Election Coup: Past, Present & Future


John R. Houk, Blog Editor

Posted April 25, 2022

Today let’s examine 2020-Election/Voting Fraud/Crimes through the lens of the attempt will be made again and COVID lies was and is the vehicle to perpetrate the past and the future Fascist-Marxist power coup. What will We The People do?

JRH 4/25/22

I need your generosity. PLEASE GIVE to overcome research expenses:

Please Support NCCR

Big Tech Censorship is pervasive – Share voluminously on all social media platforms!

***************************

Rumble VIDEO: 2000 Mules Trailer

Posted by Dinesh D’Souza

Published April 23, 2022

Enjoyed this video? Join my Locals community for exclusive content at dinesh.locals.com!

Here’s the official trailer for “2000 Mules.” It’s the movie we’ve all been waiting for. Please share! And go to 2000Mules.com to buy your ticket to see the movie in its premiere week

++++++++++++++++++

Biden And Dems Caught Trying To Steal 2024 Election

[Coup Leadership] Biden & Pelosi

By Jeff Miller

April 25, 2022

The Republic Brief

The Democrats have proven to be running on empty over the last 16 months of the Biden presidency.

It is not as if they are trying to roll back their electorally toxic policies.

This means they will be wiped out politically at the midterms. Nevertheless, they seem unperturbed by the fact that they are not worried about winning elections.

It is evident that the Democratic Party is not hiding under the covers when it comes to the election. There is a nefarious plan afoot.

Although they can’t govern well, they are the best at grabbing power by foul means or fair means.

We are now faced with the thorny topic of the 2020 presidential election. The new rules imposed under the cover of COVID had many Americans thinking something was not quite right.

Never mind Sidney Powell’s ill-conceived Kraken concept which never materialized.

Democracies tried many ways to tilt the playing field in their favor, but some worked better than others. They won a triumph when their friends in Big Tech censored The Post’s Hunter Biden laptop coverage before the election.

In order to restore trust in elections, troubling evidence of systematic schemes to subvert them is now coming to light.

In “2000 Mules,” the documentary by Dinesh D’Souza based on research by True The Vote, the most convincing evidence of suspicious ballot harvesting has emerged.

Using cellphone geotracking and surveillance video, it shows a network of “mules” in battleground states busily collecting ballots from get-out-the-vote NGOs and stuffing them, a few at a time, into multiple drop boxes in the dead of night.

It is staggering to see how extensive the undertaking is.

True the Vote bought three trillion geolocation signals from cellphones near drop boxes, as well as near election nonprofits, from October 1, 2020, to election day, November 3, 2020. The Georgia deadline covered the runoff on Jan. 6, 2021.

Then they searched for “mules,” operatives who stole ballots from election NGOs – like Stacey Abrams’ Fair Fight Action group – and then carried them to drop boxes, depositing between three and ten ballots in each drop box before moving on.

” Mule” was the term chosen by Catherine Engelbrecht, the founder of True the Vote, since it “felt a lot like a cartel, it felt like trafficking . . . This is in its essence ballot trafficking . . . You have the collectors. You have the stash houses, which are the nonprofits. And then you have the mules that are doing the drops.”

In order for a mule to be included in the data set, Gregg Phillips set a threshold of at least 10 drop boxes within a particular area, as well as at least five visits to an NGO.

In the Atlanta metro area, for instance, they drew a line around 309 drop boxes, and they bought all cellphone data collected from people that had been near those boxes and NGOs.

Thus, we were left with 2,000 mules to choose from.

They then went searching for surveillance videos of those drop boxes. All told, they uncovered four million minutes.

What they found is shocking. Video shows the scheme coming to life when a mule is matched with a video.

After midnight, a car shows up at a dropbox. A man exits, looks around discreetly, approaches the ballot box, stuffs a few ballots in, and runs away. He then moves to each ballot box, again and again.

From December 23, 2020 onwards, Phipps discovered mules in Georgia were wearing gloves. He cites the indictment handed down in Arizona on December 22 in connection to ballot stuffing. “The way the FBI nailed them was fingerprints.” The mules then started wearing gloves.

As D’Souza shows in his data, a complex network of routes taken by mules between NGOs and dropboxes is unmistakable.

An average of 38 dropbox visits per mule was made, and five ballots were deposited per visit. That amounts to about 380,000 suspicious votes.

Using the numbers, D’Souza explains whether the outcome of the election would have been different.

There were 500 mules in Michigan, averaging 50 dropbox visits per mule, or 125,000 suspected votes, not enough to overcome Biden’s 154,000-vote advantage.

With 100 mules in Wisconsin visiting a dropbox on average 28 times each, we have 14,000 suspect votes, 6,000 votes short of a Trump victory.

However, in Georgia, where 250 mules visited 24 dropboxes each, we get 30,000 suspect votes, more than enough to overcome Biden’s 12,000 vote lead. According to D’Souza, Georgia’s 16 electoral votes now go to Trump.

20,000 suspect votes can be attributed to 200 mules making an average of 20 visits to dropboxes, giving Trump 11 more likely electoral votes.

During the Philadelphia campaign alone, 1,100 mules made an average of 50 dropbox visits each, resulting in 275,000 suspect votes, which would flip the Pennsylvania result to Trump and give him another 20 electoral votes.

“Shockingly, even this narrow way of looking at just our 2,000 mules in these swing states gives Trump the win with 279 electoral votes to Biden’s 259,” notes D’Souza.

Now, those ballots can’t be examined to see if they’re fraudulent, but if we’re going to use drop boxes, they need to be secure and monitored 24/7.

There’s obviously some problem. However, on the campaign trail, Republican candidates – even potential Donald Trump – should not be looking backward at their 2020 election loss. To do so makes them appear bitter.


© 2021 – All Rights Reserved. The Republic Brief

++++++++++++++++++++

Bitchute VIDEO: MEDIA MACHINE DESPERATE TO KEEP CONTROL

Posted by BANNED.VIDEOInfowars

First Published April 24th, 2022 07:22 UTC 

bringing you what’s ignored, sensationalized, unbalanced, misleading or just plain FALSE. Here’s your Media Malfeasance for the third week of APRIL.


Kristi Leigh TV https://freeworldnews.tv/channel/kristi-leigh-tv

**Get Your “Alex Jones Was Right” Fundraiser Shirt Today! https://www.infowarsstore.com/alex-jones-was-right-lightning-shirt

📰 Breaking News: https://www.infowars.com/breaking-news/

🇺🇸 Save Infowars: https://www.givesendgo.com/G2CK4

MORE DESCRIPTION

++++++++++++++++++

Fauci Masks the Rule of Law

In declaring that public health officials are above the law, Fauci is undermining constitutional government.

Fauci Mask Tyranny Quote

By NATE JACKSON 

APRIL 25, 2022

The Patriot Post

“I do not recommend that you wear a mask,” said Dr. Anthony Fauci in an email on February 5, 2020. “There’s no reason to be walking around with a mask,” Fauci declared on March 8, 2020. That same Anthony Fauci led the flip-flop on masks once the politicos in DC needed to be seen “doing something” about the coronavirus pandemic. Now that he’s tasted power, he’s loathe to let it go.

Griping about U.S. District Judge Kathryn Kimball Mizelle’s recent ruling striking down Joe Biden’s mask mandate on public transit, Dr. “I Am the Science” Fauci argued that judges can’t make such challenges to The Science™.

“The principle of a court overruling a public health judgment by a qualified organization like the CDC is disturbing in the precedent that it might send,” Fauci complained on CBS. Things such as the mask mandate “really are the purview of the CDC,” he added on some backwater streaming service called CNN+. “We are concerned … about courts getting involved in things that are unequivocally [a] public health decision. I mean, this is a CDC issue. It should not have been a court issue.”

As the nation’s highest-paid bureaucrat, Fauci should know better.

Imperial decrees from unelected bureaucrats are not the ultimate and final word in our constitutional republic. Yet he is knowingly arguing exactly the opposite. He’s arguing that the CDC and “public health experts” should operate entirely outside the law.

Then again, this is the guy who once said of masks, “I don’t look at this as a liberty thing.”

And it has nothing to do with science, either. No state still has a mask mandate. Joe Biden gave his State of the Union to a largely maskless Congress. Yet for some reason, Biden and his know-it-all army of bureaucrats insist that masks on airplanes are the only thing saving us from another descent into viral spread.

Baloney.

Mizelle’s well-reasoned decision was made entirely based on the law. She said nothing of the merits of the science one way or the other, only that the CDC had exceeded its authority and not followed legal procedure to boot. Fauci ignores this.

The Biden administration can’t just accept Mizelle’s ruling and is therefore appealing the ruling — not because enforcing the mandate through May 3 as intended is going to stop a single case of COVID, but because protecting its future exercise of power is paramount. White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki said as much: “For current and future public health crises, we want to preserve that authority for the CDC.” But here’s the rub: Mizelle ruled that there was no “preserving” involved because the CDC never had this authority in the first place.

Whereas Fauci attacked Mizelle for not being a scientist, other leftists have attacked her for being only 35 (i.e., old enough to meet the constitutional threshold for being president), or for not having what they deem as sufficient bench experience to make such rulings.

This all obscures what to us seems glaringly obvious: Leftists have a major problem with women (or minorities) in authority thinking for themselves and coming to conservative conclusions. Diversity is great as long as there’s no deviation from leftist dogma.

Critically, what Mizelle did was stand for the Rule of Law. The power of government is derived from the consent of the governed. Our Republic and public officials both elected and unelected are bound by the U.S. Constitution. Bureaucrats like Fauci don’t get to declare themselves science itself and then insist that their decisions are final and immune from checks and balances.

Support The Patriot Fund®

Secure Liberty for the next generation of Americans.

The Patriot Post is protected speech, as enumerated in the First Amendment and enforced by the Second Amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America, in accordance with the endowed and unalienable Rights of All Mankind.

Copyright © 2022 The Patriot Post. All Rights Reserved.


“THIS MAY BE THE MOST IMPORTANT SPEECH I’VE EVER MADE” – PRESIDENT DONALD J. TRUMP


Since the MSM refused to broadcast Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, exposing the rampant Election Fraud; I have to believe the MSM is a part of the Election Coup trying to steal an election victory for President Trump. Here is that speech from 12/2/20 uncensored by the MSM and Big Tech. Watch, be educated AND DEMAND COURTS DO THEIR JOB TO STOP CRIMES (that’s right – plural) IN THE 2020 ELECTION. An avalanche of messages should be sent to Attorney General William Barr that these are felonious crimes to be prosecuted more than civil complaints subject to the whimsical interpretations of standings and complaints of fraud.

 

SHARE WIDELY!

 

JRH 12/3/20

I need your generosity via – credit, check 

& debit cards are accepted by my PayPal account: 

Please Support NCCR

Or support by getting in the Coffee from home business – 

OR just buy some FEEL GOOD coffee, that includes immune boosting products. Big Tech Censorship is pervasive – Share voluminously on all social media platforms

********************************

Bitchute VIDEO: “THIS MAY BE THE MOST IMPORTANT SPEECH I’VE EVER MADE” – PRESIDENT DONALD J. TRUMP

Posted by Banned Youtube Videos – specializedtom

Posted December 3rd, 2020 16:01 UTC 4015 subscribers

 

President Donald Trump on Wednesday called for a full forensic audit of mail-in ballots that were cast in key states during the Nov. 3 presidential election.

 

In a lengthy pre-recorded speech, the president said that “tens of thousands [of ballots] have fraudulent signatures” in key states.

 

It means “a full forensic audit is required to ensure that only legal ballots from lawfully registered voters that were properly cast are included,” Trump added.

 

“The reason for this is clear,” he said, “they were not verifying signatures because they know the ballots have not been filled out by the voters in whose names they were cast.”

 

The only way to remedy the situation, Trump said, is to carry out a full review of ballot envelopes, which contain the signatures. He did not say what states should carry out the auditing process.

 

Over the past three weeks, Trump’s legal team has sent several letters to Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensberger, demanding a full signature audit. Raffensberger, however, has responded by saying that it’s not possible to match the ballots and the envelope with the signature, citing privacy laws. His team and other Republicans have pushed for signature-audit procedures in Pennsylvania.

 

“We need a systematic analysis of the mail-in ballots to review the envelopes,” Trump said. “It’s about the signature. And if they’re on the envelopes, we can only review the envelopes. And that will tell us everything. This is the absolute minimum we should expect.”

 

On Election Day and beyond, poll watchers were not allowed to watch the tabulation process in several heavily Democratic areas, Trump said, arguing that it further compounded the allegedly fraudulent vote-tabulation process. In testimonies over the past week in Michigan, Arizona, and Pennsylvania, GOP poll observers said they witnessed irregularities, saw votes that were cast for Trump going to Biden, and were harassed by election workers.

 

Secretaries of state in these places have said there has not been sufficient evidence of voter fraud or irregularities that would overturn the election result. Going further, a spokesman for Michigan’s Secretary of State, Jocelyn Benson, told Epoch Times that Republican poll watchers who testified in front of the Michigan Legislature this week displayed a “lack of knowledge” about vote-counting and promoted “conspiracy theories,” without elaborating.

 

Trump, meanwhile, argued that his efforts to find voter fraud and irregularities are a bid to safeguard the U.S. election system.

 

“This is not just about my campaign, although it has a lot to do with who’s going to be your next president,” Trump remarked.

 

“If we don’t root out the fraud, the tremendous and horrible fraud that’s taken place in our 2020 election. We don’t have a country anymore,” he said.

 

 

Preserve American Experiment – FIRE Mueller


Trump- Fire Mueller zepplin toon

John R. Houk

© December 6, 2017

 

There is a slew of revelations exposing that Robert Mueller, Team Mueller, Obama Administration and all thing crooked Clinton family becoming available. These revelations are being pooh-poohed by the Dems and the Leftist Mainstream Media (MSM) as nothing to see here, move along, don’t believe your eyes etc., etc. and etc.

 

A few examples:

 

Gregg Jarrett: How an FBI official with a political agenda corrupted both Mueller, Comey investigations – 12/5/17

 

Massive criminal conspiracy unravels: Hillary Clinton took $145M from Russians to sell out the U.S. uranium supply to America’s enemies (and the FBI knew all along) – 10/18/17

 

Devin Nunes, House Intel Committee Prepare to Find FBI in Contempt for Mueller Cover-up – 12/2/17

 

FBI uncovered Russian bribery plot before Obama administration approved controversial nuclear deal with Moscow – 10/17/17 06:00 AM EDT

 

Top Investigator on Mueller’s Team Extolled Yates for Defying Trump Travel Ban – 12/5/17

 

Mueller Probe’s Anti-Trump Bias Exposed AGAIN and AGAIN – 12/5/17

 

POLITICAL PROSECUTION: Mueller’s Hit Squad Covered For Clinton And Persecutes Trump Associates – 12/6/17 1:09 PM

 

Mueller deputy praised DOJ official after she defied Trump travel ban order: ‘I am so proud – 12/5/17

 

The question that must be asked: Can the swamp be drained with such Leftist Deep State infiltration embedded in the Government (with the aid of Leftist MSM) be overcome by a President devoted to change the paradigm of Marxist-Socialist propaganda indoctrination of younger Americans?

 

This is a question to mull over while you decide to uphold America’s Founding Fathers’ paradigm of personal Liberty and a government accountable to WE THE PEOPLE or to keep flowing with Obama’s fundamental transformation of American culture and law to fit a Living Constitution paradigm that enables government elitists (Executive and Judicial Branches) to tell what to believe, think and say. Your decision probably will define America’s future.

 

Your decision will determine how you feel about this so far mythical speech about President Donald Trump firing Robert Mueller to preserve the United States Constitution.

 

Sign the Fire Mueller Petition

Fire Mueller

[The NY Sun post below is excellent but is a bit too erudite for my own good. I am going to assume at least a few of you are in the same position. So when you read a word in bold text followed by an asterisk (*), a very important definition will be below the NY Sun post.]

 

JRH 12/6/17 (Hat Tip Donald Moore – Private Group: WorldChatNews Email List)

Please Support NCCR

*****************

The Mueller Firing Speech

 

Editorial of The New York Sun

December 5, 2017

 

Following is the text, drafted by The New York Sun, of remarks it would like to see President Trump deliver:

 

Good evening: A year ago next month I took the Constitutional Oath that has been sworn by every president since George Washington. It binds me to do two things: To faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States and, to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States. It’s an oath I swore before God.

 

Now I have concluded that, to redeem those two vows, I must dismiss the special prosecutor, Robert Mueller, and the officers he has assembled, ostensibly to look into allegations that there may have been collusion between my campaign and the Russian camarilla(*). I have this morning placed the prosecutors’ premises under federal seal, pending a decision by House Judiciary Committee.

 

From the beginning, I never believed the appointment of such a prosecutor was necessary, or even justified. It was always perfectly within the authority and competence of the Justice Department to investigate and, if due cause were found, prosecute any wrongdoing by any member of my administration — including my daughter and son-in-law.

 

I acquiesced in the initial work of Mr. Mueller’s office because I believed that I was not a target of the investigation. As Mr. Mueller’s work has unfolded, however, suggestions have been made that his office may be investigating my own conduct. Given that possibility, I believe that the investigation must be halted, and, if it is to be resumed in respect of my own conduct, may be recommenced only by the House.

 

That is a constitutional bright line. My opponent in the recent campaign brought before her nominating convention the Gold Star father Khizr Khan to ask whether I had even read the Constitution. The answer is yes. I would not hold myself out as a constitutional scholar. I know, though, that it is only the House of Representatives that can investigate a sitting president for crimes and misdemeanors.

 

That is a provision of the same Constitution that I have sworn an oath to preserve protect and defend. That oath, incidentally, is different from the requirement of the members of Congress and the Justices of the Supreme Court. The Constitutions requires them to swear only to support the Constitution. Only the president is required by the Constitution to swear to preserve, protect, and defend our national parchment.

 

I had barely sworn that oath when it became apparent to me that the Constitution needs protecting — and not just from our external foes but also from those who would seek to subvert it by refusing to accept the results of the election that Vice President Pence and I won. This quickly became apparent to me after the vote by a campaign of leaks of the most sensitive conversations I was conducting.

 

And by the emergence of what its adherents are fain(**) to call a “resistance” against the decision of the voters. We have just learned that the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Special Counsel’s office itself have been infected by political sentiments and colluded to keep from the Congress knowledge of the political sentiments against me being expressed by a senior FBI figure in the investigation.

 

This is a shocking development. It was exposed not by the Republican press but by the Washington Post and the New York Times. They reported over the weekend that the special prosecutor had kept from House investigators the discovery that a senior investigator in the special prosecutor’s office was demoted for sending anti-Trump messages to a mistress.

 

I commend to you the editorial in the nation’s most trusted newspaper. Not only did the special prosecutor withhold evidence of that from Congress but he did so despite a subpoena that could have led to the disclosure of this perfidy. That is obstruction of Congress, a prosecutable offense. So I have decided to uphold my oath to preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States.

 

Effective immediately, the special prosecutor and his subordinates are relieved of their duties and trusts under the United States. I have instructed federal officers to secure their premises pending any subpoena from the House, which is the body that is constitutionally authorized to investigate — and decide whether to impeach — the president. This administration will play no games with the House.

 

Preserving, protecting, and defending the Constitution of the United States requires, inter alia(***), preserving, and protecting each branch of its government, including the presidency. I have learned much in the past year, but nothing more clearly than how important it is to protect the office I hold. This means — under what the courts call the “rule of necessity” — that I have a responsibility to act even when it is awkward.

 

Our country is on the brink of war in Korea, and being maneuvered against by determined enemies on every continent. These challenges may be no more pressing than the workaday assignment to rebuild our economy. All, though, are pressing. Which is why our Founding Fathers decided against dividing the executive powers among a committee or splitting them with a special counsel. They chose instead to vest them in a single president — a principle that, to the best of my ability, I am preserving, protecting, and defending today to make America and its Constitution great again.

+++++++++

Asterisk Notes

 

*Camarilla:

 

Merriam-Webster – a group of unofficial often secret and scheming advisers; alsocabal

MACMILLAN DICTIONARY – a group of advisers, usually a secret group who are involved in a plot

Wordnik.comfrom The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, 4th Edition

n. A group of confidential, often scheming advisers; a cabal.

from Wiktionary, Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License

n. A secret, usually sinister, group of conspiring advisors close to the leadership; a cabal

from the GNU version of the Collaborative International Dictionary of English

n. The private audience chamber of a king.

n. A company of secret and irresponsible advisers, as of a king; a cabal or clique.

from The Century Dictionary and Cyclopedia

n. A company of secret counselors or advisers; a cabal; a clique.

nSynonyms: Faction, Junto, etc. See cabal.

n. A small chamber or cell, as in the brain.

from WordNet 3.0 Copyright 2006 by Princeton University. All rights reserved.

n. a clique (often secret) that seeks power usually through intrigue

 

**fain:

 

Merriam-Webster

1 archaic: happy, pleased

2 archaic: inclined, desirous

3 a: willing

 

  • he was very fain, for the young widow was “altogether fair and lovely … ” —Amy Kelly

 

b: being obliged or constrained: compelled

 

  • Great Britain was fain to devote its whole energy … to the business of slaying and being slain —G. M. Trevelyan

 

***inter alia:

 

Law.com – (in-tur eh-lee-ah) prep. Latin for “among other things.” This phrase is often found in legal pleadings and writings to specify one example out of many possibilities. Example: “The judge said, inter alia, that the time to file the action had passed.”

_____________________

Preserve American Experiment – FIRE Mueller

John R. Houk

© December 6, 2017

____________________

The Mueller Firing Speech

 

© 2002-2017 TWO SL LLC, New York, NY. All rights reserved.

 

The New York Sun

%d bloggers like this: