There is a Better Future in Annexing Judea-Samaria and Gaza


Judea-Samaria is Israel

John R. Houk

© June 1, 2012

 

GOP nominee for President rated President Barack Hussein Obama’s foreign policy as an across the board “F”.

 

Of course BHO’s minions in his campaign defend BHO’s foreign policy choices:

 

Asked to grade Obama, Romney responded: “Oh, an F, no question about that,” adding that it applies “across the board.”

 

Tim Roemer, a former Democratic congressman from Indiana and ex-ambassador to India, said Romney is “misguided and misinformed.” Romney is out of step with experts in his own party who “have recognized President Obama’s accomplishments” in foreign policy, Roemer said in an e-mailed statement. (Presidential Campaigns Duel Over Candidates’ Jobs Records, by John McCormick and Alison Vekshin; Bloomberg; May 31, 2012 11:03 PM CT)

 

If you look at reality rather than Obama propaganda you know Romney is correct. There is nothing misguided or misinformed or out of step with fellow Republicans in the “F” grade for Obama.

 

No one says it better than Caroline Glick who as actually criticizing Israel Defense Minister Ehud Barak for insinuating that Israel unilaterally should give up Judea-Samaria to bring peace to Israel.

 

Glick points out that land for peace didn’t work for Barak when he was Prime Minister in 2000 after bending to pressure to leave South Lebanon in 2000. Hezbollah not only turned South Lebanon into a mini-fiefdom but eventually became the de facto rulers of Lebanon under the strings of Iran and Syria.

 

Glick points out that Prime Minister Sharon’s decision to unilaterally pull out of Gaza in 2005 forcing Israeli settlements to pull up roots was also an utter failure in the land for peace thinking. Hamas rooted out the PA and turned Gaza into a mini-Fiefdom constantly shooting rockets into Israel’s civilian urban areas.

 

Now Glick is focusing Defense Minister Ehud Barak’s idiotic comment; however as you read her article you will note the extreme failure of President Barack Hussein Obama’s in the Middle East relating to Israel, Iran, Syria and pushing the existence of a sovereign Palestine on the land of Israel’s heritage.

 

If Israel’s policy were to go along with Ehud Barak’s suggestion it would not bring peace to Israel. Rather it would bring a murdering bunch of Arab terrorists who have adopted the name Palestinian on Israel’s border. The murdering thugs would not subscribe to peace! Rather the thugs would be dedicated to destroying Israel and the mass genocide of Jews.

 

Although politically distasteful, it actually would make more sense to remove all Arabs that refuse an allegiance to Israel and permanently annex Judea-Samaria (West Bank) and Gaza. I have no doubt a war would result from such an action; however I also know at this point Israel would still win a regional war. The Jewish State of Israel could even easier shut down borders from terrorists with such an official expanded territory because sovereign nations such as Jordan, Syria, Lebanon and Egypt again could be held responsible for allow Islamic terrorist attack on Israeli soil. After all the whole reason the old Arab League created the Palestine Liberation Organization was a tactic to keep violence against Israel in perpetuity while the surrounding Arab or Muslim nations could not be held directly culpable for attacking Israel.

 

The failure of Obama and past American Presidents – Democrats and Republicans – is a failure to look at the big picture for the future. Now as Obama allows Iran to go nuclear in creating Weapons of Mass Destruction the scenario for a military enforced peace via annexation becomes less and less workable.

 

There is no doubt in my mind that a sovereign Palestine State will be yet another puppet for Iran to manage. We all know Iran’s feelings toward the Jewish State of Israel.

 

JRH 6/1/12

Please Support NCCR

Palestine Authority/Hamas Truly Practice Apartheid


PA Apartheid

John R. Houk

© April 21, 2012

 

Muslim Apologists have used half-truths (which means the goal is to lie) to convince students on college campuses across the USA that Israel is an Apartheid State. The implication comes from South Africa in which minority White Africans that had their heritage in Europe ruled the Black majority as a privileged class and treated Blacks as second class citizens.

 

Israel has NOT EVER even come close to existing as something in which non-Jews are treated as second class citizens. The Arab-Muslim minority citizens of Israel have the same Civil Rights afforded to Jews. Indeed, regardless of the propaganda a majority of Arab-Muslims that are citizens of Israel have no intention of living anywhere else than Israel. And friends, this desire to remain Israeli citizens is not because of the myth of the right of return for Palestinians. Arab-Muslim Israeli citizens simply do not desire to live substandard lives in Sharia based traditions of Arab-Muslim nations.

 

The Apartheid accusation against Israel is because of the existence of Arabs without a nation living Judea-Samaria and Gaza. Get a clue world! The PA has a degree of autonomous administration in Judea-Samaria. The Islamic terrorist organization Hamas has near unchallenged administration in Gaza. Both the PA and Hamas educate their Arab constituents from cradle to grave to hate Jews and that Israel must be terrorized out of existence and the Jews obliterated in yet another Holocaust.

 

This hatred is spewed against Israel and yet the world expects Israel to supply the PA and Hamas with an infrastructure of services that provides electricity, food, medicine and so on. Everyone expects Israel to utilize tolerant restraint when of acts of terrorism occur from terrorist attacks, homicidal suicide bombings and missile attacks. You see because of the brainwashing of these Arabs by their Islamic terrorist leaders has bred a culture in which Jewish deaths are celebrated as the will of Allah. Whole families support a shahid (Modern day Islamic terrorists: homicidal suicide bomber) in their quest to kill as many Jews as possible on their deluded belief of an express ticket to a paradise of virgins to comfort them in every sexual fantasy envisioned.

 

So when Israel builds a very effective fence making more difficult for Islamic terrorists from crossing into Israel from Judea-Samaria strongholds, propaganda has termed this persecution. When the Israeli government orders the bulldozing of the house of a celebrating family of a shahid, Muslim Apologists cry persecution yet the reality it is a war. The West has difficulty comprehending that civilian Arabs that call themselves Palestinians are citizen warriors in jihad against Jews and the Jewish State of Israel.

 

You need to keep this all in mind and feel the outrage that Caroline Glick expresses at learning that released Islamic terrorists in the Shalit for thousands of terrorists deal is already baring fruit of Jew-Hating Muslims preparing killings and kidnappings. Or that PA jurisprudence convicts an Arab of selling land to Jews with the death penalty. Or that Secretary of State Hillary Clinton did not rebuke a Muslim desiring Israel’s destruction for asking: Why do Democrats and Republicans both support Israel? Be outraged that Clinton responded to the effect that is a valid question to ask!

 

JRH 4/21/12

Please Support NCCR

Who Actually Believes Hamas and PA Have Peaceful Intentions?


Hamas TV - Kill Jews & Christians

John R. Houk

© April 6, 2012

 

My fellow Americans do you know who or what Hamas is? Hamas is the Islamic terrorist organization that rules the Gaza Strip on the Mediterranean side of Israel. Gaza is a location that Arabs fled to in Israel’s war of independence in 1948. Just for clarity’s sake, the Arabs did not flee to Gaza because of some sort of forced exodus to move Arabs out of Israel. That is what Muslims do to non-Muslims when they think too many kafir are in an area of strategic importance. Brutal forced migration can be seen in history by the example of Ottoman Turkey and later Republic of Turkey collected Christian Armenians and marched them to a Syrian Desert to kill those who survived the march. The forced Armenian migration was a death march in which Armenians were systematically stripped of possessions and life along the way which included the rape of Armenian women.

 

Arabs fled from Israel to Judea-Samaria (West Bank) and Gaza where refugee camps were set up. These Arabs did not flee fearing the brutality of Jewish Israelis. Some Arabs fled because of the fear of becoming victims of Israeli-Arab armies battling each other and most of the fled under direction from the invading Armies to get out of the way until after an Arab victory. Israel withstood 5 or 6 invading armies (I’ve read it both ways) and the fleeing Arabs became stuck to whence they fled.

 

There other ensuing Arab nation wars with the primary assailants being the governments of Egypt, Jordan and Syria. The hatred of Jews ingrained in these Arab hostile nations really had more to do with acquiring conquered land than restoring Arabs to homes that most were renters of more than owners. The surrounding Arab nations use the Arab refugees as a pretext for future invasions after 1948 and so the Arab nations refused to integrate the refugees into their own nations. The Arab nations that created the refugee problem made sure the Arabs remained in the refugee camps EVEN THOUGH after the Israeli victory in 1948 Egypt controlled Gaza and (then) Transjordan controlled Judea-Samaria of an eastern portion of the old British Mandate of Palestine thanks to British aid given to the Transjordanian army known as the Arab Legion. The Transjordanian Hashemite Monarch renamed his nation Jordan after the 1948 conquest and renamed the portion conquered from Israeli possession the West Bank.

 

For clarity Egypt and Jordan both controlled territory where Arab refugees lived but never allowed the refugees to be a part of their perspective nations. Gaza and Judea-Samaria suzerainty remained with Egypt and Jordan from 1948 until 1967 when both those nations were spanked preparing yet another Arab invasion. The spanking brought back Judea-Samaria and Gaza back to Israeli control.

 

In 1964 the Arab League came up with a plan to engage Arab Refugees in the Islamic Arab World goal of driving Israel into the sea. The Arab League created the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO). The member nations of the Arab League did not create the PLO to establish an independent Palestinian State. Rather the PLO was to act as a surrogate for Arab nations to needle Israel while giving Jew-hating Muslim nations plausible deniability to the questions of more powerful nations in West which at that time had the most influence over the United Nations (My how those days have changed). Then after Israel spanked Egypt, Syria and Jordan in the 1967 Six-Day War, the PLO mission changed from needling Israel to outright acts of terrorism. AGAIN Muslim nations supported the PLO in this terrorism for both plausible deniability for acts of war and the hope to soften Israel for another invasion to eradicate Israel.

 

Check this out:

 

… the Arab League convened to try and find a way to complete the ethnic cleansing of Jews from Israel. They had tried it once before in 1948, with incomplete results. Back then, the Arab forces had managed to capture and ethnically cleanse the eastern half of Jerusalem, as well as seizing and annexing the West Bank and Gaza. But for 16 years, Israel had managed to frustrate their designs by stubbornly continuing to exist.

 

What the Arab governments wanted was a terrorist organization that could cross the border and carry out attacks inside Israel. And they wanted plausible deniability so that Israel and the UN couldn’t hold them responsible for those attacks. And so cloaked in a lot of smoke and mirrors about “Palestinian Arab nationhood”, the Palestine Liberation Organization was born.

 

The PLO had three tasks, to harass Israel through terror, to cultivate a fifth column inside the country that would come into play in an invasion, and to make it seem as if the Arab world wasn’t a bunch of genocidal maniacs, but wanted to destroy Israel in the name of “Palestinian rights”.

 

The Arab League had never believed in an independent Palestinian state. Even while they were creating the PLO, Jordan had already annexed the West Bank. And Gaza was in Egyptian hands. The PLO’s purpose was not to liberate these areas, or even to govern them. Its own charter made that abundantly clear.

 

Article 24. This Organization does not exercise any regional sovereignty over the West Bank in the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan, in the Gaza Strip or the Himmah area. Its activities will be on the national popular level in the liberational, organizational, political and financial fields.

 

The PLO’s own founding charter had already conceded that the West Bank was not part of Palestine, and instead recognized Jordan’s annexation of the area. When the PLO talked about “liberating” Palestine, it only meant the parts of Israel that the Arab League members had not succeeded in seizing in 1948. When the PLO talked about liberating Palestine, up until 1967, it had nothing to do with the West Bank or Gaza, it simply meant destroying Israel.

 

It was not until 1967, when the latest Arab League attempt to “drive the Jews into the sea” failed, that the PLO began talking about their rights to Gaza and the West Bank. Previously they had staged terrorist attacks on Israel from bases in Gaza and the West Bank, under the sponsorship of Egypt and Jordan. After Israel reclaimed Gaza and the West Bank, and reversed the ethnic cleansing of Jews carried out in 1948, the PLO began focusing on the territories that their sponsors had lost in 1967, rather than just those they had lost in 1948.

 

(The End of Palestine; by Daniel Greenfield; Canada Free Press, 9-19-11 – ARTICLE IS AWESOME-READ IT ALL)

 

Where does Hamas fit in this PLO umbrella Islamic terrorist design to destroy Israel?

 

Hamas does not fit into the PLO paradigm. Indeed, Hamas was created by the Muslim Brotherhood because of a loss of confidence in the PLO by the transnational Islamist organization we call the Muslim Brotherhood (MB) but may be better known as Ikhwan by Muslims. Hamas does not consider itself under the authority of the PLO or the created institution of the Palestinian (National) Authority (PA). As dreadful as Hamas is a radical Islamic organization is its honesty. Hamas does not tell Arabs that call themselves Palestinians something different than they tell Western ears. This is exactly what the PA does: the PA deceives the West with bogus implied promises and sows the seeds of Jew-hatred among PA constituents. Hamas honesty tells everybody: they intend to destroy Israel and kill Jews.

 

The International Quartet (UN, EU, USA & Russia) determined to create a Palestinian State out of Israel’s heritage is an international embarrassment for lovers of Israel as the Quartet sells that a Palestinian State will bring peace to the Middle East and security to the Jewish State of Israel. No such thing will occur with a Palestinian State AND if Hamas would join such a State it is a logical conclusion there would be a war to yet again to destroy Israel as per the Hamas Charter and the PLO Charter (or at least before open deception set in).

 

Caroline Glick has written an astute article about Hamas intentions for Israel and the Arabs that call themselves Palestinians. Part of what Glick has gleaned is surprising and it is based on an interview between a high level Hamas official and an Egyptian television interview:

 

Hamad made two central points. First, he claimed that the Palestinian war against Israel is the keystone of the global jihad. Second, he said the Palestinians are not a distinct people, but transplanted Egyptians and Saudis.

 

In his words, “At al-Aksa and on the land of Palestine, all the conspiracies, throughout history, have been shattered – the conspiracies of the Crusaders, and the conspiracies of the Tatars. At al- Aksa and on the land of Palestine, the Battle of Hattin was waged. The [West] does not want this noble history to repeat itself, because the Jews and their allies would be annihilated – the Zionists, the Americans and the imperialists.

 

“Thus, the conspiracy is very clear. Al-Aksa and the land of Palestine represent the spearhead for Islam and for the Muslims. Therefore, when we seek the help of our Arab brothers, we are not seeking their help in order to eat, to live, to drink, to dress, or to live a life of luxury. No. When we seek their help, it is in order to continue to wage Jihad.”

 

Hamad next explained, “Brothers, half of the Palestinians are Egyptians and the other half are Saudis. Who are the Palestinians? We have many families called Al-Masri, [Egyptians] whose roots are Egyptian. Egyptian! They may be from Alexandria, from Cairo, from Dumietta, from the North, from Aswan, from Upper Egypt. We are Egyptians.”

 

What Hamad’s interview tells us is that today Hamas – the Palestinian branch of the Muslim Brotherhood – is more interested in unity with Muslim Brotherhood-dominated Egypt than with Fatah. Whereas in the past it joined Fatah in obscuring the direct link between the jihad against the Jews and the jihad against the non-Muslim world, today it seeks to emphasize the connection. To this end, Hamas is willing to abandon the myth of Palestinian nativism and acknowledge that the Palestinians are an artificial people, invented for the purpose of advancing the global jihad in the key battlefield of Israel. (The eternal liberation movement; by Caroline Glick; CarolineGlick.com, 4/5/12)

 

My summarization goes something like this: Hamas has become more of a client of the Muslim Brotherhood rather than a representative of the Arabs that call themselves Palestinians. Hamas typically speaks the truth about the origin of so-called Palestinians and its goals. So point here is the future destruction of Israel will be the launching pad for the return of the Islamic glory days of Mohammed and the Four (cough) Rightly Guided Caliphs that began Islamic Imperialistic global conquest with the aim of transforming the whole of planet earth into a Caliphate.

 

Does Israel need a Jew-hating sovereign nation right on its doorstep created out of Israel’s own heritage? NO!

 

America is crazy for desiring a sovereign Palestinian State under the delusion that peace will come to the Middle East. If anything such a State will begin yet another international war ala WWIII. Although Republican Presidential Administrations have also bought into the idiocy of land for peace, it is President Barack Hussein Obama’s open disdain for Israel that will probably swoop into existence a Palestinian State sooner than later.

 

If you love Israel DO NOT VOTE FOR OBAMA on that first Tuesday in November 2012.

 

JRH 4/6/12

________________________________

Please Support NCCR

ALL of Jerusalem is Israel’s Capital


Western (Wailing) Wall

John R. Houk

© March 31, 2012

 

The American people have spoken via their representation in Congress that Jerusalem must be recognized as the capital of Israel. This happened in 1995. Every President since then through today has not honored American representation to recognize Jerusalem as the Israeli capital. That would be two Democrats and one Republican: Clinton, Bush and Obama.

 

As far as Israel is concerned Jerusalem is the capital. Jerusalem is the City of David. Jerusalem is the citadel of Zion. Jerusalem is the city of God’s Presence. If Israel was more Jewish Observant than secular, there would be a stronger feeling the Temple Mount is being desecrated with the existence of two non-Jewish Mosques where the Temple of God should exist.

 

It is the existence of those two Mosques and the violence of Islam that the nations of the world refuse to recognize Jerusalem as the capital of Israel. In 1948 Israel fought for its existence to be an independent nation as all the surrounding Muslim nations vowed to invade the nascent nation to drive all the off their land of heritage and into the sea. Israel was greatly outnumbered. The Arab-Muslim army that was the most successful against the emerging Jewish Defense Forces (IDF) was Jordan’s army then dubbed the Arab Legion. The Arab Legion’s success against Israel can be attributed to one factor. The officer leadership of the Arab Legion was British including the Arab Legion’s commanding General.  Under the leadership of the British the Arab Legion drove to the gates of the Jewish Quarter of the Old City Jerusalem. Israel was forced to surrender the Old City which was the Eastern half of Jerusalem. In effect the Old City half of Jerusalem was conquered by Jordan with the help of Great Britain.

 

Under the protection of the Arab Legion; Muslims desecrated Jewish Synagogues, graves, Jewish places of historical significance and forced Jews of the Jewish Quarter to leave their homes that had roots into the thousands of years. That was 1948. In 1967 another alliance of Muslim-Arab nations tried to destroy Israel. Israel won handily and recovered East Jerusalem along with the Judea-Samaria area dubbed the West Bank by Jordan.

 

I believe it was a miracle of God Almighty that Israel was preserved and became the Jewish State. Israel became a safe haven for Jews to move back to without worry of a government persecuting them for being Jewish. Unfortunately the trade-off of freedom from persecution was to live in eternal vigilance to repulse Jew-haters that desire Jewish blood for merely returning to a sliver of land that was promised as an eternal possession from God Almighty to be a blessing to all the nations of the world.

 

Jewish people will disagree with this but part of that blessing is the coming of the Messiah Jesus Christ the Son of God. Salvation is of the Jews. Jesus has brought Redemption to all who believe in His death, burial and Resurrection as Lord. Redemption is here for individuals but full Redemption will come for nations and the earth at the Messiah’s Second Coming. Salvation is of the Jews. Jewish possession of Israel and the Holy City of Jerusalem is a precursor to the Second Coming Jesus Christ the Son of God and the son of David. In the plan of God the Jews are essential in the Redemption of the nations and the earth.

 

Whether a Biblical Christian (UNFORTUNATELY there is a large segment of Christianity that is more influenced by humanism and less influenced by the Bible) or a Jewish person, it should be agreed upon that Jerusalem is Jewish and is the capital of Israel.

 

That being established I am on record that the United States of America has played the dhimmi by not backing Israel by joining Congress and recognizing Jerusalem as the capital of Israel.

 

The American diplomatic corps via the State Department has the U.S. Embassy in Tel Aviv as do the other nations of the world that have diplomatic relations with Israel. America does have a Consulate in Jerusalem. I understand from Caroline Glick that the State Department via the Consulate is downright hostile to Jewish Israeli citizens that approach with personal business. Glick relates a personal tale about the American Consulate in Jerusalem that reflects the attitude of President Barack Hussein Obama toward Israel. Check it out and be prepared to be annoyed.

 

JRH 3/31/12

Obama makes the case for an Israeli strike on Iran


BHO Used Car Salesman 3

So Obama says he is a stalwart supporter of the Jewish State of Israel? Check out this quote from Caroline Glick:

The reason this is important is because it tells us the true nature of Obama’s demand that Israel give more time for sanctions and diplomacy to work. When one recognizes Israel’s short timeline for attacking, one realizes that when Obama demands that Israel give several more months for sanctions to work, what he is actually demanding is for Israel to place its survival in his hands. Again, once Iran’s nuclear project is immune from an Israeli strike Obama will effectively hold the key to Israel’s survival. Israel will be completely at his mercy.

Hmm … so we should give sanctions a chance and if the sanctions fail, Israel must trust an Obama Administration to bring the full force of the U.S. Military to protect Israel from a nuke armed Iran?

Read the entire Glick article down below.

JRH 3/5/12

Real Hate-Speech, The Protocols & Glick


Protocols of the Elders of Zion - Hate-Speech

John R. Houk

© February 19, 2012

 

I was recently accused of writing hate-speech because I write the truth about ideologies, theopolitical religions and atheists. The Caroline Glick article below is a story of actual hate-speech from the halls of Harvard academia.

 

Part of the story is about Harvard Professors that speak in a favorable light of the old Protocols of Zion of the Elders of Zion. Unfortunately many people in this generation do not know the history of the Protocols of Zion nor the purpose for which they were written.

 

Here is a short analysis of the Protocols:

 

With Egyptian TV now producing and screening an anti-Semitic show based on “The Protocols of the Elders of Zion” (click here for details), the ADL (www.adl.org) has published a comprehensive history on how this racist document came about.

 

It is a classic in paranoid, racist literature. Taken by the gullible as the confidential minutes of a Jewish conclave convened in the last years of the nineteenth century, it has been heralded by anti-Semites as proof that Jews are plotting to take over the world. Since its contrivance around the turn of the century by the Russian Okhrana, or Czarist secret police, “The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion” has taken root in bigoted, frightened minds around the world.

 

The booklet’s twenty-four sections spell out the alleged secret plans of Jewish leaders seeking to attain world domination. They represent the most notorious political forgery of modern times. Although thoroughly discredited, the document is still being used to stir up anti-Semitic hatred.

 

Origins of the Protocols

 

Serge Nilus, a little-known Czarist official in Moscow, edited several editions of the Protocols, each with a different account of how he discovered the document. In his 1911 edition Nilus claimed that his source had stolen the document from (a non-existent) Zionist headquarters in France. Other “editors” of the Protocols maintained that the document was read at the First Zionist Congress held in 1897 in Basel, Switzerland.

 

Note: According to reputable scholars, including Prof. Norman Cohn in his noted book, Warrant for Genocide, the world-control myth was actually lifted from a 19th century French political satire in which the alleged plotters weren’t even Jewish.

 

The Hoax Spreads

 

Impact of the Bolshevik Revolution

 

After the Russian Revolution in 1917, frustrated supporters of the ousted Czar rescued the document from obscurity in order to discredit The emigre Czarists portrayed the Revolution as part of a Jewish plot to enslave the world, and pointed to the Protocols as the blueprint of that plan. The scheme of yoking the Protocols to the Bolshevik Revolution not only led to the allegation of a Judeo-Communist conspiracy, but promoted the forgery internationally. In later years, vicious Soviet anti-Semitic propaganda under Stalin and others echoed the conspiracy mythology of the Protocols.

 

International Publicity

 

In the 1920’s, two British correspondents, Robert Wilton of the London Times and Victor Marsden of the Morning Post, each of whom had lived in pre-Communist Russia, .promoted the idea of a Jewish conspiracy in Great Britain. … READ MORE  

 

So you can see just how heinous the Protocols of Zion actually are. The Protocols are actual hate-speech designed to entice the public to hate Jews and do them harm.

 

JRH 2/19/12 

______________________________

Harvard, Jew haters, motherhood and Israel

 

By Caroline Glick

February 19, 2012, 6:51 AM

CarolineGlick.com

 

This morning I received an e-mail alert from CAMERA that my alma mater, Harvard’s Kennedy School of Government is hosting a two-day conference which essentially begins with the proposition that Israel has no right to exist. This isn’t surprising. After all, the Kennedy School is home to my old professor Steve Walt. No one there batted a lash when he co-published his updated version of the Protocols of the Elders of Zion with University of Chicago’s John Mearshimer.

 

Not only did Walt suffer no recrimination from his colleagues at Harvard when he first emerged a professional Jew basher.  He suffered no recrimination when he used the controversy surrounding his book into a means of transforming himself into a celebrity Israel basher.

 

As I wrote in my recent column about mainstreaming Jew hatred, Walt and Mearshimer’s book has enabled anti-Semites to emerge from under the rocks where they had been hiding and proudly announce that it is reasonable to discriminate against the Jewish people and side either actively or passively with those like the Iranian regime and the Sunni jihadists from Hamas and the Muslim Brotherhood who openly call for the annihilation of the Jewish state and the Jewish people.

 

Two thoughts on the Harvard conference.

 

Consider the long list of “professors” who will be speaking at the conference.

 

My sense is that the reason the Holocaust was more successful in killing Jews on a genocidal scale than say the Russian czars’ pogroms is because the Holocaust was fuelled from above – from elitist anti-Semitism and elitist xenophobia. It wasn’t the feudal lords who  organized the murder machine. Those lords just let their Cossacks murder couple hundred Jews to get their bloodlust satisfied for the year. Most of the surviving Jews were permitted to pack their suitcases and run away.

 

The Holocaust was different. It wasn’t the peasant class or their landed gentry lords that instigated the crime. And the Holocaust wasn’t perpetrated principally to satisfy their taste for Jewish blood.

 

In the decades before the Holocaust, an evil wind blew through academia and other elite quarters throughout the Western world. The doctrines of race and eugenics became all the rage of the anointed intellectuals. Even an otherwise liberal thinker like Oliver Wendell Holmes was drawn to the fashionable concept of killing mentally disabled in the name of eugenics.

 

These doctrines gave the German intellectuals the philosophical underpinning for their so-called “anti-Semitism.” That itself was a pseudo-scientific term for regular old Jew hating just like “anti-Zionism” is a progressive, politically correct term for regular old Jew hating today. That is, anti-Semitism was an elitist way of masking intolerance, even genocidal intolerance for Jews and making it socially acceptable to seek our annihilation. And this is the precise function that the term anti-Zionism serves today.

 

The worker bees of Europe in the mid-20th century had been marinated in Christian Jew hatred for centuries. But they were mere commoners. They would never have made an Auschwitz or held a Wanssee Conference, but they were more than willing to fill Jewish babies with lead when given a chance. And the German intellectuals and their counterparts from Boston to Paris to London gave them the intellectual foundation of racism to kill Jews on a scale they could never have dreamed possible.

 

Likewise, today’s crop of corrupt intellectuals of the Walt and Mearshimer variety with all their allies in academia and the media and the blogosphere and politics are seeking to delegitimize Israel – the collective Jew — intellectually. Like the work of the eugenics champions of the late 19th and early 20th century, their work will provide Muslim Jew haters with the political leeway to murder Jews on a scale they could never have dreamed possible. Hence you’ll never find a so-called “anti-Zionist” like Walt lose sleep over the prospect of a nuclear-armed Iran, but rather over the prospect of Israel preventing Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons.

 

And this brings me to the second point. I read the CAMERA alert on my Iphone as I was feeding my newborn son. I looked out the window at Jerusalem and all I could feel was thankful to be living in the independent, free Jewish state of Israel. I am thankful that these pseudo intellectuals no longer can determine the future of my people, as they could in the 1930s. I am thankful that my children will in all likelihood not study in US universities but in Israeli ones that are not as demented as their American counterparts.

 

And here’s a couple of disturbing thoughts for all the parents in the US who are about to put themselves in the poor house to pay for their children’s university education.

 

The embrace of the cause of Israel’s destruction by so many celebrity professors today is part and parcel of the destruction of the US higher education system.

 

At the Harvard conference, not a drop of truth will be spoken by any of the eminent Jew hating participants. Students who attend will be presented with lies dripping with moralistic gobbledygook and be told that they are enlightened for embracing this sewage.

 

The absence of truth from academic discourses is not limited to discussion of Israel. Rather, the ability of professors like Walt and his pals to prosper with their lies is a function of the general deterioration and corruption of academic institutions.

 

This general decline and indeed failure was highlighted last week by Prof. Peter Berkowitz in an article he published in the Wall Street Journal about Yale’s totalitarian system of “informal justice” that allows the university to effectively destroy young male students’ future by blackening their reputations on the basis of unsubstantiated and even anonymous allegations of sexual misconduct. The policies in place deny young male Yalies due process and enable witch hunts.

 

In his conclusion Berkowitz wrote that the abandonment of even the semblance of due process for male students on campuses is in line with the general deterioration or even disappearance of educational standards. As he put it:

 

At its best, university education has deteriorated into little more than random forays into the sciences, social sciences and humanities. But traditionally, and for good reason in a democracy, liberal education at its heart involved instruction in the principles of freedom.

 

If Yale and other institutions across the country were fulfilling their promise to educate students, then their faculties would teach that riding roughshod over due process shows ignorance of or contempt for the rule of law. Professors would be teaching that the presumption of innocence is rooted in a commitment to treating individuals as ends in themselves and not as a means to advancing some social goal or another, even if that goal is given the name of equality or justice. And students would be learning that our established and legitimate justice system does not presume guilt, because to do so is to fail to appreciate the limits of human knowledge and the propensity of those who wield power to abuse it.

 

Let’s not forget that this is the same Yale University that saw fit to close its interdisciplinary center for the study of anti-Semitism last year because YIISA had the unmitigated gall to highlight contemporary “progressive” Jew hatred and its unwashed cousin Islamic Jew hatred.

 

CAMERA has launched an email campaign to try to fight Harvard’s descent into Jew hating insanity. I think that it is good for what it’s worth. But I have no expectations from that institution. The madness that has taken control of America’s elite educational institutions is a threat to the US because it is robbing a generation of young people of the ability to think freely and critically about the world.

 

For me, the message is clear enough, as a Jew, a Jewish mother and a person who clings to my freedom, guns and religion, my job is to do everything I can to ensure that Israel remains strong and gets stronger so that today’s corrupted elites can’t touch us.

______________________________

Real Hate-Speech, The Protocols & Glick

John R. Houk

© February 19, 2012

_____________________________

 

Harvard, Jew haters, motherhood and Israel

 

© 2012 Caroline Glick

Is Netanyahu Ready to give up the House?


Obama & Netanyahu

John R. Houk

© November 6, 2010

 

If Caroline Glick is correct that there have been secret negotiations between the Obama Administration and Prime Minister Netanyahu’s Israeli government concerning Jerusalem, Judea and Samaria; then Netanyahu is turning his back on the Israeli voters that placed Likkud back in power. Netanyahu’s Likkud election was based in large part on NOT giving up Land for a false peace.

 

I wonder what President Barack Hussein Obama used as pressure to force Prime Minister Netanyahu to think about placing Israel in a destructive path? Glick wrote that she believes Netanyahu is gambling that the Palestinian Authority will turn down the terms Obama seems to have worked out.

 

If Glick is correct about the terms they are a deal to lease East Jerusalem, Judea and Samaria would be leased to Israel for a certain amount of years in which the lease runs out eventually giving absolute control to the Western forced and propped up State of Palestine. Like any Jew would live in an area in which the stated goals are the destruction of Israel in entirety and all Jews in the process. I say a “certain amount of years” because the time frame of lease has not been agreed upon between Netanyahu and the Obama Administration. If the deal proceeded Israel wants like a ninety year lease and Obama is thinking more of a short term lease which perhaps might be a decade or so.

 

If the deal proceeded Netanyahu would be forcing a validation of the Islamic claims to Jerusalem and to land of Jewish heritage. The validation would truly turn Israel into an occupying nation if an eventual war between the neophyte Palestinian State and Israel broke out with Israel winning retaking their Land again. I know the West is insistent on following the Jew-hating Arab nations’ mythology that Israel occupied land won in 1967. That concept is an error! Israel did win land from Egypt, Syria and Jordan in that Six Day War but Israel was not the aggressor. The land that Jordan attached the appellation of West Bank was actually occupied after a British led Jordanian Army (Arab Legion) in 1948 pushed Israel back to Jerusalem usurping the Eastern half in which Jerusalem’s ancient Jewish Quarter existed. The land occupied by Jordan and conquered by General John Gordon Glubb (Glubb Pasha) was a part of the original Palestine Mandate that was created for a Jewish Homeland with little to no protest at the idea in 1917 by surrounding Muslim-Arabs.

 

The American Left and a significant amount of Republicans (especially of the foreign policy orientation) have been twisting the screws for decades to press Israel to return at least to the pre-1967 borders. Amazingly America’s Jewish Left with the likes of J Street (SA HERE) and Israel’s land-for-peace party – aka Kadima – led by the previous Prime Minister defeated by Netanyahu’s Likkud, Tzipi Livni have called for a return to the 1948 borders that Israel managed to survive with when Independence was declared.

 

If indeed Netanyahu did participate in secret negotiations and parleyed East Jerusalem, Judea and Samaria; then Netanyahu is one of a long line of Israeli Prime Ministers that have caved into Western and American pressure to give up Jewish land to hateful Muslims who desire Israel’s destruction.

 

JRH 11/6/10

Let’s All Join Islam for its Moral Purity


John R. Houk

© November 3, 2010

 

Caroline Glick is a fearless writer as far as Western Political Correctness is concerned. Her article entitled “The Age of Dissimulation” provides clear articulation that the religion of peace is if anything – NOT PEACEFUL. Admittedly much of Islam’s moral clarity is greater than the West which in Europe has eschewed Christian morality as archaic. Incidentally even in America in which people still recognize themselves as Christians; the Left Wing agenda of rendering Biblical Morality has had an unfortunate success. Although Islam’s moral clarity is basically a reflection of the Law taught to the twelve tribes of the Hebrews long before the birth of Mohammed, that clarity does not translate into allowing God rather than humanity enforcing punishment for clear human abandonment of Divine Morality.

 

In the West toleration is a requirement for acts of sin that do not bring physical harm to others. There is no toleration in Islam. Biblical Moralists do not accept homosexuality as a lifestyle choice for the Bible specifically forbids inter-gender sex as the act of a reprobate mind. Islamic Moralists do not allow homosexuality either yet to be honest I don’t have a clue if homosexuality is forbidden in the Quran, Hadith or Sira.

 

The West has handled homosexuality by making Biblical Morality archaic and inculcating societal acceptance via the secularizing effects of Secular Humanism, Moral Relativity and the cultural segregation of multicultural-diversity. Biblical Christians in America are intolerant of the homosexual lifestyle for Biblical reasons; however yet Biblical Christians do not advocate a violent reaction to homosexuals that secularizing forces have validated. Indeed in the West anyone that expresses condemnation of homosexuality in the West is labeled a provocateur of hate and is labeled as a homophobe which is an epithet pictured as bigotry.

 

In Islamic culture homosexuality is a punishable act which is exacted on the convicted from a whipping to the execution of a death sentence. One example is President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad proclaiming in a speech that there are no homosexuals in Iran. Meaning if one is caught they are dead.

 

I use homosexuality as a mere drop in the bucket on what punishable crime in the West and in Islamic Culture. Another example is thieving. A thief goes to prison in Western society. A thief in Islamic culture can get the thieving hand or hands lopped off. Adultery in the West is handled by the mercy or lack of mercy by the offended spouse. The punishment for adultery in the West is not criminal, but can result in a divorce in which lawyers argue over the division of property and children until a settlement is hammered out or a Judge decides the division. In Islamic culture an adulterer can be whipped or stoned to death and almost always it is only the female adulterer that is the recipient of said punishment. There is no punishment for fornication (consensual sex between adults) in the West. Secular Humanism has made fornication so acceptable in the West no one turns there head anymore even if the fornicators are living together out of wedlock. That is an unfortunate moral plague in the West. In Islamic culture fornicators receive the whip. I read one place the whip is executed with 100 lashes for male and female. Again, it is usually only the women that are punished in Islamic societies, for it takes four male Muslim witnesses. In a misogynist culture such as Islam, it is doubtful four males are going to testify against a male fornicator. In talking about the four male witnesses are needed to convict, this also applies in the case of a rape of a woman. If there are four male witnesses to a rape in Islamic culture they are probably co-participants in the rape. Again the male is never punished and the female victim of rape may be lashed with the whip or stoned to death depending if she is single or married. After the whipping an unmarried rape victim there is a good chance that a male member of her family (father, brother, uncle, etc.) will kill for family honor. In America forensic evidence is enough to convict a rapist for this violent crime. Of course acts of violence, thievery, fornication and rape executed upon a non-Muslim (kafir) in Islamic culture is likely to NEVER be prosecuted. It is not uncommon for Muslims to rape kafir women in the West (especially Europe) because Islam absolutely does not view crimes against kafir to be a crime.

 

Thus when I read about the idiocy from a Muslim Cleric or apologist that Islam is peaceful, treats women with respect and generally treats humanity well; I get a little miffed at the hypocrisy. Caroline Glick really takes Islam and the West’s head in the sand toward Islam to task in her article entitled, “The Age of Dissimulation.”

 

Here is an excerpt from Glick writing about terrorist organization Hamas’ Foreign Minister Mahmoud al-Zahar:

 

Today, practically, the only individuals willing to speak honestly about who Islamic supremacists are and what they want are the Islamic supremacists themselves.

 

For instance, in an interview last week with Reuters, the Islamic supremacist Hamas movement’s “foreign minister” Mahmoud al- Zahar told the Christian West, “You do not live like human beings. You do not [even] live like animals. You accept homosexuality. And now you criticize us?”

 

Al-Zahar also made the case for Islamic feminism. As he put it, “We are the ones who respect women and honor women … not you. You use women as an animal. She has one husband and hundreds of thousands of boyfriends. You don’t know who is the father of your sons, because of the way you respect women.”

 

Finally, al-Zahar claimed that Westerners have no right to question Islam or criticize it. In his words, “Is it a crime to Islamize the people? I am a Muslim living here according to our tradition. Why should I live under your tradition? We understand you very well. You are poor people. Morally poor. Don’t criticize us because of what we are.”

 

Al-Zahar can sleep easy. The citizens of the West have rarely heard anyone in any positions of power and influence criticize Islamic supremacists “because of what they are.”

 

Anyone in the West with a modicum of common sense should be indignantly upset with Islamic Supremacist al-Zahar for actually comparing the tolerant West to the intolerant Islamic culture. Al-Zahar specifically proclaims a Muslim has NO SHAME for the violent acts of Islam because Islam is so much more pure than the West which is still influenced by its Biblical Christian heritage. This is to say a Biblical Judeo-Christian heritage that is increasingly belittled for its moral values by the ruling of elite of the West.

 

JRH 11/3/10