Wallace Life-Guards Biden with an Attempted Trump Muzzle


John R. Houk, Blog Editor

© September 30, 2020

I watched the Trump/Biden debate of 9/29/20. Admittedly I’m a Trump supporter because a Biden vote is a vote to transform America into a Marxist-Socialist do-what Big Bro government tells you to do or think  – or else – totalitarian dictatorship with a mirage of a Constitution.

So it didn’t matter to me who won that debate. Besides, I fully expected the Dem Party Propaganda Machine MSM to twist and spin the outcome to Biden’s favor even if Trump knocked the debate out of the park. AND egregiously Dems, way too many Republicans and definitely painted President Trump as an overaggressive bully.

HONESTLY if Trump bowed over to Wallace’s biased so-called moderating efforts, the President would have appeared as weak and evil as corrupt Quid Pro Joe Biden actually is. Even as the media/Dem consensus was and is to muzzle Trump, I was extremely pleased he vigorously interrupted Biden lies and Wallace rude life-guarding for the corrupt ex-Vice-President.

If you listen to the Trump detractors, you are under the process of being brainwashed to the Dem-Biden-Marxist transformed New World Order. Below is some perspective (and trust me, it’s only partial) showing Trump will not be a doormat for the coup-oriented Deep State liars.

JRH 9/30/20

Your generosity is always appreciated – various credit, check 

& debit cards are accepted by my PayPal account: 

Please Support NCCR

Or support by getting in the Coffee from home business – 

OR just buy some FEEL GOOD coffee, that includes immune boosting products.

******************************

Two crucial things emerged from the first presidential debate

 

By Andrea Widburg

September 30, 2020

American Thinker

The short version of the debate is that Biden did well if one ignored that almost every other statement he made was a lie or fantasy; Trump dominated him, almost too aggressively; and Chris Wallace may have been the worst and most obviously biased moderator since Candy Crowley.  Most significantly, though, Biden and Trump each made a critical point.  Biden’s was a tacit admission that if he is elected president, he will preside over the end of the filibuster, allowing Democrats to pack the courts and add two new Democrat-majority states.  Trump’s point was that he’s holding damning evidence about the Democrats’ coup attempt.

Let’s begin with Biden, whose squirming on court-packing and the filibuster promises the end of the American experiment.  Chris Wallace, in one of the few tough questions he posed to Biden, said this:

So my question to you is, you have refused in the past to talk about it, are you willing to tell the American tonight whether or not you will support either ending the filibuster or packing the court?

Biden refused to answer, something the Trump quickly challenged.  Here’s the colloquy:

BIDEN: Whatever position I take on that, that’ll become the issue. The issue is the American people should speak. You should go out and vote. You’re voting now. Vote and let your Senators know strongly how you feel.

TRUMP: Are you going to pack the court?

BIDEN: Vote now.

TRUMP: Are you going to pack the court?

BIDEN: Make sure you, in fact, let people know, your Senators.

TRUMP: He doesn’t want to answer the question.

BIDEN: I’m not going to answer the question.

TRUMP: Why wouldn’t you answer that question? You want to put a lot of new Supreme Court Justices. Radical left.

BIDEN: Will you shut up, man?

TRUMP: Listen, who is on your list, Joe? Who’s on your list?

WALLACE: Gentlemen, I think we’ve ended this —

BIDEN: This is so un-Presidential.

TRUMP: He’s going to pack the court. He is not going to give a list.

You can see that Biden made a nonsense statement to avoid answering whether he will preserve the filibuster and the Supreme Court’s current system of nine justices.  Shamefully, Wallace let him get away with not answering.  Wallace surely understands that Biden’s handlers plan to end the filibuster so they can pack the court and add D.C. and Puerto Rico as states.

Packing the court ends the American experiment as we know it.  It means that the Supreme Court will be a political body that will exist solely to put its imprimatur on Democrat policies.  And for those who say, “Well, if they pack the Court, then Republicans will pack it more when they’re in power,” that’s sadly foolish.

If Democrats pack the Court, there are no more Republicans.  The whole democratic republic will be over.  Once Democrats pack the Court, they never again need to persuade American voters to support their policies.  One of their first policies in that new era will be to add hard-left Washington, D.C. and Puerto Rico as the 51st and 52nd American states.  That means four more Democrat Senate votes and a permanent Democrat party majority.

You see, the hard-left Democrat party views our American political system the same way Turkey president Recep Tayyip Erdoğan viewed democracy before becoming a dictator for life: “Democracy is like a train.  We shall get out when we arrive at the station we want.”  This time around, once the Democrats win, they will change the rules so they can never lose again.

Heed this warning: if Biden wins, our constitutional America is gone.  We will be a socialist country.  If you don’t believe me, just read the Democrat platform.  They’re not hiding their goals.

Trump, though, might have some aces up his sleeve.  When the subject of a “transition” came up (based on Biden’s assumption that he will win), Trump stated that he’d been denied a transition period.  Instead, there was a coup attempt (emphasis mine):

There was no transition because they came after me trying to do a coup. They came after me spying on my campaign. They started from the day I won and even before I won. From the day I came down the escalator with our First Lady. They were a disaster. They were a disgrace to our country. And we’ve caught ’em.  We’ve caught ’em all.  We’ve got it all on tape.  We’ve caught ’em all.

Maybe Trump’s exaggerating, but I don’t think so.  And maybe he’s going to keep that evidence secret, but I don’t think that, either.

My guess is that this October, the Trump administration is going to release one piece of evidence after another showing that the Democrat party, from Hillary to Obama, and from the FBI to the CIA to the DOJ, and everywhere in between, engaged in a massive, seditious conspiracy to overturn the results of the 2016 election.  Indeed, the information cascade has already begun with the release of DNI John Ratcliffe’s letter about Hillary’s conceiving of the Russia hoax.

In sum, amid all the sound and fury of the debate, these two important points emerged:

(1) If he wins, Biden will almost certainly sign off on ending the filibuster to pack the courts and add two new states for a permanent Democrat majority that will leave the Constitution behind.

(2) Trump may have announced that he’s about to reveal that the Democrats, from Obama on down, engaged in a coup against an American president.

[Blog Editor: The American Thinker at this point provides a photo credit of which didn’t show up in my browser: “Image: First presidential debate.  YouTube screen grab.” Upon clicking the link, you will be directed to the Youtube version of C-SPAN debate coverage. Below is that C-SPAN video. There is roughly 27 minutes of C-SPAN intro coverage with the debate beginning about the 27:40 mark:

 

VIDEO: First 2020 Presidential Debate between Donald Trump and Joe Biden

Posted by C-SPAN

702K subscribers – Sep 29, 2020]

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Chris Wallace Faces Intense Backlash, Including From Colleagues, Over Bias During Debate

 

By Ryan Saavedra

Sep 29, 2020

The Daily Wire (H/T: Ann Corcoran at Frauds, Crooks and Criminals)

Chris Wallace – OLIVIER DOULIERY/POOL/AFP via Getty Images

Fox News host Chris Wallace, a registered Democrat, faced intense backlash on Tuesday night for what was widely deemed as bias in the debate in the favor of Democrat Joe Biden and against Republican President Donald Trump.

One of the issues that Wallace was called out for the most was how he appeared to let Biden interrupt Trump but would jump in to interrupt Trump when Trump would talk over Biden.

Fox News host Chris Wallace, a registered Democrat, faced intense backlash on Tuesday night for what was widely deemed as bias in the debate in the favor of Democrat Joe Biden and against Republican President Donald Trump.

One of the issues that Wallace was called out for the most was how he appeared to let Biden interrupt Trump but would jump in to interrupt Trump when Trump would talk over Biden.

Fox News host Brian Kilmeade even noted the discrepancy and called it out on social media, writing: “Why is @JoeBiden allowed to interrupt? @realDonaldTrump is not.”

Why is @JoeBiden allowed to interrupt? @realDonaldTrump is not

— Brian Kilmeade (@kilmeade) September 30, 2020

Fox News host Laura Ingraham made a similar point, writing: “Biden seems to interrupt with impunity.”

Biden seems to interrupt with impunity.

— Laura Ingraham (@IngrahamAngle) September 30, 2020

Fox News contributor Andy McCarthy wrote: “I love Chris Wallace, but he should get out of the way.”

I love Chris Wallace, but he should get out of the way.

— Andy McCarthy (@AndrewCMcCarthy) September 30, 2020

McCarthy added: “Biden doesn’t support the Green New Deal. Oh, Wallace got that out of him? No, Trump did. Oh, well, did Wallace clarify what’s parts of Green New Deal Biden is against? No, needed to move on …”

Biden doesn’t support the Green New Deal.

Oh, Wallace got that out of him?

No, Trump did.

Oh, well, did Wallace clarify what’s parts of Green New Deal Biden is against?

No, needed to move on …

Biden doesn’t support the Green New Deal.

Oh, Wallace got that out of him?

No, Trump did.

Oh, well, did Wallace clarify what’s parts of Green New Deal Biden is against?

No, needed to move on …

— Andy McCarthy (@AndrewCMcCarthy) September 30, 2020

McCarthy added: “Chris

— Andy McCarthy (@AndrewCMcCarthSeptember 30, 2020

McCarthy added: “Chris Wallace jumps in a second time when Biden having trouble with Trump’s questioning.”

Chris Wallace jumps in a second time when Biden having trouble with Trump’s questioning.

— Andy McCarthy (@AndrewCMcCarthy) September 30, 2020

Fox News host Greg Gutfeld said that it was “not good” when Wallace reportedly laughed with Biden.

That was not good

— GregGutfeld (@greggutfeld) September 30, 2020

Bill O’Reilly, who used to be a colleague of Wallace’s, wrote on Twitter: “Good line from Trump—he tells Chris Wallace he’s debating him, not Joe.”

Good line from Trump—he tells Chris Wallace he’s debating him, not Joe.

— Bill O’Reilly (@BillOReilly) September 30, 2020

O’Reilly added: “Chris Wallace doesn’t have the facts at his command about the Ukraine payments made to Biden’s son that Trump brought up. Big mistake by Mr. Wallace.”

Chris Wallace doesn’t have the facts at his command about the Ukraine payments made to Biden’s son that Trump brought up. Big mistake by Mr. Wallace.

— Bill O’Reilly (@BillOReilly) September 30, 2020

Attorney Harmeet Dhillon wrote on Twitter: “Chris Wallace is a disgrace. Republicans need to stop allowing the slanted media to have any role in debates in future years.”

Chris Wallace is a disgrace. Republicans need to stop allowing the slanted media to have any role in debates in future years.

— Harmeet K. Dhillon (@pnjaban) September 30, 2020

Actor James Woods wrote on Twitter: “Chris Wallace is shamelessly biased. It’s a beautiful demonstration of fake news in action. I’m actually glad it’s happening, because you can see it for yourself.”

Chris Wallace is shamelessly biased. It’s a beautiful demonstration of fake news in action. I’m actually glad it’s happening, because you can see it for yourself.

— James Woods (@RealJamesWoods) September 30, 2020

Journalist Yashar Ali, who was Hillary Clinton’s co-chair on her 2008 presidential campaign, wrote on Twitter that there was “no doubt” that “Wallace is not doing a good job  as a debate moderator.”

Question…Chris Wallace is not doing a good job as debate moderator…no doubt about that. But in terms of Trump’s repeated interrupting would another moderator have handled it better?

Without the ability to mute a microphone, what could another moderator have done?

— Yashar Ali 🐘 (@yashar) September 30, 2020

Newsweek editor Josh Hammer wrote on Twitter: “Just an inexcusable effort tonight from Chris Wallace. And I say that as someone who is generally a fan of his.”

Just an inexcusable effort tonight from Chris Wallace. And I say that as someone who is generally a fan of his.

— Josh Hammer (@josh_hammer) September 30, 2020

Federal co-founder Sean Davis wrote on Twitter: “Chris Wallace is now reading Biden’s energy plan back to him to remind Biden what’s in his plan. I have never, never seen anything like this from a moderator.”

Chris Wallace is now reading Biden’s energy plan back to him to remind Biden what’s in his plan.

I have never, never seen anything like this from a moderator.

— Sean Davis (@seanmdav) September 30, 2020

Davis added: “Chris Wallace is making very clear that his goal tonight is to run interference for Joe Biden. If he wants to be a deranged NeverTrumper, that’s his prerogative, but Wallace is doing everything in his power to tilt the election toward his preferred candidate. Everyone can see it.”

Chris Wallace is making very clear that his goal tonight is to run interference for Joe Biden. If he wants to be a deranged NeverTrumper, that’s his prerogative, but Wallace is doing everything in his power to tilt the election toward his preferred candidate. Everyone can see it.

— Sean Davis (@seanmdav) September 30, 2020

Ben Shapiro wrote on Twitter: “Chris Wallace, over the course of the night, has moved from moderator to debater.”

Chris Wallace, over the course of the night, has moved from moderator to debater.

— Ben Shapiro (@benshapiro) September 30, 2020

Conservative commentator Jesse Kelly wrote on Twitter: “Ok, I don’t generally nitpick moderators, but Chris Wallace asking Joe Biden about the ‘very fine people’ thing without bringing up that it’s a flat-out lie is an absolute embarrassment.”

Ok, I don’t generally nitpick moderators, but Chris Wallace asking Joe Biden about the “very fine people” thing without bringing up that it’s a flat-out lie is an absolute embarrassment.

— Jesse Kelly (@JesseKellyDC) September 30, 2020

Former Acting Director of National Intelligence Richard Grenell tweeted: “Chris Wallace is supposed to be invisible. He isn’t. He’s off to a terrible start.”

Chris Wallace is supposed to be invisible. He isn’t.

He’s off to a terrible start. @FoxNewsSunday

— Richard Grenell (@RichardGrenell) September 30, 2020

Grenell added: “Chris Wallace doesn’t interrupt Joe Biden.”

Chris Wallace doesn’t interrupt Joe Biden.

— Richard Grenell (@RichardGrenell) September 30, 2020

Commentator Candace Owens tweeted: “Unbelievable. Every person in America knows these riots are being orchestrated by black lives matter and Antifa. Chris Wallace asks the President to condemn white supremacists but did not think to ask Joe Biden to condemn Antifa or BLM.”

Unbelievable. Every person in America knows these riots are being orchestrated by black lives matter and Antifa.

Chris Wallace asks the President to condemn white supremacists but did not think to ask Joe Biden to condemn Antifa or BLM. #Debate2020 #PresidentialDebate2020

— Candace Owens (@RealCandaceO) September 30, 2020

RealClearInvestigations Senior Writer Mark Hemingway wrote: “Chris Wallace calling critical race theory ‘racial sensitivity training’ is totally ignorant of what’s being taught. It is racist and anti-American. Appalling.”

Chris Wallace calling critical race theory “racial sensitivity training” is totally ignorant of what’s being taught. It is racist and anti-American. Appalling.

— Mark Hemingway (@Heminator) September 30, 2020

Political commentator Harry Khachatrian tweeted: “Chris Wallace chuckling and joking with Biden during the debate, mid-question is grossly unprofessional conduct from a moderator.”

Chris Wallace chuckling and joking with Biden during the debate, mid-question is grossly unprofessional conduct from a moderator. #Debates2020

— Harry Khachatrian (@Harry1T6) September 30, 2020

Conservative commentator Ann Coulter wrote: “Every time Trump is nailing Biden, Chris Wallace interrupts. ‘That’s the next topic!’”

Every time Trump is nailing Biden, Chris Wallace interrupts. “That’s the next topic!”

— Ann Coulter (@AnnCoulter) September 30, 2020

MSNBC host Joe Scarborough wrote: “Where is Chris Wallace? This is a disgrace.”

Where is Chris Wallace? This is a disgrace.

— Joe Scarborough (@JoeNBC) September 30, 2020

Former White House doctor Ronny Jackson tweeted: “Fire Chris Wallace! He is an embarrassment to Fox News!!”

Fire Chris Wallace! He is an embarrassment to Fox News!!

— Ronny Jackson (@RonnyJackson4TX) September 30, 2020

Former CNN host Soledad O’Brien wrote: “Hellllo Chris Wallace??? Looking for a moderator here. Jesus Christ what a fricken mess.”

Hellllo Chris Wallace??? Looking for a moderator here. Jesus Christ what a fricken mess.

— Soledad O’Brien (@soledadobrien) September 30, 2020

Leftist Mikel Jollett wrote: “Dear Chris Wallace: You are a national embarrassment.”

Dear Chris Wallace:

You are a national embarrassment.

— Mikel Jollett (@Mikel_Jollett) September 30, 2020

Conservative Dana Loesch wrote on Twitter: “Never allow Chris Wallace to moderate another debate again. This was an absolute shit show. The viewer wasn’t even a secondary concern.”

Never allow Chris Wallace to moderate another debate again. This was an absolute shit show. The viewer wasn’t even a secondary concern.

— Dana Loesch (@DLoesch) September 30, 2020

Conservative commentator Kurt Schlichter wrote: “Everybody hates Chris Wallace, and no that’s not proof that he’s good. It’s proof that he sucks.”

Everybody hates Chris Wallace, and no that’s not proof that he’s good. It’s proof that he sucks.

— Kurt Schlichter (@KurtSchlichter) September 30, 2020

Daily Caller Editor in Chief Geoffrey Ingersoll wrote: “Chris Wallace calling critical race theory ‘racial sensitivity training’ is honestly f***ing sad. This s**t is not circa 1980s corporate hr seminars. Herding whites only into white privilege indoctrination is not ‘racial sensitivity.’ It’s racial insensitivity.”

Chris Wallace calling critical race theory “racial sensitivity training” is honestly fucking sad.

This shit is not circa 1980s corporate hr seminars.

Herding whites only into white privilege indoctrination is not “racial sensitivity.” It’s racial insensitivity.

— Geoffrey Ingersoll (@GPIngersoll) September 30, 2020

Conservative commentator Allie Beth Stuckey wrote on Twitter: “I generally like Chris Wallace. This is a HARD debate to moderate. But it’s just true that this debate is very clearly two against one.”

I generally like Chris Wallace. This is a HARD debate to moderate. But it’s just true that this debate is very clearly two against one.

— Allie Beth Stuckey (@conservmillen) September 30, 2020

Political strategist Chris Barron wrote on Twitter: “Biden/Wallace won the debate. Don’t try to spin me with some bs. Fox News just handed the most important debate in history to the left. And they did it on purpose. If you have one set of rules you enforce it on all participants. Chris Wallace failed miserably.”

Biden/Wallace won the debate. Don’t try to spin me with some bs. Fox News just handed the most important debate in history to the left. And they did it on purpose. If you have one set of rules you enforce it on all participants. Chris Wallace failed miserably.

— Chris Barron 🇺🇸 (@ChrisRBarron) September 30, 2020

The Reagan Battalion wrote: “Joe Biden better buy Chris Wallace a beer after he saved his a** so many times tonight.”

Joe Biden better buy Chris Wallace a beer after he saved his ass so many times tonight. pic.twitter.com/S8LtgMdbSs

— Reagan Battalion (@ReaganBattalion) September 30, 2020

National security expert David Reaboi wrote: “Every time Trump is landing blows, Wallace comes to shut it down.”

Every time Trump is landing blows, Wallace comes to shut it down.

— David Reaboi (@davereaboi) September 30, 2020

Radio host Hugh Hewitt wrote: “Strong, strong, strong answer by @realDonaldTrump interrupted by Wallace. ‘They were teaching people to hate our country and I’m not going to let that happen.’ Defining moment.”

Strong, strong, strong answer by @realDonaldTrump interrupted by Wallace. “They were teaching people to hate our country and I’m not going to let that happen.” Defining moment.

— Hugh Hewitt (@hughhewitt) September 30, 2020

 

This story has been updated to include additional reaction from pundits on Chris Wallace’s performance during the debate.

 

The Daily Wire is one of America’s fastest-growing conservative media companies and counter-cultural outlets for news, opinion, and entertainment. Get inside access to The Daily Wire by becoming a member.

___________________________

Wallace Life-Guards Biden with an Attempted Trump Muzzle

John R. Houk, Blog Editor

© September 30, 2020

_________________________

Two crucial things emerged from the first presidential debate

 

© American Thinker 2020

_________________________

Chris Wallace Faces Intense Backlash, Including From Colleagues, Over Bias During Debate

 

 © Copyright 2020, The Daily Wire

Dems/Never-Trumpers Caught Lying – AGAIN


Edited by John R. Houk

Posted November 18, 2019

 

There is a truism you can count on in this day and time: Dems Lie. If you support lying Dems that equates you to a liar. Never-Trumpers are like Dems ergo the same as liars.

 

Keep the truism in mind as The Gateway Pundit exposes Dems and Never-Trumpers as liars.

 

JRH 11/18/19

Your generosity is always appreciated: 

Please Support NCCR

Support this Blog HERE. Or support by getting in 

the Coffee from home business – OR just buy some healthy coffee.

 

Blog Editor: Rather than capitulate to Facebook censorship by abandoning the platform, I choose to post and share until the Leftist censors ban me. Recently, the Facebook censorship tactic I’ve experienced is a couple of Group shares then jailed under the false accusation of posting too fast. So I ask those that read this, to combat censorship by sharing blog and Facebook posts with your friends or Groups you belong to.

 

I got this message from Fascistbook (11/13/19):

 

“You’re temporarily restricted from joining and posting to groups until November 20 at 7:05 PM.” So PLEASE SHARE. My Conservative voice is currently in a restricted Facebook jail.

***************************

BREAKING: Schiff Finally Releases Tim Morrison Testimony — NSC Sr. Director BLOWS UP Ukrainian Hoax — Destroys Schiff Top Witness Lt. Col. Vindman

 

By Jim Hoft

November 17, 2019

The Gateway Pundit

 

The NSC Senior Director for European Affairs testified before the Schiff secret star chamber in October.

 

The transcript of his testimony was released this weekend.

 

Morrison’s testimony COMPLETELY DESTROYED the Democrat’s latest attempt to remove President Trump from office.

 

Worse yet, Morrison’s testimony OBLITERATES Adam Schiff’s chief witness, and reported second whistleblower, Lt. Col. Vindman who is unreliable and reports to Morrison.

 

Tim Morrison

 

Morrison, who was on the July 25 Trump-Zelensky call testified in Schiff’s secret basement star chamber that nothing illegal was discussed on the Trump-Zelensky phone call.

 

This is why Schiff held his secret hearings behind closed doors in a basement.

 

Schiff doesn’t want the American public to know that President Trump’s phone call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky was completely above board.

 

Here are the key points to Tim Morrison’s testimony.

 

  1. Mr. Morrison did not believe anything improper occurred on the July 25 call. (p. 60)

 

  1. Mr. Morrison testified that the memorandum of conversation (a phrase used to describe the call transcript) of the July 25 call was complete and accurate. (p. 60)

 

  1. Mr. Morrison, who listened to the July 25 call, testified that he was not concerned about the substance of what was discussed on the call – only that the transcript might leak. (p. 46-47)

 

  1. Mr. Morrison was told by National Security Council lawyer John Eisenberg that the July 25 call record mistakenly ended up on the highly classified system, debunking the Democrats’ allegations of an attempted “cover up.”

 

  1. Mr. Morrison repeatedly testified that he purposefully kept Lt. Col. Vindman out of the loop on this matter because he had concerns about Vindman’s judgment, which were also raised to him by Fiona Hill and others.

 

  1. Mr. Morrison testified that, as the final clearing authority for any edits made to the 7/25 call package, he accepted all of Lt. Col. Vindman’s proposed edits. (p. 61-62)

 

  1. Mr. Morrison testified that he does not believe Burisma came up on the call or that anyone suggested edits to the mem-con to include the word Burisma. (p. 64)

 

  1. Mr. Morrison testified that Lt. Col. Vindman relayed two concerns to him about the July 25 call: that the call did not get into the subject matter they had hoped, and the fidelity of the translation. (p. 72-73)

 

  1. Mr. Morrison testified that Lt. Col. Vindman never reported to Morrison any of the “light queries” that he received from Ukrainian officials in August regarding the hold on aid. (p. 93)

 

  1. Mr. Morrison confirmed that President Trump generally does not like foreign aid generally, and specifically held concerns that corruption in Ukraine may cause U.S. aid to be “misused.”

 

This should end the Democrat impeachment proceedings. There is no crime. There was no crime. And Democrats continue to lie to the American people about their secret sham investigation!

 

Democrats will pay for this.

++++++++++++++++++++++

BOOM! President Trump BLASTS “Nasty and Obnoxious” Chris Wallace on His “Dumb and Unfair” Interview with Steve Scalise

 

By  Jim Hoft

November 17, 2019

The Gateway Pundit

 

As reported earlier…
Never-Trump hack Chris Wallace continued his disgusting attacks on President Trump this weekend on FOX News Sunday.

 

On Sunday Wallace invited House Republican Whip Steve Scalise on to continue his attacks against President Trump.

 

Chris Wallace-Steve Scalise Fox News Sunday

 

At one point Chris Wallace accused NSC Senior Director for European Affairs Tim Morrison of testifying against President Trump in Schiff’s secret basement star chamber.

 

Wallace was lying. This is NOT TRUE AT ALL.

 

Tim Morrison testified IN SUPPORT OF PRESIDENT TRUMP!

 

 

President Trump was watching and also weighed in on “nasty and obnoxious” Chris Wallace’s “dumb and unfair” reporting.

 

+++++++++++++++++++++

Blog Editor: Rather than capitulate to Facebook censorship by abandoning the platform, I choose to post and share until the Leftist censors ban me. Recently, the Facebook censorship tactic I’ve experienced is a couple of Group shares then jailed under the false accusation of posting too fast. So I ask those that read this, to combat censorship by sharing blog and Facebook posts with your friends or Groups you belong to.

 

I got this message from Fascistbook (11/13/19):

 

“You’re temporarily restricted from joining and posting to groups until November 20 at 7:05 PM.” So PLEASE SHARE. My Conservative voice is currently in a restricted Facebook jail.

_____________________________

© 2019 The Gateway Pundit – All Rights Reserved.

 

Video Thoughts on Hillary’s Emailgate


Hillary Clinton emailgate schmoozing


Tony Newbill found two Youtube videos that exposes the nefariousness of Hillary Clinton’s Emailgate. This was originally placed as a comment to the post “SlantRight 2.0: Benghazigate, Gowdy, Hillary and Obama”.
 
JRH 3/13/15

Please Support NCCR

***********************
Video Thoughts on Hillary’s Emailgate
3/12/15 10:04 AM
 
Oh these are REALLY GOOD on Hilary:
 
 
Published by StopHillary PAC
Published on Mar 10, 2015
 
Watch Hillary Clinton’s email lies unravel. #MISSING
fb.com/stophillarypac | www.stophillarypac.org
 
 
 
Published on Mar 8, 2015
 
Chris Wallace GRILLS Lanny Davis Over Clinton Emails on Fox News Sunday Fox News Sunday host Chris Wallace conducted a borderline-contemptuous interview Sunday morning with longtime Clinton defender Lanny Davis, who probably has his own office at Fox News by now. Davis has defended Hillary Clinton’s use of a personal email account as Secretary of State as not only not illegal but not wrong. Lanny Davis said that Clinton’s use of personal emails was in line with the behavior of previous Secretaries of State, to which Wallace responded that the rules for archiving electronic correspondence had changed before Clinton’s tenure. (There’s widespread confusion on this matter, as Mediaite covered here.) “You, Chris Wallace, might have a subjective view of what might have happened — I hear the word ‘may’ — I’m talking about what is the case,” Davis said. “The fact is, nobody says it’s illegal. She’s turned over all of her emails — the first secretary of state to do that. And going forward, they’re available for access.”
Things became particularly heated when Davis brought up a “double standard” over Florida Governor Jeb Bush. “I’ve heard you play this Jeb Bush game before,” Wallace said. “It’s like the Republicans during Watergate saying, ‘Well, Lyndon Johnson wiretapped people, too.’ It’s completely irrelevant. Let’s not play that game.”
Wallace also lost it when Davis seemed to congratulate Clinton for the “unprecedented move” of volunteering her emails. “She did volunteer to release all of those emails,” Davis said. “She’s the only secretary to openly ask the public to look at all those emails and wants them published right now.”
“She didn’t volunteer!” Wallace objected. “She had to negotiate for four months with the State Department lawyers before she turned them over.”
Finally: “Do you ever get tired of cleaning up after the Clintons?” Wallace asked.
Davis naturally didn’t think of it as “cleaning up” and said he was proud to work with the Clintons. “There have been mistakes, but the last time you got very heated about the Clintons was Whitewater,” Davis said, though Wallace denied having covered Whitewater. “This is another bogus ‘scandal.’”
“Bill Clinton left with a 65% approval rating,” Davis continued. “Hillary Clinton today is the most popular politician in the country. And you’re discussing a non-scandal…It’s all politics.”
Watch the clip below, via Fox News: http://www.mediaite.com/tv/foxs-wallace-grills-lanny-davis-do-you-ever-get-tired-of-cleaning-up-after-the-clintons/ I’ll discuss the Clinton controversy, and what it could mean for her 2016 chances, exclusively with Lanny Davis Presumptive Democratic presidential front-runner Hillary Clinton is in the spotlight this week, after reports that she used a private email account during her time as Secretary of State. Critics say it’s a potential violation of federal law, and have raised questions over Clinton’s motives in keeping emails off of government servers. In her first response since the scandal broke, Clinton says she’s asked the State Department to make thousands of those personal emails public. Sunday We’ll discuss the Clinton controversy, and what it could mean for her 2016 chances, Chris Wallace spars with Lanny David. Presumptive Democratic presidential front-runner Hillary Clinton is in the spotlight this week, after reports that she used a private email account during her time as Secretary of State. Critics say it’s a potential violation of federal law, and have raised questions over Clinton’s motives in keeping emails off of government servers. In her first response since the scandal broke, Clinton says she’s asked the State Department to make thousands of those personal emails public.
 
_____________________________
Edited by John R. Houk
The Youtube description text was edited with spellcheck.
 
%d bloggers like this: