John R. Houk, Bog Editor
April 1, 2024
If you are one of my readers, you will have noticed I took Easter Weekend 2024 off from sharing. AND YET I was not totally inactive.
Here are two posts focused on combatting Medical Tyranny from that Easter timeframe that I’m posting just to plug up the void. I will not be sharing widely as I typically do. SO, if you find this informative, you should share this post on your favorite Social Media Platform.
- World-Renowned Physicians Receive Public Apology from Accuser Admitting Allegations of Academic Fraud Were Incorrect; FLCCC ALLIANCE; 3/30/24
- The Sovereignty Coalition/ Door to Freedom backgrounder for lawmakers on the proposed transformation of the WHO: Please read and share this brief but comprehensive summary of what is afoot widely; By MERYL NASS; The FLCCC Alliance Community (Substack); 3/27/24
JRH 4/1/24
PLEASE! I need more Patriots to step up. I need Readers to chip in $5 – $10 – $25 – $50 – $100. PLEASE YOUR generosity is NEEDED. PLEASE GIVE to Help me be a voice for Liberty:
Big Tech Censorship is pervasive – Share voluminously on all social media platforms!
******************************
World-Renowned Physicians Receive Public Apology from Accuser Admitting Allegations of Academic Fraud Were Incorrect
March 30, 2024
Washington, D.C. – The source of a series of false allegations often recited in media stories has publicly acknowledged her error and apologized for questioning the integrity of the FLCCC Alliance and founding members Paul E. Marik, M.D., FCCM, FCCP, chairman and chief science officer, and Pierre Kory, MD, MPA, president and chief medical officer.
In June of 2022, Allison Neitzel, a physician and author of the blog, Misinformation Kills, made a series of false allegations of fraud in reference to peer-reviewed published research of Drs. Marik and Kory. Dr. Neitzel’s unsubstantiated claims also included accusing the FLCCC Alliance of “grifting” when she falsely claimed that the organization is the “same” as other organizations that sold ivermectin and telehealth services to the public. Finally, Dr. Neitzel was a staunch supporter and promoter of false claims by another online influencer, Kyle Sheldrick, a physician and Ph.D. candidate in Australia, who made a series of unsubstantiated allegations of fraud committed by Dr. Marik on social media and to the journal CHEST that he later retracted following an investigation into his claims by the journal. Dr. Sheldrick publicly acknowledged his mistake in a statement issued in May 2023.
Many of Dr. Neitzel’s and Dr. Sheldrick’s false claims were often used by widely read media outlets, positioning them as authoritative sources of such information.
Today, Dr. Neitzel issued a lengthy statement acknowledging her mistakes and apologizing to Drs. Marik and Kory, and the FLCCC Alliance that included the following [Blog Editor Bold Text Emphasis]:
“A number of times in 2022 in the MisinformationKills newsletter and on Twitter, I used terms like “fraud” and “fraudulent” to criticize certain positions of and statements by the FLCCC, Dr. Marik and Dr. Kory, and to criticize certain studies by Dr. Marik or Dr. Kory. My posts have also characterized the use of ivermectin in treatment with words like “grift.” I take this opportunity to clarify that I did not mean my statements to be understood as conveying anything more than intense criticism, and I regret if anyone understood the statements as accusations that any of them had engaged in fraudulent professional or business practices.”
Her statement concludes, “I apologize to the FLCCC, Dr. Marik, and Dr. Kory for the statements that are the subject of this update.”
“As physicians in the public discourse, we all have the responsibility to not make accusations like fraud without first knowing all the facts. To do otherwise is highly irresponsible and unprofessional, especially when the media spread these accusations further,” said Pierre Kory, MD, MPA, president and chief medical officer of the FLCCC Alliance. We accept Dr. Neitzel’s apology. However, it is regrettable that it has taken almost two years for her to acknowledge her mistakes.”
“We are always open to a professional debate on any of our research. That is often how good science comes about,” said Paul E. Marik, M.D., FCCM, FCCP, chairman and chief science officer of the FLCCC Alliance. “I hope that Dr. Neitzel understands that accusations of fraud are not to be recklessly made and can be particularly damaging during a public health crisis when critical information among frontline physicians is being used to save lives.”
A link to Dr. Neitzel’s statement can be found here: https://misinformationkills.substack.com/p/correction-clarification-and-update
Additional information on the resolution of Dr. Sheldrick’s claims can be found here: https://covid19criticalcare.com/triumph-an-unconscionable-attack-against-dr-marik-ends-in-global-vindication-the-flccc-news-capsule-for-sunday-june-4-2023/
About the FLCCC Alliance
The FLCCC Alliance was organized in March 2020 by a group of highly published, world renowned critical care physicians and scholars with the academic support of allied physicians worldwide. Known for its lifesaving protocols for preventing and treating COVID-19 in all stages of illness including “Long COVID” and Post Vaccine Syndrome, the FLCCC has since developed treatment guides for several conditions and illnesses, including sepsis, metabolic disease, cancer and depression. For more information: www.FLCCC.net
©2020–2023 All Rights Reserved FLCCC Alliance. The information contained or presented on this website is for educational purposes only. Information on this site is NOT intended to serve as a substitute for diagnosis, treatment, or advice from a qualified, licensed medical professional. The facts presented are offered as information only in order to empower you – our protocol is not medical advice – and in no way should anyone infer that we, even though we are physicians, or anyone appearing in any content on this website are practicing medicine, it is for educational purposes only. Any treatment protocol you undertake should be discussed with your physician or other licensed medical professional. Seek the advice of a medical professional for proper application of ANY material on this site or our program to your specific situation. NEVER stop or change your medications without consulting your physician. If you are having an emergency contact your emergency services: in the USA that’s 911. … Please read our complete disclaimers.
DONATE TO FLCCC ALLIANCE
++++++++++++++++++++++++++
The Sovereignty Coalition/ Door to Freedom backgrounder for lawmakers on the proposed transformation of the WHO
Please read and share this brief but comprehensive summary of what is afoot widely
By MERYL NASS
Cross posted from MERYL’S COVID NEWSLETTER
March 27, 2024
The FLCCC Alliance Community (Substack)
Dr. Meryl Nass publishes urgent message on the proposed changes to transform the World Health Organization. –
BACKGROUND PAPER ON THE PROPOSED TRANSFORMATION OF THE W.H.O.
With the active support of the Chinese Communist Party, the World Economic Forum, the European Union, Bill Gates, Big Pharma, and the Biden administration, two accords are being finalized that would give the World Health Organization (WHO) wholly unprecedented and actually unconstitutional powers over the United States and her people.
If adopted, these two proposed governing protocols – a package of major amendments to the WHO’s existing International Health Regulations (IHRs) and a new treaty being described as the Pandemic Agreement – could threaten national sovereignty, undermine states’ rights, and imperil constitutional freedoms and basic individual liberties.
Specifically, the WHO and its unelected officials would be granted the authority to restrict U.S. citizens’ rights to freedom of speech, privacy, movement (especially travel across borders), choice of medical care and informed consent. The WHO would also be empowered to ignore intellectual property rights and impose a massive and unaccountable surveillance system on the world. Most significantly, the proposed instruments would violate Americans’ basic civil rights under the First, Fourth, Fifth, Tenth and Fourteenth Amendments.
The following are of particular concern:
1. If the two proposed governing protocols are adopted, the WHO would be transformed from an advisory, charitable organization into the world’s governor of public health, whose orders must be obeyed.
The World Health Organization was founded in 1948 as a specialized agency of the United Nations with a mandate to coordinate international health issues. The WHO carries out its mandate issuing guidance, making recommendations, and establishing protocols for dealing with medical emergencies. Currently, the World Health Organization (WHO) is in the final stages of considerably amending its existing International Health Regulations (IHR) and negotiating an international Pandemic Treaty. The ostensible purpose is to enable a global response to “Public Health Emergencies of International Concern” (PHEICs).
Although the WHO does not presently have the authority to enforce its recommendations, under the proposed IHR amendments and new Pandemic agreement, both of which would be binding, the WHO would gain the authority to issue mandates, not simply give advice, transforming its role from an advisory and charitable agency to one that will govern public health worldwide.
During a declaration of an actual or potential PHEIC, the IHRs would be in force. The Treaty would always be in force.
2. The proposed IHR amendments and Pandemic Treaty confer essentially unlimited powers over public health globally to the WHO’s Director-General.
The IHR amendments would require states parties to surrender sovereignty over public health to the WHO’s unelected and unaccountable Director-General, who would – among other things – be empowered to direct nations as to what laws they must pass and enforce. For example, the IHR amendments insert the word “shall” a total of 168 times. The clear intent and meaning of these changes is to establish that such dictates will be mandatory for member countries to follow, especially during a declared “emergency.” (Note that the protocols establish compliance and implementation committees, as well as a “focal point” in each country to report back to the WHO on compliance. Moreover, the defined scope of the proposed IHR has been expanded to include “all risks with a potential to impact public health” (Article 2, Scope and purpose).[1]
Moreover, if the proposed IHR changes and Pandemic Treaty are adopted in late May 2024, America’s elected representatives would no longer solely set our public health policies. Instead, they could be dictated by the WHO’s Director-General, who would be authorized to declare unilaterally public health emergencies of regional or international concern. Such declarations can include perceived or potential emergencies other than pandemics, including for example: climate change, immigration, gun violence or even emergencies involving plants, animals, or ecosystems. And, under the WHO’s proposed agreements, American citizens would be obliged to comply with whatever the Director-General says must be done about these emergencies.
3. Both the proposed Pandemic Treaty and IHR indicate a disconcerting intent to suppress free speech criticism of public health concerns, establish global surveillance, and support the proliferation of potential biological weapons.
Other problems abound with the WHO’s Pandemic Treaty and International Health Regulations amendments. For example, they would require the establishment of a global surveillance state that threatens the basic privacy rights of all Americans and reflects the organization and its partners’ determination to suppress free speech that is at odds with the WHO’s public health policies. While nominally promoting “unhindered” access to information (Treaty Article 3. General principles and approaches),[2] there is a contradictory requirement for nations to “combat false, misleading, misinformation or disinformation” (Treaty Article 18, Communication, and public awareness).[3] Notably, under these protocols, social media could be monitored and censored; citizens could be inoculated and subjected to lockdowns at the sole discretion of the WHO; and Americans’ medical data, from birth to death, could be shared globally.
Both documents also support the proliferation of potential biological weapons. While the stated goal of the Pandemic Treaty is to reduce pandemics, it establishes a “Pathogen Access and Benefit-Sharing System” (Treaty Article 12, Access and benefit sharing)4 that requires nations to share “potential pandemic pathogens” – a formula for proliferating potential biological weapons, which increases the risk of pandemics.5
Furthermore, the WHO’s Director-General would appoint experts to supervise genetic engineering and Gain-of-Function research on potential pandemic pathogens (Article 24, Scientific Advisory Committee), which appeared in the February 14, 2024, draft of the Pandemic Treaty.6 Such research will further increase the risk of escape of highly pathogenic microorganisms. A serious effort to prevent pandemics would require the WHO to end such dangerous research.
4. Implementation of public healthcare policy is a state, not federal, responsibility.
The responsibility to define and implement public health policies is not an enumerated power in the U.S. Constitution, and therefore is an authority reserved to the states. The federal government cannot transfer authority for U.S. public health policy to the WHO because it is not, in fact, entitled to exercise such authority, let alone relinquish it to a foreign entity.
The Biden administration is, nonetheless, strongly supportive of both of the proposed WHO accords. The U.S. State Department has indicated that it does not intend to request Senate advice and consent on the IHR amendments or the Treaty. And the U.S. Senate has, to date, refused to agree to require either or both to be submitted pursuant to its constitutional role in the ratification of such accords.7 8
It falls, therefore, to the states’ Attorneys General to stand against these agreements and thereby safeguard such state prerogatives and their constituents’ medical freedom, lest one or both be irreparably harmed.
[1] https://apps.who.int/gb/wgihr/pdf_files/wgihr2/A_WGIHR2_7-en.pdf. (page 3)
[2] https://apps.who.int/gb/inb/pdf_files/inb7/A_INB7_3-en.pdf. (page 7)
[3] https://apps.who.int/gb/inb/pdf_files/inb7/A_INB7_3-en.pdf. (page 22). The Treaty defines “infodemic” as “too much information, false or misleading information, in digital and physical environments during a disease outbreak. It causes confusion and risk-taking behaviors that can harm health.” It then requires “Parties” to engage in “infodemic management at local, national, regional and international levels. ” Treaty at pp. 5, 13. The Treaty also requires that Parties “harmonize … regulatory requirements” (p. 20) so it contemplates that each government will bind private parties, including any that contribute to the “infodemic.” The First Amendment prohibits this kind of speech control.
4 https://apps.who.int/gb/inb/pdf_files/inb7/A_INB7_3-en.pdf. (page 16)
5 https://brownstone.org/articles/who-amendments-increase-man-made-pandemics/
6 https://doortofreedom.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/INB8_Chapter-III.pdf
7 https://www.ronjohnson.senate.gov/2023/2/sen-johnson-leads-colleagues-in-effort-to-protect-american-sovereignty-against-world-health-organization
8 https://oversight.house.gov/hearing/reforming-the-who-ensuring-global-health-security-and-accountability/
© 2024 FLCCC Alliance
FLCCC Alliance Substack HOMEPAGE
SUBSCRIBE/SUPPORT FLCCC Alliance Substack
The Conservative-Patriot Christian Right 
