Biden’s Chamberlain Stylistics and Ukraine


Anyone a student of history? Here’s a scenario in short.

Between WWI and WWII the entire world was enveloped in a severe economic depression. Enter three authoritarian nations using despotic policies to fix their economic issues ultimately blaming Free nations for their woes and used military aggression to perpetuate economic growth.

It could be my amateurish observation: The Free World largely spent decades on a Global War on Islamic Terror which spanked Islamic terrorist tentacles but did little against Islamic ideology among nations that still embrace Islamic Supremacist ideology. Then the CCP-COVID inspires Globalist-Marxists to shut down Capitalist Enterprises on a local level. THEN Russia under Putin direction appears prepared to light the match to another world war believing the West and the U.S. in particular is too weak to respond to authoritarian aggression.

Sadly, with Dementia Joe allegedly running the show, Putin might be correct. Justin Smith examines the potential of a Russian invasion of the Ukraine.

Ukraine-Russia Military Tension (Map from 12/4/21 The Sun)

JRH 1/21/22 [UPDATED 1/23/22]

I need your generosity. PLEASE GIVE to overcome expenses:

Please Support NCCR

Big Tech Censorship is pervasive – Share voluminously on all social media platforms!

********************************

Biden’s Chamberlain Stylistics and Ukraine

Putin Spotlights the Weakness of NATO and Biden – Russia Violates the Budapest Memorandum So Much for Treaties 

By Justin O. Smith

Sent 1/21/2022 12:36 AM

When bad men combine, the good must associate, else they will fall, one by one, an unpitied sacrifice in a contemptible struggle.”  ~ Edmund Burke, ‘Thoughts on the Cause of the Present Discontents’ (1770)

Joe Biden revealed his affinity for a Neville Chamberlain-style appeasement on January 19th 2022 in his address to America, failing to understand that Machiavellian and tyrannical-minded people exist today only to expand their power and control over land and resources, which has become increasingly easy for them through the use of technology, globalization and the manipulation or utter disregard of international treaties. And as Biden spoke of any possible ” minor incursion” into Ukraine by Russian President Vladimir Putin, dripping with numerous idiocies, one very nearly expected to hear him say “freedom in our time … unless some tyrant wants to make a minor incursion into your country.”

[Blog Editor: Left-Wing CNBC provides the entire (Dementia Joe) Biden News Conference (1:52 blathering on a few subjects including Ukraine/Russia:

Youtube VIDEO: President Joe Biden holds a news conference at the White House — 1/19/2022

Posted by CNBC Television

Streamed live on Jan 19, 2022]

Jen Epstein of Bloomberg News asked two of the best questions of the question-and-answer press follow up, asking:

If the U.S. and NATO aren’t willing to put troops on the line to defend Ukraine and American allies can’t agree on a sanctions package, hasn’t the U.S. and the West lost nearly all of its leverage over Vladimir Putin?

And given how ineffective sanctions have been in deterring Putin in the past, why would the threat of new sanctions give him pause?

Turning on the green light and handing Putin an open invitation to invade Ukraine, Biden noted the action he would take after the fact of a Russian invasion, as he responded to Ms. Epstein:

Well, because he’s never seen sanctions like the ones I promised will be imposed if he moves, number one.

Number two, we’re in a situation where Vladimir Putin is about to — we’ve had very frank discussions, Vladimir Putin and I [very muddled and confused discussions if anyone asks me]. And the idea that NATO is not going to be united, I don’t buy. I’ve spoken to every major NATO leader. We’ve had the NATO-Russia summit. We’ve had other — the OSCE has met, et cetera.”

Has America ever seen a leader more stupid and dangerous than Joe Biden?

All the meetings in the world aren’t worth bull manure if no one actually stands prepared to really act in any meaningful manner, when the time comes that demands real and decisive, hard action. And as the world witnessed in 2014, America and Her Allies — NATO — under the “leadership” of Barack Hussein Obama and Joe Biden stood by and did absolutely nothing when Putin invaded, occupied and took Crimea on March 18th 2014, then a part of Ukraine. 

There are currently approximately 130,000 Russian soldiers, 175,000 by some accounts, and at least 60 Russian Battalion Tactical Groups all along the border with Ukraine, according to Ukrainian intelligence. In conjunction with this, the West has been unnerved to some degree by the arrival of several more BTGs and thousands more Russian soldiers in Belarus for “war games”, since Kyiv would quite likely fall rather rapidly to any attack from the north and Putin’s forces already have the Ukrainians so outmatched.

Noted by the Associated Press on January 18th:

Amid the tensions, Ukraine’s Defense Ministry said Tuesday it was speeding up efforts to form reserve battalions that would allow for the rapid deployment of 130,000 recruits to expand the country’s 246,000-strong military.” 

All of this stems from Putin’s anger at the United States and NATO for even remotely considering Ukraine as a member and sending armaments and financial support to enable Ukraine to better defend itself. In early 2007, Putin raged at the West during the Munich Security Conference and accused America and NATO of placing “frontline forces on our borders”, going on and even threatening nuclear war over Ukraine in 2008, 2014 and December of 2021.  And while there is some truth to this, Ukraine and all other free nations have the absolute right to form alliances for defensive purposes as they see fit, with whomever they see fit, just as individuals do.

Putin wants Russia’s own security demands met, even though it is Russia that is acting in a threatening manner towards Ukraine, and Ukraine would be hard-pressed to defend itself in the face of a full on assault and invasion. He wants assurances that Ukraine will never be granted membership in NATO and American advisors will withdraw from Ukraine and America will stop sending arms.

America should not meet Putin’s demands, mainly because NATO and the security of the West and America isn’t something that should be held hostage by a tyrant and a man working contrary to the principles of Freedom and Liberty. Why in the world would anyone actually give serious consideration to Putin’s demands?

Basically, although Putin wants Ukraine back under Russia’s blanket, he also badly wants to reveal just how weak NATO has become and just how paralyzed Joe Biden and America really are, when it comes to acting in defense of Freedom and their allies across the globe. The lid of this Pandora’s Box was opened in glaring terms with Biden’s disastrous withdrawal from Afghanistan. 

Given Biden’s weak policy with the Taliban and the abandonment of U.S. allies in Afghanistan, not one of our allies can or should trust the Biden regime. He’s made it clear that he will abandon a U.S. ally in a heartbeat. 

What an ironic contrast to Biden it is for one to hear that during the January 13th 2022 meeting of the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe, including the Russians, U.S. Ambassador Michael Carpenter stated:

As we prepare for an open dialogue on how to strengthen security for the benefit of all, we must decisively reject blackmail and never allow aggression and threats to be rewarded.” 

Normally, just as America’s Founders admonished, it really is best to stay out of other countries’ business and all foreign intrigues and misadventures for reasons we can find all across history, but in today’s modern world, any firm isolationist stance is certain to backfire on any nation taking it. The intertwined nature of the worlds commerce and economies make it virtually impossible anyway, as does the new world we live in that relies so heavily on the internet and computer technology. 

Biden’s assertion that his regime would levy harsh and heavy sanctions against Putin and Russia if Putin invades Ukraine was essentially a promise to close the barn door after the horse has escaped. He has done nothing of a positive nature with such a statement, but his words have most assuredly emboldened Putin and further ensured that Ukraine will be invaded by Russia.

The world would do well to recall that Chamberlain’s appeasement of Hitler didn’t make him stop with Czechoslovakia, Austria or Poland. 

Biden has simply signaled to the world and all of America’s allies that the era of bold, assertive and principal leadership in the face of tyranny and evil has died under his feckless, spineless, cowardly “leadership”.

If Putin is allowed to take Ukraine, look for him to absorb all of the former Soviet Union satellite states once again, since he has often remarked that the largest catastrophe of the 20th century was the dissolution and collapse of the Soviet Union. Taking Ukraine allows Putin to rebuild the empire that once existed, since Ukraine was the USSR’s breadbasket, full of resources; without Ukraine, Putin can still be managed to some degree.

When will enough be enough for the West? When China, Russia and Iran have a lock on most of the nations of the world and two or three generations of indoctrination have built one massive mindless military might loyal to their tyrannical rulers? By then, America could well be standing alone, given the uncertain allies it has in NATO and across Europe? By then, America could well be standing alone, given the uncertain allies it has in NATO and across Europe. 

It’s also good to recall the postwar words of Martin Niemöller , who opposed the Nazis in Germany:

First they came for the socialists, and I did not speak out, because I was not a socialist. Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out, because I was not a trade unionist. Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out, because I was not a Jew.

Then they came for me — and there was no one left to speak for me.”

Although Niemöller was speaking of the dynamic of German society that so easily gave way to Adolph Hitler, doesn’t the same dynamic apply to the fall of nations to totalitarian aggressors? Given a free rein, a tyrant will do as much damage as the world will allow, and to be so meek in the face of Putin’s naked aggression is to set the stage for an America that will eventually be left standing all alone, wondering what in the hell happened, especially when one considers the joint military maneuvers China and Russia have held each year since 2006 and their alliance with Iran, whose leaders call America “the Great Satan”.

However one views the current crisis over Ukraine, history reveals that Ukraine has always fought to remain free of Russia from its earliest days to the present, and even though the Treaty of Eternal Peace, signed in 1686 placed Ukraine under Russian rule, it was a “treaty” whose terms were forced by the victor Russia. Please note, that upon the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1989 (totally dissolving by 1991), a nuclear-armed Ukraine and its people immediately asserted themselves and took back their Freedom and Liberty and their nation, on January 21st 1990.

Upon Ukraine’s declaration of independence, the America and the world pressed Ukraine to relinquish its nuclear arms — some 1900 nuclear warheads —  in exchange for the world’s guarantee that it’s sovereign territory and national integrity would always be safeguarded by the world. Even Russia signed on to the agreement that came through the Budapest Memorandum of 1994, an agreement that committed America, Russia and the United Kingdom to “respect the independence and sovereignty and existing borders of Ukraine” and to refrain from the threat of use of force” against Ukraine.

However, if history shows us anything, it is that no agreement stands for long, when one is dealing with corrupt, dishonorable and evil people whose word means nothing at all and often is tossed about as their primary Machiavellian plans are being set in motion. 

At the moment, Putin appears to be under no compunction or have any inclination to uphold the Budapest Agreement or the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, and he is doing just as he pleases, even to go so far as to wage cyber war against America

To this day, Biden and his regime have not effectively countered or retaliated for Russia’s cyber warfare aimed at the U.S. and others, and now Russia has thousands of soldiers mere miles from the Ukrainian border. Biden is failing on every front, and although he assured Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelensky, in September 2021, that the United States would stand between Ukraine and any Russian aggression, it is now more than apparent those were simply empty words spewed by an incompetent, ignorant talking-head empty of any original thought.

So much for treaties. They’re only as good as the people upholding them. 

Some of the academics one finds across the board suggest the best real-world outcome for Ukraine that the world may hope to see is Ukraine following Finland’s example, refusing to take a pro-NATO, anti-Russia stance, in order to maintain a large level of its independence and freedom for its people. 

I reject this outright. Ukraine should be able to determine its own course, with or without America and NATO, but most certainly without any coercion or threats of armed invasions from Vladimir Putin and Russia’s might.

Nobody wants to see a full blown hot war flare up between America and Russia, or China for that matter, but at just what point must the so-called “Free World” — if such still exists — America and Her allies tell the tyrants “this is our line in the sand and it will not be crossed short of war”? Yes. The fact that all involved are nuclear armed is something that’s not to be taken lightly, but neither can the invasion of any nation seeking to only live free be taken lightly. 

If the world stands by and lets Putin take Ukraine, just as he did with Crimea in 2014, can anyone doubt that he will keep pushing and advancing and taking more territory, such as Latvia, Lithuania, Estonia, Belarus (a willing partner) and all the other countries of the former USSR?

For that matter, what happens when China takes Taiwan? Xi already has taken the measure of Biden. What happens when China decides to take all of Southeast Asia?

Putin and Xi have both considered, calculated and believe that they can emerge victorious over the U.S., even in an all-out nuclear war. If one side or the other gets too nervous over any given situation, a person can’t help but wonder whether our enemies might decide on a first strike; they’ve considered it and it’s well known to our Pentagon.

Most Americans can continue living, as they have for years, in good fashion, whether Ukraine is free or not — whether Taiwan is free or not. 

And although a worst case scenario for the world may not manifest for a decade or two, maybe even three, America must look at the Big Picture too and find a fine line between isolationism and interventionism.

What is the cut-off? When a tenth of the world is under the control of one tyrannical government? a fourth? half? three quarters? Or are we to let the tyrants have a free rein to run rough-shod across all the freedom-loving people of the world until America is left standing all alone, all by Herself?

Trying to avert war shouldn’t lead to kissing a tyrant’s ass or allowing one’s country to be blackmailed into silence and inaction to the point of essentially being a vassal to that tyrant and his state, paying tribute ’til one bleeds again and again.

One must understand the Ukraine is but one small part in the greater war between Good and Evil and the desire of the globalists and communists and their Islamist allies to either draw America and as much as the globe under their control or destroy Her. And for me, fighting to the death or victory is preferable to life as a serf.

Handling America’s enemies in a manner that serves Her best interests and actually defends Her national sovereignty won’t happen, until a strong freedom-minded individual takes the helm of the country and guides us to live and let live and not be put upon to our harm and detriment, by nation’s leaders who envy us and seek to conquer or destroy America. Biden is sorely at a loss in this regard and we should all pray that America survives unscathed during these last three years of his continued incompetence and his continued betrayal of America to Her enemies.

Perhaps U.S. leaders should stop bending over backwards to avoid any conflict and they should take a more belligerent attitude towards Russia, even rapping the Bear’s knuckles a time or two, as they take a lesson from Akeksandr Lukashevich, Russia’s permanent representative to the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE). During the recent meeting of the OSCE in Vienna on January 13th 2022, Lukashevich stated

“Russia is a peace-loving country. But we do not need peace at any cost. The need to obtain these legally formalized security guarantees for us is unconditional.”

The Free World must stop deluding itself and unite, and in the end, it must either act and stop tyrants as they rise or face the same fate as the conquered, when they are alone and the enemy comes for them. Pray it hasn’t become too feeble to do the right thing in the face of evil on the march.

By Justin O. Smith

_____________________________

Edited by John R. Houk

Embedded sources links are by Justin Smith. Content embraced by brackets are by the Editor. Bold text indicates Editorial agreement.

© Justin O. Smith

IRAN VIDEO #3: When bad people chant “Death to America”.


Even as Obama makes Chamberlain-esq assertions that a nuke deal is of historical significance that will lead to global harmony in our time, Iran pumps out more and more weapons grade nuclear material. The Clarion Project has put together a grassroots format to talk to your Senators and District Representative to the House to demonstrate your displeasure with President Barack Hussein Obama’s Foreign Policy initiatives that will lead to a horrific global war rather than to peace in our time.

 

Below is the Clarion Project email cross post, the link to the page that has a short but excellent video driving home the Obama fallacy and will lead you to write Congress which includes your disagreement with Obama.

 

JRH 6/2/15

Please Support NCCR

*************************

IRAN VIDEO #3:  When bad people chant “Death to America”…

 

From Clarion Project

Sent: 6/2/2015 8:42 AM

 

Clarion Project launches a series of videos ahead of the June 30 Iran nuclear-deal deadline.

VIDEO #3:  BELIEVE THEM?…    WATCH NOW

 

Hitler announced what he would do – and then he did it.

So did Osama bin Laden.

 

Now, Iran is chanting “Death to America” while lying about its nuclear capabilities.

 

When bad people say they will do bad things…BELIEVE THEM.

____________________________

VIDEO: Iran Short Film Series – 3. Believe Them!

 

 

Published by Clarion Project – Challenging Extremism | Promoting Dialogue

Published on Jun 1, 2015

 

Throughout history, good people have often tried to make deals with bad people, in the hopes of preserving peace.

Today, there are those who want to make a deal with Iran.

History has not been kind to those who make deals with bad people.

Be on the right side of history. Count your name among the righteous who oppose this historically bad deal.

 

___________________

SAY NO TO A NUCLEAR IRAN. JOIN THE RIGHT SIDE OF HISTORY

 

Click NOW: Tell your elected officials to say NO to a bad nuclear deal with Iran.

 

June 2, 2015 update: Urgent – Write to Your Elected Officials Now

 

No Nukes For Iran! We prepared a NEW e-mail and will send it for you to your elected officials. Our system will always allow you to preview the e-mail before it sends it. Make your voice count! It takes less than a minute. 

 

Click here to tell your elected officials to say NO to a bad nuclear deal with Iran. It takes less than a minute.

 

Thank you!

______________________________

The Clarion Project (formerly Clarion Fund) is a non-profit organization dedicated to educating both policy makers and the public about the growing phenomenon of Islamic extremism. The Clarion Project is committed to working towards safeguarding human rights for all peoples.

 

Donate to The Clarion Project

There are NO Winners in Syria’s Civil War


Syria- Malankara Metopolitans

John R. Houk

© July 6, 2012

 

Danny Jeffrey posted this letter from a Facebook friend who had received it from a Christian residing in the turmoil in Syria. I had posted Danny’s thoughts on Syria (FIRST RATE PROPAGANDA AND FOX NEWS IS INVOLVED) underneath my thoughts after Googling on the Houla Massacre the subject matter of Danny’s post.

 

I think this is a fair summary of the Christian’s plight in Syria:

 

§  The majority population of Syria is Sunni Muslims.

 

§  The Rebels in Syria are dominated by Radical Muslim Sunnis.

 

§  President Bashar al-Assad is a good righteous President dedicated to bring democracy to Syria.

 

§  The Assad regime is dominated by the minority Shia Muslims.

 

§  The Assad regime is dedicated to bringing a level political situation to Syria including protecting the Christian minority in Syria.

 

§  Sunnis do not care if Syrian Christians are ethnically cleansed.

 

§  Israelis do not care if Syrian Christians are ethnically cleansed.

 

§  President Barack Hussein Obama does not care if Syrian Christians are ethnically cleansed.

 

§  The world wants to remove Assad because of his friendship with Iran.

 

§  Saudi Arabia is orchestrating the world to buy into the Sunni Radical Muslims as leaders.

 

§  The world is unjust and is following the Sunni butchers to rid Syria of Bashar al-Assad.

 

This Christian is distressed and hopeless about Christianity in Syria if Assad is removed. I absolutely believe the assessment of the future of Syrian Christians if Shia Alawite Bashar al-Assad is removed (probably killed or exiled to Iran).

 

On the other hand I believe the Christian has bought into the propaganda of the Assad regime. Christians may survive in Syria under Assad but the lot in life will not be as full participants in a representative democratic government because there is no such thing under the Assad regime. Bashar al-Assad inherited the reins of dictatorship from his father who was highly involved in mid-20th century Arab wars to eradicate Jewish Israel off the earth.

 

There is a reason for the move of Syrian Sunnis toward radical Islam. It is to remove the hopelessness of the Oppression of  the Alawite Assad family rule has executed upon the majority Sunnis. Is Assad oppression a reason to butcher Syrian Shias and Christians?

 

There is no justification for massacres of the Sunni majority, the Shia minority and the Christian minority. Alas the only thing that will save Syria from savage massacres is to end the tribal mindedness of Syrian Arabs and the secularization of Islam (Sunni and Shia).

 

NONE of those situations will ever happen in Syria without bloodshed. AND that bloodshed would have to occur with the goal of ending familial tribalism and the secularization of Islam. The current antagonists in Syria indicate there is no such reform on the horizon for Syria.

 

I have to believe fear and propaganda is the foundation for Christians supporting Assad and therefore the brutal Mullahs of Iran. I am convinced Saudi Arabia is probably involved in some subterfuge in Syria for the simple matter that Syrian chaos benefits Saudi National Interests concerning their primary Middle Eastern enemy Iran.

 

As to Israel and President BHO, I believe the Christian in the letter is in a state of hopelessness in the analysis of uncaring by Israelis and the American government. Israel is a loser by whoever wins the civil war in Syria. The common thread of Jew-hatred that has brainwashed into every citizen in residing Middle Eastern nations will be the same by whoever wins. I believe the Obama Administration and some foolish Senators interest in removing Assad is the result of bad geopolitical thinking in poking a thumb in the eye of Iran by ridding the Mullahs of a client state. If Assad falls though, it will change nothing for America. The common thread of the perception of hating the Muslim big Satan (USA) and the Muslim little Satan (Israel) will continue until a war to end wars occurs in the Middle East.

 

And so, God have  mercy on the Christians in Syria. Syrian Christians are stuck between the Mohammed-style radical Islam of the Sunnis and the Alawite Shias need to rule at any cost to survive because of their own oppressive sins toward Sunnis.

 

JRH 7/5/12

Please Support NCCR

*****************************

DO NOT BELIEVE the crap in the news about Syria!!!

Danny Jeffrey

Facebook Link

Jul 2, 2012 7:59pm

 

John, thank you for joining the effort. This is a letter from a Christian in Syria to a FB friend – Terry Cook.

DO NOT BELIEVE the crap in the news about Syria!!!

From a beloved Christian sister in Syria:

We are all suffering here in Syria & have had to leave our homes in Homs & come to Aleppo. These animals, the “free Syria” [SlantRight Editor: Free Syrian Army] thugs have all but burnt our city. We Thank God we have family here where we are welcome & safe for the time being. Unfortunately I don’t think we will ever see our homes again.

We Christians have been advised to keep a low profile & to stay indoors for our safety. We were lucky to get out of Homs when we did as forty three Christians were kidnapped two days after we fled. These non humans are using our brothers & sisters as human shields so the Army cannot fire upon them.

 
Terry I don’t think many in the western world understand what is needed of a ruling party in order to enforce a free & just society for all people. Any country in the Middle East like Syria whose population is eighty seven % Sunni Muslim, have to have a strong regime to ensure the minority are treated equally. It has been difficult for our President to introduce Syria to a form of western style democracy, but this is what he had been working hard to achieve. He was working hard to open Syria up to the world by the introduction of the internet & tourism etc. He had lifted our economy by 5% just before this invasion.

The REAL problem is that many of the Sunni hard liners do not want democracy, it goes against Islamic Sharia law. They with the aid of Saudi Arabia instigated this all from outside Syria. They are not the only ones behind this as many in the region have their purpose of wanting to rid Syria of it’s President & install one that is more “Controllable”. Iran is the real target. Saudi Arabia want the Shiites eradicated, Israel want them disarmed, those controlling American foreign policy agree with Israel & accept the bribe from Saudi Arabia. Syria is the minor stumbling block to their plan so they must control it. Fine Terry but what about us? Does Saudi Arabia care if us Christians are eradicated? No they don’t. Does Israel really care if we are eradicated? No I am sure they are not. Is Mr. Obama losing sleep over us Christians? No I don’t think so! If many in the west understood our plight & the reason behind this farce invasion then just maybe Terry we might survive. One of the greatest crimes in history will be if this intervention on our country results in the killing of this VERY just President.

 

Sorry for rambling Terry I am just so overwhelmed at the injustice in this world & the way the free world are aiding Satan (Islam) to reign.

___________________

There are NO Winners in Syria’s Civil War

John R. Houk

© July 6, 2012

____________________

DO NOT BELIEVE the crap in the news about Syria!!!

 

SlantRight Editor: I ran a spell check on the Christian’s letter. I did not change the grammar, just the spelling of a few words. If you choose to you can read the pristine original at the link provided at the beginning of the letter.

 

About Danny Jeffrey from Freedom Rings 1776

 

I’m sixty seven and since Ronald Reagan left office I have watched my country slowly deteriorate as freedoms are lost and the value of our currency dwindles. This has been a slow but steady decline until Barrack Obama entered the White House. I will not refer to this man as President. That is a job that deserves respect and he has earned none at all. I am convinced that were it not for the Tea Party stirring up the public we would now be living under a total dictatorship. He seeks only power and has no loyalty at all to the United States, and as long as he is in office I shall write to any who will read and speak of what he is and what he is doing to this country.

Seeds of a Sunni-Shia War?


Iranweb lg

John R. Houk

© January 22, 2011

 

I was reading a WND news article where I came upon ad that caught my attention and was entitled: “EXPOSED: The REAL Reason Iran Wants the Bombs …” The ad had a picture of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad pointing his finger as in a speech. The ad was a link to an investment promotion that uses the carrot of “free” reports to buy a $49 subscription to an investment newsletter with a money back guarantee if the purchaser is not pleased. However, preceding the shpeel is some interesting analytic extrapolations about the probability for a coming war in the Middle East. Interestingly the war would not be the Muslims against Israel scenario. Rather the war will occur because of Iran desires to control the oil of Saudi Arabia and the underlying tension will be the age old strife between Sunni Muslims and Shia Muslims. That which is most fascinating to think about is that Sunnis are about 90% of all Muslims. The biggest concentration of Shias is in Iran with a significant minority of Arab speaking Shias in Iraq. According the video report those Shias of Iraq is the location of some of richest oil deposits in the Iraqi nation.

 

The ad video displays maps showing Shia population groups that roughly surround Saudi Arabia that have traditionally had zero political or military clout. The speculation from the ad shows that Iranian support for these Shia population centers have militarized traditionally powerless Shias into Islamic terrorist clients of Iran. The classic example is Hezbollah in Lebanon and the Islamic terrorists in Yemen.

 

I sense Iran might start a conflict with Israel through its proxies Hezbollah of Lebanon and the rogue government of Syria as an excuse to attack Israel. The saber rattling talk to wipe Israel off the map would be an excuse to turn on the current Saudi partnership with America to attack Saudi Arabia. Again the excuse will be Israel and the presence of Israel’s traditional big dog supporter America. America has military bases in the Muslim holy land of the Arabian Peninsula which is the location of Mecca and Medina which are central to Islam’s theopolitical cult. Both Sunnis and Shias revere Mecca and Medina. An excuse to invade Saudi Arabia would be to remove Mecca and Medina from the Saudi Royal family control (Wahhabi Sunni) who have brought the infidel (kafir-Americans) to the Arabian Peninsula.

 

Many purist Muslims that the West love to call radical Muslims are in agreement that the infidel should have no part on the Arabian Peninsula. So here is the irony of a Sunni/Shia war: many radical Muslim sects will undoubted support Iran’s fabricated excuse to invade Saudi Arabia even though they are Sunni by nature. This would include a number of Wahhabi Sunnis in Saudi Arabia itself. By the by, al Qaeda’s existence from founder Osama bin Laden came into being because of the infidel being on the Arabian Peninsula in the First Iraq War. Bin Laden was a Saudi citizen from a wealthy family that was partial to Wahhabi ideology. And it would not be the first time Wahhabi Sunnis confronted the Saudi Royal family over their role as the protectors of Mecca and Medina. Wahhabis seized the Great Mosque in 1979 and only an agreement between the Saudi Royal family and Wahhabi Clerics saved Saudi Arabia from a Sunni version of Khomeini’s Shia Iranian Revolution in Iran. Indeed before the Saudi/Wahhabi agreement, the Saudi Royal family clandestinely utilized infidel French commandos to wrest control away from the Wahhabi revolutionaries holding the Great Mosque. Even today the Saudis would deny using infidel to retrieve the Great Mosque.

 

Three commandos from the French GIGN led by thirty-three year old Lieutenant Paul Barril converted to Islam so that they would be allowed into Mecca to aid the Saudi police and military and their Pakistani attaches in planning the retaking of the mosque – as non-Muslims cannot enter the city of Mecca. Their identities were concealed by the Saudi government so as to avoid the appearance of being too closely allied with non-Muslim nations and parties, as was frequently the accusation leveled by the propaganda services of Ayatollah Khomeini against The House of Saud. (Ground Mosque Seizure; Siege: Absolute Astronomy)

 

I am guessing Barril’s conversion was a hypocritical exploitation of the Saudis because this guy has been involved in a bunch of controversies from his Gendarme days through to his days as a consultant about terrorism.

 

Now the prediction of this ad that a war is looming very soon in the Middle East from Iranian hegemonic desires that could indeed turn intolerant Islamic Iran into a super power interested me; however I learned some bonus information in the ad’s pursuit to plug an investment newsletter.

 

Did you know that Brazil has the sovereign control of newly discovered oil fields under the ocean of the Brazilian coast? I mean it is so huge that it may be bigger than Saudi Arabia’s oil deposits or even Russia’s Siberian oil deposits. Brazil is a large nation in South America that does have access to natural resources because of its size. Brazil as a developing nation has depended on American and European corporations to develop those resources over the years. This would all change with the kind of revenue oil development and possible oil refining that will turn Brazil into a major oil exporter. Natural resources are a major absence from other oil exporting giants such as Saudi Arabia or Iran. Can you imagine the kind of prosperity this will bring to Brazil? With Brazil’s natural resources and oil money to develop it, Brazil will enter a stage of huge industrialization. Industrialization means building a military to protect Brazil from outside competitors. Guess which nation competition would affect the most? That would be the National Interests and National Security of the United States of America.

 

Unless America begins to court Brazil as a South American partner (as in equals rather than superior/inferior), Brazil will naturally turn to America’s competitors to offset American meddling that would have to occur for America to remain strong. If Brazil hooks up with nations that are a threat to America’s economy or military prowess, American-Brazil tension could evolve into military confrontation. Any of these nations hooking up with a powerful Brazil will cause problems for America: Iran, Russia and China.

 

Iran is seeking hegemony in the Middle East to the point of trying to acquire Iraq and Saudi crude. Russia and America have not exactly seen things eye to eye lately on mutual National Interests that still has the air of military competition. China is seeking its own hegemonic region of influence in Asia. China also holds a large chunk of America’s debt and thus is doing a little tugging on America’s testicles. America’s entangled non-declared war against Islamic terrorists is diverting American resources that expose America’s back-side if Brazil engages positively with America’s competitors. I can throw in pipsqueak yet blowhard Marxist Venezuela in the mix, but I think there are a lot of variables involved with Venezuela being an oil competitor right on the border with Brazil. Although I expect a lot of nationalization from Brazil, I’m not seeing Hugo Chavez’s Marxist paradigm as being attractive to Brazil’s future. In fact old Hugo might be the best thing to move Brazil and America into a much needed alliance as the protectors of North and South America.  

 

In case you are curious about more of the ad data. It spends some time talking about how many nations with nuclear power plants are increasing that capacity thus increasing the demand for uranium. Then the ad examines gold as an investment that is wise when a global war might mess up all the currencies of the world. Conspiracy Theorists can extrapolate how this data might geopolitics and global wars that could lead to the – wait for it … the New World Order.

 

JRH 1/22/11

%d bloggers like this: