‘2000 Mules’: The Film They Don’t Want You to See


Yesterday I posted an excellent audio Bitchute version of 2000 Mules largely because I heard Rumble was experiencing a digital attack over 2000 Mules. Today I discovered The Patriot Post addresses the Dem-Marxist fears behind their blackout censoring and Internet attacks on 2000 Mules under the title, “2000 Mules’: The Film They Don’t Want You to See.”

JRH 5/10/22

READER SUPPORTED! I need Readers willing to chip in $5 – $10 – $25 – $50 – $100. I need your generosity. PLEASE GIVE to overcome research expenses:

Please Support NCCR

Big Tech Censorship is pervasive – Share voluminously on all social media platforms!

***************************

‘2000 Mules’: The Film They Don’t Want You to See

A new film makes a compelling case that the 2020 election wasn’t “the most secure election in history.”

2000 Mules – TPP Photo

By DOUGLAS ANDREWS 

MAY 10, 2022

The Patriot Post

Judging by its initial success, conservative author and filmmaker Dinesh D’Souza’s new film, “2000 Mules,” is getting folks’ attention despite the Left’s near-total news blackout of it. And frankly, we can’t blame them for wishing it would go away — because it makes them look like they stole a presidential election.

The film, which documents and corroborates claims of significant voter fraud in tightly contested swing states during the 2020 election, grossed more than $1 million in its first 12 hours of streaming on Rumble and subscription-based platform Locals.

This is the film Joe “81 Million Votes” Biden and his “most secure election in history” apologists and censors don’t want to talk about. And they definitely don’t want you to see it. But folks are seeing it anyway. According to Rumble, “The movie’s gross sales on Rumble and Locals, which began on Saturday at noon, are good enough to put ‘2000 Mules’ in the estimated box office top ten for the weekend of May 6th to May 8th.”

To anyone willing to think openly and honestly about it, the 2020 election was deeply suspect. COVID-inspired, Democrat-supported bulk-mail balloting made this an election unlike any other, and it opened the floodgates to potential ballot fraud — especially via the largely illegal practice of ballot harvesting, which is the collection, transportation, and delivering of any ballots other than one’s own.

To recap: The incumbent, Donald Trump, earned 12 million more votes than any Republican candidate in history and handily carried an astounding 18 of 19 “bellwether” counties across the nation, and yet still got seven million fewer votes than gaffe-prone, basement-bound, cognitively challenged Joe Biden — a guy whose candidacy was so awful, so utterly uninspiring, that in the primaries he finished a dismal fourth in Iowa and fifth in New Hampshire before getting clobbered by 26 points in Nevada by Bernie Sanders. But somehow, Biden managed to haul in 81 million votes in the general.

 That’s more population-adjusted votes than a far younger, far more compelling, infinitely more charismatic Barack Obama got in 2008.

Something didn’t add up, but the mainstream media wasn’t about to go digging for it. Instead, that would be up to a private citizen, one Catherine Engelbrecht, who years ago founded True the Vote, a nonprofit election integrity organization. (For her efforts, she was repeatedly targeted and harassed by the Obama administration in the run-up to his 2012 reelection.)

The result of Engelbrecht’s digging is a film that puts the lie to the New York Times’s ridiculous front-page headline, published just after the 2020 vote: “Election Officials Nationwide Find No Fraud.” How on earth could the Times have known? How much time did its staff devote to a comprehensive nationwide forensic analysis of the 2020 vote? (That’s a rhetorical question.) As Newsweek reports:

Engelbrecht said her group [True the Vote] spent $1 million to obtain geospatial information from several marketing services that she agreed not to name and $20,000 to obtain video via open-records requests to counties and cities in five states where it appeared Trump was winning, until mail-in and drop-box ballots were counted: Georgia, Arizona, Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania. From there, she says she and her staff cross-referenced the times and locations of the cell phones whose users visited multiple drop boxes with the 4 million minutes of video obtained from city and county governments.

All of this is chronicled in “2000 Mules,” in which D’Souza shows how True the Vote painstakingly used three trillion cellphone geotracking signals and surveillance video to reveal “a network of ‘mules’ in battleground states busily collecting ballots from get-out-the-vote NGOs and stuffing them, a few at a time, into multiple drop boxes in the dead of night.” The geotracking signals obtained were those near drop boxes and also near election nonprofits from October 1, 2020, through to the election on November 3, and through the Georgia runoff date of January 6, 2021.

As The New York Post’s Miranda Devine writes: “The data pattern is unmistakable, as D’Souza shows a spider web of routes taken by various mules between NGOs and drop boxes. For each of the 2,000 mules the average number of drop box visits was 38, with an average five ballots deposited per visit. That’s 380,000 suspect votes.”

Remember: Only 43,000 votes decided the election in the three battleground states of Arizona, Georgia, and Wisconsin. And this process of “ballot trafficking” is how the Democrats carried it off.

Their best defense? A weak and deeply denialist statement from their water carriers at PolitiFact, which complains about “dramatic horror movie music with grainy video footage.”

We’re happy to let you decide whose account is more plausible.

In the meantime, though, let’s keep an eye on the Democrats — specifically, whether they’ll try to run the same bulk-mail ballot scheme during November’s midterm elections. All it’ll take is another good COVID scare.


Updated to include specific data on the average number of drop-box visits and ballot deposits by the mules.

The Patriot Post is protected speech, as enumerated in the First Amendment and enforced by the Second Amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America, in accordance with the endowed and unalienable Rights of All Mankind.

Copyright © 2022 The Patriot Post. All Rights Reserved.

2000 Mules – A Bitchute Version


John R. Houk, Blog Editor

© May 9, 2022

The Documentary 2000 Mules has ended in theatres. You can now catch it on video services. YOU as a voter should find it interesting there has been a huge Leftist push to suppress and censor access to viewing 2000 Mules because it demonstrates WITHOUT A DOUBT there was a criminal ELECTION COUP in a America in 2020. I am showing the Dinesh D’Souza link to 2000 Mules with the hope people will toss some financial appreciation to D’Souza, however it is fascinating my browser freezes up every time I go there. Perhaps you will have better luck: https://2000mules.com/.

I have noticed the Leftist so-called Fact Checkers have already begun the “DON’T BELIEVE WHAT YOU SEE, RATHER BELIEVE WHAT WE TELL YOU” campaign. If you are a gullible who thinks your political party’s fundamental transformation of America is a good thing, you probably go into full sheeple-mode and believe your Leftist Fact Checker LIARS.

If you are a Bible-Believing and American Founding Documents supporting American despising the Dem-Marxist transformation into tyranny, TAKE HEED TO 2000 Mules!

JRH 5/9/22

READER SUPPORTED! I need Readers willing to chip in $5 – $10 – $25 – $50 – $100. I need your generosity. PLEASE GIVE to overcome research expenses:

Please Support NCCR

Big Tech Censorship is pervasive – Share voluminously on all social media platforms!

************************

Bitchute VIDEO: 2000 MULES; HOW THEY STOLE THE 2020 ELECTION

Posted by WORLDTVnews

First Published May 8th, 2022 13:07 UTC

THIS IS THE FULL 2000 MULES DOCUMENTARY WITH GREAT AUDIO.

“2000 Mules,” a documentary film created by Dinesh D’Souza, exposes widespread, coordinated voter fraud in the 2020 election, sufficient to change the overall outcome. Drawing on research provided by the election integrity group True the Vote, “2000 Mules” offers two types of evidence: geotracking and video. The geotracking evidence, based on a database of 10 trillion cell phone pings, exposes an elaborate network of paid professional operatives called mules delivering fraudulent and illegal votes to mail-in dropboxes in the five key states where the election was decided. Video evidence, obtained from official surveillance cameras installed by the states themselves, confirms the geotracking evidence. The movie concludes by exploring numerous ways to prevent the fraud from happening again.

Election Coup: Past, Present & Future


John R. Houk, Blog Editor

Posted April 25, 2022

Today let’s examine 2020-Election/Voting Fraud/Crimes through the lens of the attempt will be made again and COVID lies was and is the vehicle to perpetrate the past and the future Fascist-Marxist power coup. What will We The People do?

JRH 4/25/22

I need your generosity. PLEASE GIVE to overcome research expenses:

Please Support NCCR

Big Tech Censorship is pervasive – Share voluminously on all social media platforms!

***************************

Rumble VIDEO: 2000 Mules Trailer

Posted by Dinesh D’Souza

Published April 23, 2022

Enjoyed this video? Join my Locals community for exclusive content at dinesh.locals.com!

Here’s the official trailer for “2000 Mules.” It’s the movie we’ve all been waiting for. Please share! And go to 2000Mules.com to buy your ticket to see the movie in its premiere week

++++++++++++++++++

Biden And Dems Caught Trying To Steal 2024 Election

[Coup Leadership] Biden & Pelosi

By Jeff Miller

April 25, 2022

The Republic Brief

The Democrats have proven to be running on empty over the last 16 months of the Biden presidency.

It is not as if they are trying to roll back their electorally toxic policies.

This means they will be wiped out politically at the midterms. Nevertheless, they seem unperturbed by the fact that they are not worried about winning elections.

It is evident that the Democratic Party is not hiding under the covers when it comes to the election. There is a nefarious plan afoot.

Although they can’t govern well, they are the best at grabbing power by foul means or fair means.

We are now faced with the thorny topic of the 2020 presidential election. The new rules imposed under the cover of COVID had many Americans thinking something was not quite right.

Never mind Sidney Powell’s ill-conceived Kraken concept which never materialized.

Democracies tried many ways to tilt the playing field in their favor, but some worked better than others. They won a triumph when their friends in Big Tech censored The Post’s Hunter Biden laptop coverage before the election.

In order to restore trust in elections, troubling evidence of systematic schemes to subvert them is now coming to light.

In “2000 Mules,” the documentary by Dinesh D’Souza based on research by True The Vote, the most convincing evidence of suspicious ballot harvesting has emerged.

Using cellphone geotracking and surveillance video, it shows a network of “mules” in battleground states busily collecting ballots from get-out-the-vote NGOs and stuffing them, a few at a time, into multiple drop boxes in the dead of night.

It is staggering to see how extensive the undertaking is.

True the Vote bought three trillion geolocation signals from cellphones near drop boxes, as well as near election nonprofits, from October 1, 2020, to election day, November 3, 2020. The Georgia deadline covered the runoff on Jan. 6, 2021.

Then they searched for “mules,” operatives who stole ballots from election NGOs – like Stacey Abrams’ Fair Fight Action group – and then carried them to drop boxes, depositing between three and ten ballots in each drop box before moving on.

” Mule” was the term chosen by Catherine Engelbrecht, the founder of True the Vote, since it “felt a lot like a cartel, it felt like trafficking . . . This is in its essence ballot trafficking . . . You have the collectors. You have the stash houses, which are the nonprofits. And then you have the mules that are doing the drops.”

In order for a mule to be included in the data set, Gregg Phillips set a threshold of at least 10 drop boxes within a particular area, as well as at least five visits to an NGO.

In the Atlanta metro area, for instance, they drew a line around 309 drop boxes, and they bought all cellphone data collected from people that had been near those boxes and NGOs.

Thus, we were left with 2,000 mules to choose from.

They then went searching for surveillance videos of those drop boxes. All told, they uncovered four million minutes.

What they found is shocking. Video shows the scheme coming to life when a mule is matched with a video.

After midnight, a car shows up at a dropbox. A man exits, looks around discreetly, approaches the ballot box, stuffs a few ballots in, and runs away. He then moves to each ballot box, again and again.

From December 23, 2020 onwards, Phipps discovered mules in Georgia were wearing gloves. He cites the indictment handed down in Arizona on December 22 in connection to ballot stuffing. “The way the FBI nailed them was fingerprints.” The mules then started wearing gloves.

As D’Souza shows in his data, a complex network of routes taken by mules between NGOs and dropboxes is unmistakable.

An average of 38 dropbox visits per mule was made, and five ballots were deposited per visit. That amounts to about 380,000 suspicious votes.

Using the numbers, D’Souza explains whether the outcome of the election would have been different.

There were 500 mules in Michigan, averaging 50 dropbox visits per mule, or 125,000 suspected votes, not enough to overcome Biden’s 154,000-vote advantage.

With 100 mules in Wisconsin visiting a dropbox on average 28 times each, we have 14,000 suspect votes, 6,000 votes short of a Trump victory.

However, in Georgia, where 250 mules visited 24 dropboxes each, we get 30,000 suspect votes, more than enough to overcome Biden’s 12,000 vote lead. According to D’Souza, Georgia’s 16 electoral votes now go to Trump.

20,000 suspect votes can be attributed to 200 mules making an average of 20 visits to dropboxes, giving Trump 11 more likely electoral votes.

During the Philadelphia campaign alone, 1,100 mules made an average of 50 dropbox visits each, resulting in 275,000 suspect votes, which would flip the Pennsylvania result to Trump and give him another 20 electoral votes.

“Shockingly, even this narrow way of looking at just our 2,000 mules in these swing states gives Trump the win with 279 electoral votes to Biden’s 259,” notes D’Souza.

Now, those ballots can’t be examined to see if they’re fraudulent, but if we’re going to use drop boxes, they need to be secure and monitored 24/7.

There’s obviously some problem. However, on the campaign trail, Republican candidates – even potential Donald Trump – should not be looking backward at their 2020 election loss. To do so makes them appear bitter.


© 2021 – All Rights Reserved. The Republic Brief

++++++++++++++++++++

Bitchute VIDEO: MEDIA MACHINE DESPERATE TO KEEP CONTROL

Posted by BANNED.VIDEOInfowars

First Published April 24th, 2022 07:22 UTC 

bringing you what’s ignored, sensationalized, unbalanced, misleading or just plain FALSE. Here’s your Media Malfeasance for the third week of APRIL.


Kristi Leigh TV https://freeworldnews.tv/channel/kristi-leigh-tv

**Get Your “Alex Jones Was Right” Fundraiser Shirt Today! https://www.infowarsstore.com/alex-jones-was-right-lightning-shirt

📰 Breaking News: https://www.infowars.com/breaking-news/

🇺🇸 Save Infowars: https://www.givesendgo.com/G2CK4

MORE DESCRIPTION

++++++++++++++++++

Fauci Masks the Rule of Law

In declaring that public health officials are above the law, Fauci is undermining constitutional government.

Fauci Mask Tyranny Quote

By NATE JACKSON 

APRIL 25, 2022

The Patriot Post

“I do not recommend that you wear a mask,” said Dr. Anthony Fauci in an email on February 5, 2020. “There’s no reason to be walking around with a mask,” Fauci declared on March 8, 2020. That same Anthony Fauci led the flip-flop on masks once the politicos in DC needed to be seen “doing something” about the coronavirus pandemic. Now that he’s tasted power, he’s loathe to let it go.

Griping about U.S. District Judge Kathryn Kimball Mizelle’s recent ruling striking down Joe Biden’s mask mandate on public transit, Dr. “I Am the Science” Fauci argued that judges can’t make such challenges to The Science™.

“The principle of a court overruling a public health judgment by a qualified organization like the CDC is disturbing in the precedent that it might send,” Fauci complained on CBS. Things such as the mask mandate “really are the purview of the CDC,” he added on some backwater streaming service called CNN+. “We are concerned … about courts getting involved in things that are unequivocally [a] public health decision. I mean, this is a CDC issue. It should not have been a court issue.”

As the nation’s highest-paid bureaucrat, Fauci should know better.

Imperial decrees from unelected bureaucrats are not the ultimate and final word in our constitutional republic. Yet he is knowingly arguing exactly the opposite. He’s arguing that the CDC and “public health experts” should operate entirely outside the law.

Then again, this is the guy who once said of masks, “I don’t look at this as a liberty thing.”

And it has nothing to do with science, either. No state still has a mask mandate. Joe Biden gave his State of the Union to a largely maskless Congress. Yet for some reason, Biden and his know-it-all army of bureaucrats insist that masks on airplanes are the only thing saving us from another descent into viral spread.

Baloney.

Mizelle’s well-reasoned decision was made entirely based on the law. She said nothing of the merits of the science one way or the other, only that the CDC had exceeded its authority and not followed legal procedure to boot. Fauci ignores this.

The Biden administration can’t just accept Mizelle’s ruling and is therefore appealing the ruling — not because enforcing the mandate through May 3 as intended is going to stop a single case of COVID, but because protecting its future exercise of power is paramount. White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki said as much: “For current and future public health crises, we want to preserve that authority for the CDC.” But here’s the rub: Mizelle ruled that there was no “preserving” involved because the CDC never had this authority in the first place.

Whereas Fauci attacked Mizelle for not being a scientist, other leftists have attacked her for being only 35 (i.e., old enough to meet the constitutional threshold for being president), or for not having what they deem as sufficient bench experience to make such rulings.

This all obscures what to us seems glaringly obvious: Leftists have a major problem with women (or minorities) in authority thinking for themselves and coming to conservative conclusions. Diversity is great as long as there’s no deviation from leftist dogma.

Critically, what Mizelle did was stand for the Rule of Law. The power of government is derived from the consent of the governed. Our Republic and public officials both elected and unelected are bound by the U.S. Constitution. Bureaucrats like Fauci don’t get to declare themselves science itself and then insist that their decisions are final and immune from checks and balances.

Support The Patriot Fund®

Secure Liberty for the next generation of Americans.

The Patriot Post is protected speech, as enumerated in the First Amendment and enforced by the Second Amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America, in accordance with the endowed and unalienable Rights of All Mankind.

Copyright © 2022 The Patriot Post. All Rights Reserved.


%d bloggers like this: