Introducing Floyd Brown Criticizing Benghazigate Report

Benghazi Liars

John R. Houk

© December 29, 2012


In an email sent from Western Center for Journalism Floyd Brown draws from some reputable sources highly criticizes the Accountability Review Board’s (ARB) report on Benghazigate (No accountability for those held accountable).


Here are some highlights of Brown’s criticism (not comprehensive because the entire essay needs to be read):


·       The Benghazi Massacre is more than Foreign Policy ineptitude


·       Benghazigate involves government officials at the highest levels, al-Qaeda operatives, radical jihadists, the Muslim Brotherhood and even George Soros.


·       Blaming YouTube video as the reason for Massacre was smoke and mirrors


·       ARB lead investigator Thomas Pickering is on the Board of Soros’ International Crisis Group


·       The Benghazi Consulate was not a Consulate, rather it was a meeting place to discuss sending arms to al Qaeda affiliates of Libya (rebel victors against Qaddafi) and to al Qaeda affiliates of the Syrian rebels fighting the Bashar Assad dictatorship.


·       Nations represented at meeting: USA, Libya, Turkey, Saudi Arabia and Qatar


·       And More


An interesting question that Brown explores: “Is Benghazi-Gate A Criminal Conspiracy That Can Bring The Obama Regime Down?”


Remember Watergate? President Nixon’s Watergate Cover-up was an obvious illegal use of government resources to spy on George McGovern’s campaign in 1972. Nixon’s paranoia led to the Watergate break-in which politically was the stupidest decision of Nixon’s career. Nixon slaughtered McGovern in 1972.


Nixon and the Mainstream Media (MSM) hated each other. When Nixon’s Administration got caught with its hand in the cookie jar the MSM screamed often and long until Congress set up hearings in the Senate.


There will be no MSM expose asking questions about possible/probable Obama Administration illegalities. The MSM will go to great lengths to shield the Leftist-in-Chief from illegal dirt. Unless some brave person is able to make the smoking gun connection to a government cover-up Obama will slide through the wonderland mirror unscathed.


People like Floyd Brown’s Western Center for Journalism is the only hope of catching the Obama Administration with its hand in the cookie jar. So keep the pressure coming.


JRH 12/29/12

Please Support NCCR


Obama Armed Al-Qaeda Terrorists


By Floyd Brown

Sent: December 29, 2012 7:03 AM

Western Center for Journalism


“[T]he official report by the U.S. government’s Accountability Review Board [ARB] about the attack on the U.S. compound in the Libyan city of Benghazi ignored the most explosive ‘Beghazigate’ scandals: the Obama administration’s lawless arming of jihadists in Libya and Syria….” -The New American

A shocking number of investigative reporters are coming to the same horrifying conclusion. Benghazi-gate is NOT just about covering up Obama Regime security and foreign-policy ineptitude that directly lead to the murder of four brave Americans on the eve of a presidential election.

Rather… leaving these Americans to die horrible deaths was potentially part of a much larger, AND CRIMINAL, cover-up… an attempt to conceal what The New American calls; “the Obama administration’s full role in helping violent Jihadists [and] self-styled al Qaeda terrorists” … a cover-up that involves government officials at the highest levels, al-Qaeda operatives, radical jihadists, the Muslim Brotherhood and even George Soros.

Barack Obama may think that a handful of insignificant State Department resignations and the rigged results of a bogus “independent investigation” (that was launched to whitewash this growing scandal) are going to make Benghazi-gate go away, but he’s wrong… because we’re not going to let him get away with it. 

The American people deserve the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth and we’re going to force our elected officials to get the American people those answers.


Send your urgent Blast Faxes to each and every one of Members of the Republican Leadership of the United States Senate and the United States House of Representatives.


How Is George Soros Connected To This Emerging Scandal?


Everyone with a pulse already knows that the Obama Regime promoted an outrageously false story that anger over an obscure YouTube video fueled the Benghazi attack, but few know that the so-called Accountability Review Board investigation was quite possibly another attempt to cover-up the Obama Regime’s treasonous role in aiding America’s enemies abroad.

Political commentator Dick Morris says that “the blue ribbon commission charged with investigating the attack… perpetuates a cover-up by distracting attention from the main issue to side matters.” In other words, both the false YouTube narrative and the so-called “independent investigation” of this cover-up may actually be part of a much larger cover-up.

Where there is smoke, there is fire. Investigative journalist Aaron Klein with WND tells us: “The panel’s lead investigator into the Benghazi attack, former Ambassador Thomas Pickering, has largely unreported ties to the revolutions in the Middle East and North Africa.”

Klein goes on to say: “Pickering serves on the small board of the International Crisis Group, or ICG” and “Billionaire activist George Soros is on ICG’s executive board.” Klein adds: “ICG itself has long petitioned for talks with Hamas as well as normalized relations with the Muslim Brotherhood.”

Pickering’s credentials beg the question: Why would a man with such long-standing ties to radical Islam and globalist America-haters like George Soros be tapped to head an “independent investigation” into Benghazi-gate.

Should we be shocked that the “blue ribbon commission’s” findings were nothing more than a complete and total whitewash? The obvious answer to the second question isn’t no … it’s hell no.

Morris adds that “there will be a temptation on Capitol Hill to drop the inquiry after the Hillary-less hearing. We must not let them do so. Don’t let her off the hook.”

He’s right and we mustn’t allow our elected officials to enable Barack Obama’s efforts to sweep Benghazi-gate under the rug.  We must demand justice.


Send your urgent Blast Faxes to each and every one of Members of the Republican Leadership of the United States Senate and the United States House of Representatives.


Something Stinks And The Stench Leads To 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue.


But Pickering simply isn’t on the board of the Soros-funded ICG. According to Wikipedia, he’s the co-chairman and directly oversees the ICG’s international actions.

Pickering is also a member of the Council of Foreign Relations and serves on the board of the American Iranian Council, an organization devoted to the “normalization” of relations between Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s Iran and America.

When it comes to the previously posed question: Why would a man with such long-standing ties to radical Islam and globalist America-haters like George Soros be tapped to head an “independent investigation” into Benghazi-gate; political commentator Andrew Malcolm, in Investors Business Daily (IBD) draws the following conclusion.

Malcolm states: “The report from the Accountability Review Board…is only one tiny piece of a vast bureaucratic ballet that has evolved in Washington.”

The New American, referring to Malcolm’s IBD article, adds: “The purpose, he [Malcolm] said, is to shift people’s attention away from real scandals using what essentially amounts to deceitful PR tactics, and the establishment press often plays along. ‘It’s an amazingly sophisticated and bipartisan procedure that looks sound to naive eyes,’ Malcolm continued. ‘It’s built upon powerful self-interest and savvy strategic communications that manages and manipulates information and the timing of its release to minimize damage to incumbents and to dampen ongoing media interest in pursuing an embarrassing matter further.'”

And what are the “real scandals?” For starters, Klein tells us that the Benghazi Consulate “was not a consulate.”

He adds: “According to Middle East security officials I talked to, this was a major meeting point — I would say the central meeting point — for the American diplomats… to meet with officials of Turkey, Saudi Arabia, and Qatar, about supplying the opposition in Syria and Libya. Well, who is the opposition? In Libya, the opposition openly included jihadists, included al-Qaeda elements. In Syria, right now, the al-Qaeda elements are leading the opposition….”

Is the arming of al-Qaeda elements and radical jihadists what Obama was talking about when he said “I will stand with them should the political winds shift in an ugly direction.” There’s only one way to find out. Congress must act to get at the truth… no dog-and-pony shows that end in more whitewashes… the American people deserve facts.


Send your urgent Blast Faxes to each and every one of Members of the Republican Leadership of the United States Senate and the United States House of Representatives.


Here Are Some Real Questions.


It’s clear that we’re confronted with a scandal that goes beyond simple incompetence that resulted in the deaths of brave Americans and an incompetent attempt to deflect blame away from that incompetence prior to an election.

We may be dealing with something more sinister and the following questions, posed in an article in The New American, go to the heart of the matter.


**What was the Obama administration’s full role in helping violent Jihadists, self-styled al Qaeda terrorists, and Western-backed “revolutionaries” take over Libya in the first place?

**Did that half-baked scheme to arm Jihadist leaders, who as the report acknowledges had previously fought U.S. troops in Iraq, contribute to the attack, as countless experts and officials have suggested?

**What was actually going on at the compound in Benghazi, which as the report states, was never a “consulate” despite establishment media claims?

**Was Ambassador Stevens recruiting and arming Jihadists and terrorists to wage war on the Syrian regime after what Obama called the “success” in Libya, as a growing body of credible evidence suggests?

**Why did the administration claim for so long that the attack was just a “protest” over a YouTube video gone awry, even when it knew definitively that was not the case?

**Was the lack of security at the compound a political ploy to conceal the extent of the lawlessness and utter chaos left in the wake of Obama’s unconstitutional “regime change” war on Libya, as even members of Congress have alleged?


According to the ARB report: “Systematic failures and leadership and management deficiencies at senior levels within two bureaus of the State Department resulted in a Special Mission security posture that was inadequate for Benghazi and grossly inadequate to deal with the attack that took place.”

Give us a break. The ARB report is an insult to anyone possessing more intelligence than God gave the common dog. It doesn’t even acknowledge the important questions and the American people deserve to have those question asked… and answered… by our elected officials.

Send your urgent Blast Faxes to each and every one of Members of the Republican Leadership of the United States Senate and the United States House of Representatives.


Is Benghazi-Gate A Criminal Conspiracy That Can Bring The Obama Regime Down?


The New American: “These revelations are not at all shocking to those who are familiar with the Obama administration’s record of support for virulently anti-American Islamists in Libya, including those closely allied with al-Qaeda. … the Obama administration’s ‘Arab Spring’ strategy infamously embraced terrorist ‘Emir’ Abdelhakim Belhadj and his Libyan Islamic Fighting Group [LIFG].”

The New American adds: “The Libyan Islamic Fighting Group is listed by our National Counterterrorism Center and the U.S. Department of State’s Bureau of Counterterrorism as a ‘Designated Foreign Terrorist Organization.’ The United Nations Security Council likewise lists the LIFG as an al-Qaeda-affiliated terrorist group. Nevertheless, Abdelhakim Belhadj and the LIFG received blessings (and aid) from the Obama administration. After Libyan dictator Moammar Gadhafi was overthrown, Belhadj was installed as the chief of the Military Council in the new U.S.-backed ‘rebel’ regime in Tripoli. And Belhadj is only one of several notorious terrorists aided by the United States in our ‘humanitarian intervention’ in Libya.”

And The New American concludes: “According to analysts, it appears that the main purpose of the report was to deflect criticism and potentially even criminal responsibility away from President Obama, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton… and others.”

Is anyone else saying that the Obama Regime is aiding anti-American terrorists? Retired Admiral James A. Lyons leveled the following charge almost two months ago in a Washington Times opinion editorial:

“We now know why Ambassador Christopher Stevens had to be in Benghazi the night of 9/11 to meet a Turkish representative, even though he feared for his safety. According to various reports, one of Stevens’ main missions in Libya was to facilitate the transfer of much of Gadhafi’s military equipment, including the deadly SA-7 — portable SAMs — to Islamists and other al Qaeda-affiliated groups fighting the Assad Regime in Syria….”

Syndicated columnist and conservative author Diana West says: “The red flags didn’t go up over this so-called investigation for nothing. The White House isn’t just whitewashed in the report, it’s whited-out.”

And Steve Elson, an ex-Navy SEAL, says that the “Benghazi response — or, more accurately, Obama’s failure to respond in Benghazi” is “immoral and treasonous.”

Make no mistake. Barack Hussein Obama desperately wants this scandal to go away because he knows that it can topple his illegitimate occupation of the Oval Office, and he’s willing to go any lengths to get bury it. We can’t let him get away with it.


Send your urgent Blast Faxes to each and every one of Members of the Republican Leadership of the United States Senate and the United States House of Representatives.


Floyd Brown


Introducing Floyd Brown Criticizing Benghazigate Report

John R. Houk

© December 29, 2012


Obama Armed Al-Qaeda Terrorists


The Western Center for Journalism is a 501©3 educational organization. Contributions are tax-deductible as allowed by IRS regulations. Personal and corporate contributions are allowed.

The Center for Western Journalism
42104 N Venture Drive Suite B-122, Anthem, AZ 85086  (202) 370-6366


SlantRight Note: The original used multiple text colors for emphasis. I did not utilize the colors.


UN Continues NWO Course


John R. Houk

© September 26, 2012


The United Nations keeps on finding deceptive ways to enlist the United States of America into a sovereignty ending compact with the United Nations. If the UN is able to trump a national government’s sovereignty that essentially makes the UN a global governing body making the rule of law on a global basis.


In America’s case the existence of a global rule of law authority would nullify the U.S. Constitution eradicating the best Liberty-Rights the world has ever seen basically making the Bill of Rights portion of Constitution subservient to United Nations legal precedent.


Free Speech would be reduced hindering minority beliefs.


Religious Freedom would be regulated to meet varying standards; e.g. Biblical Christians could not have the same public worship say a Muslim may have (Church bells no – Islamic adhan by muezzin yes); Biblical Christians would be jailed preaching against homosexuality, Biblical Christians could be jailed for preaching (Christ’s Great Commission) for atheists and non-Christians might be offended and incited to violence and so on and so on.


The Second Amendment for American individuals to bear arms for protection would controlled or ended by the UN because armed citizens is always a threat to government authority and essentially the UN would be the World Government.


Undoubtedly there are other Constitutional Rights that would be curtailed or terminated by UN authority.


The most notorious path the UN has been implementing Agenda 21 which is using ecological-Global Warming-Agriculture-Depopulation as the path to operate a top to bottom global government.


Here is a brief description of Agenda 21:


Awareness of Agenda 21 and Sustainable Development is racing across the nation as citizens in community after community are learning what their city planners are actually up to. As awareness grows, I am receiving more and more calls for tools to help activists fight back. Many complain that elected officials just won’t read detailed reports or watch long videos. “Can you give us something that is quick, and easy to read that we can hand out,” I’m asked.


So here it is. A one page, quick description of Agenda 21 that fits on one page. I’ve also included for the back side of your hand out a list of quotes for the perpetrators of Agenda 21 that should back up my brief descriptions.


A word of caution, use this as a started (sic) kit, but do not allow it to be your only knowledge of this very complex subject. To kill it you have to know the facts. Research, know your details; discover the NGO players in your community; identify who is victimized by the policies and recruit them to your fight; and then kill Agenda 21. That’s how it must be done. The information below is only your first step. Happy hunting.


What is Sustainable Development?


According to its authors, the objective of sustainable development is to integrate economic, social and environmental policies in order to achieve reduced consumption, social equity, and the preservation and restoration of biodiversity. Sustainablists insist that every societal decision be based on environmental impact, focusing on three components; global land use, global education, and global population control and reduction.


Social Equity (Social Justice)


Social justice is described as the right and opportunity of all people “to benefit equally from the resources afforded us by society and the environment.” Redistribution of wealth. Private property is a social injustice since not everyone can build wealth from it. National sovereignty is a social injustice. Universal health care is a social justice. All part of Agenda 21 policy.


Economic Prosperity


Public Private Partnerships (PPP). Special dealings between government and certain, chosen corporations which get tax breaks, grants and the government’s power of Eminent Domain to implement sustainable policy. Government-sanctioned monopolies.


Local Sustainable Development policies


Smart Growth, Wildlands Project, Resilient Cities, Regional Visioning Projects, STAR Sustainable Communities, Green jobs, Green Building Codes, “Going Green,” Alternative Energy, Local Visioning, facilitators, regional planning, historic preservation, conservation easements, development rights, sustainable farming, comprehensive planning, growth management, consensus.


Who is behind it?


ICLEI – Local Governments for Sustainability (formally, International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives). Communities pay ICLEI dues to provide “local” community plans, software, training, etc. Addition groups include American Planning Council, The Renaissance Planning Group, International City/ County Management Group, aided by US Mayors Conference, National Governors Association, National League of Cities, National Association of County Administrators and many more private organizations and official government agencies. Foundation and government grants drive the process.


Where did it originate?


The term Sustainable Development was first introduced to the world in the pages a 1987 report (Our Common Future) produced by the United Nations World Commission on Environmental and Development, authored by Gro Harlem Brundtland, VP of the World Socialist Party. The term was first offered as official UN policy in 1992, in a document called UN Sustainable Development Agenda 21, issued at the UN’s Earth Summit, today referred to simply as Agenda 21.


What gives Agenda 21 Ruling Authority?


More than 178 nations adopted Agenda 21 as official policy during a signing ceremony at the Earth Summit. US president George H.W. Bush signed the document for the US. In signing, each nation pledge to adopt the goals of Agenda 21. In 1995, President Bill Clinton, in compliance with Agenda 21, signed Executive Order #12858 to create the President’s Council on Sustainable Development in order to “harmonize” US environmental policy with UN directives as outlined in Agenda 21. The EO directed all agencies of the Federal Government to work with state and local community governments in a joint effort “reinvent” government using the guidelines outlined in Agenda 21. As a result, with the assistance of groups like ICLEI, Sustainable Development is now emerging as government policy in every town, county and state in the nation. (READ THE REST Agenda 21 In One Easy Lesson; Worldview Times; 04/04/11)


Now that I have the stage with Agenda 21 become aware of the next UN scheme to terminate American Sovereignty. That scheme is called the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) [SA Phyllis Schlafly]. This is a United Nations sponsored international treaty that has a name that evokes the emotion of sympathy. I mean who doesn’t help Disabled People? Who wants to be labeled a wicked miser for refusing compassion for the Disabled?


The thing is there are loads wording that would nullify the United States Constitution.


Below is a Western Center for Journalism (WCJ) email that is informative and gives you the ability to participate in mass faxing to your Senator (The Senate must approve all foreign treaties).


JRH 9/26/12

Please Support NCCR


GOP Senators Pushing Constitution Subverting UN Treaty


By Floyd Brown

Sent: 9/25/2012 10:04 AM

Sent by WCJ


What Would You Say If We Told You That The United States Senate Is About To Ratify A U.N. Treaty That Seeks To • Eradicate Your Parental Rights • Advance Abortion Around The World • Sexualize Children As Young As Five-Years Old • And Institute Population-Control Measures At Home And Abroad?

And what would you say if we told you that a number of Senate Republicans have joined hands with the Democrats and are actually pushing the ratification of this United Nations treaty, either because they are legitimately ignorant when it comes to the actual language of this treaty, or are simply too scared to oppose it because it is masquerading as an international effort to affirm the rights of disabled persons?

We couldn’t have made it up if we tried. As a matter of fact, Senator Jim DeMint, who is leading the charge in opposition to this United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) treaty, came right out and said: “When you look at the language in the treaty you realize THERE ARE OTHER THINGS AT STAKE HERE. A LOT OF THE LANGUAGE IN THERE HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH DISABILITIES....” [Emphasis Ours]

And now, CRPD actually stands a better-than-even chance of actually being ratified because RINO Senators Richard Lugar, John Barrasso and Johnny Isakson, voted with the Democratic majority in the Senate Foreign Relations Committee to send it to the full Senate for ratification… and we’re not about to let our elected officials pass this unholy thing in the dark of night while no one is looking.

       You can stop CRPD the exact same way you just sunk the United Nations Law of the Sea Treaty (LOST) and the United Nations Arms Trade Treaty (ATT). We need to get our elected officials on record NOW. It only takes 34 Senators to say “No” and if 34 of them put their opposition to CRPD IN WRITING, right here and right now, as they did with LOST and ATT, we can kill CRPD, dead in its tracks, without even bringing it up for a vote.

Use the button or the hyperlink below to send your urgent Blast Faxes to each and every one of the 47 Republican Members of the United States Senate.



The Problem With The CRPD Is That It’s Not Really About Helping Persons With Disabilities. In Actuality, It’s A Ploy To Trick Us Into Voluntarily Surrendering Our Sovereignty.


Make no mistake, the canard of addressing the needs of the disabled is simply pretty ribbons and bows. What’s inside the actual package is the surrender of our sovereignty to the America-haters and tyrannical third-world dictatorships that call themselves United Nations Members.

And we’re not the only ones saying it. The Heritage Foundation writes that “ratifying it [the CRPD] would subject the U.S. to UNTOLD THREATS against its sovereignty and invite further intrusion by U.N. officials into sensitive social and domestic policies.” [Emphasis Ours]

       Heritage goes on to say: “However, U.S. ratification of the [CRPD] is more than merely superfluous; the [CRPD] threatens American sovereignty in a variety of ways. As with other human rights treaties, the [CRPD] established a treaty body composed of unelected ‘experts’ … that evaluates the compliance of state parties to the treaty.”

       Those are mighty strong words coming from an organization like Heritage that strives to phrase just about everything in as dignified and academic a manner as humanly possible. There can be no mistake, CRPD is all about the surrender of our national sovereignty… and we’re in no mood to surrender it… we’re not going to stand by a let it happen without a fight.


clip_image001[22]  Senator Jim DeMint said: “We don’t need to go beyond our Constitution and federalist system by allowing our fundamental rights to be dictated by unaccountable and unelected international bureaucrats.”

clip_image001[23]  John Bolton, the former-Ambassador to the United Nations, was making an obvious reference to the CRPD as the hat-trick to LOST and ATT when he recently said: “I think there are a lot of threats to American sovereignty that the Obama administration has had cooking in the U.N. They’ve kept it kind of low key.”

clip_image001[24]  And Bonnie Alba, an independent columnist, who served in various positions in the Department of Defense, said of the United Nations: “[I]f we acquiesce to the U.N. plan to run the world under the guise of helping the poor and weak, there is one guarantee. Over time all nations would lose their national sovereignty to the U.N. which would end up performing as a Banana Republic Dictatorship through enforced collection of taxes. And accountable to no one.”


And what is perhaps the ultimate irony is that this treaty, if ratified, would probably do nothing to safeguard the innate, inalienable (and for those of us in the United States, God-given) rights of people with disabilities. Instead, it WOULD erode (or even eradicate) the civil liberties of your children and grandchildren; and that’s why we must speak out and make our voice heard at this very moment.

Use the button or the hyperlink below to send your urgent Blast Faxes to each and every one of the 47 Republican Members of the United States Senate.



But The Eradication Of Our Sovereignty Is Not The End Game. It’s Just The Beginning.


Mike Farris with the Home School Legal Defense Fund clues us in to the first bit of United Nations trickery on CRPD when he tells us that the “CRPD provides no specific definition of disability.” And Farris is not alone. Heritage concurs: “Other language in [the CRPD] is troubling… such as its lack of a clear definition of disability, which it defines as ‘an evolving concept.'” Of course, neglecting to clearly define the term “DISABILITY” in the 50 distinct articles of the “Convention on the Rights of Persons with DISABILITIES” treaty WAS NO ACCIDENT. It’s Standard United Nations Operating Procedure.

An unelected and unaccountable body of America-haters and third-world thugs, or as Heritage put it, “a treaty body composed of unelected ‘experts,'” will define this “evolving concept” as they go. The definitions of what constitutes “disabilities” and “rights” will constantly change, expand and morph to include greater numbers of people, and as more “rights” are allocated to an ever-increasing numbers of people who are deemed “disabled,” others will demand these newly created special “rights” as well.

And our enemies will simply rinse-and-repeat the process, continually abuse this “evolving concept” and impose unfunded, unconstitutional and even sublimely ridiculous mandates upon you, your children and your grandchildren, under the guise of “securing the rights of the disabled.” In reality, they’ll simply be attempting to overwhelm our already strained entitlement system, and crippling the United States under the weight of that same entitlement system.

If you think that ObamaCare and Barack Obama’s other economy crippling shenanigans are bad, know that the demagogues of the third-world are just itching to show us how it’s really done… but we’re not going to give them the chance.

We can’t give them the chance because we might not be able to close Pandora’s Box once it is flung open; and once our own cowardly politicians start to tell us that we are obliged to follow the DICTATES of this body of third-world thugs and America-haters (and tyrannically enforce OUR compliance on THEIR behalf), it’s all over.

Article VI of our own Constitution requires compliance: “This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.”

As for our enemies, they won’t comply; and all the America-haters at the United Nations will simply turn their backs and look at us with blank stares on their faces. ‘What do you mean Iran is not complying with the provisions of the treaty… of course they’re in compliance… however, the other member nations of the panel would like to address some more issues involving your compliance with you.’

After all, THEY define the terms and THEY make the rules as they go. As with many United Nations treaties and resolutions, CRPD will mean whatever they say it means on any given day, and our children and grandchildren will be left with no national sovereignty… no individual liberties… and a wreaked economy. Our children and grandchildren will be reduced to serfdom under the iron fist and the autocratic rule of those who despise freedom, liberty, and most of all, us… but it doesn’t have to be that way. We can put a stop this menace today.

Use the button or the hyperlink below to send your urgent Blast Faxes to each and every one of the 47 Republican Members of the United States Senate.




Did You Know That The Promotion Of The Radical Worldwide Abortion Movement Goes Hand In Hand With Safeguarding The Rights Of Persons With Disabilities?


And just what do abortion and the rights of the disabled have to do with each other? We still don’t know, but we DO KNOW that the United Nations has become infamous over the years, for constantly sneaking coded abortion advocacy language into treaties and resolutions that should have nothing whatsoever to do with abortion; and CRPD is no exception.

Article 25 of the CRPD which addresses issues of “Health” states that the “State Parties” are mandated to “take all appropriate measures” to ensure those covered under the treaty have access to “gender-sensitive” health services… and “free or affordable health care and programmes… in the area of sexual and reproductive health…” (“sexual and reproductive health,” is known to be United Nations-speak for abortion).

And just so you know not only how committed the Left is when it comes to promoting a radical worldwide abortion agenda, but also how the United Nations intentionally interjects “code phrases” in treaties and resolutions; consider what happened when Senator Marco Rubio actually introduced an amendment to the CRPD in the Senate Foreign Relations Committee which simple stated:

“The United States understands that the phrase ‘sexual and reproductive health’ in Article 25(a) of the Convention does not include abortion, and its use in that article does not create any abortion rights, cannot be interpreted to constitute support, endorsement, or promotion of abortion, and in no way suggests that abortion be promoted as a method of family planning.”

ALL HELL BROKE LOOSE.  Chloe Cooney with the Planned Parenthood Federation of America (PPFA) wrote: “These extreme views in opposition to women’s rights and U.S. participation in the global community only succeed in marginalizing a bipartisan effort like the [CRPD],” and Senator Barbara Boxer echoed that statement: “No senator in my view should use any international treaty to push his or her views on an issue that isn’t part of this treaty.”

Did you catch that? The United Nations is advancing a treaty that allegedly attempts to safeguard the innate and inalienable rights of persons with disabilities and interjects the promotion of abortion into the document THROUGH THE USE OF CODE WORDS; and when a Marco Rubio sought to clarify that the treaty on the rights of the disabled “in no way suggests that abortion be promoted as a method of family planning,” Barbara Boxer and her denizens of the Left accused RUBIO of interjecting HIS “views on an issue” into the debate.

And the Democrats and the RINOs on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee voted Rubio down. That’s why we need 34 Senators to go on record NOW and put their opposition to CRPD in writing. We need to send the world a message. The United States refuses to even hold a vote on lunacy.

Use the button or the hyperlink below to send your urgent Blast Faxes to each and every one of the 47 Republican Members of the United States Senate.




And Did You Know That Our Children Have The “Right” To Sexual Gratification From The Moment They Emerge From The Womb And This Disability Treaty Is Going To Enforce That “Right” Too?


Senator DeMint and Mike Farris have very real and well-founded concerns when it comes to Article 7 of the CRPD, which mandates that states ensure that “the best interests of the child” shall be the primary consideration in all actions concerning the “rights” of the child.

As Farris, who sees the dangers in his capacity as one of the nation’s leading, if not the nation’s leading, homeschool advocate states: “Should the government’s assessment of the child’s best interests differ from that of the parents, the government gets to make the decision, not the parents.”

DeMint says: “We’re afraid that if the language suggests that parental authority is not absolute, we’re going to have an international body telling our parents they can’t homeschool.”

What DeMint and Farris aren’t addressing is that the dangers posed by this treaty to your children and grandchildren are far worse. Article 23 of the CRPD, deceptively and ironically titled, “Respect For Home And The Family” mandates that children have “access to age-appropriate information, reproductive and family planning education are recognized, and the means necessary to enable them to exercise these rights are provided.”

You might be interested in knowing what the United Nations typically means when it uses the term “age-appropriate” in reference to “reproductive and family planning education,” because it doesn’t mean what you think it means… at least not to far too many United Nations officials and NGOs.

As an aside, you may have also realized that the term “rights” is also a United Nations code word that typically means “coerced mandate;” a scary proposition when the word is used in relation to the topics of “abortion,” “health care,” “the disabled,” and “child gratification.”

One of the good-guys, Family Watch International, a NGO that attempts to prevent some of the more radical anti-family notions that come out of the United Nations from ever seeing the light of day, tells us about the term “age-appropriate:”


clip_image001[25]  “The International Guidelines on Sexuality Education,” which is a “publication issued by UNESCO, UNICEF and the United Nations Population Fund “maintains that children have a right to receive instruction in sexual pleasure, masturbation and homosexuality…”

clip_image001[26]  Other UNESCO guidelines tell us that children as young as five-years-old should be taught “that they can touch their body parts for sexual pleasure” and;

clip_image001[27]  A significant number of activists connected to the United Nations assert “that children are sexual from birth, and as such, are entitled to experience sexual    pleasure.”


Volumes have been written on this subject. Unfortunately, the vast majority of people have never read anything issued by the United Nations and United Nations’ recognized NGOs; and if you are so ignorant as to believe that the sexualization of your child is not “age-appropriate”… well that’s just too bad.

Under the terms of the treaty, the United States Government will be mandated to enforce the dissemination of “age-appropriate information” and “reproductive and family planning education” to your child, whether you, as the parent, like it or not. It’s your child’s “right.”

As Senator Boxer would probably say, you really should not “use any international treaty to push” your personal “views on an issue that isn’t part of this treaty.” We say “nuts” to that… our God-given liberties are non-negotiable and it’s essential that we communicate that message to our elected officials.

Use the button or the hyperlink below to send your urgent Blast Faxes to each and every one of the 47 Republican Members of the United States Senate.




And Did You Further Know That Population-Control And The Rights Of The Disabled Go Hand In Hand Too?


Article 25 of the CRPD, which has already been quoted in part, also mandates that “State Parties” provide access to “population-based public health programmes…” And just what is a “population-based public health” program?

One example that may actually be familiar to you is something called “Agenda 21,” a term which should conjure visions of former Vice-President Al Gore’s “Earth In The Balance”-enviro-babble; but a good, hard, look at Barack Obama’s Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy, John P. Holdren, should more accurately solidify what is meant by “population-based public health programmes” in your mind.

As it turns out, Van Jones wasn’t the only “nut” in Obama’s inner-circle, and what is probably even more startling is that the United States Senate actually confirmed Holdren.

In 1997, Holdren co-authored a textbook entitled “Ecoscience,” which advocated mass sterilization, compulsory abortion, one-world government and the establishment of a global police force to enforce these population control measures… errrr… “rights.”

Here are several more of the “greatest hits” from Holdren’s tome:


clip_image001[28]  “Indeed, it has been concluded that compulsory population-control laws, even including laws requiring compulsory abortion, could be sustained under the existing Constitution [he’s talking about the United States Constitution] if the population crisis became sufficiently severe to endanger the society.” -page 837


clip_image001[29]  “If this could be accomplished, security might be provided by an armed international organization, a global analogue of a police force. Many people have recognized this as a goal, but the way to reach it remains obscure in a world where factionalism seems, if anything, to be increasing. The first step necessarily involves partial surrender of sovereignty to an international organization.” -page 917


clip_image001[30]  “… a comprehensive Planetary Regime could control the development, administration, conservation, and distribution of all natural resources, renewable or nonrenewable… the Regime could have the power to control pollution not only in the atmosphere and oceans, but also in such freshwater bodies as rivers and lakes that cross international boundaries or that discharge into the oceans. The Regime might also be a logical central agency for regulating all international trade… including all food on the international market.” -pages 942 and 943

clip_image001[31]  “The Planetary Regime might be given responsibility for determining the optimum population for the world and for each region and for arbitrating various countries’ shares within their regional limits. Control of population size might remain the responsibility of each government, but the Regime would have some power to enforce the agreed limits.” -pages 942 and 943


Use the button or the hyperlink below to send your urgent Blast Faxes to each and every one of the 47 Republican Members of the United States Senate.





Why Would So Many Republican Senators So Willingly Support The Surrender Of Our Sovereignty To The United Nations?


We’ve got our work cut out for us because Senators Lugar, Barrasso and Isakson aren’t the only Senate Republicans supporting this atrocity. Senators John McCain, Jerry Moran and Bob Corker have already gone on record in support of the CRPD as well… and more are certain to follow if our elected officials don’t hear from you right now.

These 6 RINOs only need 8 more Senate Republicans to agree to this affront to our sovereignty, and there are plenty that are ripe for the picking… Senators Lindsey Graham, Olympia Snowe, Susan Collins, Scott Brown, Kay Bailey-Huchinson, Lamar Alexander, Mark Kirk, Thad Cochran, Michael Enzi, John Thune and Lisa Murkowski come immediately to mind.

That’s more than 8 and that list is by no means inclusive. Senators Moran and Barrasso, who stood in opposition to LOST, are actually pushing CRPD. McClatchy even reported that Jim DeMint is very aware that he’s “up against other Republican senators” and that he “faces an uphill battle in preventing ratification.”

But that doesn’t mean we can’t win this fight. We’ve fought much harder battles and if you make your voice heard now, we can win.

Why would these Republican Senators so willingly surrender our sovereignty to the United Nations? Why ask why? History, after all, is clear. In the “Federalist Papers” Alexander Hamilton observed that “a dangerous ambition more often lurks behind the specious mask of zeal for the rights of the people” and “that of those men who have overturned the liberties of republics, the greatest number have begun their career by paying obsequious court to the people….”

Perhaps it is enough to say that it takes intelligence, discernment and courage to do the right thing; particularly when the “right thing” is opposing something that masquerades as an effort to advance the rights of the disabled.

Isakson’s own office inadvertently confirmed the above by issuing a slyly-worded statement that said he “voted in favor of the [treaty] in the committee because ratification would signal to the world that the U.S. is committed to continuing its role as the international leader in disability rights.”

But hold on… wait until you hear what came next. Isakson’s office actually added that the treaty “will not erode our sovereignty.” Is he serious?

Perhaps, but it’s more than certain that Isakson and far too many of our Republican leaders didn’t bother to read Article 46 of the CRPD, which explicitly states: “Reservations incompatible with the object and purpose of the present Convention shall not be permitted.”

Isakson and Company should know better; but they don’t. Mike Farris said: “They lack the knowledge to execute their offices AND IT’S SHAMEFUL.” [Emphasis Ours]

One thing is certain. When our elected officials are
done picking up the mountains of faxes that will spill from their overflowing fax trays onto their floors… they won’t be able to use the excuse that they “lacked knowledge.”

       So let’s make our demands known. Tell our elected officials in no uncertain terms, with an election approaching, that there will be dire career-ending consequences UNLESS they send the opposition a clear message that even bringing this treaty up for a vote is an effort in futility. We want them on record… and we want it in writing.

Use the button or the hyperlink below to send your urgent Blast Faxes to each and every one of the 47 Republican Members of the United States Senate.




Floyd Brown


UN Continues NWO Course

John R. Houk

© September 26, 2012


GOP Senators Pushing Constitution Subverting UN Treaty


The Western Center for Journalism is a 501©3 educational organization. Contributions are tax-deductible as allowed by IRS regulations. Personal and corporate contributions are allowed.


The Center for Western Journalism
42104 N Venture Drive Suite B-122, Anthem, AZ 85086  (202) 370-6366


[SlantRight Editor: The WCJ email had blue, red, bold and italics for points of emphasis. I am not taking the time to include the emphasis in this post except perhaps where the emphasis is noted within the email.]


Let Congress Examine Cold Case Findings

BHO & home made BC

John R. Houk

© July 29, 2012


The Western Center for Journalism (WCJ) has sent a lengthy Birther email under the belief that Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s Cold Case Posse has produced the smoking gun proof that President Barack Hussein Obama’s birth certificate is indeed a forgery. Since the birth certificate is supposed to have been directly released under the approval of President BHO, the smoking gun proof indicates the crime of fraud against the American public.


Of course President BHO is going to claim (more than likely BHO representatives) the Birthers are Right Wing Nuts that have no credibility BECAUSE the President has gone overboard to produce a Hawaiian recognized birth certificate. However, that is the point of Cold Case Posse spokesman Mike Zullo that the Hawaiian recognized birth certificate is based on phony duplicitous paperwork.


Since the Justice Department is in the hands of Obama and his cover-up acolyte Attorney General Eric Holder, it is unlikely any hint of a criminal investigation will look at the Cold Case Posse evidence. So what is left? That would be any Congressman or Senator willing to overcome the stigma of the appellation of “Birther” and take a serious look at the evidence to once and for all show if Obama is involved is some massive cover-up or if the Birther assertions are just plain wishful thinking pertaining to the most Socialist-Marxist President America has ever elected.


I/ am posting Floyd Brown’s lengthy (but trust me – necessary) email presented as evidence; however that which I want you to notice is the call to send faxes to Congress to act on this evidence.


Whether or not you are in the Birther tank to expose BHO’s birth certificate it is well worth the investigation that would at the very least reveal information that will show an un-American character. At the very least voters will be better informed that Obama is a deceiver even if his cover-up is to hide embarrassing personal tidbit that he knows will alienate American voters. OR the miracle might proceed with a Congressional investigation concurring with the Cold Case Posse analysis making President Barack Hussein Obama susceptible to impeachment proceedings.


Below is the email:


JRH 7/29/12

Please Support NCCR


 Floodgates Now Open On Obama Birth Certificate Fraud


By Floyd Brown

Sent: 7/29/2012 10:03 AM

Sent by Western Center for Journal


Now That Sheriff Joe Arpaio Has Submitted Smoking-Gun Proof That Barack Obama’s So-Called Birth Certificate Is A Computer-Generated Forgery: Will Our Elected Officials Stand Up For What Is Right, Or Will They Run And Hide Like Pathetic Cowards?


We’ve known for far too long that the bogus birth certificate that Barack Obama published on the Internet was nothing more than a “computer-generated forgery.”

But now, Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s Cold Case Posse has produced incontrovertible evidence that the document is a fraud… incontrovertible evidence that even a member of Congress can understand… smoking-gun proof that even a thick-headed member of Congress simply can’t dismiss or ignore.

That’s why Sheriff Joe wants to take these Cold Case Posse findings to Congress as soon as humanly possible and we simply can’t leave Sheriff Joe hanging in the breeze. Patriots, like you and me, must step up to the plate, see this fight through to the bitter end and turn up the heat on Congress. And that’s exactly what we’re going to do right here and right now.

Use the button or the hyperlink below to send your urgent Blast Faxes to each and every one of the Members of the Republican Leadership of the United States Senate and the United States House of Representatives.



Sheriff Joe Isn’t Letting It Go And Barack Obama Very Desperately Wants You To Let It Go. So What Do You Believe You Should Do?


Yes, there are some folks out there who are saying that you should just give up the ghost, but do not forget for a moment that Barack Obama is one of them.

Some will remind you that an election is approaching, and claim that the energies of patriotic Americans might be better spent trying to un-elect a man from an office he should have never occupied in the first place; but that kind of talk is often no more than an excuse for cowardice.  A pending election only makes this matter even more urgent.

That’s why we’re not buying it… any of it.

At the very least, should we not pressure Congress to address the issue for no other reason than to ensure that the American people KNOW that the man who could possibly get their vote in November, presented a fraudulent birth certificate to the public in an attempt to to (sic) trick the American people into believing that he was eligible for the office he intends to occupy for four more years?

Should we not pressure Congress to address the issue for no other reason than it is the very last thing that Barack Obama wants… and it may very well be the one thing that likely keeps him awake at night?

Should we not push the issue for no other reason than to make it possible for our fellow Americans to know that the liberal media has gone above-and-beyond the call of duty, to the point of idiocy, to cover-up what may well turn out to be the greatest scandal of this yet young century?

But probably the most compelling reason why we must not give up, quite frankly, is because Sheriff Joe isn’t giving up; and if Sheriff Joe is in this fight to the bitter end, each of us has an obligation to this to stay in this fight until the bitter end.

Should we betray a man who has sacrificed so much and come so far? … Should we send the wrong message to our elected officials and let them know that they can GET AWAY WITH JUST ABOUT ANYTHING because patriotic Americans will simply give up and go away if they ignore our demands long enough?

Should we lie to ourselves and concede the point that there may be times when it is NOT advisable, as a matter of general principle, to assert our God-given rights as Americans to have our grievances heard and demand redress of those grievances?

We just don’t say no… we say ‘Hell No.’ Win, lose or draw, we will see this fight through to the bitter end and if you’re with us, then you can make your voice heard right now.

Use the button or the hyperlink below to send your urgent Blast Faxes to each and every one of the Members of the Republican Leadership of the United States Senate and the United States House of Representatives.



They Found Her. The Mysterious Registrar “U.K.E. Lee” Who Allegedly Signed Obama’s Birth Certificate. And Guess What She Had To Say?


Make no mistake, Obama’s birth certificate is about as phony as a three dollar bill.  Zullo went on to say: “The only legal authority which could have made the document [the Hawaii Department of Health], did not make it.”

According to a report filed by, after the press conference that was called on July 17 to present the new and shocking evidence: “Cold Case Posse lead investigator Mike Zullo said the new information confirms the document presented to the American public in April 2011 is undoubtedly fraudulent.”

And just what was the incontrovertible proof?

It was actually staring us in the face the whole time.

When Barack Obama released his “digitally-altered” birth certificate back in April of 2011, people asked why did numbers, which appear to have been written in pencil (see the screen shot below), appear throughout the document, and what did these numbers signify?


Birth Ceritificate 9s


Even Zullo admitted: “Nobody really knew what they were.”

But now, we finally have answers.

The Cold Case Posse located and interviewed a number of individuals who had specific and firsthand knowledge of procedures in the Hawaii Department of Health; including Verna Lee, a.k.a., the mysterious U.K.E. Lee, now 95 years old, the Registrar whose signature is reproduced on the so-called birth certificate that Obama released to the public over a year ago.


UKE Lee Signature


And all parties independently verified that the number “9” that appears in pencil in field 9, (see the screen shot), indicates that the information that should go in that field was UNKNOWN (keep reading and we’ll explain why in just a bit).

Put another way, if the image above were a copy of an original birth certificate, that field would be BLANK and, quite obviously, IT IS NOT.

The fact that ANY INFORMATION WHATSOEVER now appears in field “9” (if anything would have gone in that field, it would have been the word “unknown”) in the birth certificate indicates that the information was added later on and the document Obama presented to the public IS NOT A COPY of an original birth certificate.

This newest revelation, of course, is totally consistent with the Cold Case Posse’s original finding, after subjecting the birth certificate to forensic examination, in March that the document Obama actually produced was not only “digitally doctored,” but was also compiled using “two or three” different source documents.

Game over. As Zullo so plainly put it: “This proves the document has been tampered with and information has been placed on it.”

Use the button or the hyperlink below to send your urgent Blast Faxes to each and every one of the Members of the Republican Leadership of the United States Senate and the United States House of Representatives.




And Obama’s Father Was “Unknown?”

Did you notice that the information which presently appears in field number “9” (information that should not be there in the first place) in the alleged birth certificate, under the designation “Race of Father.” reads “African?”

That’s a huge problem for Mr. Obama because the designation “African” was not in use at the Hawaiian Health Department until 1989, a full 28 years after Barack Obama was born.

The designations and the corresponding number codes used in 1961, when Barack Obama was born, appear in the screenshot below.


Hawaiian Race Codes


Obviously, someone… who did not work at the Hawaiian Health Department… and moreover, lacked a credible command of recent American history, placed the word “African” into the document WELL AFTER THE FACT.

Zullo again: “The Department of Health didn’t create it. They didn’t create the file, somebody else did.”

Use the button or the hyperlink below to send your urgent Blast Faxes to each and every one of the Members of the Republican Leadership of the United States Senate and the United States House of Representatives.





So What Do Those Numbers Mean And Why Are They Present?

Now, some will ask if other birth certificates from 1961 show pencil marks. Another question that should be asked is if it is possible that the number “9” in field 9 of Obama’s alleged birth certificate could be a clerical error.

We’ll answer that question in a few paragraphs, but first, let’s address the question, of whether or not those numbers in pencil are supposed to be there and what they mean.

All we need do is to look at the birth certificate of Susan Elizabeth Nordyke, one of the Nordyke twins, who was born the day AFTER Obama at Kapiolani Hospital.


birth certificate of Susan Elizabeth Nordyke


Notice the same pencil marks. Notice the fact that the number codes are correctly rendered as “1” means “White” (or Caucasian as it is rendered on the certificate).

Also notice that the copy of the Nordyke birth certificate comes from a microfiche copy and not the fancy green laser printer paper that appears to have been used on the alleged birth certificate that Obama presented to the public.

As to why clerks were so busy scribbling numbers on birth certificates in pencil… ?

Zullo and the Cold Case Posse found out from Lee and others: “We discovered that the procedure for the department of health was to take a birth certificate, check it for accuracy and then code it with numerical values in some of the fields, such as ‘fathers race’ or ‘type of business or employment. They would take these numerical values that have designators to identify that information, then the federal government would take that information and put those numerical values on magnetic tape for their own census information.”

Moreover, Verna Lee and others, with credible knowledge of Hawaii Health Department procedures, told Zullo that it is incredibly unlikely that the number “9” that appears in the birth certificate Obama supplied to the public is a coding error from a Department of Health employee because all of the marked certificates were checked and then cross-checked by an entirely different set of eyes to ensure accuracy.

According to Zullo, when he asked Lee if an error was possible, Lee shot back at him; “Not on my watch.” Particularly since the number “9” was known by all those who handled the records to typically signify a birth to a single mother. It would be unthinkable that two people would repeat a mistake of that magnitude.

So, now that conclusive proof of forgery has been submitted, the only question that remains is what will our elected officials in Washington do, now that they are armed with the knowledge that the man occupying the Oval Office, in an attempt to prove that he is eligible to hold that office, supplied the American people with a fraudulent document?

Two things are certain. If you press then to do the right thing, it is entirely possible, in spite of the now overwhelming hard evidence, that they might continue to sit on their hands and do nothing, while Barack Hussein Obama throws our great country down the chute, like yesterday’s garbage.


Use the button or the hyperlink below to send your urgent Blast Faxes to each and every one of the Members of the Republican Leadership of the United States Senate and the United States House of Representatives.



And If Undeniable Proof Isn’t Good Enough, There’s Still More. Lee Helped Solve Another Mystery That, Until Now, Had Gone Unanswered.


Verna Lee had more to say about another pesky issue that could not be explained for the longest time.

Look below at the birth numbers, taken from the birth certificate for Barack Obama (top) and the birth certificate from Susan Nordyke (bottom).


Obama BC Serial Number


Nordyke BC Serial Number


You will notice that Susan Nordyke’s number is lower than Obama’s, even though she was born the day AFTER Obama; and no one, not even the Cold Case Posse, could do more than offer theories as to how it would have been possible for Nordyke to be assigned a lower birth number than Obama

Verna Lee had no problem answering the question. According to what Lee told Zullo, Obama’s number is out of sequence because he WAS NOT BORN AT Kapiolani Hospital and his birth was likely reported at a vital records satellite office.

Again, Lee’s information simply confirms a theory that we advanced long ago and, in its reporting of the July 17 Cold Case Posse press conference, restated the premise that “an established resident of Hawaii, not necessarily a U.S. citizen” was “able to register an out-of-state or foreign-born person with an official Hawaii birth certificate.”

As a matter of fact, while it was already know that section 338.17 of the Code of the State of Hawaii permitted the issuance of Hawaiian birth certificates under the criteria mentioned above, Arpaio related that he was shocked when he found out that the practice was actually quite commonplace.

As reported; “his team has discovered Hawaii provides easy access to a birth certificate, even if the child wasn’t born in the state” (emphasis on the word EASY) and Arpaio went so far as to call the very existence of such a policy “an imminent threat to national security.”


Use the button or the hyperlink below to send your urgent Blast Faxes to each and every one of the Members of the Republican Leadership of the United States Senate and the United States House of Representatives.




But Let’s Get Back To Verna Lee


Lee is clearly indicating that someone (either Barack Obama’s mother, or his grandparents, or all of them) could have marched down to the nearest vital records office and filed Obama’s birth as a Hawaiian birth.

Under Hawaiian law, they didn’t need proof. The infant did not even need to be present. Give your word and it’s done.

It would have been easy; and if we were to assume that Barack Obama was indeed born overseas and the relationship between Obama Sr. and Ann Dunham, as reported from far too many sources over the years, was on shaky ground, establishing “citizenship” for the infant Obama would have been the Dunham’s first priority.

And yes, if Obama’s birth certificate was obtained as a result of a visit to a vital records satellite office, then Obama’s birth announce would appear in the local papers.

Quick, someone alert FOX News’ Bill O’Reilly that he could be wrong for the first time in his life.

Of course the above scenario assumes that the birth certificate number is indeed Mr. Obama’s birth certificate number and not a copy-and-paste job from someone else’s number altogether; which is still also within the realm of possibility.

Here’s the bottom line.

Questions are still unanswered and our Republican leaders are going to have to show some backbone. Seriously, if some of them can lock hands with Team Obama and press Mitt Romney to release financial records with each passing day, then they should have the moral predisposition and the gumption to demand that Barack Obama start releasing some documents too (or does that sound too much like right?).

There’s no excuse for their weak and cowardly behavior. If Mitt Romney supplied the American people with anything resembling a “made-up” tax return, Team Obama would be all over him. Obama’s people, after all, had no problem falsely accusing Romney of criminal behavior even though the accusation was so outlandish that it made them look foolish.

It’s frustrating, but for the sake of argument, let’s just set aside, for an ever so brief moment, the definition of what actually constitutes “natural-born” citizenship and whether or not Obama would meet that standard (since his father was a foreigner), THIS MAN ARROGANTLY REFUSES TO VERIFY THAT HE’S EVEN A PLAIN OL’ CITIZEN under any category or definition of the word.

So what’s the problem with our Republican leaders?

They need to start demanding some documents from Mr. Transparency and they can start by demanding the document that Obama is still so determined to hide… a document that and would prove, whether or not the man who usurped the Oval Office is nothing more than a two-bit con-man and forger.


Use the button or the hyperlink below to send your urgent Blast Faxes to each and every one of the Members of the Republican Leadership of the United States Senate and the United States House of Representatives.





Floyd Brown


Let Congress Examine Cold Case Findings

John R. Houk

© July 29, 2012


Floodgates Now Open On Obama Birth Certificate Fraud


The  Western Center for Journalism is a 501©3 educational organization. Contributions are tax-deductible as allowed by IRS regulations. Personal and corporate contributions are allowed.


The Center for Western Journalism
42104 N Venture Drive Suite B-122, Anthem, AZ 85086  (202) 370-6366