Epoch TV ran an interesting two-part interview between Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and Jan Jekielek that is a discussion of RFK Jr. activism. In case you are actually unaware of RFK Jr’s pedigree, he is the son of assassinated Senator Robert F. Kennedy, Sr. (who was Attorney General for President JFK) and thus the nephew of assassinated President John F. Kennedy. ALL of Democratic Party political heritage. This was back when the Dems had a lot of big dog Anti-Communist fighters, were considered anti-establishment to Big Business, Pro-Civil Rights (boosting equal rights for minorities), Pro-Israel yet promoted Big Government to achieve policy goals.
Those Kennedys (though probably not the Ted Kennedy brother/uncle) are probably rolling in their graves at how Marxist and Globalist and Corporatist (as in Fascist-style Socialism) the Democratic Party has become TODAY!
And so, it is my suspicion that RFK Jr. still possesses Left-oriented social views I would disagree with; NEVERTHELESS, RFK Jr. has abandoned Wokeness and has become a champion AGAINST Medical/COVID Tyranny and AGAINST Censorship Tyranny that has afflicted Americans that want nothing to do with the bad science narrative.
With that I am posting the Epoch TV interviews (and I’ve noticed other video channels are sharing as well) of those airings that originally took place on March 11 & 14, 2023.
JRH 3/17/23
Thank you to those who have stepped up!
READER SUPPORTED! I need Readers willing to chip in $5 – $10 – $25 – $50 – $100. PLEASE YOUR generosity is appreciated. PLEASE GIVE to Help me be a voice for Liberty:
YOU CAN ALSO SUPPORT via buying women’s menstrual health, healthy collagen, vitamin supplements/products, coffee from my Online stores: My Store (please use referral discount code 2388058): https://modere.co/3SrOHzI
EPOCH TV interview with Robert F. Kennedy Jr., by Jan Jekielek. Original date 3/11/23. Original link (shortened url): https://tinyurl.com/ytnd9jk4
Original Description:
Robert F. Kennedy Jr., the founder and chief legal counsel of Children’s Health Defense and author of “The Real Anthony Fauci,” shares his journey from environmental activist to a fierce critic of the vaccine approval process in this comprehensive two-part interview. Not a single vaccine on the childhood immunization schedule has been tested against a true saline placebo, he argues.
From Event 201 to Dark Winter, the Pandemic Simulations That Foreshadowed Our New Reality
EPOCH TV interview with Robert F. Kennedy Jr., by Jan Jekielek. Original date: 3/14/23. Original Link (shortened url): https://tinyurl.com/3e7td7c6
Original Description:
Now in part two, he explains how U.S. government tools developed for influencing overseas populations were deployed on Americans.
We also take a look at the string of pandemic simulations conducted in the last few decades—detailed in his book “The Real Anthony Fauci”—and the eerie similarities he discovered. [Blog Editor: There is actually a Documentary video of “The Real Anthony Fauci” which I’ve noticed Bitchute removed due to copyright complaints. I placed Part One on UGETube and inexplicably Part Two is still available on Bitchute.]
What does Kennedy think about allegations the CIA was involved in the assassination of his uncle, John F. Kennedy?
And at a time when many have lost faith in the American system, how do we restore power to the American people and rekindle American ideals?
I’m about to cross post from a gal calling herself “Lily” from Substack. I say, “calling herself” because her Substack profile gives every indication of a pseudonym. Lily’s profile page:
“Ex-Intelligence agent picking apart the WEF and everything attached to it.”
The claim of an ex-Intel association sounds very pseudonymish to me.
First off, I’m a Trump supporter. I support Trump even though his last choice of Executive Branch appointees was abysmal (a revolving door of backstabbing RINOs and traitors some of which continued in Office right through Trump’s departure). AND for much of Trump’s America First stand, he still made some economic policies that leaned a bit more toward Globalism than America First (For Example: United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement [USMCA]).
WORST OF ALL, President Trump initiated the mRNA death-jab with Operation Warp Speed and as far as I am aware still supports the dangerous mRNA jab implementation though gratefully on a voluntary basis rather than government mandates.
Except for perhaps Governor DeSantis, I suspect Trump’s 2024 rivals for the GOP President nomination support the mRNA inundation on the gullible.
AND thinking of Election 2024 (BTW – TRUMP IN 2020!), it is my humble opinion Trump has entered the same vicious tactics of 2016 to hammer GOP rivals in 2024. I am certain many of those rivals are backstabbing RINOs; HOWEVER, I don’t believe DeSantis is in that category. It is unfortunate that DeSantis might have to engage in the same kind of viciousness as Trump in efforts to preserve a DeSantis reputation. AND as I pointed out above, if DeSantis indeed pursues a GOP nomination, DeSantis has been given plenty ammo of Trump errors to load a political vicious gun.
NEVERTHELESS, IT IS obvious to any intelligent individual not brainwashed by Dem-Marxist lies and MSM propaganda, that the 2020 (and 2022 for that matter) was one of the crookedest elections in American history – TRUMP WON!
That stated, with all of Trump’s bad choices, his very name drives Dem-Marxists into such apoplectic hysteria that has come to my attention some politically motivated District Attorneys are on the verge of unwinnable indictments against Trump to keep The Donald out of the 2024 Election Cycle. THAT KIND OF HYSTERIA MEANS I’M VOTING TRUMP!
6 Prison Choir consists of individuals who have been incarcerated as a result of their involvement in the January 6, 2021 protest for election integrity after President Donald J. Trump stated “I know that everyone here will soon be marching over to the Capitol building to peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard”. The J6PC continues to make their voices heard through the power of music and sings “The Star Spangled Banner” every evening before bed.
READER SUPPORTED! I need Readers willing to chip in $5 – $10 – $25 – $50 – $100. PLEASE YOUR generosity is appreciated. PLEASE GIVE to Help me be a voice for Liberty:
One of the biggest jokes of our times is not that people were informed that they live in a democracy. The biggest joke is that they believe it. In actuality, a small group of extremely wealthy, powerful, and extremely inhuman oligarchs—also known as the Deep State—control their lives and fate. These have been preparing for decades to seize control of humanity, subjugate it, and reduce it to a population they believe “sufficient” to preserve Mother Earth’s habitability. They intend to robotize, digitize, and turn the remaining survivors into a new kind of serfdom. A massive conspiracy, like George Orwell’s “1984″ and Aldous Huxley’s “Brave New World,” is being waged by this 0.001 percent against the other 99.999 percent of humanity.
The sooner the “masked” and “socially detached” understand that governments are waging war against humanity and the global nightmare they are forcing upon us, the greater the possibility we have to regain our sovereign identities. The truth is that under the guise of “corona health protection,” humanity is subject to blatantly illegal and coercive procedures that are imposed upon it. The police and military enforce the rules, which include donning masks, isolating oneself from friends and family, being quarantined, and other arbitrary punishments for disobedience.
Sadly, slice by slice, in salami tactics, the ruling “elites” have chopped out human and civil rights under false pretenses and with the assistance of relentless media propaganda, the people of the West have slowly lost their confidence, at least from the start of the neoliberal onslaught in the 1980s. The “elites” under the Corona dictatorship are getting ready to obliterate the last bits of liberty. Even the majority today, which has been inundated with all manner of propagandized dangers, pleads for more security and is willing to give up even the very last vestiges of their liberty. The globalists have unrestrainedly increased their authority under the cover of their propaganda lies and in their unbridled desire to keep multiplying their billions.
Prince Charles, Queen Elizabeth’s eldest son (I refuse to call this puppet a king), dubbed the Corona “pandemic” a “golden opportunity.” Thus, he is a member of the circle of globalists who are using the time window of the Corona crisis to remove democracy and install the totalitarian-dystopian New World Order they seek. It is unclear when …
The powerful get increasingly alarmed as more people start to wake up and go to great lengths to persuade civil employees, administrators, medical professionals, and even independent doctors to embrace and promote the official story. Nowadays, numerous individuals support the government’s lies. Governments receive “advice” from bought scientific “task teams” and justifications to tighten the screws even further.
What transpires when the “rabble” misbehaves? Job losses, medical license revocations, physical threats against family members, and additional persecution. But when they come up against informed and awakened people, the globalists’ vile deeds and influence-peddling run into a brick block.
Has anyone noticed that the flu has almost completely disappeared in the 2020/2021 winter flu season? Why? Covid-19 statistics were inflated by lying about it. The globalists’ “invisible” leadership dictates to governments the “Covid-19 quotas” that must be met, ensuring governments’ survival under the globalists’ hammer.
The Globalists’ strategy has been to divide the people for decades.
Their latest brilliant idea is to use an invisible enemy, a virus, as the foundation of fear campaigns to keep people panicked and bullied all over the world. This is reminiscent of the infamous words spoken by Rockefeller protégé Henry Kissinger more than 50 years ago:
“He who controls the food supply controls the people; he who controls energy controls whole continents; he who controls money controls the world.”
We are in the midst of a war imposed on us by globalists and their governments. This war has already wreaked havoc on our societies, tearing apart families and friendships. We will not be able to look our children and grandchildren in the eyes if we are not careful.
We could have known what was going on and what is still going on, what this small, dark power elite—the globalists—is up to. If we do not stand up for our rights, this war will continue, preparing future generations to avoid social contact. They are already indoctrinating your children to avoid friends, schoolmates, and peers, and to avoid playing in groups—this is the “New Normal.”
The reigning “elites” in finance and politics are leveraging the Corona crisis to rebuild capitalism. By maintaining the state of emergency and denying citizens their rights, they are destroying small and medium-sized enterprises, robbing them, and demolishing Western parliamentary democracies. The authorities’ goal is to create digital-financial monopolies in …
The evil masters, the pretentious crème de la crème of civilization, those same globalists, have already and continue to neoliberally transform education systems around the world to teach children and young adults that wearing masks was and may again be necessary for survival and that “social distancing” is the only way forward.
THE DESTRUCTION OF SOCIAL NETWORKS
Globalists understand that if the social network that holds a civilization together is shattered, they have won the battle—not the war because the war will last as long as the resistance exists. Their nightmare is the positive dynamic of life, of people, societies, entire nations, and continents. Without this dynamic, life on Earth would come to a halt.
They want the polar opposite: a globalist dictator controlling a small population of serfs or robotized slaves who move only when told to, own nothing, and receive a digital, blockchain-powered universal income with which they can buy food, pleasure, and comfort based on their behavior and obedience. Once the slaves are no longer useful or expendable, their electronically controlled brains are simply turned off.
THE GLOBALISTS’ VANGUARD
The vanguard of the world’s rich and super-rich all have one goal in mind: the establishment of a New World Order (NWO) or the One World Order (OWO). The World Economic Forum (WEF), the G-7, the G-20 (leaders of the world’s most powerful economies), and some lesser-known organizations such as the Bilderberg Society, the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), Chatham House, and many others are all run by obscure individuals. The World Economic Forum (WEF), founded in 1974 by CEO Klaus Schwab, is arguably the most important current vanguard.
All of these institutions and organizations share members. Even this extended vanguard represents less than 0.001% of the global population. They have all elevated themselves above sovereign, democratically elected national governments and the United Nations. They have effectively co-opted the UN to carry out their wishes. UN-Directors General, as well as the Directors General of the numerous UN: sub-organizations, are usually chosen by the US, with the approval of their European vassals, based on the candidate’s political and psychological profile. If his or her “performance” as UN Secretary-General or head of a UN sub-organization no longer corresponds to globalist ideas, his, or her days are numbered.
Furthermore, globalists have hijacked or established the following institutions or organizations: the European Union, the Bretton Woods institutions (World Bank and IMF), the World Trade Organization (WTO), and the International Criminal Court (ICC) in The Hague. The latter lacks teeth. This ensures that the law is always on the side of those who break the law. Regional development banks and similar financial institutions, in addition to the top players, the World Bank and the IMF, keep the countries in their respective regions in check. In the end, the financial or debt economy has complete control. Western neoliberal banditry has created a highly criminal system in which political disobedience is punished through economic repression or theft of national wealth in international territories. The system’s common denominator is the (still) ubiquitous US dollar.
UNELECTED INDIVIDUALS
We the People believe it is normal for unknown, unelected individuals to rule over our sovereign nations and sovereignly elected governments. We’ve turned into a herd of obedient sheep. Globalists have slowly and quietly taken over. But we didn’t notice it. Unfortunately, most only become aware of it after it is too late, and freedom, civil and human rights have vanished. The Patriot Act in the United States is an example of this. It had been planned for a long time before 9/11. Patriot legislation to ostensibly protect the people was rushed through Congress in the aftermath of 9/11 because people were clamoring for it out of fear. And, voilà, the Patriot Act permanently deprived the American people of their freedom and civil liberties.
Humanity has been enslaved by globalists. They determine when and where a pandemic will break out, as well as the conditions under which we can survive a staged pandemic. They use very skilled instruments such as a tiny invisible enemy known as a virus and a massive but also invisible monster known as fear. These two instruments take us off the street and keep us from seeing our friends or enjoying conversation, the theater, sports, or a park picnic.
If we let them, globalists will soon be deciding who lives and who dies. Another wave of pandemics, and people will be begging, yelling, and screaming for another vaccine, applauding Big Pharma’s and eugenicists’ goals. There is still time to say NO as a group. Collectively and in unity.
TRIAL RUNS AND AGENDAS
Will the people accept the agenda of the unelected World Economic Forum? As drivers of the globalization process over the last decades, the globalists will now opportunistically portray themselves as world saviors, focusing on protecting what they have left of Mother Earth. Of course, man-made CO2-based “global warming” will be at the heart of their argument. The UN Agenda 2030—which corresponds to the 17 UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)—is the instrument for protecting nature and humanity. The UN Agenda focuses on rebuilding the willfully destroyed global economy in accordance with the 17 SDGs’ “green” principles.
Keep in mind that everything is interconnected. The infamous Agenda 2021, which aligns with and supplements the (UN) Agenda 2030, was officially launched in January 2021 with the WEF’s official declaration of “The Great Reset”. Similarly, “The Great Reset” began in January 2020, with the outbreak of the Corona Pandemic. This had been in the works for decades. The Rockefeller Report of 2010 forewarned the ongoing Corona regime with its “Lockstep Scenario,” further Event 201 of October 18, 2019, in New York, which computer-simulated a Corona pandemic, with 65 million dead and a ruined economy within 18 months. Event 201 occurred just a few weeks before the actual Corona pandemic began.
The Agenda ID 2020 is the globalists’ plan to implement what is behind the UN Agenda 2030. This is a collaboration between public and private sector partners, including UN agencies and civil society. ID2020 is an electronic identification program that bases digital identity on universal immunization. Bill Gates founded and funds ID2020, as does GAVI, the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunizations. GAVI is a Big Pharma association involved in the development of coronavirus vaccines that, along with the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF), funds a large portion of the WHO budget.
The “Great Reset,” as announced by Klaus Schwab and his colleague Thierry Malleret, will undoubtedly be carried out with the assistance of Agenda ID2020. There’s more to it than meets the eye. Agenda ID2020 is even incorporated into the SDGs as SDG 16.9, which seeks to “provide legal digital identity for all by 2030, including free birth registration.” This is perfectly in line with SDG 16’s overall concept:
“Promote peaceful and inclusive societies for sustainable development, ensure equal access to justice for all, and build effective, accountable, and inclusive institutions at all levels.”
Agenda ID2020 is currently being tested on schoolchildren in Bangladesh, following the official path of the UN Agenda 2030 to achieve the SDGs. Children are given digitized ID cards as part of the process, as well as mandatory immunization programs.
All of this will drive the digitization of money and the introduction of 5G, which will necessitate the loading of personal data onto nano-chips to monitor and control the population. As a result, it’s no surprise that Agenda ID2020 is barely mentioned in the mainstream media. ID2020 is the One World Order’s ultimate control of the world population by a small elite. ID2020’s mechanism would enable tracking, control, and networking of all people on the planet, including all health data, money flows, bank accounts, and behavior in a society that I no longer want to call civilization.
Agenda ID2020 could also include “vaccination programs” to drastically reduce the global population. Eugenics is a critical component in population control around the world. All of this sounds like a conspiracy theory, but it is a massive plot unprecedented in human history.
LOCKDOWNS FOR AGENDA IMPLEMENTATION
The ruling elite employs lockdowns as a tool to carry out the aforementioned agendas. If the public knew about this, the “elites” would face massive protests. That is why they organize and finance various types of counter-demonstrations. The Ford Foundation, for example, makes no apologies for financially supporting the “Black Lives Matter” movement, which was previously dismissed as insignificant by the elites.
Total militarization of the countries is required to control the population in the United States and Europe, where the most unrest is expected. And this is in the works. According to the New York Times, at least 93,763 machine guns, 180,718 magazine cartridges, hundreds of silencers, and an unknown number of grenade launchers have been delivered to state and local police departments in the United States since 2006. This is in addition to at least 533 aircraft and helicopters, 432 MRAPs (9-foot-tall, 30-ton mine-resistant, anti-attack armored vehicles with turrets), and over 44,900 pieces of night-vision equipment that are routinely used in night raids in Afghanistan and Iraq.
This militarization is part of a larger trend. Since the late 1990s, approximately 9% of US police departments serving at least 50,000 people have used a PPU (police paramilitary unit). This figure is nearly double what it was in the mid-1980s. Even before Covid-19, approximately 15 to 20% of the US population lived at or below the poverty line. The economic devastation caused by the lockdowns will at least double that percentage, increasing the likelihood of civil unrest and clashes with authorities. This will add fuel to the fire for more justifications for militarized policing.
BRAVE NEW WORLD OF POST-COVID WORKING
The WEF has launched a new diabolical project for the post-covid working world, presenting it to the public in October 2020 as a trial balloon to see how it responds. The “Resetting the Future of Work Agenda,” a 31-page document published in July 2020, is a blueprint for how the “Great Reset” will be carried out.
I wrote about it extensively before, but I will talk about the basics again.
They call the document a “white paper,” implying that it is a draft. It does read like an executioner’s story. People would take up arms and fight against this latest totalitarian blueprint and its authors if they knew what the WEF was up to. The time frame is ten years because the UN Agenda 2021 must be implemented by 2030.
That means we are talking about a time frame of roughly 10 years until the following should be completed:
An acceleration of digitized work processes, leading to 84% of all work processes as digital, or virtual / video conferences.
Some 83% of people are planned to work remotely – i.e., no more interaction between colleagues – absolute social distancing, separation of humanity.
About 50% of all tasks are planned to be automated – in other words, human input will be drastically diminished, even while remote working.
Accelerate the digitization of upskilling / reskilling (e.g., education technology providers) — 42% of skill upgrading or training for new skills will be digitized, in other words, no human contact – all on computer via artificial intelligence (AI), algorithms.
Accelerate the implementation of upskilling / reskilling programs – 35% of skills are planned to be “re-tooled” – i.e., existing skills are planned to be abandoned – declared defunct.
Accelerate ongoing organizational transformations (e.g., restructuring) – 34% of current organizational set-ups are planned to be “restructured’ – or, in other words, existing organizational structures will be declared obsolete – to make space for new sets of organizational frameworks, digital structures that provide utmost control over all activities.
Temporarily reassign workers to different tasks – this is expected to touch 30% of the workforce. That also means entirely different pay-scales – most probably unlivable wages, which would make the also planned “universal basic income” (UBI) or “basic income” (a wage that allows you barely to survive) an obvious need. But it would make you fully dependent on the system – a digital system, where you have no control whatsoever.
Temporarily reduce the workforce – this is projected as affecting 28% of the population. It is an additional unemployment figure, disguised as “temporarily”. These people will never come back to full-time.
Permanently reduce the workforce – 13% permanently reduced workforce.
Temporarily increase the workforce – 5% – there is no reference to what type of workforce – probably unskilled labor that, eventually, will also be replaced by automation, by AI and robotization of the workplace.
No specific measures implemented – 4% – does that mean, a mere 4% will remain untouched from the algorithm and AI-directed new work places? As small and insignificant as the figure is, it sounds like “wishful thinking”, never to be accomplished.
Permanently increase the workforce – a mere 1% is projected as “permanently increased workforce”. This is of course not even cosmetics. It is a joke.
Furthermore, the “Great Reset” envisions a credit system in which all personal debts are “forgiven” in exchange for the surrender of all personal assets to an administrative body or agency—possibly the IMF. According to the ideologues, people would own nothing and be happy because all of their needs would be met.
In addition to numerous human rights violations and disasters, the “Great Reset” envisions, for example, making the use of the resources we earn dependent on our behavior—in other words, we are to be at the mercy of this cabal and subject to the wishes of the Deep State, the shadow government, this network of oligarchs that controls all 193 UN member states plus the UN. Only then can we use our money to purchase items that are still available to us. According to various WEF papers, artificially created shortages of food, health care, and other items could jeopardize the free flow of goods.
But the cabal wants even more: as briefly mentioned above, it should not occur to people to reject the system because, simultaneously, everyone has been vaccinated and given a nano-chip, allowing thoughts to be read and influenced with 5G or, soon, 6G.
DARPA, the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, as part of the Pentagon, developed this technology years ago. It is simply a matter of time before it is put into action. And if we don’t revolt, it will be implemented. Civil disobedience in large numbers is the order of the day. The longer we do nothing, the more we sleepwalk into this human disaster.
Neither “The Great Reset” nor the “Resetting the Future of Work Agenda” specify who will enforce these new, harsh rules. They appear to be the same forces that are now being trained to wage urban warfare and suppress riots and social unrest: police and military.
STRENGTHEN THE RESISTANCE
Civil disobedience organization must address the issue of how to communicate with the police and military, as well as how to educate and inform them about the purposes for which they are being misused by this small diabolical cabal. Teachers, doctors, and people in all professions must all be educated and informed about the truth.
Disinformation in the media is brutal and powerful, making it difficult for the resistance to counter without additional funds. The ruling classes’ media is doing everything they can to further divide us.
Only freedom from fear will rip “Resetting the Future of Work Agenda” and “The Great Reset” to shreds, destroying organizations such as the WEF and co-opted UN agencies such as the WHO, UNICEF, WTO, World Bank, IWE, and possibly the entire UN system.
The globalists are acting unethically and have descended to the depths of their moral dysfunctions. The time has come to indict the project’s political and economic leaders under international human rights standards or for crimes against humanity.
There’s an old cliché: A day late and a dollar short.
Well … Here is some info I might be a bit short in sharing, but if you value Liberty the information is not valued in dollars but in lessening Freedom.
Your lying, cheating stealing government that is supposed to uphold your Constitutional Rights is actually stomping on them like an old Jack-booted storm trooper.
READER SUPPORTED! I need Readers willing to chip in $5 – $10 – $25 – $50 – $100. PLEASE I need your PayPal generosity. PLEASE GIVE to Help me be a voice for Liberty:
The U.S. government has secretly been tracking those who didn’t get the COVID jab, or are only partially jabbed, through a previously unknown surveillance program designed by the U.S. National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS), a division of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
The program was implemented April 1, 2022, and adopted by most medical clinics and hospitals across the U.S. until January 2023
Under this program, doctors at clinics and hospitals have been instructed to ask patients about their vaccination status, which is then added to their electronic medical records as a diagnostic code, known as ICD-10 code, so that they can be tracked inside and outside of the medical system
These new ICD-10 codes are part of the government’s plan to implement medical tyranny using vaccine passports and digital IDs
They’re also tracking noncompliance with all other recommended vaccines using new ICD-10 codes, and have implemented codes to describe WHY you didn’t get a recommended vaccine. They’ve also added a billable ICD code for “vaccine safety counseling”
As recently discovered and reported by Dr. Robert Malone,1 the U.S. government has secretly been tracking those who didn’t get the COVID jab, or are only partially jabbed, through a previously unknown surveillance program designed by the U.S. National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS), a division of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
The program was implemented April 1, 2022,2 but didn’t become universally adopted by most medical clinics and hospitals across the U.S. until January 2023.
Under this program, doctors at clinics and hospitals have been instructed to ask patients about their vaccination status, which is then added to their electronic medical records as a diagnostic code, known as ICD-10 code, without their knowledge or consent so that they can be tracked — not just within the health care system but outside of it as well.
Secret Tracking Program Revealed
The new International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes were introduced during the September 14-15, 2021, ICD-10 Coordination and Maintenance Committee meeting. The ICD committee includes representatives from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) and the NCHS.3
Below is a screenshot of page 194 of the agenda4 distributed during that meeting. According to the NCHS, “there is interest in being able to track people who are not immunized or only partially immunized,” and they figured out a way to do just that, by adding new ICD-10 codes.
As you can see below, ICD-10 code Z28.310 identifies those who have not received a COVID jab and Z28.311 identifies those who are not up-to-date on their shots.
Tracking Unjabbed Is Part of the Biosecurity Agenda
Why do they want to track the unvaccinated? For what purpose? The short answer: to facilitate the implementation of vaccine passports. As noted by Malone:5
“Code Number Z28.310 listed above is not a code for an illness or diagnosis, but rather for non-compliance of a medical procedure … Once a person’s vaccination status is coded and uploaded into large data base, it can be accessed by government and private health insurers alike.
The administrative state officers at the CDC have not made immunization status a reportable disease (yet) but immunization status is listed as one of the reasons for mandatory reporting.6 They are just one step away from being able to collect this information without your permission. Ergo: vaccine passports made easy. In this country, not having your vaccine records ‘up-to-date’ might mean:
•The government will not restrict your travel, airlines will.
•The government will not restrict your travel, other nations will.
•The government will not restrict your travel, auto rental companies will.
•The government will not restrict your travel, public transport will.
•The government will not restrict your travel, private companies will.”
World Health Organization Signed Off on Tracking Codes
The ICD codes were created by the World Health Organization, and doctors — with the exception of those in private practice who don’t accept insurance — are required to use these codes to describe a patient’s condition and the care they received during their visit.
As noted by Malone,7 the fact that the ICD system is run by the WHO is an important detail, as this means the WHO had to authorize the CDC to add these new codes. The implication is that these codes may be in use internationally and we just don’t know it yet.
The codes are entered into your electronic health record and used by insurance companies for billing purposes. They’re also used by statisticians who track and analyze national and global disease trends such as cancer and heart disease rates over time.
Over the past decade, these statistical analyses have gotten easier to do, thanks to the transition into electronic record keeping. In the U.S., the ICD coding system has been fully integrated into the electronic health record system since 2012.
Within the ICD-10 codes, there’s a category called ICD-10-CM,8,9 and this is the category the CDC is now using to track the unvaccinated with specific codes for “Unvaccinated for COVID-19”10 and “Partially Vaccinated For COVID-19.”11
Gross Violation of Medical Privacy Rights
Since there’s no billing or payment involved with being unvaccinated, and since being unvaccinated is extremely unlikely to be part of your disease profile, there’s no valid reason to record anyone’s vaccine refusal. It’s also a violation of medical privacy, as the records can be accessed by a variety of individuals and not just your personal doctors.
As noted by Malone, a person’s decision to get a vaccine or not is a private matter, and your privacy rights are enshrined in the Privacy Act of 1974. However, during the COVID pandemic, medical privacy rights have been repeatedly violated and broken.
Children’s’ vaccination statuses were shared with schools and employers were granted the “right” to know the jab status of their employees. Private venues were even permitted to demand proof of vaccination status — all this without a single word of the law having been revoked or amended.
They’re Tracking Reasons for Jab Refusal Too
If you need proof that these codes will be used for reasons unrelated to your health, consider this: They’re also using codes to describe WHY you didn’t get the primary series or stopped getting boosters. Those codes are listed in the screenshot below, under Z28.3 Underimmunization Status.12
The use of “delinquent immunization status” under code Z28.39 also tells us something about where this is all headed. “Delinquent” means being “neglectful of a duty” or being “guilty of an offense.” Is refusing boosters a criminal offense? Perhaps not today, but some day, it probably will be.
All Missed Vaccinations Will Be Tracked
Another tipoff that these codes are part and parcel of the biosecurity control grid is the fact that code Z28.39 — “Other underimmunization status”13 — is to be used “when a patient is not current on other, non-COVID vaccines.” As detailed on the American Academy of Family Physicians website:14
“The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services have announced three new diagnosis codes, including two for COVID-19 immunization status …
ICD-10-CM
Description
Z28.310
Unvaccinated for COVID-19
Z28.311
Partially vaccinated for COVID-19
Z28.39
Other under-immunization status
According to ICD-10-CM guidelines,15 clinicians may assign code Z28.310, ‘Unvaccinated for COVID-19,’ when the patient has not received a dose of any COVID-19 vaccine.
Clinicians may assign code Z28.311, ‘Partially vaccinated for COVID-19,’ when the patient has received at least one dose of a multi-dose COVID-19 vaccine regimen, but has not received the doses necessary to meet the CDC definition of ‘fully vaccinated’ at the time of the encounter … New code Z28.39 is for reporting when a patient is not current on other, non-COVID vaccines.”
In other words, they have already begun tracking ALL of your vaccinations, not just the COVID shot, and they can use the Z28.3 sub-codes to identify why you refused a given vaccine.
Vaccine Passports Are a Fait Accompli — Unless We Act Now
As noted by Malone:16
“The administrative state is busy building a vaccine passport system that will be active before most Americans are aware of what is being done to them. No one is going to knock on your door asking for your vaccine status because they already know …
They don’t need approval from Congress or the courts because we have given them the information through our health care providers. The CDC is the governmental organization tasked with tracking vaccine status on individuals.
They already have the records, as well as updated booster information. They just need to tweak a definition here and there, or get President Biden to keep the COVID-19 public health emergency in place indefinitely and the vaccine passports will be a fait accompli.”
You Can Now Be Billed for Immunization Safety Counseling
As if all of that weren’t tyrannical enough, they’ve also added a billable ICD-10 code for “immunization safety counseling.” That’s right. If you’ve decided you’re not willing to partake in the mRNA experiment, or you just don’t think you need some other vaccine that’s recommended, your doctor can bill your insurance for regurgitating the WHO’s vaccine propaganda.
“They have codes identifying whether you declined the COVID jab and/or any other vaccine, and for each vaccine refusal, there’s a code detailing why you declined it. ‘Belief or group pressure’ is one of those, and you can bet that code will automatically qualify you for immunization safety counseling, whether you want it or not.”
This may become more or less automatic because, again, they have codes identifying whether you declined the COVID jab and/or any other vaccine, and for each vaccine refusal, there’s a code detailing why you declined it. “Belief or group pressure” is one of those, and you can bet that code, Z.28.1, will automatically qualify you for immunization safety counseling, whether you want it or not.
They also intend to indoctrinate your children, and make you pay for it. The immunization safety counseling code, Z71.85, was described in the September 2021 issue of the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) Pediatric Coding Newsletter. You have to be a member to read the entire article, but here’s the publicly available preview:17
“Reporting Encounters for Immunization Safety Counseling.
As physicians and other qualified health care professionals field increasing numbers of concerns about immunization safety, International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) offers a new code, Z71.85, for identifying immunization safety counseling as a reason for an encounter provided on or after October 1, 2021.
Use this code when reporting counseling provided to patients and caregivers who are vaccine hesitant, wish to follow an alternative immunization schedule, or otherwise require time spent in counseling at lengths beyond that typical of routine immunization counseling.
Code Z71.85 may be reported to indicate the principal or first-listed reason for an encounter or as a secondary reason.
Documentation of time spent in preventive medicine counseling and separate time spent in immunization administration counseling should be explicit in the encounter note to support that the preventive medicine counseling was significant and separately identifiable.”
Unjabbed Teachers Flagged
In related news, in early February 2023 it was revealed that New York City teachers who did not get the jab were “flagged” with a “problem code” in their personnel files, triggering their fingerprints to be sent to the FBI and the New York Criminal Justice Services.18
The purpose of this is unclear, but former public school teacher Michael Kane, founder of Teachers for Choice, believes “that unvaccinated NYC educators were being set up to be viewed as ‘right-wing extremists’ or even ‘terrorists.'”
Kane was among those who got fired for refusing the COVID jab. The revelation that teachers’ fingerprints were illegally entered into not just one, but two, criminal databases “are certain to open up a new round of lawsuits,” Kane writes.
Call to Action
Knowing all of this, what can you do about it? How do we stop this madness? Here are a few suggestions:
1. Demand Congress finish what the Senate started by declaring the public health emergency over and done with. January 17, 2023, HR 382, a bill “To terminate the public health emergency declared with respect to COVID-19” was referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce. This bill must be passed.
2. Contact your Congressional representative and let them know you:
•Support the Select Subcommittee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government’s investigation.
•Want Congress to reject all attempts by the administrative state, the United Nations, the WHO, Health and Human Services (HHS) and the Biden Administration to require a vaccine passport or a digital ID.
•Expect them to work to ensure the freedom of travel for all citizens.
•Expect them to protect Constitutional rights.
•Expect them to protect all rights to privacy, including and especially medical privacy, and since these new ICD-10 codes are in violation of your right to privacy, you want them to take immediate action to ensure the codes are revoked.
With respect to what you can do to protect your medical privacy on a personal level, keep in mind that independent doctors are not required to use ICD codes unless they accept insurance. So, by choosing a doctor who is in private practice, you can avoid getting tagged and trapped in the system.
Betsy Combier discusses the threat of a ‘Problem Code’ to unvaccinated NY educators in terms of payroll. How is this labeling based on vaccination status a scary omen of the future of personal data tracking? What hazard does this pose for both NY educators and the rest of the population? Michael and Betsy examine the link between this classification, the FBI and fingerprints. Don’t miss this!
The nightmarish Deep State vision for the future is more horrific than most can even imagine as technology advances, warns author and The New American publisher Dennis Behreandt in this episode of Behind The Deep State with host Alex Newman. Behreandt, who wrote the new book End Game: Covid and the Dark State Quest for Bio-digital Convergence in a Transhumanist World, starts off by sounding the alarm about the “elites” and their radical views on overpopulation. He proceeds to discuss the “singularity,” where technology reaches unpredictable heights. And he details some of the terrifying technologies already in use or development that promise to bring about changes that are unprecedented in human history, including some which are difficult to even imagine.
There is a remarkable amount of tyranny being pushed in America and indeed across the entire world once labeled free because they were the victors of WWII defeating the Axis tyrants Nazi-Germany, Imperial Japan and Fascist Italy. Some of the fruit of that victory was the imparting of the Western concept of Freedom to the Axis losers.
Today the instruments of governing in nations tagged as Representative Democracies (some Republics and some Constitutional Monarchies) have used a combination deceptive legislation and Bureaucratic rules (not approved by Constitutional constituents) to reverse Freedom and Liberty into government despotic control of lives, thoughts and beliefs.
One act of tyranny being thrust upon people is the concept of 15-Minute Smart Cities. In essence YOU would be required to live/exist in a specified urban area in which YOU CANNOT travel in a walking/bicycle distance of more than fifteen minutes in any direction in the name of Climate Carbon Footprint Control. The tyranny is how this 15-minutes is enforced.
I was saddened but not surprised that Search Engines I used to gather information on 15-Minute City tyranny delivered a majority of information explaining how this tyranny was for the good of humanity and planet Earth. That included Search Engines that promote their privacy (as opposed marketing snoops Google or Bing) such as DuckDuckGo, StartPage, Swiss Cows for example. All the Search Engines bringing 15-Minute City favoritism to the top while seemingly burying or lowering 15-Minute City critics/criticism.
Below are some videos and commentary on the eradication of Freedom and Liberty accomplished in most instances that brainwashed constituents are unaware and accepting of what is happening to their existence.
WAKE UP AND RESIST!
JRH 2/5/23
Thank you to those who have stepped up!
READER SUPPORTED! I need Readers willing to chip in $5 – $10 – $25 – $50 – $100. PLEASE I need your PayPal generosity. PLEASE GIVE to Help me be a voice for Liberty:
I found this video on Telegram but can’t remember which Channel. Glenn Beck & Jedediah Bila on they tyranny behind 15-minute only travel restrictions of Globalist Smart Cities.
[Blog Editor: This article on TruthTalk.uk utilizes pro-Smart City videos in its criticism of the obvious tyranny to be imposed. It was posted on 1/7/23]
What is a smart city, let alone a 15 minute smart city and do you want to live in one?
Who better to ask for a definition of what a smart city is than from the horse’s mouth, the WEF? Before you read it, notice that the article was originally published on the World Bank website who are a WEF member.
“What is a smart city? We’ve heard the term in contexts as diverse as urban planning and governance, transport, energy, the environment, health, and education. We’ve also noticed that the notion of smart cities relies on a range of technologies—including the internet of things (IoT), mobile solutions, big data, artificial intelligence (AI), and blockchain. Because of this connection with technology, we’ve had concerns about how smart cities will address issues such as data privacy and social exclusion. We see a risk that urban areas with poor web connectivity could be left out of the smart-cities trend. We’d like to continue an open dialogue on this trend.”
A smart city is basically a “Digital Gulag”. Let me explain. When you see the internet of things (IOT), data, AI and blockchain mentioned in 1 sentence it can be translated as surveillance, social credit scores and digital currencies, no matter how they dress it up. Basically a prison
How long has the concept of smart cities been around? In planning for decades but in actual fact the first mention of smart cities on the WEF site can be traced back to 2016 in an article called “4 ways smart cities will make our lives better”
The internet of things, smart phones and sensors are central to its success. In the article they also say “material and assets” will be tracked. What or who are these “material assets”? We (humans) are the “material assets” that will be tracked
“The rise of the Internet of Things (IoT) will help this to become a reality. Sensors and smart phones will be able to trac materials and assets, letting people know when they are not being used, about to break, or where they are. This will unlock huge amounts of spare capacity in the system, creating new business models that will drastically change the way the city functions. The digital circular city would not only save resources but would change the citizen’s experience for the better.”
2 years later in 2018 they posted the following image from their Twitter account. Notice the drones, electric transport, smart roads, rooftop wind turbines. It is all Agenda 2030 driven, with climate change and sustainability being key.
In 2020 the WEF and G20 entered an alliance called the Global Smart Cities Alliance (GSCA). The WEF say “Our Alliance is creating smart city governance” They have given the game away by using the word governance. What they actually mean is “control”
The 2 minute WEF video explaining the G20 GSCA is revealing. The key word that keeps popping up is data. They sell the concept of “protecting your data” when in fact it is the complete opposite. By having your data tracked everywhere you travel, everything you do can be tracked by your mobile phone. You can also expect 5G everywhere and facial recognition as standard in the smart cities of the future.
The WEF gave an example of a smart city in Toyota, Japan, in 2021. Naturally, they deleted the page. Here it is from the Wayback Machine. The 2 minute video gives a thorough explanation.
Here is what you can expect. Self-driving cars and robots. 3 types of streets: one for pedestrians, one for bikes and scooters and one for self-driving automated vehicles. Shuttles will deliver goods and robots will be everywhere. Nothing dystopian about that at all.
Interestingly out of the 36 cities that are being used as test beds for smart cities the one that has caused the most ripples recently on social media is Oxford (which isn’t one of the 36).
The smart city concept has now morphed into 15-minute cities. What is a 15-minute city? Every city will be split into sectors. Within 15 minutes by bike or walking there will be shops, bars, gyms, GP practices, schools etc. You won’t need or be able to leave without permission.
This will also mean reducing carbon footprints as there will be less cars on the roads. Sounds pretty awesome? It also sounds like it would be very easy to lock people down. Where have we seen that before? Let’s rewind 2 years.
Think back to 2020/2021 where people spent their lives within 1 to 5 square miles of their home. Looking back and with what we know now, this was nothing to do with a pandemic or public health – it was psychological preparation for “15 minute cities”
Under the guise of climate change you will no longer be able to travel more then 15 minutes in the city you live…
Cameras will be filming number plates to ensure compliance. It is simply another name for lockdowns except this time they will be “climate lockdowns”. If you watched the Hunger Games, you will remember that everywhere was broken up into districts. This is the exact same.
Undoubtedly council members will have extra “passes”. Travel now while you can because it will only be a luxury for the wealthy in the near future. The founder of the term “smart cities” called “climate lockdowns” fake news. That’s when you know it’s true.
15-Minute City: #Oxford has organised a new traffic plan to reduce the number of cars in the city while offering more local services and being more climate resilient Fake news circulated on social networks about "climate lockdown" which was severely deniedhttps://t.co/oNvOXibW8Mpic.twitter.com/BRulhW3C8m
— Carlos Moreno | IAE-Paris Sorbonne (@CarlosMorenoFr) January 5, 2023
They are giving us The Hunger Games and telling us it’s healthy for us! Oxford is not the only “15 minute city”, but this is a pilot scheme with a planned national and international roll-out. Canterbury is also on the hit list in the UK.
Maynooth University (NUI) in Ireland is the brains behind Irish smart cities. They are working hand in hand with the All Ireland Smart Cities Forum. Isn’t it funny how their logo looks similar in shape to the UN Sustainable Development Goals?
Maynooth University (NUI) held a conference back in 2016 with a workshop entitled “Creating Smart Cities”. One of the slides was called Surveilling the “smart city”
In 2017 Jamie Cudden, Smart City Programme Manager at Dublin City Council gave a talk on 20+ Smart City Use Cases in 15 minutes (ironic title). The first slide is all about data.
Here are just some of the 20 uses and the comments he made when presenting them.
Real Time Passenger Information where he says “opening that information out to the likes of Google and AI” Smart Bins “you can put sensors on the bins to count the amount of people in the area, you can also put wifi hotspots in the bin”
Smart Street Lights “what you can do with these in terms of connectivity, comms, sensors, cameras, there are huge opportunities” Smart Stadiums “using a stadium as a microcosm for a smart city” (I will come back to this later)
Smart Parking “we can put an optical sensor in parking bays and in street lights to scan up and down the road as well as using them for CO2 emissions” as well as “no need to use cash meters” EV charging and Car Sharing “great if you don’t want to own a car”
Car Pooling and Autonomous Vehicles “transforming how people use and share trips and how that feeds into the future of autonomous vehicles”
Bike sharing “transformed the whole idea of the sharing economy in cities” and “in Chinese cities it is a billion dollar industry where you can put a GPS chip and smart lock on the bike”
Have you seen enough yet? If you live in a city you will have seen many of these already operational. You may have thought they were all clever ideas before. But once we start connecting the dots, it all comes back to data and surveillance.
The same Jamie Cudden was the moderator of an event in 2022 called Sustainable Cities and Enabling Technologies. The keynote speech was given by Alice Charles, who is also a WEF member. Cristina Martinez, the other speaker is also a WEF Global Shaper.
Earlier I mentioned Smart Stadiums. In 2017 a talk was given about how they were being used as the testing ground for Smart cities. It was titled “Building Smart City Technology Into Smart Stadiums” in collaboration with Intel and Microsoft (WEF).
Croke Park has an 82k capacity. It is a test bed for the Internet of Things (IoT) which will then be rolled out to smart cities. One of the projects being tested was “crowd behaviour”. Sound sensors and cameras are everywhere feeding back data on where the crowd “are congregating and why they are congregating” as well as “spotting anti-social behaviour” (his words not mine). Facial recognition will be added as well. Sounds very big brotherish and intrusive. It could never be abused!!
Cities globally are following the agenda mapped out for them and Dublin is no different. A big shout out to @bigmacandwhys who directed me to the City Edge project based in West Dublin. Dublin Council is heavily involved.
Have a look at this: https://t.co/rEZp6MwUeM Seems to be predetermined that it will adhere to the principles of the 15min city.
Yet again they claim to be housing 75,000 people. Zero carbon and sustainability, however, are mythical concepts. It is also divided into 5 zones (remember Oxford). They even spell it out in their project vision which is based on the 15 minute principle
Sadly, the next generation are already being indoctrinated about smart cities. Jonathan Reichental, author of Smart Cities for Dummies wrote 2 books for kids called “Exploring Smart Cities” and “Exploring Cities” Bedtime Rhymes.
The brilliant Patrick Wood in Technocracy And Smart Cities sums it up best when he says “Traditional urban planners seek to build functional cities that work for people, whereas smart city planners build functional cities focused on controlling people”
When you hear “smart city” just replace it with “data, surveillance and control”. Smart villages are certainly in the pipeline. The reality is there is nothing intelligent about them whatsoever. They are just another spoke on the wheel of Agenda 2030 which people need to wake up to.
Clown & Monkey parody on UK Law aimed at silencing critics of Medical Tyranny. Could Chairman (Dementia) Joe Biden (of Coup Election 2020) or his puppeteers be preparing for America? My guess is yes!
++++++++++++++++++++++++
Federal government is accused of using antiterrorism tech to target vaccine dissent
The US federal government is adopting military-grade AI that was used to crack down on ISIS to censor dissent by US citizens on issues like election fraud and vaccine hesitancy, according to the executive director of the Foundation for Freedom Online, Mike Benz.
Private firms and universities have received millions of dollars in grants from the National Science Foundation (NSF), a federal agency, to develop tools similar to those developed by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency’s Social Media in Strategic Communications (SMISC) program in 2011.
SMISC’s tools were used “to help identify misinformation or deception campaigns and counter them with truthful information,” in the Middle East. In a report, Mike Benz detailed how the NSF and other organizations are using this technology to censor the speech of Americans.
“One of the most disturbing aspects of the Convergence Accelerator Track F domestic censorship projects is how similar they are to military-grade social media network censorship and monitoring tools developed by the Pentagon for the counterinsurgency and counterterrorism contexts abroad,” reads the report.
Speaking to Just the News, he said: “DARPA’s been funding an AI network using the science of social media mapping dating back to at least 2011-2012, during the Arab Spring abroad and during the Occupy Wall Street movement here at home. They then bolstered it during the time of ISIS to identify homegrown ISIS threats in 2014-2015.”
According to Benz, the NSF has adopted DARPA’s technology to target two groups of Americans: those skeptical of recent election results and those who claim COVID-19 vaccines could be harmful.
“The terrifying thing is, as all of this played out, it was redirected inward during 2016 — domestic populism was treated as a foreign national security threat,” Benz said.
“What you’ve seen is a grafting on of these concepts of mis- and disinformation that were escalated to such high-intensity levels in the news over the past several years being converted into a tangible, formal government program to fund and accelerate the science of censorship,” he said.
“You had this project at the National Science Foundation called the Convergence Accelerator,” Benz recounted, “which was created by the Trump administration to tackle grand challenges like quantum technology. When the Biden administration came to power, they basically took this infrastructure for multidisciplinary science work to converge on a common science problem and took the problem of what people say on social media as being on the level of, say, quantum technology.
“And so they created a new track called the track F program … and it’s for ‘trust and authenticity’ but what that means is, and what it’s a code word for is, if trust in the government or trust in the media cannot be earned, it must be installed. And so they are funding artificial intelligence, censorship capacities, to censor people who distrust government or media.”
Benz noted how mainstream media and fact-checkers have become arbiters of truth, determining what is acceptable and unacceptable to post online, and how the pandemic has normalized “censorship in the name of public health.”
“What’s happened now is the government says, ‘Okay, we’ve established this normative foothold in it being okay to [censor political speech], now we’re going to supercharge you guys with all sorts of DARPA military grade censorship, weaponry, so that you can now take what you’ve achieved in the censorship space and scale it to the level of a U.S. counterinsurgency operation,’” Benz explained.
A Thai government spokesperson told Professor Sucharit Bhakdi this week that his country could soon become the first in the world to nullify and make void its contracts with pharmaceutical giant Pfizer.
According to Bhakdi, the spokesperson said, in reference to the company’s experimental covid “vaccines,” that “we will see to it that Thailand is the first country in the world to declare this contract (with Pfizer) null.”
We are told that the Royal Family in Thailand was directly impacted by Pfizer’s covid injections, which reportedly harmed the king’s daughter, Princess Bajrakitiyabha. Because of this, Thai authorities are working towards ending the country’s relationship with Pfizer.
Bhakdi says he met with top government advisors and explained to them how the entire premise behind the “vaccines” is built on a throne of lies. Pfizer fraud is the only thing backing the jabs as there is no safety data to show they work as claimed.
Upon hearing this, Thai government advisors were shocked and assured Bhakdi that they are making preparations to sever Pfizer’s contracts with the country.
Thailand seeks billions in retribution from Pfizer for fraudulent covid injections
In addition to ending the Pfizer contracts, the Thai government also plans to seek retribution to the tune of billions of dollars in payback from the company. That money will then go towards compensating all Thai people who “lost their existence” as a result of the Pfizer covid jab rollout.
“The discussion he cited having with the Thai government spokespeople, in conjunction with their advisors to the Thai Royal family, is significant,” writes Nicholas Creed for The Daily Bell.
“The monarchy is revered by Thais, to the point of being sacrosanct and beyond reproach; subject to strict Lèse-majesté laws being invoked when criticism is made of the Royal family.”
In short, the Royal Family of Thailand holds great sway and influence over affairs such as this. The Thai people trust its decisions and are sure to support this move to remove Pfizer from their nation.
It was reported back in December that Princess Bajrakitiyabha collapsed from a heart attack after getting jabbed by Pfizer. This is the basis upon which the Royal Family is now moving towards holding Pfizer accountable for its crimes against humanity.
“If anything was going to awaken the Thai people from indoctrinated slumber, incurring their wrath and outrage at the scale of how badly they have been duped – this would probably be it,” Creed says, noting that up until now the Thai people fell for the mass psychosis and “uniformed worship of the new normal ideology.”
“I want to wake up from this nightmare.”
In the comments, someone wrote that Pfizer not only bullied but also bribed government officials, many through blackmail, into buying and distributing Pfizer’s covid shots to their populations.
“Fraud vitiates everything,” this person added, noting that contract law, which is color of law, is chartered under Roman Canon law.
“Common law is superior to color of law. The Magna Carta is superior to Roman Canon law. The Constitution of the United States of America is supreme in America.”
Another wrote that Pfizer and its executives, including CEO Albert Bourla, need to have all of their assets seized, including those being held in banks around the world.
“Go out and arrest all Pfizer executives on your soil,” this person added. “These cockroaches have to be hiding in a country somewhere.”
++++++++++++++++++
Mess with the Thai Royal Family At Your Peril, Pfizer
It seems that the Thai Royal family had a Princess who was a good global citizen. She took three of the Pfizer shots. She went into a coma a while back.
The Thai Royal family is very distressed. Investigations were ordered.
The distress of the Royals was increased by the reports coming back from their investigators. It seems that Pfizer, apparently, did NO safety studies on this shot.
Shortly thereafter, Thailand cancels the covid contracts with Pfizer on the basis of fraud. …
Additional rumors:
[Two trusted Americans ex-pats who have long lived in Thailand] have revealed to me that several, different, sources, are reporting to them, that ‘something’, a really big ‘something’, is disturbing the Bangkok ‘underworld’. My guys have contact with it through a couple of martial arts dojos. Both are hearing the same rumors, ‘disturbance in the force’ kind of rumors.
The rumor to NOT listen to says that ‘assassins’ are being ‘recruited’ out of very deep holes in the martial arts world.
Me? I would NOT want to have this logo on my letterhead as an executive.
The Central Bank Digital Currency (“CBDC”) and the digital passport can make our lives easier and more efficient. But new international legislation shows that the purpose of these possibilities, has far-reaching implications for our privacy.
The covid “pandemic” opened the doors to a new era of increased surveillance and control. The era of biosecurity. The “pandemic” may be over, but the agenda behind the unleashing of one or more deadly poisons and diseases and an even deadlier “cure” is not. The Great Reset is moving forward, and if the populations of Western countries do not wake up, the final part of the central control grid may snap into place – the rollout of digital identities and CBDCs.
“Tracked, traced, and databased….” Behind the QR codes and green passes that governments, businesses, and even churches introduced during the “pandemic” -requiring them as proof of health or vaccination status – an even vaster infrastructure is being built. Once fully implemented, this “digital gateway” will determine your identity, career, currency, liberty, and personal sovereignty.
Pitched to the public as convenient and safe, the machinery of a globally applicable digital ID and its data flows and data farming amounts to a lucrative “economics of total central control” working for the Globalists alone. The promised benefits of having all our personal identification, login, and digital interactions in one “digital wallet” may soon transform into a terrifying captivity under the rule of unelected central bankers.
Released on 25 November 2022, ‘State of Control’ is a timely and factual documentary with skillful cinematography, directed and researched by Benjamin Jonas van den Brink and produced by Max von Kreyfelt of Debunk Productions.
In this documentary international experts such as Edward Snowden, Arno Wellens, Catherine Austin Fitts express their serious concerns and criticisms. James Corbett and Lex Hoogduin give their vision on the arrival of the digital identity and CBDC. It compiles a range of facts and opinions, creating a shocking picture of the future of mankind. A crystal-clear narrative that can’t be ignored.
“State of control”, the control society is increasingly becoming a reality.
What is the price of convenience?
The CBDC (Central Bank Digital Currency) and the digital passport can make our lives easier and more efficient. But new international legislation shows that the purpose of these possibilities, has far-reaching implications for our privacy.
In this documentary international experts such as Edward Snowden, Arno Wellens, Catherine Austin Fitts express their serious concerns and criticisms. It compiles the range of facts and opinions, creating a shocking picture about the future of mankind. A crystal-clear narrative that can’t be ignored.
Cast
James Corbett
Bas Filippini
Ken van Ierlant
Lex Hoogduin
Cristian Theres
Brett Scott
Tijmen Wisman
Catherine Austin Fitts
Mahir Alkaya
Annie Machon
Co-Pierre Georg
Directed by Benjamin Jonas van den Brink
Executive producer Max von Kreyfelt
Research: José Bosman, Benjamin Jonas van den Brink
Narrated by: Andrew Piper
Camera: Maarten Langelo, Bram van Spengen, Juul Thielen
Not only is the U.S. Government corrupt, but there is every appearance our government promotes harm to its citizens (once known as WE THE PEOPLE) to maintain rule and control.
In September 2022, The Epoch Times asked the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to release its Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR) data mining results. The CDC refused. A Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request has now forced the release of these data, and they are stunning
The CDC’s PRR monitoring has identified several hundred safety signals, including for Bell’s palsy, blood clots, pulmonary embolism and death. In individuals aged 18 and older, there are 770 safety signals for different adverse events, and more than 500 of them have a stronger safety signal than myocarditis and pericarditis
In the 12- to 17-year-old age group there are 96 safety signals, and in the 5- to 11-year-old group there are 66, including myocarditis, pericarditis, ventricular dysfunction, cardiac valve incompetency, pericardial and pleural effusion, chest pain, appendicitis and appendectomies, Kawasaki’s disease and vitiligo
The proportions of deaths, which were only provided for the 18-plus age group, was 14% for the COVID jabs compared to 4.7% for all other vaccines
The FDA is also required to perform safety monitoring, using empirical Bayesian data mining. The Epoch Times asked the FDA to release its monitoring results in July 2022 but, like the CDC, the FDA refused, only to admit in December 2022 they’d confirmed the Pfizer shot was linked to pulmonary embolism
In September 2022, The Epoch Times asked the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to release its Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR) data mining results. PRR1 measures how common an adverse event is for a specific drug compared to all the other drugs in the database.
According to the standard operating procedures2,3 for the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), which is run jointly by the CDC and the Food and Drug Administration, the CDC is required to perform these data mining analyses.
Not only did the CDC refuse to release the data, but it also provided false information — twice — in response to The Epoch Times’ questions about the monitoring being performed. As reported by The Epoch Times back in September 2022,4 the CDC initially claimed PRR analyses were “outside the agency’s purview” and that no monitoring was being done by them.
Eventually, the agency admitted it was doing PRRs, starting in February 2021, only to later claim they didn’t perform any PRRs until March 2022. The Epoch Times also cited several papers in which the FDA and/or CDC claimed their data mining efforts had come up empty handed.5 Now, we find that was all a pack of lies.
CDC Monitoring Reveals Hundreds of Safety Signals
In reality, the CDC’s PRR monitoring reveals HUNDREDS of safety signals, including Bell’s palsy, blood clots, pulmonary embolism and death — all of which, according to the rules, require thorough investigation to either confirm or rule out a possible link to the shots. As reported by The Epoch Times in early January 2023:6
“The CDC analysis was conducted on adverse events reported from Dec. 14, 2020, to July 29, 2022. The Epoch Times obtained the results through a Freedom of Information Act request after the CDC refused to make the results public …
PRR involves comparing the incidence of a specific adverse event after a specific vaccine to the incidence after all other vaccines. A signal is triggered when three thresholds are met, according to the CDC: a PRR of at least 2, a chi-squared statistic of at least 4, and three or more cases of the event following receipt of the vaccine being analyzed. Chi-squared tests are a form of statistical analysis used to examine data.
The results obtained by The Epoch Times show that there are hundreds of adverse events (AEs) that meet the definition, including serious conditions such as blood clotting in the lungs, intermenstrual bleeding, a lack of oxygen to the heart, and even death. The high numbers, particularly the chi-squared figures, concerned experts.
For many of the events, ‘the chi-squared is so high that, from a Bayesian perspective, the probability that the true rate of the AE of the COVID vaccines is not higher than that of the non-COVID vaccines is essentially zero,’ Norman Fenton, a professor of risk management at Queen Mary University of London, told The Epoch Times in an email after running the numbers through a Bayesian model that provides probabilities based on available information.”
Myopericarditis Is Far From the Only Problem
One of the few side effects of the COVID jabs that the CDC has actually acknowledged is myocarditis (heart inflammation), and a related condition called pericarditis (inflammation of the heart sack). Alas, the PRR monitoring results reveal there are more than 500 other adverse events that have stronger warning signals than either of those conditions.
“The proportions of reported deaths was 14% for the COVID jabs compared to 4.7% for all other vaccines.”
In individuals aged 18 and older, there are safety signals for 770 different adverse events, and two-thirds of them (more than 500) have a stronger safety signal than myocarditis and pericarditis. Of those 770 signals, 12 are brand-new conditions that have not been reported following other vaccines. Topping the list of safety signals are cardiovascular conditions, followed by neurological conditions. In third and fourth place are thromboembolic conditions and pulmonary conditions. Death is sixth on the list and cancer is 11th. Considering the uptick we’ve seen in aggressive cancers, the fact that death tops cancer really says something.
The number of serious adverse events reported between mid-December 2020 and the end of July 2022 (just over 19 months) for the COVID jabs is 5.5 times greater than all serious reports for vaccines given to adults in the U.S. over the last 13 years (approximately 73,000 versus 13,000).
Twice as many COVID jab reports were classified as serious compared to all other vaccines given to adults (11% vs. 5.5%), which meets the definition of a safety signal.
The proportions of reported deaths, which was only provided for the 18+ age group, was 14% for the COVID jabs compared to 4.7% for all other vaccines. As noted by Fenton,12 “If the CDC wish [sic] to claim that the probability a COVID vaccine adverse event results in death is not significantly higher than that of other vaccines the onus is on them to come up with some other causal explanation for this difference.”
In the 12- to 17-year-old age group, there are 96 safety signals, including myocarditis, pericarditis, Bell’s Palsy, genital ulcerations, high blood pressure, menstrual irregularities, cardiac valve incompetency, pulmonary embolism, cardiac arrhythmia, thrombosis, pericardial and pleural effusion, appendicitis and perforated appendix, immune thrombocytopenia, chest pain and increased troponin levels (indicative of heart damage).
In the 5- to 11-year-old group, there are 66 safety signals, including myocarditis, pericarditis, ventricular dysfunction, cardiac valve incompetency, pericardial and pleural effusion, chest pain, appendicitis and appendectomies, Kawasaki’s disease, menstrual irregularities and vitiligo.
It’s worth noting that the CDC didn’t perform its first safety signal analysis until March 25, 2022 — 15 months after the shots were rolled out. Why the long wait — especially since the CDC had announced it would begin monitoring in early 2021? Just consider, for a moment, how many lives have been lost because the CDC failed to properly monitor safety, and still drags its feet when it comes to warning people about the risks involved.
FDA Still Refuses to Share Safety Data
The FDA is also required to perform safety monitoring using another technique called Empirical Bayesian data mining. The Epoch Times first asked the FDA to release its monitoring results back in July 2022,13,14 but like the CDC, the FDA refused and insisted the data showed no evidence of serious adverse effects. In other words, “Just trust us. We’re experts.”
According to the FDA, the only potential signal they’d found through April 16, 2021, was for raised body temperature.15 Then, in mid-December 2022 — just four months after The Epoch Times tried to get these data — the FDA announced that pulmonary embolism (blood clots that block blood flow in the lungs) had met the threshold for a statistical signal, and continued to meet the criteria after in-depth evaluation, but it was only linked to the Pfizer jab.16
As noted by The Epoch Times,17 pulmonary embolism is also identified as a signal in the CDC’s PRR analysis for individuals as young as 12, which really ought to strengthen concerns.
The FDA also admitted it had already evaluated three other warning signals: lack of oxygen to the heart, immune thrombocytopenia (a blood platelet disorder) and intravascular coagulation (a type of blood clotting), but none of these continued to meet the threshold after analysis.
If the FDA was evaluating four warning signals, why did they tell The Epoch Times there was no evidence of ill effects, and why did they claim the only potential signal they’d found was slight fever? Are we to believe they discovered these signals after The Epoch Times asked for the monitoring results and then completed four in-depth investigations in four months?
Whatever the truth, it’s clear that both the CDC and FDA are not being transparent. Worse, they’ve hidden data, knowing it could mean the difference between life and death for hundreds of thousands of people.
CDC Has Ignored Clear ‘Death’ Signal
The CDC ignoring a clear signal for death is probably the most egregious example of its failures as a public health institution. As early as July 2021, Matthew Crawford published a three-part series18,19,20 detailing how the CDC was hiding safety signals by using a flawed formula. In August that year, Steve Kirsch informed the agency of these problems, but was ignored.
Then, in an October 3, 2022, article,21 Kirsch went on to show how “death” should have triggered a signal even when using the CDC’s flawed formula (which is described in its VAERS standard operating procedures manual22). Here’s an excerpt:23
“The formula the CDC uses for generating safety signals is fundamentally flawed; a ‘bad’ vaccine with lots of adverse events will ‘mask’ large numbers of important safety signals … Let me summarize the key points for you in a nutshell: PRR [proportional reporting ratio] is defined on page 16 in the CDC document24 as follows …
A ‘safety signal’ is defined on page 16 in the CDC document as a PRR of at least 2, chi-squared statistic of at least 4, and 3 or more cases of the AE [adverse event] following receipt of the specific vaccine of interest. This is the famous ‘and clause.’ Here it is from the document:
Only someone who is incompetent or is deliberately trying to make the vaccines look safe would use the word ‘and’ in the definition of a safety signal.
Using ‘and’ means that if any one of the conditions isn’t satisfied, no safety signal will be generated. As noted below, the PRR will rarely trigger which virtually guarantees that most events generated by an unsafe vaccine will never get flagged.
The PRR value for the COVID vaccines will rarely exceed 1 because there are so many adverse events from the COVID vaccine because it is so dangerous (i.e., B in the formula is a huge number) so the numerator is always near zero. Hence, the ‘safety signal’ is rarely triggered because the vaccine is so dangerous.”
A Fictitious Example
Using a fictitious vaccine as the example, Kirsch explained how an exceptionally dangerous vaccine will fly under the radar and not get flagged, thanks to this flawed formula:25
“Suppose we have the world’s most dangerous vaccine that causes adverse events in everyone who gets it and generates 25,000 different adverse events, and each adverse event has 1,000 instances.
That means that the numerator is 1,000/25,000,000 which is just 40 events per million reported events. Now let’s look at actuals for something like deaths. For all other vaccines, there are 6,200 deaths and 1 million adverse events total.
Since 40 per million is less than 6,200 deaths per million, we are not even close to generating a safety signal for deaths from our hypothetical vaccine which killed 1,000 people in a year … The point is that a dangerous vaccine can look very ‘safe’ using the PRR formula.”
Calculating Death Signal for the COVID Jab
Next, Kirsch calculates the PRR for death for the COVID jab — using VAERS data and the CDC’s definitions and formula. As of December 31, 2019, there were 6,157 deaths and 918,717 adverse events total for all vaccines other than the COVID shot. As of September 23, 2022, there were 31,214 deaths and 1.4 million adverse events total for the COVID jabs. Here’s the formula as explained by Kirsch:26
“PRR = (31,214/1.4e6) / (6,157/918,717) = 3.32, which exceeds the required threshold of 2. In other words, the COVID vaccine is so deadly that even with all the adverse events generated by the vaccine, the death signal did not get drowned out!
But there is still the chi-square test. Chi-square test results were 18,549 for ‘death,’ which greatly exceeds the required threshold of 4. The CDC chi-square test is clearly satisfied for the COVID vaccine. Because the death signal is so huge, it even survived the PRR test.
This means that even using the CDCs own erroneous … formula, all three criteria were satisfied:
1.PRR>2 [PRR greater than 2]: It was 3.32
2.Chi-square>2 [Chi-square greater than 2]: It was 18,549
3.3 or more reports: There were over 31,214 death reports received by VAERS … which is more than 3
A safety signal should have been generated but wasn’t. Why not? … Hundreds of thousands of American lives have been lost due to the inability of the CDC to deploy their own flawed safety signal analysis … It’s been known since at least 2004 that using reporting odds ratio (ROR) is a better estimate of relative risk than PRR.27 I don’t know why the CDC doesn’t use it.”
The CDC is also hiding the severity of side effects in other ways. As explained by Fenton,28 the way side effects are categorized by the CDC help obfuscate the scale of certain problems. For example, “cardiac failure acute,” “cardiac failure,” “infarction,” “myocardial strain” and “myocardial fibrosis” are listed as separate categories, even though in real life they’re all potential effects of myocarditis.
By separating them, you end up with fewer frequency counts per category, thereby giving you an underpowered chi-square test so that a warning signal is not triggered. If related categories were merged, far stronger safety signals would likely emerge.
CDC Has No Reasonable Defense
The CDC is responsible for monitoring both VAERS and V-Safe, and between these two databases, there’s no possible way they could ever say they didn’t know the shots were harming and killing millions of Americans.
The CDC also has access to other databases, including the Defense Medical Epidemiology Database (DMED), which (before it was intentionally altered29) showed massive increases in debilitating and lethal conditions, including a tripling of cancer cases.30
The findings in these databases have never been brought forward during any of the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) meetings or the FDA’s Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC) meetings, at which members have repeatedly voted to authorize the jabs to people of all ages, including infants and pregnant women.
They even added these toxic shots to the childhood vaccine schedule — which allows states to mandate them for school attendance — without addressing any of the 66 safety signals found in the CDC’s PRR analysis. The fact of the matter is that the CDC has known about these risks all along, and there’s no excuse for not sharing and acting on these data.
Help Spread the Word
Mainstream media are ignoring all of this, so help spread the word. Everyone needs to know what the CDC’s safety data reveal. To that end, here are a few suggestions for how you can help:
Write or call your members of Congress and ask them to investigate the CDC’s safety monitoring — We cannot have a public safety agency that is incapable of monitoring safety and taking appropriate action when problems are found, be it correcting a flawed formula or announcing that a safety signal has been detected. Of course, they must also publish their findings once an investigation has been made.
Contact your local newspaper and urge them to investigate and report on the CDC’s failure to act on safety signals.
Share the data on social media and ask why no one in the media, Congress, academia or medical community is investigating these matters.
Share this information with your doctor and members of the medical community.
Also share it with university administrators, and ask them to explain how and why, in light of these data, they are still mandating COVID shots.
Dr. Alexandra Henrion Caude, Geneticist and Director of Research at the French NIH (21 years), has serious concerns about the effects of the Covid-19 mRNA “vaccines” and the way in which they were rolled out.
Through three planned waltzes, an unsuspecting public trustingly rolled up its sleeves starting December 2020. First waltz: fear. Second: division. And the final being a solution to the fear: an unproven, harmful and, in many cases, deadly experimental injection.
On top of the overwhelming global data to support the mRNA shot harms, Dr. Henrion Caude warns of the potential for the messenger RNA to alter human DNA, both within the vaccinee and their offspring.
Dr. Henrion Caude shared her expertise and the relevant scientific data with us in Orlando, FL, January 7, 2023.
Two years of one-party rule in Washington are over, and the new Republican House majority must now restore balance through vigorous oversight. The Select Subcommittee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government is expected to focus on allegations of collusion between social media companies and the Biden administration.
But it should expand its focus to include the government’s use of COVID to wage war against doctors — which continues to this day.
The suppression of doctors’ freedom to advise and treat patients began early in the pandemic. Promising alternative courses of treatment, such as generic drugs like ivermectin or hydroxychloroquine, were shouted down by false news narratives.
Media companies took their cues from public health agencies, which exaggerated concerns over people using medicines to treat COVID in ways that were not intended and against medical advice. Positive clinical data was ignored.
The next major front in the war on doctors opened up with the vaccine rollout. President Joe Biden, Dr. Anthony Fauci and other public officials promised these novel, rushed vaccines would prevent illness and even transmission.
Biden’s declaration that, “If you get vaccinated, you won’t get COVID” has now been exposed as a lie, but it’s crucial to understand how it came to this.
In the past, broad skepticism would have greeted plans to mass distribute a “safe and effective” vaccine that was developed and approved in just 12 months.
And society would have flatly rejected government mandates that pushed people to get vaccinated or risk losing their jobs and becoming social outcasts. Science and medicine, practiced correctly, should challenge the powers that be, not blindly follow them.
But in our ongoing ordeal, no skepticism has been allowed, no discussion, no options. Those who raised questions or suggested different approaches were smeared as “deniers” or even worse, “anti-vaxxers.”
Even as the public learned more about the virus’s actual threat, the vaccines’ disappointing performance, and the tragic reality of vaccine injuries which began occurring at an unprecedented scale, the political imperative from Biden and Fauci never wavered.
They continued to preach a single-minded focus on the experimental vaccines. More and more vaccine products were rushed through Emergency Use Authorizations from the Food and Drug Administration, resulting in astronomical profits for their manufacturers.
This unholy alliance of government, the pharmaceutical industry and media deprived the public of full and fair advice from the medical community. The American Board of Internal Medicine (ABIM), a nonprofit organization that certifies physicians’ medical licenses, has issued letters to me and my colleagues threatening our ability to practice medicine.
They accused us of spreading “misinformation” — ignoring the huge disconnect between the government’s statements and the medical reality on the ground. Despite their status as a private organization with no statutory authority, the ABIM has morphed into the “enforcement” arm of the government, wielding the ability to control certification and the livelihood of doctors, who are subject to career-ending threats for veering from the government’s narrow and singular approach.
And this month, California’s new law empowering state agencies to disbar medical professionals who deviate from the party line has taken effect. Gov. Gavin Newsom recently called California the “True Freedom State.” The scores of its residents—and its doctors—fleeing for Florida and Texas know better.
A “one-size fits all” approach to vaccines, or to any other health issue, is almost never warranted. Here, proponents of vaccine (and of government and big-tech coercion and censorship) flatly refuse to consider patient factors, such as age, medical history, and overall health, to determine who needs what treatment.
By virtue of their professional training, doctors must advise patients on available treatments and known risks of any treatment or procedure. By threatening doctors who might provide information different than their preferred worldview, ABIM is disrupting the doctor-patient relationship.
When allowed to practice their craft freely, physicians can prevent societal disaster by focusing on individual patients, informed by clinical experience.
Groups like the ABIM, and public medical officials like Fauci, should support and encourage evidence-based debate and patient-centered care.
Instead, they have suppressed both that debate and treatment approach by persecuting its proponents. This campaign must be stopped, its origins and evolution must be thoroughly documented, and it must never be allowed to recur. Physician autonomy must be restored lest all patients suffer.
Oversight is a core congressional function, and it’s particularly important when the government is under divided party control.
The new Select Subcommittee has a long to-do list, but the people deserve a thorough accounting of the ongoing war on doctors.
Pierre Kory is President and Chief Medical Officer for the Frontline COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance.
The views and opinions expressed in this commentary are those of the author and do not reflect the official position of the Daily Caller News Foundation.
This letter has been signed by Dr. Rachel Corbett, Dr. George Fareed, Dr. Melanie Gisler, Dr. Brian Hooker, Dr. Pierre Kory, Dr. Katarina Lindley, Dr. James Lyons-Weiler, Dr. Robert Malone, Dr. Peter McCullough, Dr. Liz Mumper, Dr. Meryl Nass, Dr. David Rasnick, Dr. Richard Urso and hundreds more physicians, scientists and medical professionals.
The original authors are Michael Kane and Meryl Nass, M.D., and it is being distributed by Children’s Health Defense. Medical and scientific professionals can sign the letter, which is a basic statement of principles that should be at the core of medicines but which have sidelined or violated since the beginning of the crisis.
Executive Summary
1. There is no scientific rationale for continuing any COVID-19 mandates in 2023 and beyond.
2. Mask and vaccine exemptions must be offered at the discretion of the physician and patient as opposed to one-size-fits-all government edicts.
3. Parental rights and decisions must be preserved to ensure the health and well-being of their children.
4. The ability of medical professionals to speak freely to their patients and the public must not be compromised.
Informed consent is the basis of medical ethics. Shared decision-making is a model of the patient-physician relationship that is considered the most desirable by both the US and UK government health establishments. Patients want to make their own medical decisions, and they have the legal right to do so. They expect their physicians to share knowledge with their patients to inform the best choices.
The corollary to informed consent is that medical decisions ought to be made by individual patients based on their individual situation and personal best interest. ‘One-size-fits-all’ medicine is incongruent with these principles. It denies informed consent and personal autonomy.
During the last three years, we have experienced unprecedented interference with the doctor-patient relationship by the government. Considerable financial incentives were paid to medical industries and medical providers to offer certain treatments and to refuse others.
When financial incentives did not achieve universal vaccination, mandates were imposed. One way this was done was by requiring COVID-19 vaccinations for healthcare workers whose employers received Medicare payments after we had learned that vaccinations did not protect patients or coworkers from infection.
Grants to school districts were conditioned on mask mandates in schools. These newly imposed incentives, and punishments for noncompliance, fly in the face of long-established medical ethics, especially informed consent and shared decision-making. They must end.
COVID-19 Mandates
There is general agreement that all available COVID-19 vaccines fail to prevent viral transmission and only briefly reduce cases. After several months, people who are vaccinated become more susceptible to COVID-19 infections than the unvaccinated. Therefore, mandates for COVID-19 vaccines are scientifically and logically indefensible.
In response, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) adapted its guidelines for managing COVID-19, quietly suggesting that both vaccinated and unvaccinated Americans should be treated identically with respect to isolation, quarantining and testing. Yet the CDC continues to exhort Americans to receive more COVID-19 vaccine booster doses and supports federally imposed vaccine mandates.
Essentially everyone in our country has been exposed to COVID-19 by now, and nearly everyone has been infected at least once. We can anticipate that the US will continue to face evolving COVID-19 variants, but we can also anticipate that COVID-19’s severity will keep weakening over time.
Yet patients and doctors are still not permitted to choose the COVID-19 therapies best suited to each patient. Mandates must end, and patients and doctors must reassert their human and legal rights to determine the medical care each patient receives.
Vaccine and Mask Exemptions
Patients are individuals. They experience different risks from vaccinations and may have medical or psychological issues that preclude safe masking. Pretending that these differences don’t exist is denying reality. Historically, doctors were able to issue waivers for masks and vaccinations, as they were considered to have the best knowledge and judgment to issue such waivers.
Although every state by law accepts that doctors can issue medical waivers for vaccines and masks, many health and education departments have started nullifying these waivers, superseding physician authority. States have also been investigating and punishing doctors for issuing medical waivers. It appears that federal and state governments want to make themselves the arbiters of these medical decisions. This must not stand.
Parental Rights
States decide on the age of consent, and until that age is reached, parents are wholly responsible for their children, with a few limited exceptions. But during the past two years, we have seen a dangerous trend. State requirements that parents must consent to vaccinations given to their underage children are being ignored in multiple jurisdictions. This happened in Washington, DC, for children ages 11 and older by order of the Mayor and City Council. The law they passed kept the fact that their children had a medical procedure secret from the parents. While Congress, which oversees the law in the District of Columbia, could have said no, it instead failed to act. A lawsuit challenging this law was won in November 2021, so the law no longer stands in DC.
However, in Philadelphia, PA, San Francisco, CA and Kings County, WA, the local health officers issued guidelines in early 2021 allowing local medical providers to vaccinate children as young as age 12 without parental permission, which still stand.
This is a dangerous usurpation of parental rights by local public health authorities. It also violates state and federal law. Furthermore, there has been a recent accompanying trend by ‘medico-legal’ professionals to assert in published journal articles that 12-year-olds have the maturity to decide on their own medical procedures.
Most states don’t allow children to consent to use tanning salons or get tattoos below the age of consent. To bypass parents and allow underage children to decide what gets injected into them is inconsistent with state laws, medical ethics, common sense, and optimal medical care of children. It needs to end.
Free Speech for Medical Professionals
An attack on the free speech of doctors and medical scientists is being waged across America today. While controversy is inherent in scientific advancement, and scientific knowledge continuously evolves, disagreement with the federal public health recommendations has led to draconian censorship and suppression. Doctors have been investigated, lost their specialty board certifications, and even lost their medical licenses for speaking out publicly against federal guidelines.
Yet no health authority is infallible, and the COVID-19 pandemic proved this. In fact, both the World Health Organization (WHO), NIH and CDC changed their COVID-19 policies, guidelines, and recommendations numerous times throughout the pandemic.
The suppression of medical professionals’ speech is illegal, according to the First Amendment and state statutes, and must immediately end.
The tyranny Americans and citizens of the once Free World Western nations now face has a twisted new look on the same old bad tasting fruit. The “fruit” is an Elitist control of the – considered – non-elite people. For the Elite to control the non-elite, ALL forms of individual thinking must be eliminated, beliefs must conform to Elitist paradigms, actions must conform to the Elitist will AND societal-culture is determined by State-Controlling Oligarchical -Elites.
The above is from the realm of the highly credible due to documentation and credentials. Below is a bit more speculative and hence to many (if not most) is in the realm of the incredulous (H/T: Mike Adams – Natural News).
I grew up on science fiction and Chariots of the Gods literature, ergo this information has more credibility with me than a majority of critical thinking individuals. Mike Adams in his 1/9/23 Situation Update name dropped a video-on-demand (COST – $30.00) entitled, “LIES OF MEN & GODS- THERE IS A HUGE LIE…” It is produced by GENSIX Productions. Steve Quayle is the name associated with the documentary. Quayle believes all the chaos of today’s emerging tyranny is because Aliens (NOT Illegal/Undocumented Aliens) will be hailed as saviors of the Earth by Globalist Controllers.
I REALIZE this is the point most stop reading because the concept is soooo incredulous.
ALSO I must point out that $Thirty Bucks$ is a bit out of my budget for information that I am on the fence of Believing/Not-Believing. And yet my former youth finds it fascinating.
After the Smith and Malone posts, I’m going to cross the purchase page for “LIES OF MEN & GODS” followed by a Vimeo video Trailer of the Documentary. But I thought I’d give you taste from the USAWatchdog post above with Greg Hunter interviewing Steve Quayle on Rumble:
READER SUPPORTED! I need Readers willing to chip in $5 – $10 – $25 – $50 – $100. PLEASE I need your generosity. PLEASE GIVE to Help me be a voice for Liberty:
In recent weeks I’ve been seeing an interesting narrative fallacy being sold to the general public when it comes to the designs of globalists. The mainstream media and others are now openly suggesting that it’s actually okay to be opposed to certain aspects of groups like the World Economic Forum. They give you permission to be concerned, just don’t dare call it conspiracy.
This propaganda is a deviation from the abject denials we’re accustomed to hearing in the Liberty Movement for the past decade or more. We have all been confronted with the usual cognitive dissonance – the claims that globalist groups “just sit around talking about boring economic issues” and nothing they do has any bearing on global politics or your everyday life. In some cases we were even told that these groups of elites “don’t exist.”
Now, the media is admitting that, yes, perhaps the globalists do have more than just a little influence over governments, social policies and economic outcomes. But, what the mainstream doesn’t like is the assertion that globalists have nefarious or authoritarian intentions. That’s just crazy tinfoil hat talk, right?
The reason for the narrative shift is obvious. Far too many people witnessed the true globalist agenda in action during the pandemic lockdowns and now they see the conspiracy for what it is. The globalists, in turn, seem to have been shocked to discover many millions of people in opposition to the mandates and the refusals to comply were clearly far greater than they expected. They are still trying to push their brand of covid fear, but the cat is out of the bag now.
They failed to get what they wanted in the West, which was a perpetual Chinese-style medical tyranny with vaccine passports as the norm. So, the globalist strategy has changed and they are seeking to adapt. They admit to a certain level of influence, but they pretend as if they are benevolent or indifferent.
The response to this lie is relatively straightforward. I could point out how Klaus Schwab of the WEF savored the thrill of the initial pandemic outbreak and declared that covid was the perfect “opportunity” to initiate what the WEF calls the “Great Reset.”
I could also point out that Klaus Schwab’s vision of the Reset, what he calls the “4th Industrial Revolution,” is a veritable nightmare world in which Artificial Intelligence runs everything, society is condensed into digital enclaves called “smart cities” and people are oppressed by carbon taxation. I could point out that the WEF actively supports the concept of the “Shared Economy” in which you will “own nothing, have no privacy” and you will supposedly be happy about it, but only because you won’t have any other choice.
What I really want to talk about, however, is the process by which the elites hope to achieve their dystopian epoch, as well as the globalist mindset which lends itself to the horrors of technocracy. The common naive assumption among skeptics of conspiracy is that the globalists are regular human beings with the same drives and limited desires as the rest of us. They might have some power, but world events are still random and certainly not controlled.
This is a fallacy. The globalists are not like us. They are not human. Or, I should say, they despise humanity and seek to do away with it. And, because of this, they have entirely different aspirations compared to the majority of us which include aspirations of dominance.
What we are dealing with here are not normal people with conscience, ethics or empathy. Their behavior is much more akin to higher functioning psychopaths and sociopaths rather than the everyday person on the street. We saw this on full display during the covid lockdowns and the vicious attempts to enforce vaccine passports; their actions betray their long game.
Take a look at comments by New Zealand’s prime minister and WEF attendee, Jacinda Ardern, from a year ago. She admits to the deliberate tactic of creating a two-tier class system within her own country based on vaccination status. There is no remorse or guilt in her demeanor, she is proud of taking such authoritarian actions despite numerous studies that prove the mandates are ineffective.
Beyond the covid response, though, I suggest people who deny globalist conspiracy take a deeper dive into the philosophical roots of organizations like the WEF. Their entire ideology can be summed up in a couple words – futurism and godhood.
Futurism is an ideological movement which believes that all “new” innovations, social or technological, should supplant the previous existing systems for the sake of progress. They believe that all old ways of thinking, including notions of principles, heritage, religious belief systems, codes of conduct, etc. are crutches holding humanity back from greatness.
But what is the greatness the futurists seek? As mentioned above, they want godhood. An era in which the natural world and human will is enslaved by the hands of a select few. Case in point – The following presentation from 2018 by WEF “guru” Yuval Harari on the future of humanity as the globalists see it:
Harari’s conclusions are rooted in elitist biases and ignore numerous psychological and social realities, but we can set those aside for a moment and examine his basic premise that humanity as we know it will no longer exist in the next century because of “digital evolution” and “human hacking.”
The foundation of the WEF vision is built on the idea that data is the new Holy Grail, the new conquest. This is something I have written about extensively in the past (check out my article ‘Artificial Intelligence: A Secular Look At The Digital Antichrist’) but it is good to see it expressed with such arrogance by someone like Harari because it is undeniable evidence – the globalists think they are going to build a completely centralized economy and society based on human data rather than production. In other words, YOU become the product. The average citizen, your thoughts and your behaviors, become the stock in trade.
Globalists also believe that data is most valuable because it can be exploited to control people’s behaviors, to hack the body and mind in order to create human puppets, or create super-beings. They dream of becoming little gods with omnipotent knowledge. Yuval even proudly proclaims that intelligent design will no longer be the realm of God in heaven, but of the new digitized man.
While Harari pays lip service to “democracy” vs “digital dictatorship,” he goes on to assert that centralization may become the de facto system of governance. He says this not because he fears dictatorship, but because that has always been the WEF’s intent. The globalist argues that governments cannot be trusted to hold a monopoly on the digital wellspring and that someone needs to step in to regulate data; but “who would do this?” he asks.
He already knows the answer. The UN, a globalist edifice, has consistently said it should be the governing body that takes control of AI and data regulation through UNESCO. That is to say, Harari is playing coy, he knows that the people who will step in to control the data are people just like him.
At no point in Harari’s speech does he suggest that that any of these developments should be obstructed or stopped. At no point does he offer the idea that the digitization of humanity is wrong and that there are other better ways of living. He actually mocks the concept of “going back” to old ways; only the future and the Tabula Rasa (blank slate) hold promise for the globalists, everything else is an impediment to their designs.
But here’s the thing: what the globalists are trying to accomplish is a fantasy. People are not algorithms, despite how much Harari would like them to be. People have habits, yes, but they are also unpredictable and are prone to sudden awakenings and epiphanies in the moment of crisis.
Psychopaths tend to be robotic people, acting impulsively but also very predictably. They lack imagination, intuition and foresight, and so it’s not surprising that organizations of psychopaths like the WEF would place such an obsessive value on AI, algorithms and a cold technocratic evolution. They don’t view their data Shangri-La as humanity’s future; they see it as THEIR future – the future of the non-humans, or the anti-humans as it were.
Who will produce all the goods, services and necessities required in this brave new world? Well, all of us peons, of course. Sure, the globalists will offer grand promises of a robot-driven production economy in which people no longer need to engage in menial labor, but this will be another lie. They’ll still need people to plant the crops, maintain infrastructure, take care of manufacturing, do their fighting for them, etc.; they’ll just need less of us.
At bottom, an economy built on data is an economy dependent on illusion.
Data is vaporous and oftentimes meaningless because it is subject to the biases of the interpreter. Algorithms can also be programmed to the biases of the engineers. There is nothing inherently objective about data – it is all dependent on the intentions of the people analyzing it.
For example, to use Harari’s anecdote of an algorithm that “knows you are gay” before you do: any twisted group of people could simply write code for an algorithm that tells the majority of easily manipulated kids that they are gay, even when they are not. And, if you are gullible enough to believe the algorithm is infallible, then you could be led to believe that numerous falsehoods are true and be convinced to behave against your nature. You have allowed a biased digital phantom to dictate your identity, and have made yourself “hackable.”
In the meantime, the elitists entertain delusions of surpassing their mortal limitations by “hacking” the human body, as well as reading the minds of the masses and predicting the future based on data trends. This is an obsession which ignores the unpredictable wages of the human soul, that very element of conscience and of imagination which psychopaths lack. It’s something that cannot be hacked.
The legitimacy of the data-based system and the hacking of humanity that the WEF aspires to is less important than what the masses can be convinced of. If the average person can be persuaded to implant their cell phone in their skull in the near future, then yes, humanity might become hackable in a rudimentary way.
The algorithms then supplant conscience, empathy and principles. And, without these things all morality becomes relative by default. Evil becomes good, and good becomes evil.
By the same token, if humanity can be persuaded to set down their cell phones and live a less tech-focused life, then the digital empire of the globalists comes crashing down quite easily. There is no system the elites can impose that would make their digital consciousness a reality without the consent of the public at large.
Without a vast global framework in which people willingly embrace the algorithms rather than their own experience and intuitions, the globalist religion of total centralization dies. The first step is to accept that the conspiracy does indeed exist. The second step is to accept that the conspiracy is malicious and destructive. The third step is to refuse to comply, by whatever means necessary.
If you would like to support the work that Alt-Market does while also receiving content on advanced tactics for defeating the globalist agenda, subscribe to our exclusive newsletter The Wild Bunch Dispatch. Learn more about it HERE.
As we move through January 2023, and additional details about the lies our governments have told us are revealed daily, I keep getting questioned about how it feels to be vindicated. I wrote about this last year, at a time when the approved narrative appeared to be failing, and my deep ambivalence remains. To my surprise, governments, the World Health Organization (WHO), and various non-governmental organizations (WEF, BMGF etc.) have managed to keep the COVID crisis alive and weaponized to justify policies which do not advance public health objectives, but which they use to advance their own political and financial interests. Like tossing offal over the transom, “Never let a good crisis go to waste” seems to have provoked a shark feeding frenzy which humanity may require decades to recover from.
Assuming we ever do.
The apple of knowledge about the depths of what the US government, the Uniparty, the “Administrative state” will do has been well and truly bitten into now. None who are “awake” to the damage done (to individuals, families, and communities) in the name of public health will ever be able to return to what (in retrospect) seems like the Eden of our prior innocence.
Now we are finally seeing the patient council of Augustine of Hippo come to pass — ‘Thetruthislikealion; you don’t have to defend it. Let it loose; it will defend itself.’ Like so many others, I had naively assumed that this process would require months, not years.
Just to make the point yet again, the COVID crisis was never really a crisis in the way it was portrayed. It was always a house of cards built upon (USA and CCP) government propaganda as well as grossly overstated risk modeling and projections from the Imperial College, London developed by the Neil Ferguson research group.
Layers and layers of propaganda. Deep, harmonized, simultaneous collusion, enticement, censorship, malicious defamation and gaslighting across all western political organizations and their paid toadies in corporate and social media- propagated and coordinated by the UN, WHO, EU, USA, former “British Empire” governments and the new wannabe corporatist world government body known as the “World Economic Forum” (WEF).
A comprehensive, global “shock and awe” fifth generation warfare action the likes of which the world has never seen before. All justified as necessary to protect us from a pathogen which was never a threat in the sense of Ebola (for example) or even the fentanyl flooding across the US southern border.
A pathogen which (current information suggests) many of these governments had a hand in creating. A pre-planned (Event 201) authoritarian totalitarian response resulting in a massive upwards transfer of wealth largely to those who funded the planning (that being the WEF and Bill Gates). Was the over-reaction and authoritarian mismanagement a psychological projection of their guilt about having created and loosed this slouching beast on all of us? Or was the virus just a strategy to enable a broader agenda? Or one of many possible strategies developed and waiting to be deployed? I suspect that Dr. Anthony Fauci would plead a failure of memory if asked to testify to those questions under oath.
Or perhaps (just as internet haters are going to hate), authoritarians and monopolists when given an opportunity will enable Totalitarian states and Corporate monopolies.
It has been over three years now during which we have all been banished to inhabit dark crevices and cracks in the garden of good and evil. Forced into our homes and the fringes of society while psychopathic devils who normally inhabit Dante’s nine circles of hell openly danced a global bacchanal of death, destruction, and greed. And as they danced, they steadily advanced their long anticipated “Great Reset”
.
Any so bold as to question the approved narrative, to alert chained fellow cave dwellers that they are only being allowed to see shadows on the wall projected by these dancing devils, have been further ostracized to the depths of their own personal hells. With swarms of paid demons unleashed to discover and exploit any crack in their own personal armor (or history). And now these devils assert that the whole sordid affair supports the need for the world to grant them more money and power?
[Blog Editor: Youtube video not included in Dr. Malone post:
As my mind seeks refuge from my deep weariness, I often recall the immortal dialog from the Dreamworks comedy “Shrek”;
Shrek: Ogresarelikeonions.
Donkey: They stink? Shrek: Yes. No.
Donkey: Oh, they make you cry.
Shrek: No. Donkey: Oh, you leave em out in the sun, they get all brown, start sproutin’ little white hairs. Shrek: No. Layers.
Onions have layers. Ogres have layers.
Innocence also has layers. And as I have journeyed along the broad road of corrupt propaganda, censorship and defamation hell over the last three years, each turn and twist has forced me to peel away yet another.
Belief in the universal acceptance of bioethical truths. Truths which had been so painstakingly developed since the end of World War II, and then augmented after the CDC-sponsored Tuskegee study. Faith in the integrity of international regulatory and clinical research norms, and the absolute firewall around informed consent and avoidance of compulsion, coercion as well as mandated medical and surgical procedures. Faith in the NIH, previously damaged by decades of personal experience, shattered into a thousand fragments by Robert F Kennedy Jr’s meticulously documented inditement titled “The Real Anthony Fauci”. Faith in the integrity of the FDA and CDC, and their commitment to stand as bulwarks to insure public safety under the pressure of a rapacious pharmaceutical industry. Faith in the integrity and commitment of my fellow scientists and physicians to the Hippocratic oath.
And now I confront a complete loss of faith in the commitment of the United States Government and its officials to protect and defend the US Constitution. Earlier in this twisting journey, this broad road to hell, I had taken risks to openly discuss the growing threat of totalitarianism. I received a call from a decades-long colleague employed at a senior level (GS-15) at the Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA) darkly warning me to not discuss Dr. Michael Callahan or his activities in China during 2019-2020, or there would be consequences. I was warned by a well-known broadcaster to “stay in my lane” and not discuss the World Economic Forum, its plans and activities. In a world where the term “Fascism” had been twisted and distorted beyond recognition, early on I insisted on returning to the original definition (attributed to Benito Mussolini) that the proper name for Fascism was Corporatism, and discussing the widespread acceptance of globalist corporatism as the new model for replacing the autonomous nation state as the dominant political structure.
And then there were the more mundane, transparent lies and propaganda regarding the lack of repurposed early treatment medical interventions and the safety and efficacy of the genetic “vaccine” products which all have come to clearly see (in our daily lives!) do not protect against infection, replication or spread of this cluster of novel coronavirus variants which we call SARS-CoV-2. Hour after hour spent on innumerable radio, television, and podcast interviews trying to break through the wall of propaganda erected by governments colluding with big tech and corporate press/TV.
I wish to acknowledge and thank Joe Rogan for allowing his Spotify platform to break through that firewall, and allow me to speak my truths to the world. Although I have not been welcomed back since, I suspect what happened over the subsequent days, weeks, and months was the clearest tolling of the bell for current corporate media (and 60s rock and rollers) that has ever been heard.
Yesterday, I was asked to participate in a “Twitter Spaces” discussion regarding the censorship which has been experienced by so many who have tried to break through the propaganda firewall of the last three years. Asked to discuss my own experiences, I went on and on. The words poured out.
This was a question no-one had ever really asked me before, and I have been asked so many questions over the last three years that I feel like someone who has been subjected to a strip search by the US Transportation Security Administration (TSA). No body cavity left unprobed. Except for this one.
So much to cover. Amazon deleting Jill’s book in March 2020 for irreconcilable (but undefined) “violation of community standards”. My 2020 manuscripts warning about risks encountered in prior coronavirus vax development. The original Famotidine/Mast cell hypothesis paper that got rejected again and again. The repeated rejection of high-quality clinical studies demonstrating the effectiveness of early treatment using celecoxib, famotidine +/- ivermectin. Repeated inexplicable intransigence of FDA to allow DoD funded clinical trials to proceed. The Nobel Prize marketing campaign to promote the false valor of Kariko and Weissman as having originated the mRNA platform technology which necessitated belittling, defaming, and gaslighting my own much earlier contributions. The systematic evisceration of my Wikipedia page. The reactions of Spanish and Israeli governments to my “hostage” video warning parents about the risks of the vaccines. The YouTube demonitization of Dr. Bret Weinstein after the infamous “save the world” podcast with Steve Kirsch and myself. The backlash after Joe Rogan podcast #1757. The relentless unqualified “factchecker” attacks (justified by Facebook in court as narrative reinforcement activities, not “fact” checks). The Atlantic Monthly, Rolling Stone, New York Times, Washington Post, and even Santa Barbara News Press (my home town) malicious defamation and slander. It all continues unabated to this day, now augmented by professional infiltrator/disruptors who carefully troll for tidbits in my CV that can be weaponized while continually shouting “controlled opposition” and “deep state” as a chorus to the usual lyrics of mis- dis- and mal- information accusations coming from mainstream government-sponsored press outlets.
But caught like a deer in the headlights, unprepared for this inquiry into what censorship I have experienced over the last three years, I completely forgot to cover the outcome of the huge amount of time I (together with other colleagues) had invested in establishing a special edition of “Frontiers in Pharmacology” dedicated to publishing academic manuscripts concerning repurposed drugs and protocols effective against COVID. We had invested more than six months of effort in getting the necessary permissions, soliciting and reviewing manuscripts, and building a solution to address the unwillingness of journals all of the world to publish information about life saving treatments. And then during December 2020, Pierre Kory testified in the US Senate about the potential of Ivermectin. The DoD-funded group I was working with to identify and test repurposed drugs was very aware of the potential of the repurposed agent, and when Dr. Kory and colleagues posted a summary of their findings on the web, I reached out (as an editor of this special “Frontiers” volume) and encouraged him to reformat and submit as an academic review for consideration by Frontiers in Pharmacology for our special volume. The rest is history. A somewhat biased account of what then took place can now be found published in “The Scientist”. The subsequent cascade of events are summarized in the following resignation letter (redacted below, full text available here):
23rd April 2021
Dear Dr. Fenter, Ms. Sorokowska-Yammin, Dr. Vicario, Prof. Montuschi, Topic Authors,
It is with sincere regret that we write at this time to resign from our roles as founding topic editors for the Frontiers in Pharmacology Research Topic “Treating COVID-19 With Currently Available Drugs”. Since developing this topic and associated justification documents and applying to and receiving permission to proceed with this special topic volume from “Frontiers in Pharmacology“ for publication under the “Frontiers in Pharmacology (Respiratory Pharmacology)” we have invested many hundreds of volunteer hours in soliciting manuscript submissions, identifying reviewers for submitted manuscripts, and managing the peer review process. We took this action not for any commercial gain, but rather to address an unmet need. This has been done in full and careful compliance with all “Frontiers” criteria, and with approval by “Frontiers”.
The Topic had been created with the aim to contribute to identification of better and more effective pharmacological treatments during the COVID-19 pandemic by suggesting repurposed drugs. Our goal has been to reduce the barriers to publishing earlier stage clinical research regarding repurposed drugs, and in this way help reduce the terrible burden of global death due to COVID-19. While awaiting development of herd immunity (during vaccination), we wanted to contribute in COVID-19 therapy. In proposing the guest topic, we noted that Frontiers purports to provide rapid review, and explicitly allows publication of earlier stage clinical research findings including case series reports. CVs of each guest editor and the Topic proposal were accepted after evaluation and Mr. Nathan Watkins was assigned by the Frontiers organization to support the guest editors.
The recent extraordinary and unprecedented actions by Frontiers in the rejection of the review manuscript “REVIEW OF THE EMERGING EVIDENCE DEMONSTRATING THE EFFICACY OF IVERMECTIN IN THE PROPHYLAXIS AND TREATMENT OF COVID-19” and the original research manuscript “HOSPITALIZED COVID-19 PATIENTS TREATED WITH CELECOXIB AND HIGH DOSE FAMOTIDINE ADJUVANT THERAPY SHOW SIGNIFICANT CLINICAL RESPONSES” after review and acceptance of each manuscript by four/five well qualified peer reviewers (during final validation) is what has prompted our collective resignation.
To place this into context of the Frontiers review process, the papers have been rejected during the final validation phase, having previously passed the evaluation (peer review) phase. In general, the Frontiers review process consists of the following steps: initial validation, editorial assignment, independent review, interactive review, review finalized (acceptance/rejection), final validation (this last step is the final editorial review decision prior to invoicing and finalizing manuscript proofs before actual publication). The initial validation step performed by Frontiers is independent of the Guest Editors’ evaluation and is performed prior to editorial assignment to Guest Editors. Guest Editors are then asked to look for reviewers for independent review and manage interactive review. Review is finalized by guest Editors but the final validation depends on Frontiers decision.
Redacted …… (see full letter text for details)
Upon reviewing these events, some might conclude that the journal is practicing extraordinary and unprecedented censorship of fully peer reviewed manuscripts. The rationale for doing so is speculative, and the journal has communicated that these actions are justified by the following considerations:
1) “The papers considered for publication in this Research Topic will require more specific oversight, as the subject and aim of the collection has an important involvement with the ongoing public health crisis. Frontiers aims for editorial independence while also being ultimately responsible for all article publications. We need to anticipate potential impact on the population and maintain standards of rigour for our Journals and the scientific record overall.”
2) “Moving forward, the Editorial Office will continue to monitor submissions to this topic. Articles will be screened at submission, with the support of our Specialty Chief Editor, to ensure that all articles submitted are valid, and fulfil our acceptance criteria. We ask that, as you continue to act as Handling Editors for articles, you remain vigilant and ensure that any serious recommendations for rejection are addressed swiftly. These steps, combined with increased awareness and participation from all parties involved, will help ensure the recent situation around the ivermectin paper is not repeated. We hope that you understand the rationale behind these additional measures, which are in place in the interest of maintaining scientific integrity, both for your collection, and Frontiers in Pharmacology as a journal.”
The Guest editors reject any assertion that scientific integrity was compromised or breached during the review process for either of these submissions, or that this special edition has not been managed with full integrity, except in the case of the unethical breach of the journal itself and its senior management in performing an extraordinary, arbitrary and capricious post-peer review process.
At this point, based on these many actions, we are unable to assure scientific integrity of the peer review process on the part of the journal for this special topic. Our time and that of the peer reviewers has been donated to the journal, and our reputations used without compensation. We ask to be removed from association with this special topic area, that an apology be issued to ourselves and our respective institutions for the actions of the journal in this matter, and that the special topic (which we had developed with full approval by the journal) be discontinued effective immediately. Having communicated to Frontiers that this would be our collective action if corrections were not made to this extraordinary re-review process, Frontiers has elected to expel each of the guest editors from any ongoing or future role as editors, and to close down and wipe all electronic evidence that the special topic had ever even been approved or had manuscripts submitted under the topic approved. This decision was disclosed in email communications with all corresponding authors of published, approved, or pending manuscripts, but not with the guest editors who had created the topic and solicited and managed review of the manuscripts.
The scientific process requires fair, open, and transparent peer review to proceed effectively and efficiently – particularly at this time and for this topic. The actions of “Frontiers” in this matter clearly violate well established norms and processes for peer review and publication of scientific works and intellectual contributions, and instead have substituted a unilateral, arbitrary, and capricious process. On behalf of our peers, our institutions, and our scientific and medical colleagues we cannot allow this precedent to remain unchallenged. In our opinion, these unfortunate events constitute gross editorial misconduct by “Frontiers”.
How many lives could have been saved if publication of this volume had been allowed to proceed in a normal fashion?
An unanswerable hypothetical. But as we watch the daily drip of information concerning the role of governments, non-governmental, and transnational organizations and cabals in actively suppressing information which clearly could have saved lives, colluding with corporate media and big tech to deploy a massive military-grade fifth generation propaganda and psy-ops campaign on their own citizens, enforcing medical treatment with protocols which clearly lead to widespread slaughter of elderly and other vulnerable populations, and working to destroy the reputations and livelihood of anyone so bold as to question their ‘Scientism” based on substitution of hope for data, please keep the silent dead and silenced vaccine injured in your mind.
These are the people that have paid the ultimate price for the mismanagement. These are the true victims. The hurt and widespread destruction of reputation and professional standards consequent to what has been done to myself and my colleagues will be tempered with the passage of time.
Innocence has been peeled away to the point where we may never be able to trust governments, our peers in the medical and scientific professions, or the corporate “press” again.
But who will be left to stand up and speak for the dead and the damaged?
In the twilight of mankind’s existence, the War Against God’s Creation Rages.
Boldface Lies
Aggregated deceit and accumulating falsehoods from our governments, our militaries, the Vatican, our churches, by so-called medical professionals, and “science” stack up before us. They say that they do not know what UFOs are, that mankind is causing climate change and that Covid vaccines are necessary to safeguard man’s future.
A Shot in the Arm, A Shot in the Head – Either Way You Wind Up Dead
The Vatican reshapes the world’s perspective of aliens, governments around the globe, spy on citizens, the stage is set for World War 3, the global economy teeters on the brink and the medical establishment compel people to corrupt themselves by injecting a COVID MRNA Vaccine that will change their DNA – Just like in the Days of Noah.
Pulling Strings
The World Economic Forum are the Puppet Masters who pull the strings that will starve and kill billions. But is there someone more sinister lurking in the shadows?
An Agenda of Death
With a Vatican core belief in Zecharia Sitchen’s Anunnaki, we learn that there is an Entity physically living on planet earth and everything occurring is designed to kill most of humanity and corrupt the DNA of those that remain. Weather warfare, the decimation of crops, livestock and the supply chain, the enslaving of billions, and the outright corruption of mankind’s DNA are all part of this Entity’s Agenda of Death.
Last Chance?
GenSix Productions blows the lid off a supernatural conspiracy that is thousands of years in the making and nearing its culmination. With never seen before footage of evidence pointing to the genetic corruption of humans, this film endeavors to give you the unfiltered Truth about who and what is really controlling our planet.
“The Lies of Men and Gods” – Quite possibly the last chance to expose the incomprehensible Evil that now envelops the world.
There are a significant number of doctors and scientists that are on the same page about government and Globalist Medical Tyranny. The unfortunate reality emerging is that these same Anti-Medical Tyranny doctors/scientists are beginning to squabble among themselves over fine-point differences as if those differences are huge. It has gotten to the point that anti-Medical Tyranny doctors/scientists are calling each other liars, insulting each other and even litigating each other.
The appearance is agreement Medical Tyranny exists, BUT the squabbling gives the tyrants in effect a divide-and-conquer victory making anti-Medical Tyranny information appear insignificant. There are others yet the biggest anti-Medical Tyranny proponents is the civil lawsuit between Dr. Robert Malone and Dr. Peter Breggin (Malone’s position & Breggin’s position). In my humble observer’s opinion, both sides make good points. Both sides have their allies and enemies. And chances are you support the side who is your favorite anti-Medical Tyranny proponent.
On a personal level I find the squabbling extremely saddening. I only care that the Medical Tyranny ends more than how got there or which molecule exists and which does not exist. So, I pray these guys get over their Ph.D./MD egos and work on ending the actual science liars: Big Pharma and their acolytes in government agencies; WEF-Globalist-Fascist-Marxist Elitists trying to transform society into an obedient Collective with Medical Tyranny as the catalyst; and the Leftist Billionaires (devoted to WEF principles such as Bill Gates, George Soros coming to mind).
The Medical Tyrants are fairly united in their agenda to control the world. When the anti-Medical Tyranny proponents begin shooting each other in the foot, the tyrants become secure in their power to control.
I preface my opinion on the idiocy of infighting because I want to share a VERY informative Dr. Malone Substack article on Fifth Generation Information Warfare (FGIW). This is one of those cases in which knowledge is power at least if the knowledge is used in a united front to end Medical Tyranny.
Congratulations. As we approach 2023, you are now completing and have survived the third year of the largest, most globally coordinated psychological warfare operation in the history of mankind. During this period, on a daily basis, you have experienced the US Government and many western nations deploying highly refined, military-grade fifth generation warfare technologies against their own citizens. For those who have avoided the jabs which are neither safe nor effective, you deserve a medal for your ability to see through the fog of information warfare. Those, like me, who trusted the FDA and took the initial jabs only to suffer the adverse effects of same, perhaps a purple heart for being wounded in battle. For the millions of battlefield dead, the excess mortality documented by Ed Dowd and so many others, a moment of silent mourning is in order.
“Fifth-generation warfare is a strange game. The only winning move is not to play.”
“The basic idea behind this term [fifth-generation warfare] is that in the modern era, wars are not fought by armies or guerrillas, but in the minds of common citizens.”
Fifth-generation warfare (5GW) is not waged against standing armies of nation-states or guerrilla insurgents, but against everyday citizens. This form of war is not fought in a battlefield somewhere, but in the mind. Your mind. As previously discussed, Twitter is a 5GW weapon, not a business.
If, after reading the recent coverage regarding the “Twitter Files”, you have any remaining doubts that the US Government “Administrative State” lead by the Uniparty is waging fifth generation warfare against American citizens, then this October 07, 2022 article by Becker News titled “President Biden Revokes Executive Branch Rules Against Spying on American Citizens” should dispel those. As Will Chamberlain, Senior Counsel at the Internet Accountability Project and the Article 3 Project, put it on Twitter: “Joe Biden just rescinded executive branch rules that prevent spying on American citizens.”
I am a student, not an expert on 5GW, but I certainly am getting rapidly trained in the school of hard knocks. Consequently, in trying to make sense out of this new form of warfare, I have had to rely on true experts. With that in mind, please forgive the following extended quote from “Fourth- and Fifth-Generation Warfare: Technology and Perceptions”, published in 2019 by Dr. Waseem Ahmad Qureshi. Advocate Supreme Court of Pakistan, in the San Diego International Law Journal (Volume 21). Dr. Qureshi’s highly footnoted and referenced article can be downloaded for free (PDF) here. For those seeking additional information and context, I also recommend reading “The Handbook of 5GW: A Fifth Generation of War?” by Daniel Abbott.
The composition of warfare is changing. The traditional aspects of waging a war are evolving: conventional techniques of warfare are in decline, and newer tactics and tools of warfare, such as information warfare, asymmetric warfare, media propaganda warfare, and hybrid warfare, are filling the gap, consequently blurring the lines between combatant and noncombatant, and between wartime and peacetime. The basic framework of modern warfare was elaborated by Carl von Clausewitz in his magnus opus On War. He defined modern warfare between states as “a duel on larger scale,” and explained its purpose as “a continuation of politics by other means,” with core elements of “rationality of the state, probability in military command, and rage of the population.”
William S. Lind distinguished between four generations of warfare since the Peace of Westphalia in 1648, each generation representing a way of fighting war. Daniel H. Abbott continued this by propounding fifth-generation warfare as a battle of perceptions.
First-generation warfare, which was fought between 1648 and 1860, introduced the monopoly of a state to wage war. Before that, tribes and businesses could also wage war. First-generation warfare marked the culture of order, with identifiable rules of ranks and military uniforms to counter the increasing disorderliness in the battlefields. This generation of warfare was mainly dominated by mass manpower.
The second generation of warfare was introduced by the French army and it ended with World War I. This generation introduced artillery, airplanes, and heavy gunfire, while preserving the culture of order established during the first generation. Second- generation warfare soldiers were relieved of hand-to-hand combat and obedience guided by rules took precedence over self-initiatives. This generation of warfare was mainly dominated by firepower.
The third generation, maneuver warfare, was a German product and it was used during World War II. This generation of warfare introduced the tactical warfare of surprise, applying the motto “bypassing and undermining” the enemy. In this generation, initiative was preferred to obedience guided by self-discipline. This generation of warfare was mainly dominated by maneuver tactics of warfare.
Fourth-generation warfare (4GW)—which rose to prominence over the last five to six decades—brought the most radical change since the Peace of Westphalia by introducing non-state actors in warfare and by denying the state a monopoly. … Fourth-generation warfare is mainly dominated by the asymmetric tactic of using non-state actors. This generation ended the state monopoly of the use of force and included cultures, tribes, sects, and mercenaries into warfare, going back to pre-Westphalian era warfare. In 4GW, there is no distinction between wartime and peacetime, because non-state actors use force both during war and in peacetime through asymmetric strategies, using mainly unlawful force and blurring the lines for the lawful use of force by taking refuge behind human shields and by blaming collateral damages on the state. This practice also merges combatants with noncombatants and vice-versa; asymmetric warfare strategies are this generation’s default mode, and 4GW lasts a long time. Lind correctly believes that currently there exists no military solution to 4GW; as Michael Howard found, modern warfare strategy is not purely a military undertaking but instead consists of political, social, economic, cultural, and psychological elements and actions.
Note that the United States has consistently lost 4GW wars from Vietnam to the present, which have primarily been fought in Southeast Asia and the Middle East. The catastrophically mismanaged Afghanistan withdrawal is the latest example proving the point. From this we can conclude that 4GW is an effective strategy when engaging in asymmetric battle with a technically superior (from a 3GW perspective) Imperialist foe. Good to know. Park that for future reference in the event that the Globalists succeed in having their way with us.
Fifth-generation warfare (5GW) is the battle of perceptions and information. 5GW is also a cultural and moral war, which distorts the perception of the masses to give a manipulated view of the world and politics. ….
Slog defines 5GW as the secret deliberative manipulation of actors, networks, institutions, states or any [0GW, 1GW] 2GW/3GW/4GW forces to achieve a goal or set of goals across a combination of socioeconomic and political domains while attempting to avoid or minimize the retaliatory offensive or defensive actions/reactions of 2GW, 3GW, 4GW powered actors, networks, institutions, and/ or states. (Purples Slog, 5GW Working Definition, 0.91, in THE HANDBOOK OF 5GW 213, 213 (Daniel H. Abbott ed., 2010))
5GW is the battle of perceptions and information. In 5GW, violence is so discreetly dispersed that the victim is not even aware that it is a victim of war and the victim is not aware that it is losing the war. The secrecy of this warfare makes it the most dangerous warfare generation of all time. This warfare hides in the background, and “the most successful [fifth generation] wars are wars that are never identified.”
5GW is also a cultural and moral war, which distorts the perception of the masses to give a manipulated view of the world and politics. By contrast, 4GW has mainly used asymmetric means, such as the use of non-state actors. Lind’s portrayal of 4GW in moral and cultural territory is somewhat similar to Abbott’s analysis of 5GW, which departs from the cultural rage of the population as depicted in 4GW, and which considers the perception of the conflict’s context as a main focal point of analysis. The 5GW of perception and context combines the “rage of the people” and the “rationality of the state” to form an intended outcome of warfare, rendering military command useless.
5GW exploits cultural icons and religious sentiments to defeat an opponent. Any means of creating political support of the masses is a valid tactic, similar to other military warfare tactics, like the troop surge in Iraq. Abbott argues that an enraged mob, professional soldiers, and other irregular means can constitute destructive forces. According to him, information proliferation in warfare has technologically designed practices of warfare that obviate the requirement of violence and the direct physical involvement of the aggressors; instead, the information through networks and surveillance manipulates and exploits the public’s general perceptions. Sun Tzu defines this tactic of altering the perspectives of the world as the “acme of skill [a victory without fighting].” The effectiveness of 5GW depends on its disparity: it does not require any unity in its efforts and instead, the more a warfare is dispersed in its efforts, the more immune and effective it becomes.
Wars of perception are 5GW, with information being the weapon, due to increased technology of cyberspace, media, social media, the noticeability of these tactics of deception and propaganda backed by identity construction and misperception, and the power of shaping the will of the adversary.
Since the proliferation of information decides the ultimate victory of future wars, centricity is less effective than the absence of weak links. 5GW is the battle between the absolute concentration of power (aggressor) on one end, and the absence of power on the other, and this battle compels the enemy to achieve the desired outcome without using violence. Information about the desired political world perspective is entrenched through manipulating the culture at the unconscious level, rendering it impossible for the conscious mind to even detect it and heavily influencing the political division to obtain the desired outcomes.
Adversaries are powerless to defend themselves against this infiltration of perspectives, and if they understand this change and infiltration, they will often mistake the aggressor’s true political motivation with distorted perceptions and with the manipulated information of diplomacy and propaganda. In effective 5GW, the embedded influence of perspective is harmonized with violence. This warfare of perspective makes the fifth generation “an influence, an idea, a thing invulnerable, intangible, without front and back, drifting about like a gas.” This is a kind of silent war, a “war where the war and political desires are visible but the combatants and the strategic forms of power used in the war are invisible, [not truly energetic] and lean towards . . . influence.” This concept of [silent] war was developed by Kautilya, as explained by Boesche:
“[S]ilent war is a kind of fighting that no other thinker I know of has discussed. Silent war is a kind of warfare with another kingdom in which the king and his ministers—and unknowingly, the people—all act publicly as if they were at peace with the opposing kingdom, but all the while secret agents and spies are assassinating important leaders in the other kingdom, creating divisions among key ministers and classes, and spreading propaganda and disinformation. . . . . In silent warfare, secrecy is paramount, and . . . the king can prevail only by “maintaining secrecy when striking again and again.”
Previously, war aimed at gaining greater visibility of violence and energy, but currently the desired outcome is to influence rather than being visible, with the defeated target not knowing the fact that it is being attacked, how it is being hit or even or that that the enemy exists.
In this battle of the minds, a cyberwar is taking place, turning ordinary people into insurgents against their own governments through propaganda and misinformation. This tactic creates leaderless resilience comprised of a phantom cell structure without any headquarters or hierarchical orders; where people within the movement have the same general outlook, the same philosophy, and where they react similarly and target perceived tyrannical state governments.
Every independent person has the responsibility of acquiring the skills and intelligence to be able to execute a mission by himself, coordinated by an emergent network, connected through [o]rgans of information distribution such as newspapers, leaflets, computers, etc., which are widely available to all, keep each person informed of events, allowing for a planned response that will take many variations. No one need issue an order . . . . . Those idealist [sic] truly committed to the cause of freedom will act when they feel when the time is ripe, or will take their cue from others who precede them. According to Beam’s definition, 5GW manipulates the perception of reality of the adversary, stealing the identity of the adversary and the identity of the host in the process, and works on an identity-constructivist framework of international politics.
Resisting Fifth Generational Warfare.
Returning again to Dr. Qureshi.
Fighting 5GW can be characterized as counterinsurgency. Counterinsurgency liquidates the ideological and ethnic perceptions created by 4GW, breaking the social relationship between non-state actors/insurgents and the general public. The counterinsurgent must drive societal change, target the cultural values of insurgents and the general population, fight on an intellectual level, and deny insurgents an enemy to fight against, rendering it impossible for the public and insurgents to identify the counterinsurgents’ intentions. These tactics form a non-hostile relationship between counterinsurgents and the people; as a result, it protects civilians’ well-being and survival. Counterinsurgency creates a safe space, popular security and cooperative identities. However, paradoxically this counterinsurgent involvement contributes to the dependence of the population on counterinsurgents. Therefore, states must instead resist this neocolonial Raj of imposed perspectives in shaping ideologies in the hopes of resolving all political matters.
The ways of waging a war are evolving, owing to a decline in the traditional way of waging wars and the emerging globalization and advancement in technology and communication. Therefore, wars through asymmetric means, information, and covert operations are on the rise, with non-state actors being prominent on the battlefield. A strategy to counter these new generations of warfare is to combine conventional tactics with the new innovative techniques of DIMEFILCH (full integration of Diplomatic, Information, Military, Economic, Financial, Intelligence, Law enforcement, Cultural and Humanitarian capabilities), and to develop a tight coordination among military, diplomatic, judicial, and economic institutions, while also working with foreign counterparts and international institutions. More importantly, we need to change our mindset to be able to counter and understand the newly emerging threats and their asymmetric purposes. It is imperative to know the enemy and to know ourselves, to understand why and how the enemy works, and for what purposes.
Additionally, a loophole exists in the prohibition on the use of force in the UN Charter: following Nicaragua, aggression and use of force now include supplying arms and financial support to insurgents, rebels and other non-state actors working against the state but to be held accountable, it has to established that the non-state actors are under the direct control of the state-aggressor, which in practice is hard to do. That loophole is exploited by aggressive states when they employ hired guns to do the dirty work of their political will and leave no fingerprints. Thus, the aggressor cannot be held liable: they avoid direct engagement to circumvent the requirements of the international laws of using force.
As I mentioned at the beginning of this essay, you are now completing and have survived the third year of the largest, most globally coordinated 5GW psychological warfare operation in the history of mankind. During this period, on a daily basis, you have experienced the US Government, and many western nations (in close cooperation with the Pharmaceutical industry) deploying highly refined, military-grade 5GW technologies, strategies and tactics against their own citizens.
As described by Dr. Qureshi, these methods and techniques were developed to combat overseas adversaries, but have now been turned against the citizens of western nation-states to advance globalist agendas which are shared by the Imperial Administrative State and its Uniparty political allies. What we have all experienced is the new innovative techniques of DIMEFILCH being deployed against all of us to advance a broad range of pharmaceutical, commercial, financial and political control objectives collectively referred to as “The Great Reset”. So wake up and get with the program. Understand what is being done to you, and who is doing it.
5GW is the fusion of military and “intelligence” operations, strategy and tactics, and your mind, your thoughts, your emotions are the battleground being fought over. Aligned with best 5GW practices, the objective is to win the war to advance a new centralized, command economy-based world order which you have not voted to endorse, one in which the very concept of autonomous sovereign nation-states is considered obsolete, and to do so without your even being aware of what is being done.
What is “Swarm Consensus”?
As previously discussed in the preceding essay “Physicals, Virtuals, Machines and Overlords. Is the dark vision of a new caste system for the fourth revolution inevitable?”, the old “class system” of lower, middle, and upper classes is rapidly being extinguished, replaced with a new worker caste system in which those who do physical labor and are grounded by their daily contact with physical realities inhabit a separate reality from those who live virtually – the laptop class of journalists, academics, coders and information technology workers, and those who work in advertising and finance. Above these worker castes are the machines, currently the computational, artificial intelligence/machine learning/deep learning, surveillance state devices and robotics infrastructure; soon to be the new “transhuman” human-machine hybrids so often discussed by WEF leaders Klaus Schwab and Yuval Noah Harari. And above human workers and machines reside the Overlords, the tiny fraction of a fraction of the global population who are on track to fashion a world in which “you will own nothing- and be happy” while they own everything. Larry Fink, Bill Gates, Jeff Bezos and Elon Musk being high-profile examples of the latter.
“Swarm Consensus” is a term recently popularized by the brilliant writer and analyst Mary Harrington, who writes for “UnHerd”. Swarm Consensus primarily operates at the level of the Virtual caste, as the Physical caste is currently fragmented and disorganized, and therefore unable to readily achieve its own consensus on the future direction of the Nation and the “Fourth Industrial Revolution” being so actively advocated and “shaped” by the World Economic Forum and its thought leaders. But the Virtuals have their social media tools and the backing of both the Silicon Valley Overlords as well as corporate media. Which brings us back to the 5GW weapon known as Twitter.
<An aside, what is going on with this new wave of brilliant female analyst/Authors? Mary Harrington, Whitney Webb, and my partner Dr. Jill Glasspool-Malone come to mind, but there are many others. Why have these powerful female intellectual voices been missing in the past?>
No-one is ever individually accountable. Which means that our outdated legal system and compromised legislature will never be able to provide any sort of justice or restitution for those who have been damaged by the actions of the swarm. This also happens to be what is going on within the US DHS and HHS, and why the bad actors responsible for the COVIDcrisis in those administrative agencies will never be brought to justice. Swarmism as a basis for decision making. Swarmism is analogous to the ultimate Imperial Administrative State confidential oversight committee, which by its very design can never be held accountable for actions taken. Which comes back to the central characteristic of the Virtual caste – in their world, reality and morality are subjective, context dependent, and opportunistic. The ends justify the means, and for virtual true believers, you (and objective reality) are whatever you “hope” or believe them to be. Hope can be readily substituted for data in decision making, because reality is akin to a Salvador Dali’s 1931 painting “Persistence of Memory”.
Here is an extended cautionary quote from her article which helps illuminate what Mary Harrington is writing about:
Is it okay to be authoritarian, as long as it’s in the name of the right moral values? Some “post-liberal’ conservatives would say so. America might have been founded on the liberal separation of church and state, the argument goes, but that’s running out of road. Instead, to save the American polity and way of life, church and state should once again draw together.
But if there’s one lesson we should take from the ongoing spectacle surrounding the Hunter Biden laptop, it’s not the avalanche of claims and counter-claims about censorship or bias, or the sulphurous accusation of stolen elections. It’s that polite proposals about a bit more Christianity in the public square are hopelessly behind the times. All of politics is already post-liberal, and mainstream power has already explicitly embraced a faith-based moral order.
That is: American Church and American State have already ended their three-century separation. And Laptopgate is most significant in what it reveals about the contest now on for a suitable post-liberal political regime: a battle that pits the “human” against something more like a “swarm”.
She goes on to develop her thesis by focusing on the tension between Elon Musk (as a new Cesar) and the elitist Uniparty “swarmists”.
The Biden administration is fond of talking about “democracy” versus “autocracy”, but it might be more accurate to talk about swarmism and Caesarism. Swarmism is a kind of post-democratic democracy: a mutant form of liberal proceduralism, characterised by collective decision-making in which no one is ever individually accountable. Instead, consequential decisions are as far as possible pushed out to supposedly neutral procedures or even machines. When NGO officials whom you can’t vote out of your political ecosystem talk about “our democracy”, they’re talking about swarmism.
Caesarism, on the other hand, looks substantially the same at lower levels. The main difference is that you get named humans in key decision-making roles — complete with human partiality, eccentricity, and occasional fallibility. Twitter was, until recently, a key vector of elite swarmism. And to swarmists, such rule by a named individual, rather than a collective and some committee-generated “guidelines”, is by definition morally wrong. This core assumption oozes, for example, from this report on the takeover, with its empathetic depiction of the anonymous, collegiate collective of sacked Trust and Safety workers sharply contrasted with the autocratic, erratic individual Elon Musk.
Some defenders of Twitter decision-making over the Hunter Biden case point to the fact that the emails reveal no overt demands for censorship from the CIA or any other political agency. But this is the point: swarmism doesn’t work like that. Consensus-formation is mystified and de-personalised at every turn. The Twitter Files are explosive because they afforded a peek under the purportedly neutral swarmist carapace, revealing not just the named individuals involved in steering it but also human fallibility and political affinities.
Guiding development and managing the consensus of Twitter’s blue check “swarm” is one of many examples which illustrate the strategy, tactics, and objectives of the 5GW which is being waged against citizens by the Imperial Administrative State and their Uniparty politician allies.
But have no illusions about this: your mind, opinions, and emotions are the battlefield being fought over. Your only options are to either get educated about 5GW and work hard to ferret out the lies, opt out (and consider opting into virtual communities), or just concede your (and your children’s) autonomy and sovereignty to the Uniparty and their globalist Overlords. Your choice, their future.
Bill Gates’ unsettling accuracy in predicting future pandemics is cause for alarm. He not only anticipated the Covid-19 pandemic by participating in “Event 201” — an global health exercise — but also conducted a “monkeypox preparedness exercise” that forecasted its emergence to the exact month.
You might vaguely remember, but shortly before the first suspected case of Covid-19 showed up in China, global bureaucrats and academic elites convened for a “global pandemic” exercise; it was known as Event 201. The event was invite-only, and included representatives from the WEF, Johns Hopkins, and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. It was largely funded by the Open Philanthropy Project, which is closely aligned with the Clinton Foundation. According to the official website for this preparatory practice run:
Event 201 was a 3.5-hour pandemic tabletop exercise that simulated a series of dramatic, scenario-based facilitated discussions, confronting difficult, true-to-life dilemmas associated with response to a hypothetical, but scientifically plausible, pandemic. 15 global business, government, and public health leaders were players in the simulation exercise that highlighted unresolved real-world policy and economic issues that could be solved with sufficient political
will, financial investment, and attention now and in the future.
Now, you’re not going to believe this, but the “scenario”:
…simulate[d] an outbreak of a novel zoonotic coronavirus transmitted from bats to pigs to people that eventually becomes efficiently transmissible from person to person, leading to a severe pandemic. The pathogen and the disease it causes are modeled largely on SARS, but it is more transmissible in the community setting by people with mild symptoms.
Gee, now what a coincidence! I recall an origin story of bat soup from Wuhan wet markets, a virus that looks like SARS, and “asymptomatic” spread….
Now, the same players are back, and recently hosted a new pandemic exercise, albeit it was all very hush-hush. Oddly, I can’t find much about it online, except from Johns Hopkins:
The Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, in partnership with WHO and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, conducted Catastrophic Contagion, a pandemic tabletop exercise at the Grand Challenges Annual Meeting in Brussels, Belgium, on October 23, 2022.
…
The exercise simulated a series of WHO emergency health advisory board meetings addressing a fictional pandemic set in the near future. Participants grappled with how to respond to an epidemic located in one part of the world that then spread rapidly, becoming a pandemic with a higher fatality rate than COVID-19 and disproportionately affecting children and young people.
Participants were challenged to make urgent policy decisions with limited information in the face of uncertainty….
First of all, this report illustrates one of the biggest obstacles to a free world, a message which is overtly relevant to America: bureaucrats should not be practicing making policy decisions, that responsibility lies in the hands of legislators, all of whom are bound to confines laid forth in the Constitution and respective state constitutions.
Yet, that’s exactly why these sorts of people are pushing for a global “pandemic treaty” to subjugate sovereign nations to the will of a global government.
Secondly, it’s worth noting exactly who the players are for “Catastrophic Contagion”: we have ambassadors from the WHO (the organization leading the charge for the “pandemic treaty”), we have Bill Gates himself, and two of the Event 201 figures (Tom Inglesby and Anita Cicero).
Lastly, we must deduce that this is a harbinger, just like Event 201 was. Klaus Schwab’s Great Reset has not been fully realized, and whether we like it or not, that’s the end goal.
The next “pandemic” is coming, and times like these require a reflection on timeless and grounding truths, like Ben Franklin’s famous 1755 adage: “Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.”
I’ve had a bit of difficulty deciding on an information path for a blog post today. So, this is what I’m going to do. I’m posting a hodge-podge of articles and videos that might appear unrelated yet has one common theme. THAT THEME is Government/Medical Tyranny under the coup-installed government rulers under Dem-Marxist rulers/oppressors.
1) First up is an hour and 23-minute video interview conducted by Glenn Beck with Whitney Webb. I have no idea who Ms. Webb is. The impression I had from the interview she has been a bit of a Liberal who has awakened to actions of tyranny by America’s current ruling controllers. The interview basis is her book “One Nation Under Blackmail: The Sordid Union Between Intelligence and Crime that Gave Rise to Jeffrey Epstein.” Topic hints from memory: Epstein (of course), a criminal government, transhumanism and more. WELL WORTH THE WATCH! (Beck runs a few pay-the-bills ads. I just FF through the ads, but you do as you will.)
3) The Conservative Treehouse put a roughly 3-minute video of Tucker Carlson highlighting the First Amendment violation of a Free Press for a Leftist Judge incarcerating Catherine Englebrecht and Gregg Phillips for REFUSING to reveal their source that led to the indictment of Eugene Yu for delivering Election data to the Chinese Communist Party. Yu (CEO of Konnech) sued for the source-info and mysteriously a Judge wanted to bring Whistleblowers to the light of day. Englebrecht and Phillips REFUSED: “Tucker Carlson Draws Attention to Imprisonment of Catherine Englebrecht and Gregg Phillips.”
4) Last is a 11/5/22 message from Tom Zawitowski (for Tom Z) on past Election Tyranny, current Election Tyranny (including a section on a phone message from incarcerated Englebrecht) and some rare Court victories trying to secure present and future Election Integrity. I found the original video on Tom Z’s We The People Convention website, but I’m just posting the Rumble Video: “We the People Convention News & Opinion 11-5-22.”
Journalist Whitney Webb has worked to uncover some of the most dangerous stories of our lifetime, and she joins Glenn to reveal just how eye-opening it’s been. Her new two-volume book, “One Nation Under Blackmail: The Sordid Union Between Intelligence and Crime that Gave Rise to Jeffrey Epstein,” examines Epstein’s elaborate network of corruption and power, from Bill Clinton to Ghislaine Maxwell and many more. Her research into transhumanism has given her a terrifying perspective on the World Economic Forum and tech elites, including Elon Musk. And she tells Glenn the dark truth about Biden’s push for electric vehicles that she noticed while living in Chile.
The failures of Covid health policies are legion. Absent, curiously, are any serious acknowledgments of the harms caused by these policies from the people who promoted them throughout the pandemic.
Recently, Professor Emily Oster of Brown University, admitted in The Atlantic that interventions like social distancing and outdoor masking “were totally misguided.” She decried the “wildly irresponsible claims” of many in positions of power and admits that school closures have led to “historic declines” in student test scores.
Oster acknowledges the obvious: these policies had serious unintended consequences. Oncologist reports note that nearly 50 percent of cancers went undiagnosed during the federal lockdowns because people were too scared to seek treatment. One study estimated that we may have missed over 200,000 cases of domestic abuse during the spring of 2020. Sharp-eyed teachers and administrators are usually the first ones to uncover these sad incidents, and our kids weren’t in school. Well into 2022, I was asking aloud: “How many bruises on a mom’s face were hidden because schools required masks for drop-offs?”
Did anyone weigh the true costs of shutting down the country and closing schools? What should be our position towards policy-makers who forced these ill-founded interventions on the public? What attitude should we strike with key influencers who knew of these harms but did little to call for changes?
Oster seems to recognize that the other shoe is dropping and which is why she launches a pre-emptive request for forgiveness:
We have to put these fights aside and declare a pandemic amnesty. We can leave out the willful purveyors of actual misinformation while forgiving the hard calls that people had no choice but to make with imperfect knowledge.
The professor was not an uninterested bystander. Oster and her team had collected invaluable data on Covid cases in school settings for nearly a year starting in August 2020. The data also mapped differing interventions by state, county, and district – allowing a real-time lab of comparisons. Our team charted her data and found that students in masked schools had a 21 percent higher case rate than students in schools with no masks. Oster published a study coming to similar conclusions.
Then, she dropped out of the discussion and refused to push her study for peer review and publication.
Numerous influential academics like Emily, under pressure from peers and establishment leaders, caved, stayed silent, and mothballed their data altogether. It’s difficult to separate intimidation from self-censorship – but a blanket amnesty seems premature.
Of course, no apology will be forthcoming from Dr. Anthony Fauci. During numerous media interviews in the last several months, he has refused to acknowledge any mistakes. Apparently, he fears that the slightest mea culpa would be taken “out of context.” Fauci’s only tool was fear and he’s not going to give up his tactic.
Dr. Scott Atlas, a one-time advisor to President Trump’s Covid-19 taskforce, recounts how he confronted Fauci and asked: “So you think people aren’t frightened enough?” Fauci reportedly replied: “Yes, they need to be more afraid.”
Fauci and his cadre of unelected health officials were on the wrong side of every one of these outcomes. They were made aware of every data point above but their one-size-fits-all policies never changed significantly in the face of the evidence. In their minds, there is only the panic.
Oster’s efforts for the well-being of children were not altogether silent. She repeatedly stated claims for “safe re-openings” which were interpreted into policies of school closures by proxy – the slightest exposure sending children into 10 days of quarantine during the winter of 2021-22 per policy. However, her advocacy for fear-based vaccine pressures was always there. In late December 2021 she tweeted:
It is now widely acknowledged that Covid vaccines do not stop infections or transmission of the disease, which is the only reason for mandating and forcing vaccines on the public. We commend Oster for shying away from the shaming tactics which Fauci extolled and the Biden White House perfected, but, she was wrong again.
Curiously, after the 2009 H1N1 public health debacle, an article was published on the National Institutes of Health website entitled “‘Listen to the People’: Public Deliberation about Social Distancing Measures in a Pandemic.” The article notes the vital need for good and honest communication to the public about measures being taken the protect the citizenry. It states:
Public engagement in ethically laden pandemic planning decisions may be important for transparency, creating public trust, improving compliance with public health orders, and ultimately, contributing to just outcomes.
The current crop of failed fear-mongering virus prophets coupled with the low uptake of boosters is a stark and terrible reminder that the institutions that prided themselves on public health damaged the public trust more than anything else. Your trust should be in the bedrock of our Constitution, not in some self-endowed title of “science.” Public trust in our institutions is sinking and it will require a public trial of our policy decisions to right the ship.
Oster might still find some goodwill for engaging with those of us who got it right – even if she attributes that to a “hefty element of luck” – but she shouldn’t presume that we will forget this any time soon.
Justin Hart is the author of the new book: “Gone Viral: How Covid Drove the World Insane” from Regnery Publishing.
True the Vote founder Catherine Englebrecht and election data security analyst, Gregg Phillips, were previously in contempt of court and placed in jail for failing to outline the participants in a 2020 hotel discussion that revealed the Konnech election data compromise that was transmitted to Chinese networks. {Go Deep} Konnech CEO Eugene Yu was arrested for exploiting access to U.S. election data, including election worker information, and transferring the files to China.
Eugene Yu and Konnech sued True the Vote and are using the U.S. civil judicial system to find out who told the FBI about the Chinese data harvesting operation. Federal Judge Kenneth Hoyt demanded that Phillips and Englebrecht reveal the names of everyone who was present when the original data files were shown to True the Vote.
Englebrecht and Phillips stated they did not ever possess the data file, do not have it and refused to name all the participants who may have seen it. Judge Hoyt threw them in jail last Monday until Englebrecht and Phillips give up the names to the court and the Chinese Communist Party. Tucker Carlson discusses {Direct Rumble Link} – WATCH:
This Week’s Topics: Stay Calm – We Have Work to Do! 2:00 Catherine Engelbrecht Call from Jail 5:30 HUGE PA Court Ruling 15:00 Fetterman is Toast 22:00 Masters Get Huge Lift in AZ 24:00 Cybersecurity Head “Expect Errors” 26:20 Dems Illegally Registering Voters 29:00 No Amnesty for Covid Criminals! 33:30 Proof Feds used Big Tech to Censor 37:00 SCOTUS EndingAffirmative Action 42:30 Racism against Whites 46:00 Home Schooling Explodes 49:30 Mortgage Rates highest in 20 yrs 1:03:00 US Now has Troops in Ukraine 1:06:30 150 Chinese Scientists Paid by US 1:08:30 Left & US Rig Brazil Election 1:11:00 VA Parents Changing Trans Rules 1:17:00 No Trannies in US Beauty Pageant! 1:19:00 Climate Commie Thunberg Exposed 1:21:00 Important Peterson Videos 1:25:00 Your Plan for Election Day! 1:32:30
In saying all that, The Vigilant Fox has a great post today (10/5/22) utilizing actual science from doctors which were revered in their field until they began to expose the fake-manipulative science to brainwash people to take and CONTINUE take mRNA Jab after booster Jab even though the data hidden from the public shows a volatile danger rather than the propaganda LIE: “Safe and Effective”.
As I share the cross post, I want to mention The Vigilant Fox – as many Substackers – has figured out how to embed Rumble videos within a screen captured photo. I have not. So for my Substack readers, I’ll screen capture the post video with the Rumble link above.
Now onto the relevant science brainwashers would rather you remain ignorant.
JRH 10/5/22
Thank you to those who have stepped up!
READER SUPPORTED! I need Readers willing to chip in $5 – $10 – $25 – $50 – $100. PLEASE I need your generosity. PLEASE GIVE to Help me be a voice for Liberty:
Coast Guard rescuer Chad Weston, who helped in Hurricane Ian rescue missions, went on Fox News Tuesday (10/4/22) to explain how he faces termination for refusing the jab.
He’s a man of God — but his religious exemption was denied, and he is one of 20,000 service members who face termination over the military’s vaccine mandate.
Fox News pundit Steve Doocy commented, “Given you’re so close to retirement (two years), I’m sure there are people saying, ‘Why don’t you just get the shot?’”
“Because my faith and my belief are more important than that,” Watson responded. “If I compromise that, I compromise everything I stand for.”
What a commendable action for this man to stick by his principles and not take the easy way out.
But how ethical is it to mandate these things in the first place?
That’s where we turn to Peter McCullough. But first, let’s play devil’s advocate and hear a pro-vaccine Canadian doctor’s perspective (the lady with the headphones and the mask).
Vaccine mandates are quite normal! We’ve always had them. School boards require that students are immunized against measles, mumps, rubella, chickenpox, meningitis — it’s a normal thing. As a family doctor, every year, I keep all of my patients up to date with all of their routine immunizations. If you’re a doctor and you want to go to medical school, the first thing you have to do — if you’re a nurse and you want to go to nursing school — the first thing you have to do is prove that you are up to date with all of your immunizations. That is just basic public health, and it’s basic sense.
Points noted.
But is this “vaccine” like the others? Because as far as doctors like Peter McCullough can tell, the only similarity it shares with those other shots is in the name “vaccine.” If definitions weren’t changed, they would have rightly been placed in a completely different category, gene therapy.
Dr. Peter McCullough elaborates on how unusual it is to mandate such products:
Mandating an emergency use authorized set of vaccines that have no proven safety is not routine at all. These vaccines are genetic products; they’re given every six months or more frequently. Now there are bivalent boosters that have never been tested on a human being whatsoever.
This isn’t usual or normal! This isn’t a part of conventional practice. This is far outside the norms that we have — particularly with respect to safety. Until something’s proven to be safe, in no way should it be mandated.
The elapsed time taken to get an adequate amount of safety data is always longer than the feasible length of any pandemic in history. In other words, a new vaccine is always, let me say it again, always, Mr. Gates, the wrong answer.
It will always take you longer to do a responsible job of creating and testing a novel vaccine than the length of the pandemic. And if you take less time, it means you do not have an appropriate amount of safety data, and therefore, it’s reckless to go and vaccinate the whole population.
Safety is ALWAYS the most important aspect of ANY medical intervention. Because if you kill two, three, four people for every one you save, it DOESN’T MATTER howeffective your product is.
More people died in the vaccine group than in the placebo group, and it takes 22,000 vaccines to save one life from COVID.
Steve Kirsch: “I did a calculation … So you killed 150,000 in order to maybe save 10,000 lives.”
So really, NO ONE should be injecting themselves with these things, let alone be mandated to take them. It’s a disgrace that our military members still have to deal with this.
And to watch the entirety of the interview with Dr. Peter McCullough, click/tap the link below.
Gardiner is not writing about a shooting Civil War as in 1861 – 1865 or even the Revolutionary War for Independence 1775 – 1783. Rather Gardiner is writing his observations of the Left (ok, really Dem-Marxists) utilizing effective INFILTRATION methods legally and extra-legally to subvert American Constitutional institutions. Gardiner shows what he believes is an Activist path to overthrow this infiltration in a peaceful yet powerful manner.
I indeed endorse Gardiner’s Activist path whole heartedly! AND YET I hold no illusions the Left will peacefully submit to an awakening American population making inroads first of locally then expanding nationally. A great example is the Communist managed rioting and looting perpetrated by Black Lives Matter (BLM) and Antifa that canvassed American metropolitan areas across the entire nation.
It is my suspicion that massive American Conservatives/Patriots exercising their peaceful Constitutional Rights to assemble and to vote in untainted elections will be met again with unrestrained violence likely again by BLM/Antifa Communists moving to secure Dem-Marxist power.
When I say “unrestrained” I mean the American Judicial system is so infected with corruption, the rule of law protects criminals more than citizens doing the right thing. The Ashley Biden Diary is a classic example of Judicial corruption.
A couple in Florida moved into a domicile where Ashley Biden recently resided in Florida leaving behind her Diary. The couple was charged with stealing the Diary and selling across State line in New York. The only thing that was true was the sale. The Diary was abandoned not stolen, much like another Biden idiot – Hunter – who abandoned his incriminating laptop at a computer repair shop. My guess is the couple who sold the laptop took some kind of plea deal to avoid the cost of an expensive criminal trial that if a corrupt prosecutor had won, would have landed them with a lengthy prison sentence. So the couple pled guilty. You can read the details here:
Now that is some political corruption in the Judicial system to punish a couple who divulged a Diary demonstrating a Coup-elected Dementia Joe was a pedophile pervert with his own daughter. The prosecution proves the Diary belonged to Ashley Biden (moron prosecutors) who was a victim of daddy’s sexual deviancy. Of course the Dem-Marxist propaganda mouthpieces miss the content of the Diary for the probable extorted confessed guilt of the couple selling the Diary.
I’m sure many of you can probably list Judicial and political corruption you are very aware of. The point is: Rise up peacefully but be resilient when violence confronts you AND don’t expect much Judicial protection. Rather Dem-Marxist controlled justice might prosecute your efforts more than protect your Rights.
DO NOT GIVE UP! Be Brave like our Founders to resist tyranny!
I wrote you can expect the violence of the BLM/Antifa Communist cadre, We The People should find it interesting that the rich Elitists that have adopted Globalist-Marxist principles for a One World Government will kill their own sheeple to decrease the population to a manageable number:
AND NOW the Gardiner post on the Second Civil War.
JRH 8/26/22
Thank you to those who have stepped up!
READER SUPPORTED! I need Readers willing to chip in $5 – $10 – $25 – $50 – $100. PLEASE I need your generosity. PLEASE GIVE to Help me be a voice for Liberty:
The recent clandestine FBI raid on the home of President Donald Trump leaves little doubt that America indeed is in the midst of a second civil war. The war thus far is a non-shooting war with multiple “fronts” of attack waged and supported by both domestic and foreign enemies. If they are successful, they will have effectively nullified America’s constitutional republic and negated most, if not all, of Americans’ cherished constitutional rights and freedoms.
This civil war is being waged successfully against the American republic by multiple organizations and numerous powerful, very wealthy people (“progressives”), all striving to control the manner in which Americans think, speak, and act. Because Americans’ unique constitutional freedoms and rights are under severe attack, there is an urgent and immediate need for all patriotic Americans to get actively engaged.
This article suggests three actions that patriotic citizens can take to become effectively engaged against the enemies of their republic. The power of a single citizen can be profound.
America is in dire need of leaders and supporters who care much more about the preservation of the nation’s constitutional republic than about enriching themselves or doing only what their major donors desire. America needs many more courageous, patriotic leaders like Florida governor Ron DeSantis, who, along with other bold actions, recently fired a George Soros–funded leftist Florida prosecutor.
Governor DeSantis is actively fighting the use of “woke” environmental, social, and governance (ESG) standards by financial institutions to determine loans and other financial support for Florida businesses and citizens. Many more chief executives need to demonstrate such courage and conviction.
Strong, DeSantis-type conservative leadership is urgently needed at all levels of government (county, city, state, and federal). Such leadership is also urgently needed at all levels of America’s educational hierarchy, including K–12 and college and university environments.
Domestic and foreign enemies waging and supporting America’s second civil war include:
1) The radical, far left–controlled Democrat party. Today’s Democrat party is controlled by members of the radical far left, who are committed to an ideology (religion!) that says America is an evil country that was illicitly founded by rich, old white men only for their betterment and perpetuation. These radicals lack and are not the least bit interested in a balanced history of America’s Founders and founding. Such an approach will go against their race-based Marxist agenda striving to divide the American population rather than unify the people.
Democrats’ attacks on the American republic include, among other things, a) maintaining an extremely dangerous, deadly open southern border; b) supporting violent, lawless groups such as Antifa and Black Lives Matter; and c) deliberately eliminating America’s energy independence, causing super-inflation and risking America’s national security. Given the above, traditional longtime, patriotic Democrats are choosing to leave the party.
2) The Great Reset agenda of the World Health Organization (WHO) and the World Economic Forum (WEF). Members of the WHO and WEF (both substantially funded by Bill Gates and other wealthy “progressives”) have concocted what they call the Great Reset agenda. This is nothing less than an effort to control people’s lives by controllingtheir health and money. The radical far left–controlled Democrat party supports the Great Reset agenda because it is an attack on America’s constitutional republic.
3) The Chinese Communist Party (CCP), Russia, and other tyrannical governments. The CCP, Russia, North Korea, and other tyrannical governments are notorious for continual cyber-attacks against America’s infrastructure. The involvement of the CCP in the development and release of the deadly COVID-19 virus is well accepted by numerous investigators and at least one brave Chinese whistle-blower.
The CCP exerts great influence at many of America’s leading colleges and universities to promote, either directly or indirectly, CCP propaganda against long accepted American values, including family and Christian values. The deep disdain that the CCP feels for Americans was revealed in a speech given in 2003 by Chinese defense minister (General) Chi Haotian, where he stated, “It is indeed brutal to kill one or two hundred million Americans. But that is the only path that will secure a Chinese century in which the Chinese Communist Party leads the world.”
Actions that patriotic, freedom-loving Americans can take in this 21st-century civil war:
1) Use the tools provided by Act for America that allow citizens to easily contact their state and federal representatives about pending legislation that is being promoted by far-left Democrats. Various legislators have indicated that it takes hearing from only 40–50 of their constituents to make a difference in critical votes on pending legislation.
Interviews with legislators indicate that many consider a note or call from a single constituent to be representative of 1,000 people. Thus, a single citizen indeed is potent.
2) Form small groups of military veterans (and other citizen groups) to become active, vocal supporters of bona fide conservative political candidates. Provide this same support for strong conservative candidates for local school boards and other education positions. An example of a highly successful, activist veterans organization is American Veterans Vote in Virginia.
3) Parents and all citizens concerned about the education of America’s youth need to insist on viewing the curricula that K–12 teachers are using to instruct students. Challenge any race-based materials, sexual orientation and transgender indoctrination, and anti-American books and other materials being used. Continue to appear at school board meetings to demand the end of any Critical Race Theory or derivative instruction being given to students. If necessary, contact the No Left Turn in Education organization for potential advice/legal assistance.
In conclusion, now is not the time to be complacent about life in America — there is too much at stake. Citizens who love America with its cherished constitutional freedoms and rights truly need to become active and help win America’s second civil war!
Paul S. Gardiner is a retired Army officer, Vietnam veteran, and graduate of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, University of Alabama, and the United States Army War College. He is hopeful that the information presented in this article will help motivate an army of heretofore uninvolved Americans to become actively involved in the current multi-front civil war against the American constitutional republic. The freedoms and inalienable rights of all Americans must be preserved!
The Conservative-Patriot Christian Right 
