Intro to ‘Weaponizing COVID to Promote Collectivism’


Intro by John R. Houk, Blog Editor

By Barbara Loe Fisher

November 16, 2022

When the [uncompromisingly] righteous are in authority, the people rejoice; but when the wicked man rules, the people groan and sigh.

12 If a ruler listens to falsehood, all his officials will become wicked. Proverbs 29: 2, 12 AMPC

Barbara Loe Fisher Screen Capture

Barbara Loe Fisher – President and Co-Founder of National Vaccine Information Center – has an awesome monologue AGAINST Medical Tyranny focused on COVID Lies and Jab Lies. The monologue us about 27-minutes long and worth EVERY word dripping with truth and facts. I ran into the video on the MeWe Social Platform (so when I share there, cut me some slack if you’ve seen it. Whether you’ve watched for the first time or already viewed, YOU SHOULD SHARE as an action against Medical Tyranny).

Ms. Fisher follows the monologue with what appears to be the text of the video. So, watch or read; BUT dear God in Heaven resist this godless wicked tyranny. Resist individually via civil disobedience or join a group in your community organizing active civil resistance.

If you’ve ever read Dr. Mercola posts you should notice the post is formatted after that fashion. Indeed, a version Ms. Fisher’s post is at Mercola.com, however I’m cross posting the nvic.org website version.

JRH 11/16/22

Thank you to those who have stepped up!

READER SUPPORTED! I need Readers willing to chip in $5 – $10 – $25 – $50 – $100. PLEASE I need your generosity. PLEASE GIVE to Help me be a voice for Liberty:

Please Support CPCR

YOU CAN ALSO SUPPORT via buying healthy supplements/products from Online stores (mine & my Honey):

Mine: https://modere.co/3SrOHzI

My Better Half: https://valentus.com/dianahouk  

Big Tech Censorship is pervasive – Share voluminously on all social media platforms!

********************************

Weaponizing COVID to Promote Collectivism

By Barbara Loe Fisher

Published November 15, 2022 in Industry & Business

National Vaccine Information Center

Rumble VIDEO: Weaponizing COVID to Promote Collectivism [I just realized the Rumble (which undoubtedly is the original version) does not have the typical embed codes. I found a Bitchute version which I am using posted on Bitchute Channel PeppiDiCapri]

Bitchute VIDEO: BARBARA LOE FISHER: WEAPONIZING COVID TO PROMOTE COLLECTIVISM

[Posted by National Vaccine Information Center

Published November 14, 2022

MORE DESCRIPTION]

Click for Podcast

The morning that hurricane Ian hit the coast of southwest Florida, the dramatic images of the raw power of Mother Nature blowing apart structures built by human hands and sweeping them into the sea were unbelievable.1 After hours and hours of wind, rain, and a catastrophic water surge that left a trail of destruction in its wake, I thought about how very different this natural disaster was compared to the one unleashed on the world in 2020 that also left a trail of destruction in its wake.

Two disasters, one a natural disaster legally termed an “act of God,” and the other a disaster that, three years later, people are still asking: was it natural or manmade?2 3

Whether or not the SARS-CoV-2 virus spontaneously jumped out of a bat and into a human being4 or was created by scientists in a biohazard lab,5 6 7 one thing is clear: the chaotic response by the experts in charge has been a disaster in itself.8 And the people, whose lives were impacted by that chaos, experienced the same kind of sudden shock, fear,9 disorientation, isolation, and powerlessness that many people, who experience a hurricane, tsunami, tornado, earthquake, or fire, feel when the unexpected happens.

Public Health Pandemic Response Policies Generated Fear, Instability

GIRL-MASK

In the middle of this hurricane, I found myself thinking about why fear of the unknown10 brought on by this emergency was so familiar. It was familiar because we had just experienced fear of the unknown in the winter of 2020,11 when we were told by public health officials that a weirdly mutated coronavirus was on the loose and would kill us if we didn’t hide in our homes, wear cloth over our faces, cut off physical contact with our family and friends, keep our children out of school, and stop getting our hair cut or going to church, exercising in a gym, entering restaurants or certain stores, and be OK with the government labeling many workers and private businesses as “non-essential,” which shut down our economy and threatened to plunge families into bankruptcy.12 13 14 

The people in Florida facing this real life-threatening emergency were suddenly having to call upon emotional and physical reserves already depleted by having recently gone through another emergency, in which some lost their health or their loved ones to the mutant virus, or were injured by disabling COVID vaccine reactions, while others lost their jobs, homes or businesses during the 2020 lockdown that, thankfully, was cut short in Florida compared to many other states.

The fallout from destructive federal COVID response policies on the mental health, child development, and economic stability of our nation is still being assessed.15 16 17 18 19 20 21

Two disasters: a natural one, and one that the world is still having trouble defining.

Post-hurricane Ian, there is a lot of analysis going on in Florida by those whose job it is to prepare for and respond to hurricanes.22 By most accounts, it is an honest analysis by state officials working hard to help people deal with what happened rather than politicizing what happened.23 24 25 

Keeping Us Living in Fear to Sell COVID Vaccine

COVID-19-Death-estimates

Last month, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control once again extended the COVID pandemic public health emergency declaration, this time until January 11, 2023.26 To justify keeping us living in fear, 27 28 federal health officials are warning ominously that a “twindemic” of a more transmissible SARS-CoV-2 virus mutant strain, combined with an especially bad influenza season, is poised to make more of us very sick this fall and winter if we don’t all get a COVID shot and a flu shot at the same time.29 30  One high-ranking government doctor said with a straight face – “I really believe this is why God gave us two arms — one for the flu shot and the other one for the COVID shot.” 31

But Americans have grown weary of virus porn, and while the majority of Americans have gotten at least one COVID shot, polls show that just 14 percent of children under age five have gotten one.32 33 34 There are signs that Americans are questioning the ever-changing number of COVID booster shots being aggressively advertised by Big Pharma and government officials, who are trying hard to convince us we will need to get a COVID shot every single year. 35 36 37 38 In this very lucrative marketing campaign, the two mRNA COVID vaccine manufacturers, Pfizer and Moderna, raked in 50 billion dollars in 2021 and 2022 alone, with a promise of billions more in profits in the years to come.39 40 41 42 

A Weirdly Mutated Virus, A Reactive Biological That’s Not a Vaccine

Those two drug companies are selling a cell disrupter biological product that is called a vaccine, but in no way resembles any other vaccine that has ever been injected into humans to theoretically combat a weirdly mutated coronavirus, which is acting like no other virus that has ever infected humans. The mRNA biological has been described as “transforming the body into a vaccine-making machine,”43 while one scientist explains that the rapidly mutating SARS-CoV-2 virus is “essentially viral evolution on steroids.”44 But, still, nobody in charge of the COVID pandemic response seems to know exactly where this virus on steroids came from or exactly what kind of damage it – or the genetically engineered components of the mRNA product – are doing to the biological integrity of human populations.45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53

Heart-Blood-Clots

The mRNA COVID vaccines are associated with many ugly side effects, especially ones that compromise the blood and heart and can cause death.54 55 Online it has been dubbed the “clot shot”,56 57 even as owners of social media platforms try to shut down all conversations about serious COVID vaccine reactions being reported online,58 59 60 61 62 in the medical literature,63 and to the U.S. Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS).64 65  There have been more than 1.3 million adverse events reported to VAERS after mRNA COVID vaccinations, including heart, brain and immune system damage and death. These 1.3 million reports represent more than half of all vaccine reactions reported for all vaccines since VAERS became operational in 1990 under the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act,66 while less than one percent of all vaccine reactions are reported to VAERS.67 

The mRNA COVID vaccine is the most reactive one ever distributed in the U.S. to the entire population.

COVID Shot Reactions Are Good Even When the Product Doesn’t Prevent Infection

$100-bill & Jab Vial

Yet, as soon as the mRNA COVID products were released in December 2020 under an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA), public health officials told people to celebrate adverse reaction symptoms, trying to convince them that those reaction symptoms means the vaccine is doing its job and would prevent them from getting sick with COVID.68 Nothing could be further from the truth.69 That lie not only persuaded people to accept COVID vaccine reactions as normal and a good thing, but it persuaded doctors to dismiss COVID vaccine-related injuries and deaths as just a “coincidence.”70 71

Which brings us to perhaps the biggest elephant in the room, and that is how blatantly the people were lied to from the beginning about just how effective the mRNA COVID vaccines would be, as government officials allowed people to believe that getting vaccinated would protect them from being infected with the new coronavirus and transmitting it to others, when that was never true. In fact, it was so untrue that, in 2021, CDC officials changed the centuries-old definition of a vaccine from a “product that stimulates a person’s immune system to produce immunity to a specific disease” to “a preparation that is used to stimulate the body’s immune response against diseases,” and they convinced Merriam Webster Dictionary to do the same.72 73 74 That’s because the FDA only required drug companies to demonstrate the COVID vaccine had at least 50 percent efficacy in preventing severe symptoms of COVID disease rather than preventing infection.75

There is a difference between a product producing immunity that prevents infection and one that stimulates an immune response but does not prevent infection, especially when you can be infected with the coronavirus and not show symptoms.

With vaccine induced immunity off the table and vaccine adverse reactions viewed as a good thing, by the end of October 2022, the global mass vaccination campaign had convinced about 70 percent of the world’s population to get at least one COVID shot.76

United Nations’ WHO Heading Up Global COVID Vaccine Marketing Campaign

W.H.O. & Trees

The sales force for Big Pharma’s COVID vaccine marketing campaign is headquartered at the United Nation’s World Health Organization,77 78 79 with de facto satellite offices in government agencies like the National Institutes of Health (NIH), Gavi Alliance, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, World Economic Forum, major universities, and financial and other institutions ideologically and politically committed to imposing “The Great Reset” on all countries.80 According to Klaus Schwab, who in 1971 founded an “international organization for public-private cooperation” called the World Economic Forum, the world is in the middle of the “Fourth Industrial Revolution,” which is “characterized by a range of new technologies that are fusing the physical, digital, and biological worlds, impacting all disciplines, economies and industries and even challenging ideas about what it means to be human.”81 

In June 2020, Schwab proclaimed, “Now is the time for a great reset” because, he said, in order for the world to effectively respond to the COVID-19 pandemic, governments “must act swiftly to revamp all aspects of our societies and economies, from education to social contracts and working conditions.”82 

Event 201 Prepares for ‘The Great Reset’

Schwab-Malleret Book – COVID-19 Great Reset

To prepare the way for The Great Reset, on October 18, 2019, the World Economic Forum, along with the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and Johns Hopkins University sponsored a simulated global pandemic planning exercise in New York City called Event 201.83 A “Pandemic Emergency Board” was assembled for Event 201 that included representatives of the United Nations, World Bank, the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control, the China Centers for Disease Control, and leaders from the travel, banking, pharmaceutical and healthcare industries.84

The virus selected for use in the simulated “worst case scenario” global pandemic planning exercise held three months before the World Health Organization declared a coronavirus “public health emergency of international concern” was: the coronavirus.85 86

The nagging question is: was that just a coincidence?

Clearly, it will take a lot of coordination and agreement between all governments to pull off a global Great Reset. Three years into the global COVID health emergency, it appears the global public health elite are leading the way.

Lancet Commission Publishes COVID ‘lessons learned’ Politico Manifesto

Lancet Commission Red Flag Money

In September 2022, the once respected medical journal, The Lancet, published a 56-page report called “The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic.”87The first big red flag in the report is the long list of financial conflicts of interest authors have with drug companies; government health agencies; the United Nations and its public health agency arm, the World Health Organization; Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Rockefeller Foundation and other institutions that fund or conduct vaccine research and development and promote mandatory use of vaccines.

Once family owned, The Lancet is now owned by the publishing conglomerate, Elsevier, and concerns have been raised about editorial independence, in light of investor ties to major banking, pharmaceutical and biotech corporations. One critique of the Lancet Commission report was written by a public health physician, who previously called out the journal in July 2022 for publishing what he described as “a weakly-evidenced opinion advocating medical fascism.”88 That opinion, written by well-known compulsory vaccination proponents, called for strict enforcement of COVID vaccine mandates in the U.S., and loss of employment and school education for those who refuse to comply.89

The Lancet Commission was originally assembled in the summer of 2020 as an international group of global “experts,” primarily doctors and professors at prestigious universities, who were charged with addressing the COVID pandemic. One of their first tasks was to investigate the origins of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, an endeavor they quickly abandoned because of what the authors described as “divisive public discussion” and “unprecedented attack and pressure” on Commission members.

Leaving that inconvenient “where did the virus come from” question on the table, the Lancet Commission went on to publish a self-aggrandizing political manifesto that fails to honestly analyze what went wrong with the global COVID pandemic response and, instead, basically calls for doing more of the same more quickly in the future. In a stunning demonstration of hubris and ideological bias, Commission members stray from their areas of expertise and call on governments to devalue individual rights and adopt a collectivist orientation that forces individuals to comply with multi-lateral health policies and laws adopted by the United Nations. They said, “all governments, regulators and institutions must be reoriented toward society as a whole rather than the interest of individuals – a concept the Commissioners call prosociality.”

Attacking U.S. Lawmakers, Critics of Destructive Pandemic Response Failures

Pocket U.S. Constitution

This “prosociality” reorientation would, of course, require that much more money and power be given to the United Nations and the World Health Organization so global populations can be controlled by a central authority, especially during global pandemic responses. Defending their slogan “no one is safe until everyone is safe,” which they claim “is not mere rhetoric, or a moral truth, but an epidemiological reality,” they viciously attack U.S. lawmakers for being guilty of “neglecting scientific evidence and needlessly risking lives with a view to keeping the economy open,” and for promoting “anti-science rhetoric and disinformation about COVID 19.”

Refusing to acknowledge legitimate public concerns about authoritarian COVID response policies that led to catastrophic social and economic chaos and damage to mental and physical health of child and adult populations, the Commission complains that the World Health Organization and most governments did not move fast enough to test, identify and isolate the infected while simultaneously putting all people in masks and locking them in their homes – for a long, long time. There is no critical analysis of faulty COVID tests that did not work;90 91 or bogus COVID death estimates that failed to distinguish between dying from COVID and dying with COVID;92 93 94 95 96 or ineffective COVID treatment protocols in hospitals that made people sicker or killed them when they were inappropriately put on ventilators. 97 98 99

While praising the “public-private partnerships” that fast-tracked development of COVID vaccines as a “triumph,” the Lancet Commission weaponizes the failed COVID pandemic response by placing most of the blame for COVID-related deaths on – you guessed it – those independent thinkers the Pharma’s sales force calls “anti-vaxxers.”

Infuriated that a lot of people in the U.S. and Europe questioned the competence of public health officials and defied their orders to mask up, isolate for months on end and take the COVID shot, the Lancet Commission authors alleged that anti-vaxxers – which according to Webster’s Dictionary now includes anyone who opposes mandatory vaccination100 –  caused an “epidemic of misinformation and disinformation” that fostered “low public trust” in government officials and persuaded millions of people to repeatedly take to the streets in the United Kingdom, Ireland, Netherlands, Italy, France, Germany, Austria, Denmark, Sweden, Finland, Greece, Switzerland, Canada, Australia, Bulgaria, Serbia, Poland, Romania and other nations in 2020 and 2021 to protest lockdowns and vaccine passports.101 102 103

Blaming COVID Deaths on ‘Anti-Vaccine Movement’ and Individual Rights

COVID-Jab Protestors

They said “anti-vaccine propaganda in the Americas” caused “tens of millions of people to refuse vaccines and hundreds of thousands to needlessly lose their lives.” Obsessing over the lack of “solidarity” among governments to force everyone everywhere to march to the beat of the same drum, they express special hatred for what they describe as the “hostile and coordinated anti-vaccine movement that has spread dangerous and false information about the health risks of vaccines and has campaigned against vaccine mandates.”

Climbing up on very high horse, the Lancet Commission members put “climate change deniers” and “parents who refuse or delay routine childhood vaccinations” in the same basket. They repeatedly condemn political leaders and the digital media for the “deliberate spread of misinformation and disinformation…that fosters distrust in health officials and promotes the idea that individual opinions have equal weight to the best available scientific evidence.”

They called for application of “behavioral science” to convince people to engage in “prosociality” that leads to “optimal behaviors for pandemic control,” pointing out that people living in societies with “tight” or collectivist social norms follow public health orders much better than people living in societies with “loose” or individualistic social norms that champion freedom of individual choice. They claim future pandemics would be so much easier to handle if everyone in the world can be muzzled and locked down tight whenever government health officials fly the utilitarian flag for “the greater good” and demand we salute smartly and roll up our sleeves.

Their diatribe against societies allowing individuals to exercise freedom of thought, speech, conscience and autonomy would be amusing if they weren’t so deadly serious about what they want done about it.

Although there were some public demonstrations here in the U.S., they were not as big as they were in countries without a Constitution that ensures a balance of power between local, state and federal government. Americans stopped COVID vaccine mandates in 2021 and 2022 because state legislators, who make public health laws, looked at the science, listened to concerns of their constituents, and refused to mandate the vaccine.104  Although several U.S. Governors and city mayors issued Executive Orders mandating COVID vaccine and the federal government attempted to mandate the vaccine for all federal employees and contractors, not one state legislature voted to mandate the vaccine this year.105 The online NVIC Advocacy Portal, launched in 2010 to help citizens in every state defend vaccine informed consent rights and exemptions in public health laws had a lot to do with holding back COVID vaccine mandates and passports in the U.S. when populations in other countries with centralized political control could not.106

Public Health Elite Wants US to ‘Reorient’ To A Collectivist Society

Individualism vs Collectivism

It doesn’t take a PhD in political science to figure out that what the public health elite is calling for would require Americans to reject the cultural values and beliefs and governmental structure outlined in the US Constitution, which provides decentralized checks and balances on political power and guarantees individuals God given natural rights that limit the power of government.107 108  The Public Health Empire is all about appropriating centralized power that can be wielded without accountability. That is why the Lancet Commission demands that the United States of America “reorient” toward a collectivist society, which would require disempowering local and state governments so that only the federal government – in “solidarity” with the United Nations, of course – has the authority to make public health laws and tell citizens what to think about and believe and do with their bodies and the bodies of their children.

Accompanying the Lancet Commission report was a Lancet editorial entitled “COVID-19: the case for prosociality.” And if you do a Google search using the words “prosociality and communism,” what you find at the top is an article published in Frontiers in Psychology in September 2022 entitled, “How prosocial behaviors are maintained in China: The relationship between communist authority and prosociality.”109  The authors note how prosocial behavior is associated with religious belief and argue that communist authority wielded by the ruling Communist Party of China has a positive effect on promoting prosocial behaviors in a secular atheist society. They say studies show that “the psychological functions of gods and governments are interchangeable.”

Thank you, Lancet Commission, for making the political goals of the Public Health Empire so crystal clear.

Mandatory Vaccination: The Tip of the Spear in the Culture Wars

I have been saying for many years that mandatory vaccination is the tip of the spear in the culture wars taking place in this country and others in the 21st Century. Because if the state can tag, track down and force individuals against their will to be injected with biologicals of known and unknown toxicity today, then there will be no limit on which individual freedoms the state can take away in the name of the greater good tomorrow.

Register today to use the NVIC Advocacy Portal at NVICAdvocacy.org and take action in your state to protect civil liberties in this historic Vaccine Culture War that will determine whether we will live free or die as slaves in a collectivist authoritarian state.

Be the one who never has to say you did not do today what you could have done to change tomorrow.

It’s your health, your family, your choice.

And our mission continues: No forced vaccination, not in America.

References:

1 Lada B. ‘It’s a tsunami’:’ Storm surge survey crews uncover startling damage from IanAccuweather Oct. 14, 2022. 

2 Bruttel V, Washburne A, VanDongen A. Endonuclease fingerprint indicates a synthetic originbioRxiv Oct. 20, 2022.

3 Eban K, Kao J. COVID-19 Origins: Investigating a “Complex and Grave Situation’ Inside a Wuhan Lab. Vanity Fair and ProPublica Oct. 28, 2022.

4 Pekar JE, Magee A, Parker E et al. The molecular epidemiology of multiple zoonotic origins of SARS-CoV-2Science July 26, 2022.

5 Wade N. The theory that COVID escaped from a lab may not be so far-fetchedNew York Post May 9, 2021

6 Bhattacharya S, Tilak R, Bose C, Sinha S. Is the Origin and Emergence of SARS-CoV-2 Ingenuous? J Commun Dis 2021; 53(3): 232-235.

7 Ruiz-Medina BE, Varela-Ramirez A, Kirken RA et al. The SARS-CoV-2 origin dilemma: Zoonotic transfer or laboratory leak? BioEssays 2022; 44(1).

8 LaFraniere S, Weiland N. Walensky, Citing Botched Pandemic Response, Calls for C.D.C. Reorganization. New York Times Aug. 17, 2022.

9  Javanbakht A, Saab L. What Happens in the Brain When We Feel Fear? Smithsonian Magazine Oct. 27, 2017.

10 Carleton RN. Fear of the unknown: One fear to rule them all? Journal of Anxiety Disorders 2016; 41: 5-21.

11 Mertens G, Gerritsen L, Duijndam S et al. Fear of the coronavirus (COVID-19): Predictors in an online study conducted in March 2020Journal of Anxiety Disorders 2020; 74: 102258.

12 Fisher BL. Unprecedented Response to COVIC-19 by Governments Prohibits Physical Contact and Cripples World EconomyNational Vaccine Information Center Mar. 29, 2020.

13  Parker K, Minkin R, Bennett J. Economic Fallout From COVID-19 Continues to Hit Lower-Income Americans the Hardest. Pew Research Center Sept. 14, 2020.

14 Irum T, Hudgins C. US corporate bankruptcies end 2020 at 10-year high amid COVID-19 pandemic. S&P Global Market Intelligence Jan. 5, 2021.

15 Pietrabissa G. Simpson SG. Psychological Consequences of Social Isolation During COVID-19 OutbreakFrontiers in Psychology Sept. 9, 2020.

16 Keeter S. Many Americans continue to experience mental health difficulties as pandemic enters second yearPew Research Center Mar. 16, 2021.

17 Giunetella O, Hyde K, Saccardo S et al. Lifestyle and mental health disruptions during COVID-19PNAS 2021; 118(9).

18 Bardosh K, deFigueiredo A, Gur-Arie R et al. The unintended consequences of COVID-19 vaccine policy: why mandates, passports and restrictions may cause more harm than good. BMJ Global Health 2022; 7(5).

19 Ellyatt H. Last responders: Mental health damage from Covid could last a generation, professionals sayCNBC Feb. 10, 2022.

20 Algar S, Raskin S. Young students have suffered ‘alarming’ drops in reading skills during pandemic. New York Post Mar. 9, 2022.

21 Phelan J, Njolomole M. The Costs of Lockdowns and Shutdowns Part 1: counting the economic costs of government policy responses to COVID-19American Experiment September 2022.

22 Cohen M, Hutzler A. There will be review of Hurricane Ian response, DeSantis says amid evacuation timing questionsABC News Oct. 4, 2022.

23 Huffman J. Hurricane Ian made clear: Misinterpreting risks jeopardizes livesThe Hill Oct. 6, 2022. 

24 Krawczyk K. Hurricane Ian and the future of the power gridEnergy News Network Oct. 5, 2022.

25 Ortiz OR. ‘Extremely worried’: What happens when cellphone service goes down after a storm? Miami Herald Sept. 30, 2022.

26 Kimball S. U.S. extends Covid pubiic health emergency even though Biden says pandemic is overCNBC Oct. 13, 2022.

27 Mertens G, Lodder P, Smeets T, Duijndam S. Fear of COVID-19 predicts vaccination willingness 14 months later. J Anxiety Disorders 2022; 88(102574).

28 Fitzpatrick KM Drawve G, Harris C. Facing new fears during the COVID-19 pandemic: The State of America’s mental healthJ Anxiety Disord 2020; 75: 102291.

29 Prater E. U.S. risks a ‘twindemic’ of COVID and flu this fall if what happened in Australia is any guideFortune Oct. 6, 2022.

30 Smith-Schoenwalder C. New Omicron Subvariants BQ.1, BQ.1.1 Could Help Fuel Next COVID-19 Surge in U.S. U.S. News & World Report Oct. 20, 2022.

31 Brown L. Biden’s COVID head: ‘God gave us two arms’ to get double vaccinationsNew York Post Sept. 7, 2022.

32 Brenan M. COVID-19 Vaccines Uncommon for U.S. Children Under Age 5. Gallup Aug. 19, 2022.

33 Stephenson J. Many Parents Unlikely to Seek COVID-19 Vaccination for Newly Eligible Young Children, Survey FindsJAMA Health Forum 2022; 3(8).

34 Caceres M, Fisher BL. FDA Authorizes COVID Bivalent Shots for Children as Young as Five Years Old. The Vaccine Reaction Oct. 17, 2022.

35 Khaled F. Fordham Vaccine Mandate, New York’s Toughest, Sparks Parents’ RevoltNewsweek Oct. 6, 2022.

36  Prater E. Many Americans are shunning the Omicron COVID booster. What it means for the coming season as the virus mutatesFortune Oct. 9, 2022.

37 Saric I. Pfizer CEO: Fourth shot of COVID vaccine “necessary.” Axios Mar. 13, 2022.

38 Bendix A. Covid vaccines will likely become annual like flu shots, White House officials say. NBC Sept. 6, 2022.

39 Kimball S. What’s next for Pfizer, Moderna beyond their projected $51 billion in combined vaccine sales this yearCNBC Mar. 3, 2022.

40 Report Linker. Global COVID-19 Vaccines Market to Reach $60.7 Billion by 2025. Oct. 5, 2022.

41  Erman M. Pfizer expects to hike U.S. COVID vaccine price to $110-$130 per doseReuters Oct. 21, 2022.

42 Pfizer Inc., BioNTech SE. Pfizer and BioNTech Initiate Phase 1 Study of Single Dose mRNA Based Combination Vaccine Candidate for Influenza and COVID-19. Nov. 3, 2022.

43 Langreth R, Kresge N. Moderna Wants to Transform the Body Into a Vaccine-Making Machine. Bloomberg News Aug. 11, 2020.

44 Edwards E. Omicron subvariants reflect a ‘viral evolution on steroids.’ NBC News Oct. 19, 2022.

45 Domingo JL. An updated review of the scientific literature on the origin of SARS-CoV-2. Environ Res 2022; 215: 114131.

46 Ndeupen S, Qin Z, Jacobsen S et al. The mRNA-LNP platform lipid nanoparticle component used in preclinical vaccine studies is highly inflammatoryBio Rxiv July 23, 2021.

47 Trougakos IP, Terpos E, Alexopoulos H et al. Adverse effects of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines: the spike hypothesis. Trends in Molecular Medicine 2022; 28(7).

48 Tinari S. The EMA covid-19 data leak, and what it tells us about mRNA instabilityBMJ 2021; 372.

49 Hanna N, Heffes-Doon A, Lin X et al. Detection of Messenger RNA COVID-19 Vaccines in Human Breast Milk. JAMA Pediatrics Sept. 26, 2022.

50 Fraiman J, Erviti J, Jones M et al. Serious adverse events of special interest following mRNA COVID-19 vaccination in randomized trials in adultsVaccine 2022; 40(4): 5798-5805.

51 Malhotra A. Curing the pandemic of misinformation on COVID-19 mRNA vaccines through real evidence-based medicine – Part 1J Insulin Resistance 2022; 5(1).

52 Munblit D, Nicholson TR, Needham DM et al. Studying the post-COVID-19 condition: research challenges, strategies, and importance of Core Outcome Set development. BMC Medicine 2022; 29(50).

53 Weisser R. Wot’s in the shots? Spectator (Australia) Nov. 5, 2022.

54  Chouchana L, Blet A, Al-Khalaf M et al. Features of Inflammatory Heart Reactions Following mRNA COVID-19 Vaccination at a Global LevelClin Pharmacol Ther 2022; 111(3): 605-613.

55 Choi S, Lee SH, Seo JW et al. Myocarditis-induced Sudden Death after BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 Vaccination in Korea: Case Report Focusing on Histopathological FindingsJ Korean Med Sci 2021; 36(40).

56 Ferdowsi N. No clear evidence that COVID vaccines re responsible for blood clots observed by embalmersPolitifact Feb. 9, 2022.

57 Mahoney WS. Daniel Bobinski Interview: Embalmer Says Blood Has ChangedUndercoverdc Oct 19, 2022.

58  Attkisson S. CENSORED – National Vaccine Information Center. Mar. 8, 2021.

59 Feuer W. Facebook trying to censor posts from COVID-19 vaccine skeptics: report. New York Post May 25, 2021.

60 World Health Organization (WHO). How to report misinformation online. 2022.

61 Klar R. Feds step up pressure on social media over false COVID-19 claimsThe Hill July 18, 2021.

62 Simonson J. How the CDC Coordinated with Big Tech to Censor AmericansWashington Free Beacon July 27, 2022.

63 Yamamoto K. Adverse effects of COVID-19 vaccine and measures to prevent themVirol J 2022; 19(100).

64 CDC. How to Report [Vaccine Adverse Events to VAERS. Sept. 16, 2022.

65 Flora J, Khan W, Jin J et al. Usefulness of Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System for Machine-Learning Based Vaccine Research: A Case Study for COVID-19 VaccinesInt J Mol Sci 2022; 23(15).

66  MedAlerts. Search the Government’s VAERS Data. MedAlerts.org.

67   Ross L. Electronic Support for Public Health Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (ESP: VAERS). Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) 2011.

68 Crow S. The CDC Says These 3 Side Effects Mean Your Vaccine Is WorkingYahoo Feb. 15, 2021.

69  Finberg R. No, vaccine side effects don’t tell you how well your immune system will protect you from COVID-19The Conversation Apr. 19, 2021.

70 Shmerling RH. COVID-19 vaccines: Safety, side effects – and coincidenceHarvard Health Publishing Feb. 8, 2021.

71 Caceres M. Severe Reactions Minutes After COVID Vaccination Usually Written Off As Coincidental. The Vaccine Reaction Oct. 24, 2022.

72 Camero K. Why did CDC change its definition for ‘vaccine’? Agency explains move as skeptics lurk. Miami Herald Sept 27, 2021.

73 Kochi S. Fact check: Missing context in claim that Merriam-Webster changed ‘vaccine’ definition. USA Today Nov. 30, 2021.

74 CDC. Definition of Vaccination: “The Act of introducing a vaccine into the body to produce immunity to a specific disease.” Immunization: The Basics. May 16, 2018 (Archived).

75 FDA. Development and Licensure of Vaccines to Prevent COVID-19: Guidance for Industry. Efficacy Considerations Pages 13-24. Revised June 2020.

76 Our World in Data. Coronavirus (COVID-19) Vaccinations.

77 World Health Organization. Global Vaccine Action Plan. June 14, 2020.

78 World Health Organization (WHO). COVAX: Working for global equitable access to COVID vaccines. 2022.

79  Fisher BL. WHO, Pharma, Gates & Government: Who’s Calling the Shots? National Vaccine Information Center Jan. 27, 2019.

80  Haskins J. Introducing the ‘Great Reset,’ world leaders’ radical plan to transform the economy. The Hill June 25, 2020.

81 World Economic Forum. The Fourth Industrial Revolution by Klaus Schwab.

82 Schwab K. Now is a time for a “great reset.’ World Economic Forum June 3, 2020.

83 Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security. About the Event 201 exerciseJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health 2019.

84 Dunleavy BP. Johns Hopkins Initiative Hopes to Better Prepare for Pandemics: Public Health Watch. Contagion Live Dec. 11, 2019.

85 Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security. The Event 201 scenarioJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health October 2019.

86 Nedelman M. World Health Organization declares coronavirus a public health emergency of international concernCNN Jan. 30, 2020.

87 Sachs JD, Karim SSA, Aknin L et al. The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic. The Lancet 2022; 400 (10359): 1224-1280.

88 Bell D. A Critique of The Lancet COVID-10 CommissionBrownstone Institute Sept. 27, 2022.

89 Mello MM, Opel DJ, Benjamin, RM et al. Effectiveness of vaccination mandates in improving uptake of COVID-19 vaccines in the USA. The Lancet 2022; 400)10351): 535-538.

90 Clinical Oncology News. False Negatives Found if COVID-19 Testing Done Too Soon. June 19, 2020.

91 Mouliou DS. Gourgpoulianis KI. False-positive and false-negative COVID-19 cases: respiratory prevention and management strategies, vaccination, and further perspectives. Expert Rev Respir Med 2021; 1-10.

92 Bakst B. COVID-19 death certificate change stirs controversyMinnesota Public Radio Apr. 7, 2020.

93 Boyle P. How are COVID-19 deaths counted? It’s complicatedAmerican Association of Medical Colleges News Feb. 18, 2021.

94 Ioannidis JPA. Over-and under-estimation of COVID-19 deathsEuropean Journal of Epidemiology 2021; 36: 581-588.

95 Lisinski C. Massachusetts Reports: ‘Significant Overcount’ of COVID DeathsNBC (Boston) Mar. 10, 2022.

96 Block J. Covid-19: US tracker overestimated deaths among childrenBMJ 2022; 376.

97 Associated Press. Why some doctors are moving away from ventilators for virus patientsNBC News Apr. 9, 2020.

98 King CS, Sahjwani S, Brown AW et al. Outcomes of mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19 associated respiratory failure. PLOS One Nov. 23, 2020.

99 Lim ZJ, Subramaniam A, Reddy MP et al. Case Fatality Rates for Patients with COVID-19 Requiring Invasive Mechanical Ventilation. A Meta-analysisAm J Respir Crtic Care Med 2021; 203(1): 54-66.

100 Merriam Webster Dictionary. Definition of anti-vaxxer: a person who opposes the use of some or all vaccines, regulations mandating vaccination, or usually both. Accessed Nov.6, 2022.

101 Fisher BL. Biggest Anti-Lockdown Freedom Day Protest Held in Berlin, GermanyThe Vaccine Reaction Aug 3, 2020.

102  Fisher BL. Mass Protests in Greece, France Opposing COVID-19 Vaccine Mandates and Health PassportsThe Vaccine Reaction July 18, 2021.

103 Fisher BL. Protests Against COVID Lockdowns Flare Up in 2021 Around the World. The Vaccine Reaction Mar. 29, 2021. https://thevaccinereaction.org/?s=global+protests

104 National Vaccine Information Center. NVIC’s 2021 Annual Report on State Vaccine Legislation: All Proposed COVID-19 Vaccine Mandates Rejected by State Legislatures. Sept 20, 2021.

105  National Vaccine Information Center. NVIC’s 2022 Annual Report on U.S. State Vaccine Legislation. Nov. 17, 2022.

106 NVIC Advocacy Portal.

107 Library of Congress. Constitution Annotated: Federalism and the Constitution

108  ConstitutionUS. Checks and Balances in the U.S. Constitution.

109 Sheng J, Luo S, Jiang B et al. How prosocial behaviors are maintained in China: The relationship between communist authority and prosocialityFrontiers in Psychology Sept. 29, 2022.

Copyright 1982-2021 National Vaccine Information Center. All Rights Reserved.

DONATE to NVIC

21525 Ridgetop Circle, Suite 100, Sterling, VA 20166

Follow the COVID Money


As a Baby Boomer (now age 65) it has taken me a while to get over the culture brainwashing that ONE) Doctors care more about their patients than government directives AND TWO) There might be a few bad apples in government but the majority cares about citizen wellbeing.

Frankly now, I have doubts that has ever been true. It is one of the reasons I posted on July 5, “People’s Lives are Irrelevant to Big Pharma & Govt. Science.” Our Doctors are slaves to Medical Boards and Medical Boards (and way too many individual doctors) are slaves to Big Pharma. AND ESPCIALLY IN THE 21st CENTURY (but I am guessing much-much earlier), the government elected and the government bureaucracy are more dedicated to ideological agendas than the well-being and safety of their constituents.

So I am pleased I ran into a Jeffrey I. Barke, M.D. post on American Thinker that tracks with my line of thinking entitled, “Follow the COVID Money.”

JRH 7/7/22

READER SUPPORTED! I need Readers willing to chip in $5 – $10 – $25 – $50 – $100. PLEASE I need your generosity. PLEASE GIVE to Help me be a voice for Liberty with your SUPPORT:

Please Support NCCR

Big Tech Censorship is pervasive – Share voluminously on all social media platforms!

*************************

Follow the COVID Money

100 Dollar Bill Bundles [Image: Flying Logos]

By Jeffrey I. Barke, M.D.

July 7, 2022

American Thinker

If the COVID-19 vaccines have been a disappointment from a public health standpoint in stopping the continuing spread of new variants of the disease, why is Big Pharma as well as its government allies in the FDA, CDC, and NIH still pushing them?

As Deep Throat whispered to Bob Woodward during the Watergate scandal (“Follow the money”), so, too, the American public should be demanding the same of its political leaders: Follow the COVID money to determine why we continue to spend a fortune on something that seems to have only a relatively limited benefit.

But our elected officials are embarrassingly quiet on answering the basic question of who exactly is benefiting from the constant rounds of shots being foisted on or recommended to the American public?

Maybe the silence comes from the fact that the pharmaceutical industry spends more on lobbying than any other industry group. In 2020 big pharma spent over $300 million lobbying officeholders and government officials. It clearly pays off. The research to develop the COVID-19 vaccines was nearly all funded by taxpayers. The distribution of the vaccines, once developed, was further funded nearly entirely by taxpayers. The record-keeping and reporting on the vaccines is also at the expense of taxpayers, and the new repurposed Pfizer drug Paxlovid, used to treat COVID, has been paid for by taxpayers.

If the vaccinations are proving to be ineffective in stopping the march of the disease, are they really worth what the federal government is paying the pharmaceutical industry to manufacture, distribute, and administer them? Is the public being played for suckers by a cabal of industry giants and their friends in the medical bureaucracies?

Just consider a few facts. The pharmaceutical industry is said to spend $5.2 billion annually on television advertising aimed primarily at the consumer. It poured another $9.53 billion into digital advertising aimed at consumers and industry in 2020.

This total of nearly $15 billion spent by Big Pharma on advertising is more than twice what is spent on new cancer drug research. In fact, nine out of 10 of the largest pharmaceutical companies in America spend more on advertising than on research and development.

But there is more. The U.S. government is pushing COVID-19 jabs harder than the companies would ever likely choose to do on their own. This might be the reason: Almost half of the funding that supports the U.S. Food and Drug Administration comes from the very industries it is mandated to oversee.

CDC funding is similar. But it also receives large grants for COVID research from the Bloomberg Family Foundation and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.

By contrast, money given by the private sector to the NIH is mostly hidden from the public. More troubling is the fact that the NIH allows its publicly-employed researchers to receive royalty payments from government-funded activities that result in private company income. Present and former NIH researchers received annual royalty payments averaging $9,700 in addition to their taxpayer-funded, biweekly paychecks. Some have been reported to receive as much as $150,000 in annual royalty rewards!

With the government pouring huge amounts of money on the pharmaceutical houses to develop an anti-COVID vaccine, no wonder information about all of the early treatment protocols developed by private-sector doctors working on their own was suppressed by the CDC and shunned by the FDA. Even more depressing was the fact that the media went along with this suppression of free speech and information. Social media companies, for their part, routinely banned and deplatformed any physician speaking contrary to the federal government’s accepted bureaucratic narrative. Why? Do you think the big social media companies might also have profited from the direct-to-consumer advertising of the government-funded products in the same way as traditional media? Do you know a lot of cases where the hand that feeds it is bitten?

This isn’t speculation, it’s big money. Consider: Pfizer expects $32 billion in COVID vaccine sales in 2022. Moderna is forecasting $19 billion in COVID sales with the vaccine being its only current commercial product. Moderna had never produced a vaccine before it developed its COVID shots. Pfizer, BioNTech, and Moderna are reported to be making $1,000 in profit every second of every business day.

Big pharmacy chains are also participating in this government largess as well. The big chains earn “…roughly $40 per shot” from the federal government. Since the government provides the pharmacy chains with the vaccines and Paxlovid for freealmost all their charge for administering the shots or dispensing the drug is profit.

There have been at least nine new billionaires created in the vaccine world as a result of COVID-19. No one has counted the new millionaires in COVID-19’s wake. Is there any wonder that the Pfizer CEO would offer the thought that an annual COVID-19 vaccine booster is almost a certainty? And so would his annual multiple million-dollar bonuses for bringing in this kind of business.

But we can reverse all this. A congressional investigation must be launched to shine light on what this crony capitalism is doing to American taxpayers and their health system. Get in touch with your senators and demand that they authorize an investigation of how COVID-19 money has been spent by both the Trump and the Biden administrations.

We need to put some sanity back into how our medical resources are being spent.

© American Thinker 2022.

Say Nay to Jab Tyranny


John R. Houk, Blog Editor

© April 21, 2022

I recently know of a family member who decided to get the Jab. Why the choice? It’s none of my business and neither is it your business.

What is interesting the family member passed out and was taken to the hospital soon thereafter being released.

The family member was assured the Jab and the unconsciousness had no relationship. The guess was perhaps a new diet and lack of food caused the family member to pass out.

Here’s where it gets interesting to me. The blood sugar was checked AND FOUND NORMAL. The blood pressure level was checked AND FOUND NORMAL.

Interestingly, with otherwise normal vitals an EKG was performed. I wondered to myself if the family member passed out from the guess of a bad dietary intake, why was an EKG performed?

Here’s my non-medical guess based on the massive Jab injuries documented (yet underreported). Whoever the medical staff was (doctors and/or nurses – I really don’t know), they probably lied about a dietary related fainting. My guess is the EKG was related to Jab related concerns of Myocarditis.

The MSM lies about Jab safety. Our government science-agencies lie about Jab safety. Our government forces questioning doctors to lie about Jab safety or lose their license to practice. As a whole, WE THE PEOPLE should be disgusted about these lies and as awareness (as opposed to Leftist Wokeness) grows, WE THE PEOPLE must begin some vocal demands for accountability. AND if demands are ignored, WE THE PEOPLE need to gain some 1776-style courage to resist tyranny.

Below are science-truth cross post challenging the science-lies of the Globalist-Fascist-Marxist New World Order.

JRH 4/21/22

I need your generosity. PLEASE GIVE to overcome research expenses:

Please Support NCCR

Big Tech Censorship is pervasive – Share voluminously on all social media platforms!

*****************************

mRNA Vaccines Produce Persisting Spike Protein, Likely Causing Clots, Heart Inflammations, Cancers: Dr. Ryan Cole

By Harry Lee and Roman Balmakov

April 18, 2022 Updated: April 20, 2022

The Epoch Times

Dr. Ryan Cole in an interview with The Epoch Times during the Global COVID-19 Summit at Houston, Texas, on April 8, 2022. (York Du/The Epoch Times)

According to Dr. Ryan Cole, messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines produce persisting spike protein that may cause severe damage to the recipient’s health, such as unusual clotting, heart inflammation, or cancer.

Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 vaccines are the only mRNA vaccines approved or authorized for booster use in the United States. Johnson & Johnson COVID-19 vaccines use a viral vector, a modified version of a virus, to give cells instructions.

Cole is a pathologist who has operated a lab for 18 years. He has seen, mostly through the microscope, about 500,000 patients in his career.

“[In] normal mRNA, you have cells making messages all day long … mRNA is generally broken down within minutes to maybe an hour or two. mRNA should not persist,” Cole told EpochTV’s “Facts Matter” program during the Global COVID Summit held in Houston, Texas, on April 8.

Cole said mRNA is a message that tells your cell to make a certain protein for different body reactions.

“But when you put this synthetic pseudouridine [in your body],” said Cole. “The body doesn’t know what to do with it, and it looks at it and says, ‘Hmm, I don’t know what to do. So I’m not going to break it down.’ And so it evades that breakdown process, and it also evades an immune response. But it also turns down our immune system, which is not a good thing because other things—cancers, viruses—get to wake up.”

In a February interview with The Epoch Times, Cole said that he had seen an uptick in cancers that he shouldn’t be seeing. In addition, he has seen elevations and clotting factors persisting for a long time post-vaccination. However, when he voiced his concerns, no government agencies were willing to look into this finding.

Currently, Cole examines about 40,000 biopsies a year.

Cole’s view aligns with Dr. Robert Malone, a key contributor to mRNA vaccine technology. Malone, in an article published by The Epoch Times on April 11, said the “mRNA” from the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines is not really mRNA. “These molecules have genetic elements similar to those of natural mRNA, but they are clearly far more resistant to the enzymes which normally degrade natural mRNA, seem to be capable of producing high levels of protein for extended periods, and seem to evade normal immunologic mechanisms for eliminating cells which produce foreign proteins which are not normally observed in the body,” said Malone.

Dr. Robert Malone in Washington on June 29, 2021. (Zhen Wang/The Epoch Times)

Dr. Joseph Mercola, an osteopathic physician, also said the spike protein from the COVID-19 vaccines is to blame for the severe organ damage.

“Science demonstrated that it wasn’t the virus causing endothelial damage that led to organ damage, such as was found in the heart, liver, and kidney of COVID-19 patients. Rather, it was the spike protein that was also being injected in a genetic therapy shot program,” wrote Mercola in a recent article.

Some studies showed the vaccine-induced spike protein persists in human bodies, said Cole, but “we have no idea how long that synthetic sequence is persisting.”

Stanford study by Katharina Röltgen and others showed that the synthetic sequence persists for at least 60 days. A Harvard study by Alana Ogata and others showed that the spike protein could circulate for weeks.

Cole said a German professor, Dr. Arne Burkhardt, found in his autopsy study that the spike protein could persist in the human body for as long as 128 days.

“And the spike [protein] that [mRNA vaccines] make induces pathologic changes in the body. It can cause clotting,” said Cole. “We hear these young people dying from clots, micro clots, not normal types of clots. These are a unique type of clot that persists, chokes off the body of oxygen, chokes up body parts, inflames the heart, causes heart attacks, causes strokes, causes cancers in young age groups … Unusual things that shouldn’t be happening and are likely related to a synthetic, genetically modified sequence that we’re putting into the bodies of billions of people.”

Cole said our cells have DNA-repair mechanisms, but the DNA can’t repair itself when the spike protein gets into the nucleus of the T-cells, one of the important white blood cells playing a central role in the immune system.

“A study out of Sweden shows this,” said Cole, referring to a recent study showing that mRNA from Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine can enter human liver cells and be converted into DNA inside the nucleus. “Now the cell, the DNA can’t repair itself. So the cell is going to do one of two things, it’s either going to blow itself up, that’s called apoptosis, or it’s going to mutate. And now it becomes an atypical malignant cell.”

“To that question as well, the immune suppression because of the spike [protein], because of the pseudouridine, it changes patterns of receptors on cells,” said Cole, adding these receptors could enable T cells to fight off all kinds of viruses.

“Now, you don’t have a defense system. This cancer cell can invade over the wall. This pathogen can invade over the wall because your immune system has been suppressed to a degree that allows that to happen. When does that stop? We don’t know. How do we reverse it? We don’t know. Is it happening to everybody? No, thank heavens. Is it happening to a degree that’s alarming? You bet.”

peer-reviewed study published on Apr. 15 also found that mRNA vaccines “promote sustained synthesis of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein” and “the spike protein is neurotoxic, and it impairs DNA repair mechanisms.”

Neither Pfizer nor Moderna has responded to a request for comment.

On its website, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) states COVID-19 mRNA vaccines won’t affect or interact with DNA, nor will the mRNA and the spike protein last long in the body.

“mRNA never enters the nucleus of the cell where our DNA (genetic material) is located, so it cannot change or influence our genes,” states the CDC. “Our cells break down mRNA and get rid of it within a few days after vaccination. Scientists estimate that the spike protein, like other proteins our bodies create, may stay in the body up to a few weeks.”

Intertwining Government-Corporate Interests

Cole said the vaccine manufacturers and government health agencies knew about mRNA vaccines’ problems but hid it due to their intertwining interests.

“We have known the immune modulation problems of this back since 2006, at the very least some papers there,” said Cole. “There is a reason Moderna had never brought an mRNA product to the market. And they had trials for genetic disorders. They were going to use this modality for gene modification. It never got to market because there were always too many animal models’ side effects. They knew about this. Did Pfizer know about this? Yes.”

“[The Food and Drug Administration (FDA)] is corporate-captured. Almost half of the FDA’s income and engrossing revenues come from Pharma,” said Cole. “CDC has 57, 58 vaccine patents … Do you think they have any interest in speaking ill of any vaccine? Of course not.

“The [National Institutes of Health (NIH)] holds the patent to the spike protein and the sequence, and they licensed that to Moderna. Every billion that the Moderna coffers get, so does the NIH. Is that intertwining government-corporate interest? You bet.”

The Epoch Times has contacted the FDA, CDC, and NIH for comments.

According to the FDA fact sheet, for fiscal year 2019, 54 percent of its budget was provided by federal budget authorization. The remaining 46 percent, or $2.8 billion, was paid for by industry user fees.

The CDC lists over 60 “vaccine and therapeutic candidates” technologies for licensing and collaboration on its website. The FDA has its own technology transfer program as well.

“Each year, hundreds of new inventions are made at NIH and CDC laboratories. Nine NIH Institutes or Centers (ICs) transfer NIH and CDC inventions through licenses to the private sector for further research and development and eventual commercialization,” NIH said.

Model licensing agreements show these health agencies ask for royalties to transfer their technologies.

According to Axios, in May 2020, then-NIH Director Francis Collins said, “We do have some particular stake in the intellectual property” behind Moderna’s coronavirus vaccine.

“Talking to the companies, I don’t hear any of them say they think this [vaccine] is a money-maker,” Collins said. “Nobody sees this as a way to make billions of dollars.”

Dr. Francis Collins, (L) director of the National Institutes of Health, and Dr. Robert Redfield (R), director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, testify at a Senate hearing in Washington on July 2, 2020. (Saul Loeb-Pool/Getty Images)

“So nobody’s going to vote themselves out of a job in these agencies,” said Cole. “By denying these applications and application fees and drug reviews for all these large companies, they won’t have enough revenue to keep their agency going either. It’s really a paradoxical lose-lose.”

“Truth plus transparency equals trust,” said Cole. However, the government agencies are “destroying the public’s trust” in them.

Even the left-leaning New York Times recently reported that the CDC is withholding critical COVID-19 data on boosters, hospitalizations, and other analyses.

Cole said if he were in charge, he would have managed the COVID response in line with the Great Barrington Declaration.

“We protect the vulnerable. We knew who this was going to affect right away. We keep the schools wide open. We lock nobody down. We focus on early treatments. We knew from SARS COVID-1 that chloroquines work against this family of viruses. We go to old repurposed drugs like we always do with any new and emerging disease. We treat early. We recognize those who are COVID-recovered with natural immunity. And we don’t do what we did. You never let the cure be worse than the disease itself.”

Harry Lee is a New York-based reporter for The Epoch Times. Contact Harry at harry.lee@epochtimes.com

Roman Balmakov is a Reporter with The Epoch Times and host of the show, “Facts Matter.” He has travelled around the country (as well as overseas) covering protests, riots, and elections. He is also the producer of many Epoch Times’ commercials, both on TV and social media.

Copyright © 2000 – 2022 The Epoch Times

++++++++++++++++

1000% Increase in Vaccine Deaths and Injuries Following Pfizer COVID-19 EUA Vaccine for 5 to 11 Year Olds

Children-5-to-11-year-old-covid-vaccine-deaths

By Brian Shilhavy Editor, Health Impact News

April 16, 2022

Vaccine Impact

Pfizer announced this week that they were asking the FDA to issue an emergency use authorization (EUA) for a “booster” COVID-19 vaccine for children between the ages of 5 and 11. (Source.)

The FDA issued an EUA for the first Pfizer COVID-19 shots for this age group of children in October of 2021. (Source.)

At the time, a doctor on the FDA Advisory Committee deliberating on whether or not an EUA should be given for this age group, stated that the only way to find out if the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccines were safe for this age group was to start injecting them with it.

We’re never gonna learn about how safe the vaccine is until we start giving it, and that’s just the way it goes.”

Rumble VIDEO: Dr. Ruben on the FDA panel can’t verify the vaccine’s safety

[Posted by Red Watch News

Published October 27, 2021

MORE DESCRIPTION]

So now that we have almost 6 months of data since the first EUA was issued for this age group to be injected with Pfizer’s COVID-19 shots, just how safe is it?

So far over 10,000 cases have been filed to VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System) of deaths and injuries among children in this age group following the experimental COVID-19 vaccines. (Source.)

VAERS Data for ages 5 – 11 (4/8/22)

By way of contrast, there have been 939 cases of vaccine adverse events during this same time period for all of the FDA approved vaccines for children in this age group. (Source.)

That means there has been an increase of over 1000% of vaccine injuries and deaths for this age group following the COVID-19 vaccines.

VAERS Data for ages 5 – 12 (4/8/22)

I could not find any data on how many children in this age group have been injected with the Pfizer COVID-19 shots, but news reports have stated that it is a small percentage of those eligible.

In California, for example, the LA Times reported that only 34% of children in this age group have taken the shots. (Source.)

For FDA approved vaccines in the childhood immunization schedule, this age group receives the following vaccines: Diphtheria, tetanus, & acellular pertussis vaccines, Inactivated poliovirus vaccine, Influenza (one each year), Measles, mumps, rubella vaccines, Varicella vaccine, Tetanus, diphtheria, & acellular pertussis vaccines, Human papillomavirus vaccine, and the Meningococcal vaccine. (Source.)

I think it is safe to conclude, therefore, that these children are receiving more FDA-approved vaccines than EUA COVID-19 vaccines.

Not only should the FDA not authorize a booster shot for this age group, they should immediately suspend the original 2-dose Pfizer COVID-19 vaccines for this age group.

As I have previously reported, however, it appears that Pfizer is now in control of the FDA committing their crimes against humanity with COVID-19 shots that are neither safe, nor effective.

Here are a few stories of children from this age group who are now dead or crippled after taking one of these Pfizer shots.

Photos & Summaries of Jab Victims from this Point

Copyright 2022 Health Impact News 

Vaccine Impact HOMEPAGE

+++++++++++++++++++++++

More Than 1 Million COVID Vaccine Injuries, Nearly 27,000 Deaths Reported to VAERS, CDC Data Show

VAERS data released Friday by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention included a total of 1,226,314 reports of adverse events from all age groups following COVID vaccines, including 26,976 deaths and 219,865 serious injuries between Dec. 14, 2020, and April 8, 2022.

By Megan Redshaw

4/15/22

The Defender

Jab Vial & Syringe

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) today released new data showing a total of 1,226,314 reports of adverse events following COVID vaccines were submitted between Dec. 14, 2020, and April 8, 2022, to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). VAERS is the primary government-funded system for reporting adverse vaccine reactions in the U.S.

The data included a total of 26,976 reports of deaths — an increase of 277 over the previous week — and 219,865 serious injuries, including deaths, during the same time period — up 2,564 compared with the previous week.

Excluding “foreign reports” to VAERS, 805,921 adverse events, including 12,471 deaths and 79,811 serious injuries, were reported in the U.S. between Dec. 14, 2020, and April 8, 2022.

Foreign reports are reports foreign subsidiaries send to U.S. vaccine manufacturers. Under U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulations, if a manufacturer is notified of a foreign case report that describes an event that is both serious and does not appear on the product’s labeling, the manufacturer is required to submit the report to VAERS.

Of the 12,471 U.S. deaths reported as of April 8, 17% occurred within 24 hours of vaccination, 21% occurred within 48 hours of vaccination and 59% occurred in people who experienced an onset of symptoms within 48 hours of being vaccinated.

In the U.S., 564 million COVID vaccine doses had been administered as of April 8, including 334 million doses of Pfizer, 212 million doses of Moderna and 19 million doses of Johnson & Johnson (J&J).

VAERS Chart thru 4/8/22 CHD.org

Every Friday, VAERS publishes vaccine injury reports received as of a specified date. Reports submitted to VAERS require further investigation before a causal relationship can be confirmed.

Historically, VAERS has been shown to report only 1% of actual vaccine adverse events.

U.S. VAERS data from Dec. 14, 2020, to April 8, 2022, for 5- to 11-year-olds show:

U.S. VAERS data from Dec. 14, 2020, to April 8, 2022, for 12- to 17-year-olds show:

  • 67 reports of anaphylaxis among 12- to 17-year-olds where the reaction was life-threatening, required treatment or resulted in death — with 96% of cases attributed to Pfizer’s vaccine.
  • 166 reports of blood clotting disorders, with all cases attributed to Pfizer.

U.S. VAERS data from Dec. 14, 2020, to April 8, 2022, for all age groups combined, show:

  • 20% of deaths were related to cardiac disorders.
  • 54% of those who died were male, 41% were female and the remaining death reports did not include the gender of the deceased.
  • 2,373 reports of anaphylaxis where the reaction was life-threatening, required treatment or resulted in death.

Woman develops fatal brain disease after second Moderna dose

Carol Beauchine died from sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease (CJD), a rapidly evolving, fatal degenerative brain disorder she developed after her second dose of Moderna’s COVID vaccine.

In an exclusive interview with The Defender, Carol’s son, Jeffrey Beauchine, said it was excruciating to watch his 70-year-old mother — who was healthy until she got the vaccine — die from a disease he believes the vaccine caused.

Beauchine said Carol received her first dose of Moderna on Feb. 16, 2021, and didn’t report any complaints. After getting the second dose on March 17, Carol immediately said she “felt different.” She developed numbness that spread throughout the entire left side of her body, blindness and hearing loss. She lost the ability to walk and communicate, and her brain degenerated until she passed away on Aug. 2, 2021 — just five months after receiving her second dose of Moderna.

The family submitted a report to VAERS, but the CDC has not followed up on Carol’s death. The Defender has received numerous reports of people who died from sporadic CJD after receiving a COVID vaccine — all women who were between the ages of 60 and 70, including Cheryl Cohen and Jennifer Deason Sprague.

Biden administration extends COVID public health emergency needed to keep vaccines under EUA

The Biden administration on Wednesday extended the COVID public health emergency, now two years old, for an additional 90 days — allowing vaccines and other drugs to remain under Emergency Use Authorization (EUA). Keeping COVID vaccines and other countermeasures under EUA shields pharmaceutical companies from liability for the harms caused by their products.

According to Reuters, a public health emergency was initially announced in January 2020, when the COVID pandemic began. It has been renewed each quarter since and was due to expire on April 16.

The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) said in a statement it was extending the public health emergency and will give states 60 days’ notice prior to termination or expiration. This may be the last time HHS Secretary Xavier Becerra extends it, according to policy experts.

Pfizer to seek authorization from FDA for COVID booster shot for kids 5 to 11 years old

Pfizer and BioNTech Thursday said they plan to apply for EUA of a COVID booster dose for healthy 5- to 11-year-olds based on the results of a small study that has not been published or analyzed by independent experts.

Pfizer said in a press release the third dose of its vaccine produced significant protection against the Omicron variant in children 5 to 11 in a small Phase 2/3 clinical trial. The study was based on data from only 140 children 5 through 11 years old who received a booster dose six months after the second dose of Pfizer-BioNTech’s COVID vaccine as part of the primary series.

Pfizer claimed a closer look at 30 children showed a 36-fold increase in virus-fighting antibodies — levels high enough to fight the Omicron variant, and that a third dose was “well tolerated with no new safety signals observed.”

Although Pfizer said more than 10,000 children under the age of 12 have participated in clinical trials investigating Pfizer’s COVID vaccine, only 140 were selected for the study forming the basis for the company’s EUA request.

CDC launches internal review over failed COVID response

The CDC announced Monday it was launching a month-long comprehensive agency-wide review following widespread criticism of the agency’s response to the COVID pandemic.

The agency plans to evaluate its structure, systems and processes, CDC Director Dr. Rochelle Walensky told staff in an email obtained by The Washington Post. Walensky said the goal of the review is to “modernize” the agency and “to position CDC, and the public health community, for greatest success in the future.”

The review will be conducted by Jim Mcrae, associate administrator for primary healthcare at the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA). The HRSA and the CDC are part of the Department of Health and Human Services.

Last month, the CDC’s decision to remove from its data tracker website tens of thousands of deaths linked to COVID — including nearly a quarter of the deaths the agency said had occurred among children — eroded public trust in the CDC’s handling of case counts.

Children’s Health Defense asks anyone who has experienced an adverse reaction, to any vaccine, to file a report following these three steps.

Megan Redshaw is a staff attorney for Children’s Health Defense and a reporter for The Defender.

© 2016 – 2022 Children’s Health Defense® • All Rights Reserved.

The Defender HOMEPAGE

Intro to ‘Ivermectin’


John R. Houk, Blog Editor

© August 14, 2020

 

Big Pharma in combination with Crony Capitalist medical and scientist Globalists have been covering up the efficacy of the inexpensive combined treatment HCQ, Azithromycin and Zinc to combat COVID-19 with lies and twisted information to justify waiting for the development of more expensive drugs and vaccines.

 

NOW there is another INEXPENSIVE drug that you probably NEVER hear about proven successful against COVID that like HCQ has been around for decades. HCQ was designed originally as an anti-malarial drug and has proven effective for other ailments such Lupus and rheumatoid arthritis and now COVID. THE OTHER INEXPENSIVE drug alone or in similar to HCQ combinations is Ivermectin originally designed as an anti-parasitic drug. The Australian Professor first bringing attention Ivermectin treatments for COVID is Dr. Thomas Borody MB, BS, BSc(Med), MD, PhD, DSc, FRACP,FACP,FACG, AGAF.

 

Dr. Thomas Borody

 

A Dr. Jean-Jacques Rajter, MD has been successfully using Ivermectin therapies against COVID despite a Big Pharma influenced FDA pushback in Florida.

 

Dr. Juliana Cepelowicz Rajter & Dr. Jean-Jacques Rajter

 

An interesting quote:

 

Ivermectin by itself and in combination with the treatment of hydroxychloroquine, azithromycin and zinc sulfate combination. (Broward County Doctor Using Ivermectin Off-Label Combo on COVID-19 Patients—It is Working & Secures County Health Protocol Approval; TrialSiteNews; 4/23/20)

 

I ran into this discovery of Ivermectin from a Self-Reliance Central email I am cross posting below.

 

JRH 8/14/20

Your generosity is always appreciated – various credit, check 

& debit cards are accepted by my PayPal account: 

Please Support NCCR

Or support by getting in the Coffee from home business – 

OR just buy some FEEL GOOD coffee, that includes immune boosting products.

********************************

Australian Professor/Broward County Doctor curing COVID-19. Big Pharma: *Crickets

 

By Kelly

Aug 14, 2020

Self-Reliance Central

 

In Australia, a professor believes he has come up with a cure for Coronavirus. According to The Daily Telegraph in Australia, Dr Borody, of Sydney’s Centre for Digestive Diseases, has found a promising treatment for COVID-19 using Ivermectin, a drug that has been used safely to treat parasitic infections such as scabies for half a century. He combines it in a “triple therapy” with zinc and the antibiotic Doxycycline to attack the virus from multiple angles.

 

Ivermectin Tablet & Label

 

Prof. Borody, who is a world-leading gastroenterologist credited for saving millions of lives after developing a cure for peptic ulcers, says the treatment should be in use across Australia as it is overseas in 32 countries.

 

‘We had a trial of 60 patients in Bangladesh and we got 60 out of 60 cured,’ he said. ‘Another two trials (in the US and China) have also shown results of 100 percent.’

 

According to Miranda Devine:

 

  • In Bangladesh, 400 patients with mild to moderate symptoms were treated and 98 per cent cleared the virus within four to 14 days.

 

  • In the Dominican Republic, in 1300 patients the average duration of infection fell from 21 days to 10 days.

 

  • Mortality in already sick patients at Broward County Medical Centre* in Florida dropped by 48 per cent. The results have been so remarkable that the government of the most populous Indian state, Uttar Pradesh, last week approved the use of Ivermectin for COVID-19 patients and also as a prophylactic for health workers.

 

So why don’t we know about it?

 

Because “other experts” claim there is no miracle cure. That’s it. A categorical NO from Australian health services.

 

It looks as though Big Pharma is yet again putting pressure on cheap cures as they plan a bonanza windfall in profits when they bring their vaccines to market.

 

* Dr. Jean-Jacques Rajter, a Broward Health Medical Center physician, and his pulmonologist wife are “pioneering” the use of the anti-parasitic drug ivermectin on COVID-19 patients. In fact, thanks to a recent health board decision, they may actually be healing COVID-19 patients with this off-label regimen. TrialSite News introduced the ivermectin Australian laboratory study, and a couple weeks later a small study in France. Now, it is reported that a Florida physician is using the drug off label on patients despite a recent FDA notice. When used in combination at the right time, the results are “remarkable.” His work is getting noticed: The Broward Health Board has approved the off-label protocol!

 

TrialSite News breaks down this interesting update from NBC Miami.

___________________________

© 2020 Self-Reliance Central

 

ABOUT SRC

 

Hi, I’m Kelly. I’m a regular person. Married with grown kids. I live half in the burbs and half by the sea. I try and live as independently as possible while still playing an active role in the community. I’m generally suspicious of the Establishment and I hate groupthink. I love new technology. I like firearms. I like experimenting with cooking and home skills. I believe in God and I love the Constitution as the Founders wrote it although I believe everyone is equally equal!

 

So, why Self-Reliance Central? Because we live in uncertain times. Who knows when an act of terrorism might occur, or when a natural disaster like a flood, fire, volcano or earthquake is going to strike? Or when our infrastructure will fail? Or what our over-zealous politicians, bureaucrats and regulators will do next to make our lives suck?

 

We need to stay alert to changes that affect us. And we need to know how to respond to these changes.

 

This site is dedicated to bringing you information that will empower you to respond to financial, social, medical, political and weather-related emergencies, as well as to simplify your life and reduce your dependence on outside agencies. I throw in a lot about politics.

 

Whether it’s wilderness survival, asset protection, privacy, health, food preservation, first aid, alternative life skills, understanding laws and regulations, or home maintenance we’re going to cover it. Some of it will be life saving, some life enhancing. But it will all add up to making you better equipped to deal with whatever the fates throw at you.

 

Sign up below to receive our Daily Bulletin and learn how you can become more self-reliant today.

 

%d bloggers like this: