Islamophobia – The Conservative-Patriot Christian Right

Do YOU Want European Multiculturalism?

Shrug Off Islamophobia & Xenophobia Accusations

John R. Houk

© March 30, 2019

Some fairly intuitive people have noticed what most would think an unusual cooperation between agendas related to Islam and Left-Wing ideology. I am certain more would publicly speak about this odd pattern of cooperation between Muslim Apologists and Leftist Multiculturalists except for the politically correct labeled fear: Islamophobia and Xenophobia.

Merriam-Webster on Islamophobia:

irrational fear of, aversion to, or discrimination against Islam or people who practice Islam

English Oxford Dictionary on Islamophobia:

Dislike of or prejudice against Islam or Muslims, especially as a political force.

On a personal level I do not an irrational fear or prejudice against Muslims or all things Islam. I do have a great cognitive understanding of how Islamic revered writings command Muslims to treat non-Muslim. Let’s look at a couple of examples that trust me are ONLY the tip of the iceberg against non-Muslims. Islamic scholar/expert Robert Spencer shows a Quranic surah used by apologists to prove how nice and peaceful Islam is contrasted with another surah that brings better context to the first:

In reality, Qur’an 25:68-70 warns Muslims not to kill the soul which Allah has forbidden to be killed”; it does not contain any blanket prohibition on killing someone. The Qur’an also tells Muslims to “kill them wherever you find them” (2:191); again, “kill them wherever you find them” (4:89); and “kill the polytheists wherever you find them” (9:5). So clearly killing is permitted, and indeed, commanded, under certain circumstances. (Does Allah really command Muslims to kill non-Muslims? By Robert Spencer; Jihad Watch; 4/4/18 5:34 PM)

For a deeper perspective on Islam and non-Muslims:

What Does Islam Teach About…Violence; TheReligionOfPeace.com

Violence in Hadith Books; Islam is a Religion of War

Islam and Violence; Answering-Islam.org

Then there are Leftists with a Multiculturalist agenda. These ideologues are Open Borders, One World Government and Marxist Cultural Utopian friendly folks. If you criticize Muslim migrants, Muslim immigrants or any immigrants that refuse assimilation into the nation and culture moving to then you practice Xenophobia.

English Oxford Dictionary on Xenophobia:

Dislike of or prejudice against people from other countries.

Cambridge Dictionary on Xenophobia:

extreme dislike or fear of foreigners, their customs, their religions, etc.

For the record I have no problem with foreigners coming to America for a new or better life. I do have a problem with foreigners moving to America desiring to impose cultural norms different from American culture and heritage. If a foreigner does not like America, for God’s sake don’t move here.

These thoughts were inspired by an email alert sent from Rachel Ehrenfeld via ACDemocracy. Ehrenfeld writes about European Union (EU) leadership and an apparent Open Borders Multiculturalism eradicating the separate natural cultures of Europe which is actually complying with an ongoing Islamic Dawah transforming Europe to an Islamic culture more and more every day.

This is meaning to America TODAY because of the Dem Party’s Open Borders Multiculturalist agenda is hauntingly similar to EU Multiculturalism.

JRH 3/30/19

Your generosity is always appreciated:

Please Support NCCR

*******************

‘New Europe’ and the Islamist Agenda

By Rachel Ehrenfeld

March 29, 2019

American Center for Democracy & Economic Warfare (ACDemocracy)

migrants-immigratia

The European Union’s Progressive-Left post-nationalist leadership is set on challenging the sovereignty of nation-states, by eliminating borders and letting in millions of Muslims. This policy has already contributed to moving the “old” European continent towards a new Europe, occupied by new people with a new culture. Apparently, opening the continent to millions of mostly unqualified migrants who refuse to assimilate, and who drain the coffers of their host countries, seems like the preferred solution to the negative birthrates among the Europeans.

On August 30, 2010, as he was folding his tent near the Vatican, on his last visit to Rome, Italy, then Libya’s leader Colonel Muammar Gaddafi, forewarned: “Europe runs the risk of turning black from illegal immigration; it could turn into Africa. There is a dangerous level of immigration from Africa into Europe, and we don’t know what will happen. What will be the reaction of the white Christian Europeans to this mass of hungry, uneducated Africans? We don’t know if Europe will remain an advanced and cohesive continent or if it will be destroyed by this barbarian invasion.”

Kaddafi urged the Europeans, “imagine that this could happen, but before it does, we need to work together.” He proceeded to offer the Europeans a deal, asking for a modest fee of 5bn euros, to stop the mass migration to Europe, which as he predicted, are costing billions of euros annually.

Despite the already increasing number of African migrants and Middle Eastern refugees of the evolving Arab Spring, the Europeans accused Kaddafi of blackmail and dismissed his offer. A few years later, after more than 1million refugees flooded the continent, the EU caved in to Turkey’s Islamist President, Recep Tayyip Erdogan demands of more than 6bn euros, to temporarily prevent refugees from entering Europe.

In addition to Kaddafi’s “business proposal,” the Europeans overlooked Kaddafi’s public Dawah sermon, in which he called on Europe to convert to Islam. His handing out Korans to five hundred young Italian women, impressing upon them that “Islam is the “ultimate religion. If you want to believe in a single faith, then it must be that of Mohammed,” was dismissed as one of his publicity ploys, thus overlooking the significance of his performing the Islamic religious duty, the Dawah (calling on infidels to join Islam). Incredibly, European and other Western nations continue to ignore Islamic leaders calls on Muslims residing in the West to spread Islam.

Six months later, when Libyan Muslim Brotherhood-affiliated rebels joined the “Arab Spring,” NATO began its military intervention to depose Kaddafi. The chaos that ensued after his death in October 2011, created a vacuum that was swiftly filled by local and foreign jihadist groups, including al Qaeda and ISIS.

Libya’s coastline’s strategic importance as a step-stone to Europe was not wasted on ISIS. By 2015, ISIS has been shipping more than a million Muslim and African “refugees” and to the Italian island of Lampedusa, just 162 nm from the Libyan coastline. It is unknown how many members/supporters of ISIS, al-Qaeda, and other jihadist groups arrived in Europe via Libya as “refugees.”

As the refugee crisis worsened, Turkey’s Islamist President, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, who aspires to take over and Islamize Europe, demanded a hefty ransom and other political concessions in exchange of helping control the flood of refugees. The Europeans conceded to most of his demands.

European nations and central institution’ decades-long denial of the threats posed by radical Islam, have been focusing instead on alleged ‘root causes’ of Islamist terrorism, and on attempts to accommodate and appease them, by codifying the Islamic narrative, imposing political correctness with new draconian hate- speech laws, has played into the hands of the radicals who are set on expanding the Islamization of Europe.

Widely publicized declarations by Islamic religious and political leaders and activists that Islam is not merely a religion but also a universal political and social system are not new or secret. They are advertised in all languages on the Internet and on the social media pages of global radical Muslim organizations. The Facebook pages of Hizb ut Tahrir, for example, says: (quote) “Islam is the only system that united people of all races and religions in history and will unite them once more when it returns.”

You don’t have to take my word for it. Instead, take a look at our dedicated website news.acdemocracy.org, which provides original documentation of statement made by radical Islamists leaders, official representatives of major Muslim organizations, as well as political leaders in the West who support them.

Let’s begin with the Doha based Sheikh Yusuf al-Qaradawi, the very influential spiritual leader for the worldwide Muslim Brotherhood – for many years he was on Interpol’s red alert, but last November was removed without an official explanation – who has issued many Fatwas on the duty of all Muslims to spread Islam. His fatwas have been published on his website; on Islam-online – the brotherhood’s official website, and for many years, he issued them on his widely watched TV program on al Jazeera.

According to Qaradawi, “Occupying Europe and defeating Christianity will become possible with the spread of Islam inside Europe until it becomes strong enough to take over the whole continent.”

After al -Qaeda attacked the U.S., Qaradawi explained that Islamizing Europe would be “the beginning of the righteous Caliphate’s return.”

Al-Qaradawi declared: “Islam will return once more to Europe as a conqueror and as a victorious power after it was expelled twice from the continent…I assume that next time the conquest [of Europe] will not be achieved by the sword [i.e., war] but by preaching (dawah) and spreading the ideology [of Islam]….The conquest of Europe …and the expansion of Islam will reach all the areas where the sun shines and the moon appears [i.e., the entire world.” Few, if any Europeans, took him seriously.

Instead, advancing the Islamist agenda seems to suit the Progressive-Left post-nationalist leadership everywhere. Like the Muslims, though for different reasons, they are set on challenging the sovereignty of nation states. Both aim at changing the European continent, by creating a new Europe, occupied by new people and a new culture. For the Europeans, opening the continent to millions of Muslims, who drain the coffers of their host country, seems as the solution to the negative birthrates among the Europeans. Oddly, they are convinced that the newcomers, as the old Europeans, would submit to Brussel’s dictates.

Why should they? The Europeans were never interested in assimilating Muslims. Instead, they talked about integration, which they miserably failed. They also failed to acknowledge the rise of radical Islam, especially in large concentrations of Muslim neighborhoods. And little attention, if any, has been given to the constant preaching by local Imams and Islamic scholars, many who visit Europe to inoculate the newly arrived, as well as the second and third generation of Muslim migrants against assimilation.

These preachers also warn against temptations readily available in Western secular societies, urging instead, to “spread the word of Allah.”

In September 2015, at the height of the refugee’s crisis in Europe, when more than 1 million refuges flooded Europe following the German Chancellor’s controversial decision of open border migration. Fatima Benhatta, a Canadian representative of the U.K based international organization Islamic Relief, which has ties to Hamas, issued the following statement on the Syrian mass immigration to Europe.

“…My prayer, O Allah, open their [European countries that welcomed Syrian refugees] breasts to [accept] Islam and provide them with the testimony [pledge of allegiance to Allah and Mohammad]. I swear by Allah that they deserve the prayer. What is the achievement of Syrians coming [to Europe]? Islam will be spread even more among them [Europeans], their [Muslims] ratio [in society] will increase and the Syrians will be victorious [conquering Europe], Allah Willing…” (archive)

Incidentally, Fatima is friendly with Canada’s Prime Minister, Justin Trudeau, who on March 17, 2019, after the awful Christchurch terrorist attack on Muslims, chose to visit a Muslim Community (SNMC) mosque in Ottawa to express his solidarity with the Muslim community. That mosque, however, is known for hosting a Saudi imam who prayed for killing Jews and Christians.

Also in late 2015, the popular Islamist activist Saeed Rageah, who was born in Somalia, raised in Saudi Arabia, and according to his online bio, “found his way to North America,” in the late 1980s’, visited Sweden to address Muslim refugees and immigrants. In his speech, which was posted on YouTube- Rageah enlightened his audience, saying: “The reason that Allah brought you here is so you can carry the message of Islam to the people. Why? Because each one of us has the responsibility to call people to Allah.”

Rageah has also delivered sermons calling on all Muslims living in the West, to Hire only Muslims: “Use only truck-and cab drivers that are Muslim! Use only doctors who are Muslim. — “If you want to do anything just ask if that individual is a Muslim or not. If he is not, then look for a Muslim, because I’m sure you’ll find a Muslim. I’m sure you’ll find a Muslim in that field…”

Shaikh Abdool Hamid, who like many other Islamic scholars from all over the world have been educated at Medina University, the Saudi version of the Patrice Lumumba Peoples’ Friendship University, in the former USSR.

Hamid is a popular lecturer who serves as Imam in several mosques in North America. He regularly holds sermons calling to impose Islam, with instructions on how to advance the transformation of Western secular nations into an Islamic society.

He argues that while “it may seem from one perspective that Islam took over…it is really [taking] over in order to enhance the lives” of the people. He also calls on the newcomers to become politically active, because “changing society cannot happen unless we become involved in the political process.” The involvement in the political process, he explains, “is necessary to bring Sharia (Islamic Law) because Islam is universal.”

But what should be done to the infidels who reject the Invitation to Islam?

When such an invitation, the Dawah, does not convince all non-believers to convert, the Hadith provides the next step. According to the book “The Gardens of the Righteous” [Blog Editor: 346 pg PDF English translation via al Islam] – which was written by a Sunni scholar in the 13th Century, and published and distributed with modern commentary in the United States, and on social media by the Islamic Circle of North America, “Islam strives to achieve global dominance by jihad.,, Until Islam Becomes Victorious or We Die in the Attempt. ”

The Saudi Salman bin Fahed al-‘Auda, a member of the Muslim Brotherhood’s International Union for Muslim Scholars, who in 2017 was not allowed into Denmark and in September 2018 sentenced to death by a Saudi court, is famous for asserting that the solution to Islamic distress — that may bring about the fall of America and the Western world — “exists in one word which is Jihad.”

As al-Auda explains (quote) -“The West, and above all the United States, and Western culture, in general, are undergoing a historical process that is deterministic. This process leads to its total collapse, sooner or later.” He sounds like most Democrats turned progressive socialists’ Presidential candidates in the US…. Doesn’t he?

According to al-Auda and many other Salafi scholars – Jihad is intended to accelerate that collapse. And importantly, he reminds us that Jihad is fought not only on the battlefield. “Weapons are not only the rifle, the bullet, the airplane, the tank, and the cannon. Not at all!” When thinking about weapons to advance Jihad, think about the economy as a weapon, money is a weapon…”

Anyone critical of the Europeans’ open border policies, and the Islamization of Europe is labeled Islamophobe by the radical Left and leaders of wide-spread, well-funded Muslim organizations who use lawfare as an economic warfare against their critics. Joining them are the leaders of the European Union, who willfully ignore the Islamic threat, in their haste to turn the European continent to a new, pinker version of the former USSR. The EU’s central bureaucracy delude itself into believing that they will be able to control the fast-growing radicalized Muslim population, as they have the secular Europeans.

Europe’s Left -leaning central institutions, and Europe’s leading Islamic organizations fight to protect their opacity. Both groups fear that transparency would foil their plans. Thus, they stigmatize their opponents as irrational and hate mongers to silence and abuse the legal system to punish them.

However, there is nothing irrational with those who dare to identify the threats posed by these two groups. The “Visegrad 4” – made of four Central European nations that for decades lived under Communism: Poland, the Czech Republic, Slovakia, and Hungary, joined in opposition to the EU’s post-nationalist, no-borders, “New Europe”, pro -Muslim migration agenda.

The Polish government, which resists the EU dictated quota of Muslim refugees, has instead “rolled out the welcome mat” for some 2 million economic migrants from Ukraine, who are seeking” a better life after the Russian invasion of 2014.”

At the forefront of the opposition to the EU’s efforts to end its member nations’ sovereignty, and creating a “new Europeans” with masses of Muslim migrants/refugees, is Hungary’s outspoken Prime Minister Victor Orbán.

The Ottoman’s Empire’s 158 years rule over Hungary (1541-1699), has not been forgotten. And Mr. Orban seems intent on preventing the history of Islamic oppression from repeating itself. Despite EU threats and sanctions, he continues to argue that “Without the protection of our Christian culture, we are going to lose Europe, and Europe will no longer belong to the Europeans.”

Would Europe catch up with Poland and Hungary? Could Europe get its act together before it’s too late?

________________________

Do YOU Want European Multiculturalism?

Shrug Off Islamophobia & Xenophobia Accusations

John R. Houk

© March 30, 2019

_______________________

‘New Europe’ and the Islamist Agenda

Dr. Rachel Ehrenfeld is Founder and President of the New York-based American Center for Democracy, and the Economic Warfare Institute. Dr. Ehrenfeld has authored academic and policy papers and more than one thousand articles. Her books include FUNDING EVIL: How Terrorism is Financed – and How to Stop It (2011) • EVIL MONEY (HarperCollins, 1992,1994). Her latest book project is on The Economic Warfare against the U.S. from Within and Without. • NARCOTERRORISM (Basic Books, 1990, 1992).

Making Islamophobia a Crime

If the Dem Party and that Party’s inherent Marxist-Socialist agenda of Multiculturalism has it way in the U.S., America will limit Free Speech as it appears imminent in the UK.

JRH 2/12/19

Your generosity is always appreciated:

Please Support NCCR

*********************

Making Islamophobia a Crime

By Bill Warner

Feb 10 2019

Political Islam

The APPG (All Party Parliamentary Group) some members of the UK Parliament who have issued a document that defines Islamophobia. Their goal is to make “Islamophobia” a crime. Islam is defined as whatever Muslims want it to be.

The APPG claims free speech will not be affected as long as the speaker in question does not cause harm. “Harm” is defined as anything that offends a Muslim, even if it is a fact.

Although the document is only a committee report, many British city councils are implementing the report as law. This is totalitarianism. This is Islam.

https://youtu.be/Q39uN2z2ejI

____________________

Political Islam

Political Islam About Page

What is Islam?

Islam is a cultural, religious and political system. Only the political system is of interest to kafirs (non-Muslims) since it determines how we are defined and treated. The Islamic political system is contained in the Koran, the Hadith (the traditions of Mohammed) and his biography, the Sira.

CSPI

Center for the Study of Political Islam (CSPI) is an educational organization dedicated to enlightening the general public about the doctrine of political Islam based on the works of Dr. Bill Warner.

Our Mission

Political Islam has subjugated other civilizations for 1400 years. Our mission is to educate the world about political Islam, its founder Mohammed, his political doctrine and his god, Allah.

The Five Principles

Islam’s Trilogy of three sacred texts is the Koran and two books about the life of Mohammed. When the Trilogy is … READ THE REST

Introducing Hans Kollmeyer Islamic Supremacist Venom against Critics

John R. Houk

© February 6, 2019

On my NCCR blog’s About Page, comments have somewhat become a hodgepodge of a message board of varying subjects and a few rants.

Islamophobia

Three days before Christmas 2018 a probable pseudonymous Hans Kollmeyer – a self-identifying Muslim perhaps living in Germany – commented a diatribe against those he identifies as Islamophobes. A few paragraphs down the lengthy diatribe he clearly aims most of his venom against a German expose-Islam blogger named Michael Stürzenberger. It took me a wile to realize this because I also have no respect for Islam considering that religion a theopolitical death cult whose tenets are quite murderous towards non-Muslims who would dare extoll their own religious faith or philosophical (oft times atheistic) ideology that runs contrary to Islam’s belief system. Living in America I must admit I never heard of the blogger Stürzenberger who writes in German. Even his Wikipedia notation is in German and I had to use Google-Translate to read about him.

You might wonder why I didn’t delete the oft times vulgar hate-filled diatribe against those who would expose Islam’s true ugly nature as written in the religion’s own revered writings and Muslim theological treatises. Here is the reason.

People need to be aware this is the standard mindset of Muslims adhering to the inherent Islamic Supremacism toward all things and people non-Muslim.

I have decided to respond to Hans Kollmeyer’s diatribe with some bold print text throughout the venom-laced comment. After awhile I realized old Hans was becoming a bit repetitive in which case you will notice less and less bold text responses. I am not a fan of profanity on my blogs, thus I edited profane words with asterisks replacing letters that would complete a vulgar word. The comment is quite lengthy, so I may have missed a profanity edit. Please forgive me for any misses.

JRH 2/6/19

Your generosity is always appreciated:

Please Support NCCR

********************

Hans Kollmeyer says:

December 22, 2018 at 10:15 AM

NCCR About Page

The truth concerns all Islamophobic and worthless atheist pigs in the world!

I don’t f*****g care about the police! – a German party names “FDP”, contraction for “F**k die Polizei”. In English it means “F**k the police!”.

TAKE THAT, YOU GODLESS PIECE OF S**T!

All Islam haters in the world are pathetic, meaningless, worthless and irrelevant failures! Your Germans do not interest me and are not matter! Especially dumb and ridiculous atheist pigs. Above all, the truth also refers to your provocative allusion to the headscarf ban.

The police is just an organization full of miserable and worthless failures, and most of all, the police are completely irrelevant to me. I f**k the police. If we want to voice our opinion aloud to the police, rate them as an “insult” and hand us fines to pay a high sum of fines. So you can rip us off and improve your salary in terms of corruption. But if you bull offend people on a small trifle – such as having someone look different, have a different taste, or practice a religion, etc. – we cannot say anything. Otherwise, you arrest us and condemn us to life imprisonment just because you are overwhelmed with your own life and take the nerve out of abusing the German Basic Laws, to seize the opportunity to omit your insignificant inferiority complexes to us, and we [have] nothing with your problem to be on guard. They get angry when they get insulted, but they themselves offend holy Islam, are hostile to Islam (because of their credulity of the feeble news of the media, so that they can achieve ratings by lying to them and invest a high sum and have fun our costs) and abusing the German Basic Laws [Blog Editor: Simple GBL and GBL More Detailed] to vent your frustration on us in the hope that you feel liberated. Without thinking about what causes you to discriminate against people. This represents your character and your character is miserable. You do not need to be surprised that I am not insulted here and loudly and clearly represent my point of view. I am not compelled to offend, let alone discriminate, just because you have a bad day or are mentally stressed about your personal problems or whatever complication you have in your life. That’s not my problem. To keep to the laws refers to both sides and to become law enforcement, you have to first study and understand the laws before you can provide law and order and what you have learned, you also keep in mind and you do not forget again, While most people work in a profession or club (such as martial arts clubs) or in a fitness center, they use them to make them jangle and verbally attack people in order to attract attention (which they have never had in the past) to be relevant. However, these meaningless subhumans have nothing in the bulb and consider stupidity to be intelligence as if they were something better. That was the first time with my “Intro”.

AND NOW READ THE TRUTH THROUGH [Now Comes the Islamic Supremacist Venom]:

You are a gang of wretched philistines, failures and worthless Islam haters who will never get far in their lives and sink deeper every day. Hanoverians are a waste of time and for me personally the stupidest subhumans I’ve ever experienced, like all of Germany. Cold-hearted, depressed, aggressive, unfriendly, insolent, intolerant, provocative, antisocial, far too underdeveloped and worthless. Especially the Germans (I myself German, but I despise the Nazi people [And yet book sales indicate Muslim admiration of Adolf Hitler and the Nazi Final Solution for Jews – SEE HERE, HERE, HERE, HERE, HERE {Protocols of the Elders of Zion forgery expose with Muslim connivance at article’s end}, HERE and HERE]). You are the proof that Germany or slave country is not a free country but a dictatorship. Since Adolf Hitler. On your stupid posters is that you require no special rights for Islam and a few other ridiculous quotes, where I had to laugh scrap. Above all, it says: “Do not rot our city!” The people who oppose Islam or religions are the ones who endanger peace and ENHANCE the whole world. First think and then talk and not traffic. The Koran [The book dualistic Satanic deception] says, “The unbelievers are trying to extinguish Allah’s light with their mouths, but Allah will complete His light.” No matter how much you hate Islam and Muslims. You cannot stop Allah Subhana Wa Ta’ala [Blog Editor: Arabic for “May He be glorified and exalted”, Muslim honorific.]. If the Almighty God wants Germany or the world to be Islamized, then it will also be Islamized and there is nothing to discuss at all. You stupid and worthless Germans should all take their own nose. The Muslims are peaceful people and are guided by the laws of God and are against war.

Your German atheist is exactly the opposite. You are a people that has 6 million people on their conscience. You keep saying “We are the people” over and over again, and many other racist and anti-religious slogans. However, you are all yourself, the traitors of your own nation. For these six million Jews were Germans themselves. [Blog Editor: There was not 6 million German-Jews killed by Nazis. The Nazis targeted ALL European Jews in Nazi-conquered lands stretching from France to Soviet Russia and from the Scandinavian (Norway, Denmark and Finland in the north (less Sweden) to Greece in southern Europe.] You betrayed your own people and sold them to Hitler, or you sold your own souls to the devil. At the moment I often read the internet, I quote: “No human being is illegal”. In fact, no one should be illegal? And what about Hitler? Was not he illegal? It’s always better to keep silent, you fools. You are a contradictory party that is brain-underdeveloped and will never be able to maintain peace. Instead, you endanger peace and thus start the 3rd World War. Because of “Germany the Germans”. Your media-struck ignorant, the political system in Germany is AMERICAN (if you “can” read idiots, a FOREIGN SYSTEM, which disregards human rights [Hans is confused since by inherent nature Islam violates Human Rights especially if one is a non-Muslim]). Since the system is American, Germany is still an occupied country and will never advocate democracy [Blog Editor: Muslim idiocy on full display here]. You also want democracy, but according to your imagination. Actually, you are dictators of your own nation. Worse than Hitler allowed. You hate Allah the Almighty, Islam, foreigners and other religions. [Blog Editor: Hans view of “hate” is flawed when the reality

Germanistan Danger

is the awakening of the German populace to their Western Judeo-Christian heritage. Poor Hans totally ignores the huge amount of German Leftist Multiculturalists willing to sell-out their heritage for a delusional belief multiple cultures can coexist as represented by the current German Chancellor Merkel.] You spread nothing but lies and hate, just like the media and you are in cahoots with them. [Blog Editor: Poor blind Hans can’t see most of the European media backs idiotic Multiculturalism.] Especially with the police. You are as criminal and corrupt as the cops. [Blog Editor: AND YET the German police tows the government Multiculturalist line by hiding or denying Muslim atrocities against German non-Muslims!] You spread lies and hate slogans about Islam so you can invest more money. Because of such losers as her, Germany has completely gone down the drain and is getting rid of herself. [Blog Editor: I actually concur with Hans, but not in what he believes. Germany and much of the EU is self-destructing by allowing Islamic culture to gain roots in Western Civilization.] I bet 100% that Thilo Sarrazin is your idol [Blog Editor: Thanks! I had to look him up. From the sound of his new book, “Hostile Takeover: How Islam Impedes Progress and Threatens Society,” Mr. Sarrazin just may be numbered among my heroes. I hope it will be published in English.]. Thilo Sarrazin is also a worthless Islam hater, and because of Thilo Sarrazin and many other Islam haters, Germany breaks free and you worry about Germany abolishing itself. Germany gets rid of such disgusting insects (like you). Islam is against war and the Koran (Al Hamdulillah, in German: “Praise be to Allah”) contains no contradictions [Blog Editor: Not only are there loads of contradictions, those contradictions are viewed as truth due to Islamic theological doctrines of Dualism (See Also HERE) and Abrogation. Hans you are either a liar or a poor deceived Muslim], in contrast to your “The f*****g Hanoverian party” (I laugh at myself, old man).

So, let’s come to your contradictions.

“No special rights for Islam”

Al Hamdulillah. Islam is a peaceful religion and forbids wars and murder and conforms to democratic ideas. Freedom, harmony, love, cohesion, respectful interaction with others and helpfulness. You’re doing the exact opposite. She’s looking in the telly too much and believes everything that is reported in the media / news. Without worrying about most of the scenes being cut out and added to lies, thus covering up the truth that makes it look like it’s true. So that the media can invest money through many ratings. At the expense of others. That is why there is much suffering and poverty in Germany (as in Hitler’s time). Also because of people like “The f*****g Hanoverian”. You are products and jokers of society and do exactly what others ask of you and are their slaves and behind your back they are laughing at you. You have no human rights, no hopes and no liberties. And why? Because you serve the devil and you are under the influence of the devil. The devil, unlike you, is smarter than Hanoverian. The devil knows how to MANIPULATE humanity and so he has manipulated you Hanoverians as well and therefore spreads all this quirky nonsense of posters where I had to shake my head. I am one of the people who does not advocate the hatred of Islam. Therefore: “No special rights for Islam hate”, that concerns particularly “the s***ty Hanoverian party. [Blog Editor: NOTICE old Hans doesn’t! He looks at the peaceful surahs that originate from Mecca and compares it to what is seen on television. The lying implication is Jihadi violence/terrorism is not true Islam. OOPS Hans! The Medina surahs composed/recorded after the Mecca surahs advocate killing non-Muslims especially if there is no submission to Islam.

Example of Mecca Surah – 73 (SAHIH INTERNATIONAL): 10-12

10 And be patient over what they say and avoid them with gracious avoidance.

11 And leave Me with [the matter of] the deniers, those of ease [in life], and allow them respite a little.

12 Indeed, with Us [for them] are shackles and burning fire

Example of Medina Surah – 9 (SAHIH INTERNATIONAL): 4-5, 8, 12, 29

4 Excepted are those with whom you made a treaty among the polytheists and then they have not been deficient toward you in anything or supported anyone against you; so complete for them their treaty until their term [has ended]. Indeed, Allah loves the righteous [who fear Him].

5 And when the sacred months have passed, then kill the polytheists wherever you find them and capture them and besiege them and sit in wait for them at every place of ambush. But if they should repent, establish prayer, and give zakah, let them [go] on their way. Indeed, Allah is Forgiving and Merciful.

8 How [can there be a treaty] while, if they gain dominance over you, they do not observe concerning you any pact of kinship or covenant of protection? They satisfy you with their mouths, but their hearts refuse [compliance], and most of them are defiantly disobedient.

12 And if they break their oaths after their treaty and defame your religion, then fight the leaders of disbelief, for indeed, there are no oaths [sacred] to them; [fight them that] they might cease.

29 Fight those who do not believe in Allah or in the Last Day and who do not consider unlawful what Allah and His Messenger have made unlawful and who do not adopt the religion of truth from those who were given the Scripture – [fight] until they give the jizyah willingly while they are humbled.

Take note that “jizyah” protection (i.e. extortion) to be paid in the most humiliating way possible to remain alive.]

“Colorful instead of brown” and “Women are not fair game”

The poster clearly shows a woman in a dress and a woman in a burka. The Qur’an says that Muslim women have to dress in a covered manner. Since they otherwise attract men’s attention or that the men stare at her and sexually harass her and then rape occurs. [Blog Editor: Duplicitous moron, you just admitted it’s okay to rape non-Muslim due to the lack of submission/compliance to Islam. Yup, Islam be evil.] These are, in my eyes, righteous servants of the Almighty God. These are real women and these women are not treated as “fair game”. Not like this woman wearing a dress on the poster. Where you can see the panties under her skirt? So, you can masturbate afterwards and I know that you are advocating HEARTY masturbation [Blog Editor: Sounds more like what Hans does when he is concerned about getting caught for raping non-Muslim women. Dear God, find Christ and a sanctified Christian marriage so you don’t burn in lust]. You are such a party and then you have the impudence to quote as a quotation: “Women are not fair game”. [Blog Editor: It’s not impudence, it’s righteousness to NOT call women “fair game” whatever social or religious stand a woman believes.] So you have contradicted yourself and set yourself up. You are super stupid and miserable. [Nope, YOU have implicated yourself as the wicked heathen that you are.] Typical Hanoverian. You have always been completely irrelevant to me and will remain so. [Blog Editor: That’s too bad I’m irrelevant to you, for in Christ even YOU a despicable heathen are relevant to God who died to give even the unrighteous eternal life by Resurrection life.] Al Hamdulillah. Thank God. Also, regarding the “fair game”. Most of the women who run around freely are guilty in retrospect, that they are groped and sexually harassed and afterwards they complain that they are turned on. That’s exactly what most women want. They want to be groped, so they have something to complain about afterwards. [What deceived heathens Muslims who believe like Hans, God have mercy on their eternal souls.] Exactly the same thesis as that most people absolutely want to be lied to, because firstly they cannot stand the truth (like the “f*****g Hanoverian” party) and secondly, so that they can attract attention and then have something to nag. This is truly a confirmation of the self-dissatisfaction of most people and their Hanoverian as well. You are just unhappy with yourself. [Blog Editor: I got some enlightening news for Hans. In Christ I am blessed. Those outside of Christ may find misery in the Last Judgement. Christ is the Judge. Seek redemption before you face Judgment.]

“The wind is turning”

I have to throw myself away laughing. Where should the wind turn? Direction hell? Exactly. There you belong. Towards hell. [Blog Editor: Too bad for those who trust in that satanic book – Quran. Those devoted to Satanic Quran will probably dwell with Satan, the Antichrist and False Prophet in the Lake of Fire.] The Qur’an [LIES] says that the Hellfire is 70 times stronger than volcanic fire. On the other hand, a lighter is nothing. If you continue to do so with your underexposed Islam hatred and without Islam, you end up on ETERNITY in hell. [Blog Editor: Actually, those who refuse to believe Christ died on the Cross, then arose to Life bodily, then Glorified and sitting at the Right of the Father will roast eternally in hell. BELIEVE IN THE RISEN SAVIOR AND BE SAVED.] By the way, by the way. In hell there are no emergency exits. By the way, in the Qur’an, it is said that the deniers drink and drink hot water, then drink like ever-thirsty drinkers. This is their hospitable reception on the Day of Resurrection. And not to forget. The Qur’an [LIES] also says that the mischief-makers (like you, because of your hatred of Islam) are punished with terrible and severe punishment in this worldly life. This means that Allah Subhana Wa Ta’ala will never leave you idolaters. In short. You are sinking deeper and deeper from day to day. You will never be able to achieve success with your hatred of Islam. Only with Islam one finds one’s own peace of mind. Only in Islam do you have rights and feel free as an eagle. Only ISLAM IS THE SENSE OF LIFE. POINT! [Islamic Satanic lies in Quran and demonized Muhammad!]

“So that WE too have a future!”

Since you Hanoverian had bad luck. Islam haters [Hate Islam is true, but I harbor no hate for poor deluded Muslims. I have only sorrow for Muslims who refuse the Truth in Christ according the True Word of God which IS NOT the Quran.] have no future and may not possess any rights of existence. Your future is definitely HELL and that’s your new hostel.

“The only real opposition since 2011”

You have been a true opposition to Islam haters since 2011. You were just waiting to insult Islam [The “insult” is a Muslim self-delusion believing the demonized Quran over the Holy Bible], by all means. So you can get more money, power and profit. To create a “better” world. To the dead laugh. In the Koran it says: “Do not trust anyone but Allah”. [When you believe a lying Quran, it makes you a liar.] How many parties in Germany or around the world have been formed to create a “better” world, even though they claim exactly the opposite? Think for a while. It is obvious. All parties claim that human rights and freedom are worth something. All wars, where there were numerous deaths, come mainly from parties (you belong to exactly such a party) or from politics. [Blog Editor: Islam has performed genocidal slaughter that makes the genocides committed by Nazis and Communists look like a picnic – 270 MILLION!] All the wars in the world, especially the Second World War, came from the side of the politicians. Short and sweet. The politicians and “party officials” talk and talk and talk, but they do not act. Just like Angela Merkel. She talks and talks so that the German people keeps their faces, so that Mrs. Merkel can continue to receive tax revenue and live at our expense [Blog Editor: Except the Muslim Refugees living on welfare]. That’s why there is a lot of suffering and poverty in Germany (as mentioned above). That’s why Muslims trust in Allah Subhana Wa Ta’ala [Trusting a lie] because Allah is All-Knowing, Almighty, All-Hearing and All-seeing. And Allah knows what “the f*****g Hanoverian” party has in mind. I can grind it very well what you Islamic haters have in mind. You will not get away with your evil plans, because Allah will never allow it. [Allah transitioned from Moon-god] NO WAY! So, you have proven yourself that you are the terrorists. True Muslims are not terrorists, as they say in the news. You are 100%. Since I do not want to hear any explanations. [Blog Editor: The Hans lying delusion.]

“Our country, our city, our rules Integration requires clear values.”

This is neither the land of Germans nor the land of foreigners. Allah [the demonic moon-god of ancient Arabia] has given you a land and allowed you to live in the land [Delusional lie]. Who gives hypocrites the right to claim that this is your land? So, after the motto: “Germany to the Germans”? All the countries of this world has created Allah [Satanic lie] and these are God’s lands or Allah rules the world and not such subhumans as you. Your national pride blinds you. [Your Islamic Satanic lie blinds you.] That’s why you are blind in the heart. You can see with your eyes, but not with the heart. Your hearts are surrounded by darkness, lies, dissatisfaction and hatred. Germany is a worthless Nazi country [Hmm… Inaccurate again.]. You have been talking about “integration” for many years, so that the foreigners would like to “adapt” and behave like Germans? I’m laughing. This “integration” does not exist in Germany and has never existed. Instead of treating foreigners as human beings and accepting them as they are, you evaluate the foreigners according to their origin, skin color and appearance [Hans is quite correct in denouncing ethnic racism, but Islam is a theopolitical ideology that must be condemned in Western Culture]. That’s why you want them to behave like Germans and strive for the German “culture”. Because you see the foreigners as a kind of “race”. And it’s also people like us. That is why it is disguised as “integration”. So, after the motto: “Think German, speak German and live German”, so a similar thesis Hitler had then also quoted. Pretty Nazi, right? Thus, you have declared yourself terrorists and Nazis and Germany is getting rid of terrorists (like you and Thilo Sarrazin) [I suspect the Left-Wing Multicultural Germans would like to concur with Hans]. Forever. That’s proof that you’re stuck and f*****g nationalists. Thus, you have the right to deserve hell [Without Jesus yes, yet hell will probably fill with Christ-hating and Jew-hating Muslims]. The integration is pure illusion like a mirage or Santa Claus. There is nothing of it. Unfortunately, your rules do not comply with the German Basic Laws. YOU DO NOT STAND ON THE GROUND OF THE GERMAN BASIC LAW! [Blog Editor: Good thing I live in America where Freedom and Liberty has not at least not yet been erased by Multiculturalism and Islam. Yet there is no lack of trying by the American Left.] Thus, this is a sign of self-justice or anarchy. Do not forget!

“Victim protection instead of perpetrator protection! No tolerance for violent offenders.”

Then I will specify. “Muslim protection instead of terrorist protection!” How many people (especially the Muslims) were killed by the Americans themselves [Blog Editor: America kills lunatic Muslims who think their warped supremacist ideology okays murdering Americans and I hope that includes the likes of Muslims supporting the Taliban, al Qaeda, Hamas, ISIS, etc.], like the Jews in World War II? [The Jews attacked no one first as Muslims do today.] This is deliberately and exaggeratedly portrayed in the media, so that the stupid spectators (also terrorists [Blog Editor: If Germans are terrorized by Muslims on German soil, it would not be surprising vigilante reprisals would begin, especially if the police ignore Muslim violence]) have a reason to wipe out the Muslims. Because the Muslims preach the truth a LIE] and the truth [LIE] is Islam. That’s why you do not want special rights for Islam because you cannot stand the truth [the LIE]. This represents your character and you have a miserable character and then you wonder why I write the truth [the LIE] to you. I am one of the few people who absolutely do not like anything. YOU HAVE NO GOOD SETTING! The Muslims are the victims [PERPETRATORS] and in your eyes are scapegoats and their hates for Islam, terrorists, Nazis, fascists and criminals are the real culprits. That’s why I DO NOT REQUIRE TOLERANCE FOR TERRORISTS! [Perhaps because you are an Islamic terrorist?] (Especially “The f*****g Hanoverian” party).

Well, you got on with the wrong thing. That’s why I thank God that I’ve been well educated, unlike you terrorists. [Hans if profanity is the symbol of your education, then the education was quite lacking.]

That’s the way it was. If you cannot handle the truth [or Hans fabricated truth, meaning lie], it’s your problem. If it does not suit you, then that’s just your bloody bad luck and not the Muslims. [We’ll see…]

I’ll quote a quote from myself: “Those who laugh at you for not being able to endure the truth are those who are crying inside.” [As all Muslim perpetrators should cry as the cowards they are.]

This clearly means that you laugh [actually PITY is a better description] at people like me because you cannot bear the truth and cry inside. You are repressing your negative feelings that you carry with you on a daily basis. [Blog Editor: I indeed have negative thoughts toward heathen godless Islamic terrorists.] As soon as someone speaks openly about the truth, you begin to laugh because you are terrified [ANGERED] inside and you are afraid [ANGRY] of the [Islamic lie] truth in order to suppress this feeling of fear [NO fear but disgust of Islamic culture].

There are many Islam haters who have converted to Islam [I’ll wager NO ONE that has looked into the real Islam has converted voluntarily. Converts to Islam have been deceived or forced!] and become devout Muslims, and these former Islam haters [deluded non-Muslims] themselves testify that Islam is the true and peaceful religion of God [Those converts didn’t study a truthful Islamic history or adequately read the Quran, Hadith and Sira]. These former Islam haters regret [in self-deception] that they have insulted Islam and Muslims and ask Allah for forgiveness. You say yourself that you do not need to be afraid of Islam. The fear comes from the devil and whispers the man in his breast, that you stay away from Islam and that the devil brings you to paradise [Poor Muslims look for paradise and the carnal delights of eternal virgins will discover torturing demons]. But in the Koran it says that the devil takes you to hell. Even stupider are the people, because God has given man a brain. To think before we act. But rather you are under the influence of the accursed devil (in Arabic: “Seytan”), so you have to moan for no reason [Boy are you going to discover a damnable eternal surprise]. No matter what the topic is. This suggests that you are dissatisfied with yourself [Not even close]. That’s why you founded the party in 2011 to draw attention to you and not for “improvement in the well of the German fatherland”. This is a kind of cry for help to show us that you are getting dirty. But honestly. I do not care how bad you are. Do all of them have a therapy or get yourself instructed in psychiatry. But please stop flooding Germany with stupidity. NOBODY CARES! [If I was a German I’d demand the end of flooding refugees, migrants and/or immigrants of an Islamic origin.]

And another thing. Just because many would-be Muslims say they are Muslims does not mean that they practice Islam. They call themselves NAMELY “Muslims” to attract attention (just like the Hanoverian party) and thus abuse Islam for their own cravings. But even worse are subhumans like you [Or are they Muslims awakened to the ugly nature of Islam so lean toward assimilation], who believe everything they get told. This is already the next proof that you are gullible people and that is why you [Muslims] will perish and on the day of the Last Judgment you are the biggest losers [Muslim Christ-haters and Jew-haters will not find their names in the book of Life]. The Qur’an [the lie] also states that the infidels and idolaters are totally IRREGULAR. You should take your own nose and really deal with Islam. Then you will notice and testify that Islam is the true[a lying demonized] religion [affront to] of the Almighty God [of Abraham, Isaac, Jacob and Jesus BUT NOT Ishmael].

So, miss. The truth [in Christ] goes to you, which you [Hans] will NEVER endure in your [his] life. You will spend your [Hans] entire life as an underexposed, wretched and worthless loser who is punished by Allah from day to day, will NEVER have your peace and will live day by day with fear in his heart and discontent, and you will sink deeper and deeper and deeper, until you scratch off. Back in 2012, I looked at all your video clips on your Youtube account and laughed at you for your ignorance of Islam [Probably not this Blog Editor’s Youtube Channel]. I know for a fact that you have secretly read the correct Quran translation. But since you could not endure the truth, you have searched INTENTLY and DESERVED for a false Qur’an translation [what a delusional statement]. In order to harass, provoke, insult and, above all, endanger peace for us Muslims. If you enjoyed your peace, then you idiot would not provoke us, you underexposed candelabrum [Jew-hatred exposed!]. They insult Islam only because Islam is the true [FALSE] religion. As it says in the Holy Quran. They find the peace boring and desperate for attention you NEVER got from the people. Now you have our attention. Oh, I forgot to mention. The funniest thing in one of your clips was that some people came after you and beat you up. I saw your annoying stupid injury, which was just a small scratch and you start to run around like a little girl. This scratch is NOTHING, boy. NOTHING! You have proven yourself by having been educated by your parents a wimp and a miserable [?]miserable[?]. No wonder Allah punishes you [the demon moon-god will Satan in the Lake of Fire]. Bad luck for [Muslims] you. You deserve the beatings [Typical Muslim attitude] because you’re a ridiculous big-mouth and you messed with the wrong ones and so you have something to complain about, and in your clip, say “no wonder, that’s how Muslims behave” [AMEN]. If you think you mock us Muslims, you deserve the just punishment. Al Hamdulillah (Praise be to Allah). What does that tell you? Very easily. They [Muslims] endanger peace and the Qur’an [LIE] says that the mischief-makers (and you are one of them, Michael [not this Blog Editor]) are being punished with appalling punishment. You know yourself that Allah Subhana Wa Ta’ala punishes you every day [LIE]. Why? Because you are a disgusting, provocative and unnecessary mischief-maker. Well, Mr. Stürzenberger. You have a blow and you have to live with it. Well, it’s your bloody bad luck and not ours. We faithful Muslims (like me [highway to hell]) will NEVER change us. The Qur’an [LIE] says that Allah will complete His light. No matter how many times you insult Islam. This means that the time is coming when more than 90% of people convert [EXTREMELY DOUBTFUL] to Islam and by the way, there are so many of us. You will LOSE [Not according the True Word of God – the Bible], Mr. Stürzenberger. You will lose. Now I know why you are called “Stürzenberger” with your surname because you are plunging deeper and deeper every day in your level. Laugh. Gosh, you are stupid and ridiculous. You are one of the people who believe everything you hear. Be it in the news, on the Internet, in the newspapers and so on. They are media-savvy and bully believing Muslims, so you invest more money and live at the expense of others. [Blog Editor: I’m guessing this “Michael Stürzenberger” (Wikipedia-German – for English run a translate such as Google) is a stand-up guy that is being smeared by a typical Muslim hater of all thing non-Muslim] In particular, the s**t ISIS has nothing to do with Islam [Actually ISIS is just mimicking the Muhammad Islam glorifies as the perfect man]. Just because they mention “Allah U Akbar” and other verses in the Koran, so that ISIS [Blog Editor: More and more Muslim scholars agree ISIS practices a true Islam but now cloak ISIS-Islam as a virulent strain] has a reason to kill us real Muslims and other innocent people. They abuse Islam just as you do. They behave the same way as the ISIS and then you wonder why we are upset. In truth, you are aggressive, unfriendly, provocative, pathetic and a PURE TIME-DAMAGE to me. But leave out your frustration so you can say that we Muslims are the perpetrators and you make sacrifices. It’s the other way around. They are truly the perpetrators and we are the innocent. Because of our innocence and because Islam is the true religion of [Moon-]God, since September 11th and 9/11 so many of us have been killed so people like you can invest more money. Rather, we are killed for NOTHING. People like you are the problem, Mr. Stürzenberger. And with all my heart I pray to Allah that every day you suffer more and more from depression that you already have [How Islamic Hans is]. The ISIS is intentionally over-hyped in the media so that the media can gain ratings and viewers (and you are one of them), and thereby invest more money. Above all, I saw in one of your videos that the stupid cops were standing behind you. You’ve been desperate to have the police at your side because, firstly, you’re a miserable and inferior scarecrow, and secondly, so you can offend us the way you want. They acted like a little kid. When idiots (like you are one) are on your side, you feel “strong.” But standing alone with no one on your side makes you look very anxious and swallow your fear. And you realize yourself that you are really a little weakling and I do not want to have anything to do with weaklings. With this attitude, as you behave daily, you will be LUNKED for life and never progress in life. Besides, the police have just a bunch of underexposed and unnecessary bureaucrats in your f*****g organization. Since the police hates us, those miserable jokes are the real bad guys. They are corrupt, even arresting, suppressing, beating, insulting, and so on innocent people, etc. But if we defend ourselves from the law against the police, it means “civil servants” and we are arrested for nothing. That’s proof that the police are doing what Hitler did to the Jews. Just so they can invest more money themselves, like the judges in the courtroom. The judges only want to convict, whether the defendant is guilty or innocent, whether he is right or wrong. They just want to convict so they can get more money. So these spas earn their daily bread. And you have the same approach, Michael. No matter how many Muslims tell you the truth (as I tell you the truth), you just want to harass us and not accuse Islam of anything. So you can earn their daily bread. That’s proof that you’re a miserable loser, a bad guy upstairs and a miserable character. In addition, you have proven yourself that you do not comply with German laws and the f*****g police do not. So why should we integrate ourselves in the nasty state called “Germany” and stick to the law? Al Hamdulillah, I abide by the laws of God. And Al Hamdulillah I am integrated in Islam. Especially because people like you are afraid of the truth and you do not accept Islam. We should integrate ourselves in this worthless state of failure so that we behave like the stupid society? So that we do what the others ask us to do? And if we behave the way we want, are we suddenly a danger to society just because we are telling the truth and doing the right thing? You are disgusting and a lot of scum. I f**k the society. I do what Allah asks of me and do what I want. People like me accept us as we are. As they say? “I am not in the world to be what you would like me to be”. The people in Germany (and you belong to it) I do not care about s**t! German or foreigner, DO NOT INTEREST ME! You with your stupid, ridiculous claims that will never get you anywhere in your life. As I said, Mr. STÜRZENberger. Every day, you plunge deeper and deeper into your level. Remember that well. In your eyes, I can read that you are very provocative, unfriendly, aggressive and so on-the-edge. Her face is darkened. A devout Muslim like me, sees it. They are under the influence of the accursed devil. This means that you believe in the devil (like a stupid Satanist) and serve him. You do not need to wonder that I write the truth about you. That’s just the truth you’ll NEVER endure. And if you laugh at it, it means that you are crying inside. And in Quran Surah 18 Al Kahf (The Cave), verse 54, it says, “And of all beings, man is the most contentious.” That means very clearly that you are contentious and desperately seeking attention in a negative way, without worrying about compromising peace. They are a danger to us real Muslims, as I am one. I promise you that if you die without Islam, you will land on ETERNALS in hell with the other troublemakers and the fire in hell is 70 times stronger than volcanic fire. In contrast, a lighter is nothing. Well, you washcloths. That means you BURN to eternity. Your whole body will burn tremendously. Your body in hell melts like butter and the skin regenerates again. For you to pay the penalty for an eternity. There is no escape. Look forward to it and think about hell if you continue to insult Islam. I swear to god. Here in Germany, you risk a big lip, because people here do absolutely nothing, have to put up with everything (because they have no human rights) and they must be afraid. But imagine if you were in Syria (where the war reigns) or somewhere in another so-called “Islamic” country, you would go into panties. It is still a Hitler state. And since we are not allowed to have any rights (e.g. freedom of speech), it is still a DICTATURE and the bitch Merkel has taken over Hitler’s position and the politicians want to tell us all seriously that Germany is a democratic country. If it were a democracy, why do not we have the right to free speech? Simple, Michael. Because it is still a dictatorship and the Gestapo still exists in modern times. World War III is imminent because of such mischief-makers as you are one. Almighty God punishes you day by day, as mentioned earlier. And the deniers are blinded or petrified day by day in the heart and will never be successful and prosperous in their lives. This is what it says in the Koran. And another thing. The would-be Muslims, who have INTELLIGENTLY misinterpreted many Koran books, are abusing Islam for their own cravings and for investing more money. These Muslims are, in truth, idol worshipers, as stated in the Holy Qur’an. And you are also a miserable idolater because you serve the Devil (in Arabic: “Seytan”) and in your stupid videos on Youtube you claim that you are for peace. However, you insult Islam and us Muslims. They say you do not insult us Muslims. There is a lot in the Koran about us Muslims in it. That means you have insulted us. They contradict each other in their own statements. Therefore, I can NOT take such stupid Islam enemies like you seriously. You do not seriously believe that you can insult Islam for all your life. As promised, Allah Almighty will punish you every day and will never find your satisfaction in your heart. This also applies to all other enemies of Islam, who are punished daily and I do not care. She [is a] disgusting idolater. People like you do not interest me and will NEVER interest me. I pray to God that they scrape and burn in hell. Then we are true believing Muslims a miserable upper ranks as you finally go.

Here’s a quote from me: “Those who laugh at you are the ones who cry inwardly”. And since you laugh at people like me because you do not want to bear the truth, you’re crying inside. They are increasingly suffering from day to day, their miserable little child. Never forget that.

And another thing. Those who start insulting and provoking us as you do with us need not be surprised to call for defense. In fact, think that if you begin to insult us, we must be silent. So that nothing happens to us? We do not like anything and flatten cowards(like you are one). Not even the police will stop us, no matter if those stupid bull sluts have weapons with them. Only Allah can stop us. The police are a joke. You’re a pathetic joker like Mario Barth and I hope you die. As already mentioned above. There will come a time when no police will exist. And all people in Germany or around the world are on their own. And you spoiled cockroaches would have wished you had learned self-defense. People like you will be the first ones in danger. Especially when ISIS comes here. Look forward to it, Mr. Stürzenberger.

NEVER SEE YOU AGAIN! [That should be a promise from a Muslim troll like Hans Kollmeyer]

___________________

Introducing Hans Kollmeyer Islamic Supremacist Venom against Critics

John R. Houk

© February 6, 2019

______________________

Hans Kollmeyer Says

Edited by John R. Houk

Edited with English spellcheck. Some phrases were left alone due to uncertain meaning. All links are by the Editor. Most text enclosed by brackets and in bold are by the Editor.

Hans Kollmeyer may be pseudonym

Yet Another Aspiring Apparatchik Exploits Norway’s 9/11

Axel Fjeld

I just read a great article at PJ Media (formerly Pajamas Media) rebutting a European Leftist crying Islamophobe. Bruce Bawer speculates Axel Fjeld is trying to use his academic prowess to make his bones to get a job working in some form of lucrative European Leftist media.

Unfortunately for Fjeld, Bawer shows the racist-Islamophobe accusations against Counterjihad writers is based on barefaced lies.

JRH 7/29/18

Please Support NCCR

***********************

Yet Another Aspiring Apparatchik Exploits Norway’s 9/11

By BRUCE BAWER

JULY 25, 2018

PJ Media

The ring-shaped sculpture made of steel which carries the engraved names of the victims of the Utoya massacre on the island of Utoya, Norway, on August 5, 2015. (Sigrid Harms/picture-alliance/dpa/AP Images)

This year I was not going to write about 7/22, often known as Norway’s 9/11. It is the date in 2011 on which Anders Behring Breivik bombed government buildings in Oslo, killing eight people, and then gunned down sixty-nine more, mostly kids, on the nearby island of Utøya. Famously, Breivik wrote – or rather cobbled together – a massive “manifesto” consisting mainly of material from various sources that he had cut and pasted. Most of it was critical of Islam, and it was apparently meant as a justification for his actions. But none of the people whose work he borrowed had ever called for violence, let alone violence against children.

Nevertheless, after 7/22, the Norwegian left was quick to insist on a linkage between Breivik and serious critics of Islam, and to argue, moreover, that those critics needed to be silenced in order to avoid any more such atrocities. For a while there things got pretty dicey, with prominent academics, authors, and politicians demanding strict limits on freedom of speech and stiff prison penalties for anyone violating those limits. In one op-ed after another, I saw my name, and that of other writers, dragged through the mud. I ended up writing an e-book about it, The New Quislings.

Eventually it all died down. But every now and then the whole ugly business flares up again, especially when an anniversary of 7/22 rolls around. Ambitious young ideologues who are eager to kick off a career in politics, writing, media, or the public sector have discovered that a splendid way to do so is to join the pile-on. It’s easy enough to pull off: the point is not to soberly challenge the arguments made by critics of Islam, or to say any[t]hing [sic] remotely original, but to name-call – to smear them as Islamophobes, racists, and “Eurabia conspiracy theorists.” (I’ll explain that last one in a minute.)

Meet Axel Fjeld. On July 25, the newspaper Bergensavisen published a long essay by the thirty-year-old, who is studying for his master’s degree in philosophy. The essay was entitled “Is it possible to stop racism?” Its targets were the usual ones. For example, Hans Rustad, editor of document.no, which runs Islam-related news and commentary. Describing document.no as “Breivik’s old hunting grounds” (because he, like thousands of others, used to read it), Fjeld deplores the fact that Rustad has been invited to take part in debates in mainstream media. Similarly, he complains that Fritt Ord, a free-speech foundation, awarded a stipend to the Islam critic Peder Are Nøstvold Jensen, a.k.a. Fjordman, whom Fjeld smears as a “genocide ideologist.” In the same way, recycling a years-old leftist gripe, Fjeld rebukes a certain former Aftenposten editor for having actually had a kind word to say about my 2006 book While Europe Slept.

Fjeld would have his readers believe that Rustad, Jensen, and I are all racists. He doesn’t make any effort to prove that we are. In fact we are not. I am not a racist, and I have never read a remotely racist word either at document.no or in Jensen’s voluminous writings. Fjeld, then, is barefaced liar. But this is how all of these people operate. We have the facts on our side. They have no good arguments for their position. So all they can do is hurl slurs. Moreover, even as they avoid representing our opinions fairly and honestly, they pretend that we have nothing reasonable to offer, and that they, in fact, are the reasonable ones. And why should reasonable people have to “debate” unreasonable people? As Fjeld puts it: “When we are tempted to debate rationally against opinions that are not based on reason, we cannot achieve anything other than to legitimize the irrational as something that is worth discussing.”

Fjeld pronounces it “unbelievable” that the likes of Rustad, Jensen, and me should be given air time or op-ed space in the mainstream Norwegian media. After all, those same media would never “waste time ‘debating’ people who think that the world is flat.” So why, he asks, should they welcome the voices of people who claim “that ‘Muslims are invading Europe,’ ‘it’s only Muslims who rape,’ or ‘dark-skinned people are on average less intelligent than light-skinned people’”? Frankly, I’ve never seen anybody in Norway make the ridiculous assertion that only Muslims commit rape; nor have I witnessed a Norwegian discussion of race and I.Q. (although I’m not discounting the possibility that this thoroughly legitimate question has come up at some point).

As for Muslims “invading Europe” – well, for heaven’s sake, Muslims are pouring into the continent, and the consequences are grim. Deny the obvious reality all you want, but no-go zones, forced marriages, honor killings, female genital mutilation, and “grooming gangs” exist. Muslim gangs commit rapes and burn cars. Muslim women experience the same oppression in Europe that they did in the Old Country. Muslim immigrants are bankrupting welfare states, resulting in severe cuts to education, elder services, and health care. Islamic terrorism is not a fantasy. European presidents and prime ministers may continue to mouth trite nonsense about the joys of diversity, but their intelligence services are busy monitoring countless terrorist cells and working overtime to keep down the number of jihadist atrocities. Try as hard as you want to connect Breivik to Islam critics, but the fact remains that none of those critics have ever endorsed violence, while Islamic terrorists are doing exactly what the Koran tells them to.

For the likes of Fjeld, to discuss any of this honestly is to be a racist, and should be against the law. He explicitly rejects the notion of “the liberal marketplace of ideas” – the belief that it’s healthy to allow the expression of all views, because in the end the strongest argument will win. His own position is that exposing people to what he labels “hate” will only make them less resistant to it. Translation: to allow cogent dissent from the dominant red-green orthodoxy is to risk toppling that orthodoxy. It’s Soviet thinking, pure and simple.

Oh, about that “Eurabia conspiracy theorist” business. I don’t know how many people have written books criticizing the rise of Islam in the West, but there are quite a few of us from a range of backgrounds. I assume that most, like me, started writing about the topic because they were observing changes that they found unsettling. If so many writers with such diverse histories are disturbed by the same phenomena, surely that must mean that there is, indeed, something going on out there that merits concern? Years ago, Norwegian leftists came up with a handy way to dodge this question, maintaining that we Islam critics, far from being individuals articulating our own ideas, are, instead, lockstep adherents of a conspiracy theory cooked up by Bat Ye’or, author of the 2005 book Eurabia. Never mind that many of us (myself included) started writing about Islam before we’d even heard of Bat Ye’or; if you read about us in the Norwegian papers – and this includes Fjeld’s article – you will see us identified as “Eurabia writers,” lockstep adherents of the “Eurabia conspiracy theory,” the essence of which is that there is, indeed, such a thing as jihad.

Fjeld’s article, in short, is a load of bunk – and an unoriginal load of bunk, at that. In The New Quislings I examined a series of articles by different writers all of whom seemed to be working from exactly the same list of talking points. That doesn’t mean that Fjeld has wasted his time. On the contrary, he’s put his name on the map. He’s made it clear to the powers that be that he’s a good soldier. He’s got the party line down cold, and is willing to spit it out, every bit of it, shamelessly dishonest though it is. As long as he keeps this up, Fjeld, with a little bit of luck, will go straight from grad school into a nice, cushy job at NRK (the state-run TV network), or as a columnist for one of the taxpayer-subsidized mainstream newspapers, or as a writer-researcher at some government ministry, or as an administrator at some tony cultural institution. That’s how the careers of his equally cynical predecessors have gone, anyway, once they’ve taken the obligatory high-profile swipe at critics of Islam: they all end up being well-paid apparatchiks. It will be interesting to see exactly which path Fjeld takes.

__________________

About PJ Media

For media inquiries, please contact communications@pjmedia.com

Since its inception in 2005, PJ Media has been focused on the news that matters — from the insightful commentary provided by our all-star lineup of columnists to our writers’ quick takes on breaking news and trending stories. The media company’s founders — Academy Award Nominee Roger L. Simon, Charles Johnson (Little Green Footballs) and Glenn Reynolds (Instapundit) — brought together a tightly knit band of bloggers into an integrated website that has evolved into a reliable source for original, unique, and cutting-edge political news and analysis.

We’ve been there through primaries and general elections; the U.S. border crisis; doctored climate change data; the gunrunners’ scandal; Department of Justice voter fraud and the Ground Zero mosque — stories that others in the media initially passed by.

As a company, we’ve always felt a special connection to the values which make America special, as well as a dedication to keeping America great for our children and our children’s children. That’s why our main focus is on the three main areas that will have the most impact on the future of America: politics, parenting and lifestyle.

PJMedia.com, the cornerstone of PJ Media, LLC, provides useful and helpful content for everyday Americans — especially parents who are trying to raise their kids in a very confusing and uncertain world. The website offers … READ THE REST

Are you Falsely Accused of Inexplicable/Illogical Fear?

John R. Houk

© April 17, 2018

It’s time to address phobias – again. Here is the Merriam-Webster definition of phobia:

an exaggerated usually inexplicable and illogical fear of a particular object, class of objects, or situation

Apparently, i.e. listening to the Left, Social Conservatives, Conservatives understanding Islamic revered writings and Counterjihadists all over the political spectrum are peopled filled with “inexplicable and illogical fear.”

People that believe the Word of God (i.e. the Holy Bible) and condemn the homosexual lifestyle because God calls the practice an abomination in the Old Testament and deserving death unless the homosexual lifestyle is repented by looking up to Jesus the Redeemer in the New Testament are vilified as homophobes. The problem I have with the epithet “homophobe,” is that Biblical Christians DO NOT have an inexplicable and illogical fear of those who practice a homosexual lifestyle.

Rather the view of a Biblical Christian is lining up with God in loathing the practice which as an unrepentant action separates one from the Presence of God. Incidentally, a spiritual state restored by believing in the price paid in death of Jesus Christ and enabling eternal life in the Presence of God participating by faith in the Resurrection to glorified Life by the man-God (both natures in one) Jesus Christ.

Christians (AND any non-Christian not a Muslim) must understand the revered writings of Islam deal in exacting death to anyone who does not submit to the authority of Islam. This especially the case in a region where Islam is the basis for the rule of law. In non-Muslim dominated areas, the Muslim is entreated to tolerate the inferior infidels until such a time Islam is the dominant theo-political reality.

It is at this point that a Leftist and Muslim apologist will scream my assertion is a lie and thus I must be a racist hater Islamophobe (expressing hatred out of an “inexplicable and illogical fear” of all things Islam).

Let me be clear! As a Christian I have zero fear of Muslims or of the theo-political ideology of Islam. Rather I loath the doctrine because in its essence the theo-political Islamic revered writings promote all things that separate humanity from God by denying the death, burial and Resurrection of Jesus Christ. FURTHMORE, Islamic revered writings deny that God Almighty emptied His Divine prerogatives to be born a human to be the perfect sinless man enabling His life to be the price that Redeems humanity from the inherited fallen-sin nature bequeathed by the first man Adam who switched allegiance to Satan by disobeying God.

As opposed to the Truth of the Holy Bible I linked to above, Islamic revered writings deny it all claiming Muhammad’s lying words (or if Mo heard from a spiritual being, Muhammad’s gullible allegiance to a devil disguised as an angel of light) are superior to Holy Spirit (3^rd Person of the ONE True God) inspired Holy Scripture.

Most egregious example – Quran 23: 91 – various translations:

Sahih International: Allah has not taken any son, nor has there ever been with Him any deity. [If there had been], then each deity would have taken what it created, and some of them would have sought to overcome others. Exalted is Allah above what they describe [concerning Him].

Yusuf Ali: No son did Allah beget, nor is there any god along with Him: (if there were many gods), behold, each god would have taken away what he had created, and some would have lorded it over others! Glory to Allah! (He is free) from the (sort of) things they attribute to Him!

Muhammad Sarwar: God has never given birth to a son and there is no other god besides Him. If there were, each god would have taken away his creatures and claimed superiority over the others. God is too exalted to be as they believe Him to be.

Mohsin Khan: No son (or offspring or children) did Allah beget, nor is there any ilah (god) along with Him; (if there had been many gods), behold, each god would have taken away what he had created, and some would have tried to overcome others! Glorified be Allah above all that they attribute to Him!

This Quranic Surah is only a small example of Islam’s specific antipathy of the Christian faith.

More treatment of non-Muslims that decide submission is oppression at the hands of Muslims – Quran 9:12-14 (QuranBrowser.org – under Yusuf Ali):

9:12	But if they violate their oaths after their covenant, and taunt you for your Faith,- fight ye the chiefs of Unfaith: for their oaths are nothing to them: that thus they may be restrained.
9:13	Will ye not fight people who violated their oaths, plotted to expel the Apostle, and took the aggressive by being the first (to assault) you? Do ye fear them? Nay, it is God Whom ye should more justly fear, if ye believe!
9:14	Fight them, and God will punish them by your hands, cover them with shame, help you (to victory) over them, heal the breasts of Believers,

Quran 9: 28-33 (QuranBrowser.org – under Shakir):

9:28	O you who believe! the idolaters are nothing but unclean, so they shall not approach the Sacred Mosque after this year; and if you fear poverty then Allah will enrich you out of His grace if He please; surely Allah is Knowing Wise.
9:29	Fight those who do not believe in Allah, nor in the latter day, nor do they prohibit what Allah and His Apostle have prohibited, nor follow the religion of truth, out of those who have been given the Book, until they pay the tax in acknowledgment of superiority and they are in a state of subjection.
9:30	And the Jews say: Uzair is the son of Allah; and the Christians say: The Messiah is the son of Allah; these are the words of their mouths; they imitate the saying of those who disbelieved before; may Allah destroy them; how they are turned away!
9:31	They have taken their doctors of law and their monks for lords besides Allah, and (also) the Messiah son of Marium and they were enjoined that they should serve one God only, there is no god but He; far from His glory be what they set up (with Him).
9:32	They desire to put out the light of Allah with their mouths, and Allah will not consent save to perfect His light, though the unbelievers are averse.
9:33	He it is Who sent His Apostle with guidance and the religion of truth, that He might cause it to prevail over all religions, though the polytheists may be averse.

The Quran, Hadith and Sira are full of this hatred and oppression at non-Muslims. Although the early suras instructed Muslims to respect the People of the Book (i.e. Jews and Christians) the later suras in date (NOT chronologically) reflects Mo’s disappointment in Jews and Christians rejecting Muhammad as a false prophet. Ergo, respect degenerated into oppression followed by destruction if there was any refusal to submit to allah as a convert or a subhuman existence. Sounds more like human emotional directives rather than divine prophecy.

The Word’s of Jesus in false prophets:

¹³“Enter by the narrow gate; for wide is the gate and broad is the way that leads to destruction, and there are many who go in by it.¹⁴Because^[a] narrow is the gate and difficult is the way which leads to life, and there are few who find it.

¹⁵“Beware of false prophets, who come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly they are ravenous wolves. ¹⁶You will know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes from thornbushes or figs from thistles?¹⁷Even so, every good tree bears good fruit, but a bad tree bears bad fruit. ¹⁸A good tree cannot bear bad fruit, nor can a bad tree bear good fruit. ¹⁹Every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire. ²⁰Therefore by their fruits you will know them. – Matthew 7: 13-20 NKJV

And this God-Breathed Word found in 1 John:

2¹⁸Little children, it is the last hour; and as you have heard that the^[a]Antichrist is coming, even now many antichrists have come, by which we know that it is the last hour. ¹⁹They went out from us, but they were not of us; for if they had been of us, they would have continued with us; but they went out that they might be made manifest, that none of them were of us.

4 ¹ Beloved, do not believe every spirit, but test the spirits, whether they are of God; because many false prophets have gone out into the world. ²By this you know the Spirit of God: Every spirit that confesses that Jesus Christ has come in the flesh is of God, ³and every spirit that does not confess that^[a] Jesus Christ has come in the flesh is not of God. And this is the spirit of the Antichrist, which you have heard was coming, and is now already in the world. – 1 John 2: 18-19; 4: 1-3 NKJV

Do I have an inexplicable and illogical fear of Islam? NOPE!

I have a very explicable and logical loathing of Islam. The very tenets of Islam are aggressively antipathetical not only against Christians, but against ALL people who want nothing to do with the Islamic despotic totalitarian theo-political ideology.

You may wonder what motivated me to clarify my thoughts on how “phobia” is a sadly misused application to stalwart Biblical Christians. The motivation is derived from an email I received from Brigitte Gabriel of ACT for America expressing displeasure with Senator Cory Booker’s grilling of Mike Pompeo during the Senate nomination hearing for becoming Secretary of State. In the course of the grilling Booker equated Brigitte Gabriel and Pompeo as Islamophobes.

In response to Booker’s grilling, Gabriel penned a response explaining her contempt for being wrongly called an Islamophobe.

Just as a side thought. Gabriel is in the camp that only Radical Muslims need be exposed. That is a fair point as an American supporting the 1^st Amendment of Religious Freedom.

Unfortunately, Gabriel and others in her camp are failing to see the big picture pertaining to Islam and the theo-political religion’s history of overt conquest and stealth eradication of cultures and faiths that are contrary to Islamic tenets. The more accepted Islamic tenets are become, the greater the potential that Islamic domination occurs ending the very Constitutional Rights guaranteed as inalienable.

With that minor divergence of thought between and Brigitte Gabriel, below is here Townhall article written on 4/14/18.

Here is the email intro from Brigitte Gabriel dated 4/16/2018 11:30 AM:

Dear John,

Last week, during the Secretary of State Nomination Hearings, Senator Cory Booker decided to use his time as a way to advance his own political career. I lived in an 8×10 bomb shelter for almost a decade because of Islamic terrorism. Yet, Cory Booker and the fake news media had the audacity to call me an Islamophobe and a Hate Monger on the Senate floor.

These shameful, baseless lies will not slow me down. As someone who has lived through terrorism, and experienced it firsthand – I will not be silenced by these leftist scare tactics. Over the weekend I published an op-ed on Townhall.com to give my perspective on what happened.

Thank you for support. I hope you enjoy my article!

Un-apologetically Patriotic,

Brigitte Gabriel

JRH 4/17/18

Please Support NCCR

************************

Pompeo and I Are Not Hate Mongers

By Brigitte Gabriel

Apr 14, 2018 12:01 AM

Townhall.com

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not represent the views of Townhall.com.

Cory Booker – sourpuss

Senators grilling CIA Director and Secretary of State nominee Mike Pompeo threw out a number of charged words in an attempt to taint his reputation. Senator Cory Booker used words like “anti-Islam,” “Islamaphobe,” and the other absurd and completely unfounded clichés to describe myself, my organization, ACT for America, and anyone else whose beliefs do not conform to their politically correct fantasyland that have worked with patriots like Mr. Pompeo to expose terrorist activities both within the United States and abroad.

For the last fifteen years I’ve been traveling the world, exercising freedom of speech, as is my human right, in an effort to educate others about the threat of terrorism and radical Islam. I expose the truth behind a warped ideology that legitimizes decapitation, stonings, rape, domestic violence, female genital mutilation, and a number of other abhorrent human rights atrocities. All of these appalling acts are frequent in one particular part of the world, the Islamic world. Radical Islamists will openly cry out “Allahu Akhbar,” before committing a terrorist attack, or any of the other human rights violations aforementioned, as if their God would be pleased with their barbaric actions. I’ve got news for these politically correct senators trying to score cheap political points by slandering both myself, and patriotic officials like Mr. Pompeo; this is not a partisan issue, it’s a human issue.

But the fact that I’ve dared to call out these terrorists, and spoke the truth about the roots of their radical rage, has placed me, and those who associate with me, in the crosshairs of political smear merchants. Cliché accusations of “Islamophobia” thrown at myself and my organization, still seem to be the only defense for far-left frauds.

The term “hate group,” is another term the radical left has used to attempt to delegitimize others. The definition of this term includes “intolerance or aversion for” the object of the phobia. Am I intolerant of mass murder, justified and glorified in the name of Allah? Yes. Do I have an aversion to subway and train bombings? Yes. Do any of these locations ring a bell? Fort Hood, Texas (Nidal Hasan – NOV, 2009); the Boston Marathon bombing (APR, 2013); Charlie Hebdo massacre, Paris (JAN, 2015); the multiple restaurant and Bataclan concert massacres, Paris (NOV, 2015); the San Bernardino Christmas Party massacre (DEC, 2015); the Brussels simultaneous airport and subway attacks (MAR, 2016); the Pulse Nightclub massacre, Orlando, FL (JUN, 2016) ; Nice, France, Bastille Day truck massacre (JUL, 2016). They are all places where horrendous terrorist atrocities were committed by radical Islamists, with scores of civilian fatalities and hundreds maimed.

Senator, if my intolerance of mass murder and my aversion to human rights atrocities makes me an “Islamophobe,” then I submit that I, and everyone else with any common sense or moral compass, would fall into this category.

I am not, however, fearful of moderate, Western loving Muslims, and consequently, I’ve worked with them, and continue to do so. Most Muslims are as concerned as I am about the radicalized element of Islam, and how terrorists all over the world are perverting their hope of living in peace. ACT for America has more than a million members from all walks of life. We work with moderate Muslims, members of the LGBTQ+ community, Republicans, Democrats, and anyone willing to stand for what is right in the face of evil, and the enabling of it by the regressive left.

We defend the defenseless, those who have been terrorized for being “infidels.” Our organization works to protect women, children, homosexuals, and anyone else endangered by the radical elements that threaten their very dignity and existence in the name of their religion.

As for the moniker, “hate group,” let’s be clear, there is nothing hateful about patriotism. There is nothing hateful about defending the defenseless. There is nothing about opposing hatred, only enabling it the way that an appalling number of senators on Capitol Hill, in conjunction with the media, and anti-American political organizations do so continuously.

For years, true hate enablers, like the outrageously biased Southern Poverty Law Center, have recklessly labeled dozens of mainstream conservative organizations as “hate groups,” which has led to violent and dangerous attacks on such organizations. In fact, the SPLC has been named in court as the cause of an act of domestic terrorism, when one of their loyal followers, who soaked up their dangerous propaganda like a sponge, shot up the Family Research Council headquarters in Washington, D.C. Yet, the mainstream media still uses this disgraced organization as a neutral arbiter of hate? On what authority do they make these proclamations?

Another group which frequently traffics in false accusations such as “hate group” is the Council on American Islamic Relations. CAIR is an organization whose spokespersons have been linked to terrorist groups Hamas and the Muslim Brotherhood, and who have been designated as a terrorist organization in Islamic countries such as the United Arab Emirates, which itself abides by Islamic law. Let me guess, the United Arab Emirates is also “Islamophobic?”

Apparently, a Muslim brotherhood front-group like CAIR can throw out accusations such as “hate group,” but accurately calling them a terrorist organization, and stating facts about their leadership and members is a bridge too far. Give me a break.

This week, in an ironic twist, the American Defamation League sent a letter to senators, yet again making this false claim about myself, and ACT for America. These days, I suppose facts are considered the new hate speech. Should anyone be surprised? The only ammunition these anti-free speech bullies have is to cry bigotry whenever facts contradict their feelings. I’ve been defamed many times over the years, and had my life and that of my family’s threatened, with public figures like the media’s favorite jihadist Linda Sarsour calling for the mutilation of my, and FGM survivor Ayaan Hirsi Ali’s, body.

We’re living in a dangerous time more akin to the Twilight Zone than reality. A time when the aggresors are the victims, and opposition to hate is considered hateful.

For the record, ACT for America is a grassroots national security grassroots advocacy organization focused on protecting our nation’s security, western democratic values, and basic human rights. ACT for America has never, and will never, tolerate any bias, discrimination, or violence against anyone, based on their religion, gender, race, or political persuasion.

I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again-political correctness must die so that freedom and truth can live.

___________________________

Are you Falsely Accused of Inexplicable/Illogical Fear?

John R. Houk

© April 17, 2018

____________________________

Pompeo and I Are Not Hate Mongers

Townhall.com is the leading source for conservative news and political commentary and analysis.

PEGIDA Canada Fights for Canadian Freedom while facing Antifa and Communists

Paul Sutliff is one of my favorite Counterjihad writers and speakers. Paul has a webcast on Blog Talk Radio a part of Global Patriot Radio. As of today on his Civilization Jihad Awareness podcast was posted on 11/22/17. The podcast begins with some annoying intro music until you actually listen to the lyrics, then you should be amused. Paul also is the blog journalist for Paul Sutliff on Civilization Jihad. If you want some excellent Counterjihad education, Paul’s blog is a fantastic place to go to bone-up on the parts of Islam that Islamic Apologists and Multiculturalists will not admit to.

In an email update I was informed Paul was an invited speaker at a PEGIDA-Canada event in London, Ontario. Below are three videos of that event along with some transcript below the videos.

(Americans may not be aware that “PEGIDA” is an acronym originating in Europe [via Wikipedia – not always friendly to Counterjihadists]:

Patriotic Europeans Against the Islamisation of the West (Occident) (German: Patriotische Europäer gegen die Islamisierung des Abendlandes), abbreviated PEGIDA or Pegida, is a German nationalist, anti-Islam, far-right political movement.^[3][4] It was founded in Dresden in October 2014. Pegida believes that Germany is being Islamicized^[5] and aims to oppose Islamic extremism. Pegida wants to curb immigration, and accuses authorities of not enforcing existing laws.^[6])

Just a heads up. You will probably to be very patient watching the videos. Commie-Antifa was at the outdoor ANTIFA-Canada rally making all sorts of very loud noise. This is why Paul’s mini-transcript is important. Do me a favor though. Go to Paul’s Youtube link for each video and give it a thumbs-up to stick it in the eye of Antifa anarchists.

JRH 11/27/17

Please Support NCCR

********************

PEGIDA Canada Fights for Canadian Freedom while facing Antifa and Communists

By Paul Sutliff

November 26, 2017

Paul Sutliff on Civilization Jihad

On November 26, 2017 I was in London, Ontario, Canada standing with my Canadian brethren of PEGIDA Canada. Once again Antifa and local college Communists appeared to protest. This time the police mostly kept us safe. Below you can find videos of Jenny Hill’s speech a video of Mark Vandermaas’ speech and a video of my speech with the copy of my speech below the video.

VIDEO: PEGIDA Canada in London November 25 2017

[Posted by Paul Sutliff

Published on Nov 26, 2017

Jenny Hill speaks for PEGIDA Canada while Antifa attempts to stop free speech proving themselves the real fascists!]

Mark points out the Commie and Antifa Violence.

VIDEO: Mark Vandermass speaks at PEGIDA Canada in London Ontario Nov 25 2017

[Posted by Paul Sutliff

Published on Nov 26, 2017

Mark Vandermaas speaks for PEGIDA Canada while Antifa attempts to stop free speech proving themselves the real fascists!]

VIDEO: Paul Sutliff speaks at PEGIDA Canada event London Ontario 11-25-17

[Posted by Paul Sutliff

Published on Nov 26, 2017

Paul Sutliff speaks at PEGIDA Canada event on November 25, 2017 while Antifa attempts to stop free speech proving themselves the real]

Speech London, Ontario, CANADA—-for PEGIDA CANADA and Every Canadian:

Fight for your freedom!

I am once again here in Canada to express my concern that YOUR FREEDOM will soon be gone. Your freedom of EXPRESSION is being stolen AND the fascists want that! Who are these fascists? The very ones who encouraged Antifa to come out each and every time PEGIDA Canada makes a stand.

How many Canadians here like the idea of protecting only ONE religion from being insulted? Protecting it to the point that the members of this religion become special reporters that the police must respond to and investigate those not of this religion. You would think in Canada this was not possible. But Canada unlike America can make laws regarding religion.

Let’s examine just a few of the definitions of Islamophobia that Parliamentarian Scott Reid wrote about on November 15^th.

Sept. 18:

1. Mr. Arif Virani, MP said “Islamophobia, to me, means uttering death threats, assaulting, hatred, threats of violence towards people, and vandalism of their places of worship.”

—

This sounds like concern over hate speech that Canadian law already covers.

2. Parliament Member Iqra Khalid said, “The definition of Islamophobia I subscribe to is an irrational fear or hatred of Muslims or Islam that leads to discrimination.”

So according to this definition what they want to outlaw is irrational thought. Does that mean they will now put all persons who have never committed an actual act of hatred against Islam, and only have thought that Islam is bad in an Insane Asylum???

3. Parliamentarian Dan Vandal shared the definition the Canadian Race Relations Foundation as “expressions of fear and negative stereotypes, bias, or acts of hostility towards the religion of Islam and individual Muslims”

So once again you arrest people for what they think. Not what they do. Is this what you call freedom in Canada? I know it would not fly America. But if Canadians accept this I am scared for your loss of freedom. Are you ready to be reported by any Muslim who simply makes a claim that you thought something? You don’t have to prove anything in this case. You are automatically guilty because you thought something!

On October 4^thDr. Sherif Emil of McGill University said “‘Phobia’ is a medical term, implying a pathological and irrational fear. As far as I know, the only religion it has been applied to is Islam. The proper definition of Islamophobia, therefore, is not ‘irrational hatred of Muslims’ but ‘irrational fear of Islam’.”

Under this definition you would be arrested for having an irrational fear not hating. Once again they lock you away in the psych ward for your thoughts that are claimed to be irrational. This would require a psychological evaluation in order to be freed.

I do not believe Canadians want this at all. But your Parliamentarians are discussing this as something to outlawing fear of a religion? Why? Who brought this topic to Canada? It was not the Buddhists, it was not the Sikhs, It was not the Ammadiya Muslims, nor was it the Hindus, not the Jews even though they are 10 times as likely to be assaulted than a Muslim, and not the Christians! So who is pushing this?

THE ANSWER:

Sunni Muslims affiliated with the Muslim Brotherhood. The very group that Egypt, Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates and Bahrain declared a terrorist entity! Now I ask you is this an act to take away your freedom? Who wins if this passes? It is not you is it! Only the Muslims win if this passes. So, does using logic make me Islamophobic? Does using history make me Islamophobic? I fear for you my friends. I fear you will lose more than you can understand if this motion becomes a law.

______________________

Edited John R. Houk (actually via spellcheck suggestions)

Text embraced by brackets are by the Editor.

© Paul Sutliff

About Paul Sutliff

BA Religion and Philosophy from Roberts Wesleyan College, MSED from Nazareth College of Rochester, currently a post-graduate student at Henley-Putnam University.

If you want a copy of my book, contact me on LinkedIn or here [Perhaps the comment section of Paul’s blog] and I will send you one for $15 plus shipping.

Exposing Islam Must Not be Censored

John R. Houk

© October 28, 2017

Bill Warner is one of my favorite Counterjihadists. Hence, I grateful to be on his email list which usually links to relatively short teaching moments exposing the dark side of Islam. The exposés are based on Islamic revered writings included honored Muslim commentaries.

Warner’s 10/27/17 email has an October 10 teaching moment link; however, the email is more focused on censorship conducted by the Left because that portion of the political spectrum believes exposing Islam is a hate-action described by the epithet Islamophobia.

The American oriented online Merriam-Webster defines Islamophobia thus:

“irrational fear of, aversion to, or discrimination against Islam or people who practice Islam”

Is it irrational to expose the reasoning of a Muslim who is merely following the bloody example of Islam’s founder the (pseudo)prophet Muhammad (Mohammed)? Muslims are taught from birth that Muhammad is the perfect and should be emulated. The reality – gleaned from Islamic revered writings – Muhammad was a bloodthirsty killer of all who refused him, who had a special hatred for polytheists followed closely by Jews and Christians, he raped women, turned women into sex-slaves, extorted non-Muslims with a fake-protection tax, forced non-Muslims to live a dog-of-a-subservient life and that is relatively the tip of the iceberg of this so-called perfect man.

Telling that truth, labels me a racist Islamophobe by the Left and Muslim apologist. Bill Warner in introducing one his past videos, provides an excellent yet short reality about the term Leftists and Muslims use for racism:

“Islamophobia is an imaginary mental disorder. Fear of Islam is a reality-based awareness.”

And this returns me to Bill Warner exposing Leftist censorship that is getting Counterjihadists banned and demonetized because they dare to expose Islam or some anti-Conservative value of the Left.

So this how I am going to handle the Warner email. I will cross post the text of the email less the links to videos and to the PragerU link because I am posting those separately from the email.

JRH 10/28/17

Please Support NCCR

**************

SPLC starts economic war…

Famine on the Horizon?

SPLC & Silicon Valley Elites Try to Starve Us Out

Sent by Bill Warner

Sent 10/27/2017 7:47 AM

Sent from Political Islam

The Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) publishes a hit list of “Islamophobes.” This list is the fuel behind Silicon Valley’s economic warfare against critics of Islam and conservative voices in general.

In the video, “The ‘Anti-Hate’ Group That Is a Hate Group”, Prager U exposes the true nature of the SPLC. It is important to understand this powerful and dangerous near enemy.

The censorship attack on our free speech by Silicon Valley billionaires is economic warfare, designed to cause a famine by taking myself and others out of the marketplace of ideas. There is a near enemy, dhimmi apologists for Islam, and a far enemy, political Islam. The actual work of attacking our civilization is being done by the near enemy. We need new allies to avoid a devastating future.

Good News

PragerU is suing Sharia-compliant Youtube and Google over our constitutional right to free speech. PragerU is doing work for the benefit of us all, and they use your support. The fight to maintain our 1st, and most important, Amendment rights will be a long and costly one.

+++++++++++

The Near Enemy, the Silicon Valley Enforcers

By Bill Warner

Oct 24, 2017

Political Islam

We have two enemies in our struggles– the near enemy apologists for Sharia and the far enemy, Islam. The Silicon Valley billionaires now support Sharia by censoring its critics.

VIDEO: Bill Warner PhD: The Near Enemy– Silicon Valley Enforcers

++++++++

VIDEO: The “Anti-Hate” Group That Is a Hate Group

Posted by PragerU

Published on Oct 12, 2017

The Southern Poverty Law Center bills itself as a watchdog of hate groups. But is this just a cover for its true aims? Journalist and author Karl Zinsmeister explains.

Donate today to PragerU! http://l.prageru.com/2eB2p0h

…

Script:

Shutting down people you don’t agree with is about as un-American as you can get.

Rigorous debate, honest discussion, open exchange of ideas—that’s the American way.

But free thinking and speech are threatened today by a group with a sweet-sounding name that conceals a nefarious purpose. This group is called the Southern Poverty Law Center, or SPLC.

Originally founded as a civil-rights law firm in 1971, the SPLC reinvented itself in the mid-‘80s as a political attack group. Every year now it produces a new list of people and charities it claims are “extremists” and “haters.”

Aided by glowing coverage from the establishment media, the SPLC’s hate list has become a weapon for taking individuals and groups they disagree with and tarring them with ugly associations.

The SPLC employs a two-pronged strategy:

First, find a handful of crazies with barely any followers, no address, and no staff, and blow them up into a dangerous movement— proof that there are neo-Nazis lurking everywhere. On their notorious “Hate Map,” the SPLC lists 917 separate hate groups in the U.S.! No one has even heard of more than a handful of them.

The second strategy of the SPLC is to undermine legitimate political voices that they oppose by associating them with extremists like the KKK.

Take the charity known as the Alliance Defending Freedom. The SPLC lists them as a “hate group.” Is that fair? Well, the ADF has a network of 3,000 attorneys from all across the U.S. who’ve donated more than a million volunteer hours in defense of religious liberty. They’ve had a role in 49 victories at the U.S. Supreme Court. Putting the Alliance Defending Freedom on a list with 130 Ku Klux Klan chapters is not only wrong, it’s malicious.

According to the SPLC, one of the most influential social scientists in the U.S.— Charles Murray—is a, quote, “white nationalist.” Ayaan Hirsi Ali, perhaps the most eloquent spokesperson for the rights of Muslim women, is, to the SPLC, a “toxic… anti-Muslim extremist.”

Scores of other individuals and charities active in mainstream conservative or religious causes have likewise been branded by the Southern Poverty Law Center as threats to society.

Mind you, it is entirely fair to disagree with any of those folks. But it is utterly unfair to call them haters or extremists. The largest category listed by the SPLC as extremists—with 623 entries—covers groups like the Tea Party organizations that are wary of centralized government. Last time we checked, favoring smaller government was a mainstream and perfectly honorable American tradition.

What is not honorable is the course prescribed by a leader of the SPLC, Mark Potok, who was caught on video proclaiming the organization’s true intentions. He told a group of supporters, quote, “the press will describe us as ‘monitoring hate groups’…. I want to say plainly that our aim in life is to destroy these groups, to completely destroy them.”

Portraying someone with political views different from your own as a public menace is bullying.

And it’s a dangerous game. Instead of reducing hate and violence, the SPLC’s name-calling directly incites it.

In March 2017, Charles Murray was trying to discuss his acclaimed book Coming Apart at Middlebury College when he was violently attacked by protesters inflamed by the SPLC’s labeling of him as a racist. A professor escorting Murray ended up in the hospital.

For the complete script, visit https://www.prageru.com/courses/political-science/anti-hate-group-hate-group

++++

Prager University (PragerU) Takes Legal Action Against Google and YouTube for Discrimination

**FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE** Oct. 24, 2017
CONTACT: The KAIROS Company for Prager University | Johnnie@theKcompany.co | 434-426-5310
VIEW FULL LAWSUIT HERE

“This is speech discrimination plain and simple, censorship based entirely on unspecified ideological objection to the message or on the perceived identity and political viewpoint of the speaker” – 36th Governor of California Pete Wilson
Browne, George, Ross LLP

SUPPORT OUR CAUSE

LOS ANGELES — Prager University (PragerU) has filed a lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California to stop Google and YouTube from unlawfully censoring its educational videos and discriminating against its right to freedom of speech.

The lawsuit cites more than 50 PragerU videos which have either been “restricted” or “demonetized” by Google/YouTube. The PragerU videos range on various subjects presenting a conservative point of view, and include a video by noted Harvard Law professor Alan Dershowitz on the founding of Israel. PragerU previously compiled a complete list of their restricted videos here, which includes: “Why America Must Lead,” “The Ten Commandments: Do Not Murder,” “Why Did America Fight the Korean War,” and “The World’s Most Persecuted Minority: Christians.”

In correspondence cited in the filing, Google/YouTube made it clear that the censorship of certain videos was because they were deemed “inappropriate” for younger audiences.

“Watch any one of our videos and you’ll immediately realize that Google/YouTube censorship is entirely ideologically driven. For the record, our videos are presented by some of the finest minds in the Western world, including four Pulitzer Prize winners, former prime ministers, and professors from the most prestigious universities in America,” stated PragerU founder Dennis Prager.

Prager added, “They are engaging in an arbitrary and capricious use of their ‘restricted mode’ and ‘demonetization’ to restrict non-left political thought. Their censorship is profoundly damaging because Google and YouTube own and control the largest forum for public participation in video-based speech in not only California, but the United States, and the world.”

The total number of people who currently use YouTube exceeds 1.3 billion people. Google and YouTube advertise YouTube to the public as a forum intended to defend and protect free speech where members of the general public may express and exchange their ideas. They have represented that their platforms and services are intended to effectuate the exercise of free speech among the public. According to Google and YouTube: “voices matter.” YouTube states that it is “committed to fostering a community where everyone’s voice can be heard.”

“However,” said Eric George of Browne George Ross, the firm representing PragerU, “Google and YouTube use restricted mode filtering not to protect younger or sensitive viewers from ‘inappropriate’ video content, but as a political gag mechanism to silence PragerU. Google and YouTube do this not because they have identified video content that violates their guidelines or is otherwise inappropriate for younger viewers, but because PragerU is a conservative nonprofit organization that is associated with and espouses the views of leading conservative speakers and scholars.”

“This is speech discrimination plain and simple, censorship based entirely on unspecified ideological objection to the message or on the perceived identity and political viewpoint of the speaker,” said former California Governor Pete Wilson of Browne George Ross. “Google and YouTube’s use of restricted mode filtering to silence PragerU violates its fundamental First Amendment rights under both the California and United States Constitutions. It constitutes unlawful discrimination under California law, is a misleading and unfair business practice, and breaches the warranty of good faith and fair dealing implied in Google and YouTube’s own Terms of Use and ‘Community Guidelines.’”

“There is absolutely nothing ‘inappropriate’ about the content of the PragerU videos censored by Google and YouTube; the videos do not contain any profanity, nudity or otherwise inappropriate ‘mature’ content and they fully comply with the letter of YouTube’s Terms of Use and Community Guidelines,” said Marissa Streit, PragerU’s chief executive officer who has engaged in a year-long-effort to try and persuade Google to stop censoring PragerU content. Streit continues, “It’s clear that someone doesn’t like what we teach and so they intend on stopping us from teaching it. Can you imagine what the world would look like if Google is allowed to continue to arbitrarily censor ideas they simply don’t agree with?”

“This is not a left/right issue. It is a free speech issue, which is why prominent liberals, such as Harvard law professor Alan Dershowitz, are supporting our lawsuit,” Prager concluded.

The lawsuit filed in the Northern District of California is available here.

###

Advisory Legal Council:

Former Governor Pete Wilson’s Law Firm, Browne, George and Ross; Eric George; Alan Dershowitz; Barak Lurie, Kelly Shackelford, Mat Staver; and additional prominent attorneys.

PragerU, founded by Dennis Prager in 2011, is a not-for-profit organization that helps millions understand the values that shaped America and provides millions of Americans and people around the world with the intellectual ammunition they need to advocate for limited government, individual responsibility and economic freedom. In 2016 alone, PragerU’s videos received over 250 million views, a figure that will eclipse 350 million in 2017. PragerU is a resource for all who value liberty. It is a threat to all those who do not.

Website | www.PragerU.com Twitter | @PragerU

SUPPORT OUR CAUSE

+++++++

What I Admire about Islam

By Bill Warner

Oct 10, 2017

Political Islam

Islam has many strengths that we need to learn from. For instance, Islam’s concept of civilizational war has no equal in the West. Muslims use a hijab as a weapon, for instance. Muslims have a perpetual optimism about winning. Muslims want to win; we want to tie. Muslims naturally form groups to advance their cause. They are a powerful political lobbying group.

We need to learn from Islam’s strengths so that we don’t lose.

VIDEO: Bill Warner PhD: What I Admire about Islam

_______________

Exposing Islam Must Not be Censored

John R. Houk

© October 28, 2017

___________

SPLC starts economic war…

The Near Enemy, the Silicon Valley Enforcers

What I Admire about Islam

Political Islam About Page

What is Islam?

Islam is a cultural, religious and political system. Only the political system is of interest to kafirs (non-Muslims) since it determines how we are defined and treated. The Islamic political system is contained in the Koran, the Hadith (the traditions of Mohammed) and his biography, the Sira.

CSPI

Our Mission

Political Islam has subjugated other civilizations for 1400 years. Our mission is to educate the world about political Islam, its founder Mohammed, his political doctrine and his god, Allah.

The Five Principles

Islam’s Trilogy of three sacred texts is the Koran and two books about the life of Mohammed. When the Trilogy is sorted, categorized, arranged, rewritten and … READ THE REST

_________________

The “Anti-Hate” Group That Is a Hate Group

Prager University (PragerU) Takes Legal Action Against Google and YouTube for Discrimination

PRAGER UNIVERSITY IS NOT AN ACCREDITED ACADEMIC INSTITUTION AND DOES NOT OFFER CERTIFICATIONS OR DIPLOMAS. BUT IT IS A PLACE WHERE YOU ARE FREE TO LEARN.

PragerU What We Do

…

Our Mission

The greatest threat to America is that most Americans don’t know what makes America great. PragerU’s mission is to explain and spread what we call “Americanism” through the power of the Internet. Our five-minute videos are conservative sound bites that clarify profoundly significant and uniquely American concepts for more than 100 million people each year.

Our Vision

We help millions of people understand the fundamental values that shaped America, and provide them with the intellectual ammunition they need to defend and spread those values. PragerU is a resource for every American—and every person in the world who values liberty—for understanding and explaining the values we share.

About Us

We take the best ideas from the best minds and distill them down to five focused minutes. We then add graphics and animation to create the most persuasive, entertaining, and educational case possible for the values that have made America and the West the source of so much liberty and wealth. These values are Judeo-Christian at their core and include the concepts of freedom of speech, a free press, free markets and a strong military to protect and project those values.

… READ OR VIEW ENTIRETY

Homosexuality & Islam in Light of the Orlando Massacre

John R. Houk

The Orlando Massacre conducted by the Muslim Omar Mateen opens all sorts controversial issues among the American people.

Among my fellow Conservatives it was an easy guess before details were released. it was another Muslim on a killing spree in which President Barack Hussein Obama would not acknowledge Islamic terrorism.

Among the Leftists the massacre was all about gun control and those crazy Right Wingers insisting the 2^nd Amendment allowing citizens to arm themselves to the teeth for protection.

Of course those to knee jerk reactions probably have some middle ground in which of course I lean more toward pro-2^nd Amendment Conservatives. (We who believe the government has become a huge albatross rather than a limited government. We simply do not trust how big government hijacks individual Liberty.)

The Orlando Massacre has evolved into so much more than the first knee jerk reactions of the Left and Right. We can add to the controversial list:

Homosexual activism vs. Christian Morality.

Muslim immigration (even though Mateen was a natural born American of Afghan parentage) vs. Homeland Security.

Are so-called Muslim moderates condemning the massacre out Taqiyya (deception) to America’s non-Muslim majority while secretly praising the statutes of Islamic Sharia and Allah’s will toward homosexuals?

Is ISIS directly pulling terrorist puppet strings among young Muslim immigrants and homegrown Muslims?

Are Muslims in America (citizen or not) following the Caliphate agenda that is propagated by more than just ISIS? Such as the Muslim Brotherhood and affiliates, Wahhabi proponents, various foreign Salafist groups and the Twelver Shias of Iran. In this case the issue is the S. Constitution Liberties vs. Caliphate Sharia Law.

Biblical Christians vs. Progressive Christians on defining morality based on the Bible vs. Modern Humanistic Multicultural mores.

These are just some issues off the top of my head, I am confident you could add to this list.

I’d like to address two issues that I am constantly criticized for by the Left. Those two issues are the epithetical words Homophobia and Islamophobia.

The literal meaning of those words is something I find umbrage with, which is likely one reason Leftists love to cast the words as grenades designed to shut someone up.

A Homophobe literally is one who has an unnatural fear of homosexuals. And an Islamophobe is one who has an unnatural fear of Muslims or the Islamic theopolitical religion. Most dictionaries take the epithet version that may run something like hatred, fear, prejudice and so on toward homosexuals or Muslims.

Let’s define phobia to get to my point.

The Free Dictionary Phobia definitions:

pho·bi·a -n

A persistent, abnormal, and irrational fear of a specific thing or situation that compels one to avoid it, despite theawareness and reassurance that it is not dangerous.

A strong fear, dislike, or aversion.

Phobia -n [C19: from Greek phobos fear]

(Psychiatry) psychiatry an abnormal intense and irrational fear of a given situation, organism, or object, also phobism

pho•bi•a –n., pl. -bi•as. [1780–90; extracted from nouns ending in -phobia]

a persistent, irrational fear of a specific object, activity, or situation that leads to a compelling desire to avoid it.

-phobia [< Latin < Greek, =-phob(os) -phobe + -ia -ia]

A combining form meaning “dread of,” “phobic aversion toward,” “unreasonable antipathy toward” a given object: agoraphobia; xenophobia

ENCYCLOPÆDIA BRITANNICA phobia excerpt:

Phobia, an extreme, irrational fear of a specific object or situation. A phobia is classified as a type of anxiety disorder, since anxiety is the chief symptom experienced by the sufferer. Phobias are thought to be learned emotional responses. It is generally held that phobias occur when fear produced by an original threatening situation is transferred to other similar situations, with the original fear often repressed or forgotten. An excessive, unreasoning fear of water, for example, may be based on a forgotten childhood experience of almost drowning. The person accordingly tries to avoid that situation in the future, a response that, while reducing anxiety in the short term, reinforces the person’s association of the situation with the onset of anxiety.

The point is a phobia has more to do with fear and anxiety than hatred and prejudice. I neither have fear nor anxiety around homosexuals and Muslims (except perhaps in cases of the threat of physical violence which certainly comes from both groups when their agenda or ideology has openly been criticized.) Neither do I hate homosexuals and Muslims. However, there might be some benign prejudice against both groups but not for their lifestyles or beliefs. Rather my prejudice stems from both groups having militant factions that castigate Christianity.

Among homosexual activists their hate is seen in imposing their lifestyle to point forcing a Christian to submit to accepting the homosexuality even though specifically condemned by the Word of God.

Among Muslims, their considered holy and revered writings specifically call out Jews and Christians (aka People of the Book in the Quran) as people to despise and kill if they do not submit to the supremacy of Islam.

Homosexuality and the Bible

The Bible is fairly specific that only amending the words changes the intended meanings. (But Leftist-oriented people enjoy changing Original Intent [See Also HERE] wording to imposed Humanistic evolving meanings.)

Leviticus 18:22; 20:13; Romans 1:24, 26-28; 1 Corinthians 6: 9-10 (NKJV)

Leviticus 18:22

You shall not lie with a male as with a woman. It is an abomination.

Leviticus 20:13

If a man lies with a male as he lies with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination. They shall surely be put to death. Their blood shall be upon them.

Romans 1:24, 26-28

²⁴Therefore God also gave them up to uncleanness, in the lusts of their hearts, to dishonor their bodies among themselves,

²⁶For this reason God gave them up to vile passions. For even their women exchanged the natural use for what is against nature. ²⁷Likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust for one another, men with men committing what is shameful, and receiving in themselves the penalty of their error which was due.

²⁸And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a debased mind, to do those things which are not fitting;

1 Corinthians 6:9-10

⁹Do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived. Neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor homosexuals,^[a] nor sodomites, ¹⁰nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners will inherit the kingdom of God.

After reading these Holy Scriptures, Homosexuals typically hurl profanity my way in the comment section or the more civilized Homosexuals begin a lecture telling me I am bigoted in no uncertain terms. I never receive the animosity of condemnation from homosexuals because – well, the Creator of all that exists spoke the Words. I just shared them. Their real problem is not being accepted by the Creator so typically they deny the Creator exists or vainly attempt to redefine the Original Intent of God’s Word.

To save a little time in the comment section, I do have some Good News from the Word of God:

Romans 7:21-25; 8:1-4, 11-14, 22-25, 31-39 (NKJV)

Romans 7:21-25

²¹I find then a law, that evil is present with me, the one who wills to do good. ²²For I delight in the law of God according to the inward man.²³But I see another law in my members, warring against the law of my mind, and bringing me into captivity to the law of sin which is in my members. ²⁴O wretched man that I am! Who will deliver me from this body of death? ²⁵I thank God—through Jesus Christ our Lord!

So then, with the mind I myself serve the law of God, but with the flesh the law of sin.

Romans 8:1-4

There is therefore now no condemnation to those who are in Christ Jesus,^[a] who do not walk according to the flesh, but according to the Spirit. ²For the law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus has made me free from the law of sin and death. ³For what the law could not do in that it was weak through the flesh, God did by sending His own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh, on account of sin: He condemned sin in the flesh,⁴that the righteous requirement of the law might be fulfilled in us who do not walk according to the flesh but according to the Spirit.

Romans 8:11-14

¹¹But if the Spirit of Him who raised Jesus from the dead dwells in you, He who raised Christ from the dead will also give life to your mortal bodies through His Spirit who dwells in you.

¹²Therefore, brethren, we are debtors—not to the flesh, to live according to the flesh. ¹³For if you live according to the flesh you will die; but if by the Spirit you put to death the deeds of the body, you will live. ¹⁴For as many as are led by the Spirit of God, these are sons of God.

Romans 8:22-25

²²For we know that the whole creation groans and labors with birth pangs together until now. ²³Not only that, but we also who have the firstfruits of the Spirit, even we ourselves groan within ourselves, eagerly waiting for the adoption, the redemption of our body. ²⁴For we were saved in this hope, but hope that is seen is not hope; for why does one still hope for what he sees? ²⁵But if we hope for what we do not see, we eagerly wait for it with perseverance.

Romans 8:31-39

³¹What then shall we say to these things? If God is for us, who can be against us? ³²He who did not spare His own Son, but delivered Him up for us all, how shall He not with Him also freely give us all things?³³Who shall bring a charge against God’s elect? It is God who justifies.³⁴Who is he who condemns? It is Christ who died, and furthermore is also risen, who is even at the right hand of God, who also makes intercession for us. ³⁵Who shall separate us from the love of Christ? Shall tribulation, or distress, or persecution, or famine, or nakedness, or peril, or sword? ³⁶As it is written:

“For Your sake we are killed all day long;
We are accounted as sheep for the slaughter.”^[a]

³⁷Yet in all these things we are more than conquerors through Him who loved us. ³⁸For I am persuaded that neither death nor life, nor angels nor principalities nor powers, nor things present nor things to come,³⁹nor height nor depth, nor any other created thing, shall be able to separate us from the love of God which is in Christ Jesus our Lord.

If you are subject to any action separating you from God Almighty in Christ and have read down this far, you are probably interested in this Good News that we can all be Redeemed through the same Resurrection power that raised our Lord from the dead. If that be the case I encourage you to read Romans chapters 1-16. Herein is the true Love of God that unfortunately longtime Christians too often forget themselves.

I realize that contrasting the homosexual lifestyle with Biblical Morality smacks of Christian Supremacism. The thing is the Christian Supremacism I advocate is absolutely non-violent. When a person claiming to be a Christian responds to the homosexual lifestyle with violence, that is just as ungodly as homosexuality. The only justification for violence is self-defense against violent actions.

Which leads me to the difference between Christian Supremacism and Islamic Supremacism.

Christianity vs. Islam

The difference between Christian (i.e. Biblical) Supremacism and Islamic Supremacism is that Christians are to share the Good News of the Redemptive act of Jesus Christ the Son of God in which hearer freely chooses to believe or disbelieve with no consequence until the Last Judgment. After sifting through all the abrogated suras of the Quran, Muslims share the supremacy of their Prophet and their deity Allah and if you choose reject the Muslim invitation you have three Quranic choices: Convert, not convert but acknowledge Islam is superior to your beliefs OR die.

Here are some annotated Quran suras that highlight how Muslims are to treat Jews, Christians and polytheists from The Religion of Peace:

Quran (2:191-193) – “And kill them wherever you find them, and turn them out from where they have turned you out. And Al-Fitnah [disbelief or unrest] is worse than killing… but if they desist, then lo! Allah is forgiving and merciful. And fight them until there is no more Fitnah [disbelief and worshipping of others along with Allah] and worship is for Allah alone. But if they cease, let there be no transgression except against Az-Zalimun (the polytheists, and wrong-doers, etc.)” (Translation is from the Noble Quran) The verse prior to this (190) refers to “fighting for the cause of Allah those who fight you” leading some to believe that the entire passage refers to a defensive war in which Muslims are defending their homes and families. The historical context of this passage is not defensive warfare, however, since Muhammad and his Muslims had just relocated to Medina and were not under attack by their Meccan adversaries. In fact, the verses urge offensive warfare, in that Muslims are to drive Meccans out of their own city (which they later did). Verse 190 thus means to fight those who offer resistance to Allah’s rule (ie. Muslim conquest). The use of the word “persecution” by some Muslim translators is disingenuous (the actual Arabic words for persecution – “idtihad” – and oppression – a variation of “z-l-m” – do not appear in the verse). The word used instead, “fitna”, can mean disbelief, or the disorder that results from unbelief or temptation. This is certainly what is meant in this context since the violence is explicitly commissioned “until religion is for Allah” – ie. unbelievers desist in their unbelief.

…

Quran (3:56) – “As to those who reject faith, I will punish them with terrible agony in this world and in the Hereafter, nor will they have anyone to help.”

Quran (3:151) – “Soon shall We cast terror into the hearts of the Unbelievers, for that they joined companions with Allah, for which He had sent no authority”. This speaks directly of polytheists, yet it also includes Christians, since they believe in the Trinity (ie. what Muhammad incorrectly believed to be ‘joining companions to Allah’).

…

Quran (4:89) – “They but wish that ye should reject Faith, as they do, and thus be on the same footing (as they): But take not friends from their ranks until they flee in the way of Allah (From what is forbidden). But if they turn renegades, seize them and slay them wherever ye find them; and (in any case) take no friends or helpers from their ranks.”

…

Quran (5:33) – “The punishment of those who wage war against Allah and His messenger and strive to make mischief in the land is only this, that they should be murdered or crucified or their hands and their feet should be cut off on opposite sides or they should be imprisoned; this shall be as a disgrace for them in this world, and in the hereafter they shall have a grievous chastisement”

Quran (8:12) – “I will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve. Therefore strike off their heads and strike off every fingertip of them” No reasonable person would interpret this to mean a spiritual struggle.

Quran (8:39) – “And fight with them until there is no more fitna (disorder, unbelief) and religion is all for Allah” Some translations interpret “fitna” as “persecution”, but the traditional understanding of this word is not supported by the historical context (See notes for 2:193). The Meccans were simply refusing Muhammad access to their city during Haj. Other Muslims were allowed to travel there – just not as an armed group, since Muhammad had declared war on Mecca prior to his eviction. The Meccans were also acting in defense of their religion, since it was Muhammad’s intention to destroy their idols and establish Islam by force (which he later did). Hence the critical part of this verse is to fight until “religion is only for Allah”, meaning that the true justification of violence was the unbelief of the opposition. According to the Sira (Ibn Ishaq/Hisham 324) Muhammad further explains that “Allah must have no rivals.”

Quran (8:57) – “If thou comest on them in the war, deal with them so as to strike fear in those who are behind them, that haply they may remember.”

Quran (8:67) – “It is not for a Prophet that he should have prisoners of war until he had made a great slaughter in the land…”

…

Quran (9:5) – “So when the sacred months have passed away, then slay the idolaters wherever you find them, and take them captive and besiege them and lie in wait for them in every ambush, then if they repent and keep up prayer and pay the poor-rate, leave their way free to them.” According to this verse, the best way of staying safe from Muslim violence at the time of Muhammad was to convert to Islam: prayer (salat) and the poor tax (zakat) are among the religion’s Five Pillars. The popular claim that the Quran only inspires violence within the context of self-defense is seriously challenged by this passage as well, since the Muslims to whom it was written were obviously not under attack. Had they been, then there would have been no waiting period (earlier verses make it a duty for Muslims to fight in self-defense, even during the sacred months). The historical context is Mecca after the idolaters were subjugated by Muhammad and posed no threat. Once the Muslims had power, they violently evicted those unbelievers who would not convert.

Quran (9:14) – “Fight against them so that Allah will punish them by your hands and disgrace them and give you victory over them and heal the breasts of a believing people.” Humiliating and hurting non-believers not only has the blessing of Allah, but it is ordered as a means of carrying out his punishment and even “healing” the hearts of Muslims.

…

Quran (9:29) – “Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the religion of Truth, (even if they are) of the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.” “People of the Book” refers to Christians and Jews. According to this verse, they are to be violently subjugated, with the sole justification being their religious status. Verse 9:33 tells Muslims that Allah has charted them to make Islam “superior over all religions. “This chapter was one of the final “revelations” from Allah and it set in motion the tenacious military expansion, in which Muhammad’s companions managed to conquer two-thirds of the Christian world in the next 100 years. Islam is intended to dominate all other people and faiths.

…

Quran (17:16) – “And when We wish to destroy a town, We send Our commandment to the people of it who lead easy lives, but they transgress therein; thus the word proves true against it, so We destroy it with utter destruction.” Note that the crime is moral transgression, and the punishment is “utter destruction.” (Before ordering the 9/11 attacks, Osama bin Laden first issued Americans an invitation to Islam).

…

Quran (25:52) – “Therefore listen not to the Unbelievers, but strive against them with the utmost strenuousness…” “Strive against” is Jihad – obviously not in the personal context. It’s also significant to point out that this is a Meccan verse.

Quran (33:60-62) – “If the hypocrites, and those in whose hearts is a disease, and the alarmists in the city do not cease, We verily shall urge thee on against them, then they will be your neighbors in it but a little while. Accursed, they will be seized wherever found and slain with a (fierce) slaughter.” This passage sanctions the slaughter (rendered “merciless” and “horrible murder” in other translations) against three groups: Hypocrites (Muslims who refuse to “fight in the way of Allah” (3:167) and hence don’t act as Muslims should), those with “diseased hearts” (which include Jews and Christians 5:51-52), and “alarmists” or “agitators who include those who merely speak out against Islam, according to Muhammad’s biographers. It is worth noting that the victims are to be sought out by Muslims, which is what today’s terrorists do. If this passage is meant merely to apply to the city of Medina, then it is unclear why it is included in Allah’s eternal word to Muslim generations.

Quran (47:3-4) – “Those who disbelieve follow falsehood, while those who believe follow the truth from their Lord… So, when you meet (in fight Jihad in Allah’s Cause), those who disbelieve smite at their necks till when you have killed and wounded many of them, then bind a bond firmly (on them, i.e. take them as captives)… If it had been Allah’s Will, He Himself could certainly have punished them (without you). But (He lets you fight), in order to test you, some with others. But those who are killed in the Way of Allah, He will never let their deeds be lost.” Those who reject Allah are to be killed in Jihad. The wounded are to be held captive for ransom. The only reason Allah doesn’t do the dirty work himself is to to test the faithfulness of Muslims. Those who kill pass the test.

… READ ENTIRETY (What Does Islam Teach About… Violence; The Religion of Peace; ©2002 – 2016 All Rights Reserved)

Trust me there is more in website list of the Quran. I tried to focus on Islam’s perspective on non-Muslims, but the website also addresses violence against Muslims who apostate their religion or do not properly follow its directives. Then The Religion of Peace examines violence against non-Muslims found in the revered (but not considered words of Allah via Mohammed) writings of the Hadith and Sira.

Now if directed violence against Jews, Christians and polytheists is not bad enough, there are the Quranic suras that blaspheme Christianity in particular (But again the New Testament does not command to render for evil but only in self-defense from physical violence).

The centrality of Christian faith is that Jesus is the Son of God born from a human vessel Mary who at the time was a virgin. Thus Jesus is fully God and fully man in nature. Jesus’ divine nature made him the perfect sacrifice to pay for Adam’s fall and reunite humanity with God Almighty. (Yes, I’m aware my Jewish friends disagree with this, but they don’t want to kill me over our disagreement) That sacrifice was seen in Jesus unjustly accused of crimes he didn’t commit and being killed on the Cross. THEN three days later the Power of the Father resurrects the Son in bodily form clothed with the Divine glory Jesus had before he was incarnated as a human in Mary’s womb.

Christians disagree on various points but the above is what all sects and Denominations agree on as a matter of faith in God’s Grace in Jesus Christ. So what does the Quran say about the central faith of Christianity? From a Christian perspective it is blasphemous:

JESUS CHRIST IS THE SON OF GOD

The Qu’ran clearly states that Allah has NO son.

“They say, ‘God has begotten a son.’ God forbid! Self-sufficient is He. His is all that the heavens and the earth contain. Surely for this you have no sanction. Whould you say of God what you know not?” — Qur’an 10:68

“Such was Jesus, the son of Mary. That is the whole truth, which they still doubt. God forbid that He Himself should beget a son! When He decrees a thing He need only say: ‘Be,’ and it is.” —Qur’an 19:35

“Those who say: ‘The Lord of Mercy has begotten a son,’ preach a monstrous falsehood, at which the very heavens might crack, the earth break asunder, and the mountains crumble to dust. That they should ascribe a son to the Merciful, when it does not become the Lord of Mercy to beget one!” — Qur’an 19:88

“Never has God begotten a son, nor is there any other god besides Him. Were this otherwise, each god would govern his own creation, each holding himself above the other. Exalted be God above their falsehoods!” — Qur’an 23:91

Clearly, the Qu’ran denies that Jesus Christ is the Son of God. (THE GOD OF THE HOLY BIBLE VS. THE ALLAH OF THE QU’RAN; By Geri Ungurean; Now The End Begins; 5/8/15)

Quran on Death and Resurrection

Quran 4:156-158 (SAHIH INTERNATIONAL)

And [We cursed them] for their disbelief and their saying against Mary a great slander, And [for] their saying, “Indeed, we have killed the Messiah, Jesus, the son of Mary, the messenger of Allah.” And they did not kill him, nor did they crucify him; but [another] was made to resemble him to them. And indeed, those who differ over it are in doubt about it. They have no knowledge of it except the following of assumption. And they did not kill him, for certain. Rather, Allah raised him to Himself. And ever is Allah Exalted in Might and Wise.

There Islamic theologians that have developed a view of a substitution theory in that Judas was crucified in place of Jesus. Which includes a later death of Jesus and “Allah” raising the natural death body of Jesus into Islam’s heaven. Here are some excerpts:

… Even so, the Jews were not satisfied, and they went to the king of Damascus at that time, a Greek polytheist who worshipped the stars. They told him that there was a man in Bayt Al-Maqdis misguiding and dividing the people in Jerusalem and stirring unrest among the king’s subjects. The king became angry and wrote to his deputy in Jerusalem to arrest the rebel leader, stop him from causing unrest, crucify him and make him wear a crown of thorns. When the king’s deputy in Jerusalem received these orders, he went with some Jews to the house that `Isa was residing in, and he was then with twelve, thirteen or seventeen of his companions. That day was a Friday, in the evening. They surrounded `Isa in the house, and when he felt that they would soon enter the house or that he would sooner or later have to leave it, he said to his companions, “Who volunteers to be made to look like me, for which he will be my companion in Paradise” A young man volunteered, but `Isa thought that he was too young. He asked the question a second and third time, each time the young man volunteering, prompting `Isa to say, “Well then, you will be that man.” Allah made the young man look exactly like `Isa, while a hole opened in the roof of the house, and `Isa was made to sleep and ascended to heaven while asleep. Allah said,

(And (remember) when Allah said: “O `Isa! I will take you and raise you to Myself.”) When `Isa ascended, those who were in the house came out. When those surrounding the house saw the man who looked like `Isa, they thought that he was `Isa. So they took him at night, crucified him and placed a crown of thorns on his head. The Jews then boasted that they killed `Isa and some Christians accepted their false claim, due to their ignorance and lack of reason. As for those who were in the house with `Isa, they witnessed his ascension to heaven, while the rest thought that the Jews killed `Isa by crucifixion. They even said that Maryam sat under the corpse of the crucified man and cried, and they say that the dead man spoke to her. All this was a test from Allah for His servants out of His wisdom. Allah explained this matter in the Glorious Qur’an which He sent to His honorable Messenger, whom He supported with miracles and clear, unequivocal evidence. …

… (Tafsir Ibn Kathir on 4:157)

Tafsir al-Jalalayn is one of the most significant tafsirs for the study of the Qur’an. … Tafsir al-Jalalayn is generally regarded as one of the most easily accessible works of Qur’anic exegesis because of its simple style and one volume length. …

Al-Jalalayn on [Quran] 4:157

… And yet they did not slay him nor did they crucify him, but he, the one slain and crucified, who was an associate of theirs [the Jews], was given the resemblance, of Jesus. In other words, God cast his [Jesus’s] likeness to him and so they thought it was him [Jesus]. And those who disagree concerning him, that is, concerning Jesus, are surely in doubt regarding, the slaying of him, for some of them said, when they saw the slain man: the face is that of Jesus, but the body is not his, and so it is not he; and others said: no, it is he. They do not have any knowledge of, the slaying of, him, only the pursuit of conjecture … (Tafsir Al Jalalayn on 4:157)

As pointed out elsewhere on Answering-Islam (*), there is disagreement on who substituted Christ:

“1. God made someone look like Jesus who was then crucified in the place of Christ. This is known as the substitution theory, but this interpretation is beset with many problems. First, who in fact was made to look like Christ? Muslims were not unanimous:

A. Some say that it was Judas.

B. Others say it was one of Jesus’ disciples.

C. Still others say that it was a Roman soldier named Titawus.”

The Swoon Theory

2. Jesus was crucified but did not die. He swooned on the cross and later recovered.

Although the swoon theory is held mainly by the Ahmaddiyas and the Nation of Islam, groups that are considered heretical, there are also orthodox Sunni Muslims who have adopted this theory as well. The most famous Sunni to adopt and embrace this view for polemical purposes is Ahmed Deedat.

Akbarally Meherally is another one who has decided to embrace this theory (Article 1, Article 2). Meherally even goes so far as to deny the substitution theory.

Muslim apologist Shabir Ally tried to defend this theory (quite unsuccessfully I might add) in his debate with Dr. William Lane Craig, “Did Jesus of Nazareth Physically Rise from the Dead?”, held on Monday, March 4, 2003 at the University of Toronto. …

…

The Legend Theory

3. The crucifixion didn’t even happen but was a later invention/legend. The late Muhammad Asad held this view:

Thus, the Qur’an categorically denies the story of the crucifixion of Jesus. There exist, among Muslims, many FANCIFUL LEGENDS telling us that at the last moment God substituted for Jesus a person closely resembling him (according to some accounts, that person was Judas), who was subsequently crucified in his place. However, none of these LEGENDS finds the slightest support in the Qur’an or in authentic Traditions, and the stories produced in this connection by the classical commentators must be summarily rejected. They represent no more than confused attempts at “harmonizing” the Qur’anic statement that Jesus was not crucified with the graphic description, in the Gospels, of his crucifixion. The story of the crucifixion as such has been succinctly explained in the Qur’anic phrase wa-sakin shubbiha lahum, which I render as “but it only appeared to them as if it had been so” – implying that in the course of time, long after the time of Jesus, a legend had somehow grown up (possibly under the then-powerful influence of Mithraistic beliefs) to the effect that he had died on the cross in order to atone for the “original sin” with which mankind is allegedly burdened; and this legend became so firmly established among the latter-day followers of Jesus that even his enemies, the Jews, began to believe it – albeit in a derogatory sense (for crucifixion was, in those times, a heinous form of death-penalty reserved for the lowest of criminals). … (see Qamas, art. khayala, as well as Lane II, 833, and IV, 1500). (p. 134, fn. 171, online source; capital and underlined emphasis ours)

The Natural Death Theory

Moiz Amjad of Understanding-Islam.com defends his theory that the Qur’an teaches Jesus died naturally here.

9th Century Muslim Historian Al Tabari:

… This article establishes the view of Al-Tabari and his position that Jesus was crucified and raised into heaven.

… READ ENTIRETY (The Confusion of Islam regarding the Crucifixion of Jesus Christ; By Derik Adams; Answering Islam)

Yeah, I don’t care whichever Muslim tells you the Allah of the Quran is the same as God Almighty of the Bible. The discrepancies and the time period that Mohammed lived in simply discredits Quran as at the very least a collection of Mohammed sayings he copied to entice Jews and Christians to accept him as a Prophet and enough Arab theo-philosophy to convince medieval Arab minds that there must be something to this desert pirate – after all he keeps winning and supplying his adherents with blood-bought booty.

But here is the clincher why every Christian should disdain Islam. That theopolitical religion is an antichrist ideology designed to fool Christians into denying the Son of God as the Resurrected expiation of the fall of Adam.

Matthew 24:4-5, 23-25; 1 John 2:18, 22-25; 4:1-3 (NKJV)

Matthew 24:4-5, 23-25

⁴And Jesus answered and said to them: “Take heed that no one deceives you. ⁵For many will come in My name, saying, ‘I am the Christ,’ and will deceive many.

²³“Then if anyone says to you, ‘Look, here is the Christ!’ or ‘There!’ do not believe it. ²⁴For false christs and false prophets will rise and show great signs and wonders to deceive, if possible, even the elect. ²⁵See, I have told you beforehand.

1 John 2:18, 22-25

¹⁸Little children, it is the last hour; and as you have heard that the^[a]Antichrist is coming, even now many antichrists have come, by which we know that it is the last hour.

²²Who is a liar but he who denies that Jesus is the Christ? He is antichrist who denies the Father and the Son. ²³Whoever denies the Son does not have the Father either; he who acknowledges the Son has the Father also.

²⁴Therefore let that abide in you which you heard from the beginning. If what you heard from the beginning abides in you, you also will abide in the Son and in the Father. ²⁵And this is the promise that He has promised us—eternal life.

1 John 4:1-3

Beloved, do not believe every spirit, but test the spirits, whether they are of God; because many false prophets have gone out into the world.²By this you know the Spirit of God: Every spirit that confesses that Jesus Christ has come in the flesh is of God, ³and every spirit that does not confess that^[a] Jesus Christ has come in the flesh is not of God. And this is the spirit of the Antichrist, which you have heard was coming, and is now already in the world.

I have some Good News for Muslim adherents. That news is the exact same as that above to those who choose a homosexual lifestyle. Makes Jesus Christ the Son of God, Who arose from the dead to everlasting life on the third after His Crucifixion and now sits at the right hand of the Father making continuous intercession on behalf who believe on Him as their Lord – one of the three persons – Father, Son and Holy Spirit, Who is ONE GOD.

Romans 7:21-25; 8:1-4, 11-14, 22-25, 31-39 (NKJV)

JRH 6/17/16

Please Support NCCR

Everything But Terrorism

This is an extraordinary essay by Ari Bussel. I typically like to provide some kind of summary of a submitted essay, report or exposé. To do so here would turn into another essay.

I’ll try a few words though. Ari tackles Western political correctness in relation to being blind toward Islamic terrorism AND this blindness extends to Israel which tackles Islamic terrorism with a higher intensity than the West. The Western blindness tends to criticize Israel as the perpetrator and giving a pass to Palestinian Islamic terrorists due to the lie that Arab-Muslims are the true indigenous people of some mythical Palestine. A Palestine that really never existed until after WWI. A Palestine that the West viewed as much as a land of Jews as a land of Arabs (of which a majority of those Arabs immigrated to get jobs by repatriated Western Jews). Here’s as good an essay teaser as any:

A day will come when we all – Muslims and non-Muslims alike – see that there is no difference between Daesh, Muslim Brotherhood, Wahhabism and the Iranian Supreme Global Caliphate. They all want to establish the same rule where non-Muslims are subjugated to Muslims. –Ari Bussel

JRH 6/13/16

Please Support NCCR

*******************

Everything But Terrorism

By Ari Bussel

Sent: 6/12/2016 10:24 PM

Early Sunday morning in Los Angeles, the news broke about 20 dead in Orlando. Hours later it would turn out to be 50 dead in a gay club, perpetrator happens to have a Muslim name. Speculations range, “is it a hate crime?” Clearly it cannot be a “Terrorist attack;” this we know to be an absolute truth, and facts must not confuse us.

Since we are practically forbidden from using the word “Terrorism” in the same context as “Islam,” we normally revert to “workplace violence,” the term favored by US President Obama. To make the term more suitable to the location, let us replace it with “drinking-place violence” (those inside just happened not to be “straight,” thus the entire episode is more comprehensible, open to more suggestions) and continue with our daily lives.

President Obama believes that every act of terrorism, when the perpetrators shout “Allah u Akbar” (God is Great), is simply carried out by a deranged individual and there is no overlap between it and the great religion of peace spreading its tentacles, aiming to reach global domination.

Just days earlier, at the center of Tel Aviv, at a location somewhat like the Grove in Los Angeles, two cousins sat at a restaurant chain to drink coffee. Two attractive young men, they were very well dressed, some say “disguised,” indistinguishable from any other Israeli there.

“Drinking-place violence” happens everywhere it seems. Apparently the two cousins did not want to pay, for instead they took out guns and started shooting, murdering four, wounding six others.

Perpetrators: Muslim.

Victims: Jewish/Israelis. Score (in casualties): 0:10. Real score (Islam: West): 1:0 (enemies of the West having the upper hand). But clearly this has nothing to do with the act. Or does it?

It will be later learned the two cousins planned something much bigger, the ten casualties being negligible in comparison to the actual forecast.

How are the two instances connected? They both happened during the holy-to-Muslims month of Ramadan. Also, they both targeted the most hated: Jews in Israel and gays in America.

In mosques the world over, including in Israel and the USA, Islamic clergies call to cleanse the world and promise 72 virgins in heaven to anyone bold enough to carry the act. In Gaza and Judea and Samaria, young Muslims are trained at summer camps how to bring death and mayhem (stubbing, using rifles, exploding themselves and other like heroic tasks).

In the internet, young Western disciples are recruited en masse. They go via Turkey to Syria and Iraq for training, and if they do not die there, they return to their home countries to carry out “courageous” acts against the Infidels (non-believers). During Ramadan, such acts get an extra significance of Jihad (holy-war), filled with utter and pure devotion, adorned with splashing red, hot human blood sacrifice.

In Iran gays are hung on trees or tall poles. In Gaza they are executed or thrown off rooftops. In the Palestinian Authority, children were brought to Arafat to fulfill his every craving and desire. Prohibited (like liquor), but consumed nonetheless.

Old Faithful

Now, let us turn to the way the script is played. In Israel, Israelis gather around, burying the dead the same day or the next (Jews must bury their dead immediately), and as painful as it might be, normalcy is restored.

Many go out to the same restaurant, to show support, to show we are not afraid – that life must not be interrupted or corrupted by Muslim terrorists who are influenced by Daesh or Palestinian ideology.

The world immediately warns Israel to show restraint, not to over-react (any reaction by Israel other than licking its wounds and retracting out of sight is considered by the world an “over-reaction”). Moreover, when Israel decides that the extended family of the terrorists has forfeited its privileges to go to work in Israel, the world went berserk. How dares Israel? She must be (and thus is) immediately condemned for “collective punishment.” Plans are formulated to sue Israel in the International Court of Justice in The Hague.

The privilege of being treated with respect and trust is not a right-by-virtue. Why would Israel allow those who plot to murder her citizens to come and work in Israel? It is clearly not an obligation; rather it – and participation in civilized society – must be earned.

Thus, Israel is hit by a terrorist attack, then the world stands around and spits at the wounded victim, kicks her, shouts vulgarities and threats, enjoying her misery, stubbing Israel again and again, exactly where it hurts.

For instance, France, itself the target of repeated “civilized” attacks and constant “discourse” with the Islamists and Daesh, is applying pressure on Israel to come to peace with her enemies – the brainwashed terrorists – by giving land and numerous other concessions. The French see it as a quest for peace. Israel knows it is a definite way to commit suicide.

The same should work very well if applied toward France: Just accept what the Islamists want – Sharia law in France; women covered from head to toe; women as second class citizens, whose husbands are allowed and taught how to maltreat them, use them as a punching bag and blame them for their own indiscretions; the utter elimination of Christ and Christianity and the obliteration of any history (from books to Churches, forts to museums, archeology to artwork).

To the world, there is no terrorism ever happening in Israel, for Jewish blood is of no consequence or concern. Whatever happens and however it happens, Israel is always found guilty in the court of international opinion.

The American Version

In the United States, there is a different script, yet no less familiar. Even before all the facts are known, CAIR, the Council on American Islamic Relations – calling itself “the nation’s largest Muslim civil rights and advocacy organization” – immediately “condemned the deadly shooting spree at a nightclub that left at least 20 people dead.”

It has become a standard reaction to quickly “hold a news conference with leaders of the Muslim community and interfaith representatives to condemn the deadly shooting spree.” A Jewish Rabbi, Christian Father and other clergy people are kept on standby for that exact purpose.

In short, a photo-op and hollow lip service, even before all the facts are known. Facts that turn out to indicate with absolute certainty that the terrorism act was perpetrated in the name of Islam; but let us not be confused with facts.

So quick CAIR is at organizing these “We Condemn” conferences that something smells rotten. Why would CAIR be so quick to preempt, every time, and why is it that the perpetrators in these instances always turn out to be Muslim who invoked Allah’s name as they went on a murdering spree?

The “We Condemn” conferences are sprinkled-to-saturation with lots of “no one is listening to us” and “we do not get enough news coverage which we rightfully deserve” and mixed with pointing the finger at society at large: “We are unfairly and unjustly targeted because we are Muslim!” “Americans so easily hate us!” “So many people are Islamophobes!” And then the best follows with haste: “We must be protected! The Federal Government should immediately step up protection!”

While CAIR has become accustomed at immediately convening news conferences and pointing the finger at non-Muslims, the Administration usually waits a short while longer, say another twenty minutes to an hour, and then a grim face President Obama tells the nation that Muslims are persecuted, unjustly targeted and suffer immensely for no fault of their own.

The President warns, “let us not rush to judgment,” apologizes to the Muslims, defending their motives and blaming America and Americans. His other favorite excuse: “there are too many weapons,” leaving us thinking: “Maybe we should scrap the Second Amendment!” He is, before all, a legal expert, a professor of law and a self-proclaimed “Constitutional-law professor.”

Following Obama’s logic, the perpetrators become the victims, and the victims soon will have a known complex (Stockholm Syndrome) of identifying with the terrorists, justifying their actions, understanding their motives, feeling sorry for them; blaming ourselves for what we have just endured.

How Can We Tell?

The two back-to-back incidents highlight a growing threat to the Western World: homegrown terrorism.

In Israel, due to the “popular so-called ‘non-violent’ uprising” of those determined to destroy Israel, Israelis are now accustomed to extra security: Entering a bank, restaurant, night club, major shopping center or university necessitates going through security (likely better than our own TSA at the airports, shown time and again to be less than effective).

For the past nine months, the Israeli laboratory has been trying to comprehend and offer solutions to a new phenomenon: The so-called “individualist-terrorist.” A 14 year old. A 21 year old. Male. Female. Children on a mission. Two cousins like last week’s terror attack. All supposedly unrelated, uncoordinated and seemingly justified as a no-other-choice-reaction to great grievances.

Except there is a very clear common denominator: All perpetrated by Muslims who have been brainwashed that murdering Jews would warrant their afterlife in heaven with 72 virgins. Promised an eternal glory for them and their families. Taught at summer camps, soccer fields and classrooms this is the way to go, a life worth living. A small sacrifice relative to the immense injustice done to their “people.”

Israel still has not formulated the manner by which to respond to this terrorism. The solution stares in Israel’s face, yet she refuses to take the necessary steps. Perpetrators are not the victims, and terrorism in not a “non-violent uprising.” Even in the US of A, we understand the difference between “free speech” and “hate speech” and have laws in place designed to protect us against the latter.

When Muslim leaders in Israel call to “quench the land’s thirst with Jewish blood,” they must be silenced. Free speech that has long turned into hate speech, yet is allowed from the loudspeakers of mosques (including Al Aqsa in Al Quds – i.e. from the top of the Temple Mount in Jerusalem, Israel), from the podium of the Knesset (Israel’s Parliament), via official radio, TV, internet and print journalism, must be stopped.

For Israel to regain its calm and her enemies their human sanity, the hate fire must be put out. Until it is done, the “Intifada by Individuals” (“Blood Symphony”) will continue unabated. 12 year olds will use knives to stab 80 year old women or kids their own age, Israel will be blamed and the so-called “Palestinians” will glorify these acts of madness and cowardliness as “Holy Jihad!”

Outside the Laboratory

Outside of Israel, the problem is two-fold: First, there is no security other than at the airports. Profiling is prohibited. Terminology is convoluted not to offend the touchy souls of Muslims. We are simply not used to face constant terrorism or set up to fight it.

Second, the terrorists are more and more of the “homegrown” type. They look like any other person, speak without any accent, travel freely, claim rights they do not deserve and go out on the attack.
So were the doctors in Glasgow. Belgian, French, Swedish, Finnish, Dutch, German and so many others. Homegrown Muslim Terrorists. Even in Israel, the two terrorists were not only dressed up nicely – they looked like two attractive young men in their early 20s, not much different than any other Middle-Eastern Israeli!

Israel is the laboratory where everything is being tried and experimented. From Israel, it is then exported the world over, and the world awaits Israel’s solutions and medicine to stop the spread.

CAIR and MPAC (Muslim Public Affairs Council), so quick to proclaim Islamic terrorism having nothing to do with Islam, are mysteriously silent in condemning and as usual very quick at pointing a blaming hand when it comes to terrorism against Israel. This was the case, for instance, when MPAC’s president Salam Al-Marayati, spoke earlier this year in Los Angeles about “the struggle against global terrorism,” “from San Bernardino to Brussels, Israel excluded.”

Like CAIR and MPAC, during the Second Intifada, Muslim clergy in the West and throughout the Arab world said not a word about the constant terrorist attacks in Israel. Until the same “homicide bombing” (strapping oneself with explosives mixed with bolts, tainted blood, etc., and exploding in the midst of people while shouting in deepest reverence: “Allah u Akbar!”) was carried out in Jordan at a wedding. Then the entire Islamic clergy woke up to speak against it.

How capable are the Muslim loudmouths, how sleek and appeasing? They are “against Terrorism,” but “terrorism” against Jews is not “Terrorism!” Alas, what is good in a Jewish wedding is equally as effective in a Muslim wedding. After all, the Jewish forefathers are still believed to be Muslim prophets.

In a Minefield

This, indeed, brings us to the true essence of fighting terrorism. Often, one is warned not to write about Muslims and Islam. I am often told, as if I do not know: “You cannot – must not – generalize.” “There are many good Muslims.” “You have Muslim friends who are good people!”

Beyond just “political correctness,” there is the issue of danger. Write, draw a lame cartoon or talk about Islam in a manner not acceptable to Muslims, and you bring great danger to your life.

Non-Muslims, as a general rule, are not allowed to talk about Islam other than with the utmost reverence. Anything short of that is blasphemy and is punishable by death. There are some very famous examples, from the Danish Cartoons to Charlie Hebdo in Paris. Salman Rushdie, Theo van Gogh, Geert Wilders, Ayaan Hirsi Ali. Meir Kahane, Rehavam Ze’evi.
And in between political correctness and beheading or death-by-some-other-gruesome-manner, there is being called “Islamophobe,” “Extremist” and other such pearls of modern-day-wisdom.

The Future

Thus we return to the back-to-back terrorist attacks in Israel and the USA. Both perpetrated by Muslims. In both instances, the perpetrators subscribe to an Islamic-Global-Caliphate ideology – a geopolitical movement on the rise, not a religion, or maybe a death-cult masquerading as a religion.

If Israel and the USA try to find internal blame, the terror has succeeded twice: Once for planting fear in our minds and daily lives, bringing them to a stop. And again for shaping our future behavior, conditioning us to accept Islam as being superior and untouchable and to fear being critical as we are with any other religion.

Fear is highly contagious. For those not understanding its grip, try to answer how is Daesh so successful controlling vast populations of people. Look at the Yazikis, the Iraqis, Egyptians, Iranians and Gazans. Fear’s hold is gripping-to-stand still, it freezes the person, preventing any action.

A day will come when Muslims in droves will stand and speak out. They will be silent no more. They will do so equally whether the victims are Jewish, gay, American, Saudi or Jordanian.

The day is still far, far away, for at present, nothing that happens to Jews in Israel, France, South America or elsewhere in the world amounts to “terrorism,” and so none of these attacks is ever included in the long list of terrorist attacks – from the UK to France to Spain, Malaysia and Indonesia and onward around the world – all in the name of “Allah u Akbar.”

A day will come when those speaking for American Muslims will stop blaming everyone else and treating themselves as victims. They do not cooperate when the authorities come to investigate. Quite on the contrary, they have lawyers ready to sue for “violations of their civil rights.” Buy they tell us they will freely report any “odd behavior” that leads to terrorism.

They constantly cry foul to the Administration and demand that doctors and others on “humanitarian” missions via Turkey to Syria and beyond not be stopped or questioned. (Daesh is quite “humanitarian,” when burning live people, executing, raping or mutilating and definitely when selling children and women for slavery.)

Rise, my Muslim friends, rise and take action. Speaking out selectively radiates insincerity. For terrorism is one and the same, whether applied toward a Jew, a Christian, a Muslim or any other person. Rise and be true to your words, so that we can start believing what you say. Overlapping faith and action will offer you protection as well, for else, you may find yourselves in Pastor Martin Niemöller’s poem – dead too.

Why should Muslims care? Because if they do not subscribe the particular version that sees itself superior and happens to be most gruesome, thus having the upper hand, they will find their fate is the same as that of the “Pigs and Apes” (Jews and Christians and all other non-believers) “People of the Book.”

Hamas, for instance, that exists to bring about the destruction of the Jewish State of Israel (as is prominently featured in its Charter and daily actions) has agreed for a temporary cessation of hostilities due to the real threat of Daesh. (Apparently Israel has some uses after all.)

For those that supreme ideologies and races sound familiar, there is a reason. All that is necessary is to look at our history books at what happened some 75 years ago. And for those who are skeptical at the comparison, be assured that in addition to six million Jews who were methodologically exterminated (including more than a million children), there were many other non-desirables (gays, gypsies, political opponents and tens of millions others who did not subscribe to the Arian race, the Japanese superiority, etc.).

And a day will come when common sense will return to govern. Muslims will be treated with respect rather than suspicion, like any other minority, because they deserve it, because they had removed the cancer from within. And respect and trust will have to be earned, not demanded and taken at will.

Until such time, we had another work-place violence. The perpetrator’s Muslim name has nothing to do with the act of crime. Muslims must be protected, for they are just the victims. We are all at fault, for we hate Muslims with a vengeance. And in condemning what took place, we must equate it with everything else that takes place around the world (first and foremost: Israel is guilty!).

People are murdered, and life goes on. Paris. Tel Aviv. Orlando. It will continue until Israel finds a cure. Then a new cycle-of-violence will be unleashed, more horrible than before.

At least we can rest assured that the world’s laboratory is hard at work, never sleeping nor slumbering. Israel is the guard on the walls protecting the world, although at the moment, these walls seem to be ready to fall down.

_____________________

Ari Bussel wrote for Muslim World Today, during the life of the publication, and served as the paper’s foreign correspondent in Israel.

First Published June 12, 2016

Contact: bussel@me.com

The Hill: Islamophobia – It’s a Growth Industry

Brigitte Gabriel

Brigitte Gabriel sent an email to the ACT for America list on June 16 highlighting an editorial at The Hill exposing the baloney of Islamophobia being hate speech. The article was written on June 10 but it is still quite relevant.

JRH 6/19/15

Please Support NCCR

************************

The Hill: Islamophobia – It’s a Growth Industry

From Brigitte Gabriel

Sent: 6/16/2015 7:00 PM

Sent by ACT for America

It’s rare that we see an article like this published in a mainstream news outlet like The Hill. Abraham Miller lays out the truth about the grievance industry that groups like CAIR, the Council on American Islamic Relations, have created.

Their goal is simple: rather than embrace our shared constitutional values, they seek to be set aside as a special group — freedom of religion and expression for me, but not for thee. Groups like this refuse to acknowledge the fact that the majority of “hate crimes” committed are against Jews, rather than Muslims. Meanwhile, they use the language of the left to perpetuate their status as victims.

I’m pleasantly surprised to see something like this published in a major newspaper. Perhaps the horrors of the Islamic State’s violent jihad overseas is causing Americans to take notice of the soft jihad going on all around them.

______________________

Islamophobia: It’s a growth industry

By Abraham H. Miller

June 10, 2015, 02:00 pm

The Hill

Taking time off from the crucifixions and decapitations to burn a Yazidi woman to death for refusing to perform a vile sex act, Islamic State’s home-field hard jihad is alive and well, while back at the University of California, Berkeley, the more palatable soft jihad is also alive and well.

The sixth annual Islamophobia conference was underway in a lecture hall sparsely populated by a complement of the usual suspects, women in hijabs and panel presenters working diligently to turn Islamophobia into another respected academic field based on oppression studies.

The gadfly of the movement is Berkeley instructor Hatem Bazian, a self-proclaimed authority on the subject. When not justifying Islamist violence in the streets of Europe as a response to Islamophobia or calling for an American Intifada from the streets of San Francisco, Bazian can be heard rattling off the names of Jewish donors to the Berkeley campus to show the alleged disproportionate influence of Jews in campus affairs. Bazian maintains a studied silence about the Saudi largess that sustains his own department of Near Eastern studies.

But then Bazian has seldom let facts intrude on an emotional appeal grounded in prejudice. Despite the fanfare about the supposed legitimacy of Islamic studies in the Oppression department, neither the presence of Islamophobia courses nor the data on ant-Islamic hate crimes seems to bear that out.

There is the inconvenient reality of FBI crime statistics. Of religious-oriented hate crimes, 62 percent are directed against Jews, and 12 percent — a distant second — are directed against Muslims. If one were to make the inferential leap that the same groups that target Jews in Europe target them in America and the anti-Semitism evident on campus does not stop at the campus gate, then it is clear who is responsible for a large portion of that anti-Semitism.

As Bazian prepares to run off to an Islamophobic conference in Paris, industry leader CAIR (Council of American Islamic Relations) launched a fundraising letter to rouse the faithful and the naïve to part with their money to stop the “threat” of Islamophobia.

Poster girl for the CAIR fundraising letter is Nina Rosenwald, a well-known philanthropist and granddaughter of Julius Rosenwald, the famed Chicago patron of African-American causes, who left half of his $68,000,000 fortune to African-American charities and partnered with Booker T. Washington to create Tuskegee University.

CAIR’s dispute with Rosenwald centers on her support for pro-Israel causes. To be pro-Israel is not to be anti-Muslim, as CAIR would have its donors believe. Among other charitable work, Rosenwald is actively involved in the American Friends of the Open University of Israel, a distance-learning program that provides access to higher education to all residents of Israel, regardless of faith or ethnicity.

If anything, it might be CAIR that should account for its activities. Its connections to Hamas, a listed terrorist group, do not make for credibility and are the source for the FBI ceasing connections with the self-proclaimed civil liberties group.

Recently, CAIR has been in the news opposing the showing of the biopic “American Sniper,” joining a chorus of Islamic campus voices that label it anti-Muslim. But, it would seem that either CAIR’s sensitivities are overdeveloped, or American servicemen like Sniper’s Chris Kyle are not deserving of heroic status.

While the two issues are not mutually exclusive, CAIR’s San Francisco chapter executive-director Zahra Billoo at least made it clear that she struggles each Memorial Day whether to honor American soldiers who died in wars that she considers unjust.

That kind of statement, like the outrage against the biopic of an American hero who kept some Muslims safe from other Muslims who wanted to kill them, undermines CAIR’s goal of making Islam a positive force in American life. It does far more harm to the status of Islam in America than the political positions, real or imaginary, of any group that Nina Rosenwald might fund.

Hatem Bazian does not speak for those Muslim students seeking to integrate into the fabric of American pluralistic society, who are not about exploiting a faux Islamophobia, but about getting a degree and contributing to the greater good. CAIR’s Zahra Billoo’s Memorial Day reflections do not honor the memory of those Muslim-American soldiers who died alongside their comrades in America’s wars.

The Bazians and Billoos notwithstanding, those of us who have taught in universities know that there are thousands of Muslim students who would never attend a Bazian political circus with its message of victimhood. Equally, the majority of Muslims in our community are concerned more about their future as Americans than about supporting Middle East terrorist groups.

Perhaps CAIR might consider showcasing some of these people rather than maligning a third-generation philanthropist as an Islamophobe simply because she disagrees with CAIR’s policies in the Middle East.

This is America. We can agree to disagree. CAIR is free to attack our heroes and our symbols, just as we are free to call them out for it. But if CAIR wants Americans to see Islam as a positive force in American life, it might want to rethink its message.

______________________

The Hill: Islamaphobia is a growth industry

ACT for America
869 Lynnhaven Parkway,
Suite 113, #411
Virginia Beach, VA 23452

About ACT for America

About Brigitte Gabriel

Donate to ACT for America

_____________________

Islamophobia: It’s a growth industry

Miller is an emeritus professor of political science, University of Cincinnati, and a senior fellow with the Salomon Center for American Jewish Thought. Follow @salomoncenter

Share this:

Like this:

Share this:

Like this:

Share this:

Like this:

Share this:

Like this:

Share this:

Like this:

Share this:

Like this:

Share this:

Like this:

Share this:

Like this:

Share this:

Like this:

Share this:

Like this: