM

Sent by Stop Hillary PAC

 

You know House Republicans finally created a select committee to investigate the Benghazi attacks — and the deaths of four Americans.

South Carolina Republican Congressman Trey Gowdy is leading the investigation.

And he has come under tremendous attack from Hillary Clinton, her campaign apparatus, and the left wing elite media — he needs your immediate support.

That’s why I’m leading the charge to support Trey Gowdy. Will you please stop what you are doing right now, and pledge your support by signing your “Statement of Support for Congressman Trey Gowdy?”

 

You and I both know Congressman Gowdy has shown a talent for tough questioning of administration officials. The select committee under Trey Gowdy’s leadership was the first to discover Hillary’s use of her own hidden/personal email server.

It’s only taken Gowdy a few months to find what other investigations were unable to reveal after years of “oversight.” Perhaps, finally…Americans will find the truth out about the Benghazi attacks. That is…only if we can keep the committee doors open.

As you know, previous attempts to uncover the truth were met with stonewalling by Hillary Clinton and Obama administration apologists.

Make no mistake: this stonewalling has EVERYTHING to do with protecting Hillary Clinton’s chances of becoming President in 2016. You could hear the desperation in Hillary’s own voice when she shrilly yelled, “WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES IT MAKE!!!!” at an earlier fact-finding hearing.

When it comes to going after Bill and Hillary Clinton, you can never hope to defeat them in the news media — the elite media loves them. And the Clintons and their friends in the news media will do everything they can to discredit and Trey Gowdy and his Committee investigating Benghazi.

That’s why you and I — and the American people — must stand up and stand behind Trey Gowdy and the efforts of his committee.

Will you stand up for Congressman Gowdy by signing your “Statement of Support for Congressman Trey Gowdy?”

 

Clearly, Hillary Clinton and those surrounding her think the deaths of four brave Americans makes no difference. Clinton simply cannot be troubled with anything that might stain the red carpet that has been rolled out for her Presidential run by the liberal elite and their accomplices in the media.

John, now that Trey Gowdy’s Congressional fact-finding mission has begun to uncover the truth…Gowdy is under tremendous attack from Hillary and the Left, squarely in the crosshairs of the Clintons and their political war machine.

Gowdy needs your immediate support. Democrats are going all out to shut down the Benghazi hearings.

Let me explain:

 

ü  Democrat leaders in Congress are pressuring the House Administration Committee to tarnish the Benghazi panel’s credibility by questioning the committee’s spending in an effort to cripple and even SHUT DOWN Trey Gowdy’s Select Committee on Benghazi.

 

ü  In an attempt to prevent Hillary Clinton from testifying, ranking Democrat members of the panel sent Chairman Gowdy a blistering round of letters accusing him of showmanship and improper hearing procedures.

 

That’s why Stop Hillary PAC is leading the effort to build a grassroots army to defend and support Congressman Trey Gowdy’s efforts to uncover the truth.

This effort starts with your signed personalized “Statement of Support for Congressman Trey Gowdy.” Will you sign so that I can personally deliver your signature along with hundreds -of-thousands of others to Congressman Gowdy’s committee and let Congressman Gowdy know you have his back?

 

Remember, those that dared to uncover the truth about the Monica Lewinsky/Bill Clinton affair and Clinton’s lies under oath about it? The Clinton’s and their friends in the media methodically destroyed the careers and reputations of those that dared to lead the impeachment proceedings, including Congressman Bob Livingston, Bob Barr, Henry Hyde, Newt Gingrich, Helen Chenoweth, and Dan Burton.

Bottom line? If Americans want Congressman Gowdy to uncover the truth about Benghazi and Hillary’s role in it, Gowdy will need our support. So please, take just a second of your time to sign the “Statement of Support for Congressman Trey Gowdy.”

Here are just a few examples of the attacks on Trey Gowdy so far by the Clinton apologists:

 

ü  Gowdy is a lunatic: Left-wing publication Mother Jones has called Gowdy a lunatic because he is a “tea-party true believer.”

 

ü  Gowdy is politicizing Benghazi: Democrat Campaign chief, Congressman Steve Israel, and Nancy Pelosi are accusing Gowdy of politicizing Benghazi saying, “House Republicans are spending all their time trying to invent new ways to politicize the Benghazi tragedy.”

 

ü  Gowdy is stupid and confused: Ranking Democrat member Elijah Cummings believes Trey Gowdy is stupid and confused saying, “I do not understand what the House Republicans are doing on Benghazi, and apparently they don’t either.”

 

ü  Gowdy’s hair is unacceptable: MSNBC is attacking Gowdy’s hair. That’s right, far-left cable news outfit MSNBC is even attacking Gowdy’s hair — mocking his hair as “unkempt, multi-directional silver locks.”

 

These are just a few of the outrageous attacks Trey Gowdy is experiencing on a daily basis.

That’s why your personalized “Statement of Support for Congressman Trey Gowdy” is so important. Please click here immediately and let Congressman Gowdy know you have his back.

 

We need to let him know he has the support of Americans across the country and that we will have his back when faced with the mudslinging onslaught that is sure to come his way.

If Congressman Gowdy can finally uncover the truth, then, perhaps we can stop Hillary once and for all…because, she MUST BE STOPPED.

And in order to achieve that goal, WE NEED YOU ON OUR TEAM TODAY.

Here’s how you can help:

 

1.      First, go here and sign the “Statement of Support for Congressman Trey Gowdy.“ It’s important that Congressman Gowdy knows that we have his back.

 

2.      Tell your friends! Please forward this email to every friend or family member that agrees with you that we MUST stop Hillary tomorrow by supporting Congressman Trey Gowdy today. Also, post on facebook, twitter, and every other social media outlet to spread the word.

 

3.      Make a donation. We simply cannot achieve our goals without building a substantial war chest. Hillary and pro-Hillary PAC’s have already raised millions to propel her to office. We MUST match that dollar for dollar. So, please, make a donation today. If you can afford a donation of $50, $100, $250, $500 or more, I would encourage you to do so today. However, a smaller symbolic donation of $20.16 will go a long way in helping pay for our efforts.

 

[Reader]… the choice is clear. Do we want our next President to be a solid conservative Republican with a fresh and vibrant voice to lead our country? Or do we want the ultra-liberal, retread that is Hillary Clinton?

Please, don’t delay, join our team by signing the “Statement of Support for Congressman Trey Gowdy” and making a donation today.

For America!

 

Senator Ted Harvey

P.S. Trey Gowdy is our best hope to finally get the answers Americans deserve, but he needs our help now more than ever. Chip in just $5 (or more if you can afford it) so we’ll have the funds to support Gowdy and protect him from the Clinton media machine as he digs to clear the federal stonewall!

______________________________

Benghazigate, Gowdy, Hillary and Obama

John R. Houk

© March 6, 2015

__________________________

Support Trey Gowdy

 

Paid for by Stop Hillary PAC
Contributions from foreign nationals or entities are prohibited.
Contributions are not tax deductible for federal income tax purposes.
www.StopHillaryPAC.org

 

About StopHillaryPAC

 

Stop Hillary PAC was created for one reason: to ensure Hillary Clinton never becomes President of the United States.

 

The American way of life is under attack. Hillary Clinton is the liberal standard-bearer for the next generation of liberal creep on our Constitutional rights. Stop Hillary PAC is committed to saving America from this destructive far-left, liberal cancer that’s trying to move our country further to the left.

 

Hillary Clinton is one of the most powerful – and liberal – politicians today. She has staked out very liberal positions since her early days in Arkansas. While in the White House, Senate, and Obama administration, Hillary led the charge to transform America into a bastion of liberalism. Now, she has set her eyes on the presidency.

 

Today there is not a more powerful, well-connected politician in America than Hillary Clinton. As president, her power and liberal stances would threaten to do real harm to the American way of life.

 

Take a quick look at her record on these important issues:

 

·         Hillary voted for and supports huge budget deficits that are bankrupting America.

 

·         Hillary is anti-gun. She supports Bill Clinton’s gun ban legislation, banning assault weapons and creating a national gun registry.

 

·         Hillary supports amnesty for illegal immigrants

 

·         Hillary is at the center of the Benghazi disaster, the first killing of a US Ambassador in over 30 years – yet uttered the infamous words… “what difference does it make.”

 

·         Hillary’s career has been marked with scandals, from Whitewater to Benghazi.

 

·         Hillary has supported higher taxes on virtually every segment of society justifying them by saying, “We’re going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good.”

 

·         Hillary supports forcing workers to join unions as a condition of their employment.

 

·         Hillary supports late term and taxpayer funded abortions.

 

 

We could go on and on and on… the bottom line is America can’t survive more Obama-era radical liberal policies. Another four years a Clinton White House is simply an extension of Obama’s disastrous tenure.

 

Right now, wealthy progressives are raising millions of dollars for Hillary Clinton’s impending 2016 campaign. They want their liberal utopian vision to become an American reality.

 

That’s why we cannot sit idle.

 

We must stand together to stop Hillary Clinton right now. Because in 2016…it will be too late.

 

Click here to support Stop Hillary PAC today!

 

Click here to learn about the Stop Hillary PAC leadership team.