Europe and U.S. Need a Double Take on Muslim Migration

Islamic Trojan House

John R. Houk

© February 24, 2011


European nations have stuck their heads in the sand when it comes to immigration or political asylum from Muslim Middle Eastern nations. I believe Europe’s deal is if you have job skills you can immigrate to work. Or perhaps even if people with Islamist credentials are given political asylum because they are fleeing a repressive dictatorship (or even by Western standards a moderate Muslim nation) that might result in death if caught.


The leadership of Germany, France and the United Kingdom has finally come to the politically incorrect conclusion that putting faith in multiculturalism has become ruinous because national cohesion is becoming threatened. Of course I don’t believe anyone had the guts to reference Muslims but everyone knows who these leaders were speaking of.


The blogger at 1683 AD is promoting the idea that the immigration and political asylum policy of accommodating immigrating or fleeing Muslims should change especially with the upheaval spreading from Muslim Maghreb through the Muslim Middle East with grassroots activism threatening to bring the status quo down. The 1683 AD blog goes out of its way to point out that actual persecuted people that definitely are Islamists should NOT be allowed to immigrate or flee toward European political asylum. Although there are more examples the classic group allowed safe haven in Europe should be people like the Egyptian Coptic Christians and the Middle Eastern Assyrian Christians.


Residing in America, 1683 AD’s idea should also be implemented in the good old USA as well. I believe it is such a good idea that students from the Middle East should NOT be given student visas at least not until American hatred subsides. I mean a Saudi living in Texas on a student visa was busted with plans and charts to make a Weapon of Mass Destruction (WMD). The American-hating Saudi Muslim’s name is Khalid Ali-M Aldawsari. It is time for some good old fashion religious profiling before anyone from the Muslim world is allowed to enter America. When will America wake up from the stupor of political correctness when it comes to Islam?


JRH 2/24/11

Bumper Sticker vs. Islamic Supremacism

Sharia- USA no-want no-need

John R. Houk

© January 1, 2011


Other than the negative connotation of the term “Islamic Supremacism,” does anyone non-Muslim (we the kafir) know and understand what Islamic Supremacism entails?


Here is a simplified expression Islamic Supremacism:


ISLAMIC SUPREMACISM is the belief that Islam is superior to other religions, cultures, and governmental systems, and the belief that Islam’s superiority entitles Muslims to dominate, control, and rule non-Muslims.

Islam is a supremacist religion. The Hadith and Qur’an command every Muslim to strive until Islam dominates all other religions. The Qur’an says very clearly that the only legitimate form of government is Allah’s. …  (Soda Head; Whats Her Face; Islamic Supremacism)


Michael Anderson writing for the Facebook page 1683 AD provides some interesting thoughts to bring the words “Islamic Supremacism” to the attention of the everyday Westerner as they go about their day. The thought is to utilize the power of the Bumper Sticker.


1683 AD is all about Westerners reclaiming their Western heritage that roughly stretches from Ancient Greece, Judeo-Christianity and modern thoughts on Liberty and Freedom. I say “reclaim” because there is a serious challenge to Liberty and Freedom from Islamic Supremacism. I use the identification of “Westerner” because 1683 AD has a greater emphasis on Europe and more specifically the United Kingdom.


I actually find the Bumper Sticker concept quite intriguing. Using a Bumper Sticker to bring to the fore that Islamic Supremacism is an anti-Western plague that could end our lives as we know it would be an attention getter. Anderson believes the greatest negative aspect of the Bumper Sticker is the defacing of vehicles by Islamic Supremacists or perhaps Leftist Multiculturalists. Anderson has some interesting ideas to limit vandalism.


However, I believe the greatest negative aspect to the anti-Islamic Supremacist Bumper Sticker – especially in Europe – is criminal prosecution, fines or both. The most recent example of the lunacy of European hate-speech laws that I have discovered is that of an Austrian man yodeling while he mows his lawn because he got to listen to the call for Muslim prayer. The yodeler was fined a chunk of money because the Muslim neighbors were upset about being mocked as if the eerie Muezzin call to prayer five times a day in a land with a Christian heritage is not offensive.


The Bumper Sticker is an intriguing idea but I think it would be most successful in America. If the British or Europeans utilize a Bumper Stick protest they should be aware it would be an act of civil disobedience that might result in some kind Free Speech infringement resulting in a fine or incarceration.


JRH 1/1/11

Do NOT Allow European Free Speech Limitations in USA

Battle of Vienna 1683 - Polish Hussars vs Ottomans sm

 John R. Houk

 © October 24, 2010


I am a member of a Facebook group called 1683 AD. The year is a reference to the last time Islamic military invasion attempting to enslave Europe to Political Islam. In this case King Jan III Sobieski decisively won the battle that prevented the conquest of Vienna from Ottoman Turks. I am an American; however if anyone spends anytime at Facebook 1683 AD it is apparent most of the members are European. And I am guessing the Europeans in this case are mostly citizens of the United Kingdom (UK) because the predominant language is English.


Since the 1683 AD group members are quite anti-Islamist and has a message to prevent the Islamization of Europe (and/or the UK); I am certain these brave fellows are branded as racists and promulgators of hate-speech. After all Dutch politician Geert Wilders has been under prosecution for hate-speech and incitement to violence with his film Fitna. The film Fitna merely utilizes quotes from the Quran, the words of Muslim Clerics and footage that verifies the blight of Political Islam. The plight of Geert Wilders in Netherlands is the Free Speech limitations imposed by a European culture that is moronically so into Multicultural Diversity they are willing to sacrifice their Western heritage to an immigrant Islamic culture that is increasingly becoming anchored in Europe by a high birthrate and demanding that the practices of Islamic Culture such as Sharia Law become accepted and supersede the Rule of Law. This is the very rule of law that still has some Leftist accepted Freedoms.


Now that I have talked up 1683 AD, I feel constrained to cross post a very lengthy post from the 1683 AD blog version of the Facebook group. The information disseminated is about the difficulty of developing Conservative Talk Radio on the level that exists in America. You see the European governments and the EU have control of the spoken media. Anything of a Conservative nature or anti-Islamist nature has to go through the approval path of government influenced and Leftist controlled media. Without that approval there is no alternative for voters to fully comprehend that Socialist practices are destroying government budgets and that the purist nature of Islam is a threat to the Freedoms still available to Europeans.


Another reason I am cross posting the 1683 AD post is because the American Left wishes to impose European Multicultural Diversity and limits on Free Speech in American Islamism is using First Amendment rights of Free Speech and Religious Freedom to overthrow the Constitution and replace the greatest Document outlining Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness with despot theopolitical Islam and Sharia Law.


My fellow Americans take the time to read the 1683 AD post to understand that which could be instituted in America.


JRH 10/24/10 (The Cross Post: SlantRight 2.0)