Today I am sharing three videos (except in the case of my WordPress Blog readers, it will be four videos due to embed issues). There is no direct theme between the videos yet indirectly they are related to what the threat to personal Liberty appears to be.
The first video is just a little over six minutes long. It was picked up by a Bitchute Channel I subscribe to with no relevant info in the description. The video itself is narrated by “The Philosopher” which you might know who she is, I do not. The video is a short, to-the-point history of the tyrannical tentacles of MK Ultra. A dark money CIA program breaking down Constitutional barriers to experiment on Americans. It’s not mentioned in the video, but reminds me a lot of today’s Globalist/Dem-Marxist fearmongering control instituted by a manufactured COVID crisis: “HOW THE CIA EXPERIMENTED WITH MIND CONTROL UNDER OPERATION MKULTRA.”
The second video is a 3:25 minute monologue of Paul Joseph Watson mocking UK tyranny of sending police to arrest people mocking transgender idiocy. It might be the UK, but it is the same society advocated by American Dem-Marxists who would criminalize those who stand with the Creator that only two genders exist: XY (male) and XX (female). No amount of cosmetic surgery or hormones will change the gender one is born with: “MEMEPOLICE.”
The last video (or two, depending on WordPress or not) is actually a CHD.TV of parts one and two of the Documentary “Uninformed Consent.” The two parts together are a little over 2-hours long. The original CHD.TV post has a third librti video platform video that is a Q&A of the documentary. Since CHD.TV does not provide the video link, I decided not to include it on my blogs. You will have to go to CHD.TV post to view the Q&A: “PREMIERE – Uninformed Consent: A Matador Films Picture.”
READER SUPPORTED! I need Readers willing to chip in $5 – $10 – $25 – $50 – $100. PLEASE I need your generosity. PLEASE GIVE to Help me be a voice for Liberty:
An in depth look into the Covid 19 narrative, who’s controlling it and how it’s being used to inject an untested, new technology into almost every person on the planet. The film explores how the narrative is being used to strip us of our human rights while weaving in the impact of mandates in a deeply powerful story of one man’s tragic loss.
Hear the truth from doctors and scientists not afraid to stand up against Big Pharma and the elite class who profit from mandates.
BROUGHT TO YOU BY:
Director Todd Michael Harris – Matador Films
Executive Producers Ted Kuntz – President – Vaccine Choice Canada
As I type this it is June 14. This post is related to actual science as opposed to the increasingly obvious harmful science emanating from doctors and scientists dedicated to the Globalist transformation based Leftist politics and Left-oriented Sociology (as in social-cultural transformation). Admittedly, some of this doctor-scientist dedication might be based on coercion that indicates medical licensing or science employment might be revoked by potential bucking of the party-line.
Examine the information and make your own critical decisions rather than listen to some Big Pharma dominated bureaucrat/medical professional or some WEF-dominated politician-MSM propagandist cry “false” or “misinformation” without any scientific justification for a Globalist believe-me.
A retired neurosurgeon named Russell L. Blaylock has written the mother of all ‘I told you so’ letters about the Covid-19 pandemic, which he calls the most manipulated infectious disease events in history.
In the bimonthly peer-reviewed journal Surgical Neurology International, Blaylock lays out the campaign of destructive Covid lies that characterized the federal, state and local government response that was conducted in collusion with Big Pharma.
“The COVID-19 pandemic is one of the most manipulated infectious disease events in history, characterized by official lies in an unending stream lead by government bureaucracies, medical associations, medical boards, the media, and international agencies,” Blaylock writes while providing sources. “We have witnessed a long list of unprecedented intrusions into medical practice, including attacks on medical experts, destruction of medical careers among doctors refusing to participate in killing their patients and a massive regimentation of health care, led by non-qualified individuals with enormous wealth, power and influence.”
“For the first time in American history a president, governors, mayors, hospital administrators and federal bureaucrats are determining medical treatments based not on accurate scientifically based or even experience based information, but rather to force the acceptance of special forms of care and ‘prevention’—including remdesivir, use of respirators and ultimately a series of essentially untested messenger RNA vaccines,” Blaylock went on. “For the first time in history medical treatment, protocols are not being formulated based on the experience of the physicians treating the largest number of patients successfully, but rather individuals and bureaucracies that have never treated a single patient—including Anthony Fauci, Bill Gates, EcoHealth Alliance, the CDC, WHO, state public health officers and hospital administrators.”
“The media (TV, newspapers, magazines, etc.), medical societies, state medical boards and the owners of social media have appointed themselves to be the sole source of information concerning this so-called ‘pandemic’,” he added. “Websites have been removed, highly credentialed and experienced clinical doctors and scientific experts in the field of infectious diseases have been demonized, careers have been destroyed and all dissenting information has been labeled “misinformation” and “dangerous lies”, even when sourced from top experts in the fields of virology, infectious diseases, pulmonary critical care, and epidemiology.”
“These blackouts of truth occur even when this information is backed by extensive scientific citations from some of the most qualified medical specialists in the world,” he continued. “Incredibly, even individuals, such as Dr. Michael Yeadon, a retired ex-Chief Scientist, and vice-president for the science division of Pfizer Pharmaceutical company in the UK, who charged the company with making an extremely dangerous vaccine, is ignored and demonized. Further, he, along with other highly qualified scientists have stated that no one should take this vaccine.”
Blaylock then goes on to describe this assault on dissenting voices in the medical field.
“Another unprecedented tactic is to remove dissenting doctors from their positions as journal editors, reviewers and retracting of their scientific papers from journals, even after these papers have been in print,” he continued. “Until this pandemic event, I have never seen so many journal papers being retracted— the vast majority promoting alternatives to official dogma, especially if the papers question vaccine safety. Normally a submitted paper or study is reviewed by experts in the field, called peer review. These reviews can be quite intense and nit picking in detail, insisting that all errors within the paper be corrected before publication. So, unless fraud or some other major hidden problem is discovered after the paper is in print, the paper remains in the scientific literature.”
“We are now witnessing a growing number of excellent scientific papers, written by top experts in the field, being retracted from major medical and scientific journals weeks, months and even years after publication,” he noted. “A careful review indicates that in far too many instances the authors dared question accepted dogma by the controllers of scientific publications—especially concerning the safety, alternative treatments or efficacy of vaccines. These journals rely on extensive adverting by pharmaceutical companies for their revenue. Several instances have occurred where powerful pharmaceutical companies exerted their influence on owners of these journals to remove articles that in any way question these companies’ products.”
“Worse still is the actual designing of medical articles for promoting drugs and pharmaceutical products that involve fake studies, so-called ghostwritten articles,” the retired neurosurgeon added. “Richard Horton is quoted by the Guardian as saying ‘journals have devolved into information laundering operations for the pharmaceutical industry.’ Proven fraudulent ‘ghostwritten’ articles sponsored by pharmaceutical giants have appeared regularly in top clinical journals, such as JAMA, and New England Journal of Medicine—never to be removed despite proven scientific abuse and manipulation of data.”
“Ghostwritten articles involve using planning companies whose job it is to design articles containing manipulated data to support a pharmaceutical product and then have these articles accepted by high-impact clinical journals, that is, the journals most likely to affect clinical decision making of doctors,” he went on. “Further, they supply doctors in clinical practice with free reprints of these manipulated articles. The Guardian found 250 companies engaged in this ghostwriting business. The final step in designing these articles for publication in the most prestigious journals is to recruit well recognized medical experts from prestigious institutions, to add their name to these articles. These recruited medical authors are either paid upon agreeing to add their name to these pre- written articles or they do so for the prestige of having their name on an article in a prestigious medical journal.”
The doctor then laid into television and print media for allegedly propagating myths and false claims about pharmaceutical products.
“Television media receives the majority of its advertising budget from the international pharmaceutical companies—this creates an irresistible influence to report all concocted studies supporting their vaccines and other so-called treatments,” the doctor said. “In 2020 alone the pharmaceutical industries spent 6.56 billion dollars on such advertising. Pharma TV advertising amounted to 4.58 billion, an incredible 75% of their budget. That buys a lot of influence and control over the media.”
“World famous experts within all fields of infectious diseases are excluded from media exposure and from social media should they in any way deviate against the concocted lies and distortions by the makers of these vaccines,” he added. “In addition, these pharmaceutical companies spend tens of millions on social media advertising, with Pfizer leading the pack with $55 million in 2020.”
“While these attacks on free speech are terrifying enough, even worse is the virtually universal control hospital administrators have exercised over the details of medical care in hospitals,” he added. “These hirelings are now instructing doctors which treatment protocols they will adhere to and which treatments they will not use, no matter how harmful the ‘approved’ treatments are or how beneficial the ‘unapproved’ treatments are.”
“Never in the history of American medicine have hospital administrators dictated to its physicians how they will practice medicine and what medications they can use,” he continued. “The CDC has no authority to dictate to hospitals or doctors concerning medical treatments. Yet, most physicians complied without the slightest resistance.”
Even more damning, the doctor listed a number of things that were labeled as “myths” and “misinformation” that were later proven to be true.
The asymptomatic vaccinated are spreading the virus equally as with unvaccinated symptomatic infected.
The vaccines cannot protect adequately against new variants, such as Delta and Omicron.
Natural immunity is far superior to vaccine immunity and is most likely lifelong.
Vaccine immunity not only wanes after several months, but all immune cells are impaired for prolonged periods, putting the vaccinated at a high risk of all infections and cancer.
COVID vaccines can cause a significant incidence of blood clots and other serious side effects
The vaccine proponents will demand numerous boosters as each variant appears on the scene.
Fauci will insist on the covid vaccine for small children and even babies.
Vaccine passports will be required to enter a business, fly in a plane, and use public transportation
There will be internment camps for the unvaccinated (as in Australia, Austria and Canada)
The unvaccinated will be denied employment.
There are secret agreements between the government, elitist institutions, and vaccine makers
Many hospitals were either empty or had low occupancy during the pandemic.
The spike protein from the vaccine enters the nucleus of the cell, altering cell DNA repair function.
Hundreds of thousands have been killed by the vaccines and many times more have been permanently damaged.
Early treatment could have saved the lives of most of the 700,000 who died.
Vaccine-induced myocarditis (which was denied initially) is a significant problem and clears over a short period.
Special deadly lots (batches) of these vaccines are mixed with the mass of other Covid-19 vaccines
The retired neurosurgeon’s lengthy letter can be read at the National Library of Medicine. Suffice to say, it is one of the best reviews of America’s disastrous Covid-19 response out there.
Dr. Peter Schirmacher is one of the top 100 pathologists in the world who published an autopsy study of 40 people who died within two weeks after the jab and put his reputation on the line, stating that at least 30 to 40% of these people died from the COVID injection.
Steve Kirsch reached out to Dr. Schirmacher; no callback. Interesting.
Six months later, Steve discovered that Dr. Schirmacher was coerced with death threats against his family if he dared to speak out about his research.
Later, other scientists in Germany confirmed his work, and they concluded that the vaccine likely caused 70% of the deaths.
(Natural News) EXCLUSIVE: Today we are publishing a series of lab microscopy photos of bizarre clots which are now being routinely found in adults who “suddenly died,” usually in a number of months following covid vaccinations.
These clots are often referred to as “blood clots” but they are nothing at all like normal clots, and they consist of far more than mere blood cells. Unlike normal clots which are gelatinous, almost jelly-like, these so-called “clots” contain extremely large, complex, repeating structural elements (all shown below) that are clearly being constructed in the blood of the victims who died from these clots.
All of these clots were extracted from patients within a few hours of their death. These are not the result of post-mortem blood stasis. These are structures found in blood vessels and arteries. They are not congealed blood.
We wish to publicly thank Dr. Jane Ruby for connecting us to the embalmer (Richard Hirschman) who provided these clots. (Telegram channel T.ME/DRJANERUBY) Without the persistence of Dr. Ruby, you would not be seeing this report. Dr. Ruby is frequently featured on the Stew Peters Show (StewPeters.TV) and will also be my featured guest Monday on the Infowars.com broadcast.
Here’s a vial of these raw clots, washed of blood and preserved, before staining:
These structures exhibit the following shocking properties:
They are tough, fibrous and resilient, showing material properties similar to small rubber bands.
They consist of many strands of small, fibrous strands.
These fibrous strands (see the very last photo set below) show repeating patterns of scale-like engineering, as if the body has been programmed to build another life form inside the blood vessels.
There are strange crystalline-like structures found on these clots, exhibiting transparency and resistance to normal gram staining techniques.
Below, you will find one example of a structure that appears to resemble a silicon-like biocircuitry or microchip-like structure. We don’t yet know what it is.
One of the photo sets below reveals what appears to be a biocircuitry wire which clearly shows repeating patterns and nano-scale interface structures that are assembled in a specific geometry for an unknown purpose.
Context for the photos you are about to see:
I received these “blood clot” samples from a reputable embalmer (Richard Hirschman) who is active in the field of embalming and who confirmed these are not blood vessels or other tissues of any kind. They are structures that were evacuated from inside blood vessels during embalming procedures.
I stained these samples using standard gram staining techniques used for microbiology in order to enhance structural contrast during microscopy. One of the samples below — the more yellowish sample — was stained only with iodine, not any violet-colored stains.
The samples were then washed with ethyl alcohol and prepared on slides using standard tissue sample preparation for microscopy.
Microscope magnification varies from 20x to 1500x, depending on the photo shown below. Magnifications are indicated with each photo set.
I retain possession of these samples and can reproduce these photographs if required. Any competent lab microscopy operator could reproduce these photos using the same samples.
My descriptions shown below are merely my own observations and are not intended to indicate certainty of the substances being identified. For example, when I talk about “biocircuitry” or “nanowires,” I cannot confirm these are structures actually engineered for purposes of biocircuits. Merely, they resemble structures that seem to indicate such a purpose, but further research would be needed to confirm these observations.
Microscopy photo set #1: Strange crystal-like nanostructures
This first set shows strange crystal-like structures that resist staining techniques and appear to show some sort of nano-scale, clear crystalline structures which would normally never appear in blood or blood clots.
Everything you are looking at in these photos is part of a blood clot extracted from an expired human being.
Magnifications shown here are 20x, 50x, 200x and 500x:
Microscopy photo set #3: Crystal-shaped structures
Crystal-like structures are attached to the bark-like structure of the blood clot. Remember, this clot is stained using a violet stain, which accounts for its dark purple color.
Magnifications are 20x, 50x, 100x, 200x, 500x and 1000x[Blog Editor: I think you get the idea, but if you are a science nerd I am embedding the photo link in each magnification number to the left]:
Microscopy photo set #4: Fibrous material is not simply congealed blood cells
The following sample was stained with iodine, then washed with ethyl alcohol. If you did not realize where this came from, you might think this was a sample of beef jerky or a chicken nugget. In reality, all of this is clot tissue that was found inside blood vessels or arteries.
As you can see, these are in no way “normal” blood clots. These have structure and are fibrous. They are clearly being built by the body, using protein synthesis instructions to create this large mass that nearly resembles muscle tissue. Yet it is being built inside the blood vessels.
Magnifications are 20x, 50x, 100x and 200x[Blog Editor: AGAIN I think you get the idea, but if you are a science nerd I am embedding the photo link in each magnification number to the left]:
Microscopy photo set #5: Silicon-like “chip” structure
This series shows something that appears to resemble silicon-based microchip structures, although I cannot claim with certainty that this is a circuit of any kind. It simply resembles what micro-circuitry looks like at similar magnifications.
Microscopy photo set#7: “Nanowire” structures and repeating, structural scales
What follows here is a stunning look at what appears to be, at first, a micro-scale wire. Zooming it, we see a series of repeating structures along the top that appear to be nano-scale wire interface junctions. The entire “wire” is made of repeating segments, and its outer layer is covered in repeating “scale-like” patterns that actually resemble reptile skin more than anything human.
For the record, we don’t know what these structures are. However, it’s clear this doesn’t belong anywhere in the circulatory system.
Finally, this fiber is not simply a human hair. It is firmly attached to the blood clot and when I tried to remove it, it would not tear away easily. This is not a contamination issue, it is a structure emanating from the clot itself. Everything you see here came out of a human being’s blood vessels:
We don’t yet know what all these structures are. We know what they are not, however: They are not simply clotted blood cells. If they were, then at the 1500x magnification shown in the last photo, above, we would be able to see individual blood cells. These are not blood cells, they are protein structures.
Protein structures circulating in the blood like this, building up over time, are clearly being constructed by the body’s cells. The ribosomes in the cells instruct the body what proteins to construct. These ribosomes are hijacked by mRNA gene therapy injections, which overwrite new instructions to the cells, causing them to manufacture something other than human.
I believe the structures you are seeing above are the result of mRNA protein synthesis instructions which have been injected into people under the false umbrella of “vaccines.” I welcome input from other experts who may have other theories or explanations of where this is coming from.
More research is needed to confirm the function and composition of these structures, yet because of the extreme censorship and “science authoritarianism” that now exists in the world, no lab or university will dare examine these clots and honestly report the results. To do so would risk losing all NIH funding and federal grants, since the very same people who engineer vaccines and bioweapons also control most science funding in America.
Thus, only independent scientists, labs and journalists will dare tell the truth about these clots.
In conclusion, they are not “blood” clots. They are structures in the blood. They are “structural clots” or “fibrous clots” that are extremely large and are being constructed inside the body over time.
My grave concern is that every person who has been injected with mRNA instructions may be constructing these fibrous structures inside their bodies at this very minute, and that it’s only a matter of time before they block major arteries or cause heart attacks, strokes or other acute causes of “Sudden Adult Death Syndrome” (SADS).
I believe these structures may very well explain why so many seemingly healthy adults are suddenly dying.
Hear more details on Brighteon.com and Infowars.com
I will be discussing these findings in more detail Monday mid-day on my Situation Update podcast at my channel on Brighteon.com:
In addition, I am unveiling all these photos and findings as I host the Infowars.com “Alex Jones Show” broadcast Monday, June 13th, beginning at 11 am central. The three-hour show will feature several expert guests who will comment on these findings and present their own information about what these may be and how many people are being affected right now.
Guest host of The Alex Jones Show, Mike Adams, is joined by a mortician who has found a large number of strange tissue clots in the blood of cadavers examined after the COVID vaccine was released to the public:
Mike Adams is joined by Richard Hirschman, a mortician who has found an innumerable amount of strange tissue clots in the blood of cadavers after the COVID vaccine was distributed and administered to the public.]
Mike Adams is joined by a doctor who wishes to remain anonymous, and he describes the composition and characteristics of newly discovered tissue clots that appear in victims of SADS (sudden adult death syndrome).]
Their explanation is that these vaccines will protect our health. So, why is Pfizer lying?
COVID jabs caused so many side effects and people died. Dr. Naomi Wolf discussed the growing number of miscarriages in vaccinated women.
Dr. Wolf talked to Deanna Lorraine about this disaster. She said, “Right from the start, the New York Times, CDC, Rochelle Walensky, and the NIH were telling women that the mRNA vaccine was safe and effective for pregnant women or women who wanted to get pregnant and safe for their babies. And I kept asking, ‘Where are the data?’ I couldn’t find them. Nothing. No studies showed that.”
Using the data presented by Pfizer, the doctor added, “Well, the Pfizer documents show that pregnant women were excluded from all of the trials. And so the emergency use authorization was based on zero pregnant women. However, in the internal trials, the documents show 270 Women who are vaccinated, and when I say vaccinated, I mean mRNA vaccinated, did get pregnant. 234 of those records are missing. Gone, like fight by law, Pfizer’s supposed to follow those women, follow the birth, follow the babies and say what happened to them. Outcome unknown. Of the 36 women who brought their babies to term, 28 of the babies died.”
Not just using Pfizer’s data, Dr. Wolf also used the VAERS system, warning, “Their finding is that your baby is more likely to die at or before birth if you received a COVID-19 vaccine than if you received any other vaccine. So two quick paragraphs, according to VAERS, which is the government database for adverse events, between 1998, the earliest VAERS reporting date is May of this year, the total number of pregnant women who were vaccinated for all diseases and then lost their babies was 6695.”
Dr. Wolf, astonished by the data, concluded, “These babies die in spontaneous abortions and fetal disorders, such as cardiac arrest and cystic hygroma, a tumor that forms on the newborns neck. But just in the past couple of years, meaning just since pregnant women were vaccinated with mRNA vaccines, 3816 babies died after their mothers received a combination vaccine manufactured by Moderna, Pfizer, bioNTech, or Janssen and they show you the table.” She added, “These women were vaccinated between December 2020 and March 2022. That means that 57% of all the vaccinations that resulted in a baby or fetus dying in the last 25 years or so, took place on pregnant women when they started receiving COVID-19 vaccines.”
My time is short today. Which means I do not have the time to share on Social Media to Groups and friends to which I usually share. SO, if you stumble here (I suspect I am search engine shadow banned or limited due to content) SHARE AWAY to get info out typically vilified by the Left as Conspiracy Theory.
THREE VIDEOS – 2 serious and 1 with a bit of levity impugning the Leftist mind. The order of posting:
Every day countless people die in hospitals world-wide because of bureaucratic protocols enforced by global health organizations, politicians, and billionaire investors, all for their number one priority – the insatiable greed for money, no matter what the consequences.
Covid-19 hospital protocols kill people on purpose for money. There are countless monetary incentives to perform dangerous experiments on as many hospitalized people as possible, all in the name of covid-19. There is a huge body of evidence to verify these crimes are happening.
Falsified statistics reveal the truth: There never was a covid pandemic. You were lied to by billionaires, politicians, high level health officials, and the media to enable a de-population agenda to be successfully rolled out.
Those of us that are fully awake are growing in numbers. So be sure to share this video, especially to all the non-believers. When confronted with the evidence, those in denial will slowly start to come around, the truth has that effect on people.
I began watching the television show Chicago Med (dvr-recorded). Before COVID/Medical Tyranny days I would watch shows that had an element of mystery in their drama and simply fast-forward through narratives unrelated to the mystery (usually promoting godless LGBTQ lifestyles but other anti-Conservative narratives as well) to enjoy the entertainment. Of late I have begun to notice a huge increase beyond these mystery shows’ typical plot to heavily push the brainwashing above the story.
This particular Chicago Med story began with a pregnant wife being tongue-lashed by her husband for not receiving her mRNA jab. Since that particular television network is among the most Left-Wing, I chose not to linger to see if the plot would support the wise pregnant or the mean-spirited husband. DVR-delete was deployed.
I began this post with this entertainment-share to note the is a TREMENDOUS effort by Leftists controlling News and Entertainment to LIE not only about COVID itself, but also the mRNA jabs people are still being told will protect one from a CCP-virus that already has an over 99% survival rate. AND of the less than 1% who died attributed to the CCP-virus (I say “attributed” because it has been discovered at the height of deaths many of which were due to a cause other than COVID yet COVID would be listed as death-cause) many-to-most could have been saved by medical-therapies pooh-poohed by Big Pharma controlled doctors, scientists and politicians.
ERGO, when I come across science that contradicts the mass brainwashing efforts not only thrust upon American minds, but also the minds of the once Free World, I share the info.
Jessica Rose didn’t ask for any of this. She started to analyze data on adverse reactions after COVID-19 vaccines simply as an exercise to master a new piece of software. But she couldn’t ignore what she saw and decided to publish the results of her analysis. The next thing she knew, she was in a “bizzarro world,” she told The Epoch Times.
A paper she co-authored based on her analysis was withdrawn by Elsevier, the company publishing the academic journal that ran the article, under circumstances that raised eyebrows among her colleagues. The publisher declined to comment on the matter.
Rose received her PhD in computational biology from the Bar-Ilan University in Israel. After finishing her post-doctoral studies on molecular dynamics of certain proteins, she was looking for a new challenge. Switching to a new statistical computing software, she was looking for an interesting data set to sharpen her skills on. She picked the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), a database of reports of health problems that have occurred after a vaccination and may or may not have been caused by it.
A nurse administers a CCP virus vaccine to a health and care staff member at the NHS Louisa Jordan Hospital in Glasgow, Scotland, on Jan. 23, 2021. (Jane Barlow/PA)
She said she wasn’t looking for anything in particular in the data.
“I don’t go in with questions,” she said.
What she found, however, was disturbing to her.
VAERS has been in place since 1990 to provide an early warning signal that there might be a problem with a vaccine. Anybody can submit the reports, which are then checked for duplicates. They are largely filed by health care personnel, based on previous research. Usually, there would be around 40,000 reports a year, including several hundred deaths.
But with the introduction of the COVID-19 vaccines, VAERS reports went through the roof. By Jan. 7, there were over a million reports, including more than 21,000 deaths. Other notable issues include over 11,000 heart attacks, nearly 13,000 cases of Bell’s palsy, and over 25,000 cases of myocarditis or pericarditis.
Rose found the data alarming, only to realize authorities and even some experts were generally dismissing it.
“Clearly, there’s no concern [among these authorities and experts] for people who are suffering adverse events,” she said.
The usual arguments against the VAERS data have been that it’s unverified and unreliable.
Rose, however, sees such arguments as irrelevant—VAERS was never meant to provide definitive answers, it’s meant to give early warning and, as she sees it, it’s doing just that.
“It’s emitting so many safety signals and they’re being ignored,” she said.
A screenshot of the homepage of the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), which is co-sponsored by the CDC, FDA, and HHS. (Screenshot/The Epoch Times)
She teamed up with Peter McCullough, an internist, cardiologist, and epidemiologist, to write a paper on VAERS reports of myocarditis in youth—an issue already acknowledged as a side effect of the vaccination, though usually described as rare.
As of July 9, they found 559 VAERS reports of myocarditis, 97 among children ages 12–15. Some of them may have been related to COVID itself, which can also cause heart problems, but there were too many cases to dismiss the likelihood the vaccines were involved, according to the authors.
“Within 8 weeks of the public offering of COVID-19 products to the 12–15-year-old age group, we found 19 times the expected number of myocarditis cases in the vaccination volunteers over background myocarditis rates for this age group,” the paper said.
After two weeks, on Oct. 15, the paper disappeared from the publisher’s website, replaced by a notice of “Temporary Removal.” Not only weren’t the authors told why, they weren’t informed at all, according to Rose.
“It’s unprecedented in the eyes of all of my colleagues,” she said.
“I do apologise, but Elsevier cannot comment on this enquiry,” said Jonathan Davis, the publisher’s communications officer, in an email to The Epoch Times.
In late November, the paper was replaced by a notice that the “article has been withdrawn at the request of the author(s) and/or editor.”
“It just feels like weird censorship that isn’t really justified,” Rose said.
The paper’s conclusions are not necessarily controversial. A recent Danish study concluded, for example, an elevated risk of myocarditis for young people following the Moderna COVID vaccine.
It’s common, however, even for papers that examine potential issues with the vaccines to frame their results in a way that still endorses vaccination.
“That’s what you have to say to get your work published these days,” Rose said.
Her paper did no such thing.
“As part of any risk/benefit analysis which must be completed in the context of experimental products, the points herein must be considered before a decision can be made pertaining to agreeing to 2-dose injections of these experimental COVID-19 products, especially into children and by no means, should parental consent be waived under any circumstances to avoid children volunteering for injections with products that do not have proven safety or efficacy,” the paper said.
The paper also called the vaccines “injectable biological products”—a reference to the fact that they are distinct from all other traditional vaccines.
A traditional vaccine uses “whole live or attenuated pathogens” while the COVID vaccines use “mRNA in lipid nanoparticles,” Rose explained via email. She said the lipid nanoparticles include “cationic lipids which are highly toxic.” Pfizer, the manufacturer of the most popular COVID-19 vaccine in many countries, addressed the issue by saying the dose is sufficiently low to ensure “an acceptable safety margin,” according to the European drug authority, the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (pdf).
Rose also noted that the COVID-19 vaccines haven’t gone “through the 10-15 years of safety testing that vaccines have always had to go through … for obvious reasons.”
By this point, Rose is no longer a dispassionate observer. Reading through countless VAERS reports gave her a window into the hardships of those who believe they’ve been harmed by the vaccines.
“I speak for all of those people,” she said.
An internal medicine resident sits in a waiting area before receiving a dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine at a hospital in Aurora, Colorado, on Dec. 16, 2020. (Michael Ciaglo/Getty Images)
In the past, 50 reports of deaths in VAERS would prompt authorities to hit the brakes and investigate, Rose said. In her view, that should have happened with the COVID-19 vaccines a year ago.
Not only has that not happened, but it isn’t even clear what would be enough to convince the authorities to do so.
“What’s the cut-off number for the number of deaths?” Rose asked.
The counterargument is that the vaccines save more lives than they cost. But in Rose’s view, this logic is flawed since the vaccines haven’t been around long enough and studied thoroughly enough to tell how many lives they may cost.
It is known, however, that VAERS understates adverse events following vaccination—by a factor of anywhere between 5 and as much as 100, based on some estimates.
Submitting a VAERS report takes about 30 minutes and many medical practitioners simply don’t have the time, Rose said. Some may feel that filing the report may get them labeled as “anti-vaxxers.” Some may simply not associate whatever health issue they’re facing with the vaccination. Some may not even be aware VAERS exists.
It’s unlikely that any significant number of the reports would be fraudulent, she suggested, noting it’s a federal offense to submit a false report.
Rose has now joined the ranks of dissident doctors and researchers skeptical of the official line on the vaccines and the pandemic in general. She described it as something she’s compelled to do despite the disincentives involved.
“We don’t want to be doing this. But it is our duty. Doctors swore an oath to do no harm. And researchers with integrity cannot look away from this,” she said via email.
Correction: A previous version of this article incorrectly identified Elsevier as an academic journal. Elsevier is a company specializing in publishing scientific literature. The Epoch Times regrets the error.
Petr Svab is a reporter covering New York. Previously, he covered national topics including politics, economy, education, and law enforcement.
Karen Kingston, former big Pharma employee, Biotech Analyst and whistleblower expands on recent DARPA documents recently revealed by Project Veritas. She also provides us with evidence that Fauci funded Gain of Function research.
In this interview, she proves without a doubt that this virus was created in a lab, that the vaccines are a bioweapon and are the culprit for people becoming sick with this virus.
Due to technical issues, Part 2 of this interview will be uploaded separately.
In Part 2 of my Interview with Karen Kingston, former big Pharma employee, Biotech Analyst and whistleblower, Karen provides us with undeniable evidence that the vaccines are not only killing children and adolescents, but that they were created to do so.
In October 2019, shortly before the COVID outbreak, Gates and other powerful individuals began planning how to censor vaccine safety advocates from social media during a table-top simulation of a worldwide pandemic, known as Event 201.
Over the last two weeks, Facebook and other social media sites have deplatformed me and many other critics of regulatory corruption and authoritarian public health policies. So, here is some fodder for those of you who have the eerie sense that the government/industry pandemic response feels like it was planned — even before there was a pandemic.
The attached document shows that a cabal of powerful individuals did indeed begin planning the mass eviction of vaccine skeptics from social media in October 2019, a week or two before COVID began circulating. That month, Microsoft founder Bill Gates organized an exercise of four “table-top” simulations of a worldwide coronavirus pandemic with other high-ranking “Deep State” panjandrums. The exercise was referred to as Event 201.
Gates’ co-conspirators included representatives from the World Bank, the World Economic Forum (Great Reset), Bloomberg/Johns Hopkins University Populations Center, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, various media powerhouses, the Chinese government, a former Central Intelligence Agency/National Security Agency director (there is no such thing as a former CIA officer), vaccine maker Johnson & Johnson, the finance and biosecurity industries and Edelman, the world’s leading corporate PR firm.
At Gates’ direction, these eminences role-played members of a Pandemic Control Council, wargaming government strategies for controlling the pandemic, the narrative and the population. Needless to say, there was little talk of building immune systems, off-the-shelf remedies or off-patent therapeutic drugs and vitamins, but lots of chatter about promoting uptake of new patentable antiviral drugs and vaccines.
But the participants primarily focused on planning industry-centric, fear-mongering, police-state strategies for managing an imaginary global coronavirus contagion culminating in mass censorship of social media.
Oddly, Gates now claims that the simulation didn’t occur. On April 12, 2020, Gates told BBC, “Now here we are. We didn’t simulate this, we didn’t practice, so both the health policies and economic policies, we find ourselves in uncharted territory.”
Unfortunately for that whopper, the videos of the event are still available across the internet. They show that Gates and team did indeed simulate health and economic policies. It’s hard to swallow that Gates has forgotten.
Gates’s Event 201 simulated COVID epidemic caused 65 million deaths at the 18-month endpoint and global economic collapse lasting up to a decade. Compared to the Gates simulation, therefore, the actual COVID-19 crisis is a bit of a dud, having imposed a mere 2.5 million deaths “attributed to COVID” over the past 13 months.
The deaths “attributed to COVID” in the real-life situation are highly questionable, and must be seen in the context of a global population of 7.8 billion, with about 59 million deaths expected annually. The predictions of decade-long economic collapse will probably prove more accurate — but only because of the draconian lockdown promoted by Gates.
Gates’ Event 201 script imagines vast anti-vaccine riots triggered by internet posts. The universal and single-minded presumption among its participants was that such a crisis would prove an opportunity of convenience to promote new vaccines, and tighten controls by a surveillance and censorship state.
Segment four of the script — on manipulation and control of public opinion — is most revealing. It uncannily predicted democracy’s current crisis:
The participants discussed mechanisms for controlling “disinformation” and “misinformation,” by “flooding” the media with propaganda (“good information”), imposing penalties for spreading falsehoods and discrediting the anti-vaccination movement.
Jane Halton, of Australia’s ANZ Bank, one of the authors of Australia’s oppressive “no jab, no pay” policy, assured the participants that Gates Foundation is creating algorithms “to sift through information on these social media platforms” to protect the public from dangerous thoughts and information.
George Gao, the prescient director of the Chinese Center for Disease Control, worries about how to suppress “rumors” that the virus is laboratory generated: “People believe, ‘This is a manmade’… [and that] some pharmaceutical company made the virus.”
Chen Huang, an Apple research scientist, Google scholar and the world’s leading expert on tracking and tracing and facial recognition technology, role-plays the newscaster reporting on government countermeasures. He blames riots on anti-vaccine activists and predicts that Twitter and Facebook will cooperate in “identify[ing] and delete[ing] a disturbing number of accounts dedicated to spreading misinformation about the outbreak” and to implement “internet shutdowns … to quell panic.”
Tara Kirk Sell, a senior scholar at Bloomberg School of Health’s Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, worries that pharmaceutical companies are being accused of introducing the virus so they can make money on drugs and vaccines: “[We] have seen public faith in their products plummet.” She notes with alarm that “Unrest, due to false rumors and divisive messaging, is rising and is exacerbating spread of the disease as levels of trust fall and people stop cooperating with response efforts. This is a massive problem, one that threatens governments and trusted institutions.”
Sell reminds her fellow collaborators that “We know that social media is now the primary way that many people get their news, so interruptions to these platforms could curb the spread of misinformation.” There are many ways, Sell advises, for government and industry allies to accomplish this objective: “Some governments have taken control of national access to the Internet. Others are censoring websites and social media content and a small number have shut down Internet access completely to prevent the spread of misinformation. Penalties have been put in place for spreading harmful falsehoods, including arrests.”
Matthew Harrington, CEO of Edelman Public Relations agrees that social media must fall in line to promote government policy: “I also think we’re at a moment where the social media platforms have to step forward and recognize the moment to assert that they’re a technology platform and not a broadcaster is over. They in fact have to be a participant in broadcasting accurate information and partnering with the scientific and health communities to counterweight, if not flood the zone, of accurate information. Because to try to put the genie back in the bottle of misinformation and disinformation is not possible.”
Stephen Redd, the Admiral of the Public Health Service, has the sinister notion that government should mine social media data to identify people with negative beliefs: “I think with the social media platforms, there’s an opportunity to understand who it is that’s susceptible … to misinformation, so I think there’s an opportunity to collect data from that communication mechanism.”
Adrian Thomas of Johnson & Johnson announces “some important news to share from some of “our member companies [Pharma]”: We are doing clinical trials in new antiretrovirals, and in fact, in vaccines!” He recommends a strategy to address the problems to these companies when “rumors were actually spreading” that their shoddily tested products “are causing deaths and so patients are not taking them anymore.” He suggests, “Maybe we’re making the mistake of reporting and counting all the fatalities and infections.”
Former CIA deputy director, Avril Haines unveiled a strategy to “flood the zone” with propaganda from “trusted sources,” including “influential community leaders, as well as health workers.” He warns about “false information that is starting to actually hamper our ability to address the pandemic, then we need to be able to respond quickly to it.”
Matthew Harrington (Edelman CEO) observes that the Internet — which once promised the decentralization and democratization of information — now needs to be centralized: “I think just to build a little bit on what Avril said, I think as in previous conversations where we’ve talked about centralization around management of information or public health needs, there needs to be a centralized response around the communications approach that then is cascaded to informed advocates, represented in the NGO communities, the medical professionals, et cetera.”
Tom Inglesby (John Hopkins biosecurity expert advisor to the National Institutes of Health, the Pentagon and Homeland Security) agrees that centralized control is needed: “You mean centralized international?”
Matthew Harrington (Edelman) replies that information access should be: “Centralized on an international basis, because I think there needs to be a central repository of data facts and key messages.”
Hasti Taghi (Media Advisor) sums up: “The anti-vaccine movement was very strong and this is something specifically through social media that has spread. So as we do the research to come up with the right vaccines to help prevent the continuation of this, how do we get the right information out there? How do we communicate the right information to ensure that the public has trust in these vaccines that we’re creating?”
Kevin McAleese, communications officer for Gates-funded agricultural projects, observes that: “To me, it is clear countries need to make strong efforts to manage both mis- and disinformation. We know social media companies are working around the clock to combat these disinformation campaigns. The task of identifying every bad actor is immense. This is a huge problem that’s going to keep us from ending the pandemic and might even lead to the fall of governments, as we saw in the Arab Spring. If the solution means controlling and reducing access to information, I think it’s the right choice.”
Tom Inglesby, director of Bloomberg’s Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security concurs, asking if “In this case, do you think governments are at the point where they need to require social media companies to operate in a certain way?”
Lavan Thiru, Singapore’s Finance Minister suggests that the government might make examples of dissidents with “government or enforcement actions against fake news. Some of us, this new regulations are come in place about how we deal with fake news. Maybe this is a time for us to showcase some cases where we are able to bring forward some bad actors and leave it before the courts to decide whether they have actually spread some fake news.”
Read the attached transcript to see how Gates and his government, pharma and intelligence apparatus telegraphed their plans to censor and control the media during the pandemic. In yet another uncanny coincidence, COVID-19 began circulating among global populations within days of Gates’ meeting.
Plandemic One focused on the story of unrighteously much vilified Dr. Judy Mikovits being framed and maligned by Dr. Anthony Fauci and that relationship to today’s COVID-19. I posted the Bitchute version of Plandemic One on my blog due to Youtube and Big Tech censorship of truth.
Now thanks to News Target, I am posting the Brighteon video version of Plandemic II which can also be viewed and downloaded from the Plandemic website. (The embeds will show up on my Blogger blog, but on my WordPress version, you’ll have to click the Brighteon link to watch.)
Plandemic II focuses more on the corruption of Dr. Fauci, W.H.O. and the CDC. Overcome lying censorship by sharing copiously. FULL video of Plandemic II at the end of the News Target post – READ & WATCH. (Bonus info at the end of full video: Bill Gates – Jeffrey Epstein connection!)
Your generosity is always appreciated – various credit, check
The bombshell new film, “Plandemic II: inDOCTORnation” was released yesterday, and this film unleashes bombshell after bombshell about Dr. Fauci, the CDC, the WHO, the corrupt vaccine industry, the NIH under Obama, and the whole pandemic scam that was deliberately engineered using a real virus to enslave humanity and earn billions in profits for Big Pharma.
Amazingly, the entire film has been released for free by its creator Mikki Willis, who you can find at PlandemicSeries.com (which appears to be under attack and not functioning at press time).
Consider this film to be a “must-see” documentary that will absolutely blow your mind and forever change your understanding of the total corruption of the “science” establishment and the for-profit medical system. In essence, a group of evil people built this virus and released it onto the world so they could crush humanity and earn billions in profits. Even more shockingly, this isn’t the first time they’ve tried this.
See these amazing snippets / outtakes from the film
Another channel on Brighteon called “Sharing for Humanity” has been posting snippets from the film that are incredibly powerful. Each snippet shows a particular issue in just 2-3 minutes, making these “bite-sized” episodes to share with others. These are powerful snippets that you’ve got to see.
Guided by the meticulous work of Dr. David E. Martin, Plandemic II: Indoctornation, tracks a three decade-long money trail that leads directly to the key players behind the COVID 19 pandemic. Plandemic II connects the dots between all forms of media, the medical industry, politics and the financial industry to unmask the major conflicts of interests with the decision makers that are currently managing this crisis.
A once hidden (and probably destined to be hidden again) document from the FDA justifying the safe usage of Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) as an effective treatment against COVID-19 is exposed by the journalists at The National Pulse. What is more heinously shocking is the reason the FDA buried HCQ good news! After reading the FDA/HCQ exposé, I’m providing a list of source substantiating HCQ usage science to co-opt HCQ liars at the end of The National Post article.
Your generosity is always appreciated – various credit, check
A document no longer available from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration regarding “Emergency Use Authorization” of potential COVID-19 treatments appears to suggest that hydroxychloroquine satisfies the criteria for the classification, but would stand in the way of lucrative other drugs, and a vaccine.
July 29th documents from a Food and Drug Administration (FDA) presentation reveal, however, that the “qualifying criteria” for extending EUA to the drug appear to have been met: it “may be effective” and that “no adequate, approved, and available alternative” exists.
The document makes clear that Emergency Use Authorization cannot be used for more than one drug or therapeutic, and the establishment is potentially therefore saving the EUA pre-emptively for vaccines and remdesivir – patently high-value Big Pharma drugs – instead of hydroxychloroquine.
Dr. Vladimir Zelenko, who authored a study on the efficacy of hydroxychloroquine, outlined the medical establishment’s campaign against the drug on the War Room: Pandemic show.
He emphasized that Dr. Fauci has “lied to the American people” by insisting that authorizing a treatment for COVID-19 rests on “controlled trials to get anything through the FDA.”
“That is not true. That has never been the historical precedent and almost no other medication has ever had to meet those standards,” Dr. Zelenko continued.
He also noted that due to the sheer existence of hydroxychloroquine – a potential treatment – “available drugs like Remdesevir and the vaccine by [the FDA’s] own internal rules cannot get EUA.”
Such a classification would “facilitate the availability and use” of the drug and represents a fast-track alternative to authorizing potential life-saving treatments during public health emergencies such as the ongoing pandemic.
[Blog Editor: In case some kind of crazy censorship renders the PDF link void, downloaded it.]
Or, as Dr. Zelenko describes, “there’ 150,000 dead corpses, most of which could have been avoided if Dr. Fauci did the moral and correct thing.”
The eight-page presentation entitled “Considerations for FDA Licensure vs. Emergency Use Authorization of COVID-19 Vaccines” posits two additional prerequisites for EUA: “declaration by HHS Secretary of emergency situation leading to serious or life-threatening disease or condition,” which occurred in January, and that the “known and potential benefits of the product outweigh the known and potential risks of the product.”
Actual science indicating HCQ not perfect but safe. All drugs have the potential for side effects. The Doctor/Patient has to weigh the drug for what is known of patient reactions on a personal basis. The science shows in MOST cases (long before COVID) HCQ designed for malaria has been helpful for other maladies for decades:
Hydroxychloroquine is a Food & Drug Administration (FDA)-approved drug for the long-term treatment and prevention of autoimmune conditions like rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus. It’s a disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) that decreases the swelling and pain caused by arthritis. It’s also prescribed for the treatment and prevention of acute attacks of malaria. Hydroxychloroquine is available in the US by prescriptions only. It’s sold both as a brand name and a generic version: https://www.rx2go.com/buy/hydroxychloroquine/
The progression of RA may be diminished in severity and duration by the combination of medicines and therapy that work best as determined by you and your physician. You can also put off joint damage, and in some cases, you can do more than just slow it down. Being able to stop joint damage can lessen pain and mean a better quality of life. Hydroxychloroquine is one of the medications that can be a valuable part of your treatment plan: https://www.rheumatoidarthritis.org/treatment/hydroxychloroquine/
Hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine are medications that have been used for a long time. Their most common use is for the treatment and prophylaxis of malaria. However, these antimalarial drugs are known to also have anti-inflammatory and antiviral effects and are used for several chronic diseases such as systemic lupus erythematosus with low adverse effects. The antiviral action of hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine has been a point of interest to different researchers due to its mechanism of action. Several in vitro studies have proven their effectiveness on severe acute respiratory syndrome virus and currently both in vitro and in vivo studies have been conducted on 2019 novel coronavirus (covid-19). The purpose of this article is to review the history and mechanism of actions of these drugs and the potential use they can have on the current covid-19 pandemic. …: https://pmj.bmj.com/content/early/2020/05/28/postgradmedj-2020-137785