The Canada Free Press shared a Remnant TV video (https://tinyurl.com/4r3dn9zs) of Michael Matt looking back to two years ago at a Davos Meeting which set the stage for Election Coup 2020 to remove President Trump from Office.
In full disclosure I have one HUGE beef with President Trump with his still (or at least as far as I know) promotion of mRNA Jabs. The Jab data is now flooding in so fast about horrendous side-effects and deaths that even the CDC has begun – though very quietly – to walk back some of its “safe and effective” claims. And by quietly, I mean the amplified use of double-speak.
Other Conservatives – and by “other” I’m excluding Establishment pseudo-Conservatives and RINOs who are closer to treasonous Dem-Marxists – and Patriots might have their own pet peeve issues with the 2020-deposed President Trump. Mine is the mRNA Jab.
BUT LET’S FACE IT! No one inspires Dem-Marxist hatred, among the controlling Elitists and their poor brainwashed cadres alike, than Donald J. Trump. From the time President Trump was elected in 2016 right on through the days after he succumbed to the coup, the Alphabet Law Enforcement and Intel Community have tried to frame Trump and the President beat them back EVERY TIME!
It is my suspicion Mar-a-Lago is yet another frame Trump expedition to keep him off the 2024 Ballot. Look for explosive so-called Classified Documents to show up from that Gestapo-style raid that never were at the Trump private residence. THAT MEANS planted evidence! Every single Impeachment heresy was based on FBI lies. Unless a Whistleblower steps forward, Mar-a-Lago will be no different.
So back to CFP and Remnant TV.
Much of what Michael Matt predicted two years ago has come to past to bring about the WEF-Marxist-Globalist New World Order of the Great Reset Tyranny. To those who are unaware, Remnant TV views Christianity through the lens traditional Roman Catholicism. The key word is “traditional” because Matt wastes no time to criticize the Roman Catholic Communist Pope Francis (though I can’t recall Matt using the “Communist” moniker).
Utilizing the same logic Michael Matt explained Trump hatred by the Elitists prior to Election 2020 that resulted in a coup (TWO Documentaries explain how the Coup was accomplished), is the probable same logic a framed Trump is arrested OR if an arrest fails dues Dem-Marxist exposure – AN ASSASSINATION attempt.
So like I wrote, I have an mRNA issue with President Trump. BUT President Trump is feared by Dem-Marxists in the USA and the Marxist-Globalists of the WEF and the United Nations SO MUCH President Trump will ALWAYS be a hero to me.
Dear God in Heaven, I pray you WATCH or RE-WATCH this Remnant TV video which I am using the CFP as a launching pad.
Thank you to those who have stepped up!
READER SUPPORTED! I need Readers willing to chip in $5 – $10 – $25 – $50 – $100. PLEASE I need your generosity. PLEASE GIVE to Help me be a voice for Liberty:
[CFP] Editor’s Note: Even as the top two medical advisors—who put the pandemic pox upon world masses—distance themselves from accountability, Dr. Tony Fauci escaping accountability in a coming in a yesterday-announced December retirement, scarfed-up sidekick Dr. Deborah Birx, admitting she lied about Covid 19, authoring in a boastful book, the horror of world citizens isn’t close to over—but really just getting started. Fauci and Birx were needed by the monstrous globalists running the World Economic Forum (WEF). Now tossed aside like last night’s supper potatoes, they will travel anonymously down Memory Lane while their Masters take over leaving all of humanity in an orchestrated roller coaster world where NOTHING will ever remain the same.
Remnant Editor, Michael J. Matt, (God Bless Him!) called it right back in 2020, and is back to remind us today where humanity now stands at this point in Real Time, starting with American Midterm Elections only 11 weeks away. “Where we are now” comes, as he says, not in his own words, but in the words of global leaders setting the table for the Great Reset, which they were able to succeed under the cover of pretending it was only a “conspiracy”.
These leaders include Klaus Schwab, Bill Gates, George Soros, Al Gore, Pope Francis, and for God’s sake, even Britain’s Prince Charles, who will soon replace an aging Queen Elizabeth II.
The Globalist-Fascist(Corporatist)-Marxists are so full of confident hubris about their future World-Wide Rule, they have no fear about sharing details of their global takeover ending sovereign nations. AND IN AMERICA’s case, our U.S. Constitution (which already has become pretty fractured already by Dem-Marxists, RINOs and a Leftist Activist Judicial System).
One example among many: Bill Gates’ new book, “How to Prevent the Next Pandemic.” Get ready for a dose of tyranny you will be told to like and obey.
READER SUPPORTED! I need Readers willing to chip in $5 – $10 – $25 – $50 – $100. I need your generosity. PLEASE GIVE to overcome research expenses:
There’s a joke being told in my house this week: Jeffrey Epstein’s best friend, a little-known and slightly autistic high school dropout named Bill Gates has a new book out this month. Perhaps you’ve heard of him?
Unfortunately, of course, we have all heard of him.
From Borneo to Boston, the entire world is only too familiar with the man who wants to inject you into the future. Bill Gates is the front man — the public face — of Big Pharma’s global COVID tyranny. Lockdowns? He loves them! Booster shots forever? He thinks it’s a smart idea! Germ warfare simulations? Sign him up! There’s no dystopian technological overreach that Gates won’t enthusiastically endorse. He would have already harvested your DNA and stuck it in a Shenzhen genome sequencing machine — if not for the pesky issue of, you know, human rights.
Who else would be dumb enough to evangelize that all of the world’s problems could be solved with the tip of a syringe? That’s an idiotic message because it’s so obviously untrue. Gates doesn’t have any interest in people shaping their own future — he wantsto shape your future, and he would really appreciate it if you’d get out of the way. His unlimited faith in science and technology — which is the crudest form of religion for materialists — has merged seamlessly with his unlimited faith in himself so that it’s hard to tell where the monomaniacal narcissism and the philanthropic pretenses begin and end in the Universe of Bill.
Of course the problem with the Universe of Bill Gates is that it contains a massive black hole at the center — which is his personality. He has always had a very big problem as a vaccine evangelist: he has never understood how much he strikes other people as abnormally creepy.
Imagine yourself sidled up to a bar. A talkative guy sits down on the stool next to you. He has decided that there is one thing wrong with the world. It can be literally anything. Regardless, he has the solution.
It’s interesting and weird for a few minutes. But you gradually come to realize that he is actually crazy. His main point is wrong and so his solutions are wrong too. But the drinks are good, and he is buying. So you put up with it. In any case, you will forget the whole thing in the morning.
In the morning, however, you realize that he is one of the world’s richest men and he is pulling the strings of many of the world’s most powerful people.
Now you are alarmed.
In a nutshell, that’s what it’s like to read Bill Gates’s new book…
Jeffrey Tucker didn’t come away from reading the book thinking that Gates was well-meaning but misinformed — or basically good but flawed —he came away thinking Gates was crazy. This turns out to be a recurring theme among people who deal the co-founder of Microsoft.
A journalist named James Corbett also reviewed the same book recently and found it “every bit as infuriating, nauseating, ridiculous, laughable and risible” as you would imagine. “There is certainly nothing of scientific or medical value in here,” according to Corbett. “There’s nothing even interesting here. It’s a baffling book even from a propagandistic perspective.” He sums up the book by saying: “Just when you thought you’d gotten rid of him, like a canker sore in the mouth of humanity, Bill Gates pops up yet again.”
So that’s two bad book reviews. The funny thing is that most of the world’s population now shares the same feelings about Bill Gates that these two book reviewers have — and none of us have even read the book.
That’s because Bill Gates is a new kind of villain: he’s a psychopath pretending to be a philanthropist.
If you thought that Bill Gates might do the sensible thing, and keep a low profile after his wife pursued a nasty and public divorce over his ties to an international pedophile sex trafficking ring — you would be wrong. Being sensible is for ordinary psychopaths who are concerned about exposure, and can sense reputational danger. But if you’re a psychopath who is also the world’s third wealthiest human being and “on the spectrum” you probably don’t understand what exposure means because you’re not really in touch with human morality in any fundamental sense.
After all, you capture — or, if you prefer, “influence” or “invest” or “collaborate” or whatever the global elite likes to call legalized bribery this week! — entire foreign governments and international non-government organizations from Monday to Friday every week. Basically, you think you’re God — and nobody you’ve bought (and that’s practically everybody) wants to dissuade you from that feeling.
And when you need a little R&R in your spare time, you don’t just hang out with the kind of friends that ordinary psychopaths collect — no way! — you spend your time with the world’s most infamous pedophile. I mean: you’re a trailblazer, and you only want to associate with other innovators — am I right? And when the little people start to wonder why you were hanging out (37 times!) with the world’s most infamous pedophile five years after that pedophile was forced to register as a sex offender you actually come up with the dumbest excuse in the history of mankind: you claim that you were simply trying to win the Nobel Peace Prize!
Of course, your own ex-wife would beg to differ.
That’s what makes Bill Gates special among billionaire psychopaths: his excuses are so childish and stupid that you would have to be autistic yourself to believe them.
In fact, his body language is so telling and awful in his frequent TV guest appearances that experts have a field day explaining his gestures and his sudden loss of speech whenever he’s questioned about Jeffrey Epstein or vaccine safety.
But does that stop Bill Gates from doing more TV interviews? Of course not. Only Bill Gates can stop Bill Gates — and you wouldn’t be Bill Gates if thought that Bill Gates could be stopped.
Normal people might have questions about these obvious evasions of reality. Questions like: why did his divorce from Melinda Gates coincide with the incarceration of Ghislaine Maxwell? Why does a high school dropout tech geek with no medical experience get to pretend that’s he’s in charge of global health policy? And why is Bill Gates the only friend of Jeffrey Epstein who gets pretend that he was “taking meetings to win the Nobel Peace Prize” when every other friend of Jeffrey Epstein is basically in hiding because “those meetings” with Jeffrey Epstein were obviously to rape children?
When Bill Gates has a moment to explain it, Prince Andrew would like a word.
Bill Gates doesn’t have to answer to Prince Andrew, of course, because he doesn’t have to answer to anyone — he’s too busy buying public opinion to answer to it. If American corporate media gets too interested in Bill’s “Peace Prize meetings” then he will just buy the American corporate media — or start his own with George Soros and Katie Couric! If global warming becomes a major issue, Bill Gates will just block out the sun! If there’s too much carbon in the atmosphere, Bill Gates has got a solution.
Just remember: you are the carbon that the climate change zealotswant to reduce.
You know what I’m talking about. A COVID virus pandemic breaks out globally, and Bill Gates is perfectly positioned to “rescue us” with experimental and ineffective vaccines. We find out that he’s the largest private owner of farmland in the United States and a global food shortage begins. We find out that there’s a baby formula shortage in the United States— and Gates is suddenly an investor in synthetic baby formula made in a lab.
Are you starting to sense a pattern yet?
What are the odds that Bill Gates is involved in the monkeypox virus? What are the chances that he’s collaborating or investing or partnering or subsidizing some researcher right now who will discover a vaccine about ten minutes after the monkeypox arrives on the front page of every newspaper in the world? Gates is already warning about the next pandemic before the next pandemic even arrives — and sometimes the vaccines even arrive at the same time the virus does!
That’s what happens in the Universe of Bill from time to time: the solution gets released before the problem does. Rest assured: those bugs are being fixed in the next germ warfare simulation. The global elites will run the monkeypox virus much better than the COVID virus.
Don’t worry: your new vaccine booster is on the way.
The future is a scary place but the world’s leading philanthropist will lead the way.
There’s no need to worry: Bill Gates has thought of everything.
The World Health Organization is attempting to seize control over global pandemic monitoring and response and, ultimately, all health care decisions
Bill Gates intends to play a key part in this takeover. He’s building a pandemic response team for the WHO, dubbed the “Global Epidemic Response & Mobilization” or GERM Team, which will have the authority to monitor nations and make pandemic response decisions, such as when to suspend civil liberties to prevent spread of an illness
The globalist cabal plans to seize control through biosecurity governance, and they’re attempting to do this using two different avenues. If we fail to fight off both attacks, we’ll end up under totalitarian governance
The first attack comes in the form of amendments to the International Health Regulations (IHR), which are currently being voted on by the World Health Assembly. These amendments will strip member nations of their sovereignty and give the WHO unprecedented power to restrict your medical freedoms and civil liberties in the name of biosecurity. Get involved and urge your nation’s leaders to reject the amendments if passed. Unless rejected, they will become binding law in November 2022
The second attack comes through a new international pandemic treaty with the WHO. They intend to eliminate individualized medicine and provide blanket rulings for how a given threat is to be addressed, and this can only result in needless suffering — not to mention the loss of individual freedom
In “The Corbett Report” above,1 independent journalist James Corbett reviews the contents of Bill Gates’ book, “How to Prevent the Next Pandemic.”
“It’s every bit as infuriating, nauseating, ridiculous, laughable and risible as you would expect,” he says. “This is a ridiculous book … There’s certainly nothing of medical or scientific value in here … It’s a baffling book even from a propagandistic perspective …
Gates’ goal in writing the book is to disarm the public and prepare us to accept the agenda that Gates and his allies would like to impose on the world. Ultimately, what this is about is drumming up general public support — or at least general public understanding — of the unfolding biosecurity agenda.”
Another reviewer of Gates’ book, economist Jeffrey Tucker, offered similarly negative feedback:2
“Imagine yourself sidled up to a bar. A talkative guy sits down on the stool next to you. He has decided that there is one thing wrong with the world. It can be literally anything. Regardless, he has the solution.
It’s interesting and weird for a few minutes. But you gradually come to realize that he is actually crazy. His main point is wrong and so his solutions are wrong too. But the drinks are good, and he is buying. So you put up with it. In any case, you will forget the whole thing in the morning.
In the morning, however, you realize that he is one of the world’s richest men and he is pulling the strings of many of the world’s most powerful people. Now you are alarmed. In a nutshell, that’s what it’s like to read Bill Gates’s new book ‘How to Prevent the Next Pandemic.’”
Gates’ Book Chapter by Chapter
Corbett goes through Gates’ book chapter by chapter, so if you’re short on time, you can review the ones that interest you the most:
Chapter 1: Learn from COVID (timestamp: 12:58)
Chapter 2: Create a pandemic prevention team (timestamp: 18:23)
Chapter 3: Get better at detecting outbreaks early (timestamp: 26:21)
Chapter 4: Help people protect themselves right away (timestamp: 31:01)
Chapter 5: Find new treatments fast (timestamp: 37:26)
Chapter 6: Get ready to make vaccines (timestamp: 39:46)
Chapter 7: Practice, practice, practice (timestamp: 47:06)
Chapter 8: Close the health gap between rich and poor countries (timestamp: 50:49)
Chapter 9: Make — and fund — a plan for preventing pandemics (timestamp: 57:40)
Afterword: How COVID changed the course of our digital future (timestamp: 1:03:00)
As Gates explains in a video at the beginning of Corbett’s report, he’s building a pandemic response team for the WHO, dubbed the “Global Epidemic Response & Mobilization” or GERM Team. This team will be made up of thousands of disease experts under WHO’s purview, and will monitor nations and make decisions about when to suspend civil liberties to prevent spread of an illness.3
Alas, as noted by “Rising” host Kim Iversen in the video compilation above, if COVID-19 has taught us anything, it’s that stopping the spread of a virus is more or less impossible, no matter how draconian the rules. Meanwhile, the side effects of lockdowns and business shutdowns are manifold.
People’s health has suffered from lack of health care. Depression and suicide have skyrocketed. Economies have gone bust. Violent crime has risen. Tucker also points out the false premise behind Gates’ pandemic prevention plan, stating:4
“This theory of virus control — the notion that muscling the population makes a prevalent virus shrink into submission and disappear — is a completely new invention, the mechanization of a primitive instinct.
Smallpox occupies a unique position among infectious diseases as the only one affecting humans that has been eradicated. There are reasons for that: a stable pathogen, a great vaccine, and a hundred years of focused public health work. This happened not due to lockdowns but from the careful and patient application of traditional public-health principles.
[T]he attempt to crush a respiratory virus through universal avoidance could be worse than allowing endemicity to it to develop throughout the population.”
Gates’ Destructive Greed
During COVID, we basically traded false protection against one thing for a multitude of other ills that are far worse in the long run. Now, Gates and the WHO want to make this disastrous strategy the norm.
Once again, we see Gates is basically paying the WHO to dictate what the world must do to make him a ton of money, because he’s always heavily invested in the very “solutions” he presents to the world. While he’s built a reputation as a philanthropist, his actions are self-serving, and more often than not, the recipients of his “generosity” end up worse than they were before.
Case in point: After 15 years, Gates’ Green Revolution in Africa (AGRA) project has now been proven an epic fail.5 Gates promised the project would “double yields and incomes for 30 million farming households by 2020.”
That false prognosis was deleted from the AGRA website in June 2020, after a Tuft University assessment revealed hunger had actually increased by 31%. February 28, 2022, the first-ever evaluation report6 confirmed the failure of AGRA.
The Globalists’ Double-Prong Attack on National Sovereignty
But getting back to the globalists’ plan to seize global control through biosecurity governance, they are attempting to do this using two different avenues. If we fail to fight off both attacks, we’ll end up under totalitarian governance.
The first attack comes in the form of amendments7 to the International Health Regulations (IHR). The second attack comes through a new international pandemic treaty with the WHO.
Starting with the first takeover strategy, as you read this, countries around the world are in the process of voting on amendments to the IHR.8 By May 28, 2022, the World Health Assembly will have concluded their vote on these amendments and, if passed, they will be enacted into international law in November 2022.
The IHR, adopted in 2005, is what empowers the WHO to declare a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC).9 This is a special legal category that allows the WHO to initiate certain contracts and procedures, including drug and vaccine contracts. While the IHR grants the WHO exceptional power over global health policy already, under the current rules, member states must consent to the WHO’s recommendations.
This is one key feature that is up for revision. Under the new amendments, the WHO would be able to declare a PHEIC in a member state over the objection of that state. The amendments also include ceding control to WHO regional directors authorized to declare a Public Health Emergency of Regional Concern (PHERC).
In summary, the IHR amendments establish “a globalist architecture of worldwide health surveillance, reporting and management,” Robert Malone, Ph.D., warns,10 and we the public have no say in the matter.
We have no official avenue for providing feedback to the World Health Assembly, even though the amendments will give the WHO unprecedented power to restrict our rights and freedoms in the name of biosecurity. There’s not even a publicly available list of who the delegates are or who will vote on the amendments.
Summary of Proposed IHR Amendments
A summary of the proposed changes to the IHR was recently provided by Malone.11 In all, the WHO wants to amend 13 different IHR articles (articles 5, 6, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 15, 18, 48, 49, 53 and 59), the end result of which is the following:12
1. “Increased surveillance — Under Article 5, the WHO will develop early warning criteria that will allow it to establish a risk assessment for a member state, which means that it can use the type of modeling, simulation, and predictions that exaggerated the risk from COVID-19 over two years ago. Once the WHO creates its assessment, it will communicate it to inter-governmental organizations and other member states.
2. 48-hour deadline — Under Articles 6, 10, 11, and 13, a member state is given 48 hours to respond to a WHO risk assessment and accept or reject on-site assistance. However, in practice, this timeline can be reduced to hours, forcing it to comply or face international disapproval lead by the WHO and potentially unfriendly member states.
3. Secret sources — Under Article 9, the WHO can rely on undisclosed sources for information leading it to declare a public health emergency. Those sources could include Big Pharma, WHO funders such as the Gates Foundation and the Gates-founded-and-funded GAVI Alliance, as well as others seeking to monopolize power.
4. Weakened sovereignty — Under Article 12, when the WHO receives undisclosed information concerning a purported public health threat in a member state, the Director-General may (not must) consult with the WHO Emergency Committee and the member state. However, s/he can unilaterally declare a potential or actual public health emergency of international concern.
The Director General’s authority replaces national sovereign authority. This can later be used to enforce sanctions on nations.”
Once the amendments are adopted by the World Health Assembly, nations will have only a limited time — six months — to reject them. That would put us into November 2022. Any nation which hasn’t officially rejected the amendments will then be legally bound by them, and any attempt to reject them after the six-month grace period will be null and void.
Attack No. 2: The WHO Pandemic Treaty
The second attempt to gain global control is through an international pandemic treaty with the WHO. An intergovernmental negotiating body (INB) was established as a subdivision of the World Health Assembly in December 2021,13 for the purpose of drafting and negotiating this new pandemic treaty.
In summary, the WHO wants to make its pandemic leadership permanent. It can then extend its power into the health care systems of every nation, and eventually implement a universal or “socialist-like” health care system as part of The Great Reset.
While a WHO-based universal health care system is not currently being discussed, there’s every reason to suspect that this is part of the plan. WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus has previously stated that his “central priority” as director-general is to push the world toward universal health coverage.14
And, considering the WHO changed its definition of “pandemic” to “a worldwide epidemic of a disease,”15 without the original specificity of severe illness that causes high morbidity,16,17 just about anything could be made to fit the pandemic criterion.
The problem with this treaty is that it simply cannot work. The whole premise behind this pandemic treaty is that “shared threat requires shared response.” But a given threat is almost never equally shared across regions.
“The WHO intends to eliminate individualized medicine and provide blanket rulings for how a given threat is to be addressed, and this can only result in needless suffering — not to mention the loss of individual freedom.”
Take COVID-19 for example. Not only is the risk of COVID not the same for people in New York City and the outback of Australia, it’s not even the same for all the people in those areas, as COVID is highly dependent on age and underlying health conditions.
The WHO insists that the remedy is the same for everyone everywhere, yet the risks vary widely from nation to nation, region to region, person to person. They intend to eliminate individualized medicine and provide blanket rulings for how a given threat is to be addressed, and this can only result in needless suffering — not to mention the loss of individual freedom.
Are You Ready to Cede All Authority to Gates-Led Group?
In closing, Gates’ GERM team would be the ones with the authority to declare pandemics and coordinate global response.18 Are you ready to cede all authority over your life, health and livelihood to the likes of Gates? I hope not.
In the video above, Del Bigtree with “The Highwire” provides poignant examples where Gates is now admitting what “The Highwire,” I and many others have been saying since the earliest days of the COVID pandemic, and getting censored and deplatformed for it.
Gates is two years behind everyone else, yet despite his apparent inability to interpret the readily available data, he now wants power to dictate health rules to the whole world. We can’t let that happen.
Join the Global #StopTheWHO Campaign
It’s going to require a global response to prevent these two power grabs, starting with the IHR amendments under vote by the World Health Assembly. To that end, the World Council for Health has launched a global #StopTheWHO campaign. Here’s how you can get involved:19
Speak — Raise awareness on the ground and online. Use articles, posters, videos
Act — Campaign through rallies, political mobilization, legal notices and cases and similar campaigns
Collaborate with health freedom coalitions such as the World Council for Health
Here is an interesting exposé video that could be called the Bill Gates Story that examines the family influences growing up leading this present time. Reminiscent of the old radio storyteller – Now for the rest of the story.
I need your generosity in 2021 PLEASE GIVE via – credit cards, check cards & debit cards all accepted by my PayPal account:
Please contribute in any amount to aid our mission to educate and inform. You can donate by entering our username, @americansunited, or email email@example.com in the PayPal search box. Any and all donations are greatly appreciated as they help us to continue bringing you informative content.
Bill Gates and Anthony Fauci have created a formidable public-private partnership that wields incredible power over the American public, along with global health and food policies
Inspired by Rockefeller’s business model, Bill and Melinda Gates donated $36 billion worth of Microsoft stock to the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation between 1994 and 2018
Gates also created Bill Gates Investments (BGI), which predominantly invests in multinational food, agriculture, pharmaceutical, energy, telecom and tech companies with global operations
Gates strategically targets BMGF’s charitable gifts to give him control of the international health and agricultural agencies and the media, allowing him to dictate global health and food
Fauci and Gates met in person, shaking hands in 2000 in an agreement to control and expand the global vaccine enterprise
You can read all of the details in Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s best-selling book, “The Real Anthony Fauci,” which contains more than 2,200 footnotes of referenced data
Bill Gates and Anthony Fauci have become household names in the U.S., their largely sterling reputations protected by a heavily biased press. Less known is the deep partnership between the two — the culmination of which has created a formidable public-private partnership that wields incredible power over the American public, along with global health and food policies.
You can read all of the details in Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s bestselling book, “The Real Anthony Fauci,” which contains more than 2,200 footnotes backing up its data. It exposes the connection between Gates and Fauci, as well as how Gates patterned his rise to control after John Rockefeller’s empire.
In 1913, Rockefeller created the Rockefeller Foundation, which is largely responsible for creating the Big Pharma-controlled medical paradigm that exists today. The foundation imbued its philosophy, precepts and ideologies into the League of Nations Health Organization, which turned into the World Health Organization.
Now, Gates contributes to WHO via multiple avenues, including the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF) as well as GAVI, which was founded by the Gates Foundation in partnership with WHO, the World Bank and various vaccine manufacturers. Together, this makes Gates WHO’s No. 1 funder.
How Gates Used Rockefeller’s Business Model
Inspired by Rockefeller’s business model, Bill and Melinda Gates donated $36 billion worth of Microsoft stock to the BMGF between 1994 and 2018. Gates also created a separate entity, Bill Gates Investments (BGI), which manages his personal wealth and his foundation’s corpus.
BGI predominantly invests in multinational food, agriculture, pharmaceutical, energy, telecom and tech companies with global operations. Federal tax laws require the BMGF to give away a portion of its foundation assets annually to qualify for tax exemption.
Gates strategically targets BMGF’s charitable gifts to give him control of the international health and agricultural agencies and the media, allowing him to dictate global health and food policies so as to increase profitability of the large multinationals in which he and his foundation hold large investment positions.
As was the case with Rockefeller, whose wealth only grew after his Standard Oil Company was forced to split into 34 different companies, Gates’ strategic gifts have only magnified his wealth. Gates’ personal net worth grew from $63 billion in 2000 to $129.6 billion in 2021,1 his wealth expanding by $23 billion during the 2020 lockdowns alone.2
How Gates Controls the WHO
How does a private citizen, not an elected official, gain so much control over a global health agency like WHO? When it was founded, WHO could decide how to distribute its contributions. Now, 70% of its budget is tied to specific projects, countries or regions, which are dictated by the funders.3 As such, Gates’ priorities are the backbone of WHO, and it wasn’t a coincidence when he said of WHO, “Our priorities, are your priorities.”4
As of 2018, the cumulative contributions from the Gates Foundation and GAVI made “Gates the unofficial top sponsor of the WHO, even before the Trump administration’s 2020 move to cut all his support to the organization,” according to Kennedy. “Plus, Gates also routes funding to WHO through SAGE [Strategic Advisory Group of Experts] and UNICEF and Rotary International bringing his total contributions to over $1 billion.”
These tax-deductible donations give Gates both leverage and control over international health policy, “which he largely directs to serve the profit interest of his pharma partners.”
Further, “Gate’s vaccine obsession has diverted WHO’s program contributions from poverty alleviation, nutrition and clean water to make vaccine uptake its preeminent public health metric. And Gates is not afraid to throw his weight around,” according to Kennedy. “… The sheer magnitude of his foundation’s financial contributions has made Bill Gates an unofficial — albeit unelected — leader of the WHO.” Gates’ power has grown further due to his decadeslong partnership with Fauci.
Fauci’s Immense Power
Alone, both Gates and Fauci wield immense power in their fields. Together, they’re a formidable, if unfortunately nefarious, force.
As the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) — part of the U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH) — “Fauci has a $6.1 billion budget that he distributes to colleges and universities to do drug research for various diseases,” Kennedy says. “He has another $1.7 billion that comes from the military to do bioweapons research.”5
This is where Fauci’s power lies: in his capacity to fund, arm, pay, maintain and effectively deploy a large and sprawling standing army. The NIH alone controls an annual $37 billion budget distributed in over 50,000 grants supporting over 300,000 positions globally in medical research.6
The thousands of doctors, hospital administrators, health officials and research virologists whose positions, careers and salaries depend on AIDS dollars flowing from Dr. Fauci, Gates and the Wellcome Trust (Great Britain’s version of the Gates Foundation) are the officers and soldiers in a mercenary army that functions to defend all vaccines and Dr. Fauci’s HIV/AIDS doxologies.
Along with Gates, Fauci had the power to influence funding of U.S. foreign aid to Africa for AIDS, prioritizing that for vaccines and drugs instead of nutrition, sanitation and economic development. Yet, Fauci and his team, funded by Gates, have never created a vaccine for AIDS, despite squandering billions of dollars, and causing uncounted human carnage. In 2020, many of the Gates/Fauci HIV vaccine trials in Africa suddenly became COVID-19 vaccine trials.7
As explained in Kennedy’s book, HIV provided Gates and Fauci a beachhead in Africa for their new brand of medical colonialism and a vehicle for the partners to build and maintain a powerful global network that came to include heads of state, health ministers, international health regulators, the WHO, the World Bank, the World Economic Forum, key leaders from the financial industry and military officials who served as command center of the burgeoning Biosecurity Apparatus.
Their foot soldiers were the army of frontline virologists, vaccinologists, clinicians and hospital administrators who relied on their largesse and acted as the community-based ideological commissars of this crusade.
Fauci ‘Enthusiastic’ About Gates COVID Partnership
April 1, 2020, Fauci spoke with Gates on the phone, according to emails released in 2021. Fauci referred to the phone call in an email to Emilio Emini, the director of the Gates Foundation’s tuberculosis and HIV program, stating, “As I had mentioned to Bill yesterday evening, I am enthusiastic about moving towards a collaborative and hopefully synergistic approach to COVID-19.”8
The email was part of 3,000 emails obtained via a FOIA public records request by the Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN). Despite having no medical degree, Gates has been granted direct access to top government health officials, who regard him as a public health authority. In June 2021, Daily Mail reported:9
“The Gates Foundation has committed at least $1.75 billion toward the global effort to fight the pandemic — a sum that opened doors at the highest levels of government. Following Fauci’s phone call with Gates, the Gates Foundation executive Emini emailed him to follow up and ask ‘how we can coordinate and cross inform each other’s activities.’
‘There’s an obvious need for coordination among the various primary funders or the focus we need to have given the state of the pandemic will become lost through uncoordinated activities,’ Emini wrote.”
Fauci also said he would facilitate a call between Emini and the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA),10 which provides funding for vaccine and drug development, promoting “the advanced development of medical countermeasures to protect Americans and respond to 21st century health security threats.”11 Daily Mail continued:12
“The Gates Foundation’s partnership with BARDA resulted in at least one joint funding project. In June 2020, Evidation Health announced that BARDA and the Gates Foundation were financing an effort to ‘develop an early warning algorithm to detect symptoms of COVID-19.’
It’s unclear whether the warning system was ever launched, and Evidation issued no further statements on the project after the initial announcement. Other emails released … make it clear that the Gates Foundation remained actively involved in the NIH’s pandemic response.”
The Fauci-Gates partnership led to $1 billion in increased funding to Gates’ global vaccine programs, even as the NIH budget itself experienced little growth.13 Long before the April 2021 phone call, however, Kennedy’s book reveals that Fauci and Gates met in person, shaking hands in 2000 in an agreement to control and expand the global vaccine enterprise.
Why Haven’t You Heard About This Before?
When you’re one of the richest people in the world, you can buy virtually anything you want — including control of the media so that it only prints favorable press. If you have enough money — and Gates certainly does — you can even get major media companies like ViacomCBS, which runs MTV, VH1, Nickelodeon and BET, among others, to insert your approved PSAs into their programming — and BMGF has.14
Via more than 30,000 grants, Gates has contributed at least $319 million to the media, Alan MacLeod, a senior staff writer for MintPress News, revealed.15 From press and journalism associations to journalistic training, Gates is an overarching keeper of the press, which makes true objective reporting pertaining to Gates himself — or his many initiatives — virtually impossible.16
Speaking with MintPress News, Linsey McGoey, a professor of sociology at the University of Essex, U.K., explained that Gates’ philanthropy comes with a price:17
“Philanthropy can and is being used deliberately to divert attention away from different forms of economic exploitation that underpin global inequality today.
The new ‘philanthrocapitalism’ threatens democracy by increasing the power of the corporate sector at the expense of the public sector organizations, which increasingly face budget squeezes, in part by excessively remunerating for-profit organizations to deliver public services that could be delivered more cheaply without private sector involvement.”
It’s a sentiment Kennedy, who believes Fauci and Gates should be investigated for criminal wrongdoing, has echoed. In an interview, he stated that billionaires are in collusion with media, corporations and politicians in order to increase their tremendous wealth:18
“The most important productive strategy or the big talk around the oligarchs and the intelligence agencies and the pharmaceutical companies who are trying to impoverish us and obliterate democracy, their strategy is to create fear and division.
So orchestrate fear, divide Republicans from Democrats and blacks from whites and get a lot of infighting so nobody notices that they are making themselves billions and billions, while they impoverish the rest of us and execute the controlled demolition of American constitutional democracy.”
For more details on how the Fauci-Gates-Pharma alliance is furthering the agenda of totalitarian control, using unfathomable power and greed — all under the guise of a pandemic — read “The Real Anthony Fauci.”
“The Truth About COVID-19” exposes the hidden agenda behind the pandemic, showing the countermeasures have nothing to do with public health and everything to do with ushering in a new social and economic system based on totalitarian, technocracy-led control. So, it’s not misinformation they fear. It’s the truth they want to prevent from spreading. Pick up a copy of this best-selling book today before it’s too late.
Disclaimer: The entire contents of this website are based upon the opinions of Dr. Mercola, unless otherwise noted. Individual articles are based upon the opinions of the respective author, who retains copyright as marked. The information on this website is not intended to replace a one-on-one relationship with a qualified health care professional and is not intended as medical advice. It is intended as a sharing of knowledge and information from the research and experience of Dr. Mercola and his community. Dr. Mercola encourages you to make your own health care decisions based upon your research and in partnership with a qualified health care professional. If you are pregnant, nursing, taking medication, or have a medical condition, consult your health care professional before using products based on this content.
If you want to use an article on your site please click here. This content may be copied in full, with copyright, contact, creation and information intact, without specific permission, when used only in a not-for-profit format. If any other use is desired, permission in writing from Dr. Mercola is required.
The Truth Has Been Coming Out About The COVID Shots – Are You Paying Attention? (Video)
From the lips of Dr. Anthony “Angel of Death” Fauci to the plethora of data to doctors, nurses and medical professionals, the truth about the experimental shots and the experiment itself being perpetrated on the world by these neo-Nazis is coming to light. In this episode, I’ll let you hear it from their own mouths, see the data and also you’ll hear from one South African doctor who tells the truth that there is no virus and everything is about pushing the shot… everything.
Data show current monitoring systems “are simply unsuitable” at tracking vaccine-caused fatalities, according to Columbia University researchers.
Researchers at Columbia University studied how many people are dying after receiving the experimental Covid-19 vaccine, using the CDC’s Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), whose purpose is to track safety problems in U.S.-licensed vaccines.
The researchers analyzed data showing there were over 146,000 to 187,000 vaccine-related deaths in the US alone between February to August 2021.
They pointed out how these estimates were higher than CDC’s reported [vaccine-induced fatality rates] of 0.002%, which “suggests VAERS deaths are underreported by a factor of 20, consistent with known VAERS under-ascertainment bias.”
The study authors concluded that “the risks of COVID vaccines and boosters outweigh the benefits in children,” even going on to warn against vaccinating “young adults, and older adults with low occupational risk or previous coronavirus exposure.”
They also emphasized the need for more research on the topic: “Our findings raise important questions about current COVID mass vaccination strategies and warrant further investigation and review.”
Dr. Robert Malone, inventor of the mRNA technology used in Covid-19 vaccines, posted the study to Twitter on Tuesday.
STUDY WARNS EXISTING VACCINE INJURY REPORTING SYSTEMS ARE UNRELIABLE:
“Accurate estimates of COVID vaccine-induced severe adverse event and death rates are critical for risk-benefit ratio analyses of vaccination and boosters against SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus in different age groups,” the study authors explain. “However, existing surveillance studies are not designed to reliably estimate life-threatening event or vaccine-induced fatality rates (VFR).”
In case you have been living under a stone, YOU have to be aware the science-sewer spewing from the U.S. government and its so-called science agencies are tainted by a control-the-people for a Left-Wing government to remain in power. AS SUCH to keep We-The-People brainwashed and pliable to unconstitutional and bureaucratic despotic laws and rules, the science representing the Globalist-Dem-Marxist Left is doing EVERYTHING in its nefarious power to discredit ACTUAL empiric science contradicting the control narrative.
If you concur with my sentiment of government control, here is some science-history posted by Ryan Matters about mRNA jabs came into existence and about one of the scientists very instrumental in mRNA research. That instrumental researcher is Dr. Robert Malone, currently much maligned by Globalists for warning there is an mRNA jab problem.
To be honest the history lesson is lengthy. This article is well documented with sources. I emphasize the sourcing because the latter half will sound a bit like science fiction to the skeptic. The “sourcing” hopefully will bring some open-mindedness to the skeptic. EXAMINE the information I share into the hands of Americans still concerned about Liberty more than Sheeple compliance. If it’s too long for you book mark and return and become aware the world we now live in is insidiously influenced by Globalist-Marxists who ironically have infected greedy corporations. This kind of Socialistic mixture in the past was called Fascism and/or Nazism (an acronym when anglicized translates as National Socialism).
I need your generosity in 2021 via – credit cards, check cards
mRNA “Vaccines”, Eugenics & the Push for Transhumanism
The worldwide rollout of mRNA “vaccines” is part of a much larger agenda that encompasses eugenics and transhumanism. This agenda is being funded and promoted by a network of global institutions, politicians, and billionaire technocrats.
In 1989, researchers from the Salk Institute in California published a paper detailing how they developed an RNA transfection system that could “directly introduce RNA into whole tissues and embryos”.
The concept of using RNA as a drug is first described in this paper, making it the seminal work that formed the foundation for decades of further research in this area. The “Discussion” section of the paper states that:
“The RNA/lipofectin method can be used to directly introduce RNA into whole tissues and embryos (R.W.M., C. Holt, and I.M.V., unpublished results), raising the possibility that liposome-mediated mRNA transfection might offer yet another option in the growing technology of eukaryotic gene delivery, one based on the concept of using RNA as a drug.”
One of the Salk Institute researchers listed on the paper is Dr Robert W. Malone, a scientist who has recently been censored on social media for warning about the possible dangers of the covid-19 vaccines. It could be argued that there’s no expert more qualified to warn us about the dangers of mRNA injections than the man who helped pioneer the technology, nevertheless, Big Tech decided he was expounding “misinformation”, because, well, they know better apparently.
Malone’s research, which resulted in a procedure that could be used to “efficiently transfect RNA into human cells” using a “synthetic cationic lipid” was supported by grants from the American Cancer Society and the National Institute of Health (who currently have a stake in the Moderna mRNA vaccine, showing their allegiance to the technology. More on this later).
While Malone’s contributions to the development of mRNA technology are well-known and well-documented, Wikipedia decided to remove all mention of him from their “RNA Vaccine” entry shortly after the scientist began speaking out about the dangers of the rushed-through covid vaccines. The June 14th version of the article mentioned Malone by name 3 times and cited his work 6 times. The current version of the article mentions him 0 times and cites his work only 3 times.
However, this is unsurprising considering Wikipedia’s documented bias towards the pharmaceutical industry. Far more interesting is the institution that produced the research in the first place – the Salk Institute.
The Salk Institute, named after Jonas Salk, the creator of the Salk polio vaccine, was constructed in 1962 thanks to funding from the National Foundation for Infantile Paralysis, today known as the March of the Dimes.
The March of the Dimes (MOD) was established in 1937 with the mission of eradicating polio and during a time when the Eugenics Establishment was already a prominent, but not yet popular, feature of the American health scene. The theory of Eugenics is based on the idea that selective procreation can lead to the gradual “improvement” of the human race and that certain families are fit to lead society by virtue of their “superior” genes.
At the time, the nation’s key eugenics organizations included the American Eugenics Society (AES) and the American Society of human Eugenics (ASHE), funded by the Rockefeller, Carnegie and Harriman families, as well as the Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research. It should be noted that the Rockefellers were instrumental in funding and promoting eugenics around the world. The Eugenics movement promoted selective mating, artificial insemination and compulsory sterilization and euthanasia as important means of weeding out so-called “inferior” human beings.
“In 1907, Governor J. Frank Hanly approved first state eugenics law making sterilization mandatory for certain individuals in state custody.”
Those sterilized under eugenics law were deemed “undesirable” on account of mental or physical impairments such as epilepsy, blindness and physical disabilities, as well as “social inadequacies” such as drug addiction or criminality. According to estimates, around 60,000 individuals were sterilized under such laws, deprived of their right to have children and forever branded as “feebleminded”.
In fact, the prominence of the American eugenics movement resulted in its adoption by the National Socialist Party of Germany, which sterilized more than 350,000 persons by the end of the second world war. After WW2, eugenics notions were dropped from public conversation, but the movement never dissipated, no, instead it was “re-branded” using more acceptable terminology such as “population control” and “reproductive health”, as we shall see later on. [Blog Editor Emphasis]
The emergence of the MOD as a major player in the American Eugenics movement can be traced back to the organization’s early association with the Rockefeller Institute from where it procured many of its key members and advisers, including professor Anton Julius Carlson, a member of the American Eugenics Society, recruited to serve on the MOD’s Medical and Research Committees and Professor Clair E. Turner, another AES member who served as assistant to then President, Basil O’Connor.
Just before the establishment of the Salk Institute, the MOD announced it would be phasing out its polio programs and focusing its resources on “birth defects”.
In 1959, the MOD funded courses in “medical genetics” at the Jackson Laboratory in Maine, a genetics institute founded in 1929 by Clarence Cook Little, who, “at one time or another” served as the president of the American Eugenics Society, the American Birth Control League and the American Euthanasia Society.
Jackson Laboratory’s claimed mission is “to discover precise genomic solutions for disease and empower the global biomedical community in its shared quest to improve human health.” Noteworthy is that the lab received increased funding in 2020, largely from the National Institute of Health (NIH), including a grant of $10.6 million to find treatments for rare genetic diseases by using gene-editing technologies. [Blog Editor Emphasis] And at the start of the coronavirus “pandemic”, the lab worked to develop genetically modified mice for use in vaccine studies and other research related to Sars-Cov-2.
Beginning in the 1960s, the MOD financed several “Birth Defects Prevention Centers” located at medical institutions across the US. These new centers offered prenatal testing via amniocentesis to determine whether a baby would be born with “defects” and then gave the couple the opportunity to abort the affected child.
The MOD has also made direct donations to Planned Parenthood, a clear contradiction of their claimed mission, which is to “fight for the health of all moms and babies”. Planned Parenthood is a non-profit organization that provides “reproductive health care” in the US and abroad.
From 2019-2020 the organization committed over 350,000 abortions and has been criticized as “steering resources away from women’s health and toward abortion.” Unsurprisingly, a look into the organization’s history reveals that Planned Parenthood has its roots in Eugenics ideals.
Planned Parenthood was founded by Margaret Sanger, who, far from a “birth control activist”, as the mainstream would have you believe, was a racist eugenicist who sought to rid the world of “unfit” human stock. In her essay, “A Plan for Peace”, she describes the main objects of her proposed “Population Congress” which includes
“a stern and rigid policy of sterilization and segregation to that grade of population whose progeny is tainted, or whose inheritance is such that objectionable traits may be transmitted to offspring.”
She also mentions the need to “control the intake and output of morons, mental defectives, epileptics.”
As mentioned earlier, these Eugenics ideals inspired the Nazis who took many of Sanger’s ideas and ran with them, so to speak. In his book, The War Against the Weak, Edwin Black details how the Nazi sterilization law of 1933 as well as subsequent euthanasia laws were based on blueprints drawn up by Sanger and other American “activists”. In fact, associates of Sanger knew about these Nazi euthanasia programs and praised them.
Coming back to the Salk Institute, it should be noted that the mainstream account of the 20th-century polio outbreak, namely the notion that the disease is caused by a virus and that Dr Salk’s miracle vaccine was single-handedly responsible for ending the epidemic, is dubious and likely altogether false.
Paralytic polio appeared suddenly in the US in the early 1900s with continual, dramatic fluctuations in cases – a pattern that continued until the end of the 1950s. The introduction of the Salk vaccine in 1954 seemed to coincide with the almost instantaneous decline in cases, which continued for more than two decades.
But prior to being called “polio”, conditions involving infirmity of the limbs were known by various other names including apoplexy, palsy and paralysis. Many historical writings refer to paralysis resulting from exposure to toxic substances and many of these accounts were documented by Dr Ralph Scobey in his 1952 statement to the Select Committee to Investigate the Use of Chemicals in Food Products titled The Poison Cause of Poliomyelitis and Obstructions to its Investigation.
Scobey’s paper includes references to several investigations that seemed to indicate a link between polio outbreaks in the 20th century and the consumption of fresh fruit, providing a link between Polio and toxic pesticide exposure.
“McCormick (78), Scobey (100-101), and Goddard (57), in detailed studies, have all pointed out that factors other than infective agents are certainly involved in the etiology of polio, varying from nutritional defects to a variety of poisons which affect the nervous system.”
The danger of toxic pesticides, including DDT, and their disastrous effects on the environment were illustrated by Rachel Carson in her 1962 book, Silent Spring.
In more recent times, researchers, Dan Olmstead, co-founder of the Age of Autism, and Mark Blaxil conducted two brilliant investigations into the polio epidemics of the 20th century, reaching a similar conclusion to Scobey and Biskind, namely that the disease was caused by the widespread use of neurotoxic pesticides such as arsenite of soda and DDT.
Although Salk’s vaccine was hailed as a success, the vaccine itself caused many cases of injury and paralysis. And though there does appear to be a convincing correlation between the timing of the vaccine and the reduction in polio cases, as all good scientists know, causation doesn’t equal correlation, especially considering the fact that DDT was phased out, at least in the US, over the same period.
Interestingly, Dr Salk’s polio research was funded by the mother of Cordelia Scaife May, an heiress to the Mellon family banking fortune who idealized Margaret Sanger and later joined the board of the International Planned Parenthood Foundation.
May’s views on immigration were radical, to say the least, and according to some, she favoured compulsory sterilization as a means to limit birth rates in developing countries. May later joined the board of the Population Council, an organization founded by John D. Rockefeller III focused on population reduction.
It would be a mistake to think that the polio epidemic was not related to the current ‘age of vaccination’ we find ourselves in. On the contrary, claiming that polio was “eradicated in the United States” due to vaccination alone is a lie that garnered public favour for childhood vaccinations and helped to set the groundwork for the widespread belief in the safety and efficacy of all vaccines.
Diseases such as polio and smallpox (another lie that is beyond the scope of this article), and the subsequent pro-vaccine propaganda, “primed” much of the population to accept, without question, an experimental jab based on poorly understood technology.
TWISTING THE SCIENCE
In 1997, 8 years after the Salk Institute paper, the FDA approved the first-ever trial of transfected RNA to develop immunity in cancer patients. The Recombinant DNA Advisory Committee of the National Institute of Health then voted to continue approval some months later, leading to the first-ever mRNA-based vaccine administered to humans.
Though mRNA is propagandized in the media as the next revolution in health, those with keen perception may be alarmed when reading excerpts such as this one, taken from an article on the history of mRNA, written by Damian Garde, a Biotech reporter for STATS:
“The concept: By making precise tweaks to synthetic mRNA and injecting people with it, any cell in the body could be transformed into an on-demand drug factory.”
Talk of cells being turned into “on-demand drug factories” is exactly the sort of meaningless techno-rhetoric meant to impress and entice an uninformed public. mRNA vaccines are based on the following concept: a piece of synthetic mRNA is shuttled into your cells, where it is used as a template to create the viral “spike protein”. Once this protein leaves the cell, the body produces antibodies and “learns” how to fight future Sars-Cov-2 infections.
mRNA-based vaccines are often touted as a safer alternative to DNA-based vaccines, which, according to experts “may trigger permanent and dangerous changes in the genetic information of treated people”. However, do we know for sure that mRNA vaccines don’t permanently change the genetic makeup of our cells? A 2001 paper titled RNA as a tumor vaccine: a review of the literature states that (emphasis added):
“unlike DNA-based vaccines, there is little danger of incorporation of RNA sequences into the host genome.”
The use of the word “little” would seem to indicate that there may be at least some danger of genome integration, or more likely, researchers simply don’t know.
In the 2004 “expert opinion” paper by Pascolo cited above, he outlines the link between mRNA vaccines and gene therapies, something which is continually denied and dismissed by the mainstream:
“Although located in the cytosol and not in the nucleus, mature mRNAs belong to the biochemical family of nucleic acids. mRNA, similarly to DNA, may be considered a gene and, consequently, it’s use as a vaccine may be viewed as ‘gene therapy’.”
Interestingly, it is purely due to a technicality of regulatory law that covid-19 gene therapies are allowed to be called “vaccines”. This is explained in a paper titled The European Regulatory Environment of RNA-Based Vaccines, which states that:
The definition of a gene therapy medicinal product as outlined in Annex 1 to Directive 2001/83/EC is as follows:
Gene therapy medicinal product means a biological medicinal product which has the following characteristics:
(a) it contains an active substance which contains or consists of a recombinant nucleic acid used in or administered to human beings with a view to regulating, repairing, replacing, adding or deleting a genetic sequence;
(b) its therapeutic, prophylactic or diagnostic effect relates directly to the recombinant nucleic acid sequence it contains, or to the product of genetic expression of this sequence.
Gene therapy medicinal products shall not include vaccines against infectious diseases.
As is evident, the mere act of calling a gene therapy a “vaccine against infectious disease” negates its classification as a gene therapy, the approval process for which, at least in Europe, involves going through the CAT which is the EMA’s (European Medicines Agency) “Committee for Advanced Therapies”.
Evidently, this play on language would seem to constitute a “loophole” of sorts, allowing easier approval for mRNA-based gene therapies planned for human use.
Approval is certainly a contentious topic when talked about in the context of the current covid-19 vaccines, none of which have been fully FDA approved, only authorized under emergency use (EUA), and labeled as “investigational” products, a fact that many people are unaware of. However, early in the year vaccine manufacturers already set their sights on full regulatory approval, after only 6 months of trial data.
On the 7th of May, Pfizer formally initiated their application to the FDA, with the aim of having the first-ever fully approved covid-19 vaccine. But with millions of vaccines already administered under EUA, what’s the rush?
Furthermore, for the six “first in disease” vaccines approved by the FDA over the last 15 years, the median trial duration was just shy of two years. A vaccine approved after 6 months of data would constitute one of the fastest ever.
The phase three clinical trials for Pfizer, Moderna and Janssen are two years in duration, but the FDA has not clearly stated their position with regards to minimum follow-up prior to consideration for approval.
Longer, placebo-controlled trials are paramount to assessing vaccine safety. It is extremely alarming then that vaccine manufacturers, within weeks of receiving EUA, began to unblind trials by offering those in the placebo group the chance to get vaccinated.
Moderna announced that “as of April 13, all placebo participants have been offered the Moderna covid-19 vaccine and 98% of those have received the vaccine”, meaning that their placebo group no longer exists and as such, they have no way to accurately measure long-term safety.
In an article for the British Medical Journal, Peter Doshi quotes the FDA, on several occasions, saying that the maintenance of a placebo group would be critical to assessing both the safety and efficacy of covid-19 vaccines, which is obvious to anyone who understands the consequences of failing to adhere to scientific rigor when testing a new medical therapy.
In reality, there could be many reasons for manufacturers wanting FDA approval for their vaccines, but likely top of the list is the “stamp of approval” that comes with full licensure and the ability to use this as a way to convince those who remain skeptical regarding the safety and efficacy of the vaccines. Moreover, full FDA approval would pave the way for easier vaccine mandates, putting immense pressure on those of the “awakened class” who represent a thorn in the side of the Great Reset/Great Convergence agenda pushers.
More disturbing inconsistencies can be found in the FDA’s process for assessing and approving these experimental vaccines. For example, the FDA recently cautioned against the use of antibody tests for evaluating immunity or protection from covid-19, “especially” after a person has received a vaccination, despite their EUA being originally granted, in part, due to antibody responses.
The implication for this reversal is that the EUA given for covid-19 vaccines should also be reversed, but what’s the likelihood of that happening after millions have already been jabbed?
Moreover, the idea that “antibodies” provide protection from so-called viral infections represents a poor understanding of the body and the immune system. The fact that antibodies play little role in viral infections has been known by medical scientists since the 1950s based on research that shows persons with the genetic inability to produce antibodies, called “agammaglobulinemia”, have normal reactions to typical viral infections and even appear to resist recurrences.
BILL GATES, MODERNA AND EUGENICS 2.0
One of the covid-19 vaccine manufactures most talked about in the media is Moderna, a biotech company co-founded by Robert Langer, a researcher and inventor at MIT.
In 2013, the biotech startup received $25m in funding from DARPA (the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency), a research arm of the United States Department of Defense, and an organization well-known for ruthlessly pursuing dystopian, transhumanist technologies, such as implantable nanoparticles and bio-brain interfaces (more on this later).
Noteworthy is that the US government, through the National Institute of Health, appears to have a financial stake in the Moderna vaccine thanks to a contract signed by both parties, giving the NIH joint ownership over Moderna’s mRNA vaccine candidates. According to Axios:
“The NIH mostly funds outside research, but it also often invents basic scientific technologies that are later licensed out and incorporated into drugs that are sold at massive profits.”
This is more than alarming considering the NIH is responsible for prioritizing promising treatments for covid-19 as well as improving clinical trial effectiveness, which, for Moderna, is impossible considering their trial no longer contains a control group.
NIH’s vested interest in Moderna’s success may also provide a plausible explanation for why the biotech startup received EUA for their vaccine despite failing, for over 10 years, to bring a single product to market.
In an interview for Economic Club, NIH director Francis Collins denied that covid-19 vaccines would be money-makers, saying that “Nobody sees this as a way to make billions of dollars”.
However, evidence points to the contrary as Moderna’s covid-19 vaccine sales reached $1.7 billion in the first quarter of 2021, making their CEO, Stephane Bancel, one of the many new pharma billionaires.
“Operation Warp Speed”, the name given to a partnership between several US Federal agencies aimed at accelerating the development of a covid-19 vaccine, was also wrought with conflicts of interest.
The Operation Warp Speed administration hired several “consultants” with ties to Big Pharma, including two former Pfizer executives. And in May 2020, it was reported that their chief adviser, Dr Monsef Slaoui, a former pharmaceutical executive himself, held $10m in GlaxoSmithKline stock, the same company that was later awarded a $2 billion contract to supply the US government with 100 million vials of covid-19 vaccine.
Moderna co-founder, Robert Langer, whose net worth has also skyrocketed into the billions, is one of the world’s most cited researchers. A scientist at MIT, Langer holds over 1,400 patents and specializes in biotechnology, nanotechnology, tissue engineering and drug delivery.
Furthermore, Langer holds an administrative role at the MIT Media Lab, the same institute that was the focus of a scandal after it was revealed that the lab accepted funding from convicted sex-offender, Jefferey Epstein. Epstein also happened to have a disturbing fascination with “transhumanism”, a modern-day version of eugenics (transhumanism is discussed later in this article).
Then director of the MIT Media Lab, Joi Ito, approved twodonations from Epstein of $1.75m and allowed the prolific paedophile to “direct” funds to the lab from other wealthy benefactors, including a $2m donation from Bill Gates, who also has unsettling ties to Epstein, having flown on his private jet and met with him on several occasions.
When the news broke out and Joi Ito resigned from his post at the lab, Langer was one of the first people to sign a letter calling for him to stay, and as an administrator for the lab’s Director’s Office, it’s hard to believe he didn’t know about the Epstein donations in advance.
Described as the “common denominator” in several coronavirus efforts, Robert Langer is certainly an interesting player in the transhumanist movement. In 2015, his company, Microchips Biotech, partnered with Israeli pharmaceutical giant, Teva Pharmaceutical, to commercialize its “implantable drug delivery device”.
Noteworthy is that Teva Pharmaceutical has received significant investment from Warren Buffett, who, in 2006, pledged to gradually donate his fortune to the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, an organization whom he served as a trustee up until very recently.
Langer also has ties to Charles Lieber, a Harvard nanotech scientist who was arrested in January on account of making false statements to federal authorities regarding his collaboration with Chinese researchers at the Wuhan University of Technology.
In 2012, Langer and Lieber worked together to create a “material that merges nanoscale electronics with biological tissues”. The material was described as “a first step toward prosthetics that communicate directly with the nervous system”.
Much of Langer’s research is backed by Bill Gates, who began funding mRNA technology in 2010 and has also invested millions into Moderna.
In 2017, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation sponsored a project at Langer’s lab to create a microparticle vaccine delivery system that could generate a “novel type of drug carrying particle”, allowing multiple doses of a vaccine to be administered over an extended period of time with just one injection.
Then in 2019, Gates and Langer teamed up again to create an invisible ink tattoo that “embeds immunization records into a child’s skin”. Disturbingly, the eventual goal of the project is to inject sensors that can be used to track “other aspects” of health.
Gates claims he needs the data for “disease prevention”, referring to his efforts to wipe out polio, measles and other “infectious” diseases from around the world. However, Gates’ various “health-related” initiatives in developing countries are not the work of a loving philanthropist, like the media would have us all believe. Instead, evidence would suggest that Gates’ involvement in public health represents the continuation of a long-standing eugenics agenda, hiding in plain sight.
Gates’ links to the eugenics movement start with his father, who praised the Rockefellers for their work in “public health” and even met with them in 2000 to discuss matters relating to infectious disease, vaccines and the environment. During the meeting, Gates senior was quoted as saying:
“Taking our lead and our inspiration from work already done by The Rockefeller Foundation, our foundation actually started GAVI by pledging $750 million to something called the Global Fund for Children’s Vaccines, an instrument of GAVI.”
Interestingly, almost ten years after that meeting, Gates junior co-hosted a meeting with David Rockefeller to discuss population reduction.
Perhaps even more telling is the fact that in 2012 Bill and Melinda Gates hosted their London Summit on Family Planning, where they announced their commitment to population control in the third world, on the 100th anniversary of the First International Eugenics Congress, also held in London.
Gates is well-known for his obsession with vaccines, a curious pursuit considering that the 9,000,000 people who die every year from hunger would be better served by having clean water, food supplies and sanitary living environments.
Within months, many girls began to get sick and within a year, five of them had died. During a similar study for a different brand of the HPV vaccine, many girls were hospitalized and a further two died. The Economic Times of India reported on this in 2014, with the shocking revelation that:
Consent for conducting these studies, in many cases, was taken from the hostel wardens, which was a flagrant violation of norms. In many other cases, thumbprint impressions of their poor and illiterate parents were duly affixed onto the consent form. The children also had no idea about the nature of the disease or the vaccine. The authorities concerned could not furnish requisite consent forms for the vaccinated children in a huge number of cases.”
Gates has also heavily promoted the oral polio vaccine in India, after endeavouring to eradicate the disease. However, as discussed earlier in this article, toxic chemicals are involved in the etiology of polio and thus the disease cannot be eradicated by the use of vaccines. In fact, global health numbers indicate that more cases of polio are now being caused by the vaccines themselves than anything else.
In 2018, a group of brave Indian researchers published a paper in the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health showing a correlation between the oral polio vaccine drives and increased cases of “acute flaccid paralysis”, a condition described as “clinically indistinguishable” from polio.
Ironically, Gates has a $23m investment in Monsanto, the company that markets “roundup” a glyphosate-containing pesticide that is known to cause adverse health effects, including neurological disorders and paralysis.
While many believe Gates to be selflessly giving away his money in order to fund these vaccination campaigns, it should be noted that Gates’ investment in vaccines has netted him a massive return. By 2019, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation had donated just over $10b to various vaccine-related initiatives including GAVI (the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization). Gates called it the “best investment he’s ever made”, estimating a 20-1 return, or around $200b over 20 years. Indeed, Gates’ net worth has more than doubled over the last 10 years.
And lest we forget that more than half of all deaths in low to middle income countries are caused by noncommunicable diseases, which the Bill and Melinda Foundation seems to have little interest in, directing less than 3% of their budget towards such conditions.
Furthermore, Gates’ activities in public health are wrought with conflicts of interest that that would seem to undermine the notion that Gates cares about the health of the population. Many of these conflicts of interest are outlined in a study published by Harvard researcher, David Stuckler, titled Global Health Philanthropy and Institutional Relationships: How Should Conflicts of Interest Be Addressed?, in which he states that:
“As one example, we found that Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation has substantial holdings in the Coca-Cola Corporation, and also participates in grants that encourage communities in developing countries to become business affiliates of Coca-Cola. It has been noted by some commentators that sugary drinks such as those produced by Coca-Cola are correlated with the rapid increase in obesity and diabetes in developing countries.”
Stuckler also notes that:
“Many of the Foundation’s pharmaceutical development grants may benefit leading pharmaceutical companies such as Merck and GlaxoSmithKline.” And that “Several grants are linked to companies that are represented on the Foundation’s board among its investments.”
The media rarely reports on these disturbing conflicts of interest, which isn’t surprising considering Gates funds all the major news outlets.
To call the negligent, wide-spread administration of covid-19 experimental vaccines an initiative steeped in eugenicist thinking would not be amiss considering how many figures and institutions involved in the vaccine race have ties to the eugenics movement. In fact, the developers of the Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine are also linked to the now renamed British Eugenics Society, founded by the father of Eugenics, Francis Galton. These connections are detailed by investigative journalist, Whitney Webb, in her article titled Developers of Oxford-AstraZeneca Vaccine Tied to UK Eugenics Movement.
When it comes to protecting public health, the recklessness displayed by politicians, scientists and pharmaceutical companies is unforgivable considering the widespread impact that these experimental vaccines will have. We have already begun to see the results of unleashing a dangerous gene therapy technology on a naive and trusting public, with VAERS, (the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System) showing more deaths linked with covid-19 vaccines than all other vaccines combined over the last 30 years. [Blog Editor Emphasis]
None of this is surprising though, considering the haste with which clinical trials were conducted and the question marks surrounding the reliability of the data reported. For example, vaccine manufactures reported their vaccines were “95% effective”, a number they arrived at by using a relative risk reduction as opposed to an absolute risk reduction, which was around 1% in most cases, a fact never highlighted by the mainstream media.
Furthermore, vaccine trials were not designed to assess the vaccines’ effect on infection, transmission, hospitalizations or deaths, which is puzzling considering that, if there really was a viral pandemic, these would be the most important endpoints to test for. Though perhaps this was a calculated move by vaccine manufacturers, who knew they’d have a better chance at rigging the results using the endpoint of ‘covid-19 of any severity’. After all, the dramatic increase in the use of influenza vaccines has not been associated with a decrease in mortality.
Peter Doshi, an editor for the British Medical Journal, has called into question numerous aspects of the controversial vaccine trials, including the potential for pain medication to mask covid-19 symptoms in trial groups and the objectivity of “primary event adjudication committees” in charge of counting covid-19 cases. In the case of Pfizer, this committee consisted of Pfizer employees.
Recently, Doctors for Covid Ethics, a group consisting of Dr Michael Palmer MD, Dr Sucharit Bhakdi MD and Dr Stefan Hockertz PhD, published an expert statement relating to the danger and efficacy of the Pfizer vaccine that was submitted as part of a lawsuit challenging the EU’s authorization of the use of the vaccine for children 12 years and older. The paper states that the reported efficacy of the Pfizer mRNA vaccine was “most likely altogether fraudulent” and that “Pfizer, the EMA, and the FDA have systematically neglected evidence from preclinical animal trials that clearly pointed to grave dangers of adverse events.” [Blog Editor Emphasis]
But of course, none of this is ever surfaced in the mainstream. Instead we are fed the same party lines over and over; “vaccines are safe and effective”, “follow the science”, “listen to the experts”. And by “experts” they of course mean the soulless, pharmaceutical sock puppets like Dr Anthony Fauci, the director of the U.S. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases whose been spewing lies about so-called viral infections ever since AIDS broke out in 1984.
The fact that a character like Fauci has held his post for more than 30 years is rather telling of how the system works. The late Nobel prize winner and inventor of Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR), Karry Mullis, castigated Fauci in an interview, saying that:
“He doesn’t know anything really about anything, and I’d say that to his face. Nothing. The man thinks you can take a blood sample and stick it in an electron microscope and if it’s got a virus in there, you will know it. He doesn’t understand electron microscopy and he doesn’t understand medicine. He should not be in a position like he’s in […] Tony Fauci does not mind going on television in front of the people who pay his salary and lie directly into the camera.”
A TRANSHUMANIST FUTURE
Besides being gene therapies, a technology associated with eugenics and transhumanism, according to scientists, mRNA technology “allows rapid development of novel vaccines within a very short time span of weeks rather than months”. Hence, we may be faced with the possibility of a future filled with on-demand vaccines created to “protect” the public against new, invisible threats.
Indeed, with vaccinologists already talking about “variants”, booster shots and periodic covid-19 top-up vaccines, it certainly looks like things are headed that way. And of course, thanks to intelligence-linked Big Tech conglomerates, this data will all be recorded on a “vaccine passport” linked to your smart phone, which will no-doubt form the basis for a new type of digital identity pass tied to your bank account and, eventually, your social credit. [Blog Editor: Something already practiced by the CCP in Communist China.]
Indeed, in 2019, Bill Gates’ Microsoft filed a patent, aptly named Patent WO2020060606, for a “Cryptocurrency system using body-activation data”, another clue as to the true intentions of the technocratic elite who are funding and promoting the transhumanist agenda. The patent’s title alone conjures up images of a slave society in which humans are fitted with biosensors and awarded digital coins for completing tasks issued to them by the ruling elite.
But perhaps even more alarming is the rush to get gene therapies licensed for use in young children. Pfizer are currently in the midst of a global clinical trial, where they are testing their mRNA jabs in babies as young as 6 months, despite the fact that “Covid-19”, if we suppose there is such a disease, barely affects children.
In fact, according to CDC numbers, the IFR in children is 20 per 1,000,000, or 0.002%, which is likely lower than the risk of permanent injury or death from the MMR vaccine. It’s also lower than the covid-19 vaccine death rate as calculated using VAERS data at the time of writing (5,612 deaths over 165,000,000 fully vaccinated in the US = 0.003%).
Furthermore, research has linked Pfizer’s vaccine to symptomatic myocarditis, with an estimated incidence rate of 1 in 3000 or 1 in 6000 in young men.
The rush to bring mRNA vaccines into the mainstream as part of the regular childhood vaccination schedule is not about health or protection, but rather a step towards a much more sinister goal, which is to attain control over the human body itself.
As mentioned previously in this article, DARPA, the research arm of the US Department of Defense, has been working to create nanotechnology that can interface with biological cells. In 2014, DARPA launched its “In Vivo Nanoplatforms (IVN)” program, with the aim of developing implantable nanoplatforms to collect biological data and provide “continuous physiologic monitoring”. The program has since helped to create injectable hydrogels that monitor physiologic responses and can sync to a smartphone.
Furthermore, DARPA, together with the NIH, heavily funds Profusa, a Google-backed biotech company developing and marketing this very same injectable hydrogel technology, only now it is being punted as a way to detect future “pandemics”.
Allegedly, Profusa’s sensors can “detect flu-like infections even before their symptoms begin to show”. While incredibly disturbing, this is only a step towards DARPA’s ultimate goal, which is to establish dominion over the mind. This goal is reflected in DARPA’s research to create “mutant-powered soldiers” using “genetic weaponry” that can “undermine people’s minds and bodies using a range of chemical, neurological, genetic and behavioral techniques”.
DARPA is also looking at ways to genetically engineer the brain in order to read peoples thoughts and induce images and sounds in people’s minds. The research involves the use of “magnetic nanoparticles”, the same technology that some have speculated may be included in current or future covid-19 vaccines.
Equally distressing is the “Wellcome Leap”, a new initiative created by the eugenics-linked Wellcome Trust, the world’s richest medical research Foundation, in partnership with two former DARPA frontmen. The program’s official aim is to “Deliver breakthroughs in human health over 5 – 10 years and demonstrate seemingly impossible results on seemingly impossible timelines.”
Currently, the initiative has 5 main projects, the first of which is “RNA Readiness + Response”, which seeks to (emphasis added) “create a self-sustaining network of manufacturing facilities providing globally distributed, state-of-the-art surge capacity to meet future pandemic needs”, referring to the manufacturing of RNA-based products (mRNA gene therapies). Note the seeming surety of a future pandemic.
However, the top contender for most disturbing Wellcome Leap project is, without a doubt, “The First 1000 days” (1kD), a program which seeks to use infants as test subjects in order to monitor their brain development and create AI models that can be used to “accurately predict and improve EF [executive function] outcomes”. The project also notes the use of “mobile-sensors, wearables and home-based systems”. In a detailed article on the matter, researcher Whitney Webb writes that:
“True to the eugenicist ties of the Wellcome Trust (to be explored more in-depth in Part 2), Wellcome Leap’s 1DK notes that “of interest are improvements from underdeveloped EF to normative or from normative to well-developed EF across the population to deliver the broadest impact.” One of the goals of 1DK is thus not treating disease or addressing a “global health public challenge” but instead experimenting on the cognitive augmentation of children using means developed by AI algorithms and invasive surveillance-based technology.”
The Wellcome Leap’s timeline of 5-10 years happens to line up with elite frontman, Elon Musk’s Neuralink project, which seeks to establish “the future of brain interfaces” in order to “expand our abilities”. In an interview Musk said, “I think we are about 8 to 10 years away from this being usable by people with no disability”.
Musk, whose wealth increased by more than 500% during the covid-19 “pandemic”, founded Neuralink in 2016. The company recently raised $205m in funding from 7 venture capital firms (including Google’s GV) and 5 Silicon Valley executives.
However, Neuralink isn’t the only biotech company pursuing this technology. Recently, Synchron, a small biotech firm and Neuralink competitor, received the go-ahead from the FDA to begin testing its brain chip implants in humans.
10 years from now would take us to 2030, a year that comes up again and again as a year in which transhumanist technologies will be commonplace in mainstream society. According to predictions made by the US National Intelligence Council, “human augmentation” (the merging of man and machine) will be a major theme in 2030. Their Global Trends 2030 report, published in 2012, states that:
“Successful prosthetics probably will be directly integrated with the user’s body. Brain-machine interfaces could provide “superhuman” abilities, enhancing strength and speed, as well as providing functions not previously available.”
Interestingly, the report also predicts “an easily transmissible novel respiratory pathogen” that could cause a great disruptive impact. The report goes on to state that “Unlike other disruptive global events, such an outbreak would result in a global pandemic that directly causes suffering and death in every corner of the world, probably in less than six months.”
ENSLAVEMENT: A FREE WILL CHOICE
The roll out of mRNA gene therapies and the push towards a transhumanist society represents the continuation of the eugenics movement, which was based on the pseudoscientific concept that some humans, by virtue of their genetic composition, were more “fit” to lead society than others.
The “hero” of the Polio epidemic, Jonas Salk, had his own ties to eugenics and so does the institute named in his favour, the Salk Institute. Their mRNA research, funded by the NIH, set the foundation for the development and mass roll out of gene therapies, controversially being called “vaccines”. The danger of this experimental technology is evident, having already caused thousands of injuries and deaths worldwide.
The role of intelligence organizations, billionaire technocrats and pharmaceutical initiatives in funding, researching and promoting mRNA vaccines, “bio-brain” interfaces, gene editing and other technologies steeped in eugenicist ideals paints the picture of a global agenda set to hit its stride fully by 2030.
The current covid-19 “pandemic” has served as a means to accelerate this agenda by centralizing wealth and power, bringing transhumanist technology into the mainstream and normalizing authoritarian rule.
Pfizer’s infant trials and the Wellcome Leap’s alarming “1kD” project indicate that key to this agenda is the conditioning and control of children from a young age, something that Aldous Huxley detailed extensively in his disturbingly prophetic, eugenicist novel, Brave New World.
This agenda, though backed by some of the world’s most powerful individuals and institutions, has an obvious weakness – its success is reliant on our compliance. It will only advance if we allow it to advance. Therefore, it is up to each one of us, through compassionate, non-violent resistance, to sow the seeds of awakening in the collective consciousness of mankind. [Blog Editor Emphasis]
Ryan Matters is a writer and free thinker from South Africa. After a life-changing period of illness, he began to question mainstream medicine, science and the true meaning of what it is to be alive. Some of his writings can be found at newbraveworld.org, you can also follow him on Twitter and Gab.
I discovered a very lengthy post chock full of actual science as opposed propaganda-twisted science (propagandists take factoids and twist them to fit a political agenda – a twisted factoid is a LIE). The post is located at The Liberty Beacon. The focus is COVID info, experimental vaccine info all wrapped into a Globalist-Marxist agenda to reduce the planet’s population under the probable nefarious belief less people is an easier planetary environment to control. Meaning a better planet is a controlled people planet.
In all honesty I managed to get half way before I decided to cross post the information. This is a post I’ll be going back to complete the reading and digest the info. The post has some Youtube videos in it. For that is problematic because one never knows when the Youtube-dictators will decide a narrative is found to be against its control-manic community standards (which are aligned with propaganda science, the Dem-Marxist Party and Globalist neo-Marxists in general). So, in this cross post I am replacing the Youtube version with whatever other video platform carries the Youtube version.
BUT FIRST I begin with a Tucker Carlson segment which criticizes the Dem-Marxists’ chief science propagandist Anthony Fauci for lying about his association with the Wuhan Lab in Communist China and the lies pertaining to gain-of-function, funding and COVID [PL]andemic.
I need your generosity in 2021 via – credit cards, check cards
All Global Research articles can be read in 51 languages by activating the “Translate Website” drop down menu on the top banner of our home page (Desktop version).
Visit and follow us on Instagram at @crg_globalresearch.
Remember Bill Gates’ infamously saying with his seductive smile, something to the effect, even if I’m no longer around, the system has been set up and will continue without me. This is not a verbatim but a contextual quote. Unfortunately, any reference to this and other similar anti-current narrative references were deleted from the internet.
It’s part of a massive censuring effort. Of course, without censuring the alternative media – the plan falls flat. The mainstream media, as well as the social platforms, are bought with hundreds of millions of dollars to keep propagating the fake and criminal corona narrative.
The plan is horrifying. It is a public relations distortion of the truth, of what’s behind the enormous, coercive “vaccination”. “The everybody-must-be-vaxxed drive” is so enormous, for a disease that has a 99.9% survival rate – and is about as deadly as a common flu (0.3% – 0.8%) – so, that anybody who still can think straight must wonder what’s behind it. What’s the real agenda?
The British Government has invested in excess of £184m on communications, read propaganda, relating to Covid-19 in 2020, figures from the Cabinet Office show. It is said to plan another at least £320m (about US$ 380 m equivalent) through 2022. See here.
So, how believable is Boris Johnson then, who said on several occasions that by the end of 2021 all will be over? Though he also warned we will never return to the old normal, that a New or One World Order (OWO) will emerge from this unique covid-opportunity.
Same words as uttered by Klaus Schwab, the “father” of the World Economic Forum (WEF), the alleged author of The Great Reset which – fair enough – presents us with all the horrendously inhuman plans they have for us, so horrendous, nobody really listens.
But listen we should, because these plans have already begun being implemented – and we are in the midst of them, still closing our eyes to what they tell us will come – and is coming simultaneously with their warnings. So, we better wake up, with eyes wide open, and our spirits and consciousness ready to act.
This unique “covid opportunity”, as the WEF’s guru, Klaus Schwab, calls it, has started with an equally unique death toll from these mRNA-type covid injections, falsely labeled as vaccines.
This is where one of the most severe crimes of our governments around the world begins, selling us the experimental injections – with basically no testing – as vaccines. It’s a BIG lie. They all lie to us. All of the 193 UN member governments and, of course, the UN political body, led by Secretary General, António Guterres, go along with this monster lie, with the coerced deadly “vaccination”, a fraud of epic proportions never experienced in what we know as our current civilization.
The EMA (European Medicines Agency) reports 5,993 (May 3, 2021) deaths from corona jabs. That’s a 50-fold increase over the death rate of traditional vaccines; see this. In fact, the covid injections, falsely called vaccines, administered in Europe and the US, are mRNA-type inoculations that were never to be called “vaccines”. They were allowed (not approved) by CDC as “emergency gene-therapy” treatments.
All governments and institutions calling them “vaccines” are lying to you. They are committing a fraud, a Crime Against Humanity.
Criminals should be and shall be prosecuted for Crimes Against Humanity under Nuremberg 2.0, a criminal prosecution patterned according to the Nuremberg Trials after WWII and following the Nuremberg Code. The leading architect and lawyer for this endeavor towards global justice is Dr. Reiner Füllmich, co-founder of the World’s Doctor Alliance; watch the video below.
Dr. Füllmich said without a shadow of a doubt, “this has never been about the virus. This has never been about health. See this.
49 min…but you must see! German Attorney, Exposing covid, the “pandemic” and PCR tests, class action lawsuit]
These are criminal acts out of proportion with any known attacks on humanity in our civilization’s history.
The adverse effects of these injections, as recorded by United States CDC’s Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), counting since 14 December 2020 until the end of April 2021, were a total of 4,178 deaths following Experimental Covid Injections. Deaths from covid jabs now equal 20 years of recorded deaths following vaccines since 2001. See this.
On 6 May Fox News commentator, Tucker Carlson, reported that this corresponds to about 30 people a day dying from the false Covid vaccine, between December 2020 and end of April 2021. Carlson adds,
“More people, according to VAERS, have died after getting the shot in four months during a single vaccination campaign than from all other vaccines combined over more than a decade and a half.”
Carlson stated, the number of deaths is likely much higher than what VAERS is reporting, citing reports submitted to the Department of Health and Human Services in 2010 that found“fewer than 1% of vaccine adverse events are reported by the VAERS system.” This statement matches CDC’s own assessment, that only a fraction of the real figure of covid jab injuries and deaths are reported by VAERS, estimating that the real figures may be at least up to 10 times or more higher than reported.
Dr. Joseph Mercola makes a bombshell Covid-19 shot prediction, namely that the “vaccines”, i.e., the experimental injections, will likely kill more people than covid itself.
Dr. Mercola also refers unmistakenly [sic] to a major depopulation strategy. He reminds his listeners that, unbelievably and ludicrously, CDC recommends that mRNA-inoculation be given to pregnant women. Never before, Dr Mercola affirms, have pregnant women been exposed to experimental drugs which this is, according to CDC and FDA.
This is a crime of epic proportions committed by research as well as watchdog agencies, CDC and FDA. Dr. Mercola estimates that at least 30% of pregnant women who received the covid-shot had miscarriages. He also referred to infertility and sterilization properties of these mRNA-type injections and predicts massive death rates down the road from the injection. See this.
“Thousands of women around the world are reporting disrupted menstrual cycles after receiving injections of COVID-19 vaccines.
The U.K.’s government vaccine adverse event system has collected more 2,200 reports of reproductive disorders after coronavirus injections, including excessive or absent menstrual bleeding, delayed menstruation, vaginal hemorrhaging, miscarriages, and stillbirths.”
Dr. Janci Chunn Lindsay of CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) made a public comment on how the covid “vaccine”, alias experimental gene therapy, may be affecting the Human Reproductive system and causing abortions – watch below.
The World Food Program (WFP), the UN anti-hunger agency, states that the plandemic
“has contributed to soaring hunger and acute declines in maternal health care that threatens tens of millions of people, underscoring the disproportionate spillover effects on the world’s poor.”
The number of people worldwide requiring urgent food aid hit a five-year high in 2020 — reaching at least 155 million. The JN expresses concern over the risk of maternal and newborn deaths surging, because of a covid-related shortage of at least 900,000 midwives, or one-third of the required global midwifery work force. The WFP says that “we are watching the worst-case scenario unfold before our very eyes.”
The Global Report on Food Crisis – 2021 covers 55 countries and territories, including three — Burkina Faso, South Sudan and Yemen — where it said that at least 133,000 people were suffering [covid-related] famine, the most severe phase of a hunger crisis. The resulting death rate can only be estimated at this time. – See this.
Full Digitization of Life
Is Depopulation, shoveling resources from the bottom and center to the top, and full digitization of life itself, the larger agenda of this man-made covid crisis? It’s also the key strategy enshrined in the WEF’s (Klaus Schwab’s) Great Reset.
It presents a multi-faceted approach to reaching within the span of a decade – the so-called UN Agenda 2030 – a One World Order, dictated by a small ultra-wealthy and powerful financial group, and run most likely by today’s obedient “world government”-bought top politicians and science advisers. They were probably promised not to be vaccinated, or at worst, just by an innocuous placebo, for show and public relations propaganda.
The UN 2030-cum–Great Reset agenda is playing out on many fronts, holding the entire world – at least the 193 UN members – hostage, comparable to a stranglehold by an octopus with its many tentacles. When one is defeated, the others work mercilessly on, until the defeated ones grow back – with different strategies. This is well thought out and has been planned for decades. As Bill Gates insinuates, if I’m gone, “the project”, ingrained in the system, continues.
The “Project” (Great Reset / UN Agenda 2030) means, the implementation of a three-objectives-plan:
i) massive depopulation;
ii) transferring public assets and other resources from the bottom and the center to the top (making of the multi-billionaires, multi-trillionaires), and
iii) digitization of everything, including the human brain.
Sounds crazy? – Yes, it is crazy, but coming from the Deep State and powerful financial interests, it is all the more plausible.
Here is proof. See this explosive interview Dr. Carrie Madej on covid shots’ DNA Modification – Injection of Nano-Technology through Hydrogel in Covid “vaccines” towards total Control – Transhumanism.
When it is ready, maybe already before, it will be applied to the western “better people”, what used to be the “White Supremacists”. To operate this nano-robots, the 5G-technology will come in handy. In fact, this is one of the key purposes of 5G. See this.
The Last American Vagabond (and several other online media) reports about self-spreading, self-amplifying vaccines, see this. Yet to be fully verified, a single vaccinated person could spread the vaccine to several other people in his / her environment. That would take care of the non-vaxxers.
According to an incisive article in Nature(July 27, 2020) a single vaccinated person could spread the vaccine to several other people in his / her environment:
“We are now poised to begin developing self-disseminating vaccines targeting a wide range of human pathogens, but important decisions remain about how they can be most effectively designed and used to target pathogens with a high risk of spillover and/or emergence.”
“Transmissible vaccines capable of infectious spread through a reservoir population reduce the vaccination effort required to suppress a target pathogen. With high enough transmission, a transmissible vaccine allows for autonomous pathogen eradication.” (emphasis added)
And it may have already happened, as there are several reports of especially non-vaccinated women, who had been in close contact with vaccinated people, and suffered symptoms of menstrual disorders, abortions – and, what it might amount to – infertility. Is that the purpose of “vaccine spreaders”? – “Implanted infertility, as one “branch” of the eugenics agenda?
Again, while we are still arguing about the validity and intricacies of the Great Reset – The Great Reset – or the Restructuring of the World Economy (IMF equivalent of the Great Reset), is already in full swing.
The America’s Frontline Doctors (AFLDS) interviewed former Pfizer Vice President and Chief Science Officer, Dr. Mike Yeadon, about his views on the COVID-19 vaccine, hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin, the regulatory authorities, and more.
At the outset, Dr. Yeadon said:
“I’m well aware of the global crimes against humanity being perpetrated against a large proportion of the world’s population.” He continued, “I feel great fear, but I’m not deterred from giving expert testimony to multiple groups of able lawyers like Rocco Galati in Canada and Reiner Fuellmich in Germany.” And, “I have absolutely no doubt that we are in the presence of evil (not a determination I’ve ever made before in a 40-year research career) and dangerous products.” See full interview here.
Residents decry it as a ‘criminal experiment’ by Bill Gates-backed biotechnology, see this.
The official purpose behind this plan is to release thousands of genetically modified mosquitoes in an effort to combat disease in the Florida Keys. The project has triggered dire concerns among locals, referring to a “criminal” experiment that will turn them into guinea pigs.
Spearheaded by the Florida Keys Mosquito Control District (FKMCD) and Oxitec, a British biotech firm that received backing from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the project aims to turn the first swarms of gene-edited bugs loose into the Keys starting sometime in early May 2021, as was announced in a joint statement.
For the first leg of the plan, set to be expanded later, mosquito boxes will be placed at six locations, which over 12 weeks will release around 144,000 Aedes aegypti mosquitoes, a species most closely linked with transmitting illnesses such as dengue, Zika and yellow fever. If all goes according to plan, the male, non-biting bugs will mate with local biting females, whose female offspring are programmed to die off, helping to control the Aedes aegypti population and reduce the spread of disease.
“We may not be scientists, but we read. And what Oxitec says and what we’re reading from other sources are two completely different things,”
One concerned resident said at a village council meeting, “I beg you, I implore you, to take immediate action [and] consider a resolution against this technology.”
And further, “I find it criminal that we are being bullied into this experiment – criminal that we are being subjected to this terrorism by our own Florida Keys Mosquito Control Board.” Even some elected officials expressed trepidation, calling the GMO mosquitoes “Frankenstein bugs.”
Similar exercises were carried out in Brazil with the Zika-bearing mosquito in 2016, also by Oxitec, also supported by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. The result was disastrous, as many of you may recall – knowingly or by accident? (RT, op cit)
The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, in short called DARPA, a semi-secretive Pentagon military think tank cum Research Institute, wants to spread genetically modified viruses… to ‘save crops’, or is it rather a “defensive bioweapon”?
A group of European scientists warns that a US military program dubbed ‘Insect Allies’ could be used as a biological weapon. The Pentagon’s research arm claims they are intended to defend crops, but doesn’t deny ‘dual-use’ potential. Researchers from the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology and the University of Freiburg in Germany, as well as the University of Montpellier, France, have published a critique of the program, dubbed “Insect Allies,” in the October 5 edition of Science.
They argue that
“the knowledge to be gained from this program appears very limited in its capacity to enhance US agriculture or respond to national emergencies” and therefore the program “may be widely perceived as an effort to develop biological agents for hostile purposes and their means of delivery,”
The people from the Florida Keys may have smelled a rat – and protested against these trials. Maybe what triggered their strong response was the fact that Bill Gates, a known eugenist [sic], sponsored this “trial”.
Only the future will tell whether they were right.
In the meantime, we are still living in a world where money buys everything, without regard to public interest. A system that definitely needs to be changed – but not with the likes of “The Great Reset” – which would put us right at the mercy of an ultra-capitalist directed global-control tyranny. NO WAY! NEVER!
All these octopus-like exercises around the globe, but particularly in the western world, point to a massive depopulation program, which should not surprise anyone.
Depopulation was in the Bilderberger’s Agenda already in the 1950’s – and was openly promoted by Henry Kissinger, a Rockefeller protégé, who in turn is one of the “fathers” of the eugenics agenda.
Conclusion – A Way Out
We, The People, must not despair.
As Dr. Carrie Madej says, we are very powerful beings, with an enormous potential to overcome the “dark forces” that resonate on a low level, but want to dominate us by instilling fear – fear is their most powerful weapon.
Under fear, we shed all our spiritual and heart-power; the power of LIFE. With fear we submit to their “power of darkness”, resonating on low levels.
Dr. Madej calls the worldwide catastrophe we are in, WWIII, without bombs, without bloodshed, but a war of the minds. A human energy war.
Take this – our heart is about 100,000 times stronger electrically and up to 5,000 times stronger magnetically than the brain. They can manipulate our brain, but not our heart. This enormous power comes in a high frequency – a frequency way higher than that of nano-chips or artificial bots and AI.
These “tools” only work because our brains have been conditioned by an endless rain of fear propaganda.
If we step outside this nefarious matrix, our heart can and will give us rebirth.
You may call it following a higher consciousness. We have an enormous spiritual power, an aura with an electric field that resonates on a high level, if we unite in solidarity.
In a strong person, this aura can be measured as high as 80 km (video at about 47:00 min.). We can beat this system – and we will, as both confidentially express in their videos, Dr. Carrie Madej, as well as Dr. Joseph Mercola. We shall overcome, and move from this “age of darkness” into a new age of light – into a new cycle, into a conscious civilization.
Peter Koenig is a geopolitical analyst and a former Senior Economist at the World Bank and the World Health Organization (WHO), where he has worked for over 30 years on water and environment around the world. He lectures at universities in the US, Europe and South America. He writes regularly for online journals and is the author of Implosion – An Economic Thriller about War, Environmental Destruction and Corporate Greed; andco-author of Cynthia McKinney’s book “When China Sneezes: From the Coronavirus Lockdown to the Global Politico-Economic Crisis” (Clarity Press – November 1, 2020);
He is a Research Associate of the Centre for Research on Globalization.
The Liberty Beacon Project (TLB) Mission Statement and Project Goals
The Mission (& Mission Statement) of The Liberty Beacon Project (TLB) is …“THE ERADICATION OF PROGRAMMED IGNORANCE”
To be accomplished by publishing pertinent websites and producing unbiased (alternative) media content. as well as to increase access to the abundance of coordinated alternative source media to We The People or to any and all who wish to be informed and educated as to reality in this climate of political, social, health and economic turmoil.
One thing we are all aware of is that the MainStream Media (MSM) is seriously remiss in its stated mission to keep the American people informed in real time on topics of importance by presenting timely and fact based reporting of events as they occur both in this country and across the globe. So TLB will do this in earnest knowing that an informed and educated society cannot and will not be subjugated!
In October 2019, shortly before the COVID outbreak, Gates and other powerful individuals began planning how to censor vaccine safety advocates from social media during a table-top simulation of a worldwide pandemic, known as Event 201.
Over the last two weeks, Facebook and other social media sites have deplatformed me and many other critics of regulatory corruption and authoritarian public health policies. So, here is some fodder for those of you who have the eerie sense that the government/industry pandemic response feels like it was planned — even before there was a pandemic.
The attached document shows that a cabal of powerful individuals did indeed begin planning the mass eviction of vaccine skeptics from social media in October 2019, a week or two before COVID began circulating. That month, Microsoft founder Bill Gates organized an exercise of four “table-top” simulations of a worldwide coronavirus pandemic with other high-ranking “Deep State” panjandrums. The exercise was referred to as Event 201.
Gates’ co-conspirators included representatives from the World Bank, the World Economic Forum (Great Reset), Bloomberg/Johns Hopkins University Populations Center, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, various media powerhouses, the Chinese government, a former Central Intelligence Agency/National Security Agency director (there is no such thing as a former CIA officer), vaccine maker Johnson & Johnson, the finance and biosecurity industries and Edelman, the world’s leading corporate PR firm.
At Gates’ direction, these eminences role-played members of a Pandemic Control Council, wargaming government strategies for controlling the pandemic, the narrative and the population. Needless to say, there was little talk of building immune systems, off-the-shelf remedies or off-patent therapeutic drugs and vitamins, but lots of chatter about promoting uptake of new patentable antiviral drugs and vaccines.
But the participants primarily focused on planning industry-centric, fear-mongering, police-state strategies for managing an imaginary global coronavirus contagion culminating in mass censorship of social media.
Oddly, Gates now claims that the simulation didn’t occur. On April 12, 2020, Gates told BBC, “Now here we are. We didn’t simulate this, we didn’t practice, so both the health policies and economic policies, we find ourselves in uncharted territory.”
Unfortunately for that whopper, the videos of the event are still available across the internet. They show that Gates and team did indeed simulate health and economic policies. It’s hard to swallow that Gates has forgotten.
Gates’s Event 201 simulated COVID epidemic caused 65 million deaths at the 18-month endpoint and global economic collapse lasting up to a decade. Compared to the Gates simulation, therefore, the actual COVID-19 crisis is a bit of a dud, having imposed a mere 2.5 million deaths “attributed to COVID” over the past 13 months.
The deaths “attributed to COVID” in the real-life situation are highly questionable, and must be seen in the context of a global population of 7.8 billion, with about 59 million deaths expected annually. The predictions of decade-long economic collapse will probably prove more accurate — but only because of the draconian lockdown promoted by Gates.
Gates’ Event 201 script imagines vast anti-vaccine riots triggered by internet posts. The universal and single-minded presumption among its participants was that such a crisis would prove an opportunity of convenience to promote new vaccines, and tighten controls by a surveillance and censorship state.
Segment four of the script — on manipulation and control of public opinion — is most revealing. It uncannily predicted democracy’s current crisis:
The participants discussed mechanisms for controlling “disinformation” and “misinformation,” by “flooding” the media with propaganda (“good information”), imposing penalties for spreading falsehoods and discrediting the anti-vaccination movement.
Jane Halton, of Australia’s ANZ Bank, one of the authors of Australia’s oppressive “no jab, no pay” policy, assured the participants that Gates Foundation is creating algorithms “to sift through information on these social media platforms” to protect the public from dangerous thoughts and information.
George Gao, the prescient director of the Chinese Center for Disease Control, worries about how to suppress “rumors” that the virus is laboratory generated: “People believe, ‘This is a manmade’… [and that] some pharmaceutical company made the virus.”
Chen Huang, an Apple research scientist, Google scholar and the world’s leading expert on tracking and tracing and facial recognition technology, role-plays the newscaster reporting on government countermeasures. He blames riots on anti-vaccine activists and predicts that Twitter and Facebook will cooperate in “identify[ing] and delete[ing] a disturbing number of accounts dedicated to spreading misinformation about the outbreak” and to implement “internet shutdowns … to quell panic.”
Tara Kirk Sell, a senior scholar at Bloomberg School of Health’s Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, worries that pharmaceutical companies are being accused of introducing the virus so they can make money on drugs and vaccines: “[We] have seen public faith in their products plummet.” She notes with alarm that “Unrest, due to false rumors and divisive messaging, is rising and is exacerbating spread of the disease as levels of trust fall and people stop cooperating with response efforts. This is a massive problem, one that threatens governments and trusted institutions.”
Sell reminds her fellow collaborators that “We know that social media is now the primary way that many people get their news, so interruptions to these platforms could curb the spread of misinformation.” There are many ways, Sell advises, for government and industry allies to accomplish this objective: “Some governments have taken control of national access to the Internet. Others are censoring websites and social media content and a small number have shut down Internet access completely to prevent the spread of misinformation. Penalties have been put in place for spreading harmful falsehoods, including arrests.”
Matthew Harrington, CEO of Edelman Public Relations agrees that social media must fall in line to promote government policy: “I also think we’re at a moment where the social media platforms have to step forward and recognize the moment to assert that they’re a technology platform and not a broadcaster is over. They in fact have to be a participant in broadcasting accurate information and partnering with the scientific and health communities to counterweight, if not flood the zone, of accurate information. Because to try to put the genie back in the bottle of misinformation and disinformation is not possible.”
Stephen Redd, the Admiral of the Public Health Service, has the sinister notion that government should mine social media data to identify people with negative beliefs: “I think with the social media platforms, there’s an opportunity to understand who it is that’s susceptible … to misinformation, so I think there’s an opportunity to collect data from that communication mechanism.”
Adrian Thomas of Johnson & Johnson announces “some important news to share from some of “our member companies [Pharma]”: We are doing clinical trials in new antiretrovirals, and in fact, in vaccines!” He recommends a strategy to address the problems to these companies when “rumors were actually spreading” that their shoddily tested products “are causing deaths and so patients are not taking them anymore.” He suggests, “Maybe we’re making the mistake of reporting and counting all the fatalities and infections.”
Former CIA deputy director, Avril Haines unveiled a strategy to “flood the zone” with propaganda from “trusted sources,” including “influential community leaders, as well as health workers.” He warns about “false information that is starting to actually hamper our ability to address the pandemic, then we need to be able to respond quickly to it.”
Matthew Harrington (Edelman CEO) observes that the Internet — which once promised the decentralization and democratization of information — now needs to be centralized: “I think just to build a little bit on what Avril said, I think as in previous conversations where we’ve talked about centralization around management of information or public health needs, there needs to be a centralized response around the communications approach that then is cascaded to informed advocates, represented in the NGO communities, the medical professionals, et cetera.”
Tom Inglesby (John Hopkins biosecurity expert advisor to the National Institutes of Health, the Pentagon and Homeland Security) agrees that centralized control is needed: “You mean centralized international?”
Matthew Harrington (Edelman) replies that information access should be: “Centralized on an international basis, because I think there needs to be a central repository of data facts and key messages.”
Hasti Taghi (Media Advisor) sums up: “The anti-vaccine movement was very strong and this is something specifically through social media that has spread. So as we do the research to come up with the right vaccines to help prevent the continuation of this, how do we get the right information out there? How do we communicate the right information to ensure that the public has trust in these vaccines that we’re creating?”
Kevin McAleese, communications officer for Gates-funded agricultural projects, observes that: “To me, it is clear countries need to make strong efforts to manage both mis- and disinformation. We know social media companies are working around the clock to combat these disinformation campaigns. The task of identifying every bad actor is immense. This is a huge problem that’s going to keep us from ending the pandemic and might even lead to the fall of governments, as we saw in the Arab Spring. If the solution means controlling and reducing access to information, I think it’s the right choice.”
Tom Inglesby, director of Bloomberg’s Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security concurs, asking if “In this case, do you think governments are at the point where they need to require social media companies to operate in a certain way?”
Lavan Thiru, Singapore’s Finance Minister suggests that the government might make examples of dissidents with “government or enforcement actions against fake news. Some of us, this new regulations are come in place about how we deal with fake news. Maybe this is a time for us to showcase some cases where we are able to bring forward some bad actors and leave it before the courts to decide whether they have actually spread some fake news.”
Read the attached transcript to see how Gates and his government, pharma and intelligence apparatus telegraphed their plans to censor and control the media during the pandemic. In yet another uncanny coincidence, COVID-19 began circulating among global populations within days of Gates’ meeting.
While I have been focusing on the Dem-Marxists supporting the Biden Crime Syndicate, Justin Smith submitted two persuasive articles on Dem-Marxist COVID despotism and Bill Gates’ involvement with faulty Globalist scientists/doctors forcing their errors on America (and the world for that matter). Of particular interest in the second submission is the dubious efficacy a rapidly created COVID vaccine might have on recipients.
In full disclosure I’ve never been an anti-vaxxer. However before I consider taking any COVID vaccination I am going to wait and see how it affects the sheeple before I allow an unknown to be injected in my body. (Just as an aside, you might be amused to know my wife is an anti-vaxxer. You can imagine the interesting family discussions in today’s COVID despotic society.)
ALSO due to the lateness of sharing this important info from Justin Smith, I did not do my typical diligence making sure Justin’s info is backed up. Justin is a trustworthy individual but if you question an assertion, do some of your own sleuthing.
Your generosity is always appreciated – various credit, check
Many of my countrymen now know that which they long suspected was in fact correct. The response to COVID-19, from health officials in the federal government, specifically the CDC, and many state and local governments, including here in Tennessee and Nashville, has been the greatest fraud ever perpetrated on the American public, and now the people who love freedom and liberty want the intentional manipulations and fear-mongering to facilitate a political agenda, from the earliest stages of this “plandemic”, to carry a heavy penalty, including prison time. This sort of egregious criminal nonsense that predicted 2.2 million deaths based on fraudulent models and used emergency declarations to ignore our inalienable rights, harming us all financially, physically and mentally, must never again be possible under any government presiding over the American people; and, along with the Truth, my countrymen demand that our rights be restored.
Although the World Health Organization (WHO) has just recently reversed itself on mask mandates and acknowledged that the constant wearing of masks is harmful, incredibly, there are some in America who still wish to force them on us all, such as Professor Michael Osterholm of Minnesota’s CDC and Minneapolis Fed President Neel Kashkari, and even worse, they are calling for a second lockdown to help fight “the Virus”, Covid, that is nowhere near the existential threat they have presented it to be. They are joined by WHO spokesperson, Dr Margaret Harris, as she suggested on September 22nd 2020 that a “second wave of Covid” is on its way this winter, and America and the world would need to shutdown once again, in preparation for it.
This is sheer asinine bull-pucky and insane given the data and the real facts of the matter, but given that so many are still so intent on raising themselves up to the level of a King and a dictator, however malevolent or benevolent a picture they present, it is good to recall our War for Independence, when the American people arose as a body of men and women against a multitude of grievances.
Fortunately a few good men and women can still be found within the ranks of litigators and the judiciary, and in several states now, the fight against lockdowns and mask mandates is growing and yielding some great success:
In Michigan, on October 2nd 2020, Justice Stephen Markham of the State Supreme Court wrote the majority opinion noting that Governor Gretchen Whitmer didn’t have the authority to arbitrarily extend the Covid Lockdown after April 30th 2020, although she claimed the authority under two emergency acts from 1945 and 1976. Whitmer illegitimately delegated legislative authority to the executive branch, according to Markham.
Judge Mike McHaney from Clay County, Illinois, recently delivered a ruling that Governor JB Pritzker did not have the authority to extend his emergency orders beyond their original 30 days, stating that any emergency powers stemming from the Covid virus outbreak terminated on April 8th 2020. And staying true to his malevolent, high-handed, despotic nature, Pritzker ignored McHaney’s rulings and appealed them, whereupon August 14th, McHaney ordered Pritzker to appear in court to face contempt of court charges.
In the case of Dane County, Wisconsin, the State Supreme Court properly ruled four to three that the county’s Emergency Order #9, issued on August 21st 2020, did not have the weight of law behind it. The court noted that “local health officers do not appear to have statutory authority to do what the Order commands”, i.e. to carry out the “broad closure of schools.” This same line of reasoning should be applied state by state and county by county, where many other similar abuses have occurred.
To their credit, a board of supervisors in Placer County, California unilaterally lifted the state of emergency in their county, because they used good common sense and logic. Their county had experienced only 39 deaths from Covid between February 2020 and July 1st 2020, which placed their overall infection rate at 0.0008%, and so, it did not make any good sense to force any sort of lockdown and added burden on its people.
And in September, upholding a principle many politicians choose to ignore or forget, U.S. District Judge William Stickman, in Pennsylvania, put all of our so-called “leaders” on notice, as he stated “the Constitution sets certain lines that may not be crossed, even in an emergency.” He further noted that lockdowns violate the right of assembly guaranteed by the First Amendment and the 14th Amendment’s guarantees of due process and equal protection.
So one can readily see the problems that arise, when “the law” becomes whatever some bureaucrat says it is.
There is also a push against “the Virus” hoax by thousands of doctors and medical professionals who have recently circulated a petition, as part of [JOS]The Great Barrington Declaration, a study completed by Dr. Martin Kulldorff of Harvard, Dr. Sunetra Gupta of Oxford and Dr. Jayanta Bhattacharya of Stanford. They recently announced their concerns on October 5th, as they consented to an interview with Laura Ingraham at Fox News. [Blog Editor: Justin provided this Youtube link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D4GnCLDbra4. GASP! Youtube censored the video with the lame excuse of violating Fox News copyright. HOWEVER my suspicion the Ingraham interview included people provided medical science anathema to control-freak Dem-Marxist Globalist discredited science. So I looked around and found on the Brighteon video format which I believe Justin tried to share:
The corporate media refuse to publish this news, so, it is necessary that you verify it or find other sources of information to spread it and thus prevent evil from gaining control over our planet.
2020 10 07 Top infectious disease epidemiologists along with over 80,000 supporters including scientists, medical practitioners, politicians and the general public have all signed the viral Great Barrington Declaration. Dr. Martin Kulldorff, Sunetra Gupta and Jay Bhattacharya join Laura Ingraham to make their case for herd immunity strategy and a return to a free society. You can read and sign the declaration here: https://gbdeclaration.org
Part of the study states that Covid is not a “death sentence”, since very nearly one-hundred percent of those people under age 70 survive it and nearly ninety-five percent of those who are older than 70 survive Covid.
During the course of the interview with Laura Ingraham, Dr. Jayanta Bhattacharya stated: “I think we’ve created this idea in the public mind that it is something so unique and so deadly that we should utterly end all normal existence as a result of it. That’s not right. We have a much better way. Protect the vulnerable. Shield them for a short period of time until we reach a level where there is a population immunity. And for the rest of the world, let us live our lives.”
Just as Americans were aggrieved and infuriated by the Intolerable Acts, the New Englander Restraining Act, the Stamp Act of 1765, the Townshend Act of 1767 and the Proclamation of 1763, so too does the actions of our governments today represent atrocious and despicable acts against the people, whether it was forcing them to stay home unable to work and care properly for their families, wrecking entire businesses and industries irresponsibly and most unnecessarily, damaging their health through the demand they constantly don a mask and too often arresting them without any just cause, like the time Alecia Kitts was arrested for not wearing a mask outdoors in Ohio. Just as King George III pushed the Colonists to the very edge and beyond, our own petty despots and wannabe kings are doing the very same thing to the American society who see through their arbitrary and tyrannical machinations that serve no real purpose other than expanding the power of governors and other petty bureaucrats, with no respect for the U.S. Constitution and the Bill of Rights.
At issue in the late 1700s was freedom and liberty, and all the Stamp Act and the Tea Act did was to illuminate the fact that the Colonists were actually receiving less rights than a subject on mainland Britain was, These acts revealed the extent of the corrupt ideas being forced upon them by an all-powerful, supposedly “divine”, king, and they were already run ragged by years of war, experiencing a credibly massive wealth gap, much as today, having a really hard time to make ends meet.
And so too, the issue remains the same today, one of freedom and liberty, and “the Virus” has dragged our own government’s corruption and deceptions into the limelight. Just as the Stamp Act sought to impose government control, a middle man, over literally every aspect of the new colonial life, so too did the agents facilitating this Covid hoax aspire to control our lives; just as the Stamp Act dictated which items people could purchase for both businesses and pleasure or entertainment, from household items and necessities to methods of communication, magazines and newspapers, and everything necessary for the proper management of societies contracts, marriage licenses, mortgages and the like.
Isn’t this exactly what we have been experiencing and living under, as mayors and governors have picked winners and losers, arbitrarily allowing big corporate businesses, like Walmart, to stay open, while demanding that small Mom and Pop businesses close their doors? Forcing some bars and restaurants to close, while allowing others to remain open, without any real rhyme or reason?
Isn’t this precisely what Governor Tom Wolf of Pennsylvania did?
Basically, Wolf arbitrarily decided which businesses could operate during his lockdown, but the distinctions he made were not based on logic or anything resembling a well thought plan; and they had absolutely nothing to do with the transmission of Covid in any readily visible or authentic manner. Small businesses were banned from selling appliances, groceries, hair products, liquor and furniture among other items, while the Big Corporate Retailers were deemed “life-sustaining” and “essential” and allowed to sell the very same products. Wolf’s decree shifted transactions from one place to another without placing any restriction on the people to stop them from going to these stores. So Wolf and his team must not have thought Covid was all that much a problem — no — it was merely a great fabricated “crisis” to be used to their own ends, and damn the people.
This in part motivate Judge Stickman’s conclusion that such capricious dictates cannot pass any inspection even under the highly deferential “rational basis” test, as applied to economic regulations and equal protection claims outside of cases involving race and religion. Stickman noted, “Distinctions cannot be arbitrary or irrational and pass scrutiny.”
By the Stickman Rule, it can be concluded that the entire national lockdown, the mask mandates and every other measure coming from this Covid Hoax doesn’t pass scrutiny.
Patrick Wright, from the legal department at Mackinac Center for Public Policy, finely placed this time in proper perspective, when earlier this month, he told NewsOne, the following: “The United States Constitution was created at a time of conflict. It isn’t something that is meant to be turned off every time the situation gets difficult. It is a process that is meant to serve us, both in times of calm and in times of emergency.”
Just as our ancestors rose up during the Boston Tea Party of 1773 or rejected the Stamp Act in 1765, Americans today must now and forever more reject the notion that it’s acceptable and permissible for government officials from any quarter to assume the right and authority to suppress or suspend our Constitution and Inalienable Rights in any manner whatsoever, at anytime, anywhere and any place, crisis or not.
Even though we have seen some few judges uphold our nation’s founding virtues and principles and attempt to defend and protect American’s inalienable rights, there have been many all too willing to also uphold the tyranny decreed by numerous governors and mayors, regarding specific aspects of certain lockdown edicts, such as the recent ruling handed down by Federal District Judge Kiyo Matsumoto, that upheld New York Governor Cuomo’s restrictions limiting indoor gatherings in severe “red” Covid-19 areas to ten people; I won’t beat the statistics to death again, since they have long been addressed and shown to be hyped to an unbelievable measure, that descends to the lowest, most devious sort of deception, but regardless of how one sees the danger of Covid, even if it is ten times as deadly as stated, it does not justify or warrant the violation of our religious liberties, as guaranteed under the U.S. Constitution, and for the life of me, it goes beyond the pale that any judge could say with a straight face that this does not violate our inalienable rights.
The government is either attempting the impossible, by trying to remove all risk from life, or it is moving towards a great reset and a “new normal”, wherein the Bill of Rights means nothing at all. Whatever the case may be, it is taking away our absolute right — Our Freedom to Choose — where and when to go wherever we wish, regardless of any perceived danger. If I wish to enter a worship hall filled to the rooftop with congregants, whether every single one of them is infected with Covid, that Is My Choice — That IS MY RIGHT.
As the King James Bible reads in Isaiah 41:10:
“Fear thou not; for I am with thee: be not dismayed; for I am thy God: I will strengthen thee; yea, I will help thee; yea, I will uphold thee with the right hand of my righteousness.”
Americans can take an assortment of actions to stand for freedom and liberty across our nation, however, the legal process isn’t always effective as we are witnessing far too often today, since many times, the judiciary is more corrupt than words can describe and the courts are rigged, presided over by corrupt, bought judges who don’t want to rock the boat, or disturb the political hierarchy. The most powerful solution lies in a peaceful mass refusal to comply with illegal and illegitimate executive orders and edicts, by such a massive critical gathering of Americans in a region, that they become too big to ignore. A gathering of sufficient size refusing to acquiesce, cooperate or obey makes it clear to the few tyrants that we are not their subjects to command.
Freedom-loving Americans, who seek to have their children and their children’s children, and generations beyond, always living free with the greatest amount of personal liberty, must never again accept or allow such moves against our inalienable rights by “experts” and advisors, who hold no exclusive authority in this realm. None of our leaders have ever been elected with the prospect of the severe restriction of our individual liberty in mind, and yet, they have moved against the entire Bill of Rights on the basis of a “crisis”, which has now been proven to have been grossly exaggerated and long been gone, done and over, for all practical purposes and intent. And as such, we must pass legislation limiting our executive’s power in all areas across the board, all states, preventing future abuses of power and lockdowns in America, where lockdowns were never a part of our national identity or thought to be principled for the most part.
Reject, rebuke, censure, impeach and remove all politicians and eradicate all government entities and bureaucracies that make light of freedom and liberty within America and think crises or any other excuse for an “emergency” make Constitutional restraints and the Bill of Rights irrelevant. Never again let anyone so bastardize, twist and manipulate U.S. code to the point that any future generation is forced to endure another dramatic inversion of the concept of liberty, in our supposedly free society, as Americans have endured for months now: Restore our liberty and freedom.
By Justin O. Smith
“The Virus” Vaccine Foreshadows America’s Future
America’s New Surreal and Dystopian Reality?
By Justin O. Smith
Sent 10/16/2020 3:19 AM
“The Virus” hit American towns like the Big Top Circus blowin’ into town and had its final show, for now, culminating with President Trump catching COVID-19 on October 2nd and admitted into Walter Reed National Military Medical Center on October 5th, and in the meantime, [JOS]there was a World Vaccine Congress that had just wrapped up a four day virtual conference on October 1st. It showcased 300 speakers, and it was attended by thousands, including representatives from Big Pharma, the military, the Department of Health and Human Services and many Non-Governmental Organizations, with Dr. Anthony “Dr Doom” Fauci opening the meeting as one of the first keynote speakers, certain to place his imprimatur on anything Bill Gates has proposed for him to advance as an acceptable vaccine for America and the world. [Bold text Editor’s]
All America remembers President Trump’s assurances that any vaccine forthcoming from this recent virus “crisis” would be a voluntary matter, for anyone to accept or reject. I won’t be taking the vaccine, come hell or highwater, but that’s just me. The evidence suggests that it is not going to be something beneficial to us, and that in fact, it will arrive to a point where it is used as a means of control over all society, and there is already a movement underway to eventually require everybody across the globe, including here in America, to take the vaccine; and, I would recommend avoiding taking it like it contained the plague.
Does anyone recall President Trump stating the “military would be used to distribute the vaccine in a very powerful way”?
A military panel was present at the WVC, and it discussed challenges and the strategies required to successfully handle them. People such as myself, those who might resist taking the vaccine, whether from religious reasons or concern over its safety, given its rushed schedule to production, were labeled extremists and Nazis.
But would our government really go so far as to force us to take the vaccine? The answer is yes, and there’s also a greater agenda underlying their involvement, once one considers the nanotechnology employed by Moderna.
Last year, the National Security Commission on Artificial Intelligence (NSCAI) called for the U.S. to adopt an AI-driven mass surveillance system far beyond anything seen anywhere else in the world, in order to ensure American hegemony in artificial intelligence [Blog Editor: Justin provided the pdf link to the NSCAI study referenced. Without even reading the 124 page pdf, the title should tell all the nefarious intent you should know: “Chinese Tech Landscape Overview”]. Now, with the advent of “the Virus”, many of the obstacles that had previously prevented its implementation have been swiped away in a single motion under the pretense of combating “the Virus”, a non-threat “threat” and an excuse to grow government power and further diminish the average person’s individual liberty and ability to withstand and reject the too often deep intrusions of government authority upon us all.
This makes studies like the one Yale University did in July even more the worrisome, as its researchers looked at strategies using one’s trust in science, government paid financial incentives [rewards/ bribes] and even guilt and embarrassing non-compliant individuals into taking the vaccine. They were striving to move participants to persuade others to receive the vaccine, by using fear of being treated as a second class citizen and less than a desirable member of society, essentially attempting to create a successful propaganda program to prompt everybody to willing line up to be injected.
On September 16th 2020, the CDC released their initial report [JOS link to CDC report entitled, “COVID-19 Vaccination Program Interim Playbook for Jurisdiction Operations” – 57 pages] detailing a possible phased progression, on page 11, to complete delivery of the vaccine, starting with healthcare workers. Once enough vaccines are manufactured, a partnership between government and corporations will emerge to facilitate the total distribution of the vaccine, even using churches as focal points for the Community Emergency Response Teams and mobile vaccine units.
Some quaking Covid Cowards, with a string of letters from the alphabet behind their names, wrote an article on June 26th in the New England Journal of Medicine, entitled, [JOS] “Ensuring Uptake of Vaccines against SARS-CoV-2” (i.e. COVID). And it readily becomes apparent that Michelle M. Mello, J.D., Ph.D., Ross D. Silverman, J.D., M.P.H., and Saad B. Omer, M.B., B.S., M.P.H. care nothing for one’s liberty and freedom or basic personal freedoms as they join the authoritarians one might see in a fiction novel like 1984 and Brave New World, as they write: “… noncompliance should incur a penalty [and] relatively substantive penalties could be justified, including employment suspension or stay-at-home orders for persons in designated high-priority groups who refuse vaccination.” Continuing, these mouthpieces for the new age of tyranny also suggested that fines should be discouraged due to their legal shaky ground, and the fact they “may stoke distrust without improving uptake.”
In June, one reporter from Wired set up a question for Bill Gates: “President Trump has made no secret of his desire to see a vaccine soon, ideally before the November elections. How worried are you, Bill, that the approval process is being hijacked by politics?” Gates responded: “Well that would be a tragedy, and any suggestion that … a politician helped create the vaccine or hasten it is a very dangerous thing.” But somehow, it does appear Gates or the reporter missed the irony of Gates reply. How is a private billionaire, such as Gates, doing the same thing any better?
What about the FDA? the CDC? America has already witnessed several sets of flawed information and science emanating from both agencies, from people, such as Dr Fauci, who is as tight as a tick on a hound with the Director General of WHO Tedros Adhanom and Gates, who have politicized “the Virus” and the hoped for vaccine, to the point they have damaged the public’s confidence in anything they now say. Polls reveal a third of Americans will refuse to get vaccinated — intelligent folks, I’d say — and a majority of Americans believe a vaccine is being rushed.
At this point in time, with the fact that COVID-19 is, in fact, a non-threat for the most part, to the greatest majority of Americans, having an approximate 99.62% survival rate, the entire country should be up in arms and asking why are we still in a nationwide State of Emergency, with most of the states taking even more stringent measures than the federal government ever initially recommended? And just why is the Covid Vaccine still be rushed forward so swiftly? From all the current unfolding events and information, it would seem the answers are money and governmental and societal control.
Taking a closer look at the World Vaccine Congress, one notices that top executives from Janssen, Pfizer, Merck, Moderna, GSK and other pharmaceutical developers and manufacturers were in attendance, and one of the most sensitive topics centered on their intention to use messenger ribonucleic acid — mRNA technology — for the vaccine’s delivery. mRNA carries genetic instructions that act as blueprints for every cell to become a specific type of cell, in its final development stage, whatever that might create.
At the front of the pack, in the race to create this vaccine, one finds Moderna, founded by Derrick Rossi, in 2010, who accidentally discovered mRNA technology, which he explained as a way to “reprogram” the molecules that carry genetic instructions for the cell development in the human body, [and] all biological lifeforms. This represented a new way to produce any kind of a cell within a biological organism, radically changing the course of modern medicine and science, and as it was such a cutting edge technology, it attracted almost a half billion dollars in federal award monies to be directed at creating vaccines using this technology.
Over the years, this technology has expanded and led to more sophisticated implantable technologies and the creation of hydrogel and nanotechnology, advanced by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency and its Biological Technologies Office, with the goal of gaining FDA approval, so consumers may soon get the sensors implanted to monitor any number of body functions, as its ultra-advanced design even allows it to interact with a wireless network, like 5G.
Profusa, Inc is the private company created using millions of dollars from Dr. Fauci’s National Institute of Health and DARPA for the purpose of marketing this technology. In March 2020, Profusa made “the Virus” scene, when it announced an injectable biochip for detection of viral respiratory diseases, including COVID-19.
There’s been an extreme shift in our government, and over the past decade, too many corrupt dealings have been the rule of the day, but for 2020, the primary focus has been on “the Virus” and Bill Gates has been pushed to the forefront as the face of those supposedly leading the charge against it, the one to “save the day” for America and the world.
However, whenever Gates isn’t spending billions of dollars on projects to develop a global surveillance system, geo-engineer blocking the sun’s rays, recycle feces into water [and actually expecting people to drink it] or have comic book artists paint him as a super-hero, he’s been spending billions on experimental vaccines and birth control technologies, up to and including a remote-controlled micro-chip implant.
That all may sound crazy, but it has actually already happened. These aren’t theories. They’re just the plain fact of the matter.
Why is any of this important one might wonder. It’s important to know who Gates is and what he intends, since most of those companies, researchers, scientists and corporate pharmaceutical heads involved in the current search for a COVID-19 vaccine are all directly tied to Gates, in one fashion or another.
President Trump’s main man behind “Operation Warp Speed” and the vaccine initiative is Dr. Moncef Slaoui, the former head of pharma giant GlaxoSmithKline’s vaccine division, who had to quit the board of directors at Moderna to take the job, as he dumped over $10 million in Moderna stock, after it briefly skyrocketed in price following the announcement of promising early vaccine trial results. Currently he sits on several boards of companies involved in vaccine development and bioelectronics.
Unfortunately, this makes the President seem to be out of touch with the reality of what is transpiring under his nose, or he is actually advancing the agenda of Big Pharma for some inexplicable reason.
Dr Slauoi and GSK have a long twenty-seven year history of working with the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation [JOS]Trump Appoints Big Pharma Exec Connected to Bill Gates to Head Vaccine Developments on projects such as the development of anti-HIV compounds used as microbicides and a malaria vaccine, and they ultimately partnered with Gates on a $600 million malaria vaccine. Shortly after Slauoi took the helm at GSK, his predecessor, Tachi Yamada, joined the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, noted by Derrick Broze on May 15th in The American Vagabond.
Screen Capture from JOS email – Donald Trump – Moncef Slaoui
Look at Gates, a billionaire worth $106 billion, and supposedly the second wealthiest man on the planet. His wealth is greater than that of thirty-eight countries. And, with President Trump starting a year long process of removing the United States from the World Health Organization and halting U.S. funding for the WHO, in April 2020, Bill Gates is left as the WHO’s number one financial donor. This largesse gives Gates an undue and extraordinary influence over the WHO’s agenda.
And no one exactly saw the media jumping all over themselves to report the fact that this man also is the guy who government officials are running to — left and right — to promote everywhere they can, in the face of this situation. And the media was supposed to be our unofficial Fourth Branch of Government … right? The protection of who’s press freedom was protected in the First Amendment, spelled out in the Bill of Rights has been solidly undermined by billionaire philanthropies over the last century.
Gates, through his Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, has been funding everything from our media outlets to journalism institutes around the globe for years, giving money over time to big names like ABC, NBC, National Public Radio, BBC, London Guardian, Al Jazeera, Univision Medium, the Atlantic, Financial Times, that’s just naming a few, and not to mention organizations like the Investigative Center for Reporting, or charitable organization outlets affiliated with major news organizations like BBC Media Action or the New York Times Media Cases Fund.
The man, who once paid to have himself portrayed as a comic book super-hero, has also funded media companies, that then went on to create so-called “documentaries, that then depicted Gates in a positive light. See how that worked?
Gates recently told NBC that “a lot of people” will eventually need to take a second “super-effective” vaccine to combat the Covid Virus that might be years away. He and others seem intent on eliminating it altogether, as so many authoritarian types seem to suggest it is government’s and society’s obligation to remove all risk from life, before life can return to normal, here in America and across the globe, and yet, what they propose is so far from “normal” as to present a new reality that is both surreal and dystopian.
Consider that a person may find their computer inoperable, unless one accepts the ever insistent “upgrades” we are constantly deluged with from the internet cloud and Windows. There’s just not a lot of alternative choices. And similarly, the current movement, largely from the corner of America’s leftists and outright communists hope to use this vaccine to usher in the same sort of Social Credit system utilized in China. Without a vaccine and an associated micro-chip implant in one’s body, or at the very minimum an actual digital certificate of some type to be presented everywhere one goes in the public arena, those new authoritarians hope to be able to tell each of us, either we comply with their every demand or we suffer, pushed to the fringe of society as second class citizens, or worse.
Quite telling and perhaps a bit foreshadowing even, one of the intro screens to Windows 10 even uses a visual metaphor that likens its users to sheep.
So this man, this ordinary man, an unelected nobody despite his wealth, has become one of the main faces of the so-called “health crisis of 2020. He’s made all these media rounds, where breathless pundits and “journalists” promote him everywhere as our “savior”, asking “why didn’t we listen to him”, and in the meantime, it’s also glaringly apparent this year that Gates believes himself to be at a level of authority, where he can actually get by with telling us all, that we’re going to “have to be approved”, after this non-crisis “crisis” is over, to be granted permission to enter businesses again. And such “permission” will be received after one accepts one of his novel vaccines that he’s funded, complete with its digital code to prove we’ve received it.
In a March 18th 2020 Reddit “Ask Me Anything” session, Gates is quotes saying: “Eventually we will have some digital certificates to show who has recovered or been tested recently, or when we have a vaccine, who has received it.”
Gates is saying that everybody is going to be required to have authorization through a new system put in place, as described in one area as a “digital certificate”, that he asserts we will be expected to use in the real world. So everybody will “NEED” the vaccine.
So, the large majority of people in the world are going to go from using windows to access their computer and the internet to now being required to use whatever this new digital certificate will be, as a portal, a pass card, to transact business and participate in society in the physical world.
So let’s think about this.
Though these modern new age devices and technologies offer benefit and innovation, they are not necessary, for the most part, nor should they become necessary to our lives. Men and women managed to live just fine long before these systems and devices were placed in our hands, and we certainly don’t require any new age overseers using technology to drive us down into a condition of serfdom. That these systems and platforms would act as a check to our access to many avenues of that necessary and preexisting portion of life and connection in physical society is repugnant and reprehensible. These suggested controls directed against society and individuals and any new vaccine emanating from this current vaccine drive must be rejected solidly by the people, who need to become free-thinking enough again to recognize what’s really at stake here.
Americans are not serfs, not yet. We are not victims. We are free born men and women. And we must unite in one voice against these new age tyrants, stating in no uncertain terms that we are still a free and independent people, unwilling to relinquish our bodies to their experiments and control or to be subjugated by any means, period.
Refuse to legitimize these new controls over all society and the “ruling elite”, the petty tyrants, who seek to use them for their own ends, and refuse to consent to any fundamental shift away from our Inalienable God-given Rights. Revoke their presumptive authority and deny them any further bond with the people. And in essence, reset the balance of power, even should that reset one day require “Watering the Tree of Liberty with the Blood of Tyrants”.
These things are supposed to be benefitting our lives, not stripping us away to abject submission to digital slavery. And though it seems as though people are nonchalant in giving away their consent and abandoning their individual sovereignty, we need to once more recall that our own freedom and liberty is a precious jewel, the essential heart of our existence here on earth, graced by our God. All people are, and have a right to be, sovereign and free. And nobody has any right to separate us — to cut us away — from that condition of our life. As much as we have scorned those who have attempted to do so in previous centuries, we should vehemently scorn any such attempt today. Although it may occur without the literal implementation of intimidation and chains; nonetheless revoking the natural state of God-given inherent freedom on the modern half-digital, half-physical frontier is unacceptable, and it can only be answered by way of the strongest refusal to comply, no matter how that manifests itself.
By Justin O. Smith
Edited by John R. Houk
Most embedded links are by Justin O. Smith the rest by the Blog Editor. Text enclosed by brackets are by the Editor.
Plandemic One focused on the story of unrighteously much vilified Dr. Judy Mikovits being framed and maligned by Dr. Anthony Fauci and that relationship to today’s COVID-19. I posted the Bitchute version of Plandemic One on my blog due to Youtube and Big Tech censorship of truth.
Now thanks to News Target, I am posting the Brighteon video version of Plandemic II which can also be viewed and downloaded from the Plandemic website. (The embeds will show up on my Blogger blog, but on my WordPress version, you’ll have to click the Brighteon link to watch.)
Plandemic II focuses more on the corruption of Dr. Fauci, W.H.O. and the CDC. Overcome lying censorship by sharing copiously. FULL video of Plandemic II at the end of the News Target post – READ & WATCH. (Bonus info at the end of full video: Bill Gates – Jeffrey Epstein connection!)
Your generosity is always appreciated – various credit, check
The bombshell new film, “Plandemic II: inDOCTORnation” was released yesterday, and this film unleashes bombshell after bombshell about Dr. Fauci, the CDC, the WHO, the corrupt vaccine industry, the NIH under Obama, and the whole pandemic scam that was deliberately engineered using a real virus to enslave humanity and earn billions in profits for Big Pharma.
Amazingly, the entire film has been released for free by its creator Mikki Willis, who you can find at PlandemicSeries.com (which appears to be under attack and not functioning at press time).
Consider this film to be a “must-see” documentary that will absolutely blow your mind and forever change your understanding of the total corruption of the “science” establishment and the for-profit medical system. In essence, a group of evil people built this virus and released it onto the world so they could crush humanity and earn billions in profits. Even more shockingly, this isn’t the first time they’ve tried this.
See these amazing snippets / outtakes from the film
Another channel on Brighteon called “Sharing for Humanity” has been posting snippets from the film that are incredibly powerful. Each snippet shows a particular issue in just 2-3 minutes, making these “bite-sized” episodes to share with others. These are powerful snippets that you’ve got to see.
Guided by the meticulous work of Dr. David E. Martin, Plandemic II: Indoctornation, tracks a three decade-long money trail that leads directly to the key players behind the COVID 19 pandemic. Plandemic II connects the dots between all forms of media, the medical industry, politics and the financial industry to unmask the major conflicts of interests with the decision makers that are currently managing this crisis.