YUP, Something to See Here Cuz Your Govt Lies


John R. Houk, Blog Editor

© March 4, 2023

TODAY I am focusing on what were once called MYTHS or CONSPIRACY THEORIES but we who are still ridiculed for what we know are proven to be FACTUAL.

I begin with a video I first saw on BANNED.VIDEO by Greg Reese but for embed purposes will share from Bitchute:

Bitchute VIDEO: FIGHT BACK! SAFETY COMMITTEES OF THE REVOLUTION

Posted by BANNED.VIDEOInfowars

First Published March 1st, 2023 17:02 UTC

Prior to 1776, American patriots lawfully nullified British rule by creating their own parallel government.

https://gregreese.substack.com/

https://banned.video/channel/greg-reese

The last minute & half of the Reese video is pay-the-bills information which we should all be able to relate to. The theme is setting up “Safety Committees” on a local or County level to begin RESISTING government tyranny from a power-grabbing lying government. Reese briefly uses the example of the American Revolution became instituted on a local level against British Tyranny. Reese correctly points out that day’s tyrants are the infiltrating long arm of Globalist-Elitists. (But being a bit if a history buff, the term “Safety Committee” reminds more of how the French Revolution brought power to anti-Monarchists leading to mass executions which ironically evolved into the absolute power of Emperor Napoleon Bonaparte. Just saying, be careful with whom you trust with power.)

Regardless, of how “Safety Committees” pan out, it actually might be the best RESISTANCE Movement to America’s apparently long-time Globalist-Marxist-Corporatist-Fascist political infection. It is my current humble opinion that ALL facets Constitutionally separated government powers (Executive, Legislative and Judiciary) have become infected with corruption for any sort of balanced protection for WE THE PEOPLE to manifest as our Founding Fathers intended with the U.S. Constitution.

That is the-WHY and the-HOW myths and the lies propagandized as facts and truth by a lying government has become so accepted by a gullible populace that probably STILL has zero idea how they are being manipulates like SHEEP.

I have truthful cross posts that will appear below on the facts derided as Myths and Conspiracy Theories when it is proven everyday even by the Left the truth was covered up from NewsTarget and the Activist Post:

And before moving on, I feel compelled to share a parody music video lampooning one of the worst Sheeple Manipulators (and it’s not brought to you by Pfizer):

Bitchute VIDEO: (MUSIC PARODY) EYE OF THE PFIZER

Posted by Jim Rizoli

First Published March 2nd, 2023 00:31 UTC

So many blessings come from Pfizer.

AND SERIOUSLY, Jeffrey Epstein did not kill himself BUT the China Virus (er…I mean COVID) DID COME FROM WUHAN CHINESE LAB. The speculation for why many on the Left are admitting the LAB-LEAK below the first two cross posts. HINT: Might have something to do with Ukraine and the nothing to see here demand.  

JRH 3/4/23

Thank you to those who have stepped up!

READER SUPPORTED! I need Readers willing to chip in $5 – $10 – $25 – $50 – $100. PLEASE I need your PayPal generosity. PLEASE GIVE to Help me be a voice for Liberty:

Please Support CPCR

YOU CAN ALSO SUPPORT via buying healthy collagen, vitamin supplements/products, coffee from my Online stores:

My Store (please use referral discount code 2388058): https://modere.co/3SrOHzI

Big Tech Censorship is pervasive – Share voluminously on all social media platforms!

****************************

Top 10 myths told by covid “experts” that are now completely debunked

Kid Tinfoil Hat

By Ethan Huff 

March 2, 2023

NEWSTARGET

Misinformation about the Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) continues to run rampant as government officials and public health “experts” refuse to admit they were wrong about pretty much everything.

Almost nothing people were ordered to do, from testing to masking to “vaccinating,” produced positive outcomes because all of it was based on covid myths that have since been debunked. Here are the top 10 most prominent covid myths that are still spreading as “facts:”

1) Natural immunity offers little protection compared to “vaccine immunity”

A study published in The Lancet that looked at 65 major studies from 19 different countries shows that natural immunity, meaning unvaccinated immunity, is at least as effective as the fake “immunity” produced by the primary round of covid shots.

Facebook banned the study, naturally, but it shows that the best way to stay protected against covid is to rely on your own God-given immune system rather than Big Pharma’s experimental chemical offerings.

2) Masks prevent covid transmission

This myth led to tens of millions of people being forced into face muzzles that suffocated them, and in some cases led to the spread of more disease. Esteemed Oxford researchers recently confirmed that masks are medically useless, often causing more harm than good.

3) Closing schools reduces covid transmission

The only thing keeping children at home did during covid was isolate them from their friends and teachers, leading to mental illness and other health problems, and compromised their education.

4) Myocarditis caused by the jabs is exceedingly rare

It turns out that covid jabs are a much more prominent cause of myocarditis than infection with “covid,” a virus that has never been isolated, by the way.

5) Young people can benefit from getting covid “boosted”

Even worse than the primary round of covid injections are the “boosters” that the Biden regime and others have been aggressively pushing. There is zero evidence that getting boosted does anything other than produce vaccine-induced AIDS (VAIDS), research shows.

The entire covid scamdemic was based on myths and deception

Another common covid myth, or No. 6, is the idea that forcing people to get “vaccinated” helped to increase vaccination rates, and thus reduce the number of infections, illnesses, and deaths.

The mandate was based on the theory that vaccination reduced transmission rates – a notion later proven to be false,” reported the New York Post.

7) It is a conspiracy theory to suggest that covid came from a Wuhan lab

There is still zero evidence to suggest that covid was a natural occurrence, but this has not stopped the powers that be from claiming that anyone citing the lab origin theory is spreading conspiracy lies.

8) People must get the second jab dose three or four weeks after the first one

Early on, everyone was told that the two-dose injection regimen must be taken no more than one month apart. This is despite the fact that data suggests a longer in-between spacing period of at least three months.

9) The “bivalent booster” is backed by “crystal clear” science

The only data backing the so-called “bivalent booster” shot for the latest covid variants is a pathetic animal study involving just eight mice. To this day, there has not been a single randomized controlled trial of the bivalent booster to suggest that it is anything other than snake oil for the gullible.

10) One in five people contract “long” covid

We were told by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) that 20 percent of covid infections will lead to long covid. Because of this, the federal agency wants everyone to get injected again and again and again.

The truth is that only three percent of covid patients, according to a U.K. study, suffer covid symptoms lasting longer than 12 weeks.

The latest news about covid “vaccines” can be found at ChemicalViolence.com.

Sources for this article include:

NYPost.com

NaturalNews.com

NewsTarget.com © 2021 All Rights Reserved. All content posted on this site is commentary or opinion and is protected under Free Speech. 

++++++++++++++++++++++

Gaslighting: “Conspiracy Theories” Already Proven True in 2023

Gaslighting America

By Marie Hawthorne [of The Organic Prepper]

Original Post

March 2, 2023

Activist Post

Preppers get called conspiracy theorists a lot.  It’s supposed to be demeaning, but considering how many conspiracy theories have been proven correct lately, I no longer consider it an insult.  The more time goes by, the more “conspiracy theorists” just seem ahead of the game.

Quite a few “conspiracy theories” have recently come to light as actual facts in 2023 already. And it’s only the beginning of March.

Let’s look at a recent batch of “conspiracy theories” that aren’t really theories any more.

Gas stoves in peril?

In January, the OP ran a story about the potential ban on gas stoves.  Naturally, the mainstream media poo-poohed the idea that the government would do something like that.  The New York Times insisted that “No, Biden is Not Trying to Ban Gas Stoves.”   CNN likewise claimed Biden didn’t want to ban the stoves.  NPR dismissed the thought of banning gas stoves as a right-wing, culture-war stunt.

Well, maybe they’re not going to outright ban gas stoves. . . but the Department of Energy is proposing new efficiency standards that will make approximately half the gas stoves on the market no longer available. So, technically this isn’t a ban, but regulating gas stoves out of existence has the exact same effect.

This is particularly problematic for anyone with fairly new models.  Newer appliances are made to break down within about ten years.  Anyone who’s been a homeowner for more than a decade knows this.  If appliances are made to only last ten years or so, the government doesn’t need to conduct some dramatic midnight raid to steal your stove.  All they have to do is wait.  Within ten years, most people will have to replace their stoves anyway, and at that point, very few, if any, gas stoves will still be on the market.

Nope, it’s not just a theory.  They really do want to get rid of gas stoves.

Covid origins?

And in other Department of Energy news, the agency recently came to the conclusion that Covid probably did come from a lab.  The findings were part of a classified report, which the government agency shared with the Wall Street Journal last weekend.

Back in 2021, the FBI had been the only federal agency to state with “moderate confidence” that Covid came from a lab.  At the time, their finding mostly went ignored.  However, with another agency admitting it, and WSJ covering the story, it becomes more difficult to brush aside.

And at least we’re allowed to openly discuss the lab leak now.  Two years ago, we weren’t.  In February 2021, Facebook banned any discussion of the possible laboratory origins of Covid.  The lab leak theory was just too crazy to even consider. Zero Hedge was banished from Twitter for daring to suggest the makeup of the virus was peculiar in 2020. The Organic Prepper was called a disinformation site and defunded due, in part, to our coverage of the virus.

But now, House Republicans are launching an investigation into the origins of Covid.   And once the Wall Street Journal publishes something, even the stodgiest Boomers can’t ignore it.

The Covid lab leak theory is slowly but surely looking less like a theory, and more like an established fact.

The Covid vaccine?

This is hardly the only situation in which Covid dissidents have been proven correct.  There has been a small contingent of people from the beginning who were reluctant to participate in the trial of a novel medical product.  Considering the many criminal payouts Big Pharma has had to make over the years, wanting long-term studies before trying a novel pharmaceutical product shouldn’t be controversial.

The cost (injecting a poorly-tested novel substance) did not match up with the benefit (avoiding a not-particularly dangerous disease that many of us had a natural immunity to anyway).  Plenty of well-informed people had perfectly rational reasons for vaccine hesitancy.

Were our concerns taken seriously?  No.  The Othering was vicious and relentless.  Daisy wrote an article about it here.  Family relationships were stressed and sometimes broken. Careers were ended. Opportunities were denied. Reputations were ruined.

And meanwhile, the “safe and effective” drumbeat resounded.  Anyone who wanted real answers about what was happening, who wanted to wait for long-term studies, was dismissed as a conspiracy theorist.

So, who was right?  Were the shots safe and effective?  Or were the conspiracy theorists the reasonable ones?

I’m not a doctor or statistician.  All I can do is point at actual numbers.  And even the most pro-vax publications cannot hide the non-Covid excess mortality of the past two years. Young, formerly healthy people have been dying at far higher rates than they used to, and it’s not from Covid.  As of right now, no one can prove that jabs are responsible, because no one wants to look that closely.  But we can’t prove they’re not responsible, either.  Safe?  I’m not convinced, and neither are a lot of vastly more qualified people.  Just look at Ed Dowd’s meticulously researched book, Cause Unknown.

And even Tony “The Science” Fauci recently admitted that the shots don’t really work at preventing transmission or infection.  So, nope, these jabs aren’t effective either.

Meanwhile, Congress is finally launching an investigation into the safety of the forced vaccine.

Were the conspiracy theorists right to be cautious about the new shots?  Yeah, I think so.

Mandatory masking?

And what about the masks?  We got mixed signals about masks from the beginning.  In March 2020, Dr. Fauci said they didn’t work, then he later changed his tune.  Many people around the country had to deal with mask mandates for over a year.

Well, the experts at the Cochrane Library recently published a huge meta-analysis of the effectiveness of physical barriers (like masks) at preventing respiratory viruses (like Covid).  They can’t find any strong links between masking and disease prevention.  Cochrane studies are the gold standard.  They’re very conservative, they rarely make hard and fast statements, but once they do, people typically stop arguing.

The mask debate is one that really smacks us at the OP because, back in 2021, NewsGuard cited our questioning of the mask narrative as a reason to downgrade us, which really hurt our income stream.  Daisy goes into the whole story here. She cited studies with a variety of outcomes regarding masks, and NewsGuard saw the variety of viewpoints as reason enough to downgrade us.

The journalism majors working at NewsGuard don’t seem to understand that letting multiple educated people argue is more true to the scientific ideal than top-down authoritarian mandates.

I’m not the only person saying this.  Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, a Stanford professor and MD, said as much in a recent interview with Jordan Peterson. At 5:26, he talks about public perception during the pandemic:

There was this sort of uni-vocal conclusion that you had to do lockdowns, you had to wear masks, you had to socially distance, you had to put plastic barriers up, you had to close schools, you had to do all of these things; that the vaccines would stop transmission of the disease, that therefore it was warranted that people would lose their jobs over them.  All of these ideas were sold as if there was a scientific consensus in favor of them.  That was a lie.  There was never a scientific consensus on almost any of the topics; and as you say on masks, in fact, the preexisting narrative, the preexisting idea of most scientists before the pandemic, was in quite the opposite direction.

Dr. Bhattacharya’s not the only highly qualified doctor speaking out, either.  In fact, so many of the various Covid narratives have been proven wrong, that Dr. Marty Makary, chief of Islet Transplant Surgery at Johns Hopkins medical school, recently published an article February 27 titled “10 myths told by covid experts—and now debunked.”

“Masks prevent transmission” is #2 on the list.  I guess if NewsGuard still thinks Daisy is a conspiracy theorist over this one, she’s got some pretty kick-ass company.

But in all seriousness, thank God (or whoever you pray to) for doctors like Dr. Bhattacharya and Dr. Makary for not treating the public like we’re mentally impaired rodents.  There are still a few true medical experts out there who genuinely want to educate the public, and give us real answers.

The air and water in East Palestine?

In the meantime, I wonder if the EPA will find any real experts. That agency keeps insisting that the air and water in East Palestine are perfectly safe, despite the derailment and subsequent disaster going on a few weeks ago.

The EPA says they’ve been testing for everything and that the numbers indicate everything looks good; professional chemists aren’t so sure.  “They should be testing for individual compounds, and if they are testing for total VOCs [volatile organic compounds] as a screen, they need to have very sensitive instruments because some VOCs are much more toxic than others,” says Ted Schettler, MD, and science director at the nonprofit Science and Environmental Health network.  The fact that East Palestine residents are still smelling off-odors suggests that the EPA is not using sensitive enough equipment. [Blog Editor: That was a compassionate guess by author Marie Hawthorne, I think a better suggestion is government lying and coverup.]

And the EPA hasn’t started testing for the myriad other substances that formed when the known chemicals in the train were burned.  When you mix chemicals together and burn them, new chemicals form, and this hasn’t even been talked about much yet.

It’s probably going to be a long time before we have a good picture of the damage caused by this derailment.  But, what do we know?

We know that the people of East Palestine are still suffering from bizarre symptoms.  Rashes, shortness of breath, and a burning sensation while breathing are common.  Some people have had voice changes, loss of taste and smell, and random infections. Because East Palestine is such a low-income area, doctors can’t do the tests they need to, though they all agree that the citizens are in real pain.

And yet EPA Administrator Michael Regan states, “Nothing is coming back that shows adverse health impacts.” [YUP, Govt Lying!]

Government officials are not helping themselves by insisting there’s “nothing to see here!”  Distrusting the federal government has traditionally been in the realm of conspiracy theorists, but once again, which group of people seems more reasonable?

The Twitter Files?

I’ve spent a lot of time wondering if I’m too cynical, too eager to see ill intent.

Then came the Twitter Files.

We’ve written about them before on this site. When Elon Musk bought Twitter, he handed over internal documents to independent journalists Bari Weiss, Matt Taibbi, Michael Shellenberger, and Lee Feng to peruse.

Many figures in alternative media had suspected they were being shadow-banned, or having a hard time reaching followers.  The Twitter Files confirmed everyone’s worst suspicions: the federal government does spend millions of dollars policing online content, and much of it targets law-abiding citizens with inconvenient opinions, rather than real criminals.  Many of the people that had their accounts locked or frozen weren’t even big media presences, just people with a few dozen followers with an annoying sense of humor, or who got snarky about the wrong things.

Five years ago, anyone convinced the Feds were watching their every online move would have been labeled a crazy conspiracy theorist.

Well, yet again, the conspiracy theorists have been proven correct.

The gaslighting continues.

If you’ve ever been in an abusive relationship, you probably know what it’s like to have someone trying to convince you you’re crazy.  The only way to survive gaslighting like that is to constantly remind yourself of things you know are true.  That’s why it’s so important to keep track of whatever narratives we’re supposed to swallow and constantly check them against our preexisting knowledge base.  It’s important to hold purveyors of false narratives to account; it’s important to point to tangible facts and to be able to discuss them.

These are only the most recent examples of conspiracy theorists being proven correct.  Daisy had an article about “7 Things That Used to Be ‘Crazy Conspiracy Theories’ Until 2020 Happened.”  The tin foil hat wearers have been getting vindicated a lot in the past few years.

I think we’re going to keep seeing more of this for a while.  Universal Basic Income, digital currencies, AI tech, there are so many new things happening right now.

What about you?  How have you been proven correct?  Are there any “theories” you’re just waiting to see evidence of on the mainstream? What theories have you seen mocked, then proven true? Let’s talk about it in the comments.

Marie Hawthorne is a lover of novels and a cultivator of superb apple pie recipes, Marie spends her free time writing about the world around her.

Source: The Organic Prepper

Support Activist Post for just $1 per month at Patreon or SubscribeStar or Donate cryptocurrency HERE.

ACTIVIST POST – ALTERNATIVE INDEPENDENT NEWS – CREATIVE COMMONS 2019

+++++++++++++++++++++

[Blog Editor: An INFOWARS post begins with a video of Owen Shroyer on The Alex Jones Show going over Leftist hypocrites poohing-poohing the Wuhan Lab Leak but now three years later the same Leftists are saying, “YUP! Wuhan Lab Leak!” The speculation is because the CCP is aligning with Putin’s Russia to battle the Globalist West (viz., USA and NATO Nations). The INFOWARS post then goes over a history of how Gain of Function (GoF) research went from a USA university to Wuhan and probably Ukraine bio-war labs in Ukraine. BELOW I am just embedding the link to the INFOWARS title for you to read, THEN I am cross posting three Bitchute versions of BANNED.VIDEO focusing Wuhan Lab Leak, the CCP and Ukraine. If a WWIII erupts this geopolitical idiocy will be the reason AND ALL the geopolitical players (USA, NATO, Russia, Ukraine, Communist China and any delusional alliances) will be the bad guys and the people of the world will be the gullible losers.]

Don’t Fall For The Wuhan Trap! Establishment Suddenly Admits Covid ‘Escaped’ From Biolab; By Kelen McBreen; INFOWARS; 3/1/23

Bitchute VIDEO: LEARN WHY THE WUHAN LAB LEAK IS NOW BEING PUSHED BY THE MAINSTREAM

Posted by The Alex Jones ShowInfowars

First Published March 2nd, 2023 20:46 UTC

BANNED.VIDEO Description: Owen Shroyer breaks down why the mainstream is now pushing the truth about the Wuhan COVID lab leak.

++++++++++++++++

Bitchute VIDEO: LEFTISTS BACKTRACK ON BEING WRONG ABOUT WUHAN LAB LEAK

Posted by BANNED.VIDEOInfowars

First Published March 3rd, 2023 13:18 UTC

Owen Shroyer breaks down clips of top leftist propagandists Jimmy Kimmel and the cast of The View having trouble co9ming to terms with the fact that they were wrong about dismissing the Wuhan COVID lab leak.

Learn more here: https://www.infowars.com/posts/rand-paul-covid-lab-leak-one-of-the-greatest-coverups-in-modern-medical-history/

https://www.infowars.com/posts/state-department-funded-censorship-group-punished-conservative-websites-for-circulating-lab-leak-theory/

++++++++++++++++++

Bitchute VIDEO: ECOHEALTH ALLIANCE WHISTLEBLOWER: I BELIEVE UKRAINE CONFLICT IS A COVERUP FOR FAILED US COVID OP

Posted by BANNED.VIDEOInfowars

First Published March 2nd, 2023 01:58 UTC

Andrew Huff of https://andrewhuff.com/ joins host Owen Shroyer on The Alex Jones Show to break down the truth behind the failed US COVID op.

Another Dose of Science Truth


Don’t be a Sheeple, Look at the Data

John R. Houk, Blog Editor

© June 25, 2022

Yesterday Constitutional 10th Amendment Federalism was upheld when SCOTUS overturned past Leftist Judicial activism giving power back to the States to decide if Baby-Killing is alright or evil. Expect Dem-Marxist controlled States to perpetuate the evil Baby-Killing.

THAT SAID, I now embark on another journey of sharing actual science based on data that Globalist/Big Pharma controlled science will LIE and scream DISINFORMATION/MISINFORMATION.

ALSO, I want to share with readers the last time I shared actual empirical science facts on my limited use of Facebook, it earned me a stint in their for 3-days on my FB profile and some limited jail/restrictions as follows as of 6/25/22 (Account Status):

FB Acct Status web capture 6/25/22

So this post will not even make it to my FB profile. And to those wondering why I still use Facebook: It is the primary way this 65-year old man keeps in contact with what’s happening with my fellow Class of 1975 High School graduates (regrettably being WA State [I now live in Oklahoma], some of which have embraced Leftist brainwashing).

AND NOW the science data Global science would rather you remain Sheeple oblivious in order of my interest more than date:

I begin with Dr. Jane Ruby reporting on what should be considered FDA criminality on the Red Voice Media website entitled, “U.S. FDA Is Now A Terrorist Organization.” The video on the website spends about 4-minutes on SCOTUS revoking Roe v. Wade and the rest of 22-minute video on the FDA.

NEXT is a nearly 4-minute video of Sam Dodson FDA failures to address documented mRNA mishaps.

NEXT is a Highwire/Del Bigtree interview with Dr. Peter McCullough and Senator Ron Johnson about Medical-Political persecution of doctors not agreeing with Globalist/Dem-Marxist control-the-people science tyranny.

NEXT is a past Frontline Flash video (2:15) revealing two inherent science lies from a California Bill (AB 2098) from Dr. Peterson Pierre.

NEXT is a snippet of Ben Swann elaborating on how CCP-controlled WHO chief Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus secretly got caught admitting COVID (aka CCP Virus or Chinese Virus) originated from a Wuhan Lab.

RELATED TO SWANN is an Epoch Times post ALSO on Tedros admission: “WHO and Lancet Commission Chiefs Come Out in Support of Lab Leak Theory.”

AND LAST a report from UK-oriented The Exposé where the title should pique your interest: “World Health Organization Study concludes risk of suffering Serious Injury due to COVID Vaccination is 339% higher than risk of being hospitalised with COVID-19.”

JRH 6/25/22

READER SUPPORTED! I need Readers willing to chip in $5 – $10 – $25 – $50 – $100. PLEASE I need your generosity. PLEASE GIVE to overcome research expenses:

Please Support NCCR

Big Tech Censorship is pervasive – Share voluminously on all social media platforms!

****************************

U.S. FDA Is Now A Terrorist Organization

DOD-driven domestic bioterrorism program, and Team Enigma is back to break down the CDC’s public statement that it has no responsibility to monitor safety…

Dr. Jane Ruby – Sasha Latypova

By DR. JANE RUBY

June 24, 2022

Red Voice Media

Catch every episode of The Dr. Jane Ruby Show

Rumble VIDEO: U.S. FDA Is Now A Terrorist Organization

[Posted by Stew Peters Network 

Published June 24, 2022

MORE DESCRIPTION]

On today’s Dr. Jane Ruby Show, Dr. Jane highlights a historic day in the United States, as the Supreme Court of the nation reverses the 50-year-old Roe vs Wade decision, sending back to the 50 states, the decision to legalize or criminalize abortion. And we now have clear and present evidence that the U.S.  Food and Drug Administration is a terrorist organization colluding with a DOD-driven domestic bioterrorism program, and Team Enigma is back to break down the CDC’s public statement that it has no responsibility to monitor safety… And we conclude the show, and the week, with a very special “Ask Dr. Jane”… This is the Dr. Jane Ruby Show and you’re about to enter Truth in Medicine!

Watch the full show on premium. Not a member? Join here and support Dr. Jane: https://redvoicemedia.net/ruby

[Blog Editor: The Sasha Latypova portion is premium viewing only. I am not a premium user. If you are the premium portion is embedded in the below title.]

Dr. Jane Ruby: U.S. FDA Is A BioTerrorism Organization; CDC Says Its Not Responsible For Safety And Ask Dr. Jane (FULL SHOW)

© 2022 Red Voice Media – ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

++++++++++++++++++++++

Bitchute VIDEO: CALLER DROPS MASSIVE TRUTH BOMB ON FDA

Posted by BNN

Posted on June 25th, 2022 05:35 UTC

Jun 25, 2022

Bill Gates Is EVIL

Sam Dodson, an intellectual engineer, called out the FDA for doing “nothing” with the “massive safety signals,” colluding with pharmaceutical companies to suppress trial data for 75 years, ignoring fraudulent data, ignoring adverse events like myocarditis and prion diseases and ignoring issues with infertility.

MORE DESCRIPTION

+++++++++++++++++++

Bitchute VIDEO: DR. PETER MCCULLOUGH IS UNDER FIRE FROM THE AMERICAN BOARD OF INTERNAL MEDICINE

Posted by Right2Freedom

Posted on June 23rd, 2022 03:48 UTC 

June 17, 2022
Source: www.bitchute.com/video/wt5Fua6S7G2q/

Dr. Peter McCullough is under fire from the American Board of Internal Medicine (A.B.I.M.), who is threatening his medical license for “providing false and inaccurate information to patients”. Senator Ron Johnson has responded with a call for A.B.I.M. and Dr. McCullough to participate in an open hearing on Capitol Hill, and put it all on the table of public record.

+++++++++++++++++++++++

Rumble VIDEO: Frontline Flash™ Daily Dose: ‘CA AB 2098: Based On Lies’ with Dr. Peterson Pierre

Posted by Dr. Simone Gold

Published June 20, 2022

Frontline Flash™ by AFLDS.org with Dr. Peterson Pierre presents Daily Dose: ‘CA AB 2098: Based On Lies’ (Ep. 2098 – 6.20.2022). The Real Story of Good Health ~ in 120 Seconds or Less. Follow on social media @FrontlineFlash

Source: https://aflds.org/about-us/issue-briefs/issue-brief-california-assembly-bill-2098/

+++++++++++++++++++

Bitchute VIDEO: WHO CHIEF ADMITS PRIVATELY “COVID CAME FROM CHINESE LAB”

Posted by Americans United Against The New World Order

AmericansUnitedAgainstMarxismAndTheNewWorldOrder

First Published June 25th, 2022 02:01 UTC

MORE DESCRIPTION

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++

WHO and Lancet Commission Chiefs Come Out in Support of Lab Leak Theory

The flag of the World Health Organization (WHO) at their headquarters in Geneva on March 5, 2021. (Fabrice Coffrini/AFP via Getty Images)

By Hans Mahncke

June 21, 2022 Updated: June 22, 2022

The Epoch Times

World Health Organization (WHO) Director Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus reportedly admitted to a senior European politician that the virus that causes COVID-19 most likely came out of a Wuhan lab. The Daily Mail reports that Tedros made the admission citing a catastrophic lab accident.

The disclosure comes on the heels of a WHO investigative report that was published earlier this month, concluding that the pandemic may have started at a Wuhan lab and that Chinese authorities have been blocking access to crucial data.

At the same time, Jeffrey Sachs, leader of the Lancet Commission on COVID-19, now says that he is convinced that the pandemic started in a lab and that SARS-CoV-2 was created with the aid of U.S. biotechnology.

Sachs made his stunning admission last week at a conference in Spain where he had been invited by former Spanish prime minister José Luís Zapatero.

The admissions from two of the world’s most prominent COVID-19 authorities, who also happen to be establishment stalwarts with a record of appeasing the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), is a significant development in the search for the origin of the pandemic.

Early in 2020, just as the pandemic was starting to unfold, Xiao Botao, a whistleblower from Chinapublished an article claiming that the virus had come out of a Wuhan lab. The whistleblower’s paper was quickly removed from the internet and an all-hands-on-deck effort to scrub and censor the idea of a lab leak quickly ensued.

Two institutions played a key role in that scrubbing effort. The World Health Organization and esteemed British medical journal The Lancet.

White House Chief Medical Adviser on Covid-19 Dr. Anthony Fauci at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) in Bethesda, Md., on Feb. 11, 2021. (Saul Loeb/AFP via Getty Images)

WHO chief Tedros and his organization famously pushed CCP propaganda, including lavishly praising Xi Jinping and claiming that the virus did not transmit between humans. Tedros also spearheaded efforts to “combat the spread of rumors and misinformation.” In addition, two separate WHO investigations aggressively dismissed the lab leak theory.

For its part, the Lancet published a statement that maligned anyone who deigned to so much as contemplate that the virus might have come out of a lab.

That Lancet statement—which was published before most Americans even knew that there was a pandemic spreading around the globe—was signed by a number of notable leaders in the field of virology and set the tone for the corporate media’s coverage.

It also served as a warning to other scientists and science publications around the globe that lab-leak discussions were off-limits.

Most virological research in the Western world is funded through the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), headed by Dr. Anthony Fauci—who was himself instrumental in shutting down any discussion of the lab leak theory—and Jeremy Farrar, the British pharmaceutical trust director who sits on billions of dollars’ worth of grant money and has long-standing ties to China’s CDC head, Gao Fu. Farrar co-authored the Lancet statement.

The Lancet’s editor, Richard Horton, is a recipient of the CCP’s Friendship Prize. Before the pandemic, he published a glowing tribute to Xi and the Chinese regime. Horton later went on Chinese state TV where he praised Chinese authorities, impugned Western governments, and asserted that claims that the pandemic might have started in a Wuhan lab were part of a “pandemic of disinformation.”

Horton also set up a commission to investigate “the nature, origin, and prevention of zoonotic diseases.” The focus on zoonosis—or a natural origin—meant that The Lancet had predetermined what the commission was supposed to conclude.

Sachs was appointed as head of the commission while Peter Daszak, the president of EcoHealth Alliance who helped Fauci funnel U.S. taxpayer money to the Wuhan Institute of Virology, was made a member of the group. It was Daszak’s enormous conflicts of interest, as well as the emergence of new evidence pointing to a lab leak, that led to the eventual disbanding of the Lancet Commission in September 2021.

An exterior view of building one of National Institutes of Health (NIH) inside Bethesda campus, in Bethesda, Md., on Nov. 21, 2020. NIH funds majority of biomedical research in United States. (grandbrothers/Shutterstock)

However, the group did not publicly dismiss the natural origin narrative until last week, when Sachs attended a conference in Madrid where he made his surprising admission:

“I chaired a Commission for the Lancet for two years on COVID. I’m pretty convinced it came out of U.S. lab biotechnology, not out of nature.”

Sachs’s statement is not only hugely significant because of his role as chairman of the Lancet Commission but also—and perhaps even more so—because of his admission that U.S. biotechnology was used to create SARS-CoV-2.

We have known for some time about the cooperation between the so-called godfather of gain-of-function experiments, Ralph Baric of the University of North Carolina, and the director of the Wuhan Institute of Virology, Shi Zhengli. In fact, it was the disclosure of that collaboration in a Jan. 31, 2020, article in Science magazine that led Fauci’s team to scramble to cover up the NIAID’s involvement with, and funding of, Shi’s lab.

Baric and Shi’s collaboration traces back to 2015 when they created a modified coronavirus that was not only uniquely able to latch on to human cells but also able to efficiently replicate in human lungs. While the virus they created was not SARS-CoV-2, the virus did have the attributes that we would later find in SARS-CoV-2.

Their collaboration proved that Shi had gained the technical know-how to do the kinds of experiments that might have resulted in COVID-19. Baric also sent transgenic mice with human lung receptors to Shi’s Wuhan lab. Humanized mice mimic human lung tissue and act as experimental stand-ins for humans. They are used to test whether newly created viruses can replicate and spread quickly among humans.

It is not a big leap to go from infected lab mice to infected lab workers. This is even more evident when one considers that the Wuhan lab conducted its coronavirus research under biosafety level two conditions, which even Baric acknowledged as dangerous, stating that there is much less oversight and that lab-acquired infections occur much more frequently at biosafety level two than at higher levels.

After the pandemic started, Chinese authorities directed their labs to shift coronavirus work to biosafety level three labs.

An aerial view shows the P4 laboratory at the Wuhan Institute of Virology in Wuhan in China’s central Hubei Province on April 17, 2020. (Hector Retamal/AFP via Getty Images)

But even that might not offer sufficient protection against a biosafety accident. Late last year, a lab worker in Taiwan contracted COVID-19 from handling infected lab animals in a biosafety level three lab.

To underscore how significant Sachs’s sudden shift is, he has also co-authored a paper in the prestigious Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, calling for an independent investigation of information held by U.S.-based institutions that would reveal the origin of the pandemic.

While it is correct that Chinese authorities have been concealing crucial data from the Wuhan lab, as well as data on early patients, many of the answers to the pandemic’s origins are held in the United States by organizations such as Fauci’s NIH and NIAID, by the Pentagon’s Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, by Daszak’s EcoHealth Alliance, and by Baric’s lab, which provided the Wuhan lab with biotechnology.

Sachs’s observations further highlight the significance of the highly unusual furin cleavage site, the part of SARS-CoV-2 that makes it so virulent. It has been known since the start of the pandemic that SARS-CoV-2 is the only coronavirus of its kind that has a furin cleavage site. But Sachs now goes further, pointing out that the critical amino acid sequence of SARS-CoV-2’s furin cleavage site insertion happens to be identical to one that is present in the human body, strongly suggesting that it was deliberately inserted into a SARS-like virus.

Lastly, Sachs is also raising the issue of the 2018 partnership agreement between the Wuhan Institute of Virology, Daszak’s EcoHealth, and Baric that had the specific goal of inserting such furin cleavage sites into SARS-like viruses.

It has always strained credulity that a bat virus traversed all of China without leaving a trace only to suddenly erupt on the doorsteps of a lab that was known to have been creating COVID-like viruses. Sachs and Tedros appear to have come to the same conclusion.

The fact that the two institutions at the center of efforts to aggressively push the natural origin narrative have now changed course will give considerable momentum to finally get to the bottom of what really happened at the Wuhan lab. It also—very belatedly—vindicates Xiao Botao who, at great personal risk, tried to tell the world where the virus came from.

Hans Mahncke is a co-host of “Truth Over News” on EpochTV.

Copyright © 2000 – 2022 The Epoch Times

++++++++++++++++++++++++++

World Health Organization Study concludes risk of suffering Serious Injury due to COVID Vaccination is 339% higher than risk of being hospitalised with COVID-19

By THE EXPOSÉ

June 23, 2022

The Exposé

A new study endorsed by the World Health Organization has found that the risks of mRNA Covid-19 vaccination heavily outweigh the benefits, with scientists discovering a person is on average 339% more likely to suffer a serious adverse event such as cardiac arrest, stroke, or death due to the Pfizer Covid-19 injection than they are to be hospitalised with Covid-19.

Bi-Line Title

In 2020, prior to the Covid-19 vaccine rollout, the ‘Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations’ and ‘Brighton Collaboration’ created a priority list, endorsed by the World Health Organization, of potential adverse events relevant to COVID-19 vaccines.

The list comprised adverse events of special interest (AESIs), adverse events associated with prior vaccines in general, theoretical associations based on animal models, and Covid-19 specific immunopathogenesis; the process of disease development involving an immune response or components thereof.

The World Health Organization’s Global Advisory Committee both endorsed and recommended the reporting of AESIs based on this priority list.

Jab Ailments Tables

Just some of the Serious Adverse Events included in the W.H.O endorsed listSource – Page 19

Scientists then sought to investigate the association between FDA-authorized mRNA COVID-19 vaccines and serious adverse events identified by the Brighton Collaboration, using data from the still ongoing phase III randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials on which emergency authorisation was based.

Scientists discovered that in the Moderna trial, the excess risk of serious AESIs (15.1 per 10,000 participants) greatly surpassed the risk reduction for COVID-19 hospitalization relative to the placebo group (6.4 per 10,000 participants). This means recipients of the Modern injection were and are 140% more likely to suffer a serious adverse event than they are to be hospitalised with Covid-19.

In the Pfizer trial, the excess risk of serious AESIs (10.1 per 10,000) surpassed the risk reduction for COVID-19 hospitalisation relative to the placebo group (2.3 per 10,000 participants). This means recipients of the Pfizer injections were and are 339% more likely to suffer a serious adverse event than they are to be hospitalised with Covid-19.

Serious Adverse Events Table

Source – Page 15

Combined, the mRNA vaccines were associated with an absolute risk increase of serious adverse events of special interest of 12.5 per 10,000 (95% CI 2.1 to 22.9).

The excess risk of serious adverse events of special interest surpassed the risk reduction for Covid-19 hospitalization relative to the placebo group in both Pfizer and Moderna trials (2.3 and 6.4 per 10,000 participants, respectively).

The combined risk reduction for Covid-19 hospitalisation equates to 4.35 per 10,000 participants. Therefore, recipients of mRNA Covid19 injections were and are on average 187% more likely to suffer a serious adverse event than they are to be hospitalised with Covid-19.

The scientists who conducted the study noted how when the FDA reviewed serious adverse events (SAEs) in relation to the Pfizer vaccine they concluded that SAEs were “balanced between treatment groups”.

But in contrast to the FDA’s questionable review, the scientists who conducted the W.H.O. endorsed study found an increased risk of all-cause serious adverse events in the Pfizer trial.

The full World Health Organization endorsed study can be viewed in full here, but the scientists concluded that a systematic review and meta-analysis using individual participant data should be undertaken to address questions of harm-benefit in various demographic subgroups.

However, they note that to do this full transparency of the COVID-19 vaccine clinical trial data is needed to properly evaluate these questions. But unfortunately, well over a year after the widespread use of COVID-19 vaccines, participant-level data remain inaccessible. With the FDA attempting to delay the release of some of this data for 75 years.

ABOUT THE EXPOSÉ

DONATE to THE EXPOSÉ

%d bloggers like this: