Yeagley on the Islamic Libido


Mo Pedophile & Aisha toon

John R. Houk

© May 16, 2013

UPDATED 4/20/19

 

The FrontPageMag article “Islam: Libido Unleashed?” by David Yeagley uses the sexual theories of the father of Psychiatry Sigmund Freud to explain the dark side of Islam. Although Freud’s theories are not as accepted today as in the day of his popularity, this Yeagley certainly fits as an exposé of Islam. This article is definitely NOT politically correct and is sure to incur the wrath of Muslim Apologists and Leftist Multiculturalist. Yet this “wrath” is the kind of thing Yeagley writes about.

 

JRH 5/16/13

Please Support NCCR

UPDATED 4/20/19

********************

ISLAM: LIBIDO UNLEASHED?

The Religion of Peace under the Freudian microscope.

 

By David Yeagley

May 14, 2013

FrontPageMag.com

 

[Blog Editor: FrontPageMag photo entitled “Anger” yet of Muhammad and Aisha in a pedophiliac relationship edited out undoubtedly in compliance to Pakistani government censorship demands.]

 

Islam is Freudian libido unleashed. Under the robes of dark religion, the system of Islam glorifies the most naked, destructive passions of human nature. Libido–undefined sexual energy—is expressed in gruesome death.  Among civilized people libido finds more tolerable expression through creative sublimation, such as art; but in Islam, sublimation is removed.

 

Sigmund Freud (1856-1939), the famous Viennese Jewish psychologist, father of the “couch,” or “confessional” talk therapy, introduced a profound sexual theory in which libido explained what was formerly called mayhem and cannibalism.  In The Future of an Illusion (1927), Freud suggests cannibalism, along with incest, was an instinct.  Cannibalism, always involving mayhem, is directly linked to libido.  In Totem and Taboo (1918), Freud describes various cases of incest, and suggests that sexual taboos develop precisely around the most powerful but self-destructive desires.  (Civilization simply harnesses or re-channels these dreadful desires.)

 

But Islam glories in removing sexual taboos. The brutality of Islam, so unprecedented in modern times, is the studied absence of civilized inhibition.

 

What inspires such horrid Islamic acts of bodily dismemberment—the beheadings, the chopping off of body parts, the compulsive delight in blowing to pieces the human body, and the ghastly acts of cannibalism?

 

Libido.

 

Barbarity we thought characterized more primitive man, in more primitive times.  Tribal people have always relished the grotesque.  Indulgent violence is part of what it means to be “heathen.”

 

But, according to Freud, barbarity is man, at any time, primordial, bizarre, and even mystical.

 

Cannibalism, as sexual desire, is the ultimate union of two separate entities.  Union, the coming together of separate entities, is the object of all sexual desire.  By cannibalism, two entities become one in the most literal way.  (This union accounts for the thinly sublimated cannibalism of the vampire legend, and the everlasting popularity of the Dracula story.)

Mayhem is only the foreplay of cannibalism.  Murderers who have eaten the bodies (or body parts) of their victims always dismember the body first.

 

Islam, world famous for mayhem, is also famous for cannibalism.  The “religion” of Islam honors this very worst human denigration.  (And Muslims accuse Jews of blood eating?  This is simply projection, with an odd twist of impotence.)

 

Islamic abuse of women, the brutal beatings, killings, and dismemberings, are normative in Islam.  On the other hand, the reward of the faithful is a harem of seventy virgins.  Islamic reality and fantasy clearly exhibit psycho-pathological conflict and perversion.

 

Islam’s notorious terrorism—a suicidal pervert’s mass-murdering slaughter—is mayhem on steroids.  Mayhem en mass.  Delight in this practice is a clarion declaration of sexual perversion in the Freudian sense.  The “lust for killing” (mentioned in The Future of an Illusion) is clearly sexual in nature—demonstrated by the nature of its exhibition:  mayhem, or dismemberment.   Islamic cannibalism is but the climax of the psychological perversion.

Islam may also involve supernatural influence.  Normally, sexual desire is sublimated by religious energy and its cultural accoutrements.  But, what today is called “radicalization” of a Muslim simply means the person is given to the libido unleashed, through the supernatural—expressed through long-established cultural modes.

 

But Freud warned the young Swiss psychologist Carl Jung (1875-1961) to keep sexual theory separate from the supernatural.  Jung recalls a conversation with Freud in 1907 (in Vienna):

 

“My dear Jung, promise me never to abandon the sexual theory.  That is the most essential thing of all.  You see, we must make a dogma of it, an unshakable bulwark against the black tide of mud—of occultism.”  See, C. G. Jung, Memories, Dreams, Reflections, ed. Aniela Jaffé, trans. Richard Winston (1961; rpt. New York: Vintage, 1989), p.150.  Sex is more manageable than the supernatural.

 

So, the power of Islam is libido unleashed by the impetus of the supernatural.  It is precisely belief in the supernatural, which unleashes the libido.  It may be that all religion is liable for some degree of amalgamation with unleashed libido.  Indeed, Freud says as much in Civilization and its Discontents (1929).

 

Yet, Judeo-Christian westerners understand religion as a restraint.  Ancient Hebrew religion involved animal slaughter (sacrifice) for food, but modern Judaism no longer has such a ritual.  Christianity, on the other hand, aggrandizes the historical slaughter of one human being, for forgiveness, thus psychologically turning the libido on its head, and does finally allow religion to function as a restraint.

 

But Islam shows us how lethal libido is unleashed through belief in magic, in the context of barbarous cultural identity with historical, collective support.

 

Freedom Center pamphlets now available on Kindle: Click here.  ________________________

David Yeagley is the great-great-grandson of Comanche leader Bad Eagle.

 

© COPYRIGHT 2019, FRONTPAGEMAG.COM

 

Stepping Back Over the Line – Islam is Evil


MO - Pay Jizya

John R. Houk

© February 15, 2012

 

For years I have straddled a line when it comes to Islam. Muslim apologists are quick to point out that 90% of Muslims are “Moderate” peaceful Muslims and that 10% are Radical Muslims taking the Quran out of perspective to promote-inflict a Conservative view of Islam on Muslims and non-Muslims alike.

 

There are roughly 2 billion Muslims. That means that the 10% of Radical Muslims are roughly 20 million. The Left is always trying to obfuscate the reality of 20 million radical Muslims pointing out there are Right Wing Christians also. We all know that a huge majority of Right Wing Christians (especially in America) are peacefully oriented when it comes to social distress over blaspheming the faith of Christianity. Then there is the extremist Right Christians that will use portions of the Old Testament to justify violence which often is armed with bigotry. The Left has attempted to lump all the Christian Right together whether they are Christ following New Testament Believers or the pseudo-Christians that cherry pick Old Testament Scriptures that have zero application in Christianity in the 21st Century. Violence in the name of God in the Old Testament was time-period specific. This means when the mission assigned by God was accomplished, time was up and violence was not to continue or at least not until the next assignment.

 

Whereas in Islam, the violence that is in their holy writings (Quran, Hadith and Sira SA The Five Principles) advocate violence as part of the spreading and defending the supremacy of Islam in perpetuity. Violence is only advocated in the New Testament in the Last Days and even then Jesus Christ is a general defeating Satan’s forces on planet earth. Until that time Christians on an individual basis are to fulfill the Great Commission to go throughout the world to share the Good News of Salvation in the Risen Christ.

 

There is always something that has drawn me back and forth across the line that says on one side there are good Muslims out there that believe Islam is a peaceful solution to achieve whatever Islamic bliss is out there. Then there is the side of the line that convinces me Islam is evil. Muslims that call themselves Moderate or actually believe Islam is peace and their prophet is the perfect example for all humanity to emulate are all self-deluded and blind to their own writings. Muslim holy writings – by the way – that those we label as Radical Muslims are following to the very text they are devoted to.

 

Ayaan Hirsi Ali has written a compelling article that has pushed me back over the line that Islam is evil. Ali was a Muslim gal that escaped an arranged marriage in Somalia. She then ended up in Netherlands where she was a member of that nation’s Parliament (or whatever the Dutch version is called). Obviously Ali’s experience with Islam in Somalia soured her view on that faith. She left Islam and became critical of it especially as it pertains to women’s rights.

 

Ali is an atheist yet her article is a demonstration of how the West is ignoring the Muslim perpetration of Christian genocide in Islamic dominated nations. The West and especially Western Leftists are huge on condemning criticism of Islam as bigoted Islamophobia (as if that word is an epithet); however the harassment and systemic violence often leading to deaths plural is never front page news in Western Media in print, radio or television.

 

Get ready to be outraged OR at least you should be outraged and read Ayaan Hirsi Ali’s article entitled “The Global War on Christians in the Muslim World”.

 

JRH 2/15/12 (Hat Tip: Ken)

Occupy Thugs and Tea Party Citizens


John R. Houk

© November 4, 2011

 

 

Remember when Democrats, Left Wing pundits, MSM and race card organizations like the NAACP accused the Tea Party Movement of being a combination of Right Wing Extremists and racists bent toward a path of guns and violence? Let’s compare the real Tea Party Movement to the Occupy Mobs that are spreading across America.

 

Democrats

 

 

In a video circulated Tuesday by conservative commentator Glen Beck’s website The Blaze, Indiana Rep. Andre Carson said the Tea Party was preventing African Americans from making progress toward equality.

 

“This is the effort that we are seeing of Jim Crow. Some of these folks in Congress right now would love to see us as second class citizens. Some of them in Congress right now with this Tea Party movement would love to see you and me… hanging on a tree,” Carson said at a Aug. 22 Congressional Black Caucus Job Tour even in Miami.

 

 

Another Congressional Black Caucus member Rep. Maxine Waters, D-Calif., also had harsh words for the Tea Party last week when she said members of the movement could “go straight to hell.”

 

“I’m not afraid of anybody. This is a tough game. You can’t be intimidated. You can’t be frightened. As far as I’m concerned the Tea Party can go straight to hell,” Waters said at an Aug. 20 “Kitchen Table Summit” which she hosted with her fellow California Democrats Rep. Karen Bass and Rep. Laura Richardson. (Rep. Andre Carson: Tea Party Wants To See Blacks ‘Hanging On A Tree’; By Amy Bingham; ABC New – The Note, Aug 31, 2011 10:51am)

 

Left Wing Pundits

 

 

We also held the belief that the Tea Party movement was inherently dishonest, and certainly dangerous. One need only look at their signs and their rhetoric at their so called rallies. Or the town hall meetings where they set the standard for thuggish behavior and mob mentality intended to intimidate and threaten. Or how they attack those they disagree with, like the man with Parkinsons at a healthcare reform rally or the woman that three men from the Tea Party beat up at a Rand Paul political rally.

 

Given the movement’s evil and hateful foundation, we also thought the movement would implode on itself at some point and for any number of reasons. Perhaps the abject greed that is its foundation would cause it to feed on the very people who supported it. Or maybe the core of hatred that sustains it would result in internacine warfare. Or with so many Republican ‘Tea Party’ candidates having taken advantage of the limited attention span of the American voter and getting elected, America would finally see the despicable character of the individuals who expediently rode the anger and vitriol of the movement for their own personal, and the GOP’s gain, like dead-beat dad Joe Walsh of Illinois, and realize they had been duped into supporting people that represented a movement that could care less about effective governance, or the well being of the United States of America as a whole.

 

 

Of course, this does not mean that the Tea Party is gone, or that it won’t still pose a threat to fair minded and patriotic Americans. In the months ahead, we can expect to see the movement become more angry, more volatile, and even more dangerous as it desperately seeks to remain relevant. However, as the recent polling has shown, it is far, far too late for the Tea Party Movement to save itself or the hateful doctrine it embraces. It was always a movement founded on lies, disinformation and fear, and such a movement cannot, and will not survive in the greatest country on earth. (The Tea Party doctrine of hate makes the movement less popular then Gays and Muslims!; By E. Gray; Don’t Tea on Me, September 6, 2011)

 

Mainstream Media

 

 

And while the public image of the Tea Party focuses on a desire to shrink government, concern over big government is hardly the only or even the most important predictor of Tea Party support among voters.

 

So what do Tea Partiers have in common? They are overwhelmingly white, but even compared to other white Republicans, they had a low regard for immigrants and blacks long before Barack Obama was president, and they still do.

 

More important, they were disproportionately social conservatives in 2006 — opposing abortion, for example — and still are today. Next to being a Republican, the strongest predictor of being a Tea Party supporter today was a desire, back in 2006, to see religion play a prominent role in politics. And Tea Partiers continue to hold these views: they seek “deeply religious” elected officials, approve of religious leaders’ engaging in politics and want religion brought into political debates. The Tea Party’s generals may say their overriding concern is a smaller government, but not their rank and file, who are more concerned about putting God in government.

 

This inclination among the Tea Party faithful to mix religion and politics explains their support for Representative Michele Bachmann of Minnesota and Gov. Rick Perry of Texas. Their appeal to Tea Partiers lies less in what they say about the budget or taxes, and more in their overt use of religious language and imagery, including Mrs. Bachmann’s lengthy prayers at campaign stops and Mr. Perry’s prayer rally in Houston.

 

Yet it is precisely this infusion of religion into politics that most Americans increasingly oppose. While over the last five years Americans have become slightly more conservative economically, they have swung even further in opposition to mingling religion and politics. It thus makes sense that the Tea Party ranks alongside the Christian Right in unpopularity.

 

On everything but the size of government, Tea Party supporters are increasingly out of step with most Americans, even many Republicans. Indeed, at the opposite end of the ideological spectrum, today’s Tea Party parallels the anti-Vietnam War movement which rallied behind George S. McGovern in 1972. The McGovernite activists brought energy, but also stridency, to the Democratic Party — repelling moderate voters and damaging the Democratic brand for a generation. By embracing the Tea Party, Republicans risk repeating history. (Crashing the Tea Party; By DAVID E. CAMPBELL and ROBERT D. PUTNAM; New York Times – The Opinion Pages, August 16, 2011)

 

Left Wing – Race Card Organizations

 

“A watched tea pot never boils.”

 

That’s the rallying slogan of a new online “watchdog” site launched by the NAACP, in conjunction with partners ThinkProgress, George Soros’ Media Matters and a group called New Left Media.  TeaPartyTracker.org advertises itself as a site that “monitors racism and other forms of extremism within the Tea Party movement.”

 

According to the Daily Caller, the NAACP reached out to the various groups for help in compiling information implicating the Tea Party:

 

Media Matters and Think Progress representatives said their content and reporting haven’t changed and that the NAACP approached their organizations seeking only to republish select content they’ve produced. The NAACP’s new teapartytracker.org is aimed specifically at highlighting “racism” in the Tea Party.

 

New Left Media, the duo of Chase Whiteside and Erick Stoll who use a “Trojan trick” to get interviews with Tea Partiers, is also a partner organization on the new site.

 

As for what Media Matters, New Left Media, Think Progress and the NAACP plan to do with teapartytracker.org, Think Progress editor Faiz Shakir and Media Matters Vice President for Research and Communications Ari Rabin-Havt said the NAACP contacted them about sharing content related to the Tea Party.

 

Tea Partiers beware — the NAACP is watching you, and they now have a website where people can post “evidence” of racism and extremism.  But despite Andrew Breitbart’s offer of a sizable reward for solid evidence, there remains none. (NAACP Joins Left-Wing Groups to ‘Monitor’ Tea Party Groups; By Meredith Jessup; The Blaze, September 3, 2010 at 1:39am)

 

In their report, “Rage on the Right: The Year in Hate and Extremism,” Intelligence Report, Spring 2010, asserts that the Tea Party movement is “shot through with rich veins of radical ideas, conspiracy theories and racism.” They quote radical scribe Chip Berlet, who breathlessly charges, “We are in the midst of one of the most significant right-wing populist rebellions in United States history.” The SPLC goes on to complain that only 25 percent of respondents to a recent NBC News/ Wall Street Journal poll think the federal government can be trusted. And, according to the SPLC, another dangerous sign of the times is the introduction in 37 state legislatures of “Tenth Amendment Resolutions,” based on the constitutional provision keeping all powers not explicitly given to the federal government with the states. (Targeting the Tea Parties; By Wayne Lutton; The Social Contract Press, Volume 20, Number 3 (Spring 2010), Issue theme: “The Southern Poverty Law Center – A Special Report“)

 

 

All of these fears that are actually propaganda lies from the Left are pointed to the Tea Party Movement. NOW, after the Occupy Movement is spreading across the nation, there is an extreme lack of reporting on the real violence and thuggery going on inspired by the Left.

 

Jeff Jacoby has written an article entitled, “Occupiers, Tea Partiers, and the Tenth Amendment.” Jacoby exposes this Leftist hypocrisy of accusing the Tea Party Movement rallies of all kinds of despicable acts when the reality is these dysfunctional Occupy kids not only have no idea what they are protesting but are receiving an education on how to protest from Left Wing interests that are promoting violence and anarchy against the legal authorities AND also exacting vandalism, theft and rape. I dare anyone that is not a lunatic that say this same action occurs at Tea Party Movement rallies.

 

JRH 11/4/11

Pro-Homosexual Advocate Destroys Traditional Marriage Banner


folsom-east-2009-electrotorture-remote

 

One always hears about the demand to accept homosexuality as a matter of multicultural diversity. In fact the Leftist MSM and the Leftist leaning entertainment industry have brainwashed most of America into believing that a stand for Biblical Morality or exposing the overt public perversion of homosexuals in their debauched public often outdoor parties is homophobic discrimination on par with racism.

 

So what happens when Christians or confirmed heterosexuals peacefully protest the stain of homosexuality? The homosexuals go psycho-medieval and assault peaceful protestors or those that expose the truth of homosexuality.

 

Check this out!

 

JRH 6/6/11 (Hat Tip: Solid Snake)

***************************************

VIDEO: Pro-Homosexual Advocate Destroys Traditional Marriage Banner in New York

 

By John Ritchie

June 06, 2011

TFP Student Action

Defending Moral Values on Campus

 

Man Rips up TFP Marriage Banner in NY

 

TFP Student Action members were assaulted while peacefully demonstrating for traditional marriage in Fairport, New York, on June 2.

As young TFP volunteers stood at the corner of Main Street and Church Street with signs, a pro-homosexualist hurled himself against the group’s thirteen foot long banner inscribed with “God’s Marriage = 1 Man & 1 Woman.” The banner, held by three volunteers, was knocked down and violently torn to pieces.

 

Pro-homosexual advocate violently tears up TFP banner
in Fairport, New York
.

homosexual violence

 

The assailant also threatened to destroy the group’s cameras used to document their campaigns for moral values. “I’ll smash your camera,” he said. Approaching another TFP volunteer who was holding a sign that read “Honk for Traditional Marriage,” the aggressor said: “Are you going to give me your sign, or do I need to rip it up too!?”

Assault with glass bottle

In a separate incident at the same demonstration, another supporter of “gay marriage” threw a beer bottle at TFP volunteer Michael Shibler from a moving vehicle. The glass bottle hit him on the forehead, causing it to swell and bleed. Local police are investigating both incidents.

“These bully tactics do not even slightly dampen my resolve to continue promoting the truth about marriage in charity. Our cause is noble and we will win,” said Shibler.

“Some say that same-sex ‘marriage’ doesn’t harm or affect anybody. Well, I think my throbbing forehead is a good example of how it does harm people. Anti-family proponents would like to completely silence my first amendment right to free speech,” he said. “While demanding tolerance for what they call ‘diversity,’ they are utterly intolerant of opposing viewpoints.”

 

TFP volunteers and members of Citizens for a Decent Community joined forces in Rochester, New York, to defend true marriage.

Protesting in favor Traditional Marriage

 

On their tour for traditional marriage, TFP Student Action members are distributing flyers titled 10 Reasons Why Homosexual “Marriage” Is Harmful and Must Be Opposed. It calls on New Yorkers to firmly and peacefully resist the advance of the so-called gay-rights movement.

Help us stay on the road

 

To help us stay on the road for traditional marriage, please consider filling our gas tank. With an intense travel schedule, our fifteen passenger van consumes about one tank of gasoline per day. Your gift of $79.00 will keep us going for 330 miles.

Sponsor 1 Tank (330 miles) = $79
Sponsor 2 Tanks (660 miles) = $158
Sponsor 3 Tanks (990 miles) = $237

 

Top of Form

DONATE HERE

 

If you want to contact us on the tour, please call 717-495-5427. God bless you.

 

Bottom of Form

________________________________

©2011 TFP Student Action