OVERCOME Dem-Marxist Tyranny on November 8


John R. Houk, Blog Editor

© November 6, 2022

I’ve had a bit of difficulty deciding on an information path for a blog post today. So, this is what I’m going to do. I’m posting a hodge-podge of articles and videos that might appear unrelated yet has one common theme. THAT THEME is Government/Medical Tyranny under the coup-installed government rulers under Dem-Marxist rulers/oppressors.

1) First up is an hour and 23-minute video interview conducted by Glenn Beck with Whitney Webb. I have no idea who Ms. Webb is. The impression I had from the interview she has been a bit of a Liberal who has awakened to actions of tyranny by America’s current ruling controllers. The interview basis is her book “One Nation Under Blackmail: The Sordid Union Between Intelligence and Crime that Gave Rise to Jeffrey Epstein.” Topic hints from memory: Epstein (of course), a criminal government, transhumanism and more. WELL WORTH THE WATCH! (Beck runs a few pay-the-bills ads. I just FF through the ads, but you do as you will.)

2) A 11/2/22 post from The Federalist about some Globalist controllers are beginning to panic a bit about a massive transfer of political power might begin on November 8: “Public Health Elites Who Pushed Anti-Science Policies Deserve Accountability, Not ‘Amnesty’.”

3) The Conservative Treehouse put a roughly 3-minute video of Tucker Carlson highlighting the First Amendment violation of a Free Press for a Leftist Judge incarcerating Catherine Englebrecht and Gregg Phillips for REFUSING to reveal their source that led to the indictment of Eugene Yu for delivering Election data to the Chinese Communist Party. Yu (CEO of Konnech) sued for the source-info and mysteriously a Judge wanted to bring Whistleblowers to the light of day. Englebrecht and Phillips REFUSED: “Tucker Carlson Draws Attention to Imprisonment of Catherine Englebrecht and Gregg Phillips.”

4) Last is a 11/5/22 message from Tom Zawitowski (for Tom Z) on past Election Tyranny, current Election Tyranny (including a section on a phone message from incarcerated Englebrecht) and some rare Court victories trying to secure present and future Election Integrity. I found the original video on Tom Z’s We The People Convention website, but I’m just posting the Rumble Video: “We the People Convention News & Opinion 11-5-22.”

JRH 11/6/22

Thank you to those who have stepped up!

READER SUPPORTED! I need Readers willing to chip in $5 – $10 – $25 – $50 – $100. PLEASE I need your generosity. PLEASE GIVE to Help me be a voice for Liberty:

Please Support CPCR

Big Tech Censorship is pervasive – Share voluminously on all social media platforms!

******************************

Bitchute VIDEO: HOW ELITES WILL CREATE A NEW CLASS OF SLAVES | WHITNEY WEBB | THE GLENN BECK PODCAST

Posted by Banned Youtube Videosspecializedtom

Posted on November 6th, 2022 04:43 UTC

Journalist Whitney Webb has worked to uncover some of the most dangerous stories of our lifetime, and she joins Glenn to reveal just how eye-opening it’s been. Her new two-volume book, “One Nation Under Blackmail: The Sordid Union Between Intelligence and Crime that Gave Rise to Jeffrey Epstein,” examines Epstein’s elaborate network of corruption and power, from Bill Clinton to Ghislaine Maxwell and many more. Her research into transhumanism has given her a terrifying perspective on the World Economic Forum and tech elites, including Elon Musk. And she tells Glenn the dark truth about Biden’s push for electric vehicles that she noticed while living in Chile.

MORE DESCRIPTION

++++++++++++++++++++++++

Public Health Elites Who Pushed Anti-Science Policies Deserve Accountability, Not ‘Amnesty’

Fear-mongering virus prophets that prided themselves on public health damaged public trust more than anything else.

Mask Tyranny

By JUSTIN HART

November 2, 2022

The Federalist

The failures of Covid health policies are legion. Absent, curiously, are any serious acknowledgments of the harms caused by these policies from the people who promoted them throughout the pandemic.

Recently, Professor Emily Oster of Brown University, admitted in The Atlantic that interventions like social distancing and outdoor masking “were totally misguided.” She decried the “wildly irresponsible claims” of many in positions of power and admits that school closures have led to “historic declines” in student test scores.

Oster acknowledges the obvious: these policies had serious unintended consequences. Oncologist reports note that nearly 50 percent of cancers went undiagnosed during the federal lockdowns because people were too scared to seek treatment. One study estimated that we may have missed over 200,000 cases of domestic abuse during the spring of 2020. Sharp-eyed teachers and administrators are usually the first ones to uncover these sad incidents, and our kids weren’t in school. Well into 2022, I was asking aloud: “How many bruises on a mom’s face were hidden because schools required masks for drop-offs?”

Did anyone weigh the true costs of shutting down the country and closing schools? What should be our position towards policy-makers who forced these ill-founded interventions on the public? What attitude should we strike with key influencers who knew of these harms but did little to call for changes?

Oster seems to recognize that the other shoe is dropping and which is why she launches a pre-emptive request for forgiveness:

We have to put these fights aside and declare a pandemic amnesty. We can leave out the willful purveyors of actual misinformation while forgiving the hard calls that people had no choice but to make with imperfect knowledge.

The professor was not an uninterested bystander. Oster and her team had collected invaluable data on Covid cases in school settings for nearly a year starting in August 2020. The data also mapped differing interventions by state, county, and district – allowing a real-time lab of comparisons. Our team charted her data and found that students in masked schools had a 21 percent higher case rate than students in schools with no masks. Oster published a study coming to similar conclusions.

Then, she dropped out of the discussion and refused to push her study for peer review and publication.

Numerous influential academics like Emily, under pressure from peers and establishment leaders, caved, stayed silent, and mothballed their data altogether. It’s difficult to separate intimidation from self-censorship – but a blanket amnesty seems premature.

Of course, no apology will be forthcoming from Dr. Anthony Fauci. During numerous media interviews in the last several months, he has refused to acknowledge any mistakes. Apparently, he fears that the slightest mea culpa would be taken “out of context.” Fauci’s only tool was fear and he’s not going to give up his tactic.

Dr. Scott Atlas, a one-time advisor to President Trump’s Covid-19 taskforce, recounts how he confronted Fauci and asked: “So you think people aren’t frightened enough?” Fauci reportedly replied: “Yes, they need to be more afraid.”

Fauci-endorsed lockdowns were ineffective and damaging. Risks from Covid are not uniform for the entire population but directly aligned to your age. The mortality impact on children is almost immeasurable but we burdened them with mandates and school closures. Mask mandates have shown zero impact on quelling the spread of the virus. Denied by Fauci & Co., natural immunity offers strong protection and vaccines (designed for a 2-year-old variant) have proven ineffectual at stopping the current crop of feared COVID variants.

Fauci and his cadre of unelected health officials were on the wrong side of every one of these outcomes. They were made aware of every data point above but their one-size-fits-all policies never changed significantly in the face of the evidence. In their minds, there is only the panic.

Oster’s efforts for the well-being of children were not altogether silent. She repeatedly stated claims for “safe re-openings” which were interpreted into policies of school closures by proxy – the slightest exposure sending children into 10 days of quarantine during the winter of 2021-22 per policy. However, her advocacy for fear-based vaccine pressures was always there. In late December 2021 she tweeted:

Emily Oster Tweet screen capture

It is now widely acknowledged that Covid vaccines do not stop infections or transmission of the disease, which is the only reason for mandating and forcing vaccines on the public. We commend Oster for shying away from the shaming tactics which Fauci extolled and the Biden White House perfected, but, she was wrong again.

Curiously, after the 2009 H1N1 public health debacle, an article was published on the National Institutes of Health website entitled “‘Listen to the People’: Public Deliberation about Social Distancing Measures in a Pandemic.” The article notes the vital need for good and honest communication to the public about measures being taken the protect the citizenry. It states:

Public engagement in ethically laden pandemic planning decisions may be important for transparency, creating public trust, improving compliance with public health orders, and ultimately, contributing to just outcomes.

The current crop of failed fear-mongering virus prophets coupled with the low uptake of boosters is a stark and terrible reminder that the institutions that prided themselves on public health damaged the public trust more than anything else. Your trust should be in the bedrock of our Constitution, not in some self-endowed title of “science.” Public trust in our institutions is sinking and it will require a public trial of our policy decisions to right the ship.

Oster might still find some goodwill for engaging with those of us who got it right – even if she attributes that to a “hefty element of luck” – but she shouldn’t presume that we will forget this any time soon.

Justin Hart is the author of the new book: “Gone Viral: How Covid Drove the World Insane” from Regnery Publishing.

© 2022 THE FEDERALIST, A WHOLLY INDEPENDENT DIVISION OF FDRLST MEDIA. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

++++++++++++++++++++++++

Tucker Carlson Draws Attention to Imprisonment of Catherine Englebrecht and Gregg Phillips

Tucker Carlson and Catherine Englebrecht

By Sundance 

November 5, 2022

The Conservative Treehouse

True the Vote founder Catherine Englebrecht and election data security analyst, Gregg Phillips, were previously in contempt of court and placed in jail for failing to outline the participants in a 2020 hotel discussion that revealed the Konnech election data compromise that was transmitted to Chinese networks.  {Go Deep} Konnech CEO Eugene Yu was arrested for exploiting access to U.S. election data, including election worker information, and transferring the files to China.

Eugene Yu and Konnech sued True the Vote and are using the U.S. civil judicial system to find out who told the FBI about the Chinese data harvesting operation. Federal Judge Kenneth Hoyt demanded that Phillips and Englebrecht reveal the names of everyone who was present when the original data files were shown to True the Vote.

Englebrecht and Phillips stated they did not ever possess the data file, do not have it and refused to name all the participants who may have seen it.   Judge Hoyt threw them in jail last Monday until Englebrecht and Phillips give up the names to the court and the Chinese Communist Party.  Tucker Carlson discusses {Direct Rumble Link} – WATCH:

Rumble VIDEO: Tucker Carlson discusses how two leaders of the group “True the Vote” ended up in prison.

[Posted by The Post Millennial Clips

Published November 4, 2022

Tucker Carlson discusses how two leaders of the group “True the Vote” ended up in prison.]

© 2022 The Conservative Treehouse

++++++++++++++++++++++

Rumble VIDEO: We the People Convention News & Opinion 11-5-22

Posted by TomZWTPC

Published November 5, 2022

This Week’s Topics:
Stay Calm – We Have Work to Do! 2:00
Catherine Engelbrecht Call from Jail 5:30
HUGE PA Court Ruling 15:00
Fetterman is Toast 22:00
Masters Get Huge Lift in AZ 24:00
Cybersecurity Head “Expect Errors” 26:20
Dems Illegally Registering Voters 29:00
No Amnesty for Covid Criminals! 33:30
Proof Feds used Big Tech to Censor 37:00
SCOTUS EndingAffirmative Action 42:30
Racism against Whites 46:00
Home Schooling Explodes 49:30
Mortgage Rates highest in 20 yrs 1:03:00
US Now has Troops in Ukraine 1:06:30
150 Chinese Scientists Paid by US 1:08:30
Left & US Rig Brazil Election 1:11:00
VA Parents Changing Trans Rules 1:17:00
No Trannies in US Beauty Pageant! 1:19:00
Climate Commie Thunberg Exposed 1:21:00
Important Peterson Videos 1:25:00
Your Plan for Election Day! 1:32:30

An Intro – If Can’t Prove Jab Safety, Can’t Justify Jab Mandates


Intro by John R. Houk, Blog Editor

© October 5, 2022

I have to admit I discover most The Vigilant Fox from (his/her – I don’t really know which) from the person’s Telegram Channel (https://t.me/VigilantFox). And I say this even though I subscribe to The Vigilant Fox Substack page and I’m fully aware The Vigilant Fox is closely associated with Red Voice Media.

In saying all that, The Vigilant Fox has a great post today (10/5/22) utilizing actual science from doctors which were revered in their field until they began to expose the fake-manipulative science to brainwash people to take and CONTINUE take mRNA Jab after booster Jab even though the data hidden from the public shows a volatile danger rather than the propaganda LIE: “Safe and Effective”.

As I share the cross post, I want to mention The Vigilant Fox – as many Substackers – has figured out how to embed Rumble videos within a screen captured photo. I have not. So for my Substack readers, I’ll screen capture the post video with the Rumble link above.

Now onto the relevant science brainwashers would rather you remain ignorant.

JRH 10/5/22

Thank you to those who have stepped up!

READER SUPPORTED! I need Readers willing to chip in $5 – $10 – $25 – $50 – $100. PLEASE I need your generosity. PLEASE GIVE to Help me be a voice for Liberty:

Please Support NCCR

Big Tech Censorship is pervasive – Share voluminously on all social media platforms!

*********************

FAR Outside Medical Norms: Until You Can Prove Safety, You CANNOT Justify Vaccine Mandates

I did a calculation … So you killed 150,000 in order to maybe save 10,000 lives.”

Dr. Peter McCullough on Liberty Dispatch

By The Vigilant Fox

October 5, 2022

The Vigilant Fox

Coast Guard rescuer Chad Weston, who helped in Hurricane Ian rescue missions, went on Fox News Tuesday (10/4/22) to explain how he faces termination for refusing the jab.

He’s a man of God — but his religious exemption was denied, and he is one of 20,000 service members who face termination over the military’s vaccine mandate.

Rumble VIDEO: Military Hero to Be Fired for Refusing the Shot After Religious Exemption Denied

[Posted by The Vigilant Fox

Published October 4, 2022 

MORE DESCRIPTION]

Fox News pundit Steve Doocy commented, “Given you’re so close to retirement (two years), I’m sure there are people saying, ‘Why don’t you just get the shot?’”

“Because my faith and my belief are more important than that,” Watson responded. “If I compromise that, I compromise everything I stand for.”

What a commendable action for this man to stick by his principles and not take the easy way out.

But how ethical is it to mandate these things in the first place?

That’s where we turn to Peter McCullough. But first, let’s play devil’s advocate and hear a pro-vaccine Canadian doctor’s perspective (the lady with the headphones and the mask).

Rumble VIDEO: FAR Outside Medical Norms: Until You Can Prove Safety, You CANNOT Justify Vaccine Mandates

[Posted by The Vigilant Fox

Published October 5, 2022

MORE DESCRIPTION]

Vaccine mandates are quite normal! We’ve always had them. School boards require that students are immunized against measles, mumps, rubella, chickenpox, meningitis — it’s a normal thing. As a family doctor, every year, I keep all of my patients up to date with all of their routine immunizations. If you’re a doctor and you want to go to medical school, the first thing you have to do — if you’re a nurse and you want to go to nursing school — the first thing you have to do is prove that you are up to date with all of your immunizations. That is just basic public health, and it’s basic sense.

Points noted.

But is this “vaccine” like the others? Because as far as doctors like Peter McCullough can tell, the only similarity it shares with those other shots is in the name “vaccine.” If definitions weren’t changed, they would have rightly been placed in a completely different category, gene therapy.

Dr. Peter McCullough elaborates on how unusual it is to mandate such products:

[Blog Editor: Here a reprise of the video clip with Leftie Doctor & Doctor McCullough exposing the Leftie’s twisted vax-facts.]

Dr. Peter McCullough on Liberty Dispatch

Mandating an emergency use authorized set of vaccines that have no proven safety is not routine at all. These vaccines are genetic products; they’re given every six months or more frequently. Now there are bivalent boosters that have never been tested on a human being whatsoever.

This isn’t usual or normal! This isn’t a part of conventional practice. This is far outside the norms that we have — particularly with respect to safety. Until something’s proven to be safe, in no way should it be mandated.

Mic drop. And to take it even further…

Vaccinating into a Pandemic is ALWAYS the wrong answer.

As explained by Dr. Michael Yeadon:

Rumble VIDEO: Listen Up, Mr. Gates: Vaccinating into a Pandemic Is ALWAYS the Wrong Answer

[Posted by The Vigilant Fox

Published June 5, 2022 

MORE DESCRIPTION]

The elapsed time taken to get an adequate amount of safety data is always longer than the feasible length of any pandemic in history. In other words, a new vaccine is always, let me say it again, always, Mr. Gates, the wrong answer.

It will always take you longer to do a responsible job of creating and testing a novel vaccine than the length of the pandemic. And if you take less time, it means you do not have an appropriate amount of safety data, and therefore, it’s reckless to go and vaccinate the whole population.

Safety is ALWAYS the most important aspect of ANY medical intervention. Because if you kill two, three, four people for every one you save, it DOESN’T MATTER howeffective your product is.

And in the Pfizer trials, they FAILED on all-cause mortality.

Rumble VIDEO: Steve Kirsch Breaks Down the Math Showing the Upside Down Risk/Benefit Analysis of the Vaccine

[Posted by The Vigilant Fox

Published March 8, 2022

MORE DESCRIPTION]

More people died in the vaccine group than in the placebo group, and it takes 22,000 vaccines to save one life from COVID.

Steve Kirsch: “I did a calculation … So you killed 150,000 in order to maybe save 10,000 lives.”

So really, NO ONE should be injecting themselves with these things, let alone be mandated to take them. It’s a disgrace that our military members still have to deal with this.

And to watch the entirety of the interview with Dr. Peter McCullough, click/tap the link below.

Dr. Peter McCullough Reacts to UNHINGED Canadian Physician [Red Voice Media link to the entire video. Below is the Rumble version:]

Rumble VIDEO: Dr. Peter McCullough’s Rational Response to a Hysterical Canadian Doctor

Posted by LibertyCoalitionCanada

Published September 30, 2022

MORE DESCRIPTION

Dr. McCullough Reacts – Liberty Dispatch

© 2022 The Vigilant Fox

Be Brave Like our Founders to Resist Tyranny!


John R. Houk, Blog Editor

© August 26, 2022

Paul S. Gardiner writing at the American Thinker has an interesting post/observation on the state of existence in the United States of America entitled, “The Second American Civil War, and Ways to Win It.”

Gardiner is not writing about a shooting Civil War as in 1861 – 1865 or even the Revolutionary War for Independence 1775 – 1783. Rather Gardiner is writing his observations of the Left (ok, really Dem-Marxists) utilizing effective INFILTRATION methods legally and extra-legally to subvert American Constitutional institutions. Gardiner shows what he believes is an Activist path to overthrow this infiltration in a peaceful yet powerful manner.

I indeed endorse Gardiner’s Activist path whole heartedly! AND YET I hold no illusions the Left will peacefully submit to an awakening American population making inroads first of locally then expanding nationally. A great example is the Communist managed rioting and looting perpetrated by Black Lives Matter (BLM) and Antifa that canvassed American metropolitan areas across the entire nation.

It is my suspicion that massive American Conservatives/Patriots exercising their peaceful Constitutional Rights to assemble and to vote in untainted elections will be met again with unrestrained violence likely again by BLM/Antifa Communists moving to secure Dem-Marxist power.

When I say “unrestrained” I mean the American Judicial system is so infected with corruption, the rule of law protects criminals more than citizens doing the right thing. The Ashley Biden Diary is a classic example of Judicial corruption.

A couple in Florida moved into a domicile where Ashley Biden recently resided in Florida leaving behind her Diary. The couple was charged with stealing the Diary and selling across State line in New York. The only thing that was true was the sale. The Diary was abandoned not stolen, much like another Biden idiot – Hunter – who abandoned his incriminating laptop at a computer repair shop. My guess is the couple who sold the laptop took some kind of plea deal to avoid the cost of an expensive criminal trial that if a corrupt prosecutor had won, would have landed them with a lengthy prison sentence. So the couple pled guilty. You can read the details here:

Now that is some political corruption in the Judicial system to punish a couple who divulged a Diary demonstrating a Coup-elected Dementia Joe was a pedophile pervert with his own daughter. The prosecution proves the Diary belonged to Ashley Biden (moron prosecutors) who was a victim of daddy’s sexual deviancy. Of course the Dem-Marxist propaganda mouthpieces miss the content of the Diary for the probable extorted confessed guilt of the couple selling the Diary.

I’m sure many of you can probably list Judicial and political corruption you are very aware of. The point is: Rise up peacefully but be resilient when violence confronts you AND don’t expect much Judicial protection. Rather Dem-Marxist controlled justice might prosecute your efforts more than protect your Rights.

DO NOT GIVE UP! Be Brave like our Founders to resist tyranny!

I wrote you can expect the violence of the BLM/Antifa Communist cadre, We The People should find it interesting that the rich Elitists that have adopted Globalist-Marxist principles for a One World Government will kill their own sheeple to decrease the population to a manageable number:

Bitchute VIDEO: OPERATION DEPOPULATION: BILLIONAIRES & THEIR SELL-OUT AGENTS OPENLY PLOTTING TO EXTERMINATE BILLIONS

Posted by SixthSense

First Published August 26th, 2022 08:52 UTC

MORE DESCRIPTION

AND NOW the Gardiner post on the Second Civil War.

JRH 8/26/22

Thank you to those who have stepped up!

READER SUPPORTED! I need Readers willing to chip in $5 – $10 – $25 – $50 – $100. PLEASE I need your generosity. PLEASE GIVE to Help me be a voice for Liberty:

Please Support NCCR

Big Tech Censorship is pervasive – Share voluminously on all social media platforms!

***********************************

The Second American Civil War, and Ways to Win It

U.S. Flag TatteredImage via Max Pixel.

By Paul S. Gardiner

August 25, 2022

American Thinker

The recent clandestine FBI raid on the home of President Donald Trump leaves little doubt that America indeed is in the midst of a second civil war. The war thus far is a non-shooting war with multiple “fronts” of attack waged and supported by both domestic and foreign enemies. If they are successful, they will have effectively nullified America’s constitutional republic and negated most, if not all, of Americans’ cherished constitutional rights and freedoms.

This civil war is being waged successfully against the American republic by multiple organizations and numerous powerful, very wealthy people (“progressives”), all striving to control the manner in which Americans think, speak, and act. Because Americans’ unique constitutional freedoms and rights are under severe attack, there is an urgent and immediate need for all patriotic Americans to get actively engaged.

This article suggests three actions that patriotic citizens can take to become effectively engaged against the enemies of their republic. The power of a single citizen can be profound.

America is in dire need of leaders and supporters who care much more about the preservation of the nation’s constitutional republic than about enriching themselves or doing only what their major donors desire. America needs many more courageous, patriotic leaders like Florida governor Ron DeSantis, who, along with other bold actions, recently fired a George Soros–funded leftist Florida prosecutor.

Governor DeSantis is actively fighting the use of “woke” environmental, social, and governance (ESG) standards by financial institutions to determine loans and other financial support for Florida businesses and citizens. Many more chief executives need to demonstrate such courage and conviction.

Strong, DeSantis-type conservative leadership is urgently needed at all levels of government (county, city, state, and federal). Such leadership is also urgently needed at all levels of America’s educational hierarchy, including K–12 and college and university environments.

Domestic and foreign enemies waging and supporting America’s second civil war include:

1) The radical, far left–controlled Democrat party. Today’s Democrat party is controlled by members of the radical far left, who are committed to an ideology (religion!) that says America is an evil country that was illicitly founded by rich, old white men only for their betterment and perpetuation. These radicals lack and are not the least bit interested in a balanced history of  America’s Founders and founding. Such an approach will go against their race-based Marxist agenda striving to divide the American population rather than unify the people.

Democrats’ attacks on the American republic include, among other things, a) maintaining an  extremely dangerous, deadly open southern border; b) supporting violent, lawless groups such as Antifa and Black Lives Matter; and c) deliberately eliminating America’s energy independence, causing super-inflation and risking America’s national security. Given the above, traditional longtime, patriotic Democrats are choosing to leave the party.

2) The Great Reset agenda of the World Health Organization (WHO) and the World Economic Forum (WEF). Members of the WHO and WEF (both substantially funded by Bill Gates and other wealthy “progressives”) have concocted what they call the Great Reset agenda. This is nothing less than an effort to control people’s lives by controlling their health and money. The radical far left–controlled Democrat party supports the Great Reset agenda because it is an attack on America’s constitutional republic.

3) The Chinese Communist Party (CCP), Russia, and other tyrannical governments. The CCP, Russia, North Korea, and other tyrannical governments are notorious for continual cyber-attacks against America’s infrastructure. The involvement of the CCP in the development and release of the deadly COVID-19 virus is well accepted by numerous investigators and at least one brave Chinese whistle-blower.

The CCP exerts great influence at many of America’s leading colleges and universities to promote, either directly or indirectly, CCP propaganda against long accepted American values, including family and Christian values. The deep disdain that the CCP feels for Americans was revealed in a speech given in 2003 by Chinese defense minister (General) Chi Haotian, where he stated, “It is indeed brutal to kill one or two hundred million Americans.  But that is the only path that will secure a Chinese century in which the Chinese Communist Party leads the world.”

Actions that patriotic, freedom-loving Americans can take in this 21st-century civil war:

1) Use the tools provided by Act for America that allow citizens to easily contact their state and federal representatives about pending legislation that is being promoted by far-left Democrats. Various legislators have indicated that it takes hearing from only 40–50 of their constituents to make a difference in critical votes on pending legislation.

Interviews with legislators indicate that many consider a note or call from a single constituent to be representative of 1,000 people. Thus, a single citizen indeed is potent.

2) Form small groups of military veterans (and other citizen groups) to become active, vocal supporters of bona fide conservative political candidates. Provide this same support for strong conservative candidates for local school boards and other education positions. An example of a highly successful, activist veterans organization is American Veterans Vote in Virginia.

3) Parents and all citizens concerned about the education of America’s youth need to insist on viewing the curricula that K–12 teachers are using to instruct students. Challenge any race-based materials, sexual orientation and transgender indoctrination, and anti-American books and other materials being used. Continue to appear at school board meetings to demand the end of any Critical Race Theory or derivative instruction being given to students. If necessary, contact the No Left Turn in Education organization for potential advice/legal assistance.

In conclusion, now is not the time to be complacent about life in America — there is too much at stake. Citizens who love America with its cherished constitutional freedoms and rights truly need to become active and help win America’s second civil war!

Paul S. Gardiner is a retired Army officer, Vietnam veteran, and graduate of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, University of Alabama, and the United States Army War College. He is hopeful that the information presented in this article will help motivate an army of heretofore uninvolved Americans to become actively involved in the current multi-front civil war against the American constitutional republic. The freedoms and inalienable rights of all Americans must be preserved!

© American Thinker 2022

People’s Lives are Irrelevant to Big Pharma & Govt. Science


John R. Houk, Blog Editor

© July 5, 2022

One thing that is disappointing and infuriating simultaneously is the unquestioning faith in government science which TODAY is owned by Big Pharma science greed.

Big Pharma Money Painfully-Slowly Becoming Exposed:

AND THAT means science is manipulated to increase the profits of the new Corporatist-Fascism (** You do yourself a favor and bone-up on Corporatist-Fascism because there are variances from the past that have merged into the “new”) which is very much inline the Globalist-Marxism (an odd combination of Gramsci and Great Reset-Klaus Schwab) which includes Elitist depopulation ideology. Which I realize sounds a bit fantastical to believe, but sounds remarkably viable to anyone willing  read actual science the Globalists and Big Pharma are trying to hide from PUBLIC AWARENESS.

(** Corporatist-Fascism info to digest:

ERGO, here is some documented truth that informs the unfortunate gullible the science in our government has been LYING to you! The lies occur because the science is owned by greedy Big Pharma AND control-the-people Globalist-Marxist Elitists who have an agenda based on a demented Eco-Marxist Earth view that benefits the Elitist few and damns the perceived insignificant lives of the masses not only in the USA but also world-wide.

To unpack this I have another lengthy yet worthy for your information three cross post exposing Big Pharma in relation to their mRNA evil ending with an interview with Dr. David Martin who is being politically persecuted for exposing Jab facts denied by bad science.


If you don’t believe you can wade through the actual science in one sitting or for future reference, you might want to bookmark this post to refer back.

JRH 7/5/22

READER SUPPORTED! I need Readers willing to chip in $5 – $10 – $25 – $50 – $100. PLEASE I need your generosity. PLEASE GIVE to Help me be a voice for Liberty with your SUPPORT:

Please Support NCCR

Big Tech Censorship is pervasive – Share voluminously on all social media platforms!

*****************************

Vaccine Response To COVID-19 Was Pre-Planned: Authors Of New Book, ‘The Courage to Face COVID-19’

July 5, 2022

GreatGameIndia

There is a vaccine agenda in which the forces that be want everyone to continue getting vaccinated eternally. Furthermore, the vaccine response to COVID-19 was pre-planned, according to the authors of a new book, ‘The Courage to Face COVID-19.’

Dr. Peter McCullough – cardiologist & John Leake – writer

While conducting research for their book “The Courage to Face COVID-19: Preventing Hospitalization and Death While Battling the Bio-Pharmaceutical Complex,” Dr. Peter McCullough, a cardiologist, and John Leake, a writer, learned that the “system” was set up by world leaders to render vaccination the primary reaction to the COVID-19 pandemic.

“This was absolutely telegraphed from the beginning,” McCullough said. “[In] 2010, Gates says it’s the decade of the vaccines. Later on, Gates announces at meetings that the return on investment of vaccines is 20-to-1 anything else that he’s done.

In a new interview with “American Thought Leaders” show, McCullough stated, “It is clear the system is juiced for a vaccine.”

McCullough was responding to a tweet from billionaire investor Bill Gates from 2010 that read: “Decade of Vaccines- a $10B, 10yr pledge for vaccine research, development & delivery.”

Gates informed CNBC’s Becky Quick on “Squawk Box” in 2019 from the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, that “We feel there’s been over a 20-to-1 return” on his $10 billion investment in vaccine development.

In his interview with McCullough, Leake asked why the COVID vaccines, which were produced quickly, were marketed as safe and hailed as the only answer to the pandemic, while effective alternative and off-label treatments were vilified.

“What we discovered in our research and what we map out in our book is that this was being planned for, well in advance,” Leake said.

He also chastised Gates for his vaccine addiction.

Bill Gates attends a press conference on the sidelines of the World Economic Forum’s annual meeting in Davos, Switzerland, on May 25, 2022. (Fabrice Coffrini/AFP via Getty Images)

“[Gates] seems to have sort of shifted his monopolistic spirit from the software business to the vaccine business,” said Leake.

Gates is also the founder and major contributor to the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness and Innovation (CEPI), which was inaugurated in 2017 at the World Economic Forum. According to McCullough, the organization’s business strategy seems to be exclusively focused on the production of vaccinations, with no mention of alternate therapies for viral outbreaks.

According to CEPI, it pulls together heads of government, private businesses, and philanthropists to “accelerate” the production of vaccinations to avoid future “epidemics and pandemics,” as well as to guarantee that “all people in need” have access to these vaccinations.

Furthermore, one of Gates’ most recent initiatives in vaccine proliferation is his book, “How to Prevent the Next Pandemic.” According to McCullough, Gates makes the argument in the book for the establishment of a well-funded worldwide institution that would be overseen by the United Nations’ World Health Organization and whose duty it would be to hunt for and react to the world’s next outbreak.

According to McCullough, despite the fact that vaccines normally do very little to prevent disease from upper-respiratory infections, they were nonetheless promoted as the solution to the COVID-19 pandemic.

“There isn’t a single shot in the arm that does virtually anything for a respiratory illness,” McCullough said, adding that the COVID vaccines were introduced “with an implicit talking point, and the talking point is, ‘They are safe and they are effective, and you will take them.’ Period. No discussions after that. No official discussions on safety and efficacy, no guarantee for reevaluation, no monthly review of safety.”

According to McCullough, the safety was just accepted, even after a Chinese scientific report was released pointing out that the vaccination caused serious health concerns for individuals with preexisting health difficulties.

McCullough described the widespread use of vaccinations as a “biological catastrophe.”

Furthermore, the FDA attempted to conceal knowledge regarding the vaccines’ safety and efficacy by sealing the “Pfizer dossier,” which is around 500,000 pages of data outlining the important results in the vaccines’ development and deployment, for 55 years, according to McCullough.

The nonprofit Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit against the FDA, demanding that the dossier be publicly disclosed.

U.S. District Judge Mark Pittman ruled that the group’s FOIA petition was “of paramount public importance,” and he directed the FDA to produce 55,000 pages every month (read below).

From these documents, “we learned there were 1,223 deaths within 90 days of the release of the Pfizer program, worldwide. The standard is typically 50 deaths for some widely used product, [and it’s] taken off the market,” said McCullough.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) tracks vaccine-related deaths in its Vaccine Adverse Event Recording System (VAERS).

According to McCullough, 13,000 people died in the United States after getting the COVID vaccine.

“That is astounding,” he said. “We have never let a product run like this for this period of time without revisiting safety, without reporting safety, without even questioning safety, and death being the final outcome.”

McCullough also stated that the three primary vaccines have caused a myriad of nonfatal but substantial adverse effects, including heart damage, blood clots, and inflammatory disease.

“What I think a lot of the public didn’t understand is this is a completely novel technology,” said Leake. “These are genetic transfer technologies. You’re actually injecting messenger RNA that codes for the production of the spike protein, so this is Star Trek stuff.”

According to McCullough, the assertion that vaccinations minimize hospitalization and death is untrue.

He stated that there have been no comprehensive randomized trials with the active medicine and a placebo to demonstrate a reduction in hospitalization and death.

“None of the vaccines have had clinical trials done versus placebo with that composite endpoint,” said McCullough. “What’s happened over time is a false narrative that’s developed from observational data.”

There have been many “biased analyses by investigators and doctors and those in the biopharmaceutical complex who are invested in trying to promote the vaccines,” said McCullough.

This file photo shows a box of ivermectin tablets. (Carl D. Master/Shutterstock)

He went on to say that the assessments are based on incorrect and skewed data, which does not keep a record of vaccinated people who visit a hospital. Instead, everybody who comes into the hospital with a COVID illness is automatically considered unvaccinated.

“I can tell you those who’ve taken the vaccine are much more likely to have gotten early treatment, which really is the driver for reducing hospitalization and death,” said McCullough. He went on to say that while Gates, Anderson Cooper, and Vice President Kamala Harris have all been vaccinated, they have also taken Paxlovid, an early treatment for COVID-19.

According to Leake, the very same rigor and safety criteria that were adhered to early COVID treatment are completely neglected with the new messenger RNA vaccinations. “Suddenly, the methodology and the rigor of ascertaining safety and efficacy is just thrown out the window with the vaccine,” he said.

McCullough believes that if funds had been invested in offering high-risk individuals early treatments with hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin, the pandemic could have concluded much sooner.

McCullough also mentioned monoclonal antibodies, another safe and effective treatment that has been reduced in favour of vaccines.

Despite the fact that these early therapies function well, they are taken off the market, while vaccines, which have not been proven to be safe or effective, are pressed on the public as the answer for the pandemic, according to McCullough.

Leake and McCullough identified and reported a “monolithic vaccine solution” to all public health challenges.

“This is what these international foundations are: the Gates Foundation, the Rockefeller Foundation, and the Wellcome Trust. The big money guys have put all of their money on vaccines,” said Leake.

Their book explains how other government institutions, such as the National Institutes of Health, benefit from vaccinations and relationships with wealthy patrons.

“They actually had a meeting at Bill Gates’ grand house near Seattle back in 2000. For 20 years, they’ve been working together,” said Leake.

According to McCullough, there is a vaccine agenda in which the forces that be want everyone to continue getting vaccinated eternally.

“They have advanced it forward and there is at the same time an oblivion to safety, and it’s global,” said McCullough.

McCullough and Leake have stated that they would like to see all vaccine requirements abolished and all COVID-19 vaccines taken from the market for a complete safety and efficacy evaluation.

“We have been burned,” McCullough said. “This has been, in a sense, the crime of our lifetime, if not of all time, of mass vaccination of the world in the middle of a highly prevalent and evolving pandemic.”

Read the document below:

GreatGameIndia is being actively targeted by powerful forces who do not wish us to survive. Your contribution, however small help us keep afloat. We accept voluntary payment for the content available for free on this website via UPI, PayPal and Bitcoin.

© Copyright 2020 – GreatGameIndia

+++++++++++++++++++++++++

The Covid Plot Against Humanity

By Llewellyn H. Rockwell, Jr.

July 4, 2022

LewRockwell.com

The great historian and literature scholar Dr. Naomi Wolf has written the most important book of our times. She really nails it. After you read The Bodies of Others: The New Authoritarians, Covid-19 and the War Against the Human, you will understand the truly diabolical conspiracy that threatens the world with destruction. In an article a few weeks ago, I reviewed Robert Kennedy’s essential book The Real Anthony Fauci. Kennedy showed that Fauci’s efforts to promote global catastrophe and to profit from it go back decades. But Dr. Wolf goes even further. She shows how evil the forces of destruction really are.

She begins from the onset of the so-called “pandemic” early in 2020. That’s only a little more than two years ago, but the world before then was vastly different from what it is now. We have entered a new Dark Age. In Dr. Wolf’s career as a reporter and journalist, she knew for a while Chrystia Freeland, who became the Deputy Prime Minister of Canada. Dr. Wolf writes, “’Ms. Freeland was part of a small cadre of ‘influentials’ connected to the World Economic Forum. . .She and her peers, along with allied elites in other fields, eventually masterminded a crime against humanity unprecedented in our times—-a crime that involves the theft of assets and the destruction of cultures, as well as untold deaths.” “This book,” she says, “is about how we came to this harrowing civilizational crossroads—-engaged in a war against vast impersonal forces with limitless control over our lives for the freedoms we have taken for granted; how these forces seized upon two years of COVID-19 panic in sinister new ways; and how, yet, against overwhelming odds, we might still win.”

The argument Dr. Wolf makes for this far-reaching conclusion is simple and devastating. Human culture depends on contact between people. But our high and mighty masters want to keep us apart through lockdowns, government control of all our activities, and injecting harmful substances into us. “In these two years, the COVID-19 pandemic, which began unfolding with unprecedented global ‘lockdown’ in March 2020, has fundamentally remade human relations, capitalism, and culture in the West. No matter that in the past we had lived through far graver medical crises without passing thought of stopping all congregation, suspending the production of all culture, or compelling all healthy people to cover their faces, close their businesses and keep apart—-this time, the elites used the ‘crisis’ to shut down Western norms of liberty, the human-centered world, and civilization itself.

But what is our culture, which we once thought durable, to be replaced by? A world managed by machines and mediated by digital interfaces; a world predicated on cruelty, without human empathy as an organizing principle; a world in which national boundaries, cultures, and languages are drained of meaning, in which cultures embody only the goals of meta-national oligarchs, a world organized for the benefit of massive pharmaceutical companies, a few global tech giants, and technocrats. . .”

You might at first be inclined to wonder, “Is Dr. Wolf exaggerating? Didn’t the world face a real threat that required drastic action to combat? One way to answer this is to say that the “drastic” measures didn’t take enough account of the costs, both economic and psychic, that they imposed on the world’s population. But Dr. Wolf, with exemplary insight and courage, offers us a better answer that strikes to the heart of the danger that confronts us. The whole “threat’ was manufactured by the enemies of civilization in order to control us. “None of this is accidental. Nor does it have anything to do with ‘science.’ The data were soon widely available, and even in 2020 studies showed the ‘lockdowns’ and restrictions did not stop disease and often made health outcomes far worse. But the draconian measures did not stop.”

Dr. Wolf spells out in detail how lockdowns and masks destroy civilization. “How do you destroy civilization? One way a machine program could target human beings is by attacking and undoing the magical power of touch. One of the strongest diktats from the start of the pandemic was the demand for ‘distancing,’ that inorganic, awkward verb that was introduced in a new context, and redefined, early in the pandemic. The implications of the war on touch, more than two years on, are beyond tragic. Physical closeness is not an ‘extra’ for human beings. Without it we suffer from mental illnesses ranging from depression to anxiety and are even vulnerable to hallucinations and other forms of psychosis, as many studies have demonstrated. . .From a hug to a high-five, positive moments of human touch can calm the nervous system, boost mood and release endorphins, strengthen the immune system, and boost healing.”

Dr. Wolf issues a dire warning that she supports with irrefutable evidence. “The end goal is something much darker than a dark-enough world in which everyone is coercively vaccinated, whether they are at risk or not, whether they have immunity or not, a world in which ‘boosters’ for seven billion people annually are guaranteed forever. The end-goal, rather, is to ensure that our pre-March 2020 world disappears forever, irretrievable. To be replaced with a world in which all human endeavor is behind a digital paywall, and in which all of us ask the permission of technology to gain access to the physical world, access to culture and access to other human beings. . .The real goal has nothing to do with public health. The real goal is to destroy Western and human culture, and to replace it with a techno-fascistic culture—-a culture in which we have forgotten what human beings can do. The crime that was perpetrated during the pandemic years of 2020-22 was perhaps the greatest ever committed against humanity. And it is being perpetrated still.”

When Governor Andrew Cuomo put New York “on pause” in March 2020, Dr. Wolf and her husband reacted with astonishment. “Since we had both lived in combat zones and war areas, we knew that commerce was never closed, even in the worst crises. People needed to keep making their livings in order to survive the crisis, and the economy needed to be sustained in order for the community to survive the crisis. We both knew from the history of warfare that when people are forbidden to buy and sell, they can’t fight back. It is the death of their economy that kills them off or leads to their eventual enslavement or occupation.”

Why are the global elites doing these terrible things to us? In one of the most insightful passages of this always insightful book, Dr. Wolf explains that the elites think differently from the rest of us. “For others do always not think as we do. To understand such an immense crime, it is essential to grasp the thought processes of many political elites, of financial oligarchs, and of tech elites. . .To understand what is going on in the current lockstep of tyranny, we must understand that certain subcultures, certain leaders, and certain ideologies simply don’t have our core values at heart; and we must face the fact that these monsters are not just Nazis long dead or members of the CCP far away. Some monsters are very near to us. . .To understand 2020-22, it is essential to grasp that great evil need not arrive in the guise of a goose-stepping soldier, or an official knocking at your door wearing jackboots. To understand how COVID-19 policy can be so coordinated and so cruel and so neo-fascistic, we need to understand that human evil can come in the form of a well-dressed man or woman far removed from any traditional human or national loyalties or decencies but pleasantly passing the sherry.”

Let’s return to a question we asked before. Even if you don’t like masks and isolation, aren’t these needed to cope with a pandemic? Dr. Wolf not only knows the medical science we need to answer this question. She is also a scholar of English literature who has studied epidemics in history and literature. She says, “Tubercular people in the past were at times quarantined or sent to sanatoria, but never before in the history of dealing with serious airborne illness had the human race ‘distanced’ the healthy from one another in order to deal with the risk from this kind of pathogen. If ‘distancing’ and ‘masking’ had ‘worked’ with regard to serious airborne respiratory illnesses, why was this presumably tremendously important discovery now news only coincidentally with the onset of a brand-new illness in 2020? The question naturally arises: how did we deal with similar medical crises in the past? The answer: for all the devastation these crises brought, civilization and commerce were not brought to a standstill.”

Dr. Wolf tells us something about masks that clarifies and articulates the repulsion we feel for them. “In all cultures and at all times, masks have represented de-individuation and dehumanization. Thieves wear masks. Executioners wear black masks so their victims cannot see them. Torturers are masked. . .On the other side of the equation, masks allow for people to be more easily punished and victimized.”

But what about the “pandemic” itself? She is an expert on digital dashboards, and she argues that we cannot rely on data reported on them. “’Cases’ tabulated on a digital dashboard are not necessarily generated from actual tests that are generated from real human biological samples. ‘Deaths’ tabulated on a digital dashboard do not necessarily derive from any actual dead bodies recorded by real coroners in real hospital morgues or from funeral directors retrieving bodies from homes. A digital dashboard is simply a product of codes that counts data inputs in a certain way. It counts what the developer told it to count.”

As if all of this were not enough, “vaccine passports” pose an even greater danger to liberty. The global elite can use them to control all our movements. “This mechanism can also directly manage dissent. With a tweak of the backend, those who control the mechanism can be sure never to grant you a ‘rejoin society’ or ‘I don’t have COVID’ checkmark. You would be at the mercy of what the ‘passport’ says about your status. So if you’re a dissident, you can always be positive for COVID without much recourse to challenge it. And you’d be in a second-class category in society for the rest of your life. Your family would too.”

Dr. Wolf notes that many people have had enough. They resist masks, lockdowns, and medically unsafe and coerced “vaccines.” She mentions a number of heroes in the campaign against tyranny, including Steve Berger, a Board Member of the Mises Institute, who supplied her with “important research links, impactful analyses of his own, and read the manuscript”; but she has left one out. She herself is one of the most heroic battlers for liberty today. Her book is must reading and renders a great public service. Three cheers for Dr. Naomi Wolf!

[Blog Editor: Wolf’s book is entitled (Amazon link embedded): The Bodies of Others: The New Authoritarians, COVID-19 and The War Against the Human]

Llewellyn H. Rockwell, Jr. [send him mail], former editorial assistant to Ludwig von Mises and congressional chief of staff to Ron Paul, is founder and chairman of the Mises Institute, executor for the estate of Murray N. Rothbard, and editor of LewRockwell.com. He is the author of Against the State and . Follow him on Facebook and Twitter.

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Will Pfizer Be Charged for Mislabeling Vaccine Side Effects?

Jab Side Effects

Analysis by Dr. Joseph Mercola

July 5, 2022

Mercola.com

STORY AT-A-GLANCE

  • Pfizer classified almost all severe adverse events that occurred during its Phase 3 trials as unrelated to the injection. A 2,566-page document catalogues serious adverse events and six deaths during the trial. These events were all classified as “toxicity level 4,” which is the most serious, yet none of them was deemed related to the injection
  • Examples of Level 4 adverse events — all of which were written off as “not related” to the mRNA injection — include acute respiratory failure, cardiac arrest, brain abscess, adrenal carcinoma (adrenal cancer) and chronic myeloid leukemia (blood and bone marrow cancer)
  • Most Level 3 adverse events were also dismissed as unrelated to the shot. Only a small number were listed as related. Examples of Level 3 side effects include tachycardia (disruption of the normal electrical impulses that control your heart rate — the very problem that underlies most cases of “sudden adult death syndrome” or SADS) and ventricular arrhythmia (abnormal heart rhythm that makes the lower chambers twitch rather than pump — another underlying cause of SADS)
  • A reanalysis of data from the Pfizer and Moderna COVID vaccine trials found that, combined, Pfizer and Moderna mRNA COVID-19 jabs were associated with a risk increase of serious adverse events of special interest of 12.5 per 10,000 vaccinated. Meanwhile, the risk reduction for COVID-19 hospitalization was only 2.3 per 10,000 participants for Pfizer and 6.4 per 10,000 for Moderna
  • Whether intentional or not, mounting evidence now indicate the COVID-19 injections will result in depopulation through premature death and adverse effects on fertility in women and men alike. Research from Israel reveals the shot deteriorates sperm count and sperm motility in men for about three months post-jab

As the U.S. Food and Drug Administration continues to release Pfizer’s clinical trial documentation,1 we’re finding more and more evidence that very little has been done on the up-and-up, and the COVID jab trials may be among the most fraudulent in medical history.

Can All Serious Adverse Effects Be Written Off?

Importantly, Pfizer classified almost all severe adverse events that occurred during its Phase 3 trials as unrelated to the injection. As reported by The Defender, June 21, 2022:2

“The latest release by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine documents reveals numerous instances of participants who sustained severe adverse events during Phase 3 trials. Some of these participants withdrew from the trials, some were dropped and some died.

The 80,000-page document cache includes an extensive set of Case Report Forms (CRFs) from Pfizer Phase 3 trials conducted at various locations in the U.S., in addition to other documentation pertaining to participants in Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine trials in the U.S. and worldwide …

The CRFs included in this month’s documents contain often vague explanations of the specific symptoms experienced by the trial participants. They also reveal a trend of classifying almost all adverse events — and in particular severe adverse events (SAEs) — as being ‘not related’ to the vaccine.”

The Defender article includes 11 examples3 of trial participants who experienced severe adverse effects that were classified as “unrelated” to the experimental gene transfer technology they’d received just days or weeks earlier.

A 2,566-page document4 catalogues the serious adverse events and six deaths that occurred during the trial. These events were all classified as “toxicity level 4,” which is the most serious, yet none of them were deemed related to the injection.

This simply isn’t believable. It’s completely unrealistic, especially when serious events occur in multiple participants. A handful of examples of Level 4 adverse events listed in this document — all of which were written off as “not related” to the mRNA injection — include:5

  • Acute respiratory failure
  • Cardiac arrest
  • Brain abscess
  • Adrenal carcinoma (adrenal cancer)
  • Chronic myeloid leukemia (blood and bone marrow cancer)

The six deaths reported were listed as being caused by arteriosclerosis, cardiac arrest, hemorrhagic stroke and myocardial infarction.6 Many participants also dropped out or were excluded from the trial due to serious side effects involving the heart, cardiovascular system, cancer, stroke, hemorrhage and neurological impacts.

Examples of Level 3 Adverse Events

Most Level 3 adverse events were also dismissed as unrelated to the shot. As reported by The Defender, only a “small number” were listed as being related to the injection. Examples of Level 3 side effects include:7

  • Deafness/hearing loss
  • Ventricular arrhythmia (abnormal heart rhythm that makes the lower chambers twitch rather than pump — another underlying cause of SADS)
  • Neutropenia (low neutrophil level in your blood; neutrophils are a type of white blood cell made by your bone marrow that fight infections by destroying viruses and bacteria)
  • Vertigo

45% Experienced One or More Adverse Events

Another document8 that raises suspicions of bias is one admitting that “40% to 45% of participants who received BNT162b1 and BNT162b2 across age groups and across dose levels reported one or more AEs [adverse events] from Dose 1 through 28 days (i.e., 1 month) after Dose 2.”

BNT162b2 was the candidate injection that went on to receive Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) from the FDA. Among those who got the highest dose (30 micrograms) of BNT162b2, 50% of younger participants 25% in the older age group reported one or more adverse events.

The most common adverse events were nervous system disorders, followed by musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders. Yet despite high rates of side effects across dose levels, this document also insists that “most AEs were considered by the investigator as not related to study intervention.”

During the open-label period of the study, 12,006 participants were followed for a minimum of six months, and among those, 28.8% reported at least one adverse event at some point during that follow-up, and 2.1% reported one or more severe adverse events.

Incidence Rate in Treatment Group FAR Higher Than Placebo

As reported by The Defender:9

“The review provides data for participants from dose 3 … to the data cutoff date. The severe adverse event incidence rate (IR) was 6.0 per 100 PY (patient-years), with specific conditions reported including pulmonary embolisms, thrombosis, urticaria, a cerebrovascular accident and COVID-19 pneumonia.

Here, the review adds that the IR for original placebo participants who had at least 1 life-threatening AE from Dose 3 to the data cutoff date was 0.5 per 100 PY.

Only one such life-threatening event, an instance of anaphylactoid reaction, was considered to be related to the vaccination. Other life-threatening, serious adverse events included cardio-respiratory arrest, gastrointestinal necrosis, deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism …

Notably, according to the review, ‘all … events of facial paralysis were considered by the investigator as related to study intervention.” [Editor’s note: these specifically refer to events that occurred during the open-label follow-up period when BNT162b2 Dose 3 or Dose 4 was offered to both placebo and initial treatment groups.]

Young Children Have Extremely Low Risk of Death From COVID

Rumble VIDEO:  EUA amendment request for Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine for Children and Babies

[Blog Editor: I have no idea how Dr. Mercola embedded this video on his website because “ManuHerold” does not provide Rumble embed codes. The video is so good I’m uploading to my Bitchute Channel so I can embed it on my blogs.]

[Posted by ManuHerold 

Published June 21, 2022

HUGE AMOUNT OF INFO IN DESCRIPTION YOU SHOULD READ]

In the end, we all know what happened. Despite all the evidence to the contrary, Pfizer concluded the shot was safe and effective for everyone and the FDA went along with it. The vaccine manufacturers and the FDA have decided it isn’t even worth invoking the precautionary principle for the very youngest of children, which is nothing short of reprehensible, criminal maleficence.

In mid-June 2022, against strong objections from physicians, scientists and researchers, the FDA’s vaccine advisory panel — the Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC) — unanimously agreed to grant EUA to both Pfizer’s and Moderna’s COVID shots for infants and young children.10,11

Pfizer’s EUA is for a three-dose regimen (3-microgram shots) for children 6 months to 5 years old, while Moderna’s EUA is for a two-dose regimen (25-microgram shots) for children 6 months to 6 years.

According to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention,12 an estimated 75% of American children ages birth to 11 already have some level of immunity, having been exposed to one of the several variants that have come into circulation over the past two-plus years.

This immunity level alone makes EUA for COVID shots questionable. CDC data also prove young children have a very low risk of hospitalization and death from COVID, which makes the EUAs even more questionable.

Data13 published in mid-March 2022 suggest babies and young children under the age of 4 have had a peak hospitalization rate for COVID of 14.5 per 100,000. That peak occurred after Omicron became predominant. The hospitalization rate for the Delta variant in this age group was 2.9 per 100,000.

In all, since March 2020, a total of 2,562 infants and young children (6 months to 4 years) have been hospitalized WITH COVID. Of those, 2,068 had COVID listed as the primary reason for admission (84.7% of the total), and only 624 required ICU admission.

The median length of hospital stay was 1.5 days (range: one to three days). Of the 2,562 children with suspected COVID infection, 16 of them (0.6%) died in the hospital. Death certificate data push that number a bit higher. The Vaccine Reaction notes,14 “According to death certificate data,15 202 deaths have been attributed to COVID-19 among children 6 months to 4 years of age through May 11, 2022.”

While any death is tragic, it’s worth noting that 923 (35.8%) of the children hospitalized with suspected COVID also had one or more underlying medical conditions.16 We don’t know for sure, but it’s quite possible that those who died with a COVID diagnosis actually died from whatever underlying condition was present or had brought them to the hospital in the first place.

What I’m trying to say is that 16 to 202 deaths over two-plus years aren’t cause for panic, and that’s true even if COVID was the primary cause of those deaths. The likelihood of your child getting injured by the mRNA shot is undoubtedly significantly greater than their risk of dying from COVID.

Jab More Likely to Put You in the Hospital Than Keep You Out

The same is true for adults, by the way. A June 2022 analysis17,18 of Pfizer and Moderna trial data found the shots are more likely to put you in the hospital than keep you out of it. As reported by The Daily Sceptic:19

“A new paper20 by BMJ Editor Dr. Peter Doshi and colleagues has analyzed data from the Pfizer and Moderna COVID vaccine trials and found that the vaccines are more likely to put you in hospital with a serious adverse event than keep you out by protecting you from COVID.

The pre-print (not yet peer-reviewed) focuses on serious adverse events highlighted in a WHO-endorsed ‘priority list21 of potential adverse events relevant to COVID-19 vaccines.’ The authors evaluated these serious adverse events of special interest as observed in ‘phase III randomized trials of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines’ …

Dr. Doshi and colleagues found that the Pfizer and Moderna mRNA COVID-19 vaccines were associated with an increased risk of serious adverse events of special interest of 10.1 events per 10,000 vaccinated for Pfizer and 15.1 events per 10,000 vaccinated for Moderna …

When combined, the mRNA vaccines were associated with a risk increase of serious adverse events of special interest of 12.5 per 10,000 vaccinated … The authors note that this level of increased risk post-vaccine is greater than the risk reduction for COVID-19 hospitalization in both Pfizer and Moderna trials, which was 2.3 per 10,000 participants for Pfizer and 6.4 per 10,000 for Moderna.

This means that on this measure, the Pfizer vaccine results in a net increase in serious adverse events of 7.8 per 10,000 vaccinated and the Moderna vaccine of 8.7 per 10,000 vaccinated.”

Doshi’s team wasn’t the first to reanalyze Pfizer’s trial data. The Canadian COVID Care Alliance has also published a clear and easy-to-read summary22 of the Pfizer trial results, and the many questions raised by it. As noted by Dr. Robert Malone:23

“The bottom line is that the Pfizer Phase 3 trial which was used by NIAID [the National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases], FDA and CDC to justify the emergency use authorization is pretty much a junk clinical trial which was inappropriately halted long before it even got close to meeting the intended follow up period, did not provide a sufficiently long follow up analysis of vaccination-associated adverse events, and in which the control group was intentionally eliminated.

This resulted in basically erasing any opportunity to ever get to the bottom of what the major true risks of the Pfizer mRNA inoculations were. In terms of more minor risks, the study was not powered (not big enough) to evaluate those.”

FDA and CDC Have Neglected Important Duties

Doshi and his coauthors also note the FDA also watered down results by including “thousands of additional participants with very little follow-up, of which the large majority had only received one dose.”

They then further diluted the appearance of risk by counting only the number of people affected rather than counting the total number of individual adverse events. This makes a big difference, as twice as many people in the treatment group reported multiple serious adverse events, as compared to the placebo group.

The FDA and CDC have both also failed to produce promised follow-up investigations. In July 2021, now a full year ago, the FDA said it would investigate four “potential adverse events of interest following Pfizer vaccination,” namely pulmonary embolism, acute myocardial infarction, immune thrombocytopenia and disseminated intravascular coagulation, but to date, no update has been issued.

Similarly, in early 2021, the CDC published a protocol on how to use proportional reporting ratios to detect signals in the U.S. Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), but no study or report showing what that protocol might have found has ever been published.

As it turns out, the CDC hasn’t been looking for safety signals in VAERS — not with the proportional ratios protocol or any other. So, while they’ve publicly claimed they haven’t seen any signals of concern, the reason they haven’t seen any signals is very simple: They never looked at the data!24

That’s how ridiculous things are now. When a drug company or health agency claims they haven’t found a problem, you actually have to ask them, “where, when, how and how often did you look?” But of course, virtually no one would ever ask such questions because they would assume these agencies are competent, which of course is a false assumption.

Their Fraudulent Behavior Could Be Their Undoing

As you probably know, the makers of the COVID shots are indemnified against legal liability for any injuries and all deaths stemming from their products. No one is able to sue them for damages.

“Whether intentional or not, mounting evidence now indicate the COVID-19 injections will result in depopulation through premature death and adverse effects on fertility in women and men alike.”

The only way to hold them responsible is to prove they’ve committed fraud. This would remove their liability immunity. As detailed at the beginning of the article, their consciously choosing to miscategorize adverse events during the initial trials and concealing the harms should be a slam dunk to convict them of fraud.

But there is also another fact they concealed: There’s evidence showing they knew the mRNA doesn’t stay in the injection site but, rather, distributes throughout the body,25 and this too could be a smoking gun that proves fraud. If convicted of fraud, Pfizer, Moderna and Janssen would likely face liabilities in the trillions of dollars in damages.

When I exposed Merck’s Vioxx scandal in 1999 in this newsletter, before they even released their drug on the market, I thought that was huge. Their drug killed more than 60,000 people, and they could have been liable for $25 billion in damages, but their clever lawyers reduced it to $5 billion.

Well, that catastrophe is a drop in the bucket compared to the COVID scam, which has likely killed between 600,000 and 750,000 Americans, disabled as many as 5 million, and injured an estimated 30 million Americans in one way or another.26,27 That’s just the estimated toll in the U.S., so you can imagine what the global numbers might be. It’s a catastrophe of unprecedented proportions. A June 2022 survey by Steve Kirsch also found:28

  • 6.6% of COVID jabbed respondents suffered heart injury (about 10 million Americans, based on the national vaccination rate)
  • 6.3% had to be hospitalized for their side effects (another 10 million Americans)
  • 9.2% of those who took the jab had to seek medical help for their injury, which translated over the whole country would be about 18 million doctor’s visits
  • People who got the shot were more likely to die from COVID than the unvaccinated
  • 2.63% of the responders had lost someone in their household to COVID infection, and 2.03% had lost someone in their household to the COVID jab

Expect Depopulation

Whether intentional or not, mounting evidence now indicates the COVID-19 injections will result in depopulation through premature death and adverse effects on fertility in women and men alike. I’ve previously discussed the risk of pregnancy loss and infertility in women who get the shot, as the mRNA has an affinity for accumulating in the ovaries29 (as well as the adrenals, liver and bone marrow).

Research30,31 from Israel now also reveals the shot deteriorates sperm count and sperm motility in men for about three months. Considering the multidose mRNA shots are recommended at three-month intervals, you can see how this can really decimate a man’s prospects of fathering a child.

Fertility has been on a steady decline for decades in most parts of the world,32 but the worldwide COVID jab campaign may massively speed that up. Germany recently released data showing a 10% decline in birth rate during the first quarter of 2022.33

Germany First Quarter Births By Year 2011-2022

Other countries are also seeing a drop in birth rate, nine months after the start of the mass vaccination campaign against COVID. Between January and April 2022, Switzerland’s birth rate was 15% lower than expected, the U.K.’s was down by 10% and Taiwan’s was down 20%.34

What punishment could possibly be appropriate for company heads and health agency leaders responsible for causing massive depopulation worldwide through products that were based on fraudulent science and fictional claims? I doubt if there’s enough money in the world to set that right.

Future Trials To Be Skipped Altogether

As if matters weren’t already beyond horrible, the FDA is considering allowing manufacturers to reformulate their COVID injections in perpetuity without conducting any additional clinical trials!35 In other words, they’d allow drug companies to change the mRNA and/or other ingredients without any safety or efficacy testing whatsoever. As reported by Toby Rogers, Ph.D., in a June 27, 2022, article in The Defender:36

“FDA released a briefing document37 in connection with this scheme to end science as we know it in connection with future COVID-19 shots … The briefing document is 18 pages of text, 1.5 line spacing, with just 19 references — 9 of which are pre-prints or from the CDC’s in-house newsletter Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR) which means they are not peer-reviewed.

Any true believer in The Narrative(TM) could have written this in a few hours. To base the entire future of COVID-19 shots on this glorified undergrad term paper is madness …

The core argument of the briefing document is hilarious (or rather, it would be hilarious if it was not a plan to permanently institutionalize genocide and hide the evidence). In several places the FDA argues (colloquialisms mine):

1. These COVID-19 shots work great … Boosters too, total home run, the Israelis even have 10-weeks of data showing that they might help old people. What more evidence could you want?

2. Okay, well, it depends on what you mean by ‘work.’ These shots do not stop infection, transmission, hospitalization, or death, even though that’s why we licensed them. Any protection wears off fairly quickly, but It’s Not Our Fault(TM) because This Wily Virus(TM) mutates too fast and no one told us that it would ever mutate.

3. So these shots must be reformulated but we cannot possibly ask Lord Pharma to do proper clinical trials ever again because we already know that these shots work great (see point #1)!”

In short, the FDA argues that since there are time constraints, evaluation of effectiveness must rely on “measures other than actual health outcomes.” In other words, whether the shots actually lower your risk of severe illness, hospitalization and death will have no bearing.

The only measure they’ll take into account is whether or not the jab triggers a rise in antibody levels, which has never been proven to be beneficial. If anything, the increase in COVID antibodies actually increases your risk of infection. This also means that as long as antibody levels are through the roof, the death rate could be just about anything, because it’s not part of the safety equation.

Faith in Magic Has Officially Replaced Science

As noted by Rogers,38 “The ‘Future Framework’ is a plan to base the entire COVID-19 vaccine program on magical thinking rather than science.” Indeed, Dr. Deborah Birx recently confirmed that the whole vaccine push has been based in faith in magic.39

June 23, 2022, Birx answered questions from the House Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Crisis. Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, asked whether the government was lying or guessing when they stated that vaccinated individuals couldn’t catch or spread COVID. At first, she claimed she didn’t know, but when pressed, she replied, “I think it was hope that the vaccine would work in that way.”40

So, the government issued mandates and made unequivocal, absolute statements that were not allowed to be questioned because they HOPED the shots would work a certain way — all while insisting they were the ones following and trusting the science and anyone who questioned their logic was a dangerous nut job. Let that sink in. Hope is literally the diametrical opposite of science.

It’s an Insiders’ Plot

As explained by Rogers, the same old players are behind this brazen attempt to eliminate the need for clinical trials: CDC staffers, academics who are in the pockets of Bill Gates and the NIAID, the drug companies themselves and the World Health Organization. Rogers writes:41

“I did not understand until just yesterday (as I started to write this article) that this entire ‘Future Framework’ is actually coming from the WHO. The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation is the biggest voluntary contributor to the WHO. So Gates is likely directing the play.

Gates requires that WHO use the McKinsey consulting firm so this is probably a McKinsey operation (and McKinsey also works for Pharma so this is a huge conflict of interest). As Naomi Wolf points out, the involvement of the WHO also raises troubling questions about the influence of the Chinese Communist Party over this process.

As far back as January, the WHO/Gates/McKinsey junta realized that these shots were terrible and so they decided to use that as an opportunity to seize even more power and control.

The WHO set up a Technical Advisory Group on COVID-19 Vaccine Composition (TAG-CO-VAC) to implement these Orwellian ‘Future Frameworks’ across the developed world to lower manufacturing costs for Pharma and avoid bothersome health data that might hurt profits. All the messaging we have seen from the FDA and leaked to the press was initially developed and released by TAG-CO-VAC.”

No doubt, we live in unprecedented, precarious times. Logic, reason, science and sanity itself has been tossed aside by those who claim the right to make decisions for all mankind. If the FDA goes forward with this “Future Framework” scheme, the only safe assumption is that COVID shots will become more and more dangerous.

Worse, we can expect other vaccines and drugs to be allowed on the market without clinical trials as well. It truly could change the science of medicine as we know it.

Of course the WHO also wants to seize control over health care worldwide, which would eliminate medical rights everywhere. It’s a nightmare scenario with no end in sight as of yet. All we can do is continue to push back, to inform ourselves, to speak out, share facts and data, and refuse to comply with unscientific recommendations based on little more than hope in fabricated conclusions.

Sources and References

1 PHMPT.org Pfizer Documents Released by FDA

2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 9 The Defender June 21, 2022

4 PHMPT.org 16.2.7.1 Adverse Events Legend

8 PHMPT.org 2.5 Clinical Overview for BNT162b2

10 The Defender June 15, 2022

11, 14 The Vaccine Reaction June 21, 2022

12 CDC MMWR April 29, 2022; 71(17): 606-608

13, 16 CDC MMWR March 18, 2022; 71(11): 429-436

15 FDA. Briefing Document on EUA amendment request for Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine for use in children 6 months […]. VRBPAC Meeting June 15, 2022

17, 20 SSRN June 23, 2022

18, 23 Robert Malone Substack June 22, 2022

19 The Daily Sceptic June 22, 2022

21 SPEAC October 26, 2021

22 Canadian COVID Care Alliance, More Harm Than Good

24 Jackanapes Substack June 16, 2022

25, 29 Paul Alexander Substack June 27, 2022

26 the New American June 27, 2022

27, 28 Steve Kirsch Substack June 25, 2022

30 Andrology June 17, 2022 DOI: 10.111/andr.13209

31 Expose June 26, 2022

32 Bloomberg June 21, 2022

33 Twitter Jikkyleaks June 26, 2022

34 SWPRS June 2022

35, 36, 38, 41 The Defender June 27, 2022

37 FDA Briefing Document June 28, 2022

39, 40 Daily Caller June 23, 2022

My latest book, “The Truth About COVID-19,” is an instant bestseller. After thousands of reviews it has a nearly perfect 5-star rating, so grab your copy today before it’s too late!

© 1997-2022 Dr. Joseph Mercola. All Rights Reserved.

+++++++++++++++++++++++++

Rumble VIDEO: Dr David Martin outlines what’s in his upcoming 6th of July trial against the deepstate + so much more

Posted by ShatteringTheMatrix

Published June 30, 2022

USAwatchdog.com

https://www.fullyliveacademy.com/

https://prosecutenow.io/

ShatteringTheMatrix@protonmail.com

https://t.me/ShatteringTheMatrix

https://www.buymeacoffee.com/ShatterMatrix

ko-fi.com/shatteringthematrix

If you find it in your heart, please consider supporting me on one
of these channels so I can continue to bring you up to date information
on all thing’s regarding The Great Awakening 💚

Mr. Bill’s Ugly-Dark Neighborhood


John R. Houk, Blog Editor

May 25, 2022

The Globalist-Fascist(Corporatist)-Marxists are so full of confident hubris about their future World-Wide Rule, they have no fear about sharing details of their global takeover ending sovereign nations. AND IN AMERICA’s case, our U.S. Constitution (which already has become pretty fractured already by Dem-Marxists, RINOs and a Leftist Activist Judicial System).

One example among many: Bill Gates’ new book, “How to Prevent the Next Pandemic.” Get ready for a dose of tyranny you will be told to like and obey.

JRH 5/25/22

READER SUPPORTED! I need Readers willing to chip in $5 – $10 – $25 – $50 – $100. I need your generosity. PLEASE GIVE to overcome research expenses:

Please Support NCCR

Big Tech Censorship is pervasive – Share voluminously on all social media platforms!

**************************

Bill Gates: The Psychopath As Philanthropist

The Microsoft founder wants to own your DNA but, don’t worry, it’s for your own good!

By Emerald Robinson

May 25, 2022

Emerald Robinson’s The Right Way

There’s a joke being told in my house this week: Jeffrey Epstein’s best friend, a little-known and slightly autistic high school dropout named Bill Gates has a new book out this month. Perhaps you’ve heard of him?

Unfortunately, of course, we have all heard of him.

From Borneo to Boston, the entire world is only too familiar with the man who wants to inject you into the future. Bill Gates is the front man — the public face — of Big Pharma’s global COVID tyranny. Lockdowns? He loves them! Booster shots forever? He thinks it’s a smart idea! Germ warfare simulations? Sign him up! There’s no dystopian technological overreach that Gates won’t enthusiastically endorse. He would have already harvested your DNA and stuck it in a Shenzhen genome sequencing machine — if not for the pesky issue of, you know, human rights.

Who else would be dumb enough to evangelize that all of the world’s problems could be solved with the tip of a syringe? That’s an idiotic message because it’s so obviously untrue. Gates doesn’t have any interest in people shaping their own future — he wants to shape your future, and he would really appreciate it if you’d get out of the way. His unlimited faith in science and technology — which is the crudest form of religion for materialists — has merged seamlessly with his unlimited faith in himself so that it’s hard to tell where the monomaniacal narcissism and the philanthropic pretenses begin and end in the Universe of Bill.

Of course the problem with the Universe of Bill Gates is that it contains a massive black hole at the center — which is his personality. He has always had a very big problem as a vaccine evangelist: he has never understood how much he strikes other people as abnormally creepy.

Depopulation Bill Gates

This is not simply my personal opinion. It’s the common opinion of people who have never met Gates personally — but have read his books or watched his speeches.

Here’s Jeffrey Tucker reviewing Gates’ latest book just this week:

Imagine yourself sidled up to a bar. A talkative guy sits down on the stool next to you. He has decided that there is one thing wrong with the world. It can be literally anything. Regardless, he has the solution.

It’s interesting and weird for a few minutes. But you gradually come to realize that he is actually crazy. His main point is wrong and so his solutions are wrong too. But the drinks are good, and he is buying. So you put up with it. In any case, you will forget the whole thing in the morning.

In the morning, however, you realize that he is one of the world’s richest men and he is pulling the strings of many of the world’s most powerful people.

Now you are alarmed.

In a nutshell, that’s what it’s like to read Bill Gates’s new book…

Jeffrey Tucker didn’t come away from reading the book thinking that Gates was well-meaning but misinformed — or basically good but flawed —he came away thinking Gates was crazy. This turns out to be a recurring theme among people who deal the co-founder of Microsoft.

A journalist named James Corbett also reviewed the same book recently and found it “every bit as infuriating, nauseating, ridiculous, laughable and risible” as you would imagine. “There is certainly nothing of scientific or medical value in here,” according to Corbett. “There’s nothing even interesting here. It’s a baffling book even from a propagandistic perspective.” He sums up the book by saying: “Just when you thought you’d gotten rid of him, like a canker sore in the mouth of humanity, Bill Gates pops up yet again.”

So that’s two bad book reviews. The funny thing is that most of the world’s population now shares the same feelings about Bill Gates that these two book reviewers have — and none of us have even read the book.

That’s because Bill Gates is a new kind of villain: he’s a psychopath pretending to be a philanthropist.

If you thought that Bill Gates might do the sensible thing, and keep a low profile after his wife pursued a nasty and public divorce over his ties to an international pedophile sex trafficking ring — you would be wrong. Being sensible is for ordinary psychopaths who are concerned about exposure, and can sense reputational danger. But if you’re a psychopath who is also the world’s third wealthiest human being and “on the spectrum” you probably don’t understand what exposure means because you’re not really in touch with human morality in any fundamental sense.

After all, you capture — or, if you prefer, “influence” or “invest” or “collaborate” or whatever the global elite likes to call legalized bribery this week! — entire foreign governments and international non-government organizations from Monday to Friday every week. Basically, you think you’re God — and nobody you’ve bought (and that’s practically everybody) wants to dissuade you from that feeling.

So you don’t even bother taking a break from your busy schedule of pretending to be the world’s leading TV expert on pandemics — because you’re too busy blocking out the sun, and buying up America’s farmland, and signing deals with Chinese DNA harvesting firms, and teaching Seattle schoolkids that math is racist.

And when you need a little R&R in your spare time, you don’t just hang out with the kind of friends that ordinary psychopaths collect — no way! — you spend your time with the world’s most infamous pedophile. I mean: you’re a trailblazer, and you only want to associate with other innovators — am I right? And when the little people start to wonder why you were hanging out (37 times!) with the world’s most infamous pedophile five years after that pedophile was forced to register as a sex offender you actually come up with the dumbest excuse in the history of mankind: you claim that you were simply trying to win the Nobel Peace Prize!

Of course, your own ex-wife would beg to differ.

That’s what makes Bill Gates special among billionaire psychopaths: his excuses are so childish and stupid that you would have to be autistic yourself to believe them.

In fact, his body language is so telling and awful in his frequent TV guest appearances that experts have a field day explaining his gestures and his sudden loss of speech whenever he’s questioned about Jeffrey Epstein or vaccine safety.

But does that stop Bill Gates from doing more TV interviews? Of course not. Only Bill Gates can stop Bill Gates — and you wouldn’t be Bill Gates if thought that Bill Gates could be stopped.

He will tell you that he’s simply the victim of wild conspiracy theories — and he will say that right after he tells you that he cannot recall why he flew on Jeffrey Epstein’s plane when he owns a bigger plane himself! And that lame excuse might come right after he explains that he has no idea why he was secretly donating millions of dollars to MIT using Epstein as a cut-out! And, furthermore, he really has absolutely not the faintest clue why Jeffrey Epstein would name the Gates Foundation’s science advisor as the trustee to his will right before his death!

Normal people might have questions about these obvious evasions of reality. Questions like: why did his divorce from Melinda Gates coincide with the incarceration of Ghislaine Maxwell? Why does a high school dropout tech geek with no medical experience get to pretend that’s he’s in charge of global health policy? And why is Bill Gates the only friend of Jeffrey Epstein who gets pretend that he was “taking meetings to win the Nobel Peace Prize” when every other friend of Jeffrey Epstein is basically in hiding because “those meetings” with Jeffrey Epstein were obviously to rape children?

When Bill Gates has a moment to explain it, Prince Andrew would like a word.

Youtube VIDEO: Bill Gates’s INCREDIBLY AWKWARD Interview – Is He Hiding Something??

[Posted by Russell Brand

Posted on Oct 4, 2021

MORE DESCRIPTION]

Bill Gates doesn’t have to answer to Prince Andrew, of course, because he doesn’t have to answer to anyone — he’s too busy buying public opinion to answer to it. If American corporate media gets too interested in Bill’s “Peace Prize meetings” then he will just buy the American corporate media — or start his own with George Soros and Katie Couric! If global warming becomes a major issue, Bill Gates will just block out the sun! If there’s too much carbon in the atmosphere, Bill Gates has got a solution.

Just remember: you are the carbon that the climate change zealotswant to reduce.

You know what I’m talking about. A COVID virus pandemic breaks out globally, and Bill Gates is perfectly positioned to “rescue us” with experimental and ineffective vaccines. We find out that he’s the largest private owner of farmland in the United States and a global food shortage begins. We find out that there’s a baby formula shortage in the United States— and Gates is suddenly an investor in synthetic baby formula made in a lab.

Are you starting to sense a pattern yet?

What are the odds that Bill Gates is involved in the monkeypox virus? What are the chances that he’s collaborating or investing or partnering or subsidizing some researcher right now who will discover a vaccine about ten minutes after the monkeypox arrives on the front page of every newspaper in the world? Gates is already warning about the next pandemic before the next pandemic even arrives — and sometimes the vaccines even arrive at the same time the virus does!

That’s what happens in the Universe of Bill from time to time: the solution gets released before the problem does. Rest assured: those bugs are being fixed in the next germ warfare simulation. The global elites will run the monkeypox virus much better than the COVID virus.

Don’t worry: your new vaccine booster is on the way.

The future is a scary place but the world’s leading philanthropist will lead the way.

There’s no need to worry: Bill Gates has thought of everything.

ANNOY A LIBERAL SUPPORT EMERALD!

© 2022 Emerald Robinson

+++++++++++++++++++

Bill Gates Lays Out Plan for Global Takeover

Analysis by Dr. Joseph Mercola

May 25, 2022

Mercola.com

Rumble VIDEO: The Corbett Report MAY 10, 2022: I READ BILL GATES’ NEW BOOK (SO YOU DON’T HAVE TO!)

[Posted by The Corbett Report

Published May 10, 2022

MORE DESCRIPTION]

STORY AT-A-GLANCE

  • The World Health Organization is attempting to seize control over global pandemic monitoring and response and, ultimately, all health care decisions
  • Bill Gates intends to play a key part in this takeover. He’s building a pandemic response team for the WHO, dubbed the “Global Epidemic Response & Mobilization” or GERM Team, which will have the authority to monitor nations and make pandemic response decisions, such as when to suspend civil liberties to prevent spread of an illness
  • The globalist cabal plans to seize control through biosecurity governance, and they’re attempting to do this using two different avenues. If we fail to fight off both attacks, we’ll end up under totalitarian governance
  • The first attack comes in the form of amendments to the International Health Regulations (IHR), which are currently being voted on by the World Health Assembly. These amendments will strip member nations of their sovereignty and give the WHO unprecedented power to restrict your medical freedoms and civil liberties in the name of biosecurity. Get involved and urge your nation’s leaders to reject the amendments if passed. Unless rejected, they will become binding law in November 2022
  • The second attack comes through a new international pandemic treaty with the WHO. They intend to eliminate individualized medicine and provide blanket rulings for how a given threat is to be addressed, and this can only result in needless suffering — not to mention the loss of individual freedom

In “The Corbett Report” above,1 independent journalist James Corbett reviews the contents of Bill Gates’ book, “How to Prevent the Next Pandemic.”

“It’s every bit as infuriating, nauseating, ridiculous, laughable and risible as you would expect,” he says. “This is a ridiculous book … There’s certainly nothing of medical or scientific value in here … It’s a baffling book even from a propagandistic perspective …

Gates’ goal in writing the book is to disarm the public and prepare us to accept the agenda that Gates and his allies would like to impose on the world. Ultimately, what this is about is drumming up general public support — or at least general public understanding — of the unfolding biosecurity agenda.”

Another reviewer of Gates’ book, economist Jeffrey Tucker, offered similarly negative feedback:2

“Imagine yourself sidled up to a bar. A talkative guy sits down on the stool next to you. He has decided that there is one thing wrong with the world. It can be literally anything. Regardless, he has the solution.

It’s interesting and weird for a few minutes. But you gradually come to realize that he is actually crazy. His main point is wrong and so his solutions are wrong too. But the drinks are good, and he is buying. So you put up with it. In any case, you will forget the whole thing in the morning.

In the morning, however, you realize that he is one of the world’s richest men and he is pulling the strings of many of the world’s most powerful people. Now you are alarmed. In a nutshell, that’s what it’s like to read Bill Gates’s new book ‘How to Prevent the Next Pandemic.’”

Gates’ Book Chapter by Chapter

Corbett goes through Gates’ book chapter by chapter, so if you’re short on time, you can review the ones that interest you the most:

Chapter 1: Learn from COVID (timestamp: 12:58)

Chapter 2: Create a pandemic prevention team (timestamp: 18:23)

Chapter 3: Get better at detecting outbreaks early (timestamp: 26:21)

Chapter 4: Help people protect themselves right away (timestamp: 31:01)

Chapter 5: Find new treatments fast (timestamp: 37:26)

Chapter 6: Get ready to make vaccines (timestamp: 39:46)

Chapter 7: Practice, practice, practice (timestamp: 47:06)

Chapter 8: Close the health gap between rich and poor countries (timestamp: 50:49)

Chapter 9: Make — and fund — a plan for preventing pandemics (timestamp: 57:40)

Afterword: How COVID changed the course of our digital future (timestamp: 1:03:00)

Gates GERM Team

[I found the] Youtube version VIDEO: Kim Iversen: Lockdowns For Life? Bill Gates Reveals Alarming Plan To Prevent Future Pandemics

[Posted by The Hill

Posted May 4, 2022

MORE DESCRIPTION]

By now, you’ve probably heard that the World Health Organization is attempting to seize control over global pandemic monitoring and response, and ultimately, all health care decisions. But did you know Bill Gates, the largest funder of the WHO (if you combine funding from his foundation and GAVI), also intends to play a key part in this takeover?

As Gates explains in a video at the beginning of Corbett’s report, he’s building a pandemic response team for the WHO, dubbed the “Global Epidemic Response & Mobilization” or GERM Team. This team will be made up of thousands of disease experts under WHO’s purview, and will monitor nations and make decisions about when to suspend civil liberties to prevent spread of an illness.3

Alas, as noted by “Rising” host Kim Iversen in the video compilation above, if COVID-19 has taught us anything, it’s that stopping the spread of a virus is more or less impossible, no matter how draconian the rules. Meanwhile, the side effects of lockdowns and business shutdowns are manifold.

People’s health has suffered from lack of health care. Depression and suicide have skyrocketed. Economies have gone bust. Violent crime has risen. Tucker also points out the false premise behind Gates’ pandemic prevention plan, stating:4

“This theory of virus control — the notion that muscling the population makes a prevalent virus shrink into submission and disappear — is a completely new invention, the mechanization of a primitive instinct.

Smallpox occupies a unique position among infectious diseases as the only one affecting humans that has been eradicated. There are reasons for that: a stable pathogen, a great vaccine, and a hundred years of focused public health work. This happened not due to lockdowns but from the careful and patient application of traditional public-health principles.

[T]he attempt to crush a respiratory virus through universal avoidance could be worse than allowing endemicity to it to develop throughout the population.”

Gates’ Destructive Greed

During COVID, we basically traded false protection against one thing for a multitude of other ills that are far worse in the long run. Now, Gates and the WHO want to make this disastrous strategy the norm.

Once again, we see Gates is basically paying the WHO to dictate what the world must do to make him a ton of money, because he’s always heavily invested in the very “solutions” he presents to the world. While he’s built a reputation as a philanthropist, his actions are self-serving, and more often than not, the recipients of his “generosity” end up worse than they were before.

Case in point: After 15 years, Gates’ Green Revolution in Africa (AGRA) project has now been proven an epic fail.5 Gates promised the project would “double yields and incomes for 30 million farming households by 2020.”

That false prognosis was deleted from the AGRA website in June 2020, after a Tuft University assessment revealed hunger had actually increased by 31%. February 28, 2022, the first-ever evaluation report6 confirmed the failure of AGRA.

The Globalists’ Double-Prong Attack on National Sovereignty

But getting back to the globalists’ plan to seize global control through biosecurity governance, they are attempting to do this using two different avenues. If we fail to fight off both attacks, we’ll end up under totalitarian governance.

The first attack comes in the form of amendments7 to the International Health Regulations (IHR). The second attack comes through a new international pandemic treaty with the WHO.

Starting with the first takeover strategy, as you read this, countries around the world are in the process of voting on amendments to the IHR.8 By May 28, 2022, the World Health Assembly will have concluded their vote on these amendments and, if passed, they will be enacted into international law in November 2022.

The IHR, adopted in 2005, is what empowers the WHO to declare a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC).9 This is a special legal category that allows the WHO to initiate certain contracts and procedures, including drug and vaccine contracts. While the IHR grants the WHO exceptional power over global health policy already, under the current rules, member states must consent to the WHO’s recommendations.

This is one key feature that is up for revision. Under the new amendments, the WHO would be able to declare a PHEIC in a member state over the objection of that state. The amendments also include ceding control to WHO regional directors authorized to declare a Public Health Emergency of Regional Concern (PHERC).

In summary, the IHR amendments establish “a globalist architecture of worldwide health surveillance, reporting and management,” Robert Malone, Ph.D., warns,10 and we the public have no say in the matter.

We have no official avenue for providing feedback to the World Health Assembly, even though the amendments will give the WHO unprecedented power to restrict our rights and freedoms in the name of biosecurity. There’s not even a publicly available list of who the delegates are or who will vote on the amendments.

Summary of Proposed IHR Amendments

A summary of the proposed changes to the IHR was recently provided by Malone.11 In all, the WHO wants to amend 13 different IHR articles (articles 5, 6, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 15, 18, 48, 49, 53 and 59), the end result of which is the following:12

1. “Increased surveillance — Under Article 5, the WHO will develop early warning criteria that will allow it to establish a risk assessment for a member state, which means that it can use the type of modeling, simulation, and predictions that exaggerated the risk from COVID-19 over two years ago. Once the WHO creates its assessment, it will communicate it to inter-governmental organizations and other member states.

2. 48-hour deadline — Under Articles 6, 10, 11, and 13, a member state is given 48 hours to respond to a WHO risk assessment and accept or reject on-site assistance. However, in practice, this timeline can be reduced to hours, forcing it to comply or face international disapproval lead by the WHO and potentially unfriendly member states.

3. Secret sources — Under Article 9, the WHO can rely on undisclosed sources for information leading it to declare a public health emergency. Those sources could include Big Pharma, WHO funders such as the Gates Foundation and the Gates-founded-and-funded GAVI Alliance, as well as others seeking to monopolize power.

4. Weakened sovereignty — Under Article 12, when the WHO receives undisclosed information concerning a purported public health threat in a member state, the Director-General may (not must) consult with the WHO Emergency Committee and the member state. However, s/he can unilaterally declare a potential or actual public health emergency of international concern.

The Director General’s authority replaces national sovereign authority. This can later be used to enforce sanctions on nations.”

Once the amendments are adopted by the World Health Assembly, nations will have only a limited time — six months — to reject them. That would put us into November 2022. Any nation which hasn’t officially rejected the amendments will then be legally bound by them, and any attempt to reject them after the six-month grace period will be null and void.

Attack No. 2: The WHO Pandemic Treaty

The second attempt to gain global control is through an international pandemic treaty with the WHO. An intergovernmental negotiating body (INB) was established as a subdivision of the World Health Assembly in December 2021,13 for the purpose of drafting and negotiating this new pandemic treaty.

In summary, the WHO wants to make its pandemic leadership permanent. It can then extend its power into the health care systems of every nation, and eventually implement a universal or “socialist-like” health care system as part of The Great Reset.

While a WHO-based universal health care system is not currently being discussed, there’s every reason to suspect that this is part of the plan. WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus has previously stated that his “central priority” as director-general is to push the world toward universal health coverage.14

And, considering the WHO changed its definition of “pandemic” to “a worldwide epidemic of a disease,”15 without the original specificity of severe illness that causes high morbidity,16,17 just about anything could be made to fit the pandemic criterion.

The problem with this treaty is that it simply cannot work. The whole premise behind this pandemic treaty is that “shared threat requires shared response.” But a given threat is almost never equally shared across regions.

“The WHO intends to eliminate individualized medicine and provide blanket rulings for how a given threat is to be addressed, and this can only result in needless suffering — not to mention the loss of individual freedom.”

Take COVID-19 for example. Not only is the risk of COVID not the same for people in New York City and the outback of Australia, it’s not even the same for all the people in those areas, as COVID is highly dependent on age and underlying health conditions.

The WHO insists that the remedy is the same for everyone everywhere, yet the risks vary widely from nation to nation, region to region, person to person. They intend to eliminate individualized medicine and provide blanket rulings for how a given threat is to be addressed, and this can only result in needless suffering — not to mention the loss of individual freedom.

Are You Ready to Cede All Authority to Gates-Led Group?

Rumble VIDEO: BILL GATES REVEALS THE HIGHWIRE WAS RIGHT

[Posted by The HighWire with Del Bigtree  

Published May 13, 2022

MORE DESCRIPTION]

In closing, Gates’ GERM team would be the ones with the authority to declare pandemics and coordinate global response.18 Are you ready to cede all authority over your life, health and livelihood to the likes of Gates? I hope not.

In the video above, Del Bigtree with “The Highwire” provides poignant examples where Gates is now admitting what “The Highwire,” I and many others have been saying since the earliest days of the COVID pandemic, and getting censored and deplatformed for it.

Gates is two years behind everyone else, yet despite his apparent inability to interpret the readily available data, he now wants power to dictate health rules to the whole world. We can’t let that happen.

Join the Global #StopTheWHO Campaign

It’s going to require a global response to prevent these two power grabs, starting with the IHR amendments under vote by the World Health Assembly. To that end, the World Council for Health has launched a global #StopTheWHO campaign. Here’s how you can get involved:19

  • Speak — Raise awareness on the ground and online. Use articles, posters, videos
  • Act — Campaign through rallies, political mobilization, legal notices and cases and similar campaigns
  • Collaborate with health freedom coalitions such as the World Council for Health
  • Engage global indigenous leadership to take a united stand against the WHO’s IHR
  • Notify World Health Assembly country delegates to oppose the IHR amendments
  • Activate people’s parliaments, legislatures or referendums to oppose power grabs

My latest book, “The Truth About COVID-19,” is an instant bestseller. After thousands of reviews it has a nearly perfect 5-star rating, so grab your copy today before it’s too late!

 Sources and References

1 Corbett Report Episode 418, May 10, 2022

2, 4 Brownstone Institute May 3, 2022

3 The Counter Signal May 2, 2022

5 Corey’s Digs April 27, 2022

6 USRTK March 17, 2022

7 Health Policy Watch February 23, 2022

8, 9 CDC International Health Regulations

10, 11, 12, 19 RW Malone Substack May 17, 2022

13 WHO Proposed Method of Work February 21, 2022

14 National Review June 14, 2017

15 Wayback Machine, WHO Pandemic Preparedness captured September 2, 2009 (PDF)

16 The BMJ 2010;340:c2912

17 Wayback Machine, WHO Pandemic Preparedness captured May 1, 2009 (PDF)

18 The Lancet May 14, 2022; 399(10338): 1853

© 1997-2022 Dr. Joseph Mercola. All Rights Reserved.

Do YOU Trust Your Government? Their Science? Their Doctors?


John R. Houk, Blog Editor

© May 8, 2022

I’m a Baby-Boomer. Born in 1956, I grew up in a period of time when family TV was Leave It To Beaver, Dennis the Menace, The Andy Griffith Show and so on. Before and after Elementary School had local TV programing for kids (even though I lived 100 miles from Seattle, the local Cable picked up KIRO’s JP Patches which I was addicted to particularly during the Winter months).

This was a time kids were taught to trust until Left-Wing primarily 1960s Counterculture movement began to question various norms of the day. I was both a Leave It To Beaver and emerging Counterculture kid as I realized some norms were good and some norms belittled people (e.g. Black-Americans, Native Americans). As kid growing up to a young adult I became disenchanted with government overreach at the time that led me Left-thinking. The irony of this present 21st century is that the presence AGAIN of government overreach and a lot more maturity has made a stalwart Christian and Conservative Values Individual. Come to think of it, I am amazed how government overreach influences my thinking. HMM…

ANYWAY … One of the last issues of trust for me due to government overreach is the trust in doctors and medicine. I have come to the realization a majority of doctors have abandoned the age-old adage of “Do No Harm” to conform to what government agencies and the cash of Pharmaceutical Corporations demand REGARDLESS of harm or health.

If you are a Senior Citizen as I am, you probably are stuck seeing a doctor on a regular basis. I encourage to use the rare doctor who place more stock in “Do No Harm” than following government and Pharmaceutical directives. If you can’t locate such a doctor, DEAR GOD IN HEAVEN be wise enough to verify medical advice or medical treatment rather than obeying wholesale what you are told. Keep in mind there are many doctors who still trust the science of a politically motivated government agency and corporate-for-profit/hang-the-actual-science Pharmaceutical Corporation. Those doctors trusting such authority are perhaps well-meaning yet mere drones of powers that should be mistrusted.

ERGO, I have three posts with information (That Biden’s new government Truth Ministry undoubtedly label as misinformation) I hope leads you to question your government so-called medical agencies and the doctors who follow such dictates.

JRH 5/8/22

READER SUPPORTED! I need Readers willing to chip in $5 – $10 – $25 – $50 – $100. I need your generosity. PLEASE GIVE to overcome research expenses:

Please Support NCCR

Big Tech Censorship is pervasive – Share voluminously on all social media platforms!

*************************

Meet the BRANCH COVIDIANS: An apocalyptic medical-extremist group of tyrants whose avid followers participate in genocide by vaccination

Satan-Demon-Hell

By S.D. Wells

May 7, 2022

News Target

Science is no longer evidence-based when it comes to medicine in America, it’s a new religion that’s all faith-based. Do you “believe” in vaccines? Do you “believe” that wearing face masks all day and night works to prevent the spread of COVID? If not, you will be persecuted for not believing in the new religion of faith-based science. If you buck the system, your “conspiracy theories” will land you strung up on a cross (bankrupted and force-injected with prions), or burnt at the stake like a witch (put on deadly Remdesivir and a choke-you-to-death ventilator at the hospital).

Meet the Branch Covidians, an apocalyptic medical-extremist group of scientists, doctors, patients, and propagandists who have one end goal in mind, coerce the rest of the world to “practice” their religion, or die.

The Branch Covidian Cult includes everyone who makes vaccines, funds them, pushes them, and takes them. It’s a religious new world order, and their fake science and ministry of truth propaganda machine has brainwashed over 4 billion worshippers, and in just the first two years of “membership.” It’s a doomsday war happening for control of your health and psyche, and if you don’t resist or fight back, you automatically lose.

The Branch Davidians apocalyptic religious movement (cult) was founded in the 1950s,  the same time as the fake-science-religion of vaccines

Remember the “Seventh-Day Adventists?” [Blog Editor: Koresh’s Branch Davidians to be fair were splinter group from mainline 7th Day Adventists] The Feds burned 76 of the 85 of their “offshoots” alive, including some children (the ones ATF agents couldn’t coax out), for not coming out of their compound and surrendering. It happened in Waco, Texas, where the “Mount Carmel Center” was the home of the Branch Davidians. The leader? David Koresh – the self-proclaimed “Final Prophet” (think Fauci here).

Koresh taught his followers about the Seven Seals and that the end of the world was “imminent.” This is much like the CDC right now claiming that if we don’t all get experimental vaccines, the whole world will DIE from COVID-19 (which has a .01 percentage kill rate and mainly among the immune compromised). Vaccines, ever since the Polio vaccine, have caused more harm than help, that is, if you REALLY look at the evidence-based science behind them.

In other words, the “science” of vaccines is a religion that you must believe in, without any evidence-based proof of efficacy. It’s faith-based medicine and the “end of the world” is hinged on everyone getting flu shots that cause blood clots and myocarditis.

The Branch Covidian Cult has over 4.6 billion members worldwide and growing

Most Branch Covidian Cult members (vaccine pushers and takers) wholly believe that all “anti-vaxxers” are crazed lunatics (heretics) who don’t value human life and are walking around KILLING people because they “do NOT believe in” getting toxic gene therapy injections (“vaccines”) or wearing a useless, bacteria-laden mask 24/7/365. The mask has become a cult member signature cloth, and all members are instructed to give dirty looks to the mask-less and declare them guilty of blasphemy and sacrilegious acts (report them to DHS) for opposing the religious belief that masks help save the world from the Black Plague of 2022 (the Fauci Flu).

The Branch Covidian Cult is chock full of vaccine fanatics who are suffering from mercury poisoning, also called Mad Hatter Syndrome, from all the “thimerosal” in flu shots over the years, and now from Spike Protein Syndrome from the nanoparticle, clot shot injections. Are the booster shots the poisonous “magic kool-aid” of the next Jonestown Massacre? It’s genocide by vaccination, and the leading tyrants have all the “church” attendees worshipping at the inoculation altar.

How many more members will the Branch Covidians recruit for the “final siege” before the whole herd goes “up in flames?” The end of the world looks like it’s really coming soon, but it’s really just coming for the Branch Covidians, little do they know. Bookmark Vaccines.news to your favorite independent websites for updates on experimental COVID “vaccines” that cause blood clots and other horrific side effects.

Sources include:

Pandemic.news

GatewayPundit.com

NaturalNews.com

Off-Guardian.org

TheBlueStateConservative.com

NewsTarget.com © 2021 All Rights Reserved. All content posted on this site is commentary or opinion and is protected under Free Speech. NewsTarget.com is not responsible for content written by contributing authors. The information on this site is provided for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended as a substitute for professional advice of any kind. NewsTarget.com assumes no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. Your use of this website indicates your agreement to these terms and those published on this site. All trademarks, registered trademarks and servicemarks mentioned on this site are the property of their respective owners.

++++++++++++++++++++

[Blog Editor: This next post is from NWO Report which they acquired from Mercola.com. In case you are unaware, Mercola.com post remain open to the public for 48-hours from the time posted. Since the original has a 5/6/22 date, some time on the 8th it will only be available to paid subscribers. The NWO Report version does not include the typical “STORY AT-A-GLANCE” portion which I will include.]

The WHO Pandemic Treaty & the Banality of Evil

WHO Emblem & Post Title

Posted by Nwo Report

Analysis by Tessa Lena

May 7, 2022

ORIGINALLY Mercola.com

NWO Report

[STORY AT-A-GLANCE

  • In December 2021, the World Health Organization announced their plan to develop a new pandemic treaty
  • The new treaty has the potential to undermine national sovereignty as we know it
  • In 2009, the WHO changed the definition of the word “pandemic” and then used the new definition to declare an influenza pandemic and activate massive vaccine purchasing agreements
  • The definition of “public health” is being used in a misleading manner to push for the Fourth Industrial Revolution
  • Dr. Tess Lawrie was on a call with the WHO as a part of the public commentary submission process, and the call left her “shaken”]

This story is about the proposed new World Health Organization pandemic treaty that can potentially eradicate the national sovereignty as we know it. It is also about the banality of evil and the impact of our individual daily choices on the future generations and the history of the world.

What’s the Deal With the World Health Organization Pandemic Treaty?

In December 2021, the World Health Organization announced their plan to develop a new pandemic treaty “strengthening” international cooperation during future pandemics. What does it mean in practical terms? The language of the announcement was vague, so we need to interpret it in context. Here’s from the horse’s mouth: (December 2021):

“In a consensus decision aimed at protecting the world from future infectious diseases crises, the World Health Assembly today agreed to kickstart a global process to draft and negotiate a convention, agreement or other international instrument under the Constitution of the World Health Organization to strengthen pandemic prevention, preparedness and response.

Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, WHO Director-General, said the decision by the World Health Assembly was historic in nature, vital in its mission, and represented a once-in-a-generation opportunity to strengthen the global health architecture to protect and promote the well-being of all people.”

More from the horse’s mouth (April 2022):

“In a consensus decision aimed at protecting the world from future infectious diseases crises, in December 2021 the World Health Assembly agreed to kickstart a global process by establishing an intergovernmental negotiating body (INB) to draft and negotiate a convention, agreement or other international instrument under the Constitution of the World Health Organization to strengthen pandemic prevention, preparedness and response …

As part of this historic decision, the World Health Assembly requested the Director-General to hold public hearings, in line with standard WHO practice, to support the work of the INB. Per the INB’s timeline, the first round of those hearings has been set for 12-13 April 2022, with a second round set for 16-17 June. This information on the modalities for the first round of hearings is also expected to apply to the second round as well.”

Lies, Lies, Lies

Let’s start with the issue of distorted language. In an honest world with no dark agendas, no Fourth Industrial Revolution, and no upside-down language, their treaty could sound like a beautiful idea. Like, what can possibly be wrong with benevolently guided, meaningful international cooperation during a time of crisis? A beautiful fairy tale, no?

Sadly, not a fairy tale at all but more like a horror movie because we are living in a world of shameless lying and upside-down language — and the words no longer mean what they are supposed to mean.

To deceive us, the bureaucrats are trying to create a feeling in our minds that they getting together to protect us, like a benevolent council of wise indigenous grandmothers — while in reality, it’s more like they are aiming to trap us, being a gang of greedy and ruthless wolves in sheep’s clothes that they are.

“Health” doesn’t mean actual health but rather the promotion of any product or interference that is desirable to the shareholders and the CEOs of pharmaceutical and technology companies.

Just like Fauci recently equated himself with science, the corporate mouthpieces equate whatever they want to sell or impose on us with “health,” and then say they are protecting our “health” while in fact, they are merely protecting their pockets.

We are living in a world where our leaders (translation: our fellow human being who have no intrinsic upper hand on us but who have gotten ahead on the basis of being extremely power-hungry) are taking full advantage of the fact that in order to do destructive things with the least resistance, then can call them “useful things that are good for the people,” and get away with it for some time. That’s the trick!

And besides, if the past two years are any indication, “international cooperation” means in practice that all WEF-affiliated leaders go ahead and throw their people under the bus in unison, to the sound of uniform messaging in the media.

“International cooperation” means that all countries do the same destructive thing, resulting in unnecessary human death and suffering, a disruption of social structures and the world economy, all to clear the way for their favorite “new normal.” That’s some international cooperation!

Public Hearings

Given the self-proclaimed historical nature of this treaty, the World Health Organization dedicated the whole two days to the first round of the public hearings (and they didn’t advertise it much). The first round took place in April 2022. The second round will be held in June of this year.

Dr. Tess Lawrie wrote a very moving article about the WHO pandemic treaty and the video comment submission by the World Council for Health.

Here are Dr. Lawrie’s comments on the proposed treaty, after she had a chance to participate in a call with the WHO (as well as UNAIDS, the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations, the UN Environment Programme, and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations) as a part of the submission process.

• Calls for ‘human security centric’ not just ‘health security centric’. Apparently, they don’t just want to control your body but every aspect of your life.

• Fast approval of emergency diagnostics – and unified regulatory registration for diagnostics. In other words, more control.

• Equitable access to vaccines and ‘a mechanism to hold violators accountable’. So if a nation concludes a vaccine is not safe – as has happened in this last pandemic – the WHO would have the power to override that and jab their population anyway.

• Vaccines should be developed within 100 days. This is absurd. Safe drugs take ten years to be adequately tested and declared safe. There are more than 3.5 million people on the WHO database who have been harmed by Covid vaccines and this may be the tip of the iceberg.

I agree that these bullet points sound like it’s about control, so no surprise that it comes with more censorship!

More Censorship

While the public comments were open, the #StopTheTreaty campaign by the World Council for Health, where Dr. Tess Lawrie is on the Steering Committee, was the talk of the town in the “freedom community.” But if you searched for it on Google, you wouldn’t know anything about it! Here’s what I wrote just a few hours after the comment period ended:

“If you search for the phrase “WHO pandemic treaty” on DuckDuckGo, #StopTheTreaty comes up among the top results. On Google though no such thing exists. If you actually search for the phrase “stop the treaty,” on DuckDuckGo #StoopTheTreaty is the number one result. Google, on the other hand, tells you everything you ever wanted to know about the 1919 Treaty of Versailles!)”

For the World Health Organization, It’s Not the First Rodeo

It is curious that it’s not the first time that the WHO is trying to serve the pharmaceutical industry and various industry shareholders using “pandemic preparedness” as a legal tool.

For example, in 2009, they announced an influenza pandemic (H1N1) that activated vaccine purchasing agreements and forced participating countries to large batches of doses that they didn’t need. The rushed release of a subpar medical product led to a “narcolepsy fiasco,” among other things.

Youtube VIDEO: Channel 4 News Exposes Swine Flu Scandal in 2010

[Posted by Minerva

No Posting Date

MORE DESCRIPTION]

According to the report by the Council of Europe’s Parliamentary Assembly:

“The Parliamentary Assembly is alarmed about the way in which the H1N1 influenza pandemic has been handled, not only by the World Health Organization (WHO), but also by the competent health authorities at the level of the European Union and at national level.

It is particularly troubled by some of the consequences of decisions taken and advice given leading to distortion of priorities of public health services across Europe, waste of large sums of public money, and also unjustified scares and fears about health risks faced by the European public at large.

The Assembly notes that grave shortcomings have been identified regarding the transparency of decision-making processes relating to the pandemic which have generated concerns about the possible influence of the pharmaceutical industry on some of the major decisions relating to the pandemic.

The Assembly fears that this lack of transparency and accountability will result in a plummet in confidence in the advice given by major public health institutions. This may prove disastrous in the case of the next disease of pandemic scope – which may turn out to be much more severe than the H1N1 pandemic …

The rapporteur considers that some of the outcomes of the pandemic, as illustrated in this report, have been dramatic: distortion of priorities of public health services all over Europe, waste of huge sums of public money, provocation of unjustified fear amongst Europeans, creation of health risks through vaccines and medications which might not have been sufficiently tested before being authorised in fast-track procedures, are all examples of these outcomes.”

Even Forbes wrote in 2010 that “from the beginning the World Health Organization’s actions have ranged from the dubious to the flagrantly incompetent.” A poignant quote:

“The WHO’s dubious decisions demonstrate that its officials are too rigid or too incompetent (or both) to make needed adjustments in the pandemic warning system — deficiencies we have come to expect from an organization that is scientifically challenged, self-important and unaccountable.

The WHO may be able to perform and report worldwide surveillance — i.e., count numbers of cases and fatalities — but its policy role should be drastically limited.

U.N. bureaucrats pose as authorities on all manner of products, public policy and human activities, from desertification and biodiversity to the regulation of chemicals, uses of the ocean and the testing of genetically engineered plants.

However, the U.N.’s regulatory policies, requirements and standards often defy scientific consensus and common sense. Its officials are no friends of commerce, public health or environmental protection. The result is a more precarious, more dangerous and less resilient world. When it comes to pestilence, the U.N. may be the greatest plague of all.”

What’s a Pandemic, Anyway?

It’s noteworthy that just before the WHO declared a pandemic, they changed the definition of the word. From the British Medical Journal:

“WHO for years had defined pandemics as outbreaks causing “enormous numbers of deaths and illness” but in early May 2009 it removed this phrase — describing a measure of severity — from the definition.

Key scientists advising the World Health Organization on planning for an influenza pandemic had done paid work for pharmaceutical firms that stood to gain from the guidance they were preparing. These conflicts of interest have never been publicly disclosed by WHO, and WHO has dismissed inquiries into its handling of the A/H1N1 pandemic as ‘conspiracy theories.’

A joint investigation by the BMJ and the Bureau of Investigative Journalism has uncovered evidence that raises troubling questions about how WHO managed conflicts of interest among the scientists who advised its pandemic planning, and about the transparency of the science underlying its advice to governments.

Was it appropriate for WHO to take advice from experts who had declarable financial and research ties with pharmaceutical companies producing antivirals and influenza vaccines?”

Boasting About the Tricks

In 2019, Marc Van Ranst, Belgian Flu Commissioner, gave a talk at the ESWI/Chatham House Influenza Pandemic Preparedness Stakeholders Conference. At around 13 minutes in, he boasted about how he “misused the fact that that the top, top football … soccer clubs in Belgium inappropriately and against all agreements vaccinated … they made their soccer players priority people.” The audience responded with laughter.

Vimeo VIDEO: Communication and public engagement – MARC VAN RANST – 9

[Posted by ESWI

Posted 3/2/19 3:41 AM EST

MORE DESCRIPTION]

“Trust WHO”

In order to understand the corruption inside the WHO, one may want to watch a pre-pandemic documentary called “Trust WHO,” produced by Lilian Franck. Among other things, it looks into various conflicts of interest as well as the examples of how the organization has been influenced by the tobacco industry and the nuclear industry.

Youtube VIDEO: Trust Who | Trailer | Available Now

[Posted by Journeyman Pictures

Posted Mar 20, 2018

MORE DESCRIPTION]

The United Nations Has Been Hijacked

Last year, I interviewed Mary Otto-Chang, a former United Nations employee, who talked about the hijacking of the UN and the 2019 agreement between the UN and the World Economic Forum that the Fourth Industrial Revolution as a cooperation goal.

So what we are looking at is using the authority of the UN as supposedly a just and wonderful international organization that protects the people for the commercial and philosophical goals of the richest people of the world. What an intricate lie!

Youtube VIDEO: A Conversation with Mary Otto-Chang on Make Language Great Again with Tessa Lena

[Posted by Tessa Makes Love

Posted May 1, 2021

MORE DESCRIPTION]

Banality of Evil

Most horrible things that people do to each other don’t come out of nowhere. There is usually a “warm-up” period during which evil actions are trivialized, and people’s senses are “re-trained.”

Sometimes, using upside-down language, people’s senses are re-trained to the extent of swapping out the meanings completely, where war becomes peace, and murder becomes compassion. It takes time to dehumanize entire demographics — based on a particular ethnicity, or religion, or health status, or any other arbitrary affiliation.

For example, in early Nazi Germany, there was a campaign to kill mentally disabled children, (and also do inhumane experiments on them), and the parents were often told that their children were being taken away for better care. The parents didn’t know that their children were being murdered — but the nurses who killed the disabled knew exactly what they were doing, but perhaps some of them believed that they were performing acts of mercy!

There is a powerful, must-see documentary about it, called, “The Killing Nurses of the Third Reich.” I wrote about it last year:

“The only thing that was needed for the nurses to make the transition to the horror zone was to decide that the poor suffering imbeciles had no agency. As soon as in their minds, the nurses stripped the disabled children and the mentally ill adults of their human agency and turned them into creatures akin to suffering pets, killing them became virtuous. The nurses held the disabled babies lovingly, and then killed them.”

Our Choices Matter

Something that I have been thinking about a lot over the course of my life is how our choices have long-term consequences: for ourselves, for the people around us, and even for the history of the world!

For example, to come back to the topic of pandemic preparedness, much of what happened in the U.S. in 2020 was made possible thanks to Bush’s 2005 decision to redo the pandemic preparedness plan. Who paid any attention to it back in 2005? Who could imagine that it would have such a profound impact on our lives? Nobody, probably, except for the people who planned it. And yet here we are …

Or another example. When people accept censorship against the groups that they don’t relate to, they often don’t think that the censors are coming for them next — and yet more often than not, that is exactly what happens.

Or sometimes, a choice that we make at a very young age comes back to us years later, and whatever we tried to escape stares us straight in the face, and we have to deal with it anyway.

Which is to say, courage and trying to do the right thing are not only praise-worthy, they are also very practical, especially during challenging times.

There is most certainly no formula, and no universal prescription for a time like this but it’s important to see the scammers in high chairs for who they are (including when they talk about pandemic preparedness treaties “for our own good”), and to see through them without being afraid. When we stand together, with love in our hearts, we are strong.

© 2022 NWO REPORT

+++++++++++++++

Study shows mRNA in COVID-19 vaccines enter liver cells and alter human DNA

COVID Jab Vials

By Cassie B. [Interestingly as of 5/7/22, the author link comes up as “500 – Internal server error.”]

05/05/2022

News Target

A new study out of Sweden confirms that the mRNA found in the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine can infiltrate human cells and transcribe its message onto human DNA in under six hours.

This adds to a growing body of evidence that the vaccine could indeed be altering people’s DNA. For example, a different study from Sweden that was published in October 2021 found that spike protein makes its way into the nuclei of cells and impairs the mechanism they have to repair damaged DNA.

The cell’s nucleus is its main control center, and it is imperative for it to remain intact. When the vaccines first hit the market, pharmaceutical companies repeatedly insisted that mRNA vaccines did not enter the nucleus or alter DNA.

In the October study, the researchers concluded: “Our findings reveal a potential molecular mechanism by which the spike protein might impede adaptive immunity and underscore the potential side effects of full-length spike-based vaccines.”

Blocking the action that repairs DNA on a constant basis can cause cell death and the formation of cancer.

Findings like these inspired scientists from Lund University to investigate the effects of the Pfizer jab on human liver cells and determine whether its encoded spike protein RNA can be reverse transcribed onto DNA.

They found that not only is it possible, but it happens within just six hours. They wrote: “Our study shows that BNT162b2 [Pfizer’s mRNA injection] can be reverse transcribed to DNA in liver cell line Huh7, and this may give rise to the concern if BNT162b2[injection]-derived DNA may be integrated into the host genome and affect the integrity of genomic DNA, which may potentially mediate genotoxic side effects.”

The study marks the first time researchers have demonstrated in a petri dish how mRNA vaccines are converted into DNA in a human liver cell line – something fact checkers have long claimed could simply not occur.

The researchers did caution, however, that the findings were observed in petri dishes, and they cannot say for certain if the converted DNA is integrated into cellular DNA in the genomes or what the consequences of that could be.

More studies are needed to better understand potential effects

One of the study’s authors, Professor Magnus Rasmussen, said that the attention the study is getting is not surprising, but he believes we need more studies like this.

“We understood that the study would attract attention, but we think it is self-evident that this type of research should be pursued. We have a new vaccine, and it needs to be tested in cell and animal models and also in humans, in various ways. The result might be surprising, but it is also a bit surprising that such studies do not seem to have been carried out before,” he said.

Renowned cardiologist Dr. Peter McCullough said the paper suggests the CDC’s insistence that vaccines do not change the human genome could be “gravely wrong” and believes there should have been monthly safety reports on the vaccines.

He said: “This is getting into human chromosomes, at least this segment is. If it turns out that the entire code goes into human chromosomes, and if it expresses spike protein within cells—spike protein is an abnormal protein, it is not a human protein— if this protein is expressed within human cells on a regular basis or on demand, and it’s passed from parent cells to daughter cells, and it’s passed to the developing embryo, we’re in trouble.”

While we still don’t know if what happened in the study will occur in living organisms or if the DNA converted from the mRNA in the vaccine will integrate with the cell’s genomes, it is certainly something that needs to be explored. The authors said that investigations in whole living organisms, like animals, are needed to better understand the effects of these vaccines.

Sources for this article include:

DailyExpose.uk

TheEpochTimes.com

LundUniversity.lu.se

NewsTarget.com © 2021 All Rights Reserved. All content posted on this site is commentary or opinion and is protected under Free Speech. NewsTarget.com is not responsible for content written by contributing authors. The information on this site is provided for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended as a substitute for professional advice of any kind. NewsTarget.com assumes no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. Your use of this website indicates your agreement to these terms and those published on this site. All trademarks, registered trademarks and servicemarks mentioned on this site are the property of their respective owners.

Intro Remarks on Dr. Yeadon, ‘The Covid Lies’


John R. Houk, Blog Editor

© April 13, 2022

On Telegram I subscribe to Doctors For Covid Ethics. Yesterday that Telegram Channel shared links to a Dr. Mike Yeadon PDF entitled, “The Covid Lies.” The PDF is dated 4/10/22. The PDF is lengthy AND informative ergo well worth the read even if you have to back to it to complete your reading.

In PDF format the length is 31-pages. In order to cross post on blog I used a PDF-to-Word converter. The Word version is even longer. You should be aware converters are not perfect. If you find an unintelligible word, number or broken link; it will because I missed it in the editing process. I hope Dr. Yeadon and you forgive me.

The PDF is actually two essays that begins with “The Covid Lies,” but about half way through another essay emerges on how Dr. Yeadon came to his scientific conclusions entitled, “How Much of the Covid-19 Narrative Was True? Additional Reflections.”

The Telegram Doctors For Covid Ethics links to a Doctors For Covid Ethics webpage which serves as an introduction to the PDF and then has a download link. The intro page is dated 4/12/22 (actually in the British style in listing day-month-year thus appearing “12/04/2022.” Indeed the entire document is in the British grammatical style.)

This cross post will include the Doctors For Covid Ethics intro followed by the Dr. Yeadon document. As a bonus I am including three videos that I believe are related to Dr. Yeadon’s thoughts in “The Covid Lies” which are:

There is a lot to mentally digest if you are willing to believe actual empirical science as opposed to control-the-masses fearmongering science – GOD BE WITH YOU.

JRH 4/13/22

I need your generosity. PLEASE GIVE to overcome research expenses:

Please Support NCCR

Big Tech Censorship is pervasive – Share voluminously on all social media platforms!

***************************

The Covid Lies

DFCE Intro

4/12/22

Doctors For Covid Ethics

In this comprehensive review, Dr. Yeadon argues that all the main narratives about SARS-CoV-2 and imposed “measures” are lies.

Given the foregoing, it is no longer possible to view the last two years as well- intentioned errors. Instead, the objectives of the perpetrators are most likely to be totalitarian control over the population by means of mandatory digital IDs and cashless central bank digital currencies (CBDCs).

The-Covid-Lies: DOWNLOAD

In the first part of the article (The Covid Lies), Dr. Yeadon counters the 12 widespread Covid narratives with the following arguments:

1. The infection fatality rate of SARS-CoV-2 is 0.1 – 0.3%, which is not significantly different from some seasonal influenza epidemics.

2. Based on the peer-reviewed articles, at least 30 to 50% of the population has prior cross-immunity.

3. SARS-CoV-2 does discriminate. “The lethality of this virus, as is common with respiratory viruses, is 1000X less in young, healthy people than in elderly people with multiple comorbidities.”

4. Asymptomatic transmission is the “central conceptual deceit” used to “underscore almost every intrusion: masking, mass testing, lockdowns, border restrictions, school closures, even vaccine passports.”

5. PCR test is “the central operational deceit.”

6. Neither cloth nor surgical masks prevent respiratory virus transmission.

7. Lockdown is “epidemiologically irrelevant” and never works. “Only “stay home if you’re sick” works.”

8.Covid-19 is the most treatable respiratory viral illness ever”. Safe and effective early treatments are available.

9. Based on the peer-reviewed articles, very few clinically significant reinfections of SARS-Cov-2 have ever been confirmed.

10. SARS-CoV-2 mutates slowly, and no variant is even close to escaping naturally-acquired immunity. However, there is the possibility that the so-called vaccines prevent the establishment of immune memory, leading to the repeated infections, which would be a form of acquired immune deficiency.

11. Safety is the top priority in a public health mass intervention, even more than effectiveness. “It was NEVER appropriate to attempt to “end the pandemic” with a novel technology vaccine.”

12. The four gene-based “vaccines” are toxic. The basic rules of selecting vaccine candidates are: 1) the agent has no inherent biological action (non-toxic); 2) the agent should be the genetically most stable part of the virus; 3) the agent should be most different from human proteins. Spike protein as the vaccine does not fit any of the above criteria.

In the second part of the article (How Much of the Covid-19 Narrative Was True? Additional Reflections), Dr. Yeadon further stresses his contention on the Covid-19 narratives on:

In the second part of the article (How Much of the Covid-19 Narrative Was True? Additional Reflections), Dr. Yeadon further stresses his contention on the Covid-19 narratives on:

  • Unprecedented Pronouncements by the senior scientific and medical advisers, such as “Everyone is vulnerable.”
  • Instigating Fear
  • Using Mass Testing to Promote Fear
  • One Dominant Narrative
  • More Vaccine Lies
  • The Question of Motive

At the end of the article, Dr. Yeadon also provides a list of extra supplemental points to support his conclusions.

About the author:

Dr. Michael YEADON PhD was Formerly Vice President & Chief Scientific Officer Allergy & Respiratory at Pfizer Global R&D. He holds Joint Honours in Biochemistry and Toxicology and a PhD in Respiratory Pharmacology. He is an Independent Consultant and Co-founder & CEO of Ziarco Pharma Ltd.

ABOUT Doctors for COVID Ethics

++++++++++++++++

The Covid Lies

By Dr. Mike Yeadon

Working Draft [Originally PDF Format], April 10, 2022

Doctors for COVID Ethics – PDF Download

PDF converted to Word format

Summary

I contend that all the main narrative points about the coronavirus named SARS-CoV-2 are lies. Furthermore, all the “measures” imposed on the population are also lies. In what follows, I support these claims scientifically, mostly by reference to peer-reviewed journal articles. In 2019, World Health Organization (WHO) scientists reviewed the evidence for the utility of all non-pharmaceutical interventions, concluding that they are all without effect.

Given the foregoing, it is no longer possible to view the last two years as well-intentioned errors. Instead, the objectives of the perpetrators are most likely to be totalitarian control over the population by means of mandatory digital IDs and cashless central bank digital currencies (CBDCs).

There is no medical or public health emergency. We can and should take back our freedoms with immediate effect. Testing healthy people stops. If you’re sick, please stay home. Masks belong in the trash. The Covid-19 gene-based injections are not recommended and must not be coerced or mandated. Crucially, the vaccine passports database must be destroyed. Economic rectitude is recommended.

Serious crimes have obviously been committed. It is not the purpose of this document to accuse anyone or to assemble the evidence against them at this time. However, when this is all resolved, We The People are strongly recommended to pay much more attention to Washington than previously.

TABLE OF CONTENTS [Blog Editor: The page numbers though helpful in the PDF will only be helpful as a guess in this post]

  • The Covid Lies  —- pages 2–15
  • How Much of the Covid-19 Narrative Was True? Additional Reflections — pages 19–28
  • About Dr. Mike Yeadon —  page 29

1. SARS-CoV-2 has such a high lethality that every measure must be taken to save lives.

Note: Covid-19 is the disease resulting from infection with the virus, SARS-CoV-2. They are often used interchangeably. Sometimes it doesn’t much matter, but the confusion was sowed deliberately.

IMPORTANCE

Essential to claim high lethality in order that unprecedented responses may seem justified. To “pep up” the claim, recall “falling man” in Wuhan? The person was allegedly sick but walking about, before falling dead on his face. That was never real. It was theatre.

THE REALITY

Early estimates of lethality were very high with, in some reports, an “infection fatality rate” (IFR) of 3%. Seasonal influenza is generally considered to have a typical IFR of 0.1%. That means some seasons, IFR for flu may be 0.3% and other times, 0.05% or lower.

In practise, and this was usual, estimates of IFR for Covid-19 were revised downwards repeatedly and now are generally recognised as in the range of 0.1–0.3%. It cannot now be argued that it is significantly different from some seasonal influenza epidemics. Why, then, have we all but destroyed the modern world over it?

CONCLUSION AND VERDICT

-FALSE-

  • The perpetrators knew that lethality estimates of new respiratory viral illnesses ALWAYS start high and reduce. This is because, early on, we do not have any estimate of the number of people infected but not seriously ill and the number infected with no symptoms at all.
  • They created the impression of extreme danger, which was never true. This is such a crucial point, for once one sees it for what it is, the rest of the narrative is superfluous.
  • Dr. John Ioannidis is one of the world’s most-published epidemiologists and he has been scathing about the inappropriate responses to a novel virus of not particularly unusual lethality. Like most respiratory viruses, SARS-CoV-2 represents no serious health threat to those under 60 years of age, certainly not children, and is a serious threat only to those nearing the end of their lives by virtue of age and multiple comorbidities.¹
  • Dr. Ioannidis’s current estimate of global IFR is around 0.15%. For reference, a typical seasonal influenza outbreak has a typical IFR of around 0.1%, but can be markedly worse in bad winters.²

2. Because this is a new virus, there will be no prior immunity

in the population.

IMPORTANCE

Seems reasonable, doesn’t it? This remark, made repeatedly early on, aimed to squash any notion that there was a degree of “prior immunity” in the population. Prior immunity and natural immunity are only now, two years in, not considered “misinformation”.

THE REALITY

Within a few months, multiple publications showed that a large minority (ranging from 30%–50%, some later said even more) of the population had T-cells in their blood which recognised various pieces of the viral protein (synthesised, as no one seemed to have any real virus isolates to use).

While some people argued that recognition by T-cells didn’t mean functional immunity, really it does.

We were prevented from learning that we already knew of six coronaviruses, four of which cause “common colds,” which in elderly and infirm people can cause death.

CONCLUSION AND VERDICT

-FALSE-

  • This was a straight lie. It’s pretty much never true that there’s no prior immunity in a population. This is because viruses are each derived from earlier viruses and some of the population had already defeated its antecedents, giving them either immunity or a big head start in defeating the new virus. Either way, a sizeable proportion of the population never had cause to worry.
  • This article includes all the important peer-reviewed articles to mid-2020, with many showing at least 30%–50% having prior immunity (it depends upon the measure used to assess it).³

3. This virus does not discriminate. No one is safe until everyone is safe.

IMPORTANCE

Intention was to minimise the numbers who might reason they’re not “at risk” people.

THE REALITY

This claim was always absurd. The lethality of this virus, as is common with respiratory viruses, is 1000X less in young, healthy people than in elderly people with multiple comorbidities.

CONCLUSION AND VERDICT

-FALSE-

  • In short, almost no one who wasn’t close to the end of their lives was at risk of severe outcomes and death. In middle-aged individuals, obesity is a risk factor, as it is for a handful of other causes of death.
  • This intriguing review details how the initial modelling induced fear and provided the excuse for heavy-handed measures, especially “lockdowns”.ª It was, however, just that: an excuse. All experienced public health experts knew that lockdowns were absurd, ineffective, and hugely destructive. There’s no way to sugar-coat this. It was wrong before it was ordered, and it’s necessary to examine why those who knew did not protest. It’s almost as if they were complicit.

4. People can carry this virus with no signs and infect others: asymptomatic transmission.

IMPORTANCE

This is the central conceptual deceit. If true, then anyone might infect and kill you. Falsely claimed asymptomatic transmission underscores almost every intrusion: masking, mass testing, lockdowns, border restrictions, school closures, even vaccine

passports.

THE REALITY

The best evidence comes from a meta-analysis of a larger number of good studies, examining how often a person testing positive went on to infect a family member (they compared as potential sources of infection people who had symptoms with those who did not have symptoms). ONLY those WITH symptoms were able to infect a family member at any rate that mattered.‘

CONCLUSION AND VERDICT

-FALSE-

  • Asymptomatic transmission is epidemiologically irrelevant. It’s not necessary to argue it never happens; it’s enough to show that if it occurs at all, it is so rare as not to be worth measuring.
  • In this video, we also have Fauci and a WHO doctor telling us exactly this.ª Also, I show why it is like it is. It’s very clear.

5. The PCR test selectively identifies people with clinical infections.

IMPORTANCE

This is the central operational deceit. If true, we could detect risky people and isolate them. We could diagnose accurately and also count the number of deaths.

Polymerase chain reaction (PCR), at its best, can confirm the presence of genetic information in a clean sample and is useful in forensics for that reason. It involves cycle after cycle of amplification, copying the starting material at the beginning of each cycle. The inventor of the PCR test, Kary Mullis, won a Nobel Prize for it and often criticised Fauci for misusing that test to diagnose AIDS patients, which Mullis insisted was inappropriate.

THE REALITY

In a “dirty” clinical sample, there is more than a possible piece of, or a whole, virus which might replicate. There are bacteria, fungi, other viruses, human cells, mucus, and more. It’s not possible unequivocally to know, if a test is judged “positive” after many cycles, what it was that was amplified to give the signal at the end that we call “positive”.

In mass testing mode, commonly used, no one ever runs so-called “positive controls” through the chain of custody. That’s diagnostic testing 101. It’s a deception.

Every test has an “operational false positive rate” (oFPR), where some unknown percent of samples turns positive, even if there is no virus present. A good oFPR would be less than 1%, but is it 0.8% or 0.1%? If you test 100,000 samples daily, and the oFPR is 0.8%, you will get 800 positive tests or “cases,” even if there is no virus in the entire community. Often, the “positivity,” the fraction of tests that are positive, is in that range, sub-1% or low-single-digit percent. I believe much or all of that can be caused by false positives. Note, criminals can manipulate the content of the test kits because there are very few providers in a territory, often just one. The conditions for running the test are also subject to variation by the authorities, like the CDC.

CONCLUSION AND VERDICT

-FALSE-

  • You can be genuinely positive, yet not ill. There is no lower limit of true detection below which you’d be declared to have some copies of the virus, but declared clinically well. It’s an absurd idea.
  • You can have no virus yet test positive (with or without symptoms). All of these are swept together and called “confirmed Covid-19 cases”. If you die in the next 28 days, you’re said to be a “Covid death,” no matter what the cause.
  • Those using the test kits provided commercially are what are called “black box”. They are unable to say what is in the kit, because this is proprietary. The original “methods paper” was published in 48 hours, making a mockery of claimed peer review, by a Berlin lab headed by Professor Christian Drosten, scientific advisor to Angela Merkel of Germany. The paper was comprehensively rebutted by an international team.’
  • The WHO released a series of guidance notes on PCR,8 and it was clear that their technical staff did not approve of mass testing the population, because it’s possible to return wholly false positives. Indeed, at times of low genuine prevalence, that’s all they can be.
  • I often wonder if this 2007 real-life example of a PCR-based testing system which returned 100% false positives, yet convinced a major hospital that they had a huge disease outbreak for weeks, might have been the inspiration for the untrustworthy methods used in the Covid-19 deception?ª
  • Drosten also led the TV publicity around the idea of asymptomatic transmission. One lucky scientist is at the centre of the two most important deceptions in the entire Covid-19 event!
  • Professor Norman Fenton here presents a multi-part lecture with two main elements.¹º First, he describes how mass testing of people with no symptoms unavoidably drives up the proportion of positive PCR test results that are false. The second part deals with the possibility that data fraud entirely accounts for the apparent efficacy of the vaccines, while attempting to hide vaccine deaths, by classifying them as unvaccinated for 14 days after injection.

6. Masks are effective in preventing the spread of this virus.

IMPORTANCE

This is mostly used to maintain the illusion of danger. You see others’ masks and feel afraid. Complying is also a measure of whether you do what you’re told, even if the measure is useless.

THE REALITY

We have known for decades that surgical masks worn in medical theatres do not stop respiratory virus transmission. Masks were tested across a series of operations by doctors at the Royal College of Surgeons (UK). No difference in post-operative infection rate was seen by mask use.

Cloth masks definitely don’t stop respiratory virus transmission as shown by several large, randomised trials. If anything, they increase risk of lung infections. The authorities have mostly conceded on cloth masks.

Some people speak of “source control,” catching droplets. Problem is, there is no evidence that transmission takes place via droplets. Equally, there is no evidence it occurs via fine aerosols. No one finds it on masks, or on air filters in hospital wards of Covid patients, either. Where is the virus?

CONCLUSION AND VERDICT

-FALSE-

  • It’s not necessary to use up time on this topic. It was known long before Covid-19 that face masks don’t do anything.
  • Many don’t know that blue medical masks aren’t filters. Your inspired and expired air moves in and out between the mask and your face. They are splashguards, that’s all.
  • This is a good review of the findings with masks in respiratory viruses by a recognised expert in the field. No effect.¹¹
  • Neither masks nor lockdowns prevented the spread of the virus. This review summarizes 400 papers.¹²

7. Lockdowns slow down the spread and reduce the number of cases and deaths.

IMPORTANCE

The most impactful yet wasteful intervention, accomplishing nothing useful. Useful to the perpetrators, however, wishing to damage the economy and reduce interpersonal contacts. This measure was surprisingly tolerated in many wealthy countries, because “furlough” schemes were put in place, compensating many people for not working, or requiring them to work from home.

THE REALITY

The measure, though among the most repressive acts ever imposed on citizens in a democracy, was intuitively reasonable to many. This is an example of how far off-course uninformed intuition can be.

The core idea was simple. Respiratory viruses are transmitted from person to person. Reducing the average number of contacts surely reduces transmission? Actually, it doesn’t, because the transmission concept is wrong. Transmission is from a SYMPTOMATIC person to a susceptible person. Those with symptoms are UNWELL.

They remain at home in most cases with no action from the government. Transmission occurred mostly in institutions where sick people and susceptible people were forced into contact: hospitals, care homes, and domestic settings.

CONCLUSION AND VERDICT

-FALSE-

  • A general lockdown had no detectable impact on epidemic spreading, cases, hospitalisations, or deaths.
  • This is now widely accepted, after a meta-analysis by Johns Hopkins University (interestingly, as the JHU repeatedly features as an actor in a documentary about pandemic-related fraud by German journalist Paul Schreyer).¹³
  • This is because those involved in the vast bulk of human-to-human contacts are fit and well and such contacts didn’t result in transmission. Essentially, if you’re fooled by the “asymptomatic transmission” lie, then lockdown might make sense. However, since it is epidemiologically irrelevant, lockdowns can never work, and of course, all the voluminous literature confirms this.
  • This concept is unequivocally known to multiple public health scientists and doctors. This is why “lockdown” had never been tried before.
  • Importantly, WHO scientists drafted a detailed reviewof all the non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) in 2019 and distributed copies of the report to all member states.¹4
  • This means that ALL member states already knew, late in 2019, that masks, lockdowns, border restrictions, and business or school closures were futile. Only “stay home if you’re sick” works at all, and people don’t need to be told this, for they are too unwell to go out.

8. There are unfortunately no treatments for Covid beyond support in hospital.

IMPORTANCE

Reinforced the idea that it was vital to avoid catching the virus.

Legally, it was essential for the perpetrators bringing forward novel vaccines that there be no viable treatments. Had there been even one, the regulatory route of Emergency Use Authorisation would not have been available.

THE REALITY

In my opinion, while all these measures were destructive and cruel, active deprivation of access to experimentally applied but otherwise known safe and effective early treatments led directly to millions of avoidable deaths worldwide. In my mind, this is a policy of mass murder.

Contrasting with the official narrative, the therapeutic value of early treatment was already understood and demonstrated empirically during spring 2020. Since then, a sizeable handful of well-understood, off-patent, low-cost and safe oral treatments have been characterised.

CONCLUSION AND VERDICT

-FALSE-

  • The official position was that the disease Covid-19 could not be treated and the patient only “supported,” often by mechanical ventilation. Ventilation is wholly inappropriate because Covid-19 is rarely an obstructive airway disease, yet has a high associated morbidity and mortality. An oxygen mask is greatly preferred.
  • In my view, due to the very large amount of empirical treatment and good communication, Covid-19 is the most treatable respiratory viral illness ever. We knew in the first three months of 2020 that hydroxychloroquine, zinc, and azithromycin were empirically useful, provided treatment was started early and tackled rationally.¹5
  • It’s very important to note that it has been known for a decade and more that elevating intracellular zinc acts to suppress viral replication.¹6
  • There is no question that senior advisors to a range of governments knew that so-called “zinc ionophores,” compounds which open channels to allow certain dissolved minerals to cross cell membranes, were useful in severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) in 2003 and should be expected also to be therapeutically useful in SARS-CoV-2 infection.
  • This is a starting point for all of the clinical trials in Covid-19,¹7 including especially ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine (which are zinc ionophores).¹8
  • It should be noted that using known safe agents for experimental purposes as a priority has always been an established ethical medical practice and is known as “off-label prescribing”.

9. It’s not certain if you can get the virus more than once.

IMPORTANCE

The idea of natural immunity was flatly denied and the absurd idea that you might get the same virus twice was established. This ramped up the fear, which might otherwise have passed swiftly.

THE REALITY

Those with even a basic grasp of mammalian immunology knew that senior advisors to government, speaking in uncertain terms on this question, were lying. Certainly, in the author’s case, it was a pivotal point. I shared a foundational education in UK universities at the same time as the UK government’s Chief Scientific Advisor. This shared education meant we’d have had the same set texts. I reasoned that he knew what I knew and vice versa. I was as sure as it is possible to be that it wouldn’t be possible to get clinically unwell twice in response to the same virus, or close-in variants of it. I was right. He was lying.

CONCLUSION AND VERDICT

-FALSE-

  • There have been scoresof peer-reviewed journal articles on this topic.¹9 Very few clinically important reinfections have ever been confirmed.
  • Beating off a respiratory virus infection leaves almost everyone with acquired immunity, which is complete, powerful, and durable.
  • You wouldn’t know it for the misdirection around antibodies in blood, but such antibodies are not considered pivotally important in host immunity. Secreted antibodies in airway surface liquid of the IgA isotype certainly are, but most important are memory T-cells0
  • Those infected with SARS in 2003 still had clear evidence of robust, T-cell mediated immunity 17 years later.²¹

10. Variants of the virus appear and are of great concern.

IMPORTANCE

I believe the purpose of this fiction was to extend the apparent duration of the pandemic—and the fear—for as long as the perpetrators wished it. While there is controversy on this point, with some physicians believing reinfection by variants to be a serious problem, I think untrustworthy testing and other viruses entirely is the parsimonious explanation.

THE REALITY

I come at it as an immunologist. From that vantage point, there is very strong precedent indicating that recovery after infection affords immunity extending beyond the sequence of the variant that infected the patient to all variants of SARS-CoV-2.

The number of confirmed reinfections is so small that they are not an issue, epidemiologically speaking.

We have good evidence from those infected by SARS in 2003: they not only have strong T-cell immunity to SARS, but cross-immunity to SARS-CoV-2. This is very important because SARS-CoV-2 is arguably a variant of SARS, there being around a 20% difference at the sequence level.

Consider this: if our immune systems are able to recognise SARS-CoV-2 as foreign and mount an immune response to it, despite never having seen it before, because of prior immunity conferred by infection years ago by a virus which is 20% different, it’s logical that variants of SARS-CoV-2, like delta and omicron, will not evade our immunity.

No variant of SARS-CoV-2 differs from the original Wuhan sequence by more than 3%, and probably less.

CONCLUSION AND VERDICT

-FALSE-

  • Normal rules of immunology apply here.²² Despite the publicity to the contrary, SARS-CoV-2 mutates relatively slowly and no variant is even close to evading immunity acquired by natural infection.
  • This is because the human immune system recognises 20–30 different structural motifs in the virus, yet requires only a handful to recall an effective immune memory.²³
  • The variants story fails to note “Muller’s Ratchet,” the phenomenon in which variants of a virus, formed in an infected person during viral replication (in which “typographical errors” are made and not corrected) trend to greater transmissibility but lesser lethality. If this was not the case, at some point in human evolution, we would have expected a respiratory viral pandemic to have killed off a substantial proportion of humanity. There is no historical record for such an event.
  • I do not rule out the possibility that the so-called vaccines are so badly designed that they prevent the establishment of immune memory. If that is true, then the vaccines are worse than failures, and it might be possible to be repeatedly infected. This would be a form of acquired immune deficiency.

11. The only way to end the pandemic is universal vaccination.

IMPORTANCE

This, I believe, was always the objective of the largely faked pandemic. It’s NEVER been the way prior pandemics have ended, and there was nothing about this one that should have led us to adopt the extreme risks that were taken and which have resulted in hundreds of thousands, probably millions, of wholly avoidable deaths.

THE REALITY

The interventions imposed on the population didn’t prevent spread of the virus. Only individual isolation for an open-ended period could do that, and that’s clearly impossible (hospital patients and residents of care homes have to be cared for at very least and additionally, the nation has to be supplied with food and medicines).

All the interventions were useless and hugely burdensome.

Yet we have reached the end of the pandemic, more or less. We would have done so faster and with less suffering and death had we adopted measures along the lines proposed in the Great Barrington Declaration and used pharmaceutical treatments as they were discovered, plus general improvements to public health, such as encouraging vitamin supplements.

CONCLUSION AND VERDICT

-FALSE-

  • It was NEVER appropriate to attempt to “end the pandemic” with a novel technology vaccine. In a public health mass intervention, safety is the top priority, more so even than effectiveness, because so many people will receive it.
  • It’s simply not possible to obtain data demonstrating adequate longitudinal safety in the time period any pandemic can last.
  • Those who pushed this line of argument and enabled the gene-based agents to be injected needlessly into billions of innocent people are guilty of crimes against humanity.
  • It quickly became apparent that natural immunitywas stronger than any protection from vaccination,²4 and most people were not at risk of severe outcomes if infected.²5
  • Even children who were immunocompromisedare not at elevated risk from Covid-19, so advice that such children should be vaccinated is lethally flawed.²6

12. The new vaccines are safe and effective.

IMPORTANCE

I feel particularly strongly about this claim. Both components are lies. I outline the inevitability of the toxicity of all four gene-based agents below.

Separately, the clinical trials were wholly inadequate. They were conducted in people not most in need of protection from safe and effective vaccines. They were far too short in duration. The endpoints only captured “infection” as measured by an inadequate PCR test and should have been augmented by Sanger sequencing to confirm real infection. Trials were underpowered to detect important endpoints like hospitalization and death.

There’s evidence of fraud in at least one of the pivotal clinical trials. I think there is also clear evidence of manufacturing fraud and regulatory collusion. They should never have been granted emergency use authorisations (EUAs).

THE REALITY

The design of the agents called vaccines is very bothersome. Gene-based agents are new in a public health application. Had I been in a regulatory role, I would have informed all the leading R&D companies that I would not approve these without extensive

longitudinal studies, meaning they could not receive EUA before early 2022 at the earliest. I would have outright denied their use in children, in pregnancy, and in the infected-recovered. Point blank. I’d need years of safe use before contemplating an alteration of this stance.

The basic rules of this new activity, gene-based component vaccines, are: (1) to select part of the virus that has no inherent biological action—that rules out spike protein, which we inferred would be very toxic, before they’d even started clinical trials;²8 (2) select the genetically most stable parts of the virus, so we could ignore the gross misrepresentations of variants so slight in difference from the original that we were being toyed with via propaganda—again, this rules out spike protein; (3) choose parts of the virus which are most different from any human proteins. Once more, spike protein is immediately deselected, otherwise unnecessary risks of autoimmunity are carried forward.

That all four leading actors chose spike protein, against any reasonable selection criteria, leads me to suspect both collusion and malign intent.

Finally, let nature guide us. Against which components of the virus does natural immunity aim? We find 90%of the immune repertoire targets NON-spike protein responses.²9 I rest my case.

CONCLUSION AND VERDICT

-FALSE-

  • These agents were always going to be toxic. The only question was, to what degree? Having selected spike protein to be expressed, a protein which causes blood clotting to be initiated, a risk of thromboembolic adverse events was burned into the design.
  • Nothing at all limits the amount of spike protein to be made in response to a given dose. Some individuals make a little and only briefly. The other end of a normal range results in synthesis of copious amounts of spike protein for a prolonged period. The locations in which this pathological event occurred, as well as where on the spectrum, in my view played a pivotal role in whether the victim experienced adverse events, including death.
  • There are many other pathologies flowing from the design of these agents, including, for the mRNA “vaccines,” that lipid nanoparticle (LNP) formulations leave the injection site and home to the liver and ovaries0 among other organs,³¹ but this evidence is enough to get started.
  • See this interview for evidence of clinical trial and other fraud, publicised by Edward Dowd, a former BlackRock investment analyst.³²
  • See this video for evidence of official data fraud (UK Office of National Statistics): especially at 2min 45sec for the heart of the matter.³³
  • See here for evidence of manufacturing fraud.³4 The same methodology was used to obtain regulatory authorisations, and so it is my contention that there is also regulatory fraud.
  • In the Pfizer clinical trial briefing document to FDA, which was used for issuing the EUA (on p. 40 or thereabout), there is a paragraph stating that there were approximately 2,000 “suspected unconfirmed Covid cases”—meaning people were sick with symptoms but were not tested (otherwise, it would be stated that the tests were negative). Of these, in the first seven days after injection, there were 400 in the vaccine arm and 200 in placebo. These subjects were excluded from the dataset used to assess efficacy. It’s as clear evidence of fraud as you can get; they admit to it in the FDA briefing! Nobody paid any attention to this that I am aware of.
  • There’s also evidence of data fraud in that clinical trial as summarised by Dr. Peter Doshi, associate editor of The BMJ (formerly called the British Medical Journal).
  • Though many people refuse to accept or even look at the evidence, it is clear that the number of adverse events and deaths soon after Covid-19 vaccination is astonishing and far in excess, in 2021 alone, than all adverse effects and deaths reported to the U.S. Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) in the previous 30 years. Here is a simplified view of Covid vaccine-related mortality reports from VAERS.³5
  • This excellent presentation by a forensic statistician, well used to presenting analyses for court purposes, dismantles the claims that the vaccines are effective and shows how toxicity is hidden (see the second half of the recording).¹0
  • Another paper published by the same group questions vaccine efficacy.³6

References

1. Ioannidis JPA, Axfors C, Contopoulos-Ioannidis DG. Population-level COVID-19 mortality risk for non-elderly individuals overall and for non-elderly individuals without underlying diseases in pandemic epicenters. Environ Res. 2020 Sep;188:109890.

2. Ioannidis JPA. Reconciling estimates of global spread and infection fatality rates of COVID-19: an overview of systematic evaluations. Eur J Clin Invest. 2021 May;51(5):e13554.

3. Doshi P. Covid-19: Do many people have pre-existing immunity? BMJ. 2020;370:m3563.

4. Joffe AR. COVID-19: Rethinking the lockdown groupthink. Front Public Health. 2021 Feb 26;9:625778.

5. Madewell ZJ, Yang Y, Longini Jr IM, Halloran ME, Dean NE. Household transmission of SARS-Cov-2: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Dec 1;3(12):e2031756.

6. “Exposing the lie of asymptomatic transmission, once and for all.” May 10, 2021. https://www.bitchute.com/video/lIj22KttYq7z/

7. https://cormandrostenreview.com/

8. World Health Organization. Diagnostic testing for SARS-CoV-2. Interim guidance, Sep. 11, 2020. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/334254/WHO-2019-nCoV-laboratory-2020.6-eng.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

9. Kolata G. Faith in quick test leads to epidemic that wasn’t. New York Times, Jan. 22, 2007. Available at https://eumeswill.wordpress.com/2020/08/11/faith-in-quick-test-leads-to-epidemic-that-wasnt/

10. “Prof. Norman Fenton – Open science sessions: How flawed data has driven the narrative.” PANDA, Feb. 3, 2022. https://rumble.com/vtxi1h-open-science-sessions-how-flawed-data-has-driven-the-narrative.html

11. Jefferson T, Del Mar CB, Dooley L, et al. Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Nov 20;11(11):CD006207.

12. Alexander PE. More than 400 studies on the failure of compulsory Covid interventions (lockdowns, restrictions, closures). Brownstone Institute, Nov. 30, 2021. https:// brownstone.org/articles/more-than-400-studies-on-the-failure-of-compulsory-covid-interventions/

13. Dinerstein C. The Johns Hopkins lockdown analysis. American Council on Science and Health, Feb. 16, 2022. https://www.acsh.org/news/2022/02/16/johns-hopkins-lockdown-analysis-16135

14. World Health Organization. Non-pharmaceutical public health measures for mitigating the risk and impact of epidemic and pandemic influenza: annex: report of systematic literature reviews. World Health Organization, 2019. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/ 10665/329439. License: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO

15. McCullough PA, Kelly RJ, Ruocco G, et al. Pathophysiological basis and rationale for early outpatient treatment of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) infection. Am J Med. 2021 Jan;134(1):16-22.

16.     Te Velthuis AJW, van den Worm SHE, Sims AC, Baric RS, Snijder EJ, van Hemert MJ. Zn(2+) inhibits coronavirus and arterivirus RNA polymerase activity in vitro and zinc ionophores block the replication of these viruses in cell culture. PloS Pathog. 2010 Nov 4;6(11):e1001176.

17.     COVID-19 early treatment: real-time analysis of 1,609 studies. Retrieved Apr. 4, 2022 from https://c19early.com/.

18.     Bryant A, Lawrie TA, Dowswell T, et al. Ivermectin for prevention and treatment of COVID-19 infection: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and trial sequential analysis to inform clinical guidelines. Am J Ther. 2021 Jun 21;28(4):e434-e460.

19.     Alexander PE. How likely is reinfection following Covid recovery? Brownstone Institute, Dec. 29, 2021. https://brownstone.org/articles/how-likely-is-reinfection-following-covid-recovery/

20.    Wyllie D, Mulchandani R, Jones HE, et al. SARS-CoV-2 responsive T cell numbers are associated with protection from COVID-19: a prospective cohort study in keyworkers. MedRxiv, Nov. 4, 2020.

21.     Le Bert N, Tan AT, Kunasegaran K, et al. SARS-CoV-2-specific T cell immunity in cases of COVID-19 and SARS, and uninfected controls. Nature. 2020 Aug;584(7821):457-462.

22.    Tarke A, Sidney J, Methot N, et al. Negligible impact of SARS-CoV-2 variants on CD4+ and CD8+ T cell reactivity in COVID-19 exposed donors and vaccinees. BioRxiv, Mar. 1, 2021.

23.    Tarke A, Sidney J, Kidd CK, et al. Comprehensive analysis of T cell immunodominance and immunoprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 epitopes in COVID-19 cases. BioRxiv, Dec. 9, 2020.

24.    Gazit S, Shlezinger R, Perez G, et al. Comparing SARS-CoV-2 natural immunity to vaccine-induced immunity: reinfections versus breakthrough infections. MedRxiv, Aug. 25, 2021.

25.    Alexander PE. 150 plus research studies affirm naturally acquired immunity to Covid-19: documented, linked, and quoted. Brownstone Institute, Oct. 17, 2021. https://brownstone.org/articles/79-research-studies-affirm-naturally-acquired-immunity-to-covid-19-documented-linked-and-quoted/

26.    Chappell H, Patel R, Driessens C, et al. Immunocompromised children and young people are at no increased risk of severe COVID-19. J Infect. 2022 Jan;84(1):31-39.

27.    Alexander PE. 46 efficacy studies that rebuke vaccine mandates. Brownstone Institute, Oct. 28, 2021. https://brownstone.org/articles/16-studies-on-vaccine-efficacy/

28.    Grobbelaar LM, Venter C, Vlok M, et al. SARS-CoV-2 spike protein S1 induces fibrin(ogen) resistant to fibrinolysis: implications for microclot formation in COVID-19. MedRxiv, Mar. 8, 2021.

29.    Ferretti AP, Kula T, Wang Y, et al. Unbiased screens show CD8+ T cells of COVID-19 patients recognize shared epitopes in SARS-CoV-2 that largely reside outside the spike protein. Immunity. 2020 Nov 17;53(5):1095-1107.

30.    Schädlich A, Hoffmann S, Mueller T, et al. Accumulation of nanocarriers in the ovary: a neglected toxicity risk? J Control Release. 2012 May 30;160(1):105-112.

31. https://www.docdroid.net/xq0Z8B0/pfizer-report-japanese-government-pdf#page=14

32.    “Edward Dowd interview portion on Steve Bannons War Room Ep #1602.” https://www.onenewspage.com/video/20220204/14277521/Edward-Dowd-Interview-portion-on-Steve-Bannons-War.htm

33.    “Norman Fenton interviewed by Majid Nawaz, LBC Radio 4 Dec 2021.” Truth Archive 2030, Feb. 21, 2022. https://www.bitchute.com/video/KApFxhjiWLqI/

34.    “COVID vax variability between lots – independent research by international team.” Craig-Paardekooper, Dec. 15, 2021. https://www.bitchute.com/video/4HlIyBmOEJeY/

35.        https://openvaers.com/covid-data/mortality

36.    Neil M, Fenton NE, Smalley J, et al. Latest statistics on England mortality data suggest systematic mis-categorisation of vaccine status and uncertain effectiveness of Covid-19 vaccination. ResearchGate, December 2021. DOI:10.13140/RG.2.2.14176.20483

How Much of the Covid-19 Narrative Was True? Additional Reflections

Introduction

The purpose of this document is to demonstrate that all of the key narrative points about the SARS-CoV-2 virus said to cause the disease Covid-19 and the measures imposed to control it are incorrect. Given that the sources of these points are scientists, doctors, and public health officials, it is evident that they were not simply mistaken. Instead, they have lied in order to mislead. I believe the motivations of those who I call “the perpetrators” become clear, once it is internalised that the entire event is based on lies.

In recent days, breaking news indicates that coronavirus antibodies are present in blood stored in European blood banks from 2019.¹ The implications are momentous.

Unprecedented Pronouncements

In the first three months of the Covid event, I started noticing senior scientific and medical advisors on UK television saying things that I found disturbing. It was hard to put my finger on the specifics, but they included remarks like:

  • “Because this is a new virus, there won’t be any immunity in the population”.
  • “Everyone is vulnerable”.
  • “In view of the very high lethality of the virus, we are exploring how best to protect the population”.

I had been reading extensively about the apparent spread of SARS-CoV-2 in China and beyond, and had already arrived at a number of important conclusions. Essentially, I was sure that, objectively, we weren’t going to experience a major event. I based some of my conclusions on the Diamond Princess cruise ship experience. Note that no crew members died, and only a minority on the ship even got infected, suggesting substantial prior immunity, a steep age-lethality relationship, and an infection fatality ratio (IFR) not much different, if at all, from prior respiratory virus infections. But what was happening was that, in my view, senior people were acting a lot more frightened than seemed appropriate.

It was with this heightened interest that I began to closely examine all aspects of the alleged pandemic. I suspected something very bad was happening when the Imperial College released its modelling paper by Neil Ferguson. This claimed that over 500,000 people in the UK would die unless severe “measures” were put in place. Ferguson had over-projected all of the last five disease-related emergencies in the UK and had been responsible for the destruction of the beef herd through his modelling of the spread of foot-and-mouth disease.

I had also been reading about all sorts of “non-pharmaceutical interventions” (NPIs), and what this had taught me was that there was absolutely no experimental literature around any of the NPIs being spoken of, except masks—which were clearly ineffective in blocking respiratory virus transmission. Moreover, the non-experts in the mainstream media drew on a very limited group of experts, and I noticed that none were immunologists.

I had, in parallel, watched the evolving scene in Sweden and was pleased to note that the Swedes’ chief epidemiologist, Anders Tegnell, seemed to know what he was doing and had dismissed the panic. I knew he had been the deputy of his predecessor, Johan Gieseke, who was still around in an emeritus role. Gieseke was also reassuringly calm.

The final straw was when on March 23, 2020, the British prime minister initiated the first “lockdown”. This was wholly without precedent. I knew Sweden had rejected lockdown measures as wholly unnecessary and extremely damaging.

Instigating Fear

From that day forward, the team from the UK Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (SAGE) put up one or more members every day to appear alongside the prime minister or the health minister. These press conferences were meandering affairs, and it wasn’t clear what their purpose was. The questions asked never sought to place things in context, but instead seemed to always explore the outer edges of possible outcomes and then follow up with remarks that didn’t seem adequately prepared.

In retrospect, I think the aim was to make the press conferences the only “must watch” thing on TV, and with such a large, captive audience, a form of fear-based hypnosis was instigated. Much later, Belgian professor and clinical psychologist Mattias Desmet informed us that this was indeed the aim, calling the process “mass formation”.² This process can become malignant, as have past beliefs in events that were later conceded to have been episodes of societal madness, like the Salem witch trials, satanic abuse of children, and other delusions.

Some experts believe that modern societies are more—and not less—susceptible to mass panics because of the ubiquity of easily-controlled messaging (properly termed “propaganda,” since it was completely deliberate and carefully planned). An August 2021 animated video titled “Mass Psychosis – How an Entire Population Becomes Mentally Ill” illustrates this phenomenon; despite the animation format, the film leans heavily on academic research from luminaries such as Gustave Le Bon, Sigmund Freud, Edward Bernays, Stanley Milgram, and Solomon Asch, as well as later researchers and studies.³

It is important to be cautious about the purported importance of “mass formation,” however. In a sense, it might be seen as wholly impersonal and something that is thrown at the population and lands more or less effectively on people at random.

Worse, it comes with the notion that, if you are susceptible, it cannot be resisted. There is a contrasting school of thought that holds that information technology (IT), data, and artificial intelligence (AI) are capable of assembling a “digital prison” that is tailored to each individual and shaped over time by choices that we each make.4 The outcome isn’t in any way preordained. However, incentives and deterrents are associated with innumerable decisions we make, such as how to pay for something, whether we sell our data for tiny rewards, whether we consciously decide to open links suggested for us, whether we leave location services running permanently, and more.5

Using Mass Testing to Promote Fear

As soon as the UK lockdown was initiated, the focus turned full force onto mass testing, and especially on testing people without symptoms. I knew this didn’t make any sense, because if a large enough number of people are tested daily, without knowledge of the false-positive rate, it could certainly very quickly panic people into thinking there were lots of people walking around with the virus, unaware they had it and allegedly spreading it to others.

Once the lockdown was in place, in addition to testing, the press conferences focused on numbers in hospital, numbers on ventilators, and ultimately, the daily deaths “with Covid”. Early treatments and improved lifestyle were never spoken of. The first lockdown lasted 12 weeks, with most office staff told to work from home while being paid “furlough” (a word never before used in Britain). The “fear porn” continued all the way into high summer, long after daily Covid deaths had reached approximately zero. The introduction of mandatory masking in all public areas in the heat of summer, when they had never been required before, was the last straw for me. It was all theatre.

At that point, I set out to investigate a couple of core concepts: the “PCR test” and “asymptomatic transmission”. I’m embarrassed to say, however, that it wasn’t until the autumn of 2020 that I had clear in my mind, with mounting horror, that the entire event, if not completely manufactured, was being grossly exaggerated, with the intent of deceiving the entire “liberal democratic West”. Scores of countries were economically being squeezed to death. I knew that from a financial perspective, borrowing or printing enough money to subsidize tens of millions to remain at home could not be long sustained without destroying the sovereign currency. Strangely, exchange rates didn’t move much—another clue that powerful forces were managing this event as well as its consequences. Around this time, country leaders started talking about “Build Back Better,” and Klaus Schwab’s book, COVID-19: The Great Reset, appeared.

All of this contributed to my developing the idea of “The Covid lies”. It seemed to me that everything we had been told about the virus wasn’t true, and also that all the NPIs imposed upon us couldn’t work, and so were for nothing more than show.

One Dominant Narrative

As already mentioned, repetition and fear were key to instigating “mass formation” as described by Mattias Desmet.² This narrowing of focus, according to Desmet, means those “in the mass” (crowd) literally are incapable of hearing anything that challenges the narrative of which they’ve been convinced. Any explanation other than the truth is marshalled to dismiss rational counter-arguments. And indeed we saw that anyone challenging the dominant narrative was attacked, smeared, censored, and cancelled on social media, and no reasonable and independent voices were ever seen or heard on TV or radio.

Desmet argues that mass formation, to be successful, requires that certain conditions be in place: high levels of free-floating anxiety; a strong degree of social isolation (where devices replace real human interactions); and finally, low levels of “sense-making,” that is, many things do not make sense to many people. When a crisis is dropped into a population where these conditions obtain and is repeated ad nauseam, it is possible in effect to hypnotise them.

When the narrative has taken hold, what happens next?

  • Now, the population’s anxiety has an obvious focus, which is felt as a relief.
  • The routines—masking, lockdowns, testing, hand sanitizing—become for some a ritual, which provides daily meaning.
  • Finally, so many people are acting the same way and echoing the same lines (the lines they’ve heard time and again on TV, radio, newspapers, and their devices), that people can feel part of a national effort in a way they’ve not felt before.
  • This combination, coupled with visible and strong punishment for anyone who questions the narrative or simply refuses to comply, reinforces the groupthink.

It is, according to crowd psychology experts, nearly impossible to extract those who are this deeply “in the mass”. However, there is always another group of individuals who never fall for such tricks. Outwardly pleasant and easygoing, these individuals typically are sceptical and go along with things only if they make sense to them personally, and not because an authority figure tells them to.

There is also a third group in the middle—individuals who often sense that something is wrong but lack the courage of their own convictions and tend to side with whatever they’re told to do, rather passively. They are not hypnotised, but to third parties, they can seem to be.

Crowd psychology experts encourage those who’ve seen through the lies (the second group) to speak out and continue to do so. This legitimises speaking out by all others not persuaded by the narrative and might even extract some from the middle group. Even those in the “mass” group will be prevented from sinking yet more deeply into the narrative, from where those orchestrating events can otherwise prompt such people to commit atrocities.

Vaccine Lies

In the second half of 2020, the conversation turned to the oncoming vaccines. Having spent 32 years in pharmaceutical research and development (R&D), I knew that what we were being told about vaccines was just lies. It’s not possible to bypass a dozen years of careful work or to compress it into a few months. The product that was to emerge was almost certain, to my mind, to be very dangerous. And after I began reading my way into this area, I grew more concerned still.

In my “Covid Lies” comments, I isolate ONLY the major narrative points themselves and show that none of them are true. In other words, this was not just a little lying here and there—no, the entire construct was false. After I describe all the main lies, I show how the perpetrators were able to get away with it. At the conclusion, I believe the reader will share my view that the whole event was manufactured or exaggerated from a mild situation.

Remember, no alternative views were permitted in the “public square”. In fact, in July 2019—well before the declared pandemic—a group of powerful media organisations had already assembled and founded the Trusted News Initiative (TNI). The purpose of TNI was both to control mass media messages and crush alternative voices from any direction.6

Again, all of the Covid narrative was lies. Not mistakes. Many of the politicians who repeated others’ lines might try to offer as defence that they relied on experts to inform them. U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) director Rochelle Walensky recently did just that when she said that the CDC made vaccination recommendations because CNN published Pfizer’s press release saying that their Covid-19 vaccine was 95% effective. (You can’t make this up.) However, the true subject matter experts who promoted the false narrative from the public health departments— such as Chief Scientific Advisor Sir Patrick Vallance in the UK and National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) director Dr. Anthony Fauci in the U.S.—knew their statements were untrue.

The Question of Motive

The question of motive has to arise. What possible motive might there have been to create this state of fear? Who must have been involved to have granted authorisation to do it?

I have tried to find benign explanations and have failed to do so. The logical conclusions I’m drawn to make for very disturbing reading. I look forward to discussing them with you and indeed with anyone. Although it’s unlikely I am correct on every point, what I am sure of is that the overall picture is one of extreme deception and a highly-organised fraud. Moreover, I am not alone in reaching this view. For example, in an essay titled “if I were going to conquer you,” one author walks us through what the perpetrators would do in order to take over the world through a simultaneous “coup d’état” of the liberal democracies.7 Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. summarised a plausible explanation in a speech in Milan in November 2021.8

I appear to be the ONLY former executive-level scientist from big pharma anywhere in the world speaking out. I have invested two years pro bono in identifying the key elements of the fraud, in the sincere hope I can connect with upright individuals who can help bring this to wider attention and, ultimately, to a halt and to justice. As a result of these efforts, I can describe a global fraud operating for two years at tremendous cost in lives, the economy, and the very structure of human societies, which could only have been undertaken by powerful people, organised for a purpose that is not to the benefit of ordinary people.

Additional Observations

Though not all central, there are a large number of ancillary points that reinforce my conclusions. I have assembled some of them below. This list is not exhaustive and may be added to.

Fraud Assessed

In a series of five short videos,9 you will find remarkable similarities in a Canadian team’s interpretation of the same fraud. Note, in particular, the second film (3.5 minutes) on non-pharmaceutical interventions.¹0

Fraud Rehearsed

German investigative journalist Paul Schreyer shows that this fraud was rehearsed for many years, increasingly, with all the stakeholders now running the alleged Covid-19 fraud.¹¹

Autopsies

Why were autopsies strongly discouraged worldwide in 2020 and still today? My conclusion is that this was to cover up the lack of Covid-19 deaths. After vaccination, a large fraction of deaths have been judged to be due to the vaccines, and the lack of autopsies covers them up, too.¹²

PCR Test

The Nobel-prize-winning inventor of the PCR test, Dr. Kary Mullis, stated definitively that PCR must not be used to diagnose viral illnesses.¹³ On what basis, therefore, were “cases” determined purely by the results of this one test, much disputed as to its appropriateness?

Cause of Death

A death from any cause, within 28 days of a positive test for SARS-CoV-2, is recorded as a “Covid death”. It’s absurd—we have never assigned cause of death like this before, ever. The effect of untrustworthy PCR tests and the arbitrary assignment of a dubious “positive” as somehow causative of death has been a very effective way to fool and frighten people. Most do not know that there are literally scores of viruses, even common cold viruses, which can infect human airways, some of which—in elderly and infirm people—can give rise to severe illness.

Hospital Protocols

Hospital treatment protocols, where I have explored them, look designed to kill:

  • In the UK, the pathway starts with everyone being tested with untrustworthy PCR tests, which are applied repeatedly for an inpatient. Given that 2% of hospital admissions end in a hospital death, repeated poor testing guarantees a lot of “Covid deaths”.
  • A patient “diagnosed” as “positive” Covid is then placed in isolation, and visitors are not allowed until the patient is moribund.
  • A standard treatment involves intravenous midazolam (a benzodiazepine used for sedation) and morphine from a syringe driver, at doses up to 10 times greater than advisable for a patient capable of breathing unaided. This often results in respiratory failure and either immediate death or mechanical ventilation, accompanied by withdrawal of all care; of course, these patients then expire. It’s murder.

In the UK, we have documentary evidence that the UK National Health Service (NHS) stockpiled a year’s supply of midazolam by ordering it normally but banning 2019 prescriptions. By April 2020—over no more than two months—the entire supply was exhausted. Another year’s supply was then bulk-purchased from a generics company in France, cleaning out their stock.

Something similar occurred in U.S. hospitals, with ramped-up cash bonuses for each stage passed, up to and including mechanical ventilation.

Mechanical ventilation is rarely appropriate, because Covid-19 is NOT an obstructive lung disorder. Blood oxygen desaturation is best addressed using non-invasive masks with elevated oxygen levels. When hospitals tried this in Italy in February 2020, they ceased mechanical ventilation within a week, so stark were the differences in outcomes; that is, most ventilated patients died, while most masked patients survived. Apparently, the method of treatment the Italian health care providers had been given from “colleagues in Wuhan” was what they called “the Wuhan protocol”. In this, the guidance given was that the sooner they sedated and ventilated an agitated patient, the better the patient’s chances. This was a lie. Panicked patients needed anxiolytics (anti-anxiety drugs) and an oxygen mask, but instead, they were killed.

Experimental Vaccines

I have been incensed by the misuse of novel, experimental “vaccines,” particularly in Covid-recovered individuals, pregnant women, and children.

  • Recovered individuals are immune, and the risks of adverse events are greatly increased because the body is already poised to attack any cells expressing spike protein.
  • Pregnant women are not at greatly elevated risks from Covid-19 because they tend to be young and healthy. NEVER, since thalidomide (1956–1962), have we approved the use of experimental agents in pregnant women, and certainly not without reproductive toxicology studies. None of the vaccines have a completed “Reprotox” package (summaries on the reproductive effects of chemicals, medications, physical agents, or biologics). I filed a short expert opinion in court with America’s Frontline Doctors (AFLDS) on this topic.¹4 The vaccine makers also didn’t complete something called an ADME-Tox (Absorption Distribution Metabolism Excretion- Toxicity) package. Documents obtained in March 2022 through Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests show that Pfizer was “planning to study” vaccination in maternity as of April 30, 2021—that is, after they had already manufactured and shipped close to 100 million doses.
  • The misuse of these agents in healthy children has, without question, reverse risk/ benefit: the injections kill far more children than the virus could.

The whole thing stinks of a purpose different from public health, because if it was a legitimate public health effort, we definitely would NOT do any of these things. When I co-authored the world’s first treatise explaining some of these concerns, officials lied on the nationally broadcast BBC and other media outlets, smearing me and others like me who were raising questions. Note that the petition in question, filed with the European Medicines Agency (EMA), was co-authored by Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg, the public health doctor and minor politician from Germany who stopped the fraudulent “swine flu pandemic” in 2009.¹5

Revised Definitions

I observed two strange occurrences. First, the WHO altered the definition of “immunity” from “that obtained after natural infection or vaccination,” only mentioning vaccination and excluding “natural immunity”.¹6 That meant that only vaccination could accomplish the goal. They eventually changed this back, but for many, the damage was done, leaving non-experts not trusting natural immunity, even though it is superior to that from vaccination because the body has been exposed to all parts of the virus and will, therefore, respond to any part of it if reinfected. The

definition of a “vaccine” was also changed, so that it wasn’t necessary to prevent infection or transmission, whereas traditional vaccines almost always do this. They do so because they prevent the development of clinical illness and, in the case of respiratory viruses at least, lack of symptoms renders the person all but incapable of infecting anyone else.

In addition, the WHO changed the definition of “pandemic.” Previously, “pandemic” meant the simultaneous spreading across many countries of a pathogen, causing many cases and deaths. The definition was changed to eliminate the need for many deaths. (See Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg [at 45 min, 50 sec], interviewed on UK TV in 2010 after the exaggerated swine flu pandemic, which I now believe was something of a rehearsal for the 2020 Covid-19 pandemic.)¹7

This is a critical point, because PCR can be designed against any pathogen, and protocols can be adopted such that a large number of false positives appear. This grants bad actors the ability, relatively easily, to create the illusion of a pandemic, almost to order. Dr. Wodarg recaps his 2009 experiences and shows interesting similarities with recent events in an January 2021 interview.¹8

Many people simply don’t believe experts when they talk of a “very high fraction of positive test results being false positives”. I assure you, however, there have genuinely been a number of events where the entire suspected epidemic was an illusion, and 100% of positives were false positives. In 2007, the New York Times reported on an example of “an epidemic that wasn’t” which, when I first read it, gave me a crawling sensation.¹9 I wonder if it was this genuine event—a false alarm in which experts admitted placing “too much faith in a quick and highly sensitive molecular test that led them astray”— that birthed the method for exaggerating (or even fully faking) a pandemic such as the one we are currently living?

Bizarre Statements

I noticed early on that Bill Gates said, “We won’t return to normal until pretty much the whole planet has been vaccinated”. This is a bizarre statement from a person with no medical or scientific training (or indeed a college degree in anything). It is never necessary to vaccinate the entire population, when only the elderly and infirm are at serious risk of death if infected. Note, too, that the median age of deaths from/with Covid was the same or even older than the median age of death due to all causes.

For his part, former UK prime minister Tony Blair insisted that vaccine passports would be essential to restore confidence. Again, this was absurd, especially once we learned that these vaccines do not prevent transmission. Once this became clear, the case for coerced vaccination vanished, and this is still the present position. Yet, my unvaccinated relatives may not enter the U.S. If you fear infection, the safest person to be around isn’t a vaccinated person but a person who is fit and well, with no respiratory symptoms.

Boosters and Antibodies

The practise of “boosting”—giving people dose after dose of poorly-designed agent, ostensibly to reinforce their immunity—has no immunological basis. No genuine immunity wanes in a few months, or sometimes even in a few weeks. The perpetrators have exploited the public’s understanding of the annual influenza vaccine to somehow normalise something that is both dangerous and ineffective.

I also noticed that early on, in discussing immunity, antibodies were the discussion topic, whereas T-cells were an “extremist plot”. This is another absurdity. I can assemble expert witnesses who will attest alongside me that blood-based antibodies are relatively unimportant, potentially irrelevant to infection by respiratory viruses. This is because the virus infects the air side of the airways and blood-based antibodies cannot leave the blood and enter this “compartment”. Blood antibodies and respiratory viruses never meet except under unusual circumstances. On the contrary, T-cells leave the blood and migrate through infected airway tissue, removing infected cells.

Ferguson Track Record

Professor Neil Ferguson at Imperial College has a poor record of modelling and predictions.²0

Prescient Testimony

A former WHO staffer, Jane Bürgermeister, shared frighteningly prescient testimony in 2010. Her understanding was that respiratory virus pandemics will be used to force near universal vaccination and that this had sinister motives.²¹ I dismissed this the first time I saw it. Many of us turn away instinctively from evil because we cannot or do not want to believe that other humans are capable of that which our logic tells us is happening. I now no longer reject it. It fits far too well with the totally independent Paul Schreyer documentary.¹¹

More Prescient Testimony

Another doctor, Dr. Rima Laibow, made similar claims.²² This testimony speaks of population rejection, and like Jane Bürgermeister, locates the fraud in a conceptual world government. Again, one can reject it, or consider it alongside other pieces of information.

Conclusions

I think it’s worth developing the theme of turning away from evidence of sheer evil, and I have to say more, because it is THE pressing issue today. The evidence I set forth makes it perfectly plain that the entire world is being lied to in ways that led— predictably—to huge suffering and death. Given that none of the “measures” imposed could have mitigated illness and death from a respiratory virus, the only outcome was to be the fracturing of civil society and damage, potentially fatal, to the economy and financial system. I emphasise again here that WHO scientists had conducted a detailed review of control measures for respiratory virus epidemics and pandemics as recently as 2019, and they concluded that no imposed NPI measures make any difference at all.²³ The claims made for control in Wuhan are not credible.

The stakeholders who must have approved this action own or control the majority of the world’s capital and assets. Their motivation cannot be for money, for they stand astride the money-creating apparatus in the central and private banks. Equally, it cannot be to obtain gross control over the population, since they already demonstrably have that. This is what leads me inexorably to propose that the motives behind this are terrible—at the very least, to secure totalitarian control through mandatory, digital IDs (in the guise of useless “vaccine passports,” useless because none of these so-called vaccines reduce transmission, the only possible justification for them). Add to this a “financial great reset” with withdrawal of cash and introduction of central bank digital currencies (CBDCs), and we have a wholly controlled population, controlled automatically without human intervention on the ground. All that’s needed is to require the population to show their health passport or else they will not be allowed to cross a regulated threshold, like accessing a food store, or make a transaction using digital money unless the AI algorithm permits it. If those operating this takeover of humanity wished then to eliminate a portion of the population, with plausible deniability, I doubt a more propitious starting point could be had.

I do not believe it’s a fault in those who fall for the narrative that they cannot see the lies. People want to believe that governments and experts, for all their well-known flaws and occasionally uncovered corruption, are trying to do the best they can. They cannot accept the truth, that there is a group of powerful people who regard the ordinary members of the public as surplus to requirements. They want to deny evil because it makes them feel bad, sad, and uncomfortable to think about the world this way. They want to deny reality; that’s their coping mechanism, which is being exploited by the perpetrators of evil. It gives a cloak of invisibility to those who want to commit mass murder, quite literally, since so many people are so willing to imagine that it is not happening.

It is not clear to me what to do with the information I’ve gathered here. I believe that a calm review of the summary that I call “The Covid Lies” will result in any open-minded person agreeing that we all have been subjected to a monstrous fraud with lethal consequences, and that there is overwhelming evidence of long-term planning and deliberately injurious acts. There is no easy way to say that, but it could be represented objectively and taught, in the manner of a workshop, so that participants get to derive their own conclusions (albeit being led by the evidence).

I doubt just talking to a group of people who hold the dominant narrative view as “true” would respond at all well to this, delivered as a lecture. Nobody wants to accept that they’ve been fooled, even if the blow is softened by telling them that this has been brought about by highly experienced professionals in the covert services and has required huge amounts of money to buy off several groups. On the positive side, an increasing number of people have detected that fraud is ongoing. A particularly good example comes from the financial analyst community and refers to life insurance claims among many other pieces of evidence of wrong-doing.²4

Ignoring this and hoping it will go away is naïve and very dangerous for us all. The perpetrators have not gone away and will likely return in the fall. I expect this year or the next will see them assume totalitarian tyranny, if we have not, before then, “inoculated” important stakeholder groups to understand what has happened so far and cautioned them to be alert to the many potential presentations of the next fear-provoking episode.

Best wishes and thanks for reading.

About Dr. Mike Yeadon

I am an experienced life sciences R&D professional, with 32 years in commercial R&D. There is no reason for me to be saying the things I do, other than that I believe them to be true. I have never campaigned for or against anything in my life, and I had never made public comment on anything outside the narrow confines of my professional roles, prior to Covid-19.

I hugely enjoyed my years with Pfizer. They were a good employer, and I left on excellent terms as they shuttered their UK R&D base. Evidence of this is that I formed a business partnership with Pfizer the year after I left (2012), and we worked together on an ultimately successful venture, which concluded profitably for all in 2017.²5

I am the most highly- and broadly-qualified scientist speaking out about this alleged fraud. I have no financial or other conflicts of interest, unlike most of those who I assert are deceiving the public, everywhere.

Professional Profile

  • Currently Chief Scientific Advisor to America’s Frontline Doctors and to the Truth For Health Foundation.
  • Former founder and CEO of Ziarco, a biotech acquired by Novartis (2017).
  • Former VP and worldwide head of Allergy & Respiratory Diseases research at Pfizer, UK (1995–2011).
  • Independent consultant to over 30 biotech companies, mostly U.S. (2011–2021).
  • PhD in respiratory pharmacology (1988) and double 1st class honours degree in biochemistry and toxicology (1985).

Endnotes

1. https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1503112014700285953.html

2.      Max Blumental. “Foreign Agents #10 – Covid and mass hypnosis w/Dr. Mattias Desmet.” https://rokfin.com/stream/9705/Foreign-Agents-10–Covid-and-Mass-Hypnosis

3.      “Mass psychosis – How an entire population becomes mentally ill.” After Skool and Academy of Ideas, Aug. 14, 2021. https://rumble.com/vl52me-mass-psychosis-how-an-entire-population-becomes-mentally-ill-by-after-skool.html

4.      Catherine Austin Fitts. “Control & freedom happen one person at a time with Catherine & Ulrike Granögger.” The Solari Report, Feb. 11, 2022. https://home.solari.com/deep-state-tactics-101-part-i-with-catherine-austin-fitts/

5.       Catherine Austin Fitts. “Deep state tactics 101 Part I with Catherine Austin Fitts.” The Solari Report, May 18, 2019. https://home.solari.com/deep-state-tactics-101-part-i-with-catherine-austin-fitts/

6.      “The Trusted News Initiative – A BBC led organisation censoring public health experts who oppose the official narrative on Covid-19.” The Exposé, Aug. 29, 2021. https://dailyexpose.uk/2021/08/29/the-trusted-news-initiative-a-bbc-led-organisation-censoring-public-health-experts-who-oppose-the-official-narrative-on-covid-19/

7.       el gato malo. “If I were going to conquer you.” Bad cattitude (SubStack), Mar. 4, 2022. https://boriquagato.substack.com/p/if-i-were-going-to-conquer-you

8.      “Robert F. Kennedy Jr., son of Robert Kennedy, delivers a great speech in Milan 13 Nov 2021.” truth.exposed123, Nov. 23, 2021. https://www.bitchute.com/video/wyFtd4mshFO8/

9. https://www.canadiancovidcarealliance.org/media-resources/pandemic-alternative/

10.    “Non-pharmaceutical Interventions (NPIs).” https://rumble.com/vv3xn6-non-pharmaceutical-interventions-npis.html

11.     “Paul Schreyer: Pandemic simulation games – Preparation for a new era?” https://wissen-ist-relevant.de/vortrage/paul-schreyer-pandemic-simulation-games-preparation-for-a-new-era/  

12.     Bhakdi S, Burkhardt A. “On COVID vaccines: why they cannot work, and irrefutable evidence of their causative role in deaths after vaccination.” Doctors for COVID Ethics, Dec. 15, 2021. https://doctors4covidethics.org/on-covid-vaccines-why-they-cannot-work-and-irrefutable-evidence-of-their-causative-role-in-deaths-after-vaccination/

13.     “Kary Mullis explains why his PCR test is not a diagnostic test.” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rXm9kAhNj-4

14.          https://home.solari.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/Declaration-of-MikeYeadon-fertility-signed.pdf

15.     “Dr Yeadon’s (former Pfizer VP) coronavirus vaccine safety petition.” Dryburgh.com, Dec. 4, 2020. https://dryburgh.com/mike-yeadon-coronavirus-vaccine-safety-concerns-petition/

16.     “WHO changes definition of herd immunity.” Peter Byel [blog], n.d. https://peterlegyel.wordpress.com/2021/01/15/who-changes-definition-of-herd-immunity/

17.     “W.H.O. / Governments working in collusion with big pharma? | A necessary look back at the swine flu pandemic.” https://www.expandingawarenessrelations.com/tag/wolfgang/  

18.     “A conversation with Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg.” Pandacast, Jan. 2, 2021. https://www.pandata.org/wolfgang-wodarg/

19.     Silviu “Silview” Costinescu. “NYT 2007: Faith in quick test leads to epidemic that wasn’t.” Silview, Dec. 26, 2020. https://silview.media/2020/12/26/nyt-2007-faith-in-quick-test-leads-to-epidemic-that-wasnt/

20.    Don Via, Jr. “Neil Ferguson’s latest faux pas in a long line of fear-driven predictions.” COVID-19 Up, Aug. 18, 2021. https://covid19up.org/neil-ferguson-fear-driven-predictions/

21.     “Jane Bürgermeister | Forced vax warning – February 15, 2010.” https://brandnewtube.com/watch/jane-bu-rgermeister-forced-vax-warning-february-15-2010_Con7FXMOCvgW8Or.html  

22.    “Jesse Ventura meets Dr. Rima Laibow.” https://www.brandnewtube.com/watch/jesse-ventura-meets-dr-rima-laibow_kL2AlRqtejqXMr1.html

23.    World Health Organization. Non-pharmaceutical public health measures for mitigating the risk and impact of epidemic and pandemic influenza: annex: report of systematic literature reviews. World Health Organization, 2019. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/329439. License: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO

24.    “Bombshell: Naomi Wolf interviews Edward Dowd about Pfizer fraud & criminal ramifications.” https://rumble.com/vwjmjm-bombshell-naomi-wolf-interviews-edward-dowd-about-pfizer-fraud-and-criminal.html

25.    John LaMattina. “Turning Pfizer discards into Novartis gold: The story of Ziarco.” Forbes, Mar. 15, 2017. https://www.forbes.com/sites/johnlamattina/2017/03/15/turning-pfizer-discards-into-novartis-gold-the-story-of-ziarco/?sh=1ce601c57572   

++++++++++++++++++++++

Bitchute VIDEO: REINER FUELLMICH: THIS GENOCIDE IS NOT BY ACCIDENT

Posted by The-Truth-Seeker

First Published April 11th, 202220:25 UTC

All Credit To The Whistle-blower News Room

++++++++++++++++

Rumble VIDEO: WATCH THE WATER: Dr. Bryan Ardis Unmasks What’s Behind CONVID-1984

Posted by SettingBrushfires

Published April 11, 2022

The plandemic continues, but its origins are still a nefarious mystery. How did the world get sick, how did Covid really spread, and did the Satanic elite tell the world about this bioweapon ahead of time? Dr. Bryan Ardis (www.ardisantidote.com) has unveiled a shocking connection between this pandemic and the eternal battle of good and evil which began in the Garden of Eden.

In this Stew Peters Network exclusive, Director Stew Peters, award winning filmmaker Nicholas Stumphauzer and Executive Producer Lauren Witzke bring to light a truth satan himself has fought to suppress.

Visit http://ardisantidote.com/ to learn how to protect you and your loved ones during this biological war.

Originally posted here: https://rumble.com/v10mnew-live-world-premiere-watch-the-water.html

+++++++++++++++++++++

Bitchute VIDEO: DR. YUVAL NOAH: FREEWILL IS OVER

Posted by Conservative Politics,anti-NWO,anti-left/socialistStarblazer692003

 First Published April 11th, 2022 10:54 UTC

MORE DESCRIPTION

Introducing Dr. Alexander Deep State Alphabet Science Encounter


John R. Houk, Blog Editor

© April 6, 2022

I subscribe to Dr. Paul Alexander’s Substack page, which has the annoyingly long descriptor name: Alexander COVID News evidence-based medicine convoy mandate. Yet it is the Substack name that got my attention and the reason I subscribed.

Dr. Paul Alexander Substack Profile Photo

In an April 6 post Dr. Alexander describes his frustration with so-called American alphabet health organizations (NIH, CDC, FDA, etc.) when he challenged the efficacy of their COVID-science during his brief tenure in Trump Administration. Those challenges resulted in Dr. Alexander’s suppression and the recipient of a smear campaign as he watched the Deep State alphabets take aim to hinder President Trump’s every move.

Besides Substack, Dr. Alexander has a personal webpage: https://www.drpaulalexander.com/. His science research education credentials are quite solid from his webpage. You can examine under the heading “Education”.

The New American posted an interview between Veronika Kyrylenko and Dr. Alexander on 1/25/22 under the title, “Dr. Paul Alexander: COVID Response Is a Catastrophic Failure.” The title kind of indicates the reason control-Globalist scientists have chosen to vilify Dr. Alexander’s traditional observe-then-analyze science. Here’s the video:

Rumble VIDEO: Dr. Paul Alexander: COVID Response is a Catastrophic Failure

AND NOW Dr. Alexander’s encounter with Deep State alphabet-science Globalist-oriented bureaucrats.

JRH 4/6/22

I need your generosity. PLEASE GIVE to overcome research expenses:

Please Support NCCR

Big Tech Censorship is pervasive – Share voluminously on all social media platforms!

****************************

Dr. Alexander: How Fauci, Francis Collins, NIH, & CDC worked with deepstate Washington DC bureaucracy to CANCEL & SILENCE me, threatening to fire me if I did not resign same day; “Trump is powerless”

The attack by Fauci and the CDC and NIH on me, with the DC press, was to silence me because I told Fauci and NIH they were wrong and did not understand the data/science on lockdowns/masks

By Dr. Paul Alexander

April 6, 2022

Alexander COVID News evidence-based medicine convoy mandate

‘Trump is powerless’ they told me, he has zero power. Nothing he says matters to them in the deepstate bureaucracy.

You need to know that if Obama admin would have asked me to join, or the Biden current admin, I would have or would, for

i) who would not be honored to work for a POTUS and admin and

ii) this is not about politics for me, it was always about the science and helping in any way allowed to save lives

I have decided that you need to know the TRUTH, any and all of it, as to COVID, the science, any part of COVID that I could give it to you and especially as it applied to me. I/we, people like me who stood out as contrarians and skeptics and have lost lots and this has already happened. This is about knowing how we got here including what the origins of this virus was or who was involved and why. This includes allowing you to peer inside of the filth of DC bureaucracy and malfeasant people, people who function to benefit themselves only to the loss of the society.

The entire matter I wish to share today showed me just how powerless POTUS Trump was in the DC bureaucracy swamp and yes, I was there, I worked there for a short while, and there is a real deepstate, it is real and it is devastating if you are the target. Trump was the target and the deepstate with CDC and NIH and the press, worked daily to destroy Trump. They undercut him and really it was the deepstate that hobbled and doomed the pandemic response. I class CDC and NIH and FDA as part of the deepstate. I was there, it is how it operated. The deepstate is the ‘entrenched bureaucracy’ and Trump had no chance against it for he mistakenly appointed and surrounded himself with ineffective backstabbers and deepstate people who themselves worked against him. I supported him then and still today. He is/was a good man, good for the USA, he was just overrun by the deepstate and he just did not know how deep they were and how much they ran DC and not him. He trusted and should not have. He should have fired them all. They damaged him. As they told me, ‘he is only visiting, we run things’.

Some say put things in a book, well, I will, there are very informative things I wish to share and these are issues that I can share and will be of help. I have shared lots with persons in ways to protect me too. In this matter as per title, let me explain how I came to be the first person ‘cancelled’ and ‘silenced’ by Fauci and his gang of horsemen at CDC and NIH. Mind you, I am today punishing them with the science and my technical depth and the data which is 100% on my/our side. As said, lots are set up to be put in the public space for my protection.

So let me begin this brief explanation:

1) I was asked to work for the Trump administration in Washington DC. I arrived early May 2020; I was asked because of my academic background and work I was doing COVID related; when I was asked, I was already consulting for WHO/PAHO as their COVID advisor

2) The pandemic’s Task Force was already on deck e.g. Fauci, Birx etc. for 3 months or so and the daily clown car was ongoing and the effects of their lockdowns and school closures were already gripping society, killing people

3) My office in DC was in HHS, Independence Avenue, opposite the capitol building and DC mall

4) I went to the White House for meetings, I will not say how many, about what, and with whom, due to confidence and sensitive details

5) When I was asked to go to DC, I was already working for World Health Organization (WHO)/Pan American Health (PAHO) as their COVID pandemic evidence synthesizer; my role was to help WHO/PAHO understand COVID and how it was unfolding initially as no one knew and my skills from graduate training in EBM was called upon; why me? I was already working for WHO/PAHO from mid-2019 as a consultant helping build a training program/document on EBM, epidemiology etc. for low and middle nations

6) I took the position when asked to join the administration because I actually appreciated and admired what Trump had done for the society, the economy, for minorities and could see the benefit long-term; I thought he did very good for the US and even deserved a 2nd term; I do think that the lockdowns hurt him terribly and the OWS injections, two catastrophic mistakes and he failed to fire Fauci and Birx day 1 (among others); this cost him for they devastated his administration and they worked along with others, to harm his pandemic response, to undermine and undercut him, and their lockdown and school closure policies (Fauci and Birx) caused the death of thousands; not the virus, but their polices; we will discuss separately

7) When I got to DC early May, I was informed by high up people, that the bureaucracy has decided that it will not complete my hire and paperwork so that would be frustrated and leave DC

8) #7 went on for a while and day by day it was difficult for I was operating in my capacity but no formal paperwork, though I had badge, equipment and attended meetings officially; to allow me to move around the DC meetings and building, I was designated a ‘volunteer’ for you need some status from the security apparatus view to enter the places I entered

9) After a while of this, I was then informed that the bureaucracy did not understand how come I did not quit and so will continue not paying me. Yes, that right, I was not paid; and each day it was difficult for my family I took with me, furniture, I rented a residence in DC and had to sign a one year lease and it was incredibly expensive; I had also resigned the post at WHO/PAHO as it became a conflict (I will explain at another post) and so had no income

10) Yet the bureaucracy was not paying me; after a long while of this, and me going to office daily and doing the job I was assigned as a senior COVID pandemic advisor to the A Secretary at HHS for POTUS Trump, I finally got an initial pay check from the US Department of Defense. They decided to complete this hire and pay me as they learnt I was not paid and I even attended meetings for OWS where the military was there in heavy presence as the logistics of the injection involved them; I was told they stepped up on knowing I was not being paid and I grew to know the senior leaders of the military who were in the OWS meetings and I have to say tremendously beautiful men and women, Navy folk too.

11) I was told I was not going to be given any of the backpay for the months/time I was not paid and this I felt was not fair but this was the decision

12) At about this time when I got my first paycheck, the bureaucracy and CDC and NIH decided to leak our e-mails and only words and one line here and there to paint a deceitful narrative; they lied and smeared us and we were told it is only to hurt Trump and not to take it personally

13) This happened because the Task Force were to write the communication department and advise any media shows they were going on e.g. CNN, FOX, NBC etc. and mainly to align their statements with POTUS who was on the road trying to open society and states.

14) One such communication came from NIH and CDC and Fauci et al. It said that Fauci was going on some talk shows to discuss why schools to remain closed and masking of children, to this effect, as I recall; many very senior officials were in this email

15) I read it for I was in the e-mail chain and I decided to inform all, including Fauci and NIH and CDC officials, that he and the NIH and CDC did not know the science, were not updated on it, and did not understand it for the science showed children had such low risk of infection and actual transmission, and that the masks were essentially junk, ineffective; I attached about 10-15 studies that were out and that showed that children did not need to be kept out of school

16) Needless to say the NIH and CDC did not approve of me calling them or Fauci out and saying Fauci was not knowledgeable on the science and that he should be aware of it and giving them the science

17) There was a meeting at HHS a day or so after and several high level people from NIH and CDC attended; I cannot disclose what the meeting was for and whom were there; two folk walked with me after the meeting telling me they knew of me, heard me on telecons they were part of and really liked my views on why the lockdowns were catastrophic and had to end and on why masks, to this effect; but they wanted to tell me what had happened at CDC and NIH, involving FAUCI and my e-mail response

18) Basically, I was told that because I called NIH, CDC, and Fauci out openly and said they did not know the science, that they decided they were going to ‘cut my balls off’; that they and Fauci were outraged that I would call him out and state that he did not know the data or science and should read up on it, and that they, Fauci et al. would ensure my name was zero and could not work ever in DC and my career would be over, that they would ensure my name was destroyed; that they, Fauci and NIH and CDC officials would work with the media and leak my e-mails and others mails and work to smear and slander me; I asked if I apologized to Fauci, if they would stop; I was told no, that they, Fauci, Francis Collins, NIH, and CDC officials would ensure I was ‘silenced effectively’; I was told para ‘no, it’s already done Paul, the e-mails have already been selected, the lines of the e-mails, just words or lines but selected in a way to paint a negative picture, not the entire communications; the narrative was written already and given to the entire media already, and in about 4 days it will come out in the media and the media will write a narrative to destroy you; this is what para I was told; if you read the full communications, the text before and after that they leaked, you would understand how filthy and vile the media is+

19) Exactly as I just wrote, near word for word, it happened and it was hell, devastating hell for the White House reacted by silencing me, telling me due to the election, they wanted the story to die and POTUS was campaigning and so you could not talk, zero, no interviews to clear my name, nothing; just say quiet and they went into complete isolation of me and it was the most horrible experience I can describe; they said only POTUS must be on the news and not me and if I spoke, the story will not go away as the media would feed it; they said wait 2-3 days and another story will emerge and the media will run after it and you will not be the story anymore etc. As they said, Justice Bader passed away and it became the news; side note, I attended the viewing at the SCOTUS, the nightly vigils, it was beautiful

20) I am unsure of the exact dates but the content is accurate, and at this time, as I proceeded to the office, I was told by the HR bureaucracy that I had until 4 pm one day to resign or they would fire me; I was told by a senior official that Fauci and NIH and CDC had gotten the bureaucracy to move to terminate me for my calling him out; I could not believe this but this was what I was told and that I had to give back the laptop, and any material etc. by 4 pm

21) During that day, without me saying who was on the phone, and how, I received many telephone calls and meetings where it became know that the bureaucracy and Fauci et al. were moving to fully silence by getting me fired; the calls were from the White House (WH), counsel, liaison, and many folk in the WH and in the oval. On one of the calls of which there were many, a very very senior official (I cannot name) called me to advise me they learnt of the move to silence me (Fauci et al. using the bureaucracy) and that they, the WH were going to intervene (this was like a movie); my wife, a reporter, and another person was in my apartment during several calls and I had on speaker; the WH official said that a decision was made to move me direct to the WH to advise directly; I assumed POTUS; this was what was told to me, and that in 2 weeks I would enter with an office in the WH; many calls took place and in one of them, there was the HR bureaucracy, legal, some other people I did not know and they were threatening me to resign or they would fire me at 4.01 pm and state that I was fired; they said this way they would put out an advisory if press asked, that my services were no longer needed (to that effect)

22) I have to be very complete here; at one point maybe 2 pm, I had on one phone, the HR bureaucracy screaming at me, ‘are you coming in to sign and resign or do we fire you’ and on another phone, I had the WH and I have to say now the oval; there were people in my place listening to my discussion; the people in the WH oval told me as I asked, para ‘is this a done deal that I would enter the WH now’? They said yes, done deal, and that they have instructed the HR bureaucracy to stand down, and to take no resignation from me and do not terminate me; so the WH oval is telling me this and I said hold on please, and then spoke to the HR bureaucracy who could hear the WH oval and the people there; I asked who was in the meeting at the WH, who is there to put the muscle on the HR bureaucracy for they are yelling at me to resign and the WH oval people could here this as I had both phone going and the people in my place thought this was a movie; I was told para “the top person is sitting here with me, his orders”, so I understood who that was and I was told that he has said that the HR bureaucracy must stand down, must make no move on me, and that there must be no resignation, no termination, that I did nothing wrong, and that I WOULD enter the WH very shortly and just get through the day; it was then that I knew this was a good guy; yet, the HR bureaucracy could also hear the WH people statements as much as the WH oval people could hear the bureaucracy people’s statements; so WH oval people were screaming at me on one phone to DO NOT give them any paper or any resignation, just turn off the phone, don’t talk to them, and take a few days off, and the HR bureaucracy was telling me each time the WH oval persons spoke that if they have nothing by me at 4.01 they will fire me; to not listen to the WH, and they then said if I resigned they will give me 2-weeks’ pay, this after they refused to pay me all along;

23) then what happened next was shocking; the HR bureaucracy told me that POTUS Trump is powerless, he has no power, I was not a political appointee and because the first pay check I got from Department of Defense was as a federal employee for my designation was changed to this, then in their words para ‘we the bureaucracy run things, not Trump and he had no power and we do not care what he says, it means nothing, he is powerless, you will resign today or we will fire you’; so here I was standing with people around me, WH oval people telling me to turn off the phone and not talk to the HR and to tell the HR bureaucracy to pound sand, and the HR bureaucracy telling me that POTUS has zero power and they will not follow what he said and will move to terminate me at 4.01; if I resigned, they will give me 2-weeks’ pay and will just say I resigned and my services no longer needed, to that effect

24) at about 3.30 pm that day, I went to the HHS building to sign the paper etc. I had my laptop etc. and I was told, people will come down and collect all govt material and I could not enter the building; I was treated like pure garbage that afternoon; needless to say, I just could not take the stress anymore and hated it all and I resigned and as they said, I myself heard it officially, for the press inquired, and the statement on the WH site was that I had resigned. My services were no longer needed.

25) So yes, Fauci did work to silence and cancel and punish me but their problem is now since leaving, I am using my intellect, my skills, my knowledge, and some very good technical relationships and friends, to punish them, daily, I do it daily for I will not let them go, Fauci, NIH, CDC, I will continue to show and write and talk as to how inept, incompetent, reckless, corrupt, and dangerous they have all been and their actions, FAUCI’s particularly, have costed lives and at sometime, he must be investigated properly and legally, including as to his role in gain-of-function (as I do believe he had a role in this virus, many of them and we need to know if a financial one too; btw, I did study of biological weapons and bioterrorism under Dr. DA Henderson out of Johns Hopkins, he agreed to supervise my doctorate but I for funding, did the doctorate under Gordon Guyatt, founder of Evidence based medicine/EBM, McMaster; btw, EBM is dead now, EBM killed itself over COVID, it’s a dead field, they just do not know it yet) and made to defend his actions.

If it is shown Fauci et al. definitively costed lives by their decision and actions, their policies, that could have been prevented, that they were reckless, then he and they must be stripped of all their monies, stiff financial penalties and monies given to the families, and Fauci et al. must face harsh legal punishment. If their COVID actions are shown to have killed people. Lock them all up! [Bold emphasis Blog Editor’s]

© 2022 Paul

______________________________

Some minor spellcheck editing was performed by the Blog Editor.

Doc Tracy Follows Dick Tracy Tracks


Dick Tracy Comics

John R. Houk, Blog Editor

© April 1, 2022

If you are younger than the Baby Boom Generation, there is a good chance you have no clue about Dick Tracy in the Comic Pages of a newspaper or in Comic Books. Here is a brief Britannica.com entry of the one-time comics detective hero: https://www.britannica.com/topic/Dick-Tracy-comic-strip-character

Doc Tracy Episode screen capture

Utilizing the Dick Tracy meme, America’s Frontline Doctors appear to be preparing brief semi-documentary/entertainment episodes of Doc Tracy using documented science to expose Medical Tyranny using warped science and hearsay called science. This episode examines Kristina Lawson which the MSM has gone into overdrive to portray her as a victim of “anti-vaxxers” rather than a perpetrator of Medical Tyranny.

JRH 4/1/22 (H/T: Margaret Knueven at Wimkin Group Post at The Patriot Party)

I need your generosity. PLEASE GIVE to overcome research expenses:

Please Support NCCR

Big Tech Censorship is pervasive – Share voluminously on all social media platforms!

*****************************

Rumble VIDEO: Doc Tracy, PI – S1 E1: Lawson’s Hunt

Posted by Dr. Simone Gold

Published March 31, 2022

Frontline Films™ by AFLDS.org presents ‘Doc Tracy, Physician Investigator’ – Season 1, Episode 1: ‘Lawson’s Hunt’. Doc Tracy tracks down the California bureaucrat leading a sinister hunt to silence and terminate doctors from the frontlines. Exposing pseudoscience, fake news, and fraudulent experts ~ crack the case at DocTracy.org

Medical Kidnapping? Breast milk-dependent infant deteriorates in state custody


Parents- Levi & Marissa Anderson (Baby Cyrus) Protesting [Photo from Vaccine Impact]

I am still a bit confused why and how an Idaho pediatrician (Aaron Dykstra) could claim child endangerment to trigger a Medical Kidnapping of a child that only days before was released from a clinic with a full bill of health.

When I first read this story a MSM outlet vilified Ammon Bundy for protesting the Medical Kidnapping which went on to report the 10 month old kid’s weight loss and queasy stomach to justify Medical Tyranny against some Christian parents. I chalked the story up to a local issue and moved on.

THEN I discovered some left-out details should stoke the flames of Parental Rights over abusive government tyranny. Here are those details the local and MSM news selectively left out courtesy of America’s Frontline Doctors.

JRH 3/15/22

I need your generosity. PLEASE GIVE to overcome research expenses:

Please Support NCCR

Big Tech Censorship is pervasive – Share voluminously on all social media platforms!

*************************

Medical Kidnapping? Breast milk-dependent infant deteriorates in state custody

By Rafael King

Mar 15, 2022 05:08 AM

America’s Frontline Doctors

Unable to eat solid foods, 10-month-old removed from mother after she didn’t feel well and canceled clinic appointment

Infant’s Tootsies

An Idaho couple is accusing the Idaho Department of Health and Welfare of kidnapping their son, Cyrus, and depriving him of his only source of nutrition, his mother’s milk.

Show of force

Cyrus was taken into custody Saturday morning in a dramatic scene described by the baby’s grandfather, Diego Rodriguez, in a post entitled, Baby Cyrus Was Kidnapped!!! The baby’s parents, Marissa and Levi Anderson, were followed to a gas station and surrounded by

 “well over a dozen officers and squad cars. They acted like they were arresting Al Capone. The officers violated multiple rights, did not follow the constitution or other laws and statutes and arrested both of my daughters, handcuffed Levi, and then forcefully stripped Baby Cyrus away from his crying mother (my daughter), for alleged “child endangerment” because they canceled a pediatric appointment and the doctor called CPS [Child Protective Services] claiming that Cyrus was ‘underweight.’”

For his health?

The Andersons were allowed to see their son Sunday night in the hospital in which the Child and Family Services and Foster Care agency placed him, in the presence of a police officer and social worker. After less than two days in state custody, they reported that their infant son had become

“unresponsive and lethargic and his spirit has completely changed. He is unrecognizable from the child he was when they stole him away from us.”

Rodriguez’s post includes video showing an alert and happy, though thin, baby just prior to the seizure compared to pictures taken during the parent’s hospital visit in which Cyrus is seen sleeping with red skin blotches on his face.

Parental neglect?

Rodriguez says his grandson’s low weight is due to his inability to fully digest proteins at this point, causing him to vomit each time he eats anything other than his mother’s milk, even goat’s milk powder:

“Baby Cyrus had begun vomiting a month or so ago when Marissa started to introduce solid foods to him. Her and Levi spent countless hours researching every possible cause—going to doctors, naturopaths, specialists, and more—and all at great out-of-pocket expense. Cyrus would get better and then relapse. This happened a few times.

“As part of their continued research and care for Cyrus, they decided (reluctantly) to take Cyrus to St. Luke’s so he could get an IV to help re-hydrate him after vomiting so much. The plan/idea was for him to be well so they could try different foods, formulas, or whatever—to see what Cyrus could take and what he could not.”

Not cooperating?

Ironically, just days before the state seized Cyrus on March 12, 2022, and hospitalized him, the Andersons themselves had their son admitted to the very same hospital voluntarily for 4 days after they brought him to the hospital’s emergency room on March 1, 2022, to treat his weakness and dehydration resulting from his difficulty eating, with Marissa staying at the hospital to nurse Cyrus.

Red Voice Media summarizes what happened next:

“Other than the digestive issues, Cyrus was sent home with a ‘clean bill of health’ … Still, the Andersons were taking Cyrus in for daily weigh-ins to Dr. Aaron Dykstra at Functional Medicine of Idaho.

“Marissa called the office on Friday (March 11) to let them know she wasn’t feeling well and wouldn’t be bringing Cyrus in that day (as per just about every hospital protocol in the world right now). The doctor called her back later but she didn’t answer (she was sleeping). Marissa then found out via text message from social worker Nice Loufoua that CPS was contacted for alleged child endangerment of Cyrus.”

Presumably, during COVID, the clinic would not have allowed Marissa to enter while showing cold symptoms. Additionally, Mr. Dykstra is actually not a medical doctor. He is a nurse with a Doctor of Nursing Practice degree. Nonetheless, the social worker relied on his report and, instead of checking with the baby’s parents whether they would be bringing Cyrus for his daily weigh-in the next day, Saturday, at the same clinic, the social worker demanded that they immediately bring Cyrus to the Faces of Hope Victim Center’s Triage and Support Center for victims of domestic and sexual violence and other forms of child abuse.

 “Levi did contact Nice Loufoua, the social worker who had texted Marissa, and asked her what was going on? She refused to give any answers to him. He asked what they thought was wrong with Baby Cyrus since they were given a clean bill of health and discharged from the hospital.

Nice refused to give Levi, Cyrus’s father, any information and just demanded that he go immediately to a clinic because it is a “medical emergency.” But she refused to tell him what the ‘medical emergency’ was. She then texted him the address for “Faces of Hope Victim Center.”

Rodriguez asks rhetorically,

“Would you take your child to a place called the Faces of Hope Victim Center after being verbally harassed by a social worker?”

Even up to the last moment, the Andersons offered to cooperate with daily weighings. According to an interview on the One America News Network, Marissa offered to go with the police to have the baby weighed at the hospital, only to be arrested and forcibly removed from the ambulance in which the baby was placed.

Protests

Ammon Bundy, a current candidate for Governor of Idaho, has led protests against the seizure of Cyrus, tweeting, “Today hundreds of people gathered with us at St. Luke’s in Boise to demand an end to medical tyranny and a prompt return of Baby Cyrus to his loving parents.” In fact, Bundy is the interviewee in the above referenced One America story.

Fake News

KTVB7 published an article relying entirely on the government’s version of this story and including several verifiably false statements. For example, they stated that the baby had, “been admitted to the hospital on March 1 ‘after medical personnel determined the child was suffering from severe malnourishment.’”

Without mentioning that it was the parents who brought the child to the hospital or that the child suffered from a digestive disorder making it impossible to hold down food or that the parents made huge efforts to find a food or drink that he could hold down, they gave the impression that the parents were doing the very opposite – trying to starve their child.

Baby Rocker

As pointed out by Rodriguez, the article claimed that the father agreed to a doctor’s appointment for the baby but then “failed to show up,” when in reality the father never agreed because it wasn’t an appointment at their doctor but rather an appointment with the above described victim center. In fact, the news article makes it sound like there was some kind of long-term refusal to cooperate with health care workers when, in reality, it all happened in one day – a canceled Friday morning weigh-in and arrests and a seizure just after midnight (early Saturday morning).

The article even falsely stated that Bundy refused to leave the hospital property after being requested to do so, and was therefore arrested, when video posted by Rodrigues clearly shows that no such request was made and the police simply grabbed Bundy suddenly and arrested him. Bundy tweeted that, “this was an ambush arrest with no legal grounds.”

Local articles like these are picked up by national outlets and repeated without fact checking, creating the false appearance of a consensus on the (incorrect) facts.

Targeted?

Interestingly, both the father and the grandfather of the seized infant are active in Freedom Man Press, an organization that works to “advance the cause of Freedom, Liberty, and the founding principles of the United States of America.”

Levi Anderson serves as the organization’s Executive Director while Diego Rodriguez is the Communications and Marketing Director. Diego is described as a professional speaker and the marketing director for Freedom Man Press. He is also a known political activist and a frequent speaker at Freedom-related events.

The family has also been vocal in their opposition to mask and vaccine mandates and, during their son’s hospitalization, the Andersons made clear that they want the freedom to choose whether or not to vaccinate their child. They even link to AFLDS COVID treatment protocols. While all this may be a mere coincidence, it is worth noting that these views happen to be anathema to public health officials.

Source of heavy-handed approach to parents

Why does the government act so aggressively with parents on scant evidence of abuse (weight loss in a child where the parents are trying every possible diet to help) but so lax about, say, locating stolen property?

In Marx, Engels, and the Abolition of the Family, Richard Weikart described the socialist approach to children.

“Marx’s first significant exposure to the concept of the abolition of the family probably came during his stay in Paris in 1843-1844, when he first imbibed communist ideas and held long discussions with numerous socialists … Charles Fourier’s ideas played a significant role in the socialist movement in France in the 1830s and 1840s … Fourier advocated the replacement of monogamous marriage … He also proposed that children be raised communally …

“In another passage in The German Ideology Marx and Engels asserted that both French and English socialists were pressing for the dissolution of the family. This implies some knowledge, however cursory it may have been, of Robert Owen’s disdain for the family as an institution, since he was the foremost English socialist to attack the family. There is no doubt that Engels’ understanding of family relationships was strongly influenced by Fourier and Owen. In Anti-Duhring, which was Engels’ most influential work, he lavished praise on both socialists for their views on the family. He considered Owen’s writings on marriage among his most important works.

 …

“Engels in his draft for The Communist Manifesto articulated more clearly his vision for children in communist society:

‘”The raising (Erziehung) of children together in national institutions and at national expense, from that moment on, in which they can dispense with the first motherly care.’ The child-rearing principles that Marx and Engels espoused were not original. Fourier and especially Owen had already vigorously touted the superiority of the communal education of children and the removal of children from parental control and influence.”

Similarly, in Communism and the Family, Alexandra Kollontai wrote, 

“The state is responsible for the upbringing of children … There is no escaping the fact: the old type of family has had its day.”

SUPPORT and/or SUBSCRIBE to America’s Frontline Doctors

ABOUT AFLDS

+++++++++++++++++++++++++

{Blog Editor: AFLDS is vilified and censored for offering safe options to heal from the CCP virus known as COVID-19. As such I share the AFLDS plea for support email I received today.]

Tyranny

Email by Dr. Simone Gold, MD, JD

Sent 3/15/2022 3:26 PM

Sent via America’s Frontline Doctors (AFLDS)

Dear John,

We are watching tyranny spread across the world.

Many are rightly outraged over the use of brute military force against innocent people.

Here in America, tyranny doesn’t need tanks, and coercion doesn’t require a powerful army.

Two years ago we were told to wash our hands frequently and stay safe. Now thousands of bank accounts are being frozen because people voiced opposition to extreme and unconstitutional abuses of emergency powers.

Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau did not need tanks to strangle and conquer his enemies because he decided to control their wallets.

And you can be sure the United States government took notes.

Our enemies have done the same to America’s Frontline Doctors—from PayPal’s decision to cut off your ability to donate to us; to Amazon’s decision to shut our website down as it was hosted on their servers. And this week we received a notice from Google—they too are committed to censoring AFLDS. (More about that in an upcoming email).

In spite of it all, America’s Frontline Doctors is committed to fighting the battle to keep Americans free, and with western democracies now turning on their citizens, we need your support more than ever.

Please consider a 2022 gift today to America’s Frontline Doctors to help…

Frontline News: AFLDS is producing and delivering news content committed to the truth—news you can TRUST;

• Our Legal Team committed to preserving our constitutional freedoms; and,

• Our Medical Community committed to preserving your health and your autonomy (with huge news coming in the next few weeks!).

Perhaps you are in a position to become one of our 2022 monthly donors. If so, please let me hear from you. Maybe this will be your first annual gift—and we would be grateful for your support.

The good news is people are rising up and they are not backing down. And we will never back down either. We are committed to liberty—and are thankful you are too. Join us today so that together you and I will stand strong and prevail.

For Liberty,

Simone Gold, MD, JD
Founder
America’s Frontline Doctors
The Trusted Name for Independent Information

%d bloggers like this: