Intro to Justin Smith Thoughts on Dangers of Islam


John R. Houk

© May 16, 2018

Justin Smith has sent two articles, some Justin quotes and some photos demonstrating the religion of Islam is diametrically opposed to anything Western Culture and opposed to any religion that is NOT Islamic, particularly Judaism and Christianity. Justin makes clear that he is in the Counterjihad camp that the label “Radical Islam” is a huge misdirect. The entirety of Islamic doctrine displayed in the Quran, Hadith and Sira (one could include Islamic theological theologians respected by current Muslim theologians such as respected Islamic Theologian Ibn Taymiyyah (Of interest: Ibn Taymiyya: the father of modern Muslim terrorism?Ibn Taymiyya’s Theodicy of Perpetual Optimism) and influential Islamic treatises such as “Reliance of the Traveller” By Ahmad ibn Naqib al-Misri. Here is a Traveller” analysis.

 

You will quickly discover that Justin his little tolerance with Counterjihadists (or multiculturalists for that matter that claim true Islam is not a terrorist ideology) that try to distinguish Moderate Islam from Radical Islam. It is my humble opinion when Counterjihadists make the distinction, it is out of political correctness. The reality is the theological tool of Islamic Dualism enables a Muslim to follow any peaceful dictates from the Quran, Hadith and Sira. But what the knowledgeable Muslim will not tell you is the Islamic theological term of Abrogation (See Also: “David Bukay on Islamic Abrogation” posted 6/21/08) can be used to override any Quranic peaceful tenet by the simple fact of the date of the of the newer displaces the older. Hence, all a peaceful Muslim needs to know to transform into a terrorist is to understand the Islamic principle of Abrogation.

 

I like Justin’s intro to his submission; hence I am using an except from his submission email as the intro to his own thoughts.

 

JRH 5/16/18

Please Support NCCR

************************

Some Items of Interest on Islam and Middle East Troubles

Assembled by Justin O. Smith

Sent 5/14/2018 1:16 PM

 

It is right and proper that America stands with Israel, because most of the current uproar against Her is steeped in the Islamic hatred for both Jews and Christians and the Islamic nations’ desire to wipe Israel from the face of the earth. Muslim Arabs cannot and never will accept a Sovereign Jewish State in the middle of an area that they have claimed for Islam and Allah, and since Israel was under the occupation of the Muslim hordes of the Ottoman Empire for so many centuries, today’s Muslims across the globe believe that this conquest makes Israel theirs and Allah’s until the end of days.

 

I think many readers will find these most revealing in a variety of ways, and if We are ever to turn away the evil growth of Islam in America, We Must Educate Our Citizenry to Islam’s EXISTENTIAL THREAT and the LIES that Islam has used to insulate itself and hide behind.

 

For all men and women capable of using their own ability to reason — Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new and I’ll show you that these things were only Evil and Inhuman; such was his command to spread this Islamic ideology and the so-called “faith” — this so-called “religion of peace” — he manufactured and delivered by the sword and mayhem, kidnappings and slavery, chaos, rape and murder. ~~~ Justin O Smith

++++++

 

The Clarion Project is a worthless entity in the fight to halt Islam and the terrorism that accompanies it, so long as the Clarion Project continues using the term “Radical Islam” as if Islam contains any component that does not demand its own supremacy above all ideologies and religions.

 

Even Islamic scholars, the theologians of Al Azhar and the Mullahs of Iran — even PM Tayyip Erdogan of Turkey, All Agree That There Is Not Any “moderate” or “radical” Islam. There IS ONLY ISLAM AS IT HAS ALWAYS BEEN FOR MORE THAN 1400 YEARS.

 

Islam is only “a religion of peace” so long as it and its evil and backward Sharia Law doctrines go unquestioned, unchallenged and accepted as infallible by the inhabitants of whatever domain it controls. Islam is only “a religion of peace” once all non-Muslims are either converted or murdered — in the streets, in their beds as they lay sleeping — trapped in cages and set on fire or hung from scaffolds and cranes, or simply decapitated and their heads placed on spiked poles in horrific fashion for the world to behold — ISLAM — in all its sick, perverse evil.~~~ Justin O Smith

++++++

US Embassy Move Helps the Fight Against Radical Islam

 

By MEIRA SVIRSKY 

May 14, 2018

Clarion Project

 

A new road sign showing the way to the new US Embassy in Jerusalem (Photo: THOMAS COEX/AFP/Getty Images)

 

Today, the United States moved its embassy in Israel from Tel Aviv to Israel’s capital city, Jerusalem. The move is significant – it marks a recognition of Jerusalem as Israel’s capital city by the U.S. and an end to the dispute of its status by the world’s foremost superpower.

 

The move is also significant in the battle against radical Islam. Here are four reasons why:

 

  1. The move marks an end the era of appeasement of radical Islamists

Congress passed the bipartisan Jerusalem Embassy Act in 1995 which required the U.S. Embassy in Israel to be located in Jerusalem. It was unanimously affirmed by the Senate in 2017.

 

Up until President Trump recognized Jerusalem as the capital of Israel, U.S. presidents declined to act on the bill, citing security concerns. That was a code word for appeasement of radical Islamists (as well as other Arab nationalists, like the Palestinian Authority, which conveniently pulls out Islamist tropes [Blog Editor: This is me admitting to literary ignorance. I had to look up “trope.”] for violent jihad when it suits their purposes).

 

As it has been proven historically, appeasement has only led to the emboldening of violent Islamists and has been the impetus for broad-scale and unrelenting terrorism, both against Israel and the U.S.

 

(The opposite is also true. Far from causing a world conflagration as predicted by various elements which have traditionally taken the appeasement route, the recognition by Trump that Jerusalem is the capital of Israel passed with narry [sic] a whimper in the Arab world.)

 

The embassy move is a message to Islamists: There will be no more appeasement.

 

  1. The move puts Islamists on notice that the US president keeps his word

Former president Obama famously vowed the use of chemical weapons in Syria was his red line. When Syrian President Assad pulled out the weapons and used them on his own people, Obama reneged on his promise to take action, serving to embolden the Syrian despot even further.

 

That’s just one example.

 

World powers have already gotten the idea that Trump is a force to be reckoned with. One gets the idea that his saber rattling against North Korea was not a bunch of empty promises, as we have already witnessed substantial progress with North Korea, from their willingness to come to the table to talk about getting rid of their nuclear weapons to the release of political prisoners to the U.S.

 

  1. The move tells Iran, Hamas, Hezbollah and the rest of the Islamist world that the US is serious about standing up to them

Jason Greenblatt, a key player in Trump’s Mideast negotiating team, said the move “show(s) that America will always stand with Israel.”

 

Said another way, the move demonstrates in a dramatic way (i.e., going against the stance of the European Union) that it supports a country that actually fights radical Islam instead of giving it lip service.

 

Tiny Israel has risked war with Iran by not crossing its own red lines – which, at the moment, have to do with making sure that Iranian forces and their advanced weapons are not knocking on Israel’s borders or being transferred to Israel’s enemies like Hezbollah. To this end, Israel has repeatedly attacked Iranian installations in Syria and been willing to face the consequences.

 

Similarly, Israel is currently showing the world it will not back down when threatened by the Islamist terror organization Hamas on its southern border.

 

  1. The move is a way to get radical Islamists to accept reality and move on

Greenblatt also noted the move is “not a departure from our strong commitment to facilitate a lasting peace deal. Rather, it is a necessary condition for it.”

 

In other words, the Arab World needs to accept the reality of the State of Israel, make peace with it and stop using the issue as an excuse for not getting their own houses in order.

 

We see this has already happened in the Sunni states of Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates and Egypt. Under tremendous and potentially disastrous threats from not only from their own radical elements but from Iran, these states have chosen to accept (and even embrace) the reality of the State of Israel, which they rightly believe can help them win these battles.

+++++++++++++++

Blog Editor: Justin originally linked to the below video via the Gatestone Institute. I’m not exactly sure where Justin got the first paragraph, but the second paragraph is from the GI page. The GI page is dated 5/14/18 9:30 am

 

Too often these scenes of chaos and mayhem are staged and there are high tech cameras and film equipment operating behind the scenes, almost as though on a movie set.

 

If Palestinians managed to breach the fence, they will presumably kill and capture as many Israelis as possible, while calling it a “return.” If Palestinians are killed, Hamas can always blame Israel.

 

VIDEO — Behind the Smokescreen: Hamas Unrest in Gaza

 

Posted by Pierre Rehov

Published on May 4, 2018

 

From inside Gaza, the reality of the so called “peaceful demonstrations”. Watch Hamas hate speeches. See how they build their propaganda at the expense of brainwashed, deceived and manipulated unfortunate people. Understand why Israel has no choice but to protect itself using lethal force

 

++++++++++++++++++

Muslim “palestinian” protesters run away from tear gas near the border fence separating Israel and the Gaza Strip on May 11. (Marcus Yam / Los Angeles Times)

++++++++++++++++

Amazingly, not a single elected Democrat is here to celebrate this historic event in Jerusalem, a bonafide [sic] signal that they do not stand with Israel.

This snub will not soon be forgotten—not in America or abroad.
#USEmbassyJerusalem #PromisesMade #PromisesKept
Candace Owens

Candace Owens- JP front pg. of Trump Keep Promises Made about Jerusalem

+++++++

There is nothing “extremist” about this view. This is Mainstream Islam thinking. ~~~ Justin O Smith 

++++++++++++++++++

U.S. Muslim preacher: “Soon, America will be ours”

 

By Pamela Geller

May 13, 2018

Geller Report

 

White House with Muslim Terrorist Flag

 

“In a few centuries, in Syria, where more than 90% percent of the population were Christians, and in Iran where an overwhelming majority of citizens were Zoroastrians, the demography drastically shifted to majority-Muslim. Neither nation could have anticipated such a change.”

 

And here in the United States: “The number of Muslims in the US has increased by 40% in just five years — between 2010-2015 — while in the same period the non-Muslim population of the US has grown by only five percent.”

 

You see who is responsible for this: the man who was President of the United States during those years. He is the one who pursued reckless immigration policies that have placed the U.S. in this situation. He is the one who remains responsible for the great strife and violence that his actions will be bringing to America for generations to come.

 

“Radicalism: The Real Shock Was the Reaction of the Americans…,” by Majid Rafizadeh, Gatestone Institute, May 12, 2018:

 

“Soon,” said the letter, “America Will Be Ours”.

 

“Ours?”

 

The writer, it became clear, was an extremist Muslim in the U.S. who claimed to be a reputable religious preacher. With each new word, concern grew.

 

He pointed out, throughout the letter, the “sinful” ways of the West: dancing, drinking, dating…

 

He expressed disgust that most women did not wear the hijab or participate in prayer five times a day. Then he got straight to the point: “Ours,” he explained, represented Muslims like him.

 

The sentiment is hardly a new one. A person hears similar proclamations from many Muslim extremists throughout the years. The real shock was not letter but the reaction of many Americans after seeing it.

 

Such a thing, they said, could never happen. The writer’s words were “just bluster,” nothing to be taken seriously. Most surprisingly, they stated — honestly — that Muslims who speak of such intentions do not really mean what they say, so these threats should not be cause for concern.

 

The history of the two nations where I grew up — Iran and Syria — taught all of us there a big lesson about living in this kind of ignorance: the reality of how quickly a nation can be consumed by the philosophies of a religious state. An authoritarian and malicious regime, as exists now in Iran — the world’s leading sponsor of terrorism and brutal even to its own people — is something we cannot forget.

 

In a few centuries, in Syria, where more than 90% percent of the population were Christians, and in Iran where an overwhelming majority of citizens were Zoroastrians, the demography drastically shifted to majority-Muslim. Neither nation could have anticipated such a change.

 

While many may underestimate the radical preacher’s claims that “Soon, America Will Be Ours”, for extremist Muslims these beliefs are strongly and deeply rooted.

 

Many extremists believe that their religious desire — for a “Muslim takeover of the White House, a directive from Muhammad himself ” — is coming true in the US. Religiously speaking, for these Muslims, ruling America is Allah’s (God’s) word, a sacred promise is coming to fruition.

 

A recent survey and demographic research released by the Pew Research Center found that Muslims will soon overtake members of other religions, including Jews, as the second-largest religious group in the United States.

 

This issue should not be taken lightly. What does being the second-largest religion in a country mean? Voters impact local and national politics, swing domestic elections, elect more representatives from the same religious affiliation, are influential enough to determine who the next president of the United States may be, and change the laws of the land. All it takes is a subtle shift in power for the entire society, political system and culture of a nation to be changed.

 

The number of Muslims in the US has increased by 40% in just five years — between 2010-2015 — while in the same period the non-Muslim population of the US has grown by only five percent. This means that the Muslim population is growing almost eight times faster than the non-Muslim population in the US….

 

Pamela Geller’s shocking new book, “FATWA: HUNTED IN AMERICA” is now available on Amazon. It’s Geller’s tell all, her story – and it’s every story – it’s what happens when you stand for freedom today. Buy it. Now. Here.

________________________

Intro to Justin Smith Thoughts on Dangers of Islam

John R. Houk

© May 16, 2018

________________

Some Items of Interest on Islam and Middle East Troubles

 

Edited by John R. Houk

Most text embraced by brackets are by the Editor. Some source links are by the Editor. Most source links originated from original posts.

 

Compiled by Justin O. Smith

 

It’s Time to Take a Stand


Here’s a Bill Warner moment thanks to his email list.

 

The message of the email is “It’s Time to Take a Stand”. Warner cites the bravery of some Europeans willing to stand up to Leftist Multiculturalist rule of law that makes exposing the Islam a hate-crime. Thus, Free Speech becomes illegal and can result in fines, jail or both.

 

Then Warner links to his latest Political Islam mini-teaching video just short of five minutes entitled, “We Need Heroes”. I sense you see Warner’s theme.

 

AND NOW, the cross post.

 

JRH 3/9/18

Please Support NCCR

***************

It’s Time to Take a Stand

 

By Bill Warner

Sent March 9, 2018 4:31 AM

Sent by Political Islam

 

The power of a few courageous people is not to be underestimated.

We have many web sites, videos and news outlets where we accumulate articles on the problems posed by political Islam.  What we don’t have enough of is personal courage to go public. Too many of us choose to suffer and whine, saying “Bye-bye Sweden”, “stick a fork in Germany, it’s done” and “the U.S. is next.”

 

This defeatist attitude allows for our cowardice to overwhelm our courage. It keeps us from standing up and proclaiming the truth. We need to find inspiration in what a few activist women did in Berlin, the brave women of Iran who dared remove their hijabs, or women like Miriam in Kandel, Germany [Link needs translated from German] and Uta in Hamburg, Germany who mobilized a movement with something as simple as a sign. What they all have in common is they were willing to take a stand, out in the open for all to see.

 

Take heart from these courageous souls and when you are at dinner, parties, church, or any gathering where you can bring up the topic of political Islam, think of them and speak the truth. Be willing to say something and suffer the consequences because in the end, it will be up to the common man to save our civilization. To this end, we must take a stand, we have to, because what we have is far too precious to lose.

 

++++

VIDEO: We Need Heroes

 

Posted by Political Islam

Uploaded on Mar 7, 2018

 

Join Bill Warner’s newsletter at http://eepurl.com/cKjOdD Buy Bill’s books at: www.politicalislam.com/shop

 

[From Political Islam link]

 

We Need Heroes

Mar 7, 2018 | by Bill Warner

 

I just got through watching a video by one of my personal heroes, Anni Cyrus. Now, why do I call her a hero? Well, I did something very unusual this week. I went to see a movie about Jihad in Europe called the 15:17 to Paris. These were real heroes because these were flawed people. People who have their own problems, but when the time came to be courageous, they moved in the face of fear. Now before this video where a lot of previews of movies that are coming to this theater and I was struck by, although they talk about heroes leaves are not real heroes. These are computer graphics heroes. These are artificial people who are super heroes. So those are real heroes, but people like Anni Cyrus and the men on the train to Paris where now this was a video in which a man talked about his objections to what Anni had said in the lecture about Sharia.

 

Now he’s not capable of really talking about Islam. So he comes back to talk about Muslims. Muslims he has known and what they said, now he doesn’t know it, but he’s displaying as ignorance because he thinks that whatever a Muslim says is Islam. That is very advantageous. Why? Because you can find a Muslim who will say what you want to hear so you can say Islam is what you want it to be, but there’s only one Muslim accounts listened to Mohamed and this man knew nothing about Muhammad. He’s also confused about cause and effect. Now a scientist and I love cause and effect, so let me address this problem. As long creates Muslims. Muslims do not create Islam, so people start talking about Muslims when they don’t know anything about the Koran, the Sira and hadith. What’s really strange in any experiences, this, when you quote Koran and Hadith, how did they call you?

A hater is not strange. I’m one of America’s top Islamophobes. Why? Because I say what Islam says. I say what Muhammad said and did. Then it comes back to the standard argument, but it all depends on how you interpret it. Well, let’s take an interpretation moment. Some men came to Muhammad and wound up converting to Islam and then leaving Islam and stealing his camels. Mohammed had their hands and feet cut off cauterized so they wouldn’t bleed to death, but at their eyes with hot nails then throw them in the sun on sharp rocks to die of starvation. Now, how do you interpret that? Well, here’s one interpretation, but in our [inaudible] can cause you to get killed, which is one of the reasons I say Anni Cyrus as a hero.

 

Then our man, the opponent of Annie says, well, what about this bad stuff in the Bible too? Well, this is a standard riff comparative religion. They don’t know anything about Islam. So they talk about what they do know, which is a religion usually either Judaism or Christianity. Now I’ve had this happen in my lectures and so what I tell him is, sir, this is a lecture on Islam. You have to lecture on comparative religion. It’s down the hall to the right. So what these people are doing is they don’t know anything about Islam. So they talk about what they do know and they wind up waving and saying, oh well all religions are bad, but then they pull out their ace in the hole, they know a verse of the Koran, and so they quoted, this is truly the market beginners because they don’t understand that the Koran, that dualistic document, Muhammad preached a religion of peace for 13 years in Mecca and converted about a hundred and 50 people.

 

He then moved to Medina where we became a politician on a jihadist. He committed some 95 acts of jihad, but when he died he was a complete success. And all the Arabs are Muslims. So what did we learn from this? Islam is a religion of peace and the politics of jihad, but those contradict each other. Yes. That’s the nature of dualism. Then he says, well, you think that she really will take over this country? Well, there’s not a chance of that. Well, this man says in another way, I don’t want to think about Islamic history. Islamic innovated while we call Turkey and 1453. It took centuries for Turkey to become completely Sharia compliant. But it happened, you see, this law of Islamic saturation wants Islam enter into society given enough time, centuries, it will become completely Islamic. Now, this man’s arguments are so standard and yet he thinks he’s so intelligent and so original and virtuous.

 

Then here’s the moral of the story. Don’t talk about Muslims. Talk about Islam, and you be brave enough to talk about Islam even though you’re going to be called a bigot, a hater, or a racist, Islamophobe. You can be a hero to speak the truth.

+++++

Further Reading From Email

 

 

 

____________________

[Blog Editor: It appears to me the text from the video was produced via voice recognition software. I tried not to alter the text. You may notice a better word could have been used in reading the text.]

 

© 2007-2018 CSPI, LLC. all rights reserved. 

 

 What is Islam?

 

Islam is a cultural, religious and political system. Only the political system is of interest to kafirs (non-Muslims) since it determines how we are defined and treated. The Islamic political system is contained in the Koran, the Hadith (the traditions of Mohammed) and his biography, the Sira.

 

CSPI

 

Center for the Study of Political Islam (CSPI) is an educational organization dedicated to enlightening the general public about the doctrine of political Islam based on the works of Dr. Bill Warner.

 

Our Mission

 

Political Islam has subjugated other civilizations for 1400 years. Our mission is to educate the world about political Islam, its founder Mohammed, his political doctrine and his god, Allah.

 

The Five Principles

 

Islam’s Trilogy of three sacred texts is the Koran and two books about the life of Mohammed. When the Trilogy is sorted, categorized, arranged, rewritten and analyzed, it becomes apparent that five principles are the foundation of Islam.

 

All of Islam is based upon the Trilogy—KoranSira (Mohammed’s biography) and Hadith (his Traditions).


Most of the Islamic doctrine is political, not religious. Islam is a political ideology.

 

Islam divides the READ THE REST

 

Countering Islamic Apologist with Truth


Insanity & Consequence of Islam

 

John R. Houk

© April 17, 2015

 

Zaheer Baig posted a comment on my “About Page” on my WordPress blog called NeoConservative Christian Right (NCCR). Raig is an apologist for Islam and is pursuing the deceptive (or self-deceived) line that Islam is peace and goes on to include other Quranic lies pertaining that Biblical persons were and always have been Islamic:

 

Zaheer Baig | April 14, 2015 at 2:26 AM

 

Islam is a natural way of life that encourages one to give due attention to their relationship with God and His creation. Islam teaches that it is through the doing of good deeds and seeking the pleasure of God that souls find true happiness and peace. It is in this context that the word Islam derives from the root word “salam,” or peace.

God sent Prophets to teach mankind how to worship Him; starting with Adam, including Noah, Abraham, Moses, Jesus and the last of the messengers, Muhammad (peace be upon them all). The Islamic position is that all of these prophets came with the same message, that there is no deity worthy of worship except the One True God, known in Arabic as Allah.

 

Vlad Tepes found an interesting quote about Islam from the irreligious yet seeker of a self-satisfactory answer about that which is divine – Voltaire (1694-1777):

 

“The Koran teaches fear, hatred, contempt for others, murder as a legitimate means for the dissemination and preservation of this satanic doctrine, it talks ill of women, classifies people into classes, calls for blood and ever more blood. Yet, that a camel trader sparks uproar in his tribe, that he wants to make his fellow citizens believe that he talked to the archangel Gabriel; that he boasted about being taken up into heaven and receiving a part of that indigestible book there, which can shake common sense on every page, that to gain respect for this work, he covers his country with fire and iron, that he strangles fathers, drags away daughters, that he leaves the beaten a free choice between death and his faith: now this is certainly something that no-one can excuse, unless he came as a Turk into the world, unless superstition has stifled any natural light of reason in him. ”

 

Voltaire (1694-1788) Translation by SIMONXML from “ISLAM – Dem Untergang geweiht” by Thomas K. Luther, p.24. (Voltaire quote on Islam from the 1700s; Posted by Eeyore; Vlad Tepes; 4/16/15 – Bold text by Editor JRH)

 

Voltaire was no friend of Christianity or any revealed religion including Islam. And yet he was also wise enough to provide an astute observation of that theopolitical religion’s Quran. In the first paragraph I called Zaheer Baig deceptive; however I also gave him (actually I don’t know if the person is male or female) the benefit of the doubt by throwing in parentheses “self-deceptive”. I mention this because there are a number of Muslims that toe the line about “Islam is Peace”. Frankly if you examine the Islamic writings as did Voltaire you will discover that Islam is so far from peace that is laughable not to exchange “peace” for “violent”.

 

To be clear though deceiving or self-deceived Muslims will tell a non-Muslim (Islam labels as kafir) that Islam is peace and quote Quranic references that show a shining light of a religion that embraces a brotherhood who has an opportunity to submit and worship their deity Allah which in turns provides the assurance of peace.

 

At al-Islam.org there is a demonstration ecstatic relationship between Allah perceived as the Creator and that deity’s so-called creation:

 

 

We cannot understand certain questions in this regard unless we know what sort of relationship there exists between Allah and the creation. …

 

Anyhow the relationship between Allah and the creation is not of the sort that exists, for example, between father and son, that is between two things existing independently but related to each other. The sun and its rays are an example of a closer relationship. In this case also the sun and its rays are two different things, each having a separate existence to some extent. Man and his mental and physical faculties are an example of another kind of relationship.

 

Even in this case man and his faculties are not identical, though they are closely related. Unlike all these examples, the relationship between the existing things and Allah, Who is the source of their existence, is of quite a different kind and cannot be compared to any of the relationships mentioned above. At several places in the Qur’an and the traditions the relationship between Allah and His creation has been described as Allah’s glory. The Qur’an says:

 

When his Lord revealed His glory to the mountain. (Surah al-A’raf, 7:143).

 

There is a sentence in the Samat Supplication which says:

 

‘By the light of Your glory You revealed to the mountain and thus sent it down crashing…’

 

 

Meanings of Al-Hamd

 

We said earlier that the first possibility about the definite article in al-Hamdu is that it might be denoting comprehensiveness. In that case hamd (praise) would mean all praises, and the word ‘hamd’ as well as the word, ‘ism’ will have a sense of multitude. From this point of view ‘al-hamdu lillahi’ would mean that every praise that is made is that of Allah, for it is always the praise of some aspect of His manifestation or glory.

 

The sun manifests itself in its rays. Man is manifested in his seeing and hearing faculties. Allah manifests Himself far more clearly in every creation of His. Therefore, when anything is praised actually a manifestation of Allah’s glory is praised.

 

As all the existing things are the signs of Allah, they are His names. According to the second possibility we mentioned, the meaning would be diametrically different, and ‘al-hamdu lillahi’ would signify that no praise made by any praiser was that of Allah, although in this case also His glory is revealed in all the objects which are praised. But our praise cannot be absolute, nor are we capable of praising the Absolute Being.

 

Anyhow, as all pluralities are lost and absorbed in the unity of the Absolute Being, it may be said that from one angle even in this case it is the Absolute Being that is praised. The only difference is … (Light Within Me: Part 3.2: Relationship between Allah and His Creation; By Ayatullah Murtadha Mutahhari; Allamah Sayyid Muhammad Husayn at-Tabataba’i, and Ayatullah Sayyid Imam Ruhallah al-Musawi al-Khomeini; Al-Islam.org [Shi’ite website]; Copyright Ahlul Bayt Digital Islamic Library Project 1995 – 2015)

 

WOW! If you are a person searching for divine attunement with an eternal deity that provides inner peace and inner fulfillment this sounds alluringly enticing. You’ll figure out that this represents Shi’ite theopolitical theology which in full disclosure probably represents only about 10% of Islam, but the significance is the deception is an English translation of some big dogs from Iran. Also it is crap compared the part of Islam that abrogates these enticing words.

 

Take note the alluring enticement is also among the Sunni that roughly represent about 90% of Islam as well:

 

 

The Sunni ideology is directly related to the doctrine of monotheism, in which the relationship between God and the elements of nature, either humanity or even non-living beings, is that of a continuous state of complete submission and worshipping from the side of the created to God, the Creator:

 

[Blog Editor: This essay gives the translation for Quran 17:44 but mistakenly sources Quran 44:17. Or the essay author sets the Surah first than the chapter but I don’t think so.]

 

This relationship of servitude takes place without any merging or sharing of the divine nature by the Creator and his creation, but it takes place while God is completely outside of and beyond the world.

 

According to the Sunni ideology, God is God and man is man. Their relationship is very close. …

 

But this closeness does not imply identification between the two. Moreover, orthodox Sunni belief tends to hold a transcendental vision of Godhead in the way it believes that Allah does not resemble his creation. Allah describes Himself in Quran saying:

 

Quran 42: 11

 

This verse of the Quran encompasses that Allah is completely different from His creation in His attributes and actions.

 

Any created being, either man or any other element of nature, is liable to materialistic measures of existence, i.e. time and place which cannot be ascribed to Godhead. God exists but without a place. …

 

 

Although the relationship between God and man is that of servitude and submission to God’s will, it is not to be of subjugation or humiliation. On the contrary, it is of trust and respect. In the following long verse Allah the Almighty sheds light on the special and intimate relationship between Him and man amongst the other creations. He says:

 

Quran 2:30-34

 

We learn from these verses that God created humans with the purpose of being God’s vicegerents and trustees on earth.

 

 

According to the Sunni conception of God and His relationship with nature, nature is not the manifestation of God but of His infinite wisdom, capability and empowerment.

 

God has created nature in this perfect form as signs of His existence which guides humanity to strengthen their belief in Him. Allah the … (God, Nature, and Humanity; By Amani Aboul Fadl Farag; OnIslam.net; 2012/10/30)

 

Okay, I realize I probably overshared on Shia and Sunni subject pertaining to the allure of Islam, but you need to understand just how sugarcoated the deception is and the nature of the theology is taught to Muslim adherents who should know that the Quran, Hadith and Sira are very violent against Muslims AND toward Muslims who deviate from the submission standards that make Islam theopolitical.

 

The reality is Islam is a dualistic theological ideology that mixes the standard of political governance in its submission process. The short explanation for this dualism is that two opposite Quranic statements or commands are both correct depending on the circumstances presented to the Muslim.

 

Not only are there two Korans, Meccan and Medinan, that are different in tone and subject matter, but also the Koran has many verses that contradict each other.

 

Koran 2:219 says that Muslims should be tolerant and forgiving to People of the Book.
Koran 9:29 says to attack the People of the Book until they pay the jizyah, the dhimmi tax, submit to Sharia law and be humbled.

 

Which verse shows the true nature of Islam?

 

The Koran recognizes its contradictions and even gives a rule to resolve the contradictions. The later verse abrogates (supersedes) the earlier verse. This does not mean, however, that the earlier verse is wrong or in error. This would be impossible since the fundamental hypothesis is that Allah created the Koran and, hence, the earlier verse must be true or Allah would be wrong.

 

 

But, the earlier verse is true and still used. Abrogation does not negate the early verse. Indeed, the earlier “peaceful” verse that is abrogated is the one most apt to be used in public discourse.

 

… In Koranic logic, two statements can contradict each other and both are true. This is dualistic logic.

 

 

… Duality includes the special case of abrogation and it explains how the entire doctrine of Koran and Sunna work. It is not just the Koran that is contradictory, but all of the Sunna. 

 

… (Statistical Islam Part 5 of 9 – Abrogation and Dualism; By Bill Warner; Political Islam; 12/2/10)

 

In an earlier post by Bill Warner on Islamic Dualism he writes:

 

 

The Koran defines an Islamic logic that is dualistic. … … so in dualistic logic. All of the doctrine refers to two classes of people–Muslims and non-Muslims, kafirs. The doctrine that applies to kafirs is political in nature and is rarely neutral or positive. The part of the doctrine that applies to Muslims is cultural, legal, and religious.

 

The second grand division of Islamic doctrine is into religious Islam and political Islam. It is surprising how much of the doctrine is political. Approximately 67% of the Meccan Koran and 51% of the Medinan Koran is political. About 75% of the Sira is about what was done to the kafir. Roughly 20% of the Hadith is about jihad, a political act.

 

… (Duality and Political Islam; Bill Warner; Political Islam; 10/26/07)

 

You should also read “Peace or Jihad? Abrogation in Islam,” by David Bukay.

 

Zaheer Baig further asserts that Islam is derived from the Arabic salaam (he/she spelled it “salam”) which means peace, BUT is it true that Islam is derived from salaam?

 

 

The word Islam derives from the Arabic triconsonantal root sīn-lām-mīm (SLM [ س ل م ]). Many different words are created from this root word by inserting different vowels between the three root consonants. Many English speakers wrongly assume that if two Arabic words share the same root word then their meanings are related when in reality the fact that some words share the same root word does not imply a relationship between the meanings of the words. For instance, all of these words are derived from the root S-L-M:

 

o   Islam = Submission

 

o   Salam = Well-being/Peace

 

o   (Derivation of) Salama = To be saved or to escape from danger (when refering to a female)

 

o   Saleem = To be saved or to escape from danger (when refering to a male)

 

o   Aslam = To submit

 

o   Istaslama = To surrender

 

o   Musal = Undisputed

 

o   Tasleem = To receive a salutation or becoming submitted

 

Many people have wrongly attempted to equate the word Islam with peace by showing that Islam, meaning ‘submission’, shares a root word with Salaam, meaning ‘peace’. But if such relationships between the meanings of Arabic words can be created then that would imply that there is a relationship between one of the derivations of the infinitive Salama, meaning the stinging of the snake or tanning the leather, and Salam, meaning peace; a relationship which obviously does not exist.

 

The Compendium of Muslim Texts, compiled by the USC-MSA, the Muslim Students Association at the University of Southern California,[1] confirms READ THE REST (The Meaning of Islam; Updated by Axius; WikiIslam; page was last modified 15:59, 6 February 2014)

 

Mo recited Biblical stories but noticeably transformed those stories to fit a perception that validated Allah as the true god, Mo as the last prophet and the other Judeo-Christian faiths based on the Bible as corrupted and corrected by Mo’s prophetic words eventually edited and turned into the Quran. That should send up a red flag in the believability factor. Duped original Arabs fell for Mo’s line and Biblically knowledgeable Jews and Christians often paid with their lives knowing Mo was a false prophet.

 

,,,

 

The Quran alters stories and beliefs taught in the Christian Bible

 

… The Old and New Testament stories are anointed as divine messages from “prophets”, but the stories and beliefs those prophets introduced are noticeably altered before Islam’s holy book takes a new tack, condemning the people, message, and beliefs of both Judaism and Christianity.

 

 

The Quran tells different versions of New Testament stories

 

The Quran promotes its own modified view of Christianity and Jesus’ life. The Quran expands on Mary’s life, introduces new tales of Jesus’ early life, and goes to great lengths to deemphasize Jesus as a divine figure, proclaiming he was simply another “Messenger” (like Muhammad). In fact, Islam teaches its followers that Jesus’ crucifixion did not occur but rather was a cunning deception.

 

The Quran tells different versions of Old Testament stories

 

According to the Quran, God revealed new details of Old Testament stories to Muhammad. In particular, events surrounding Adam and Eve, Abraham, Lot, Joseph, Jacob, Noah, and numerous other minor Old Testament characters are revised. Most Old Testament stories related in the Quran are similar to the Christian (and Jewish) versions but with additional, surprising details “revealed by God” to Muhammad (these new versions of Old Testament stories are often repeated several times throughout the Quran).

 

 

Initial acceptance of other religions (e.g. Jewish, Christian)

 

Initially the Quran accommodates other religions and in particular, accepts the word of the Old and New Testaments as messages from God. While initially seeming tolerant of Jewish and Christian beliefs, it quickly reveals that the Quran has the authority to override Old and New Testament teachings.

 

 

The Muslim version of heaven

 

The Muslim vision of heaven differs slightly from the typical Christian depiction. In fact, there are seven heavens mentioned in the Quran (a concept carried over from the Jewish Talmud).

 

 

The Quran notes that people are “ranked” in heaven according to the number and quality of good deeds they do, and many Muslims believe this ranking dictates which “heaven” you will be admitted to.

 

In most instances, heaven is described as a “garden wherein streams flow”, a peaceful place where those granted entry can live an existence of luxury amongst flowing rivers, fruit trees, servants, and as noted in one verse, young virgin women. Notice that there is no mention of “72 virgins for every man” in the Quran. This often-quoted number comes from a hadith, a sort of eye-witness commentary on the Quran and life of Muhammad.

 

… Quite Lengthy but READ ENTIRETY (A Christian guide to the Quran – the surprising truth behind the religion of Islam; Bible Blender; 2/10/15)

 

Zaheer Baig mentions these names from the Quran that are also in the Old and New Testaments of the Bible: Adam, Noah, Abraham, Moses and Jesus:

 

Adam

 

·         In the Bible, God tells the man to name the animals.[22] In the Qur’an, God teaches Adam the names “of all things” and Adam repeats them.[15]

 

·         In the second of the Bible’s creation stories, the woman is created from the rib of the man. In the Qur’an, Eve is not mentioned by name, but it states that all mankind were created from one soul (Adam).[23][24]

 

·         In the Bible, the forbidden tree named is the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil (3:5), and while its fruit is often depicted as an apple, the Bible does not describe the fruit.[25] In the Qur’an the forbidden tree is not named but Shaitaan calls it The Tree of Eternity to deceive Adam and his wife.[15]

 

·         In the Bible, God creates man in His own image.[26] In the Qur’an, God says “Surely the likeness of (Prophet) Isa(Jesus in Bible) is with God as the likeness of Adam; He created him from dust, then said to him, Be, and he was.”[8]

 

·         In the Qur’an, God tells the angels to prostrate before Adam (as a sign of respect and obedience), but Iblis (thereafter referred to as Shaitaan) refuses.[27] In the Bible, no such account is given.

 

·         According to the Bible, because of God’s curse, serpents have to crawl and eat dust, women have to suffer in childbirth, and men have to sweat for a living. The Biblical story also states that women will suffer from periods and will bear pregnancy pain.[28] This apparently differentiates blessing and obedience from pain and sinning. According to the Qur’an, no such curse was issued. The difficulties of life on earth are what makes it different from life in paradise. (Adam and Eve (آدم Adam and حواء Hawwaa); Wikipedia)

 

Cain and Able or (Qābīl and Hābīl)

 

The story of Cain and Abel

 

·         After Cain killed his brother Abel, The Quran says that “Allah sent a raven who scratched the ground to show him how to hide the shame of his brother.” Surah 5:31. This is not mentioned in the Bible. (The Bible vs. The Quran: The Story of Cain and Abel; By Abdullah al Araby; Islam Review)

 

Noah

 

·         The Qur’an focuses on a dialogue between Noah and the wicked (Hud 11:32–37), in which Noah unsuccessfully attempts to remonstrate with his countrymen, who reject his message. Genesis does not mention such a dialogue. (In the Christian Bible, 2Peter2:5, Noah is called a “preacher of righteousness”.)

 

·         In the Qur’an, Noah’s wife and one of his sons reject him (Hud 11:43) and die in the flood, while some people outside his family are faithful and join him (Hud 11:42). In the biblical narrative, Noah’s wife together with his three sons and their wives all board the Ark, but no others.

 

·         In the Qur’an, there is no such indication that the flood was universal, although many Islamic scholars claim to interpret otherwise.

 

·         In the Qur’an, the Ark is said to rest on the hills of Mount Judi (Hud 11:44); in the Bible, it is said to rest on the mountains of Ararat (Gen. 8:4) The Al-Djoudi (Judi) is apparently a mount in the Biblical mountain range of Ararat. The Qur’an cites a particular mount in the Ararat Range, whereas the Bible just mentions the Ararat Range by name. There is a Mount Al-Djoudi in the present-day Ararat mountain range in Turkey. (Noah (نوح Nūḥ); Wikipedia)

 

Abraham

 

·         In Genesis, the sacrificial son is Isaac, whereas in the Qur’an it is Ishmael (Ismā’īl إسماعيل), since it first narrates this story, followed by the account (mentioned above) of Abraham receiving the tidings of a son, Isaac (As-Saaffat 37:102–112. Therefore, Muslims believe the sacrificial son was Ishmael (Ismā’īl إسماعيل) and that this event happened prior to Isaac’s birth. It may be added that the name Abraham is a literary trope in Genesis Ab- “father-of(-many-nations)” while the Arabic name masks the connection. In the New Testament the son is Isaac (James 2:21).

 

·         While God seems to speak directly to Abraham in Genesis, He speaks through a vision in the Qur’an.

 

·         In the Qur’an, Abraham directly tells his son Ishmael (Ismā’īl إسماعيل) that he intends to sacrifice him. In Genesis, Abraham tells Isaac, that “God will provide the sacrifice.” (Abraham (Ibrāhīm ابراهيم); Wikipedia)

 

Isaac and Ishmael – Child of Promise?

 

·         Isaac was the only promised child of Abraham, a fact which the Quran agrees with (cf. Genesis 17:15-21; Surah 11:69-73, 37:112-113, 51:24-30). Ishmael was never a promised child.

 

·         Isaac was conceived miraculously to a barren mother and a very aged father, with the Quran likewise agreeing (cf. Genesis 17:15-17, 18:9-15, 21:1-7; Galatians 4:28-29; Surah 11:69-73, 51:24-30). Ishmael was conceived normally without the need of any miraculous intervention.

 

·         God promised that it would be Isaac’s descendants who would inherit the land given to Abraham. (Genesis 13:14-18, 15:18-21, 28:13-14). Ishmael had no part in the inheritance and promise given to Isaac through Abraham. (Abraham and the Child of Sacrifice – Isaac or Ishmael? By Sam Shamoun; Answering Islam)

 

The TRUE Word of God on Isaac and Ishmael:

 

21 Tell me, you who desire to be under the law, do you not hear the law? 22 For it is written that Abraham had two sons: the one by a bondwoman, the other by a freewoman. 23 But he who was of the bondwoman was born according to the flesh, and he of the freewoman through promise, 24 which things are symbolic. For these are the[a] two covenants: the one from Mount Sinai which gives birth to bondage, which is Hagar— 25 for this Hagar is Mount Sinai in Arabia, and corresponds to Jerusalem which now is, and is in bondage with her children— 26 but the Jerusalem above is free, which is the mother of us all.

 

28 Now we, brethren, as Isaac was, are children of promise. 29 But, as he who was born according to the flesh then persecuted him who was born according to the Spirit, even so it is now. 30 Nevertheless what does the Scripture say? “Cast out the bondwoman and her son, for the son of the bondwoman shall not be heir with the son of the freewoman.”[a] 31 So then, brethren, we are not children of the bondwoman but of the free. (Galatians 4: 21-26, 28-31 NKJV)

 

Moses

 

·         The Biblical Moses is reluctant to become a prophet and makes excuses. He eventually agrees and Aaron speaks and performs miracles at first until Moses is ready and takes over. In Quran, Aaron was made God’s messenger on Moses’ request to back him up in the difficult task. Moses asked God to give him human support from Family, then ask for Aaron (his brother) praising Aaron by saying that he (Aaron) is better speaker than him (Moses).

 

·         The sorcerers, in the Quranic story, repent after seeing Moses’ signs and submit to God at the anger of Pharaoh.

 

·         In the Quran, Pharaoh didn’t repent but tried to deceive Moses and God by saying that now he believes in one God, the God of Moses and Aaron (while drowning). But God didn’t accept this because he sought repentance at the time of death after seeing the angels.

 

·         In the Bible, Moses first goes to Pharaoh without showing any signs.

 

·         In Exodus, Aaron helps make the golden calf. In the Quran, Aaron himself was a messenger of God and was representing Moses in his absences. He opposed that idea with all his might and warned the Israelites that God will be angry with them. In the Qur’an, a person named Samiri (not to be confused with Samaritans) leads the Israelites to worship the golden calf.

 

·         Pharaoh drowns in Exodus. In the Quran, Pharaoh drowned as well, but God said in the Qur’an that he preserved the pharaoh’s body as an example for generations to come (or made an example for coming generations) (Moses (Mūsā موسى); Wikipedia)

 

Jesus Christ the Son of God

 

 

… The Christian faith has several key beliefs. The teaching that is unique to the Christian faith is that there is one God who eternally manifests Himself in three persons: the Father, Son and Holy Spirit. This is known as the Godhead or the blessed Trinity. The second critical doctrine is that Jesus of Nazareth is the only begotten Son of God; therefore He is unique from everyone else. His Father was not human, but the holy God of Israel. The third key doctrine is that the Lord Jesus died on the cross to pay the penalty for man’s sin and then rose from the dead. There are other important doctrines, but these three really comprise the very heart of the Christian faith.

 

 

… The Koran claims that the Lord Jesus is only an apostle and for Christians to desist from teaching the blessed Trinity! In this same Sura, the Koran denies the Lord Jesus is the Son of God.

 

In one Sura the Koran attacks the very heart of Christianity by denying the blessed Trinity and that the Lord Jesus is the only begotten Son of God! It calls Christians liars and demands that the preaching of the Trinity and Jesus being the Son of God stop. The Koran identifies Christians sometimes as “followers of the book,” but when they proclaim Christian doctrine, the Koran then calls them liars. …

 

 

… The Koran even states in Sura 9:30 that those that believe Allah has a son should be destroyed by Allah! The Koran is very clear that it was written to attack this Christian doctrine.

 

 

The Koran literally says the Lord Jesus did not die on the cross. It claims that He appeared to have died on the cross, but He was not killed nor was He crucified. Allah just took Jesus to heaven. The Koran directly attacks the vicarious death of Jesus of Nazareth on the cross, and thus rejects His redemption of man from sin. …

 

 

… The very heart of Christianity that the Lord is the Son of God is the worst sin in Islam! According to the Koran, Allah forbids heaven to anyone who commits this sin and their abode is hell without any help.

 

 

… The Koran states that God does not have a son. The Bible states that all life is in the Lord Jesus as the only begotten Son of God. With the Bible, if you have the Son, you have eternal life: if you do not have the Son, then you do not have eternal life. A person that does not believe this makes God a liar. The Koran written 500 years after these verses denies the Son, and therefore makes the God of the Bible a liar. The Bible is written in the positive stating God has a Son. …

 

 

… The warning of the Bible is same today as it was at the time of Muhammad:

 

1 John 5:9 If we receive the witness of men, the witness of God is greater: for this is the witness of God which he hath testified of his Son.

 

(10) He that believeth on the Son of God hath the witness in himself: he that believeth not God hath made him a liar; because he believeth not the record that God gave of his Son.

 

(11) And this is the record, that God hath given to us eternal life, and this life is in his Son.

 

(12) He that hath the Son hath life; and he that hath not the Son of God hath not life.

 

(13) These things have I written unto you that believe on the name of the Son of God; that ye may know that ye have eternal life, and that ye may believe on the name of the Son of God.

 

… (The Koran Directly Attacks Christianity; By John McTernan; Defend and Proclaim the Faith; Copyright 2009 by John McTernan: All rights reserved.)

 

 

Needless to say, I highly disagree with Zaheer Baig assertions that Islam is a peaceful faith in which “…  souls find true happiness and peace” and that the “Islamic position is that all of these prophets came with the same message, that there is no deity worthy of worship except the One True God, known in Arabic as Allah.”

 

That Islamic deception is a blatant antichrist lie!

 

18 Little children, it is the last hour; and as you have heard that the[a] Antichrist is coming, even now many antichrists have come, by which we know that it is the last hour. 19 They went out from us, but they were not of us; for if they had been of us, they would have continued with us; but they went out that they might be made manifest, that none of them were of us.

 

22 Who is a liar but he who denies that Jesus is the Christ? He is antichrist who denies the Father and the Son. 23 Whoever denies the Son does not have the Father either; he who acknowledges the Son has the Father also.

 

24 Therefore let that abide in you which you heard from the beginning. If what you heard from the beginning abides in you, you also will abide in the Son and in the Father. 25 And this is the promise that He has promised us—eternal life.

 

26 These things I have written to you concerning those who try to deceive you.

 

4 Beloved, do not believe every spirit, but test the spirits, whether they are of God; because many false prophets have gone out into the world. 2 By this you know the Spirit of God: Every spirit that confesses that Jesus Christ has come in the flesh is of God, 3 and every spirit that does not confess that[a] Jesus Christ has come in the flesh is not of God. And this is the spirit of the Antichrist, which you have heard was coming, and is now already in the world.

 

12 No one has seen God at any time. If we love one another, God abides in us, and His love has been perfected in us. 13 By this we know that we abide in Him, and He in us, because He has given us of His Spirit. 14 And we have seen and testify that the Father has sent the Son as Savior of the world. 15 Whoever confesses that Jesus is the Son of God, God abides in him, and he in God.16 And we have known and believed the love that God has for us. God is love, and he who abides in love abides in God, and God in him. (1 John 2: 18-19, 22-26; 4: 1-3, 12-16 NKJVBold text by Editor)

 

JRH 4/17/15

Please Support NCCR

Accused of Contradicting Christ’s Writings


Good Tree- not both good & bad fruit

John R. Houk

© December 12, 2014

 

A gal going by the name Polyethene Pam posted a comment to a post I placed at my NCCR blog (among other places) entitled “Let’s Anger CAIR and Offend Muslims by Exposing Them” on 4/12/14. The post has numerous comments – some approving and some not so much.

 

Pam posted her comment this morning (12/12/14) at 7:25 AM. She was quite civil but not so approving. Her comment is as follows:

 

‘The NeoConservative Christian Right’ as someone who has a vast knowledge on Christianity, your actions and words contradict the teachings of Christ, the same way in which the actions and words of Islamic extremists contradict the teachings of Islam.

The ‘knowledge’ you have on Islam derives from your deep rooted hatred of Muslims NOT from a reliable unbiased source, hence the ignorance you have has rendered you blind and deaf, the hatred you have in your heart has made you bitter and while you spew venomous hatred towards people who you view as the ‘Other’ , there are people out there coexisting peacefully regardless of race, religion, caste or creed, it is those people who realise we must judge one another as individuals, that we must ask questions to find out the truth, that we shouldn’t assume because to assume is to make an ASS out of U and ME. #FOODFORTHOUGHT

 

As I proceeded to respond to Pam I came to the realization I was investing a bit of time in the response. It bugged me so much I decided to make Pam’s comment and my response a stand alone post. I already included her comment. Below is my response:

 

Pam you wrote:

 

“‘The NeoConservative Christian Right’ as someone who has a vast knowledge on Christianity, your actions and words contradict the teachings of Christ, the same way in which the actions and words of Islamic extremists contradict the teachings of Islam.”

 

Pam I will accept that my theology might be disagree with by other Christians; nonetheless it is my firm belief I am not saying anything that contradicts the teachings of Christ based on Matthew 7: 15-20 (NKJV):

 

15 Beware of false prophets, who come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly they are ravenous wolves. 16 You will know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes from thornbushes or figs from thistles? 17 Even so, every good tree bears good fruit, but a bad tree bears bad fruit. 18 A good tree cannot bear bad fruit, nor can a bad tree bear good fruit. 19 Every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire. 20 Therefore by their fruits you will know them. (Bold Emphasis Mine)

 

Most extreme pacifists, Muslim Apologists and Progressive Christians like to quote Matthew 7: 1-2 about judgment:

 

1 “Judge not, that you be not judged. 2 For with what judgment you judge, you will be judged; and with the measure you use, it will be measured back to you.  (NKJV)

 

The thing is verses 1-2 need to be interpreted in the context of verses 15-20 of the same chapter seven. Clearly Jesus is saying not to judge an individual with the agenda of condemnation, especially those people of covenant.

 

BUT Jesus is saying become aware of those that bring falsehood as if it is truth or do wrong and say it is good. That is what I do pertaining to Islam which has a theology that contradictory paradigms are both true with duality thinking which enables a Muslim to commit wrong or lie if one believes it advances the cause of Islam.

 

Here are some examples exposing the nefarious thinking of Islam:

 

http://www.rgcombs.com/islam-dualism-and-the-golden-rule/

 

http://www.politicalislam.com/an-ethical-basis-for-war-against-political-islam-part-1-2/

 

http://www.politicalislam.com/an-ethical-basis-for-war-against-political-islam-part-2-2/

 

Islamic Dualistic theology makes possible the Islamic ideology of Abrogation.

 

http://www.handbookforinfidels.com/Abrogation.html#.VItAOXtBlZY

 

The principle of abrogation plays a very important role in Islamic theology.  In fact, it’s one of the primary reasons that Islam is so implacably hostile to non-Muslims, to human rights, and to progressive, democratic societies. …

 

… Abrogation means that those verses in the Qur’an that were revealed to Muhammad later in his career cancel out earlier verses that contradict them.  That’s right, they cancel them right out!  It’s as if those earlier “truths” were never revealed at all. … (Click the above link and READ ENTIRETY)

 

http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/raymond-ibrahim/islamic-jihad-and-the-doctrine-of-abrogation/

 

… No careful reader will remain unaware of the many contradictory verses in the Koran, most specifically the way in which peaceful and tolerant verses lie almost side by side with violent and intolerant ones. The ulema were initially baffled as to which verses to codify into the Shari’a worldview—the one that states there is no coercion in religion (2:256), or the ones that command believers to fight all non-Muslims till they either convert, or at least submit, to Islam (8:39, 9:5, 9:29). To get out of this quandary, the commentators developed the doctrine of abrogation, which essentially maintains that verses revealed later in Muhammad’s career take precedence over earlier ones whenever there is a discrepancy. In order to document which verses abrogated which, a religious science devoted to the chronology of the Koran’s verses evolved (known as an-Nasikh wa’l Mansukh, the abrogater and the abrogated). (Click the above link and READ ENTIRETY)

 

In Christianity apparent contradictions differ from the Quran are time sensitive or limited in territory. Jesus himself proclaims He did not come to end the Law and the Prophets but to fulfill it. Thus the Redemptive act of dying on the Cross and arising bodily in a Glorified Resurrected body ends the curses of the Law and magnifies the blessings of the Law. For example in Leviticus the Law commands to stone homosexuals to death because the practice is an abomination to God. That is the curse. The blessing in Christ Jesus is the knowledge it is God’s will that humanity that believes in Christ will be Saved from eternal separation from God. Rejecting Christ keeps the curse activated however the punishment of the Law are dealt out in the Last Judgment. Every human being enjoys the Grace and Mercy through Jesus Christ the son of God in believing in the Redemptive act to the dying breath.

 

OR God’s command for the Twelve Hebrew Tribes to exterminate the inhabitants residing in the Land Promised to Abraham’s descendants through the lineage of the child of Promise Isaac (NOT Ishmael the child of the bondwoman Hagar) was to be active ONLY within the Promised Land and NOT the entire world. God’s explanation is that the future displaced inhabitants were beyond the point of return in corrupt morals with issues such as sex-sins, baby-murder, child human sacrifices, False God temple prostitution of both sexes to name a few. Once the Promised Land was secured and the children of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob perpetuate in obedience to God Almighty global Salvation would come from their numbers.  That Salvation is through Jesus Christ the son of Mary and the Son of God. Mary is a descendant of David who is a descendant of Abraham.

 

On the other hand under Islam perpetual conquest and slaughter of the world is commanded by demonized Mohammed and attributed to the demon-god Allah until all humanity is Islamic or dead.

 

The only existent contradictions is the very nature of Islam’s BAD FRUIT.

 

JRH 12/12/14

Please Support NCCR

ISNA Radical – OK Local ISNA Chapters Radical – Alton Nolan Radical


Islamists LUV inability Connect Dots

John R. Houk

© October 10, 2014

 

I am on a Jihad Watch alert list for posts. I received an alert relating to Robert Spencer (Mr. Jihad Watch) being on Hannity talking about the Oklahoma City Mosque that was attended by Jihadi assassin formerly known as Alton Nolan but now for the glory of allah goes by Jah’keem Yisrael. The name of that Mosque is Islamic Society of Greater Oklahoma City.

 

On Hannity was not only Spencer and Hannity but also the pseudonymous former Muslim and former member of the Islamic Society of Greater Oklahoma City called Noor. I actually first saw Noor (or I should say his blacked-out version) on The Kelly File hosted by Megyn Kelly.

 

On The Kelly File Noor exposed the OKC Mosque as a stealth hotbed of Radical Islam that covertly support Islamic Terrorism while to the public the Mosque officials lie through crescent moon teeth about being on the side of Moderate Islam.

 

SIDE NOTE: There is a sister Mosque of the Islamic Society of Greater OKC called the Islamic Society of Tulsa. The very same Mosque that the Tulsa Police Chief ordered Captain Paul Fields to attend fake Law Enforcement Appreciation Day which was really a Muslim proselytization moment. As a Christian, Captain Fields refused to subject himself to the worship and tenets of Islam. The Police Chief disciplined Captain Fields by suspending him. Remarkably on 9/15/14 Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the Tulsa Police Chief’s violation of Captain Field’s First Amendment Rights of Religious Freedom.

 

The website Wizbang provides a pro-TPD version claiming Captain Fields erred in claiming his First Amendment Rights were violated. Wizbang completely sides with the three Appellate Justices (3-0) decision against Paul Fields. Here is an excerpt of Wizbang’s excerpt of the Appellate ruling:

 

TPD had engaged in community policing for more than two decades, participating in about 3,500 community events between 2004 and 2011. Of those events, more than 350 were held at religious venues or institutions or were sponsored by religious organizations of various faiths. After TPD spent months protecting the Islamic Society and the school next door from a terrorist threat, the Society decided to hold the “Law Enforcement Appreciation Day” event to thank TPD for its help…

 

…No informed reasonable person could view the purpose or effect of TPD’s attendance at the event as suggesting that Islam is a preferred religion. Officers attending the event were not required to attend a religious service (and the timing of visits ensured that no officer would be required to be there during a service), read Islamic literature, or even discuss Islam. Those who wished to learn more about Islam could do so. The Establishment Clause does not prohibit governmental efforts to promote tolerance, understanding, and neighborliness. There is no evidence in the record of any attempts to convert officers to Islam, as opposed to providing information. And in any event, if perhaps some representatives of the Center crossed the line, there is nothing that would suggest to a reasonable observer that such conduct had received governmental endorsement. (About That Gossip …; By David Robertson; Wizbang; 9/29/14)

 

Are Justices over there at the 10th Appellate idiots? Captain Paul Fields was punished and moved to another precinct for refusing to attend the Radical Mosque’s pseudo-Law Enforcement Appreciation Day. It was an attend-or-else order. Then Wizbang author David Robertson steps into the idiocy putting out …

 

“The officers who attended were not required to participate in a Muslim worship service. On the contrary, the event was scheduled during a time when there was no Muslim worship service taking place. Also, the officers were not required to participate a pro-Islam discussion or to read literature about Islam.

 

 

By the way, if a single guest-speaker at a religious institution defines that institution, then Liberty University is a liberal Democrat university, because Ted Kennedy once gave a speech there.”

 

Being in an ungodly worship service is participation in that service even if you do not perform the religious acts of that service. Islam is an antichrist religion and that is insulting to Biblical-minded Christians. Then the pears and apples comparison used implying one Radical Muslim does not make a Mosque radical any more than Conservative Christian Right Liberty University became a Leftist institution when Left Winger Senator Ted Kennedy spoke there.

 

Kennedy may have been a baby-killing supporting, big government and more socialism than Capitalism Senator but he never condemned the Constitution or the operation of his government (even though interpreted both incorrectly) with a – conform or die mandate – as Islam does with its Sharia Law. TALK ABOUT IDIOCY! You can look at how ISIS runs things where in control or how Iran runs things to comprehend that Sharia to-the-T is not only incompatible with the U.S. Constitution but is absolutely antithetical to Christianity. As is the Islamic Society of Greater OKC so is the Islamic Society of Tulsa. Both are affiliated with the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA) and ISNA is a completely radicalized Islamic organization. Paul Fields legal representation is appealing to SCOTUS – HERE and HERE and SEE HERE. END OF SIDE BAR

 

Radical Islam is already in America! DO NOT be scared away by Multicultural Leftists and lying Muslim Apologists that begin to shout “Islamophobe!” That word is as a pejorative to bring guilt for speaking and/or to know about the truth. DO NOT feel guilty about defending your American Values and/or your Judeo-Christian faith. When a religion has kill the Jews and kill the Christians because these “People of the Book” have become ignorant of what Muslims have deluded themselves into believing as the truth.

 

Islamic Society of OKC mosque

 

Islamic Society of Greater Oklahoma City

 

 

Now I had mentioned that I watched the pseudonymous Noor on The Kelly File. Hannity is giving credit to Robert Spencer for first breaking the news of Noor exposing what goes on for the Muslims-only crowd at the Islam Society of Greater Oklahoma City. Here is that very enlightening Spencer interview with Noor posted on 10/2/14 at JihadWatchVideo:

 

VIDEO: Robert Spencer interviews ex-member of Oklahoma beheader’s mosque

 

Pamela Geller posted some thoughts from a person she only identifies as an ex-Muslim still living in the OKC area that is similar to the words of Noor:

 

I went to the same mosque the Oklahoma Muslim who beheaded his co-worker today. I live ten minutes away!

 

The Imam was Imad Enchassi the last I heard. He was a friend of mine. He is a Lebanese-born Sunni who hates Israel. He once gave a sermon that the Israelis were trying to collapse al-Aqsa mosque by digging tunnels underneath it. They have no issue with Palestinian suicide bombings because, as it was explained to me, that is the only weapon the Palestinians have.

 

They sold Milestones in the book shop while I was there, which as you know calls for replacing all non-Islamic governments with Islamic ones. I remember listening to a tape a friend of mine, Yahya Graff, another white convert to Islam, had that prayed for the destruction of Israel and America.

 

The imam when I first converted, Suhaib Webb, is hailed as a moderate by liberals in the United States but he was the one that explicitly told me that according to Islam, three choices are to be given to non-Muslims: convert, pay the jizyah tax and live under Islamic rule, or jihad. They try very hard to whitewash Islam when the media is around, but they believe in their religion and the ultimate goal of an Islamic caliphate. (Oklahoma beheader’s mosque taught caliphate, destruction of US and Israel; By Pamela Geller; Atlas Shrugs; 9/27/14)

 

Here is a shorter in scope dialogue that includes Hannity, Noor and Spencer on Sean Hannity’s Fox News show from 10/6/14:

 

VIDEO: Robert Spencer on Fox News Sean Hannity Show

 

Now this shows the mind-blowing insensitivity that President Barack Hussein Obama has for the victims of homicidal jihadis such as Alton Nolen. Attributed to the White House so one has to believe at the very least signed off on by BHO a special message marking the end of the pilgrimage period to Mecca called Eid Ul-Adha; however the purpose of the message from the White House was to congratulate the ISGOKC Mosque for voluntary work contributing to rebuilding the Moore community from last year’s devastating tornado that ripped through the OKC suburb city:

 

Today, an official from Washington D.C. flew in to Oklahoma to present a special thank you to the Muslim congregation.

 

He read a message from President Barrack Obama, extending warm greetings from the American people during the Muslim holiday.

 

“Your service is a powerful example of the powerful roots of the Abrahamic faiths and how our communities can come together with shared peace with dignity and a sense of justice,” President Barack Obama said.

 

The Imam, the leader of the prayer service, stated during his sermon that the Muslim faith has been called a “cancer that needs to be cut off from the American society.”

 

Now, with the recent praise, Oklahoma Muslims have been reassured that they are a part of the American society. (Oklahoma Muslims receive special praise from White House officials; By ANDREW DONLEY; KFOR.com – Channel 4; 10/4/14 3:26 PM – UPDATED 10/6/14 07:31PM)

 

See Also Western Journalism

 

What the Imam said for OKC Channel 4 cameras was public hence a load of hogwash because Islam is a cancer that needs to be cut off from American society, especially the kind of Islam practiced by the Mosque at ISGOKC. AND when the Imam told whatever Muslims call a Mosque congregation they can now be reassured that Muslims were a part of American society, based on the Radical Islam that Noor reports goes on behind closed door I can imagine that Imam felt he had to flush his Taqiyya gullet with mouth wash.

 

Check out Radio host taking the Taqiyya of a Muslim Apologist defending Islam:

 

VIDEO: Radio host takes on Muslim over lies

 

Allow me to finish with this. Thanks to Justin Smith I found an article at Raw Story reporting on a Muskogee, OK State Representative John Bennett at a Townhall meeting telling the people about Islam in light of Jihadi assassin Alton Nolen beheading of Colleen Hufford who had just had her Moore residence rebuilt. (I wonder – does anyone see the irony of the ISGOKC Mosque receiving praise from President Obama for aiding in rebuilding of Moore, OK and the beheaded victim that just had her home rebuilt?)

 

I find John Bennett a bold guy for bucking political correctness to face criticism for voicing a mistrust for Muslims that claim to be devout. At Raw Story Bennett is made out to be a product of – what for it- Islamophobic Conservative Talk Radio for his words:

 

In a town hall appearance in Muskogee, Republican Oklahoma State Rep. John Bennett told the assembled crowd that the expansion of rights for Muslim Americans is no different than the growth of the Nazi Party in Germany before World War II.

 

Bennett argued that there are no distinctions between radical Islamists and everyday Muslims, that all of them are programmed by their faith to attack and destroy Christianity.

 

“Mohammed’s teaching only teaches one thing,” he told the Muskogee Patriots this week. “And that’s the violence that we’re seeing today in ISIS and in the beheading in Moore and other places.”

 

In September, a 30-year-old employee of Vaughan Foods attacked two women, killing and beheading one of them. The suspect, Alton Nolen, had recently converted to Islam and had reportedly tried to convert coworkers. However, police have not ascribed a religious motive to the murder, which is being prosecuted as an act of workplace violence.

 

Rep. Bennett, however, sees the attack as evidence of a growing domestic jihad movement in this country.

 

Audience member Tina Kelley accused Bennett of needlessly fomenting suspicion and fear of Islamic people, citing her friendships with Muslim families.

 

“They don’t like having their government say that they’re no better than ISIS,” Kelley said, “and having their Oklahoma neighbors made afraid of them.”

 

“Well, let me ask you a question,” Bennett countered. “Where are your nice friends? Why aren’t they here? Why aren’t they out there saying, ‘Hey, we don’t believe in that?’”

 

He said that Muslims condemn violence against the innocent, but that no one outside the Muslim faith is considered truly innocent by Islamic standards. Muslims, said Bennett, can only be trusted if they fully renounce their faith.

 

“Do you think every German was a Nazi?” he asked. “No, they weren’t. But what happened with the Nazis was that once they got in power, all those Germans that sat quiet or were scared to say anything had no choice but to follow and support what they were doing.”

 

“So is every Muslim bad? No,” he said, “but if they subscribe to Islam and what it teaches, and if they’re not standing up and condemning what Islam teaches, then they’re just going right along with them, just like the Germans did when the Nazis were around.”

 

In September, U.S. Muslim leaders drafted and sent a 17-page open letter to the leaders of ISIS denouncing them and their use of violence in the name of their faith. British Muslims started the #NotInMyName campaign to denounce the group’s violence and extremism.

 

Media watchdog group Media Matters pointed out that multiple mainstream Islamic groups around the world have forcibly denounced ISIS, and yet conservative media regularly demand to know why more Muslims aren’t speaking out. (Oklahoma Republican: Muslims can’t be trusted if they practice Islam; By DAVID FERGUSON; Raw Story; 10/8/14)

 

At the very end of the article author Ferguson embeds a PBS news story on that Town Hall meeting held by Rep. John Bennett. On the blogs I operate typically only Youtube videos are allowed to be embedded; ergo here is that link to the PBS video: http://videos.oeta.tv/video/2365339599/  

 

Now just to comment on Tina Kelley’s thoughts that she has some dear Muslim friends who are not violent and are afraid of the government when good Representatives like John Bennett tell the truth about Islam. There is an element in truth on what Kelley says. But you need to understand that what Tina Kelley views as a good Muslim is a Muslim who has cherry picked their religion to act on what is good and ignore what is bad. Radical Muslims despise the Muslims that cherry pick their religion as selective kafir or secularist kafir who should pay the price for not being a devout Muslim according to what Muslims believe is the perfect man in the pseudo-prophet Mohammed and the very words of allah disseminated by Mo in the Quran.

 

The dualistic nature of Islam is something that is difficult for a Westerner to understand. Islamic dualism allows contradictory Quranic words or thoughts to be compatibly correct depending on the physical situation a Muslim or the Muslim ummah may find itself in. Hence when the Quran proclaims there is no compulsion of religion in Islam that works in the West; however in a Muslim dominated land (Dar al-Islam) any unbeliever (i.e. kafir) that does not submit absolutely to the tenets prescribed for unbelievers can be executed for disrespecting Islam and Mo. Hence the kill-them-wherever-you-find-those-kafir – also in the Quran – is just as valid as the call for no compulsion of religion or the call to respect the People of the Book; viz. Jews and Christians. The contradictory concepts are valid depending on the situation.

 

AND THEN as to the European campaign of “#NotInMyName” or the 17 page American-Muslim leaders denouncing ISIS, that is the exception rather than the rule among the Muslims in the West.

 

I know I said I was wrapping it up, but I have to share this with you. According to Ralph Mauro and expert in Islam but not a Muslim shares the extreme deception of this 17 page open letter:

 

A published letter to the Islamic State (ISIS) signed by 126 international Muslim leaders and scholars, including top American leaders, is getting major press for rebutting the theological arguments behind the actions of Islamic State. Unfortunately, the same letter endorsed the goal of the Islamic State of rebuilding the caliphate and sharia governance, including its brutal hudud punishments.

 

Point 16 of the letter states, “Hudud punishments are fixed in the Qu’ran and Hadith and are unquestionably obligatory in Islamic Law.” The criticism of the Islamic State by the scholars is that the terrorist group is not “following the correct procedures that ensure justice and mercy.”

 

The Muslim “moderates” who signed the letter not only endorsed the combination of mosque and state; they endorsed the most brutal features of sharia governance as seen in Iran, Saudi Arabia and elsewhere.

 

An example of a hudud punishment is the death penalty for apostates (Muslims who leave Islam). The letter does not dispute or oppose that. It says that labeling Muslims as apostates is only permissible when an individual “openly declares disbelief.”

 

The signatories are not condemning the execution of apostates, only how the Islamic State is deciding who qualifies as an apostate.

 

Point 7 states that Islam forbids the killing of diplomats, journalists and aid workers, but READ THE REST (Muslim Leaders Sign Letter Against ISIS, But Endorse Sharia; By Ryan Mauro; The Counter Jihad Report; 10/1/14)

 

This is theopolitical Islamic duality in action. It enables schmoozing to non-Muslims while simultaneously maintaining the superiority of Islam to the ummah.

 

The Media Matters organization is a Left Wing propaganda tool of George Soros utilizing the guilt complex of making Conservative Talk Radio to be the pejorative sense of the manipulative word “Islamophobia”.

 

JRH 10/10/14 (Hat Tips to Justin Smith & Tony S.O.)

Please Support NCCR

 

Thoughts on Darwish Chain Email – ‘Joys of Muslim Women’


Nonie Darwish - I will not submit

John R. Houk

© May 6, 2013

 

I received a chain email from a respected friend. The chain email has been around for awhile and its most common title is “Joys of Muslim Women.” The words of the chain email are attributed to Nonie Darwish. Darwish has become an esteemed Counterjihad writer and speaker. The term Counterjihad means Darwish is scores big on the Muslim and Leftist hate-meter which in turn means Muslim Apologists and Leftist Multiculturalists spew hate towards her by ironically accusing her of Hate Speech.

 

Briefly Nonie Darwish was born a Muslim in Egypt that also resided in Gaza. Gaza can be nicknamed Hamastan due to the Muslim Brotherhood affiliated Islamic terrorist group Hamas ruling Gaza.

 

Unfortunately the chain email attribution to Nonie Darwish is a falsehood. However, Darwish agrees that much of the information in the chain email is accurate. Here are some quotes from some fact check websites (that I might illuminate are leaning toward the Left and are quick to display the Islamic Apologist view that utilizes Taqiyya [deception] to contradict Counterjihadists with abrogated verses from the Quran).

 

Watch Nonie Darwish in a passionate indictment against Islam’s Shariah Law in this video:

 

Nonie Darwish and “Islamic Apartheid” at Temple University

 

 

Fact Checkers on Chain Email:

 

About.com Urban Legends

 

Analysis: Despite the attribution at the top (“Joys of Muslim Women by Nonie Darwish”), this text was not written by Muslim-turned-Christian human rights activist Nonie Darwish; indeed, the bottom two-thirds of it repeatedly refer to her in the third person. Darwish confirmed via email that she did not write the article, though it is, in her words, “to a large extent accurate.” She further stated that her 2009 book, Cruel and Usual Punishment, better represents her views.

 

It should be noted that while the email is at least partially based on Darwish’s personal experiences growing up in a Muslim country and reading the Qur’an, her claim that it’s to a large extent accurate also means that, even in her opinion, it’s not entirely accurate. To say the least, the text is hyperbolic, awash in generalizations, and makes extreme claims about Islam and Islamic practices that do not pertain to all Muslims.

 

For more on Nonie Darwish’s views in her own words, see Cruel and Usual Punishment (Interview) – FamilySecurityMatters.org, 8 January 2009.

 

For a differing view on the Islamic faith, see Myths About Islam by Christine Huda Dodge – About.com.

 

Snopes.com

 

 

clip_image002

 

 

Fact Check: Nonie Darwish and Enough Muslims to Elect a President in 20 years – Irregular Times

 

Posted by Jim Cook

January 23rd, 2011

 

In this morning’s e-mail, Irregular Times received the following message:

 

Joys of Muslim Women by Nonie Darwish…

 

In twenty years there will be enough Muslim voters in the U.S. and Canada to elect the President or Prime Minister by themselves! Rest assured they will do so… You can look at how they have taken over several towns in the USA and Canada, Dearborn Mich. is one, Brampton, Ontario is another and there are others…

 

I think everyone in the U.S. and Canada should be required to read this, but with the ACLU, there is no way this will be widely publicized, unless each of us sends it on!

 

Claim: Nonie Darwish wrote this article, “The Joys of Muslim Women,” or any other piece of writing so titled.

Fact: Nonie Darwish has specifically denied this. The association of Nonie Darwish with this text is a hoax.

 

Claim: The ACLU is preventing the wide dissemination of the assertion I received by e-mail.

Fact: There is not any record of the ACLU agitating to restrict the dissemination of this text. It would not make sense for the ACLU to agitate to restrict dissemination of this text, since the ACLU is a major proponent of free speech, including freedom of speech for unpopular ideas across the political spectrum. As an empirical matter, a google search for the text “In twenty years there will be enough Muslim voters in the U.S. to elect the President by themselves” turns up 17,900 results, indicating a rather wide dissemination. It is nearly impossible to prove that a conspiracy does not exist, so I leave it to you to decide between the two possibilities: Either the ACLU is carrying on a stealthy, invisible and utterly ineffectual campaign to quash the story we received by e-mail this morning, or the ACLU is not trying to quash it at all.

 

Claim: “In twenty years there will be enough Muslim voters in the U.S. and Canada to elect the President or Prime Minister by themselves!”

Fact: This is a claim we looked at last September after someone used it as a justification of bans on mosque building:

 

As a mother and a grandmother, I worry. I learned that in 20 years with the rate of the birth population, we will be overtaken by Islam, and their goal is to get people in Congress and the Supreme Court to see that Shariah is implemented. My children and grandchildren will have to live under that.

 

The truth is that, according to the two most recent studies of religious populations in America, (the American Religious Identification Survey and the U.S. Religious Landscape Survey), Muslims make up only 0.6% of the adult population of the United States. That’s approximately 1.8 million out of about 300 million Americans.

 

Here’s a graph showing what we can expect the Muslim population of the United States to look like over the next twenty years if the American Muslim population follows the U.S. birth rate, the World birth rate, or the Saudi birth rate (three reasonable expectations):

 

clip_image003

 

The total U.S. population during the period will be somewhere in the range of 300-350 million. Clearly, unless a comet blasts into North America and Muslims put up their secret comet-debris-shields, there is no reasonable scenario under which the American Muslim population will come anywhere close to making up a majority in the next twenty years.

 

Conclusion: This article is once, twice, three times disconnected from reality.

 

If you want to read the chain email then you need to stick with me. I am posting it as I received it from my friend. Nonetheless, there are some allegations within the email that are simply meant to stir up an anti-Muslim sentiment among readers. The thing is exaggerated and false statistical stands do not need to be made. A careful examination of the Quran with an understanding of Islam’s dualistic theology; that the newest commands from Mohammed (or Allah depending on your perception) outweigh previous commands – the principle is Abrogation; know that although the Quran (See also Chronological Order) is considered the uncreated word of Allah by Muslims BUT the Hadith and Sira weigh in heavily in interpreting the Quran and realize that some Hadith are considered more accurate than others then become cognizant which of those Hadith are the most accepted. Muslim Apologists either knowingly lies by telling an abrogated verse (or surah) is the foundation of Islam. A Muslim theologian can lie with a straight face because Islam’s dualistic principles actually can make two opposites true if it serves the purpose of the moment. In Western thought theology is more singular in that the theological thought is either right or wrong and NOT both right dependent on circumstances.

 

As a reminder Nonie Darwish has said the chain email “Joys of Muslim Women” was not written by her but that the essence of its message is true. Now some of the claims in it are ridiculous yet the anti-woman aspect of the email is valid.

 

So without further adieu here is the text of that chain email sent to me by a friend.

 

JRH 5/6/13

Please Support NCCR

*********************************

20 years from now? Frightening!!!!

Sent to me: 5/5/2013 6:41 PM

 

I am guilty of thinking that each religion had one main prophet and a “golden rule”.  I am wrong.  The Muslim religion is spreading like the plague and it carries the same gruesome results if we do not stop it now.

 

20 years from now, I will be in Heaven – bye!!!

 

This was written by a woman born in Egypt as a Muslim. Make sure you read the paragraph (in red) towards the end.

 

Joys of Muslim Women
By Nonie Darwish

 

In the Muslim faith a Muslim man can marry a child as young as 1 year old and have sexual intimacy with this child. And then consummate the marriage by 9.

The dowry is given to the family in exchange for the woman (who becomes his slave) and for the purchase of the private parts of the woman, to use her as a toy.


Even though a woman is abused she cannot obtain a divorce.

To prove rape, the woman must have (4) male witnesses.

Often after a woman has been raped, she is returned to her family and the family must return the dowry. The family has the right to execute her (an honor killing) to restore the honor of the family. Husbands can beat their wives ‘at will’ and he does not have to say why he has beaten her.


The husband is permitted to have (4 wives) and a temporary wife for an hour (prostitute) at his discretion.


The Shariah Muslim law controls the private as well as the public life of the woman.

 

In the West World (America and Britain) Muslim men are starting to demand Shariah Law so the wife cannot obtain a divorce and he can have full and complete control of her. It is amazing and alarming how many of our sisters and daughters attending American Universities and British Universities are now marrying Muslim men and submitting themselves and their children unsuspectingly to the Shariah law.


By passing this on, enlightened American and British women may avoid becoming a slave under Shariah Law.

Ripping the West in Two.

Author and lecturer Nonie Darwish says the goal of radical Islamists is to impose Shariah law on the world, ripping Western law and liberty in two.


She recently authored the book, Cruel and Usual Punishment: The Terrifying Global Implications of Islamic Law. Darwish was born in Cairo and spent her childhood in Egypt and Gaza before immigrating to America in 1978, when she was eight years old. Her father died while leading covert attacks on Israel. He was a high-ranking Egyptian military officer stationed with his family in Gaza…


When he died, he was considered a “shahid,” a martyr for jihad. His posthumous status earned Nonie and her family an elevated position in Muslim society.


But Darwish developed a skeptical eye at an early age. She questioned her own Muslim culture and upbringing… She converted to Christianity after hearing a Christian preacher on television.


In her latest book, Darwish warns about creeping shariah law – what it is, what it means, and how it is manifested in Islamic countries.


For the West, she says radical Islamists are working to impose sharia on the world. If that happens, Western civilization will be destroyed. Westerners generally assume all religions encourage a respect for the dignity of each individual. Islamic law (Sharia) teaches that non-Muslims should be subjugated or killed in this world.


Peace and prosperity for one’s children is not as important as assuring that Islamic law rules everywhere in the Middle East and eventually in the world.


While Westerners tend to think that all religions encourage some form of the golden rule, Shariah teaches two systems of ethics – one for Muslims and another for non-Muslims. Building on tribal practices of the seventh century, Shariah encourages the side of humanity that wants to take from and subjugate others.


While Westerners tend to think in terms of religious people developing a personal understanding of and relationship with God, Shariah advocates executing people who ask difficult questions that could be interpreted as criticism.


It’s hard to imagine, that in this day and age, Islamic scholars agree that those who criticize Islam or choose to stop being Muslim should be executed. Sadly, while talk of an Islamic reformation is common and even assumed by many in the West, such murmurings in the Middle East that is silenced through intimidation.


While Westerners are accustomed to an increase in religious tolerance over time, Darwish explains how petro dollars are being used to grow an extremely intolerant form of political Islam in her native Egypt and elsewhere.


(In twenty years there will be enough Muslim voters in the U.S. and Britain to elect the President and Prime Minister by themselves! Rest assured they will do so… You can look at how they have taken over several towns in the US… Dearborn Mich. is one…and there are others… Britain has several cities now totally controlled by Muslims.)


I think everyone in the U.S. And Great Britain should be required to read this, but with the ACLU, there is no way this will be widely publicized, unless each of us sends it on!


It is too bad that so many are disillusioned with life and Christianity to accept Muslims as peaceful. Some may be but they have an army that is willing to shed blood in the name of Islam. The peaceful support the warriors with their finances and own kind of patriotism to their religion. While America and Britain are getting rid of Christianity from all public sites and erasing God from the lives of children, the Muslims are planning a great jihad on America and Britain.


This is your chance to make a difference! Pass it on to your email list or at least those you think will listen.


Some of those I’m sending it to WILL NOT! Put your head back under the covers so you can’t see the boogie man!

______________________

Chain email edited by John R. Houk

 

A Picture of Dualism


 

Bill Warner explains how Islam can deceptively claim to be a religion of peace and a religion of violence simultaneously. Islamic apologists always emphasize the peace but neglect to tell the truth that violence is integrated into the Islamic religious writings and in the dualistic thought of Islam both can be true and applied to the nature of circumstance. The practice is called dualistic thought.

 

JRH 5/1/11

%d bloggers like this: