EXPLOSIVE! Hillary, The Movie: The Politics of Personal Destruction


I found a video exposing Crooked Hillary. It’s a bit of a documentary being 1:35:23 long. It was posted by James Red Pills America on November 10, but footage shows noted people much younger than they are now. Nevertheless, with rumors the wicked woman is thinking of entering the Dem Party fray, it is good to go over the reasons the States dominating the Electoral College rejected her Presidency in 2016. A 2016 election she tried to cheat her to victory then blaming the very Russians/Ukrainians she employed to cheat for losing.

 

JRH 11/12/19

Your generosity is always appreciated: 

Please Support NCCR

Support this Blog HERE. Or support by getting in 

the Coffee from home business – OR just buy some healthy coffee.

Blog Editor: Rather than capitulate to Facebook censorship by abandoning the platform, I choose to post and share until the Leftist censors ban me. Recently, the Facebook censorship tactic I’ve experienced is a couple of Group shares then jailed under the false accusation of posting too fast. So I ask those that read this, to combat censorship by sharing blog and Facebook posts with your friends or Groups you belong to.

**********************************

VIDEO: EXPLOSIVE! Hillary, The Movie: The Politics of Personal Destruction [FULL HD MOVIE]

 

Posted by James Red Pills America

85.1K subscribers – Nov 10, 2019

 

EXPLOSIVE DOCUMENTARY! Hillary: The Movie is a political documentary about past United States Senator and failed presidential candidate Hillary Clinton. It was produced by the conservative non-profit organization Citizens United. The producers went to U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia to get a declaration that they could show this movie. This case was titled Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission and its final decision at the U.S. Supreme Court resulted in a major change in campaign finance law.

 

The documentary interviewed various conservative figures such as Dick Morris and Ann Coulter and reviewed various scandals in which Hillary Clinton participated, such as the White House travel office controversy, White House FBI files controversy, Whitewater controversy, and cattle futures controversy.

 

The factual finding of the three-judge district court was that there was “no reasonable interpretation [of the movie] other than as an appeal to vote against Clinton”, thus making it “electioneering communication”.

 

The Supreme Court did not change that decision, but applied the strict scrutiny test for the First Amendment of the Constitution and said corporations could not be banned from making electioneering communications.

 

Join me, #PastorJames of James Red Pills America, as we #RedPill the entire world with this one!

 

MORE TO READ

 

++++++++++++++++++++

Blog Editor: Rather than capitulate to Facebook censorship by abandoning the platform, I choose to post and share until the Leftist censors ban me. Recently, the Facebook censorship tactic I’ve experienced is a couple of Group shares then jailed under the false accusation of posting too fast. So I ask those that read this, to combat censorship by sharing blog and Facebook posts with your friends or Groups you belong to.

 

There Can Only Be One America


When you see the American Left deliver unproven propaganda against President Trump or violent riots against a Conservative voice or fake police accusations, more than likely there is some form of a Communist agenda behind it.

 

Justin Smith breaks down the obvious.

 

JRH 4/25/17

Please Support NCCR

*************

There Can Only Be One America

 

By Justin O. Smith

Sent: 4/23/2017 2:18 PM

 

America is at a dangerous crossroads, and all normal Americans, who love God, their families and their unalienable rights and Liberty, are necessarily going to have to eventually fight and decisively defeat the American totalitarian Left, that seeks our silence, obeisance and submission to their Marxist vision by any means necessary. The Left’s recently renewed ready use of violence to achieve their goals and their calls for the violent overthrow of our republic, as they riot and throw bricks, glass bottles containing M-80s and Molotov cocktails and attempt to burn our cities, leaves little choice. Either our government stops them, or it will fall to millions of armed American patriots defending their homes, their families and their lives, because the Leftist ideology only ensures that freedom is replaced with tyranny.

 

Although the Left constantly claims President Trump and his administration and supporters are “fascists”, Americans saw real live fascists, every bit as despicable and violent as the Brown Shirts of Nazi Germany, prior to Trump’s nomination and after the election. Various groups have gathered under the banner of Antifa, so-called “anti-fascists”, and they have prevented free speech on campuses and in cities across America, through riots and organized and George Soros-funded acts of violence, often incited by university professors who spread their hate for conservative America, from the University of Washington and Sacramento State to Clemson, Cal State Fullerton, UC Berkeley and points beyond.

 

[Blog Editor supports petition: Declare ANTIFA a terrorist organization

 

VIDEO: What is Antifa?: Antifa Exposed

 

Posted by Jason Kessler

Published on Mar 13, 2017

 

The left-wing terrorist organization Antifa explained: from the masks they wear, the belief systems they follow, to the tactics they employ to enforce their agenda. Know their plans and be prepared to defend yourself with the knowledge you gain in this video.

Support my work through READ THE REST]

 

It was Joseph Goebbels, Hitler’s propaganda minister, who noted: “History is made in the street.” Get enough Brown Shirts to silence your opponents, and you can seize power.

 

Our side is growing and also prepared to be more politically militant …”, Yvette Felarca, of the Antifa terrorist organization By Any Means Necessary, told Al Jazeera, and she added, “If the movement continues building as large and powerfully in this direction, we can defeat Trump, his racist agenda, and get him out without waiting for the next election.”

 

A howling mob of Leftists stopped Breitbart editor Milo Yiannopoulos from speaking at the University of Washington on Inauguration Day 2017, and later that month a Black Lives Matter “activist” spoke to an anti-Trump protest in Seattle and advocated for “killing the White House”.

 

On February 1st 2017, Occupy Oakland organized 1500 protesters to stop Yiannopoulos from speaking at the University of California at Berkeley, and even after they succeeded, they rioted. Black clad domestic terrorists threw bricks, beat suspected conservatives and Trump supporters, smashed windows and set fires.

 

Occupy Oakland later proclaimed: “We won this night. We will control the streets. We will liberate the land. We will fight fascists. We will dismantle the state. This is war.”

 

Does anyone recognize the irony at this point? Occupy Oakland stopped free speech where anti-war leader Mario Savo and his followers started the Free Speech Movement in 1964. Savo wanted a ban on campus political activities lifted, and he demanded freedom of speech and academic freedom.

 

Next in Antifa’s sights is Ann Coulter, a highly acclaimed journalist and an American patriot. Ms. Coulter plans to honor an invitation from the Young Americans Foundation to speak at UC Berkeley on Thursday April 27th, despite the speech being canceled by UC Berkeley. Antifa is threatening to do anything it can to prevent Ms. Coulter from speaking.

 

It is worth noting that during the April 15th free speech event at Berkeley, which was organized by independent journalist Lauren Southern, Antifa’s tactics didn’t work so well. They were promptly whipped by some anti-communist Freedom Loving Oath Keepers and bikers, honest-to God red-blooded Americans, who showed up ready for the fight.

 

These throngs of criminals and domestic terrorists clad in black use their signature chaos and havoc-laden paramilitary “Black Bloc” tactics to give the appearance of solidarity for any cause they support, and while they claim to be anarchists, they are not. Ideologically they are the descendants of the New Left uprisings of the 1960s, the Weather Underground [Bill Ayers] and the Black Panthers. They love the authoritarian State, as long as it is used to advance a Marxist agenda and browbeat the people into submission to achieve their desired goals. They are Marxists.

 

This rabble in the streets function as the strong-arm wing of the heavily left-leaning Progressive Democratic Party, whose own vitriol gave rise to much of this violence. The Democratic Party and its apologists aren’t too bothered by the riots, just as long as it’s only conservatives, Christians and Republicans who are harmed. If violence is what it takes for them to prevail, they have no problem resorting to it. This is their message to conservative America on the price of dissent where Leftists hold sway.

 

Matthew Vadum, author of Subversion, Inc, stated: [Antifa] “are nihilistic thugs who want to destroy everything that is good in America. They’re a leftist counterpart to skinheads and neo-Nazis. They call themselves anti-fascists but they use fascistic tactics against their targets. Just as Hitler’s Sturmabteilung, or SA, beat up and terrorized political opponents …”.

 

After the Berkeley riots, Yiannopoulos lamented: “America, of all places, now, is seeing political violence in response to ideas … Is this the new normal? Riots in the streets …?”

 

The Left hates conservative America and the U.S. Constitution, because we have prevented them from dictating every minute detail of our personal lives. We prevented these anti-American communists and militant leftists from fundamentally transforming this wonderful and exceptional America of ours into the hellish utopian totalitarian order of their fevered imaginings, and for our defiance we must be broken, beaten or even killed.

 

For those of us who oppose Leftist nihilism, it is impossible to reconcile with those who seek control over each individual’s life completely. No argument they present justifies eradicating capitalism. Must we accept their assertion that the greatest problems for black Americans are caused by white racism and white privilege? We have nothing in common with those who label us misogynistic and homophobic over our concerns for the traditional American family, and we certainly will never accept the notion that America is imperialistic and immoral simply due to Her defense of the country.

 

How can America avoid conflict, when the New Left — the real fascists — view everyone to the right of Bernie Sanders as racists and fascists? This is the Left’s Bolshevik moment as they attempt to gain momentum for a revolution.

 

There can only be one America, a country that respects everyone’s rights and individual liberty. There will be no truce with domestic terrorists, who act violently towards innocent men, women and children, young and old, for the sake of altering our government. They have not any right to exist in a free society, and they must be dealt with accordingly, or matters will only become worse. Normally peaceful Americans, millions who swore oaths to protect and defend the Constitution and America, will not allow these outrages to continue, and they will not see our God-given rights undone by Leftist thugs and a failed communist vision.

 

By Justin O. Smith

________________

Edited by John R. Houk

All links, photos (placed) and text embraced by brackets are by the Editor.

 

© Justin O. Smith

 

Coulter: Avoid the Need for Spying Using One Not-So-Weird Trick


Islamic Terrorist Networks USA map

 

You need to read this tongue-in-cheek article from Ann Coulter about the American government and Obama’s immigration policies. He spies on American citizens, has porous borders for illegal immigrants to flow in and brings in Radicalized Muslims while placing real political refugees or immigrants that offer value for the USA to be denied or quagmire in immigration paperwork and waiting lists.

 

JRH 6/20/13

Please Support NCCR

Protect Life, Liberty and Property from the Left


Careful What Wish For - BHO toon

John R. Houk

© January 10, 2013

 

I do not own a gun however I am not pro-gun control. I am a gun rights kind-of-guy along the lines of the Second Amendment of the Bill of Rights.

 

A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.

 

Leftists like to point out the part that says, “A well regulated militia”. This is as if militia equals a Federal government administered military. The next part brings greater context: “being necessary to the security of a free state”. The implication is that citizens of a sovereign State in the USA can ban together to aid in protecting their State.

 

The Revolutionary War was fought largely by a volunteer army to throw off the oppression of an unjust British government. The British chased that Blue Coat American army all over the place. In the mean time the British deprived Americans of their Private Property as well as confiscating weapons so they could not be used against the British army.

 

The Right to Bear Arms is the right of the “people”. Thus this excludes government control of civilian weapons because those civilian citizens have the right to protect their property from an oppressive government (whether foreign or domestic) or crime.

 

President Barack Hussein Obama is about to use the excuse of crazy people perpetuating massacres as a reason to limit the kinds of arms private citizens can own. Just like everything else this President has down to move the USA slowly to transform into a Socialist society like Europe, this President will eventually confiscate American arms just like the European nations have deprived their citizens to own fire arms.

 

This President is about to take a shot at the Second Amendment by attempting the Presidential power of the Executive Order to begin to take away the gun rights of American citizens to protect themselves from criminal acts  as well as from foreign and corrupted domestic governments.

 

Americans – We the People – need to stand against the intentions to track and disarm citizens depriving of the right to bear arms to protect Life, Liberty and Family.

 

Ann Coulter’s recent article is what started me on the path of indignant thinking concerning our government’s attempt to assault the Constitution.

 

JRH 1/10/13

Please Support NCCR

**********************************

Doing the research the N.Y. Times won’t do

Ann Coulter helps out Old Gray Lady with digging up actual facts on gun control

 

By Ann Coulter

January 9, 2013

WND

 

In Sunday’s New York Times, Elisabeth Rosenthal claimed, as the title of her article put it, “More Guns = More Killing.” She based this on evidence that would never be permitted in any other context at the Times: 1) anecdotal observations; and 2) bald assertions of an activist, blandly repeated with absolutely no independent fact-checking by the Times.

 

There is an academic, peer-reviewed, long-term study of the effect of various public policies on public, multiple shootings in all 50 states over a 20-year period performed by renowned economists at the University of Chicago and Yale, William Landes and John Lott. It concluded that the only policy to reduce the incidence of, and casualties from, mass shootings are concealed-carry laws. The Times will never mention this study.

 

Instead, Rosenthal’s column proclaimed that armed guards do not reduce crime because: “I recently visited some Latin American countries … where guards with guns grace every office lobby, storefront, ATM, restaurant and gas station. It has not made those countries safer or saner.”

 

So there you have it: The cock crowed, then the sun came up. Therefore, the cock’s crowing caused the sun to come up. Rosenthal went to Harvard Medical School.

 

Here’s a tip: High-crime areas are often bristling with bulletproof glass, heavy-duty locks, gated windows and armed guards. The bulletproof glass doesn’t cause the crime; it’s a response to crime. On Rosenthal’s logic, hospitals kill people because more people die in hospitals than outside of them.

 

(In any event, the Lott-Landes study didn’t recommend armed guards, but armed citizens.)

 

Rosenthal also produces a demonstrably false statistic about Australia’s gun laws, as if it’s a fact that has been carefully vetted by the Newspaper of Record, throwing in the true source only at the tail-end of the paragraph:

 

“‘After a gruesome mass murder in 1996 provoked public outrage, Australia enacted stricter gun laws, including a 28-day waiting period before purchase and a ban on semiautomatic weapons. … Since, rates of both homicide and suicide have dropped 50 percent …,’ said Ms. Peters, who lobbied for the legislation.”

 

“Ms. Peters” is Rebecca Peters, a George Soros-funded, Australian anti-gun activist so extreme that she had to resign from the International Action Network on Small Arms so as not to discredit the U.N.-recognized organization – which isn’t easy to further discredit.

 

Could the Times’ public editor weigh in on whether unsubstantiated quotes from radical activists are now considered full and complete evidence at the Times?

 

It would be as if the Times headlined an article, “Abortion Increases Risk of Breast Cancer” with the sole support being a quote from Operation Rescue’s Randall Terry. (Except Terry would have evidence.)

 

Whether or not the homicide rate went up or down in Australia as a result of strict gun-control laws imposed in 1997 is a fact that could have been checked by Times researchers. But they didn’t, because facts wouldn’t have given them the answer they wanted.

 

Needless to say, the effect of Australia’s gun ban has been extensively researched by Australian academics. As numerous studies have shown: After the gun ban, gun homicides in Australia did not decline any more than they were expected to without a gun ban.

 

Thus, for example, according to the Australian Institute of Criminology, the homicide rate has been in steady decline from 1969 to the present, with only one marked uptick in 1998-99 – right after the gun ban was enacted.

 

The showstopper for anti-gun activists like Ms. Rosenthal and Ms. Peters is the fact that suicides by firearm seemed to decrease more than expected after the 1997 gun ban.

 

But so did suicides by other means. Something other than the gun ban must have caused people to stop guzzling poison and jumping off bridges. (Some speculate that it’s the availability of anti-depressants like Prozac.)

 

Curiously – and not mentioned by Rosenthal – the number of accidental firearms deaths skyrocketed after Australia’s 1997 gun ban, although the law included stringent gun training requirements.

 

It turns out, until the coroner has certified a death as a “suicide,” it’s classified as “unintentional.” So either mandatory gun training has led to more accidents, or a lot of suicides are ending up in the “accident” column.

 

Most pinheadedly, especially for a graduate of the Harvard Medical School, Rosenthal says: “Before (the gun ban), Australia had averaged one mass shooting a year. (Since then,) there have been no mass killings.”

 

Mass murder is a rare enough crime that any statistician will tell you discerning trends is impossible. In this country, the FBI doesn’t even track mass murder as a specific crime category.

 

After Truman Capote’s “In Cold Blood” killers slaughtered the entire Clutter family in Holcomb, Kan., the murder rate in that quiet farming town went up 400 percent in a single year! Was it Holcomb’s big showing at the 4-H club competition that year?

 

Totally unbeknownst to Elisabeth Rosenthal, Australian academics have already examined the mass murder rate by firearm by comparing Australia to a control country: New Zealand. (Do they teach “control groups” at Harvard?)

 

New Zealand is strikingly similar to Australia. Both are isolated island nations, demographically and socioeconomically similar. Their mass murder rate before Australia’s gun ban was nearly identical: From 1980 to 1996, Australia’s mass murder rate was 0.0042 incidents per 100,000 people and New Zealand’s was 0.0050 incidents per 100,000 people.

 

The principal difference is that, post-1997, New Zealand remained armed to the teeth – including with guns that were suddenly banned in Australia.

 

While it’s true that Australia has had no more mass shootings since its gun ban, neither has New Zealand, despite continuing to be massively armed.

 

The only thing Australia’s strict gun-control laws has clearly accomplished is increasing the amount of violent crime committed with guns immediately after the ban took effect. Of course, Times reporters don’t have to worry about violent muggings, rapes and robberies because they live in doorman buildings.

 

For those who can’t afford fancy doorman buildings, bad journalism kills.

_______________________

Protect Life, Liberty and Property from the Left

John R. Houk

© January 10, 2013

______________________

Doing the research the N.Y. Times won’t do

 

© Copyright 1997-2013. All Rights Reserved. WND.com.

 

 

“Mugged” Ann Coulter Stirs Up More Trouble & Talks to Glenn Beck About It!


Anne Coulter is a pundit/author that sometimes bugs me and sometimes is amusingly witty. Coulter was on Glen Beck promoting her new book “Mugged: Racial Demagoguery from the Seventies to Obama.”

 

Below are a couple of videos and some text about Mugged.

 

JRH 10/4/12

Please Support SlantRight 2.0 With Your Contribution.

****************************

“Mugged” Ann Coulter Stirs Up More Trouble & Talks to Glenn Beck About It!

 

Mugged-Ann-Coulter- Bk Jk

 

Written by admin 

September 30, 2012

Glen Beck’s Book List

 

If there is one thing that Ann Coulter does will it is stirring up emotions and trouble. Her latest book Mugged: Racial Demagoguery from the Seventies to Obama is already off to a good start. She has already managed to set of[f] the women over at The View, especially Whoopi Goldberg, all of whom obviously had not read the book, shocker! Coulter takes a unique topic and takes it where many are afraid to go, the racial circus that the democratic party is abusing taking advantage of. Watch the interview with Glenn and The View Ladies below.

 

Click Here for Mugged: Racial Demagoguery from the Seventies to Obama

 

VIDEO: “Mugged” Author Ann Coulter talks to Glenn Beck

 

VIDEO: Ann Coulter on Her Book, Mugged-Part 1 – The View

 

“This isn’t a story about black people—it’s a story about the Left’s agenda to patronize blacks and lie to everyone else.”

 

For decades, the Left has been putting on a play with themselves as heroes in an ongoing civil rights move­ment—which they were mostly absent from at the time. Long after pervasive racial discrimination ended, they kept pretending America was being run by the Klan and that liberals were black America’s only protectors.

 

It took the O. J. Simpson verdict—the race-based acquittal of a spectacularly guilty black celebrity as blacks across America erupted in cheers—to shut down the white guilt bank.

 

But now, fewer than two decades later, our “pos­tracial” president has returned us to the pre-OJ era of nonstop racial posturing. A half-black, half-white Democrat, not descended from American slaves, has brought racial unrest back with a whoop.

 

The Obama candidacy allowed liberals to engage in self-righteousness about race and get a hard-core Leftie in the White House at the same time. In 2008, we were told the only way for the nation to move past race was to elect him as president. And 53 percent of voters fell for it.

 

Now, Ann Coulter fearlessly explains the real his­tory of race relations in this country, including how white liberals twist that history to spring the guilty, accuse the innocent, and engender racial hatreds, all in order to win politically. You’ll learn, for instance, how A U.S. congressman and a New York mayor con­spired to protect cop killers who ambushed four police officers in the Rev. Louis Farrakhan’s mosque.

The entire Democratic elite, up to the Carter White House, coddled a black cult in San Francisco as hun­dreds of the cult members marched to their deaths in Guyana.

New York City became a maelstrom of racial hatred, with black neighborhoods abandoned to crimi­nals who were ferociously defended by a press that assessed guilt on the basis of race.

Preposterous hoax hate crimes were always believed, never questioned. And when they turned out to be frauds the stories would simply disappear from the news.

Liberals quickly switched the focus of civil rights laws from the heirs of slavery and Jim Crow to white feminists, illegal immigrants, and gays.

Subway vigilante Bernhard Goetz was surprisingly popular in black neighborhoods, despite hysterical denunciations of him by the New York Times.

Liberals slander Republicans by endlessly repeating a bizarro-world history in which Democrats defended black America and Republicans appealed to segregationists. The truth has always been exactly the opposite.

 

Going where few authors would dare, Coulter explores the racial demagoguery that has mugged America since the early seventies. She shines the light of truth on cases ranging from Tawana Brawley, Lemrick Nelson, and Howard Beach, NY, to the LA riots and the Duke lacrosse scandal. And she shows how the 2012 Obama campaign is going to inspire the greatest racial guilt mongering of all time. (Amazon.com)

________________________________

Copyright © 2012 Glenn Beck’s Book List — GBTV Books

Are Social Relativists Conservatives?


Ann Coulter - Homocon

 

John R. Houk

© August 12, 2011

 

I am a huge Ann Coulter fan. I find it humorous the she slices and dices Liberals with her Conservative voice. I was very disappointed a while back when Coulter accepted to be the key note speaker at a GOProud conference. GOProud asserts it is a Conservative/Republican crowd. The problem I have with GOProud is their focus is the ungodly social value of homosexuality.

 

If I had any doubts earlier about Coulter’s Conservatism I have none now. Coulter is joining GOProud’s Board of Advisors. This indicates that Coulter definitely is not a Social Conservative values kind of gal. I was pointed toward a WND article in which Coulter defends the identity of normal of homosexual Conservatives.

 

“…I speak to a lot of groups and do not endorse them. I speak at Harvard and I certainly don’t endorse their views. I’ve spoken to Democratic groups and liberal Republican groups that loooove abortion. The main thing I do is speak on college campuses, which is about the equivalent of speaking at an al-Qaida conference. I’m sure I agree with GOProud more than I do with at least half of my college audiences. But in any event, giving a speech is not an endorsement of every position held by the people I’m speaking to.”

 

 

She said, “If you’re born gay, why would you be liberal? Are you born liberal? Gays are a demographic group that have one of the highest incomes in America, they are victims of crimes. The Muslims don’t think too highly of them. So, you know, basically the entire Republican platform is fighting the same causes any sane gay person should care about, and the entire Democratic platform is sucking up to soccer moms and women who want abortions.

 

“What do you care about that for, gay person. Abortion isn’t at the top of your list, I’m guessing. And, by the way, as soon as liberals find a gay gene, guess who’s going to get aborted? So I think all gays who are born gay are overwhelmingly conservative, maybe apolitical. And all those angry gays, causing trouble for everybody, I don’t even think they were born gay. I think they just are angry at their fathers,” she said.

 

If you are a Social Conservative Christian Right kind of person as I am, you have to see these Coulter quotes are a contradiction to Conservative-Family values. As a good Capitalist Conservative Coulter points out that many homosexuals are in the upper economic bracket of America. Capitalism is good but Capitalism without moral principle will ultimately end Capitalism. “Ending Capitalism” may sound like sweeping hyperbole; however it is Christian morality that made America good. Diluting Christian morality with Secular Humanist Moral Relativity will end America’s goodness. Even though I enjoy Coulter’s slicing political humor at Leftist’s expense, I am going to have to rethink my support for her.

 

Ann Coulter is definitely not a trend setter among Conservatives validating homosexuality as a normal lifestyle. Another WND article dated January 2011 lists a handful of Conservatives that are a part of the GOProud advisory board:

 

Andrew Breitbart

 

Margaret Hoover

 

Grover Norquist

 

Tammy Bruce (Bruce has been a homosexual before any Conservative credentials. She has thought of herself as a Democrat probably because of Social Liberalism.)

 

JRH 8/12/11 (Hat Tip: Western Journalism)

New York Times reader kills dozens in Norway


Ann Coulter

 

Ann Coulter nails Leftists in the media as well as Leftists in general that have deceptively associated Anders Breivik with Bible believing Christians and Anti-Jihad/Anti-Islamist writers in America. Coulter takes aim at the big dog of newspaper rags the New York Times. BREIVIK WAS NO BIBLE BELIEVING CHRISTIAN!

 

JRH 7/28/11

Mud libel


Stand With Palin

Establishment Republicans do not believe in Sarah Palin as a Conservative standard bearer. Fortunately for those who love to read political wit that drives Leftists nuts, Ann Coulter is not one of those establishment Republicans. Palin’s folksy and grassroots Conservatism that has so much identified with the Tea Party Movement even though I believe she is not an actual member of any Tea Party organization.

 

I am elated to discover that even Coulter is defending Sarah Palin from absurd and reprehensible “BLOOD LIBEL” being dished out by Leftists in the Mainstream Media (MSM) and the Democratic Party. Let’s be clear about the phrase “blood libel.” The original context of the phrase was lies made up about Jews doing horrible things to Christians. In the context of the Muslim world, lies are made up all time relating to Jewish atrocities. The phrase “blood libel” has been used so often that it has begun to be associated with villainous lies against a group of people or organizations against other groups or organizations. Although the a blood libel has a primary meaning of debasing Jews, today the term has evolved outside of the Jewish context.

 

So let us read Ann Coulter’s defense of Palin.

 

JRH 1/20/11

Wikileaks Founder a Terrorist?


Hannity interviews Ann Coulter about WikiLeaks. Read this: http://www.slantright.com/index.php?name=News&file=article&sid=2852. Coulter talks about WikiLeaks, National Security and the treasonous homosexual behind the leak to WikiLeaks.

 

JRH 12/2/10 (Hat Tip Ed)

Bradley Manning: Poster Boy For ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’


Ann Coulter 15

Ann Coulter in her fantastic stinging wit connects WikiLeaks, DADT and homosexuality supported by the military. This is a bit surprising considering her appearance at Homocon. Maybe Coulter is doing literary penance for hanging with the oxymoron of Conservatives claiming to be homosexuals. Whatever Coulter’s reasoning this will be a great read for Conservatives opposed to homosexuality on Biblical grounds and sure to raise the ire of homosexuals and Leftists alike.

 

JRH 12/2/10

%d bloggers like this: