Margaret Anna Alice (Uncertain if actual name or pseudonym – perhaps you know) is credited with an awesome poem that essentially is an indictment on the creators (or is it perpetrators?) of COVID. As you listen and/or read the poem, the mRNA Jab comes to mind for me. My guess is M.A.A. is focusing more on COVID. Either way, WAKE UP! Those in political control are in the process of culling the population. YOUR burning self-preservation question should be, “WHY!?”
Below is THE EXPOSÉ reporting on the poem that includes a video reading by Dr. Tess Lawrie and the poem transcript has embedded links that function as exposing Elitist plans. I am actually uncertain which Rumble version of the video THE EXPOSÉ used because they just have the embed of the video and not the link. I am using the Rumble Channel Margaret Anna Alice Through the Looking Glass version and as a quote, including a portion of the description.
JRH 3/21/23
Thank you to those who have stepped up!
READER SUPPORTED! I need Readers willing to chip in $5 – $10 – $25 – $50 – $100. PLEASE YOUR generosity is appreciated. PLEASE GIVE to Help me be a voice for Liberty:
YOU CAN ALSO SUPPORT via buying women’s menstrual health, healthy collagen, vitamin supplements/products, coffee from my Online stores: My Store (please use referral discount code 2388058): https://modere.co/3SrOHzI
Big Tech Censorship is pervasive – Share voluminously on all social media platforms!
************************
Mistakes were not made; The Great Democide of the 2020s was not a mistake
“The following poem was inspired by a conversation with Mike Yeadon. We have both independently noticed the increasing use of terms like ‘bungled’ and ‘blunder’ to describe the crimes against humanity perpetrated under the cloak of covid. Even well-meaning people who share similar values and goals sometimes fall into this trap being set by those preparing their parachute jump from culpability.
“This Anthem for Justice is my attempt to succinctly chronicle the calculated intentionality underlying the covid tyranny, and I ask your help in spreading the clear message that #MistakesWereNOTMade. Please share this poem and keep it handy for the next time anybody uses verbiage to gloss over the atrocities committed. Let’s make 2023 the Year of Accountability so none dare repeat such acts in the future.” – Margaret Anna Alice, 1 January 2023
In the video below, the poem ‘Mistakes Were NOT Made: An Anthem for Justice’ written by Margaret Anna Alice is read by Dr. Tess Lawrie:
I am profoundly honored to share Dr. Tess Lawrie’s exquisitely poignant reading of my “Mistakes Were Not Made: Anthem for Justice” poem. It was masterfully filmed by Mark Lawrie, director of “A Letter to Dr Andrew Hill,” my #1 red-pilling video.
Mistakes Were NOT Made: An Anthem for Justice by Margaret Anna Alice
The Armenian Genocide was not a mistake. Holodomor was not a mistake. The Final Solution was not a mistake. The Great Leap Forward was not a mistake. The Killing Fields were not a mistake.
Name your genocide – it was not a mistake. That includes the Great Democide of the 2020s. To imply otherwise is to give Them the out they are seeking.
The last minute & half of the Reese video is pay-the-bills information which we should all be able to relate to. The theme is setting up “Safety Committees” on a local or County level to begin RESISTING government tyranny from a power-grabbing lying government. Reese briefly uses the example of the American Revolution became instituted on a local level against British Tyranny. Reese correctly points out that day’s tyrants are the infiltrating long arm of Globalist-Elitists. (But being a bit if a history buff, the term “Safety Committee” reminds more of how the French Revolution brought power to anti-Monarchists leading to mass executions which ironically evolved into the absolute power of Emperor Napoleon Bonaparte. Just saying, be careful with whom you trust with power.)
Regardless, of how “Safety Committees” pan out, it actually might be the best RESISTANCE Movement to America’s apparently long-time Globalist-Marxist-Corporatist-Fascist political infection. It is my current humble opinion that ALL facets Constitutionally separated government powers (Executive, Legislative and Judiciary) have become infected with corruption for any sort of balanced protection for WE THE PEOPLE to manifest as our Founding Fathers intended with the U.S. Constitution.
That is the-WHY and the-HOW myths and the lies propagandized as facts and truth by a lying government has become so accepted by a gullible populace that probably STILL has zero idea how they are being manipulates like SHEEP.
I have truthful cross posts that will appear below on the facts derided as Myths and Conspiracy Theories when it is proven everyday even by the Left the truth was covered up from NewsTarget and the Activist Post:
And before moving on, I feel compelled to share a parody music video lampooning one of the worst Sheeple Manipulators (and it’s not brought to you by Pfizer):
AND SERIOUSLY, Jeffrey Epstein did notkill himself BUT the China Virus (er…I mean COVID) DID COME FROM WUHAN CHINESE LAB. The speculation for why many on the Left are admitting the LAB-LEAK below the first two cross posts. HINT: Might have something to do with Ukraine and the nothing to see here demand.
JRH 3/4/23
Thank you to those who have stepped up!
READER SUPPORTED! I need Readers willing to chip in $5 – $10 – $25 – $50 – $100. PLEASE I need your PayPal generosity. PLEASE GIVE to Help me be a voice for Liberty:
Misinformation about the Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) continues to run rampant as government officials and public health “experts” refuse to admit they were wrong about pretty much everything.
Almost nothing people were ordered to do, from testing to masking to “vaccinating,” produced positive outcomes because all of it was based on covid myths that have since been debunked. Here are the top 10 most prominent covid myths that are still spreading as “facts:”
1) Natural immunity offers little protection compared to “vaccine immunity”
A study published in The Lancet that looked at 65 major studies from 19 different countries shows that natural immunity, meaning unvaccinated immunity, is at least as effective as the fake “immunity” produced by the primary round of covid shots.
Facebook banned the study, naturally, but it shows that the best way to stay protected against covid is to rely on your own God-given immune system rather than Big Pharma’s experimental chemical offerings.
2) Masks prevent covid transmission
This myth led to tens of millions of people being forced into face muzzles that suffocated them, and in some cases led to the spread of more disease. Esteemed Oxford researchers recently confirmed that masks are medically useless, often causing more harm than good.
3) Closing schools reduces covid transmission
The only thing keeping children at home did during covid was isolate them from their friends and teachers, leading to mental illness and other health problems, and compromised their education.
4) Myocarditis caused by the jabs is exceedingly rare
It turns out that covid jabs are a much more prominent cause of myocarditis than infection with “covid,” a virus that has never been isolated, by the way.
5) Young people can benefit from getting covid “boosted”
Even worse than the primary round of covid injections are the “boosters” that the Biden regime and others have been aggressively pushing. There is zero evidence that getting boosted does anything other than produce vaccine-induced AIDS (VAIDS), research shows.
The entire covid scamdemic was based on myths and deception
Another common covid myth, orNo. 6, is the idea that forcing people to get “vaccinated” helped to increase vaccination rates, and thus reduce the number of infections, illnesses, and deaths.
“The mandate was based on the theory that vaccination reduced transmission rates – a notion later proven to be false,” reported the New York Post.
7) It is a conspiracy theory to suggest that covid came from a Wuhan lab
There is still zero evidence to suggest that covid was a natural occurrence, but this has not stopped the powers that be from claiming that anyone citing the lab origin theory is spreading conspiracy lies.
8) People must get the second jab dose three or four weeks after the first one
Early on, everyone was told that the two-dose injection regimen must be taken no more than one month apart. This is despite the fact that data suggests a longer in-between spacing period of at least three months.
9) The “bivalent booster” is backed by “crystal clear” science
The only data backing the so-called “bivalent booster” shot for the latest covid variants is a pathetic animal study involving just eight mice. To this day, there has not been a single randomized controlled trial of the bivalent booster to suggest that it is anything other than snake oil for the gullible.
10) One in five people contract “long” covid
We were told by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) that 20 percent of covid infections will lead to long covid. Because of this, the federal agency wants everyone to get injected again and again and again.
The truth is that only three percent of covid patients, according to a U.K. study, suffer covid symptoms lasting longer than 12 weeks.
Preppers get called conspiracy theorists a lot. It’s supposed to be demeaning, but considering how many conspiracy theories have been proven correct lately, I no longer consider it an insult. The more time goes by, the more “conspiracy theorists” just seem ahead of the game.
Quite a few “conspiracy theories” have recently come to light as actual facts in 2023 already. And it’s only the beginning of March.
Let’s look at a recent batch of “conspiracy theories” that aren’t really theories any more.
This is particularly problematic for anyone with fairly new models. Newer appliances are made to break down within about ten years. Anyone who’s been a homeowner for more than a decade knows this. If appliances are made to only last ten years or so, the government doesn’t need to conduct some dramatic midnight raid to steal your stove. All they have to do is wait. Within ten years, most people will have to replace their stoves anyway, and at that point, very few, if any, gas stoves will still be on the market.
Nope, it’s not just a theory. They really do want to get rid of gas stoves.
Covid origins?
And in other Department of Energy news, the agency recently came to the conclusion that Covid probably did come from a lab. The findings were part of a classified report, which the government agency shared with theWall Street Journal last weekend.
Back in 2021, the FBI had been the only federal agency to state with “moderate confidence” that Covid came from a lab. At the time, their finding mostly went ignored. However, with another agency admitting it, and WSJ covering the story, it becomes more difficult to brush aside.
And at least we’re allowed to openly discuss the lab leak now. Two years ago, we weren’t. In February 2021, Facebook banned any discussion of the possible laboratory origins of Covid. The lab leak theory was just too crazy to even consider. Zero Hedge was banished from Twitter for daring to suggest the makeup of the virus was peculiar in 2020. The Organic Prepper was called a disinformation site and defunded due, in part, to our coverage of the virus.
The Covid lab leak theory is slowly but surely looking less like a theory, and more like an established fact.
The Covid vaccine?
This is hardly the only situation in which Covid dissidents have been proven correct. There has been a small contingent of people from the beginning who were reluctant to participate in the trial of a novel medical product. Considering the many criminal payoutsBig Pharma has had to make over the years, wanting long-term studies before trying a novel pharmaceutical product shouldn’t be controversial.
The cost (injecting a poorly-tested novel substance) did not match up with the benefit (avoiding a not-particularly dangerous disease that many of us had a natural immunity to anyway). Plenty of well-informed people had perfectly rational reasons for vaccine hesitancy.
Were our concerns taken seriously? No. The Othering was vicious and relentless. Daisy wrote an article about it here. Family relationships were stressed and sometimes broken. Careers were ended. Opportunities were denied. Reputations were ruined.
And meanwhile, the “safe and effective” drumbeat resounded. Anyone who wanted real answers about what was happening, who wanted to wait for long-term studies, was dismissed as a conspiracy theorist.
So, who was right? Were the shots safe and effective? Or were the conspiracy theorists the reasonable ones?
I’m not a doctor or statistician. All I can do is point at actual numbers. And even the most pro-vax publications cannot hide the non-Covid excess mortality of the past two years. Young, formerly healthy people have been dying at far higher rates than they used to, and it’s not from Covid. As of right now, no one can prove that jabs are responsible, because no one wants to look that closely. But we can’t prove they’re not responsible, either. Safe? I’m not convinced, and neither are a lot of vastly more qualified people. Just look at Ed Dowd’s meticulously researched book, Cause Unknown.
And even Tony “The Science” Fauci recently admitted that the shots don’t really work at preventing transmission or infection. So, nope, these jabs aren’t effective either.
Were the conspiracy theorists right to be cautious about the new shots? Yeah, I think so.
Mandatory masking?
And what about the masks? We got mixed signals about masks from the beginning. In March 2020, Dr. Fauci said they didn’t work, then he later changed his tune. Many people around the country had to deal with mask mandates for over a year.
Well, the experts at the Cochrane Library recently published a huge meta-analysis of the effectiveness of physical barriers (like masks) at preventing respiratory viruses (like Covid). They can’t find any strong links between masking and disease prevention. Cochrane studies are the gold standard. They’re very conservative, they rarely make hard and fast statements, but once they do, people typically stop arguing.
The mask debate is one that really smacks us at the OP because, back in 2021, NewsGuard cited our questioning of the mask narrative as a reason to downgrade us, which really hurt our income stream. Daisy goes into the whole story here. She cited studies with a variety of outcomes regarding masks, and NewsGuard saw the variety of viewpoints as reason enough to downgrade us.
The journalism majors working at NewsGuard don’t seem to understand that letting multiple educated people argue is more true to the scientific ideal than top-down authoritarian mandates.
I’m not the only person saying this. Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, a Stanford professor and MD, said as much in arecent interview with Jordan Peterson. At 5:26, he talks about public perception during the pandemic:
There was this sort of uni-vocal conclusion that you had to do lockdowns, you had to wear masks, you had to socially distance, you had to put plastic barriers up, you had to close schools, you had to do all of these things; that the vaccines would stop transmission of the disease, that therefore it was warranted that people would lose their jobs over them. All of these ideas were sold as if there was a scientific consensus in favor of them. That was a lie. There was never a scientific consensus on almost any of the topics; and as you say on masks, in fact, the preexisting narrative, the preexisting idea of most scientists before the pandemic, was in quite the opposite direction.
Dr. Bhattacharya’s not the only highly qualified doctor speaking out, either. In fact, so many of the various Covid narratives have been proven wrong, that Dr. Marty Makary, chief of Islet Transplant Surgery at Johns Hopkins medical school, recently published an article February 27 titled “10 myths told by covid experts—and now debunked.”
“Masks prevent transmission” is #2 on the list. I guess if NewsGuard still thinks Daisy is a conspiracy theorist over this one, she’s got some pretty kick-ass company.
But in all seriousness, thank God (or whoever you pray to) for doctors like Dr. Bhattacharya and Dr. Makary for not treating the public like we’re mentally impaired rodents. There are still a few true medical experts out there who genuinely want to educate the public, and give us real answers.
The air and water in East Palestine?
In the meantime, I wonder if the EPA will find any real experts. That agency keeps insisting that the air and water in East Palestine are perfectly safe, despite the derailment and subsequent disaster going on a few weeks ago.
The EPA says they’ve been testing for everything and that the numbers indicate everything looks good; professional chemists aren’t so sure. “They should be testing for individual compounds, and if they are testing for total VOCs [volatile organic compounds] as a screen, they need to have very sensitive instruments because some VOCs are much more toxic than others,” says Ted Schettler, MD, and science director at the nonprofit Science and Environmental Health network. The fact that East Palestine residents are still smelling off-odors suggests that the EPA is not using sensitive enough equipment. [Blog Editor: That was a compassionate guess by author Marie Hawthorne, I think a better suggestion is government lying and coverup.]
And the EPA hasn’t started testing for the myriad other substances that formed when the known chemicals in the train were burned. When you mix chemicals together and burn them, new chemicals form, and this hasn’t even been talked about much yet.
It’s probably going to be a long time before we have a good picture of the damage caused by this derailment. But, what do we know?
We know that the people of East Palestine are still suffering from bizarre symptoms. Rashes, shortness of breath, and a burning sensation while breathing are common. Some people have had voice changes, loss of taste and smell, and random infections. Because East Palestine is such a low-income area, doctors can’t do the tests they need to, though they all agree that the citizens are in real pain.
And yet EPA Administrator Michael Regan states, “Nothing is coming back that shows adverse health impacts.” [YUP, Govt Lying!]
Government officials are not helping themselves by insisting there’s “nothing to see here!” Distrusting the federal government has traditionally been in the realm of conspiracy theorists, but once again, which group of people seems more reasonable?
The Twitter Files?
I’ve spent a lot of time wondering if I’m too cynical, too eager to see ill intent.
Then came the Twitter Files.
We’ve written about them before on this site. When Elon Musk bought Twitter, he handed over internal documents to independent journalists Bari Weiss, Matt Taibbi, Michael Shellenberger, and Lee Feng to peruse.
Many figures in alternative media had suspected they were being shadow-banned, or having a hard time reaching followers. The Twitter Files confirmed everyone’s worst suspicions: the federal government does spend millions of dollars policing online content, and much of it targets law-abiding citizens with inconvenient opinions, rather than real criminals. Many of the people that had their accounts locked or frozen weren’t even big media presences, just people with a few dozen followers with an annoying sense of humor, or who got snarky about the wrong things.
Five years ago, anyone convinced the Feds were watching their every online move would have been labeled a crazy conspiracy theorist.
Well, yet again, the conspiracy theorists have been proven correct.
The gaslighting continues.
If you’ve ever been in an abusive relationship, you probably know what it’s like to have someone trying to convince you you’re crazy. The only way to survive gaslighting like that is to constantly remind yourself of things you know are true. That’s why it’s so important to keep track of whatever narratives we’re supposed to swallow and constantly check them against our preexisting knowledge base. It’s important to hold purveyors of false narratives to account; it’s important to point to tangible facts and to be able to discuss them.
I think we’re going to keep seeing more of this for a while. Universal Basic Income, digital currencies, AI tech, there are so many new things happening right now.
What about you? How have you been proven correct? Are there any “theories” you’re just waiting to see evidence of on the mainstream? What theories have you seen mocked, then proven true? Let’s talk about it in the comments.
Marie Hawthorne is a lover of novels and a cultivator of superb apple pie recipes, Marie spends her free time writing about the world around her.
ACTIVIST POST – ALTERNATIVE INDEPENDENT NEWS – CREATIVE COMMONS 2019
+++++++++++++++++++++
[Blog Editor: An INFOWARS post begins with a video of Owen Shroyer on The Alex Jones Show going over Leftist hypocrites poohing-poohing the Wuhan Lab Leak but now three years later the same Leftists are saying, “YUP! Wuhan Lab Leak!” The speculation is because the CCP is aligning with Putin’s Russia to battle the Globalist West (viz., USA and NATO Nations). The INFOWARS post then goes over a history of how Gain of Function (GoF) research went from a USA university to Wuhan and probably Ukraine bio-war labs in Ukraine. BELOW I am just embedding the link to the INFOWARS title for you to read, THEN I am cross posting three Bitchute versions of BANNED.VIDEO focusing Wuhan Lab Leak, the CCP and Ukraine. If a WWIII erupts this geopolitical idiocy will be the reason AND ALL the geopolitical players (USA, NATO, Russia, Ukraine, Communist China and any delusional alliances) will be the bad guys and the people of the world will be the gullible losers.]
Owen Shroyer breaks down clips of top leftist propagandists Jimmy Kimmel and the cast of The View having trouble co9ming to terms with the fact that they were wrong about dismissing the Wuhan COVID lab leak.
Photo from Breitbart with this caption: A black plume rises over East Palestine, Ohio, as a result of the controlled detonation of a portion of the derailed Norfolk and Southern trains Monday, Feb. 6, 2023. (AP Photo/Gene J. Puskar)
The phrases “controlled detonation” or “controlled burn” are government lying propaganda to deceive safety is involved. BECOME INFORMED of the truth!
Yesterday (2/26/23) I watched a video interview between the Resistance Chicks and Mike Adams on the Brighteon Video format. Although I did not actually hear the word “Depopulation” until the 20-minute mark, the video smacks of a DEPOPULATION agenda that is evidenced from the probable intentional derailment of a train near East Palestine Ohio. The derailed train led to a “BURN” of the toxic chemicals hauled by the train that actually released a toxic mushroom cloud releasing toxic dioxins in the atmosphere, soil and water. THE VIDEO after a bit of source information below.
Our government is soooooooo corrupt on ALL LEVELS (Local, State & Federal), that the government tells the exposed, “all is well and safe”. AND YET sources not controlled by the government have a differing analysis. Citizens News has this story from 2/17/23:
East Palestine train wreck may have created largest dioxin plume in world history
The situation in East Palestine, Ohio, is much worse than the media is letting on, particularly as it pertains to the widespread release of chemical dioxins. The 14 some-odd tanker cars carrying vinyl chloride that were intentionally blown up released a massive plume of these deadly chemicals, which were spread far and wide, including up the eastern seaboard through Pennsylvania, New York and beyond. Tens of millions of people stand to be affected by this dioxin release, which by and large appears to be the most disastrous dioxin incident to have ever occurred in world history. Water supplies, food crops, city parks, state forests – all of them stand to become toxified with dioxins due to this disaster. “Burning vinyl is the most serious source of dioxin in the environment – whether from trash incinerators, house fires or chemical spills,” explained Eric Coppolino, writing for Planet Waves FM – Chiron Return. “While vinyl chloride is a precursor chemical to making PVC, any time chlorinated compounds burn there will be dioxins created. And dioxin is a manufacturing byproduct of any manufacturing process involving chlorine, from ‘disinfectants’ to the bleaching of paper. There was plenty of dioxin in those tanker cars before they caught fire.”
Dioxins are a hormonal toxin that builds up in the food chain
One of the most concerning things about dioxins is their persistence. They do not biodegrade and tend to remain wherever they lodge themselves for years and years. (Related: The Agent Orange released during the Vietnam War is still a problem in the areas where it was spread.) Most people are unaware of what dioxins even are because the media rarely talks about them. Back in the day, a small release of them led to the closure of Times Beach, Mo., which was leveled and had its zip code removed over a dioxin release much smaller than the one that just occurred in Ohio. “It is one of the most serious environmental issues, but the background is not known by nearly anyone (and that’s partly why I have posted the history below),” Coppolino wrote. So where do dioxins come from? They are generated when chlorinated chemicals like vinyl chloride burn, explode or degrade. They are never an end product but are rather a contaminant and degradation byproduct. “They are directly related to PCBs, which are considered dioxin-like compounds,” Coppolino explained. “Dioxins were the extremely toxic component in the Vietnam War-era defoliant Agent Orange. They were at the Love Canal in Niagara Falls. They were the toxin involved in the evacuation and dissolution of Times Beach, Missouri. They are the cause of toxic shock syndrome from bleached paper tampons. “Dioxins are acute toxins on one level. There will be a lot of dead fish and animals in the path of the Ohio plume – and people will get very sick immediately.
Kids are extremely sensitive due to their low body weight.” Their persistence in the environment and hormonal toxicity makes dioxins a very serious problem, especially when released at high levels like what happened in Ohio. We have not even begun to see the effects of what just occurred, which will manifest in the months and years to come as animals, humans and nature suffer over time. “I guess a new disease is going to be invented soon,” one commenter wrote about how the establishment will probably invent some new made-up disease to explain away all the future cases of dioxin poisoning caused by the controlled explosion. “And a new ‘virus’ will be invented, too. And new vaccines. And the shame. People being intoxicated being shamed because they can ‘infect’ people.” More related news can be found at ChemicalViolence.com. Sources for this article include:PlanetWavesFM.substack.com, NaturalNews.com
Other News Stories the LYING GOVERNMENT would prefer your ignorance:
The video you are about to watch informs about the toxic permanence of dioxin and yet Mike Adams in the second half offers natural solutions to offset dioxin toxicity.
If you are a Trump supporter (as I am), you will notice Mike Adams has a critical tone for President Trump. The reason for the tone is President Trump’s continued support for the mRNA danger-Jab. I concur with the Adams criticism of Trump for his mRNA Jab promotion! BUT I also believe Trump is the best monkey wrench against the Dem-Marxist tyranny currently infecting America! So I’m a pick-and-choose which battles to fight kind-a-guy for now.
READER SUPPORTED! I need Readers willing to chip in $5 – $10 – $25 – $50 – $100. PLEASE I need your PayPal generosity. PLEASE GIVE to Help me be a voice for Liberty:
My Referral Code: 2388058 My Health Store Suggestion: Axis TreBiotics – Promo website: https://tinyurl.com/2p8hfnp9
Description & Purchase Info: Your gut microbiome is the master switch to wellness. Turn it on with one-of-a-kind Modere Axis™ TreBiotic, cutting-edge nutraceutical science that goes beyond gut health with 3-in-1 Microbiome Matrix™ technology featuring three key factors: GOS prebiotic helps beneficial gut bacteria populate faster and with greater density; NeuroFlora™ probiotic complex provides 3 scientifically selected strains of acid-resistant bacteria shown to support microbiome diversity, immune health and brain and cognitive health; and EpiCor® GI+, a whole food fermentate, supports a healthy gut lining for optimal micronutrient synthesis and overall wellbeing*. Axis TreBiotic utilizes an innovative beadlet delivery system, and there are no pills to swallow. (REMEMBER DISCOUNT REFERRAL CODE: 2388058)
If you watch television, I am certain you have heard the so-called science on mRNA Jabs of “Safe and Effective” or “Trust the Science”. HOWEVER, if you pay attention to the statistics that every government tries to sweep under the proverbial carpet, YOU SHOULD comprehend what is being told about mRNA Jabs is pure brainwashing propaganda!
That propaganda is still being perpetrated upon the public. If you are AWAKE enough, YOU should ask the big question: “WHY or WHAT is the purpose behind the constant lying to get YOU to be injected with an UNSAFE and INEFFECTIVE and statistically DANGEROUS mRNA Jab?”
Hopefully the actual science in the below cross post helps you ask or ponder some self-preservation questions about lying governments and lying science propaganda.
“We discuss how corruption in government contracting works, how there was a gold rush to produce pandemic products, and how WHO wants a major piece of this action, with surveillance, propaganda, censorship, vaccine passports, travel restrictions. We discuss the many so-called pandemic scares declared by the W.H.O. during the last 20 years, including avian flu, swine flu, polio, 2 Ebola outbreaks, Zika, COVID, monkeypox.”
JRH 2/13/23
Thank you to those who have stepped up!
READER SUPPORTED! I need Readers willing to chip in $5 – $10 – $25 – $50 – $100. PLEASE I need your PayPal generosity. PLEASE GIVE to Help me be a voice for Liberty:
Amidst growing concerns over the safety of Covid-19 vaccines, a shocking report from the Office for National Statistics (ONS) reveals the devastating impact of the injections on children and young adults.
The data shows a staggering increase in mortality rates among vaccinated children, with triple-vaccinated children being 45.23 times more likely to die from any cause than unvaccinated children. Meanwhile, mortality rates per 100,000 are lowest among unvaccinated 18 to 39-year-olds and highest among vaccinated 19 to 39-year-olds.
This alarming trend is echoed by a secret CDC report, which confirms that half a million American children and young adults have died following the Covid vaccine roll-out, resulting in nearly 118,000 excess deaths against the 2015-2019 five-year average.
These staggering figures raise serious questions about the safety of the Covid-19 vaccines, the impact they are having on our youth, and why they were ever granted emergency use authorisation for use among children and young adults in the first place.
Despite the U.S. Government’s reputation for poor publication of relevant and up-to-date data regarding the consequences of rolling out Covid-19 injections, a surprising discovery has been made through the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OEC).
The OECD, an intergovernmental organization with 38 member countries founded in 1961 to promote economic growth and global trade, houses a treasure trove of information on excess deaths.
Thanks to figures provided by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and found in the OEC database, a chart has been created to showcase the excess deaths among children and young adults aged 0-44 across the USA by week in 2020 and 2021.
The grim reality of the situation has been revealed through official figures.
When the alleged Covid-19 pandemic struck the United States in early 2020, there was only a slight increase in excess deaths among children and young adults. However, with the advent of a Covid-19 vaccine, one would have expected a decrease in the number of deaths in this age group. Unfortunately, the opposite occurred.
The year 2021 saw significantly higher excess deaths among children and young adults every week, with the exception of weeks 29 and 30. But then, in week 31, a shocking event took place that caused excess deaths to skyrocket among children and young adults.
Tragically, official figures from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control (CDC) reveal that this trend has persisted into 2022.
Comparing the figures from 2020, the height of the Covid-19 pandemic, to 2022, the increase in excess deaths is undeniable. In 2022 alone, there were 7,680 more deaths among children and young adults compared to the same time frame in 2020.
However, the year 2021 stands out as the worst year for deaths in this age group, with a staggering 27,227 more excess deaths by week 40 following the rollout of the Covid-19 vaccine.
The official CDC data provides a sobering look at the effects of the vaccine, with the figures showing a continuous rise in deaths after its rollout on December 14th, 2020.
The grim figures reveal a haunting reality – the year 2022 saw a staggering 1,352 more deaths among 0-44-year-olds by week 40 compared to the same period in 2020, despite the latter being at the height of the alleged COVID pandemic.
But the most concerning aspect of the data is the overall number of deaths and excess deaths since the roll-out of the Covid-19 injections.
With millions of Americans being coerced into getting the injections, and millions of parents being forced to get their children vaccinated, the truth of the matter lies in the mounting number of deaths among young Americans.
Nearly half a million people aged 0 to 44 have lost their lives and this has resulted in a devastating 117,719 excess deaths compared to the 2015-2019 average.
The average life expectancy in the US in 2020 was 77.28 years, which begs the question – how can the staggering number of deaths, including 231,987 children and young adults up to the age of 44 and 40,365 excess deaths, be explained as an unfortunate consequence of COVID-19?
However, the real shocker lies in the further increase in death among children and young adults in both 2021 and 2022, despite the official narrative that Covid-19 injections are safe and effective. The data provided by the CDC, and even further data published by the UK Government, reveals a sinister truth.
Because the official narrative that Covid-19 injections are safe and effective has been debunked by a report quietly published by the UK’s Office for National Statistics on July 6th, 2022.
A report that proves beyond doubt the Covid-19 vaccines are not what authorities claim them to be.
According to the data in Table 2 of a report by the UK’s Office for National Statistics, the consequences of the mass Covid-19 vaccination campaign are shocking.
The report contains the monthly age-standardized mortality rates by vaccination status among 18 to 39-year-olds for Non-Covid-19 deaths from January to May 2022. The data shows that in every single month of 2022, partially vaccinated and fully vaccinated 18 to 39-year-olds were more likely to die than unvaccinated individuals in the same age group.
To put it into perspective, the data shows that in February, triple-vaccinated 18 to 39-year-olds were 27% more likely to die than unvaccinated individuals, with a mortality rate of 26.7 per 100,000 among the triple-vaccinated and 21 per 100,000 among the unvaccinated.
And by May, the situation had significantly worsened, with triple-vaccinated individuals 52% more likely to die, with a mortality rate of 21.4 per 100,000 compared to 14.1 per 100,000 among the unvaccinated.
However, the most concerning figures are among the partially vaccinated, with May seeing partially vaccinated 18 to 39-year-olds 202% more likely to die than unvaccinated individuals.
These findings raise serious questions about the safety and effectiveness of the Covid-19 vaccines, and it’s imperative that further research is conducted to understand the impact of these vaccinations on public health.
The report on the monthly age-standardised mortality rates by vaccination status in England up to May 2022 would have raised alarm among the public if it was publicised.
But yet again it wasn’t and was instead swept under the carpet.
Because the same data contained in Table 2 of the report, gathered by the Office for National Statistics, also reveals the dire consequences of the mass Covid-19 vaccination campaign on children.
The mortality rate for unvaccinated children equated to 0.31 for Covid-19 deaths, however, for one-dose vaccinated children the rate skyrocketed to 3.24 per 100,000 person-years.
The rate is even more concerning for triple-vaccinated children, with a staggering 41.29 per 100,000 person-years.
The report also revealed the impact of the vaccinations on non-Covid-19 deaths, with unvaccinated children having an all-cause death mortality rate of 6.39 per 100,000 person-years, and partially vaccinated children having a slightly higher rate of 6.48.
However, the rates rapidly increased following each injection, with double-vaccinated children having a 97.28 all-cause death mortality rate and triple-vaccinated children having an alarming 289.02 per 100,000 person-years.
These figures, which are age-standardised and rates per 100,000 population, provide conclusive evidence of the devastating impact of Covid-19 vaccination.
Double-vaccinated children are at least 15.22 times more likely to die from any cause compared to unvaccinated children, and triple-vaccinated children are a staggering 45.23 times more likely to die.
The numbers don’t lie, and they paint a disturbing picture of the devastating effects of the Covid-19 vaccines.
This information, therefore, proves that the vast majority of the 118,000 excess deaths among half a million deaths suffered by children and young adults – in the secret report given to the OECD by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) – are a shocking and tragic consequence of Covid-19 vaccination.
New paper: An estimated 13 million people worldwide killed by the COVID vaccines
That’s twice as many as were killed by the virus. In the US, the estimates are 670K Americans killed. Perhaps it’s time to declare that the vaccines are a worldwide emergency?
The paper suggests you can take the number of vaccine doses delivered, divide by 1,000 to get an estimate of the number of people killed by the COVID vaccine.
The tweet directly from the author sums it up:
In our new article, which will be posted this week, we estimate that ❗️13 MILLION❗️ were killed by the COVID-19 vaccines to date, worldwide. The great majority old and frail. The number for India alone is 3.7 million. All-cause mortality is a powerful information source.
The paper points out that “it is not unreasonable to assume an all-population global value of vDFR = 0.1 %”
For the US, 670M doses have been given, so the estimate is 670,000 people have been killed by the COVID vaccines in the US.
I have said for a long time that the URF in VAERS is 41, and there are 16,300 excess US deaths in VAERS (subtracting 250 background deaths per year which gets reported into VAERS) which comes to 668K.
The paper gives a simple way to estimate the number of people a country has killed by deploying the COVID vaccines: 0.001*# of doses.
In short, you can just take the number of vaccine doses in millions and just change “millions” to “thousands” to estimate the number of people killed by the vaccine.
Using data from Israel and Australia, the paper estimates 13 million deaths worldwide from the COVID vaccines:
The COVID-19 vaccines did not only not save lives but they are highly toxic.
On the global scale, given the 3.7 million fatalities in India alone, having vDFR = 1 % (Rancourt, 2022), and given the age-stratified vDFR results presented in this work, it is not unreasonable to assume an all-population global value of vDFR = 0.1 %. Based on the global number of COVID-19 vaccine doses administered to date (13.25 billion 24 doses, up to 24 January 2023, Our World in Data),3 this would correspond to 13 million deaths from the COVID-19 vaccines worldwide. By comparison, the official World Health Organization (WHO) number of COVID-19 deaths to date is 6.8 million (6,817,478 deaths, reported to WHO, as 3 February 2023),4 which are not detected as COVID-19 assignable deaths in ACM studies.
James Corbett and Meryl Nass continue their efforts to unpack the WHO’s vast bureaucratic overreach toward a global biosecurity state. Interpreting recently drafted amendments to the International Health Regulations for future pandemics, Nass and Corbett remind us of the sordid history of so-called pandemics, from Smallpox, Swine Flu, Bird Flu, Zika, Ebola, Monkeypox to COVID, pointing out the failures of the WHO at dealing with nearly every one of them. Yet one area continuously prevails, curiously evading public questioning — the demand for toxic products and the success of selling pharmaceuticals, and the sleeper contracts which activate the WHO’s financial fangs. Don’t miss this quintessential duo on today’s ‘Good Morning CHD’.
The tyranny Americans and citizens of the once Free World Western nations now face has a twisted new look on the same old bad tasting fruit. The “fruit” is an Elitist control of the – considered – non-elite people. For the Elite to control the non-elite, ALL forms of individual thinking must be eliminated, beliefs must conform to Elitist paradigms, actions must conform to the Elitist will AND societal-culture is determined by State-Controlling Oligarchical -Elites.
The above is from the realm of the highly credible due to documentation and credentials. Below is a bit more speculative and hence to many (if not most) is in the realm of the incredulous (H/T: Mike Adams – Natural News).
I grew up on science fiction and Chariots of the Gods literature, ergo this information has more credibility with me than a majority of critical thinking individuals. Mike Adams in his 1/9/23 Situation Update name dropped a video-on-demand (COST – $30.00) entitled, “LIES OF MEN & GODS- THERE IS A HUGE LIE…” It is produced by GENSIX Productions. Steve Quayle is the name associated with the documentary. Quayle believes all the chaos of today’s emerging tyranny is because Aliens (NOT Illegal/Undocumented Aliens) will be hailed as saviors of the Earth by Globalist Controllers.
I REALIZE this is the point most stop reading because the concept is soooo incredulous.
ALSO I must point out that $Thirty Bucks$ is a bit out of my budget for information that I am on the fence of Believing/Not-Believing. And yet my former youth finds it fascinating.
After the Smith and Malone posts, I’m going to cross the purchase page for “LIES OF MEN & GODS” followed by a Vimeo video Trailer of the Documentary. But I thought I’d give you taste from the USAWatchdog post above with Greg Hunter interviewing Steve Quayle on Rumble:
READER SUPPORTED! I need Readers willing to chip in $5 – $10 – $25 – $50 – $100. PLEASE I need your generosity. PLEASE GIVE to Help me be a voice for Liberty:
In recent weeks I’ve been seeing an interesting narrative fallacy being sold to the general public when it comes to the designs of globalists. The mainstream media and others are now openly suggesting that it’s actually okay to be opposed to certain aspects of groups like the World Economic Forum. They give you permission to be concerned, just don’t dare call it conspiracy.
This propaganda is a deviation from the abject denials we’re accustomed to hearing in the Liberty Movement for the past decade or more. We have all been confronted with the usual cognitive dissonance – the claims that globalist groups “just sit around talking about boring economic issues” and nothing they do has any bearing on global politics or your everyday life. In some cases we were even told that these groups of elites “don’t exist.”
Now, the media is admitting that, yes, perhaps the globalists do have more than just a little influence over governments, social policies and economic outcomes. But, what the mainstream doesn’t like is the assertion that globalists have nefarious or authoritarian intentions. That’s just crazy tinfoil hat talk, right?
The reason for the narrative shift is obvious. Far too many people witnessed the true globalist agenda in action during the pandemic lockdowns and now they see the conspiracy for what it is. The globalists, in turn, seem to have been shocked to discover many millions of people in opposition to the mandates and the refusals to comply were clearly far greater than they expected. They are still trying to push their brand of covid fear, but the cat is out of the bag now.
They failed to get what they wanted in the West, which was a perpetual Chinese-style medical tyranny with vaccine passports as the norm. So, the globalist strategy has changed and they are seeking to adapt. They admit to a certain level of influence, but they pretend as if they are benevolent or indifferent.
The response to this lie is relatively straightforward. I could point out how Klaus Schwab of the WEF savored the thrill of the initial pandemic outbreak and declared that covid was the perfect “opportunity” to initiate what the WEF calls the “Great Reset.”
I could also point out that Klaus Schwab’s vision of the Reset, what he calls the “4th Industrial Revolution,” is a veritable nightmare world in which Artificial Intelligence runs everything, society is condensed into digital enclaves called “smart cities” and people are oppressed by carbon taxation. I could point out that the WEF actively supports the concept of the “Shared Economy” in which you will “own nothing, have no privacy” and you will supposedly be happy about it, but only because you won’t have any other choice.
What I really want to talk about, however, is the process by which the elites hope to achieve their dystopian epoch, as well as the globalist mindset which lends itself to the horrors of technocracy. The common naive assumption among skeptics of conspiracy is that the globalists are regular human beings with the same drives and limited desires as the rest of us. They might have some power, but world events are still random and certainly not controlled.
This is a fallacy. The globalists are not like us. They are not human. Or, I should say, they despise humanity and seek to do away with it. And, because of this, they have entirely different aspirations compared to the majority of us which include aspirations of dominance.
What we are dealing with here are not normal people with conscience, ethics or empathy. Their behavior is much more akin to higher functioning psychopaths and sociopaths rather than the everyday person on the street. We saw this on full display during the covid lockdowns and the vicious attempts to enforce vaccine passports; their actions betray their long game.
Take a look at comments by New Zealand’s prime minister and WEF attendee, Jacinda Ardern, from a year ago. She admits to the deliberate tactic of creating a two-tier class system within her own country based on vaccination status. There is no remorse or guilt in her demeanor, she is proud of taking such authoritarian actions despite numerous studies that prove the mandates are ineffective.
Beyond the covid response, though, I suggest people who deny globalist conspiracy take a deeper dive into the philosophical roots of organizations like the WEF. Their entire ideology can be summed up in a couple words – futurism and godhood.
Futurism is an ideological movement which believes that all “new” innovations, social or technological, should supplant the previous existing systems for the sake of progress. They believe that all old ways of thinking, including notions of principles, heritage, religious belief systems, codes of conduct, etc. are crutches holding humanity back from greatness.
But what is the greatness the futurists seek? As mentioned above, they want godhood. An era in which the natural world and human will is enslaved by the hands of a select few. Case in point – The following presentation from 2018 by WEF “guru” Yuval Harari on the future of humanity as the globalists see it:
Harari’s conclusions are rooted in elitist biases and ignore numerous psychological and social realities, but we can set those aside for a moment and examine his basic premise that humanity as we know it will no longer exist in the next century because of “digital evolution” and “human hacking.”
The foundation of the WEF vision is built on the idea that data is the new Holy Grail, the new conquest. This is something I have written about extensively in the past (check out my article ‘Artificial Intelligence: A Secular Look At The Digital Antichrist’) but it is good to see it expressed with such arrogance by someone like Harari because it is undeniable evidence – the globalists think they are going to build a completely centralized economy and society based on human data rather than production. In other words, YOU become the product. The average citizen, your thoughts and your behaviors, become the stock in trade.
Globalists also believe that data is most valuable because it can be exploited to control people’s behaviors, to hack the body and mind in order to create human puppets, or create super-beings. They dream of becoming little gods with omnipotent knowledge. Yuval even proudly proclaims that intelligent design will no longer be the realm of God in heaven, but of the new digitized man.
While Harari pays lip service to “democracy” vs “digital dictatorship,” he goes on to assert that centralization may become the de facto system of governance. He says this not because he fears dictatorship, but because that has always been the WEF’s intent. The globalist argues that governments cannot be trusted to hold a monopoly on the digital wellspring and that someone needs to step in to regulate data; but “who would do this?” he asks.
He already knows the answer. The UN, a globalist edifice, has consistently said it should be the governing body that takes control of AI and data regulation through UNESCO. That is to say, Harari is playing coy, he knows that the people who will step in to control the data are people just like him.
At no point in Harari’s speech does he suggest that that any of these developments should be obstructed or stopped. At no point does he offer the idea that the digitization of humanity is wrong and that there are other better ways of living. He actually mocks the concept of “going back” to old ways; only the future and the Tabula Rasa (blank slate) hold promise for the globalists, everything else is an impediment to their designs.
But here’s the thing: what the globalists are trying to accomplish is a fantasy. People are not algorithms, despite how much Harari would like them to be. People have habits, yes, but they are also unpredictable and are prone to sudden awakenings and epiphanies in the moment of crisis.
Psychopaths tend to be robotic people, acting impulsively but also very predictably. They lack imagination, intuition and foresight, and so it’s not surprising that organizations of psychopaths like the WEF would place such an obsessive value on AI, algorithms and a cold technocratic evolution. They don’t view their data Shangri-La as humanity’s future; they see it as THEIR future – the future of the non-humans, or the anti-humans as it were.
Who will produce all the goods, services and necessities required in this brave new world? Well, all of us peons, of course. Sure, the globalists will offer grand promises of a robot-driven production economy in which people no longer need to engage in menial labor, but this will be another lie. They’ll still need people to plant the crops, maintain infrastructure, take care of manufacturing, do their fighting for them, etc.; they’ll just need less of us.
At bottom, an economy built on data is an economy dependent on illusion.
Data is vaporous and oftentimes meaningless because it is subject to the biases of the interpreter. Algorithms can also be programmed to the biases of the engineers. There is nothing inherently objective about data – it is all dependent on the intentions of the people analyzing it.
For example, to use Harari’s anecdote of an algorithm that “knows you are gay” before you do: any twisted group of people could simply write code for an algorithm that tells the majority of easily manipulated kids that they are gay, even when they are not. And, if you are gullible enough to believe the algorithm is infallible, then you could be led to believe that numerous falsehoods are true and be convinced to behave against your nature. You have allowed a biased digital phantom to dictate your identity, and have made yourself “hackable.”
In the meantime, the elitists entertain delusions of surpassing their mortal limitations by “hacking” the human body, as well as reading the minds of the masses and predicting the future based on data trends. This is an obsession which ignores the unpredictable wages of the human soul, that very element of conscience and of imagination which psychopaths lack. It’s something that cannot be hacked.
The legitimacy of the data-based system and the hacking of humanity that the WEF aspires to is less important than what the masses can be convinced of. If the average person can be persuaded to implant their cell phone in their skull in the near future, then yes, humanity might become hackable in a rudimentary way.
The algorithms then supplant conscience, empathy and principles. And, without these things all morality becomes relative by default. Evil becomes good, and good becomes evil.
By the same token, if humanity can be persuaded to set down their cell phones and live a less tech-focused life, then the digital empire of the globalists comes crashing down quite easily. There is no system the elites can impose that would make their digital consciousness a reality without the consent of the public at large.
Without a vast global framework in which people willingly embrace the algorithms rather than their own experience and intuitions, the globalist religion of total centralization dies. The first step is to accept that the conspiracy does indeed exist. The second step is to accept that the conspiracy is malicious and destructive. The third step is to refuse to comply, by whatever means necessary.
If you would like to support the work that Alt-Market does while also receiving content on advanced tactics for defeating the globalist agenda, subscribe to our exclusive newsletter The Wild Bunch Dispatch. Learn more about it HERE.
As we move through January 2023, and additional details about the lies our governments have told us are revealed daily, I keep getting questioned about how it feels to be vindicated. I wrote about this last year, at a time when the approved narrative appeared to be failing, and my deep ambivalence remains. To my surprise, governments, the World Health Organization (WHO), and various non-governmental organizations (WEF, BMGF etc.) have managed to keep the COVID crisis alive and weaponized to justify policies which do not advance public health objectives, but which they use to advance their own political and financial interests. Like tossing offal over the transom, “Never let a good crisis go to waste” seems to have provoked a shark feeding frenzy which humanity may require decades to recover from.
Assuming we ever do.
The apple of knowledge about the depths of what the US government, the Uniparty, the “Administrative state” will do has been well and truly bitten into now. None who are “awake” to the damage done (to individuals, families, and communities) in the name of public health will ever be able to return to what (in retrospect) seems like the Eden of our prior innocence.
Now we are finally seeing the patient council of Augustine of Hippo come to pass — ‘Thetruthislikealion; you don’t have to defend it. Let it loose; it will defend itself.’ Like so many others, I had naively assumed that this process would require months, not years.
Just to make the point yet again, the COVID crisis was never really a crisis in the way it was portrayed. It was always a house of cards built upon (USA and CCP) government propaganda as well as grossly overstated risk modeling and projections from the Imperial College, London developed by the Neil Ferguson research group.
Layers and layers of propaganda. Deep, harmonized, simultaneous collusion, enticement, censorship, malicious defamation and gaslighting across all western political organizations and their paid toadies in corporate and social media- propagated and coordinated by the UN, WHO, EU, USA, former “British Empire” governments and the new wannabe corporatist world government body known as the “World Economic Forum” (WEF).
A comprehensive, global “shock and awe” fifth generation warfare action the likes of which the world has never seen before. All justified as necessary to protect us from a pathogen which was never a threat in the sense of Ebola (for example) or even the fentanyl flooding across the US southern border.
A pathogen which (current information suggests) many of these governments had a hand in creating. A pre-planned (Event 201) authoritarian totalitarian response resulting in a massive upwards transfer of wealth largely to those who funded the planning (that being the WEF and Bill Gates). Was the over-reaction and authoritarian mismanagement a psychological projection of their guilt about having created and loosed this slouching beast on all of us? Or was the virus just a strategy to enable a broader agenda? Or one of many possible strategies developed and waiting to be deployed? I suspect that Dr. Anthony Fauci would plead a failure of memory if asked to testify to those questions under oath.
Or perhaps (just as internet haters are going to hate), authoritarians and monopolists when given an opportunity will enable Totalitarian states and Corporate monopolies.
It has been over three years now during which we have all been banished to inhabit dark crevices and cracks in the garden of good and evil. Forced into our homes and the fringes of society while psychopathic devils who normally inhabit Dante’s nine circles of hell openly danced a global bacchanal of death, destruction, and greed. And as they danced, they steadily advanced their long anticipated “Great Reset”
.
Any so bold as to question the approved narrative, to alert chained fellow cave dwellers that they are only being allowed to see shadows on the wall projected by these dancing devils, have been further ostracized to the depths of their own personal hells. With swarms of paid demons unleashed to discover and exploit any crack in their own personal armor (or history). And now these devils assert that the whole sordid affair supports the need for the world to grant them more money and power?
[Blog Editor: Youtube video not included in Dr. Malone post:
As my mind seeks refuge from my deep weariness, I often recall the immortal dialog from the Dreamworks comedy “Shrek”;
Shrek: Ogresarelikeonions.
Donkey: They stink? Shrek: Yes. No.
Donkey: Oh, they make you cry.
Shrek: No. Donkey: Oh, you leave em out in the sun, they get all brown, start sproutin’ little white hairs. Shrek: No. Layers.
Onions have layers. Ogres have layers.
Innocence also has layers. And as I have journeyed along the broad road of corrupt propaganda, censorship and defamation hell over the last three years, each turn and twist has forced me to peel away yet another.
Belief in the universal acceptance of bioethical truths. Truths which had been so painstakingly developed since the end of World War II, and then augmented after the CDC-sponsored Tuskegee study. Faith in the integrity of international regulatory and clinical research norms, and the absolute firewall around informed consent and avoidance of compulsion, coercion as well as mandated medical and surgical procedures. Faith in the NIH, previously damaged by decades of personal experience, shattered into a thousand fragments by Robert F Kennedy Jr’s meticulously documented inditement titled “The Real Anthony Fauci”. Faith in the integrity of the FDA and CDC, and their commitment to stand as bulwarks to insure public safety under the pressure of a rapacious pharmaceutical industry. Faith in the integrity and commitment of my fellow scientists and physicians to the Hippocratic oath.
And now I confront a complete loss of faith in the commitment of the United States Government and its officials to protect and defend the US Constitution. Earlier in this twisting journey, this broad road to hell, I had taken risks to openly discuss the growing threat of totalitarianism. I received a call from a decades-long colleague employed at a senior level (GS-15) at the Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA) darkly warning me to not discuss Dr. Michael Callahan or his activities in China during 2019-2020, or there would be consequences. I was warned by a well-known broadcaster to “stay in my lane” and not discuss the World Economic Forum, its plans and activities. In a world where the term “Fascism” had been twisted and distorted beyond recognition, early on I insisted on returning to the original definition (attributed to Benito Mussolini) that the proper name for Fascism was Corporatism, and discussing the widespread acceptance of globalist corporatism as the new model for replacing the autonomous nation state as the dominant political structure.
And then there were the more mundane, transparent lies and propaganda regarding the lack of repurposed early treatment medical interventions and the safety and efficacy of the genetic “vaccine” products which all have come to clearly see (in our daily lives!) do not protect against infection, replication or spread of this cluster of novel coronavirus variants which we call SARS-CoV-2. Hour after hour spent on innumerable radio, television, and podcast interviews trying to break through the wall of propaganda erected by governments colluding with big tech and corporate press/TV.
I wish to acknowledge and thank Joe Rogan for allowing his Spotify platform to break through that firewall, and allow me to speak my truths to the world. Although I have not been welcomed back since, I suspect what happened over the subsequent days, weeks, and months was the clearest tolling of the bell for current corporate media (and 60s rock and rollers) that has ever been heard.
Yesterday, I was asked to participate in a “Twitter Spaces” discussion regarding the censorship which has been experienced by so many who have tried to break through the propaganda firewall of the last three years. Asked to discuss my own experiences, I went on and on. The words poured out.
This was a question no-one had ever really asked me before, and I have been asked so many questions over the last three years that I feel like someone who has been subjected to a strip search by the US Transportation Security Administration (TSA). No body cavity left unprobed. Except for this one.
So much to cover. Amazon deleting Jill’s book in March 2020 for irreconcilable (but undefined) “violation of community standards”. My 2020 manuscripts warning about risks encountered in prior coronavirus vax development. The original Famotidine/Mast cell hypothesis paper that got rejected again and again. The repeated rejection of high-quality clinical studies demonstrating the effectiveness of early treatment using celecoxib, famotidine +/- ivermectin. Repeated inexplicable intransigence of FDA to allow DoD funded clinical trials to proceed. The Nobel Prize marketing campaign to promote the false valor of Kariko and Weissman as having originated the mRNA platform technology which necessitated belittling, defaming, and gaslighting my own much earlier contributions. The systematic evisceration of my Wikipedia page. The reactions of Spanish and Israeli governments to my “hostage” video warning parents about the risks of the vaccines. The YouTube demonitization of Dr. Bret Weinstein after the infamous “save the world” podcast with Steve Kirsch and myself. The backlash after Joe Rogan podcast #1757. The relentless unqualified “factchecker” attacks (justified by Facebook in court as narrative reinforcement activities, not “fact” checks). The Atlantic Monthly, Rolling Stone, New York Times, Washington Post, and even Santa Barbara News Press (my home town) malicious defamation and slander. It all continues unabated to this day, now augmented by professional infiltrator/disruptors who carefully troll for tidbits in my CV that can be weaponized while continually shouting “controlled opposition” and “deep state” as a chorus to the usual lyrics of mis- dis- and mal- information accusations coming from mainstream government-sponsored press outlets.
But caught like a deer in the headlights, unprepared for this inquiry into what censorship I have experienced over the last three years, I completely forgot to cover the outcome of the huge amount of time I (together with other colleagues) had invested in establishing a special edition of “Frontiers in Pharmacology” dedicated to publishing academic manuscripts concerning repurposed drugs and protocols effective against COVID. We had invested more than six months of effort in getting the necessary permissions, soliciting and reviewing manuscripts, and building a solution to address the unwillingness of journals all of the world to publish information about life saving treatments. And then during December 2020, Pierre Kory testified in the US Senate about the potential of Ivermectin. The DoD-funded group I was working with to identify and test repurposed drugs was very aware of the potential of the repurposed agent, and when Dr. Kory and colleagues posted a summary of their findings on the web, I reached out (as an editor of this special “Frontiers” volume) and encouraged him to reformat and submit as an academic review for consideration by Frontiers in Pharmacology for our special volume. The rest is history. A somewhat biased account of what then took place can now be found published in “The Scientist”. The subsequent cascade of events are summarized in the following resignation letter (redacted below, full text available here):
23rd April 2021
Dear Dr. Fenter, Ms. Sorokowska-Yammin, Dr. Vicario, Prof. Montuschi, Topic Authors,
It is with sincere regret that we write at this time to resign from our roles as founding topic editors for the Frontiers in Pharmacology Research Topic “Treating COVID-19 With Currently Available Drugs”. Since developing this topic and associated justification documents and applying to and receiving permission to proceed with this special topic volume from “Frontiers in Pharmacology“ for publication under the “Frontiers in Pharmacology (Respiratory Pharmacology)” we have invested many hundreds of volunteer hours in soliciting manuscript submissions, identifying reviewers for submitted manuscripts, and managing the peer review process. We took this action not for any commercial gain, but rather to address an unmet need. This has been done in full and careful compliance with all “Frontiers” criteria, and with approval by “Frontiers”.
The Topic had been created with the aim to contribute to identification of better and more effective pharmacological treatments during the COVID-19 pandemic by suggesting repurposed drugs. Our goal has been to reduce the barriers to publishing earlier stage clinical research regarding repurposed drugs, and in this way help reduce the terrible burden of global death due to COVID-19. While awaiting development of herd immunity (during vaccination), we wanted to contribute in COVID-19 therapy. In proposing the guest topic, we noted that Frontiers purports to provide rapid review, and explicitly allows publication of earlier stage clinical research findings including case series reports. CVs of each guest editor and the Topic proposal were accepted after evaluation and Mr. Nathan Watkins was assigned by the Frontiers organization to support the guest editors.
The recent extraordinary and unprecedented actions by Frontiers in the rejection of the review manuscript “REVIEW OF THE EMERGING EVIDENCE DEMONSTRATING THE EFFICACY OF IVERMECTIN IN THE PROPHYLAXIS AND TREATMENT OF COVID-19” and the original research manuscript “HOSPITALIZED COVID-19 PATIENTS TREATED WITH CELECOXIB AND HIGH DOSE FAMOTIDINE ADJUVANT THERAPY SHOW SIGNIFICANT CLINICAL RESPONSES” after review and acceptance of each manuscript by four/five well qualified peer reviewers (during final validation) is what has prompted our collective resignation.
To place this into context of the Frontiers review process, the papers have been rejected during the final validation phase, having previously passed the evaluation (peer review) phase. In general, the Frontiers review process consists of the following steps: initial validation, editorial assignment, independent review, interactive review, review finalized (acceptance/rejection), final validation (this last step is the final editorial review decision prior to invoicing and finalizing manuscript proofs before actual publication). The initial validation step performed by Frontiers is independent of the Guest Editors’ evaluation and is performed prior to editorial assignment to Guest Editors. Guest Editors are then asked to look for reviewers for independent review and manage interactive review. Review is finalized by guest Editors but the final validation depends on Frontiers decision.
Redacted …… (see full letter text for details)
Upon reviewing these events, some might conclude that the journal is practicing extraordinary and unprecedented censorship of fully peer reviewed manuscripts. The rationale for doing so is speculative, and the journal has communicated that these actions are justified by the following considerations:
1) “The papers considered for publication in this Research Topic will require more specific oversight, as the subject and aim of the collection has an important involvement with the ongoing public health crisis. Frontiers aims for editorial independence while also being ultimately responsible for all article publications. We need to anticipate potential impact on the population and maintain standards of rigour for our Journals and the scientific record overall.”
2) “Moving forward, the Editorial Office will continue to monitor submissions to this topic. Articles will be screened at submission, with the support of our Specialty Chief Editor, to ensure that all articles submitted are valid, and fulfil our acceptance criteria. We ask that, as you continue to act as Handling Editors for articles, you remain vigilant and ensure that any serious recommendations for rejection are addressed swiftly. These steps, combined with increased awareness and participation from all parties involved, will help ensure the recent situation around the ivermectin paper is not repeated. We hope that you understand the rationale behind these additional measures, which are in place in the interest of maintaining scientific integrity, both for your collection, and Frontiers in Pharmacology as a journal.”
The Guest editors reject any assertion that scientific integrity was compromised or breached during the review process for either of these submissions, or that this special edition has not been managed with full integrity, except in the case of the unethical breach of the journal itself and its senior management in performing an extraordinary, arbitrary and capricious post-peer review process.
At this point, based on these many actions, we are unable to assure scientific integrity of the peer review process on the part of the journal for this special topic. Our time and that of the peer reviewers has been donated to the journal, and our reputations used without compensation. We ask to be removed from association with this special topic area, that an apology be issued to ourselves and our respective institutions for the actions of the journal in this matter, and that the special topic (which we had developed with full approval by the journal) be discontinued effective immediately. Having communicated to Frontiers that this would be our collective action if corrections were not made to this extraordinary re-review process, Frontiers has elected to expel each of the guest editors from any ongoing or future role as editors, and to close down and wipe all electronic evidence that the special topic had ever even been approved or had manuscripts submitted under the topic approved. This decision was disclosed in email communications with all corresponding authors of published, approved, or pending manuscripts, but not with the guest editors who had created the topic and solicited and managed review of the manuscripts.
The scientific process requires fair, open, and transparent peer review to proceed effectively and efficiently – particularly at this time and for this topic. The actions of “Frontiers” in this matter clearly violate well established norms and processes for peer review and publication of scientific works and intellectual contributions, and instead have substituted a unilateral, arbitrary, and capricious process. On behalf of our peers, our institutions, and our scientific and medical colleagues we cannot allow this precedent to remain unchallenged. In our opinion, these unfortunate events constitute gross editorial misconduct by “Frontiers”.
How many lives could have been saved if publication of this volume had been allowed to proceed in a normal fashion?
An unanswerable hypothetical. But as we watch the daily drip of information concerning the role of governments, non-governmental, and transnational organizations and cabals in actively suppressing information which clearly could have saved lives, colluding with corporate media and big tech to deploy a massive military-grade fifth generation propaganda and psy-ops campaign on their own citizens, enforcing medical treatment with protocols which clearly lead to widespread slaughter of elderly and other vulnerable populations, and working to destroy the reputations and livelihood of anyone so bold as to question their ‘Scientism” based on substitution of hope for data, please keep the silent dead and silenced vaccine injured in your mind.
These are the people that have paid the ultimate price for the mismanagement. These are the true victims. The hurt and widespread destruction of reputation and professional standards consequent to what has been done to myself and my colleagues will be tempered with the passage of time.
Innocence has been peeled away to the point where we may never be able to trust governments, our peers in the medical and scientific professions, or the corporate “press” again.
But who will be left to stand up and speak for the dead and the damaged?
In the twilight of mankind’s existence, the War Against God’s Creation Rages.
Boldface Lies
Aggregated deceit and accumulating falsehoods from our governments, our militaries, the Vatican, our churches, by so-called medical professionals, and “science” stack up before us. They say that they do not know what UFOs are, that mankind is causing climate change and that Covid vaccines are necessary to safeguard man’s future.
A Shot in the Arm, A Shot in the Head – Either Way You Wind Up Dead
The Vatican reshapes the world’s perspective of aliens, governments around the globe, spy on citizens, the stage is set for World War 3, the global economy teeters on the brink and the medical establishment compel people to corrupt themselves by injecting a COVID MRNA Vaccine that will change their DNA – Just like in the Days of Noah.
Pulling Strings
The World Economic Forum are the Puppet Masters who pull the strings that will starve and kill billions. But is there someone more sinister lurking in the shadows?
An Agenda of Death
With a Vatican core belief in Zecharia Sitchen’s Anunnaki, we learn that there is an Entity physically living on planet earth and everything occurring is designed to kill most of humanity and corrupt the DNA of those that remain. Weather warfare, the decimation of crops, livestock and the supply chain, the enslaving of billions, and the outright corruption of mankind’s DNA are all part of this Entity’s Agenda of Death.
Last Chance?
GenSix Productions blows the lid off a supernatural conspiracy that is thousands of years in the making and nearing its culmination. With never seen before footage of evidence pointing to the genetic corruption of humans, this film endeavors to give you the unfiltered Truth about who and what is really controlling our planet.
“The Lies of Men and Gods” – Quite possibly the last chance to expose the incomprehensible Evil that now envelops the world.
If you’ve read past blog posts and cross post shares, you are aware that I consider our current rulers to be corrupt and tyrannical. ALSO – though I pray I am wrong – my sense is the situation is so irredeemable that the only solution might lay in a combination of extreme non-compliance and possible civil war situations (the latter only has a chance with components of the U.S. Military stepping up to the plate against Dem-Marxist coup-usurpers). Extreme Measures would likely be violent conflicts between Constitutional ORIGINALISTS and Living Constitution proponents who have no regard for Founding Principles.
How did this happen in the one-time home of the brave and land of the free? CREEPING MARXISM occurring so slowly that the frog in boiling water did not know what was happening. Are we at the Frog Legs stage? I PRAY NOT!
Was those near forlorn thoughts, allow me to share in my youth (now age 65) I was a huge science fiction fan. I could not get enough books and movies in the genre. Unsurprisingly, I was a huge X-Files fan. (Am I so old that there are actually young people who have never heard of the X-Files?)
2 When the [uncompromisingly] righteous are in authority, the people rejoice; but when the wicked man rules, the people groan and sigh.
12 If a ruler listens to falsehood, all his officials will become wicked. — Proverbs 29: 2, 12 AMPC
Barbara Loe Fisher Screen Capture
Barbara Loe Fisher – President and Co-Founder of National Vaccine Information Center – has an awesome monologue AGAINST Medical Tyranny focused on COVID Lies and Jab Lies. The monologue us about 27-minutes long and worth EVERY word dripping with truth and facts. I ran into the video on the MeWe Social Platform (so when I share there, cut me some slack if you’ve seen it. Whether you’ve watched for the first time or already viewed, YOU SHOULD SHARE as an action against Medical Tyranny).
Ms. Fisher follows the monologue with what appears to be the text of the video. So, watch or read; BUT dear God in Heaven resist this godless wicked tyranny. Resist individually via civil disobedience or join a group in your community organizing active civil resistance.
If you’ve ever read Dr. Mercola posts you should notice the post is formatted after that fashion. Indeed, a version Ms. Fisher’s post is at Mercola.com, however I’m cross posting the nvic.org website version.
Rumble VIDEO: Weaponizing COVID to Promote Collectivism [I just realized the Rumble (which undoubtedly is the original version) does not have the typical embed codes. I found a Bitchute version which I am using posted on Bitchute Channel PeppiDiCapri]
The morning that hurricane Ian hit the coast of southwest Florida, the dramatic images of the raw power of Mother Nature blowing apart structures built by human hands and sweeping them into the sea were unbelievable.1 After hours and hours of wind, rain, and a catastrophic water surge that left a trail of destruction in its wake, I thought about how very different this natural disaster was compared to the one unleashed on the world in 2020 that also left a trail of destruction in its wake.
Two disasters, one a natural disaster legally termed an “act of God,” and the other a disaster that, three years later, people are still asking: was it natural or manmade?23
Whether or not the SARS-CoV-2 virus spontaneously jumped out of a bat and into a human being4 or was created by scientists in a biohazard lab,567 one thing is clear: the chaotic response by the experts in charge has been a disaster in itself.8 And the people, whose lives were impacted by that chaos, experienced the same kind of sudden shock, fear,9 disorientation, isolation, and powerlessness that many people, who experience a hurricane, tsunami, tornado, earthquake, or fire, feel when the unexpected happens.
Public Health Pandemic Response Policies Generated Fear, Instability
In the middle of this hurricane, I found myself thinking about why fear of the unknown10 brought on by this emergency was so familiar. It was familiar because we had just experienced fear of the unknown in the winter of 2020,11 when we were told by public health officials that a weirdly mutated coronavirus was on the loose and would kill us if we didn’t hide in our homes, wear cloth over our faces, cut off physical contact with our family and friends, keep our children out of school, and stop getting our hair cut or going to church, exercising in a gym, entering restaurants or certain stores, and be OK with the government labeling many workers and private businesses as “non-essential,” which shut down our economy and threatened to plunge families into bankruptcy.121314
The people in Florida facing this real life-threatening emergency were suddenly having to call upon emotional and physical reserves already depleted by having recently gone through another emergency, in which some lost their health or their loved ones to the mutant virus, or were injured by disabling COVID vaccine reactions, while others lost their jobs, homes or businesses during the 2020 lockdown that, thankfully, was cut short in Florida compared to many other states.
The fallout from destructive federal COVID response policies on the mental health, child development, and economic stability of our nation is still being assessed.15161718192021
Two disasters: a natural one, and one that the world is still having trouble defining.
Post-hurricane Ian, there is a lot of analysis going on in Florida by those whose job it is to prepare for and respond to hurricanes.22 By most accounts, it is an honest analysis by state officials working hard to help people deal with what happened rather than politicizing what happened.232425
Last month, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control once again extended the COVID pandemic public health emergency declaration, this time until January 11, 2023.26 To justify keeping us living in fear, 2728 federal health officials are warning ominously that a “twindemic” of a more transmissible SARS-CoV-2 virus mutant strain, combined with an especially bad influenza season, is poised to make more of us very sick this fall and winter if we don’t all get a COVID shot and a flu shot at the same time.2930 One high-ranking government doctor said with a straight face – “I really believe this is why God gave us two arms — one for the flu shot and the other one for the COVID shot.” 31
But Americans have grown weary of virus porn, and while the majority of Americans have gotten at least one COVID shot, polls show that just 14 percent of children under age five have gotten one.323334 There are signs that Americans are questioning the ever-changing number of COVID booster shots being aggressively advertised by Big Pharma and government officials, who are trying hard to convince us we will need to get a COVID shot every single year. 35363738 In this very lucrative marketing campaign, the two mRNA COVID vaccine manufacturers, Pfizer and Moderna, raked in 50 billion dollars in 2021 and 2022 alone, with a promise of billions more in profits in the years to come.39404142
A Weirdly Mutated Virus, A Reactive Biological That’s Not a Vaccine
Those two drug companies are selling a cell disrupter biological product that is called a vaccine, but in no way resembles any other vaccine that has ever been injected into humans to theoretically combat a weirdly mutated coronavirus, which is acting like no other virus that has ever infected humans. The mRNA biological has been described as “transforming the body into a vaccine-making machine,”43 while one scientist explains that the rapidly mutating SARS-CoV-2 virus is “essentially viral evolution on steroids.”44 But, still, nobody in charge of the COVID pandemic response seems to know exactly where this virus on steroids came from or exactly what kind of damage it – or the genetically engineered components of the mRNA product – are doing to the biological integrity of human populations.454647484950515253
The mRNA COVID vaccines are associated with many ugly side effects, especially ones that compromise the blood and heart and can cause death.5455 Online it has been dubbed the “clot shot”,5657 even as owners of social media platforms try to shut down all conversations about serious COVID vaccine reactions being reported online,5859606162 in the medical literature,63 and to the U.S. Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS).6465 There have been more than 1.3 million adverse events reported to VAERS after mRNA COVID vaccinations, including heart, brain and immune system damage and death. These 1.3 million reports represent more than half of all vaccine reactions reported for all vaccines since VAERS became operational in 1990 under the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act,66 while less than one percent of all vaccine reactions are reported to VAERS.67
The mRNA COVID vaccine is the most reactive one ever distributed in the U.S. to the entire population.
COVID Shot Reactions Are Good Even When the Product Doesn’t Prevent Infection
Yet, as soon as the mRNA COVID products were released in December 2020 under an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA), public health officials told people to celebrate adverse reaction symptoms, trying to convince them that those reaction symptoms means the vaccine is doing its job and would prevent them from getting sick with COVID.68 Nothing could be further from the truth.69 That lie not only persuaded people to accept COVID vaccine reactions as normal and a good thing, but it persuaded doctors to dismiss COVID vaccine-related injuries and deaths as just a “coincidence.”7071
Which brings us to perhaps the biggest elephant in the room, and that is how blatantly the people were lied to from the beginning about just how effective the mRNA COVID vaccines would be, as government officials allowed people to believe that getting vaccinated would protect them from being infected with the new coronavirus and transmitting it to others, when that was never true. In fact, it was so untrue that, in 2021, CDC officials changed the centuries-old definition of a vaccine from a “product that stimulates a person’s immune system to produce immunity to a specific disease” to “a preparation that is used to stimulate the body’s immune response against diseases,” and they convinced Merriam Webster Dictionary to do the same.727374 That’s because the FDA only required drug companies to demonstrate the COVID vaccine had at least 50 percent efficacy in preventing severe symptoms of COVID disease rather than preventing infection.75
There is a difference between a product producing immunity that prevents infection and one that stimulates an immune response but does not prevent infection, especially when you can be infected with the coronavirus and not show symptoms.
With vaccine induced immunity off the table and vaccine adverse reactions viewed as a good thing, by the end of October 2022, the global mass vaccination campaign had convinced about 70 percent of the world’s population to get at least one COVID shot.76
United Nations’ WHO Heading Up Global COVID Vaccine Marketing Campaign
The sales force for Big Pharma’s COVID vaccine marketing campaign is headquartered at the United Nation’s World Health Organization,777879 with de facto satellite offices in government agencies like the National Institutes of Health (NIH), Gavi Alliance, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, World Economic Forum, major universities, and financial and other institutions ideologically and politically committed to imposing “The Great Reset” on all countries.80 According to Klaus Schwab, who in 1971 founded an “international organization for public-private cooperation” called the World Economic Forum, the world is in the middle of the “Fourth Industrial Revolution,” which is “characterized by a range of new technologies that are fusing the physical, digital, and biological worlds, impacting all disciplines, economies and industries and even challenging ideas about what it means to be human.”81
In June 2020, Schwab proclaimed, “Now is the time for a great reset” because, he said, in order for the world to effectively respond to the COVID-19 pandemic, governments “must act swiftly to revamp all aspects of our societies and economies, from education to social contracts and working conditions.”82
To prepare the way for The Great Reset, on October 18, 2019, the World Economic Forum, along with the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and Johns Hopkins University sponsored a simulated global pandemic planning exercise in New York City called Event 201.83 A “Pandemic Emergency Board” was assembled for Event 201 that included representatives of the United Nations, World Bank, the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control, the China Centers for Disease Control, and leaders from the travel, banking, pharmaceutical and healthcare industries.84
The virus selected for use in the simulated “worst case scenario” global pandemic planning exercise held three months before the World Health Organization declared a coronavirus “public health emergency of international concern” was: the coronavirus.8586
The nagging question is: was that just a coincidence?
Clearly, it will take a lot of coordination and agreement between all governments to pull off a global Great Reset. Three years into the global COVID health emergency, it appears the global public health elite are leading the way.
In September 2022, the once respected medical journal, The Lancet, published a 56-page report called “The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic.”87The first big red flag in the report is the long list of financial conflicts of interest authors have with drug companies; government health agencies; the United Nations and its public health agency arm, the World Health Organization; Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Rockefeller Foundation and other institutions that fund or conduct vaccine research and development and promote mandatory use of vaccines.
Once family owned, The Lancet is now owned by the publishing conglomerate, Elsevier, and concerns have been raised about editorial independence, in light of investor ties to major banking, pharmaceutical and biotech corporations. One critique of the Lancet Commission report was written by a public health physician, who previously called out the journal in July 2022 for publishing what he described as “a weakly-evidenced opinion advocating medical fascism.”88 That opinion, written by well-known compulsory vaccination proponents, called for strict enforcement of COVID vaccine mandates in the U.S., and loss of employment and school education for those who refuse to comply.89
The Lancet Commission was originally assembled in the summer of 2020 as an international group of global “experts,” primarily doctors and professors at prestigious universities, who were charged with addressing the COVID pandemic. One of their first tasks was to investigate the origins of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, an endeavor they quickly abandoned because of what the authors described as “divisive public discussion” and “unprecedented attack and pressure” on Commission members.
Leaving that inconvenient “where did the virus come from” question on the table, the Lancet Commission went on to publish a self-aggrandizing political manifesto that fails to honestly analyze what went wrong with the global COVID pandemic response and, instead, basically calls for doing more of the same more quickly in the future. In a stunning demonstration of hubris and ideological bias, Commission members stray from their areas of expertise and call on governments to devalue individual rights and adopt a collectivist orientation that forces individuals to comply with multi-lateral health policies and laws adopted by the United Nations. They said, “all governments, regulators and institutions must be reoriented toward society as a whole rather than the interest of individuals – a concept the Commissioners call prosociality.”
Attacking U.S. Lawmakers, Critics of Destructive Pandemic Response Failures
This “prosociality” reorientation would, of course, require that much more money and power be given to the United Nations and the World Health Organization so global populations can be controlled by a central authority, especially during global pandemic responses. Defending their slogan “no one is safe until everyone is safe,” which they claim “is not mere rhetoric, or a moral truth, but an epidemiological reality,” they viciously attack U.S. lawmakers for being guilty of “neglecting scientific evidence and needlessly risking lives with a view to keeping the economy open,” and for promoting “anti-science rhetoric and disinformation about COVID 19.”
Refusing to acknowledge legitimate public concerns about authoritarian COVID response policies that led to catastrophic social and economic chaos and damage to mental and physical health of child and adult populations, the Commission complains that the World Health Organization and most governments did not move fast enough to test, identify and isolate the infected while simultaneously putting all people in masks and locking them in their homes – for a long, long time. There is no critical analysis of faulty COVID tests that did not work;9091 or bogus COVID death estimates that failed to distinguish between dying from COVID and dying with COVID;9293949596 or ineffective COVID treatment protocols in hospitals that made people sicker or killed them when they were inappropriately put on ventilators. 979899
While praising the “public-private partnerships” that fast-tracked development of COVID vaccines as a “triumph,” the Lancet Commission weaponizes the failed COVID pandemic response by placing most of the blame for COVID-related deaths on – you guessed it – those independent thinkers the Pharma’s sales force calls “anti-vaxxers.”
Infuriated that a lot of people in the U.S. and Europe questioned the competence of public health officials and defied their orders to mask up, isolate for months on end and take the COVID shot, the Lancet Commission authors alleged that anti-vaxxers – which according to Webster’s Dictionary now includes anyone who opposes mandatory vaccination100 – caused an “epidemic of misinformation and disinformation” that fostered “low public trust” in government officials and persuaded millions of people to repeatedly take to the streets in the United Kingdom, Ireland, Netherlands, Italy, France, Germany, Austria, Denmark, Sweden, Finland, Greece, Switzerland, Canada, Australia, Bulgaria, Serbia, Poland, Romania and other nations in 2020 and 2021 to protest lockdowns and vaccine passports.101102103
Blaming COVID Deaths on ‘Anti-Vaccine Movement’ and Individual Rights
They said “anti-vaccine propaganda in the Americas” caused “tens of millions of people to refuse vaccines and hundreds of thousands to needlessly lose their lives.” Obsessing over the lack of “solidarity” among governments to force everyone everywhere to march to the beat of the same drum, they express special hatred for what they describe as the “hostile and coordinated anti-vaccine movement that has spread dangerous and false information about the health risks of vaccines and has campaigned against vaccine mandates.”
Climbing up on very high horse, the Lancet Commission members put “climate change deniers” and “parents who refuse or delay routine childhood vaccinations” in the same basket. They repeatedly condemn political leaders and the digital media for the “deliberate spread of misinformation and disinformation…that fosters distrust in health officials and promotes the idea that individual opinions have equal weight to the best available scientific evidence.”
They called for application of “behavioral science” to convince people to engage in “prosociality” that leads to “optimal behaviors for pandemic control,” pointing out that people living in societies with “tight” or collectivist social norms follow public health orders much better than people living in societies with “loose” or individualistic social norms that champion freedom of individual choice. They claim future pandemics would be so much easier to handle if everyone in the world can be muzzled and locked down tight whenever government health officials fly the utilitarian flag for “the greater good” and demand we salute smartly and roll up our sleeves.
Their diatribe against societies allowing individuals to exercise freedom of thought, speech, conscience and autonomy would be amusing if they weren’t so deadly serious about what they want done about it.
Although there were some public demonstrations here in the U.S., they were not as big as they were in countries without a Constitution that ensures a balance of power between local, state and federal government. Americans stopped COVID vaccine mandates in 2021 and 2022 because state legislators, who make public health laws, looked at the science, listened to concerns of their constituents, and refused to mandate the vaccine.104 Although several U.S. Governors and city mayors issued Executive Orders mandating COVID vaccine and the federal government attempted to mandate the vaccine for all federal employees and contractors, not one state legislature voted to mandate the vaccine this year.105 The online NVIC Advocacy Portal, launched in 2010 to help citizens in every state defend vaccine informed consent rights and exemptions in public health laws had a lot to do with holding back COVID vaccine mandates and passports in the U.S. when populations in other countries with centralized political control could not.106
Public Health Elite Wants US to ‘Reorient’ To A Collectivist Society
It doesn’t take a PhD in political science to figure out that what the public health elite is calling for would require Americans to reject the cultural values and beliefs and governmental structure outlined in the US Constitution, which provides decentralized checks and balances on political power and guarantees individuals God given natural rights that limit the power of government.107108 The Public Health Empire is all about appropriating centralized power that can be wielded without accountability. That is why the Lancet Commission demands that the United States of America “reorient” toward a collectivist society, which would require disempowering local and state governments so that only the federal government – in “solidarity” with the United Nations, of course – has the authority to make public health laws and tell citizens what to think about and believe and do with their bodies and the bodies of their children.
Accompanying the Lancet Commission report was a Lancet editorial entitled “COVID-19: the case for prosociality.” And if you do a Google search using the words “prosociality and communism,” what you find at the top is an article published in Frontiers in Psychology in September 2022 entitled, “How prosocial behaviors are maintained in China: The relationship between communist authority and prosociality.”109 The authors note how prosocial behavior is associated with religious belief and argue that communist authority wielded by the ruling Communist Party of China has a positive effect on promoting prosocial behaviors in a secular atheist society. They say studies show that “the psychological functions of gods and governments are interchangeable.”
Thank you, Lancet Commission, for making the political goals of the Public Health Empire so crystal clear.
Mandatory Vaccination: The Tip of the Spear in the Culture Wars
I have been saying for many years that mandatory vaccination is the tip of the spear in the culture wars taking place in this country and others in the 21st Century. Because if the state can tag, track down and force individuals against their will to be injected with biologicals of known and unknown toxicity today, then there will be no limit on which individual freedoms the state can take away in the name of the greater good tomorrow.
Register today to use the NVIC Advocacy Portal at NVICAdvocacy.org and take action in your state to protect civil liberties in this historic Vaccine Culture War that will determine whether we will live free or die as slaves in a collectivist authoritarian state.
Be the one who never has to say you did not do today what you could have done to change tomorrow.
It’s your health, your family, your choice.
And our mission continues: No forced vaccination, not in America.
I posted yesterday some only-tip-of-the-iceberg information of the government lies (really science lies) that mRNA Jabs were safe and effective. Today’s post focuses on the LIE that the remedy Ivermectin is dangerous when the proven truth it is more than SAFE, it is also EFFECTIVE to combat the Chinese Virus – er I mean COVID-19. AND Ivermectin has massive medical uses for humans not just horses as the Big Pharma propagandists lied about.
I begin with a Rumble video which I found linked from a Steve Kirsch Substack post entitled, “The new ivermectin video is a must see.” I can’t figure out how to embed Rumble videos on my Substack, but the video is 13:38 minutes in length – not very long at all:
Just so you are aware Steve Kirsch is not the only person sharing science truth contradicting the science lies of the government, WND has found science studies upholding the efficacy of Ivermectin to battle COVID. My God people, IF you haven’t taken the unsafe and ineffective Jab, don’t start now! Ivermectin and other remedies are much safer and effective ESPECIALLY as early treatment! The WND article: “New ivermectin study shows 92% lower chance of COVID death.”
JRH 9/1/22
Thank you to those who have stepped up!
READER SUPPORTED! I need Readers willing to chip in $5 – $10 – $25 – $50 – $100. PLEASE I need your generosity. PLEASE GIVE to Help me be a voice for Liberty:
Big Tech Censorship is pervasive – Share voluminously on all social media platforms!
**************************
The new ivermectin video is a must see
This video is approved by Doctors Pierre Kory and Paul Marik and many others. The video is NOT approved by the FDA, the CDC, the NIH, CNN, or the White House. Producer: Mikki Willis, Length: 15 min.
Ivermectin: The Truth is an amazing film, less than 15 minutes long! I highly recommend this film. Watch it and share it.
Pierre Kory, Paul Marik, Peter McCullough, Robert Malone, Chris Martenson, Richard Bartlett, and Mike Yeadon all appear. My name appears briefly at 11:45 in the video. Still trying to get that debate with the mainstream “experts.”
Leana Wen appears briefly in this video (at the beginning and near the end) saying “we know it doesn’t work.” She’s total blue pill. If you feel the same way about Lena as I do, you’ll want to watch this excellent Leana Wen takedown video by Kim Iversen. It’s awesome.
The world would be a better place if Kim Iversen was the authority being promoted on CNN instead of Lena Wen.
[Blog Editor: Substack does embed Youtube videos, ergo here’s the Iverson “takedown”. The first 6-minutes are blatant science lies then takedown:
P.S. Kim should write a book on “How I avoid being censored by YouTube.” She walks as close to the line as you can get. I don’t know how she does it.
Fluvoxamine
Just a footnote here since I was heavily involved in funding the research on fluvoxamine, another highly effective drug for treating COVID. If you take just 50mg of fluvoxamine twice a day for 2 weeks, most everyone avoids long-haul COVID symptoms due to the anti-inflammatory properties of this drug (Prozac also works).
They did the same thing to fluvoxamine as they did with ivermectin. They used the excuse that the US Phase 3 trial was halted for futility as a reason for not recommending the drug, but they never pointed out that the futility was that very few people in the placebo group were being hospitalized because the variants had gotten so mild and people were likely taking ivermectin, so they had no “comparison group” and they did a horrible job at recruiting (we spent gobs of money sending them leads and their enrollment % was horrible).
This doesn’t mean the drug doesn’t work. These are the kinds of games these people play.
Here’s what the reference cited by the NIH said:
The Data Safety Monitoring Board(DSMB) for the study recommended an early stop for futility due to a low case rate and difficulty recruiting patients.
The subsequent STOP COVID 2, a Phase 3 randomized controlled trial (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT04668950) that enrolled >700 participants in the United States and Canada, was stopped for futility by a data safety monitoring board after lower than expected case rates and treatment effect were observed.
A large study on the impact of using ivermectin as a prophylaxis for COVID-19 found that regular users of the drug experienced up to a 92% reduction in mortality compared to those who did not.
Brazilian research scientist Dr. Flavio A. Cadegiani said via Twitter that his study in his home country showed a “dose-response effect,” meaning that “the more you used, the more protection you had.”
He observed that people who use ivermectin regularly every 15 days for at least six to eight weeks had up to a 92% reduction in mortality.
Cadegiani conducted a previous study of drug that evaluated whether its use could impact COVID-19 infection and mortality rates.
In April, after noticing that the word ivermectin was trending on Twitter amid Elon Musk’s move to buy the company, the FDA reprised its disingenuous “horse dewormer” smear of the drug as a treatment for COVID-19.
“Hold your horses, y’all. Ivermectin may be trending, but it still isn’t authorized or approved to treat COVID-19,” said a post on the FDA’s Twitter account.
During the pandemic, Twitter and other social media platforms censored positive mention of ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine despite the countless testimonies and dozens of studies from around the world showing the drugs to be effective in treating COVID-19.
A follow-up FDA post said: “Also, a reminder that a study showed it didn’t actually work against COVID.”
Dr. Pierre Kory, who has testified to the Senate of the effectiveness of ivermectin against COVID-19, fired back.
“You are not a horse, you are not a cow, you are Big Pharma’s ass,” he tweeted.
The FDA, he wrote, was “messaging BS” by citing “one corrupt study” while ignoring 82 trials, including 33 randomized controlled trials with 129,000 patients from 27 countries that show “massive benefits” of ivermectin in treating COVID-19.
“Stop lying man, people are dying,” he wrote, adding the hashtag “earlytreatmentworks.”
You are not a horse, you are not a cow, you are Big Pharma's ass.
Messaging BS w/ one corrupt study while ignoring 82 trials (33 RCTs) from 27 countries, 129K patients – sum showing massive benefits https://t.co/WQRjMQKaqJ
In an article published in April for the Brownstone Institute, Kory wrote that it’s “a tried-and-true tactic with effective and dastardly results” for “Big Pharma and other well-financed interests” to sponsor purportedly impartial medical trials “aimed at discrediting cheaper generic alternatives.’
“Ignoring the flaws in the methodology, the media runs wild with the desired narrative, which is amplified by a well-orchestrated public relations effort,” he wrote.
Kory cited as an example the newly reported clinical trial from Brazil known as “TOGETHER,” which he said ostensibly aimed at studying the effectiveness of ivermectin to treat COVID.
Among the flaws was the lack of explicit exclusion criteria for trial participants on ivermectin, meaning both trial groups had access to the same drug. Further, the treatment window was set for only three days, which didn’t allow for adequate dosing, and the trial was conducted during the massive gamma variant surge, which was one of the most virulent and deadly COVID variants.
“The dosage of the trial was far lower than everyday Brazilian clinicians were prescribing patients at the time to match the strength of the strain,” Kory pointed out.
“In spite of these and other readily apparent shortcomings, the nation’s leading media gobbled up the results. ‘Ivermectin Didn’t Reduce Covid-19 Hospitalizations in Largest Trial to Date’ blared the Wall Street Journal, while a New York Times headlined announced, ‘Ivermectin Does Not Reduce Risk of Covid Hospitalization, Large Study Finds.'”
Meanwhile, social media platforms stifled conversations while California pushed potentially precedent-setting legislation to punish doctors “who dare question phony studies,” threatening loss of a medical license.
A similar study of ivermectin “of far larger size, conducted by investigators without any conflicts of interest, found the drug led to massive reductions in Covid infection, hospitalization and mortality—yet it received virtually no media coverage.”
Kory said that ending “this cycle of perpetual disinformation requires revamping our dysfunctional drug approval process.”
“An independent board free of pharma industry conflicts must be established to oversee trials for re-purposed medicines,” he said. “Recommendations should be based on trials designed by impartial experts and actual results, not the desired ones, and policymakers or prescribers who ignore the findings should be held accountable.”
And academia and the regulatory agencies must be reminded, he said, “that observational trials data – wherein a sample of population who take a drug are compared to those who do not – is equally valid at informing policy.”
“Randomized controlled trials can yield useful information, but their complexity, costs, and delays to treatment lead to errors and effectively shut out low-cost drugs from the approval process, regardless of their efficacy,” he said.
Art Moore, co-author of the best-selling book “See Something, Say Nothing,” entered the media world as a PR assistant for the Seattle Mariners and a correspondent covering pro and college sports for Associated Press Radio. He reported for a Chicago-area daily newspaper and was senior news writer for Christianity Today magazine and an editor for Worldwide Newsroom before joining WND shortly after 9/11. He earned a master’s degree in communications from Wheaton College.
Canada lacks a Bill of Rights so I am a bit surprised about the that nations relatively successful Trucker Freedom Convoy from Canada’s West coast to the nation’s capital city Ottawa on the East side. Some reports those successes might begin to meet some good old fashioned authoritarianism once absent in the one-time Free World especially after the Axis Powers lost WWII and the Iron Curtain melted at the demise of European Communist rulers in the late 1980s and early 1990s.
I wonder if this Canadian government decision to increase authoritarian force against its citizens has anything to do with Canadians inspiring similar Freedom Convoys across the once Free Western World (including the USA)?
However it works out in Canada and Globally as citizens of so-called Representative governments begin to exercise civil protest, I pray authoritarianism is met with RESISTANCE – peaceful until a 1776-response becomes necessary – to reestablish government by the governed.
While you dwell on RESISTANCE, here are some insights from Canadian Professor Elsa Schieder and American Mike Adams.
JRH 2/12/22
I need your generosity. PLEASE GIVE to overcome expenses:
What do I have for you? Recently I wrote on: how do we break the spell holding so many people. And then came the amazing TRUCKERS FREEDOM CONVOY. I will get back to breaking the spell and responding to its impact. But first, a bit about those fabulous truckers in their fantastic powerful convoys, sparking pride, joy, love.
The first day of the protests, cars drove in convoys to Ottawa. In Ottawa, from sidewalk to sidewalk people crowded the streets around the Canadian Parliament. One estimate: half a million people. Other estimates went higher. At the end, there are links to several of my posts on the Convoy, and to 2 of the truckers’ press conferences. Calm, strong, peaceful people, acting as a team, utterly dedicated to non-violence and to having their lawful demands met: the end to the unlawful government-imposed mandates which violate the Constitution.
My first post starts:
I was there. Part of the Freedom Rally in Ottawa. One tiny part of a huge movement. We left for Ottawa at 7 in the morning. Soon we came to a convoy of cars, heading for Ottawa. By 8 o’clock on Saturday morning, on one overpass after the other, people were gathered, cheering us on. WE LOVE TRUCKERS FOR FREEDOM. WE LOVE FREEDOM. WE LOVE YOU.
The story presented in the mainstream is different. Either the story isn’t there at all. Or the truckers are hateful, hated, angry, racist, misogynistic extremists with unacceptable views disturbing everyone.
I could go back to the question from last time: how do we get heard?
There’s another question: what does it do to us, to have these amazing people vilified, and to be vilified ourselves? People who believe the mainstream story wonder why we would be on the side of the truckers. What does it do to be faced with that on many sides?
In other words, what’s the impact – the often traumatic impact – of living in a society with induced mass formation / mass psychosis / mass narrative-control?
The truckers broke through. Everywhere I keep hearing: this is the Canada I have known and loved. It is back.
Yes, people are acting with strength and pride – happy to support in any way they can. When the police took away the fuel from the truckers, a citizens’ army came to the rescue, carrying (some empty, some full) red containers of gasoline to the truckers. Heart-warming to see.
I’ve seen videos of several police officers who have quit over unlawful orders.
As for me, I’m having a webinar on dealing with all the stuff we’ve had to cope with, and still are coping with.
The first meeting will be on Monday, February 21st – 8 pm in the UK; 3 pm EST; noon PST.
The agenda:
– the 12 Rules for Survival;
– 3 strategies for self-soothing when things get too much;
– and a brief exploration of the impact of the traumatizing events.
If this interests you, please send an email to:
elsa [which is at] elsasemporium [dot] com
Put YES TO TRAUMA WEBINAR in the subject line.
The confirmation will be coming from that address within 24 hours.
If you don’t receive it, check your spam folder.
And now, as always, all the best to all of us,
Elsa
PS. By the way, thank you to all of you who sent strategies for spell-breaking. Many of these have been mentioned in the Sunday group (Connection and Community – Taking Action). PPS. Here are links:
– to posts on the truckers, – to press conferences given by the truckers, – and to something else I see as a huge world event – I have heard it called Nuremberg 2.
[Blog Editor: I would love to check out Elsa’s LinkedIn posts, but content disagreements with that social platform and my unwillingness to bend to their rules has placed me on their restricted list until I agree to conform.]
Freedom Convoy Leadership Update – Address to the Nation 7:00pm February 6, 2020. Ottawa Mayor declared a state of emergency. How Ottawa Police taking the convoy fuel and occupying the convoy tents does not impact the Freedom Convoy logistics.
Marcel Irnie travelling track to track to teach Rider Training and Race Motorcycles. Roaming with a 2009 Duramax LMM dually, carrying a 06′ Northern Lite 10.2, pulling a 16′ race trailer with BMW S1000RR Merlin, Ninja 400 Motoko, KTM 300xc TPI Acme Moto and a Polaris RS1 named RYzen.
[Here is the Before It’s News title and introductory paragraph:
Attorney Reiner Fuellmich Presents Opening Statements At Grand Jury, Court Of Public Opinion: “There Is No Corona Pandemic, Only A PCR Test Plandemic” (Video)
Attorney Reiner Fuellmich presented his opening statements to what is being referred to as a Grand Jury in the court of public opinion. He laid out a case in which he said there was no corona pandemic but rather a “PCR test plandemic.”
PLEASE PRAY AND SHARE, DOWNLOAD AND PUT ON YOUR OWN SITE THANKS
We, a group of international lawyers and a judge, hereby are conducting criminal investigation modeled after the United States Grand Jury proceedings.
This Grand Jury Investigation serves as a model legal proceeding to present to a jury (consisting of the citizens of the world) all available evidence of COVID-19 Crimes Against Humanity to date against “leaders, organizers, instigators and accomplices” who aided, abetted or actively participated in the formulation and execution of a common plan for a pandemic.
Crimes to be investigated include all acts performed or omitted by a person in pursuance of a common design to commit Crimes Against Humanity, and all such criminal acts condemned in the various communities of jurors around the world.
This investigation is of the people, by the people and for the people and shall be referred to as the ‘Peoples´ Court of Public Opinion.
Having been unable to find a court to hear the actual evidence in the current system´s courts of law, we are undertaking this proceeding outside of the current system and based on natural law.
This, in turn is founded on the firm belief that every person can easily distinguish between good and evil, and between right and wrong.
The allegation is that the world’s governments have come under the controlling influence of corrupt and criminal power structures.
They colluded to stage a pandemic that they had been planning for years. To this end they deliberately created mass panic through false statements of fact and a socially engineered psychological operation whose messages they conveyed through the corporate media.
The purpose of this mass panic was to persuade the population to agree to the so-called “vaccinations” which have in the meantime be proven to be neither effective, nor safe, but extremely dangerous, even lethal.
The economic, social, and health damage that these Crimes Against Humanity have caused to the world’s population can be measured in quadrillions of dollars.
Grand Jury Proceeding by the Peoples´ Court of Public Opinion Empowering Public Conscience through Natural Law ‘Injustice to One is an Injustice to All’
We, a group of international lawyers and a judge, hereby are conducting criminal investigation modelled after the United States Grand Jury proceedings.
This Grand Jury Investigation serves as a model legal proceeding to present to a jury (consisting of the citizens of the world) all available evidence of COVID-19 Crimes Against Humanity to date against “leaders, organizers, instigators and accomplices” who aided, abetted or actively participated in the formulation and execution of a common plan for a pandemic.
Crimes to be investigated include all acts performed or omitted by a person in pursuance of a common design to commit Crimes Against Humanity, and all such criminal acts condemned in the various communities of jurors around the world.
This investigation is of the people, by the people and for the people and shall be referred to as the ‘Peoples´ Court of Public Opinion.
Having been unable to find a court to hear the actual evidence in the current system´s courts of law, we are undertaking this proceeding outside of the current system and based on natural law.
This, in turn is founded on the firm belief that every person can easily distinguish between good and evil, and between right and wrong.
THIS IS THE SITE FOR THE COMMON LAW TRIALS IN THE COURT OF PUBLIC OPINION.
Here are the participants: Attorney at Law Virginie de Araujo Recchia, France Judge Rui Fonseca E Castro, Portugal Attorney at Law Claire Deeks, New Zealand Attorney at Law Viviane Fischer, Germany Attorney at Law Dr. Reiner Fuellmich, Germany Attorney at Law N. Ana Garner, USA Attorney at Law Dr. Renate Holzeisen, Italy Attorney at Law Tony Nikolic, Australia Attorney at Law Dipali Ojha, India Attorney at Law Dexter L-J. Ryneveldt (Adv.), South Africa Attorney at Law Deana Sacks, USA Attorney at Law Michael Swinwood, Canada
Cooperating Human Rights Defenders and Legal Activists: Tjaša Vuzem, Slovenia Gina Cloud, USA Dr. Cristiane Grieb, Canada Leslie Manookian, USA
** Finally, here are:
ORGANIZATIONS AND SOME POLITIAL FIGURES SPEAKING OUT FOR THE CANADIAN BILL OF RIGHTS AND THE CANADIAN CONSTITUTION
https://action4canada.com/urgent-message-canadians/ Police on Guard Mounties 4 Freedom Action4Canada ACT! For Canada Stand up Canada Take Action Canada Mama Bears Police for Freedom Vaccine Choice Canada Canadian Frontline Nurses Canadian Citizens for Charter Rights and Freedoms Rick Nicholls – Deputy Leader Ontario Party, MPP Chatham-Kent-Leamington Harold Albrecht – Retired MP – Kitchener Conestoga Derek Sloan – Leader Ontario Party Dean Allison – MP for Niagara West Randy Hillier – MPP Lenark-Frontenac-Kingston/No More Lockdowns Larry Sault – Former Chief and Grand Chief in Ontario/ Indigenous Consultant (Present
++++++++++++++++++++
The globalists have LOST – Humanity withdraws consent from the tyrants and lets the system crash and burn
(Natural News) The Canadian truckers and freedom protesters deserve huge credit for bringing humanity to a tipping point against tyranny. Thanks to the courage, determination and dedication to peace that’s demonstrated by Canada’s protesters, humanity is withdrawing its consent from government tyrants all over the world.
Globalism is crashing, and centralization of power is being ripped to shreds. The entire model of globalism is dead, and no human being that’s aware and alive right now wants to return to a society structured as a top-down, totalitarian, centralized control system of global enslavement run by a few hundred hyper-wealthy freakazoids like Zuckerberg and Gates.
What I’m trying to explain here is that this is about much more than covid vaccines or lockdowns. This is about humanity rising up against the very idea of centralized government, corporations, media and tech giants. The era of centralization has come to an end, and the free people of the world have begun the process of dismantling it by simply withdrawing their consent.
Consider the impact of the realizations now spreading across the world:
Government failed the people.
Corporations murdered people for profit.
Doctors, hospitals and the medical system betrayed the people.
Big Tech platforms silenced the truth, costing millions of lives.
Big Media was complicit in the plandemic and the vaccine biowar against humanity.
The institution of science deceived the people and proved it is hopelessly corrupt and evil.
What we’ve all lived through over the last two years is corrupt, deceptive, anti-human institutions waging war against truth and humanity, showing their true cards and exposing the depth of their evil.
And that’s why the people of the world are now peacefully rising up and demanding an end to the entire centralization structure of globalism. It is the centralized control over media, information, government and “science” that brought us all to the brink of destruction. Absolute power corrupts absolutely, and for the past several generations, the people have handed over far too much power to governments, science journals, media giants and tech platforms.
Now, the people are taking their power back.
And they’re doing it, ironically, by mimicking the mRNA spike protein blood clots in the real world: Clogging bridges, roadways and cities, bringing society to a standstill with nothing but trucks, horns and raw courage.
The message is clear: You try to put clots into our blood and we’ll put traffic clots across your cities.
The evil governments, predictably, call these peaceful protesters “terrorists” — even as the governments themselves are carrying out acts of terrorism and mass murder against their own people. So let’s take a look at some of the very real people behind the Ottawa protests. The masterful portrait photos shown here are from Dan Aponte, a Canadian photographer who brilliantly captures the humanity of the freedom protesters in Ottawa. This is flat-out the most impactful photography I’ve seen in years. Read more details about these truckers and peaceful protesters at:
The solidarity was infectious. There were copycat protests popping up in Helsinki, Finland, and Wellington, New Zealand and Nice, France (they planned to hit Paris and Brussels). There were truckers organizing in the Netherlands, Australia and the United States. Among the Americans who had driven up to Ottawa there was talk that soon the big rigs would descend on Washington, D.C.
“Seeing the country fall apart like this is heartbreaking,” Sim said. “For me, this is the line in the sand. If we lose this battle, I’d like to move out of Canada.” He said that he was thinking of maybe heading to Florida. A lot of the truckers were thinking about the States. But not yet. “I feel that I owe it to me and others that share my values to, at least, fight for this.”
Learn more about how humanity defeats globalism and centralization, dismantling the whole damned system
Today’s Situation Update podcast covers all this in more detail. Definitely hear the last 30 minutes of the podcast for an inspiring analysis of why we’re all here right now in this pivotal time of human history:
he Canadian truckers and freedom protesters deserve huge credit for bringing humanity to a tipping point against tyranny. Thanks to the courage, determination and dedication to peace that’s demonstrated by Canada’s protesters, humanity is withdrawing its consent from government tyrants all over the world.
All content posted on this site is commentary or opinion and is protected under Free Speech. Truth Publishing International, LTD. is not responsible for content written by contributing authors. The information on this site is provided for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended as a substitute for professional advice of any kind. Truth Publishing assumes no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. Your use of this website indicates your agreement to these terms and those published here. All trademarks, registered trademarks and servicemarks mentioned on this site are the property of their respective owners.
I recently became aware that some Jewish organizations (without checking I can guess they are Leftist self-loathing Jewish organizations who have abandoned their Torah-tenets to favor Biblical-hating Leftist principles) have criticized Robert F. Kennedy, Jr’s Defeat The Mandatespeech by twisting his words (Leftist-style) to claim Jab-Mandates are like herding Jews to Holocaust death – HE DID NOT SAY THAT! Rabbi Michael Barclay sets the record straight.
THEN Dr. Mercola has a post entitled, “Health Officials Deny Even a Single Death From COVID Shots.” The focus is government science agencies lying to American beginning with CDC Director Walensky lies and NIAID Director Fauci lies. TAKE NOTE: When Dr. Mercola writes about VAERS statistics, those numbers are skewed by under reporting which make Jab deaths and injuries even more horrific.
JRH 1/28/22
I need your generosity. PLEASE GIVE to overcome expenses:
Big Tech Censorship is pervasive – Share voluminously on all social media platforms!
*************************
Is Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. Right?
Recent attacks on Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. are unwarranted as his speech expressed a valid opinion about how technology has advanced in ways that make hiding or fleeing from a nation’s imperious actions significantly more challenging now than 80 years ago.
Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. recently was taken to task in the media and by many Jewish organizations for supposedly comparing the Holocaust to the current events involving personal rights violations.
If he had indeed said that, it would have demonstrated a lack of awareness about the horrors of the Holocaust, the single worst example of hatred and evil by a government in human history.
Unlike Democrats like Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, who specifically compared the border detainment facilities for illegal aliens to concentration camps, Kennedy never even brought up the Holocaust or its horrors.
Whereas Reps. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.) and Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.) co-sponsored a clearly anti-Semitic bill that morally equates Israel with both the Soviet Union and Nazi Germany’s Holocaust, Kennedy did not equate the uniquely evil events of the Holocaust with anything in today’s world.
So what is all the hullabaloo about and why is Kennedy being so castigated in the public forum?
Kennedy is a student of history, and his bachelor’s degree from Harvard is actually in American history and literature.
As such, he sees political and cultural patterns in an historical perspective, and it is from this understanding that he made the remark that has been so taken out of context.
The first thing to realize is that there is a difference between the Holocaust per se and Nazi Germany as a national government. Nazi Germany was an oppressive political regime whose evil practices resulted in the Holocaust.
Not all oppressive governments end up with a Holocaust-type event (thank God), and there is a qualitative difference between the foundational organization and the ultimate results of the beliefs of that organization. This is a primary understanding that every historian, including Kennedy, knows.
Nazi Germany made authoritarian demands that separated and degraded segments of the population. As this happened in the 1930s, Jews and others went into hiding and/or escaped from the Nazi regime, often by fleeing through Spain or Switzerland.
The most famous examples of hiding or fleeing are the Von Trapp family (the basis of “The Sound of Music”) and Anne Frank, who wrote her famous diary about her time in hiding from the Nazis in a “secret annex.”
While the Von Trapps ultimately escaped to America, Anne Frank ended up being caught by the Nazis and dying in Bergen-Belsen. But her fame is due to her ability to successfully hide from the Nazis for two years, and her understanding about that time as expressed through her diary.
It was this ability to hide that Kennedy was specifically referring to in his recent speech.
He clearly states:
“Even in Hitler’s Germany you could cross the Alps into Switzerland. You could hide in an attic like Anne Frank did.”
Kennedy goes on to speak about how because of technology, we now have challenges that will prevent anyone from fleeing or hiding from an authoritarian regime.
Nowhere does he reference the death camps or horrors of the Holocaust.
Kennedy’s comparison to the current state of affairs, where personal liberties are being lost and where privacy is being destroyed, is valid.
And there is a truth to the fact that the ability to flee or hide if you want to avoid a government’s edicts and mandates is even more difficult in some ways than it was in Nazi Germany.
But that is extremely different than making a comparison to the Holocaust, which included such infamous names as Auschwitz, Dachau, Treblinka and Babi-Yar.
So why is there such a media frenzy of attack on Kennedy? Could it be because of his vocal attacks on the establishment regarding vaccinations, required papers and the media’s collusion with the Biden administration?
Maybe it’s because of the success of his most recent bestselling book about Anthony Fauci?
Whatever the reason, the attacks are unwarranted as his speech expressed a valid opinion about any government’s authoritarian actions, and how technology has advanced in ways that make hiding or fleeing from a nation’s imperious actions significantly more challenging now than 80 years ago.
Before unjustly castigating Kennedy for something he did not say, the media needs to be more intellectually honest and condemn those people like Omar, Tlaib and Ocasio-Cortez for their actual acts of comparing modern events to the Holocaust.
There has never been a man in human history as evil as Hitler, who desired the final solution of the eradication of Jews, Gypsies and other minorities.
Should we ever compare anything to the horrors of the Holocaust and the evil leaders of that stain in human history? The unequivocal answer is no.
Is it appropriate to compare the patterns of one government, in this case Nazi Germany, with modern situations?
If there is truth to the comparison, which there clearly is in the aspects that Kennedy was referencing, then we must make the comparison so that we never have a repetition of the outcome.
More importantly, we need to all expose and reject any leader’s comparison of anyone with Adolf Hitler, and never allow anyone to compare the evils of the death camps and persecutions with the challenges we face today.
May we all call out true evil in every circumstance, and never allow others to minimize the evils of the Holocaust through comparisons for political gain.
The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Children’s Health Defense.
Rabbi Michael Barclay is the spiritual leader of Temple Ner Simcha and the author of “Sacred Relationships: Biblical Wisdom for Deepening Our Lives Together.”
CDC Director Rochelle Walensky and Anthony Fauci appeared before a Senate Committee Hearing this week and lied under oath.
They both claimed that they “didn’t know” how many deaths were recorded in VAERS following COVID-19 vaccines, and Walensky stated the COVID-19 vaccines are “incredibly safe” and “protect us against Omicron, they protect us against Delta, they protect us against COVID.”
She also stated that all reported COVID-19 vaccine deaths have been “adjudicated,” when in fact not a single COVID-19 vaccine injury, let alone a death, has been tried in the Government CounterMeasures Injury Compensation Program.]
STORY AT-A-GLANCE
As of January 7, 2022, the U.S. Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) has received 9,936 reports of death following the COVID jab in the U.S. When you include foreign reports received by VAERS, the death toll stands at 21,745
A total of 1,541 miscarriages have also been reported post-jab in the U.S., or 3,594 if you include foreign reports. Despite these shocking statistics, U.S. health officials and “fact checkers” insist not a single death can be attributed to the shots
According to OneAmerica, a national life insurance company, in the third quarter of 2021, working age Americans (aged 18 to 64) died at a rate that is 40% higher than the prepandemic rate, and they didn’t die from COVID
The Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India also reports a 41% rise in death claims in 2021, and teens’ mortality in the U.K. shot up 47% in the three months after they became eligible for COVID shots
A recent histopathologic analysis of the organs from 15 patients who died within seven days to six months’ post-jab, ages 28 to 95, found 14 of the deaths — 93% — were caused by the jab
As of January 7, 2022, just over a year into the campaign to inject every human being with a gene transfer product to protect against COVID, the U.S. Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) has received 9,936 reports of death following the COVID jab in the United States’ territories alone.1 When you include foreign reports received by VAERS, the death toll stands at 21,745.
A total of 1,541 miscarriages have also been reported post-jab in the U.S., or 3,594 if you include foreign reports. Despite these shocking statistics, U.S. health officials and “fact checkers” insist not a single death can be attributed to the shots.
During an early January 2022 Senate committee hearing on the nation’s Omicron response (see video above), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention director Dr. Rochelle Walensky, and director for the National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Dr. Anthony Fauci, testified — under oath — that they “did not know” how many deaths had been reported to VAERS following COVID “vaccination.”2,3
Walensky referred to the shots as “incredibly safe,” claiming — against all science — that they “protect us against Omicron, they protect us against Delta, they protect us against COVID.” She also falsely claimed that all reported COVID-19 vaccine deaths have been “adjudicated.”
No, VAERS Is Not a Repository of Fake Reports
Worse yet, both Walensky and Fauci claim any and all adverse events following vaccination get reported to VAERS, including accidental deaths and car accidents. They both actually claim that if a person gets the COVID shot and gets hit by a car afterward, that is reported as an adverse reaction.
Nothing could be further from the truth. First of all, adverse events are not automatically reported and, certainly, obvious accidents are not entered into the system as a suspected vaccine side effect.
As reported by Health Impact News,4 there are about 18 reports in VAERS that include “road traffic accident,” but most if not all relate to an adverse event, such as a heart attack, occurring while driving. They were not hit by someone else and entered into the system. As noted by Pam Long in a January 12, 2022, Twitter thread:5
“If anyone in public health utters ‘a person can get hit by a car & report their death to VAERS’ you need stop them, in any public meeting, and demand they explain what motive would a physician have to inflate VAERS reports with car accidents or any unrelated mortality?
Despite Walensky’s & Fauci’s cliché testimony to Congress. Not one person ‘got hit by a car’ & reported their own death to VAERS as a vaccine injury. Most reports are filed by medical professionals, using diagnostic language about drug reactions.”
VAERS was designed and created as an early warning system. It’s true that anyone can file a report, but it’s time-consuming, requires the knowledge of medical details a patient oftentimes won’t have, and carries penalties for filing a false report. There’s absolutely no reason to suspect, let alone assume, that people are filing false reports just to make the shots look bad.
Fact Checker Outs Himself as a Pharma Propagandist
Walensky and Fauci aren’t the only ones lying about the lethality of the COVID jab. Mainstream media are all-in as well. In a USA Today fact check,6 Daniel Funke claims that “COVID-19 vaccines [are] safe for children” and “not linked to deaths.”
“… online, some claim children face more risk from the vaccine than COVID-19 itself,” Funke writes. “USA TODAY previously rated False a claim that children are 50 times more likely to die from the COVID-19 vaccine than the virus. This claim is similarly wrong.
Public health officials say the vaccine from Pfizer-BioNTech is safe and effective at preventing COVID-19 in children ages 5-11. As other independent fact-checking organizations have reported, the benefits of the vaccine outweigh its known and potential risks.
‘Over 700 children have died due to COVID-19 in the United States,’ Dr. Sonja Rasmussen, a professor in the departments of pediatrics and epidemiology at the University of Florida, said in an email.
‘I am not aware of any deaths in children that have been attributed to the COVID-19 vaccine’ … The benefits of the COVID-19 vaccine for children outweigh its known and potential risks, according to the CDC. The shot does not cause death.”
Funke cites data from Pfizer’s clinical trials, “which found the vaccine was safe” for children, as “no deaths were reported” in Pfizer’s trials for 12- to 25-year-olds, and those for 12- to 17-year-olds. Funke dismisses the rationale for looking at VAERS data on the basis that anyone can file a report and that reports are unverified, and therefore cannot be used to determine causation.
All Opinion and No Data
There are so many issues with this “fact-check,” no wonder Facebook attorneys are using the legal defense that fact checks are “opinion” only and not actual assertions of fact.7,8 There’s nothing but opinions in this piece. As “evidence” that the COVID shots are safe and have caused no deaths, Funke presents:
Another opinion piece by USA Today
The supposed opinion of unnamed “public health officials”
Biased opinion assertions by other pharma-funded propaganda organizations (aka, “fact checking organizations”)
The opinion of a single professor who admits she is unaware of publicly available data
The unsupported opinion of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, a captured agency that has repeatedly been caught manipulating data and changing definitions to fit the pandemic narrative
Pfizer’s preliminary trial data, which whistleblowers warn may have integrity issues9
The unsupported claim that VAERS data are unreliable because anyone can file, the implication being that people can file fake reports
The debatable claim that VAERS data cannot tell us anything about causation, hence it’s useless looking at it
It’s hard to come up with a less compelling list of evidences for safety, but then again, propagandists have to work with what they have, and in this case, they have nothing. Funke presents zero actual data to support his opinion.
Explain the Rise in Mortality if You Can
There are many data-driven reasons to suspect, predict and even assume that the COVID shots are killing more people than they’re saving — regardless of the age group in question. It would take an entire book to cover it all, so I will only review a few of those reasons here.
One very telling clue that recently came to light is life insurance data. According to OneAmerica, a national life insurance company based in Indianapolis, in the third quarter of 2021, working-age Americans (aged 18 to 64) died at a rate that is 40% higher than the prepandemic rate, and they didn’t die from COVID.10
And, according to CEO Scott Davidson, this catastrophic abnormality is consistently seen “across every player” in the life insurance industry.11 A 40% increase in mortality is simply unheard of, and as of yet, they claim to have no clue as to what’s causing young and middle-aged people to die prematurely at such an astounding rate.
Looking at it from a sleuth’s point of view, one might ask, “What environmental factor with unknown safety was introduced in 2021 to people in this age group?” Sure, pandemic restrictions have led to spikes in drug overdoses and suicides, which affects this cohort in particular. But “deaths of desperation” cannot account for all of it.
The one wild card is the COVID jab. More than 173 million working-age Americans (18 to 64) got these experimental gene transfer injections,12 and doctors and scientists have elucidated several mechanisms by which they might injure or kill.
What’s more, the rise in deaths began AFTER the rollout of the shots, and whatever the causative factor, it is not only national but likely international in scope. The Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India, for example, also reports a 41% rise in death claims in 2021.13
Excess deaths (exceeding prepandemic norms) are also reported in the U.K.14 Among teens (aged 15 to 19), mortality spiked right after teens became eligible for the COVID shot.15 Between the week ending June 26 and the week ending September 18, 2020, and that same period of time in 2021, teenage deaths rose by 47%.16
A rise in disability claims17 also suggests that many who aren’t killed by this novel lethal threat are seriously injured, often long-term. For all of these reasons, the COVID jabs cannot be taken off the table. Logic demands that they be looked into as a potential causative factor.
Can VAERS Data Demonstrate Causality?
One person who has taken a strong stance against the claim that VAERS data cannot tell us anything about causation is Steve Kirsch, executive director of the COVID-19 Early Treatment Fund. In the video “Vaccine Secrets: COVID Crisis,”18 he argues that VAERS can indeed be used to determine causality.
It’s important to realize that the idea that VAERS cannot show causality is part of how and why the CDC can claim none of the deaths is attributable to the COVID shot. Kirsch argues that this premise is in fact false, and that causation can be determined using VAERS’ data.
To prove his point, Kirsch gives the following analogy: Suppose you give a two-dose vaccine. After the first dose, nothing happens, but after the second dose, people die within 24 hours of a deep vein thrombosis (DVT).
When you look at the VAERS data, what you would find is no reports associated with the first dose, and a rash of deaths after the second dose, all within the same timeframe and with the same cause of death.
According to the CDC, you cannot ascribe any causality at all from that. To them, it’s just random chance that everyone died after the second dose, and from the same condition, and not the first dose or from another condition.
Kirsch argues that causality can indeed be identified from this kind of data. It’s very difficult to come up with another explanation for why people — many who are young, in perfect health with no predisposing conditions — die exactly 24 hours after their second dose. It’s even difficult to come up with another explanation for people who do have underlying conditions.
For example, is it reasonable to assume that people with, say, undiagnosed heart conditions, would die from DVT exactly 24 hours after getting a second dose of vaccine? Or that people with undiagnosed diabetes would die from DVT exactly 24 hours after their second dose?
Why not after the first dose, or two months after the second dose, or any other random number of hours or days, or for other random cause of death? Why would people randomly die of the same condition at the exact same time, over and over again?
At bare minimum, as an early warning system, VAERS is designed to flag potential causation. It’s by looking for repeated patterns of side effects that you would begin to identify a potentially problematic vaccine. Once a pattern is identified — and there’s no denying death within 24 hours to one week is a pattern seen for the COVID shots — an investigation should be launched.
But no such investigation has been launched for the COVID jabs. Clear-cut patterns are simply ignored. As an early warning system, VAERS is performing as intended, despite severe underreporting (the CDC recently published a paper in which they admit COVID jab adverse effects in children are underreported by a factor of 6.519). It’s the follow-up that’s lacking. But lack of investigation and follow-up is not evidence that the shots can’t cause death.
Another clue that hints at SOME of the shots being able to cause rapid death is the “bad batch” phenomenon. Independent investigations have revealed that some lots of the shots are associated with very severe side effects and death, whereas other lots have no adverse events associated with their use.
According to howbadismybatch.com, a site that matches up vaccine lot codes with reports in the VAERS system, approximately 5% of the lots are responsible for 90% of all adverse reactions. Some of these batches have 50 times the number of deaths and disabilities associated with them, compared to other lots.20
Another website that basically does the same thing is TheEagle’s VAERS Dashboard. (A video explaining how to use the dashboard can be found on Bitchute.21)
“According to Fuellmich and Wodarg, this lot-dependent data shows vaccine makers are conducting secret experiments within the larger public trial. They appear to actually be doing lethal-dose testing on the public.”
Dr. Reiner Fuellmich, cofounder of the German Corona Investigative Committee, and Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg, a former member of the German parliament, discuss this “smoking gun” evidence in the video above. According to Fuellmich and Wodarg, this lot-dependent data shows vaccine makers are conducting secret experiments within the larger public trial.
They appear to actually be doing lethal-dose testing on the public. Wodarg argues that the evidence for this is very clear from the data. They also appear to be coordinating these lethal-dose experiments, so that they’re not all releasing their most toxic lots at the same time, or in the same areas, so as to avoid detection through clustering.
More Data Showing COVID Jabs Can Kill
In closing, I will raise just two more pieces of evidence that speaks to COVID jabs having the ability to kill large numbers of people:
A recent histopathologic analysis of the organs from 15 patients who died within seven days to six months’ post-jab, ages 28 to 95, found 14 of the deaths — 93% — were caused by the jab.22,23 None of the original coroners’ reports implicated the shots, however.
The association was only established through autopsy, which revealed a “process of immunological self-attack” that is “without precedent.” “Because vaccination was the single common denominator between all cases, there can be no doubt that it was the trigger of self-destruction in these deceased individuals,” Drs. Sucharit Bhakdi and Arne Burkhardt wrote.
According to researchers at Columbia University, the real number of people killed by the COVID jabs is about 20 times the reported rate, based on their analysis of two publicly available databases (VAERS in the U.S., and another in Europe).24,25,26 That analysis was published in October 2021, but few ever heard a peep about it. According to the authors:
“Comparing our age-stratified VFRs [vaccine-induced fatality rates] with published age-stratified coronavirus infection fatality rates (IFR) suggests the risks of COVID vaccines and boosters outweigh the benefits in children, young adults and older adults with low occupational risk or previous coronavirus exposure.
We discuss implications for public health policies related to boosters, school and workplace mandates, and the urgent need to identify, develop and disseminate diagnostics and treatments for life-altering vaccine injuries.”
Based on the ever-mounting data, the claim that COVID shots have not, cannot, and/or will not cause death simply isn’t credible. And the longer these shots continue to be used, the greater the likelihood that they will indeed kill far more than the actual virus ever did. We also need to remember that the disabilities and long-term chronic ill health these shots are causing will prematurely kill many more, even if it takes 10 or 15 years, and we have no data on any of that yet.
By popular demand, I am pleased to share with you an exciting update — my entire Censored Library has finally returned! Through Substack, an information sharing platform, I am once again able to share with you all the valuable research I have gathered through the years. Click below to access my Censored Library now.
As a reminder, my daily newsletter is still free and content will be released on Mercola.com before anywhere else. After 48 hours, the articles will be transferred to my Censored Library on Substack.
Disclaimer: The entire contents of this website are based upon the opinions of Dr. Mercola, unless otherwise noted. Individual articles are based upon the opinions of the respective author, who retains copyright as marked. The information on this website is not intended to replace a one-on-one relationship with a qualified health care professional and is not intended as medical advice. It is intended as a sharing of knowledge and information from the research and experience of Dr. Mercola and his community. Dr. Mercola encourages you to make your own health care decisions based upon your research and in partnership with a qualified health care professional. If you are pregnant, nursing, taking medication, or have a medical condition, consult your health care professional before using products based on this content.
If you want to use an article on your site please click here. This content may be copied in full, with copyright, contact, creation and information intact, without specific permission, when used only in a not-for-profit format. If any other use is desired, permission in writing from Dr. Mercola is required.
The Conservative-Patriot Christian Right 
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
