Safe & Effective Lie Exposed by Trust-The-Science Liars


John R. Houk, Blog Editor

May 18, 2024

Are you still reading/seeing/hearing the mRNA Jab is “Safe & Effective”? God help YOU! Are you still believing “Safe & Effective”?

If you answered “yes” to any of those questions, 300 PAGES of revealed emails from the doctors and scientists who bombarded the Public with the deceptive aphorism – “Trust The Science – should help you KNOW THE TRUTH. Unless of course, you have become too hopelessly BRAINWASHED. Then again, GOD HELP YOU!

If I were you, I’d trust the documentation more than those purporting to represent science.

JRH 5/18/24

READER SUPPORTED!

PLEASE! I need more Patriots to step up. I need Readers to chip in $5 – $10 – $25 – $50 – $100 (one-time or recurring). PLEASE YOUR generosity is NEEDED. PLEASE GIVE to Help me be a voice for Liberty:

Please Support CPCR

Big Tech Censorship is pervasive – Share voluminously on all social media platforms!

Our Senior Citizen Family Supplements income by selling healthy coffee products. If you are not a donate-kind-of-individual, buy some healthy, feel-good & taste-great COFFEE: https://dianahouk.beneve.com/

****************************

300 Pages of Emails Leave No Doubt: Fauci, NIH Knew Early on of Injuries, Deaths After COVID Shots

According to documents obtained by Children’s Health Defense, reports of injuries and deaths following COVID-19 vaccines — including a child injured by the Pfizer vaccine during a clinical trial and a fatal vaccine-induced case of myocarditis — reached NIH researchers, Dr. Anthony Fauci and others in 2021 and 2022.

Fauci KNEW mRNA Injures (The Defender Photo)

By Michael Nevradakis, Ph.D.

May 16, 2024

The Defender

Several adverse event reports from people injured by the COVID-19 vaccines reached National Institutes of Health (NIH) researchers in 2021 and 2022 — including a report of a child injured by the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine during a clinical trial, according to documents obtained by Children’s Health Defense (CHD).

The documents also include reports of vaccine-injured people who were suicidal and emails sent to government officials — including Dr. Anthony Fauci — by a COVID-19 vaccine injury victim frustrated with the Countermeasures Injury Compensation Board’s (CICP) slow pace of responding to their vaccine injury claims.

As reports of vaccine injuries came in, the agency advised one injured person that it was “not prudent” to get a second dose.

Some researchers cited a lack of knowledge about vaccine injuries due to the rapid speed at which they were developed.

The 300-page batch of documents released to CHD on April 21 contains emails between the NIH and people reporting COVID-19 vaccine injuries. CHD requested the documents via a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request in November 2022.

On April 12, 2023, CHD sued the NIH to obtain the records after the NIH did not respond to the request.

In an October 2023 settlement, the NIH agreed to produce up to 7,500 pages of documents at a rate of 300 pages per month. This month’s batch also revealed that Fauci and U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) officials knew of serious COVID-19 vaccine adverse events as early as December 2020.

‘No doubt in my mind that the vaccine caused’ girl’s injuries

In emails sent to NIH researchers Farinaz Safavi, M.D., Ph.D.Dr. Avindra Nath and Amanda Wiebold starting May 24, 2021 (pages 237-243), the parents of a girl injured during the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine trial detailed their daughter’s condition.

Nath-Safavi-Pfizer-Trial – Redacted Email (The Defender Photo)

Symptoms initially included “severe muscle/nerve pain, painful electric shocks down her neck and spine which caused her to walk hunched over, severe chest pain that felt like her heart was being pulled out,” pain in her toes, a fever and “severe abdominal pain.”

According to the email, the symptoms “persisted” and new symptoms developed, including “the inability to swallow food or liquids,” “unexplained painful cysts on her vagina and then her head,” “erratic blood pressure, and heart rate, memory loss, brain fog, verbal and motor tics, fainting/seizures (10+ a day), loss of feeling from the waist down then paralysis of her legs, inability to walk,” tinnitus, vision problems and others.

These injuries led to nine ER visits and three hospital admissions. According to the email, the girl developed “medical PTSD” from “this experience with doctors, especially in the ER and Pfizer Vaccine Trial, doubting her and treating her like a mental patient.”

“There is no doubt in my mind that the vaccine caused this,” the email read.

In a May 25, 2021, response, Nath said, “It is hard to make a diagnosis over emails” but “We have certainly heard of a lot of cases of neurological complications form [sic] the vaccine,” offering to speak to the girl’s neurologist.

On May 26, 2021, the girl’s parents said specialists they visited had “an unconscious bias” and, “from the beginning” at the hospital that hosted the trial, “no one was even willing to talk about the vaccine as the trigger for this.”

In a May 27, 2021 email, the girl’s parents added that inpatient rehabilitation doctors “were not willing” to speak with Nath. “They are unwilling to look any further into this because then they would have to admit the vaccine caused her reaction.” But no further reply from Nath or other NIH officials appears in the documents.

‘It would not be prudent to receive the second dose’

In a Jan. 22, 2021, email (pages 162-163), a vaccine-injured person contacted Dr. Alkis Togias, branch chief of Allergy, Asthma, and Airway Biology at the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, after having “ended up in the ER” following an anaphylactic reaction after the first dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine.

“I had never had severe reactions to anything, until the last year, when I have had three,” the individual wrote, asking Togias if it was safe to receive the second dose.

In his Jan. 23, 2021, reply, Togias said, “It would be very hard … to offer an opinion as to whether you experienced a true allergic reaction.” “If what you experienced was a true allergic reaction, it would not be prudent to receive the second dose.”

In a March 24, 2021, follow-up email (page 175), Togias admitted “There is no study that I am aware of that has carefully followed people who had a reaction to the first shot and received the second shot. As a result of this lack of knowledge, I do not think that anybody can advise you with major certainty as to whether to proceed with the 2nd dose.”

“If you fulfill the criteria for a severe allergic reaction as defined in the CDC guideline … you should not be receiving the second dose,” Togias added. He also noted that “the lack of clear answers to your questions reflects our lack of knowledge,” which he said “is not surprising given the speed at which these vaccines came out.”

In another instance, someone contacted Togias on Feb. 24, 2021 (pages 289-290), informing him of “a pretty scary reaction” to the first dose of the Moderna COVID-19 vaccine “within one hour of getting it.”

“This was a frightening occurrence, and I suspect it was a mild anaphylactic shock,” the individual wrote, noting that they had “never felt anything like this.” The person asked for “any advice on whether I should get the second shot in a month.”

In his Feb. 24, 2021, reply, Togias said it was hard to say “whether it was an allergic reaction or not” but noted that “Both the Moderna and the Pfizer vaccines have induced allergic reactions” and suggested it might not be a good idea to get a second dose.

“The most important decision is, of course, whether you should receive your second dose or not,” Togias wrote, recommending the patient consult with an allergist and report their reaction to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS).

NIH officials gave mixed messages about VAERS in other emails. Notably, in a March 24, 2021, email (page 175), Togias said “VAERS is based on self-reporting and it misses a tremendous amount of information that would have been so helpful to everybody.”

Togias-VAERS-Response – Redacted Email (The Defender Photo)

But, in a June 13, 2021, email (page 257), Nath wrote, in response to whether 110 VAERS reports of transverse myelitis after COVID-19 vaccination constitute a safety signal, that “the reliability of the VAERS database is poor since anyone can enter the information and there may even be duplication of entries.”

‘My life as I knew it was gone’

The documents also show that vaccine-injured individuals contacted NIH researchers before January 2021.

In a Dec. 25, 2020, email (page 167), a person injured after getting the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine said that, within 30 minutes, they felt “burning and tingling of my face, tightness at the base of my tongue, shortness of breath, heart racing, chest tightness and had a near syncopal event.” Symptoms, including facial swelling and hives, recurred the next day.

“I believe I am having a significant allergic reaction to the vaccine,” the person wrote, adding that they were “very nervous about receiving the second dose of the vaccine.”

In his Dec. 27, 2020, reply (page 166), Togias said he “can understand [the person’s] hesitancy for receiving the second dose” and that he was aware of such reactions to the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines.

The individual sent follow-up emails on Dec. 29, 2020, and Jan. 2, 2021 (page 165), reporting they were still ill, “really afraid” and “frightened,” reporting “tachycardia … chest tightness, anorexia,” and an opinion from a rheumatologist and immunologist, who believed they were experiencing “some time [sic] of immunological/neurological reaction.”

In a Jan. 3, 2021, reply, Togias suggested the patient file a VAERS report, but in replies on Jan. 3, the injured individual wrote that they filed reports “to VAERS, v safe [sic], Pfizer multiple times but have had no response from anyone.”

With no response from Togias, the individual sent a Feb. 10, 2021 (page 164), email, saying they were “very desperate,” “still very ill with neurological symptoms” and “completely incapacitated … with severe paresthesias in my face, tongue, chest wall, limbs,” asking Togias for “anyone … who might be able to help me in some way recover.”

In Togias’ Feb. 11, 2021, reply (page 164), he said that similar injuries “have been reported by other people; so the various agencies and the companies know about them” but that he was “not aware whether any research is being conducted to understand their nature.” No other responses appear in the documents that have been released.

Autopsy ‘concurred’ death caused by Pfizer booster shot

A person who lost their brother to a vaccine injury sent a Jan. 24, 2022, email (pages 139 and 184) to Togias, stating that an autopsy “concurred that his death was caused directly due to the Pfizer booster vaccine” as a result of “severe myocarditis.”

Myocarditis-Pfizer-Booster-Togias-Email – Redacted (The Defender Photo)

“Please give us answers and follow up to why this occurred,” the individual wrote. But in his Jan. 30, 2022, reply (page 184), Togias said myocarditis caused by COVID-19 vaccines is “rare” and “more commonly seen in young males,” adding that the victim “was in the very, very small group of people who lost their lives” and suggesting the filing of a VAERS report.

In an email exchange with Nath and Safavi (pages 9-12) beginning Jan. 9, 2022, an injured individual said they had emailed Safavi in April 2021 with no response and described “severe” injuries immediately after receiving the Moderna vaccine, including “cardiac issues” and “severe neurological issues.”

“At the twelve minute mark my life as I knew it was gone,” the patient wrote (page 11). In a response the same day, Nath wrote, “We are just as mystified as everyone else about these complications,” while in a Jan. 10, 2022, email (page 9), she said she has “absolutely no idea what might be causing your symptoms.”

But in a Jan. 10, 2022, reply, the injured person said they were “at the best research hospitals,” but doctors there were “waiting for direction from the FDA and NIH on what is going on as there has been no study that they know of as to why this is happening.”

“So many people are suffering and I’m talking people out of suicide on a weekly basis who are having the same reactions and can’t take it,” the individual wrote.

Nath-Best-Hospitals-FDA-NIH – Redacted Email (The Defender Photo)

Fauci ignored complaint of CICP’s slow processing of vaccine injury claim

The emails of a person who developed myocarditis after receiving the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine and who was frustrated with CICP’s slow processing of their vaccine injury report was also included in this month’s documents (pages 292-300).

According to the emails, CICP received this person’s report on Sept. 7, 2021, and confirmed receipt on Sept. 20, 2021 (page 299), but said, “The CICP cannot estimate when a decision may be made in you [sic] claim.” After two follow-up emails requesting an update, CICP said on Sept. 28, 2021 (page 297), “There is no new update for your claim.”

By Oct. 5, 2021, though, the injured individual wrote to CICP, “I’m done waiting! Your time is up!” and threatened to contact lawmakers. The individual ultimately reached out to Rep. James McGovern (D-Mass.) — and to Fauci, in an Oct. 20, 2021 email (page 292).

“I received myocarditis from the Pfizer vaccine [redacted] and spent 3 days in the hospital. It wasn’t fun. It was a wretched experience. I now have bills to pay.” This person noted that CICP only had eight people reviewing claims, calling this “simply unacceptable.”

“I’ve contacted the CICP, news organizations, and my local Senators and Congressman. Haven’t heard much of anything yet.” “I would love to hear from Dr Fauci or anyone at NIH with a response.” But no such response came.

Michael Nevradakis, Ph.D., based in Athens, Greece, is a senior reporter for The Defender and part of the rotation of hosts for CHD.TV’s “Good Morning CHD.”

© 2016 – 2024 Children’s Health Defense® • All Rights Reserved

Children’s Health Defense® is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization. Our mission is ending childhood health epidemics by eliminating toxic exposure. We will restore and protect the health of children by eliminating environmental exposures, holding responsible parties accountable, and establishing safeguards to prevent future harm of children’s health. Protecting Children. Exposing Harms. Seeking Justice.

Dr. McCullough – mRNA Jab Should be PULLED


Bad Science is More About Money than Individual Health

John R. Houk, Blog Editor

September 19, 2023

This post takes a look at Dr. Peter McCullough’s testimony before the European Parliament on 9/13/23.

The post includes Dr. McCullough’s Substack post which included a 10-minute clip of Emerald Robinson interviewing the good doctor about his mRNA testimony.

Then I am cross posting The Exposé which has excerpts of the testimony and a 17-minute of Dr. McCullough testifying. In essence Dr. McCullough testifies the mRNA Jab is more dangerous than helpful and should be pulled from the market and NOT be used even in booster form.

Something to ponder: If more and more actual science is showing the mRNA Jab is dangerous for way too many recipients, yet Big Pharma, the FDA and the CDC keep pushing the bad science of “safe and effective”. Doesn’t that demonstrate that “follow the money” is more important than individual health?

JRH 9/19/23

READER SUPPORTED!

Thank you to those who have stepped up! I need Readers willing to chip in $5 – $10 – $25 – $50 – $100. PLEASE YOUR generosity is appreciated. PLEASE GIVE to Help me be a voice for Liberty:

Please Support CPCR

YOU CAN ALSO SUPPORT via buying women’s menstrual health, healthy collagen, vitamin supplements/products, coffee from my wife’s Online store: My Store (please use referral discount code 3917004): https://modere.co/3f9x6xy

Big Tech Censorship is pervasive – Share voluminously on all social media platforms!

*************************

Trump, Megyn Kelly, Fauci, and Dr. McCullough on the Absolute Truth with Emerald Robinson

False Claims Continue, Vaccine Side Effects Raised, Calls for Market Removal of All COVID-19 Vaccines

By PETER MCCULLOUGH, MD

September 18, 2023

COURAGEOUS DISCOURSE

[I uploaded Dr. McCullough’s Substack clip to my Bitchute Channel and gave it a different name.]

Bitchute VIDEO: Absolute Truth with Emerald Robinson – Clip Trump, Megyn Kelly, Dr. McCullough on mRNA Jab

[Posted by SlantRight2

First Published September 18th, 2023 19:54 UTC

MORE DESCRIPTION]

I am working from France presently and wanted to update you with this news clip from The Absolute Truth with Emerald Robinson. Emerald gives highlights from the Trump interview by Megyn Kelly who is recently open about her own vaccine injury. Trump claims the vaccines saved a hundred million lives. That unforced error will become a problem for him during the campaign season. I have learned as a doctor never to overstate clinical benefit. We err on the side of caution being hawkish on safety and conservative on efficacy. Trump did neither.

You can watch the show and see how Fauci continues to spread the false narrative about COVID-19 illness and myocarditis, trying to conceal the common and leading causes of vaccine deaths—mRNA vaccination.

Finally, we conclude with some major points from the European Parliament COVID-19 Vaccine Session on September 13, 2023. Robinson prompted me “Dr. McCullough what are you asking the EU Parliament to do?” My response: “1) EU to pull all COVID-19 vaccines off the market—they are unsafe for human use, 2) EU to withdraw from the WHO, they are doing more harm than good to the world.”

Dr. McCullough calls for removal of all COVID-19 vaccines from the European Union market for excess risk of death, September 13, 2023.

Please subscribe to Courageous Discourse as a paying or founder member so we can continue to bring you the truth.

© 2023 Peter McCullough MD MPH

Courageous Discourse HOMEPAGE

SUBSCRIBE/SUPPORT Courageous Discourse

+++++++++++++++++++++++

Dr. Peter McCullough: No one should take another shot, covid vaccines are not safe for human use

Dr. Peter McCullough at European Parliament 9/13/23 – THE EXPOSÉ PHOTO

Posted by RHODA WILSON 

September 19, 2023

THE EXPOSÉ

Last Wednesday, Dr. Peter McCullough gave a speech at the European Parliament during a hearing hosted by five Members of the European Parliament (“MEPs”).  The hearing was to raise awareness about the World Health Organisation’s (“WHO’s”) power grab.

Dr. McCullough gave evidence of the enormous wave of harms the covid “vaccines” have caused.  There’s a false narrative that it’s covid causing all these illnesses. Don’t fall for the false narrative. It’s the vaccines causing this enormous wave of illness, he said.

“The path forward is, clearly, for no one to take another shot – no one,” Dr. McCullough said. “The covid-19 vaccines and all of their progeny and future boosters are not safe for human use.”

“The WHO is standing behind these vaccines,” he added. “It’s my belief that the European Union, the United States and all major stakeholders should actually completely pull out of the WHO.”

Below are some excerpts from Dr. McCullough’s recent speech at the European Parliament followed by a video of it.

“At the outset of the pandemic, there was an investigation by the WHO on the origins of SARS cov2 that’s when the beginning of the cover-up began,” Dr. McCullough said. “We knew at that time … that Anthony Fauci, Francis Collins, Jeremy Farrar who was at Wellcome Trust [and] who’s now the chief scientist at the WHO, Kristian Andersen at Scripps [Research], Eddie Holmes in Sydney, Peter Daszak at EcoHealth Alliance – they all conspired in January of 2020 to cover up what they knew. That the virus was engineered in a joint US-Chinese collaboration in the lab in Wuhan China.  And they deceived the world with 12 subsequent fraudulent papers in the peer-reviewed literature.”

“The vaccines have ravaged the populations in the world.  Worldwide two-thirds of people took a vaccine … [the messenger RNA vaccine] is the code for the potentially lethal spike protein part of the virus.  It was the worst idea ever to install the genetic code by injection and allow the unbridled production of a potentially lethal protein in the human body for an uncontrolled duration of time.  everything we’ve learned about the vaccine since they’ve come out is horrifying.

“The spike protein is proven in 3 400 peer-reviewed manuscripts to cause four major domains of disease.  One is cardiovascular disease, heart inflammation or myocarditis … The cardiovascular domain of damage in the human body from the vaccine is substantial more than anything we’ve ever seen with cholesterol, high blood pressure or diabetes … We’ve seen cardiac arrests two years after these shots.

“The second major domain is neurologic disease. Strokes, both ischemic and haemorrhagic, Guillain-Barre syndrome, ascending paralysis that can lead to death [and] which it has led to death with messenger RNA vaccines, small fibre neuropathy, numbness and tingling, ringing in the ears [and] headaches.  These are common.

“Third major domain is blood clots – blood clots like we’ve never seen before.  The spike protein is the most thrombogenic protein we’ve ever seen in human medicine … the spike protein causes blood clots.

“Fourth and last domain [is] immunologic abnormalities.  Vaccine-induced thrombotic thrombocytopenia [VITT] and muscle system inflammatory disorder are early acute syndromes.

“73.9 per cent of the deaths after vaccination are due to the vaccine … when it’s suspected myocarditis … it’s 100 per cent of the time it’s due to the vaccine. Not covid respiratory illness – the vaccine.

“The first false narrative was ‘the virus is unassailable we have to stay in lockdown and be fearful’.  The second false narrative is ‘take a vaccine it’s safe and effective’.  The third false narrative now is ‘it’s not the vaccine causing these problems it’s covid, it’s covid that we saw back in 2020 that’s causing all these problems in 2023’. Don’t fall for the false narrative … The vaccines are causing this enormous wave of illness.”

Dr. McCullough explained that it seems about 30% of people who have had an injection have no adverse effects, not even a sore arm.  Just under 70% seem to have “some moderate side effects, some trouble but they don’t seem to really have serious events.”  And then about 4.2% – “it’s through the roof, myocarditis, cardiac arrest, blood clots, haemorrhagic stroke, disabilities, sudden death at home in bed.”  It’s the same in the United States Dr. McCullough said.

“4.2 per cent of people in Europe right now are in trouble because they were unlucky enough to get a high-risk batch.

“The path forward is, clearly, for no one to take another shot – no one … the covid-19 vaccines and all of their progeny and future boosters are not safe for human use … I implore you …  to apply all pressure and due urgency to remove the covid-19 vaccines from market.

“The WHO is standing behind these vaccines. They are far more of a problem than a help … And it’s my belief that the European Union, the United States and all major stakeholders should actually completely pull out of the WHO”

Youtube VIDEO: Peter McCullough and European Parliament 14SEPT23

[Posted by Ken Allen

Posted on Sep 14, 2023

MORE DESCRIPTION]

If the video above is removed from YouTube, you can watch it on Bitchute HERE.

The day before the event, Christine Anderson MEP tweeted details about the hearing:

Expert Hearing in the EU Parliament 13.09.2023 / 14:30 – 16:30 (CET)

The WHO – with its pursuit of ever more power and increased funding – is the central driver of “pandemic emergencies” as well as the undemocratic shift of political decisions to unelected, supranational organisations that can no longer be held accountable by us citizens.

With an expert hearing on 13 September in the EU Parliament, we want to get to the root of the problem and expose for the first time the constitutional mechanisms behind the WHO’s power grab.

Our goals are:

1. To make people aware of the real dangers coming from the WHO and the EU.

2. To advance the public and political debate about this rapid power grab.

3. To provide concrete suggestions and examples of what we as civil society can and should do in each of our countries.

The idea is to clearly expose and dissect the clandestine WHO power grab from a legal and scientific perspective for the common citizen. After all the expert presentations, this event will result in a list of questions and demands to the European Commission in order to drive the parliamentary debate.

Experts:

  • Prof. Mattias Desmet (Belgium)
  • Prof. Michael Geistlinger (Austria)
  • Prof. Andreas Sönnichsen (Austria)
  • Dr. Peter McCollough (USA)
  • Dr. Beate Pfeil (Germany)
  • Dr. David E. Martin (USA)
  • Dr. Maria Hubmer-Mogg (Austria)
  • Dr. Renate Holzeisen (Italy)
  • Philipp Kruse, Attorney at law (Switzerland)

Hosting MEPs:

  • MEP Christine Anderson (Germany)
  • MEP Mislav Kolakušić (Croatia)
  • MEP Ivan Sinčić (Croatia)
  • MEP Cristian Terhes (Romania)
  • MEP Virginie Joron (France)

Yours, Christine Anderson, MEP

THE EXPOSÉ HOMEPAGE

SUPPORT THE EXPOSÉ

Another Fearmongered Pandemic Exposed?


John R. Houk, Blog Editor

© April 7, 2021

In a post submitted by Justin Smith in November 2020 a huge amount of info is available related to how COVID was a Plandemic/Scamdemic tool by Globalist neo-Marxists (of which American Dem-Marxists are part and parcel) to transform political rule by instilling fear in the masses. Particularly in the masses that exercise voting rights to determine who governs the PEOPLE.

If you are not familiar with terms associated with this Plandemic/Scamdemic that ushered in Dementia-Beijing Joe and his Dem-Marxist oligarchy into power in America give “[REFUSE] THE DARKEST WINTER” another examination. You should be or become familiar with terminology found there as:

Just to name-drop a few Marxist/Globalist plans for your life thought out before despotism came into existence.

Fear has not only been used to manipulate elections, FEAR has been used to make sure criminal election acts are not adjudicated by the legal system.

NOW it appears the Globalist-Marxists (including American Dem-Marxists) are about to utilize lessons learned in fear to consolidate power over YOUR life. The Left has so much hubris they don’t even show concern the next medical fearmongering is documented.

I ran into a 90-minute video on Bitchute with Infowars led by Alex Jones exposing the next documented Plandemic – SPARS Pandemic 2025 – 2028. You can read the Johns Hopkins documentation in PDF format under the title, “The SPARS Pandemic 2025–2028: A Futuristic Scenario to Facilitate Medical Countermeasure Communication”. I downloaded the PDF in case Leftist-hubris is overcome by concern to be exposed. You can still find Event 201 (etc.) documentation so I have doubts Leftist-hubris will subside anytime soon.

Alex Jones points to the similarities of the COVID spread, the experimental vaccine implementation and the coverup vaccine deaths and long-term vaccine side-affect tragedies NOW OCCURING and the SPARS Pandemic 2025 – 2028 predictions published in 2017.

I suspect you are thinking info from Alex Jones is not credible due to numerous debunked Conspiracy Theories associated with his name. I KNOW I would have doubts before the assault of the CCP-COVID Virus exploding globally doing the very things Globalist-Marxist documentation predicted ahead of time still being fearmongered.

To alleviate Alex Jones skepticism, before cross posting the video, I am going to cross post SPARS Pandemic 2025 -2028 exposés that are separate from Infowars info. BUT you should really take some time (in segments of your availability if need be) to observe what Alex Jones has discovered.

JRH 4/7/21

I need your generosity in 2021 via – credit cards, check cards

& debit cards are accepted by my PayPal account:

Please Support NCCR

Or if donating you can support by getting in the Coffee from home business making yourself extra cash – OR just buy some FEEL GOOD coffee, that includes immune boosting products. Big Tech Censorship is pervasive – Share voluminously on all social media platforms!

**********************************

2017 Johns Hopkins Document Called “SPARS 2025-2028” Mirrors Today’s COVID Crisis

Centipede Nation screen capture SPARS 2025-28 PDF

Posted by Centipede Nation Staff 

April 5, 2021 4:51 pm

Centipede Nation – Resistance to Tyranny is a Virtue

A 2017 document by Johns Hopkins is currently going viral which details plans for a global medical response under a hypothetical ‘exercise’ pandemic named “SPARS 2025-2028”, mirroring today’s world scenarios under COVID-19.

From John Hopkins’ centerforhealthsecurity.org:

The Center’s SPARS Pandemic exercise narrative comprises a futuristic scenario that illustrates communication dilemmas concerning medical countermeasures (MCMs) that could plausibly emerge in the not-so-distant future.

[…]

The self-guided exercise scenario for public health communicators and risk communication researchers covers a raft of themes and associated dilemmas in risk communications, rumor control, interagency message coordination and consistency, issue management, proactive and reactive media relations, cultural competency, and ethical concerns.

The most interesting thing about this document is how it mirrors and outlines the entirety of the current Plandemic. The similarities are uncanny, including strategies for the MSM, presidents and celebrities being used to sell the vaccines – to the actual fatality rates being ‘predicted’ along with the numbers, to tweets and marketing campaigns, to “isolation procedures”. They even planned in advance how to counter people’s arguments on social media that question the side effects of the experimental vaccines, including calling everyone questioning the main narrative a conspiracy theorist.

Some people on social media have commented that the paper was basically a retrospective on the past year, and asked the questions about where the breakdowns in communication were. The interesting part is that while it reads like a retrospective of the past year, the John Hopkins website says that it was completed in October 2017.

Highlights

“After showing no adverse side effects for nearly a year, vaccine recipients slowly began to experience symptoms.”

“As time passed and more people across the United States were vaccinated, claims of adverse side effects began to emerge.”

“As the investigations grew in intensity, several high-ranking officials at the CDC and FDA were forced to step down and withdraw from government.”

“Nearing the end of 2027, reports of new neurological symptoms began to emerge.”

“Several parents claimed that their children were experiencing neurological symptoms.”

“Small groups of individuals spread throughout the country, for example, who felt that natural cures such as garlic and vitamins would be more effective at treating SPARS than an “untested” drug, were much less likely to accept Kalocivir as a treatment option or even seek medical attention for SPARS-like symptoms. Similarly, some ethnic minorities, and particularly ethnic groups who lived close together in large, tight-knit communities, also rejected Kalocivir.”

“As the pandemic tapered off, several influential politicians and agency representatives came nder fire for sensationalizing the severity of the event for perceived political gain. As with many public health interventions, successful efforts to reduce the impact of the pandemic created the illusion that the event was not nearly as serious as experts suggested it would be. President Archer’s detractors in the Republican Party seized the opportunity to publicly disparage the President and his administration’s response to the pandemic, urging voters to elect “a strong leader with the best interests of the American people at heart.”

“In an effort to further reach certain population subgroups, agency officials enlisted the help of well-known scientists, celebrities, and government officials to make short videos and Zap clips and, in a few cases, give interviews to major media outlets. Among those chosen were former President Jaclyn Bennett; BZee, a popular hiphop star; and Paul Farmer, co-founder of Partners in Health and a renowned global health expert… While common messaging resulted in more cohesive traditional media coverage, the celebrity outreach campaign was more problematic.”

“What are the roles of a media-literate staff and organizational capacity to communicate via both social and traditional media platforms critical to understanding and influencing public debates about an MCM like Kalocivir?”

“What communication strategies might be effective for breaking into, and engaging with otherwise self-isolating groups who oppose a recommended MCM like Corovax and might be placing themselves and others at risk during the outbreak?”

How might federal health authorities avoid people possibly seeing an expedited SPARS vaccine development and testing process as somehow “rushed” and inherently flawed, even though that process still meets the same safety and efficacy standards as any other vaccine?

“That month, a group of parents whose children developed mental retardation as a result of encephalitis in the wake of Corovax vaccination sued the federal government, demanding removal of the liability shield protecting the pharmaceutical companies responsible for developing and manufacturing Corovax.”

“Given the positive reaction to the federal government’s response and the fact that the majority of US citizens willing to be vaccinated had already been immunized, the negative publicity surrounding adverse reactions had little effect on nationwide vaccination rates.”

“A widespread social media movement led primarily by outspoken parents of affected children, coupled with widespread distrust of “big pharma,” supported the narrative that the development of SPARS MCMs was unnecessary and driven by a few profit-seeking individuals. Conspiracy theories also proliferated across social media, suggesting that the virus had been purposely created and introduced to the population by drug companies or that it had escaped from a government lab secretly testing bioweapons.”

“In order to prioritize distribution of limited Corovax supply, the federal government requested that states report summary information for patient electronic health records (EHRs) to estimate the number of individuals in high-risk populations. This effort was met with resistance from the public, who protested the federal government accessing their private medical information.”

“The Corovax vaccination program met resistance from several groups: alternative medicine proponents, Muslims, African Americans, and anti-vaccination activists. Initially operating independently, these groups banded together via social media to increase their influence.”

“Japan announced that it would not approve Corovax for use in Japan in favor of developing and producing its own vaccine.”

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Spars Pandemic 2025-2028

By DarkDox

April 4, 2021

DARKDOX

[Dark Dox places the InfoWars video which I am cross posting later in this post]

Here is a link to the SPARS Pandemic document. A 2017 Johns Hopkins document details plans for Big Pharma global domination. “This document is the holy grail. The key to defeating the globalist.” – Alex Jones

Resources

Dark Dox screen capture of SPARS 2025-28 PDF

(LastAmericanVagabond) In the months since SARS-CoV-2 was declared a pandemic, researchers and journalists have spent countless hours searching for relevant information that might shed some light on the origins of what has come to be known as COVID-19. This research has led some to a number of simulations and exercises which “war gamed” a potential viral outbreak and asked how the people and institutions of the world would respond.

As TLAV has extensively documented, the pandemic exercises are numerous. The most well-known simulation is likely Event 201, a high-level pandemic exercise organized by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation partnered with the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security and the World Economic Forum on October 18, 2019. Event 201 simulated how the world would respond to a fictional coronavirus pandemic known as CAPS which swept around the planet. The simulation imagined 65 million people dying, mass lock downs, quarantines, censorship of alternative viewpoints under the guise of fighting “disinformation,” and even floated the idea of arresting people who question the pandemic narrative.

Another exercise known as Crimson Contagion simulated an outbreak of a respiratory virus originating from China. From August 13 to August 16, 2019, Trump’s Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), headed by Alex Azar, partnered with numerous national, state, and local organizations for the exercise. According to the results of the October 2019 draft report, the spread of the novel avian influenza (H7N9) resulted in 110 million infected Americans, 7.7 million hospitalizations, and 586,000 deaths.

Another simulation known as Clade X took place on May 2018. This event examined the response to a pandemic resulting from the release of a fictional virus known as Clade X. In the simulation, the virus was released by a terror group called A Brighter Dawn. As the outbreak spread through the United States, the participants asked what would be needed if the President issued a federal quarantine, noting that authorities would need to “Determine (the) level of force authorized to maintain quarantine.” The Clade X exercise also resulted in the federal government nationalizing the healthcare system.

A lesser known exercise involving the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security took place in 2017. This exercise also involved a coronavirus pandemic sweeping the world between 2025 and 2028. While the exercise has received very little press, the details and findings of the simulation are extremely relevant to COVID-19.

The SPARS Pandemic, 2025-2028

In October 2017, the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security released their report, SPARS Pandemic, 2025-2028: A Futuristic Scenario for Public Health Risk Communicators. The report is written from the perspective of someone in 2030 who is looking back on a pandemic which swept around the world between 2025 and 2028. The document states that the creators identified major socioeconomic, demographic, technological, and environmental trends which they believe are likely to emerge during this period. The two trends they said are likely to influence public health emergencies are “varying degrees of access to information technology” and increased “fragmentation among populations along social, political, religious, ideological, and cultural lines.”

The document states:

“Ultimately, a world comprised of isolated and highly fragmented communities with widespread access to information technology—dubbed “the echo-chamber”—was selected as the future in which the prospective scenario would take place. From this point, scenario-specific storylines were then developed, drawing on subject matter expertise, historical accounts of past medical countermeasure crises, contemporary media reports, and scholarly literature in sociology, emergency preparedness, health education, and risk and crisis communication. These sources were used to identify communication challenges likely to emerge in future public health emergencies.”

The exercise describes the world of 2025 as “more connected, yet more divided” with near universal access to wireless internet. The report discusses a new technology known as internet accessing technology (IAT), which is described as “thin, flexible screens that can be temporarily attached to briefcases, backpacks, or clothing and used to stream content from the internet.” New social media platforms also affect the digital landscape, including ZapQ, a platform that “enables users to aggregate and archive selected media content from other platforms and communicate with cloud-based social groups based on common interests and current events.”

While this has allowed for an increase and ease in sharing news, many people choose to “self-restrict the sources they turn to for information”, creating the echo chambers.

In mid-October 2025, three deaths were reported at a church in St. Paul, Minnesota. Two church members recently returned from a trip to the Philippines. While their deaths were initially assumed to be influenza, laboratory results later disproved this theory. Eventually, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) confirmed that the three patients were infected with a novel coronavirus, known as the St. Paul Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus (SPARS-CoV, or SPARS).

Interestingly, the report notes that “early case fatality estimates were inflated” with the CDC estimating SPARS case fatality rate of 4.7%, and the WHO saying 14-15% and over 50% for people over the age of 64. Later studies would provide a more accurate estimate of only 0.6%. This simulated scenario mimics what we have seen with COVID-19. The CDC and WHO both initially claimed the fatality rate was much higher before later admitting that the rate was below 1%.

The report goes on to detail how public health and medical professionals were not successful in stopping the spread of SPARS. By time Thanksgiving and Black Friday arrived the transmission of SPARS accelerated due to asymptomatic individuals traveling. By mid-December, SPARS cases were reported in 26 states, as well as Mexico, Canada, Brazil, Japan, and several European countries.

Eventually, an animal vaccine is seen as a potential solutions. Ranchers had used the vaccine to treat a SPARS-like respiratory coronavirus disease in cows and pigs in the Philippines. The vaccine manufacturer, GMI, claimed the vaccine would help, but clinical trials reveal side effects, including swollen legs, severe joint pain, and encephalitis leading to seizures or death. There was no data available on the long term effects of the GMI vaccine. Despite this controversy, CynBio, a US-based pharmaceutical corporation developed a SPARS vaccine based on the GMI technology.

Much like in real life, the simulation states that the Department of Health and Human Services agreed to provide liability protection to the vaccine manufacturer CynBio in the event someone is harmed from the vaccine. This is the same situation we have seen with COVID-19, where U.S. government officials have acknowledged that the vaccine companies are going to be given indemnity against potential liabilities arising from their products.

The simulation makes it clear that health officials have planned for potential vaccine injuries and the objection to vaccine mandates. In one section the report asks, “How might federal health authorities respond to critics who propose that liability protection for SPARS vaccine manufacturers jeopardizes individual freedom and wellbeing?”

The report goes on to discuss the creation of a therapeutic called Kalocivir and how a growing number of individuals begin to challenge the use of pharmaceuticals and vaccines. These individuals who promoted “natural cures such as garlic and vitamins” were less likely to take Kalocivir or seek medical attention for SPARS-like symptoms.

Concerns about Kalocivir increased in February 2026 when a viral video shows a three-year-old boy projectile vomiting after taking a dose of the therapeutic. The clip is shared across the U.S. with the hashtags #NoKalocivir and #NaturalIsBetter. Social media activists began to use ZapQ groups to share the video and also place IAT screens on the backs of their jackets and backpacks while looping the video. By the summer the video is the most shared “Zap clip” among junior high and high school students.

Another telling line from the Center for Health Security report notes that even though SPARS cases had begun to drop off, the “persistent social media buzz around the pandemic ensured that public anxiety remained high.” Again, this mirrors what we are seeing with COVID-19.

By May 2026 the CDC admitted that SPARS was only fatal in 0.6% of cases in the United States. This reality was reflected on social media, where much of the public began to recognize that SPARS was not as dangerous as they had been told. “Combined with persisting doubts about Kalocivir and the lack of a commercially available SPARS vaccine, the new, lower case fatality rate estimate led the public to grow increasingly hostile toward continued SPARS messaging,” the report states.

The report details how the CDC, the FDA, and other government agencies worked with “social media experts” to develop public health messaging campaigns about SPARS, Kalocivir, and the forthcoming vaccine, Corovax. Much like in the Event 201 exercise, the SPARS simulation involved enlisting the help of “well-known scientists, celebrities, and government officials” to make videos and give interviews promoting the government messaging campaigns.

The public did not respond well to the campaigns and instead took to social media to express their disapproval. The mainstream media even began to question the government narrative and the safety of the Corovax. The opposition to the Corovax merged with the growing anti-vaccination movement which emerged on social media. These groups were made up of Muslims who opposed the vaccine; African Americans, who did not trust the government due to fears of experimentation on the black community; the alternative medicine community; and the “anti-vaccination” community.

These vaccine opponents spread information claiming that Corovax was not properly tested and had unknown side effects. National polls conducted in mid-August 2026 showed that 68% of US citizens had seen a post or read a comment from someone expressing anti-Corovax sentiments. Even the Japanese government rejected the Corovax, leading to viral video clips of Japanese news conferences.

In response to the Corovax opposition, the U.S. government began working with social media and search companies to target advertisements to individuals searching for “anti-vaccination websites.” The CDC also began mining data from public social media sources for “positive stories” they could promote via social media. The U.S. government also asked healthcare providers to grant access to patients’ electronic health records (EHRs) in an attempt to determine the number of individuals in high risk populations in particular areas.

Aftermath: Long-Term Side Effects, Lawsuits and a Loss of Trust

The report describes how adverse side effects began to emerge as more Americans received the vaccine. Parents claimed their children were experiencing neurological symptoms similar to those seen in the animals injected with the GMI vaccine. By May 2027, parents began filing lawsuits and demanding a removal of the liability protecting the pharmaceutical companies who developed Corovax. The report states that “concern was particularly high among some African American parents who continued to question the government’s motives regarding the Corovax vaccination campaign.”

By the end of 2027, new neurological symptoms began to appear in people who had taken Corovax. “After showing no adverse side effects for nearly a year, several vaccine recipients slowly began to experience symptoms such as blurry vision, headaches, and numbness in their extremities,” the Center for Health Security wrote. The report says that by 2030 it was still unclear if the vaccinations were to blame for the side-effects.

The social media backlash caught the HHS off guard as they faced pressure to award compensation to those experiencing long-term effects from Corovax. The public increasingly held negative opinions regarding the vaccine and what they perceived as indifference to the victims.

As the report wraps up it examines how the world looks from 2030, five years after the SPARS pandemic began. While the pandemic officially ended in 2028, cases exist in 14 countries across Europe, Africa, and Asia. WHO experts anticipate that future outbreaks will continue to emerge unless countries maintain widespread vaccination coverage.

As the public finally goes back to “normal life” they begin to focus their frustrations on politicians and agency representatives who they blame for exaggerating the severity of the event. Eventually, several high-ranking officials within the CDC and FDA are forced to retire. However, there appears to be a lack of accountability as there is “little desire” to “rehash the events of the past several years.”

Of course, the simulation states that “conspiracy theories also proliferated across social media, suggesting that the virus had been purposely created and introduced to the population by drug companies or that it had escaped from a government lab secretly testing bioweapons.” These sort of accusations have also been lobbed at researchers during the COVID-19 crisis and used to justify censorship.

While the “Echo Chamber” exercise is as a fictional scenario, it is important to understand what the researchers at the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security have observed. While these events are not intended to be a prediction of things to come, history has shown that simulations and exercises of this sort can often offer a window of how governments and private institutions will respond in times of crisis to come.

+++++++++++++++++++++++++

World Shocked by SPARS 2025-2028 Document

By Constitutional Nobody  

April 4, 2021

USSA News

[USSA News places the InfoWars video which I am cross posting later in this post]

Anthony Fauci is on video in 2017 predicting the current COVID outbreak and he spent millions of dollars at several labs, including at the Level 4 facility in Wuhan, China to weaponize viruses by bioengineering so-called “gain of function”.

Also in 2017, Johns Hopkins published “The SPARS Pandemic 2025-2028”, a report about a drill for a vaccine that caused spongiform encephalopathy aka “Mad Cow” prion disease.

There is a concern, that as with other “drills” they have published in the past, such as Crimson Contagion and Event 201, the SPARS report will turn out to be the actual script of a planned genocidal attack on the mass populace that is unfolding as we speak, because many scenarios in the report have indeed already come to pass.

In the SPARS drill, it is the politicians – not Big Pharma – who are blamed for speeding up the release of the vaccines without proper testing and trials, thus unleashing this massive brain damage due to prion disease in children and adults, which has an onset of 6 months to a year to develop after the injection. Alex Jones says here that “Trump really stepped into it. He got set-up, bigtime.”

The SPARS report is the smoking gun, the blueprint for how they’re going to censor people and for how they will cover up the side effects. It is a script of talking points for the Globalist minions who are read-in to this diabolical plan.

The intended result of all of this is to centralize all medical authority on Earth within the UN with its own massive Marshall Fund to enact total medical tyranny that makes our current reality seem like a mask-free walk in the park.

Alex Jones is joined by Rob Due and Mike Halperin, who have each read the 89-page document,

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Bitchute VIDEO: EMERGENCY SATURDAY BROADCAST! WORLD SHOCKED BY SPARS 2025-2028 DOCUMENT | INFOWARS

Posted by Banned Youtube Videosspecializedtom

19619 subscribers – April 6th, 2021 15:01 UTC

Here is a link to the SPARS Pandemic document. https://www.centerforhealthsecurity.org/our-work/Center-projects/completed-projects/spars-pandemic-scenario.html

A 2017 Johns Hopkins document details plans for Big Pharma global domination. “This document is the holy grail. The key to defeating the globalist.” – Alex Jones

______________________________

Another Fearmongered Pandemic Exposed?

John R. Houk, Blog Editor

© April 6, 2021

_______________________

2017 Johns Hopkins Document Called “SPARS 2025-2028” Mirrors Today’s COVID Crisis

© 2017-2021, Centipede Nation – Reporting On The Great Awakening

_______________________

Spars Pandemic 2025-2028

https://www.darkdox.com/

____________________________

World Shocked by SPARS 2025-2028 Document

Copyright © 2021. All rights reserved. USSA News