The House Creates Funding but the President Manages the Spending


John R. Houk

© January 18, 2019

 

President Trump put the brakes on Speaker Pelosi’s intention to use taxpayer money to finance a Dem Party political junket to Brussels, Egypt and Afghanistan. This news went viral on Conservative Social Media yesterday.

 

The President’s stated reasoning was because Pelosi and Dems refuse to negotiate a political settlement to the government shutdown and funding the border security Wall.

 

Most realize the probable true reason was because Pelosi tried to silence President Trump from using the State of the Union (SOTU) Address to influence Americans about Dem Obstructionism. Pelosi – typical of a Democratic Party operative – LIED about security concerns for the SOTU due to the lack of government shutdown funding. Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen and the Secret Service repudiated Speaker Pelosi’s security funding propaganda.

 

GOOD FOR TRUMP! If Pelosi is so concerned about government funding she and her MSM propaganda tools should not complain about President preventing a Dem Party foreign junket on government funds not available due the shutdown.

 

JRH 1/18/19 (Hat Tip: P. Jacobs – Let’s Roll Trump Troopers!!)

Your generosity is always appreciated: 

Please Support NCCR

********************

Blue State Blues: Shutdowns Are Different When Republicans Fight Back

 

By Joel B. Pollak

January 18, 2019

Breitbart

 

Nancy Pelosi

 

Spare, if you will, a moment’s pity for Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY). They are not exactly enjoying the government shutdown as they might have hoped.

 

Pelosi had already packed her bags and boarded the Air Force bus Thursday, along with a sizable delegation of House Democratic leaders, for her overseas junket.

 

She and her comrades were, no doubt, looking forward to touring NATO’s billion-dollar-plus new headquarters in Brussels; posing for selfies on camelback by the pyramids in Egypt; grinning for photo-ops with the troops in Afghanistan.

 

Then the order came from President Donald Trump to prohibit her use of government aircraft.

 

Fly commercial, he suggested. There is a government shutdown going on, after all.

 

And, as Trump noted, 800,000 federal workers will continue to go unpaid — unless Democrats stay in town to negotiate.

 

The bus went ’round the block and back.

 

Pelosi’s shock must have been quite something to observe.

 

She is not used to being treated like this, you see. She apparently expected she could cancel (ahem, “postpone”) the State of the Union address due to the shutdown — and then disappear abroad.

 

Trump’s response — blocking Pelosi’s use of the aircraft — was gutsy. It was a “drain the swamp” moment.

 

 

But the timing was pure comedy gold. (Adam Schiff, stepping off the bus, looked like he’d seen a Russian.)

 

In a statement, Pelosi’s spokesman protested that the purpose of the trip had been “to affirm the United States’ ironclad commitment to the NATO alliance,” something the president had already done earlier that day.

 

Her real goal was to conduct an alternative foreign policy — as she did after being elected Speaker in 2007, when she paid a friendly visit to Syrian butcher Bashar al-Assad.

 

Pelosi’s flack complained that President Trump himself had flown to visit the troops in Iraq early in the shutdown.

 

But Trump is the commander-in-chief, and Pelosi is not. How jarring for her to be reminded that although she might pretend the Constitution grants her equal power to the president, only Trump can turn the bus around.

 

It was just the latest setback for Pelosi in the shutdown fight.

 

She and Schumer insisted on equal television time after Trump’s Oval Office address last week — only to be mocked mercilessly for odd staging and absurd makeup.

 

Pelosi must have thought her State of the Union gambit would be a winner. And it was — with the media.

 

Politico’s lead headline Thursday morning blared: “PELOSI PLAYS HARDBALL.” The article added: “The bold move also sent the unmistakable signal that Pelosi holds all the cards in the lower chamber.” A separate article in Politico declared: “Donald Trump may have finally met his match in Nancy Pelosi.” It described her as “satin and steel.”

 

CNN’s Chris Cilizza also chimed in, praising Pelosi’s “major power move.”

 

But her decision was soon exposed as a major blunder.

 

First, Pelosi’s stated justification — security concerns — was quickly debunked by the Secret Service and Department of Homeland Security. (In other words: she lied.)

 

Second, by refusing to hear the president’s speech, Pelosi effectively gave Trump license to give his speech anywhere — in the Senate, perhaps, or in a football stadium, far beyond the frowns of Pelosi’s new majority.

 

Believe it or not, Trump is winning the shutdown.

 

True, polls suggest a majority of Americans blame him — not a surprise, since he told us he would be “proud” to take responsibility. And a National Public Radio poll suggested that there are “cracks showing with his base.”

 

Moreover, though the public is somewhat inoculated against the media’s usual shutdown horror stories — they have cried wolf too many times before — there could be some real hardship ahead.

 

Yet Trump is winning — because he is fighting back.

 

That is partly a consequence of his position: the White House always has the advantage in a negotiation with Congress, especially a divided Congress.

 

But Trump is also winning because he is fighting harder — and smarter — than any Republican has before.

 

He began by picking the right battle. The one reason for which the public — or enough of the public — might forgive a government shutdown is national security. And Trump has framed the border issue as a national security problem, not a question of immigration policy.

 

That means the shutdown can never be entirely his fault: it is his duty, as commander-in-chief, to refuse to sign a budget that places Americans in danger.

 

Trump does not need to convince the polls that he is right. He knows if he begins to solve the problem, his support will return.

 

Pelosi and Schumer are somewhat new to problem-solving. They have also never seen a Republican who fights back. That is why they are losing the shutdown.

____________________

The House Creates Funding but the President Manages the Spending

John R. Houk

© January 18, 2019

__________________

Blue State Blues: Shutdowns Are Different When Republicans Fight Back

 

Copyright © 2019 Breitbart

 

UN hit list can bypass Congress and fund Trump border wall


Twenty-one nations that receive U.S. foreign aid refused to support a U.N. vote to condemn Hamas as a terrorist organization in the Islamic terrorist organization’s recent attack on Israeli soil.

 

Canada Free Press (CFP) author David Singer suggests tapping into that nearly $14 BILLION in aid be withheld and use at least a portion of it to build the Border Wall.

 

If President Trump can legally redirect foreign aid, then the President should thumb his nose at hate-Trump Dems and BUILD THAT WALL!

 

JRH 12/19/18

So readers, I’ve been using a seven year old laptop to fulfill the old blogging habit. My lovely wife sprang for a Christmas upgrade. I’m a relatively small-time blogger but with a consistently growing readership despite some token censorship from the liberal-oriented blog and social platforms. Still looking to defray the Christmas costs.  

Whatever my readers can chip in will be appreciated: https://www.paypal.me/johnrhouk

Please Support NCCR

********************

UN hit list can bypass Congress and fund Trump border wall

If the President does not secure the border wall funding from Congress–then those countries that humiliated Trump could well see their foreign aid in 2019 slashed from their 2017 levels

 

By David Singer 

December 19, 2018

Canada Free Press

 

Dry Bones

 

21 Nations that received almost $14 billion in US foreign aid in 2017 could become the key to unlocking the White House confrontation between President Trump and Democrat leaders Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer over their refusal to commit the Democrats to authorizing Congress to commit $5 billion immediately towards the construction of Trump’s border wall to prevent illegal immigration into America.

 

Trump’s threatened Government shutdown by 21 December has been withdrawn as he seeks alternative sources of funding.

 

The following UN hit list offers a ready solution:

 

Country – US Aid 2017

Bangladesh – $261 million

Congo – $494 million

Egypt – $1475 million

Indonesia – $277 million

Iraq – $3712 million

Jordan – $1489 million

Lebanon – $505 million

Mali – $230 million

Morocco – $490 million

Mozambique – $580 million

Niger – $173 million

Nigeria – $852 million

Pakistan – $837 million

Russia – $168 million

Senegal – $197 million

South Africa – $511 million

Turkey – $153 million

Vietnam – $150 million

Yemen – $595 million

Zambia – $419 million

Zimbabwe – $194 million

TOTAL – $13762 Million

 

These 21 states were major players in humiliating Trump – when an American sponsored resolution in the United Nations General Assembly seeking to condemn Hamas and other militant groups for indiscriminately targeting Israel’s predominantly Jewish civilian population since 2007 failed to secure the required two-third’s majority earlier determined as necessary for its passage.

 

Trump has warned on many occasions that those who receive money from America—yet do not support America diplomatically—stand to lose financially as a result.

 

  • Trump has already well and truly practised what he preached:

 

  • Defunding the United Nations Relief and Works Agency of $360 million annually

 

  • Withdrawing from UNESCO leaving it to fund the 22% of its budget lost as a result

 

  • Calling on NATO countries to meet their agreed share of the NATO budget

 

  • Cutting more than $200 million in funding the Palestine Liberation Organisation

 

Trump has already ominously warned those countries that humiliated him on the Hamas Resolution that they could be in the firing line for reductions in their annual foreign aid as a result of not voting with America.

 

This threat becomes increasingly more likely as the Democrats dig in their heels and refuse to give the President the $5 billion he needs to build the border wall—one of the President’s cardinal promises made in the 2016 election campaign that has been frustrated by the Democrats from the day Trump became President.

 

Trump should be readily able to determine how $5 billion of this $14 billion funding to these recalcitrant states can be redirected to building the border wall.

 

Trump can also look at defunding:

 

  • another 54 recipients of US aid that supported a two-thirds majority vote being required on the Hamas resolution over America’s claim that a simple majority only was necessary and

 

  • an additional 36 similarly US-funded countries that voted against condemning Hamas on the actual motion

 

Jordan and Egypt—in addition to not voting with America—apparently continue to resist Trump’s efforts to replace the Palestine Liberation Organisation in negotiations with Israel on Trump’s peace proposals. Their aid could be substantially reduced by a clearly-piqued and very angered Trump.

 

The ball is now well and truly in the Democrats hands.

 

If the President does not secure the border wall funding from Congress—then those countries that humiliated Trump could well see their foreign aid in 2019 slashed from their 2017 levels.

 

Trump is determined to protect America against illegal immigration—and no one will be allowed to stand in his way of making America great again.

 

Author’s note: The cartoon—commissioned exclusively for this article—is by Yaakov Kirschen aka “Dry Bones”—one of Israel’s foremost political and social commentators—whose cartoons have graced the columns of Israeli and international media publications for decades. His cartoons can be viewed at Drybonesblog

______________________

David Singer is an Australian Lawyer, a Foundation Member of the International Analyst Network and Convenor of Jordan is Palestine International—an organization calling for sovereignty of the West Bank and Gaza to be allocated between Israel and Jordan as the two successor States to the Mandate for Palestine. Previous articles written by him can be found at: jordanispalestine.blogspot.com

 

Pursuant to Title 17 U.S.C. 107, other copyrighted work is provided for educational purposes, research, critical comment, or debate without profit or payment. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for your own purposes beyond the ‘fair use’ exception, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. Views are those of authors and not necessarily those of Canada Free Press. Content is Copyright 1997-2018 the individual authors. Site Copyright 1997-2018 Canada Free Press.Com

 

Donald Trump 10 PT Immigration Speech from Phoenix


PHOENIX, AZ - AUGUST 31:  Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump speaks during a campaign rally on August 31, 2016 in Phoenix, Arizona. Trump detailed a multi-point immigration policy during his speech. (Photo by Ralph Freso/Getty Images)
PHOENIX, AZ – AUGUST 31: Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump speaks during a campaign rally on August 31, 2016 in Phoenix, Arizona. Trump detailed a multi-point immigration policy during his speech. (Photo by Ralph Freso/Getty Images)

John R. Houk

© September 2, 2016

 

On August 31 in a Phoenix Arizona speech, Donald Trump outlines his ten-point plan for immigration reform. Most Conservative outlets were very pleased with the speech. I have not checked the American Left’s (Dems and MSM) viewpoint on the speech yet. The reason for that is the spin of lies and warped criticism that typically flows from a Leftist’s mouth.

 

Even the Never Trumper Conservatives of the Nationally Review grudgingly praised the speech as sensible:

 

After two weeks spent waffling on immigration, and making noises on the subject largely indistinguishable from those of Jeb Bush and Marco Rubio, Donald Trump has settled on a hawkish position — and a practical one. Trump’s crowd-pleasing antics aside, in his immigration speech in Phoenix, Ariz., on Wednesday he laid out a sensible, realistic path forward on genuine immigration reform.

 

Trump’s rhetoric on immigration has frequently been reckless, and on occasion he has seemed to play to feelings of animosity. He would be well served to strike a soberer tone. But on the merits, Trump has put forward a responsible immigration agenda. READ ENTIRETY (A Tough but Sensible Immigration Policy; By The Editors; National Review; 9/1/16 7:30 PM)

 

The Trump plan for immigration reform is awesome! It focuses on security, the border and unvetted Muslim regugees.

 

Donald Trump’s speech in entirety can be read at DonaldTrump.com. I am excerpting the ten points followed by the entire speech (about 1:17 and some odd seconds) courtesy of ABC.

 

Number One: We will build a wall along the Southern Border.

 

On day one, we will begin working on an impenetrable physical wall on the southern border. We will use the best technology, including above-and below-ground sensors, towers, aerial surveillance and manpower to supplement the wall, find and dislocate tunnels, and keep out the criminal cartels, and Mexico will pay for the wall.

 

Number Two: End Catch-And-Release

 

Under my Administration, anyone who illegally crosses the border will be detained until they are removed out of our country.

 

Number Three: Zero tolerance for criminal aliens.

 

According to federal data, there are at least 2 million criminal aliens now inside the country. We will begin moving them out day one, in joint operations with local, state and federal law enforcement.

 

Beyond the 2 million, there are a vast number of additional criminal illegal immigrants who have fled or evaded justice. But their days on the run will soon be over. They go out, and they go out fast.

 

Moving forward, we will issue detainers for all illegal immigrants who are arrested for any crime whatsoever, and they will be placed into immediate removal proceedings. We will terminate the Obama Administration’s deadly non-enforcement policies that allow thousands of criminal aliens to freely roam our streets.

 

Since 2013 alone, the Obama Administration has allowed 300,000 criminal aliens to return back into U.S. communities – these are individuals encountered or identified by ICE but who were not detained or processed for deportation.

 

My plan also includes cooperating closely with local jurisdictions to remove criminal aliens.

 

We will restore the highly successful Secure Communities program. We will expand and revitalize the popular 287(g) partnerships, which will help to identify hundreds of thousands of deportable aliens in local jails. Both of these programs have been recklessly gutted by this Administration. This is yet one more area where we are headed in a totally opposite direction.

 

On my first day in office, I am also going to ask Congress to pass “Kate’s Law” – named for Kate Steinle – to ensure that criminal aliens convicted of illegal reentry face receive strong mandatory minimum sentences.

 

Another reform I am proposing is the passage of legislation named for Detective Michael Davis and Deputy Sheriff Danny Oliver, two law enforcement officers recently killed by a previously-deported illegal immigrant. The Davis-Oliver bill will enhance cooperation with state and local authorities to ensure that criminal immigrants and terrorists are swiftly identified and removed.

 

We are going to triple the number of ICE deportation officers. Within ICE, I am going to create a new special Deportation Task Force, focused on identifying and removing quickly the most dangerous criminal illegal immigrants in America who have evaded justice.

 

The local police know who every one of these criminals are. There’s no great mystery to it, they’ve put up with it for years. And now, finally, we will turn the tables and law enforcement will be allowed to clear up this dangerous and threatening mess.

 

We’re also going to hire 5,000 more Border Patrol agents, and put more of them on the border, instead of behind desks. We will expand the number of Border Patrol Stations.

 

I’ve had a chance to spend time with these incredible law enforcement officers, and I want to take a moment to thank them. The endorsement I’ve received from the Border Patrol officers means more to me than I can say.

 

Number Four: Block Funding For Sanctuary Cities

 

We will end the Sanctuary Cities that have resulted in so many needless deaths. Cities that refuse to cooperate with federal authorities will not receive taxpayer dollars, and we will work with Congress to pass legislation to protect those jurisdictions that do assist federal authorities.

 

Number Five: Cancel Unconstitutional Executive Orders & Enforce All Immigration Laws

 

We will immediately terminate President Obama’s two illegal executive amnesties, in which he defied federal law and the constitution to give amnesty to approximately 5 million illegal immigrants.

 

Hillary Clinton has pledged to keep both of these illegal amnesty programs – including the 2014 amnesty which has been blocked by the Supreme Court. Clinton has also pledged to add a third executive amnesty.

 

Clinton’s plan would trigger a Constitutional Crisis unlike almost anything we have ever seen before. In effect, she would be abolishing the lawmaking powers of Congress in order to write her own laws from the Oval Office.

 

In a Trump Administration, all immigration laws will be enforced. As with any law enforcement activity, we will set priorities. But, unlike this Administration, no one will be immune or exempt from enforcement – and ICE and Border Patrol officers will be allowed to do their jobs. Anyone who has entered the United States illegally is subject to deportation – that is what it means to have laws and to have a country.

 

Our enforcement priorities will include removing criminals, gang members, security threats, visa overstays, public charges – that is, those relying on public welfare or straining the safety net, along with millions of recent illegal arrivals and overstays who’ve come here under the current Administration.

 

Number Six: We Are Going To Suspend The Issuance Of Visas To Any Place Where Adequate Screening Cannot Occur

 

According to data provided to the Senate Subcommittee on Immigration and the National Interest, between 9/11 and the end of 2014, at least 380 foreign-born individuals were convicted in terror cases inside the United States. The number is likely higher, but the Administration refuses to provide this information to Congress.

 

As soon as I enter office, I am going to ask the Department of State, Homeland Security and the Department of Justice to begin a comprehensive review of these cases in order to develop a list of regions and countries from which immigration must be suspended until proven and effective vetting mechanisms can be put into place.

 

Countries from which immigration will be suspended would include places like Syria and Libya.

 

For the price of resettling 1 refugee in the United States, 12 could be resettled in a safe zone in their home region.

 

Another reform involves new screening tests for all applicants that include an ideological certification to make sure that those we are admitting to our country share our values and love our people.

 

For instance, in the last five years, we’ve admitted nearly 100,000 immigrants from Iraq and Afghanistan – in these two countries, according to Pew research, a majority of residents say that the barbaric practice of honor killings against women are often or sometimes justified.

 

Applicants will be asked for their views about honor killings, about respect for women and gays and minorities, attitudes on Radical Islam, and many other topics as part of the vetting procedure.

 

Number Seven: We will ensure that other countries take their people back when we order them deported

 

There are at least 23 countries that refuse to take their people back after they have been ordered to leave the United States, including large numbers of violent criminals. Due to a Supreme Court decision, if these violent offenders cannot be sent home, our law enforcement officers have to release them into U.S. communities. There are often terrible consequences, such as Casey Chadwick’s tragic death in Connecticut just last year. Yet, despite the existence of a law that commands the Secretary of State to stop issuing visas to these countries, Secretary Hillary Clinton ignored this law and refused to use this powerful tool to bring nations into compliance.

 

The result of her misconduct was the release of thousands of dangerous criminal aliens who should have been sent home.

 

According to a report from the Boston Globe, from the year 2008 through 2014, nearly 13,000 criminal aliens were released back into U.S. communities because their home countries would not take them back. Many of these 13,000 releases occurred on Hillary Clinton’s watch – she had the power and the duty to stop it cold and she didn’t do it.

 

Those released include individuals convicted of killings, sexual assault and some of the most heinous crimes imaginable, who went on to reoffend at a very high rate.

 

Number Eight: We will finally complete the biometric entry-exit visa tracking system.

 

For years, Congress has required a biometric entry-exit visa tracking system, but it has never been completed.

 

In my Administration, we will ensure that this system is in place at all land, air, and sea ports. Approximately half of new illegal immigrants came on temporary visas and then never left. Beyond violating our laws, visa overstays pose a substantial threat to national security. The 9/11 Commission said that this tracking system should be a high priority and “would have assisted law enforcement and intelligence officials in August and September 2001 in conducting a search for two of the 9/11 hijackers that were in the U.S. on expired visas.”

 

Last year alone, nearly a half a million individuals overstayed their temporary visas. Removing visa overstays will be a top priority of my Administration. If people around the world believe they can just come on a temporary visa and never leave – the Obama-Clinton policy – then we have a completely open border. We must send the message that visa expiration dates will be strongly enforced.

 

Number Nine: We will turn off the jobs and benefits magnet.

 

We will ensure that E-Verify is used to the fullest extent possible under existing law, and will work with Congress to strengthen and expand its use across the country.

 

Immigration law doesn’t exist just for the purpose of keeping out criminals. It exists to protect all aspects of American life – the worksite, the welfare office, the education system and much else. That is why immigration limits are established in the first place. If we only enforce the laws against crime, then we have an open border to the entire world.

 

I will enforce all of our immigration laws.

 

The same goes for government benefits. The Center for Immigration Studies estimates that 62 percent of households headed by illegal immigrants used some form of cash or non-cash welfare programs, like food stamps or housing assistance. This directly violates the federal public charge law designed to protect the U.S. treasury.

 

Those who abuse our welfare system will be priorities for removal.

 

Number 10: We will reform legal immigration to serve the best interests of America and its workers

 

We’ve admitted 59 million immigrants to the United States between 1965 and 2015.

 

Many of these arrivals have greatly enriched our country. But we now have an obligation to them, and to their children, to control future immigration – as we have following previous immigration waves – to ensure assimilation, integration and upward mobility.

 

Within just a few years immigration as a share of national population is set to break all historical records.

 

The time has come for a new immigration commission to develop a new set of reforms to our legal immigration system in order to achieve the following goals:

 

  • To keep immigration levels, measured by population share, within historical norms

 

  • To select immigrants based on their likelihood of success in U.S. society, and their ability to be financially self-sufficient. We need a system that serves our needs – remember, it’s America First.

 

  • To choose immigrants based on merit, skill and proficiency

 

  • And to establish new immigration controls to boost wages and to ensure that open jobs are offered to American workers first.

 

We want people to come into our country, but they have to come in legally and properly-vetted, and in a manner that serves the national interest.

 

We’ve been living under outdated immigration rules from decades ago. To avoid this happening in the future, I believe we should sunset our visa laws so that Congress is forced to periodically revise and revisit them. We wouldn’t put our entire federal budget on autopilot for decades, so why should we do the same for immigration?

 

Let’s talk about the big picture

 

These ten steps, if rigorously followed and enforced, will accomplish more in a matter of months than our politicians have accomplished on this issue in the last fifty years.

 

Because I am not a politician, because I am not beholden to any special interest, I will get this done for you and your family.

 

We will accomplish all of READ ENTIRE SPEECH (Donald J. Trump: Address On Immigration; DonaldTrump.com; 8/31/16)

 

YOU should really take the time to read or to watch the entire speech! The speech was focused on immigration HOWEVER, the atmosphere exudes quite believable patriotism to make AMERICA GREAT.

 

VIDEO: Trump FULL Immigration Speech in Phoenix

 

 

Posted by ABC News

Streamed live on Aug 31, 2016

 

Donald Trump FULL Immigration Speech from Phoenix | Donald Trump has started giving his long-awaited immigration speech in Phoenix tonight after touching down in the U.S. after a surprise visit to Mexico.

When he started talking about the “beautiful” wall that he wants to build along the southern U.S. border, Trump reiterated his earlier claim that Mexico will pay for the wall. That became READ THE REST

 

JRH 9/2/16

Please Support NCCR