Examine the Future of Smart City Tyranny

John R. Houk, Blog Editor

May 8, 2023

The Plandemic (the CCP-virus known as COVID) is/was a disease that had ill-effects that were largely preventable by already existing remedies that were vilified by greedy Big Pharma corporations wanting to make a profit from their dangerous experimental mRNA Jab. THAT Plandemic – in my opinion – was a three year practice on how to enforce tyranny on a fearmongered world population.

Enter the planned tyranny to control the masses b plugging them into surveilled yet restricted 15-MINUTED SMART CITIES.

Unsurprisingly, Smart Cities are being pushed as the next convenience to make the human race a happy people. THE REALITY is for the normal working person, the Smart City will be a despotism of control while the wealthy Elites will have the freedom of mobility at the expense of the controlled working human drones.

I begin with a short and long video on this emerging Globalist tyranny followed by a couple posts shared in excerpt fashion and ending with a lengthy yet informative post from A Lily Bit that you should read if for any reason to know what to resist on an individual basis. It’s title, “Billionaires Playing Sim-City: An Emotionless Look at the WEF’s Great Reset—Spoiler Alert, It’s Still Bad”.

The Good Morning CHD show on May 5 divided the show between discussions on Smart City Tyranny (largely with W. Scott McCullough) and a World Health Organization (WHO) Globalist Power Grab via Pandemic Treaties ending National Sovereignty (largely with Professor Francis A. Boyle). At about the 60-minute mark MEP Christine Anderson is shown giving about 3-minutes on Smart City Tyranny (I’m actually giving Anderson a separate video to place her first).

JRH 5/8/23


Thank you to those who have stepped up! I need Readers willing to chip in $5 – $10 – $25 – $50 – $100. PLEASE YOUR generosity is appreciated. PLEASE GIVE to Help me be a voice for Liberty:

Please Support CPCR

YOU CAN ALSO SUPPORT via buying women’s menstrual health, healthy collagen, vitamin supplements/products, coffee from my Online stores: My Store (please use referral discount code 3917004): https://modere.co/3f9x6xy

Big Tech Censorship is pervasive – Share voluminously on all social media platforms!



Posted by SnowPheonix

First Published May 6th, 2023 3:37 UTC

**It’s about control.** It’s about Yeah, pretty much imprisoning people in their assigned area. Why am I saying this? I mean, a lot of people may say, Well, he or she goes against spreading, you know, conspiracy theories. Well, look at what they’re doing. They’re where they’re starting to build these **15 minute ghettos.** They’re not starting by, you know, a building schools or hospitals or you know, leisure parks or none of that no libraries. No, they **start by erecting barricades and installing surveillance cameras. That is a big tell.** So anyone jelling me, it’s about making my life easier. Yeah. Right. Not for a single second, will I believe this BS it is coming? And how will they control it? I mean, you know, all there is simple, they will not no longer need electrified barbed wire fences all around this this area, no digital idea. That will do it.

Take a look to China. That is our future. (If we didn’t take action)


Bitchute VIDEO: Smart Cities + Pandemic Treaties

Posted by SlantRight2

First Published May 7th, 2023 15:31 UTC

Stephanie Locricchio hosts discussion on the tyranny of Smart Cities and Pandemic Treaties. The program is Good Morning CHD. This topic was posted 5/5/23. Here’s shortened url of the original post: https://tinyurl.com/3749w279

Here’s the Good Morning CHD description:

Should we be concerned about our personal privacy? From pandemic policies to smart technology, there is a clear effort to control the human population. Three guests, well-versed on this topic, appear on ‘Good Morning CHD’ to disclose the details of this imminent threat. Watch the episode on CHD.TV!


[Blog Editor: Excerpted portions driving the point of Smart City Tyranny. You should read entire post.]

UN Agenda 2030 Beware: ’15-Minute Cities’ Are Another Globalist Scheme to Control, Punish, Surveil and Imprison You (Video)

By Amy Mek

December 31, 2022


Like with Covid, those questioning the Globalist agenda and their new policed “climate-friendly” zone will be labeled “extremists and conspiracy theorists.”

To seize further control of people’s lives, Globalists are pushing the false idea that these cities will “save the planet” and help all of humanity. Instead, they are nothing more than a way for them to restrict, coerce, fine, punish, surveil, and limit the fundamental right of freedom of movement for residents.

Rumble VIDEO: Oxfordshire County Council 15 Minute City”-inspired plan

[Posted by RAIRFoundationUSA

Published 12/31/22]

People do not realize that residents will only be allowed within 15 minutes of their home address, and violators will be fined. For example, under the new proposals, if any of Oxford’s 150,000 residents drive outside their designated district more than 100 days a year, they could be fined £70. In addition, the government will track and control your every movement through your smartphones & facial recognition technology, …

Globalists like to present their 15-minute cities as being for the ‘people, environment, and the greater good. However, Hopkins warns that these claims are nothing but a way to control people. Furthermore, these restrictions come from high-placed politicians and wealthy institutions who do not follow their own rules. And it was only after Covid lockdowns that the previously unthinkable idea of confining people to their local areas for the greater good was able to gain currency,” …

United Nations Agenda 2030

The “15-minute city” concept is crucial in the United Nations Agenda 2030 and their Net Zero green agenda. The World Economic Forum is also pushing this new concept. Oxford, which has declared a ‘climate emergency,’ is hoping their 15-minute cities will help achieve the council’s ‘Net Zero carbon Oxford’ vision by 2040.”

However, as RAIR Foundation USA previously reported, “the socialists pushing these outrageous proposals care much less about the environment than about controlling you.” UN Agenda 2030 is nothing less than global government tyranny that enslaves all humanity while calling the scheme “sustainable development” and “equality.” 



[Blog Editor: Excerpted portions driving the point of Smart City Tyranny. You should read entire post.]

The Real Threat of 15-Minute Cities


MARCH 5, 2023

Brownstone Institute [ABOUT PAGE]

One needn’t be a card-carrying QAnon member to have fears over these Trojan-like creations. Before going any further, it’s important to get our definitions in order. As the political scientist Kelly M. Greenhill has noted, not all conspiracy theories are wacky, and not all conspiracy theories are wrong. Take the Watergate conspiracy theory, for instance, or the fact that Edith Wilson made most of the executive decisions after her husband, President Woodrow Wilson, suffered a stroke. Quite often conspiracy theories turn out to be accurate.

Also known as smart cities, FMCs [15-Minute Cities] are places where everything imaginable, from your place of work to your favorite pizzeria, is accessible either by foot or bike (not by car, though; they will be verboten) in 15 minutes or less. What’s so bad about this?

… but these creations will also make it easier for those in power to spy on us, to harvest our data, and enable Big Brother to become Bigger Brother.

As I write this, FMCs are being actively championed by the World Economic Forum (WEF), the group behind the “Great Reset” and the idea of owning nothing, having absolutely no privacy, and being very happy. This fact alone should concern all readers.

FMC policies are currently being rolled out in cities such as Barcelona, Bogotá, MelbourneParis, and the dystopian wasteland known as Portland. What do these cities have in common? Surveillance technology. Between now and 2040, cities right across the United States (and beyond) are predicted to spend trillions of dollars on the installation of additional cameras and biometric sensors. Sure, surveillance is bad now. But, as Randy Bachman famously hollered, you ain’t seen nothing yet.

By 2050, more than two-thirds of the world’s population will live in closely surveilled urban centers, like glorified rats in cramped cages. Contrary to popular belief, we no longer live in a panoptic society. When Jeremy Bentham, the English philosopher and social theorist, put forward the idea of this prison system, there was no internet. In truth, there weren’t even cars. We now live in a post-panoptic world—a digital panopticon, if you will—with huge social media platforms collecting personal user data before selling it to the highest bidder.

The companies running these platforms often work closely with government officials, identifying supposed sinners and punishing them in the swiftest of manners. As the writer Kylie Lynch has noted, these companies know absolutely everything about you; they have instant access to your browser history, your activity online, and now, rather worryingly, even your biometrics. Not surprisingly, these Big Tech companies will have a big impact on the FMCs of the future, by providing the underlying digital infrastructure needed to monitor us and ensure mass compliance.

FMC are wolves in sheep’s clothing. Don’t believe the countless stories telling you otherwise. It has become common for elitist, mainstream outlets to poke fun at those who dare to question the “we have your best interests at heart” narratives. We have been burned too many times before. READ ENTIRETY


Billionaires Playing Sim-City

An Emotionless Look at the WEF’s Great Reset—Spoiler Alert, It’s Still Bad


May 6, 2023

A Lily Bit

Over the past few years, many publications in various forms have (mine included) warned about the World Economic Forum’s (WEF) Great Reset agenda, which aims to transform the international community into a techno-hierarchy controlled by a stakeholder elite. Klaus Schwab, the Forum’s president, is the epitome of what Samuel Huntington described as the “Davos Man” and “gold-collared workers” in 2004.


Huntington referred to these “dead souls” as individuals who have renounced their national identity. In 1994, Christopher Lasch observed that this elite had “abandoned their loyalty to America.” They view the world as their financial playground and have no allegiance to any flag or border. CNBC later characterized the typical Davos Man as wealthy, powerful, and, perhaps, disconnected, but primarily representative of the global elite.

We have been blindly heading towards Schwab’s Fourth Industrial Revolution, or Globalization 4.0, for over three decades, starting with the fall of the Soviet Union and the near silence of anti-globalization protests following 9/11. When this new revolution began is relatively unimportant, but two events at the end of the first Bush administration seem to have inadvertently hastened its onset.

First, the Soviet Union’s collapse destroyed the old geopolitical landscape, which had divided the world into two military superpowers. As US military supremacy grew, the era of neoliberal globalization entered hyperdrive, and the Clinton administration’s new generation of neoconservatives sought to keep Cold War myths alive through NATO. Second, the aftermath of the first Gulf War led to the launch of the digital age and the era of big tech and social media when the World Wide Web went public in 1993.


It is an amateurish assumption to attribute the Great Reset solely to Schwab. Many of its underlying principles are not new in theory. Technologies such as 5G telecommunications, robotics and artificial intelligence, data collection and surveillance, blockchain applications, biotechnology and genetic engineering, and transhumanist visions were already advancing and becoming more sophisticated exponentially.

A dozen years ago, urban theorist Richard Florida published his book, The Great Reset: How New Ways of Living and Working Drive Post-Crash Prosperity. Well before Schwab spoke about the opportunity to reset human civilization during the Covid-19 pandemic, Florida’s Reset promised a better life without the “ownership of real estate, appliances, cars, and all manner of material goods.”

Youtube VIDEO [16:39]: Richard Florida: The Great Reset

[Posted by Rotman School of Management

Posted on Dec 6, 2011


Several of Richard Florida’s predictions, such as the shift towards a renter economy from homeownership, are becoming a reality. This transition is particularly important for large urban areas due to population migration from rural regions. The United Nation’s Agenda 20 and the WEF’s futurist strategies share many commonalities. In 2014, Dutch economist Willem Middelkoop proposed The Big Reset in his book of the same name.

Despite its significant global presence, the WEF has achieved little as an international institution since its inception in 1971. It is largely a façade of human arrogance and self-delusion. Left to its own devices, the Forum is a rather ineffective institution. According to Schwab, the organization’s sole purpose is to promote “dialogue between stakeholders” and “does not engage in negotiations for treaties or policy decisions.” Schwab once stated, “Elites have always existed. We bring together people of influence, and we hope they use their influence in a positive way.” When questioned about whether the WEF could replace the current multilateral international institutional structure, Schwab replied that this was not the Forum’s objective. Instead, the WEF aims to initiate reforms from within the existing institutions.

The Forum functions as a massive clearing house that assimilates a vast quantity of analytical reports, geopolitical analyses, scenario exercises, and public and private symposia from a diverse range of entities including governmental and multilateral organizations, financial firms, transnational corporations, banks, NGOs, think tanks, and even intelligence agencies and elitist institutions such as the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Council on Foreign Relations, Trilateral Commission, and others.

Despite its global public profile, the Forum has not achieved anything earth-shattering on its own, apart from providing a premier space for the Davos elite, corporate multinationals, and financial magnates to network privately and develop novel ways to preserve and advance a post-capitalist technological agenda without significantly disturbing the parasitic neoliberal framework upon which these entities depend. Nevertheless, the WEF is also driven by a desire to promote a model for socioeconomic progress based on a technologically driven regime that does not provoke significant disruptions within the ruling elite class.


However, by keeping a low profile, the WEF has inadvertently created a nurturing environment where some of the most infamous members of the elite can initiate global disruptions and leverage them to further their own nefarious agendas. Jacques Attali, a French economist and social theorist, is a powerful and influential figure who is often overlooked by critics of the Great Reset.

Despite being a senior consultant to French presidents Mitterrand, Sarkozy, and a key player in Emmanuel Macron’s election, Attali’s role in the globalist agenda remains largely unrecognized. In 1989, he founded the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development with a mission to rebuild the former Soviet republics into functioning capitalist democracies, but he was later accused of gross mismanagement. Nevertheless, Attali is considered one of the world’s top global thinkers by prestigious publications such as Foreign Policy.

According to Professor Valentin Katasonov, Chairman of the Russian Economic Society, Jacques Attali’s ideas and plans for a Positive Planet Initiative align with many of Klaus Schwab’s strategies for the Great Reset. Some have even suggested that Attali may be the true “mastermind behind the Great Reset.”

Adopting a doctrine of radical scientific materialism, Attali sees all human activity, including politics, agriculture, transportation, technology, economics, human behavior, health, and medicine, as nothing more than codes that govern “sets of rules.” In Attali’s dystopian vision of the future, all such codes need to be rewritten so that a “living being” becomes “an object” and “an artifact.”

Ten years ago, Attali expressed his support for the voluntary or involuntary implantation of radio-identification chips to achieve universal traceability, creating an electronic surveillance system that would allow the elite to execute total control over our lives. Attali has also suggested that modern medicine could be the foundation for future surveillance systems, which he believes will enslave people for their own good through gentle and permanent conditioning. Attali rejected the idea that his technological utopia was Orwellian, instead believing in implicit totalitarianism with an invisible and decentralized Big Brother. Attali has recommended a reduction in agriculture, transportation, mechanical and chemical engineering, and widespread decarbonization, all of which are outlined in Schwab’s The Fourth Industrial Revolution (which I have read, so you don’t have to).

In a recent appearance on China’s state media, Schwab praised the Chinese Communist Party’s control as a role model for global transformation. Attali’s ideas and strategic plans coincide with Schwab’s Great Reset goals. His Positive Planet Initiative is also part of the WEF’s network. In his 2009 book The Crisis and After, Attali predicted an “uncontrolled pandemic” and supported Bill Gates’ pandemic strategies. During a 2021 TED talk, which was removed shortly after being posted, Attali supported a technological readjustment of the human organism through vaccination, embracing the doctrine of radical scientific materialism and advocating for the overhaul and rewriting of all codes that govern human activity.

After the fall of the Soviet Union, the US and the West envisioned a new neo-capitalist age. According to Fukuyama’s The End of History, history was coming to a close and a neoliberal epoch was being orchestrated by the US and its economic partners.

Nevertheless, the events that led to this ahistorical period may have also signaled the end of crony capitalism itself. The 2008 financial crisis hastened the erosion of the tangible value of money. All that was needed was a printing press to conjure up value and purchasing power from thin air.

A Short History of Central Banking — The biggest Scam ever invented

What better time is there to write about the scam that is our money supply and banking system than now? The public believes that all money is issued by and controlled by the government, however this is untrue. All money is presently produced by private corporations, i.e., banks, except for coins, which make up less than 0.05% of the total amount of …

Read full story


It’s possible that a stakeholder surveillance state, controlled by multinational corporations who develop and control technology, may replace neoliberal capitalism and emerge as the new sovereign state, reducing nation-states to subservience. In this scenario, the advancement of technology and its benefits may not serve humanity and democratic ideals, but rather lead to increasing enslavement of humanity, with humans serving technology itself.

Historian David Baker, writing before the WHO declared Covid-19 a pandemic, predicted various crises for the century, including stagnant real wages, worsening health inequality, more riots and uprisings, ongoing political polarization, and elites competing for limited positions of power, among others. As we have seen in recent times, these predictions are becoming reality.

The Great Reset agenda may lead to a counterrevolutionary movement, orchestrated by a global elite, which seeks to upend neoliberalist capitalism in order to usher in a post-capitalist era. Christopher Lasch warned of such a revolution in his 1995 book, The Revolt of the Elite and the Betrayal of Democracy, noting that the elites’ desire to destroy the middle class would result in a “war of all against all.”

It is important to note that post-capitalism is not synonymous with Marxism, despite the misconception perpetuated by some critics of the World Economic Forum. While they bear parallels, terms such as Marxist, communist, socialist, and fascist (in their generally accepted meanings) fail to accurately describe the Great Reset’s larger vision. In fact, those most closely aligned with the Fourth Industrial Revolution’s techno-economic ideology, such as Attali and Schwab, invert true Marxism into some weird corporation-controlled cyberpunk dystopia that reuses ideas from classical Socialism to keep people under control. [Blog Editor Bold Text Emphasis]

It should be clear that the WEF’s counterrevolution is not rooted in genuine class struggle, nor does it support the proletariat worker’s fight against a powerful global bourgeoisie that holds opaque positions in socio-economic governance as stakeholders. The Reset revolution is orchestrated by the wealthy owners of capital, rather than the average citizen, and as a result, it represents a new form of oppression aimed at further destroying the middle and upper working classes. [Blog Editor Bold Text Emphasis]

As banks and large investment firms like Blackrock continue to devour real estate, tens of millions of homeowners and small and medium-sized business owners are facing bankruptcy and property seizure.

The Dutch government’s recent land seizures from farmers is another illustration of this trend. Ultimately, the objective is to establish a depopulated caste system that benefits an empowered elite class and its privileged supporters. Below them will be a socially engineered caste made up of masses of expendable “useless eaters.”


At the invitation-only 2018 Santa Fe conference held by the National Security Agency (NSA), attendees voted on their preferred or anticipated outcome of four future scenarios for humanity in addressing the world’s impending crises.

The first and most optimal scenario portrayed our civilization’s capacity to meet and solve every obstacle and crisis. The second scenario was contingent upon a significant technological breakthrough to enable modern civilization to overcome its most daunting challenges. However, the attendees dismissed both this and the first scenario due to the perceived lack of intelligence among Western political leaders, and the belief that the most law-abiding citizens (i.e., middle and upper working classes) are ill-equipped to assume the responsibility required to tackle these challenges (which in an intentionally dumbed down society is not too surprising).

The third scenario received the most approval. It involves a controlled and orchestrated chaos, which aligns with Klaus Schwab’s preferred trajectory. This scenario is inspired by economist Joseph Schumpeter’s theory of “creative destruction” which sees innovation as a force for revolutionizing the status quo.

The fourth, and second most popular scenario, was called the “anthropological transition,” which envisions a shift towards a new social order where the divide between the upper and lower classes is so great that it resembles the separation of different biological species. This concept of a new caste system is embedded within the Great Reset as a backup plan.

The Cyborgization of Society

The World Economic Forum (WEF), known for its annual meetings in Davos, Switzerland, is the most influential platform for the super-rich and powerful. The WEF was not elected by anyone, but for many years it has acted like the world government, regularly revealing the plans that the Western power elites have for humanity. It has long been clear that …

Read full story


The concepts and ideas put forth at the Santa Fe conference are not entirely new, and have been discussed before in the Crisis of Democracy report commissioned by the Trilateral Commission in 1975. The report suggests that in order for a functioning democracy to exist, a large portion of the population must become apathetic and disengaged from civil action, and thus diminishing civil society’s public influence is essential. This may require moving towards less rather than more democracy, and even the destruction of the middle-class altogether.

Although the report was written almost half a century ago, it was resurrected in the Trilateral Commission’s Summer 2019 report entitled “Democracies Under Stress”. The 2019 report states that the Commission will return to its roots and produce content as seminal and lasting as the Crisis of Democracy report by Huntington, Crozier, and Watanuki.

The globalists have used the pandemic as an opportunity to suppress individuality, critical thinking, and self-awareness among the public. [Blog Editor Bold Text Emphasis] In this context, social movements such as the New Woke, environmentalism, and gender identity have served as predictable distractions co-opted by the same elites behind the Great Reset. Critical Race Theory and identity politics have replaced genuine class struggle, aligning with the system’s agenda to replace democracy with mass idiocracy. To achieve this goal, public control over social media networks needs to be abolished, as demonstrated by the US Democrat and EU governments’ opposition to Elon Musk’s acquisition of Twitter.

Following Obama’s 8-year presidency, the elite class had high hopes for Hillary Clinton to rule for the following two terms, resulting in a 16-year reign by established corporate Democrats. The success of the globalist ideology’s politicos and the implementation of the neoliberal project for establishing the unipolar regime described in the Great Reset would have been more likely during this time. Notably, Silicon Valley, a symbol of technological autocracy, voted heavily for Clinton in 2016 and Biden in 2020.

A significant event occurred with the “unexpected” election of Donald Trump, a maverick member of the elite class who, unlike his predecessors, at first impression espoused nationalist views and advocated for his country’s sovereignty but ultimately fell in line with the globalists’ agenda goals, by installing deep state puppets as CIA heads and vaccinating the nation. However, Trump was also opposed to international institutional structures such as the UN, World Bank, IMF, and World Health Organization, which he viewed as infringing on national sovereignty. But who doesn’t need some good old controlled opposition to keep half the population in check and the other half outraged over his hair and skin color and how he says “China”?

Trump’s presidency was feared to be a departure from the typical high-ranking clerks of his predecessors. He allegedly stood on the margins and opposed the international institutional infrastructures that encroach on nations’ sovereignty, which hyperactive globalists like George Soros, Bill Gates, and Klaus Schwab prefer to demolish. These global elites envision Schwab’s stakeholder capitalism, which would put multinational banks, corporations, and selected NGOs in charge of domestic and foreign governance. Despite Trump’s buffoonery, and the ultimate disappointment he proved to be, it may have been a surreal blessing that interrupted the globalist agenda, gave the middle class some extra survival time, and made people wake up to what went on behind the scenes. Trump’s presidency exposed the underbelly of the globalist class and its connections to the deep state apparatus. [Blog Editor Bold Text Emphasis]

However, Trump is not a suitable architect or leader for a constructive counterattack against the new global order based on the Great Reset’s plans. Nonetheless, his presidency disrupted the tyrannical forces of the new faux left and the wealthy powers that support it. [Blog Editor: I too have questions about President Trump’s future efficacy as a leader, BUT the continued efforts to prevent his return as President is evidence to me that Globalist Elites and the Deep State fear his intentions. THAT WORKS FOR ME!]

The Great Reset and its accompanying ideology of stakeholder capitalism represent a significant threat to democracy and individual liberty. It is an agenda driven by a small group of megalomaniac globalists who seek to demolish the state and national boundaries and replace them with multinational corporations and NGOs governing domestic and foreign affairs. The pandemic has been used as an opportunity to push this agenda forward and to shatter public self-awareness, squash individuality, and dumb down critical thought.

While the Great Reset may be seen as a path towards a sustainable future, it is one that comes at the cost of personal freedom and sovereigntyAs we move forward, it is essential to remain vigilant of the power grabs by the global elites and to protect our democratic values and institutions.

If you found the information provided insightful please consider becoming a paid subscriber for more in-depth insights on various topics.

If you don’t want to commit to a paid subscription but still wish to support me, you can donate an amount you choose here. Thank you!

If you do not wish to make a contribution of any kind, please leave at least a like. It costs you nothing and helps others see this post.

© 2023 Consolidated Frontiers. A LILY BIT HOMEPAGE

Dear God in Heaven – Understand Your Enemy!

John R. Houk, Blog Editor

© April 22, 2023

The Exposé – under the auspices of Rhoda Wilson (I suspect pseudonym) – is sharing an excellent Substack post from A Lily Bit on the development of the World Economic Forum (WEF). I subscribe to A Lily Bit thus I am pleased to share.

Lily (yup, probably a pseudonym) has put together a lengthy yet very informative post on the WEF. If you are a WEF agenda supporter (God have mercy on your soul), know your friends. If you despise the WEF agenda of ending personal Liberty in favor of a Borg-like collective managed by an odd oligarchy of Marxist-Corporatist-Fascists; THEN KNOW YOUR ENEMY!

I am posting The Exposé version of the A Lily Bit post. Oddly, Rhoda did not include Lily’s first paragraph from her post which is quoted below:

Shall we debunk Adrian Monck’s and Klaus Schwab’s fascinating statements and sugarcoating, that the WEF is nothing but a think tank to benefit all? [Blog Editor: The embedded link apparently is only for paid subscribers of A Lily Bit] Well, let’s take a tour down memory lane and explore the history of the World Economic Forum (WEF) — and pick it apart, tear down the charade, the masks and the “we care for you”-talks. I have a score to settle. And I promise: This is not going to be boring to read.

JRH 4/22/23

Thank you to those who have stepped up!

READER SUPPORTED! I need Readers willing to chip in $5 – $10 – $25 – $50 – $100. PLEASE YOUR generosity is appreciated. PLEASE GIVE to Help me be a voice for Liberty:

Please Support CPCR

YOU CAN ALSO SUPPORT via buying women’s menstrual health, healthy collagen, vitamin supplements/products, coffee from my Online stores: My Store (please use referral discount code 2388058): https://modere.co/3SrOHzI

Big Tech Censorship is pervasive – Share voluminously on all social media platforms!


A history of Davos meetings in context of events at the time

WEF-Davos Meeting History

Featured image: Prophecies Made in Davos Don’t Always Come True

[Posted] by RHODA WILSON 

April 21, 2023


This is a tour down memory lane and explores the history of the World Economic Forum (“WEF”).  It has been shaping and shaped by geopolitics for decades.  Leaders from around the world gather at Davos to set aside their differences and speak a common language, reaffirming their commitment to a single, global economy.

The following is an essay written by Lily describing “a journey in time through the WEF’s sweet talk: debunking their sugar-coated statements and revealing the bitter truth.”  Lily self-describes as an ex-intelligence agent picking apart the WEF and everything attached to it.  She publishes articles on her Substack page ‘A Lily Bit’ which you can subscribe to and follow HERE.

Davos – The Met-Gala for Ugly People

By A Lily Bit

The annual gathering of the World Economic Forum in Davos is where the world’s elite get together to pat themselves on the back and feel good about their power and influence. And boy, have they been successful! The WEF has been the breeding ground for all sorts of neoliberal goodies, like the rise of the financial sector, the spread of corporate trade agreements, and the integration of emerging economic powers into the global economy. Because nothing says, “improving the state of the world” like cozying up to big corporations and ignoring the needs of everyday people, right?

But fear not, my friends. The WEF isn’t just a place for billionaires to sip champagne and congratulate themselves on their own awesomeness. No, they’re also committed to “public-private cooperation” and collaborating with other influential groups and sectors to “shape global, regional and industry agendas” and to “define challenges, solutions, and actions.” Because who requires democratic decision-making when you can have several rich people decide what’s best for the rest of us?

Oh, and let’s not forget the NGOs! The WEF realised it needed to include some token non-governmental organisations to make themselves look good, so they started inviting them to the party. And wouldn’t you know it, according to a poll they conducted, NGOs are the only group that people actually trust these days. Go figure.

So don’t worry, folks. Even though the WEF is mostly about heads of state and big corporations, they’ve got everyone covered. They’ll even try to integrate the youth into what they’re doing. Because nothing screams “youth integration” like a bunch of old dudes in suits talking about global economic policy, am I right?

Humble Beginnings

The origins of the World Economic Forum can be traced back to 1971 when it was established as the European Management Forum. Its initial purpose was to introduce American-style business management practices to Europe’s top CEOs. The event was founded by Klaus Schwab, a German national who had studied in the US and who continues to lead the Forum until now. In 1987, the Forum changed its name to the World Economic Forum, and it has since become an annual gathering of the world’s elite, with a focus on promoting and profiting from the expansion of global markets.

Despite the Forum’s emphasis on globalising the economy, its politics have remained largely national. The meetings serve as a platform for networking and deal-making between corporate and financial power players, as well as national leaders. In addition, the WEF promotes the idea of “global governance” in a world governed by global markets. Its primary purpose is to function as a socialising institution for the emerging global elite, which includes bankers, industrialists, oligarchs, technocrats, and politicians. These individuals promote their own interests and common ideas that serve their shared objectives.

As noted by Gideon Rachman in the Financial Times, the World Economic Forum’s true significance lies in its ability to shape ideas and ideology. Leaders from around the world gather at the Forum to set aside their differences and speak a common language, reaffirming their commitment to a single, global economy and the “capitalist” values that support it. This reflects the “globalisation consensus” embraced not only by the powerful Group of Seven nations, but also by prominent emerging markets such as China, Russia, India, and Brazil.

Geopolitics and Global Governance

The World Economic Forum has been shaping and being shaped by geopolitics for decades. It was created during a time when West Germany and Japan were starting to challenge the United States as economic powerhouses – and let’s not forget the oil shocks of the ’70s that made the Arab oil dictators and global banks even more powerful by recycling that oil money and loaning it to Third World countries. But I guess you just had to hear it from me, huh?

In the mid-1970s, there was a rise in forums dedicated to discussing “global governance”, such as the Group of Seven meetings. Comprised of the leaders of the seven major industrial nations, including the US, (former) West Germany, Japan, UK, France, Italy, and Canada, these meetings aimed to address global economic issues. However, in the 1980s, the debt crisis led to the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank gaining significant new powers over entire economies and regions. This resulted in the restructuring of societies to promote “market economies” and prioritise the interests of domestic and international corporate and financial elites.

Between 1989 and 1991, the global power structure decided to mix things up a bit with the fall of the Berlin Wall and the collapse of the Soviet Union. And just like that, President George H.W. Bush announced a “New World Order” where the United States emerged as the ultimate ruler of a unipolar world. The West was declared victorious in its ideological war against the Soviet Union, and Western “Capitalist Democracy” was crowned the champion. The “market system” got to go global, baby! Bill Clinton, the superstar president, even led the US through its biggest economic boom ever from 1993 to 2001. Excitement was in the air. Unfortunately, it was more for them than for you.

The annual gatherings of the World Economic Forum became the talk of the town during this time. And let’s not forget about the prestigious “Davos Class” that the WEF helped establish – the Met Gala for boring people! At the 1990 meeting, the spotlight was on Eastern Europe and how they could transition into those oh-so-desirable “market-oriented economies.” Of course, the bigwigs from both Eastern and Western Europe had their secret meetings, with West German Chancellor Helmut Kohl leading the pack. He made it pretty clear that he wanted to bring Germany back together and make sure they continued to dominate the European Community and NATO.

Good old Helmut Kohl – always thinking ahead! He had a cunning strategy for shaping Europe’s “security and economic structure” by using a unified Germany as the centrepiece. His “grand design” involved firmly embedding a unified Germany within the rapidly expanding European Community. The main goal was to create an “internal market” by 1992 and to push for an economic and monetary union that could eventually extend eastward. Kohl played it cool and presented this plan as a peaceful way for Germany to flex its muscles without scaring the pants off Eastern Europeans and other countries worried about Germany’s newfound economic strength. Smart move, Kohl.

It was quite the show at the 1992 WEF meeting! The United States and newly reunified Germany teamed up to push for some serious action in liberalising world trade and bolstering market economies in Eastern Europe. The German Economics Minister even called for the elite Group of Seven to convene and kickstart global trade negotiations under the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT), which included a whopping 105 countries. And let’s not forget about the surprise appearance from the Chinese delegation, led by none other than Prime Minister Li Peng – the highest-ranking Chinese official to leave the country since the infamous Tiananmen Square crackdown in 1989.

The drama was just too much to handle when Nelson Mandela showed up as well. The new president of South Africa caused quite a stir because he used to be all about nationalising mines, banks, and other monopolistic industries when he was part of the African National Congress (“ANC”). But when Mandela arrived at the WEF meeting just after taking office, he pulled a complete 180 and announced that he was now fully on board with capitalism and globalisation. Talk about a change of heart!

But Nelson did not come alone. No, he brought no other than the governor of the central bank of South Africa, Tito Mboweni. Apparently, when Mandela arrived, he had a speech in hand that was all about nationalising stuff, which was a bit of a shock to everyone. However, as the week wore on, Mandela had some eye-opening conversations with Communist Party leaders from China and Vietnam. These guys were all about privatising state enterprises and bringing in private businesses – even though they were running Communist Party governments, but you can read more about why this makes more sense than you think HERE. They looked at Mandela and said, “Hey, you’re the leader of a national liberation movement. Why are you still talking about nationalisation?” Burn!

So, after some persuasive conversations, Mandela had a change of heart and decided to embrace market economics and encourage investment in South Africa. It paid off – South Africa became the fastest-growing economy on the continent! Of course, there’s always a catch – today, inequality in the country is worse than it was during apartheid. But hey, you can’t have everything, right? As Mandela himself later explained to his official biographer, he realised that the choice was simple: “We either keep nationalisation and get no investment, or we modify our attitude and get investment.”

The 1993 WEF meeting was all about keeping the United States in its position of global power, both economically and militarily. Participants agreed that the US needed to lead the charge in promoting greater cooperation between powerful nations. The big concern at Davos was that even though economies were becoming increasingly globalised, politics was heading in the opposite direction, with countries becoming more insular and focused on their own interests.

In 1993, Anthony Lake, the National Security Adviser under Bill Clinton, presented what became known as the “Clinton Doctrine,” which emphasised the need for the US to expand the community of market democracies worldwide. Lake argued that the US should combine its goals of promoting democracy and markets with its traditional geostrategic interests. This announcement surely pleased the Davos crowd, who were all about promoting globalisation and free markets.

During the 1994 World Economic Forum gathering, the Director-General of GATT, Peter D. Sutherland, emphasised the need for a new high-level forum for international economic cooperation that would be more inclusive of major emerging market economies. Sutherland asserted that the current system excluded the majority of the world’s population from participating in global economic management. He proposed establishing an organisation that would bring together the leading 20 industrial and economic powers, and eventually, the Group of 20 was formed in 1999. However, it did not become a major forum for global governance until the 2008 financial crisis.

In 1995, the Financial Times observed that the hot new term for policymakers was “global governance,” signalling an eagerness to enhance and modernise international co-operation efforts and institutions. At the January 1995 World Economic Forum, an official UN report on global governance was unveiled. Even President Clinton chimed in, speaking to the Davos attendees via satellite and emphasising his commitment to promoting a fresh “economic architecture,” particularly at Group of Seven meetings.

The Davos Man

In 1997, the esteemed US political scientist Samuel Huntington introduced the term “Davos Man,” referring to a clique of high-ranking individuals who “disdain national loyalty, view national borders as inconvenient obstacles that are happily disappearing, and consider national governments as vestiges of the past whose sole purpose is to facilitate the global operations of the elite.” Huntington’s thesis, as presented in the Financial Times, envisioned a world divided into spheres of influence, where “one or two core states” would reign supreme. Despite their influence, Huntington noted that the “Davos culture people” represented only a minuscule fraction of the world’s population, and their grip on power within their own societies was far from assured.

The Financial Times suggested that the “Davos Man” might not be a “universal civilisation,” but they could be “the vanguard of one.” Ah, the Davos crowd – so humble and down-to-earth.

And The Economist was quick to defend these elites, claiming that they were just replacing traditional diplomacy and bringing people together. Of course, it had nothing to do with being paid for by companies and run in their interests.

TNI fellow Susan George took it even further, calling the Davos class a genuine social class with a clear agenda. But, she noted, they were also wedded to an ideology that isn’t working and had no imagination to come up with a solution. So, just a group of powerful, clueless people – what could possibly go wrong?

A (Fascinating) Threat Rises in The East

To put it plainly, the WEF played a significant role in enabling the rise of seven Russian oligarchs, who ultimately took over Russia and steered its destiny. During the 1996 WEF meeting, the Russian delegation was dominated by these oligarchs, who had amassed massive wealth during the country’s transition to a market economy. Worried about the possibility of the Communist Party staging a comeback in the upcoming election, they banded together to fund Boris Yeltsin’s re-election campaign and strategise about “reshaping their country’s future” in private meetings. This coalition of the rich and powerful, led by Boris Berezovsky, proved instrumental in securing Yeltsin’s victory later that year, as they held regular meetings with Yeltsin’s top aide, Anatoly Chubais, the mastermind behind Russia’s privatisation program that had enriched them all.

Moreover, as the West became increasingly fascinated with the rise of Russia’s oligarchs, China was quietly emerging as the next major player on the global economic stage. By the early 2000s, China’s rapid economic growth and expanding middle class had become the new obsession of Davos attendees, who saw it as an unprecedented opportunity for business and investment. The rise of China also led to a shift in global power dynamics, with many predicting that it would eventually overtake the United States as the world’s dominant superpower.

Berezovsky laid out the obvious for his fellow oligarchs: without cooperation, their beloved market economy would crumble like a stale croissant. He urged his peers to unleash their combined power to ensure the transformation of Russia’s economy. The oligarchs heeded his call and assembled a political machine to further their own interests and entrench the market economy. The Financial Times observed that the oligarchs controlled half of the entire Russian economy, making them not just wealthy but also terrifyingly powerful.

In a rather cynical tone, Anatoly Chubais, a Russian politician, gave his two cents on the matter, saying: “Ah, those oligarchs. They steal, steal and steal. They are a bunch of kleptomaniacs, but don’t worry, let them steal everything. Once they’ve stolen enough, they’ll become respectable property owners and wise administrators of their loot.”

The spread of global markets in the 1990s also brought with it a wave of financial crises that hit countries like Mexico, Africa, East Asia, Russia, and Latin America. In 1999, the WEF meeting focused on the “reform of the international financial system” as the crises continued to spread. The Davos Class and the Group of Seven nations advised the countries in crisis to implement “radical structural reforms,” i.e., liberalisation and deregulation of markets, in order to restore market confidence and attract Western corporate and financial interests.

China had become especially keen to show off its high-level delegations since the mid-80s. At the 2009 gathering, we were all graced with the wisdom of President Putin and Chinese Prime Minister Wen Jiabao, who pointed their fingers at the United States and other centres of finance and globalisation as the root of the crisis. They bemoaned the “blind pursuit of profit” and the “failure of financial supervision” – how charming. But fear not, for both Wen and Putin promised to work with the major industrial powers to tackle these “common economic problems.” How noble of them.

In 2010, China really made a splash at Davos, didn’t they? Prime Minister Wen Jiabao, who graced the event with his presence the year before, decided to sit this one out. Instead, he sent his handpicked successor, Li Keqiang, to hobnob with the global elite. Meanwhile, China’s economy was doing better than anticipated, causing major global corporations to start breathing down their necks.

Kristin Forbes, a former White House big shot and former attendee of the prestigious Davos bonanza, had some thoughts on China’s emergence. She remarked that China is both the West’s greatest hope and greatest fear. Oh, the drama! Nobody saw China’s rise coming so quickly, and now everyone was scrambling to figure out how to deal with them. But fear not, for China sent its largest delegation yet to the World Economic Forum, complete with 54 fancy executives and government officials. And what were they up to, you may ask? Oh, just a bit of shopping for clients among the world’s elite.

So, what pearls of wisdom did the charming future Chinese prime minister Li Keqiang impart upon the Davos class? Well, apparently, China was shifting its focus from exports to “boosting domestic demand.” How quaint. And what’s the reasoning behind this genius move, you may ask? Oh, just to “drive growth in China” and “provide greater markets for the world.” Of course! And how is this grand plan going to be executed, you may ask? Well, according to Li, they’re just going to let the market “play a primary role in the allocation of resources.” I’m really not sure who was supposed to believe this.

The New York Times decided to call out the WEF in 2011. I know right? The World Economic Forum was dubbed “the emergence of an international economic elite” at the same time as inequality between the rich and poor skyrocketed. And it was not just the powerful countries that were experiencing this delightful phenomenon. The fast-emerging economies were getting in on the action, too! Chrystia Freeland, of all people, wasn’t afraid to speak up about the rise of government-connected plutocrats, stating that this wasn’t just happening in places like Russia, India, and China. Oh no, the major Western bailouts reflected what former IMF chief economist, Simon Johnson, called a “quiet coup” by bankers in the United States and beyond.

Where Global Finance Elites Come to Ignore Public Outrage and Party On

The lovely world of global finance, where banks and oligarchs hold all the power – and it only grows stronger with each financial crisis! The 2008 crisis was a doozy, and even the World Economic Forum felt the impact at its January 2009 meeting. Wall Street titans took a back seat to top politicians, and Klaus Schwab couldn’t help but note that “this is the biggest economic crisis since Davos began.” Oh, dear. Goldman Sachs, which used to throw one of the hottest parties at the annual Davos meeting, decided to cancel its 2009 event. But never fear, Jamie Dimon, the CEO of JPMorgan Chase, was determined to keep the party going. What a man.

In 2010, thousands of delegates gathered at Davos to elaborate on the “important” issues of the day, even though banks and bankers were at an all-time low in terms of reputation. Yet, top executives from the world’s largest financial institutions showed up in full force, seemingly oblivious to public outrage. The week before the meeting, President Obama called for laws to deal with “too big to fail” banks and European leaders were facing domestic anger over the massive bailouts of financial institutions during the financial crisis. Britain and France even discussed taxing banker bonuses, while Mervyn King, then governor of the Bank of England, suggested breaking up the big banks. Nevertheless, several panels at the WEF meeting were devoted to discussing the financial system and its potential regulation, with bankers like Josef Ackermann of Deutsche Bank offering limited support for regulation (at least when it came to “capital requirements”).

Read more: The Creation of War and Debt Slavery in Perpetuity | The Dark Ages, the Bank of England and the creation of the financial long cycle, A Lily Bit, 29 March 2023

What really stole the show at the 2010 WEF meeting were the secretive, private meetings between government representatives and bank executives. The number of bankers attending the summit increased by 23%, with around 235 bankers in attendance. The global bankers and corporate leaders present were concerned about the potential financial impact of populist policies aimed at regulating banks and financial markets. French President Nicolas Sarkozy called for a “revolution” in global financial regulation and reform of the international monetary system. Meanwhile, the heads of about 30 of the world’s largest banks held a private meeting to strategise on how to reassert their influence with regulators and governments. This clandestine gathering was followed by another meeting involving top policymakers and regulators.

Brian Moynihan, the CEO of Bank of America, revealed that the gathered bankers were brainstorming ways to increase their involvement. He also disclosed that much of the private discussion involved strategising about whom to approach and when. The CEO of UBS, a major Swiss bank, praised the meeting, calling it “positive” and stating that there was consensus. The bankers acknowledged that some new regulations were inevitable, but they hoped to promote coordination of these regulations through the Group of 20, which was revived in 2009 as the premier forum for international cooperation and “global governance.”

Josef Ackermann, the CEO of Deutsche Bank, proposed that it was time to put an end to the “bank bashing” and emphasised the “noble role” that banks had in the economic recovery. Similarly, Christine Lagarde, former French Finance Minister and then Managing Director of the IMF and current President of the European Central Bank, advocated for a “dialogue” between governments and banks, stating that it was the only way to overcome the crisis. Later that week, bankers met privately with finance ministers, central bankers, and regulators from major economies. How do I know? Well, you for once have to trust me on that.

At the time, finance ministers, regulators, and central bankers had a clear political message for the bankers: accept more stringent regulations or face more Draconian curbs from politicians who are responding to an angry public. Guillermo Ortiz, the former governor of the central bank of Mexico, remarked that “banks have misjudged the deep feelings of the public regarding the devastating effects of the crisis.” Former French President Sarkozy added that bankers who were awarding themselves excessive bonuses while simultaneously “destroying jobs and wealth” were engaging in behaviour that was “morally indefensible” and would no longer be tolerated by public opinion in any country in the world.

As the 2011 Davos meeting kicked off, Edelman, a communications consultancy, decided to burst the bankers’ bubble by releasing a report on a poll conducted among 5,000 wealthy and educated individuals in 23 countries, who were apparently considered to be “well-informed.” The poll revealed a staggering decline in trust for major institutions, and guess who took the biggest hit? Yep, you guessed it – the banks. Before the 2007 financial crisis, a whopping 71% of those surveyed expressed trust in banks. Fast-forward to 2011, and that number plummeted to a measly 25%. Ouch.

Après-Ski With Klaus

Despite the plummeting public trust in banks and financial institutions, Davos continued to serve as a cozy haven for the global elite to safeguard and expand their interests. And why wouldn’t it, when the Foundation Board of the World Economic Forum, its top governing body, is and was heavily populated by representatives of the financial world and global financial governance?

Take, for instance, Mukesh Ambani, who sits on advisory boards for Citigroup, Bank of America, and the National Bank of Kuwait, or Herman Gref, the CEO of Sberbank, a sizable Russian bank. And let’s not forget Ernesto Zedillo, a former President of Mexico, who also happened to be a board member once. He’s also a director for Rolls-Royce and JPMorgan Chase, on international advisory boards for BP and Credit Suisse, an adviser to the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, a member of the Group of Thirty and the Trilateral Commission, and he even sits on the board of one of the world’s most influential economic think tanks, the Peterson Institute for International Economics. Impressive, huh?

In a surprise to no one, Mark Carney, former governor of the Bank of England, was a member of the Foundation Board of the World Economic Forum because nothing screams “global economic elite” like a board of bankers and corporate honchos. Carney’s resume reads like a veritable who’s who of financial powerhouses – he spent 13 years at Goldman Sachs before moving on to the Bank of Canada, where he was Deputy Governor. He then did a stint in Canada’s Ministry of Finance before returning to the Bank of Canada as Governor. And if that’s not enough, Carney has been the Chairman of the Financial Stability Board, based out of the Bank for International Settlements in Basel, Switzerland, because clearly one job at a time is not enough for the global elite.

Mark Carney’s impressive resume doesn’t end with his role as Governor of the Bank of England. He’s also a board member of the Bank for International Settlements, which serves as the central bank for the world’s major central banks. As if that’s not enough, he’s a member of the Group of Thirty, a private think tank and lobby group that brings together the most influential economists, bankers, and finance ministers. And let’s not forget his attendance at the ultra-exclusive Bilderberg Group meetings, which are so exclusive they make the Davos crowd look like amateurs.

The World Economic Forum is not exactly a feminist utopia. But hey, at least they have one woman on their list of top dogs: Christine Lagarde, who just so happens to also be, as mentioned, the president of the ECB. Lagarde has quite the résumé, having previously served as the French finance minister during the financial crisis, the managing director of the IMF, and she occasionally rubs shoulders with the Bilderberg crowd too.

The World Economic Forum has yet another group of self-important bigwigs to make us all feel inadequate: the International Business Council. This exclusive club consists of 100 CEOs who are apparently “highly respected and influential,” although I am not quite sure who is doing the respecting and influencing. The council serves as an advisory body to the WEF, providing “intellectual stewardship” – whatever that means (it’s probably just a fancy term to make you feel dumb) – and helping to shape the agenda for the annual meeting.

The WEF’s membership is divided into three tiers because what’s more exclusive than categorising people into groups? The lowly Regional Partners and Industry Partner Groups are nothing compared to the almighty Strategic Partners, who shell out nearly $700,000 for the privilege of setting the agenda and having private meetings with delegates. And who are these elite companies, you ask? Only the most powerful and influential in the world, including the likes of Big Oil (BP, Chevron, Total), Big Banks (Barclays, Citi, Deutsche Bank, Goldman Sachs, HSBC, JPMorgan Chase, Morgan Stanley, UBS), Big Pharma (Pfizer, Moderna), Big Tech (Facebook, Google), and Big Sugar (Coca-Cola, PepsiCo), among others. Don’t you just love how money buys you access to power and influence?

Given that the Forum is bankrolled by these institutions and has its leadership drawn from them, it’s hardly shocking that Davos prioritises the interests of financial and corporate power above all else. And this bias is made even more apparent in their stance on trade issues.

Davos: Corporate Power Meets Trade Deals and Democracy Goes To Die

Trade, trade, trade – it’s all about the powerful corporate and financial interests at Davos. The World Economic Forum has made it a consistent and major issue, and as the Wall Street Journal so aptly noted, “it is almost a tradition that trade ministers meet at Davos with an informal meeting.” So much for promoting the interests of the little guy.

In case you missed it, the Davos meetings are essentially a corporate and financial power-fest, so naturally trade is a major topic of discussion. At the 2013 meeting, US Trade Representative Ron Kirk emphasised that the Obama administration was eager to “smooth” trade with the European Union, emphasising the importance of the “trans-Atlantic relationship.” Surprise, surprise, progress was made toward a trade accord that week. The year prior, at the 2012 meeting, top US and EU officials met secretly with the Transatlantic Business Dialogue (“TABD”), a major corporate group pushing for a US-EU “free trade” agreement. The TABD brought along 21 corporate executives, and the meeting was attended by top technocrats, including WTO Director-General Pascal Lamy and Obama’s Deputy National Security Adviser for International Economic Affairs, Michael Froman (who used to be the US Trade Representative). The result was a report on a “Vision for the Future of EU-US Economic Relations,” which called for “urgent action on a visionary and ambitious agenda.” Because who needs democracy when you can have multinational corporations writing trade policies?

In a move that surprised no one, the US and EU elites announced their plan to launch the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (“TTIP”) after a cozy meeting in Davos. This “comprehensive trade and investment agreement” was sure to benefit the powerful corporate interests that helped finance the World Economic Forum. US Trade Representative Ron Kirk couldn’t contain his excitement about the potential to exploit all sectors, including agriculture, stating that “for us, everything is on the table.” Finally, the ultra-rich can rest easy knowing that their financial interests will be protected above all else.

“Davos Class Fascinated by Social Unrest: Protests Just as Entertaining As Latest Market Trends” – Fact Checkers Say

The World Economic Forum seems to have a morbid fascination with social unrest, protests, and resistance movements that challenge the interests of corporate and financial elites. This interest peaked after the 1999 Seattle protests against the World Trade Organisation, which Davos dubbed the “anti-globalisation movement.” Apparently, watching people stand up for their rights and against corporate power is just as entertaining as a panel discussion on the latest market trends.

Oh, how the mighty have fallen! The Davos Class was anxious about the backlash against globalisation and the protests that were ruining their fancy little meetings. The New York Times reported that they were desperately trying to restore confidence in their precious trade agreements while pretending to care about inequality, environmental destruction, and financial instability. I’m sure they shed a few crocodile tears before heading off to enjoy their champagne and caviar.

The head of the WTO declared that “globalism is the new ‘ism’ that everyone loves to hate… There is nothing that our critics will not blame on globalisation and, yes, it is hurting us.”

The elite guest list of the annual WEF meeting in 2000 was truly impressive, with President Clinton, British Prime Minister Tony Blair, and Mexican President Ernesto Zedillo among the attendees. But let’s not forget the other world leaders who graced the event with their presence, such as those from South Africa, Indonesia, Malaysia, and Finland. Of course, the head of the WTO and several trade ministers were also slated to attend, despite the looming threat of protesters disrupting the Forum. To safeguard these precious elites from the riff-raff, the Swiss Army was called in to protect the 2,000 members of the Davos Class. Because who cares about the rights of the people when the elites are in town?

As the Davos elite gathered once again in January 2001, they were determined to ensure their exclusive event was not spoiled by any pesky “hooligans” or voices of dissent. Meanwhile, in Porto Alegre, Brazil, a counter-forum was taking place, providing a platform for activist groups and those from the Third World to voice their concerns. But the Davos Class remained oblivious, comfortably cocooned in their concrete and razor-wire fortress, while police outside used brute force to suppress any dissenting voices.

In 2009, the WEF meeting drew a lot of attention from protesters, who were met with tear gas and water cannons from the riot police. Then French Finance Minister, Christine Lagarde, gave a warning to the Davos Class about the two major risks they were facing: social unrest and protectionism. She emphasised the need to restore confidence in the system, but the protesters outside held up signs that read, “You are the Crisis.” It seems like the WEF attendees weren’t exactly the most popular kids on the block, but the circus went on unbothered.

The WEF meeting in January 2012 was like a gathering of the world’s elite amidst a backdrop of turmoil and unrest. The Arab Spring had shaken the foundations of the Middle East, anti-austerity protests rocked Europe, and the Occupy Wall Street movement gained momentum. But the WEF, ever on the ball, had identified the top two risks facing the world as “severe income disparity and chronic fiscal imbalances.” Wow, what a revelation! The Occupy Movement even set up camp at Davos to drive the point home, and for the first time, inequality topped the risk list. It seems the Davos Class was finally catching up to the rest of the world. Beth Brooke of Ernst & Young warned that countries with vanishing middle classes were at risk, as history had shown. Well, good luck with that one, Davos.

As angry citizens rallied in city streets and public squares from Cairo to Athens and New York, the Financial Times observed that dissatisfaction was “pervasive,” and that “the only common message is that leaders worldwide are failing to meet the expectations of their citizens and that Facebook and Twitter enable crowds to unite instantly and let them know about it.” For the 40 government leaders gathering in Davos, “this was not a reassuring picture.”

Europe was not immune to the unrest and upheaval seen in other parts of the world. In 2011, democratically elected leaders in Italy and Greece were ousted and replaced by technocrats, leading to accusations of a “technocratic coup” at the behest of Germany. Mario Draghi, former head of the European Central Bank (“ECB”), was considered one of the most powerful leaders in Europe at the time. However, even the ECB was not immune to the Occupy movement, which had set up camp outside its headquarters in Frankfurt. During the 2012 WEF meeting in Davos, Occupy protesters clashed with police outside the event. Stephen Roach, a Yale University faculty member and chairman of Morgan Stanley Asia, recounted his experience as a panellist at the “Open Forum,” where citizens from the local community, students, and Occupy protesters participated.

Roach’s discussion topic at the Open Forum in Davos 2012 was “remodelling capitalism.” He hoped to engage the public in a discussion on this important issue. However, things quickly turned chaotic as Occupy protesters disrupted the Forum with chants calling for more support. Roach described the scene as “disturbing,” and he was more focused on finding an escape route than opening comments. Clearly, the seething masses were not interested in his proposal to fix capitalism because no one understood that capitalism has basically been hijacked by a chaotic form of technocratic communism with the sole goal of consolidating wealth, power, and influence with a few selected plutocrats.

During the discussions, Roach was struck by the perspective of the first panellist, a 24-year-old Occupy protester named Maria. She expressed her anger at “the system” and emphasised the need to build a new one based on equality, dignity, and respect. The other panellists from the WEF, which included Ed Miliband from the UK, a UN Commissioner, a Czech academic, and a minister from the Jordanian dictatorship, seemed to speak a different language compared to Maria. But maybe Maria was the spark that fuelled Klaus Schwab’s ambitions to sugar-coat the totalitarian Great Reset agenda with “equality, dignity and respect”.

Read more: ‘Covid-19: The Great Reset’ is the Perfect Manual for Tyranny | I read Klaus Schwab’s infamous book, so you don’t have to. Here’s what I found, A Lily Bit, 2 October 2022

In a condescending tone, Roach admitted that his experience engaging with the Occupy protesters was unsettling for someone who spent decades as a Wall Street banker. He complained that despite his attempts to speak as an expert economist, the crowd’s main complaint rooted in Occupy Wall Street made it difficult for him to be heard over their hisses. According to Roach, Maria from Occupy got the last word, stating that Occupy’s aim is to think for yourself and change the process of finding solutions, rather than focus on specific solutions. Roach described making a hasty exit through a secret door in the kitchen as the crowd roared their approval. He concluded that his experience in Davos had forever changed him and that the battle for big ideas could not be won with retreat.

It was reported by The Economist in October 2013 that social unrest was on the rise globally, from anti-austerity movements to middle-class rebellions, in both wealthy and impoverished countries. The World Economic Forum released a report in November 2013, predicting a “lost generation” that would succumb to populist politics and escalate social unrest. Meanwhile, financial institutions such as JPMorgan Chase, UBS, HSBC, and AXA warned of the dangers of social upheaval and rebellion in their reports throughout 2013. In its May 2013 report, JPMorgan Chase complained about laws that hindered its agenda, such as the “constitutional protection of labour rights” and the “right to protest if unwelcome changes are made to the political status quo,” as it warned of major challenges ahead in Europe’s economic “adjustment,” which it deemed only “halfway done on average.”

The 2014 meeting of the World Economic Forum was chimed in with over 40 heads of state in attendance! Talk about a power-packed guest list. They had everyone from Viktor Yanukovich of Ukraine to Enrique Pena Nieto of Mexico, and even Shinzō Abe, David Cameron, Dilma Rousseff, Hassan Rouhani, Benjamin Netanyahu, and Goodluck Jonathan. Not to mention the top dogs of international finance like Jacob Lew, Mario Draghi, Mark Carney, Christine Lagarde, and Jim Yong Kim. It looks like the 1% really know how to throw a shindig.

At the start of the meeting, the World Economic Forum released a report stating that the “single biggest risk to the world in 2014” was the increasing “gap between rich and poor.” Oh dear, how unexpected! Income inequality and social unrest were identified as the most critical issues that would have a significant impact on the world economy in the next ten years. The report noted that youth around the world were part of a “lost generation” that lacked jobs and opportunities and warned that such dissatisfaction could “boil over into social upheaval,” citing recent examples in Brazil and Thailand.

The Davos Class, comprised of global elites, has only gained more influence and control in response to the rise of worldwide social and political upheavals and during the Covid-19 pandemic. The 2024 gathering of the wealthy and powerful at Davos will likely serve as a reminder of the consequences of the centralised system, as citizens across the globe continue to demand their voices be heard and their leaders held accountable.




TRUMP WON! … But Things to Consider

John R. Houk, Blog Editor

March 12, 2023

I’m about to cross post from a gal calling herself “Lily” from Substack. I say, “calling herself” because her Substack profile gives every indication of a pseudonym. Lily’s profile page:

Ex-Intelligence agent picking apart the WEF and everything attached to it.”

The claim of an ex-Intel association sounds very pseudonymish to me.

BUT before I get to Lily’s awesome and in my opinion accurate presentation of a minority of billionaire Globalist Elitist calling the shots politically and economically around the entire world; I believe I’ll share as brief as possible my Trump thoughts.


First off, I’m a Trump supporter. I support Trump even though his last choice of Executive Branch appointees was abysmal (a revolving door of backstabbing RINOs and traitors some of which continued in Office right through Trump’s departure). AND for much of Trump’s America First stand, he still made some economic policies that leaned a bit more toward Globalism than America First (For Example: United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement [USMCA]).

WORST OF ALL, President Trump initiated the mRNA death-jab with Operation Warp Speed and as far as I am aware still supports the dangerous mRNA jab implementation though gratefully on a voluntary basis rather than government mandates.

Except for perhaps Governor DeSantis, I suspect Trump’s 2024 rivals for the GOP President nomination support the mRNA inundation on the gullible.

AND thinking of Election 2024 (BTW – TRUMP IN 2020!), it is my humble opinion Trump has entered the same vicious tactics of 2016 to hammer GOP rivals in 2024. I am certain many of those rivals are backstabbing RINOs; HOWEVER, I don’t believe DeSantis is in that category. It is unfortunate that DeSantis might have to engage in the same kind of viciousness as Trump in efforts to preserve a DeSantis reputation. AND as I pointed out above, if DeSantis indeed pursues a GOP nomination, DeSantis has been given plenty ammo of Trump errors to load a political vicious gun.

NEVERTHELESS, IT IS obvious to any intelligent individual not brainwashed by Dem-Marxist lies and MSM propaganda, that the 2020 (and 2022 for that matter) was one of the crookedest elections in American history – TRUMP WON!

That stated, with all of Trump’s bad choices, his very name drives Dem-Marxists into such apoplectic hysteria that has come to my attention some politically motivated District Attorneys are on the verge of unwinnable indictments against Trump to keep The Donald out of the 2024 Election Cycle. THAT KIND OF HYSTERIA MEANS I’M VOTING TRUMP!

Rumble VIDEO: “Justice for All” by Donald J. Trump & J6 Prison Choir (Official Music Video)

Posted by Ed Henry

Published March 11, 2023

6 Prison Choir consists of individuals who have been incarcerated as a result of their involvement in the January 6, 2021 protest for election integrity after President Donald J. Trump stated “I know that everyone here will soon be marching over to the Capitol building to peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard”. The J6PC continues to make their voices heard through the power of music and sings “The Star Spangled Banner” every evening before bed.

Vinyl Link- j6prisonchoir.com
Merch Link- justicej6.com
Stream/Download- https://too.fm/3zb78aa

BUT unless there is a massive turnout for Trump that corruption cannot overcome by reversing the voters’ will, the same 2020/22 results will occur.

AND FROM this point you get to read A Lily Bit’s, “A Short History of an Intagible [sic] Crime Against Humanity: The bulk of humanity is at war with a small handful of despotic and authoritarian multi-billionaires”.

JRH 3/12/23

Thank you to those who have stepped up!

READER SUPPORTED! I need Readers willing to chip in $5 – $10 – $25 – $50 – $100. PLEASE YOUR generosity is appreciated. PLEASE GIVE to Help me be a voice for Liberty:

Please Support CPCR

YOU CAN ALSO SUPPORT via buying women’s menstrual health, healthy collagen, vitamin supplements/products, coffee from my Online stores:

My Store (please use referral discount code 2388058): https://modere.co/3SrOHzI  

Big Tech Censorship is pervasive – Share voluminously on all social media platforms!


A Short History of an Intangible Crime Against Humanity

The bulk of humanity is at war with a small handful of despotic and authoritarian multi-billionaires.

By Lily

March 12, 2023

A Lily Bit

One of the biggest jokes of our times is not that people were informed that they live in a democracy. The biggest joke is that they believe it. In actuality, a small group of extremely wealthy, powerful, and extremely inhuman oligarchs—also known as the Deep State—control their lives and fate. These have been preparing for decades to seize control of humanity, subjugate it, and reduce it to a population they believe “sufficient” to preserve Mother Earth’s habitability. They intend to robotize, digitize, and turn the remaining survivors into a new kind of serfdom. A massive conspiracy, like George Orwell’s “1984″ and Aldous Huxley’s “Brave New World,” is being waged by this 0.001 percent against the other 99.999 percent of humanity.

The sooner the “masked” and “socially detached” understand that governments are waging war against humanity and the global nightmare they are forcing upon us, the greater the possibility we have to regain our sovereign identities. The truth is that under the guise of “corona health protection,” humanity is subject to blatantly illegal and coercive procedures that are imposed upon it. The police and military enforce the rules, which include donning masks, isolating oneself from friends and family, being quarantined, and other arbitrary punishments for disobedience.

Sadly, slice by slice, in salami tactics, the ruling “elites” have chopped out human and civil rights under false pretenses and with the assistance of relentless media propaganda, the people of the West have slowly lost their confidence, at least from the start of the neoliberal onslaught in the 1980s. The “elites” under the Corona dictatorship are getting ready to obliterate the last bits of liberty. Even the majority today, which has been inundated with all manner of propagandized dangers, pleads for more security and is willing to give up even the very last vestiges of their liberty. The globalists have unrestrainedly increased their authority under the cover of their propaganda lies and in their unbridled desire to keep multiplying their billions.

What the F**k Is Going On? PART 2: In the Grip of the Deep State

Prince Charles, Queen Elizabeth’s eldest son (I refuse to call this puppet a king), dubbed the Corona “pandemic” a “golden opportunity.” Thus, he is a member of the circle of globalists who are using the time window of the Corona crisis to remove democracy and install the totalitarian-dystopian New World Order they seek. It is unclear when …

The powerful get increasingly alarmed as more people start to wake up and go to great lengths to persuade civil employees, administrators, medical professionals, and even independent doctors to embrace and promote the official story. Nowadays, numerous individuals support the government’s lies. Governments receive “advice” from bought scientific “task teams” and justifications to tighten the screws even further.

What transpires when the “rabble” misbehaves? Job losses, medical license revocations, physical threats against family members, and additional persecution. But when they come up against informed and awakened people, the globalists’ vile deeds and influence-peddling run into a brick block.

Has anyone noticed that the flu has almost completely disappeared in the 2020/2021 winter flu season? Why? Covid-19 statistics were inflated by lying about it. The globalists’ “invisible” leadership dictates to governments the “Covid-19 quotas” that must be met, ensuring governments’ survival under the globalists’ hammer.

The Globalists’ strategy has been to divide the people for decades.

Their latest brilliant idea is to use an invisible enemy, a virus, as the foundation of fear campaigns to keep people panicked and bullied all over the world. This is reminiscent of the infamous words spoken by Rockefeller protégé Henry Kissinger more than 50 years ago:

“He who controls the food supply controls the people; he who controls energy controls whole continents; he who controls money controls the world.”

We are in the midst of a war imposed on us by globalists and their governments. This war has already wreaked havoc on our societies, tearing apart families and friendships. We will not be able to look our children and grandchildren in the eyes if we are not careful.

We could have known what was going on and what is still going on, what this small, dark power elite—the globalists—is up to. If we do not stand up for our rights, this war will continue, preparing future generations to avoid social contact. They are already indoctrinating your children to avoid friends, schoolmates, and peers, and to avoid playing in groups—this is the “New Normal.”

Highway to Hell

The reigning “elites” in finance and politics are leveraging the Corona crisis to rebuild capitalism. By maintaining the state of emergency and denying citizens their rights, they are destroying small and medium-sized enterprises, robbing them, and demolishing Western parliamentary democracies. The authorities’ goal is to create digital-financial monopolies in …

The evil masters, the pretentious crème de la crème of civilization, those same globalists, have already and continue to neoliberally transform education systems around the world to teach children and young adults that wearing masks was and may again be necessary for survival and that “social distancing” is the only way forward.


Globalists understand that if the social network that holds a civilization together is shattered, they have won the battle—not the war because the war will last as long as the resistance exists. Their nightmare is the positive dynamic of life, of people, societies, entire nations, and continents. Without this dynamic, life on Earth would come to a halt.

They want the polar opposite: a globalist dictator controlling a small population of serfs or robotized slaves who move only when told to, own nothing, and receive a digital, blockchain-powered universal income with which they can buy food, pleasure, and comfort based on their behavior and obedience. Once the slaves are no longer useful or expendable, their electronically controlled brains are simply turned off.


The vanguard of the world’s rich and super-rich all have one goal in mind: the establishment of a New World Order (NWO) or the One World Order (OWO). The World Economic Forum (WEF), the G-7, the G-20 (leaders of the world’s most powerful economies), and some lesser-known organizations such as the Bilderberg Society, the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), Chatham House, and many others are all run by obscure individuals. The World Economic Forum (WEF), founded in 1974 by CEO Klaus Schwab, is arguably the most important current vanguard.

All of these institutions and organizations share members. Even this extended vanguard represents less than 0.001% of the global population. They have all elevated themselves above sovereign, democratically elected national governments and the United Nations. They have effectively co-opted the UN to carry out their wishes. UN-Directors General, as well as the Directors General of the numerous UN: sub-organizations, are usually chosen by the US, with the approval of their European vassals, based on the candidate’s political and psychological profile. If his or her “performance” as UN Secretary-General or head of a UN sub-organization no longer corresponds to globalist ideas, his, or her days are numbered.

Furthermore, globalists have hijacked or established the following institutions or organizations: the European Union, the Bretton Woods institutions (World Bank and IMF), the World Trade Organization (WTO), and the International Criminal Court (ICC) in The Hague. The latter lacks teeth. This ensures that the law is always on the side of those who break the law. Regional development banks and similar financial institutions, in addition to the top players, the World Bank and the IMF, keep the countries in their respective regions in check. In the end, the financial or debt economy has complete control. Western neoliberal banditry has created a highly criminal system in which political disobedience is punished through economic repression or theft of national wealth in international territories. The system’s common denominator is the (still) ubiquitous US dollar.


We the People believe it is normal for unknown, unelected individuals to rule over our sovereign nations and sovereignly elected governments. We’ve turned into a herd of obedient sheep. Globalists have slowly and quietly taken over. But we didn’t notice it. Unfortunately, most only become aware of it after it is too late, and freedom, civil and human rights have vanished. The Patriot Act in the United States is an example of this. It had been planned for a long time before 9/11. Patriot legislation to ostensibly protect the people was rushed through Congress in the aftermath of 9/11 because people were clamoring for it out of fear. And, voilà, the Patriot Act permanently deprived the American people of their freedom and civil liberties.

Humanity has been enslaved by globalists. They determine when and where a pandemic will break out, as well as the conditions under which we can survive a staged pandemic. They use very skilled instruments such as a tiny invisible enemy known as a virus and a massive but also invisible monster known as fear. These two instruments take us off the street and keep us from seeing our friends or enjoying conversation, the theater, sports, or a park picnic.

If we let them, globalists will soon be deciding who lives and who dies. Another wave of pandemics, and people will be begging, yelling, and screaming for another vaccine, applauding Big Pharma’s and eugenicists’ goals. There is still time to say NO as a group. Collectively and in unity.


Will the people accept the agenda of the unelected World Economic Forum? As drivers of the globalization process over the last decades, the globalists will now opportunistically portray themselves as world saviors, focusing on protecting what they have left of Mother Earth. Of course, man-made CO2-based “global warming” will be at the heart of their argument. The UN Agenda 2030—which corresponds to the 17 UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)—is the instrument for protecting nature and humanity. The UN Agenda focuses on rebuilding the willfully destroyed global economy in accordance with the 17 SDGs’ “green” principles.

Keep in mind that everything is interconnected. The infamous Agenda 2021, which aligns with and supplements the (UN) Agenda 2030, was officially launched in January 2021 with the WEF’s official declaration of “The Great Reset”. Similarly, “The Great Reset” began in January 2020, with the outbreak of the Corona Pandemic. This had been in the works for decades. The Rockefeller Report of 2010 forewarned the ongoing Corona regime with its “Lockstep Scenario,” further Event 201 of October 18, 2019, in New York, which computer-simulated a Corona pandemic, with 65 million dead and a ruined economy within 18 months. Event 201 occurred just a few weeks before the actual Corona pandemic began.

The Agenda ID 2020 is the globalists’ plan to implement what is behind the UN Agenda 2030. This is a collaboration between public and private sector partners, including UN agencies and civil society. ID2020 is an electronic identification program that bases digital identity on universal immunization. Bill Gates founded and funds ID2020, as does GAVI, the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunizations. GAVI is a Big Pharma association involved in the development of coronavirus vaccines that, along with the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF), funds a large portion of the WHO budget.

The “Great Reset,” as announced by Klaus Schwab and his colleague Thierry Malleret, will undoubtedly be carried out with the assistance of Agenda ID2020. There’s more to it than meets the eye. Agenda ID2020 is even incorporated into the SDGs as SDG 16.9, which seeks to “provide legal digital identity for all by 2030, including free birth registration.” This is perfectly in line with SDG 16’s overall concept:

“Promote peaceful and inclusive societies for sustainable development, ensure equal access to justice for all, and build effective, accountable, and inclusive institutions at all levels.”

Agenda ID2020 is currently being tested on schoolchildren in Bangladesh, following the official path of the UN Agenda 2030 to achieve the SDGs. Children are given digitized ID cards as part of the process, as well as mandatory immunization programs.

All of this will drive the digitization of money and the introduction of 5G, which will necessitate the loading of personal data onto nano-chips to monitor and control the population. As a result, it’s no surprise that Agenda ID2020 is barely mentioned in the mainstream media. ID2020 is the One World Order’s ultimate control of the world population by a small elite. ID2020’s mechanism would enable tracking, control, and networking of all people on the planet, including all health data, money flows, bank accounts, and behavior in a society that I no longer want to call civilization.

Agenda ID2020 could also include “vaccination programs” to drastically reduce the global population. Eugenics is a critical component in population control around the world. All of this sounds like a conspiracy theory, but it is a massive plot unprecedented in human history.


The ruling elite employs lockdowns as a tool to carry out the aforementioned agendas. If the public knew about this, the “elites” would face massive protests. That is why they organize and finance various types of counter-demonstrations. The Ford Foundation, for example, makes no apologies for financially supporting the “Black Lives Matter” movement, which was previously dismissed as insignificant by the elites.

Total militarization of the countries is required to control the population in the United States and Europe, where the most unrest is expected. And this is in the works. According to the New York Times, at least 93,763 machine guns, 180,718 magazine cartridges, hundreds of silencers, and an unknown number of grenade launchers have been delivered to state and local police departments in the United States since 2006. This is in addition to at least 533 aircraft and helicopters, 432 MRAPs (9-foot-tall, 30-ton mine-resistant, anti-attack armored vehicles with turrets), and over 44,900 pieces of night-vision equipment that are routinely used in night raids in Afghanistan and Iraq.

This militarization is part of a larger trend. Since the late 1990s, approximately 9% of US police departments serving at least 50,000 people have used a PPU (police paramilitary unit). This figure is nearly double what it was in the mid-1980s. Even before Covid-19, approximately 15 to 20% of the US population lived at or below the poverty line. The economic devastation caused by the lockdowns will at least double that percentage, increasing the likelihood of civil unrest and clashes with authorities. This will add fuel to the fire for more justifications for militarized policing.


The WEF has launched a new diabolical project for the post-covid working world, presenting it to the public in October 2020 as a trial balloon to see how it responds. The “Resetting the Future of Work Agenda,” a 31-page document published in July 2020, is a blueprint for how the “Great Reset” will be carried out.

I wrote about it extensively before, but I will talk about the basics again.

The WEF’s “Resetting the Future of Work Agenda”

I’ve been talking a lot about the Great Reset in the past months. It is now time to show you how it will look like in detail once it’s completed.

They call the document a “white paper,” implying that it is a draft. It does read like an executioner’s story. People would take up arms and fight against this latest totalitarian blueprint and its authors if they knew what the WEF was up to. The time frame is ten years because the UN Agenda 2021 must be implemented by 2030.

That means we are talking about a time frame of roughly 10 years until the following should be completed:

  • An acceleration of digitized work processes, leading to 84% of all work processes as digital, or virtual / video conferences.
  • Some 83% of people are planned to work remotely – i.e., no more interaction between colleagues – absolute social distancing, separation of humanity.
  • About 50% of all tasks are planned to be automated – in other words, human input will be drastically diminished, even while remote working.
  • Accelerate the digitization of upskilling / reskilling (e.g., education technology providers) — 42% of skill upgrading or training for new skills will be digitized, in other words, no human contact – all on computer via artificial intelligence (AI), algorithms.
  • Accelerate the implementation of upskilling / reskilling programs – 35% of skills are planned to be “re-tooled” – i.e., existing skills are planned to be abandoned – declared defunct.
  • Accelerate ongoing organizational transformations (e.g., restructuring) – 34% of current organizational set-ups are planned to be “restructured’ – or, in other words, existing organizational structures will be declared obsolete – to make space for new sets of organizational frameworks, digital structures that provide utmost control over all activities.
  • Temporarily reassign workers to different tasks – this is expected to touch 30% of the workforce. That also means entirely different pay-scales – most probably unlivable wages, which would make the also planned “universal basic income” (UBI) or “basic income” (a wage that allows you barely to survive) an obvious need. But it would make you fully dependent on the system – a digital system, where you have no control whatsoever.
  • Temporarily reduce the workforce – this is projected as affecting 28% of the population. It is an additional unemployment figure, disguised as “temporarily”. These people will never come back to full-time.
  • Permanently reduce the workforce – 13% permanently reduced workforce.
  • Temporarily increase the workforce – 5% – there is no reference to what type of workforce – probably unskilled labor that, eventually, will also be replaced by automation, by AI and robotization of the workplace.
  • No specific measures implemented – 4% – does that mean, a mere 4% will remain untouched from the algorithm and AI-directed new work places? As small and insignificant as the figure is, it sounds like “wishful thinking”, never to be accomplished.
  • Permanently increase the workforce – a mere 1% is projected as “permanently increased workforce”. This is of course not even cosmetics. It is a joke.

Furthermore, the “Great Reset” envisions a credit system in which all personal debts are “forgiven” in exchange for the surrender of all personal assets to an administrative body or agency—possibly the IMF. According to the ideologues, people would own nothing and be happy because all of their needs would be met.

In addition to numerous human rights violations and disasters, the “Great Reset” envisions, for example, making the use of the resources we earn dependent on our behavior—in other words, we are to be at the mercy of this cabal and subject to the wishes of the Deep State, the shadow government, this network of oligarchs that controls all 193 UN member states plus the UN. Only then can we use our money to purchase items that are still available to us. According to various WEF papers, artificially created shortages of food, health care, and other items could jeopardize the free flow of goods.

But the cabal wants even more: as briefly mentioned above, it should not occur to people to reject the system because, simultaneously, everyone has been vaccinated and given a nano-chip, allowing thoughts to be read and influenced with 5G or, soon, 6G.

DARPA, the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, as part of the Pentagon, developed this technology years ago. It is simply a matter of time before it is put into action. And if we don’t revolt, it will be implemented. Civil disobedience in large numbers is the order of the day. The longer we do nothing, the more we sleepwalk into this human disaster.

Neither “The Great Reset” nor the “Resetting the Future of Work Agenda” specify who will enforce these new, harsh rules. They appear to be the same forces that are now being trained to wage urban warfare and suppress riots and social unrest: police and military.


Civil disobedience organization must address the issue of how to communicate with the police and military, as well as how to educate and inform them about the purposes for which they are being misused by this small diabolical cabal. Teachers, doctors, and people in all professions must all be educated and informed about the truth.

Disinformation in the media is brutal and powerful, making it difficult for the resistance to counter without additional funds. The ruling classes’ media is doing everything they can to further divide us.

Only freedom from fear will rip “Resetting the Future of Work Agenda” and “The Great Reset” to shreds, destroying organizations such as the WEF and co-opted UN agencies such as the WHO, UNICEF, WTO, World Bank, IWE, and possibly the entire UN system.

The globalists are acting unethically and have descended to the depths of their moral dysfunctions. The time has come to indict the project’s political and economic leaders under international human rights standards or for crimes against humanity.

© 2023 Consolidated Frontiers. A Lily Bit HOMEPAGE

Are YOU Ready to be Manipulated by Technocratic Diktats?

John R, Houk, Blog Editor

© January 6, 2023

Yesterday while sharing on various Social Media Platforms I belong to, I came across a Bitchute video posted by In4mation. The pseudonymous In4mation shares on multiple platforms as I do. This particular video was borrowed from The Epoch Times TV and is narrated by Roman Balmakov (sadly, In4mation failed to include source info in the borrowing).

I am grateful In4mation “borrowed” because Epoch-TV can be a bit stingy on embed shares.

In4mation does not share the Epoch-TV description. Ergo, before I cross post the Bitchute version, here is the Epoch-TV title, narrator and description:

‘Operation Jigsaw’: Google’s 4 New Secret Methods of Online Censorship | Facts Matter

By Roman Balmakov

January 2, 2023

Google has a new initiative called “Info Intervention.” It’s a plan couched in the idea of keeping people safe from misinformation and harmful language—and the way to do that is to control ever more what we are able to see and say online.

Their official website bills this new initiative as a “set of approaches, informed by behavioral science research and validated by digital experiments, to build resilience to online harms.” This new initiative has Google essentially using the exact same methodology on the user that Pavlov used on the dogs during his experiments. However, while Pavlov was trying to get the dogs to salivate, Google is trying to make their users question anything that goes against what their fact-checkers determine to be misinformation.

This new “Info Intervention” initiative is being led by one of Google’s subsidiary companies—a company called Jigsaw. It is under complete Google management, and its mission statement is to “[apply] technological solutions, from countering extremism, online censorship and cyber-attacks, to protecting access to information.”

Episode Resources:

🔵 Moonshot:


🔵 Info Interventions:


🔵 Jigsaw:



Before I post the Bitchute version of the video, I feel compelled to offer some of my thoughts.

Balmakov talks of Google’s motivation is to expose Conspiracy Theory Misinformation. This is a Globalist-Leftist program. Thus you should be aware the Google-thinking is Leftist ideology is true-think and anything contradicting the Left is wrong-think.

Balmakov highlights Left-think enemies White Supremacists and Extremists. Which sounds like a great group to target and expose. The Problem is in Left-think definitions. For the Left White Supremacism encompasses more than bigoted racists such as Neo-Nazis (which is actually Leftist Extremism), the KKK, Skin Heads and the such usually labeled as White Supremacists. For the Left, if YOU are pro-Originalist Constitution, an American Patriot (American Exceptionalism, MAGA proponent, a Biblical Morality proponent and so on), anti-Illegal Immigration, Limited Government and such Conservative notions; THEN YOU are a White Supremacist Extremist.

THINK ON THAT! As you watch Roman Balmakov explain how OPERATION JIGSAW plans to program the American Sheeple into compliance.

Then as a bonus, I want to share a lengthy yet VERY important insights from the Substack-site A Lily Bit on Klaus Schwab-WEF intentions to transform the entire culture of the World into subservience to the diktats of a Technocratic Society. A hint: You will be told how to live, think and believe – AND BE HAPPY ABOUT IT!

And if this not upsetting enough, you should read a relatively short essay from Victor Davis Hanson:

JRH 1/6/23

Thank you to those who have stepped up!

READER SUPPORTED! I need Readers willing to chip in $5 – $10 – $25 – $50 – $100. PLEASE I need your generosity. PLEASE GIVE to Help me be a voice for Liberty:

Please Support CPCR

YOU CAN ALSO SUPPORT via buying healthy supplements/products from Online stores (mine & my Honey):

My Store (please use referral code 2388058): https://modere.co/3SrOHzI

My Better Half’s Store (please use referral code 3917004): https://dianahouk.shiftingretail.com/



 Big Tech Censorship is pervasive – Share voluminously on all social media platforms!



Posted by In4mation

First Published January 5th, 2023 01:01 UTC


Schwabian Cyberpunk

I read Klaus Schwab’s book “The Fourth Industrial Revolution”, so you don’t have to.

By Lily

January 6, 2023

A Lily Bit

Since the turn of the century, we have been in the midst of the “Fourth Industrial Revolution,” according to the World Economic Forum (WEF). Klaus Schwab, the Forum’s founder and CEO, describes this as a technical revolution accompanied by nothing less than a dramatic transformation of human civilization that “will radically affect the way we live, work, and engage with each other.” This transformation will usher in an entirely “new chapter in human development.”

The availability and fusion of new, “quite astonishing technology,” according to Klaus Schwab, is a distinguishing aspect of the Fourth Industrial Revolution. This, he claims, will eventually result in “the blurring of the boundaries between the physical, digital, and biological domains.” This mostly pertains to the application of bio- and neurotech, implantable technologies, and the Internet of Bodies (IoB).

The Cyborgization of Society: How the WEF seeks to turn you into a spineless drone

These are technologies that are less concerned with the human surroundings and more concerned with transforming the human person itself, having a long-term impact on its being and identity. With the Fourth Industrial Revolution—according to Klaus Schwab—we are facing “a metamorphosis of the human being the likes of which we have never encountered before”.


Schwab clearly can hardly contain his excitement about the impending technological breakthroughs and mechanization of man he predicts. He anticipates that humans would soon begin “integrating digital technologies into our bodies.” The new technology may “actually become a part of us” in the process. This, he claims, will blur the distinction between technologies and living beings. He builds his technocratic ideal of a new human being, alluding to the “cyborg” metaphor, and predicts that in the future there will be “strange hybrids of digital and analog life that redefine our very being.”

Schwab’s statements speak of the traditional dream of a new, more ideal human being. This is a long-standing dream. It is nothing novel or special. A diverse range of intellectuals often aspired for a more perfect human being, while remaining confident of humanity’s unending growth. This conviction in development was sometimes accompanied by an unwavering faith in scientific advances and, later, in the potential connected with the widespread application of technology.

The new man of the Fourth Industrial Revolution, on the other hand, differs fundamentally from prior ideas of man created by Friedrich Nietzsche, or even Karl Marx, for example. Moral ideals, character structure, and societal conditions have all been replaced by technology. Humans are supposed to progress simply through the successful application of new technologies, rather than through education, upbringing, practical experience, or revolutionary action. According to the World Economic Forum’s stated intention, the human being emerging from the future economic transition will predominantly be the result of new technology. This transhumanist future vision seeks to perfect and further perfect man through the application of new technology processes and technological interventions in his body. It promotes an elitist and repressive technocratic image of man, the repercussions of which cannot even be estimated at this time.


According to the World Economic Forum, neurotech is at the heart of the Fourth Industrial Revolution. After all, they provide for “unique insights—not only into how the brain interacts with its physical and social environment, but also into novel ways of experiencing life.” They could also assist to “advance the industry of mechanizing the human body” by tackling a variety of neurological illnesses and physical limitations.

It is not uncommon for the military to provide the required financing for neurotechnologies and other cutting-edge research. There, they are initially placed in the “defensive context,” and then their results are used. As a result, the human brain—particularly “in the border area of war and security”—is the focus of attention. According to Schwab, crossing a national border may need a comprehensive brain scan in the future to assess a person’s security risk.

Employers will be increasingly interested in using neurotechnologies to boost performance, as well as to evaluate job applicants and monitor staff. The usage of biometric technology in the workplace, as well as tracking via radio frequency identification (RFID), may lead to “employers directly or indirectly monitoring the brains of employees” in the future. Increased use of brain-monitoring gadgets is also on the horizon for the retail sector. This would allow firms to see through key consumer decision-making tendencies and more readily encourage consumers to behave in a desired manner.

Fundamentally, neurotechnologies are proving to be ideal for affecting people’s awareness and thinking. Furthermore, such technology can aid in decoding ideas, repairing “errors” in the brain, and “enhancing” its function. In a society driven by algorithms and pervasive data collecting, access to even a person’s most private thoughts cannot be ruled out.


The World Economic Forum also sees biotechnologies as having a great potential for increasing mechanization of humans. They provide critical tools and techniques for fundamentally reframing man’s connection with nature. Recent advances in biology, particularly genetics, have been remarkable. For example, there has been significant advancement in gene editing. Researchers from Yatsen University in Guangzhou presented the world’s first scientific publication on modifying the DNA of human embryos in April 2015. As a result, it is now possible to “precisely modify the DNA even in living embryos.” All of this, Schwab explained, “means that in the future, designer babies with exceptional features or illness resistance can be born.”

The Forum then sees the next logical step as the broad application of synthetic biology, which results in the production of designer creatures. This would eventually usher humanity into “a whole new age of metabolic engineering and synthetic biology.” This should allow one to create organisms for oneself. “They can be customized by writing their DNA. Ultimately, this is about nothing less than interfering with future generations’ genetic code,” according to Schwab.


Computer technology will no longer be worn or carried around on the body (wearables), but will instead be implanted directly into the human body with implantable technologies. This will largely help to increase communication as well as to identify people and track their behavior, in addition to medical needs. In this regard, Klaus Schwab refers to “active implantable microchips that break through our body’s epidermal barrier and generate exciting alternatives.” These range from “possibilities for maximizing and enhancing human capabilities” to “integrated therapeutic systems” (human enhancement). Small computers will be integrated into the human body in this manner and “gradually become a physical part of us.” It is thus an issue of technological intervention in the body, which will essentially result in the merger of man and machine. The goal is to enable purely technological further development and optimization of the human being, which should contribute to an increase in performance.

The World Economic Forum has been discussing an Internet of Bodies (IoB) in its publications for several months. Recent technological advancements have heralded the IoB’s new era. This period is distinguished by an unparalleled number of networked devices and sensors that can be attached to the human body (non-invasively), implanted, or otherwise introduced into the body (invasive). Invasive technologies include digital pills, the first use of which was allowed in the United States in 2017. They have microscopic sensors that are linked to a medicine, activated in the patient’s stomach, and provide data.

The Internet of Bodies makes it fundamentally possible to generate massive amounts of biometric and behavioral data. The human body will be changed into some kind of “technology platform” as a result of this process. However, not everyone will be able to pay the sometimes prohibitively expensive technical optimization of their physical and mental processes, which will inevitably lead to additional discrimination against specific groups and hence a widening of society’s already existent social divide. In this event, “a gap is likely to grow up between all those who technically enhance their bodies and those who are left behind,” according to Schwab.


The Earth is currently “on the verge of major structural transformation,” the World Economic Forum continues. As a result, the globe is more polarized “between those who embrace change and those who resist it.” The resulting “ontological inequality separates those willing and competent to adapt from those refusing to adapt,” thereby defining who will succeed and who will lose in this process. While the victors would gain from “some forms of radical human optimization,” such as genetic engineering, the ‘losers’ would not—I am so sad! The resultant tensions promote the creation of “class conflicts and other disagreements unlike anything we have ever known.” As a result, there is a significant risk of “greater fragmentation, exclusion, and social instability in a hyperconnected world of increasing inequality.” Klaus Schwab sure did read his Cyberpunk.

In 2016 Schwab wrote that there is a “dearth of a cohesive, optimistic, and unified narrative that highlights the prospects and challenges of the Fourth Industrial Revolution.” However, he believes that the existence of such a narrative would be necessary if various people and communities are to be encouraged to play an active role in defining it while avoiding “a broad social backlash against the basic changes.” Under such conditions, the Fourth Industrial Revolution’s present potential cannot be efficiently and thoroughly harnessed. In numerous instances, politicians lack the essential leadership and awareness of the changes that are occurring. Furthermore, “the required institutional regulatory structure is either insufficient or non-existent.” Aha, thanks Klaus. And who again told you that you are supposed to come up with that narrative?


With the outbreak of the coronavirus pandemic and the resulting constraints on public life, the digital transformation of society has found its “impetus,” as Klaus Schwab and Thierry Malleret write in their book “Covid-19: The Great Reset” which I have analyzed for you here:

‘Covid-19: The Great Reset’ is the Perfect Manual for Tyranny: I read Klaus Schwab’s infamous book, so you don’t have to. Here’s what I found.

As a result, they regard the pandemic as a “fundamental turning point” in global development. They claim that the time has finally come for a paradigm shift. In the following decades, “a new world with a new normal may develop.”

The World Economic Forum’s organizers regard the crisis caused by the Coronavirus pandemic as a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to carry out a “Great Reset” of the capitalist economic order. They are concerned with the global implementation of far-reaching economic and social reforms, which will result in a fundamental upheaval of the entire previous economic and lifestyle system. They rely on enhanced centralism with strong authoritarian elements in the measures they intend to implement to build their technocratic agenda. Within a global regulatory framework (global governance), “‘bequeathed’ actors must consider themselves as elements of a globally ramified power system that can only succeed through increasingly cooperative forms of engagement.”

Concerning the worldwide ‘catastrophe’ caused by the pandemic, Schwab and Malleret believe that it is precisely deep, existential crises that “carry the promise for change.” They even have the nerves to say that the Corona pandemic is similar to World War II in terms of transformative force because “both have the potential of a transformative crisis of previously unknown dimensions.” Just as the Second World War caused a “fundamental transformation in the world order and the world economy,” the “moment for a paradigm shift” has arrived today. The pandemic expedited this transformation by acting as a catalyst for technology changes that had already begun before the crisis, Schwab continues.

The thesis of the close relationship between a crisis and later social change dates back to economist Milton Friedman, who died in 2006 and was one of the most important economists of recent decades.

“Only a crisis, genuine or perceived, leads to meaningful change. What happens next in such a crisis is determined by the ideas that are in circulation.” — Milton Friedman

This speech by Friedman is referred to by Naomi Klein as the key strategic ideology that would become a kind of chant for his movement: the shock doctrine. He claims that the strategy entails “using periods of communal traumatic experience to compel dramatic social and economic change.” Here’s how the shock doctrine works:

An initial disaster shocks practically the whole society, softening it for the transformations that will follow. “Shocked cultures frequently accept things they would otherwise strongly reject. Companies and politicians would take advantage of people’s fear and disorientation as a result of the ‘shock’ to impose an economic shock therapy. A severe collective trauma that either temporarily suspends or completely stops democratic activities is required for this to be implemented without restriction.” This necessitates authoritarian settings and the focused deployment of the state’s regulatory agencies.

A cabinet strategy paper on COVID-19 containment, initially confidential, adopts and applies Friedman’s shock strategy. The study was written by a group of academics, the bulk of whom were economists, and it is likely that it influenced the federal government’s decision to impose the lockdowns, which restricted the economy and fundamental rights. Instead of presenting individuals with real information and educating them to build trust and alleviate existing worries, the scientists took an entirely different strategy. Thus, they openly support a policy whose purpose must be to instigate terror in the peoples’ minds through a “desired shock effect.”

Schwab and Malleret saw the shock effect of a crisis on people as a wonderful opportunity for social reform to occur. The Corona pandemic, for example, is “a huge shock” that “brings with it the uneasy confidence that it will have both unexpected and extraordinary implications.” Despite the difficulty of the changes ahead, Schwab believes the pandemic will hasten a systemic transition that was already underway before the crisis. These include “increasing technological power” and rapid automation. For many individuals, this means that the technologization of their lives will accelerate quickly, as a result of which “life as they have known it up to now will rip apart at the seams with alarming speed”. At the same time, however, “the technologization of life provides an opportunity, and this is also the real meaning of the Fourth Industrial Revolution.”


In the aftermath of the Corona crisis, representatives and supporters of the World Economic Forum see a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to implement a comprehensive mechanization of man, as well as the system change they forecast and consider essential, in an accelerated and non-violent manner worldwide. According to Schwab, the drastic system transformation envisaged necessitates people constantly adapting to the changes that are occurring. However, it is unclear “how the constant integration of technology into our lives will influence our idea of identity and whether it would damage key human capacities such as self-reflection, empathy, and sympathy.”

Furthermore, governments face a genuine risk of combining technologies to undermine civil society organizations and citizen groups that demand for transparency in government and economic activity. Finally, constraining such organization’s’ independence and operations through laws and other measures further reduces the space for civil society. As a result, the instruments of the Fourth Industrial Revolution enable “new types of surveillance and new control possibilities that run antithetical to healthy, open communities.” Additionally, as the digital world developed and evolved, the Corona pandemic improved options for human observation and control.

In this context, “contact tracing,” which was supposedly critical in countering COVID-19, appears to be on track to becoming “a facilitator of mass surveillance.”

Corporations, in particular, have become increasingly interested in tracking their employees’ health. As a result, it is reasonable to expect increased surveillance of dependent employees in the future. This could be attributed to concerns about their health and safety. According to Schwab and Malleret, technical surveillance tools will most likely stay in place even after the pandemic. This is evident, they write because “employers have no reason to remove a monitoring system once it has been installed, especially if one of the indirect benefits of monitoring is to check worker productivity.”

Technical solutions implemented to contain a pandemic, on the other hand, are also ideal for expanding a surveillance state. They can also be employed as political surveillance technology, allowing for greater human control as well as additional coercive tactics. Schwab and Malleret even advocate for “a global surveillance network” in their book. According to them, “once released,” “the genie of technical monitoring” will not be “put back into the bottle” in the post-pandemic period and will thus be with communities for a long time. Hooray.


Both authors also predict that “the number of those who are unemployed, concerned, dissatisfied, indignant, unwell, and hungry today (will) increase considerably” following the pandemic. They also note that “two types of people” will confront a “particularly bleak employment situation”: “young people entering the pandemic-ravaged labor market for the first time and workers who may be displaced by machines.”

There will also be personal tragedies, as well as the hatred and despair of people from all walks of life. The emergence of social unrest must thus be seen as one of the most serious threats, with such a development—in their opinion—even “generating to social breakdown and political collapse” in extreme situations. However, history has shown that prospects of eliminating current inequities “are unlikely without accompanying severe social disturbance.”

To be sure, governments and corporations had employed “increasingly sophisticated technologies to monitor and occasionally control citizens and employees” in earlier years. However, the potential offered by the Corona crisis could have a considerably greater influence on individual rights and liberties, making it a “watershed moment in surveillance history.” Such a scenario would result in the growth of authoritarian tendencies and more repression. Perhaps some individuals will soon discover that “their country has suddenly turned into a place where they no longer want to live,” as Schwab and Malleret rightfully worry.

Overall, it “all comes down to individuals and values,” summarizes Klaus Schwab. That is why it must be feasible to create a future worth living in because “in its worst, dehumanized form, the Fourth Industrial Revolution does certainly have the ability to turn people into machines without a heart or a soul,” says Schwab. Furthermore, there had never been a moment “that arrived with more promise, but also with such immense looming doom.” As a result, the utopia of mankind’s technological perfection may lead sooner than predicted to a dystopian society that offers no future worth living for humans.

The yearning for a new, designed human being did not emerge accidentally, but rather as a result of a protracted historical evolution. However, such a growth is not predetermined nor necessarily imperative for humanity. As a result, it is correctable. Nobody has to accept it as fate. We’ve been warned!

Lily is worthy of your SUPPORT: Paid Subscription Options From which to Choose

© 2023 Consolidated Frontiers – A Lily Bit HOMEPAGE

%d bloggers like this: