NO SURPRISE HERE! Deceptive propagandists are attempting to discredit the entirety of the Documentary over ONE reporting error. The propagandists use the brainwash that implies one mistake means the entire Documentary is unfounded.
Let’s use lying propagandist logic about COVID/mRNA-Jab:
Joe Biden’s entire campaign was based on lies about COVID.
The above two videos are a mere fraction of outright lies, actual disinformation and misinformation spread by the oligarchical elites to justify their crimes against humanity. AND YET they accuse truth-tellers of misinformation, disinformation and conspiracy theory. Using propagandist logic, the entire COVID and Jab narrative is discredited. Well, their narrative should be discredited but not because of idiot logic; the GLOBALIST-COVID-JAB narrative MUST be discredited based on actual facts rather than the lies spread as if they were facts.
GreatGameIndia calls BBC propagandist Rachael Schraer on her disinformation and includes her BBC article which calls “Died Suddenly” a fake news documentary. I personally would have only showed the twisted information parts but author Mark Crispin Miller (GGI only credits authorship at the end of the post. I’m making an editorial decision to include the name at the beginning) shows but hit pieces and “Died Suddenly” corroborating pieces.
First, if you have not yet seen Died Suddenly, the killer documentary that dropped two days ago, I urge you to watch it as soon as you can—it’s a little over an hour—and share it far and wide. Although it makes some trivial mistakes, it is a very solid piece of work—as sound as it is harrowing, and that’s really saying something; so all those who appreciate my weekly Substacks on the toll of the “vaccines” will also very much appreciate this film, and learn a lot from it (as I did):
Watch the video below[Blog Editor: If you haven’t watched “Died Suddenly” yet, I highly encourage you to view the little over an hour Documentary. HOWEVER, you should read the Miller article to better understand the hit piece propaganda you might have already read prior to viewing]:
I’m certain that this film will open many people’s eyes, which is (of course) why I am recommending it. The BBC has joined me in that expectation—which has impelled them not to recommend the film, but, on the contrary, to try to kill it, with this attempted takedown by one Rachael Schraer, who works for BBC as an “disinformation reporter” (as indeed she is).
On the one hand, Schraer’s piece is a mighty effort at dissuasion, as she plays every trick she can to urge her readers not to watch the film themselves, so they might make up their own minds. That’s the last thing she and her employer want, since, by now, so many people have lost loved ones to the jab, and/or have been thereby severely harmed themselves, that they may be both staggered and enlightened by Died Suddenly, which, if they’re not activists already, might move them to speak out at last, and forge alliances with others who have also been severely hurt.
And so, to move people not to watch it, Schraer vigorously slimes it as a shoddy and deceptive piece of propaganda, based on weak research (if any), riddled with gross errors, and also an offensive exercise, since all those poor people that it claims have been bereaved or injured by their “vaccination” almost never were, such consequences being “rare” (as she says twice); and even hinting that they were thus injured is a cruel and callous act of “trolling,” typical of “anti-vaxxers.” (Check out the rather murky anecdote with which Schraer starts her piece.) Above all, Schraer casts Died Suddenly as an expression of delusion: “[T]he film tells a fictitious story of a dangerous vaccine killing off swathes of young people – all part of an imagined plot to depopulate the earth” [emphasis added].
And while she does all she can to make as many people as the BBC can reach not want to see the film, Schraer also ends by hinting that right-minded people (like herself) should lobby Twitter—that is, Elon Musk—not to let its users recommend the film, or, presumably, even talk about it in that forum.
Again, Died Suddenly does make some few mistakes; Schraer caught the film’s misuse of video showing the mid-game collapse of Kansas State basketball player Keyontae Johnson—presented as a sudden “vaccine” death, although the footage is from 2020, and Johnson is, in fact, alive and well. It’s too bad that the filmmakers slipped up like that, since it’s a gift to propagandists such as Schraer; but such things happen when you’re dealing with a heavy volume of material (I’ve made mistakes like that myself)—but such errors in Died Suddenly are few and far between, whereas Schraer’s piece is a tapestry of propaganda lies: I’ve annotated it to highlight some of them; so read it, and my annotations, here, and make up your own mind.
And if you should be so moved, feel free to email Rachel Schraer (whose address is below her piece), and/or BBC ombudsman Nick Bennett (whose address I can’t seem to find), and ask her, or him, or them—and as politely as you can!—if they think it’s appropriate for an august journalistic outlet like the BBC to function as a propaganda mouthpiece for Big Pharma—which is precisely what the Beeb became with its so-called “Trusted News Initiative,” whereby Big Media outlets have been simultaneously pumping out disinformation and blacking out all those who have dissented from the official COVID narrative, no matter how extensive their experience or impressive their credentials.
It is of course regrettable, and wholly understandable, that people who have been bereaved or harmed by “vaccination,” but haven’t yet faced up to it, should feel attacked by those who broach that possibility—especially by strangers coming at them out of nowhere. And yet such random tactlessness is nowhere near as grave a sin as pushing lethal “vaccination” on the global population for no scientific reason, and without informed consent—the mortal sin committed by the BBC and all its “journalistic” peers, and one for which there can be no forgiveness.
What do the inventor of mRNA technology; the lead author of the most downloaded paper on Covid-19 in the American Journal of Medicine; a former editor of the American Journal of Epidemiology; …
They died suddenly – then the anti-vax trolling started
“Seven days, 18 hours, 39 minutes ago my beloved… died suddenly of cardiac arrest”. When Victoria Brownworth logged onto Twitter to post these words about her partner of 23 years, she didn’t know that two of them in particular would provoke a storm of online harassment.
Because, as Victoria waited at her home in Philadelphia on Sunday night for her wife’s ashes to be delivered, a video titled Died Suddenly was about to drop.
In an hour and eight minutes of dramatic music and out-of-context news reports, the film tells a fictitious story of a dangerous vaccine killing off swathes of young people – all part of an imagined plot to depopulate the earth.
It landed on niche video-sharing platform Rumble on Monday and began to spread [like COVID—MCM. By Wednesday morning it had been viewed more than 4 million times on Rumble and at least 1.5 million times on Twitter.
The claims made in the video quickly fall apart under scrutiny. Vast amounts of evidence from different independent scientists all over the world, as well as the experiences of billions of people, have shown that serious Covid vaccine side effects are rare.
But its call for people to look at any reported deaths through a lens of suspicion had made Victoria fair game – and as the phrase “died suddenly” started to trend, people flocked to her memorial thread.
“How long’s it been since she got the jab?”, hundreds of people began to reply.
Victoria’s wife, Madelaine Gold – a painter and design professor – had an advanced stage of cancer, though she had been doing better just before she died. There is no suggestion the vaccine had anything to do with her death.
When she began to hit back, Victoria was told she was lying.
“She did die suddenly… We didn’t have time to say goodbye, I didn’t have time to give her a last kiss. I will never get to talk to her again.”
“They were trolling her obituary, literally.”
So what was it about this film that led people online to deny Victoria’s reality?
The film flashes through dozens of upsetting news reports and images of people collapsing.
One headline reads: “My kind, compassionate son died unexpectedly.” Another clip shows a young athlete dramatically keeling over.
Together, this can easily be used to paint an alarming picture of something suspicious going on.
Yet just a couple more clicks would reveal the son in question died in a car crash. And the athlete, college basketball player Keyontae Johnson, collapsed in December 2020 before he could even have had a Covid vaccine. He didn’t die suddenly as the title suggests – he returned to the court last week.
Other people featured are also still alive. [Well, that’s a relief! Who are they?—MCM] And several of the genuine deaths are explained by an alternative cause within the very news reports used as evidence by the film makers.
Image caption, Keyontae Johnson collapsed during a game on 12 December 2020
Part of the film’s power is that it takes scraps of truth but distorts them to tell a misleading story.
There have been a small number of deaths from the vaccines – I’ve spoken to people affected – but these cases are rare and their causes are established through extensive monitoring, complex medical testing and statistical analysis.
It’s not possible to measure vaccine side effects by simply Googling news reports. As Dr Frank Han, a US cardiologist says, it can “give you pieces of the puzzle, but actual medical training is necessary to link all the pieces of how the body works together”.
Long stretches of the film involve gruesome images of clots being pulled out of bodies, designed to suggest Covid vaccines are having alarming effects.
When people feel afraid or disgusted they might be more likely to leap to conclusions. But these images can’t tell us anything on their own.
Firstly, they are mostly based on the testimony of one embalmer with no indication this is a wider concern.
And, Dr Han explains, it’s “insufficient to establish why the clots are there”.
Blood clots are commonly found in dead bodies and are caused by a range of things from smoking to being bed-bound to Covid-19.
When unusual clotting was identified in rare cases after the AstraZeneca vaccine – not used in the US – it was quickly investigated and vaccine recommendations changed, after which the cases pretty much disappeared.
Emotional stories, backed up by official numbers make a powerful persuasive tool.
But it’s important to understand where the numbers actually come from and whether they are being fairly represented – something many people won’t have the time or resources to investigate.
A graph in the film shows stillbirths shooting up around 2021, making the unsupported suggestion Covid vaccines are causing miscarriages, looks shocking.
The film-makers don’t provide a source, though.
Allow me (MCM):
A memo leaked, late last month, from a hospital system in Fresno, CA has revealed a sharp uptick in stillbirths among pregnant women. The memo was reported by Epoch Times on Oct. 24. The lede:
An email recently shared with The Epoch Times that was sent out to the healthcare staff of a hospital system in Fresno, California, reported an increase in “demise patients,” or stillbirths, that is expected to continue, according to the email.
“There were 22 demise patients in August [2022], which ties the record number of demises in July 2021, and so far in September there have been 7 and it’s only the 8th day of the month,” a managing nurse wrote.
The managing nurse went on to write that she hopes the “trend doesn’t continue indefinitely.”
“I know of a few more that are scheduled to deliver in the week ahead, so unfortunately the process is going to be very familiar with all of you,” the managing nurse said.
The staff member who leaked the email told The Epoch Times that since the rollout of the vaccines, the fetal death (stillbirth rate) has skyrocketed from its pre-COVID-19 vaccine average of one to two every three months in her hospital alone.
The staff member spoke to The Epoch Times on condition of anonymity due to fear of losing their job.
On the “substantial surge” of stillbirths in three different locations in Canada, as noted by Canadian whistleblowers, and reported by Dr. James Thorp, whose essay was posted on Substack by Dr. Robert Malone on Nov. 10:
Three other Canadian whistleblowers document a substantial surge in the stillbirth rates in three separate geographic locations in 2021 as documented in the three graphs below. The data was compiled from multiple whistleblowers in Canada. The hospitals and Canadian Government have not been forthcoming in providing clarity with their vital statistics.
As to the uptick of stillbirths in British Columbia, last year Dr. Melvin Bruchet sought to call attention to the spike in Vancouver—for which he was attacked by the Canadian “free press” (just as the BBC is attacking Died Suddenly), and then forcibly committed to a psychiatric ward, as in the Soviet Union, or Trudeau’s father’s Cuba:
On the deliberate obfuscation, by the New England Journal of Medicine, of the stillbirth rate among pregnant women injected with either the Pfizer or Moderna “vaccine” in the early months of 2021:
Although the voiceover claims the data is from Waterloo, Canada, genuine data from Ontario, the province Waterloo is part of, has not seen any increase in stillbirths, according to Dr Victoria Male, a reproductive immunologist [at Imperial College London, well-known as a recipient of Bill Gates’ largesse—MCM].
In fact, a large study found a “lower (not higher) rate of stillbirth among those vaccinated in pregnancy, compared to those who were not,” she said.
This is supported by dozens of studies involving tens of thousands of people produced by different independent teams around the world.
That link to “dozens of studies” takes us to a summary article by none other than Dr. Victoria Male!
The tactics used in this video have been seen before and this isn’t the first time misleading health information has been spread by verified accounts.
What’s new this time is the main account spreading the film on Twitter has bought verification – the blue tick which is supposed to be a mark of credibility, something experts have warned could help misinformation spread.
“Since Elon Musk took over he’s just, you know, let it be the Wild West again,” Victoria believes.
A like hit-piece from Forbes:
New ‘Died Suddenly’ Film Pushes Unfounded Depopulation Claims About Covid-19 Vaccine
A representative passage:
While the film shows headlines and stories of people dying suddenly, it never really provides much concrete scientific evidence linking Covid-19 vaccines to all these sudden deaths. It essentially just says oh look at all these sudden deaths over the past couple years and, oh. people, in general, have been getting Covid-19 vaccines. Never mind the fact that people have been dying suddenly ever since, oh, the beginning of human existence. Never mind the fact that over a million people in the U.S. and over 6.6 million around the world have died from, you know, Covid-19, since early 2020. Never mind the fact that these deaths from the Covid-19 pandemic have resulted in excess mortality. Never mind the fact that people have been dying suddenly since Rep. Marjorie Taylor-Greene (R-Georgia) was elected to Congress when the film doesn’t try to link these two sets of events in same way as it is trying to link vaccines with excess mortality.
Mark Crispin Miller is the Professor of Media, Culture, and Communication at NYU. He is also the founder of News from Underground and author of numerous books, including Boxed In, The Bush Dyslexicon, and Fooled Again. This article was originally published on News from Underground.
GreatGameIndia is being actively targeted by powerful forces who do not wish us to survive. Your contribution, however small help us keep afloat. We accept voluntary payment for the content available for free on this website via UPI, PayPal and Bitcoin.
2 When the [uncompromisingly] righteous are in authority, the people rejoice; but when the wicked man rules, the people groan and sigh.
12 If a ruler listens to falsehood, all his officials will become wicked. — Proverbs 29: 2, 12 AMPC
Barbara Loe Fisher Screen Capture
Barbara Loe Fisher – President and Co-Founder of National Vaccine Information Center – has an awesome monologue AGAINST Medical Tyranny focused on COVID Lies and Jab Lies. The monologue us about 27-minutes long and worth EVERY word dripping with truth and facts. I ran into the video on the MeWe Social Platform (so when I share there, cut me some slack if you’ve seen it. Whether you’ve watched for the first time or already viewed, YOU SHOULD SHARE as an action against Medical Tyranny).
Ms. Fisher follows the monologue with what appears to be the text of the video. So, watch or read; BUT dear God in Heaven resist this godless wicked tyranny. Resist individually via civil disobedience or join a group in your community organizing active civil resistance.
If you’ve ever read Dr. Mercola posts you should notice the post is formatted after that fashion. Indeed, a version Ms. Fisher’s post is at Mercola.com, however I’m cross posting the nvic.org website version.
Rumble VIDEO: Weaponizing COVID to Promote Collectivism [I just realized the Rumble (which undoubtedly is the original version) does not have the typical embed codes. I found a Bitchute version which I am using posted on Bitchute Channel PeppiDiCapri]
The morning that hurricane Ian hit the coast of southwest Florida, the dramatic images of the raw power of Mother Nature blowing apart structures built by human hands and sweeping them into the sea were unbelievable.1 After hours and hours of wind, rain, and a catastrophic water surge that left a trail of destruction in its wake, I thought about how very different this natural disaster was compared to the one unleashed on the world in 2020 that also left a trail of destruction in its wake.
Two disasters, one a natural disaster legally termed an “act of God,” and the other a disaster that, three years later, people are still asking: was it natural or manmade?23
Whether or not the SARS-CoV-2 virus spontaneously jumped out of a bat and into a human being4 or was created by scientists in a biohazard lab,567 one thing is clear: the chaotic response by the experts in charge has been a disaster in itself.8 And the people, whose lives were impacted by that chaos, experienced the same kind of sudden shock, fear,9 disorientation, isolation, and powerlessness that many people, who experience a hurricane, tsunami, tornado, earthquake, or fire, feel when the unexpected happens.
Public Health Pandemic Response Policies Generated Fear, Instability
In the middle of this hurricane, I found myself thinking about why fear of the unknown10 brought on by this emergency was so familiar. It was familiar because we had just experienced fear of the unknown in the winter of 2020,11 when we were told by public health officials that a weirdly mutated coronavirus was on the loose and would kill us if we didn’t hide in our homes, wear cloth over our faces, cut off physical contact with our family and friends, keep our children out of school, and stop getting our hair cut or going to church, exercising in a gym, entering restaurants or certain stores, and be OK with the government labeling many workers and private businesses as “non-essential,” which shut down our economy and threatened to plunge families into bankruptcy.121314
The people in Florida facing this real life-threatening emergency were suddenly having to call upon emotional and physical reserves already depleted by having recently gone through another emergency, in which some lost their health or their loved ones to the mutant virus, or were injured by disabling COVID vaccine reactions, while others lost their jobs, homes or businesses during the 2020 lockdown that, thankfully, was cut short in Florida compared to many other states.
The fallout from destructive federal COVID response policies on the mental health, child development, and economic stability of our nation is still being assessed.15161718192021
Two disasters: a natural one, and one that the world is still having trouble defining.
Post-hurricane Ian, there is a lot of analysis going on in Florida by those whose job it is to prepare for and respond to hurricanes.22 By most accounts, it is an honest analysis by state officials working hard to help people deal with what happened rather than politicizing what happened.232425
Last month, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control once again extended the COVID pandemic public health emergency declaration, this time until January 11, 2023.26 To justify keeping us living in fear, 2728 federal health officials are warning ominously that a “twindemic” of a more transmissible SARS-CoV-2 virus mutant strain, combined with an especially bad influenza season, is poised to make more of us very sick this fall and winter if we don’t all get a COVID shot and a flu shot at the same time.2930 One high-ranking government doctor said with a straight face – “I really believe this is why God gave us two arms — one for the flu shot and the other one for the COVID shot.” 31
But Americans have grown weary of virus porn, and while the majority of Americans have gotten at least one COVID shot, polls show that just 14 percent of children under age five have gotten one.323334 There are signs that Americans are questioning the ever-changing number of COVID booster shots being aggressively advertised by Big Pharma and government officials, who are trying hard to convince us we will need to get a COVID shot every single year. 35363738 In this very lucrative marketing campaign, the two mRNA COVID vaccine manufacturers, Pfizer and Moderna, raked in 50 billion dollars in 2021 and 2022 alone, with a promise of billions more in profits in the years to come.39404142
A Weirdly Mutated Virus, A Reactive Biological That’s Not a Vaccine
Those two drug companies are selling a cell disrupter biological product that is called a vaccine, but in no way resembles any other vaccine that has ever been injected into humans to theoretically combat a weirdly mutated coronavirus, which is acting like no other virus that has ever infected humans. The mRNA biological has been described as “transforming the body into a vaccine-making machine,”43 while one scientist explains that the rapidly mutating SARS-CoV-2 virus is “essentially viral evolution on steroids.”44 But, still, nobody in charge of the COVID pandemic response seems to know exactly where this virus on steroids came from or exactly what kind of damage it – or the genetically engineered components of the mRNA product – are doing to the biological integrity of human populations.454647484950515253
The mRNA COVID vaccines are associated with many ugly side effects, especially ones that compromise the blood and heart and can cause death.5455 Online it has been dubbed the “clot shot”,5657 even as owners of social media platforms try to shut down all conversations about serious COVID vaccine reactions being reported online,5859606162 in the medical literature,63 and to the U.S. Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS).6465 There have been more than 1.3 million adverse events reported to VAERS after mRNA COVID vaccinations, including heart, brain and immune system damage and death. These 1.3 million reports represent more than half of all vaccine reactions reported for all vaccines since VAERS became operational in 1990 under the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act,66 while less than one percent of all vaccine reactions are reported to VAERS.67
The mRNA COVID vaccine is the most reactive one ever distributed in the U.S. to the entire population.
COVID Shot Reactions Are Good Even When the Product Doesn’t Prevent Infection
Yet, as soon as the mRNA COVID products were released in December 2020 under an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA), public health officials told people to celebrate adverse reaction symptoms, trying to convince them that those reaction symptoms means the vaccine is doing its job and would prevent them from getting sick with COVID.68 Nothing could be further from the truth.69 That lie not only persuaded people to accept COVID vaccine reactions as normal and a good thing, but it persuaded doctors to dismiss COVID vaccine-related injuries and deaths as just a “coincidence.”7071
Which brings us to perhaps the biggest elephant in the room, and that is how blatantly the people were lied to from the beginning about just how effective the mRNA COVID vaccines would be, as government officials allowed people to believe that getting vaccinated would protect them from being infected with the new coronavirus and transmitting it to others, when that was never true. In fact, it was so untrue that, in 2021, CDC officials changed the centuries-old definition of a vaccine from a “product that stimulates a person’s immune system to produce immunity to a specific disease” to “a preparation that is used to stimulate the body’s immune response against diseases,” and they convinced Merriam Webster Dictionary to do the same.727374 That’s because the FDA only required drug companies to demonstrate the COVID vaccine had at least 50 percent efficacy in preventing severe symptoms of COVID disease rather than preventing infection.75
There is a difference between a product producing immunity that prevents infection and one that stimulates an immune response but does not prevent infection, especially when you can be infected with the coronavirus and not show symptoms.
With vaccine induced immunity off the table and vaccine adverse reactions viewed as a good thing, by the end of October 2022, the global mass vaccination campaign had convinced about 70 percent of the world’s population to get at least one COVID shot.76
United Nations’ WHO Heading Up Global COVID Vaccine Marketing Campaign
The sales force for Big Pharma’s COVID vaccine marketing campaign is headquartered at the United Nation’s World Health Organization,777879 with de facto satellite offices in government agencies like the National Institutes of Health (NIH), Gavi Alliance, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, World Economic Forum, major universities, and financial and other institutions ideologically and politically committed to imposing “The Great Reset” on all countries.80 According to Klaus Schwab, who in 1971 founded an “international organization for public-private cooperation” called the World Economic Forum, the world is in the middle of the “Fourth Industrial Revolution,” which is “characterized by a range of new technologies that are fusing the physical, digital, and biological worlds, impacting all disciplines, economies and industries and even challenging ideas about what it means to be human.”81
In June 2020, Schwab proclaimed, “Now is the time for a great reset” because, he said, in order for the world to effectively respond to the COVID-19 pandemic, governments “must act swiftly to revamp all aspects of our societies and economies, from education to social contracts and working conditions.”82
To prepare the way for The Great Reset, on October 18, 2019, the World Economic Forum, along with the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and Johns Hopkins University sponsored a simulated global pandemic planning exercise in New York City called Event 201.83 A “Pandemic Emergency Board” was assembled for Event 201 that included representatives of the United Nations, World Bank, the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control, the China Centers for Disease Control, and leaders from the travel, banking, pharmaceutical and healthcare industries.84
The virus selected for use in the simulated “worst case scenario” global pandemic planning exercise held three months before the World Health Organization declared a coronavirus “public health emergency of international concern” was: the coronavirus.8586
The nagging question is: was that just a coincidence?
Clearly, it will take a lot of coordination and agreement between all governments to pull off a global Great Reset. Three years into the global COVID health emergency, it appears the global public health elite are leading the way.
In September 2022, the once respected medical journal, The Lancet, published a 56-page report called “The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic.”87The first big red flag in the report is the long list of financial conflicts of interest authors have with drug companies; government health agencies; the United Nations and its public health agency arm, the World Health Organization; Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Rockefeller Foundation and other institutions that fund or conduct vaccine research and development and promote mandatory use of vaccines.
Once family owned, The Lancet is now owned by the publishing conglomerate, Elsevier, and concerns have been raised about editorial independence, in light of investor ties to major banking, pharmaceutical and biotech corporations. One critique of the Lancet Commission report was written by a public health physician, who previously called out the journal in July 2022 for publishing what he described as “a weakly-evidenced opinion advocating medical fascism.”88 That opinion, written by well-known compulsory vaccination proponents, called for strict enforcement of COVID vaccine mandates in the U.S., and loss of employment and school education for those who refuse to comply.89
The Lancet Commission was originally assembled in the summer of 2020 as an international group of global “experts,” primarily doctors and professors at prestigious universities, who were charged with addressing the COVID pandemic. One of their first tasks was to investigate the origins of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, an endeavor they quickly abandoned because of what the authors described as “divisive public discussion” and “unprecedented attack and pressure” on Commission members.
Leaving that inconvenient “where did the virus come from” question on the table, the Lancet Commission went on to publish a self-aggrandizing political manifesto that fails to honestly analyze what went wrong with the global COVID pandemic response and, instead, basically calls for doing more of the same more quickly in the future. In a stunning demonstration of hubris and ideological bias, Commission members stray from their areas of expertise and call on governments to devalue individual rights and adopt a collectivist orientation that forces individuals to comply with multi-lateral health policies and laws adopted by the United Nations. They said, “all governments, regulators and institutions must be reoriented toward society as a whole rather than the interest of individuals – a concept the Commissioners call prosociality.”
Attacking U.S. Lawmakers, Critics of Destructive Pandemic Response Failures
This “prosociality” reorientation would, of course, require that much more money and power be given to the United Nations and the World Health Organization so global populations can be controlled by a central authority, especially during global pandemic responses. Defending their slogan “no one is safe until everyone is safe,” which they claim “is not mere rhetoric, or a moral truth, but an epidemiological reality,” they viciously attack U.S. lawmakers for being guilty of “neglecting scientific evidence and needlessly risking lives with a view to keeping the economy open,” and for promoting “anti-science rhetoric and disinformation about COVID 19.”
Refusing to acknowledge legitimate public concerns about authoritarian COVID response policies that led to catastrophic social and economic chaos and damage to mental and physical health of child and adult populations, the Commission complains that the World Health Organization and most governments did not move fast enough to test, identify and isolate the infected while simultaneously putting all people in masks and locking them in their homes – for a long, long time. There is no critical analysis of faulty COVID tests that did not work;9091 or bogus COVID death estimates that failed to distinguish between dying from COVID and dying with COVID;9293949596 or ineffective COVID treatment protocols in hospitals that made people sicker or killed them when they were inappropriately put on ventilators. 979899
While praising the “public-private partnerships” that fast-tracked development of COVID vaccines as a “triumph,” the Lancet Commission weaponizes the failed COVID pandemic response by placing most of the blame for COVID-related deaths on – you guessed it – those independent thinkers the Pharma’s sales force calls “anti-vaxxers.”
Infuriated that a lot of people in the U.S. and Europe questioned the competence of public health officials and defied their orders to mask up, isolate for months on end and take the COVID shot, the Lancet Commission authors alleged that anti-vaxxers – which according to Webster’s Dictionary now includes anyone who opposes mandatory vaccination100 – caused an “epidemic of misinformation and disinformation” that fostered “low public trust” in government officials and persuaded millions of people to repeatedly take to the streets in the United Kingdom, Ireland, Netherlands, Italy, France, Germany, Austria, Denmark, Sweden, Finland, Greece, Switzerland, Canada, Australia, Bulgaria, Serbia, Poland, Romania and other nations in 2020 and 2021 to protest lockdowns and vaccine passports.101102103
Blaming COVID Deaths on ‘Anti-Vaccine Movement’ and Individual Rights
They said “anti-vaccine propaganda in the Americas” caused “tens of millions of people to refuse vaccines and hundreds of thousands to needlessly lose their lives.” Obsessing over the lack of “solidarity” among governments to force everyone everywhere to march to the beat of the same drum, they express special hatred for what they describe as the “hostile and coordinated anti-vaccine movement that has spread dangerous and false information about the health risks of vaccines and has campaigned against vaccine mandates.”
Climbing up on very high horse, the Lancet Commission members put “climate change deniers” and “parents who refuse or delay routine childhood vaccinations” in the same basket. They repeatedly condemn political leaders and the digital media for the “deliberate spread of misinformation and disinformation…that fosters distrust in health officials and promotes the idea that individual opinions have equal weight to the best available scientific evidence.”
They called for application of “behavioral science” to convince people to engage in “prosociality” that leads to “optimal behaviors for pandemic control,” pointing out that people living in societies with “tight” or collectivist social norms follow public health orders much better than people living in societies with “loose” or individualistic social norms that champion freedom of individual choice. They claim future pandemics would be so much easier to handle if everyone in the world can be muzzled and locked down tight whenever government health officials fly the utilitarian flag for “the greater good” and demand we salute smartly and roll up our sleeves.
Their diatribe against societies allowing individuals to exercise freedom of thought, speech, conscience and autonomy would be amusing if they weren’t so deadly serious about what they want done about it.
Although there were some public demonstrations here in the U.S., they were not as big as they were in countries without a Constitution that ensures a balance of power between local, state and federal government. Americans stopped COVID vaccine mandates in 2021 and 2022 because state legislators, who make public health laws, looked at the science, listened to concerns of their constituents, and refused to mandate the vaccine.104 Although several U.S. Governors and city mayors issued Executive Orders mandating COVID vaccine and the federal government attempted to mandate the vaccine for all federal employees and contractors, not one state legislature voted to mandate the vaccine this year.105 The online NVIC Advocacy Portal, launched in 2010 to help citizens in every state defend vaccine informed consent rights and exemptions in public health laws had a lot to do with holding back COVID vaccine mandates and passports in the U.S. when populations in other countries with centralized political control could not.106
Public Health Elite Wants US to ‘Reorient’ To A Collectivist Society
It doesn’t take a PhD in political science to figure out that what the public health elite is calling for would require Americans to reject the cultural values and beliefs and governmental structure outlined in the US Constitution, which provides decentralized checks and balances on political power and guarantees individuals God given natural rights that limit the power of government.107108 The Public Health Empire is all about appropriating centralized power that can be wielded without accountability. That is why the Lancet Commission demands that the United States of America “reorient” toward a collectivist society, which would require disempowering local and state governments so that only the federal government – in “solidarity” with the United Nations, of course – has the authority to make public health laws and tell citizens what to think about and believe and do with their bodies and the bodies of their children.
Accompanying the Lancet Commission report was a Lancet editorial entitled “COVID-19: the case for prosociality.” And if you do a Google search using the words “prosociality and communism,” what you find at the top is an article published in Frontiers in Psychology in September 2022 entitled, “How prosocial behaviors are maintained in China: The relationship between communist authority and prosociality.”109 The authors note how prosocial behavior is associated with religious belief and argue that communist authority wielded by the ruling Communist Party of China has a positive effect on promoting prosocial behaviors in a secular atheist society. They say studies show that “the psychological functions of gods and governments are interchangeable.”
Thank you, Lancet Commission, for making the political goals of the Public Health Empire so crystal clear.
Mandatory Vaccination: The Tip of the Spear in the Culture Wars
I have been saying for many years that mandatory vaccination is the tip of the spear in the culture wars taking place in this country and others in the 21st Century. Because if the state can tag, track down and force individuals against their will to be injected with biologicals of known and unknown toxicity today, then there will be no limit on which individual freedoms the state can take away in the name of the greater good tomorrow.
Register today to use the NVIC Advocacy Portal at NVICAdvocacy.org and take action in your state to protect civil liberties in this historic Vaccine Culture War that will determine whether we will live free or die as slaves in a collectivist authoritarian state.
Be the one who never has to say you did not do today what you could have done to change tomorrow.
It’s your health, your family, your choice.
And our mission continues: No forced vaccination, not in America.
The Canada Free Press shared a Remnant TV video (https://tinyurl.com/4r3dn9zs) of Michael Matt looking back to two years ago at a Davos Meeting which set the stage for Election Coup 2020 to remove President Trump from Office.
In full disclosure I have one HUGE beef with President Trump with his still (or at least as far as I know) promotion of mRNA Jabs. The Jab data is now flooding in so fast about horrendous side-effects and deaths that even the CDC has begun – though very quietly – to walk back some of its “safe and effective” claims. And by quietly, I mean the amplified use of double-speak.
Other Conservatives – and by “other” I’m excluding Establishment pseudo-Conservatives and RINOs who are closer to treasonous Dem-Marxists – and Patriots might have their own pet peeve issues with the 2020-deposed President Trump. Mine is the mRNA Jab.
BUT LET’S FACE IT! No one inspires Dem-Marxist hatred, among the controlling Elitists and their poor brainwashed cadres alike, than Donald J. Trump. From the time President Trump was elected in 2016 right on through the days after he succumbed to the coup, the Alphabet Law Enforcement and Intel Community have tried to frame Trump and the President beat them back EVERY TIME!
It is my suspicion Mar-a-Lago is yet another frame Trump expedition to keep him off the 2024 Ballot. Look for explosive so-called Classified Documents to show up from that Gestapo-style raid that never were at the Trump private residence. THAT MEANS planted evidence! Every single Impeachment heresy was based on FBI lies. Unless a Whistleblower steps forward, Mar-a-Lago will be no different.
So back to CFP and Remnant TV.
Much of what Michael Matt predicted two years ago has come to past to bring about the WEF-Marxist-Globalist New World Order of the Great Reset Tyranny. To those who are unaware, Remnant TV views Christianity through the lens traditional Roman Catholicism. The key word is “traditional” because Matt wastes no time to criticize the Roman Catholic Communist Pope Francis (though I can’t recall Matt using the “Communist” moniker).
Utilizing the same logic Michael Matt explained Trump hatred by the Elitists prior to Election 2020 that resulted in a coup (TWO Documentaries explain how the Coup was accomplished), is the probable same logic a framed Trump is arrested OR if an arrest fails dues Dem-Marxist exposure – AN ASSASSINATION attempt.
So like I wrote, I have an mRNA issue with President Trump. BUT President Trump is feared by Dem-Marxists in the USA and the Marxist-Globalists of the WEF and the United Nations SO MUCH President Trump will ALWAYS be a hero to me.
Dear God in Heaven, I pray you WATCH or RE-WATCH this Remnant TV video which I am using the CFP as a launching pad.
JRH 8/24/22
Thank you to those who have stepped up!
READER SUPPORTED! I need Readers willing to chip in $5 – $10 – $25 – $50 – $100. PLEASE I need your generosity. PLEASE GIVE to Help me be a voice for Liberty:
[CFP] Editor’s Note: Even as the top two medical advisors—who put the pandemic pox upon world masses—distance themselves from accountability, Dr. Tony Fauci escaping accountability in a coming in a yesterday-announced December retirement, scarfed-up sidekick Dr. Deborah Birx, admitting she lied about Covid 19, authoring in a boastful book, the horror of world citizens isn’t close to over—but really just getting started. Fauci and Birx were needed by the monstrous globalists running the World Economic Forum (WEF). Now tossed aside like last night’s supper potatoes, they will travel anonymously down Memory Lane while their Masters take over leaving all of humanity in an orchestrated roller coaster world where NOTHING will ever remain the same.
Remnant Editor, Michael J. Matt, (God Bless Him!) called it right back in 2020, and is back to remind us today where humanity now stands at this point in Real Time, starting with American Midterm Elections only 11 weeks away. “Where we are now” comes, as he says, not in his own words, but in the words of global leaders setting the table for the Great Reset, which they were able to succeed under the cover of pretending it was only a “conspiracy”.
These leaders include Klaus Schwab, Bill Gates, George Soros, Al Gore, Pope Francis, and for God’s sake, even Britain’s Prince Charles, who will soon replace an aging Queen Elizabeth II.
As you go through The Defender’s analysis on how the CDC lies via twisted and bad data conclusions to American gullible Sheeple to entice compliance, YOU need to ask yourself a question: What is the CDC motive for lying? AND: Who ultimately benefits from CDC lies? One clue: the American can’t possibly benefit from CDC lies!
JRH 7/20/22
READER SUPPORTED! I need Readers willing to chip in $5 – $10 – $25 – $50 – $100. PLEASE I need your generosity. PLEASE GIVE to Help me be a voice for Liberty:
Big Tech Censorship is pervasive – Share voluminously on all social media platforms!
***************************
How CDC Blatantly Uses Weekly Reports to Spread COVID Disinformation: Three Examples
The authors of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report are afforded the luxury of broadcasting their findings to massive audiences through media outlets that don’t hold them accountable for even gross lapses in scientific rigor.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) — the primary U.S. health protection agency — publicly pledges, among other things, to “base all public health decisions on the highest quality scientific data that is derived openly and objectively.”
The CDC’s “primary vehicle for scientific publication of timely, reliable, authoritative, accurate, objective, and useful public health information and recommendations,” according to the agency, is its Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR).
The CDC states that the MMWR readership consists predominantly of physicians, nurses, public health practitioners, epidemiologists and other scientists, researchers, educators and laboratorians.
However, these weekly reports also serve as the means by which the agency disseminates its scientific findings to a much wider readership through media outlets that inform hundreds of millions of people.
Though the CDC asserts its MMWRs reliably communicate accurate and objective public health information, the reports are not subject to peer review, and the data behind the scientific findings are not always available to the public.
Moreover, when the media summarizes MMWR findings in articles intended for the general public, they often omit or misrepresent important details.
As a result, the reports often steer public opinion to a level of certainty the authors of the reports themselves cannot justify — and often, to incorrect conclusions.
As Marty Makary M.D., M.P.H., and Tracy Beth Høeg M.D., Ph.D., recently revealed, some officials within the CDC claim the heads of their agencies “are using weak or flawed data to make critically important public health decisions, that such decisions are being driven by what’s politically palatable to people in Washington or to the Biden administration and that they have a myopic focus on one virus instead of overall health.”
In this article, I will demonstrate how the CDC used three key MMWRs to compel the public to comply with pandemic response measures.
These reports were flawed to an extent suggesting more than mere incompetence or even negligence — they were deliberate attempts by CDC scientists to mislead the public.
The New York Times in May ran this story, “Why Masks work, but Mandates Haven’t,” in which the author concluded:
“When you look at the data on mask-wearing — both before vaccines were available and after, as well as both in the U.S. and abroad — you struggle to see any patterns.”
But that’s not what the CDC concluded in its March 5, 2021, MMWR:
“Mask mandates were associated with statistically significant decreases in county-level daily COVID-19 case and death growth rates within 20 days of implementation.”
How could the CDC claim there was a statistically significant decrease in cases within 20 days of mask mandate implementation if there were no patterns in the data?
The explanation is necessarily detailed because the CDC authors’ methodology is so devious. A detailed critique of the agency’s approach is offered in this preprint paper (Mittledorf, Setty) which I will summarize here.
The CDC researchers examined the number of COVID-19 cases reported each day in each U.S. county that implemented a mask mandate.
Then they calculated the Daily Growth Rate (DGR) of cases (and deaths) in each county on each day for 60 days preceding the countywide mandate and for 100 days afterward.
The authors purportedly showed the DGR fell after mandates were imposed. It is important to realize that when the DGR falls on a certain day, it does not mean that fewer new cases occurred on that day compared to the day before — it means the number of new cases is not growing as fast as it was prior to that day.
In other words, by using DGR as the measure of interest, the authors can still claim a “significant decrease in COVID-19 case growth rate” even if the number of new cases on a given day is larger than the day before.
When data for 2,313 U.S. counties were tallied into a composite graph, this is what they found:
Note that mandates were implemented at different times in different counties, so the “reference period” occurred at different times during the year depending on the county.
Furthermore, the plot indicates the DGR at different times relative to the DGR at the reference period.
In other words, when the plot falls below zero it does not mean the DGR is negative — it means it was less than it was during the 20 days prior to the institution of the mandate (the “reference period”).
Nevertheless, it seems that on average, the DGR falls after the implementation of mask mandates.
However, what was happening prior to the reference period?
We don’t know — and neither do the authors of the CDC report.
Figure 1 includes ranges of confidence intervals that stretch above and below that of the reference period prior to mask mandate implementation. Because the upper bound of the DGR is greater than the reference period prior to the point mandates were implemented, it is entirely possible the DGR was already in decline prior to the implementation of mask mandates.
The authors’ own data and calculations demonstrate the drop in DGR may have had nothing to do with mask mandates at all.
In other words, the authors also could have concluded mask mandates were associated with a drop in the DGR 40 days prior to their implementation.
In fact, this is clearly demonstrated in the graph. The DGR for both cases and deaths is highest in the period 20 to 40 days before the mandate.
How amazing! Masks seem to work several weeks before people are forced to wear them!
Beyond ignoring what their own data suggested, the CDC authors made two very suspicious decisions when designing their study.
The CDC chose to limit its analysis to 100 days after mandates were instituted. Was this an arbitrary length of time? Or was there another reason?
We examined data from the entire country for the period of the study and plotted the DGR for a full year here:
Figure 2 clearly demonstrates the DGR was already in steep decline at the beginning of the study period, just as pointed out earlier.
The graph also indicates the DGR temporarily rose at the beginning of the summer, then fell, then began to rise again at the beginning of the autumn.
Because the overwhelming majority of mask mandates began in the late spring and early summer, a 100-day window of analysis will show a declining DGR because it will miss the increase in DGR in the fall.
Also note that a shorter period of observation, say 50 days, would have resulted in equivocal or opposite findings as the summer “bump” would have made it seem like mask mandates had no effect or possibly increased the DGR.
The CDC conveniently chose an observational window that could be neatly nestled between the periods of higher DGR.
For example, the state of California imposed statewide mandates on June 18, 2020. Using CDC data, this is what a plot of the DGR for the state looks like if the period of observation were extended beyond 100 days:
The DGR at the end of the 100 days (Sept. 25, 2020) was approximately 0.5%, or about 1.5% lower than it was prior to the mandates in that state. However, two months later, the DGR had returned to its pre-mandate level.
If the CDC extended its window of analysis it would not have been able to claim there was any benefit from the mask mandates. The pattern was similar in the country as a whole, as demonstrated in Figure 2.
Did the CDC just get lucky with its window of observation? Or was the agency seeking a way to justify unpopular masking policies that had been in effect for nearly a year at the time this study was released?
At this point, any reasonable researcher would suspect the CDC’s authors were engaged in elaborate hand-waving to lead the public to a predetermined conclusion.
How can we know for sure?
If the CDC were truly interested in demonstrating a fall in the DGR due to mask mandates, the authors of the study would have asked the most basic of questions: What happened in counties that did NOT institute mask mandates during the study period? In other words, what happened in the “control” group during the same time?
Though there were 829 U.S. counties that did not implement mask mandates, the CDC researchers did not analyze any of them to test their hypothesis. Why didn’t they?
We did. From our preprint study linked above, this is what we found:
Using publicly available data from the CDC and an arbitrary “reference period” of Aug. 6, 2020 (roughly in the middle of the CDC’s study period date), we calculated the DGR in counties of seven states without mandates also fell to similar levels at the end of 100 days.
In other words, the decrease in DGR had nothing to do with the imposition of mask mandates. It was due to a predictable pattern of any infectious disease as it spreads through a population over time — whether or not people were forced to wear masks.
This would have been obvious if the CDC were actually interested in being scientific.
Nevertheless, the New York Times unhesitatingly covered the CDC’s findings on the very same day the MMWR was released in this article: “The Virus Spread Where Restaurants Reopened or Mask Mandates Were Absent.”
The Times quoted CDC Director Dr. Rochelle Walensky who said, “You have decreases in cases and deaths when you wear masks,” and Joseph Allen, an associate professor at Harvard’s T.H. Chan School of Public Health, who said;
“The study is not surprising. What’s surprising is that we see some states ignoring all of the evidence and opening up quickly, and removing mask mandates.”
The Times wasn’t the only media outlet to report on the flawed study.
CNBC posted this article: “CDC study finds easing mask and restaurant rules led to more Covid cases and deaths, as some states move to lift restrictions.”
And U.S. News and World Report ran an article under this headline: “Mask Use Associated With Decline in Coronavirus Cases, Deaths, CDC Says.”
In fact, more than 100 media outlets cited the CDC study within 24 hours of its release — but not one questioned the authors’ analysis.
In their defense, that is not their job. The media’s role is to simply relay what the CDC has to say. Yet without any oversight or accountability, the CDC can conclude whatever it chooses.
Because the mainstream media machine grants the CDC infallible status, the public is lured into an illusion that “the science is settled.”
But why would the CDC authors go to such lengths to manufacture an unfounded position on mask mandates? Surely they realized their methodology would be scrutinized and found to be manipulative by those who don’t consider the agency to be irreproachable. Why risk their credibility? What do they have to gain?
The MMWR was released on a Friday. On the following Monday, March 8, 2021, the CDC tells us, as NBC News reported:
“‘As more Americans are vaccinated, a growing body of evidence now tells us that there are some activities fully vaccinated people can do,’ the CDC’s director, Dr. Rochelle Walensky said during a White House Covid-19 briefing Monday.
“‘The latest science [emphasis added],’ Walensky said, ‘suggests that fully vaccinated people can congregate indoors with other fully vaccinated people without wearing face coverings or practicing physical distancing.’”
And there you have it.
Three days after the flawed MMWR was released, being with other human beings indoors without masks became a privilege reserved exclusively for the “fully vaccinated.”
The “latest science” must demonstrate that masks offer some protection, however miniscule. If there were no benefit to mask wearing, there would be one less carrot authorities could use to get the public to comply with their vaccine agenda.
Are COVID-19 vaccines safe during pregnancy?
In a Jan. 7 MMWR, the authors addressed another important public concern: Are the vaccines safe during pregnancy?
To answer this question, CDC authors examined the incidence of only two pregnancy outcomes: preterm births and small-for-gestational age (SGA) in unvaccinated and vaccinated mothers.
They concluded:
“CDC recommends COVID-19 vaccination for women who are pregnant, recently pregnant (including those who are lactating), who are trying to become pregnant now, or who might become pregnant in the future to reduce the risk for severe COVID-19–associated outcomes.”
Their assurances came more than a year after the first COVID-19 vaccine was granted Emergency Use Authorization, in December 2020.
In this example, CDC authors did not have to cherry-pick periods of observation or ignore control groups to make their “conclusions.”
Here, they relied on comparing two poorly matched groups of mothers (the unvaccinated were at a higher risk of pregnancy complications):
There were greater than 50% more mothers in the unvaccinated group classified as having inadequate prenatal care than in the vaccinated group.
Obesity, a risk for preterm birth, was also overrepresented in the unvaccinated group (29% vs 23.9%) compared to the vaccinated.
There were greater than three times more African American women in the unvaccinated group than in the vaccinated group. The CDC acknowledges African American mothers may have as much as a 50% greater risk for preterm birth compared to white mothers.
COVID-19 infection, another potentially important confounder, was present in the unvaccinated group at a 25% greater incidence than in the vaccinated cohort. Viral infections early in pregnancy are particularly deleterious to the developing fetus.
The differences between the two cohorts should have been obvious to the authors. Why?
Because they found the risk of preterm birth and SGA in the vaccinated weren’t equal to that in the unvaccinated group — in fact, they were lower (adjusted Hazard Ratios were 0.91 and 0.95 respectively).
These numbers were very close to being statistically significant.
Amazing. Masks prevent the spread of the disease weeks before they are mandated and now we find that the COVID-19 jabs aren’t just safe, they can actually lower the risk of preterm birth and SGA!
Why didn’t the authors report that their data indicated that COVID-19 vaccines somehow reduce the risk of these outcomes? Was it because the data weren’t quite statistically significant?
Or was it because they didn’t want to draw attention to the fact that the unvaccinated group was at higher risk for these outcomes to begin with?
But the most glaring deficit in the CDC analysis was the scarcity of vaccinated mothers who received a vaccine in the first trimester in this study.
The risk of untoward outcomes (birth defects, miscarriages) in pregnancy is greatest during the first third of pregnancy, a time when crucial embryonic structures are developing.
This is the period of time where maternal health is particularly important and exposure to toxins, infections and certain medicines must be minimized or eliminated entirely if possible.
Only 172 of more than 10,000 (1.7%) vaccinated mothers in the study received a vaccine in the first trimester.
This was acknowledged by the authors who explicitly stated: “Because of the small number of first-trimester exposures, aHRs (adjusted Hazard Ratios) for first-trimester vaccination could not be calculated.”
If they could not calculate the risk of the vaccine in the first trimester, on what basis could they assure the recently pregnant, those who are trying to become pregnant and those who might become pregnant in the future that this experimental intervention was safe?
They couldn’t — but they did anyway. And once again, mainstream media outlets wasted little time in spreading the “good news”:
Boston.com (Jan. 18, 2022): “New study bolsters case for COVID vaccination during pregnancy.”
Medical News Today (Jan. 11, 2022): “COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy not linked to adverse birth outcomes.”
Medscape (Jan. 12, 2022): “COVID-19 Vaccination During Pregnancy Not Linked to Complications at Birth: US Study.”
And even on other continents:
Juta Medical Brief, Africa’s Medical Media Digest (Jan. 12, 2022): “COVID vaccination not linked to premature birth or unusually small babies — CDC study.”
newKerala.com (Jan. 8, 2022): “Researchers say COVID-19 vaccine does not disrupt pregnancy.”
Even People magazine, a go-to source for the latest in medical research and public health, helped spread the CDC gospel: “COVID Vaccines Among Pregnant Women Are Not Linked to Pre-Term Births, According to New Study.”
Should I vaccinate my child?
In this April 19 MMWR, CDC authors compared the risk of hospitalization of 5- to 11-year-old children from COVID-19 during three different time periods: pre-Delta, Delta and Omicron.
By the end of the period of observation, Feb. 28, 2022, only approximately 30% of children in this age group had received both doses of the primary series of COVID-19 vaccines. The experimental product had been authorized for these children four months prior.
Was this report a “reliable, accurate and objective” publication of available data? Or was it an attempt to persuade parents to inoculate their children by making contradictory statements and illogical reasoning?
Read on and decide for yourself.
The April 19 report uses a different set of tactics to lead the unwary reader to false conclusions. In this example, statements are made in the text of the paper that are true, but also irrelevant or misleading.
From the CDC’s own data (Table 1), among hospitalized children aged 5-11 who had laboratory-confirmed COVID-19, more were admitted because of COVID-19 during the Delta wave (364) than during the Omicron wave (160). These numbers were statistically significant.
Yet the authors did not mention this fact in their discussion. Instead, they chose to compare the rate of hospitalization during a single, one-week peak of each wave: 2.8 per 100,000 during Omicron, and 1.2 per 100,000 during Delta.
Clearly, it is the total number of hospitalizations that is salient when assessing the risk of the predominant variant in circulation — not the number during a brief period of each wave.
Intentionally or not, the authors suggested Omicron is even more dangerous than Delta — which is not true.
This same strategy was used in yet another MMWR (from March 15, 2022) that sought to convince parents of children under age 5 to inoculate their young children by comparing hospitalizations at the peak of each wave rather than the total number of hospitalizations.
What are parents to do if they believe Omicron is more dangerous than the Delta variant? The answer is apparently obvious.
The authors of the April 19 MMWR extracted hospitalization rates from 14 states for fully vaccinated and unvaccinated children in this age group: Unvaccinated kids are 2.1 times more likely to be hospitalized than those who were fully vaccinated.
Surely this should be enough to motivate the uncertain parent. However, when there is a potential risk it is imperative to assess the absolute risk of the intervention, not just the relative benefit.
In this case, the risk of hospitalization during the Omicron wave was 19.1 per 100,000 in the unvaccinated compared to 9.2 per 100,000 in the fully jabbed.
This means roughly 10,000 children had to be fully vaccinated to prevent a single hospitalization — a striking number the CDC authors did not mention.
In typical fashion, the CDC authors don’t mention the risk, which is yet to be established, of the experimental vaccine.
Though the authors accurately reported on the aggregate data, they mysteriously chose to include another statistic: 87% of hospitalized children were unvaccinated.
How could roughly 7 of 8 hospitalized kids (87%) be unvaccinated if the rate of hospitalization was only about double in the unjabbed?
The answer is that most children (70% or more) hadn’t been inoculated during this time. Why would they mention this true-but-misleading statistic?
We can’t know with any certainty, but it certainly makes a good talking point.
Forbes did not consider such questions when it ran this piece the same day: “87% Of Kids Hospitalized With Covid During Omicron Wave Were Unvaccinated, CDC Says.”
Other media outlets also fell into line and ran stories with misleading headlines based on this MMWR:
The World Business News: “Omicron Was More Severe for Unvaccinated Children in 5-to-11 Age Group, Study Shows.”
Axios: “CDC: 87% of children hospitalized during U.S. Omicron surge unvaccinated.”
BNN Bloomberg ran this: “Unvaccinated Kids Bore Brunt of Omicron Wave, CDC Report Says.” The title is not inaccurate. However, the very first line of the story predictably reads: “Almost 90% of U.S. children hospitalized for Covid during the omicron wave this winter were unvaccinated, according to a government study.”
If you read these articles you will find they all regurgitate the same misleading statements the CDC authors included in the text of their report.
On this page, there are dozens of articles titled (more or less) “Unvaccinated Children Hospitalized at Twice the Rate During Omicron Surge: US Study.” All cite the misleading MMWR.
The data that supported the fact that the unvaccinated children were twice as likely to be hospitalized was found here on the CDC website. The data from the MMWR study period has since been updated.
As of May 2022, in the 5-to-11 age group, there is a difference of 0.88 hospitalizations (3.35 – 2.47) per month in every 100,000 kids between the unvaccinated and vaccinated.
This means more than 113,000 children in that age group must receive both doses to prevent a single hospitalization per month.
In yet a final attempt to confuse the reader, the CDC authors state up front in their highlighted “Summary”:
“Increasing COVID-19 vaccination coverage among children aged 5–11 years, particularly among racial and ethnic minority groups disproportionately affected by COVID-19, can prevent COVID-19–associated hospitalization and severe outcomes.”
Read that statement closely. They clearly state that increasing vaccination coverage in this age group can prevent severe outcomes.
Can they prevent severe outcomes? Maybe. But did they? Not according to their data.
The authors later correct themselves in the body of the report: “There were no significant differences for severe outcomes by vaccination status.”
Which statement do you think the media outlets chose to publish?
“Often called ‘the voice of CDC,’ the MMWR series is the agency’s primary vehicle for scientific publication of timely, reliable, authoritative, accurate, objective, and useful public health information and recommendations.”
If the MMWR series is “the voice of CDC,” mainstream media serves as its mouthpiece.
By working together, the CDC authors are afforded the luxury of broadcasting their findings to massive audiences through media outlets that will not — and in many cases cannot — hold them accountable for even gross lapses in scientific rigor.
In my opinion, these examples demonstrate something more than honest mistakes. These are egregious misrepresentations of data that were meant to deliberately mislead the public, public officials and the medical establishment in order to galvanize support around unpopular mandates and push the “safe and effective” narrative. [Blog Editor Emphasis]
There wasn’t a “statistically significant decrease in COVID-19 case counts associated with mask mandates.”
There wasn’t enough data to recommend the COVID-19 vaccine for mothers who recently became pregnant.
The data did not demonstrate that the COVID-19 vaccine can prevent severe outcomes in children ages 5 to 11.
The common thread in all three of these cases is that an uninformed reader of these reports will readily conclude that getting the jab is the best way to return to normalcy or protect a young child or a pregnancy.
We can speculate that Big Pharma’s insatiable thirst for profit is behind the CDC and corporate media, but with tens of billions of dollars already earned, why are they so desperate to keep the misinformation campaign going?
The most obvious answer is that they cannot afford not to. From the initial adult vaccine trials conducted in the summer and fall of 2020 to the most recent trials in the pediatric population, all placebo recipients were given the jab after just a few short months.
This resulted in only short-term efficacy and safety data. Using trial outcomes alone, no long-term safety assessments can be made. If there is a significant risk in the middle to long term, it can be estimated only through observational studies in the population.
The unvaccinated millions and their enduring health will stand as the biggest threat to the industry’s income stream and our health authorities’ credibility.
Authors of the CDC MMWR series are not accountable to anyone, including the CDC director who parrots their findings, or the public who rely on captured media outlets to ask the right questions.
With this level of impunity, there are no limits to their treachery. [Blog Editor Emphasis]
The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Children’s Health Defense. [Blog Editor: I understand the reasoning for the CHD disclaimer, but the bad science is so egregious CHD should get behind this author’s findings with a “YES! AMEN!”]
It’s time for some COVID & Jab truth that the Globalist-controlled science and Dem-Marxists probably will tell you not to believe what see but only believe what We-The-Tyrants tell you.
JRH 11/2/21
I need your generosity in 2021 via – credit cards, check cards
What a joyful time of the year this is going to be for the countless families who are about to experience a job loss. You would think that Joe Biden’s rapidly plunging poll numberswould cause him to rethink his absurd mandates, but that hasn’t happened. Instead, he is has chosen to stubbornly move forward, and the consequences are going to be absolutely disastrous.
Earlier today, I watched a heartbreaking video of a pandemic hero being marched out of a hospital in California because her religious exemption was denied. She admits that she could soon lose her house as a result, but freedom is more important to her. Sadly, similar scenes are about to be repeated over and over again all across the country, because the biggest mandate of them all is about to be implemented. According to the senior White House correspondent for CBS News, it appears that the OSHA mandate will go into effect in just a few days…
OSHA has finished developing a rule that compels companies with 100+ employees to require vaccines or regular testing. It also requires employers to provide paid time to workers to get vaccinated and to recover from any side effects. The rule will go into effect in days.
It has been estimated that the OSHA mandate will cover somewhere around 80 million American workers.
As the new regulations start to be enforced, countless Americans will choose to willingly leave their jobs, and countless others will be ruthlessly terminated for not complying. Needless to say, this is going to cause enormous nightmares in industry after industry.
Logistics companies in industries ranging from trucking to warehouses are warning that President Joe Biden’s vaccine mandate will cause further supply chain backlogs.
Groups representing them say substantial numbers of their employees are unvaccinated, and may quit or be let go at the height of the holiday season.
Even if he purposely wanted to be this evil, why in the world would Biden want to make our supply chain headaches far more painful right as we are entering the busiest time of the year?
It doesn’t make any sense.
Because of the epic worker shortage that we are currently experiencing, replacing employees that are lost is going to be exceedingly difficult.
American Trucking Associations has sent a letter to the Biden administration expressing “grave concern” over the potential damage that the president’s plans for a COVID-19 vaccine mandate for many businesses — including trucking companies — could cause for the country.
“While much of the country was sequestered in their homes, the trucking industry served its essential function and did so successfully with safety standards developed by public health experts,” said the Oct. 21 letter, signed by ATA President Chris Spear. “Now placing vaccination mandates on employers, which in turn force employees to be vaccinated, will create a workforce crisis for our industry and the communities, families and businesses we serve.”
We aren’t just talking about the loss of a few thousand truck drivers.
According to the ATA, we could potentially be facing the loss of 37 percent of all truck drivers in the entire nation…
The federation warns that motor carriers it represents – who it said supply 80% of the country and move 70% of all freight tonnage — could lose up to 37% of their drivers.
37 percent!
If you think that store shelves are empty now, just wait until that happens.
Besides trucking, retailers are also concerned the mandate could trigger resignations in an industry also short on workers, according to a lobbyist at the Retail Industry Leaders Association, Evan Armstrong.
‘It has been a hectic holiday season already, as you know, with supply chain struggles,’ Armstrong told CNBC after a meeting with White House officials last Monday.
‘This is a difficult policy to implement. It would be even more difficult during the holiday season.’
Retailers are already really struggling to staff their stores in many areas of the country.
This new mandate certainly will not help matters.
The U.S. military has their own mandates that are in the process of being implemented, and this week we learned that large numbers of Marines could be on the verge of being kicked out of the military…
The Corps will kick out every Marine who refuses the COVID-19 vaccine and fails to receive an approved exemption by the Nov. 28 deadline, a new administrative message said.
Barring an approved administrative, medical or religious accommodation, or a pending appeal, Marines who fail to meet the deadline will be processed for administrative separation, the MARADMIN said. General court-martial convening authorities will “retain authority to take any additional adverse administrative or disciplinary action” deemed appropriate.
Frankly, this makes me sick.
We are really going to do this right around Thanksgiving?
How heartless are these people?
After our military has been gutted, I hope that no major conflict suddenly erupts, because our ability to go to war will be greatly diminished.
In so many ways, this moment represents a fundamental turning point for the United States, and nothing will ever be the same after this.
Personally, I have never been more disgusted with the Democratic Party than I am right now, and countless others feel the same way. If you doubt this, just check out these poll results…
Independents believe that the Democratic Party more than the Republican Party is “the bigger threat” to American democracy, according to an NPR/PBS NewsHour/Marist poll released on Monday.
In response to the question, “In general, which party do you think is the bigger threat to democracy in the United States,” 41 percent of Independents said the Democratic Party, while 37 percent said the Republican Party.
The sort of mandates that are now being pushed on all of us have absolutely no place in a civilized society.
If you have lost a job or are about to lose a job, I want you to know that you are not alone.
There are millions upon millions of other Americans that still believe in freedom, and we shall not bow our knees before these tyrants.
***It is finally here! Michael’s new book entitled “7 Year Apocalypse” is now available in paperback and for the Kindle on Amazon.***
About the Author: My name is Michael Snyder and my brand new book entitled “7 Year Apocalypse” is now available on Amazon.com. In addition to my new book I have written five other books that are available on Amazon.com including “Lost Prophecies Of The Future Of America”, “The Beginning Of The End”, “Get Prepared Now”, and “Living A Life That Really Matters”. (#CommissionsEarned) By purchasing the books you help to support the work that my wife and I are doing, and by giving it to others you help to multiply the impact that we are having on people all over the globe. I have published thousands of articles on The Economic Collapse Blog, End Of The American Dream and The Most Important News, and the articles that I publish on those sites are republished on dozens of other prominent websites all over the globe. I always freely and happily allow others to republish my articles on their own websites, but I also ask that they include this “About the Author” section with each article. The material contained in this article is for general information purposes only, and readers should consult licensed professionals before making any legal, business, financial or health decisions. I encourage you to follow me on social media on Facebook and Twitter, and any way that you can share these articles with others is a great help. During these very challenging times, people will need hope more than ever before, and it is our goal to share the gospel of Jesus Christ with as many people as we possibly can.
ACTIVIST POST – ALTERNATIVE INDEPENDENT NEWS – CREATIVE COMMONS 2019
++++++++++++++++
PRE-PLANNED: Weeks before covid appeared in U.S., Congress redefined the word “vaccine” to include mRNA injections
Up until December 2019, the official government definition for the word “vaccine” did not include the mRNA (messenger RNA) technology that is now being injected into people’s bodies for the Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19). That changed, though, just weeks before the first “cases” of the Chinese Virus appeared on American soil.
Just in time for “Operation Warp Speed,” the United States Congress quietly redefined the word “vaccine” to include the drug injections that would soon be unveiled by Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna – almost like they knew well in advance that a plandemic was coming.
Right before the turn of the year into 2020, the federal government signed a contract with Moderna that specifically referred to the company’s soon-to-be jab as an “mRNA coronavirus vaccine” that was “developed and jointly owned” by both Moderna and the federal government.
That same month, Congress changed the definition of “biological product” in federal laws that pertain to vaccine labeling, emergency use authorization (EUA), and approval. Now, the federal government considers vaccines as “biological products,” which was not the case prior to that.
“A basic summary is as follows: without the December 2019 change to U.S. law defining ‘biological product,’ the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines may have been required to be labeled as something other than a vaccine,” reported LifeSiteNews about the change.
“Stated slightly differently, the U.S. federal government’s definition of ‘biological product’ which was used up until a few weeks before the reported outbreak of COVID-19 may have prohibited the mRNA COVID-19 products from being labeled as vaccines.”
Mandates would have been much harder had mRNA poisons not been redefined as “vaccines”
Since mRNA technology had never previously been inserted into humans prior to the advent of the Fauci Flu, it would have been a much harder sell for governments to try to force mystery injections on the public as a condition of remaining employed or participating in society.
Also keep in mind that every mRNA experiment on animals that was conducted prior to the Chinese Flu entering from stage left resulted in mass death well beyond that caused by conventional vaccines.
Had the truth about all this been publicly disclosed in good faith, chances are that most of America, regardless of political affiliation, would have just said no to these experimental drugs. However, because they once again made this a left-versus-right thing, along with redefining what a “vaccine” even is, we are now stuck in this current conundrum.
Another thing worth noting is that Congress struck the words “except any chemically synthesized polypeptide” from the definition of “biological product.” This further paved the way for Operation Warp Speed participants to roll out experimental gene therapies made from such and call them “vaccines,” when that never would have been allowed under the old wording.
“The significance of this change is that the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines chemically synthesize the SARS-CoV-2 ‘Spike’ (also known as the ‘S’) protein,” LifeSiteNews added.
“Thus, the wording of the previous definition of ‘biological product’ seems to suggest that the mRNA COVID-19 ‘vaccines’ could not legally be labeled as vaccines. That would be a major problem for public health officials and ‘vaccine’ makers.”
It appears as though Congress knew well in advance of the plandemic that chemically synthesized mRNA substances would need to be redefined as “vaccines” in order to be mandated as such by the government, is the gist of all this.
“It is also worth repeating that the U.S. federal government partially owns an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine, and soon before their imposition onto Americans, the U.S. federal government seemingly ensured COVID-19 mRNA vaccines would be legal,” LifeSiteNews further explained.
More related news about criminality in government can be found at Corruption.news.
Hundreds of thousands of covid vaccine injuries BACKLOGGED and not yet entered into VAERS … far greater numbers of injuries and deaths are still to come
On the latest episode of “Doctors and Scientists,” Dr. Brian Hooker Ph.D., P.E., was interviewed Dr. Jessica Rose, Ph.D. to discuss the failures of the vaccine injury surveillance system that was set up by the CDC and FDA over thirty years ago. Dr. Rose is an expert in bio-mathematics and molecular research.
In January of 2021, she utilized her skills as a computational biologist and began analyzing data in the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS). Each week, she downloaded publicly-available data sets from VAERS, comparing inputs week-to-week. She discovered that vaccine injury reports went missing from one week to the next. Each week, the data is updated in the VAERS system. She found that some of the data is overwritten, vanished from the system. She also found that “hundreds of thousands” of covid vaccine injury reports were backlogged and did not appear in a timely manner to alert healthcare professionals to serious issues with the vaccine.
Hundreds of thousands of vaccine injury reports backlogged in VAERS
In the interview, Dr. Rose discussed the systemic flaws of the VAERS system, flaws that stop the passive reporting system from working in the public’s interest, as was originally intended. The pharmacovigilance system was set up in 1990 to detect issues with vaccines, to alert regulatory agencies and the public about serious adverse events and contraindications for specific vaccines. The data is managed by the Department of Health and Human Services. Healthcare professionals input the data into the system, and have a narrow thirty-minute window to complete the report. In 2021, healthcare workers have been overwhelmed with vaccine injury reports and have not had the time to enter them all into the system. Many medical concerns associated with the covid vaccine are overlooked, discarded or discounted as coincidental or normalized reactions to the vaccine.
The hundreds of thousands of adverse event reports that have been filed paint a grisly picture of medical malfeasance. These serious public health issues have yet to be addressed by any regulatory agency or judicial process. In the past, vaccines were pulled from the market if the VAERS system documented more than fifty deaths from a single vaccine. In 2021, there have been more than 20,000 deaths recorded in just ten months. Up to 97 percent of these issues are coming from the new mRNA covid vaccines, not the rest of the vaccine supply. Instead of pulling the deadly products from the market, the federal government has issued unlawful mandates, coercing individuals to take part in the depopulation experiment. This might be the biggest flaw with the system yet: The agencies that are supposed to oversee the data and alert the public to medical atrocities are the same entities trying to push a narrative forward – that vaccines are “safe and effective.” (Related: COVID vaccine experiment causes monstrous spike in vaccine injuries and deaths, serious adverse events under-reported by a factor of eight.)
Serious adverse events and fatalities are occurring at magnitudes greater than what is recorded in the VAERS system
After analyzing missing data in the VAERS system, Dr. Rose came to the conclusion that serious adverse events and fatalities following covid vaccination are much higher than what is recorded in the VAERS system. Some issues are under-reported by a factor of thirty-one, and other, more common side effects can be under-reported by a factor of one hundred. By September, Dr. Rose attended the FDA’s Vaccine and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee meeting, bringing attention to under-reporting problem in the VAERS system. Her research is titled, “Critical Appraisal of VAERS Pharmacovigilance: Is the U.S. Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) a Functioning Pharmacovigilance System?” and was published in Science, Public Health Policy and Law.
Her paper concludes that “hundreds of thousands” of adverse events are backlogged and waiting to be entered into the system. “The most important thing I found in my determination is whether or not this tool — which can be a pharmacovigilance tool — is being used as such,” Dr. Rose said.
17 Pharma Henchmen Who Voted to Experiment on Your Kids — and How to Shun Them
The 17 members of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee who voted 17-0 in favor of authorizing Pfizer’s COVID vaccine for kids ages 5 to 11 all have deep ties to pharma.
The Defender is experiencing censorship on many social channels. Be sure to stay in touch with the news that matters by subscribing to our top news of the day. It’s free.
On Oct. 26, the membership of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC) voted 17-0 in favor of lower-dose use of Pfizer’s experimental COVID-19 vaccine in children ages 5 to 11.
The 17 individuals — including an “acting” committee chair and 11 voting members who were temporary rather than core VRBPAC members — formulaically stated the injections’ benefits outweigh the risks in that age group.
Three days later, Dr. Janet Woodcock — a 35-year FDA veteran serving “temporarily” as commissioner — evoked her personal credentials “as a mother and a physician” when she predictably extended Pfizer’s emergency use authorization (EUA) to the 5-11 age group, having previously granted EUAs for adolescents (ages 12-15) and those age 16 and up.
This article highlights the conflicts of interest and financial entanglements with vaccine companies that enabled this rogues’ gallery’s immoral vote to expose 28 million U.S. children to the risk of injury and death.
These conflicts are ably documented by groups such as the Project On Government Oversight (POGO), in databases such as the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ Open Payments and in the Children’s Health Defense (CHD) eBook, “Conflicts of Interest Undermine Children’s Health.”
What this information strongly suggests is that VRBPAC’s members — soi-disant (so-called) authorities in their respective fields — are thoroughly beholden to pharmaceutical, military, philanthropic and academic paymasters, with stock options, grants, patents and prestige clearly ranking well ahead of children’s safety.
This article also gives readers the tools and information to shun and shame these corrupt doctors and scientists — and their institutions. (See shunning action items at the end of the article.)
Sham deliberations
The Biden administration’s Oct. 20 release of a detailed pediatric vaccination plan, the administration’s pre-purchase of 65 million Pfizer pediatric doses and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC’s) advance issuance of guidelines for vaccinating 5- to 11-year-olds are all clear signals that VRBPAC’s “deliberations” and vote were a sham — with the outcome predetermined.
VRBPAC’s Oct. 26 vote to foist the risky COVID vaccines onto defenseless children shows that even under intense and well-informed public pressure, the committee members were prepared to proceed with their shameful and shameless decision.
Buttressed by top-down directives, VRBPAC members apparently felt free to ignore 140,000 comments submitted to FDA by members of the public — an estimated 99.999% of whom objected to administering the vaccines to younger children.
On Oct. 25, CHD put FDA on notice that “CHD will seek to hold [FDA] accountable for recklessly endangering this population with a product that has little efficacy but which may put them … at risk of many adverse health consequences, including heart damage, stroke and other thrombotic events and reproductive harms.”
Around the world, doctors, scientists, parents and citizens who have questioned or opposed the need for pediatric COVID vaccination are horrified by the VRBPAC and FDA decisions, having witnessed the cascade of catastrophic post-injection adverse events in adolescents and young adults — including life-altering injuries that FDA and Pfizer refuse to acknowledge.
Two of VRBPAC’s “yes” votes came from CDC officials — hardly a disinterested or independent contingent. Most of the others who voted “yes,” including the 11 temporary voting members and acting chair, are affiliated with leading schools of medicine and public health heavily reliant on government grants and funding from entities like the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. (The Gates Foundation is a “major funder of universities” and gives two-thirds of those funds to U.S. institutions).
One National Institutes of Health (NIH) division director abstained, citing “limited safety and efficacy data.” The VRBPAC meeting also included one non-voting pharmaceutical industry representative from Merck.
The CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) is widely expected to endorse vaccination of 5- to 11-year-olds at its meeting on Nov. 2-3. As political economist Toby Rogers has noted, “Every person on [the ACIP membership] list has a financial conflict of interest. That is not good science.”
Shunning: a powerful tool
What can a frustrated and appalled public do to take to task powerful policymakers who are impervious to embarrassment?
We can shun.
The word “shun” means to “avoid using, accepting, engaging in or partaking of” or to “refuse to accept socially” or “stay away from.”
Psychologists are well aware of the impact of shunning — a tried-and-true method of rejecting those who behave immorally. Speaking in 1880 of absentee landlords intent on evicting Irish farmers suffering from near-famine conditions, Charles Stewart Parnell argued to great effect:
“When a man takes a farm from which another has been evicted, you must shun him on the roadside when you meet him, you must shun him in the streets of the town, you must shun him in the shop, you must shun him in the fairgreen and in the marketplace and even in the place of worship, by leaving him alone, by putting him in a moral Coventry, by isolating him from the rest of his country as if he were the leper of old, you must show your detestation of the crime he has committed.”
After reviewing VRBPAC members’ statements, activities and affiliations (summarized below), you may agree that it is well past time to shun them.
As citizens, employees, co-workers, shareholders and alumni, stop supporting individuals and institutions that are unashamedly willing to harm our children.
Cowardice, avarice and petty craving for prominence are no substitute for integrity and morality, and should not be rewarded.
Acting Chair Arnold Monto
Dr. Arnold Monto (asmonto@umich.edu) is professor of public health and epidemiology at the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor. Monto has been acting chair for VRBPAC’s COVID-19 vaccine deliberations since October 2020. Previously, he was a four-year VRBPAC member (through January 2020).
Monto was a key player in pandemic planning and response for many decades, including during past headline-grabbing pandemics (real or invented) such as the 1968 Hong Kong influenza, bird flu, severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) and Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS).
Monto is a key proponent of the unproven theory that schoolchildren must be vaccinated to achieve “herd immunity.”
Pfizer’s COVID vaccine clinical trial results showed more Bell’s palsy in the vaccine group (four cases out of 18,801) than in the placebo group (zero out of 18,785). Monto characterized this finding as “not out of line with the routine occurrence of Bell’s palsy in the population,” adding, “so we cannot say the vaccine caused it.”
Monto founded and co-directs the University of Michigan-based Michigan Influenza Center, one of five centers across the country that collects data for CDC.
Monto has served as principal investigator on studies funded by CDC, the National NIH and Sanofi Pasteur.
According to POGO and Open Payments, between 2014–2020, Monto received 117 payments totaling more than $176,000 (65% for consulting and speaking fees) from Pfizer as well as Seqirus, Hoffmann-La Roche, Sanofi, Genentech, Novartis and Shionogi.
Monto has consulted for the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA).
In earlier clinical trials (2006–2008 and 2011–2013), Monto laid the groundwork for the “nonpharmaceutical interventions” that have been brought to the fore during COVID (e.g., masking, “sequestration” and social distancing).
Notably, the University of Michigan houses the nation’s #5-ranked School of Public Health and one of the country’s largest university health systems. In 2020, the university received $144 million in revenue via the Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security (CARES) Act — most of which (94%) was associated with the Provider Relief Fund administered by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). The CARES monies represent an amount nearly equal to what the university received in private gifts ($149 million) from foundations and others.
The University of Michigan has been embroiled in a massive sex abuse scandal, with allegations that it covered up decades of abuse by the university’s late athletic physician Robert Anderson — reportedly “the largest scale of sexual abuse by a single person in U.S. history.”
Captain Amanda Cohn (core VRBPAC member)
Captain Amanda Cohn, M,D, (acohn@cdc.gov) is chief medical officer in the Office of Vaccine Policy, Preparedness, and Global Health at CDC’s National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases.
Cohn is also executive secretary for ACIP, which is about to have its own vote on COVID vaccines for 5- to 11-year-olds. Cohn has attended past VRBPAC meetings and has served on the committee since February 2020.
Cohn started her CDC career as an officer with the agency’s Epidemic Intelligence Service (EIS). After researching the part played by EIS officers in past “epidemics,” journalist Jon Rappoport concluded it serves as a front for the medical cartel, with a mission to persuade the public that “the whole world is being attacked by viruses, all the time.”
Judging by the papers listed in her curriculum vitae, Cohn’s particular niche seems to be to sell vaccines as a “rite of passage” for infants and troubleshoot how best to increase vaccine uptake in specific (and vulnerable) populations such as pregnant women, unaccompanied minors, adolescents, senior citizens and Africans.
At the Oct. 26 meeting, Cohn cheerily framed COVID vaccination as an equity issue, stating “This is an age group that deserves and should have the same opportunity to be vaccinated as every other age group.”
“I just want to … clarify one point, which is just for the public record that the federal government cannot mandate vaccines … In the setting of an EUA, patients and individuals will have the right to refuse the vaccine.”
She has not repeated this statement since President Biden issued his attempted federal-mandate-by-press-release in early September.
Cohn lied to the public and to medical professionals, incorrectly referring to non-existent evidence that COVID vaccines are effective in individuals who previously had a coronavirus infection — the clinical trial evidence showed the contrary.
Speaking with Congressman Thomas Massie in early 2021, Cohn agreed this messaging was a “mistake” but then continued to publicly put forth the same false information without correcting the record.
Also of note:
In October 2020, Cohn presented “Vaccinate with Confidence for COVID-19 Vaccines,” a national strategy to “reinforce confidence” through “novel and … robust strategies to increase demand and uptake.” In that presentation, Cohn noted that “a new pandemic, a new vaccine and a new adult-focused platform means shifting tactics.”
At the VRBPAC meeting that same month, Cohn evoked the likelihood of waning COVID vaccine immunity after four to six months, describing it as a “potential communication issue.”
Oveta Fuller (temporary voting member)
Oveta Fuller, Ph.D. (fullerao@umich.edu) is, like Monto, at the University of Michigan (since 1988), where she directs the African Studies Center and is an associate professor of microbiology and immunology.
I begin with a post by Adina Kutnicki. Kutnicki has fallen from favor from me because has been posting Gitmo military tribunals and executions of Left-Wing traitors as truth – AND IT IS NOT. Those reports are wishful myths designed to make outraged Conservatives believe actual justice exists in a Dem-Marxist tyranny.
Needless to say though she has hit upon a report where actual documentation exists about the AMA telling member Doctors to lie about Jab hazards and deaths and about media lies on Ivermectin being dangerous as an effective COVID therapy.
I include a Vic Freeman post issuing a rally cry for Americans to legally and peacefully rise up to resist a Jab Mandate tyranny.
Then I found an Epoch Times article reporting funding money was DEFINITELY dispatched to Wuhan labs from the NIH and NIAID to research bat coronavirus yet cryptically includes a quote from Richard Ebright who claims the 900 or so pages exposing funding let’s liar Fauci off the hook. I’d sure like the explanation how this 2 + 2 = 5 assertion works.
JRH 9/9/21
I need your generosity in 2021 via – credit cards, check cards
American Medical Association Releases Stunning Doc Teaching Doctors to LIE to Patients While Deliberately Exaggerating Covid Death Claims … “Primum Non Nocere” DOA [VIDEO]
FULL DISCLOSURE: it is few and far between that an investigative journalist has the closest of access to a first-hand source, let alone, more than a few others. This is one of those times.
IN this regard, this American-Israeli (currently, living in Israel) is surrounded by surgeons of the highest caliber; all of whom received their education in the most renowned medical schools in America: namely, Harvard, Yale, Columbia University College of Physicians & Surgeons, and Stanford. Not only that, before immigrating to Israel, this hard-charging group of docs spent years in practice within top-tier surgical departments across the U.S. They can’t be fooled.
OVER the years, each and every one has maintained their membership in the AMA, as well as associated credentialed societies in the U. S.; one of whom is the AMA’s representative in Israel! For the record, elite U.S. universities have a sizable number of alumni spread throughout the country — with each school maintaining a roster of active reps, etc. to ensure this and that.
BACK to the surgeons and the AMA.
HAVING become privy to particular instances of less than honest dealings in the recent past, the attached AMA directive and document became a bridge to far, so to speak. Not only that, alongside placing the AMA on notice that they crossed a red line — having veered from their mandate as an association based upon offering membership sound medical advice to share with their patients; as they segued into a government-directed medical propaganda arm — they have no intention of standing idly by. Enough is enough. They are taking matters into their own hands. Let’s leave it at that.
FOR since this top-tier understands better than most that the covid-19 mRNA-based vax was rushed to market under sub-standard scientific criteria — no less, with a warning issued by its inventor, having been threatened for doing so — how can any rational, ethical medical professional tolerate the AMA’s deception, and worse?
AND, for the record, not only are they calling out the AMA for “koshering” the booster campaign in the process, they have sent warning letters to the Israel Ministry of Health, to boot. They have zero intention of encouraging their patients to submit to booster upon booster ….
THIS is just the tip of what is really going down among the most ethical group of doctors that this writer has ever come across, bar none.
“Primum non nocere“ [Blog Editor: Latin for “first, do no harm”. It’s supposed to be a Medical Doctor credo] are not just words to them; it is their sacred oath and duty.
The self-destruct sequence that will bring down the death cult cabal of anti-human globalists has already been activated. With hilarious fake news attempts like the recent Rolling Stone hit piece against ivermectin, the cabal media is self-destructing by the day. With endless fiat currency printing by the Fed, the entire financial underpinning of illegitimate Big Government is imploding. And with the laughable, desperate attempts to imply covid vaccine “approval” while pushing utterly unproven booster shots backed by no supporting data whatsoever, Big Science is ripping its own eyeballs out and throwing them across the room.
We are witnessing the total self-destruction of Big Pharma, Big Science, Big Media and Big Government, all as they trip over each other trying to discredit ivermectin and vitamin D while pushing vaccine death shots and medical authoritarianism. All they’ve really accomplished, however, is the accelerated awakening of the masses as they witness the authoritarian lunacy and junk science death cult that’s paraded all around us, falsely claiming our freedoms have to be obliterated in the name of “safety.”
In Victoria, Australia, by the way, lunatic Premier Daniel Andrews just declared that unvaccinated people will be “locked out” of all health care and hospital services. Given how toxic, deadly and incompetent mainstream doctors have become, that’s probably a blessing. Perhaps the free people of Australia will finally turn to nutrition and natural medicine, and they will therefore outlive the vaccine zombies who are committing medical suicide.
AMA releases document teaching doctors how to deceive patients with disinformation that may KILL them
Background/messaging on vaccines, vaccine clinical trials & combatting vaccine misinformation
The American Medical Association — which is now engaged in training its members to lie to patients as they murder them —has released an eyebrow-raising documentthat claims, “rampant disinformation” is, “eroding public confidence in science and undermining trust in physicians and medical institutions.” And to reacquire that lost trust, the AMA proceeds to teach doctors how to lie to the world about covid.
On page 9 of the document, doctors are told to replace the phrase “hospitalization rates” with the claim that all hospitalized patients are “deaths,” thereby wildly exaggerating covid deaths in order to achieve mass hysteria. Make no mistake: This is the AMA directly instructing doctors to lie about covid deaths. This is straight up medical fraud.
Similarly, doctors are also told to replace the word, “lockdown” with “stay-at-home order,” because that somehow sounds less totalitarian.
In the same document, on page 8, doctors are instructed on how to block, deflect and redirect questions to cover up the truth about vaccine injuries and deaths. They are specifically instructed to change the subject and reject questions from reporters or patients, while pushing AMA-approved “official” propaganda by claiming it’s all based on “facts,” not “science” or “medicine.”
In essence the AMA is now attempting to transform doctors into propaganda puppets for the global depopulation agenda. Practicing real medicine is no longer the priority of the AMA, it seems. Rather, physicians must practice lying in order to remain an AMA member in good standing.
Here’s a section from the document, entitled, “COVID-19 Language Swaps”
The AMA just provided evidence that can be used to prosecute its own corrupt officials for crimes against humanity
What’s just as disturbing in all this is how the AMA appears to have no realization that by posting this document, the AMA admits its own complicity in crimes against humanity. This is sometimes called “saying the quiet part out loud,” and this document that instructs doctors to lead patients to their own death can be used as evidence in international war crimes tribunals that seek the arrest and prosecution of AMA leaders who are taking part in this murderous scheme.
I first learned about this extraordinary AMA document by watching Dr. Bryan Ardis interviewed by Stew Peters (both are Brighteon.TV show hosts). This amazing interview, shown below, delves into even more detail about the AMA’s bold deception and how it recruits physicians to be propagandists carrying out medical genocide against humanity:
I also cover the topic in more detail in my Sep. 6th Situation Update podcast, which reveals extremely positive information about how we prevail by rejecting the medical death cult that’s right now destroying its own credibility (while killing its own advocates with bioweapons death shots):
[Blog Editor: Brighteon does not embed on the WordPress platform, so Kutnicki just provides the link.]
{ADDENDUM: Bear uppermost in mind — To stifle the truth-telling found at this site, FB’s censors have “zeroed-out” all of my articles via their “Boom and Ban” censors ala their ubiquitous “Community Standards” — as they hunt me up and down the internet like rabid dogs to their prey! No kidding. This is just some of FB’s modus operandi, what is now deemed their “love notes” to yours truly: This URL goes against our Community Standards on spam: adinakutnicki.files.wordpress.comACTIVITY
[From Facebook:]
About your post Today at 4:34 PM: No one else can see your post. And so on and so forth. In fact, just recently, each article at my “parent site”, ADINA KUTNICKI: A ZIONIST & CONSERVATIVE BLOG, had its FB registered shares go from the hundreds, with some up to the many thousands, to a big, fat ZERO. In other words, all my shares have gone down the rabbit hole. Just like that. Poof. Gone. As such, take it to the bank that each and every conservative voice which reaches a wide readership will, sooner than later, be CENSORED. MUTED.} MESSAGE FAILED: This message contains content that has been blocked by our security systems. If you think you’re seeing this by mistake, please let us know. Yes, additional “proof-in-the pudding” as to why “BANNED: How Facebook Enables Militant Islamic Jihad” had to be written!}
If you think that our establishment medical community is honest, think again. They are not. The litany of lies and deception grows with each passing day. The latest victim of the new Orwellian world of redefining truth comes courtesy of the CDC. They have changed the definition of “vaccine” and “vaccination” because so many vaccinated people are still being infected with a variant of Covid. This is good news for Alex Berenson, who is suing Twitter for defamation.
Here is the tweet about the Covid vaccine that got Alex banned:
“It doesn’t stop infection. Or transmission. Don’t think of it as a vaccine.
Vaccine– “a product that stimulates a person’s immune system to produce immunity to a specific disease.”
Vaccination– “the act of introducing a vaccine into the body to produce immunity to a specific disease.”
Got it? A vaccine is supposed to produce immunity to a specific disease.
The problem is that Covid 19 is not a disease. It causes a variety of diseases. CDC Director Rochelle Walensky recently admitted that the effectiveness of the COVID-19 vaccines are “waning.”
Rather than admit the Covid vaccine is not working as advertised, CDC took a page out of Orwell’s 1984 and opted for new spin language.
Here is the new definition:
Vaccine– “a preparation that is used to stimulate the body’s immune response against diseases.”
Note the subtle but important change. Instead of “PRODUCING IMMUNITY” the new definition moves the goal posts and states that their pseudo vaccine “STIMULATES THE BODY’S IMMUNE RESPONSE.”
The problem for people keen on protecting their health is that the Immune Response produced by the Covid vaccines appears to actually spark more Covid infection in some patients.
In light of Fauci’s demonstrable lying before Congress, it is time to stop trusting anything the CDC says.
Alex Berenson is taking a victory lap. He was banned from Twitter for claiming, CORRECTLY, that the Covid vaccine DID NOT PRODUCE IMMUNITY. Looks like the CDC now agrees with Alex.
*The below can STOP THE JABS cold in their tracks: IF there’s enough people on board. So:
If YOU want to see the Jabs STOP: Join at bottom and SHARE.
**BE AWARE: It is up to The People, so if YOU want to see the Jabs STOPPED you will need to share this so everyone can be COORDINATED AS REQUIRED (everyone interested in DOING SOMETHING EFFECTIVE can sign up at the FORM at the bottom of this post).
THE CRIMINALS WILL NEVER HOLD THEMSELVES OR EACH OTHER ACCOUNTABLE
They are ALL GUILTY.
Every politician, every official and every law enforcement officer or agent in this country are GUILTY of a list of crimes longer than War & Peace minus the Peace.
They are either directly guilty of crimes, OR they are guilty of being accessories to crimes.
In many cases they are guilty of aiding and abetting crimes.
The crimes include the worst sort, such as Treason and Crimes Against Children and Humanity.
Along with EVERY PERSON who has administered even ONE JAB:
They are guilty of breaking Codes which were designed to protect people and children from ATROCITIES like took place in NAZI GERMANY:
The Nuremberg Codes are not only being broken: They are and have been SHATTERED WHOLESALE all day, every day, in every community in this land.
They have chosen to put the will and mandates of Global Corporate Psychopaths ahead of not only our Constitution, but ahead of the very will of God.
THEY SAY that what they are and have been doing is right.
THEY SAY that what they’ve been doing is not Treason.
THEY SAY that what they are doing is, “Safe and Effective”.
THEY SAY that THEY cannot be held liable.
THEY SAY a whole lot of nonsense.
BUT:
THEY don’t decide.
We The People ARE WHO DECIDES.
WE THE PEOPLE WILL HOLD THEM ALL ACCOUNTABLE VIA 100% LAWFUL DUE PROCESSES
Our Founding Fathers were extremely smart people. Some say they were downright inspired.
As such, it should be no surprise that they left us 100% Lawful solutions according to the Constitution and The Bill of Rights even for a time like this.
WHEN THE LAW NO LONGER ABIDES THE LAW-ABIDING
What should we do when the law no longer abides the law-abiding?
When not only are corrupt officials and their useful idiots given a free pass for the wrong they do, but to top it off Patriotic Americans are arrested for things they didn’t do?
When the Mandates of Global-Corporate Tyrants are enforced, while Codes designed to protect future generations from the atrocities like those of Nazi Germany are not only broken but shattered wholesale from Coast-to-Coast?
WHEN NOBODY CHECKS AND NOBODY BALANCES
There’s a good reason our government is formed with 3 separate branches.
The Separation of the Powers of the Legislative, Executive and Judicial branches is designed to prevent any one branch of government from concentrating too much power.
The Separate Powers are supposed to keep each other in check and hold each other accountable if anyone goes rogue.
But what can We The People do when ALL THREE Branches are rotten to the core?
THE GRAND JURY IS NOT PART OF THE JUDICIAL BRANCH NOR THE EXECUTIVE BRANCH NOR THE LEGISLATIVE BRANCH
As The Constitution, The Bill of Rights and Supreme Court Justice Scalia all confirm:
The American Grand jury does not belong to any of the 3 branches of government, including the Judicial Branch.
The American Grand Jury belongs ONLY to We The People.
As such, here is what we shall do:
We will conduct 100% Lawful Nationwide Citizens Grand Juries (Get Updates at Bottom).
CONVICTIONS, RIGHTS AND LAWS MEAN NOTHING WITHOUT THE ABILITY TO ENFORCE THEM
Since the beginning of 2020 especially, Americans have continued to protest and make demands of acutely corrupt government.
In response to the demands of Americans, the unspoken response of officials has been:
“Or else WHAT?! LOL! WHAT exactly are you ‘commoners’ going to do about it.?! LOL!”
The harsh truth of the situation has been:
There in fact has been absolutely nothing Americans can do about it.
THIS CHANGES EVERYTHING
We are forming 100% Lawful Nationwide Citizens Arrest Posse. (Get Updates At Bottom).
Our Laws, and any CONVICTIONS handed down by Citizens Grand Juries WILL BE ENFORCED.
IF YOU really want to stand up for your rights and our Constitution and our Republic, or if you would simply like updates as you consider your decision:
Sign Up at the Bottom of This Post.
*These are 100% Lawful DUE PROCESSES of The Law which We The People are conducting:
This is NOT a “protest”, nor some attempt to “overthrow” government:
This is 100% Lawful DUE PROCESS which was handed down to us by our Founding Fathers.
EVERY and ALL of our activities are and shall always remain 100% Lawful according to The Constitution and the Bill of Rights.
IT WILL ALSO BE A LOT OF FUN TO SEE WHO CRIES FOUL
Did You Know…
There is only ONE type of person who cries foul over 100% Lawful Due Processes of The Law:
New documents have been released detailing U.S.-funded research on various types of coronaviruses at the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) in Wuhan, China, where the first outbreak of the CCP (Chinese Communist Party) virus occurred.
More than 900 pages of materials were obtained by The Intercept in connection with a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit brought by the publication against the National Institutes of Health (NIH).
The documents detail the work of the EcoHealth Alliance, a U.S.-based health organization that used federal money to fund research into bat coronaviruses at the Chinese lab. They include two previously unpublished grant proposals funded by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, as well as project updates related to EcoHealth Alliance’s research.
The grant proposal outlines an ambitious plan, led by EcoHealth Alliance President Peter Daszak, to “investigate the ecology, evolutionary biology, and transmission dynamics of bat coronaviruses at the human-wildlife interface.”
“Specifically, we will conduct field studies in China to obtain high-quality samples from bats, and identify, characterize and isolate known and novel coronavirus,” the grant proposal reads. “We will analyze the patterns of coronavirus transmission among bats and other wildlife, and the risk of spillover to humans.”
Daszak’s research also involved screening people who work with live animals.
The documents also note that key experimental work with humanized mice was conducted at a biosafety level 3 lab at the Wuhan University Center for Animal Experiment and not at the WIV, as was previously assumed, The Intercept reported.
A laboratory technician working on samples from people to be tested for the new coronavirus at “Fire Eye” laboratory in Wuhan, Hubei Province, China, on Feb. 6, 2020. (STR/AFP via Getty Images)
The grant proposal also acknowledges the potential dangers of the study, including during fieldwork, stating that it “involves the highest risk of exposure to SARS or other CoVs, while working in caves with high bat density overhead and the potential for fecal dust to be inhaled.”
“There is also some risk of exposure to pathogens or physical injury while handling bats, civets, rodents or other animals, their blood samples or their excreta,” the document reads. “Virus isolation may be a challenge.”
The bat coronavirus grant provided the EcoHealth Alliance with a total of $3.1 million, including $599,000 that the Wuhan Institute of Virology used in part to identify and alter bat coronaviruses likely to infect humans, according to The Intercept.
The grant was initially awarded for a five-year period from 2014 to 2019. Funding was renewed in 2019, but suspended by the Trump administration in April 2020. [Blog Editor Emphasis]
It is unclear if the award was withdrawn or suspended by the government, however separate documents state that budgeting ended on May 31, 2021.
The grant proposal states that it “will bring leaders in emerging disease research from the U.S., Thailand, Singapore, and the three major Malaysian administrative regions together to build an early warning system to safeguard against pandemic disease threats.”
The team would “identify novel viruses from Southeast Asian wildlife, characterize their capacity to infect and cause illness in people, and use serological assays of samples from people in rural communities with high wildlife contact to identify the background rate of exposure, and risk factors that drive this.”
In-depth surveillance at hospitals serving those communities would be used to examine if cryptic outbreaks are caused by those novel agents, which researchers hoped would help them develop a rapid response to outbreaks in such regions.
Researchers with Franceville interdisciplinary Medical Research Center collect samples from a bat inside a cave in the Zadie region of Gabon on Nov. 25, 2020. (Steeve Jordan/AFP via Getty Images)
Even before the COVID-19 pandemic, many scientists were concerned about the potential dangers associated with such experiments, and the newly released documents will no doubt raise further questions regarding the theory that the CCP virus pandemic originated from a lab leak in Wuhan.
Following the release of the documents, Richard Ebright, a molecular biologist at Rutgers University, wrote on Twitter:
“The materials confirm the grants supported the construction—in Wuhan—of novel chimeric SARS-related coronaviruses that combined a spike gene from one coronavirus with genetic information from another coronavirus, and confirmed the resulting viruses could infect human cells.
“The documents make it clear that assertions by the NIH Director, Francis Collins, and the NIAID Director, Anthony Fauci, that the NIH did not support gain-of-function research or potential pandemic pathogen enhancement at WIV are untruthful.”
In August, the World Health Organization (WHO) urged China to share raw data from the earliest COVID-19 cases, saying that it’s “vitally important to know how the COVID-19 pandemic began” and to set an example for establishing the origins of all future animal-human spillover events.
A WHO-led team spent four weeks in and around the central city of Wuhan with Chinese researchers in January 2021 to investigate the origins of the pandemic.
In March, researchers said that the virus had probably been transmitted to humans from bats through another animal and that “introduction through a laboratory incident was considered to be an extremely unlikely pathway.”
However, the Chinese communist regime has faced fierce criticism from the international community, which has accused them of engaging in a cover-up.
In July, WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesustold reporters that investigations into the origins of the COVID-19 pandemic in China were being hampered by the lack of raw data on the first days of spread there and urged the regime to be more transparent.
When governments tell doctors what they can and cannot say and do about treatment, and much worse, what they must say, and may not say, about a government plan to treat everyone, then this is not science or medicine. Case in point, Canada’s Minister of Health is a graphic designer with no medical training at all, and is a perfect example of what may be a result of Klaus Schwab’s little future-leaders project.
I’ll go farther.
It never was and anyone who says it is, has not thought it through.
Doctors deal in medicine and scientists deal with science. And in Western thought, each individual often draws different conclusions which is why for all my life’s experience in Canada, the default response to a doctor’s visit one is unhappy with has always been: “You must go and get a second opinion”. Even doctors told you that. This is default thinking under reason and logic.
Now we have proof that in both Canada and Australia, the same tactic was used. Government threatened doctors to follow a political line of reasoning that was even internally inconsistent and self-contradictory. For example, that they may not ever prescribe a treatment for Covid at all but only point to a Vaccine, which did not even exist for a year of this policy.
That recommending a course of HCQ or Ivermectin would lead to loss of livelihood or worse.
And that this policy we see proof for, being in Canada and Australia, and we can reasonably assume France, the UK, much or most of the USA and other nations, leads us to believe that this was not, ever, nor is not about medicine or science.
http://www.StopMedicalSilencing.com Drea Humphrey speaks to Dr. Charles Hoffe, a longtime family doctor in British Columbia who has been punished after he raised concerns about COVID vaccines and suggested that patients who already had, and recovered from, COVID-19 did not need to be vaccinated.
We posted the actual email sent out to doctors in Canada from the Canadian government that stated that they may not recommend or prescribe untested or unsafe treatments for Covid such as HCQ or Ivermectin etc. and could not in any way say or do anything leading to “vaccine hesitancy” despite the fact that the vaccines discussed are not safe by definition as they have not even finished trials yet, but drugs like HCQ and Ivermectin have been out for decades and are known to be safe and one even got a Nobel Prize for medicine.
At the moment I cannot find that post. But it was Dr. Charles Hoff who, I believe actually revealed that email.
About Eeyore
Canadian artist and counter-jihad and freedom of speech activist as well as devout Schrödinger’s catholic — View all posts by Eeyore →
My fellow Americans and people of the world – YOU ARE BEING LIED TO BY YOUR GOVERNMENTS AND MEDIA SOURCES in relation to COVID-19 and experimental Jab called a vaccination to combat COVID-19!
This is a compilation video concerning the covid-19 injection and what doctors around the world are calling “Medical Malpractice”. Get ready for Project BLUE BEAM.
You are being told critics and whistleblowers of the experimental Jab showing adverse effects up to and including death are Conspiracy Theorists providing false information. THE REAL TRUTH is being videotaped coupled with doctors, nurses and scientists sharing the truth. The lying Left’s response to facts is character assassination rather than refuting what you can see or refuting reputable science.
BELOW (in no particularorder) are some articles and videos showing facts that Dem-Marxists, Globalist-Marxists and control despots DO NOT WANT YOU TO BE AWARE OF. There is now so much info available to refute the lies being told that what you read and watch here is only a fraction.
Keep in mind there is still a 99% (perhaps down to 97% for senior citizens) survival rate for the COVID infected AND if therapies ridiculed by Big Pharma science were used, EVEN FEWER people would have died. There are other therapies but Ivermectin, HCQ and Azithromycin come to mind according to recent 2021 studies.
Read, learn, defend yourself and share with others. RESIST TYRANNY!
JRH 6/16/21
I need your generosity in 2021 via – credit cards, check cards
Most of the people who took a COVID “vaccine” will be dead by the year 2025. The proof is now available for all to see.
Thanks to the people who participated in this first ever human experiment with a mRNA gene-therapy, fooled into thinking it was a “vaccine” for a phony “pandemic” allegedly caused by the never-isolated “COVID-19,” we now know the following based on fact-based, post-vaccine research:
1.) It’s not a vaccine. The COVID-19 mRNA vaccine does not provide immunity to Covid or it’s variants so you can still catch Covid and transmit it to others making you asymptomatic. You will likely need a booster shot every 6 months, so get ready to roll up that sleeve every six months once that system rolls out. [link to www.bustle.com]
2.) The 95% efficacy is the RRR (Relative Reduction Risk) where the real reduction rate ARR (Absolute Reduction Risk) is less than 2% as per this scientific Lancet study. [link to www.thelancet.com]
This means you are really not protected much at all, as the architects of this phony pandemic would like you to ‘believe.’
3.) The lipid nanoparticles in the vaccines do not remain in the intramuscular region of the deltoid muscle. They seep out into the cardiovascular system infecting the entire body with spike-protein. Something the manufacturers claimed would never happen, yet it does and is why the adverse-side effects are so bad with this shot. [link to www.sciencedirect.com]
This means the spike-protein itself is enough to damage the cardiovascular system and organs, some of which can have harmful events in the future and is like injecting someone with Covid-19 damaging the inside of the body rather than the lungs.
6.) The lipid nanoparticles after injection bulk in Ovaries in women followed by bone-marrow. Dr. Robert Malone the inventor of mRNA covers these findings in lay terms for stupid people who can’t process scientific data easily. [link to www.bitchute.com]
If it wasn’t for the gullible and naïve idiots who jumped on an experimental gene-therapy shot which skipped any real, meaningful, trials that would have presented the above findings, we now have this data and evidence from the human lab-rats running around gleefully and ignorantly celebrating their Eugenics shot, completely blind to the short-term and long term consequences that this data all points to: MOST of them will die from one or more of the conditions outlined in the reports above, and MOST of those deaths will take place by the year 2025.
Enjoy your harmful spike-protein that you will never get out of your body, and the neural degenerative, long-term risks, which ultimately could lead to untreatable deadly neurological illnesses as your brain slowly rots and deteriorates from the prion causing misfolded proteins that damage your neurons slowly over time.
Your sacrifice for the safety of others, which will likely kill most of you, was based on your ignorance, your failure to research things for yourself, and your willingness to simply accept what other (ignorant) people – like politicians – told you.
World population of 500 million coming; just as the Georgia Guide Stones suggested, and the psychotic maniacs who believe humans need to be culled from the planet, took literally.
How about we blame the real culprits who created this in the first place:
Fauci with his gain-of-function research that was banned in the US so he moved it the lab in Wuhan where this took place.
Bill Gates with his depopulation agenda and ties to pedophile Jeffery Epstein.
The CDC/WHO/Rockefeller Foundation and John Hopkins, who ran Event 201, Spars, Lockstep, planning all of this for their globalist new world order.
Canadian immunologist and vaccine researcher Byram Bridle, Ph.D., has gained access to Pfizer’s biodistribution study from the Japanese regulatory agency. The research, previously unseen, demonstrates a huge problem with all COVID-19 vaccines
The assumption that vaccine developers have been working with is that the mRNA in the vaccines would primarily remain in and around the vaccination site. Pfizer’s data, however, show the mRNA and subsequent spike protein are widely distributed in the body within hours
This is a serious problem, as the spike protein is a toxin shown to cause cardiovascular and neurological damage. It also has reproductive toxicity, and Pfizer’s biodistribution data show it accumulates in women’s ovaries
Once in your blood circulation, the spike protein binds to platelet receptors and the cells that line your blood vessels. When that happens, it can cause platelets to clump together, resulting in blood clots, and/or cause abnormal bleeding
Pfizer documents submitted to the European Medicines Agency also show the company failed to follow industry-standard quality management practices during preclinical toxicology studies and that key studies did not meet good laboratory practice standards
PODCAST: On Point With Alex Pierson (Interview with Dr. Byram Bridle, an Associate Professor on Viral Immunology)
Alex talks with Dr. Byram Bridle, an Associate Professor on Viral Immunology at the University of Guelph about new peer-reviewed studies that suggests there may be terrifying reasons side effects such as heart inflammation, VITT, and other serious issues may occur in those who have been vaccinated.
Let’s get talking.]
The more we learn about the COVID-19 vaccines, the worse they look. In a recent interview1 with Alex Pierson (above), Canadian immunologist and vaccine researcher Byram Bridle, Ph.D., dropped a shocking truth bomb that immediately went viral, despite being censored by Google.
It also was featured in a “fact” check by The Poynter Institute’s Politifact,2 which pronounced Bridle’s findings as “false” after interviewing Dr. Drew Weissman,3 a UPenn scientist who is credited with helping to create the technology that enables the COVID mRNA vaccines to work. But, as you can see below, unlike Bridle, Politifact neglected to go beyond interviewing someone with such a huge stake in the vaccine’s success.
In 2020, Bridle was awarded a $230,000 government grant for research on COVID vaccine development. As part of that research, he and a team of international scientists requested a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) access to Pfizer’s biodistribution study from the Japanese regulatory agency. The research,4,5 previously unseen, demonstrates a huge problem with all COVID-19 vaccines.
“We made a big mistake,” Bridle says. “We thought the spike protein was a great target antigen; we never knew the spike protein itself was a toxin and was a pathogenic protein. So, by vaccinating people we are inadvertently inoculating them with a toxin.”
This toxin, Bridle notes, can cause cardiovascular damage and infertility — a claim echoed by researchers such as Stephanie Seneff, Ph.D., and Judy Mikovits, Ph.D., whom I’ve interviewed about these issues.
Pfizer Omitted Industry-Standard Safety Studies
What’s more, TrialSite News reports6 that Pfizer documents submitted to the European Medicines Agency [EMA] reveal the company “did not follow industry-standard quality management practices during preclinical toxicology studies … as key studies did not meet good laboratory practice (GLP).”
Neither reproductive toxicity nor genotoxicity (DNA mutation) studies were performed, both of which are considered critical when developing a new drug or vaccine for human use. The problems now surfacing matter greatly, as they significantly alter the risk-benefit analysis underlying the vaccines’ emergency use authorization. As reported by TrialSite News:7
“Recently, there has been speculation regarding potential safety signals associated with COVID-19 mRNA vaccines. Many different unusual, prolonged, or delayed reactions have been reported, and often these are more pronounced after the second shot.
Women have reported changes in menstruation after taking mRNA vaccines. Problems with blood clotting (coagulation) — which are also common during COVID-19 disease — are also reported. In the case of the Pfizer COVID mRNA vaccine, these newly revealed documents raise additional questions about both the genotoxicity and reproductive toxicity risks of this product.
Standard studies designed to assess these risks were not performed in compliance with accepted empirical research standards. Furthermore, in key studies designed to test whether the vaccine remains near the injection site or travels throughout the body, Pfizer did not even use the commercial vaccine (BNT162b2) but instead relied on a ‘surrogate’ mRNA producing the luciferase protein.
These new disclosures seem to indicate that the U.S. and other governments are conducting a massive vaccination program with an incompletely characterized experimental vaccine.
It is certainly understandable why the vaccine was rushed into use as an experimental product under emergency use authority, but these new findings suggest that routine quality testing issues were overlooked in the rush to authorize use.
People are now receiving injections with an mRNA gene therapy-based vaccine, which produces the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein in their cells, and the vaccine may be also delivering the mRNA and producing spike protein in unintended organs and tissues (which may include ovaries).”
Toxic Spike Protein Enters Blood Circulation
The assumption that vaccine developers have been working with is that the mRNA in the vaccines (or DNA in the case of Johnson & Johnson and AstraZeneca’s vaccines) would primarily remain in and around the vaccination site, i.e., your deltoid muscle, with a small amount draining into local lymph nodes.8
Pfizer’s data, however, show this isn’t the case at all. Using mRNA programmed to produce luciferase protein, as well as mRNA tagged with a radioactive label, Pfizer showed that the majority of the mRNA initially remain near the injection site, but within hours become widely distributed within the body.9
The mRNA enters your bloodstream and accumulates in a variety of organs, primarily your spleen, bone marrow, liver, adrenal glands and, in women, the ovaries. The spike protein also travel to your heart, brain and lungs, where bleeding and or blood clots can occur as a result, and is expelled in breast milk.
This is a problem, because rather than instructing your muscle cells to produce the spike protein (the antigen that triggers antibody production), spike protein is actually being produced inside your blood vessel walls and various organs, where it can do a great deal of damage.
“It’s the first time ever scientists have been privy to seeing where these messenger RNA [mRNA] vaccines go after vaccination,” Bridle told Pierson.10
“Is it a safe assumption that it stays in the shoulder muscle? The short answer is: absolutely not. It’s very disconcerting … We have known for a long time that the spike protein is a pathogenic protein.
It is a toxin. It can cause damage in our body if it gets into circulation … The spike protein on its own is almost entirely responsible for the damage to the cardiovascular system, if it gets into circulation.”
The Spike Protein Is the Problem
Indeed, for many months, we’ve known that the worst symptoms of severe COVID-19, blood clotting problems in particular, are caused by the spike protein of the virus. As such, it seemed really risky to instruct the body’s cells to produce the very thing that causes severe problems.
Bridle cites research showing that laboratory animals injected with purified spike protein from SARS-CoV-2 straight into their bloodstream developed cardiovascular problems and brain damage.
Assuming that the spike protein would not enter into the circulatory system was a “grave mistake,” according to Bridle, who calls the Japanese data “clear-cut evidence” that the vaccine, and the spike protein produced by it, enters your bloodstream and accumulates in vital organs. Bridle also cites recent research showing the spike protein remained in the bloodstream of humans for 29 days.
Once in your blood circulation, the spike protein binds to platelet receptors and the cells that line your blood vessels. As explained by Bridle, when that happens, one of several things can occur:
It can cause platelets to clump together — Platelets, aka thrombocytes, are specialized cells in your blood that stop bleeding. When there’s blood vessel damage, they clump together to form a blood clot. This is why we’ve been seeing clotting disorders associated with both COVID-19 and the vaccines
It can cause abnormal bleeding
In your heart, it can cause heart problems
In your brain, it can cause neurological damage
Importantly, people who have been vaccinated against COVID-19 absolutely should not donate blood, seeing how the vaccine and the spike protein are both transferred. In fragile patients receiving the blood, the damage could be lethal.
Breastfeeding women also need to know that both the vaccine and the spike protein are being expelled in breast milk, and this could be lethal for their babies. You are not transferring antibodies. You are transferring the vaccine itself, as well as the spike protein, which could result in bleeding and/or blood clots in your child. All of this also suggests that for individuals who are at low risk for COVID-19, children and teens in particular, the risks of these vaccines far outweigh the benefits.
The Spike Protein and Blood Clotting
In related news, Dr. Malcolm Kendrick posted an article11 on his website June 3, 2021, in which he discusses the links between the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and vasculitis, a medical term referring to inflammation (“itis”) in your vascular system, which is made up of your heart and blood vessels.
There are many different types of vasculitis, including Kawasaki’s disease, antiphospholipid syndrome, rheumatoid arthritis, scleroderma and Sjogren’s disease. According to Kendrick, all of them have two things in common:12
1. Your body for some reason starts to attack the lining of your blood vessels, thereby causing damage and inflammation — The “why” can differ from one case to another, but in all cases, your immune system identifies something foreign in the lining of the blood vessel, causing it to attack. The attack causes damage to the lining, which results in inflammation.
Blood clots are a common result, and can occur either because the platelets clump together in response to the vessel wall damage, or because your anticlotting mechanism has been compromised. Your most powerful anticlotting system is your glycocalyx, the protective layer of glycoproteins that lines your blood vessels.
Among many other things, the glycocalyx contains a wide variety of anticoagulant factors, including tissue factor inhibitor, protein C, nitric oxide and antithrombin. It also modulates the adhesion of platelets to the endothelium. When blood clots completely block a blood vessel, you end up with a stroke or a heart attack.
A reduction in platelet count, known as thrombocytopenia, is a reliable sign that blood clots are forming in your system, as the platelets are being used up in the process. Thrombocytopenia is a commonly-reported side effect of COVID-19 vaccines, as are blood clots, strokes and lethal heart attacks — all of which are pointing toward spike proteins causing vascular damage.
2. They significantly increase your risk of death, in some cases raising mortality by 50 times compared to people who do not have these conditions.
The take-home message Kendrick delivers is that “If you damage the lining of blood vessel walls, blood clots are far more likely to form. Very often, the damage is caused by the immune system going on the attack, damaging blood vessel walls, and removing several of the anti-clotting mechanisms.” The end result can be lethal, and this chain of events is exactly what these COVID-19 vaccines are setting into motion.
SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein May Damage Mitochondrial Function
Other research suggests the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein can have a serious impact on your mitochondrial function, which is imperative for good health, innate immunity and disease prevention of all kinds.
When the spike protein interacts with the ACE2 receptor, it can disrupt mitochondrial signaling, thereby inducing the production of reactive oxygen species and oxidative stress. If the damage is serious enough, uncontrolled cell death can occur, which in turn leaks mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) into your bloodstream.13
Aside from being detected in cases involving acute tissue injury, heart attack and sepsis, freely circulating mtDNA has also been shown to contribute to a number of chronic diseases, including systemic inflammatory response syndrome or SIRS, heart disease, liver failure, HIV infection, rheumatoid arthritis and certain cancers.14 As explained in “COVID-19: A Mitochondrial Perspective”:15
“Apart from its role in energy production, mitochondria are crucial for … innate immunity, reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation, and apoptosis; all of these are important in COVID-19 pathogenesis. Dysfunctional mitochondria predispose to oxidative stress and loss of cellular function and vitality. In addition, mitochondrial damage leads to … inappropriate and persistent inflammation.
SARS coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) … enters cell by attaching to angiotensin converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptors on cell surface … Following infection, there is internalization and downregulation of ACE2 receptors.
At vascular endothelium, ACE2 performs conversion of angiotensin II to angiotensin (1–7). Thus, a low ACE2 activity subsequent to SARS-CoV-2 infection leads to imbalance in renin-angiotensin system with relative excess of angiotensin II.
Angiotensin II through binding to its type 1 receptors exerts pro-inflammatory, vasoconstrictive, and prothrombotic effects, while angiotensin (1–7) has opposing effects … In addition, angiotensin II increases cytoplasmic and mitochondrial ROS generation leading to oxidative stress.
Increased oxidative stress may lead to endothelial dysfunction and aggravate systemic and local inflammation, thus contributing to acute lung injury, cytokine storm, and thrombosis seen in severe COVID-19 illness …
A recent algorithm showed that majority of SARS-CoV-2 genomic and structural RNAs are targeted for mitochondrial matrix. Thus it appears that SARS-CoV-2 hijacks mitochondrial machinery for its own benefit, including DMV biogenesis. Manipulation of mitochondria by virus may lead to mitochondrial dysfunction and increased oxidative stress ultimately leading to loss of mitochondrial integrity and cell death …
Mitochondrial fission enables removal of the damaged portion of a mitochondrion to be cleared by mitophagy (a special form of autophagy). Metabolomic studies suggest that SARS-CoV-2 inhibits mitophagy. Thus, there is accumulation of damaged and dysfunctional mitochondria. This not only leads to impaired MAVS [mitochondrial antiviral signaling] response but also aggravates inflammation and cell death.”
The author, Pankaj Prasun, points out that the virus’ impact on mitochondria helps explain why COVID-19 is so much deadlier for older people, the obese, and those with diabetes, high blood pressure and heart disease.
All of these risk factors have something in common: They’re all associated with mitochondrial dysfunction. If your mitochondria are already dysfunctional, the SARS-CoV-2 virus can more easily knock out more mitochondria, resulting in severe illness and death.
The Spike Protein Is a Bioweapon
In my interview with Seneff and Mikovits (see earlier hyperlink), they both stressed that the key danger — both in COVID-19 and with the vaccines — is the spike protein itself. However, while the spike protein found in the virus is bad, the spike protein your body produces in response to the vaccine is far worse. Why?
Because the synthetic mRNA in the vaccine has been programmed to instruct your cells to produce an unnatural, genetically engineered spike protein. Specific alterations make it far more toxic than that found on the virus itself. Mikovits goes so far as to call the spike protein a bioweapon, as it is a disease-causing agent that demolishes innate immunity and exhausts your natural killer (NK) cells’ ability to determine which cells are infected and which aren’t.
In short, when you get the COVID-19 vaccine, you are being injected with an agent that instructs your body to produce the bioweapon in its own cells. This is about as diabolical as it gets.
In summary, normally, the spike protein on a virus will collapse on itself and fall into the cell once it attaches to the ACE2 receptor. The vaccine-induced spike protein does not do this. Instead it stays open and remains attached to the ACE2 receptor, thereby disabling it and causing a host of problems that lead to heart, lung and immune impairment.
What’s more, because the RNA code has been enriched with extra guanines (Gs) and cytosines (Cs), and configured as if it’s a human messenger RNA molecule ready to make protein by adding a polyA tail, the spike protein’s RNA sequence in the vaccine looks as if it is part bacteria,17 part human18 and part viral at the same time.
There’s also evidence suggesting the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein may be a prion, which is yet another piece of really bad news, particularly as it pertains to vaccine-induced spike protein. Prions are membrane proteins and when they misfold, they form crystals in the cytoplasm resulting in prion disease.
Since the mRNA in the vaccines has been modified to spew out very high amounts of spike protein (far greater than that of the actual virus), the risk of excessive buildup in the cytoplasm is high. And, since the spike protein doesn’t enter into the membrane of the cell, there’s a high risk that it can become problematic if indeed it works like a prion.
Remember, the research cited by Bridle at the beginning of this article found the spike protein accumulates in the spleen, among other places. Parkinson’s disease is a prion disease that has been traced back to prions originating in the spleen, that then travel up to the brain via the vagus nerve. In the same way, it’s quite possible COVID-19 vaccines may promote Parkinson’s and other human prion diseases such as Alzheimer’s.
What Are the Solutions?
While all of this is highly problematic, there is help. As noted by Mikovits, remedies to the maladies that might develop post-vaccination include:
Hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin treatments. Ivermectin appears particularly promising as it actually binds to the spike protein. Please listen to the interview that Brett Weinstein did with Dr. Pierre Kory,19 one of Dr. Paul Marik’s collaborators
Low-dose antiretroviral therapy to reeducate your immune system
Low-dose interferons such as Paximune, developed by interferon researcher Dr. Joe Cummins, to stimulate your immune system
Peptide T (an HIV entry inhibitor derived from the HIV envelope protein gp120; it blocks binding and infection of viruses that use the CCR5 receptor to infect cells)
Cannabis, to strengthen Type I interferon pathways
Dimethylglycine or betaine (trimethylglycine) to enhance methylation, thereby suppressing latent viruses
Silymarin or milk thistle to help cleanse your liver
From my perspective, I believe the best thing you can do is to build your innate immune system. To do that, you need to become metabolically flexible and optimize your diet. You’ll also want to make sure your vitamin D level is optimized to between 60 ng/mL and 80 ng/mL (100 nmol/L to 150 nmol/L), ideally through sensible sun exposure. Sunlight also has other benefits besides making vitamin D.
Use time-restricted eating and eat all your meals for the day within a six- to eight-hour window. Avoid all vegetable oils and processed foods. Focus on certified-organic foods to minimize your glyphosate exposure, and include plenty of sulfur-rich foods to keep your mitochondria and lysosomes healthy. Both are important for the clearing of cellular debris, including these spike proteins. You can also boost your sulfate by taking Epsom salt baths.
To combat the toxicity of the spike protein, you’ll want to optimize autophagy, which may help digest and remove the spike proteins. Time-restricted eating will upregulate autophagy, while sauna therapy, which upregulates heat shock proteins, will help refold misfolded proteins and also tag damaged proteins and target them for removal. It is important that your sauna is hot enough (around 170 degrees Fahrenheit) and does not have high magnetic or electric fields.
The National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC) recently posted more than 50 video presentations from the pay-for-view Fifth International Public Conference on Vaccination held online October 16 to 18, 2020, and made them available to everyone for free.
The conference’s theme was “Protecting Health and Autonomy in the 21st Century” and it featured physicians, scientists and other health professionals, human rights activists, faith community leaders, constitutional and civil rights attorneys, authors and parents of vaccine injured children talking about vaccine science, policy, law and ethics and infectious diseases, including coronavirus and COVID-19 vaccines.
In December 2020, a U.K. company published false and misleading information about NVIC and its conference, which prompted NVIC to open up the whole conference for free viewing. The conference has everything you need to educate yourself and protect your personal freedoms and liberties with respect to your health.
Don’t miss out on this incredible opportunity. I was a speaker at this empowering conference and urge you to watch these video presentations before they’re censored and taken away by the technocratic elite.
Disclaimer: The entire contents of this website are based upon the opinions of Dr. Mercola, unless otherwise noted. Individual articles are based upon the opinions of the respective author, who retains copyright as marked. The information on this website is not intended to replace a one-on-one relationship with a qualified health care professional and is not intended as medical advice. It is intended as a sharing of knowledge and information from the research and experience of Dr. Mercola and his community. Dr. Mercola encourages you to make your own health care decisions based upon your research and in partnership with a qualified health care professional. If you are pregnant, nursing, taking medication, or have a medical condition, consult your health care professional before using products based on this content.
If you want to use an article on your site please click here. This content may be copied in full, with copyright, contact, creation and information intact, without specific permission, when used only in a not-for-profit format. If any other use is desired, permission in writing from Dr. Mercola is required.
+++++++++++++++++++
CDC ACKNOWLEDGES HEART RISKS TO YOUNG PEOPLE, MUST DISCONTINUE COVID-19 VACCINATION IN PEOPLE ≤ 30
LOS ANGELES, CA – America’s Frontline Doctors released the following statement today in response to the announcement by the Centers for Disease Control that they will hold a June 18th emergency meeting of The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practice (ACIP) to address increased rates of inflammation of the heart muscle and heart lining after COVID-19 vaccination, particularly in young people. In a June 10th meeting the CDC disclosed, as of May 31, 475 cases of myocarditis/pericarditis were reported to VAERS of Americans age 30 and younger. The conditions called myocarditis and pericarditis can cause permanent heart damage. AFLDS is currently suing the Dept. of Health and Human Services to prevent additional emergency use authorizations of COVID-19 vaccines.
“It’s long past time that the CDC acknowledged there are hundreds of cases involving young people who have been vaccinated. Almost all of these children require hospitalization and 20% have reduced heart function. The children/youths will need to be on heart failure drugs and no physical activity for 3-6 months to try to prevent permanent heart failure. The CDC must immediately suspend any additional authorizations for the use of COVID-19 vaccines in children. If an otherwise healthy 12-year-old suffers heart damage after receiving these vaccines, their life will never be the same. These conditions can change a young person’s healthy heart to that of a frail 70 year old overnight. It continues to be unfortunate that the CDC refuses to acknowledge risks and mounting adverse events until they are forced to by rising cases.
“Pediatric Medical Director for America’s Frontline Doctors, Dr Angie Farella submitted a letter to CDC for review on this very issue. She wrote, “Vaccines take years to safely test. It’s not only the number of people tested but the length of time that is important when creating new vaccines. These experimental agents must not be rushed and licensed early, before the completion of all trials.”
“The risk to children from COVID-19 is statistically insignificant, yet the nation’s medical bureaucracy and Big Pharma continue to put our children at risk to push an experimental agent that is not medically necessary. Parents, physicians and elected officials must stand up for our nation’s children now before we find more damage has been done at the hands of politicized science.”
MEDIA NOTE: To book an AFLDS member physician on your media outlet or program, please send requests to Sarah Absher at Sarah@aflds.org or call 336-392-5850.
ABOUT AMERICA’S FRONTLINE DOCTORS
America’s Frontline Doctors (AFLDS) is a non-partisan, not-for-profit organization. AFLDS stands up for every American looking for the best quality healthcare by empowering doctors working on the front lines of our nation’s most pressing healthcare challenges. Our growing community of member physicians come from across the country representing a range of medical disciplines and practical experience. To learn more about America’s Frontline Doctors, visit AFLDS.org.
Jennifer Bridges of https://www.gofundme.com/f/freedom-of-choice-methodist-mandating-vaccine joins The Alex Jones Show to break down how she lost her job as a nurse after refusing to sign a waiver and take a mandatory covid injection and being ordered to cover up vaccine injuries and death.
After a year of fiendishly censoring everyone who suggested COVID may have come from a communist Chinese lab in Wuhan, the truth is starting to come out. In this episode of Behind the Deep State, host Alex Newman breaks down the dangers of this Orwellian Censorship regime that has included efforts to silence the President of the United States and some of the nations most important governors. Somebody must be held accountable for this. Oh yeah, and Dr. Fauci is a liar!
+++++++++++++++++++
Must-listen interviews of the week: Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and JR Nyquist
The oblivious masses who aren’t tuned in to Brighteon.com are missing out on the best interviews and video content found anywhere on the planet. The platform features the very best cutting-edge video content on vaccines, covid-19, politics, prepping and more.
This past week, I posted two bombshell interviews on my own channel (HRreport), featuring conversations with Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and JR Nyquist. These interviews are absolutely packed with bombshell after bombshell, such as Bobby Kennedy stating that Anthony Fauci is “the single greatest mass murderer in the history of our planet,” or JR Nyquist warning that China has accelerated its plans to attack the United States in “a matter of months” instead of years.
If you wish to stay up on current events and acquire critical information about what’s coming, listen to these two interviews and also consider the Greg Caton interview from a previous week, also shown below. Monitor the HR Report channel on Brighteon for daily Situation Update podcasts as well as new interviews each week: https://www.brighteon.com/channels/hrreport
Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. (“Bobby”) is the author of a groundbreaking new book called, “The Real Anthony Fauci.” It’s available for preorder on Amazon at this link.
Although we don’t support Amazon, in this case pre-ordering the book is important because it helps push the book onto bestseller lists and earns it more attention that the media will find difficult to ignore.
In addition to exposing the science fraud of Fauci, the book also takes a critical look at Bill Gates and his seemingly nefarious global vaccine/population reduction schemes.
Watch the full interview here. The most powerful quotes are toward the end, so watch all the way through:
JR Nyquist warns that China is accelerating its timetable to attack the United States via cyber war, biological war and eventually kinetic war
This interview left me sleepless. JR Nyquist is a brilliant researcher with an extraordinary grasp of history. In this latest interview, he reveals that we are already in a war with communist China, and that China’s military stance prefers the use of nuclear weapons as part of a first strike barrage on the USA (most likely targeting military installations).
Learn about China’s stealth drones and total infiltration of the Pentagon, FBI and CIA in this mind-blowing (and frightening) interview that will undoubtedly have you accelerating your preparedness and survival plans.
Dr. “Zev” Zelenko discusses the reality with the experimental gene editing “vaccine” that is killing thousands of Americans while our health agencies are paying for propaganda to lie to citizens on its safety and effectiveness. Unfortunately, the jab is neither safe nor effective. He claims the right to informed consent is no longer being respected worldwide. Dr. “Zev” is the creator of the Zelenko protocol that has saved hundreds of thousands of lives worldwide. He has been nominated for the Noble peace prize, the Presidential Medal of Freedom, and now provides counsel to multiple governments, hospitals, physicians, and public figures. You can learn more about him and his work at https://vladimirzelenkomd.com/
Dr. “Zev” also wrote the forward to the book “Globalist Predators: We are the Prey” – You can purchase your own copy at https://WeAreThePrey.com
The Conservative-Patriot Christian Right 
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
