Breaking Christian News is promoting a Pro-Life movie that will be available on various digital video formats available for viewing October 2 on TV, PC, Smart Phone, etc. Is an unborn child a person to be murdered or a biological appendage to discarded? LOOK FOR THE MOVIE! Hopefully President Trump nominates a Justice that addresses personhood.
JRH 9/26/20
Your generosity is always appreciated – various credit, check
Mark your calendars for October 2nd as we release this highly acclaimed pro-life movie “The Order of Rights” on various digital platforms.
Featuring evangelist Dr. Alveda King staring herself as a cameo role.
This film addresses the rights of the unborn as well as the rights of the father’s voice. We are praying for a return to America’s founding principles and to the God that inspired them. To view our trailer and sign the petition to defund planned parenthood, visit our website here.
[Blog Editor: The movie promotional website (https://orderofrightsmovie.com/) has release info, a trailer (posted below) and a small descriptive paragraph followed by a DEFUND Planned Parenthood petition which follows this sentence.]
The Order of Rights is a pro-life film. The story centers around Emma Stein, a pregnant single girl who has been advised by her mother to have an abortion. Despite the objection of the child’s father, Ethan Carpenter, and his promise to help her, she decides to go ahead with the procedure. When Ethan and his family file a lawsuit on behalf of the child’s right to life, the drama escalates as Emma’s mother, Kerri, contacts a friend in the Associated Press. Before long, the case is mired in media frenzy. The court has to decide whether the child in Emma’s womb is a person or not, and if so, if it is endowed with the unalienable rights as enumerated in the Declaration of Independence. The title, “Order of Rights” refers to the order in which the categories of rights are deliberately listed in the document: Life, Liberty and Pursuit of Happiness.
The debate over the sanctity of life is at the center of the upcoming prolife film, “The Order of Rights.” Releasing October 2,2020, from Stone Road Productions on streaming platforms Amazon, Google, and VUDU, the movie raises the issue of whether a child in the womb is a person or not.
“The Order of Rights” centers on Emma Stein (Emma Elle Roberts), a pregnant single girl who has been advised by her mother to have an abortion despite the objection of the child’s young Christian father, Ethan Carpenter (Ben Davies). Even as Ethan tries to help her, she decides to go ahead with terminating the pregnancy. Ethan and his family file a lawsuit on behalf of the child’s right to life, and their story moves to prominence as a nationally publicized court case. The court has to decide whether the child in Emma’s womb is a person or not and if so if it is endowed with the unalienable rights as enumerated in the Declaration of Independence. “The title, “The Order of Rights” refers to the order in which the categories of rights are deliberately listed in the Declaration of Independence: ‘Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness,’ such ideals often recognized as America’s mission statement upon which our governing framework, the Constitution, is based,” said Jim Ball, movie director. In most abortion cases, a mother’s ‘right to pursue happiness’ overshadows a baby’s ‘right to life.’ The film’s fair-minded approach gives audiences a nuanced look at both views of the unborn in a courtroom setting. “It is our hope to raise the voices of millions through this film who are speaking out and especially for those who cannot speak for themselves, the unborn,” said Steve Ball, executive producer. “It is also our hope that this film touches those who have experienced abortions so that they know that they can receive forgiveness and begin to heal.”
Nicholas Sandmann was in a Catholic High School in Kentucky when a made a Pro-Life school trip to Washington DC. While at the Lincoln Memorial a group of racist members of the radicalized Black Hebrew Nationalists (ironically one focus of hate are Jews ergo Black Hebrew Nationalists has zero to do with Judaism), then enter elderly Native American Nathan Phillips (not associated with Black Hebrews) was lionized as a hero by the MSM while the Pro-Life teen from Kentucky was demonized as a White racist. Phillips definitely tried to agitate Sandmann. THE PROBLEM: The MSM LIED to smear a Trump-supporting kid.
This defamed Nicholas Sandmann made of one the best speeches at the Republican National Convention that I heard. I don’t watch MSM news outlets anymore so I am unaware if any actually aired the Sandmann speech. If you didn’t catch it, HERE IT IS:
Mike Adams utilizes News Target to post an awesome anti-abortion video from the video format Brighteon. I operate two blogs SlantRight 2.0 and NCCR. The SlantRight 2.0 blog is on Blogger owned by Google which ironically owns Youtube. Blogger allows Brighteon embeds. The NCCR blog is on WordPress owned by Automattic. The irony is I seem to only be able embed Youtube videos on WordPress.
I did find this Brighteon video on Youtube posted by James Trump45 but with restrictions. That means Youtube might pull the video. AND HERE’S WHY: The Anti-abortion video targets the Dems for validating Baby-murder of unborn children.
I’m using the Youtube version on WordPress but I will include the Brighteon link so you can watch directly.
JRH 1/19/20
Your generosity is always appreciated – various credit, check
Blog Editor: Rather than capitulate to Facebook censorship by abandoning the platform, I choose to post and share until the Leftist censors ban me. Recently, the Facebook censorship tactic I’ve experienced is a couple of Group shares then jailed under the false accusation of posting too fast. So I ask those that read this, to combat censorship by sharing blog and Facebook posts with your friends or Groups you belong to.
****************************
The Awakening to Human Truth – Powerful new video forces Leftists to face the depths of their own anti-human EVIL
We’ve now posted a powerful new mini-documentary called, “The Awakening to Human Truth.” Just ten minutes in duration, the documentary forces pro-abortion Leftists to face the depths of their own evil as they call for the destruction of the very same kind of conscious human existence that once defined their own lives as unborn human babies.
Human consciousness begins in the womb. Unborn babies have memories, emotions and experiences that some people even remember. Consciousness exists in human babies long before the day of birth, at which point the child is nearly ten months old, not nine as is typically misstated by most people. This is why in Eastern cultures, a child is considered to be one year old at the moment of birth.
All abortionists living today were once an unborn human being, yet their own mothers did not choose to murder them. They chose to nurture them and care for them, allowing them to be born alive and grow into adults that turn around and demand the murder of their own brothers and sisters.
All those who advocate abortion are intensely evil, having embraced a philosophy of violence, suffering, murder and death. This is consistent, of course, with the economic and political philosophies of Leftists who espouse communism, left-wing socialism, fascism and other forms of authoritarian, corrupt government that always lead to large-scale human suffering and death.
The very philosophy of Leftists is rooted in intense hatred for life, love, abundance, liberty and real progress. Instead, they worship death, destruction, chaos, suffering, demonic entities, pedophilia, lies and lawlessness.
Murdering innocent children is always wrong. And those who celebrate it are always evil. You cannot negotiate with evil; you must defeat it.
Blog Editor: Rather than capitulate to Facebook censorship by abandoning the platform, I choose to post and share until the Leftist censors ban me. Recently, the Facebook censorship tactic I’ve experienced is a couple of Group shares then jailed under the false accusation of posting too fast. So I ask those that read this, to combat censorship by sharing blog and Facebook posts with your friends or Groups you belong to.
All content posted on this site is protected under Free Speech. NewsTarget.com is not responsible for content written by contributing authors. The information on this site is provided for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended as a substitute for professional advice of any kind. NewsTarget.com assumes no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. All trademarks, registered trademarks and service marks mentioned on this site are the property of their respective owners.
Individual States of the American Union are pushing back against the godless SCOTUS decision of 1973 in Roe v. Wade which legalized baby-killing for any reason. Justin Smith elaborates on this sanctity of human life usurped by Leftist Court decisions.
Intellectual dishonesty is the only condition that allows so many Americans to call the murder of unborn children “a right to privacy”. It allows the sacred union between men and women and their joining in love to be diminished and made so casual to the point that any product of sex can simply be tossed in the garbage, like so much refuse. It has become a cover for denying one’s own responsibility and the consequences for any ‘mistake’, as far too many deny their own irresponsible behavior, and instead, they relax comfortably in their ignoble position that destroys the sanctity of life and kills a baby that has a soul, without a valid reason sanctioned by God, an act tantamount to infanticide.
Recently, after chaos broke out during a debate over a proposed abortion bill in Alabama’s state Senate, Lieutenant Governor Will Ainsworth said, “It is important that we pass this statewide abortion ban legislation and begin a long overdue effort to directly challenge Roe v. Wade”.
Not long afterwards on May 14th 2019, Alabama Governor Kaye Ivey signed into law the Alabama Human Life Protection Act, without exceptions for rape and incest, that was approved by overwhelming majorities in both chambers of the legislature. The Governor noted: “To the bill’s many supporters, this legislation stands as a powerful testament to Alabamian’s deeply held belief that every life is precious and that every life is a sacred gift from God.”
This is the issue nationwide. Far too many Americans are not willing to acknowledge the fact that sex between a man and a woman is a sacred matter ordained by God. They are not willing to admit that the product of such unions — a little vulnerable innocent live baby — cannot and must not be taken away on a whim, due to the inconvenience it may cause them.
Abby Johnson, one of the youngest ever to head a Planned Parenthood clinic, had her come to Jesus moment at a time in her life, when she had already facilitated nearly 22,000 abortions. One day in October 2009, she was asked to assist in an abortion at the clinic in Texas. Here is her emotional testimony: “Ultimately I left [Planned Parenthood] after witnessing a live … procedure where I saw a thirteen week old baby fight and struggle for his life against the abortion instruments only to lose his life, and I knew there was humanity in the womb. I knew that for all these years I had essentially put the rights of the woman above the rights of the unborn child, and it became very clear to me in that moment that our rights should be equal — that one shouldn’t supersede the other.”
It is accurate to state that a newly created human being is human because it has its own very specific and unique DNA. Life begins at fertilization and any action that puts an end to human life is indisputably a homicide, not matter how cute, obtuse or disingenuous one wants to be on the topic. Unborn children are not property or parasites to be discarded at will.
It’s important to note here that Roe v. Wade is a 1973 lawless ruling by the Supreme Court that has been foisted upon a majority of states in stark contravention of actual laws that they passed. There is not one actual law in existence that states a woman has a right to an abortion, and nowhere does any such thing exist within the constitution, something the Supreme Court conceded in the Roe decision itself. The Court uncertainly concluded that any guarantee of personal privacy only extended to areas such as procreation, contraception and childrearing.
Shortly after Roe was delivered by the Court, John Hart Ely, a supporter of legalized abortion and a Harvard Law School professor, wrote: “Roe is bad … because it is not constitutional law and gives almost no sense of an obligation to try to be.”
Justice Blackmun offered no sound logic in support of his decision, and in the forty-six years since the Roe v. Wade ruling shoved its way into American society, no one has produced a convincing defense of Roe on its own terms and merit.
Before Roe v. Wade this issue fell to each respective state to determine democratically through the duly elected representatives. The Supreme Court’s dictate was erroneous on its face, and this judicial tyranny resulted in the circumvention of the will of the people at the time and the deprivation of the states’ authority and rights under the 9th and 10th Amendments, every bit as bad as if a despot had been in control of America.
Currently, there are nearly twenty other states poised to act more stridently to ban abortion, and with recent changes in the membership of the Supreme Court, any challenges have a good chance to be struck down. It also appears that some states are purposefully crafting these laws precisely to see Roe v. Wade rescinded in the affirmative support for the life of the unborn child. Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch are probably the most certain pro-life Justices; in February of this year, Thomas wrote that Roe was among the Court’s “most notoriously incorrect decisions“, and he gave the 1857 decision of Dred Scott v. Sanford as another equally bad decision that said black slaves were property and not citizens.
People just don’t understand the Constitution, if they agree to submit to unconstitutional rulings, especially in light of the fact that the Supreme Court has admitted to being wrong over 300 times by reversing their own rulings. And more importantly, Americans no longer seem to understand their own divine nature having been created in the image of God.
I grew up understanding that all souls were known to God long before He gave Us our human form, by way of my dear Grandmother’s constant reminder as she recited Jeremiah 1:5 from the Old Testament: “Before I formed you in the womb, I knew you. Before you were born, I set you apart; I appointed you as a prophet to the nations.” Just as God knows and loves each of Us long before we are born, Americans, people everywhere, must learn to love the Unborn Child while he or she is still in the womb.
Americans must fight for the right of all human life to exist, despite the sad truth that a generation and a half have lived in America seeing legality as a basis for their morality, no matter how wrong or heinous the act. Abortion must be revealed for the morally reprehensible act it truly is, an act that has reduced medicine to tearing limbs from feeling beautiful unborn babies, while we also move American society towards ending the federal legality of abortion and returning the issue to the states. Americans must stop killing babies for fear of poverty and any other rationalized false justification. We must protect our children in the streets and in the womb and stop this insane acceptance of infanticide, or surely one day face the wrath of God.
Abortion is a horrendous act of murder perpetrated on an unborn life PRIMARILY for the purpose preventing unwanted pregnancies from promiscuous consensual sex.
The only potential caveat for an acceptable abortion is to save the life of the mother for whatever the legitimate medical reason in existence. There are other caveats that are a matter controversy among Pro-Lifers related to rape, incest, physical/mental disabilities and/or other unborn maladies I can’t think of. BUT those controversial matters for abortion are miniscule compared to the downright genocidal taking of unborn life for the sake of unwanted pregnancy due to promiscuous copulation (92% in the USA).
Abortion is nothing less than the murder of Unborn Children, Babies, and on the anniversary of Roe v Wade, January 22nd 1973, the Empire State of New York has just passed its abominable Baby Murder Act, the “Reproductive Health Act“, that attempts to give legitimacy to this abominable, heinous and horrific practice, by calling abortion a “fundamental right”. This act stands in direct contravention of the virtues and principles, that built America, often referenced as a “shining City on the Hill”, and there are consequences for these actions, which are unacceptable under any set of circumstances. We must protect the lives of the Unborn Children.
New York was already doing a fine job of slaughtering the innocent Unborn, under its “archaic abortion law, as described by the secular Leftist media, as it aborted twice the number of babies as the national average — one baby aborted for every two that were born with more black babies murdered in the womb than brought to birth. Only a blood lust could demand such a heinous law be expanded.
Shortly after passage, Sarah [née] Ragle Weddington, an attorney who represented Norma “Jane Roe” McCorvey in the original case, excitedly exclaimed, “To see New York pass a bill so that right is protected is just a dream come true.” Curiously and ironically, one never hears the Leftstream media mention that Norma McCorvey became Pro-Life in 1995 and dedicated her life to opposing Roe v Wade.
In celebration of their demonic act and their hate for life, that allows a baby to be murdered the very day up to its birth, a full 9 months, Governor Andrew Cuomo and his fellow Democrats lit theOne World Trade Center in a bright neon pink light, as they delighted and cheered along with their mainstream media tools.
Must I state the obvious. Taking the lives of a babies right up until the day they could be delivered alive IS NOTHING TO CELEBRATE. IT IS PURE EVIL.
Charlie Daniels tweeted: “The NY legislature has created a new Auschwitz dedicated to the execution of a whole segment of defenseless citizens. Satan is smiling.”
As Lifesite noted: “Declaring abortion a ‘fundamental right’ opens the door to invalidating ‘any limits on abortion’ and ‘mandating’ that everyone take part in the culture of death … and [having] the effect of ‘authorizing infanticide’ …”.
Bishop Edward Scharfenberger of the Albany Diocese observed that the law appears to be a step toward criminalizing anyone who does not subscribe to the Democratic Party’s Anti-Life platform. How will this illegitimate “law” affect Pro-Life nurses and doctors and health facilities and maternity services? The Good Bishop offered: “If abortion is deemed a fundamental right … I shudder to think of the consequences this law will wreak … Will being pro-life one day be a hate-crime in the State of New York?”
Although all abortions are wrong, I and many other Americans would offer this caveat. Young women surviving rape and mothers with young children at home and truly endangered by their pregnancy can be forgiven, for choosing this path. I would hope and pray that in the former case, a woman might be strong enough to want her baby, or at least let the baby live and place it for adoption.
The moral bankruptcy of New York’s new law is fully exposed in the last phrase of this sentence: “An abortion may be performed by a licensed … practitioner within 24 weeks from the commencement of pregnancy, or there is an absence of fetal viability, or at any time when necessary to protect the patient’s life or health.”
Does this mean that any woman can now have an abortion if the day before delivery of her baby she feels that she can’t handle the stress of raising a child?
In New York, it was already the law that doctors and nurse practitioners could abort babies through nine months to save a mother’s life. “Health” has been added to this act only to ensure that women have a greater access to abortion, should they desire one for any reason. Based on political jargon, the Reproductive Health Act has nothing to do with “reproductive health” and it fundamentally devalues the life of any Unborn Child.
It’s the child’s mere existence, not the pregnancy, that poses the alleged health risk. The pregnancy can be concluded by delivering the baby alive, rather than murdering him or her. One should be able to see the glaring sophistry in the argument for abortion.
Lifesite expands the discussion with this explanation: “The bill is also part of a broader trend of left-wing states codifying a ‘right’ to abortion in anticipation of a future Supreme Court ruling that could reverse Roe, restoring states’ ability to ban abortion themselves and automatically banning it in the handful of states with pre-Roe bans still on the books.”
If You’ve never heard any former abortionists speak on the topic, the baby is injected with a poison directly into his little skull or body, and his developed nervous system allows him to feel and suffer through an agonizing and painful death. After writhing and suffering in agony, sometimes it is discovered at the next day ultrasound that the baby hasn’t died, and he is injected again. He’s soon delivered dead by the woman who has no claim to the word “mother”. [Blog Editor: Various graphic methods of abortion]
Abortion has never been about “reproductive health”, rights or freedom. It is about self-centered feminist women who want to walk away “clean” from an unwanted pregnancy just as some worthless men can physically walk away. However, the women are the ones left to deal with the physical and mental trauma of miscarriage and abortion, and even though many women think abortion is crucial to their cause, they and their children are the ones most hurt by atrociously immoral bills, like New York’s.
America must not allow loosely constructed laws that contain “health” undefined to deceptively use a multitude of reasons, like mental and emotional stability, age and family situation as factors in any abortion. If such is now the case, a depressed woman who loses her job and her boyfriend or husband at nine months pregnant can now easily get an abortion in New York, if she so desires. No problem. This cannot stand.
The One World Trade Center should have been lit up Blood Red.
By Justin O Smith
________________________
Heads up: Justin submits posts at numerous websites & blogs with suggested titles for Editors to choose from. There is an excellent chance you will run into the same post with a different title or editing format.
Edited by John R. Houk
All source links and text embraced brackets are by the Editor.
Do you know the history behind the term “Abolitionism”? I am guessing if you are a product of America’s current Leftist education system and the Left’s penchant to revise history, you might be a little clueless.
In American history Abolition was a movement to free African-Americans from the bonds of slavery. By the time Republican Abraham Lincoln was elected in 1860, the Southern Slave States were concerned Lincoln’s election would mean interference in the slave economy and thus rebelled against the Northern Free States. The irony about Southern slave concerns is that President Lincoln never acted on slavery until 1863 (Lincoln and EmancipationProclamation), two years into the roughly four year Civil War that ended in 1865.
So, what has me reminiscing about American history and the Abolitionist Movement? I ran into a Tim Brown post at the Freedom Outpost with this title: “Why Abolitionism isReplacing the Pro-Life Movement”.
After seeing the title, I had to ask myself, “What in the world does the Abolitionist Movement that led to freeing the slaves have to do with the Pro-Life Movement?”
Well, it turns out that a movement is being initiated in Oklahoma that believes the tactics of the Pro-Life Movement have been ineffectual in reversing the curse of killing babies as a method of birth control. The movement being initiated in Oklahoma is called Abolitionism. Here’s an excerpt from the Freedom Outpost article (which I will be cross posting below my thoughts):
While the pro-life movement may mean well, it has the wrong concept of dealing with the murder of the unborn. The pro-life movement, like its progressive counterparts, want to incrementally push their agenda.
The problem is that they are always allowing space and reason for the murder of the unborn.
Abolitionism in the modern context reasons that Pro-Life has been too tepid on why there is a Pro-Life Movement; viz., to radically inject the Christian Faith and vocally proclaim the Word of God and the moral ramification in Christ on killing babies. Especially looking at sexual promiscuity of unwed people causing a pregnancy.
The centrality is to know wrong is wrong and right is right. Thus, any concept of incrementalism to end abortion is nearly as bad or wrong or sinful as the abortion itself.
WHOA! That’s some good preaching!
But there is a concern that needs to be measured in this new Abolitionism to end pre-born baby-killing. My concern is that some idiot Christian will believe God has called him to act seditiously against the rule of law to the point of even killing pro-abortion advocates or doctors performing the baby-killing procedure.
Pre-Civil War abolitionists were also a God-fearing Christian lot that correctly believed slavery was morally reprehensible. As long as the Abolitionist activist civil disobedience was limited to helping escaped slaves to freedom by some kind of underground railroad so-to-speak, then I believe that was awesome. The modern era’s Martin Luther King is a classic American example of proper civil disobedience to cause social-cultural change.
The Abolitionists of Abraham Lincoln’s day practiced proper civil disobedience to free slaves. The Southern Plantation elitists hated Abolitionist civil disobedience because it messed with the culture they grew up in and believed should be maintained – at the very least to protect the family business.
Abolitionists were a bit more radical than President Lincoln. They wanted to end slavery yesterday, while Lincoln was willing to work compromises for the sake of the Southern economy. Southerners who had become rich from slave operated plantations wanted nothing to do with Abolition immediacy or Lincoln gradual slave elimination.
Some abolitionists were so extreme that they were willing to use violent terrorist tactics against Slave States to make a point. Such Abolitionist thinking did more to harden the Southern populace to support the wealthy plantation elites than to abolish slavery. Right or wrong, Americans don’t like to be told what to do. Fear tactics merely drove hostile public opinion against the Free State in the Southern States.
Abolitionists were peaceful protestors for the most part often active in aiding runaway slaves to escape to Canada. The most famous or infamous violent Abolitionist was John Brown who believe it was his duty to God to incite violence which he thought would embolden slaves to rise up against their masters and end slavery. Even many Northerners condemned Brown’s violent tactics, but in the end after he was hung for murder, John Brown became a rally cry legend of the Northern States and Union Army to take the fight to the Confederate Army.
The reality was though, John Brown was a seditious rabblerouser who killed innocent people. He began his violent campaign in the then Kansas Territory and it ended with his capture in Harper’s Ferry Virginia in 1859. After which he was tried, convicted and hung for murder.
Our guest on the Road to Now for Monday, Aug. 14, Randall Fuller author of, “The Book that Changed America,” discusses John Brown’s infamous raid on Harper’s Ferry.
The irony of John Brown terrorism even in my grade school days in the 60s, the portrait of heroism of old Hollywood still made him the patriotic hero. Check this brief clip which I spotted Errol Flynn and Olivia de Havilland showing sympathy for John Brown as he was led to the gallows:
Santa Fe Trail is a 1940 American western film directed by Michael Curtiz and starring Errol Flynn, Olivia de Havilland, Raymond Massey and Ronald Reagan. Written by Robert Buckner, the film is about the abolitionist John Brown and his fanatical attacks on slavery as a prelude to the American Civil War. Subthemes include J.E.B. Stuart and George Armstrong Custer as they duel for the hand of Kit Carson Holliday.
The film was one of the top-grossing films of the year, and the seventh Flynn–de Havilland collaboration.
Some of the speech the actor portraying John Brown was actually spoken by the real Brown at his hanging which would later add to his legend as an Abolitionist hero.
And here is a song that Union troops actually sang about John Brown adapted from the Battle Hymn of the Republic:
But face it, John Brown went beyond civil disobedience escalating toward terrorism that cost the lives of people who disagreed with him. My concern there is a person listening to the new message of 21st century abolitionism that my sense God has called him to seditious murder to bring attention that abortion is murder.
That person will not only face the same result as John Brown, but in this day of lying Leftists, laws aimed at all Christian morality will bring persecution to the Bible Believing Christians that may not have been seen since before Rome became a government ordained Christian empire.
Tim Brown’s (fairly certain no relation to John Brown) article promoting the new Abolitionism to save pre-born babies from murder centers around a couple of Okies joining the Freedom Outpost team: Dan Fisher and T. Russell Hunter. Brown focuses on Hunter’s five tenets of the new Abolitionism that should be more activist oriented than the current Pro-Life Movement. The radical key of the new Abolitionism is ending the concept of “incrementalism”.
Here is the Brown article that culminates with a Hunter video preaching the new Abolitionism five tenets.
I am excited to announce that very soon we will be having a few contributors from the state of Oklahoma. Among those contributors, we are hoping to welcome gubernatorialcandidate Dan Fisher. However, to give you a taste of a man who has works that demonstrate his faith, I’d like to introduce you to T. Russell Hunter.
Mr. Hunter took time to speak with me over the weekend and we are excited about a new video that is set to rock Oklahoma politics on Wednesday and quite possibly the entire nation.
In preparation of that release, I thought it appropriate to point you to a short talk that Hunter did on why abolitionism is replacing the pro-life movement.
While the pro-life movement may mean well, it has the wrong concept of dealing with the murder of the unborn. The pro-life movement, like its progressive counterparts, want to incrementally push their agenda.
The problem is that they are always allowing space and reason for the murder of the unborn.
With that stated, Hunter lays out the five tenets of abolition and why the pro-life movement must be abandoned if people are serious about ending the murder of the unborn.
Watch the video, listen to his presentation and see if you do not agree that those who believe in the sanctity of human life must become abolitionists and not simply be content with the scraps that pro-life representatives are throwing to us in order to maintain the status quo and bow the knee to the state and Molech.
Abolitionist Russell Hunter on the five tenets of abolitionism and why the pro-life movement must be abandoned and those who seek an end to child sacrifice should become abolitionists.
On July 14, 2015, the Center for Medical Progress (CMP) released its first undercover Planned Parenthood video, blowing the whistle on the abortion industry’s practice of illegally harvesting and selling the body parts of aborted babies.
Just 17 days later, the National Abortion Federation (NAF) filed alawsuit against CMP and ultimately secured a preliminary injunction against lead investigator and CMP founder David Daleiden. The injunction prohibited him from releasing any footage obtained during NAF conferences and meetings, which David had attended undercover with the goal of exposing illegal activity by the abortion industry.
U.S. District Judge William Orrick violated the First Amendment Rights of the Center for Medical Progress (CMP) by gagging all undercover videos exposing the murderous intent by National Abortion Federation (NAF) in trafficking aborted and live birth baby parts for profit. PlannedParenthood was stung the same way. Leftists in law enforcement are doing their best to cover-up these nefarious murders and felonious activities with baby part trafficking.
U.S. District Judge William Orrick, who granted the preliminary injunction in favor of the National Abortion Federation to halt the release of the videos, ordered any links to the video to be removed after it was published by the Center for Medical Progress on Thursday.
Judge Orrick also ordered CMP lead investigator David Daleiden and his attorneys to appear in court June 14, The Associated Press reported, for a hearing where he will consider holding them in contempt for releasing the footage.
Mr. Daleiden has been charged with 15 felonies in California stemming from his undercover investigation into the abortion giant. His attorneys have called it a “witch hunt” that flies in the face of the First Amendment.
YouTube has not responded to a request for comment.
Judge Orrick took advantage of the 9th Circuit Appellate Court’s unfavorable ruling to make that gag order.
The abortion industry has desperately tried to suppress and delegitimize the work of CMP, including through the use of litigation. We represent former CMP board member Troy Newman – who is also the President of Operation Rescue – in lawsuits filed by the National Abortion Federation (NAF) as well as Planned Parenthood Federation of America (PPFA) and numerous Planned Parenthood affiliates, and we recently filed briefs in both cases.
In the NAF case, the trial court issued a preliminary injunction that prevents the defendants from publishing videos or materials relating to NAF conferences, or sharing such information with anyone, including state Attorneys General or local law enforcement officers, while the case moves forward. The defendants have appealed the decision to the U.S. Court of Appeals to the Ninth Circuit, and we recently filed a reply brief (under seal by court order) that emphasizes that government investigators, and the general public, have a compelling interest in being able to review the videos and materials themselves.
One of the founders of CMP, Troy Newman, has filed a petition with the Supreme Court to win back the First Amendment Right to expose the crimes of Planned Parenthood.
Here is the Press Release that I first received in my Inbox from Operation Rescue; however, I’m cross posting the PR from ChristianNewsWire.com.
WASHINGTON, Aug. 4, 2017 /ChristianNewswire/ — Troy Newman, president of Operation Rescue and a founding member of the Center for Medical Progress, filed a petition yesterday to the U.S. Supreme Court, challenging the Constitutionality of a preliminary injunction that prohibits the release of undercover videos recorded at National Abortion Federation (NAF) meetings – even to law enforcement when they contain evidence of crimes.
The petition, captioned Newman v. National Abortion Federation, states:
This Petition stems from an injunction forbidding the voluntary disclosure to law enforcement agencies, other governmental bodies, and the general public of recordings and other information that the enjoined individuals and entities-as well as Congressional investigators-believe are evidence of widespread criminal, illegal, and unethical conduct, including felonies.
Newman is represented by Jay Sekulow, who leads Newman’s team of attorneys from the American Center for Law and Justice (ACLJ).
During Newman’s tenure on the Board of the Center for Medical Progress, the NAF, and later Planned Parenthood, filed suits in a San Francisco Federal Court against Newman and others in an effort to prevent the release of further undercover videos that exposed the illegal trade in aborted baby body parts.
And it is little wonder that the NAF would not want the videos released.
Newman’s Supreme Court Petition notes that Congressional investigations conducted by the SenateJudiciary Committee and the House Select InvestigativePanel on Infant Lives referred members of the National Abortion Federation and Planned Parenthood to federal, state, and local law enforcement agencies for criminal investigation and prosecution.
Newman argues that the enjoined recordings corroborate the determination of the two Congressional investigations, which found evidence that NAF members (including several Planned Parenthood organizations) were engaged in the following criminal conduct:
Profiting from the sale of fetal organs;
Altering abortion procedures for financial gain;
Performing illegal partial-birth abortions;
Killing newborns who survived attempted abortions;
Failing to obtain informed consent for fetal tissue donations;
Violating federal regulations regarding Institutional Review Boards (IRBs); and
Fraudulent overbilling practices.
Newman’s petition further states:
It has long been a tenet of Anglo-American jurisprudence that individuals who believe that they have information concerning criminal or illegal activities should be permitted, and encouraged, to voluntarily provide such information to government authorities. Similarly, investigative journalism concerning matters of public concern, including the uncovering of illegal, unethical, or troubling activities, is a constitutionally protected, venerable undertaking.
Newman’s unsuccessful appeal to the Ninth Circuit was joined by state 14 Attorneys General, led by Arizona, who are seeking to review the evidence contained in the recordings.
As the most important abortion case currently under litigation, Newman v. NAF could have profound implications on the future use of undercover investigative techniques and the ability of law enforcement to gather evidence in criminal investigations.
Operation Rescue is one of the leading pro-life Christian activist organizations in the nation and has become a strong voice for the pro-life movement in America. Click here to support Operation Rescue.
Christian Newswire is the most used and most recognized distributor of religious content news releases in the nation.
Over 2100 public policy groups, government agencies, PR firms, religious organizations, think-tanks, watchdog groups, advocacy groups, coalitions, foundations, colleges, universities, activists, politicians, and candidates use Christian Newswire to distribute their news releases. Click to see our client list.
How much does it cost?
$75 is what we charge to transmit your 400-words-or-less(‡) news release to our exclusive national media list. Our competitors charge from $295 to $395, yet they do not have the direct contact with reporters and news producers that we have.
You do not need to use a credit card. We will send you a bill. It is that easy. Just emailus your news release, or use theform onthis websiteand tell us to send it out. No membership fee. You are not required to purchase any additional services.
Want to know more about where your news release will go and who will see it?
National list of over 2500 reporters and news producers whosebeat is “conservative & family issues”($75 for up to 400 words‡) These are TV, radio, wire-service, and print reporters/producers that cover family and conservative issues, that …READ THE REST
Roe v. Wade legalized baby-killing as a form of birth control in America in 1973. In case you didn’t know it, Roe was a pseudonym for Norma McCorvey. At the time McCorvey was 23 when she wanted to end an unwanted pregnancy. Because of Texas law against abortion she ended up giving birth but gave the child up for adoption.
The American took up McCorvey’s case to legalize baby-killing for birth control and won for Roe-McCorvey two-years later before the Supreme Court in a 7-2 decision favoring “privacy” over an unborn child’s right to life.
In 1989 McCorvey publicly made known she was the “Jane Roe” of Roe v. Wade – still a proponent of baby-killing.
“O Death, where is your sting? O Hades, where is your victory” (1 Corinthians 15:55)
WACO, Texas, Feb. 18, 2017 /Christian Newswire/ — Right after Norma McCorvey’s conversion to Christ, she wrote, “I’m Norma McCorvey, the former Jane Roe of the Roe v. Wade decision that brought legal child killing to America. I was persuaded by feminist attorneys to lie; to say that I was raped, and needed an abortion. It was all a lie. Since then, over 50 million babies have been murdered. I will take this burden to my grave. Please, don’t follow in my mistakes.”
Operation Rescue/Operation Save America is pleased to report that she did not go to the grave with that burden. She went to the grave with the salvation of her Lord. He took the burden, her debt of sin upon Himself and through His crucifixion and resurrection, redeemed Miss Norma’s guilt-ridden soul. The old Norma died (Pre Roe) and a new Norma emerged (Post Roe).
When she struggled with the overwhelming guilt of her involvement with abortion, Rev. Flip Benham, who baptized her, gave her this reassuring Scripture, “I sought the LORD, and he answered me; he delivered me from all my fears. Those who look to him are radiant; their faces are never covered with shame.” (Psalms 34:4, 5)
Rev. Flip Benham, former National Director of OR/OSA, states, “The three people most instrumental in ushering us into the era of Roe v. Wade, Dr. Barnard Nathanson (founder of NARAL), Sandra Cano (Jane Doe of Doe v. Bolton), and Norma McCorvey (Jane Roe of Roe v. Wade), are now all in the great cloud of witnesses cheering us on as we continue to fight for the lives of our Lord’s precious preborn babies. All three lied or were lied to, to give us this damnable law. All three were sinners saved by grace through faith in Jesus Christ. All three, in their Christian years, did their very best to undo the lies that gave us Roe v. Wade. All three are today more alive than they have ever been. All three have run their lap of the race. It is our turn now! Good night for now Miss Norma – we will see you in the morning!”
Rev. Rusty Lee Thomas, current National Director of OR/OSA states, “Looking back on how the Lord has used this ministry, we rejoice in the thousands of lives that have been spared, the souls that have been saved, like Miss Norma, and the many death camps that have been shut down. We pray the death of Roe (Miss Norma) prophetically signals the death of Roe vs. Wade. May the destroyer of men made in the image of God be destroyed in Jesus’ mighty name!”
Christian Communication Network, 2020 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20006
Christian Newswire is the most used and most recognized distributor of religious content news releases in the nation.
Over 2100 public policy groups, government agencies, PR firms, religious organizations, think-tanks, watchdog groups, advocacy groups, coalitions, foundations, colleges, universities, activists, politicians, and candidates use Christian Newswire to distribute their news releases. …READ THE REST
Rep. Jim Bridenstine (R) was elected to Congress in 2012 by first defeating the GOP incumbent in the Primary then winning the seat to the 1st Congressional District of Oklahoma in the November 2012 vote. He came in as a Tea Party candidate supporting less government and less taxes. He is my Congressional Representative.
I set this up because I received an email update that highlights two very bills that I suspect if it makes the Leftist-in-Chief’s desk they will be vetoed. At any rate they still represent the civil rights of Pro-Life medical professionals and the other bill more specifically defines what each branch of government can and cannot do pre-empting bureaucratic rules as laws that are not enacted by Congress,
Rep. Bridenstine first highlights the Conscience Protection Act which enables a medical professional or hospital to NOT be forced to perform abortions if it violates their conscience. This would not only undercut Obama’s Executive Orders that instruct the Obama Administration bureaucrats to force otherwise BUT ALSO prevent a State apparatus under the thumb of Leftists from forcing conscience violations.
The next Congressional Rep. Bridenstine looks at is Separation of Powers Restoration Act. SCOTUS is case law oriented more than interpreting the Constitution with Original Intent standards. The result has led to the slow watering down of the intended Liberties and Rights of the U.S. Constitution, the Bill of Rights and Amendments ratified after the Bill of Rights. Thus the unconstitutional doctrine of the Living Constitution has superseded Original Intent that has led to Executive Branch superiority in a system in which Legislative, Executive and Judicial branches were originally arranged as separate but equal with a concept of Checks and Balances institutionalized in the Constitution.
The Separation of Powers Act (SOPRA) is specifically designed to reverse the course of Federal Bureaucratic Agencies from turning regulations into the force of law without action from Congress. SOPRA would eliminate the case law that established the Chevron Deference (1984) standards in which Courts would uphold bureaucratic regulatory interpretation of legislation as the force of law.
The Bridenstine email below is editorially focused on the two Acts mentioned above. The Congressman addresses other issues as well but these two piqued my interest.
The House recently passed landmark pro-life legislation to stop abortion coercion. The Conscience Protection Act prohibits government from penalizing or retaliating against any health care provider who refuses to participate in abortion activities, or insurers who refuse to provide coverage. The bill also creates a right to sue for anybody forced to violate their consciences on abortion.
I believe that abortion takes the life of an unborn child and harms women. Even if some disagree with that, we can all agree that government should respect everyone’s freedom to NOT participate in abortions. Government should not require hospitals, doctors, nurses and insurances plans to carry out, assist in, or pay for abortions. The Conscience Protection Act enhances important protections against abortion coercion. The Senate should waste no time in getting this bill to the President’s desk.
Federal law has protected conscience rights on abortion since the 1970s across the private sector. In 2005, the “Weldon Amendment” expanded these rights to cover institutions receiving government funds. Now, state and local governments, including California and New York, are increasingly threatening to withhold funding to coerce insurers to provide abortion coverage and pro-life hospitals, doctors, and nurses to participate in abortion activities.
When government engages in abortion coercion, the only available remedy is filing complaints to the Department of Health and Human Services. Predictably, HHS has slow-rolled its response. That’s why the Conscience Protection Act is so important: the pro-life community needs standing to sue, not more paperwork to fill out.
Today, the House passed landmark pro-life legislation to stop abortion coercion. The Conscience Protection Act prohibits government from penalizing or retaliating against any health care provider who refuses to participate in abortion activities, or insurers who refuse to provide coverage. The bill also creates a right to sue for anybody forced to violate their consciences on abortion. – Read More at: http://bridenstine.house.gov/blog/?postid=741
Recently, the House passed the Separation of Powers Restoration Act (SOPRA), a bill that aims to take back Congress’s legislative power. President Obama has consistently used bureaucratic rules and regulations to bypass Congress and implement his liberal agenda.
The Separation of Powers Restoration Act is a good step towards reining in the executive branch’s ability to essentially create laws through regulations, however, more must be done. Congress must use the power of the purse to defund harmful rules and regulations when the executive branch steps outside its Constitutional authority.
I am a little hampered from doing my typical introductory duties today due to recovering from cataract surgery and I feel a one-eyed cyclops, Because of the surgery I am excerpting Justin Smith’s thoughts to the submission. This also me tugging on potential heartstrings: If anyone would like to donate to my hospital deductible feel free to avail yourself to either my paypal button on SlantRight 2.0 blog or to the
link under my initials
This submission addresses the recent abortion SCOTUS ruling on June 27th.
The recent Supreme Court ruling on Texas abortion clinics needs much closer examination, and by that same token so too does the overall question of abortion and how We proceed in the future as a moral nation that truly does value all life.
Life has intrinsic value, but pro-abortionists of the Far Left and the Democratic Party, who have already received their unalienable God-given right to life, have ignored the rights of the unborn to live since the 1973 Roe vs Wade Supreme Court decision. They have attempted to desensitize American society to the murders of nearly 70 million babies, horrifically and painfully killed by being ripped apart, suctioned, chemically burned and decapitated, and far too often their agenda has been advanced by Supreme Court Justices, who have interjected their own political bias into a case rather than objectively interpret the law, just as America witnessed once more on June 27th, 2016.
The Court’s opinion, written by Justice Stephen Breyer, struck down two safety-directed and medically sound common sense provisions of Texas law that demanded abortion physicians must have “admitting privileges” at a hospital within 30 miles of their abortion clinics and that abortion clinics must meet the standards of an “ambulatory surgical center.” The decision called these provisions an “undue burden” on a woman’s non-existent and phantom “right” to an abortion, which illustrates how sick and lost America has become, as our courts, many so-called “leaders” and many citizens define what constitutes life based on convenience, the height of inhuman evil.
Star Parker, a well-known journalist, observed in her June 29th article that the requirement for Texas abortion clinics to meet the standards on an “ambulatory surgical center”, a provision adopted by 20 other states, was a direct response to the Kermit Gosnell case in Pennsylvania. Gosnell operated a filthy, unregulated clinic for years, and he was convicted on manslaughter and murder charges stemming from his unsavory, immoral and incompetent procedures.
Many Americans have a great appreciation for their right to privacy, but that right does not supersede the right of the unborn to their lives. The hypothesis advanced in the 1965 Griswold vs Connecticut decision and the basis for Roe vs Wade was created from thin air and incoherent logic, pulled straight from the Supreme Court’s ass. In similar fashion, the Court’s June 27th decision was pulled from its collective ass, with Justices Ruth Bader Ginsberg, Elena Kagan, Anthony Kennedy and Sonia Sotomayor joining Breyer in finding within the 14th Amendment and the U.S. Constitution a “right” unknown to our Founding Fathers, a right that actually embodies an atrocity that the Founders most certainly would have rejected if it had come before them.
There is absolutely no mention of anything in the U.S. Constitution or the Bill of Rights and subsequent amendments that remotely resembles any right to abortion. As such, anything concerning abortion must fall to the States, because the Tenth Amendment plainly states: “The powers not delegated to the United Sates by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.”
Justice Antonin Scalia, a staunch conservative, provided years of objective service and his adjudication of cases should serve as a template. Scalia noted in 2009: “I do not believe that the Constitution requires States to permit abortion, but neither do I believe it invalidates state laws that permit abortion”.
Following the latest trends activated by minority protests and their own whims, time and again, ignorant high-perched idiots on the Supreme Court, this council of kings __ court jesters to be more accurate __ have supplanted sound existing laws, proper precedents, referendums and the will of the people and tradition with perversions of the law, as viewed through the lens of Obamacare, “gay” [same-sex] marriage and religious liberty. They make law rather than interpret law objectively, and in the process, they betray America and trample on the critical ingredient of our democratic constitutional republic __ our Liberty.
Thomas Jefferson, a lawyer and our third U.S. President, foresaw this day, stating: “… the germ of dissolution of our federal government is in the constitution of the judiciary; an irresponsible body … advancing its noiseless step like a thief over the field of the jurisdiction, until all shall be usurped from the states … [It] will become as venal and oppressive as the government from which we separated.”
While one ponders all of this, bear in mind that Margaret Sanger’s Negro Project, the fountainhead of Planned Parenthood, started as a eugenics plan to contain the “inferior” races through birth control, sterilization and abortion, a plan to make certain only the most “fit” were allowed to be born. And, as Rev. Jesse Peterson observes in ‘From Rage to Responsibility’, Sanger never intended for abortion to be widespread in the white population; she viewed abortion as a method for improving the population by convincing poor minorities to murder their unborn babies.
Since 1939 abortion on demand has been a part of the Far Left’s vision for America and the Democratic Party’s platform. In fact, abortion as birth control is implicit in the Democratic Party’s platform for 2016 and beyond, and they are demanding the revocation of all restrictions on abortion, including the gruesome partial-birth abortions in which late-term babies are murdered as they exit the birth canal.
On June 27th, Hillary Clinton tweeted: “Women won’t be ‘punished’ for exercising their basic rights,” suggesting that babies are a form of punishment rather than a gift from God, unless the mother decides she wants the baby. But packaging abortion as “a woman’s right to choose” ignores the rights of the father and the rights of the unborn child.
Abortion is the murder of a human child, and it should be illegal.
America’s Founding Fathers articulated one’s right to life in the Declaration of Independence, in such a manner that the right to life is known and recognized to be fundamental to the unalienable God-given rights our Constitution was designed to protect; and, since life begins at conception, each individual human life has an unalienable right to life from its earliest beginning. This is especially true once the unborn baby can survive outside the womb, and as such, even in the womb, these babies are deserving of “due process” and “equal protection” under the law, as provided under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments.
Unmask the horror of abortion and reveal the beauty and worth of those little persons residing in millions of wombs across America, our fellow human beings, in every definition of the word “person” __ Little perfectly formed human babies. Negate and nullify the abortionists’ claim to constitutional primacy, with the certainty that these little human beings’ unalienable rights come from God by virtue of the fact that all humans are created in His image, imbued with a unique dignity and worth not found in the rest of creation, and move America to once again see abortion as grossly immoral, barbaric and criminal, just as America viewed it centuries before this generation.
End this abominable practice by advancing the standard that “these truths” are “self-evident” throughout States’ constitutions and Congressional mandates, while dismissing and refusing to obey the Supreme Court’s edicts that are based on pretexts and ill-conceived logic and that are contrary to American principles that value life and liberty.
JRH 9/26/20
The Conservative-Patriot Christian Right 
