My Thoughts on Newbill Soviet Historical Parallels


Obama - NDRP

John R. Houk

© April 16, 2012

 

Tony Newbill has found two moments in now defunct Soviet history and sees a parallel to President Barack Hussein Obama’s seeming consolidation of Executive power through the vehicle of the Presidential Executive Order.

 

The first parallel is an examination of Josef Stalin’s maneuvering to set himself up as the supreme leader of the USSR as it became apparent that Lenin was dying a slow death. At a time that many felt Leon Trotsky would be the successor to Lenin, Stalin effectively mobilized the affections of the Russian poor that had a difficult time grasping the Marxist intellectualism of Lenin and Trotsky. An example might be something like spreading the wealth was more comprehensible to the poor than the dictatorship of the proletariat.

 

It would take a dictatorship to actually spread the wealth to the people in an (cough) equal manner; however the term dictatorship might sound more like the old life of serfdom experienced for hundreds of years under Russian Czarist rule. Thus spread the wealth concepts were more understandable to the poor and used by Stalin instead of the more intellectual terms such as dictatorship of the proletariat.

 

The 2008 candidate promised “Change” for America and transparency of government. “Change” has turned out to be creeping Socialistic transformation wrapped in terms of a better life for the American poor, American minorities, Pro-Choice women, diverse cultures that have no intention of becoming One out of Many – E Pluribus Unum (i.e. divisive Multiculturalism) and the elimination of the American Culture based on Judeo-Christian principles. The last concept being closer to the Marxist concept of the elimination of religion and traditional morals to mold society into what the government proclaims to morally good for the society of now.

 

“Democracy extends the sphere of individual freedom, socialism restricts it. Democracy attaches all possible value to each man; socialism makes each man a mere agent, a mere number. Democracy and socialism have nothing in common but one word: equality. But notice the difference: while democracy seeks equality in liberty, socialism seeks equality in restraint and servitude.”
Alexis de Tocqueville

 

“America is great because she is good. If America ceases to be good, America will cease to be great.”
Alexis de Tocqueville

 

Socialism is bad for America. With Socialistic concepts America will cease to be good. If America ceases to be good, America will no longer be exceptional. That is the “Change” Obama failed to tell voters when delusions of Obamasiah emerged in 2008.

 

The second defunct Soviet history moment was the purposeful use of withholding food to cause deprivation and starvation in Red Army conquered Ukraine. In an effort to keep Ukraine a loyal Soviet Socialist Republic, Stalin decided to starve the nationalism out of the Ukrainians. The political nature of the Ukrainian Genocide is often given the name Holodomor” – murder by famine.

 

Can you see the depopulation agenda to control people? Can you say Club of Rome or Agenda 21? Can you say Eco-Marxism?

 

JRH 4/16/12

Please Support NCCR

*************************

Obama’s latest Executive Order, “National Resources Preparedness Act ” has these same traits

 

By Tony Newbill

Sent: 3/29/2012 2:14 PM

 

Obama’s latest Executive Order, “National Resources Preparedness Act[READ HERE and HERE] has these same traits

 

The similarities between Stalin’s era and What Obama Executive orders are designed to do are astonishingly comparable!!!!

 

See here; http://www.historytoday.com/norman-pereira/stalin-and-communist-party-1920s  

 

This quote is 7 paragraphs up from the end of this story.

 

 Having disposed of the left – Stalin was only half done. He then had the Congress reaffirm the principles of NEP but also lay the groundwork for the first Five Year Plan (FYP) which proposed the consolidation of agricultural production into large collective farms as well as a new emphasis upon heavy industry. The FYP, in fact, represented a sharp turning away from NEP toward centralised command of the economy. Initially, however, the transition was presented as a gradual and voluntary plan; there was no indication of the brutally coercive features of implementation which Stalin introduced several months later “.

 

The last Paragraph in this story simulates Obama executive order Law as well with the most recent one that Focus on control of Food and resources relating to human needs survival. Executive order, “National Resources Preparedness Act”

 

http://faminegenocide.com/resources/causes.html

 

The Famine was a conscious instrument of Soviet policy. “Food is a weapon” said Maxim Litvinov, the Soviet Commissar of Foreign Affairs. This weapon was not directed against the Soviet peasants in general, nor did the Ukrainian peasants become its target by chance. The 1933 Famine was part of a wider campaign against the Ukrainian nation, and must be considered together with the destruction of the Ukrainian national elites launched at the end of the twenties, and the renewed Russification of Ukrainian cities begun in the early thirties. As the peasants lost their freedom of movement (a new passport system tied the farmers to the collective farm), a new era of serfdom began. Meanwhile, Russian colonists filled the emptied Ukrainian villages, changed the demographic composition of the Ukrainian countryside and helped carry Russification into the very heart of the Ukrainian nation. The present situation in central and eastern Ukraine is to a large measure a direct consequence of the demographic engineering facilitated by famine.

 

___________________________

My Thoughts on Newbill Soviet Historical Parallels

John R. Houk

© April 16, 2012

________________________

Obama’s latest Executive Order, “National Resources Preparedness Act ” has these same traits

 

© Tony Newbill

Creeping Socialism Diluting American Liberty


BHO Creeping Socialism 

John R. Houk

© April 1, 2012

 

Wow friends! As Americans we know concepts of Socialism are creeping into the American mindset as a necessity of entitlements for those with the reputation of struggling to exist in America. In full disclosure I am one that benefits from a government entitlement due to disability. The disability check is pittance compared to what I earned when I was fully capable in the job market. Complications resulting from diabetes have taken their course on the operation of my physical body which has had added humiliation in my psyche leaving me little desire to change my mind set to learn a trade that is congruent with my physical circumstances.

 

I have not written about my plight for pity but rather that I know entitlements are helpful to live a life in America. Howbeit my entitlement and I am certain of those that have an honest need for an entitlement does not make ends meet in the budget. I skirt a life of living in the red and the black back and forth from entitlement check to entitlement check. I could whine a bit more but that is not the inspiration for these thoughts being typed.

 

As much as I benefit from an entitlement it is my opinion Americans that have no physical disparities are demanding the government for entitlements that otherwise can make a living even if it is meager off the public dole. I have a problem with entitlements that come because men can’t keep their zipper closed or that a woman insists that the zipper opens. I have a problem with abortion (aka baby killing) and especially abortions that are paid by government entitlement or government mandate. I have a problem with the government spreading the wealth for entitlements for those of us that are poor yet very able bodied. I think you get the point.

 

The increased pervasive nature of American entitlements is turning America into a Socialistic nation in which the government regulates every nature of American life. Regulating American lives means the Constitutional intent of living Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness is limited by the definition of the ruling elites of the government without representation of the people.

 

Socialism has crept into America so slowly most of us do not realize that our Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness has been diluted to an American disadvantage of diminishing choices.

 

Now those are my thoughts on Socialism.

 

A friend of mine on the social network America Conservative 2 Conservative (AC2C) wrote a comment to a cross post on my blog there entitled “Where is Obama’s Executive Orders Taking America?” The title is a bit self-explanatory that the EOs of President Barack Hussein Obama has become a process of carving Liberty out of American lives.

 

My friend’s comment was a bit mysterious because a link was left as the comment. Thus you have to read the link to discover how it applied to my post on BHO’s Executive Orders. The friend is CJ and this is the comment:

 

please read and pass on http://americac2c.com/profiles/blogs/my-journey-for-your-freedom#comments.”

 

As you can tell CJ linked to a comment he/she (I used the “he/she” because I have not paid close enough attention to know CJ’s gender. Sorry about that CJ) posted entitled “My Journey For Your Freedom”. The comment is this:

 

we didn’t think of our freedoms…we didn’t worry…we just enjoyed…NOW we might loose (sic) them and we think, talk and cry freedom/liberties”.

 

I am going to cross post the title commented on by CJ. Although it was written about a year ago its message should resonate with American voters that are faced a Socialist minded President Barack Hussein Obama on the first Tuesday in November 2012.

 

JRH 4/1/12