Communists – The Conservative-Patriot Christian Right

Racist America: The Big Lie

Justin Smith addresses the Left-Wing hypocrisy being imposed on the lives of Americans.

JRH 6/9/20

Your generosity is always appreciated – various credit, check

& debit cards are accepted by my PayPal account:

Please Support NCCR

Or support by getting in the Coffee from home business –

OR just buy some FEEL GOOD coffee, that includes immune boosting products.

************************

Racist America: The Big Lie

By Justin O. Smith

Sent June 6, 2020, 03:16:11 PM CDT

“The vast majority of the rioters wreaking havoc have never experienced an ounce of racism in their entire lives. Americans have been trained to know they better kiss blacks’ derrieres at every opportunity or suffer crucifixion by Democrats and fake news media.” ~ Lloyd Marcus

The Big Lie being sold by the Leftist race-baiters, such as Al Sharpton, is that America is a “racist nation”, and, if one believes Elisha Harris, a young 23 year old indoctrinated Black Lives Matter radical from the Nashville area, America’s system is a “system of white supremacy” and “oppression”. While our nation has a crime and violence problem, it has largely been free of racism on the whole, aside from individual instances of bigotry and racist actions, since the racial reforms and the Civil Rights Movement of the 1960s, but white guilt over our nation’s racist past has been manipulated by those proponents of collectivism and Marxism within the Democratic Party and its subsidiaries, such as Black Lives Matter and ANTIFA, to further create problems designed to subvert American principles and bring America all the way down.

In an outrageous act of obeisance and submission, much as one offered by the conquered to the conqueror, Democrat Senators Chris Van Hollen, Martin Heinrich, Tim Kaine, Michael Bennet and Sherrod Brown kneeled to the ground during a moment of silence in the Capitol on June 4th. All across the country, similar scenes were seen as various politicians, much like Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti, and policemen from Louisville and even Nashville and all the way to Sacramento and it’s police chief were dropping to their knees and propping up the notion that white America owed the Black Community something more.

This new urgency that uses George Floyd’s murder as an excuse to rush towards ending racism in America and police reform and defunding police departments, in such a way that only serves the criminals, is all based on a false premise and narrative, as borne out by the statistics. Typically, police show up according to where the most crimes are being committed, and because blacks commit and inordinate amount of the crimes in urban areas, they are very often profiled, unfortunately, whether they are up to no good or not. And, from all indications, the real racists in this entire scenario are those members of Black Lives Matter who see all conservative Americans today as racists of the worst order.

Candace Owens, a well-known black conservative political pundit, stated the following on June 3rd: “Our [Black] culture is unique from other communities because we are the only community that caters to the bottom denominator of our society. Not every black American is a criminal. Not every black American is committing crimes. But we are unique in that we are the only people that fight and scream and demand support for the people in our community that are up to no good.”

As noted by Heather MacDonald, renown journalist and Fellow at the Manhattan Institute, on June 2nd, of the 1004 individuals shot by police officers in 2019, after they were stopped for reason or in the commission of a crime, the fact that only a quarter of that number were black is quite remarkable, given that they commit 53 percent of all homicides and 60 percent of all robberies in America; this from 13 percent of America’s population.

According to MacDonald, police shot 19 unarmed whites and nine unarmed blacks in 2019. If one can assume the number of black homicide victims in 2019 was approximately the same as the 7,407 seen in 2018, “those nine unarmed black victims of police shootings represent 0.1% of all African-Americans killed in 2019.” One must also note that law enforcement officers are approximately 18 times more likely to be killed by a black male than an unarmed black male is likely to be killed by law enforcement officers.

During the past week, America has seen the Leftists of Black Lives Matter and ANTIFA pretending to want to save America from racism and police brutality, and yet, they defaced the Lincoln Memorial and the World War II Memorial and torch St. John’s Episcopal Church in D.C., where presidents have prayed for over a hundred years. America has essentially witnessed domestic terrorists roaming our streets and destroying private property, who subscribe to the Obama Leftist mantra and the Saul Alinsky, Marxist anti-American ideology that seeks to destroy our nation. And all the while they chanted “Black Lives Matter”.

In the name of peace, tolerance and making all right with the Black Community, hundreds of police officers have been assaulted across America, and retired Police Captain David Dorn, a black man, was murdered by looters during St Louis’s riots, while Patrick Underwood, another black man, was murdered in Oakland, as the crowds chanted “Black Lives Matter”.

Scores of black owned businesses were burned and looted during the riots and the “peaceful protests”, sometimes by crowds of mostly young black radicals and just as often by crowds of mostly young white ANTIFA members. And ironically, the common denominator was they were both chanting “Black Lives Matter.”

On May 31st, Nestride Yumga, a D.C. resident, former Miss Cameroon and a young black lady, told Black Lives Matter protesters outside her home, in part: “You are hypocrites, attention seekers. … Go to southeast D.C., northeast D.C. and tell them ‘Black Lives Matter’ … Black lives should matter everywhere, and it doesn’t take a white cop to kill a black person to matter. … George Floyd’s death shouldn’t be used as an excuse or an opportunity to come across as a victim. … Everybody knows that blacks kill more blacks than anyone. … Black kids get killed in Chicago everyday. Where is the Black Lives Matter in Chicago? When black people kill black people, they don’t come out and do this crap. The only time they do this crap is when a white person is involved; they are racists. If Black Lives Matter, they should matter at all times.”

How many of you recall all the black youths that were shot and killed by black policemen, when Eric Holder was a U.S. Attorney in Washington, D.C.? Interesting isn’t it? The flaw of looking at life through the prism of race becomes readily apparent, when there is no public outcry over any illegality or evil and it escapes detection because it wears a black face.

Despite Al Sharpton’s assertion that “the reason we [Black people] could never be who we wanted to be is you kept your knee on our neck”, the truth has been far different from the 1960s to the present, and it has been proven to be a lie by impeccable Black conservative scholars, such as Carol Swain, Thomas Sowell, Walter E. Williams and Shelby Steele, and millions of other successful black people in the ranks of the middle and upper class, over the past few decades. In essence, a black person is just as likely to do as well as any white person, if they are hardworking and determined enough to get an education and some sort of training, the type of which is necessary to succeed in the advanced society that we have built over the centuries.

Regarding the approximate 22 percent of impoverished black households in part, Shelby Steele says, “Blacks live in a bubble because nobody ever tells us the truth. No one says, ‘You’re making too many excuses. Your kids can do better and ought to do better than they do now, and you ought to be more responsible about that.’ But I think the real problem in the black community is the decline of family life, the fact that we have an illegitimacy rate of 70 percent. In the inner cities, it’s around 90 percent.”

By 1998, only one percent of white respondents admitted they would move if a black family moved next door to them, as opposed to 44 percent in 1958. When the Civil Rights Act was passed, only eighteen percent of white Americans claimed having a black friend, but by 1998, that number increased to eighty-six percent. And by 2015, the rate of interracial marriages had increased to seventeen percent, more than fivefold from 1967, suggesting that many people now exhibit a willingness to spend the rest of their lives with someone of another race and white attitudes have changed.

The few high profile incidents that have raised America’s awareness concerning matters of police brutality, such as George Floyd, Eric Garner, Breonna Taylor and others, have cast a pall over all of the nearly 900,000 law enforcement officers nationwide, unfairly, since most police officers interact daily with all races. These three incidents account for approximately .0003 percent of all law enforcement and do not define America.

Regardless of all the apologies under the sun and all the money one may wish to throw at the “problem” of racism in America, white guilt will be used to discredit any and all of it. If a white liberal bends over backwards, the blacks shrug it off pointing to his white guilt and an ulterior motive, as they demand more proof of his repentance. If any white male shows any anger over the communist inspired subversion ongoing currently, the Black Lives Matter holds it up as proof of his guilt.

Even during the era of Segregation, all Americans of all races, creeds and colors pretty much understood the same principles, held the same values and pretty well agreed on a very similar vision of America, but today, despite the freedom won by peaceful protest in the 1960s, the Black Community — at least the segment that subscribes to the Marxist views of Black Lives Matter — wants to turn back the clock and pretend that America is still the same land of the White Oppressors. BLM wants to continue the victim card, and far too many whites are allowing the nation to eat itself, in order to try and win some fake absolution for a sin that is not ours to bear.

The Black Community has found enormous power in manipulating white guilt and setting the terms for any forgiveness. They say they will forgive the White Community, if they receive X, Y and Z. This has given way to the grievance industry around this idea. Blacks present their grievance, stating how they’ve been victimized, and Whites pay off through our institutions. And on closer inspection, one will see that this current fight is more about ushering in full blown socialism more than any question of racism in America. These rioters want to gain control of the mechanisms that generate wealth, the means of production, and turn it to their own agenda for their own gain, benefit and enrichment, without ever having done any of the necessary work to be a part of anything worthwhile, whereby they could have become wealthy on their own, through the sweat equity they have, up ’til now, been unwilling to invest themselves.

One of the most significant unacknowledged events of the civil rights era was the stigmatization of White America. And, from 1964 to the present, America’s entire national culture of racial and social reform — the norms, protocols, programs and policies we use for race-related problems — has been shaped more by the stigmatization of whites than any other factor, including the actual needs of the Black Community.

The reality remains that the only real enemy of the Black Community, especially conservative Black people, is the Leftists and the Communist movement we are currently witnessing Black Lives Matter and ANTIFA advancing in the streets of America.

America is not a racist nation, although we do see racists in the Black Lives Movement, the Black Panthers, the KKK and the AltRight Movement, CAIR, LA Raza and the New Black Panthers, and those who describe it as such are pushing the poison that creates and embeds resentment and division among us. They are systematically reducing the fundamentals of citizenship to race, in the wake of the Civil Rights era and sowing greater distrust and painful conflict. But that’s precisely what their purposeful daily hunt for racism in every corner of our nation’s institutions is intended to do, and it is necessary to their plans to eventually destroy this republic, by any means necessary.

BLM and the white communists ANTIFA want to convince Americans they must condemn our most fundamental structures and everything about our Founding as corrupt and racist, but this is deadly and dangerous, since it only leaves one path and one choice open, that tears us apart and sets a course for civil war. They are not about absolution or allowing for the extirpation of America’s past. They want the Founding declared illegitimate and they want it destroyed.

America, stand firm. Refuse to bow to the demands of the new fascists of color and force Black America to take responsibility for itself, its own choices and its own actions, while we reject any charge of white privilege and the guilt they want us to bear. Embrace traditional America and our heritage rather than trying to erase it, as those are want to do, who seek to remove the statue of Robert E. Lee in Richmond — an honorable and decent man who did not own slaves — and even memorials for the Founding Fathers, such as the Lincoln Memorial and the Jefferson Memorial, and prepare to fight for America however one must. And refuse to ever drop to your knees, unless you intend to pray to God.

Ignorant, gray-haired, ponytail wearing Old Commies and their minions, and other stupid Americans, can get on their knees and beg forgiveness everyday from now ’til the end of time, and the war against white America and the Founding of America will continue, no matter the cost it exacts from our people.

By Justin O. Smith

________________________________

© Justin O. Smith

U.S. Communists fret as some progressives shun Hillary

This article was originally posted on WND. The writing is about how the U.S. Leftist Communists are concerned that Crooked Hillary is alienating some Dem Leftists. The article uses the pc version for Leftists with the word Progressives.

JRH 8/29/16

Please Support NCCR

****************

U.S. Communists fret as some progressives shun Hillary

Posted by Dee Fatouros

Sourced from WND

August 28, 2016 07:26 PM PDT

The Realistic Observer

The Communist Party USA (CPUSA) has infiltrated the Democrat Party far more than most realize. Its influence has been steady and pernicious like a slow growing cancer. It has now taken over the entire body politic in varying degrees. Although much of the electorate remains uninformed or in denial as to this phenomenon, many exist who do recognize that something is not quite right with the Dems.

Numerous progressives remain idealistic and cannot neither relate nor stomach what they are seeing in the present party as corruption, hypocrisy, and betrayal. (Many in the GOP have the same disgust with their party, but that is another story).

Witness the rise of Bernie Sanders. Was it because his supporters were true hard core Socialists/Communists or because they were fed up with leaders who talked out of both sides of their mouths and saw him as “the real thing”.

The following post discusses the dismay of the CPUSA over the fact that not all Dems seem willing to support Hillary. They are concerned. She must win in November in order for the agenda begun in earnest by the present WH occupant to continue.

These voters have apparently abandoned Hillary and possibly the party.

Democratic Party nominee Hillary Clinton (Photo: Twitter)

‘They deeply despise her ties to Wall Street and call her a warmonger and a liar’

WASHINGTON – How deep and wide is the Communist Party USA’s support for Hillary Clinton?

It’s unambiguous. It’s 100 percent. And it’s uncompromising.

A new editorial on the party’s home page calls any thoughts about voting for the Green Party presidential candidate Jill Stein or not voting for the top of the Democratic ticket “a flawed strategy.”

The CPUSA, birthed by Josef Stalin’s pocketbooks and sustained through the fall of the Soviet Union by KGB subsidies, is all in for Hillary.

The party is also excited about America’s corporate press jumping on the bandwagon with support for its candidate.

“Unprecedented early endorsements of Clinton have appeared in the Washington Post and Houston Chronicle, which described Trump as a ‘danger to the Republic,’” the editorial states with approval. “Many refer to Trump as an extreme authoritarian or worse, as a fascist.”

On the other hand, the Democrats meet the political litmus test with flying rainbow colors:

“The message from the DNC was the polar opposite. It reflected the broad electoral coalition backing Clinton, including the labor movement, African American, Latino, Asian and other communities of color, women, the LGBT community, youth, environmentalists, immigrant and disabled rights advocates.”

However, the CPUSA is concerned that not all ‘progressives” are on board for Clinton.

“But there are still some progressives, including some Bernie or Bust activists, who refuse to support Clinton,” the editorial says. “They deeply despise her ties to Wall Street and call her a warmonger and a liar. They see nothing positive in Clinton, her historic candidacy or the Democratic Party platform. They dismiss the broad electoral coalition, including the labor movement, that is backing Clinton and that has shaped the platform, a coalition with obvious leverage. To them, she is as bad as Trump.”

It continues: “Some are voting for Green Party candidate Jill Stein to ‘send a message.’ Still others hope a Clinton defeat provokes a crisis in the Democratic Party leading to its break-up.”

Jill Stein of the Green Party

Sounding like a press release from the DNC, the Communist Party editorial explains: “This is a flawed strategy. First, like it or not, we have a two party system. One of the two major parties will win and govern. If this were a parliamentary democracy different tactics would be called for.”

“To call for a vote against Clinton is to separate oneself from this electoral coalition,” it states.

Not only do the Communists want Hillary to win, they want her to win big, explaining “mandates are real. This election will be a national referendum on racism, misogyny, homophobia, xenophobia and Islamophobia. The aim should be a landslide defeat of Trump and a decisive rejection of hate. The election of Clinton as the first woman president would make history. A landslide would not end sexism, but it would represent a mighty blow just as the election of President Obama was a blow against racism. It would advance democracy. A landslide makes it more likely that GOP congressional and state legislative majorities can be ousted and an end put to the politics of obstruction. Most people tend to vote straight ticket.”

“A landslide will give added weight to the progressive platform adopted at the Democratic Convention and give encouragement to appoint progressive Supreme Court justices,” the editorial continues. “It would be added pressure against backsliding on opposition to TPP and other trade deals. It will put public opinion and the movements in a better position to pressure against Clinton’s tendency toward military adventurism and policies of regime change.”

Again, the CPUSA warns off against voting Green.

“Voting Green Party separates activists and voters from these key forces,” the editorial says. “One cannot credibly engage in mobilizations of labor, civil rights, women’s organizations, LGBT community, and environmentalists while also advocating voting Green Party.”

The Communist Party “press” was out in force at the Democratic National Convention in full support of the Dems and their nominee from the beginning.

Joseph Farah, the founder of WND.com and a former revolutionary communist himself in his youth, said the CPUSA’s coverage was so effusive in its enthusiasm it put MSNBC to shame.

“Back in the day when Stalinists Gus Hall and Angela Davis were regularly nominated by the party as presidential and vice presidential candidates every four years, the U.S. Communists actually had beefs with the Democrats,” he said. “But, in recent years, the party ceased those efforts in favor of a united front with the Democrats, with whom they have very few differences, if any.”

The Communist Party was so eager to endorse Barack Obama for re-election, it couldn’t wait until 2012. It did so a year before the campaign officially got under way. The party was jubilant in 2008, when Obama won his first race for the presidency.

Saul Alinsky

Hailing Barack Obama’s win as a victory for the “working class,” the Communist Party USA called on the president-elect to carry out his promises, including his noted commitment to “spread the wealth.” An editorial by the People’s Weekly World, the official newspaper of the party, said the victory was for “workers of all job titles, professions, shapes, colors, sizes, hairstyles and languages.”

In 2009, President Obama’s leadership was “one of the best opportunities that Americans have had in decades,” declared a civil-rights activist addressing an overflow crowd at a gathering sponsored by the official newspaper of the Community Party USA.

The party was never disappointed by Obama. Here’s how it critiqued Obama’s final State of the Union Address earlier this year:

“In his final SOTU address, President Obama projected a bold vision for a more socially and economically just nation while appealing to the hopes of the American people. … President Obama pointedly rejected right-wing-Republican policy solutions including repeal of Obamacare, aggressive military buildup and action, tax cuts to the wealthy, blocking common-sense gun control … He also rejected efforts to exploit the fears of the American people using hate, anti-Muslim bigotry, racism and division.

“The challenges facing the nation and planet are immense: climate crisis, massive concentration and inequality of wealth, growing poverty and declining wages, joblessness, including skyrocketing unemployment in the African-American community, over $1 trillion in student debt, a crumbling infrastructure, underfunded schools and social services, lack of affordable housing, a frayed retirement security system, etc.”

David Kupelian, managing editor of WND.com, had this to say earlier this year in a commentary on the shrinking divide between the two parties: “Amazing as it may seem, Barack Obama has dragged the entire Democratic Party so far leftward over the past seven-plus years that today’s Democratic Party has become almost indistinguishable from the Communist Party.

“If that sounds hyperbolic to you, just stop reading right now and pull up the CPUSA’s website,” he added. “Spend some time reading and digesting it. Try to discern any major differences between the Communist Party’s concerns, sensibilities and solutions – on issues from ‘gay’ rights, to unfettered immigration, to renewable energy, to wealth redistribution, to condemning cops as racist, to universal health care – and those of today’s Democratic Party.”

Hillary Clinton’s association with radical thought dates back to at least 1969, when Obama was just 8 years old, himself a protégé early on of Frank Marshall Davis, a loyal Communist Party activist. Interest has been largely fueled by Clinton’s suppressed and later released 92-page senior thesis for Wellesley College offering an extensive, largely positive critique of Saul Alinsky and his work.

Clinton’s 1969 Wellesley College senior thesis was titled “There Is Only the Fight … : An Analysis of the Alinsky Model.” The thesis received attention when it was released after the Bill Clinton presidency. According to reports, in early 1993, the White House requested that Wellesley keep the thesis on “Rules for Radicals” author Saul Alinsky confidential and not release any copies.

Clinton was said to have met with Alinsky several times in 1968, when she was writing her thesis. In her most recent memoir, Clinton wrote that she rejected a job offer from Alinsky to instead attend law school.

Read the history of the attacks on marriage and the family, from the days of Karl Marx and Margaret Sanger to those now pushing for mandatory recognition of same-sex “marriage,” in “Takedown: From Communists to Progressives, How the Left has Sabotaged Family and Marriage.”

Last year, WND found that long after Alinsky’s death in June 1972, a group Clinton co-chaired maintained a working relationship with Alinsky’s main community organizing outfit, the Industrial Areas Foundation, or IAF. The partnership extended into the 1990s and yielded influence over the education policy of the Bill Clinton presidency, it can now be disclosed. Founded by Alinsky in 1940 and run by him until his death, the IAF is a national community-organizing network established to implement Alinsky’s expansive organizing agenda. After Alinsky’s death, the IAF was taken over by his longtime associate and designated successor, Ed Chambers, who became the group’s executive director.

Dick Morris, a former top political adviser to Bill Clinton both as governor of Arkansas and as president, noted to WND that education reform “is the key issue Hillary Clinton used to propel herself independently to the forefront of Arkansas politics during Bill’s governorship.”

“The revelation of how closely linked her efforts were back in the 80s – and have been since – to an Alinsky radical front group is deeply disturbing and expands our understanding of Hillary’s fundamental radicalism and commitment to the new left of Saul Alinsky,” Morris said.

David Horowitz, whose parents were members of the Communist Party and who himself became a leader in the new left movement of the 1960s and 1970s before rejecting it, said the revelation is significant though not surprising.

“When radicals set out to fundamentally transform a society, the first institution they attack is the educational system which under their influence becomes a system of indoctrination in radical ideas,” he told WND.

Interestingly, the Communist Party USA has not changed its stripes in any significant way. It hasn’t walked back its 100 percent commitment to Communism. What has changed is the Democratic Party.

The drift leftward hit warp speed beginning in the 1990s, according to Farah. That’s the year Bernie Sanders was first elected to Congress and founded the Congressional Progressive Caucus.

“One of his first actions in Congress was to found the Congressional Progressive Caucus, which was partnered with the Democratic Socialists of America,” recounts Farah. “No surprise there, because most Americans have no idea of what the Congressional Progressive Caucus and the Democratic Socialists of America are really all about.”

Farah reported on the antics of the caucus in 1998.

“Back then the Congressional Progressive Caucus shared a website with the DSA,” he wrote. “In other words, these two organizations, one government-funded and the other a tax-exempt nonprofit, were of like mind and on the same page politically. What I found back then was astonishing – even for me. On this shared website, that was quickly scrubbed after I exposed it, was a collection of songs I can almost hear Bernie, Nancy Pelosi, Barney Frank and other members of the Congressional Progressive Caucus singing in harmony. One of my favorites back then – was ‘Red Revolution’ sung to the tune of ‘Red, Red Robbin.’”

Here are the lyrics as they still appear on the Congressional Progressive Caucus website as captured by the Wayback Machine: (The original site was scrubbed within hours after it was exposed by WND)

When the Red Revolution
brings its solution
along, along

There’ll be no more lootin’
when we start shootin’
that Wall Street throng

Wake up you proletarians
Don’t act like seminarians
Expropriate barbarians
Build a workers’ republic

Exploitation and degradation
you won’t find here
Surplus value and capital will disappear

I’m just a Red again,
saying what I’ve said again,
When the Red Revolution … da, da, da, da
brings its solution … da, da, da, da, da
along

“How do these people get away with denying they are redder than a robin’s breast while singing songs like this – and printing them on the Internet?” asked Farah incredulously.

The song list also included lyrics to “Are You Sleeping, Bourgeoisie,” sung to the tune of “Frere Jacques.”

Are you sleeping, are you sleeping,
Bourgeoisie, Bourgeoisie,
And when the revolution comes,
We’ll kill you all with knives and guns,
Bourgeoisie, Bourgeoisie

“For those not trained in the lingo of communism, the dictionary definition of ‘bourgeoisie,’ is, and I quote: ‘(in Marxist theory) the class that, in contrast to the proletariat or wage-earning class, is primarily concerned with property values,’” wrote Farah. “If you’ve got property, if you’re part of the middle class, these people not only want to raise your taxes, they want to kill you with knives and guns!”
Source: WND
__________________

Edited by John R. Houk

The Realistic Observer posts everything in bold text. Honestly I find that annoying thus I took away most of the bold text. I indented the short verse prose in the post.

The Realistic Observer Homepage

Is Anders Behring Breivik the Nordic Che Guevara?

Ever since the Norwegian Massacre, at the hands of Anders Breivik, Leftists and Muslim Apologists have been very active in blaming Counterjihad Writers for inciting Muslims to commit violence. At first glance there is some logic to the stand of Leftists and Muslim Apologists. Breivik’s magnum opus consistently utilizes exposés of Counterjihad Writers as part of his plan to incite Europeans to a revolution against the European ruling elite. Breivik’s revolution imagined a New European Order that would unite Europeans under some kind of Odinic-Christian (Understanding Odinism: Here, Here, Here and Here) religion (can you imagine the Nazi Aryan Race of Hitler?) that would preserve a connection to Europe’s Greco-Roman-Christian heritage with a large splash German-Nordic influence.

Fjordman takes on the ‘blame the Counterjihadists’ mentality by pointing out Marxists are responsible for genocides in which millions died and yet Europe’s Socialist oriented politics and Communist terrorists of the past are hailed as heroes of yesteryear. Fjordman zeroes in on the atrocities of Che Guevara (incidentally Obama is a Guevara admirer See also Here).

JRH 10/8/12 (Hat Tip: Politicus)

Please Support NCCR

*********************************

Is Anders Behring Breivik the Nordic Che Guevara?

By Fjordman

Oct 5th, 2012

FrontPage Magazine

In a provocative essay at the website Gates of Vienna, I once asked whether the mass murderer Anders Behring Breivik could be labeled the “Nordic Muhammad.” The first pair of forensic psychiatrists who evaluated Breivik compared his self-image to religious literature. He claimed to be a “perfect” man worthy of emulation. John L. Esposito, one of the most pro-Islamic writers in the Western world, states that Muhammad can be seen as the “living Koran.” He is viewed by Muslims as a perfect man worthy of emulation, almost like Breivik imagined himself to be.

Yet, fortunately for us, Breivik did not found a new religion. Perhaps a more appropriate question to ask is whether Breivik, with his sadistic cruelty and bloodthirstiness, is a Nordic equivalent of Che Guevara.

On page 1164 of his confused manifesto, Breivik quoted the Marxist leader Fidel Castro, who ruled Cuba for more than half a century: “I began the revolution with 82 men. If I had to do it again, I would do it with 10 or 15 individuals with absolute faith. It does not matter how small you are if you have faith and a plan of action.” Mr. Castro represents a violent totalitarian ideology, but although he is a revolutionary Socialist he has not been blamed by the mass media for inspiring Breivik. That is reserved for so-called “Islamophobes.”

On April 23 2012, during the trial in Oslo, Breivik compared himself to the Marxist militants and revolutionary Socialists Fidel Castro and Ernesto “Che” Guevara. The latter has become a popular icon of rebellion and anti-capitalism among segments of the political Left throughout the Western world, his image decorating posters and t-shirts and used to sell everything from coffee mugs to key chains. ABB claimed that his alleged Knights Templar militant network had as much legitimacy as these Marxists did in their violent struggle to overthrow the ruling regimes.

This was, as usual, not emphasized much by journalists with Socialist sympathies. The Socialist Left Party, part of Prime Minister Jens Stoltenberg’s coalition government, have resisted calls for a boycott of the Communist dictatorship in Cuba, but at the same time wanted to boycott goods from democratic Israel. Much the same may be said about the Labor Party’s intimate and powerful partner, the Norwegian Confederation of Trade Unions (LO).

When Breivik greeted the court several times with a clenched fist, the press described this as a “right-wing extremist salute,” without mentioning that virtually the same gesture has been used by the Black Panthers and modern Socialist rulers such as Hugo Chavez in Latin America or the Marxist terrorist Carlos the Jackal.

Peter Neumann, the Director of the International Centre for the Study of Radicalisation in London, claims that Breivik has changed our view of “lone wolf” terrorists radicalized by the Internet. The historian Nikolai Brandal, however, labels him a “hybrid terrorist” who sought inspiration from many different sources. During his court testimony, Brandal found it noteworthy that Breivik employs the term “urban guerrilla” for his style of warfare. This term was popularized in the 1960s, partly by the revolutionary international Socialist Che Guevara.

Che Guevara played a major role in the cooperation between Fidel Castro’s Communist-ruled Cuba and the Soviet Union, thereby contributing to the Cuban missile crisis in October 1962 that almost triggered a full-scale intercontinental nuclear war between the two superpowers of the era, the USA and the Soviet Union.

Che actually regretted that it didn’t come to nuclear war, proclaiming that “If the nuclear missiles had remained [in Cuba] we would have fired them against the heart of the U.S. including New York City. The victory of Socialism is well worth millions of atomic victims!” He also said some extremely negative things about black people as well as homosexuals, statements that are usually covered up by his left-wing cheerleaders today.

The writer Rubén Palma, who was originally born and raised in Chile but has lived in Denmark for the past four decades, has looked into some little-quoted, but well-documented, material about Che Guevara.

The French Marxist philosopher Jean-Paul Sartre, an apologist for the murderous Communist regime of Josef Stalin, at one point called Che Guevara “the most complete human being of our time.” The Oscar-winning American film director and screenwriter Steven Soderbergh has worked with A-list Hollywood movie stars such as George Clooney, Brad Pitt, Matt Damon and Julia Roberts. He also made the two part-film Che in 2008, which was more than four hours long and described the protagonist in largely positive terms.

Che Guevara publicly bragged about executing as many opponents of the glorious Socialist revolution as he deemed necessary, stating that “Our fight is a fight to the death!” Yet as Rubén Palma dryly notes, this turned out to be mainly a struggle against unarmed opponents tied to a pole, or a fight to other people’s death. That was Che’s specialty. In Palma’s view, newer material on Che Guevara shows clearly how his skills as a military leader have often been dramatically exaggerated – and his callous and violent personality meticulously hidden.

During a speech in 1967, Che praised the “uncompromising hatred” that transforms a man into a determined, effective and cold-blooded “killing machine.” Already in his diary in 1952, he had fantasies about how he would in the future storm barricades and trenches, “behead” any enemy he could lay his hands on and dip his weapon in their blood. He felt excited by the mere thought of this, and that was written while he was a medical student. Clearly, the “do no harm” doctrine of the Hippocratic Oath, so central to Western medicine, meant little to him.

Che became an active member of the Purging Commission, which as the name implies was designed to get rid of enemies of the Socialist revolution. From 1957 to 1959, he ordered dozens of summary executions – many of which were carried out by him own hand. During his years as a revolutionary, he was responsible for hundreds of murders, which he often watched or participated in while drinking alcohol and smoking cigars. Che has been described as a hateful and cruel man who enjoyed terrorizing and demeaning prisoners or their relatives.

The best thing I can say about Che Guevara is that, unlike Anders Behring Breivik, he participated in several real struggles against armed opponents who actually shot back. He published a manual entitled Guerrilla Warfare in 1961, although critics claim that his alleged skills as a military strategist have been greatly exaggerated.

What is undisputed, however, is that in Cuba and elsewhere, Che personally participated in dozens of executions, usually without trial, of unarmed men and women. He talked about “fighting to the death,” but it turned out to be other people’s death he was referring to. It is commonly accepted that when he was finally captured in Bolivia in 1967, Che shouted “Don’t shoot! I am Che Guevara and worth more to you alive than dead.”

During his massacre at Utøya Anders Behring Breivik executed unarmed opponents, just as Che enjoyed doing. Also like Che, he surrendered when finally faced with armed opponents who were in a position to kill him. Breivik has claimed that he planned to become a “martyr” and did not expect to survive his attacks.

Perhaps, but this explanation does not sound entirely credible. The risks to himself with his attacks were greater than zero, but not terribly great, either, since he attacked unarmed people who were totally unprepared for a fight, mentally as well as physically. Given the fact that Breivik the narcissist seems to relish media attention surrounding his person, I consider it at least as likely that he wanted to survive. Other observers agree.

If he had wanted to be killed, he could easily have done so. Somewhat belatedly, he was eventually confronted by armed police at the island. Americans have observed a phenomenon they call “suicide by cop,” whereby a person who wants to die provokes armed police into shooting him. Breivik still had ammunition left when the police finally showed up. If he had wanted to make a final stand and go down in a blaze of bullets, he could have done so. But he didn’t. When finally faced with armed opponents who could and would take him out, he meekly surrendered.

Breivik the military dilettante exhibited many of the same violent fantasies as Che, including even the possibility of beheading his victims, and displayed cruel sadism when executing dozens of unarmed victims. Also just like Che Guevara, his fight to the death turned out to be a fight to other people’s death, whereas he himself in the end surrendered to people who could actually shoot back. Due to his toxic combination of cruelty, hypocrisy and cowardice, Anders Behring Breivik could be labeled the “Nordic Che Guevara.”

Fortunately, even though Breivik was for a while a peripheral member of the Progress Party in Oslo, we haven’t seen many coffee mugs or t-shirts bearing his portrait among members of the political Right. For some reason, celebration of mass murderers and terrorists seems to be more widespread in segments of the political Left.

________________________

Beware the American Left

John R. Houk

NoGuff sent a YouTube video to me entitled, “What is Communism?” It is a copy of an educational film made in the early 1950s to expose the truth of Communism. I have to be honest that the film was made in the days of Senator Joe McCarthy investigating Communist infiltration into American government. The thing is McCarthy’s anti-Communist crusade began to expand quicker than verified facts could come. Left leaning Congressman began to view McCarthy as entering the realm of paranoia. This view that McCarthy was more paranoid than an investigator of fact; therefore a block of Senators and Representatives began to demand for McCarthy to show the proof of the evils of Communist infiltration in America. Of course McCarthy did not have all his ducks in a row and began to gain the image of crazy man bent more on ruining people’s lives and careers than in finding Communists in influential positions in government and business.

Recent declassified documents from America and Russia (from its USSR days have proven that Senator Joe McCarthy was way more correct than paranoid. Unfortunately when McCarthy could not keep up with the proven data, his Congressional enemies ruined his life.

As you watch this old anti-Communist video have to understand 95% percent of it is true; however I caught one piece of information that was untrue. The narrator says that Communism or a Communist Party is illegal in America. Unfortunately that is not the case. Communist ideology is covered by Free Speech as much as any political speech and ideology that exists and does not take an active proven role to act against the U.S. Constitution and duly elected and appointed government personnel.

It is also true that Communism wishes to build a utopia that is diametrically opposed to the tenets of the U.S. Constitution; however the days of the now defunct Communist Soviets planting spies, recruiting treasonous Americans and infiltrating the government is not as much as a danger today as it was in the 1940s through the early 1960s.

Local Communism began to splinter up over ideological disagreements on achieving the goal of a stateless utopia. Revolution was (and probably is) on the table to a lesser degree. The greater divergence among Communists and secret Marxists these days is to become a part of government by election or appointment to influence a transformation in America within the rules of the U.S. Constitution until the Constitution becomes a worthless piece of parchment.

Hello President Barack Hussein Obama!

Anyway, I am including NoGuff’s attraction to the video and the video poster’s thoughts on the video.

JRH 10/1/11

*******************************

NoGuff sent you a video: “What is Communism?”

By NoGuff

Sent: 9/24/11

I thought this was going to be another boring school film. But it turned out to be an excellent brief guide to who and what Communists are and what they want and how they accomplish things.

Once you watch it, you’ll realize that what he’s describing pertains to us today just as much as it did when it was made. We are in a fight that most Americans are totally unaware of and will deny without equivocation. Because they are ignorant, just as the Leftists want them to be, just as they try to make them via the news and media’s efforts.

I think all Americans should watch this. Thank you.

-NG

____________________________

What is Communism?

Posted by RedSquareEye

Posted: Nov 13, 2008

Educational video presented by Herbert A. Philbrick, former undercover agent for the FBI, author of “I Led 3 Lives.”

Herbert Philbrick, a Boston advertising executive who infiltrated the U.S. Communist Party on behalf of the FBI in the 1940s, wrote a bestselling book on the topic, I Led Three Lives: Citizen, ‘Communist’, Counterspy (1952). “I Led Three Lives” was an American television show which was syndicated by Ziv Television Programs from 1953 to 1956 and lasted 117 episodes. The part of Philbrick was played by Richard Carlson.

This video is not part of the show.

VIDEO: What is Communism?

Please Support NCCR

Share this:

Like this:

Share this:

Like this:

Share this:

Like this:

Share this:

Like this: