Intro to ‘Weaponizing COVID to Promote Collectivism’


Intro by John R. Houk, Blog Editor

By Barbara Loe Fisher

November 16, 2022

When the [uncompromisingly] righteous are in authority, the people rejoice; but when the wicked man rules, the people groan and sigh.

12 If a ruler listens to falsehood, all his officials will become wicked. Proverbs 29: 2, 12 AMPC

Barbara Loe Fisher Screen Capture

Barbara Loe Fisher – President and Co-Founder of National Vaccine Information Center – has an awesome monologue AGAINST Medical Tyranny focused on COVID Lies and Jab Lies. The monologue us about 27-minutes long and worth EVERY word dripping with truth and facts. I ran into the video on the MeWe Social Platform (so when I share there, cut me some slack if you’ve seen it. Whether you’ve watched for the first time or already viewed, YOU SHOULD SHARE as an action against Medical Tyranny).

Ms. Fisher follows the monologue with what appears to be the text of the video. So, watch or read; BUT dear God in Heaven resist this godless wicked tyranny. Resist individually via civil disobedience or join a group in your community organizing active civil resistance.

If you’ve ever read Dr. Mercola posts you should notice the post is formatted after that fashion. Indeed, a version Ms. Fisher’s post is at Mercola.com, however I’m cross posting the nvic.org website version.

JRH 11/16/22

Thank you to those who have stepped up!

READER SUPPORTED! I need Readers willing to chip in $5 – $10 – $25 – $50 – $100. PLEASE I need your generosity. PLEASE GIVE to Help me be a voice for Liberty:

Please Support CPCR

YOU CAN ALSO SUPPORT via buying healthy supplements/products from Online stores (mine & my Honey):

Mine: https://modere.co/3SrOHzI

My Better Half: https://valentus.com/dianahouk  

Big Tech Censorship is pervasive – Share voluminously on all social media platforms!

********************************

Weaponizing COVID to Promote Collectivism

By Barbara Loe Fisher

Published November 15, 2022 in Industry & Business

National Vaccine Information Center

Rumble VIDEO: Weaponizing COVID to Promote Collectivism [I just realized the Rumble (which undoubtedly is the original version) does not have the typical embed codes. I found a Bitchute version which I am using posted on Bitchute Channel PeppiDiCapri]

Bitchute VIDEO: BARBARA LOE FISHER: WEAPONIZING COVID TO PROMOTE COLLECTIVISM

[Posted by National Vaccine Information Center

Published November 14, 2022

MORE DESCRIPTION]

Click for Podcast

The morning that hurricane Ian hit the coast of southwest Florida, the dramatic images of the raw power of Mother Nature blowing apart structures built by human hands and sweeping them into the sea were unbelievable.1 After hours and hours of wind, rain, and a catastrophic water surge that left a trail of destruction in its wake, I thought about how very different this natural disaster was compared to the one unleashed on the world in 2020 that also left a trail of destruction in its wake.

Two disasters, one a natural disaster legally termed an “act of God,” and the other a disaster that, three years later, people are still asking: was it natural or manmade?2 3

Whether or not the SARS-CoV-2 virus spontaneously jumped out of a bat and into a human being4 or was created by scientists in a biohazard lab,5 6 7 one thing is clear: the chaotic response by the experts in charge has been a disaster in itself.8 And the people, whose lives were impacted by that chaos, experienced the same kind of sudden shock, fear,9 disorientation, isolation, and powerlessness that many people, who experience a hurricane, tsunami, tornado, earthquake, or fire, feel when the unexpected happens.

Public Health Pandemic Response Policies Generated Fear, Instability

GIRL-MASK

In the middle of this hurricane, I found myself thinking about why fear of the unknown10 brought on by this emergency was so familiar. It was familiar because we had just experienced fear of the unknown in the winter of 2020,11 when we were told by public health officials that a weirdly mutated coronavirus was on the loose and would kill us if we didn’t hide in our homes, wear cloth over our faces, cut off physical contact with our family and friends, keep our children out of school, and stop getting our hair cut or going to church, exercising in a gym, entering restaurants or certain stores, and be OK with the government labeling many workers and private businesses as “non-essential,” which shut down our economy and threatened to plunge families into bankruptcy.12 13 14 

The people in Florida facing this real life-threatening emergency were suddenly having to call upon emotional and physical reserves already depleted by having recently gone through another emergency, in which some lost their health or their loved ones to the mutant virus, or were injured by disabling COVID vaccine reactions, while others lost their jobs, homes or businesses during the 2020 lockdown that, thankfully, was cut short in Florida compared to many other states.

The fallout from destructive federal COVID response policies on the mental health, child development, and economic stability of our nation is still being assessed.15 16 17 18 19 20 21

Two disasters: a natural one, and one that the world is still having trouble defining.

Post-hurricane Ian, there is a lot of analysis going on in Florida by those whose job it is to prepare for and respond to hurricanes.22 By most accounts, it is an honest analysis by state officials working hard to help people deal with what happened rather than politicizing what happened.23 24 25 

Keeping Us Living in Fear to Sell COVID Vaccine

COVID-19-Death-estimates

Last month, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control once again extended the COVID pandemic public health emergency declaration, this time until January 11, 2023.26 To justify keeping us living in fear, 27 28 federal health officials are warning ominously that a “twindemic” of a more transmissible SARS-CoV-2 virus mutant strain, combined with an especially bad influenza season, is poised to make more of us very sick this fall and winter if we don’t all get a COVID shot and a flu shot at the same time.29 30  One high-ranking government doctor said with a straight face – “I really believe this is why God gave us two arms — one for the flu shot and the other one for the COVID shot.” 31

But Americans have grown weary of virus porn, and while the majority of Americans have gotten at least one COVID shot, polls show that just 14 percent of children under age five have gotten one.32 33 34 There are signs that Americans are questioning the ever-changing number of COVID booster shots being aggressively advertised by Big Pharma and government officials, who are trying hard to convince us we will need to get a COVID shot every single year. 35 36 37 38 In this very lucrative marketing campaign, the two mRNA COVID vaccine manufacturers, Pfizer and Moderna, raked in 50 billion dollars in 2021 and 2022 alone, with a promise of billions more in profits in the years to come.39 40 41 42 

A Weirdly Mutated Virus, A Reactive Biological That’s Not a Vaccine

Those two drug companies are selling a cell disrupter biological product that is called a vaccine, but in no way resembles any other vaccine that has ever been injected into humans to theoretically combat a weirdly mutated coronavirus, which is acting like no other virus that has ever infected humans. The mRNA biological has been described as “transforming the body into a vaccine-making machine,”43 while one scientist explains that the rapidly mutating SARS-CoV-2 virus is “essentially viral evolution on steroids.”44 But, still, nobody in charge of the COVID pandemic response seems to know exactly where this virus on steroids came from or exactly what kind of damage it – or the genetically engineered components of the mRNA product – are doing to the biological integrity of human populations.45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53

Heart-Blood-Clots

The mRNA COVID vaccines are associated with many ugly side effects, especially ones that compromise the blood and heart and can cause death.54 55 Online it has been dubbed the “clot shot”,56 57 even as owners of social media platforms try to shut down all conversations about serious COVID vaccine reactions being reported online,58 59 60 61 62 in the medical literature,63 and to the U.S. Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS).64 65  There have been more than 1.3 million adverse events reported to VAERS after mRNA COVID vaccinations, including heart, brain and immune system damage and death. These 1.3 million reports represent more than half of all vaccine reactions reported for all vaccines since VAERS became operational in 1990 under the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act,66 while less than one percent of all vaccine reactions are reported to VAERS.67 

The mRNA COVID vaccine is the most reactive one ever distributed in the U.S. to the entire population.

COVID Shot Reactions Are Good Even When the Product Doesn’t Prevent Infection

$100-bill & Jab Vial

Yet, as soon as the mRNA COVID products were released in December 2020 under an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA), public health officials told people to celebrate adverse reaction symptoms, trying to convince them that those reaction symptoms means the vaccine is doing its job and would prevent them from getting sick with COVID.68 Nothing could be further from the truth.69 That lie not only persuaded people to accept COVID vaccine reactions as normal and a good thing, but it persuaded doctors to dismiss COVID vaccine-related injuries and deaths as just a “coincidence.”70 71

Which brings us to perhaps the biggest elephant in the room, and that is how blatantly the people were lied to from the beginning about just how effective the mRNA COVID vaccines would be, as government officials allowed people to believe that getting vaccinated would protect them from being infected with the new coronavirus and transmitting it to others, when that was never true. In fact, it was so untrue that, in 2021, CDC officials changed the centuries-old definition of a vaccine from a “product that stimulates a person’s immune system to produce immunity to a specific disease” to “a preparation that is used to stimulate the body’s immune response against diseases,” and they convinced Merriam Webster Dictionary to do the same.72 73 74 That’s because the FDA only required drug companies to demonstrate the COVID vaccine had at least 50 percent efficacy in preventing severe symptoms of COVID disease rather than preventing infection.75

There is a difference between a product producing immunity that prevents infection and one that stimulates an immune response but does not prevent infection, especially when you can be infected with the coronavirus and not show symptoms.

With vaccine induced immunity off the table and vaccine adverse reactions viewed as a good thing, by the end of October 2022, the global mass vaccination campaign had convinced about 70 percent of the world’s population to get at least one COVID shot.76

United Nations’ WHO Heading Up Global COVID Vaccine Marketing Campaign

W.H.O. & Trees

The sales force for Big Pharma’s COVID vaccine marketing campaign is headquartered at the United Nation’s World Health Organization,77 78 79 with de facto satellite offices in government agencies like the National Institutes of Health (NIH), Gavi Alliance, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, World Economic Forum, major universities, and financial and other institutions ideologically and politically committed to imposing “The Great Reset” on all countries.80 According to Klaus Schwab, who in 1971 founded an “international organization for public-private cooperation” called the World Economic Forum, the world is in the middle of the “Fourth Industrial Revolution,” which is “characterized by a range of new technologies that are fusing the physical, digital, and biological worlds, impacting all disciplines, economies and industries and even challenging ideas about what it means to be human.”81 

In June 2020, Schwab proclaimed, “Now is the time for a great reset” because, he said, in order for the world to effectively respond to the COVID-19 pandemic, governments “must act swiftly to revamp all aspects of our societies and economies, from education to social contracts and working conditions.”82 

Event 201 Prepares for ‘The Great Reset’

Schwab-Malleret Book – COVID-19 Great Reset

To prepare the way for The Great Reset, on October 18, 2019, the World Economic Forum, along with the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and Johns Hopkins University sponsored a simulated global pandemic planning exercise in New York City called Event 201.83 A “Pandemic Emergency Board” was assembled for Event 201 that included representatives of the United Nations, World Bank, the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control, the China Centers for Disease Control, and leaders from the travel, banking, pharmaceutical and healthcare industries.84

The virus selected for use in the simulated “worst case scenario” global pandemic planning exercise held three months before the World Health Organization declared a coronavirus “public health emergency of international concern” was: the coronavirus.85 86

The nagging question is: was that just a coincidence?

Clearly, it will take a lot of coordination and agreement between all governments to pull off a global Great Reset. Three years into the global COVID health emergency, it appears the global public health elite are leading the way.

Lancet Commission Publishes COVID ‘lessons learned’ Politico Manifesto

Lancet Commission Red Flag Money

In September 2022, the once respected medical journal, The Lancet, published a 56-page report called “The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic.”87The first big red flag in the report is the long list of financial conflicts of interest authors have with drug companies; government health agencies; the United Nations and its public health agency arm, the World Health Organization; Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Rockefeller Foundation and other institutions that fund or conduct vaccine research and development and promote mandatory use of vaccines.

Once family owned, The Lancet is now owned by the publishing conglomerate, Elsevier, and concerns have been raised about editorial independence, in light of investor ties to major banking, pharmaceutical and biotech corporations. One critique of the Lancet Commission report was written by a public health physician, who previously called out the journal in July 2022 for publishing what he described as “a weakly-evidenced opinion advocating medical fascism.”88 That opinion, written by well-known compulsory vaccination proponents, called for strict enforcement of COVID vaccine mandates in the U.S., and loss of employment and school education for those who refuse to comply.89

The Lancet Commission was originally assembled in the summer of 2020 as an international group of global “experts,” primarily doctors and professors at prestigious universities, who were charged with addressing the COVID pandemic. One of their first tasks was to investigate the origins of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, an endeavor they quickly abandoned because of what the authors described as “divisive public discussion” and “unprecedented attack and pressure” on Commission members.

Leaving that inconvenient “where did the virus come from” question on the table, the Lancet Commission went on to publish a self-aggrandizing political manifesto that fails to honestly analyze what went wrong with the global COVID pandemic response and, instead, basically calls for doing more of the same more quickly in the future. In a stunning demonstration of hubris and ideological bias, Commission members stray from their areas of expertise and call on governments to devalue individual rights and adopt a collectivist orientation that forces individuals to comply with multi-lateral health policies and laws adopted by the United Nations. They said, “all governments, regulators and institutions must be reoriented toward society as a whole rather than the interest of individuals – a concept the Commissioners call prosociality.”

Attacking U.S. Lawmakers, Critics of Destructive Pandemic Response Failures

Pocket U.S. Constitution

This “prosociality” reorientation would, of course, require that much more money and power be given to the United Nations and the World Health Organization so global populations can be controlled by a central authority, especially during global pandemic responses. Defending their slogan “no one is safe until everyone is safe,” which they claim “is not mere rhetoric, or a moral truth, but an epidemiological reality,” they viciously attack U.S. lawmakers for being guilty of “neglecting scientific evidence and needlessly risking lives with a view to keeping the economy open,” and for promoting “anti-science rhetoric and disinformation about COVID 19.”

Refusing to acknowledge legitimate public concerns about authoritarian COVID response policies that led to catastrophic social and economic chaos and damage to mental and physical health of child and adult populations, the Commission complains that the World Health Organization and most governments did not move fast enough to test, identify and isolate the infected while simultaneously putting all people in masks and locking them in their homes – for a long, long time. There is no critical analysis of faulty COVID tests that did not work;90 91 or bogus COVID death estimates that failed to distinguish between dying from COVID and dying with COVID;92 93 94 95 96 or ineffective COVID treatment protocols in hospitals that made people sicker or killed them when they were inappropriately put on ventilators. 97 98 99

While praising the “public-private partnerships” that fast-tracked development of COVID vaccines as a “triumph,” the Lancet Commission weaponizes the failed COVID pandemic response by placing most of the blame for COVID-related deaths on – you guessed it – those independent thinkers the Pharma’s sales force calls “anti-vaxxers.”

Infuriated that a lot of people in the U.S. and Europe questioned the competence of public health officials and defied their orders to mask up, isolate for months on end and take the COVID shot, the Lancet Commission authors alleged that anti-vaxxers – which according to Webster’s Dictionary now includes anyone who opposes mandatory vaccination100 –  caused an “epidemic of misinformation and disinformation” that fostered “low public trust” in government officials and persuaded millions of people to repeatedly take to the streets in the United Kingdom, Ireland, Netherlands, Italy, France, Germany, Austria, Denmark, Sweden, Finland, Greece, Switzerland, Canada, Australia, Bulgaria, Serbia, Poland, Romania and other nations in 2020 and 2021 to protest lockdowns and vaccine passports.101 102 103

Blaming COVID Deaths on ‘Anti-Vaccine Movement’ and Individual Rights

COVID-Jab Protestors

They said “anti-vaccine propaganda in the Americas” caused “tens of millions of people to refuse vaccines and hundreds of thousands to needlessly lose their lives.” Obsessing over the lack of “solidarity” among governments to force everyone everywhere to march to the beat of the same drum, they express special hatred for what they describe as the “hostile and coordinated anti-vaccine movement that has spread dangerous and false information about the health risks of vaccines and has campaigned against vaccine mandates.”

Climbing up on very high horse, the Lancet Commission members put “climate change deniers” and “parents who refuse or delay routine childhood vaccinations” in the same basket. They repeatedly condemn political leaders and the digital media for the “deliberate spread of misinformation and disinformation…that fosters distrust in health officials and promotes the idea that individual opinions have equal weight to the best available scientific evidence.”

They called for application of “behavioral science” to convince people to engage in “prosociality” that leads to “optimal behaviors for pandemic control,” pointing out that people living in societies with “tight” or collectivist social norms follow public health orders much better than people living in societies with “loose” or individualistic social norms that champion freedom of individual choice. They claim future pandemics would be so much easier to handle if everyone in the world can be muzzled and locked down tight whenever government health officials fly the utilitarian flag for “the greater good” and demand we salute smartly and roll up our sleeves.

Their diatribe against societies allowing individuals to exercise freedom of thought, speech, conscience and autonomy would be amusing if they weren’t so deadly serious about what they want done about it.

Although there were some public demonstrations here in the U.S., they were not as big as they were in countries without a Constitution that ensures a balance of power between local, state and federal government. Americans stopped COVID vaccine mandates in 2021 and 2022 because state legislators, who make public health laws, looked at the science, listened to concerns of their constituents, and refused to mandate the vaccine.104  Although several U.S. Governors and city mayors issued Executive Orders mandating COVID vaccine and the federal government attempted to mandate the vaccine for all federal employees and contractors, not one state legislature voted to mandate the vaccine this year.105 The online NVIC Advocacy Portal, launched in 2010 to help citizens in every state defend vaccine informed consent rights and exemptions in public health laws had a lot to do with holding back COVID vaccine mandates and passports in the U.S. when populations in other countries with centralized political control could not.106

Public Health Elite Wants US to ‘Reorient’ To A Collectivist Society

Individualism vs Collectivism

It doesn’t take a PhD in political science to figure out that what the public health elite is calling for would require Americans to reject the cultural values and beliefs and governmental structure outlined in the US Constitution, which provides decentralized checks and balances on political power and guarantees individuals God given natural rights that limit the power of government.107 108  The Public Health Empire is all about appropriating centralized power that can be wielded without accountability. That is why the Lancet Commission demands that the United States of America “reorient” toward a collectivist society, which would require disempowering local and state governments so that only the federal government – in “solidarity” with the United Nations, of course – has the authority to make public health laws and tell citizens what to think about and believe and do with their bodies and the bodies of their children.

Accompanying the Lancet Commission report was a Lancet editorial entitled “COVID-19: the case for prosociality.” And if you do a Google search using the words “prosociality and communism,” what you find at the top is an article published in Frontiers in Psychology in September 2022 entitled, “How prosocial behaviors are maintained in China: The relationship between communist authority and prosociality.”109  The authors note how prosocial behavior is associated with religious belief and argue that communist authority wielded by the ruling Communist Party of China has a positive effect on promoting prosocial behaviors in a secular atheist society. They say studies show that “the psychological functions of gods and governments are interchangeable.”

Thank you, Lancet Commission, for making the political goals of the Public Health Empire so crystal clear.

Mandatory Vaccination: The Tip of the Spear in the Culture Wars

I have been saying for many years that mandatory vaccination is the tip of the spear in the culture wars taking place in this country and others in the 21st Century. Because if the state can tag, track down and force individuals against their will to be injected with biologicals of known and unknown toxicity today, then there will be no limit on which individual freedoms the state can take away in the name of the greater good tomorrow.

Register today to use the NVIC Advocacy Portal at NVICAdvocacy.org and take action in your state to protect civil liberties in this historic Vaccine Culture War that will determine whether we will live free or die as slaves in a collectivist authoritarian state.

Be the one who never has to say you did not do today what you could have done to change tomorrow.

It’s your health, your family, your choice.

And our mission continues: No forced vaccination, not in America.

References:

1 Lada B. ‘It’s a tsunami’:’ Storm surge survey crews uncover startling damage from IanAccuweather Oct. 14, 2022. 

2 Bruttel V, Washburne A, VanDongen A. Endonuclease fingerprint indicates a synthetic originbioRxiv Oct. 20, 2022.

3 Eban K, Kao J. COVID-19 Origins: Investigating a “Complex and Grave Situation’ Inside a Wuhan Lab. Vanity Fair and ProPublica Oct. 28, 2022.

4 Pekar JE, Magee A, Parker E et al. The molecular epidemiology of multiple zoonotic origins of SARS-CoV-2Science July 26, 2022.

5 Wade N. The theory that COVID escaped from a lab may not be so far-fetchedNew York Post May 9, 2021

6 Bhattacharya S, Tilak R, Bose C, Sinha S. Is the Origin and Emergence of SARS-CoV-2 Ingenuous? J Commun Dis 2021; 53(3): 232-235.

7 Ruiz-Medina BE, Varela-Ramirez A, Kirken RA et al. The SARS-CoV-2 origin dilemma: Zoonotic transfer or laboratory leak? BioEssays 2022; 44(1).

8 LaFraniere S, Weiland N. Walensky, Citing Botched Pandemic Response, Calls for C.D.C. Reorganization. New York Times Aug. 17, 2022.

9  Javanbakht A, Saab L. What Happens in the Brain When We Feel Fear? Smithsonian Magazine Oct. 27, 2017.

10 Carleton RN. Fear of the unknown: One fear to rule them all? Journal of Anxiety Disorders 2016; 41: 5-21.

11 Mertens G, Gerritsen L, Duijndam S et al. Fear of the coronavirus (COVID-19): Predictors in an online study conducted in March 2020Journal of Anxiety Disorders 2020; 74: 102258.

12 Fisher BL. Unprecedented Response to COVIC-19 by Governments Prohibits Physical Contact and Cripples World EconomyNational Vaccine Information Center Mar. 29, 2020.

13  Parker K, Minkin R, Bennett J. Economic Fallout From COVID-19 Continues to Hit Lower-Income Americans the Hardest. Pew Research Center Sept. 14, 2020.

14 Irum T, Hudgins C. US corporate bankruptcies end 2020 at 10-year high amid COVID-19 pandemic. S&P Global Market Intelligence Jan. 5, 2021.

15 Pietrabissa G. Simpson SG. Psychological Consequences of Social Isolation During COVID-19 OutbreakFrontiers in Psychology Sept. 9, 2020.

16 Keeter S. Many Americans continue to experience mental health difficulties as pandemic enters second yearPew Research Center Mar. 16, 2021.

17 Giunetella O, Hyde K, Saccardo S et al. Lifestyle and mental health disruptions during COVID-19PNAS 2021; 118(9).

18 Bardosh K, deFigueiredo A, Gur-Arie R et al. The unintended consequences of COVID-19 vaccine policy: why mandates, passports and restrictions may cause more harm than good. BMJ Global Health 2022; 7(5).

19 Ellyatt H. Last responders: Mental health damage from Covid could last a generation, professionals sayCNBC Feb. 10, 2022.

20 Algar S, Raskin S. Young students have suffered ‘alarming’ drops in reading skills during pandemic. New York Post Mar. 9, 2022.

21 Phelan J, Njolomole M. The Costs of Lockdowns and Shutdowns Part 1: counting the economic costs of government policy responses to COVID-19American Experiment September 2022.

22 Cohen M, Hutzler A. There will be review of Hurricane Ian response, DeSantis says amid evacuation timing questionsABC News Oct. 4, 2022.

23 Huffman J. Hurricane Ian made clear: Misinterpreting risks jeopardizes livesThe Hill Oct. 6, 2022. 

24 Krawczyk K. Hurricane Ian and the future of the power gridEnergy News Network Oct. 5, 2022.

25 Ortiz OR. ‘Extremely worried’: What happens when cellphone service goes down after a storm? Miami Herald Sept. 30, 2022.

26 Kimball S. U.S. extends Covid pubiic health emergency even though Biden says pandemic is overCNBC Oct. 13, 2022.

27 Mertens G, Lodder P, Smeets T, Duijndam S. Fear of COVID-19 predicts vaccination willingness 14 months later. J Anxiety Disorders 2022; 88(102574).

28 Fitzpatrick KM Drawve G, Harris C. Facing new fears during the COVID-19 pandemic: The State of America’s mental healthJ Anxiety Disord 2020; 75: 102291.

29 Prater E. U.S. risks a ‘twindemic’ of COVID and flu this fall if what happened in Australia is any guideFortune Oct. 6, 2022.

30 Smith-Schoenwalder C. New Omicron Subvariants BQ.1, BQ.1.1 Could Help Fuel Next COVID-19 Surge in U.S. U.S. News & World Report Oct. 20, 2022.

31 Brown L. Biden’s COVID head: ‘God gave us two arms’ to get double vaccinationsNew York Post Sept. 7, 2022.

32 Brenan M. COVID-19 Vaccines Uncommon for U.S. Children Under Age 5. Gallup Aug. 19, 2022.

33 Stephenson J. Many Parents Unlikely to Seek COVID-19 Vaccination for Newly Eligible Young Children, Survey FindsJAMA Health Forum 2022; 3(8).

34 Caceres M, Fisher BL. FDA Authorizes COVID Bivalent Shots for Children as Young as Five Years Old. The Vaccine Reaction Oct. 17, 2022.

35 Khaled F. Fordham Vaccine Mandate, New York’s Toughest, Sparks Parents’ RevoltNewsweek Oct. 6, 2022.

36  Prater E. Many Americans are shunning the Omicron COVID booster. What it means for the coming season as the virus mutatesFortune Oct. 9, 2022.

37 Saric I. Pfizer CEO: Fourth shot of COVID vaccine “necessary.” Axios Mar. 13, 2022.

38 Bendix A. Covid vaccines will likely become annual like flu shots, White House officials say. NBC Sept. 6, 2022.

39 Kimball S. What’s next for Pfizer, Moderna beyond their projected $51 billion in combined vaccine sales this yearCNBC Mar. 3, 2022.

40 Report Linker. Global COVID-19 Vaccines Market to Reach $60.7 Billion by 2025. Oct. 5, 2022.

41  Erman M. Pfizer expects to hike U.S. COVID vaccine price to $110-$130 per doseReuters Oct. 21, 2022.

42 Pfizer Inc., BioNTech SE. Pfizer and BioNTech Initiate Phase 1 Study of Single Dose mRNA Based Combination Vaccine Candidate for Influenza and COVID-19. Nov. 3, 2022.

43 Langreth R, Kresge N. Moderna Wants to Transform the Body Into a Vaccine-Making Machine. Bloomberg News Aug. 11, 2020.

44 Edwards E. Omicron subvariants reflect a ‘viral evolution on steroids.’ NBC News Oct. 19, 2022.

45 Domingo JL. An updated review of the scientific literature on the origin of SARS-CoV-2. Environ Res 2022; 215: 114131.

46 Ndeupen S, Qin Z, Jacobsen S et al. The mRNA-LNP platform lipid nanoparticle component used in preclinical vaccine studies is highly inflammatoryBio Rxiv July 23, 2021.

47 Trougakos IP, Terpos E, Alexopoulos H et al. Adverse effects of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines: the spike hypothesis. Trends in Molecular Medicine 2022; 28(7).

48 Tinari S. The EMA covid-19 data leak, and what it tells us about mRNA instabilityBMJ 2021; 372.

49 Hanna N, Heffes-Doon A, Lin X et al. Detection of Messenger RNA COVID-19 Vaccines in Human Breast Milk. JAMA Pediatrics Sept. 26, 2022.

50 Fraiman J, Erviti J, Jones M et al. Serious adverse events of special interest following mRNA COVID-19 vaccination in randomized trials in adultsVaccine 2022; 40(4): 5798-5805.

51 Malhotra A. Curing the pandemic of misinformation on COVID-19 mRNA vaccines through real evidence-based medicine – Part 1J Insulin Resistance 2022; 5(1).

52 Munblit D, Nicholson TR, Needham DM et al. Studying the post-COVID-19 condition: research challenges, strategies, and importance of Core Outcome Set development. BMC Medicine 2022; 29(50).

53 Weisser R. Wot’s in the shots? Spectator (Australia) Nov. 5, 2022.

54  Chouchana L, Blet A, Al-Khalaf M et al. Features of Inflammatory Heart Reactions Following mRNA COVID-19 Vaccination at a Global LevelClin Pharmacol Ther 2022; 111(3): 605-613.

55 Choi S, Lee SH, Seo JW et al. Myocarditis-induced Sudden Death after BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 Vaccination in Korea: Case Report Focusing on Histopathological FindingsJ Korean Med Sci 2021; 36(40).

56 Ferdowsi N. No clear evidence that COVID vaccines re responsible for blood clots observed by embalmersPolitifact Feb. 9, 2022.

57 Mahoney WS. Daniel Bobinski Interview: Embalmer Says Blood Has ChangedUndercoverdc Oct 19, 2022.

58  Attkisson S. CENSORED – National Vaccine Information Center. Mar. 8, 2021.

59 Feuer W. Facebook trying to censor posts from COVID-19 vaccine skeptics: report. New York Post May 25, 2021.

60 World Health Organization (WHO). How to report misinformation online. 2022.

61 Klar R. Feds step up pressure on social media over false COVID-19 claimsThe Hill July 18, 2021.

62 Simonson J. How the CDC Coordinated with Big Tech to Censor AmericansWashington Free Beacon July 27, 2022.

63 Yamamoto K. Adverse effects of COVID-19 vaccine and measures to prevent themVirol J 2022; 19(100).

64 CDC. How to Report [Vaccine Adverse Events to VAERS. Sept. 16, 2022.

65 Flora J, Khan W, Jin J et al. Usefulness of Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System for Machine-Learning Based Vaccine Research: A Case Study for COVID-19 VaccinesInt J Mol Sci 2022; 23(15).

66  MedAlerts. Search the Government’s VAERS Data. MedAlerts.org.

67   Ross L. Electronic Support for Public Health Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (ESP: VAERS). Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) 2011.

68 Crow S. The CDC Says These 3 Side Effects Mean Your Vaccine Is WorkingYahoo Feb. 15, 2021.

69  Finberg R. No, vaccine side effects don’t tell you how well your immune system will protect you from COVID-19The Conversation Apr. 19, 2021.

70 Shmerling RH. COVID-19 vaccines: Safety, side effects – and coincidenceHarvard Health Publishing Feb. 8, 2021.

71 Caceres M. Severe Reactions Minutes After COVID Vaccination Usually Written Off As Coincidental. The Vaccine Reaction Oct. 24, 2022.

72 Camero K. Why did CDC change its definition for ‘vaccine’? Agency explains move as skeptics lurk. Miami Herald Sept 27, 2021.

73 Kochi S. Fact check: Missing context in claim that Merriam-Webster changed ‘vaccine’ definition. USA Today Nov. 30, 2021.

74 CDC. Definition of Vaccination: “The Act of introducing a vaccine into the body to produce immunity to a specific disease.” Immunization: The Basics. May 16, 2018 (Archived).

75 FDA. Development and Licensure of Vaccines to Prevent COVID-19: Guidance for Industry. Efficacy Considerations Pages 13-24. Revised June 2020.

76 Our World in Data. Coronavirus (COVID-19) Vaccinations.

77 World Health Organization. Global Vaccine Action Plan. June 14, 2020.

78 World Health Organization (WHO). COVAX: Working for global equitable access to COVID vaccines. 2022.

79  Fisher BL. WHO, Pharma, Gates & Government: Who’s Calling the Shots? National Vaccine Information Center Jan. 27, 2019.

80  Haskins J. Introducing the ‘Great Reset,’ world leaders’ radical plan to transform the economy. The Hill June 25, 2020.

81 World Economic Forum. The Fourth Industrial Revolution by Klaus Schwab.

82 Schwab K. Now is a time for a “great reset.’ World Economic Forum June 3, 2020.

83 Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security. About the Event 201 exerciseJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health 2019.

84 Dunleavy BP. Johns Hopkins Initiative Hopes to Better Prepare for Pandemics: Public Health Watch. Contagion Live Dec. 11, 2019.

85 Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security. The Event 201 scenarioJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health October 2019.

86 Nedelman M. World Health Organization declares coronavirus a public health emergency of international concernCNN Jan. 30, 2020.

87 Sachs JD, Karim SSA, Aknin L et al. The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic. The Lancet 2022; 400 (10359): 1224-1280.

88 Bell D. A Critique of The Lancet COVID-10 CommissionBrownstone Institute Sept. 27, 2022.

89 Mello MM, Opel DJ, Benjamin, RM et al. Effectiveness of vaccination mandates in improving uptake of COVID-19 vaccines in the USA. The Lancet 2022; 400)10351): 535-538.

90 Clinical Oncology News. False Negatives Found if COVID-19 Testing Done Too Soon. June 19, 2020.

91 Mouliou DS. Gourgpoulianis KI. False-positive and false-negative COVID-19 cases: respiratory prevention and management strategies, vaccination, and further perspectives. Expert Rev Respir Med 2021; 1-10.

92 Bakst B. COVID-19 death certificate change stirs controversyMinnesota Public Radio Apr. 7, 2020.

93 Boyle P. How are COVID-19 deaths counted? It’s complicatedAmerican Association of Medical Colleges News Feb. 18, 2021.

94 Ioannidis JPA. Over-and under-estimation of COVID-19 deathsEuropean Journal of Epidemiology 2021; 36: 581-588.

95 Lisinski C. Massachusetts Reports: ‘Significant Overcount’ of COVID DeathsNBC (Boston) Mar. 10, 2022.

96 Block J. Covid-19: US tracker overestimated deaths among childrenBMJ 2022; 376.

97 Associated Press. Why some doctors are moving away from ventilators for virus patientsNBC News Apr. 9, 2020.

98 King CS, Sahjwani S, Brown AW et al. Outcomes of mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19 associated respiratory failure. PLOS One Nov. 23, 2020.

99 Lim ZJ, Subramaniam A, Reddy MP et al. Case Fatality Rates for Patients with COVID-19 Requiring Invasive Mechanical Ventilation. A Meta-analysisAm J Respir Crtic Care Med 2021; 203(1): 54-66.

100 Merriam Webster Dictionary. Definition of anti-vaxxer: a person who opposes the use of some or all vaccines, regulations mandating vaccination, or usually both. Accessed Nov.6, 2022.

101 Fisher BL. Biggest Anti-Lockdown Freedom Day Protest Held in Berlin, GermanyThe Vaccine Reaction Aug 3, 2020.

102  Fisher BL. Mass Protests in Greece, France Opposing COVID-19 Vaccine Mandates and Health PassportsThe Vaccine Reaction July 18, 2021.

103 Fisher BL. Protests Against COVID Lockdowns Flare Up in 2021 Around the World. The Vaccine Reaction Mar. 29, 2021. https://thevaccinereaction.org/?s=global+protests

104 National Vaccine Information Center. NVIC’s 2021 Annual Report on State Vaccine Legislation: All Proposed COVID-19 Vaccine Mandates Rejected by State Legislatures. Sept 20, 2021.

105  National Vaccine Information Center. NVIC’s 2022 Annual Report on U.S. State Vaccine Legislation. Nov. 17, 2022.

106 NVIC Advocacy Portal.

107 Library of Congress. Constitution Annotated: Federalism and the Constitution

108  ConstitutionUS. Checks and Balances in the U.S. Constitution.

109 Sheng J, Luo S, Jiang B et al. How prosocial behaviors are maintained in China: The relationship between communist authority and prosocialityFrontiers in Psychology Sept. 29, 2022.

Copyright 1982-2021 National Vaccine Information Center. All Rights Reserved.

DONATE to NVIC

21525 Ridgetop Circle, Suite 100, Sterling, VA 20166

Do YOU Want Liberty or No Liberty?


John R. Houk, Blog Editor

May 26, 2022

I’ve got three cross posts I hope you find interesting enough to digest to comprehend the world the American Founding Fathers hoped to frame has been whittled away for decades. Whittled so grotesquely that the whittlers of Liberty’s total annihilation DO NOT even hide their actions any longer believing the Sheeple are so hooked to obedience, total transformation of the masses is nearly complete.

Perhaps there are still enough naysayers willing to withstand the onslaught of complete tyranny – I DON’T KNOW? Do you?

JRH 5/26/22

READER SUPPORTED! I need Readers willing to chip in $5 – $10 – $25 – $50 – $100. I need your generosity. PLEASE GIVE to overcome research expenses:

Please Support NCCR

Big Tech Censorship is pervasive – Share voluminously on all social media platforms!

***********************

Welcome to the totalitarians’ “New World Order”

Earth NWO

By Frank Gaffney, Jr.

May 26, 2022

Center for Security Policy

The global governance crowd is on a roll in destroying the sovereignty of nations like ours and freedoms guaranteed by our Constitution. The Global Resetters and their Chinese Communist allies have recently revealed three initiatives designed to catalyze a New World Order.

First, with the Biden administration’s connivance, the World Health Organization is beavering away in Geneva on agreements that will empower its Chinese-appointed, Marxist director-general to dictate public health policies here and elsewhere.

Second, on Tuesday, China’s Alibaba conglomerate announced at Davos that it will produce a “personal carbon footprint tracker” to monitor everyone’s contribution to climate change – and everything else.

Then, yesterday, German-owned T-Mobile boasted at the World Economic Forum that the World Health Organization has selected it to provide universal Global Digital Health Passports, yet another building-block for insinuating worldwide China’s totalitarian Social Credit System.

God help us.

This is Frank Gaffney.

CSP VIDEO: Welcome to the totalitarians’ “New World Order”

https://www.podbean.com/ew/pb-m7a69-1236122

© 2022 Center for Security Policy

++++++++++++++++++

Defending Sovereignty: The Fight of our Lifetime

Continuous vigilance and vigorous support of States’ Constitutional rights is critical

Madison Quote on Abridged Freedom

By Robert W Malone MD, MS

May 25, 2022

Who Is Robert Malone

A gradual and silent encroachment of our freedom and Federal, States’ and individual sovereignty by a globalist financial corporate cartel continues to proceed. One key aspect of our current political reality in the US is that many of our laws at the Federal level have been placed there by corporate stakeholders. Corporate lobbyists work tirelessly and relentlessly to insert legislation that benefits their industries and increases the wealth of their corporate clients and associated “stakeholders” into our federal laws and regulations, and to twist existing legislation so that it becomes a more perfect tool of their clients’ corporate interests. In parallel, within the many branches of the US Federal bureaucracy, regulatory capture has become the norm. Furthermore, it has become increasingly clear that it is grossly naive to expect solutions to these corrupting influences to come from either Congress or the entrenched and captured bureaucracy. And one hard truth learned by the first Trump administration is that the executive branch lacks the power and authority required to replace the entrenched bureaucrats that have become the ruling lords and ladies of the new inverted Totalitarian reality which is the entrenched Federal bureaucracy.

In this new Federal reality, where the culture of government institutions and agencies is damaged beyond repair, real change cannot occur by replacing one figurehead for another. Corrupted policy can’t be easily replaced with good policy. The ideology, the rule of law, the subverted corporatist regulations are baked in. The system is rigged. The unknown (or known) bureaucrats controlling the levers aren’t going to let go of that easily. When they have done their time, most likely those employees will move into corporate leadership positions so long as they have protected corporatist interests during what has all too often become a form of internship-as-prelude prior to landing a “good job”. As most federal employees at the top-tier are well aware of their future career opportunities, they have no incentives to try to change the status-quo and upset their potential future employers . Government institutions that are intrinsically controlled by outside interests cannot be reformed from within, so it is important to not waste too much energy trying. That’s why many argue that a “siege strategy” or even the creation of completely new institution(s) may be the answer.

Those of us fighting for freedom have come full circle and now confront the issue of state’s rights. This is a fundamental principle of our republic (often incorrectly referred to as “our democracy”). Each state has the ability to govern itself, within the confines of the Constitution, Federal law and the Bill of Rights. Those powers are vast but frequently under-utilized. States have the power to ensure that a strong federalized governance is not the norm.

State Dept Logo

In 2012, Obama lifted restrictions from the Smith-Mundt Act (passed in 1948) that allowed domestic dissemination of government-funded media. Then the Countering Disinformation and Propaganda Act, introduced by Republican Sen. Rob Portman of Ohio in 2016, established the Global Engagement Center under the State Department, with the following Mission and Vision statements:

Core Mission: To direct, lead, synchronize, integrate, and coordinate efforts of the Federal Government to recognize, understand, expose, and counter foreign state and non-state propaganda and disinformation efforts aimed at undermining or influencing the policies, security, or stability of the United States, its allies, and partner nations.


Vision: A data-driven Mission Center leading U.S. inter-agency efforts to proactively address foreign adversaries’ attempts to use disinformation and propaganda to undermine U.S. interests.

For examples of how this is being operationalized, please see the associated COVID-19 recovery policy page for this organization.

This center authorizes grants to non-governmental agencies to help “collect and store examples in print, online, and social media, disinformation, misinformation, and propaganda” directed at the U.S. and its allies, as well as “counter efforts by foreign entities to use disinformation, misinformation, and propaganda to influence the policies and social and political stability” of the U.S. and allied nations. These laws have worked to loosen the controls previously placed on the Federal government regarding its ability to push propaganda. The very fact that we have an ex-president of the USA, the very same one who presided over the lifting of restrictions of the Smith-Mundt Act calling for censorship of the press to “PROTECT OUR DEMOCRACY” and this he is SUPPORTED in this call by so many on the left is chilling.

When the changes to Smith-Mundt Act are combined with the Global Engagement Center, it is interesting to speculate how the US population might be manipulated. The CDC has spent a billion dollars on propaganda and censorship to ensure vaccine compliance through media buys, and one has to wonder just what sort of propaganda will be pushed on the American people in the future.

But what happens when a state like Florida becomes a threat to the Federal government exceeding its enumerated powers, and seizing control of more powers that have been traditionally assigned to the states?  The back and forth between President Biden and Governor DeSantis over Florida’s COVID policies make clear the power that the Federal government has developed over states by leveraging the distribution (and ability to withhold) Federal Tax dollars. The actions of Governor DeSantis of Florida are so harshly criticized by those who control the levers of the Federal government (as well as purchased main stream media) because he has refused to comply with the Biden administration’s HHS bureaucratic edicts.

After the Biden administration admonished Florida for stagnant vaccination rates in Florida, the Feds then decided to federalize the distribution of monoclonal antibodies so that those who don’t get the vaccine have no alternative treatment option. This is a prime example of the retaliatory tools available to the Federal government, and illustrates that the Federal government is able and willing to compromise the health of US citizens to punish a state that choses to be noncompliant. Remember, the states regulate medicine and public health policy within that state. Biden refusing to send lifesaving medicine is a clear abuse of Federal power. The 10th Amendment of the United States Constitution authorizes states to establish laws and regulations protecting the health, safety, and general welfare of their citizens. The practice of medicine is not an inherent right of an individual, but a privilege granted by the people of a state acting through their elected representatives. For further details please see the Federation of State Medical Boards statement “About State Medical Boards”.

It is state’s rights – as imperfect as that system is, that protects us from the WHO/globalist power grab to leverage public health to compromise the sovereignty of the United States. The current strategic agenda of those seeking to advance globalism and global governance policies at the expense of the autonomy of nation-states is often referred to as the New World Order. Those advocating for the New World Order include the World Economic Forum, transnational corporations/globalized investment capital, the UN, World Trade Organization, World Bank and now the World Health Organization. These entities have, to a more or lesser extent, gained control of the Federal government through leveraging the regulatory capture of our federalized agencies, departments and institutions. Money from these entities flows into the coffers of Congress to influence law makers. Often, treaties and agreements on the global level codify these arrangements. This ensures that our federal government is coopted by these entities.

Our federal government believes that it will be stronger when states have little or no control over the rules and regulations of the state. This is not what our founding fathers intended, and this is when the rights of all of us are trampled on. Our constitution codifies that each state maintains its own set of laws, rules and regulations. The beauty of this system is the diversity of cultures can be maintained within states. Living in Texas is very different than living in New Hampshire, and I believe that this is a good thing. Although states are stronger when there is a federal government appropriately assuming and defending those responsibilities enumerated under the US Constitution, they are also guaranteed the freedom to have their own cultural identity and rule of law. This is the beauty of our Constitution and Bill of Rights. This interweaving of states rights under the limited umbrella of a Federal government.

For many, the erosion of each states’ right to monitor and control federal elections, as guaranteed in the constitution, is the easy example to reach for as that line is also being repeatedly crossed. But the depth of this problem is much, much deeper than this single issue.

The use of federal tax dollars to control states may be a more persistent and pernicious issue. As an example, the Department of Transportation allocates funds for states that comply with seat belt laws or speeding limits, but will withhold such funds for states that don’t. The Department of Education allocates taxpayer funds based on the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) goals or other “reforms”, thereby controlling and harmonizing certain aspects of education in the USA across all states. In the example of COVID lock down policies and masking, it is quite clear that the CDC and the NIH have overstepped Federal powers again and again by leveraging Federal Tax Dollars to create perverse financial incentives within hospitals and to promote mis- dis- and malinformation and to promote propaganda in both old and new media. It is time to return to the rule of law, and return the power back to the state to regulate medicine and public health.

States must remember that Federal funding is not the be all, end all. If a state can develop the political will to refuse such funds, sovereignty can be re-established. This requires that plans can be made to mitigate the impact of such an action. These Tax kickbacks are often weaponized in an arbitrary and capricious way by the Federal Executive branch to illegally control state policies, including public health policies. State leaders who are willing to walk away from federal funding, who are willing to work with other states and congress to negotiate better terms for federal dollars, may offer the best hope for breaking this Federal overreach.

This is why the upcoming ruling on Roe v. Wade is so important, as this ruling by the Supreme Court appears to reset the constitutionally correct relationship between the Federal government and the States in a wide range of ways, including regulation of health care. IF they are willing to plan for and mitigate the risks associated with taking back their Constitutionally-granted powers, States can leverage this new ruling to enable something closer to the intended balance of powers. “We the People” need to insist that they do so by electing strong and independent leaders at the state level, leaders who will fight for the right of each state to govern itself as our founding fathers intended. Governor Ron DeSantis and Attorney General Jeff Landry are two leaders leading the fight on this front. We must support them, so that they can continue to restore and protect the Constitutional rights of each State in the Union. Other states will follow their example. I believe that it is critical to the future success of our nation to have these great leaders paving the way, being brave and setting an example for other state leaders to follow, so that the attempts of the Globalist cabal to empower the WHO to subvert Constitutionally-granted States Rights can be thwarted.

Governor DeSantis Swamp Loaded with Snakes Meme

The federal government has been intentionally infiltrated by Globalists trained by the World Economic Forum. Make no mistake. The elites and transnational corporations have and continue to undermine our institutions and our very Constitution. President Trump has taught us that we can’t pull our punches, we must act aggressively and give no quarter. That means utilizing every tool available; these tools include using the judicial branch (the courts), working to elect and educate legislators and of course, educating and mobilizing the populace.

Individuals can have a huge role in working to ensure our freedoms, our sovereignty as a nation by writing letters, phoning legislators, publishing independent articles and memes. Even just re-posting on social media can help. We are all in this fight together. Individuals must organize, join groups and organizations, and create new groups and organizations.

Having an independent and free press that can report on our government and institutions is critical. It is how we can help Americans make informed decisions when voting. That means replacing the captured and outdated old media with new media outlets that are censorship free. Using block chain to create new social media outlets that cannot be subjected to propaganda and censorship is a good step in the right direction.

Organizing into groups that can work collectively to get the truth out is another way to help save the Sovereignty of our great nation, and that of all of the independent nations of the world. We must fight against the narratives that are being constantly pushed by government agencies that have been subverted by the Globalists. They do not want their corruption exposed. What we have learned over the past two years is that they will do whatever it takes to hide their dirty dealings from the American and world public.

So, get ready patriots – we have a lot of work to do in the coming months. First and foremost – let’s take back the House and Senate in November and flip as many states as possible to RED. We must have as many congress people as possible who are committed and aware that our nation is in danger. 

Fire up your engines – and let’s get to work!

© 2022 Robert W Malone, MD

++++++++++++++++++++

Exposing the ‘Digital ID is a Human Right’ Scam

Phone Alien (Digital ID)

Posted by Billy M | NwoReport

By Derrick Broze

May 26, 2022

NWO Report

A major component of the Great Reset-Technocratic Agenda is the implementation of a worldwide digital identity scheme. One of the first steps to realize this goal is to convince the public that digital identity programs are a “human right” worth fighting for.

Why is the push for digital identity absolutely vital to the Technocrats visions?

The world of 2030 — the one in which the World Economic Forum imagines “you will own nothing and be happy” — depends on an all-encompassing digital id program. This digital ID will allow a track and trace society where the authorities can see every purchase and every move you make.

One could argue much of society has already handed over this data with the ubiquitous use of credit cards which track purchases, and phones which log GPS data.

However, the digital ID scheme will also be linked to a digital wallet holding the local Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC), the digital currency of governments which will be needed for all legal transactions. Eventually, this digital ID and the digital wallet will be connected to, and impacted by, your individual social credit score.

As I have reported since March 2020, these initiatives were already in the works prior to COVID-19. However, it was the beginning of the COVID-19 panic that allowed governments around the world to push further towards their vision of Technocracy.

For example, we have been told that use of cash should be greatly reduced or eliminated altogether because of reports claiming COVID-19 spread through dirty old money. This conveniently leads into the calls for digital currency programs such as CBDCs.

Of course, we see the push for “contact tracing” apps to track the alleged spread of disease, and jjab passport/health passport apps have begun to acclimate the public to carrying a digital ID card with them everywhere they go.

The jjab passport is simply a gateway to a digital identity which has already been in the works in the United States, to one degree or another, since at least 2005 with the passing of the controversial REAL ID Act.

UN Sustainable Development Goal 16

This push towards a digital identity has its roots in the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals and the 2030 Agenda. The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) are a collection of 17 interlinked objectives adopted by the United Nations in 2015 with the ostensible goal of ending poverty, protecting the planet, and spreading peace and prosperity to all people by 2030. Their actions, however, regularly belie their stated intentions.

The SDGs were part of a larger resolution known as the 2030 Agenda, or Agenda 2030, with the stated purpose of fighting climate change.

While the United Nations SDGs and Agenda 2030 are often touted as a tool for establishing healthy multilateral relationships between nations, in truth, they are based in a deeper agenda to monitor, control, and direct all life on the planet.

The 17 SDGs each tackle a different area of their ostensible fight for justice and equality. UN SDG 16 focuses on “Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions” and states that “by 2030, provide legal identity for all, including birth registration.”

One document from the United Nations titled “United Nations Strategy for Legal Identity for All” further defines what is meant by “legal” and “digital identity.” A legal identity is essentially a form of registration with a civil body (a government).

The UN document makes it clear that “legal identity is widely acknowledged to be catalytic for achieving at least ten of the SDGs“, and the data generated by the registration supports the measurement of more than 60 SDG indicators. “Legal identity has a critical role to ensure the global community upholds its promise of leaving no one behind as espoused in the 2030 Agenda,” the UN report states.

When it comes to digital identity, the document says digital identity is generally understood as a unique and constant identity — a virtual identification card, for example — assigned to individuals that authenticates them as users of all their portable digital devices.

This identity can apply to the digital and physical worlds. Using a digital identity involves passwords, cryptographic key, biometrics such as fingerprint or iris scanning.

Digital Identity as a Human Right

As we approach 2030 the “digital identity as a human right” meme is increasingly being planted in the minds of the masses. I would expect this trend to become a standard talking point amongst corporate media hacks and their followers.

Not only is the public being primed to accept digital identity as a method of tracking illness (and the population), but digital identity is being sold to the bleeding hearts of the Western world as a necessity for helping the so-called “unbanked” of the world and bringing them into modern financial systems.

The term unbanked refers to those people who, for one reason or another, lack bank accounts and credit cards. This apparent lack is often reported as a flaw of modern society, an example of another poor population being left behind. What goes unquestioned is whether integration into the banking system is the best thing for an individual or not.

It is assumed that all people should need or want to be involved in the debt based banking system, allowing the criminal banks behind The Great Reset to fund their projects with the people’s money.

Many of these people live in the developing world, and in places like Mexico there exists a thriving counter or informal economy of people trading, buying, and selling goods without taxes, regulations, or a digital record of any kind.

This type of economic and social activity is the exact behavior the Technocrats want to eliminate, precisely because it flies in the face of the Great Reset vision.

Thus the media must do its job to convince the public that colonization is not colonization when it involves sustainability and diversity. The people need to be convinced that those poor Mexican farmers won’t be complete until they have a digital ID, with a digital wallet for receiving the digital currency as part of the Universal Basic Income program. These gushing stories promoting digital identity as the savior of the developing world fail to mention the dark side to the digitization of all life, specifically the coming terror of social credit and social impact finance tools.

Instead we get headlines like, “Digital Inclusion. The Human Right to Have an Identity” from the Thales Group, a French multinational with ties to the French government and one of the largest military weapons contractors in the world.

“The lack of identity is not just a loss in terms of being seen by the system and society. It is an exclusion that prevents people from achieving their full potential. They cannot be educated, they cannot access healthcare services, and their children inherit this legacy as they’re born outside the system,” the group wrote in February 2021. Again, the general assumption is that there is no life to be had “outside the system”.

Meanwhile, Impakter Magazine, known for promoting the SDGs, published a piece titled “Digital Identity As a Basic Human Right” in May 2018. The Impakter piece promotes blockchain based ID’s and putting children’s birth certificates on the blockchain as well.

Thankfully there are some examples of pushback to the commonly held narratives surrounding digital id.

In April 2021, the Center for Human Rights and Global Justice published a skeptical piece titled “Everyone Counts! Ensuring that the human rights of all are respected in digital ID systems.” This article looked at some of the ways marginalized populations are further marginalized by digital systems. They warn of the “need for the human rights movement to engage in discussions about digital transformation so that fundamental rights are not lost in the rush to build a ‘modern, digital state’.”

The group Access Now published a report, Busting the dangerous myths of Big ID programs: cautionary lessons from India, focused on the concerns surrounding India’s implementation of their digital ID system, Aadhaar. The report concludes that so-called “Big ID programs” — that is programs implemented by governments with the help of Big Tech — are not needed to give people a legal identity. Further, the report found that Big ID creates space for surveillance to flourish, as demonstrated by India’s Aadhaar system.

In May 2021, the ACLU released a blog in response to concerns around jab passports. The ACLU warned about digital identities, including recent efforts to mandate digital drivers licenses“A move to digital IDs is not a minor change but one that could drastically alter the role of identification in our society, increase inequality, and turn into a privacy nightmare,” the ACLU wrote.

Finally, the organization Privacy International directly challenged the United Nations SDGs and asked, “The Sustainable Development Goals, Identity, and Privacy: Does their implementation risk human rights?.” The report states:

“If actors fail to consider the risks, ID systems can themselves threaten human rights, particularly the right to privacy. They can become tools for surveillance by the state and the private sector; they can exclude, rather than include.

There are thus risks in the implementation of an ID scheme – not only that it fails to meet the promise of SDG 16.9, but that it also builds a system for surveillance and exclusion. It is thus essential to critically engage with the interpretation of the goal, and the uses to which it has been put.”

The World Economic Forum, the United Nations, and The World Bank

The United Nations is not the only supranational body lobbying for digital identity. In January 2021, the World Economic Forum met for their annual meeting to discuss the “Davos Agenda.” As TLAV previously reported, the January meeting was focused on restoring trust and outlining the plan for The Great Reset. In the lead up to the January 2021 meeting the WEF published an article titled “How digital identity can improve lives in a post-COVID-19 world.”

The article notes, “while government’s role is key, regulators have understood that they don’t hold all the cards and that solutions are needed across the public and private sectors. Digital identity trust frameworks led by governments working with the private sector are emerging.” This discussion of “frameworks led by governments working with the private sector” is exactly the public-private partnership the WEF has been promoting for decades.

We should also remember that the WEF was one of the first organizations to begin promoting the idea of jjab passports as part of a “new normal.” The WEF would officially announce The Great Reset initiative in June 2020, only 3 months into the COVID-19 panic.

Of course, the WEF’s Great Reset plan is ultimately a refinement of the UN’s Agenda 2030 and SDGs. Thus it should come as no surprise that the UN is also working on a form of digital identity. The UN Digital Solutions Centre (UN DSC) has developed an “innovative digital identity solution for UN personnel.”

The UN DSC, a pilot project of the UN World Food Programme (WFP) and the UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), says they are working on a suite of digital solutions that can be shared among UN Agencies to “transform common business operations and streamline time-consuming transactional tasks.”

The UN Digital ID will use blockchain and some form of biometrics. It has been described as a digital wallet for UN personnel. The UN DSC website describes the project as “based on a blockchain, biometrics and a mobile app solution, this pilot will look to offer a unique digital ID for every UN employee for end-to-end lifecycle management from on-boarding through to retirement that will be immutable, protected, transparent and portable.”

While the UN and WEF have been promoting the acceptance of digital identity, the World Bank has been funding the development of such programs as part of the Identification for Development (ID4D) initiative. The World Bank is funding digital biometric ID programs in Mexico, pushing digital ID in poorer countries with the ostensible goal of providing legal identity to the 1.1 billion people who do not currently have one.

Luis Fernando García, the director of the Mexican digital rights organization R3D, says the programs are being funded by those interested in exploiting Mexico’s human data. “Sophisticated intelligence agencies in rich countries are delighted that poor countries are creating these databases of people that they can exploit for their benefit. They have offensive capabilities that allow them to attack, obtain, and collect information that less-developed countries create through these databases,” he stated in a 2021 interview.

“Like many other Global South national identity projects — whether in Kenya, Uganda, or Mexico — the World Bank is behind it. The World Bank is giving Mexico a loan of $225 million to implement the system. It is not promoting this approach in Germany or Canada or the U.S.: countries that do not have a national identity system. But they are promoting it in the Global South, which is very telling.”

At the same time an alliance of Microsoft, GAVI — the Global Vaccine Alliance which is funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation — and the Rockefeller Foundation have organized their efforts under the ID2020 project. The ID2020 project is an attempt to create digital identification for every single person on the planet. In 2018, Microsoft announced a formal partnership with the ID2020 project at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland.

The usual cast of characters — the WEF, the UN, the World Bank, the Gates Foundation, the Rockefeller Foundation — have spent the recent years lobbying for the need to create a digital identity for every person on the planet. During the COVID-19 crisis, these organizations promoted the use of jjab passports, which itself is a form of a digital identity.

Now, they are poised to use economic turmoil and fears of pandemic 2 to promote the value of digital identity, whether to receive a digital currency in exchange for dollars, or to prove vaccination status. One way or another, the Technocrats will force their digital identity prisons on the masses.

Colonization 3.0 and the Future of Identity

The colonization of the Americas and Africa took place in the obvious forms — physical slavery, murder, rape, erasing of language, customs, and culture, etc. — and in less obvious ways — psychological trauma, isolation, loss of identity. The exploits of the European empires were the first wave of the colonization, with later colonization in the form of weaponized financial aid and assistance designed to trap developing nations in debts which require them to sell their natural wealth and resources.

Now, digital colonization is on the horizon. Once again, Africa and Latin America are on the list of targets for digital id schemes. As Impakter Magazine reported, there are plans for placing infant identity on a blockchain so there may be a permanent record of the person. These programs are already taking place in South Africa. Dr. Aaron Ramodumo says the country is on a “progressive transition” towards using biometrics for an infant identity with unique ID numbers.

South Africa’s new program will begin in 2024, and provide capabilities for palm prints, fingerprint, footprint, face and iris biometrics. Ramodumo told Biometric Update he hopes it will be available for infants soon. “While we want to build a policy around biometric capture of infants and children, we still have not made a selection of the specific technology,” Ramodumo said. “And that continues to be a subject of research, and I hope researchers will provide other options to choose from.”

Another organization which has been calling for a “legal identity” in Africa is ID4Africa. Coincidentally, the organization received 3 grants totaling $600,000 USD from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation in 2019 and 2021.

Despite the attempts to colonize Africa with digital identity, there is some hope. In late 2021, Kenya’s digital ID program, the National Integrated Identity Management System (NIIMS), was ruled illegal by the highest court because the government did not clearly establish the data privacy risks, nor did they outline a strategy for measuring and mitigating risks.

Ultimately, the crux of this discussion centers around identity and what is needed for a person to operate in the world today.

For example, in many nations a person already cannot open a bank account, attend school, rent a house, take out a loan, or drive a vehicle legally without presenting some form of identification. These are conditions that many people in the modern world have come to accept as norms.

However, there is a growing skepticism of the incoming digital systems, and, in some cases, even the “traditional” systems most people are familiar with.

Why should we have to show a government approved ID to be recognized as a person? Why must we submit to the government sanctioned identity if we do choose to carry a form of identity (digital or physical)?

These are important questions to ask and the assumptions we hold must be questioned. As we push further into the digital world of 2030, I encourage all readers to alert your friends and family to the dangers posed by digital identity.

Help them understand how digital id will inevitably be connected to digital currency, and eventually, a social credit score. This infrastructure, along with widespread facial recognition cameras, will be the invisible enforcement arm of the Technocratic State.

Together, facial recognition, digital identity, digital currency, and social credit scores represent a giant leap forward towards digital totalitarianism.

© 2022 NWO REPORT

%d bloggers like this: