It’s in the Quran

Bukhari Hadit on killing Jews illustrated


Dajjal adds a comment to the NCCR blog cross-post “The Threat of Islam” by Martha Vanderpol. Ms. Vanderpol effectively explains what Islam is doing to Western Europe. Dajjal’s comment explains that a good Muslim is a violent Muslim because it is encoded in Islam’s considered holiest book known to us as the Quran. Next to the Quran in reverence is the Hadith which are from man rather than Allah. Hadith are broken down into degrees of reliability or authenticity. Sunnis represent about 90% of all Muslims and Shias roughly about 10%. As expected Sunnis and Shias do not agree with each other on what is a reliable Hadith. Since Dajjal’s expose on Islam uses a Sunni reliable Hadith Let’s narrow down the Sunni expectations.


Just to be clear the Quran is so holy to Muslims because it is considered the uncreated words of Allah delivered through the lips of Islam’s considered perfect man Mohammed. With all this divine and perfect association you MUST understand that Islam is NOT a religion of peace regardless of the propaganda you read or hear from the media and Muslim apologists.


At any rate Sunnis divide Hadith reliability into Sound (Sahih), Good (Hasan), Weak (Da’if) and Fabricated (Maudu). For Sunnis a Hadith follows certain rules to the crossed “t” and the dotted “i” then you had pay attention almost like it came from Allah although it may not have. Here are those rules:


1. Each of its narrators is of good character,


2. Each of its narrators has a precise memory,


3. The isnad (chain of narrators) is uninterrupted from the beginning to end,


4. The hadith is sound and free of any shudhudh (irregularity) in its isnad or matn (text), and


5. The hadith is sound and free of any ‘illah (fault) in its isnad or text (What Is “Hadith Sahih” and “Isnad Sahih”; from; a pro-Islam site)


Dajjal quotes from Sahih Muslim which from what I have read is second only to Sahih Bukhari which is of course surpassed by the so-called uncreated words of Allah delivered through the lips of Mohammed.


The below title and subheading was constructed from the Editor.


JRH 1/12/15

Please Support NCCR


It’s in the Quran

Islam: Moderate or Radical Irrelevant


By Dajjal

January 4, 2015 1:03 AM

Comment to ‘The Threat of Islam


Radical, radicalization & Islamism are false memes. The mission of Islam is the personal emolument of its founder and his successors. It is an Arab war crime syndicate gone global.


Islam is incapable of reform; it was created to enrich its founder through the professional practice of plunder & extortion. Global imposition of Allah’s will is a pretext, not a purpose; part of Moe’s clever marketing scheme.


Islam is a real, proximate and continuing threat. It is persistent because each generation of Muslims is confronted with the threat of Hellfire if they hold back and promise of eternity in Allah’s celestial bordello if they wage offensive warfare to conquer the world.


It ain’t about radicalism; it’s about belief. Believers are only those who fight in Allah’s cause. When MINOs [Blog Editor: Muslims in Name Only] get [an] Imam and believe, they go to war. That is Islam, not radicalization.


If the masses were aware of the fundamental facts, they would be with Robert Gentle, clogging the streets echoing demands for nuking every Islamic nation.


I will now display to you something others will not reveal: an excerpt from Sahih Muslim 19.4294 [Blog Editor: For the Islam challenged it’s from a Hadith]:


… When you meet your enemies who are polytheists invite them to three courses of action. If they respond to any one of these, you also accept it and withhold yourself from doing them any harm. Invite them to (accept) Islam; if they respond to you, accept it from them and desist from fighting against them. Then invite them to migrate from their lands to the land of Muhajirs and inform them that, if they do so, they shall have all the privileges and obligations of the Muhajirs. If they refuse to migrate, tell them that they will have the status of Bedouin Muslims and will be subjected to the Commands of Allah like other Muslims, but they will not get any share from the spoils of war or Fai’ except when they actually fight with the Muslims (against the disbelievers). If they refuse to accept Islam, demand from them the Jizya. If they agree to pay, accept it from them and hold off your hands. If they refuse to pay the tax, seek Allah’s help and fight them …


Muslims threaten, if the victims succumb, they are recruited to victimize others. If not, they are attacked. After the conquest, they are enslaved, dhimmified or convert to Islam, in which case they are recruited to victimize others. Islam is vampirism: stake it!!!


Edited by John R. Houk

Text enclosed in brackets are by the Editor.


© Dajjal


Blog Editor for further learning check out below links: (Crusader’s Amory – Copious Expose Islam site) (P1177).html (Pro-Islam info) (Pro-Shia info) (Pro-Islam on Hadith Classifications) (Pro-Islam on Sahih Muslim Hadith [Hadis, Hadiths, Ahadith or whatever])


Jizya Opposition to halal is irrational, is it?

Imposing jizya in Australia - Morning Mail photo

I am a member of the Facebook Group Stop Islam. Another member there found a Bret Harte article at the Facebook Group Australophobia. Just to be clear I am an American and not Australian; nonetheless there is a growing controversy in the Land Down Under that could creep its way into the USA. That Controversy is centered on legally forcing food packing or distribution companies to pay a fee to a certified Muslim who then gives the “halal” stamp of approval that notifies Muslims that the food is certified A-OK to consume according to Sharia. IN ESSENCE this would force various Aussie companies to pay the jizya tax for Muslim certification in which the fees would trickle into some Muslim theopolitical agenda (whether that be Mosque building, Muslim charity [Can you say terrorist funding?] and so on).


Australia’s controversy today will probably be America’s controversy tomorrow. I mean Radical Muslims are preaching in the National Cathedral in Washington DC.


My first inkling was to cross post this directly from Stop Islam; however it became apparent to me that the Facebook postings were without Mr. Harte’s links he included in his original post. So thanks to the old Google search engine I found a version at an Aussie location called Morning Mail dated 11/13/14. I included the original links from there. Take note that the Stop Islam version also has some of the Morning Mail comments at the end of the post. Those comments are currently longer than the Stop Islam version. I am not providing the comment links from the original. Also note the English grammar of the Aussies is similar to the British hence there are some spelling deviations from the grammar rules found in America.


JRH 11/20/14

Please Support NCCR


Jizya Opposition to halal is irrational, is it?
Bret Harte

Paula Wells shared Australophobia‘s post.

November 15 at 11:42pm

Stop Islam Closed Facebook Group


The craven halal-paying companies are striking back. Australians who oppose halal are prejudiced, ignorant, misinformed, extremists and inspired by hate, they say.

The Dairy Farmers Association talks of “irrational bullying campaigns” and urges members to go ahead and pay the halal levy.

So does South Australia’s Investment and Trade Minister, Martin Hamilton-Smith. He urged local exporters to “keep working” with the multi-million-dollar Middle Eastern market. “I encourage South Australian exporters to put enterprise and job opportunities ahead of the extreme views of a minority… prejudice has no place in Australia.”

And as for the cloth-head halal supporter, Darren Chester MP of the Nationals, he is more than a supporter of it, he is an apologist for it. In his own words, “The decision by a food company to meet halal requirements is a voluntary decision.” What? All these Australian companies suddenly voluntarily agreed to pay a religious tax? Chester is either pig-ignorant or is deliberately misinforming those who write to him.

So are Australians prejudiced, ignorant, misinformed, hate-inspired extremists?

Let’s start with the Jizya.

Muhammad very clearly established that people of other religions have to pay a tax – the jizya – to Muslims as a reminder of their inferior status.

It is specifically laid down in the Muslim Holy Book: “Fight those who believe not in Allah… until they pay the Jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.” Qur’an (9:29)

This is not some out-of-date old notion from the 8th century. The jizya is commanded by Allah himself. It is an obligation on all Muslims. But it is an obligation which actually coins money for them and as such one which has been enthusiastically endorsed by them.

The extortion has been followed through the centuries and was a part of the brutal Ottoman rule over Christians, Jews and others. The Serbs of Europe often had to hand over their children to satisfy the collector of the jizya. The children were converted to Islam and trained in jihad as warriors (Janissaries [Link]). This was the Devşirme [Link and Link] system.

In India, well into the 17th century, Muslim jizya collectors would even take the wives and children of impoverished Hindus and sell them into slavery for the jizya requirement.

This is why Islamic purists such as Hamas and the Taliban wish to reinstate the jizya.

The Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt have it as part of their current policy that Christians must pay a jizya and an Egyptian cleric on al-Hafaz TV said in 2013 that America that Muslims should demand more money as jizya from the Americans so that, in his words, “we can leave them alone.”

The notorious British Muslim preacher, Anjem Choudary, points out that “the normal situation is for [Muslims] to take money from the kuffar” (kuffars are non-muslims and is a term of contempt.) This cookie, by the way has been associated with around 20% of all convicted terrorism cases in the UK over the past 10 years, says he wants a passport to join ISIS, according to The Times.

The first thing ISIS does right now is impose jizya. The rounding up of women and selling them in the markets is one way how they collect the jizya. It is sanctioned by the ISIS Mullahs. Hamas has the same idea.

So the obligation is current, and it is no grand leap to see the halal levy as one way the jizya is paid. Under a masquerade of the thinnest kind a certifier decides that no pig fat was used anywhere in the production. They even certify water!

Muslims make no bones about it. Halal certification is a gold mine. They use this very phrase – a gold mine – in the Indonesian Jakarta Post. [Click on this link for a detailed look at Muslim enforcement of halal]

Now, it really does not matter how the money collected is disbursed – the very fact that it is collected at all is Australian’s acceptance of an inferior status to Muslims. This is why it is collected – to make Australians feel subdued At present, in Australia, it supposedly goes to charity.

Let’s assume it does.

What charity?

What are the objects of Muslim charity? Well, laid down as top of the list of charitable objects is building mosques. It is called Waqf.

Is that clear enough?

The money that Australian companies pays to Muslims as halal certification is used for the building of mosques.

And on the list of charitable objects is the support of jihad warriors.

Nowhere on the list is any non-Muslim objective, not one cent goes to the Royal Blind Society or the RSPCA or Vinnies [St. Vincent de Paul Society]. It is raised from Australian citizens to go to Muslim-only causes.

And in spite of all the poppycock talked about inspection by government authorities – there is none.

No Australian with an ounce of pride would pay the halal extortion.

But many Australian companies have no sense of national pride or honour; they are gutless appeasers of Islam following a buck. Literally they sell Australia’s soul for their profit.

And so too, do the ‘economic rationalists’ in Canberra.

* “During a roundtable discussion on U.S. and foreign aid to Egypt, an Islamic cleric, clearly of the Salafi bent—he had their trademark mustache-less-beard—insisted that the U.S. must be treated contemptuously, like a downtrodden dhimmi, or conquered infidel; that Egypt must make the U.S. conform to its own demands; and that, then, all the money the U.S. offers to Egypt in foreign aid can be taken as rightfully earned jizya.”


Share this:


{8 comments… add one}


One thing I do know is that we are not the minority. If we were, what we say would be gospel, that is how this country works now.



Ordinary real Australians are being sold out to Islam by ignorant politicians and arrogant un-Australian companies all in the name of a buck. Even though the Islamics themselves say of the ‘Zakat’ (tax):

6. “Fi sabi `Lillah. Those who are fighting in the Cause of Allah, e.g., the Mujahideen.”

(Support terrorism?)

7. “Ibn as’Sabil. The wayfarer; Muslim travelers who need assistance while on a journey.”

(Pay fares of those going to join ISIS in Iraq?)

Those running these companies aren’t able to programme their one brain cell to recognise that aiding and abetting Islamic terrorise is treason and apparently the government doesn’t want to know about it either.

This national disgrace is about more than just building jihadist training centres (Mosques). It is about supporting Sharia with plans to introduce it into Australia as soon as they have the numbers here to pull it off.

In the words of an leading Mullah, “At a meeting of the Islamic Global Halal Congress held in Pakistan, the former Grand Mufti of Bosnia, Mustafa Ceric called upon all Muslims to, “Conquer the world through the Halal movement, as Halal means pure and hygienic and the non-Muslim world will have no choice but to accept it.” He went on to say, “The Halal certification movement has the strength to lead Muslims to rule the global economy, as food and other services are the basic need of every human being”.

Wake up Australia and boycott halal products. Go to and become informed about the realities of this Islamic extortion racket that you are paying for.


Edited by John R. Houk

Texts or links enclosed by brackets are by the Editor.


About Morning Mail’s author Bret Harte:


Morning Mail does not want your real name or personal details as pen-names are the standard. Content character, not personal character. For a pen-name pick a quality, dead, non-Australian author. Jack London, Lord Byron, Bret Harte, Mary Shelley, Charlotte Bronte or let MM pick one. This provides a consistent look, and gives a spurious air of intellectualism to Morning Mail. (Contributor’s Page; Morning Mail; 10/24/13)

Jizya Resurgence

Muslim - Dhimmi Christian


John R. Houk

© July 8, 2011


Do you know what jizya is? Jizya is the name that Muslims use to extort money from non-Muslims (kafir) living under the political authority of a Muslim State. The jizya-poll tax is justified as protection money that the non-believing Muslim will be free from harm from other Muslims. Of course there is also a catch to the protection money. The kafir living in Muslim lands is also called a dhimmi. The dhimmi must pay jizya for protection; however if the dhimmi prays in public, acts in any many defined as insulting to a Muslim, if a dhimmi builds a Church, if a dhimmi attempts to marry a Muslim and does not convert then a crime has been committed and on and on and on. The point is the life a dhimmi in a Muslim nation is worse than what Black South Africans endured during White enforced Apartheid.


Now a Muslim apologist will tell a Westerner especially an American that jizya has not been enforced for years and years. Most Muslim nations indeed officially ended the imposition of jizya by the late 19th and early 20th century; however the spirit of jizya has not ended for the dhimmis in Muslim lands. Marks of humiliation are still exacted in Muslim nations to this very day. If the humiliation is not government sanctioned the government looks away as Muslim clerics lead Muslim mobs to acts of violence and destruction against the dhimmi (primarily Christians) according to the Islamic rules of jizya and dhimmitude.


The practice of jizya’s unofficial enforcement was less for protection and more to bring wealth to conquering Muslim Caliphs. The conquered Christian and Hindu areas of the world was the majority population. Once oppressive measures of dhimmitude took its toll on the Christian faithful, the jizya began to bring less revenue as more converted to Islam to escape the cruelty of dhimmitude.  


With a resurgence of Islamic purity sweeping the Muslim world which is quickly ending the Muslim apologist claim that Islamism is an aberrant practice compared to the majority of moderate Muslim, there is a clamor for the return of jizya and government sanctioned enforcement of dhimmitude as official policy in Muslim nations. The Egyptian government which is slowly becoming dominated by the ideology of the Muslim Brotherhood is publicly talking of the return of official jizya for that nation’s rather large Coptic Christian population.


Raymond Ibrahim writes about Egyptian talk of returning the jizya on Coptic Christians.


JRH 7/8/11