I’m not sure how much sharing of something I’m sure every God-Fearing Christian American is aware of, AND YET Leftist Judicial Activism has been OVERTURNED by Judicial Constitutionalism! TODAY, ROE v. WADE IS DEAD. Now voters in each State will be accountable if Baby-Killing continues.
There are predictions of Leftists beginning “Days of Rage” which I have no doubt will again be MSM propagandized as mostly peaceful protests while actual peaceful J6 Protesters are Political Prisoners of the Dementia Biden Regime. It’s good thing SCOTUS also affirmed 2nd Amendment Rights to overcome Leftist violence.
Now the cross posts.
READER SUPPORTED! I need Readers willing to chip in $5 – $10 – $25 – $50 – $100. PLEASE I need your generosity. PLEASE GIVE to overcome research expenses:
After weeks of anticipation and much speculation, today pro-lifers across the globe received news of a 6-3 majority pro-life decision in the U.S. Supreme Court case Dobbs vs. Jackson Women’s Health Organization. LifeSiteNews’ Jim Hale and Doug Mainwaring were on the ground to capture the spectacular moment the judgment was announced and pro-lifers celebrated the overturning of Roe v. Wade.
Fifty years of blood, sweat and prayers, often watered with tears for the 63 million little victims, has ended in a decisive victory for pro-life Americans today. In a 6-3 decision, the Supreme Court of the Unites States of America has overturned Roe v. Wade.
With that decision, the federal government no longer has any role to play in the abortion issue. Yes, Joe Biden can issue any executive orders he wants, but the states controlled by Republicans can simply thumb their nose at the madman in the White House and ban the butchering of babies.
It was particularly refreshing to see how many young people in their teens, 20s and 30s were gathered outside the Supreme Court today, celebrating this historic moment. From the pictures I saw, the vast majority were under 40.
I would be remiss, however, if I did not send out warnings of things to come. Don’t be naive and think that the other side is going to lie down now and accept this defeat.
They will not. One thing about any Marxist/communist movement: They never cede back conquered territory. Abortion on demand has become a sacred right — for some it’s even a religious rite — to those on the left, both men and women who want to have sex without any thought of the consequences.
We are about to see what the face of evil really looks like. Here’s what to expect.
Their leaders will call out the shock troops and have them unleash the demonic force of violence that they so feverishly believe in.
We will see boycotts against states that stand up for life. Organizations like the NCAA and the National Football League will likely refuse to play games in states where abortion is made illegal. Certain major corporations will refuse to do business in the pro-life states.
But there’s more we need to be aware of.
Remember this: Only a violent people could accept the murder of babies.
If they were OK with killing the most innocent among us, do you think they will lose a night’s sleep over killing those who made today’s decision possible? Those who fought on the front lines all these years, who prayed out in front of abortion clinics, who counseled pregnant teens to keep their babies and not kill them?
These are the same people who now want to shoot up 6-month-old infants with a toxic mRNA concoction that will kill off a percentage of our youngest generation and sterilize those who manage to survive the endless shots.
If they would do this to babies in the womb and children in their first few years of life, what do you think they will do to you?
These vicious adversaries will now unleash hell’s fury against pro-lifers, and pro-life Christians in particular.
We are about to find out who the real Christians are and who among us were just playing Church.
Why do I say that?
Because for the first time in American history, Christians will be forced to stand on an entirely Christian principle — LIFE — which could actually get them beaten, spat upon, even killed. Just like Christ himself and his apostles were spat upon, beaten and killed.
Every church must prepare now to harden their church doors.
Every pastor and every lay leader must meet together and come up with a plan to protect not just the church building, for buildings will be torched, but more importantly the worshipers, parishioners and congregants.
Even some liberal churches will be attacked, because many of these crazies who answer to aparachiks like Nancy Pelosi, Chuck Schumer and AOC, will go on discriminant burning, looting and killing sprees. I believe it will start this weekend and who knows how long it will last.
Even within certain churches we will see turbulence, chaos and potential violent attacks by liberal church members against their conservative pro-life brethren.
We must be on a heightened state of alert. Be aware of your surroundings at all times if you are out in public, especially in larger Democrat-run cities. Better yet, stay out of those cities at least until we see where this is heading.
Something you may not even think about, like a Christian bumper sticker, T-shirt slogan or anything could trigger someone under the spell of demonic inspiration to attack you. It could happen at a restaurant, a grocery store, a gas station, anywhere.
I know people are going to say, Leo, why must you always be the “glass is half empty” messenger of gloom and doom.
I don’t relish that role.
When I heard the news this morning about the Supreme Court’s decision, it affected me emotionally like I did not expect it would. I was overcome with joy.
We all knew the decision was coming because it was leaked more than a month ago. Still, when it came down, I felt emotional. My eyes filled up with water. I am so happy that these six justices not only understood the Constitution but had the courage to put their understanding down on paper in the form of a Supreme Court opinion. Thank God for Justices Alito, Thomas, Gorsuch, Barrett, Kavanaugh and, yes, even John Roberts. A 6-3 decision is much better even than a 5-4 decision. It sends a more resounding message to the nation and to the world. The “right” to murder your baby is no longer the law of the land. Of course no such right ever existed in the U.S. Constitution. It was fabricated out of thin air. The states are now in control of this issue and nearly half will no doubt still allow abortion to be carried out, business as usual.
But in the other half of the states, sanity and common decency will return. Praise the Lord God Almighty, now and and forever!
My only word of caution is for you, my dear readers, to realize that you are now a target of the evil ones. They are violent and they are merciless and they don’t play fairly. We are all targets now. God be with us. Amen.
LeoHohmann.com is 100 percent reader supported and does not answer to any corporate sponsors or advertisers. That’s why we can boldly speak the truth, but we do operate on donations so please consider giving, if you are able. Contributions of any size may be sent c/o Leo Hohmann, PO Box 291, Newnan, GA 30264, or via credit card below.
The FBI has turned into a Gestapo-like organization that has become a political weapon for Dem-Marxists to stay in power. A FBI Whistleblower has come forward exposing FBI & DOJ corruption practices targeting otherwise law-abiding American citizens.
BREAKING: FBI Whistleblower Leaks Document Showing Bureau Targeting ‘News Media’
• Document reveals the FBI labeled Project Veritas as “news media,” and categorized the probe as a “Sensitive Investigative Matter” due to Veritas being journalists. This is a direct contradiction of the U.S. government’s in-court position that Project Veritas are not journalists.
• The whistleblower, who has several years of experience as an FBI Special Agent and is still on payroll with the Bureau, came to Project Veritas with the document after seeing what he calls “a number of troubling things that are happening in the FBI.”
• The document also shows the federal investigation was launched into Project Veritas the same day Ashley Biden’s Attorney, Roberta Kaplan, said, “This is insane. We should send to SDNY” in response to a request for comment on the contents of Ashley Biden’s abandoned diary.
• Additionally, the FBI categorized the investigation into an abandoned diary under Threat Band I, which is usually reserved for “threat issues that are likely to cause the greatest damage to national interests or public safety in the coming year.”
• The Whistleblower also revealed how the document shows surveillance of Project Veritas included use of CAST tools, an analysis which includes cellular geolocation tracking of phone devices.
• FBI Whistleblower: “Tyranny happens incrementally, and it happens by a bunch of people agreeing to small injustices over and over simply to keep their paycheck and their pension…to maintain your paycheck and pension that gives you the Holocaust”
[NEW YORK – May 11, 2022] A source within the Federal Bureau of Investigation has come forward to expose the FBI’s targeting of members of the “news media” including information about what the FBI calls a Special Investigative Matter (“SIM”) regarding their investigation into Project Veritas over Ashley Biden’s abandoned diary.
According to a document obtained and published by Project Veritas, the FBI opened an investigation into Project Veritas knowing full well they were journalists as the document is labeled under a “news media” classification.
This classification is a direct contradiction to the government’s court filing where they argued that actions taken by the government to surveil, raid and seize materials from Project Veritas journalists were appropriate. The government’s filing stated, “Project Veritas is not engaged in journalism within any traditional or accepted definition of that word,” because it’s reporting is “non-consensual.”
The whistleblower, who has several years of experience as an FBI Special Agent, came to Project Veritas because, “The direction that the agency has headed troubles a vast majority of the agents.”
Something else the whistleblower called “alerting” was the fact that the FBI categorized the investigation into Ashley Biden’s diary under Threat Band I, which is usually reserved for “threat issues that are likely to cause the greatest damage to national interests or public safety in the coming year.”
The document, which lacks certain information due to the restricted classification of the file, also shows the investigation was launched the same day Ashley Biden’s Attorney, Roberta Kaplan, said, “This is insane. We should send to SDNY,” in response to a request for comment on the contents of Ashley Biden’s diary.
The FBI also used its Cellular Analysis Survey Team (CAST) tools, which includes cellular geolocation tracking of phone devices, to secretly surveil Project Veritas journalists, according to the whistleblower and as revealed on the leaked document.
The whistleblower, who is still on the Bureau’s payroll, sat down for an interview with Project Veritas CEO and Founder, James O’Keefe. “Tyranny happens incrementally, and it happens by a bunch of people agreeing to small injustices over and over simply to keep their paycheck and their pension,” said the whistleblower, adding, “To maintain your paycheck and pension that gives you the Holocaust.”
At the time of this writing, the FBI has not yet responded to a request for comment.
Initially, one should note that 2000 Mules is not a Western movie. It refers to the term developed decades ago of “drug mules” who carry illegal drugs for criminal cartels such as smuggling drugs across the border.
With 2000 Mules the leftists desperate to hide voter fraud clearly only watched the free trailer for the movie and did not spring for the $20 to $29 to actually see the entire film. The film can be purchased from the Salem radio network from Dinesh D’Souza on “Locals” at or at the main website. [Blog Editor: Can be watched free HERE.]
After mainstream journalists became discredited as biased, left-wing propagandists, very suddenly a new fad sprung up: fact checkers. Now, the same journalists whom we stopped believing in the normal news are suddenly believable because they call themselves “fact checkers.”
But if there is anything that presumably a fact checker would do is actually carefully read and analyze a claim and compare it point by point to determine its truth. (Typically, fact checkers specialize in being distracted by a minor detail. For example, a news story might report that Sen. Nogood smashed into a green-colored van full of nuns while driving drunk. The fact checker would then spend pages discussing how there is “no evidence” that the van was colored green. The van might have been blue. So rating: False.)
True The Vote did what the government failed to do. They purchased through commercial brokers the cell phone “geotracking” or “geolocator” data from specific cities in particular states where the election was decided. They then analyzed the GPS data to show the paid “mules” who visited left-wing nonprofit organizations and then drove to many different ballot drop boxes on the same day — then did it all over again the following day, day after day, for weeks.
While ballot “harvesting” is illegal in the states sampled, one is allowed to deliver ballots from their family members or a voter for whom they are officially-designated caregivers. Otherwise, it is a crime to drop off someone else’s ballots in an election drop box.
But under no circumstances would one legally or legitimately do that again and again, day after day, for weeks or months. The fake checkers discuss the data as if these mules made only one trip, on one day, to only one drop box location. They didn’t watch the film.
The film explains that the analysis filtered out people who were driving past drop boxes, or whose routines did not fit a voter fraud hypothesis. Only those driving straight up to a drop box carrying their cell phones were included.
The analysis considered the “pattern of life” routines of cell phone users. Those going to work or shop near a drop box would be excluded, as opposed to those who spent only a few minutes at the drop box and then immediately turned around and drove on to the next drop box location. A person parked for a long time for an appointment or shopping would be excluded.
(The fact checkers also skip over the fact that — by my rough estimate — perhaps around 10% of those mules active during the election season were also located in the middle of violent ANTIFA riots throughout the year 2000.)
The documentary carefully explains how they filtered out the possibility of anyone dropping off ballots for their family. Only mules who visited 10 or more ballot drop boxes were included in the analysis. For example, one “mule” visited drop boxes in six different counties.
Ballots are different for different counties, congressional districts, and state legislative districts. So no one dropping off legitimate ballots would go to drop boxes in six different counties. Someone dropping off grandma’s ballot would not visit ten to one hundred different drop boxes — and do this over again the next day and the next and the next.
The fact checkers tell us that geotracking is not that accurate. Oddly, the FBI is prosecuting peaceful, nonviolent protestors from January 6, 2021, based on that same “imprecise” geotracking data allegedly showing people inside the U.S. Capitol. Oops. Never mind. So, geotracking cell phone locations is very precise, except when it isn’t. Depends on the needs of the moment.
But it doesn’t actually matter, because True the Vote set such a high bar that the data cannot be dismissed. Only those mules who visited left-wing, election-related nonprofit offices and then went from there straight to election drop boxes were included.
The film repeatedly explains how they obtained over four million minutes of official government surveillance video viewing the ballot drop boxes (promiscuously deployed due to COVID-19). The trailer only shows a few snippets out of four million minutes. Even the documentary barely scratches the surface of that ocean of data.
Yet, the fact checkers “analyze” the surveillance videos as if the few examples shown are the only surveillance videos. That is, they dismiss the examples shown only in the movie trailer. Had they actually watched the documentary, they would have known that the same mules are showing up again and again in various surveillance videos at different drop boxes all over the city. Not just once, as in the movie trailer.
The four million minutes of video show mules stuffing dozens of ballots into drop boxes, not two or three. Often, we see ballots falling all over the sidewalk. The governmental surveillance video shows sometimes twenty or thirty ballots at a time getting stuffed into boxes already full.
The surveillance videos repeatedly show mules taking photographs of themselves putting the ballots into the drop boxes or just photos of the drop box itself. The only reason to take photographs of the drop boxes is because the mules are being paid and are presenting proof that they delivered the illicit ballots.
Oh, and not to mention that this is often happening between 1 AM and 4 AM in the morning.
The surveillance videos show mules wearing surgical gloves as they stuff illicit ballots into the drop boxes. Then they remove the surgical gloves and toss them into nearby trash cans — all caught on government surveillance videos. The film explains that this started the day after ballot harvesters were arrested in one state based on fingerprints on the ballots. In one case, a woman never looks at the trash can until after taking off her gloves, indicating that she had done it before at that same location.
Finally, True the Vote concentrated only on specific cities or areas within the battleground states that decided the 2020 presidential election. The fact checkers are again off base. D’Souza’s excellent documentary is a call for honest law enforcement (if there are any left) to conduct a full analysis of the entire country. There is one indisputable conclusion: This must be thoroughly investigated in full.
Today’s cross posts focus on MSM bait-n-switch – aka LYING – primarily as a mouthpiece for Dem-Marxist liars who have less a wellbeing for America AND MORE a whatever it takes to remain in power to complete America’s transformation AWAY from the heritage of America’s Founding.
First up is the NWO Report pick up of an Infowars piece of Joe Rogan noticing the Left once vilified Ukraine as the most corrupt nation in world AND YET today CORRUPT Zelenskyy is a hero. Although the title theme is Rogan, the post’s best feature isa video by Paul Joseph Watson mocking Zelenskyy’s so-called democracy as more a reflection of autocratic dictatorship.
Then a few posts on Biolabs in Ukraine once denied to exist but now PROVEN to exist with a bit of still unproven U.S. Bioweapon Research speculation. As one Social Media commenter asked, “Why would the U.S. Dept. of Defense be funding either pathogen research or old Soviet Bioweapon destruction for OVER a decade and not some other civilian hazardous/infectious disease agency in the Ukraine?” A legitimate question in my opinion amidst all the denials and lukewarm admissions.
I need your generosity. PLEASE GIVE to overcome research expenses:
“They were talking about the massive corruption of Ukraine, and how horrible it was over there. And now, all of a sudden, they’re looking at it like they’re heroes.”
Joe Rogan noted on his podcast that the Western narrative on Ukraine has flipped 180 degrees in a few weeks from the country having a horrible corrupt government to being heroic allies against the Russian scourge.
“I have this screenshot that someone sent me,” Rogan stated, “about the way the people on the left were talking about the Ukraine situation before the war.”
He continued, “This is one of the things that’s so weird is that they were very disparaging of Ukraine, and they were talking about the massive corruption of Ukraine, and how horrible it was over there.”
“And now, all of a sudden, they’re looking at it like they’re heroes. The same exact people. This is what’s confusing,” the host added.
“We’re supposed to just veer away from the narrative that was being pushed just a couple years ago,” Rogan asserted.
Rogan also went on to point out how insane it is that Facebook and other social media platforms are officially sanctioning violent rhetoric against Russians, exclaiming “What the f*ck is that? What is that?”
[Blog Editor: Both NWO Report & Infowars use the Youtube version Paul Joseph Watson video. Since I am always suspicious that Youtube will censor Conservative viewpoints, I’m using the Bitchute version below. Here is the original Youtube link]
Zelenskyy – Photo by Laurent Van der Stockt for Le Monde/Getty Images [Screen Capture from Blaze Media]
In case you haven’t noticed, there has been quite the controversy in the last week about whether Ukraine does or does not have biological research facilities that were funded, at least in part, by the United States military. The accusation has been the subject of some absurd fact-checks by our corporate media and accusations of “Russian disinformation” from our government.
The truth is: Yes, there are indeed biological research facilities in Ukraine that have been funded by our government. We don’t have any way to know whether these facilities were conducting research that was intended to produce weapons or not, but we do know that if the pathogens housed in these facilities escaped, they would be just as deadly as an intentionally produced bioweapon.
The controversy began when the Russian government tweeted the following accusation:
Specifically, the Russian government stated that it found evidence of a “military-biological programme” that was funded by the United States Department of Defense and that was being cleaned up during the course of the invasion.
Promptly, the United States government leapt into action to dispute this contention with the assertion that the United States military does not, and never has, funded a “biological weapons” program and claimed that this accusation was part of a “Russian disinformation” campaign. This assertion was dutifully repeated by the government’s stenographers in the corporate media.
Amazingly, the seminal “fact-check,” written by USA Today, argued that there were no “biolabs” funded by the military, even while acknowledging the existence of such labs. The “fact-check” notes that the United States and Ukraine did have such labs, but that they were to “prevent the proliferation of dangerous pathogens and related expertise and to minimize potential biological threats” and further explicitly stated that the United States was providing funding to those labs, albeit for the purpose of “making repairs, updating equipment and purchasing supplies” at those laboratories.
At the risk of overstating the obvious, if the military is “purchasing supplies” at these laboratories, to say nothing of “updating equipment” or “making repairs” at these laboratories, it is funding them.
In a remarkable off-camera briefing held last week, the Defense Department further spoke about these claims. In that briefing, an unidentified “senior Department of Defense official” said, among other things:
A few key points about the Department of Defense’s Cooperative Threat Reduction Program Biological Threat Reduction Program activities in Ukraine this is part of the Department of Defense’s Cooperative Threat Reduction Program. Through that program, we have invested approximately $200 million in Ukraine since 2005, supporting 46 Ukrainian labs, health facilities, and diagnostic sites. DOD’s CTR program began its biological work with Ukraine to eliminate the remnants of the Soviet Union’s illegal biological weapons program left in the Soviet successor states after the USSR fell. There are no DOD bioweapon labs in Ukraine or anywhere else in the world.
The first and most obvious point to make about this statement is that it is an admission that: a) these laboratories exist, and b) we have given them a lot of money. Now, the unnamed senior official follows this up with two red herrings. First, the senior official asserted that our cooperation with Ukraine on this project began as an effort to eliminate the bioweapons program that was being carried on by the Soviet Union. Assuming that is true, it has nothing to do with our efforts that began in 2005, some 14 years after the Soviet Union fell. Second, the official asserted that “there are no DOD bioweapon labs” anywhere in the world.
Let’s assume that this assertion is true, because it seems to be all that either the DOD or the press is focusing on. Assume that nowhere in Ukraine is a laboratory that has the express purpose of creating or proliferating a bioweapon. Fine. The assertion is simply not responsive to the charge that was actually made by the Russian government, which was that they found evidence of a “military-biological programme” that was funded by the United States Department of Defense. That assertion is demonstrably true and has been confirmed as true by our government. Now, our government says, and I have no reason to disbelieve it, that the purpose of those labs was not to create a bioweapon. But that doesn’t mean, in this case, that what the Russian government said was false.
We know some of what the government was doing in Ukraine from documents that were released by Wikileaks. In a 2008 cable, it was revealed that Andrew Weber of the OSD/CTR (the same Department of Defense agency referred to in last week’s briefing) held a discussion with Ukrainian officials about the need to create one central laboratory in Ukraine that would house its most dangerous pathogens because, among other reasons, “the U.S. seeks to consolidate the strains/pathogens that could be used by terrorists on human or agricultural targets.”
This illustrates the problem with the government’s straw man protestations that it does not fund bioweapon labs. Unlike other potential weapons of mass destruction, there is no functional difference between the danger associated with biological materials that are collected for peaceful purposes and materials that are collected for illicit, non-peaceful purposes. If a terrorist breaks into a nuclear power plant, they can’t make off with a functioning nuclear bomb. However, if they break into a biological research facility that houses a dangerous pathogen that is being kept for the purpose of, say, vaccine development, they now have a fully functioning dangerous pathogen.
It probably (hopefully) is true that the Ukrainians are not housing dangerous pathogens in order to develop bioweapons on the U.S. taxpayer’s dime. However, after we have just come through a two-year pandemic that has taken millions of lives and may well have been started due to a leak from a laboratory that was trying to develop a coronavirus vaccine, that may come as cold comfort to people who are justifiably concerned about the safety of those pathogens during the course of the scorched-earth campaign the Russian military is now conducting.
By the way, the initial Russian accusation did not just say the program existed, it said that there was an “emergency cleanup” under way that was trying to eradicate the program. This is, frankly, good news. It’s exactly what should be happening.
Absolutely no one would begrudge the Ukrainians an aggressive research program into chemical and biological agents, given Russia’s nasty history with poisons and pathogens — a history that includes the probable attempted assassination of Ukrainian president Viktor Yushchenko by the Russian government in 2004. And, given that the Russian military is now carpeting Ukraine with explosive devices, with apparently little care or ability to deliver those devices with precision, it is entirely appropriate for a cleanup operation to be under way to ensure that those pathogens are not inadvertently released.
But the United States government should be saying that, in order to ensure that our credibility remains intact on the world stage after the sad and senseless invasion of Ukraine is over.
There are between 11 and 15 key U.S.-funded biolabs in Ukraine, some of which store and conduct experiments with dangerous pathogens, including samples of Soviet-era bioweapons.
Nevertheless, so far, there is no evidence that those biolabs in Ukraine violated the 1972 Biological Weapons Convention or have produced offensive biological weapons.
I have read all the main, publicly-available information about them, including the documents submitted to the United Nations by Russia.
Like other similar critiques, Russia declares guilt by innuendo.
People need to understand that the 1972 Biological Weapons Convention allows for defensive research using dangerous pathogens.
Let’s use anthrax as an example.
It is not a violation of the 1972 Biological Weapons Convention, for example, to grow anthrax, conduct experiments on anthrax, or store anthrax.
I worked in a Biosafety Level-3 facility at the U.S. Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases, Fort Detrick, Maryland.
In that facility, anthrax was grown in fermenters. Experiments were conducted with the anthrax bacteria and with its toxins. The anthrax was used to devise detection and identification systems and prepare medical treatment for and protection against anthrax infections, such as vaccines.
Various anthrax strains were stored at Fort Detrick for future experiments comparing different strains or to conduct forensic analysis of natural or man-made outbreaks of anthrax. That included samples of anthrax used by the Soviet Union to generate its biological weapons in order to prepare defensively for a potential attack.
All of that is allowed under the 1972 Biological Weapons Convention.
Those who say there is a thin line between defensive and offensive anthrax research are uninformed.
I can attest that there are distinct differences in the skills and methodologies needed for defensive and offensive anthrax research.
Defensive anthrax research is done with what we call “wet” anthrax, that is, anthrax in culture. Anthrax as a bioweapon has to be specially prepared and tested in a dry form as individual spores capable of widespread aerosol distribution. Wet anthrax is not a very effective bioweapon.
Unfortunately, the facts concerning the Ukraine biolabs have been obscured by propaganda from the United States, Russia, China, and the European Union, as well as efforts by news organizations and individuals to either downplay or exaggerate the facts. [Emphasis Blog Editor’s]
The published activities of the Ukraine BSL-3 facilities focus on detection, identification, and storage of anthrax and other pathogens, activities very similar to what we did at Fort Detrick. There is nothing in any of the documents I have seen so far that would indicate weaponization or anything that would violate the 1972 Biological Weapons Convention.
Understandably, people assume the worst because the Biden regime lies about everything. [Emphasis Blog Editor’s]
Now, was it a dumb decision and bad policy to set up those kinds of labs in Ukraine funded by the U.S. Defense Department? Perhaps. Would having such labs in Ukraine lead to rogue experiments like in Wuhan or leaks? Perhaps. But those are different questions. [This Blog Editor believes these are pertinent questions rather than “different questions.”]
Actually, what the Biden regime may be really trying to hide is Biden family corruption.
Hunter Biden’s investment firm, Rosemont Seneca, had a stake in one of the prime contractors for the construction and renovations of the U.S.-funded biolabs in Ukraine, Black and Veatch.
Hunter Biden is also connected to the China-linked company, Metabiota, which, together with Peter Daszak’s EcoHealth Alliance and the USAID-funded University of California, Davis’ PREDICT program, were deeply involved with the Ukrainian biolabs, and, all of whom, have close collaborations with China.
Therefore, one should not discount the possibility that all of the information related to the activities conducted in the Ukrainian biolabs was finding its way to Beijing and, subsequently, to Moscow.
Ultimately, we may learn that the whole Ukrainian biolab program may have had less to do with bioweapons than a U.S. taxpayer-funded profit-making scheme for the corrupt Biden family and its friends.
Col. Lawrence Sellin (Ret.) was a U.S. Army Reserve colonel with branch qualifications and assignments in Special Forces, Infantry, Chemical and Medical Services. He served in Afghanistan and Iraq and participated in a humanitarian mission to West Africa.
Sellin holds a Master’s Degree in Strategic Studies from the U.S. Army War College and received training in Arabic, Kurdish and French from the Defense Language Institute. He had a distinguished civilian career in medical research and international business after completing a Ph.D. in physiology.
So what is America Out Loud? America Out Loud is exactly what it sounds like it is – It’s American patriots that are Out Loud in their love of our constitution and our way of life. It’s Americans that are Out Loud on every imaginable topic of concern to We The People. These are Americans who understand the threats facing America and refuse to remain silent.
America Out Loud began in April of 2016 as a brilliant idea of Malcolm, the network’s Founder, President, CEO, and daily clarion voice. Today, America Out Loud has evolved into an American values media colossus, bringing you unbridled and unadulterated facts, opinions, analyses, and truer-than-life stories voiced through the magic of talk radio and print media. … READ THE REST
While the conflict between Russia and Ukraine is playing out all over social media, in real time, it appears another story has captivated Americans, the Biden administration, and the mainstream media. Approving over $13 billion in aid for Ukraine, the Biden administration is now dealing with claims that the United States helped fund secret biolabs in the worn-torn country. Although many Democrats have declared the story is nothing more than Russian propaganda, one of their own members, Tulsi Gabbard, isn’t buying the narrative.
On Sunday, Gabbard, who ran for President back in 2020, uploaded a video of herself to Twitter. In the video, which is featured below, the Democrat discussed the possibility of biolabs in Ukraine and what that means for America and the rest of the world. Using COVID-19 as an example, Gabbard noted that if a pathogen leaked from one of these labs, it could mean more than just another pandemic.
Shortly after her tweet, Republican Mitt Romney blasted the Democrat, writing, “Tulsi Gabbard is parroting false Russian propaganda. Her treasonous lies may well cost lives.”
Confused by the entire ordeal, Fox News’ Tucker Carlson discussed how the politicians consistently refuse to accept the biolabs theory when Undersecretary of State Victoria Nuland stated before the Senate, “Ukraine has biological research facilities which, in fact, we’re now quite concerned Russian troops, Russian forces may be seeking to gain control of, so we are working with the Ukrainians on how we can prevent any of those research materials from falling into the hands of Russian forces should they approach.”
Appearing on Fox News with Carlson, Gabbard seemed unfazed by Romney’s comments, admitting, “This is not a matter of disagreement or holding a dissenting view. This is about facts. While Senator Romney and all these different talking heads in the mainstream media are regurgitating Hillary Clinton’s slanderous talking points, the facts remain.”
Gabbard added, “They are accusing me of saying that somehow there are bioweapons labs in Ukraine. I’ve said no such thing at any point. I have said that there are biolabs in Ukraine that have received U.S. support that contain dangerous pathogens that if those labs are breached, then we in the world are facing a potential future of pandemics that this is a dangerous crisis that needs to be addressed immediately. These pathogens need to be destroyed.”
Yesterday I posted a Justin Smith submission entitled, “A Righteous War Against Hamas Terrorism”. The post in brief was about the evil of Islamic terrorism focused on Israel and how it has overlapped on to American soil with acts of Muslim violence against Jews here in the USA.
In the course of sharing Justin’s submission, I ran into a Dan Bongino Rumble video posted on 5/21/21. After you get through about three-minutes of ads, Bongino talks about Jew-hating Hamas and the hypocrisy of Dem-Marxists whining about Arabs-who-call-themselves-Palestinians casualties as if it is fine and dandy for Antisemite Muslims to kill Jews but when Israel responds with their own deadly force, the Dem-Marxists cry foul. Bongino points out the Islamic credo is kill Jews first then kill Christians. THESE ANIMALS NEED TO BE CONDEMNED AND NOT APPROVED! This is a great Bongino episode.
I need your generosity in 2021 via – credit cards, check cards
I got an email yesterday that changed me, and it’ll change you too. In this episode, I discuss the email and I address the disastrous “commission” being formed to harass and prosecute Trump supporters.
Looking for news?
The Bongino Report brings you the top conservative and libertarian news stories of the day, aggregated in an easy to read format to assist the public in getting accurate information. https://bonginoreport.com/
Dan Bongino exposes idiot Dems and Dem propaganda MSM siding with Iran over death of Iran’s General Soleimani by an American reaper drone. Some would call this Dem coverage treason. I call it treason. I’m an Independent asking voters to vote GOP to stop this treasonous idiocy from the airwaves.
(Endure the Bongino ads, he has bills to pay like us all)
Blog Editor: Rather than capitulate to Facebook censorship by abandoning the platform, I choose to post and share until the Leftist censors ban me. Recently, the Facebook censorship tactic I’ve experienced is a couple of Group shares then jailed under the false accusation of posting too fast. So I ask those that read this, to combat censorship by sharing blog and Facebook posts with your friends or Groups you belong to.
In this episode, I address the outrageous media response to the killing of one of the world’s most dangerous terrorists. I also address a fascinating interview with Devin Nunes where he drops an explosive piece of information. Finally, I address what John Bolton, and the Democrats, are really up to with the impeachment hoax.
Blog Editor: Rather than capitulate to Facebook censorship by abandoning the platform, I choose to post and share until the Leftist censors ban me. Recently, the Facebook censorship tactic I’ve experienced is a couple of Group shares then jailed under the false accusation of posting too fast. So I ask those that read this, to combat censorship by sharing blog and Facebook posts with your friends or Groups you belong to.
Dan Bongino uses the video version of his podcast to expose Mueller and his team of Angry Dems knew by June-July 2017 that Trump working with Russia to win 2016 election was a hoax! So, check it out! Mueller knows it’s all a hoax AND still goes after anyone that had a hand in Trump’s campaign with charges ABSOLUTELY nothing to do with his Special Persecutor mandate.
The video is one minute over an hour. Do Bongino a favor and less to his intermittent ads, Bongino pays bills like you and me.
I ran into a social media post linking to the audio of a Dan Bongino podcast. I usually give credit to such discoveries, but I can only remember it was on a G+ Community.
Bongino takes about an hour to discuss the ramifications of the FBI raid on Whistleblower Dennis Cain in Chicago. The surprise is Cain was supposed to be a cooperating Whistleblower protected by Intelligence Community Whistleblower Protection Act (ICWPA).
So, why would the FBI get a search warrant and raid a person supposedly under the protection of the ICWPA? Bongino theorizes three possibilities:
The initial theory the raid is good.
Bongino’s theory (which I think is plausible) the raid might be to prevent incriminating evidence against the FBI.
OR a combination of 1 & 2.
Below is the nearly long Youtube version of the Bongino podcast followed by the Epoch Times pierce referred to Bongino, then a Daily Caller update on the FBI raid on Cain’s home posted on 12/5.
So readers, I’ve been using a seven year old laptop to fulfill the old blogging habit. My lovely wife sprang for a Christmas upgrade. I’m a relatively small-time blogger but with a consistently growing readership despite some token censorship from the liberal-oriented blog and social platforms. Still looking to defray the Christmas costs.
A series of four investigations that recently came to light suggest that something larger is at play in clearing out corruption in the United States. In this episode of Declassified, we take a look at these investigations and their significance.
If anyone tells you they are tired of nothing happening with regard to ongoing investigations, perhaps they should take a closer look at a number of events that came to light over the past few days.
In a matter that caused no small amount of worry and consternation among supporters of President Donald Trump, The Daily Caller reportedon Nov. 29 that the FBI had raided the home of whistleblower Dennis Nathan Cain.
The raid, which took place on Nov. 19, involved 16 FBI agents who had obtained a court order signed on Nov. 15 by federal magistrate Stephanie A. Gallagher in the U.S. District Court for Baltimore, according to The Daily Caller. No reason for the 10-day delay between the raid and his lawyer’s public announcement was given.
Cain, whose name is new to the public, isn’t just any whistleblower. He retains a top-level security clearance and maintains a number of security-related credentials, according to his resume, which has since been deleted online. Specialties include the FISA Amendment Act (FAA) Section 702 and USSID SP0018 Minimization Procedures and Signals Intelligence Authorities.
According to the article, Cain “privately delivered documents pertaining to the Clinton Foundation and Uranium One to a government watchdog, according to the whistleblower’s attorney.”
“The Justice Department’s inspector general was informed that the documents show that federal officials failed to investigate potential criminal activity regarding former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, the Clinton Foundation and Rosatom, the Russian company that purchased Uranium One,” the article states.
Cain also had obtained official whistleblower status from DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz. Michael Socarras, Cain’s lawyer, told The Daily Caller that Cain had met with a “senior member of Horowitz’s office” and delivered a flash drive along with a sealed envelope containing documents. The same materials reportedly were also delivered to the Senate and House Intelligence committees.
The FBI agents seized all of the original documents in Cain’s possession, according to Socarras. The Daily Caller said that one document they reviewed showed that then-FBI Director Robert Mueller “failed to investigate allegations of criminal misconduct pertaining to Rosatom and to other Russian government entities attached to Uranium One.” How The Daily Caller was able to review any documents, following what was reported to be a full seizure, remains unexplained.
There have been strong reactions to the news, with many perceiving it as some sort of coverup. However, a few facts are worth entertaining. Regardless of the FBI’s seizure, both IG Horowitz and the House and Senate intelligence committees already have the documents in their possession. The FBI’s seizure of documents from Cain doesn’t indicate the documents are being hidden.
As noted in the article, the FBI agents obtained a court order which means their identities are known. FBI Director Chris Wray, if he doesn’t already know, could easily determine the agents’ identities—this wasn’t a clandestine operation.
Another possible issue might have to do with Cain himself. Very little is known about him other than that he’s a whistleblower, which generally conveys images of positive actions taken by a well-intentioned individual. However, we know nothing of Cain’s true motivations or the actions that lay behind them. It may turn out that an invasive raid by the FBI was fully warranted.
Another explanation may lie within the documents themselves. The FBI’s actions may be related to chain-of-custody issues. The FBI may have been required to ensure that all evidence was accumulated and taken into their custody. It’s possible this document seizure by the FBI may indicate a case against the Clintons and/or their Foundation is actively underway.
The Chicago Raid
The FBI raid on Cain’s house wasn’t the only one.
On Nov. 29, federal agents raided the offices of Alderman Edward Burke, a powerful Chicago politician who has held his position in Chicago politics for 50 years. Burke’s office windows were covered and FBI agents remained on the premises for about seven hours, according to media reports.
Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel, who abruptly announced in September that he would not seek re-election, said his office had no advance warning of the raid, noting: “I know what I read in the paper. I’m out here. That’s it. … You are asking hypotheticals and I am not going to do that with the FBI walking around his office.”
Burke, who has beenunder federal scrutiny on several occasions, has never been convicted or indicted. His investigation is being handled by the public corruption squad from the local FBI office.
Burke’s law firm specializes in property-tax reductions for his clients, and some have speculated that the raid could be connected to work that Burke’s law firm did for the president, but there are several problems with that theory.
The Burke investigation, according to the Chicago Tribune, “was being conducted in conjunction with the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Chicago, not Mueller’s office.” Additionally, the Sun-Times reported, “the raids were in response to new allegations, and not prompted by any past controversies that have swirled around Burke.”
Dan Mihalopoulos, a reporter for WBEZ in Chicago, was somewhat more direct: “Worth also noting today: Burke’s huge role in the local Democratic judge-making process. One judge just told me, ‘Everyone’s crapping themselves here.’”
The investigation probably has more to do with corrupt Chicago politics than anything related to the president.
Two other events with a more international scope also have been underway.
Several banks are currently under investigation for a massive money-laundering scandal that is likely to only grow larger.
Danske Bank is being investigated by the U.S. Department of Justice, and new charges were filed this week by Danish authorities. The bank’s CEO and chairman both have been forced to resign and numerous current employees are under investigation. Danske Bank has admitted that approximately $230 billion has flowed through one of its units in Estonia, but the focus now appears to be shifting to other financial institutions:
“Howard Wilkinson, a former Danske Bank A/S manager who blew the whistle on its multibillion-dollar laundromat, told lawmakers in Brussels that when it comes to shell companies, or limited liability partnerships, the U.K. is ‘worst of all.’ He said he was legally prevented from naming the other banks involved, but urged lawmakers to treat the Danske scandal as a case that goes well beyond its core in Estonia,” Bloomberg reported Nov. 21.
The corporate headquarters of Deutsche Bank in Frankfurt, Germany, on Nov. 29, 2018. German law enforcement and tax authorities raided the offices over suspicions of tax evasion and money laundering. (Thomas Lohnes/Getty Images)
Also on Nov. 29, Deutsche Bank’s headquarters was also raided by German officials. Transactions being examined by investigators relate to the bank’s wealth-management division, which previously has come under scrutiny.
According to a spokeswoman for prosecutors, the investigation covers the five-year period from 2013 to 2018 and is related to disclosures made in the Panama Papers—11.5 million leaked documents from Panamanian law firm Mossack Fonseca, then the world’s fourth-biggest provider of offshore services.
The Deutsche Bank raids continued for a second day and reportedly included the executive management board’s floor. Deutsche was one of Danske’s correspondent banks, as are JPMorgan Chase and Bank of America. Any potential involvement of other banks will bear close watching.
Clinton Donor Charged
Lastly, in a Nov. 29 DOJ press release, three executives including Abul Huda Farouki were charged “for their roles in a scheme to defraud U.S. military contracts in Afghanistan, engaging in illegal commerce in Iran, and laundering money internationally.” Farouki was the CEO of Anham, a defense contractor based in the United Arab Emirates
This wasn’t the first time Farouki or his company have been involved in allegations of misconduct. In a 2013 article by The Daily Caller, headlined “Clinton Donors Get a Pass on Shady Contracting,” Farouki and his company were highlighted:
“In June 2011, the Defense Department’s Office of the Special Inspector General for Iraq Reconstruction (SIGIR) released a scathingreport on a defense contracting company called Anham. The title of the report and its conclusion were the same: ‘Poor Government Oversight of Anham and Its Subcontracting Procedures Allowed Questionable Costs to Go Undetected.’”
The article then asked a simple question: Given prior violations, how was Anham able to secure an $8 billion contract in Afghanistan that “allowed it to illegally ship supplies through two Iranian border crossings and a seaport controlled by the Iranian Revolutionary Guard?”
The $8 billion contract, along with the illegal shipment of supplies, being cited in the 2013 article appear to be exactly the same violations being alleged in the 2018 DOJ indictment. So why weren’t Farouki and his company charged with these same, known violations back in 2013?
The answer may lie within Farouki’s many connections to the Democratic Party. The Daily Caller notes that Farouki is a longtime donor to Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.), and donated to Obama for America in 2008. But Farouki’s closest ties lie with the Clintons and their Foundation.
Farouki, a member of the now-shuttered Clinton Global Initiative,participated in annual CGI meetings since the group’s formation in 2005 through at least 2010 and made multiple donations to the Clinton Foundation. Farouki also made donations to Terry McAuliffe and has been photographed with Huma Abedin.
There appears to be a common thread among what might appear to be unrelated events: the raid on the whistleblower, the raid on the Chicago politician, the investigations of European banks, and the charges brought against a Clinton donor. All the activities targeted were either occurring during the Obama era or, in the case of the DOJ whistleblower, were directly related to underlying events from that time.
There may be more going on than meets the casual eye.
Jeff Carlson is a CFA charterholder. He worked for 20 years as an analyst and portfolio manager in the high-yield bond market. He runs the website TheMarketsWork.com.
WHISTLEBLOWER ADVOCATES, ATTORNEYS CONDEMN FBI RAID ON CLINTON FOUNDATION WHISTLEBLOWER
Whistleblower activists condemned the FBI’s raid of a recognized whistleblower, Dennis Cain.
Cain had previously shared documents with Department of Justice Inspector General Michael Horowitz.
The documents contained potential wrongdoing regarding the Clinton Foundation, the Uranium One deal and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, according to Cain’s lawyer.
Whistleblower advocates across the political spectrum condemned an FBI raid on the home of a recognized whistleblower who reported potential wrongdoing surrounding the Clinton Foundation, the Uranium One deal and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.
The Daily Caller News Foundation, in a bombshell report, detailed how 16 FBIagents raided the home of Dennis Cain, a former employee of an FBI contractor, on Nov. 19. They rummaged through his home for six hours even though he told them that Department of Justice Inspector General Michael Horowitz awarded him whistleblower status, according to Cain’s lawyer, Michael Socarras.
Everyone TheDCNF interviewed said the raid should never have occurred. They said it appeared Cain followed the rules in accordance to the Intelligence Community Whistleblower Protection Act, which protects federal whistleblowers from retaliation.
“I really do question the need for this raid at all,” said Nick Schwellenbach, the investigations director for the Project on Government Oversight, a nonpartisan watchdog group that frequently works with whistleblowers. “On its face it doesn’t seem like it was necessary.”
“This isn’t how we should be treating whistleblowers who are coming forward with information about high level wrongdoing,” he told TheDCNF. “It sends a very strong message that you will be treated as a criminal even though what you’re trying to do is expose crime or a potential crime.”
Craig Holman, a lobbyist for Public Citizen, the liberal advocacy group founded by Ralph Nader, told TheDCNF: “Well it certainly sounds like an absolute violation of the spirit of what the whistleblower law is supposed to be all about.”
The documents Cain possessed, which he gave to the special agent leading the search, show that federal officials failed to investigate potential criminal activity pertaining to Clinton, the Clinton Foundation, and the Russian company that purchased Uranium One, according to a document TheDCNF reviewed.
The court order and all the documents justifying the raid are sealed and are not available for public viewing. Federal magistrate Stephanie A. Gallagher of the U.S. District Court of Maryland in Baltimore issued the court order on Nov. 15.
TheDCNF asked the court on Friday to unseal the documents. Gallagher has not yet responded.
A conservative attorney on ethics law, Cleta Mitchell, questioned whether the FBI was truthful when it sought the court order.
“If they did not fully advise the court of his whistleblower status, then I would find that to be extremely troublesome,” she said. “The main question is whether or not they properly informed the court that this individual is a whistleblower and that he had gone through the procedures to receive whistleblower status.”
“Until Mr. Cain’s attorney is able to see what the FBI or the U.S. Attorney presented to the court in order to obtain this search warrant, then we have no way of knowing and he has no way of knowing whether they fully and properly advised the court that he had whistleblower status, and whether they informed the judge that he had gone through all of the proper procedures,” Mitchell continued.
Schwellenbach said the judge should release the original documents filed by the FBI and the U.S. Attorney.
“I would love to see what’s in their subpoena request to the judge,” he told TheDCNF. “What facts do they present to the judge? I think that is a document that should see the light of the day.”
Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley asked FBI Director Christopher Wray in a Nov. 30 letter whether the bureau was “aware at the time of the raid that Mr. Cain had made what appeared to be lawful disclosures to the Inspector General?”
FBI Director Christopher Wray testifies during a Senate Intelligence Committee hearing.REUTERS/Leah Millis
Texas defense attorney Stuart Baggish told TheDCNF that the search of Cain’s home could be a violation of the Fourth Amendment, which protects against unreasonable search and seizures. Baggish is challenging a recent raid on his client’s business after local law enforcement allegedly omitted key facts before a judge when justifying the search.
Baggish is challenging a recent raid on his client’s business by local law enforcement for omitting key facts before a judge when justifying a raid on his client’s business.
“If the search warrant for Mr. Cain’s property was based on an affidavit that purposely or recklessly omitted his whistleblower status, like my client’s case against the Smith County Sheriff [in Texas], the search could be ruled unreasonable and hence a Fourth Amendment violation,” he said.
“Material information may occasionally inadvertently be left out of a search warrant affidavit, but it is rare and dangerous when it is done purposely or recklessly,” Baggish continued.
Schwellenbach, the POGO investigator, told TheDCNF: “I think the FBI needs to be thoughtful how it uses these powers. Judges need to be skeptical of FBI claims.”
“They shouldn’t be raiding people’s homes unless there’s a real compelling reason to do so and alternative means have been exhaustive,” he continued.
Baggish warned that such raids also undermine the judiciary and violate civil rights.
“When law enforcement officers intentionally mislead a court to obtain a search warrant, they are entering a realm of malfeasance that harms not just the individual or entity whose property is raided, destroyed and confiscated, they also harm the judiciary itself by depriving it of its efficacy as the guardian of Americans’ civil rights,” he said.
The Epoch Times, published by The Epoch Times Association, Inc., a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization, is dedicated to seeking the truth through insightful and independent journalism.
We stand outside of political interests and the pursuit of profit, to educate readers about today’s most critical issues with the intention of broadening minds and uplifting society. A well-informed society is the cornerstone of a flourishing democracy.
Being independent, we investigate issues overlooked—or avoided—by other media outlets. We do this because we believe journalism must play the role of being truly responsible to society.
We strive to highlight solutions and what’s good in society rather than the conflicts that divide us. We recognize the value of the traditional arts and their ability to inspire humankind towards its highest ideals.
In our newsroom and our reporting, we are committed to being honest, respectful, and compassionate.
We stand against the systematic destruction of traditional culture by destructive ideologies such as communism, which continues to harm societies around the world.
We are inspired in this mission by our own experience. The Epoch Times was founded in 2000 to bring honest and uncensored news to people oppressed by the lies and violence of communism.
Fulfilling this mission is our passion and our greatest honor.
The Epoch Times provides award-winning newspapers and news platforms with the goal of being the global newspaper of record, with a positive influence on society. The Epoch Times provides critical in-depth analysis that has often been overlooked by other mainstream media outlets.
Having witnessed events like Tiananmen Square and the persecution of the spiritual group Falun Gong, and at a great risk to themselves and their loved ones, a group of Chinese-Americans started publishing The Epoch Times in Chinese in May 2000 in New York City. Some reporters in China were jailed, and some suffered severe torture. Yet despite the risks, they could see the growing need for uncensored coverage of events in China.
Local editions published by regional bureaus soon followed. Today it is the largest Chinese-language newspaper outside of Mainland China and Taiwan.
The English edition of The Epoch Times launched in September 2003 on the web, and in August 2004 as a newspaper in New York. … READ THE REST
WHISTLEBLOWER ADVOCATES, ATTORNEYS CONDEMN FBI RAID ON CLINTON FOUNDATION WHISTLEBLOWER
Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please email@example.com.