al-Hijrah: The secret Islamic doctrine of Migration for Jihad


Only now are a growing number of Europeans waking up that allowing the mass immigration of Muslims devoted to the concept that the Quran is absolute and perfect was and is a huge mistake. Thanks to the likes of Leftists like President Barack Hussein Obama who support the culture destroying concept of Multiculturalism, Muslim immigration has continued to grow toward the USA. Couple that much of these Muslim immigrants of the same quality of the Quran loving Muslims that have disrupted European society are now flowing in the USA, societal problems WILL arise significantly beyond the shores of American coasts.

 

AND here is another thing to think about! A huge majority of organized Mosques and Muslim-American organizations that exist in the USA have a direct affirmative relationship or monetary relationship with the Islam that derives from Saudi Arabia (Wahhabi), Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood (radical Salafist global Caliphate-minded), Shi’ites from Lebanon (Lebanese Hezbollah affiliated to crazy Twelver Shias of Iran), Pakistan (Deobandi/Wahabi/Salafi schools of Islam including but not limited to Jamaat ul-Fuqra, al Qaeda and Taliban: HERE, HERE and HERE), Somalia (al-Shabab), Turkey (Fethullah Gülen-Hizmet movement: HERE and HERE) and probably more I don’t have time to look up.

 

SEE: An Explanatory Memorandum on the General Strategic Goal for the Brotherhood in North America

 

JRH 4/1/15

Please Support NCCR

************************

al-Hijrah: The secret Islamic doctrine of Migration for Jihad

al hijrah mosque

 

By Paul Sutliff 

March 30, 2015

Paul Sutliff on Civilization Jihad

 

Today thousands of Muslims are answering a call to immigrate to non-Muslim lands. According to the Department of Homeland Security, of the 70,000 refugees granted asylum in the USA in 2013 “the leading countries of nationality for refugee admissions were Iraq (28 percent), Burma (23 percent), Bhutan (13 percent), and Somalia (11 percent). Seventy-five percent [75%] of refugee admissions in 2013 were from these four countries” (Martin & Yankay, 2014). If we accept that the vast majority of those living in these countries are Muslim, then 70% of 70,000 translates into 49,000 Muslims migrated to America in 2013.

 

Why is this happening when fatwas have been given stating it is Haram (forbidden) for a Muslim to move to a non-Muslim land?

 

Islam Q and A recently answered: Can Muslims settle in kaafir countries for the sake of a better life? Part of the answer stated that:

 

In the Sunnah, the Prophet (PBUH) said: “I disown every Muslim who settles among the mushrikeen” [non-Muslims]. (Narrated by Abu Dawood, 2645; classed as saheeh by al-Albaani in Saheeh Abi Dawood.)

 

According to this manner of thought living in Dar al-Harb is not only wrong for Muslims it was not acceptable to live in non-Islamic communities in Muslim lands, according to their prophet. However, the author of this document does make an exception.

 

“Rather we should say that each Muslim has his own unique set of circumstances and his own ruling that applies to him, and each person is accountable for himself. If he is able to practise his religion in the Muslim country in which he lives more than he can in a kaafir country, then it is not permissible for him to settle in a kaafir country.

 

But if it is the other way round, then it is permissible for him to settle in a kaafir country, subject to the condition that he is confident that he can resist the desires and temptations to be found there by taking the precautionary measures prescribed in sharee’ah.

 

Zakariya al-Ansaari al-Shaafa’i said in his book Asna al-Mataalib (4/207):

It is obligatory to migrate from the kaafir lands to the Muslim lands for those who are able to do that, if they are unable to practise their religion openly.”

 

So why are Muslims coming to non-Muslim countries, what they call Dar al-Harb if it is forbidden? Is this merely a smoke screen? Are these very words quoted above only for a select few? It makes little sense that they could not practice what they believe in an Islamic country. Or is this a screening out policy? A doctrinal statement that insists Muslims not strong in their faith must stay in an Islamic country. What then of those who hold their Islamic faith with strength?

 

Keep in mind that Muslims practice taqiyyah, lying to protect their faith. If they think it is not advantageous to the spreading of Islam, they will lie or obfuscate the truth. Since we cannot trust a Muslim to tell the truth on al-hijrah, we must rely on what the Islamic scriptures state.

 

According to Hadith no. 2863 Kitab al Amthael reported by Timri, also reported by Imam Ahmed Ibn Hanbel as Hadith no 17344 Mohammad said:

 

I charge you five of what Allah has charged me with: to assemble, to listen, to obey, to immigrate and to wage jihad for the sake Allah.

 

According to this wording it is implied that migration for the purpose of jihad is not only Ok, it is commissioned by the prophet of Islam. But is this the only citation of such a statement?

·         Sura 2:218 “Surely those who believed and those who emigrated and performed jihad.”

 

·         Sura 8:72    “Surely those who believed and those who emigrated and performed jihad with their money and their lives for the sake Allah, and those who gave asylum…”

 

·         Sura 8:74    “And those who believed and emigrated and performed jihad for the sake of Allah, and those who gave asylum and help [gave you victory], those are the true believers, they will receive forgiveness and generous provisions.

 

·         Sura 8:75   ““And those who believed afterward and emigrated and performed jihad with you, so those are of you.

 

As you can see the Koran provides several examples that the purpose of migration (al-Hijrah) is to accomplish jihad. Shouldn’t Immigration and State Department officials considers this practice when reviewing persons who are Muslim seeking entry into the United States?

 

Careful thought in this would go back to the first large amount of Muslims coming to America in 1962. Did they come for the purpose of jihad? This would account for the founders of the North American Muslim Brotherhood. It would also explain their usage of the term civilization jihad in 1991 when they defined their goals. It directs the Muslim migrant who came for jihad, on how to pursue that goal.

 

If Muslims coming here would have the purpose of jihad, you would expect them to:

1.       You would expect to find communities of Muslims starting to request sharia law.

 

2.      You would expect to find Muslims here coordinating new Muslims coming to the states into designated areas for the furtherance of Islam and the declaration of sharia law.

 

3.      Attempt to infiltrate every level of government for the purpose of subverting the constitution. 

 

These things are happening today! 20,000 Syrian Muslims are slated to arrive in the USA between 2015 and 2016. Will America cease to be the land of the free and become dar al Islam (land of submission) if it does not wake up soon?

We have to fight and make America wake up NOW!

 

Bibliography

 

Martin, D. C., & Yankay, J. (2014, September 5). Refugees and Asylees 2013. Retrieved March 30, 2015, from Department of Homeland Security: http://www.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/publications/ois_rfa_fr_2013.pdf

 

Solomon, S., & Al Maqdasi, E. (2009). Modern Day Trojan Horse: The Islamic Doctrine of Immigration. Charlottesville, VA: ANM Publishers.

 

The Generous Koran. (2009). (U. Dakdok, Trans.) Venice, FL: Usama Dakdok Publishing, LLC.

_____________________________

Edited by John R. Houk

 

© Paul Sutliff

 

I am writer and a teacher. You can find my books on Amazon portraying the truth about Civilization Jihad!


Civilization Jihad and the Myth of Moderate Islam Paperback – January 21, 2015

 

Paul Sutliff on Civilization Jihad Homepage

 

Norwegian Bjorn Jansen Gets Islam Ideology


Björn Jansen. 4-30-2014

Bjorn Jansen
 
 
John R. Houk
© January 24, 2015
 
Today the Gatestone Institute sent an email update with three essays on it. The first is by Bjorn Jansen and the second and third essays are by Alan M. Dershowitz. To be honest I did not read Dershowitz’s contribution. I immediately was drawn to Mr. Jansen’s essay largely due to his last name. Mr. Jansen’s last name is similar to pseudonymous counterjihad essayist/blogger Fjordman’s actual name. Fjordman’s actual name is Peder Are Nøstvold Jensen (Full name from a somewhat uncomplimentary article in Wikipedia).
 
Fjordman has been one of my hero bloggers for years. His name actual name was exposed to the massacre perpetuated by Right Wing semi-Nazi aficionado Anders Breivik who murdered nearly a hundred in Norway with the deluded aim of inspiring a NWO revolution in Europe against Islam and European Muslims. Although Breivik killed mostly teenage Norwegians away at a camp I believe he sought to place the blame on Norway’s growing minority of Muslims. (Here’s a dialogue between myself and an atheist who did his best to associate Breivik with the Christian Right.)
 
Fjordman’s essays apparently were an inspiration for Breivik’s 1500 page manuscript discovered after his arrest. The manuscript lays out a plan for Christian-Odinists (which I equate with Nazi mysticism. Odinism: HERE and HERE) in Europe to rise up and slay Europe’s ruling elite to rid Europe of Muslims. Fjordman’s essays were the most numerous but not the only Counterjihad writer in the mix. Indeed much of Breivik’s manuscript are from the Counterjihadists in which contributes a distorted interpretation of the creation of a Nazi-like nationalist European state. Since Fjordman’s essays standout in Breivik’s manuscript, the multiculturist authorities of Left leaning Norway branded Fjordman as synonymous to Breivik’s agenda. This Norwegian branding of Fjordman led to his arrest, interrogation and confiscation of the Fjordman computer and writings in his home. The Norwegian police of course could not pin their suspicions on Fjordman because a careful reading of the Fjordman essays simply demonstrates an expose Islam nature and there is absolutely no incitement to execute violence against Muslims. However, if you have followed Europe’s concept of Civil Liberties, you would realize that exposing Islam is considered a hate-crime which many European Counterjihadists have had to defend their Free Speech in a Court of Law.
 
So … Anyway, Bjorn Jansen, the author of the Gateway Institute article, made me think of Peder Jensen. Indeed Mr. Jansen’s essay is quite like a Fjordman essay. Bjorn Jansen is a Norwegian politician that seems to have awakened to how Norway’s Muslim minority non-assimilation mentality is harming the native Norwegian culture. Jansen rightly accuses his fellow politicians of looking the other way to preserve their political multiculturalism of accepting all people and religion and that with the correct applied societal aims the diverse cultures will live in harmony. Considering what the Norwegian police did to Fjordman/Peder Jensen, this is quite the courageous stand by a Norwegian politician. Bjorn Jansen even mentions the contributions of European Counterjihad leaders but sadly does not mention Fjordman. I suspect the reason for this failure is because Fjordman has been vilified in Norwegian society as a Right Wing extremist when he is not.
 
Before I move on to the Bjorn Jansen cross post allow me to share some Norwegian Wikipedia info on him. The original is in Norwegian and is translated by Google:
 
Bjorn Jansen (Politicians)
 
Björn Jansen (* 1977 in Aachen) is a German local politician (SPD) and since 2009 acting mayor of Aachen.
 
Life and work
 
Björn Jansen holds a degree in business administration at the RWTH Aachen University and graduated in 2008 with a thesis on “Standardization of IT in the local environment” as a business graduate from. Since 2010 he has worked as a consultant in the energy and water.
 
After years Jansen was previously occurred in the SPD, he was elected at the municipal election, 2004 the Council of the City of Aachen. In 2009, he was able to repeat the success and was also next to Margrethe Schmeer (CDU) and Hilde Scheidt (Alliance 90 / The Greens) voted one of the three mayors. 2014 he was a candidate for the mayoral and was confirmed after losing an election again as Assistant Mayor. In the city of Aachen Council Jansen mainly engaged as Vice Chair of the Finance Committee and as a member of the audit committee.
 
In addition to his party affiliation in the SPD Björn Jansen also belongs to the Supervisory Board of the spa and bathing Aachen Society and the Association of Assembly of the Sparkasse Aachen and Deputy Chairman of the Board of Directors in the Student Union Aachen. He is also Chairman of the City Sports Federation Aachen e. V. and since 2011 also president of the newly established Regional Sports Federation Aachen e. V., in which it is the merger of the municipal and local sports organizations in the Aachen region is the Stadtsportbund Aachen.
 
Björn Jansen is married to Daniela Jansen, who in the 2012 state election in North Rhine-Westphalia won a direct mandate for the SPD Aachen. With her ​​he has two children.
 
… (Bjorn Jansen (Politicians); Wikipedia; This page was last modified on 19 June 2014 at 09:32 clock [Translated from Norwegian by Google Translate – Wikipedia links in article removed and indicated by bold text])
 
JRH 1/24/15

Please Support NCCR

*************************
Norway: The People’s Revolution vs. The “Religion of Peace”
 
By Bjorn Jansen
January 24, 2015 at 5:00 am
 
In Norway’s educational system, history is not a valued subject. It is included under either “Social Studies” or “Norwegian.” Many Norwegians are therefore unaware how their society and democracy were formed, or of the enormous prices paid to attain them. Recent generations seem to take them for granted.
 
Norway’s education system is … [Blog Editor: The original text is abbreviated from original because the entirety in the post.]
 
It seems that most people in Europe — in the wake of the Paris massacres at the magazine Charlie Hebdo and the kosher supermarket — have either forgotten, or never been taught, that Muslims have invaded Europe several times before. In the Eighth Century, the Moors (Muslims from North Africa) succeeded in conquering Spain and the early medieval French King, Charles Martel, fought and put a stop to the Moors’ invasion of France. It took 800 years to expel Islam from Spain; the final expulsion of the Moors from Andalusia occurred 1494. Later, the Ottomans made it to the gates of Vienna in 1683. How has Islam’s nature and history in Europe been forgotten?
 
Norway, like many other countries in Europe after World War II, has built up an expansive welfare state. It is based on the principle of shared values, shared goals and shared faith in the state. Historically, Norway has prided itself in being a largely classless society with a large middle class, and only a small upper class or nobility.
 
In Norway’s educational system, history is not a valued subject. It is included either under the umbrella of “social studies” or “Norwegian.” This downgrading, combined with the erosion and virtual removal of Christianity from the education system, means that many are unaware of how their society and democracy were formed, or of the enormous prices paid to attain them. Recent generations seem to take them for granted.
 
The development of the West, which began with Socrates in Athens; then proceeded to rule of law based on verifiable evidence and equal justice from Rome; then the theological debate that preceded the Reformation and the Renaissance; the Enlightenment and the growth of science — all of these, over hundreds of years, have shaped constitutions and created today’s democratic societies. Today’s constitutions, legal systems, codes of ethics, and even desired values for children, are based on the values and qualities expressed in both the Old and New Testament, but most young people are not aware of this.
 
Islam is an ideology. All nations have their own, although this may not be obvious to those who are born and brought up in them. What, then, is Norway’s post-war ideology (or idealism), and how does it permeate Norway’s society today?
 
Before large amounts of oil began to be extracted in the 1970s, Norway was largely a monocultural society. However, the last 40 years have been a high-speed transition to a multicultural society, whose previous solidarity and joint values are now being broken down and questioned by parallel and, in the case of Islam, some widely opposing values and goals.
 
With immigration comes a larger gap between the poorest and richest than before, but Norway retains its strong social values of equality and its dream of solidarity — perhaps a key reason why socialism still has such a strong hold on the country.
 
Norway’s education system is permeated in an idealistic vision of equality and a belief in cultural relativism: that everyone, every culture and every religion are of the same value. Schools and even preschools are obliged to work toward wiping out class differences. As the state opposes the idea of private schools, there is virtually no alternative to the state school. The majority of teachers are idealists who believe in the idealism they are obliged to preach.
 
Cultural and religious relativism prevail. Islam is presented in schoolbooks as “just another religion.” Key practices, such as washing before praying, and praying five times a day, are presented; but Mohammed’s biography, Islam’s ideology and agenda, the concept of the kafir [infidel] and all its aggressive contents are brushed under the carpet. Islam is presented as an attractive religion, not an ideology, and is portrayed as if has already been reformed, a situation that is just not the case.
 
There is no tradition of debate clubs in Norway; the result is pressure for consensus of views and thoughts. To debate, in England, is considered an art. Many schools have debate clubs, and there is no harm seen in disagreeing strongly, then still going after to the pub. In Norway, in the workplace, to disagree is not always a safe option. To express an opinion that runs against the stream can be associated with “being difficult,” “argumentative,” and that what you think is “wrong,” with unpleasant overtones of “you are wrongly programmed.”
 
Norway’s politicians are both younger and less experienced than their European counterparts, who mostly enter politics later in life after a career in business. Few of Norway’s politicians have an international perspective from higher education or a career apart from politics. Many have gone straight into politics from student days. They are raised in a society with a small population entrenched in a socialist consensus, and that presses for conformity. How then does one express dissent in a country whose politicians and media are rooted in socialist thinking; where discussing religion is a no-go; where politics has replaced religion, and where there is a small population ensuring conformity of thought, with the risk of being sanctioned for expressing other thoughts?
 
Most of the media has the same socialist outlook as Norway’s politicians. There is either complete ignorance or a blind refusal to go to the root of Islamic terrorism, or how Islam’s doctrine effects the socialisation, mindset and actions of Muslims. Despite the existence of informative, independent websites such as document.no and rights.no, the media refuses even to look at Islam’s doctrines.
 
Rather than investigate Islam for themselves, politicians in Norway have put their blind faith in what the imams in Norway say is Islam. Likewise Islamsk Råd, The Islamic Council of Norway, has been given media space to determine what Islam is or is not.
 
The last three years have seen an explosion in the knowledge of Islam by the man-in-the street, largely thanks to the internet, and inspired by key figures such as Geert Wilders, Ayaan Hirsi Ali, Irshad Manji, Brother Rachid and Norway’s own Hege Storhaug. While no voice critical of Islam gets coverage in the media, recent coverage in the media of Germany’s populist PEGIDA movement (Patriotic Europeans against the Islamization of the West) has already started changing this lapse.
 
PEGIDA was started in Dresden last October by Lutz Bachman, who stepped down on January 21, 2015, after a photo of him posing as Hitler surfaced. Its wildfire popularity throughout Europe in just three months or existence seems due to the politicians’ and media’s neglect of their populace — especially the media’s refusal or inability to undertake independent investigative journalism.
 
Left-World Islamic Mission-Oslo - Right-Ubaydullah Hussain-Norway Islamist 
 
People are now discussing what exactly is preventing the European media from going to the root of Islam — discussing which elements of Islam’s key scriptures (the Koran, the sira and the hadith) are at conflict with the non-Muslim world.
 
If the media and politicians admit there is a problem, they will be forced to retract their belief in multiculturalism and apologize for voluntarily allowing a change in Norway’s demographics, with potentially many violent outcomes. They might have to admit that the media and politicians know of the dangers of Islam’s doctrines but do not dare to publish them; that maybe they have been collectively threatened and are afraid of the consequences. Other countries’ media might be afraid to talk about Islam’s doctrines because of their dependence on oil from the Middle East, but this is not the case for Norway.
 
PEGIDA’s followers can trigger a sorely needed debate on the unopened Pandora box of Islam’s doctrines. They can also ask questions that need to be asked, but that neither politicians nor the media have so far had the guts to ask. Caricatures and cartoons are only the symptom; we need to get to the root.
_____________________
Norwegian Bjorn Jansen Gets Islam Ideology
John R. Houk
© January 24, 2015
____________________
Norway: The People’s Revolution vs. The “Religion of Peace”
 
Bjorn Jansen is a journalist based in Norway.
 
Copyright © 2015 Gatestone Institute. All rights reserved.
 
Edited by John R. Houk
 

Sunna – Deceiving the Professionally Gullible


Here is a five minute or so video of Bill Warner explaining that when a Muslim says Islam is peace or Islam categorically condemns terrorism, that Muslim is being deceptive. (Warner doesn’t mention overt deception as opposed to self-deceived deception. It is my opinion that a huge amount of Muslims simply believe their Imams out of hand rather than checking for themselves.)

 

JRH 2/11/14

Please Support NCCR

*****************************

Sunna – Deceiving the Professionally Gullible

 

By Bill Warner

February 5, 2014

Political Islam

 

One of the most discouraging things about dealing with Islam is how our leadership has learned nothing in the years since Sept 11, 2001. Leadership’s favorite fantasy is that Islam is whatever a Muslim wants to say it is. So if you want a nice Islam, ask a nice imam. But, would a Muslim deceive the Kafir (non-Muslim)? Mohammed did.

 

VIDEO: Sunna – Deceiving the Professionally Gullible

________________________

© 2007-2014 Political Islam

 

Mission

 

Islam is a cultural, religious and political system. Only the political system is of interest to kafirs (non-Muslims) since it determines how we are defined and treated. The Islamic political system is contained in the Koran, the Hadith (the traditions of Mohammed) and his biography, the Sira.

 

Our mission is to educate the world about political Islam, its founder Mohammed, his political doctrine and his god, Allah.

 

Biography of Bill Warner

 

Intro to Elsa’s Thoughts on Subversion


Elsa Schieder

John R. Houk

© February 23, 2013

 

I am on the World Truth Summit (WTS) update email list. The WTS is a series of seminars provided by prominent Counterjihad authors and speakers who have a mission to educate whoever is wise enough to listen about the dark side of Islam. Now I say ‘dark side’ because I believe that a majority of Muslims are either nominal in adherence to Islam or are dedicated to a spiritual fulfillment that is on an individual basis than on the da’wah Jihad nature of Political Islam’s past military brutal conquests that forced non-Muslims into Islam. The intentions of da’wah Jihad are described well below as written by Dr. David Bukay:

 

 

This is Da`wah, the other operational arms of Jihad to conquer and submit Dar al-Harb. We are well acquainted with Jihad, characterizing the globalization of Islamic terrorism. However, the atrocious acts of Jihad should not mislead and disorient us. While we can win over all sorts of Jihad terrorism, Da`wah is the secretive lethal enemy which we even are unaware of. It is the non-violent stealth strategy of coercion; it is the concept of missionary activity to proselytize; it is the propagation to approach the infidels in moderate, tender, graceful ways; and above all it is the religious legitimization basis to invite all human beings to believe in Islam as the only supreme religion.

 

Da`wah is intended to changing our minds and our behavior and to subverting our mode of thinking. It is a cultural coercive strategy aimed at toppling democratic liberal regimes and eliminating freedoms and civil rights; and by infiltrating Western technology and society’s fabrics with the aim to destroying them from within.

 

 

How does the Da`wah operate in reality?

 

Here is an Islamic manual for the activists in the US, published by brochures and pamphlets, and disseminate through internet sites. The Da`wah aim is to propagate in all fields and sources to exhibit that Islam is a religion of peace, compassion and harmony. This is perpetuated by the following aspects, with the assistance of Islamists in the academia, political experts, public opinion molders, and the communication media.

 

a) The educational system. This is the most important objective, with the aim to transform the educational system at all levels into venues for spreading Islam by encouraging the establishment of exclusively Muslim educational system; by studying Islamic religious teachings and Arabic language. The intermediate result will be eating Halal foods and celebrating Islamic holidays. On internet sites, there are working Tips for Imams and Community Leaders of how to bring Islam to the heart of the infidels, mainly by changing the Christian and Jewish youth attitudes and perceptions.

 

b) The political and public life. The aim is to take advantage of Western ignorance about Islam, and to use deceit in order to keep the Kuffar confused and at odds with each other, and at the same time to sow disarray and hostility among them. This realm is so important that it clearly exposes the Da`wah strategy to participate in politics and public life: to become a candidate in political posts; and to promote favorable legislations for Islam. The second strata are to actively engage in dialogues, discussions and debates in the academia, in the media, and in public, with proactive attitudes.

 

c) The Communication Media. The media has become an important tool how to instill Islam and Islamic life in the American public, and to serve as an attacking weapon to mould and to change reality by mere lying and distorting the facts about Islam: “your words are out-of-context;” “you do not understand Islam and its teachings;” “you do not know Arabic;” “it is a very personal interpretation;” “it is Islamophobic and racist;” “it is inaccurate interpretation of the Qur’an;” “it is a Zionist propaganda.” The order is never to give up in discussions and debates and to reiterate all the slogans about Islam. Let the entire world know that the terrorists have hijacked Islam; that they do not represent Islam and its teachings; and that Islam totally denounces and forbids violence and killing.

 

… (READ IN ENTIRITY; The Role of Da’wah in the Islamic Onslaught against Dar al-Harb; By David Bukay; GERARD GROUP INTERNATIONAL; 8/29/06)

 

See Also David Bukay on YouTube:

 

Jihad and Da`wah – Part 1

 

Jihad and Da`wah – Part 2

 

JRH 2/23/13

Please Support NCCR

*******************************

A Video for You – and More about Difficult Journeys

 

By Elsa

Sent: Feb 17, 2013 at 4:31 PM

World Truth Summit Updates

 

I’ve been thinking about the journeys of the 21 people who have been interviewed – Robert Spencer, Bill Warner, Nonie Darwish, Alain Wagner, and on. Especially, I’ve been thinking about the similarities in many of the journeys.

 

I also have a link I want to share with you. It came into my inbox today. On subversion. I’ll start with that.

 

It’s to a lecture by someone I’d never heard of, Yuri Bezmenov, given in the 1980’s. It’s on Communist subversion, and on an ancient book on warfare, Sun Tzu’s The Art of War. I think it may give you a lot to think about:

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5gnpCqsXE8g

Psychological Warfare, Subversion, and Control of Western Society

 

And now, as I said, I’ve been thinking about the journeys of the 21 people interviewed.

 

They’re all explorers on journeys they haven’t chosen, journeys they set out on because of some unexpected trigger – from the devastating loss of 100 friends in the World Trade Center, to curiosity about how Islamic religious texts compare with the Biblical stories.

 

The story that comes to mind is about Frodo and his hobbit friends living in the Shire. Only there’s been no Gandalf coming pounding into a friendly village and warning Frodo and his friends.

 

Instead, almost all set out alone, unexpectedly, on their voyage of discovery. What’s in the Qur’an? And what about the other Islamic religious texts, the Sira and the Hadiths? What’s the history of Islam? What’s happening now?

 

Wherever they started, for most of the people (not all), many of the findings have been the same. The Qur’an – it contains passages calling for the death of infidels and apostates. It contains a mass of Jew-hatred. In life, there is no equality between women and men – though there is after death, on judgment day (when women will be judged for their obedience to men).

 

All the explorers have also discovered very hard truths about what is happening in the West around Islam. Political correctness, meaning the denial of their findings, and name-calling instead of ready listening to their warnings.

 

It’s as if they were Gandalf – but instead of meeting Frodo, they meet … the three most famous monkeys: Hear No Evil, See No Evil, Say No Evil. Over and over, their words have fallen, not only on deaf ears, but on hostile ears.

 

That brings me back to the video I started by recommending:

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5gnpCqsXE8g

 

Maybe there are bit of answers in it. (Some of you, I am sure, already know what’s in the video.)

 

Despite the lack of ready listening, the explorers haven’t fallen silent. They haven’t given up trying. Over and over, they ask: What can we do, if we believe in universal human rights like democracy, freedom of speech, the equality of men and women, and also gay rights?

 

I think that’s a question we’re all asking and also answering.

 

You will have information on the March reruns at the end of the month.

 

And now, all the best to all of us,

 

Elsa

_____________________

NCCR Editor: Below is the description of the speaker in the hour or so long video that Elsa is referring to. I believe the description provides the legit platform from which the speaker – Yuri Bezmenov – speaks in this teaching moment on the implementation of subversion.

************************

Yuri Bezmenov: Psychological Warfare Subversion & Control of Western Society (Complete)

 

Uploaded by GBPPR2

Uploaded: Uploaded on Feb 22, 2011

 

Yuri Bezmenov (alias Tomas Schuman), a Soviet KGB defector, explains in detail his scheme for the KGB process of subversion and takeover of target societies at a lecture in Los Angeles, 1983.

Yuri Bezmenov was a former KGB propagandist who was assigned to New Delhi, India – and defected to the West in 1970.

Bezmenov explains his background, some of his training, and exactly how Soviet propaganda is spread in other countries in order to subvert their teachers, politicians, and other policy makers to a mindset receptive to the Soviet ideology.

He also explains in detail the goal of Soviet propaganda as total subversion of another country and the four-step formula for achieving this goal.

He recalls the details of how he escaped India, defected to the West, and settled in Montreal as an announcer for the CBC.

Note the segments starting at around 14 and 24 minutes into the video.

Please mirror this video! Thank you.

______________________

Intro to Elsa’s Thoughts on Subversion

John R. Houk

© February 23, 2013

_____________________

A Video for You – and More about Difficult Journeys

 

World Truth Summit homepage

 

Elsa’s Train of Thought

 

Edited by John R. Houk

____________________

Yuri Bezmenov: Psychological Warfare Subversion & Control of Western Society (Complete)

 

About GBPPR YouTube Channel

Homebrew amateur radio and electronics projects, plus a little old-school hacking/phreaking.

 

Longer/banned videos are on the backup channels.

 

 

 

Under Quran – Purist Islam does Enlist Killing NON-Muslims


Radical Islam and Kafir

John R. Houk

© July 21, 2012

 

WND has undoubtedly paid attention to a little known Radical Islamic group known as United Muslim Nations International since the group threatened WND with an or else if the Internet magazine did not cease from criticizing Islam.

 

On July 7, 2012 WND released an article entitled, “Muslims: Wipe Christianity from Face of Earth.” The article caused quite a stir among expose Islam bloggers big dog and little dog. The thing is WND did not post the link to the UMN Intl. 23 page document. In fact Pamela Geller’s post on the WND article linked to Michael Rubin and Robert Spencer saying to the effect the 23 page document was typical Radical Islamic material; however the links at Atlas Shrugs pointing Rubin and Spencer are now dead links. Now I don’t know if the links were posted incorrectly or if the Rubin and Spencer sources links were removed or changed. I would not have thought anything about it except a Google+ friend found the PDF 23 page document she believes that WND is referring to. She did not find a specific reference of any outright call to wipe Christianity off the face of the Earth. She asked for my thoughts and sent me a link she had found.

 

I went to the PDF document and downloaded it in case it disappeared from the Internet. I have now just finished reading it fairly close manner.

 

I have to concur with Linda that the PDF document does not specify the genocide of Christians from planet Earth.

 

However, the PDF document is clearly written in the purist style of Radical Islam and once you get past the flowery theology of what a good Muslim is, the document indeed push Muslim readers to follow the example of Mohammed and the Four Rightly Guided Caliphs in its brutal conquest and conversion of NON-Muslims to Islam. Of the author does not write of the brutality of conquest but of the glory of Islam and how good old Allah was their protector and guide for the Islamic Golden Age.

 

There are definite references to NON-Muslims and Muslims described as hypocrites (i.e. Moderate Muslims) are kafir (unbelievers). The kafir are not to be trusted or treated nicely, indeed they must be punished and killed if they withstand the author’s perceived New World Order of a new Islamic Caliphate.

 

So there is an insinuation to wipe Christians off the face of the Earth but in all honesty not just Christians. Any kafir is worthy of death in resisting Islam and Islamic Sharia Law.

 

There are a lot of references that Muslims must treat Mohammed as the perfect example of how a Muslim should live and how a Muslim should treat NON-Muslims. Let’s look at this perfect man.

 

 

Muhammad was born around 570 AD to a widowed mother who died just six years later.  He grew up poor and orphaned on the margins of society, which was controlled by tribal chiefs and trading merchants.  He worked for his uncle, Abu Talib, as a camel herder.  Although his uncle had some standing in the community, Muhammad himself did not rise above his lowly station until he was 25, when he met and married a wealthy widow, Khadija, who was 15 years older.

 

His wife’s trading business not only nurtured Muhammad’s natural talents of persuasion, but it also gave the successful salesman an opportunity to travel and acquire knowledge that was not as accessible to the local population.  He would later use this to his advantage by incorporating the stories that he had come across into his “revelations” from Allah, particularly the tales from the earlier religions, Judaism and Christianity. 

 

Having attained a comfortable lifestyle and the idle time that wealth affords, Muhammad would wander off occasionally for periods of meditation and contemplation.  It is quite likely that he was experiencing the symptoms of a midlife crisis, including a desire for personal accomplishment and meaning.

 

One day, at the age of 40, he told his wife that he had been visited by the angel Gabriel in a dream.  Thus began a series of “revelations” which lasted almost until his death 23 years later.  The Qur’an is a collection of words that Muhammad attributed to Allah.  The Hadith is a collection of narrations of the life and deeds of Muhammad.  The Sira is his recorded biography.  The Sunnah is said to be Muhammad’s way of life, on which Islamic law (Sharia) is based.

 

With his wife’s influence and support, Muhammad proclaimed himself a prophet in same “lineage” as that of Abraham and Jesus, and began trying to convert those around him to his new religion.  He narrated the Quran to those who believed him, telling them that it was the word of Allah (heard only by himself, of course).

 

 

Relations with the Meccans turned particularly sour after an episode known as “the Satanic Verses” in which Muhammad agreed to recognize the local gods in addition to Allah.  This delighted the Meccans, who generously extended their welcome.  But Muhammad soon changed his mind after his own people began to lose faith in him.  He claimed that Satan had spoken through him, and he rescinded recognition of the Meccan gods (Tabari 1192, Quran 22:5253:19-26).

 

 

To deal with this unpleasant truth, sympathetic narratives of the early Meccan years usually exaggerate the struggle of the Muslims with claims that they were “under constant torture.”  They may also include apocryphal accounts that are unsupported by earliest and most reliable historians (see MYTH: Persecution of Muslims at Mecca – Many Deaths).

 

Modern storytellers and filmmakers (such as those behind 1976’s The Message) have even been known to invent fictional victims of Meccan murder, either to dramatize their own tale or to provide justification for the “revenge killings” that followed.  But, in fact, the only Muslim whose life was truly in danger was that of Muhammad – after 13 years of being allowed to mock the local religion.  (See also MYTH: Muhammad was Tortured at Mecca).

 

 

It was at Medina that Islam evolved from a relatively peaceful religion borrowed from others and into a military force that was intended to govern all aspects of society.  During these last ten years of Muhammad’s life, infidels were evicted or enslaved, converted upon point of death and even rounded up and slaughtered depending on expediency.

 

To fund his quest for control, Muhammad first directed his followers to raid Meccan caravans in the holy months, when the victims would least expect it.  This was despite the fact that the Meccans were not bothering him in Medina (see MYTH: Muhammad and his Muslims were Persecuted by the Meccans at Medina).

 

Muhammad provided his people with convenient revelations “from Allah” which allowed them to murder innocent drivers and steal their property (Ibn Ishaq/Hisham 426).  The people around him gradually developed a lust for things that could be taken in battle, including material comforts and captured women and children.  (See also MYTH: Muhammad Raided Caravans to Retrieve Stolen Property).

 

Often the people captured in battle would be brought before the self-proclaimed prophet, where they would plead for their lives, arguing, for example, that they would never have treated the Muslims that way.  The traditions are quite clear in portraying Muhammad as largely unmoved by their pleas, and ordering their deaths anyway, often by horrible means.  In one case, he orders a man slain, telling him that “Hell” will take care of the poor fellow’s orphaned daughter (Ishaq 459).  (See also MYTH: Muhammad Never Killed Captives)

 

The raids on caravans preceded the first major battle involving a Muslim army, the Battle of Badr.  This was the spot where the Meccans had sent their own army to protect their caravans from Muslim raiders.  Although, Muslims today like to claim that they only attack others in self-defense, this was clearly not the case in Muhammad’s time.  In fact, he had to compel his reluctant warriors with promises of paradise and assurances that their religion was more important than the lives of others.  (See also MYTH: The Battle of Badr was Defensive).

 

 

First, to try and gain their favor, Muhammad briefly preached that Christians and Jews could attain salvation through their own faith.  In fact, he changed his followers’ direction for prayer from Mecca to Jerusalem, which prompted the Jews’ tolerance of him while he worked surreptitiously for the power to evict them.  These earlier concessions and teachings were later revoked by Muhammad, since the Jews ultimately refused his religion.  The rare early verses of tolerance in the Quran are abrogated by later verses such as 9:29.

 

 

While we were in the Mosque, the Prophet came out and said, “Let us go to the Jews” We went out till we reached Bait-ul-Midras. He said to them, “If you embrace Islam, you will be safe. You should know that the earth belongs to Allah and His Apostle, and I want to expel you from this land. So, if anyone amongst you owns some property, he is permitted to sell it, otherwise you should know that the Earth belongs to Allah and His Apostle.”  Bukhari 53:392

 

The Jews of Mecca were the first in a very long line of unfortunate people to be offered the opportunity to convert to Islam under obvious duress.  Forcible conversion is very much a Muslim tradition started by Muhammad (see MYTH: Muhammad Rejected Conversions to Islam made under Duress)

 

Since they chose to hold on to their religion (and their property) Muhammad looked for reasons to go to war against the Jews at Medina.  According to some Muslims, the first tribe, the Qaynuqa, were driven from their homes and land on the pretext that one of their own had harassed a Muslim woman.  Although the offender was killed prior to this by a Muslim, the Muslim was also killed by Jews in retaliation for the first murder.

 

After laying siege to the entire community and defeating the tribe, Muhammad wanted to put every male member to death, but was talked out of it by an associate – something that Allah later “rebuked” him for.  The Qaynuqa were forced into exile and the Muslims took their possessions and property, making it their own.  Muhammad personally reserved a fifth of the ill-gotten gain for himself (a rule that he was sure to include in the Quran).

 

 

The Jews of the Banu Qurayza tasted Muhammad’s wrath after their leader half-heartedly sided with the Meccan army during a siege of Medina (the Battle of the Trench).  By then, Muhammad had evicted the other Jews and declared that all land at Medina belonged to him, so the original constitution of the town was no longer in effect.  It is important to note that the Qurayza did not attack the Muslims, even after switching loyalties (contrary to another popular myth).

 

Although the Qurayza surrendered peacefully to the Muslims, Muhammad determined to have every man of the tribe executed, along with every boy that had reached the initial stages of puberty (between the ages of 12 and 14).  He ordered a ditch dug outside of the town and had the victims brought to him in several groups.  Each person would be forced to kneel, and their head would be cut off and then dumped along with the body into the trench.

 

Between 700 and 900 men and boys were slaughtered by the Muslims after their surrender. (Bold Emphasis Mine)

 

The surviving children of the men became slaves of the Muslims, and their widows became sex slaves.  This included the Jewish girl, Rayhana, who became one of Muhammad’s personal concubines the very night that her husband was killed.  The prophet of Islam apparently “enjoyed her pleasures” (ie. raped her) even as the very execution of her people was taking place.

 

 

At one point following a battle, Muhammad provided instructions on how women should be raped after capture, telling his men not to worry about coitus interruptus, since “Allah has written whom he is going to create.”  (See also MYTH: Muhammad Never Approved of Rape)

 

Following the battle against the Hunain, late in his life, Muhammad’s men were reluctant to rape the captured women in front of their husbands (who were apparently still alive to witness the abomination), but Allah came to the rescue with a handy “revelation” that allowed the debauchery.  (This is the origin of Sura 4:24 according to Abu Dawud 2150).

 

 

Not content with waiting for Allah to act on his behalf, Muhammad had personal critics executed, including poets.  One of these was a mother of five children, who was stabbed to death by Muhammad’s envoy after a suckling infant was removed from her breast (see MYTH: Muhammad Never Killed Women).  Other innocent people were killed merely because they were of a different religion, sometimes including children (see MYTH: Muhammad Never Killed Children).

 

 

An elderly woman named Umm Qirfa once ran afoul of Muhammad merely by fighting back when her tribe was targeted by Muslim raiders.  Muhammad’s adopted son tied the woman’s legs separately to two camels, then set the camels off in opposite directions, tearing the woman’s body in two.  He also killed her two sons – presumably in gruesome fashion – and made her daughter into a sex slave.  (See also MYTH: Muhammad Never Killed the Elderly).

 

… (The Life of Muhammad: An Inconvenient Truth; TheReligionofPeace.com; Read Entirety)

 

I apologize for the time spent on Mohammed’s real biography. In some fair play for Muslims that have been indoctrinated on the goodness of Mohammed, there are plenty of Quran, Hadith and Sira that do indeed show a good Mohammed. The good Mohammed is what is preached to Muslims at their Mosques. Just as there is plenty of bad news in the Bible of people considered good men in the Old and New Testament it exists for humanity to know that as people we are not perfect. The Christian Bible points to Jesus the Christ as both fully man and fully God. Christ’s humanity was needful for humanity to be Redeemed from Satan’s grasp. Thus Christ in the New Testament is often referred as the Last Adam because as a man he born perfect because  His Father is God. Mohammed on the other hand example of a typical man that may have indeed started out with a good agenda; however as Mohammed increased in power, power definitely corrupted.

 

This is the document [That can be read below this point at SlantRight 2.0] that WND claims a Muslim Cleric is to have said all Christian must be killed. Portions I placed in Bold Italics followed by “Mine” are sections to take notice as misleading, deceptive or downright violent.

 

JRH 7/21/12 (Hat Tip: Linda Strawn)

Please Support NCCR

Jizya Resurgence


Muslim - Dhimmi Christian

 

John R. Houk

© July 8, 2011

 

Do you know what jizya is? Jizya is the name that Muslims use to extort money from non-Muslims (kafir) living under the political authority of a Muslim State. The jizya-poll tax is justified as protection money that the non-believing Muslim will be free from harm from other Muslims. Of course there is also a catch to the protection money. The kafir living in Muslim lands is also called a dhimmi. The dhimmi must pay jizya for protection; however if the dhimmi prays in public, acts in any many defined as insulting to a Muslim, if a dhimmi builds a Church, if a dhimmi attempts to marry a Muslim and does not convert then a crime has been committed and on and on and on. The point is the life a dhimmi in a Muslim nation is worse than what Black South Africans endured during White enforced Apartheid.

 

Now a Muslim apologist will tell a Westerner especially an American that jizya has not been enforced for years and years. Most Muslim nations indeed officially ended the imposition of jizya by the late 19th and early 20th century; however the spirit of jizya has not ended for the dhimmis in Muslim lands. Marks of humiliation are still exacted in Muslim nations to this very day. If the humiliation is not government sanctioned the government looks away as Muslim clerics lead Muslim mobs to acts of violence and destruction against the dhimmi (primarily Christians) according to the Islamic rules of jizya and dhimmitude.

 

The practice of jizya’s unofficial enforcement was less for protection and more to bring wealth to conquering Muslim Caliphs. The conquered Christian and Hindu areas of the world was the majority population. Once oppressive measures of dhimmitude took its toll on the Christian faithful, the jizya began to bring less revenue as more converted to Islam to escape the cruelty of dhimmitude.  

 

With a resurgence of Islamic purity sweeping the Muslim world which is quickly ending the Muslim apologist claim that Islamism is an aberrant practice compared to the majority of moderate Muslim, there is a clamor for the return of jizya and government sanctioned enforcement of dhimmitude as official policy in Muslim nations. The Egyptian government which is slowly becoming dominated by the ideology of the Muslim Brotherhood is publicly talking of the return of official jizya for that nation’s rather large Coptic Christian population.

 

Raymond Ibrahim writes about Egyptian talk of returning the jizya on Coptic Christians.

 

JRH 7/8/11