Steven Seagal Takes a Strong Conservative Stand

John R. Houk

© February 27, 2014


I just discovered that actor Steven Seagal is not your typical Left Wing oriented Hollywood star. I just watched a video of Segal speaking at the Western Conservative Conference held in Phoenix, AZ on February 22. I’ve enjoyed Seagal action/martial arts films and now I appreciated them more. I wish there was an online archive of the speakers for the Conference. If there is one I couldn’t find it or least not yet.


In looking for video archives I found out the Steven Seagal video is making its way around Conservative blogs and websites. The Western Center for Journalism (WCJ) is how I found out about the Segal speech. Here is that Youtube video posted on the WCJ website:


VIDEO: Actor Steven Seagal Calls For Obama Impeachment


I did find this roughly 42 minute video from the Conference in which the topic of a panel discussion is “Tea Party Under Attack: Western Conservative Conference Panel”. Perhaps this is a snapshot of the entire Conference until I can dig up some other speaker videos.



JRH 2/27/14

Please Support NCCR

Hillary Sex Scandal Smoke – The Fire must be Found

WCJ Screen Capture Hillary in Eyeball

John R. Houk

© January 3, 2014


The Western Center for Journalism (WCJ) will be depicted as a fringe Right Wing Conservative website by America’s Left. Thus when the WCJ runs an exposé against Obama or Hillary or any other big dog Leftist person or organization the Left will fall toward explaining away the exposé as propaganda from a fringe Right Wing group.


I found a recent WCJ story and video that is an exposé aimed at Hillary Clinton with a decent amount of dirt on the whole Obama Administration. The headline catcher to get you to watch the video implies Hillary is the perpetrator of sex scandals while she was the Secretary of State. That is actually a pretty good hook because WCJ reeled me in to read and watch their story on Hillary.


I am actually going to cross post the WCJ post; however I wish to issue a bit of criticism toward the accusations.


The video’s first swipe is toward President Obama usage of the NSA to spy on his political enemies by virtue of the exposed information that the NSA has been collecting data on all Americans without a Search Warrant. The justification is the Patriot Act and the FISA Courts that enable police representing the Federal Government to search and detain any suspected terrorists for America’s security. Honestly after 9/11 I was a huge supporter of the Patriot Act; however the powers granted must be considered war powers (as in the Global War on Terrorism – GWOT). And frankly the Patriot Act particularly during the Bush Administration was very successful in preventing Islamic terrorist attacks on a huge scale on U.S. soil.


Unfortunately somewhere toward the end of Bush’s Administration and in the beginning of Obama’s Administration someone made the decision to allow the NSA to spy on every single American in the name of the Patriot Act. This takes a war power to the absurd, smacks of Police State, definitely is unconstitutional according to the 4th Amendment and government corruption.


The second swipe the WCJ deals with the unsubstantiated rumor that Hillary Clinton and Huma Abedin (Deputy Chief of Staff and Close Advisor and Still Married to Anthony Weiner) are having a Lesbian love affair. Undoubtedly WCJ is operating under the paradigm of where there is smoke there’s fire. Nonetheless you still have to find the fire to verify the connection to the smoke. To my knowledge this has never happened.


That which verifiable is the documentation that Hillary Clinton badly managed the State Department by allowing sex scandals to permeate during her time as Secretary of State. Hillary may little attempt to publically demonstrate disciplining action against the deeply immoral actions of those under her (no pun intended). Could Hillary’s lack of disciplining her staff be an example of more smoke?


JRH 1/3/13

Please Support NCCR


Exposed: Hillary Clinton’s Sex Scandals



JANUARY 3, 2014

Western Center for Journalism


VIDEO: Hillary Clinton’s Sex Scandals


Posted by Western Journalism

Published Jan 3, 2014


Video produced by Produced, written, and edited by Kris Zane. Narrated by Tom Hinchey


Barack Obama has created a massive surveillance state, sicking his attack dog the NSA to spy on everyday Americans—presumably to use this information to punish his enemies.


And who will more than likely get the keys to the kingdom if the radical (that is, socialist) Democrats get their way? The Radical-in-Chief Barack Obama’s kindred spirit: Hillary Rodham Clinton.


Except it looks like Hillary Clinton is already using the NSA to punish her enemies.


Enter Clinton’s massive State Department sex scandals—including her alleged paramour, Muslim Brotherhood double agent Huma Abedin—and you have a perfect job for NSA spooks: disappearing emails, lawyers’ offices being broken into to steal documents exposing Clinton’s sex scandals—including charges of pedophilia—just to mention a few of the sexual peccadilloes being shoved down the memory hole more than likely with the help of the NSA.


Watch Western Center for Journalism’s exclusive video to find out how the Benghazi Bimbo, “What Difference Does it Make” Hillary Rodham Clinton, is using the NSA to punish her enemies.


Hillary Sex Scandal Smoke – The Fire must be Found

John R. Houk

© January 3, 2014


Exposed: Hillary Clinton’s Sex Scandals



About WCJ


The Western Center for Journalism is a vigorous watchdog that keeps a check on government abuse and the media. The Center believes strongly in open public debate. We believe that informed public debate requires quality journalism and reporting.




Our mission is to inform and equip Americans who love freedom.


Company Overview


The Center promotes and supports investigative reporting and the new media projects of citizen and traditional journalists.


Led by columnist and veteran broadcaster Floyd Brown, the Western Center for Journalism is a vigorous watchdog that keeps a check on government abuse and the media.


Our website,, is the place to READ THE REST

Obama’s Benghazi Secrets

Since the Mainstream Media refuses to ask the investigative questions that might show President Obama and former Secretary of State Clinton I will post either my thoughts or thoughts of other Conservatives trying to break through Teflon of the Obama Administration. Here is some Benghazigate perspective from the Western Center for Journalism (WCJ).


JRH 5/8/13

Please Support NCCR


The New Marxist Infiltration

Taking USA back from Hammer-Sickle-Swastika

John R. Houk

© April 1, 2013


There was a time in America that being a Communist or Marxist sympathizer was an expression of un-American treason. Senator Joseph McCarthy was initially looked upon as an American hero for exposing Soviet-Communism in the U.S. government. After McCarthy’s vigilance began to spill-over into the First Amendment protected Right to believe in Marxist ideology outside of the direct manipulation of the old Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR), then Liberal Democrats and Center-Left Republican began an agenda to smear the character and agenda of Senator Joe McCarthy. McCarthy was publically transformed from an American hero into an American witch hunter. Witch hunting of course is viewed as a profession of creating lies to convict people of crimes that really do not exist.


For example in the ‘real world’ there is no such thing as witches with supernatural powers to wiggle their noses and speak a few Latin words and create some evil ex nihilo. McCarthy’s agenda was painted as finding Communist spies ex nihilo from influential people that believed in the principles of Karl Marx or flirted with the idea Communist utopianism in their youth out of a dissatisfaction of a Free Market society favoring the opportunity of individuals utilizing hard work for prosperity while the less entrepreneurial and oft time poor people seemed stuck in lower income working class misery.


In defense of a Free Market society that experiences the Liberty guaranteed with a Bill of Rights; whether there is Marxist society or a Free Market society there will always be people stuck in low income working class situations. The reality is the low income people in a Free Market society usually have a better life than the Liberty-Less low income people of a Marxist-Socialist society. The innovative prosperity of the few more often provides a better income for the poor in a Free Market world than for the income of the poor in a Marxist-Socialist world.  Scarcity reigns for the poor of Marxist-Socialism and abundance reigns for the poor of Free Market Capitalism.


Painting McCarthy as a Communist witch hunter was the beginning of the slow acceptance of stealth Marxism in American society. Organizations like the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU – See Also HERE and HERE) used their Marxist sympathies to aid in the eradication of Christian morals in America which has paved the way to removing prayer from schools, making abortion-murder on demand as a birth control method normal, validating ungodly homosexuality as normal rather than as an abomination toward God, using the tax code to prevent Ministers of the Gospel from endorsing godly political candidates for Office and now the pervasive anti-Christian of entrenched Liberals has emboldened more attacks on Christianity in America.


Prayer at public sports events (as in Public Schools and Colleges) or City Council meetings is being attacked with the threat of litigation that Public Schools and small to medium sized cities cannot afford to litigate. In these cases Marxist ideals are infused into our Free Market society ironically because the financial clout of Leftist-minded organizations and individuals can out-fund the local Public Schools or the Local Governments. It is the use of the Free Market to destroy the Free Market Liberty society.


It is time to publicly rehabilitate the image of Joe McCarthy where he was correct and to criticize him where he was incorrect on a First Amendment basis. It was evil for the old Soviet Union to infiltrate our government to bring down the U.S. Constitutional government from within. It was wrong for McCarthy to brand people as a threat to the nation because of a mere belief in Marxism. As much as Marxism is against the Liberty principles of initiated by America’s Founding Fathers, it is a First Amendment Right to believe in Marxist principles.


And yet when dedicated Marxists utilize Liberty to terminate Liberty via deception to purposefully eradicate the Constitution, we who still believe in Liberty must begin to take a stand even if Marxists have convinced society it is politically incorrect to take public stands that contradict stealth Marxist principles.


For example preventing Christianity influencing government is our Constitutional Right. Marxists may take the words of Thomas Jefferson that he wrote to Danbury Baptists that the government has no Right to enfranchise or disenfranchise a Church in the Federal Government; those words are not in the Constitution. Not only that, but Jefferson was not one of the principle framers of the Constitution.


Another example is the use of a Left-minded Judiciary to redefine the Constitution as a Living parchment in which it can be interpreted according to what the Left find culturally relevant in the present. This kind of Judicial fiat creates Law unconstitutionally. The Constitution that frames the three branches of government that exist with checks and balances under the concept that not any government branch has absolute power limits the Judiciary to only interpreting Law and NOT Bench-Legislating Law.


The Constitution insures that a duly elected Congress and the sovereign States make the Law with the President signing off or vetoing legislation and with the duly elected Congress having the expanded privilege to override a Presidential veto. The sovereign State’s Right in this Constitutional process is the required percentage to ratify Constitutional Amendments that Amends a section of the Constitution or adds to the Constitution. In which the Judiciary has no power to terminate a State approved Amendment.


Marxist utopians such as our President Obama and the Dems intend to use the Living Constitution deception to terminate portions of the Constitution and current Amendments to mean something not Originally Intended (See Also HERE) as the Law.


And this is where the accusation that our President is a Manchurian Candidate comes into play:


The Manchurian Candidate (1959), by Richard Condon, is a political thriller novel about the son of a prominent US political family who is brainwashed into being an unwitting assassin for a Communist conspiracy.


The novel has been adapted twice into a feature film by the same title, in 1962 and again in 2004. (Wikipedia)


I am not such a Conspiracy Theorist that I believe President Obama is a brainwashed individual from a Communist nation. The international vision of Soviet-Communism collapsed at the dissolution of the USSR into separate sovereign nations shedding off the hegemony of a Russian dominated Communist government. The only other Communist Super Power that still exists is more interested in its National Interests that the global domination of Maoist-Marxist world. The People’s Republic of China (Red China) is interested in regional hegemony and confronting other powers that may conflict with those regional National Interests. For Red China that may include a wary eye on Russia as much as on the USA. It is only when Russia’s and China’s National Interest intersect in keeping the USA at bay do Russia and China appear as friends against the USA.


I am such a Conspiracy Theorist that President Obama is involved in some sort of nefarious Marxism to change American culture to seem closer to Marxist utopianism rather than our Founding Fathers’ concept of Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness based on a combination of Christian Morality and Greco-Roman political thought.


Whether or not Obama’s Marxist-Socialist utopianism is based on the individual precepts he developed from the Marxist influence of family and mentors OR from a network of stealth Marxist Global Elitists is something I cannot put my finger on. Whether Obama’s change agenda is individual or networked is irrelevant. That which is relevant is Obama has a Gramsci-like agenda to transform America away from its roots into a Communist utopia in the near future or to create a foundation for future Marxist-Elitist to build on.


That is what makes President Barack Hussein Obama a Manchuria Candidate.


VIDEO: The Manchurian President


The inspiration for these thoughts is an article by Kris Zane found at Western Center for Journalism (WCJ) entitled – you got it – The Manchurian Candidate.


JRH 4/1/13

Please Support NCCR

UN Continues NWO Course


John R. Houk

© September 26, 2012


The United Nations keeps on finding deceptive ways to enlist the United States of America into a sovereignty ending compact with the United Nations. If the UN is able to trump a national government’s sovereignty that essentially makes the UN a global governing body making the rule of law on a global basis.


In America’s case the existence of a global rule of law authority would nullify the U.S. Constitution eradicating the best Liberty-Rights the world has ever seen basically making the Bill of Rights portion of Constitution subservient to United Nations legal precedent.


Free Speech would be reduced hindering minority beliefs.


Religious Freedom would be regulated to meet varying standards; e.g. Biblical Christians could not have the same public worship say a Muslim may have (Church bells no – Islamic adhan by muezzin yes); Biblical Christians would be jailed preaching against homosexuality, Biblical Christians could be jailed for preaching (Christ’s Great Commission) for atheists and non-Christians might be offended and incited to violence and so on and so on.


The Second Amendment for American individuals to bear arms for protection would controlled or ended by the UN because armed citizens is always a threat to government authority and essentially the UN would be the World Government.


Undoubtedly there are other Constitutional Rights that would be curtailed or terminated by UN authority.


The most notorious path the UN has been implementing Agenda 21 which is using ecological-Global Warming-Agriculture-Depopulation as the path to operate a top to bottom global government.


Here is a brief description of Agenda 21:


Awareness of Agenda 21 and Sustainable Development is racing across the nation as citizens in community after community are learning what their city planners are actually up to. As awareness grows, I am receiving more and more calls for tools to help activists fight back. Many complain that elected officials just won’t read detailed reports or watch long videos. “Can you give us something that is quick, and easy to read that we can hand out,” I’m asked.


So here it is. A one page, quick description of Agenda 21 that fits on one page. I’ve also included for the back side of your hand out a list of quotes for the perpetrators of Agenda 21 that should back up my brief descriptions.


A word of caution, use this as a started (sic) kit, but do not allow it to be your only knowledge of this very complex subject. To kill it you have to know the facts. Research, know your details; discover the NGO players in your community; identify who is victimized by the policies and recruit them to your fight; and then kill Agenda 21. That’s how it must be done. The information below is only your first step. Happy hunting.


What is Sustainable Development?


According to its authors, the objective of sustainable development is to integrate economic, social and environmental policies in order to achieve reduced consumption, social equity, and the preservation and restoration of biodiversity. Sustainablists insist that every societal decision be based on environmental impact, focusing on three components; global land use, global education, and global population control and reduction.


Social Equity (Social Justice)


Social justice is described as the right and opportunity of all people “to benefit equally from the resources afforded us by society and the environment.” Redistribution of wealth. Private property is a social injustice since not everyone can build wealth from it. National sovereignty is a social injustice. Universal health care is a social justice. All part of Agenda 21 policy.


Economic Prosperity


Public Private Partnerships (PPP). Special dealings between government and certain, chosen corporations which get tax breaks, grants and the government’s power of Eminent Domain to implement sustainable policy. Government-sanctioned monopolies.


Local Sustainable Development policies


Smart Growth, Wildlands Project, Resilient Cities, Regional Visioning Projects, STAR Sustainable Communities, Green jobs, Green Building Codes, “Going Green,” Alternative Energy, Local Visioning, facilitators, regional planning, historic preservation, conservation easements, development rights, sustainable farming, comprehensive planning, growth management, consensus.


Who is behind it?


ICLEI – Local Governments for Sustainability (formally, International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives). Communities pay ICLEI dues to provide “local” community plans, software, training, etc. Addition groups include American Planning Council, The Renaissance Planning Group, International City/ County Management Group, aided by US Mayors Conference, National Governors Association, National League of Cities, National Association of County Administrators and many more private organizations and official government agencies. Foundation and government grants drive the process.


Where did it originate?


The term Sustainable Development was first introduced to the world in the pages a 1987 report (Our Common Future) produced by the United Nations World Commission on Environmental and Development, authored by Gro Harlem Brundtland, VP of the World Socialist Party. The term was first offered as official UN policy in 1992, in a document called UN Sustainable Development Agenda 21, issued at the UN’s Earth Summit, today referred to simply as Agenda 21.


What gives Agenda 21 Ruling Authority?


More than 178 nations adopted Agenda 21 as official policy during a signing ceremony at the Earth Summit. US president George H.W. Bush signed the document for the US. In signing, each nation pledge to adopt the goals of Agenda 21. In 1995, President Bill Clinton, in compliance with Agenda 21, signed Executive Order #12858 to create the President’s Council on Sustainable Development in order to “harmonize” US environmental policy with UN directives as outlined in Agenda 21. The EO directed all agencies of the Federal Government to work with state and local community governments in a joint effort “reinvent” government using the guidelines outlined in Agenda 21. As a result, with the assistance of groups like ICLEI, Sustainable Development is now emerging as government policy in every town, county and state in the nation. (READ THE REST Agenda 21 In One Easy Lesson; Worldview Times; 04/04/11)


Now that I have the stage with Agenda 21 become aware of the next UN scheme to terminate American Sovereignty. That scheme is called the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) [SA Phyllis Schlafly]. This is a United Nations sponsored international treaty that has a name that evokes the emotion of sympathy. I mean who doesn’t help Disabled People? Who wants to be labeled a wicked miser for refusing compassion for the Disabled?


The thing is there are loads wording that would nullify the United States Constitution.


Below is a Western Center for Journalism (WCJ) email that is informative and gives you the ability to participate in mass faxing to your Senator (The Senate must approve all foreign treaties).


JRH 9/26/12

Please Support NCCR


GOP Senators Pushing Constitution Subverting UN Treaty


By Floyd Brown

Sent: 9/25/2012 10:04 AM

Sent by WCJ


What Would You Say If We Told You That The United States Senate Is About To Ratify A U.N. Treaty That Seeks To • Eradicate Your Parental Rights • Advance Abortion Around The World • Sexualize Children As Young As Five-Years Old • And Institute Population-Control Measures At Home And Abroad?

And what would you say if we told you that a number of Senate Republicans have joined hands with the Democrats and are actually pushing the ratification of this United Nations treaty, either because they are legitimately ignorant when it comes to the actual language of this treaty, or are simply too scared to oppose it because it is masquerading as an international effort to affirm the rights of disabled persons?

We couldn’t have made it up if we tried. As a matter of fact, Senator Jim DeMint, who is leading the charge in opposition to this United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) treaty, came right out and said: “When you look at the language in the treaty you realize THERE ARE OTHER THINGS AT STAKE HERE. A LOT OF THE LANGUAGE IN THERE HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH DISABILITIES....” [Emphasis Ours]

And now, CRPD actually stands a better-than-even chance of actually being ratified because RINO Senators Richard Lugar, John Barrasso and Johnny Isakson, voted with the Democratic majority in the Senate Foreign Relations Committee to send it to the full Senate for ratification… and we’re not about to let our elected officials pass this unholy thing in the dark of night while no one is looking.

       You can stop CRPD the exact same way you just sunk the United Nations Law of the Sea Treaty (LOST) and the United Nations Arms Trade Treaty (ATT). We need to get our elected officials on record NOW. It only takes 34 Senators to say “No” and if 34 of them put their opposition to CRPD IN WRITING, right here and right now, as they did with LOST and ATT, we can kill CRPD, dead in its tracks, without even bringing it up for a vote.

Use the button or the hyperlink below to send your urgent Blast Faxes to each and every one of the 47 Republican Members of the United States Senate.



The Problem With The CRPD Is That It’s Not Really About Helping Persons With Disabilities. In Actuality, It’s A Ploy To Trick Us Into Voluntarily Surrendering Our Sovereignty.


Make no mistake, the canard of addressing the needs of the disabled is simply pretty ribbons and bows. What’s inside the actual package is the surrender of our sovereignty to the America-haters and tyrannical third-world dictatorships that call themselves United Nations Members.

And we’re not the only ones saying it. The Heritage Foundation writes that “ratifying it [the CRPD] would subject the U.S. to UNTOLD THREATS against its sovereignty and invite further intrusion by U.N. officials into sensitive social and domestic policies.” [Emphasis Ours]

       Heritage goes on to say: “However, U.S. ratification of the [CRPD] is more than merely superfluous; the [CRPD] threatens American sovereignty in a variety of ways. As with other human rights treaties, the [CRPD] established a treaty body composed of unelected ‘experts’ … that evaluates the compliance of state parties to the treaty.”

       Those are mighty strong words coming from an organization like Heritage that strives to phrase just about everything in as dignified and academic a manner as humanly possible. There can be no mistake, CRPD is all about the surrender of our national sovereignty… and we’re in no mood to surrender it… we’re not going to stand by a let it happen without a fight.


clip_image001[22]  Senator Jim DeMint said: “We don’t need to go beyond our Constitution and federalist system by allowing our fundamental rights to be dictated by unaccountable and unelected international bureaucrats.”

clip_image001[23]  John Bolton, the former-Ambassador to the United Nations, was making an obvious reference to the CRPD as the hat-trick to LOST and ATT when he recently said: “I think there are a lot of threats to American sovereignty that the Obama administration has had cooking in the U.N. They’ve kept it kind of low key.”

clip_image001[24]  And Bonnie Alba, an independent columnist, who served in various positions in the Department of Defense, said of the United Nations: “[I]f we acquiesce to the U.N. plan to run the world under the guise of helping the poor and weak, there is one guarantee. Over time all nations would lose their national sovereignty to the U.N. which would end up performing as a Banana Republic Dictatorship through enforced collection of taxes. And accountable to no one.”


And what is perhaps the ultimate irony is that this treaty, if ratified, would probably do nothing to safeguard the innate, inalienable (and for those of us in the United States, God-given) rights of people with disabilities. Instead, it WOULD erode (or even eradicate) the civil liberties of your children and grandchildren; and that’s why we must speak out and make our voice heard at this very moment.

Use the button or the hyperlink below to send your urgent Blast Faxes to each and every one of the 47 Republican Members of the United States Senate.



But The Eradication Of Our Sovereignty Is Not The End Game. It’s Just The Beginning.


Mike Farris with the Home School Legal Defense Fund clues us in to the first bit of United Nations trickery on CRPD when he tells us that the “CRPD provides no specific definition of disability.” And Farris is not alone. Heritage concurs: “Other language in [the CRPD] is troubling… such as its lack of a clear definition of disability, which it defines as ‘an evolving concept.'” Of course, neglecting to clearly define the term “DISABILITY” in the 50 distinct articles of the “Convention on the Rights of Persons with DISABILITIES” treaty WAS NO ACCIDENT. It’s Standard United Nations Operating Procedure.

An unelected and unaccountable body of America-haters and third-world thugs, or as Heritage put it, “a treaty body composed of unelected ‘experts,'” will define this “evolving concept” as they go. The definitions of what constitutes “disabilities” and “rights” will constantly change, expand and morph to include greater numbers of people, and as more “rights” are allocated to an ever-increasing numbers of people who are deemed “disabled,” others will demand these newly created special “rights” as well.

And our enemies will simply rinse-and-repeat the process, continually abuse this “evolving concept” and impose unfunded, unconstitutional and even sublimely ridiculous mandates upon you, your children and your grandchildren, under the guise of “securing the rights of the disabled.” In reality, they’ll simply be attempting to overwhelm our already strained entitlement system, and crippling the United States under the weight of that same entitlement system.

If you think that ObamaCare and Barack Obama’s other economy crippling shenanigans are bad, know that the demagogues of the third-world are just itching to show us how it’s really done… but we’re not going to give them the chance.

We can’t give them the chance because we might not be able to close Pandora’s Box once it is flung open; and once our own cowardly politicians start to tell us that we are obliged to follow the DICTATES of this body of third-world thugs and America-haters (and tyrannically enforce OUR compliance on THEIR behalf), it’s all over.

Article VI of our own Constitution requires compliance: “This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.”

As for our enemies, they won’t comply; and all the America-haters at the United Nations will simply turn their backs and look at us with blank stares on their faces. ‘What do you mean Iran is not complying with the provisions of the treaty… of course they’re in compliance… however, the other member nations of the panel would like to address some more issues involving your compliance with you.’

After all, THEY define the terms and THEY make the rules as they go. As with many United Nations treaties and resolutions, CRPD will mean whatever they say it means on any given day, and our children and grandchildren will be left with no national sovereignty… no individual liberties… and a wreaked economy. Our children and grandchildren will be reduced to serfdom under the iron fist and the autocratic rule of those who despise freedom, liberty, and most of all, us… but it doesn’t have to be that way. We can put a stop this menace today.

Use the button or the hyperlink below to send your urgent Blast Faxes to each and every one of the 47 Republican Members of the United States Senate.




Did You Know That The Promotion Of The Radical Worldwide Abortion Movement Goes Hand In Hand With Safeguarding The Rights Of Persons With Disabilities?


And just what do abortion and the rights of the disabled have to do with each other? We still don’t know, but we DO KNOW that the United Nations has become infamous over the years, for constantly sneaking coded abortion advocacy language into treaties and resolutions that should have nothing whatsoever to do with abortion; and CRPD is no exception.

Article 25 of the CRPD which addresses issues of “Health” states that the “State Parties” are mandated to “take all appropriate measures” to ensure those covered under the treaty have access to “gender-sensitive” health services… and “free or affordable health care and programmes… in the area of sexual and reproductive health…” (“sexual and reproductive health,” is known to be United Nations-speak for abortion).

And just so you know not only how committed the Left is when it comes to promoting a radical worldwide abortion agenda, but also how the United Nations intentionally interjects “code phrases” in treaties and resolutions; consider what happened when Senator Marco Rubio actually introduced an amendment to the CRPD in the Senate Foreign Relations Committee which simple stated:

“The United States understands that the phrase ‘sexual and reproductive health’ in Article 25(a) of the Convention does not include abortion, and its use in that article does not create any abortion rights, cannot be interpreted to constitute support, endorsement, or promotion of abortion, and in no way suggests that abortion be promoted as a method of family planning.”

ALL HELL BROKE LOOSE.  Chloe Cooney with the Planned Parenthood Federation of America (PPFA) wrote: “These extreme views in opposition to women’s rights and U.S. participation in the global community only succeed in marginalizing a bipartisan effort like the [CRPD],” and Senator Barbara Boxer echoed that statement: “No senator in my view should use any international treaty to push his or her views on an issue that isn’t part of this treaty.”

Did you catch that? The United Nations is advancing a treaty that allegedly attempts to safeguard the innate and inalienable rights of persons with disabilities and interjects the promotion of abortion into the document THROUGH THE USE OF CODE WORDS; and when a Marco Rubio sought to clarify that the treaty on the rights of the disabled “in no way suggests that abortion be promoted as a method of family planning,” Barbara Boxer and her denizens of the Left accused RUBIO of interjecting HIS “views on an issue” into the debate.

And the Democrats and the RINOs on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee voted Rubio down. That’s why we need 34 Senators to go on record NOW and put their opposition to CRPD in writing. We need to send the world a message. The United States refuses to even hold a vote on lunacy.

Use the button or the hyperlink below to send your urgent Blast Faxes to each and every one of the 47 Republican Members of the United States Senate.




And Did You Know That Our Children Have The “Right” To Sexual Gratification From The Moment They Emerge From The Womb And This Disability Treaty Is Going To Enforce That “Right” Too?


Senator DeMint and Mike Farris have very real and well-founded concerns when it comes to Article 7 of the CRPD, which mandates that states ensure that “the best interests of the child” shall be the primary consideration in all actions concerning the “rights” of the child.

As Farris, who sees the dangers in his capacity as one of the nation’s leading, if not the nation’s leading, homeschool advocate states: “Should the government’s assessment of the child’s best interests differ from that of the parents, the government gets to make the decision, not the parents.”

DeMint says: “We’re afraid that if the language suggests that parental authority is not absolute, we’re going to have an international body telling our parents they can’t homeschool.”

What DeMint and Farris aren’t addressing is that the dangers posed by this treaty to your children and grandchildren are far worse. Article 23 of the CRPD, deceptively and ironically titled, “Respect For Home And The Family” mandates that children have “access to age-appropriate information, reproductive and family planning education are recognized, and the means necessary to enable them to exercise these rights are provided.”

You might be interested in knowing what the United Nations typically means when it uses the term “age-appropriate” in reference to “reproductive and family planning education,” because it doesn’t mean what you think it means… at least not to far too many United Nations officials and NGOs.

As an aside, you may have also realized that the term “rights” is also a United Nations code word that typically means “coerced mandate;” a scary proposition when the word is used in relation to the topics of “abortion,” “health care,” “the disabled,” and “child gratification.”

One of the good-guys, Family Watch International, a NGO that attempts to prevent some of the more radical anti-family notions that come out of the United Nations from ever seeing the light of day, tells us about the term “age-appropriate:”


clip_image001[25]  “The International Guidelines on Sexuality Education,” which is a “publication issued by UNESCO, UNICEF and the United Nations Population Fund “maintains that children have a right to receive instruction in sexual pleasure, masturbation and homosexuality…”

clip_image001[26]  Other UNESCO guidelines tell us that children as young as five-years-old should be taught “that they can touch their body parts for sexual pleasure” and;

clip_image001[27]  A significant number of activists connected to the United Nations assert “that children are sexual from birth, and as such, are entitled to experience sexual    pleasure.”


Volumes have been written on this subject. Unfortunately, the vast majority of people have never read anything issued by the United Nations and United Nations’ recognized NGOs; and if you are so ignorant as to believe that the sexualization of your child is not “age-appropriate”… well that’s just too bad.

Under the terms of the treaty, the United States Government will be mandated to enforce the dissemination of “age-appropriate information” and “reproductive and family planning education” to your child, whether you, as the parent, like it or not. It’s your child’s “right.”

As Senator Boxer would probably say, you really should not “use any international treaty to push” your personal “views on an issue that isn’t part of this treaty.” We say “nuts” to that… our God-given liberties are non-negotiable and it’s essential that we communicate that message to our elected officials.

Use the button or the hyperlink below to send your urgent Blast Faxes to each and every one of the 47 Republican Members of the United States Senate.




And Did You Further Know That Population-Control And The Rights Of The Disabled Go Hand In Hand Too?


Article 25 of the CRPD, which has already been quoted in part, also mandates that “State Parties” provide access to “population-based public health programmes…” And just what is a “population-based public health” program?

One example that may actually be familiar to you is something called “Agenda 21,” a term which should conjure visions of former Vice-President Al Gore’s “Earth In The Balance”-enviro-babble; but a good, hard, look at Barack Obama’s Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy, John P. Holdren, should more accurately solidify what is meant by “population-based public health programmes” in your mind.

As it turns out, Van Jones wasn’t the only “nut” in Obama’s inner-circle, and what is probably even more startling is that the United States Senate actually confirmed Holdren.

In 1997, Holdren co-authored a textbook entitled “Ecoscience,” which advocated mass sterilization, compulsory abortion, one-world government and the establishment of a global police force to enforce these population control measures… errrr… “rights.”

Here are several more of the “greatest hits” from Holdren’s tome:


clip_image001[28]  “Indeed, it has been concluded that compulsory population-control laws, even including laws requiring compulsory abortion, could be sustained under the existing Constitution [he’s talking about the United States Constitution] if the population crisis became sufficiently severe to endanger the society.” -page 837


clip_image001[29]  “If this could be accomplished, security might be provided by an armed international organization, a global analogue of a police force. Many people have recognized this as a goal, but the way to reach it remains obscure in a world where factionalism seems, if anything, to be increasing. The first step necessarily involves partial surrender of sovereignty to an international organization.” -page 917


clip_image001[30]  “… a comprehensive Planetary Regime could control the development, administration, conservation, and distribution of all natural resources, renewable or nonrenewable… the Regime could have the power to control pollution not only in the atmosphere and oceans, but also in such freshwater bodies as rivers and lakes that cross international boundaries or that discharge into the oceans. The Regime might also be a logical central agency for regulating all international trade… including all food on the international market.” -pages 942 and 943

clip_image001[31]  “The Planetary Regime might be given responsibility for determining the optimum population for the world and for each region and for arbitrating various countries’ shares within their regional limits. Control of population size might remain the responsibility of each government, but the Regime would have some power to enforce the agreed limits.” -pages 942 and 943


Use the button or the hyperlink below to send your urgent Blast Faxes to each and every one of the 47 Republican Members of the United States Senate.





Why Would So Many Republican Senators So Willingly Support The Surrender Of Our Sovereignty To The United Nations?


We’ve got our work cut out for us because Senators Lugar, Barrasso and Isakson aren’t the only Senate Republicans supporting this atrocity. Senators John McCain, Jerry Moran and Bob Corker have already gone on record in support of the CRPD as well… and more are certain to follow if our elected officials don’t hear from you right now.

These 6 RINOs only need 8 more Senate Republicans to agree to this affront to our sovereignty, and there are plenty that are ripe for the picking… Senators Lindsey Graham, Olympia Snowe, Susan Collins, Scott Brown, Kay Bailey-Huchinson, Lamar Alexander, Mark Kirk, Thad Cochran, Michael Enzi, John Thune and Lisa Murkowski come immediately to mind.

That’s more than 8 and that list is by no means inclusive. Senators Moran and Barrasso, who stood in opposition to LOST, are actually pushing CRPD. McClatchy even reported that Jim DeMint is very aware that he’s “up against other Republican senators” and that he “faces an uphill battle in preventing ratification.”

But that doesn’t mean we can’t win this fight. We’ve fought much harder battles and if you make your voice heard now, we can win.

Why would these Republican Senators so willingly surrender our sovereignty to the United Nations? Why ask why? History, after all, is clear. In the “Federalist Papers” Alexander Hamilton observed that “a dangerous ambition more often lurks behind the specious mask of zeal for the rights of the people” and “that of those men who have overturned the liberties of republics, the greatest number have begun their career by paying obsequious court to the people….”

Perhaps it is enough to say that it takes intelligence, discernment and courage to do the right thing; particularly when the “right thing” is opposing something that masquerades as an effort to advance the rights of the disabled.

Isakson’s own office inadvertently confirmed the above by issuing a slyly-worded statement that said he “voted in favor of the [treaty] in the committee because ratification would signal to the world that the U.S. is committed to continuing its role as the international leader in disability rights.”

But hold on… wait until you hear what came next. Isakson’s office actually added that the treaty “will not erode our sovereignty.” Is he serious?

Perhaps, but it’s more than certain that Isakson and far too many of our Republican leaders didn’t bother to read Article 46 of the CRPD, which explicitly states: “Reservations incompatible with the object and purpose of the present Convention shall not be permitted.”

Isakson and Company should know better; but they don’t. Mike Farris said: “They lack the knowledge to execute their offices AND IT’S SHAMEFUL.” [Emphasis Ours]

One thing is certain. When our elected officials are
done picking up the mountains of faxes that will spill from their overflowing fax trays onto their floors… they won’t be able to use the excuse that they “lacked knowledge.”

       So let’s make our demands known. Tell our elected officials in no uncertain terms, with an election approaching, that there will be dire career-ending consequences UNLESS they send the opposition a clear message that even bringing this treaty up for a vote is an effort in futility. We want them on record… and we want it in writing.

Use the button or the hyperlink below to send your urgent Blast Faxes to each and every one of the 47 Republican Members of the United States Senate.




Floyd Brown


UN Continues NWO Course

John R. Houk

© September 26, 2012


GOP Senators Pushing Constitution Subverting UN Treaty


The Western Center for Journalism is a 501©3 educational organization. Contributions are tax-deductible as allowed by IRS regulations. Personal and corporate contributions are allowed.


The Center for Western Journalism
42104 N Venture Drive Suite B-122, Anthem, AZ 85086  (202) 370-6366


[SlantRight Editor: The WCJ email had blue, red, bold and italics for points of emphasis. I am not taking the time to include the emphasis in this post except perhaps where the emphasis is noted within the email.]


Let Congress Examine Cold Case Findings

BHO & home made BC

John R. Houk

© July 29, 2012


The Western Center for Journalism (WCJ) has sent a lengthy Birther email under the belief that Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s Cold Case Posse has produced the smoking gun proof that President Barack Hussein Obama’s birth certificate is indeed a forgery. Since the birth certificate is supposed to have been directly released under the approval of President BHO, the smoking gun proof indicates the crime of fraud against the American public.


Of course President BHO is going to claim (more than likely BHO representatives) the Birthers are Right Wing Nuts that have no credibility BECAUSE the President has gone overboard to produce a Hawaiian recognized birth certificate. However, that is the point of Cold Case Posse spokesman Mike Zullo that the Hawaiian recognized birth certificate is based on phony duplicitous paperwork.


Since the Justice Department is in the hands of Obama and his cover-up acolyte Attorney General Eric Holder, it is unlikely any hint of a criminal investigation will look at the Cold Case Posse evidence. So what is left? That would be any Congressman or Senator willing to overcome the stigma of the appellation of “Birther” and take a serious look at the evidence to once and for all show if Obama is involved is some massive cover-up or if the Birther assertions are just plain wishful thinking pertaining to the most Socialist-Marxist President America has ever elected.


I/ am posting Floyd Brown’s lengthy (but trust me – necessary) email presented as evidence; however that which I want you to notice is the call to send faxes to Congress to act on this evidence.


Whether or not you are in the Birther tank to expose BHO’s birth certificate it is well worth the investigation that would at the very least reveal information that will show an un-American character. At the very least voters will be better informed that Obama is a deceiver even if his cover-up is to hide embarrassing personal tidbit that he knows will alienate American voters. OR the miracle might proceed with a Congressional investigation concurring with the Cold Case Posse analysis making President Barack Hussein Obama susceptible to impeachment proceedings.


Below is the email:


JRH 7/29/12

Please Support NCCR


 Floodgates Now Open On Obama Birth Certificate Fraud


By Floyd Brown

Sent: 7/29/2012 10:03 AM

Sent by Western Center for Journal


Now That Sheriff Joe Arpaio Has Submitted Smoking-Gun Proof That Barack Obama’s So-Called Birth Certificate Is A Computer-Generated Forgery: Will Our Elected Officials Stand Up For What Is Right, Or Will They Run And Hide Like Pathetic Cowards?


We’ve known for far too long that the bogus birth certificate that Barack Obama published on the Internet was nothing more than a “computer-generated forgery.”

But now, Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s Cold Case Posse has produced incontrovertible evidence that the document is a fraud… incontrovertible evidence that even a member of Congress can understand… smoking-gun proof that even a thick-headed member of Congress simply can’t dismiss or ignore.

That’s why Sheriff Joe wants to take these Cold Case Posse findings to Congress as soon as humanly possible and we simply can’t leave Sheriff Joe hanging in the breeze. Patriots, like you and me, must step up to the plate, see this fight through to the bitter end and turn up the heat on Congress. And that’s exactly what we’re going to do right here and right now.

Use the button or the hyperlink below to send your urgent Blast Faxes to each and every one of the Members of the Republican Leadership of the United States Senate and the United States House of Representatives.



Sheriff Joe Isn’t Letting It Go And Barack Obama Very Desperately Wants You To Let It Go. So What Do You Believe You Should Do?


Yes, there are some folks out there who are saying that you should just give up the ghost, but do not forget for a moment that Barack Obama is one of them.

Some will remind you that an election is approaching, and claim that the energies of patriotic Americans might be better spent trying to un-elect a man from an office he should have never occupied in the first place; but that kind of talk is often no more than an excuse for cowardice.  A pending election only makes this matter even more urgent.

That’s why we’re not buying it… any of it.

At the very least, should we not pressure Congress to address the issue for no other reason than to ensure that the American people KNOW that the man who could possibly get their vote in November, presented a fraudulent birth certificate to the public in an attempt to to (sic) trick the American people into believing that he was eligible for the office he intends to occupy for four more years?

Should we not pressure Congress to address the issue for no other reason than it is the very last thing that Barack Obama wants… and it may very well be the one thing that likely keeps him awake at night?

Should we not push the issue for no other reason than to make it possible for our fellow Americans to know that the liberal media has gone above-and-beyond the call of duty, to the point of idiocy, to cover-up what may well turn out to be the greatest scandal of this yet young century?

But probably the most compelling reason why we must not give up, quite frankly, is because Sheriff Joe isn’t giving up; and if Sheriff Joe is in this fight to the bitter end, each of us has an obligation to this to stay in this fight until the bitter end.

Should we betray a man who has sacrificed so much and come so far? … Should we send the wrong message to our elected officials and let them know that they can GET AWAY WITH JUST ABOUT ANYTHING because patriotic Americans will simply give up and go away if they ignore our demands long enough?

Should we lie to ourselves and concede the point that there may be times when it is NOT advisable, as a matter of general principle, to assert our God-given rights as Americans to have our grievances heard and demand redress of those grievances?

We just don’t say no… we say ‘Hell No.’ Win, lose or draw, we will see this fight through to the bitter end and if you’re with us, then you can make your voice heard right now.

Use the button or the hyperlink below to send your urgent Blast Faxes to each and every one of the Members of the Republican Leadership of the United States Senate and the United States House of Representatives.



They Found Her. The Mysterious Registrar “U.K.E. Lee” Who Allegedly Signed Obama’s Birth Certificate. And Guess What She Had To Say?


Make no mistake, Obama’s birth certificate is about as phony as a three dollar bill.  Zullo went on to say: “The only legal authority which could have made the document [the Hawaii Department of Health], did not make it.”

According to a report filed by, after the press conference that was called on July 17 to present the new and shocking evidence: “Cold Case Posse lead investigator Mike Zullo said the new information confirms the document presented to the American public in April 2011 is undoubtedly fraudulent.”

And just what was the incontrovertible proof?

It was actually staring us in the face the whole time.

When Barack Obama released his “digitally-altered” birth certificate back in April of 2011, people asked why did numbers, which appear to have been written in pencil (see the screen shot below), appear throughout the document, and what did these numbers signify?


Birth Ceritificate 9s


Even Zullo admitted: “Nobody really knew what they were.”

But now, we finally have answers.

The Cold Case Posse located and interviewed a number of individuals who had specific and firsthand knowledge of procedures in the Hawaii Department of Health; including Verna Lee, a.k.a., the mysterious U.K.E. Lee, now 95 years old, the Registrar whose signature is reproduced on the so-called birth certificate that Obama released to the public over a year ago.


UKE Lee Signature


And all parties independently verified that the number “9” that appears in pencil in field 9, (see the screen shot), indicates that the information that should go in that field was UNKNOWN (keep reading and we’ll explain why in just a bit).

Put another way, if the image above were a copy of an original birth certificate, that field would be BLANK and, quite obviously, IT IS NOT.

The fact that ANY INFORMATION WHATSOEVER now appears in field “9” (if anything would have gone in that field, it would have been the word “unknown”) in the birth certificate indicates that the information was added later on and the document Obama presented to the public IS NOT A COPY of an original birth certificate.

This newest revelation, of course, is totally consistent with the Cold Case Posse’s original finding, after subjecting the birth certificate to forensic examination, in March that the document Obama actually produced was not only “digitally doctored,” but was also compiled using “two or three” different source documents.

Game over. As Zullo so plainly put it: “This proves the document has been tampered with and information has been placed on it.”

Use the button or the hyperlink below to send your urgent Blast Faxes to each and every one of the Members of the Republican Leadership of the United States Senate and the United States House of Representatives.




And Obama’s Father Was “Unknown?”

Did you notice that the information which presently appears in field number “9” (information that should not be there in the first place) in the alleged birth certificate, under the designation “Race of Father.” reads “African?”

That’s a huge problem for Mr. Obama because the designation “African” was not in use at the Hawaiian Health Department until 1989, a full 28 years after Barack Obama was born.

The designations and the corresponding number codes used in 1961, when Barack Obama was born, appear in the screenshot below.


Hawaiian Race Codes


Obviously, someone… who did not work at the Hawaiian Health Department… and moreover, lacked a credible command of recent American history, placed the word “African” into the document WELL AFTER THE FACT.

Zullo again: “The Department of Health didn’t create it. They didn’t create the file, somebody else did.”

Use the button or the hyperlink below to send your urgent Blast Faxes to each and every one of the Members of the Republican Leadership of the United States Senate and the United States House of Representatives.





So What Do Those Numbers Mean And Why Are They Present?

Now, some will ask if other birth certificates from 1961 show pencil marks. Another question that should be asked is if it is possible that the number “9” in field 9 of Obama’s alleged birth certificate could be a clerical error.

We’ll answer that question in a few paragraphs, but first, let’s address the question, of whether or not those numbers in pencil are supposed to be there and what they mean.

All we need do is to look at the birth certificate of Susan Elizabeth Nordyke, one of the Nordyke twins, who was born the day AFTER Obama at Kapiolani Hospital.


birth certificate of Susan Elizabeth Nordyke


Notice the same pencil marks. Notice the fact that the number codes are correctly rendered as “1” means “White” (or Caucasian as it is rendered on the certificate).

Also notice that the copy of the Nordyke birth certificate comes from a microfiche copy and not the fancy green laser printer paper that appears to have been used on the alleged birth certificate that Obama presented to the public.

As to why clerks were so busy scribbling numbers on birth certificates in pencil… ?

Zullo and the Cold Case Posse found out from Lee and others: “We discovered that the procedure for the department of health was to take a birth certificate, check it for accuracy and then code it with numerical values in some of the fields, such as ‘fathers race’ or ‘type of business or employment. They would take these numerical values that have designators to identify that information, then the federal government would take that information and put those numerical values on magnetic tape for their own census information.”

Moreover, Verna Lee and others, with credible knowledge of Hawaii Health Department procedures, told Zullo that it is incredibly unlikely that the number “9” that appears in the birth certificate Obama supplied to the public is a coding error from a Department of Health employee because all of the marked certificates were checked and then cross-checked by an entirely different set of eyes to ensure accuracy.

According to Zullo, when he asked Lee if an error was possible, Lee shot back at him; “Not on my watch.” Particularly since the number “9” was known by all those who handled the records to typically signify a birth to a single mother. It would be unthinkable that two people would repeat a mistake of that magnitude.

So, now that conclusive proof of forgery has been submitted, the only question that remains is what will our elected officials in Washington do, now that they are armed with the knowledge that the man occupying the Oval Office, in an attempt to prove that he is eligible to hold that office, supplied the American people with a fraudulent document?

Two things are certain. If you press then to do the right thing, it is entirely possible, in spite of the now overwhelming hard evidence, that they might continue to sit on their hands and do nothing, while Barack Hussein Obama throws our great country down the chute, like yesterday’s garbage.


Use the button or the hyperlink below to send your urgent Blast Faxes to each and every one of the Members of the Republican Leadership of the United States Senate and the United States House of Representatives.



And If Undeniable Proof Isn’t Good Enough, There’s Still More. Lee Helped Solve Another Mystery That, Until Now, Had Gone Unanswered.


Verna Lee had more to say about another pesky issue that could not be explained for the longest time.

Look below at the birth numbers, taken from the birth certificate for Barack Obama (top) and the birth certificate from Susan Nordyke (bottom).


Obama BC Serial Number


Nordyke BC Serial Number


You will notice that Susan Nordyke’s number is lower than Obama’s, even though she was born the day AFTER Obama; and no one, not even the Cold Case Posse, could do more than offer theories as to how it would have been possible for Nordyke to be assigned a lower birth number than Obama

Verna Lee had no problem answering the question. According to what Lee told Zullo, Obama’s number is out of sequence because he WAS NOT BORN AT Kapiolani Hospital and his birth was likely reported at a vital records satellite office.

Again, Lee’s information simply confirms a theory that we advanced long ago and, in its reporting of the July 17 Cold Case Posse press conference, restated the premise that “an established resident of Hawaii, not necessarily a U.S. citizen” was “able to register an out-of-state or foreign-born person with an official Hawaii birth certificate.”

As a matter of fact, while it was already know that section 338.17 of the Code of the State of Hawaii permitted the issuance of Hawaiian birth certificates under the criteria mentioned above, Arpaio related that he was shocked when he found out that the practice was actually quite commonplace.

As reported; “his team has discovered Hawaii provides easy access to a birth certificate, even if the child wasn’t born in the state” (emphasis on the word EASY) and Arpaio went so far as to call the very existence of such a policy “an imminent threat to national security.”


Use the button or the hyperlink below to send your urgent Blast Faxes to each and every one of the Members of the Republican Leadership of the United States Senate and the United States House of Representatives.




But Let’s Get Back To Verna Lee


Lee is clearly indicating that someone (either Barack Obama’s mother, or his grandparents, or all of them) could have marched down to the nearest vital records office and filed Obama’s birth as a Hawaiian birth.

Under Hawaiian law, they didn’t need proof. The infant did not even need to be present. Give your word and it’s done.

It would have been easy; and if we were to assume that Barack Obama was indeed born overseas and the relationship between Obama Sr. and Ann Dunham, as reported from far too many sources over the years, was on shaky ground, establishing “citizenship” for the infant Obama would have been the Dunham’s first priority.

And yes, if Obama’s birth certificate was obtained as a result of a visit to a vital records satellite office, then Obama’s birth announce would appear in the local papers.

Quick, someone alert FOX News’ Bill O’Reilly that he could be wrong for the first time in his life.

Of course the above scenario assumes that the birth certificate number is indeed Mr. Obama’s birth certificate number and not a copy-and-paste job from someone else’s number altogether; which is still also within the realm of possibility.

Here’s the bottom line.

Questions are still unanswered and our Republican leaders are going to have to show some backbone. Seriously, if some of them can lock hands with Team Obama and press Mitt Romney to release financial records with each passing day, then they should have the moral predisposition and the gumption to demand that Barack Obama start releasing some documents too (or does that sound too much like right?).

There’s no excuse for their weak and cowardly behavior. If Mitt Romney supplied the American people with anything resembling a “made-up” tax return, Team Obama would be all over him. Obama’s people, after all, had no problem falsely accusing Romney of criminal behavior even though the accusation was so outlandish that it made them look foolish.

It’s frustrating, but for the sake of argument, let’s just set aside, for an ever so brief moment, the definition of what actually constitutes “natural-born” citizenship and whether or not Obama would meet that standard (since his father was a foreigner), THIS MAN ARROGANTLY REFUSES TO VERIFY THAT HE’S EVEN A PLAIN OL’ CITIZEN under any category or definition of the word.

So what’s the problem with our Republican leaders?

They need to start demanding some documents from Mr. Transparency and they can start by demanding the document that Obama is still so determined to hide… a document that and would prove, whether or not the man who usurped the Oval Office is nothing more than a two-bit con-man and forger.


Use the button or the hyperlink below to send your urgent Blast Faxes to each and every one of the Members of the Republican Leadership of the United States Senate and the United States House of Representatives.





Floyd Brown


Let Congress Examine Cold Case Findings

John R. Houk

© July 29, 2012


Floodgates Now Open On Obama Birth Certificate Fraud


The  Western Center for Journalism is a 501©3 educational organization. Contributions are tax-deductible as allowed by IRS regulations. Personal and corporate contributions are allowed.


The Center for Western Journalism
42104 N Venture Drive Suite B-122, Anthem, AZ 85086  (202) 370-6366

%d bloggers like this: