The Heart of Darkness

Mo says convert to Islam or die


Justin Smith makes a very good case showing Obama and other deceived politically correct American leaders (Left, Center and Right) are full of baloney when it comes to the assertion that ‘Islam is peace’.


JRH 9/29/14

Please Support NCCR


The Heart of Darkness


By Justin O. Smith

Sent: 9/28/2014 11:25 PM


Islam is violent and repressive, and it is the “heart of darkness” at the center of the Islamic State’s inspiration and motivation, despite Barack Obama’s assertions in September 10th’s address to the nation that the Islamic State “is not Islamic” and that “no religion condones the killing of innocents.” Violence is an integral part of Islamic doctrine, following the example set by its prophet Mohammed, and in the name of Islam and Allah, Muslims have been murdering innocents, since 656 AD.


Six hundred years after Mohammed, one of Islam’s most respected scholars, Ibn Khuldan wrote ‘Muqaddimah’ (Introduction to History), which explained: “In the Muslim community, the holy war is religious duty, because of the universalism of the Muslim mission and [the obligation to] convert everybody to Islam either by persuasion or force.”


Like most good Muslims, Khaldun’s inspiration came from ‘The Verse of the Sword’, Sura 9:5, “revealed” towards the end of Mohammed’s life, as well as similar themes previous to Sura 9:


Sura 9:5__ “…kill the Mushrikun (unbelievers) wherever you find them … But if they repent and perform As-Salat/ Iqamat-as-Salat [the Islamic ritual prayers], then leave their way free…” Also Sura 9:33__ “It is He [Allah] Who has sent His Messenger [Mohammed] with guidance and the religion of truth [Islam], to make it superior over all religions…”


The Hindu Kush, seventy-five thousand square miles between Afghanistan and Pakistan, was populated by Hindus until approximately 1000 AD and the Muslim invasions. An estimated 60 million Hindus were murdered by Muslims over a thousand year reign, and Hindu Kush is the Muslim name for the region. It means “Hindu Killer”.


Now today, the majority of the Muslim community worldwide, including the U.S., does not completely frown on their “holy warriors” in the Islamic State, Al Qaeda, Jaamat e-Islami and any other terror group one cares to mention, for fear of being called heretics or apostates themselves. The murderous “holy warriors” are following a literal interpretation of Koranic scripture, without omissions, innovation or revision. By contrast, heretical views deviate from doctrine.


The 2013 PEW Poll of the Muslim World shows that the majority of Muslims, in several countries, support the death penalty for Muslims who leave Islam, including Malaysia (58%), Egypt (88%), Jordan (83%), Afghanistan (79%), Gaza and the West Bank (62%) and Pakistan (75%); in 2006, a poll for ‘The Sunday Telegraph’ found 40% of British Muslims wanted Sharia Law in the UK and 20% supported the 7/7 bombers. And alarmingly, in 2011 nineteen percent of American Muslims stated they viewed Al Qaeda favorably, while a new poll shows 16% of the French population view the Islamic State favorably.


Are you beginning to see a pattern here?

Logical minded Americans were not fooled by the big lie Obama delivered before the United Nations on September 24th, when he spoke of Islam’s “great tradition that stands for … the dignity of life, not murder”. Americans see a significant number of Muslims still support Sharia Law, slavery, rape and Islamic inspired violence and murder in this 21st century, and rather than “a religion of peace”, Islam always has been and always will be an ideology of violence and conquest.


Don’t get me wrong. I am thankful for the many Muslims who simply adhere to the first early peaceful verses of the Koran, but let’s not allow that to dissuade us from seeing and revealing the fact that Islam was propagated through violence, staying with Mohammed’s teachings, and it is still utilizing violence today. This can clearly be seen by examining the teachings of Islam, the daily news reports and practically any good, scholarly history book.


One problem in Islamic tradition, affirmed by many scholars, is the doctrine of abrogation, which states that later revelation to Mohammed supersedes prior revelation. And the Koranic verses ordering Muslims to fight and slay infidels, Christians and Jews came after those admonishing Muslims to live with non-believers in peace and without religious compulsion.


As Obama spoke before the UN, he called on the Islamic nations and their leaders to address the spread of “extremism”, full well knowing that he was speaking to the very advocates of Wahabbist fundamentalism, other Islamic orthodoxies and proponents of inflexible, intolerant Islamic scholars, the likes of Sayyid Qutb. Saudi Arabia and Qatar, for example, have supported terrorism and financed the spread of Wahabbism and Qutb’s Islamic philosophy globally, including in America, for decades.


And now Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Turkey, the United Emirates and several others, who helped create, train and fund the Islamic State, are screaming for the U.S. and the West to end the vicious advance of the Islamic State. They look to destroy the Islamic State, only because they can no longer control its self-appointed “caliph”, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, who has announced his intentions to take Mecca and Medina; so, it is fear of losing their power and their regimes that motivates them, not any disagreement with the Islamic State’s implementation of jihad and the violent doctrines of Islam.


What about the Muslim Brotherhood, the Islamic Republic of Iran, Hezbollah, which means “the party of Allah”, and Hamas, which means “Islamic Resistance Movement”? Does Obama deem these Islamic entities “not Islamic” too?


As Obama appealed to young Muslims to follow their “great tradition [Islam] that stands for education … innovation, not destruction”, he must have intentionally forgotten some of the other traditions of Islam. The recent spate of beheadings of Westerners by the Islamic State is only the old made new again, and although horrible beyond belief, they actually pale in comparison to the heinous atrocities committed in the name of Allah across the centuries. Three thousand Catholic nuns were raped at the Church of St Sophia during the sacking of Constantinople in 1453, and many other women and children were simply torn to pieces.


Hadith 107:13_ It was shown the Prophet said, “Allah wrote everything we need to know about Ihsan [kindness] so if you kill, perfect your killing and if you slaughter, perfect your slaughter, perfect your slaughter and sharpen your blade and comfort your sacrifice.”


Koran 8:12 “I will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve. Therefore strike off their heads and strike off every fingertip of them.”


Millions of devout fundamentalist orthodox Muslims, devout in the manner of Osama bin Laden_ Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi and Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, are making preparations and have already been waging a divinely endorsed war against Europe, America and Israel. And, rather than continue against all reason and, in the light of Islam’s sacred texts, to propagate the lie that “Islam is peace”, which is placing America within a quagmire of reoccurring expansionist jihad, this administration and future administrations must cut all funding to all Islamic nations and acknowledge that “extremism” and violence are the basis of Islam, if America is to win the future war against Islam.


By Justin O Smith


Editor John R. Houk

© Justin O. Smith

Defeat Islam – Rediscover Moral Rectitude

Moral Decay

John R. Houk
© September 2011
All those that venture my blog posts are aware that I believe Islam is an evil cult that exists to eradicate all non-Muslim cultures whether they are religious or secular. Islam is a supremacist theo-political ideology that views individual Liberty, Freedom and the right to seek personal prosperity as against the Islamic code of submission to Allah and the deity’s prophet Mohammed. In America’s case that means tossing out the U.S. Constitution and the political evolution of a wider sway of who is enfranchised with Liberty, Freedom and the Pursuit of Happiness.
In Islam all violations to Allah’s submission whether by Muslims or by non-Muslims (aka kafir) are dealt with the severest of Islamic Justice. And just think the mere existence of the kafir is revolting against submission to Allah. If a kafir thinks or speaks critically of Islam or Mohammed you have entered a realm outside of submission. If a kafir openly displays their religion or atheism in public then one has rejected submission to Allah and his prophet. If a woman disobeys her husband especially in not submitting to the act of sex, then she has violated submission to Allah and his prophet Mohammed. If a kafir woman walks alone Islam considers that an invitation to rape without legal repercussions. If a Kafir woman or child is found to be desirous by a Muslim man, the Muslim is within his religious duty to kidnap her then force her to convert to Islam then force her into marriage. OR if that kidnapped kafir woman steadfastly resists conversion she is open to rape sometimes in Muslim gang style.
You get the point, Islamic theo-political culture must either destroy Western culture (America in particular) or be destroyed.
I have had the frame of mind that Islam must be exposed for its actual nature of the desire to destroy all other cultures by violence or by stealth. The violence is the oft discussed theo-political ideology of Jihad; i.e. conquer, transform – by force, convert or kill. Now there is a practice among devout Muslims in the 21st century that believe there is a Jihad to confront the inner struggles of becoming a good Muslim (we Christians might say sin). Muslim apologists who more often than not are actually radical Muslims will proclaim this inner struggle Jihad is the primary focus of Islamic religious thought. Be careful! The Jihad that conquers with extreme prejudice is historically the Jihad that has spread Islam AND that spread has been historically vicious.
Stealth Jihad is actually a more modern expression of Islamic Jihad. Stealth Jihad is the deception of the appearance of entering positions of power typically in some form of government with the agenda of influencing policy that is favorable to Islamic Supremacism even if Constitutional law is compromised or to influence foreign policy that is amicable to an Islamic nation or to Islamic terrorism (e.g. Hamas, Muslim Brotherhood, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia and so on).
Now after expressing my dissatisfaction with Islamic thinking, culture and political ideology, I have to let you know I just read an article that made me think hard on the approach to expose Islam. Thanks to an ICJS email exposing Islam could possibly take second seat to exposing how America has lost it moral fortitude that has made America great.
Rabbi Jonathan Sacks writes about an Islamic term Asabiyah which Sacks defines as “social cohesion”. Rabbi Sacks attributes the concept to Muslim philosopher Ibn Khaldun. Of course the Khaldun concept of social cohesion dealt with the expansion of Islam during Muslim imperialism days of conquest, transform, convert or kill.
I assure you I will do a deficient job of explaining ibn Khaldun’s concept of social cohesion than Rabbi Sacks, but I am going to give it an abbreviated shot.
Ibn Khaldun observed that cultures that became dominated by an urban culture would eventually decay from within. Why? The reason is because an urban culture has become accustomed to living a peaceful life of order. Also urban cultures typically began to lose sight of that which brought the culture into cohesion in the first place. In most cases the cohesion of culture is the concept of morality agreed upon symbiotically by the people dominated by a rural mindset. As urbanism grows and dominates moral rectitude diminishes. As moral rectitude diminishes the cohesion of like minded purpose begins to fracture. The fracturing makes an urban culture weak. The weakness opens up an urban culture to the invasion from a rural cohesive culture that has a strong moral rectitude which enables a constant that a fractured weak urban culture will eventually lose. The ONLY redemption for a morally fractured culture is to find that which unifies all the people in a cohesive way.
History demonstrates few strong civilizations were able to end or reverse moral fracturing. Rabbi Sacks points out two modern nations that actually did reverse moral fracturing: Great Britain and the USA.
The period of time was that which occurred from 1820 onward a few years. In America the period was known as the Second Great Awakening. May God bring Revival again! In that Revival, Americans will comprehend just how much Islam is un-American.
Think on these quotes:
Chesterton, however, is able to resist this temptation. What I Saw in America begins as a travelogue but eventually becomes an extended reflection on what makes a nation a nation. However that is defined, America is the exception. It is a nation like no other. America, says Chesterton, is “the only nation in the world that is founded on a creed.” That creed is that all men are created equal. “There is no basis for democracy except in a dogma about the divine origin of man.” Thus, America is necessarily a religious nation. Chesterton says in fact, that it has “the soul of a church.” This is a elementary truth about our country that we neglect or actively ignore. (What I Saw in America, By Dale Ahlquist,; about G.K. Chesterton on America – Emphasis mine)
“… Covenant defeats the law of entropy that says that all systems lose energy over time. It creates renewable energy. It has the power to arrest, even reverse, the decline and fall of nations.
None of us should be in any doubt as to the seriousness of what is at stake. Europe today is pursuing the chimera of societies without a shared moral code, nations without a collective identity, cultures without a respect for tradition, groups without a concern for the common good, and politics without the slightest sense of history. Ibn Khaldun, were he alive, would tell them precisely where that leads.
The question is not radical Islam but, does the West believe in itself any more? Is it capable of renewing itself as it did two centuries ago? Or will it crumble as did the Soviet Union from internal decay. “We have met the enemy,” said the cartoon character Pogo, “and he is us.” That is the challenge of 9/11. It’s about time we came together to meet it.” (Rabbi Jonathan Sacks 9/5/11, Standpoint Magazine)
You need to read Rabbi Jonathan Sacks’ much better eloquence than my thoughts.
JRH 9/12/11