Beware the mRNA in Food Connection

John R. Houk, Blog Editor

© February 9, 2023

The statistics from VAERS (U.S. government tracking based on voluntary reporting ERGO probably even worse) demonstrate the mRNA Jab program is dangerous AND NOT the government/Big Pharma lie of “Safe and Effective”. Here is a screen capture of a VAERS chart summary updated through 1/6/23 picked up and shared by USSA News (this one of many data charts through that date):

To be up front: Our government lies and the Pharmaceutical Industry lies about the mRNA safety and efficacy. If you are a critical thinking person, you should begin to ask, “WHY the lie?

Chairman (as in 2020 Election-Coup installed President) Joe Biden is displeased with Americans beginning to reject continual mRNA Jab boosters because Americans are becoming aware of the largely under-reported mRNA problems yet are making the connection anyway. As you ask yourself, “WHY the lie?”, look at this video I discovered on Telegram or Facebook (I can’t remember which) and placed on my Bitchute Channel:


Posted by SlantRight2

First Published February 4th, 2023 16:56 UTC 


Unsurprisingly I found little information on Search Engines (I almost never use Google, Bing or Yahoo). The Search Engine alternatives touted as privacy conscious seems to follow the guidelines in burying sought-after information that bucks the narrative-lies. There were many politically-Left oriented Fact-Checkers honoring the narrative. Therefore, you will have to do your own thinking on the danger of mRNA in your food supply.

The video I placed on my Bitchute Channel sounds a lot like this Axcess News story from 9/21/21 of a Stew Peters interview with  Deanna Lorraine. The story is short so here it is in entirety including the video:

Researchers Putting mRNA Vaccines in Food

By Ernest Dempsey

September 21, 2021

Axcess News

The mRNA vaccines like those developed for COVID 19 are now being put into food as a university in California experiments to grow edible plants with mRNA in them.

Developing Plant-Based mRNA Vaccines

On September 16, the University Of California, Riverside, announced on their website a new project that attempts to develop plant-based mRNA vaccines that can be eaten instead of injected in the body via a syringe. Funded with half a million dollars by the National Science Foundation (NSF), the project aims at incorporating mRNA into plant cells in such a way that the molecule can replicate in the plant tissue and accumulate to a level that is enough to vaccinate a person who eats the plant.

Juan Pablo Giraldo, the lead researcher of the project, was cited telling that his team is testing the approach with spinach and lettuce.

We are testing this approach with spinach and lettuce and have long-term goals of people growing it in their own gardens.

Giraldo also said that farmers could eventually “grow entire fields of it.”

mRNA Salad – Image @ Word Matters

Grounds for Controversy suggested that making a vaccine you can eat as a salad can be a way to overcome the controversy vaccination by injection causes for many people. The site wrote:

So what if you could replace your next shot with a salad instead?

On Stew Peters’ show, Deanna Lorraine talked about the technology of mRNA in plants and indicated that this seems a way to sneak the potentially dangerous vaccine in salads as if vaccinating people without their knowledge.


[Posted by The Beautiful Now

First Published September 21st, 2021 10:05 UTC


Lack of Media’s Interest in the Story

While the project of growing mRNA in plants to serve as vaccines sounds innovative and potentially controversial, it seems to have entirely escaped the mainstream media’s attention or interest. No major news website or channel seems to have featured the story and all stories about the project are found on smaller, independent sites and on social media.


My Bitchute video and this Axcess News story is about mRNA and the vegetable food sources.

Dr. Robert Malone on January 11, 2023 wrote about Big Pharma looking injecting mRNA tech into the livestock from which we get our meat-food. Dr. Malone informs Big Pharma has been experimenting on the process since 2016. Even more disturbing Dr. Malone highlights there not a FDA public trial process for safety because it all about animals rather than humans.

I’ve noticed many sources quoting Dr. Malone’s findings most of which to me is Revolver News which adds credibility regardless of Leftist Fact-Checkers spinning the accepted and mostly propaganda lies: Dr. Malone shares dire warning: mRNA vaccines are being injected into our food supply… (1/12/23)

The cross posts for convenient reading are as follows:

What kind of lunacy thinks a proven dangerous mRNA Jab can be good in any kind if delivery system?!

JRH 2/9/23

Thank you to those who have stepped up!

READER SUPPORTED! I need Readers willing to chip in $5 – $10 – $25 – $50 – $100. PLEASE I need your PayPal generosity. PLEASE GIVE to Help me be a voice for Liberty:

Please Support CPCR

YOU CAN ALSO SUPPORT via buying healthy supplements/products from Online stores (mine & my Honey):

My Store (please use referral discount code 2388058):

My Better Half’s Store (please use referral discount code 3917004):  

Big Tech Censorship is pervasive – Share voluminously on all social media platforms!


mRNA Vaccines in Livestock and Companion Animals are here now.

The current (public) receipts are included in this essay, and more are on the way

RNA Particle Dose for Livestock by Merck

By Robert W Malone MD, MS

January 11, 2023

Who is Robert Malone

Before we can discus mRNA vaccines for livestock, pets and wildlife, we must first address the elephant in the room. That is, how come the public is able to access human clinical trial information, but is not able to do the same for clinical trials involving animal health?

During the early days of the AIDS epidemic, the AIDS community demanded public access to clinical trials. In 1988,  the U.S. Congress passed the Health Omnibus Programs Extension Act of 1988 (Public Law 100-607) which mandated the development of a database of AIDS Clinical Trials Information Services. This Congressional Act motivated other non-profit disease related groups to demand access also.

The Food and Drug Administration Modernization Act of 1997 amended the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act and the Public Health Service Act to require that the NIH create a publicly available clinical trials database. This eventually led to the development of the website  This allowed tracking of drug efficacy studies resulting from approved Investigational New Drugs (including vaccines).

The law requires (from Wiki):

  • Federally and privately funded clinical trials;
  • The purpose of each experimental drug;
  • Subject eligibility criteria to participate in the clinical trial;
  • The location of clinical trial sites being used for a study; and
  • A point of contact for patients interested in enrolling in the trial.
  • The National Library of Medicine in the National Institutes of Health to host the public website/database

(BTW, one of my former clients held the federal contract to support and Pubmed. I have spent time in the back rooms of the NLM and do know a fair amount about these things….)

The searchable website was made available to the public via the internet on February 29, 2000. makes searching for human clinical trials easy.  For instance, a quick search reveals that there are over 50 clinical trials for mRNA vaccines in progress and over 200 registered.

With animals, there is no such database.  mRNA vaccines in the “animal health” or veterinary markets are difficult to track until the company or the USDA is ready to release information on that product’s development or release. The USDA and/or the NIH have no mechanism for tracking potential new vaccines, drugs or biologics for the animal market.

Therefore, one must rely on press releases, the occasional peer reviewed paper, conference notes, USDA grant and contract notifications, university websites and company profiles for discovery of such new products. Not adequate, in my opinion, and most definitely not transparent. By federal law, the public should have open access to the results of this type of federally funded research.

In today’s substack, the state of mRNA “vaccines” for animal “health” is discussed.  Citing public sources, I will review what is known and not known about commercial liaisons and partnerships, the corporations involved, ongoing research and products in various states of development. 

Bayer Partners with BioNTech to Develop mRNA Vaccines, Drugs for Animal Health

Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology News.  May 10, 2016

Bayer will partner with BioNTech to develop novel, first-in-class mRNA vaccines and therapeutics for animal health indications, the companies said today, under a collaboration whose value was not disclosed.

Bayer agreed to secure exclusive rights to BioNTech’s mRNA technology and intellectual property for development of mRNA vaccines for animal health applications…

The companies said their partnership is the first of its kind focused on developing mRNA therapeutics specifically for animal health applications.

Infectious disease vaccines is the focus of one of the three therapy platforms BioNTech is building through mRNA technologies; the other two are cancer immunotherapies and protein replacement. The three platforms are designed to produce pharmacologically optimized protein coding RNA for targeted in vivo delivery…

2016. This means that Bayer and BioNTech have been working on livestock and companion animal mRNA vaccines for over six years…

Logic predicts that they will soon have livestock and companion mRNA vaccine and RNA therapeutics on the market.

Bayer, BioNTech developing new mRNA vaccines May 16, 2016

Companies collaborate on cutting-edge technology to develop new solutions to protect companion and farm animal health.

Again, note the date…2016. This means that Bayer and BioNTech have been working on livestock and companion animal mRNA vaccines for over six years…

There are three therapy platforms that BioNTech has been building through mRNA technologies to be used in livestock and companion animals.

  • Infectious disease vaccines
  • Cancer immunotherapies and
  • Protein replacement.

Bayer to manufacture mRNA vaccine in Germany

Bayer Website, February 1, 2021

“Following discussions with the German government it has become clear that current manufacturing capacities for vaccines need to be increased, particularly for potential variants of the SARS-CoV-2 virus.

This includes the need to expand production capacity as well as related manufacturing expertise in Germany.

We at Bayer will contribute even further by making more vaccine available to help fight the pandemic.

So, Bayer lent their mRNA manufacturing vaccine facilities for use for the making of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines. Given the above 2016 press releases, that Bayer and BioNtech were collaborating to make mRNA vaccines for the animal markets, it would make sense that these facilities were actually built for the production of veterinary vaccines.

SEQUIVITY: Custom Swine Vaccines, using RNA vaccines.

Merck Website, Accessed Jan 2023

Combat current and future swine diseases with SEQUIVITY from Merck Animal Health. revolutionary swine vaccine platform, SEQUIVITY harnesses RNA particle technology to create customized prescription vaccines against strains of influenza A virus in swine, porcine circovirus (PCV), rotavirus and beyond. It’s supported by a sophisticated dashboard filled with comprehensive data and insights, all to help you stay on top.

Important to know. Merck is already selling mRNA vaccines for swine. For whatever reason, they are selling these products as “customized prescription vaccines against strains of influenza A virus in swine, porcine circovirus (PCV), rotavirus and beyond.” This is an interesting market segment. Merck’s reason to limit the production of mRNA vaccines in the “customized prescription” market is unclear. Production facility size and scaleability of the RNA product could be factors.

Acquisition Expands and Complements Merck Animal Health’s Strong Vaccine Portfolio

Merck Press Release, November 12, 2015 5:00 pm ET

MADISON, N.J., November 12, 2015 – Merck Animal Health (known as MSD Animal Health outside the United States and Canada) and Harrisvaccines, Inc., today announced the companies have entered into an agreement under which Merck Animal Health will acquire Harrisvaccines, a privately-held company that develops, manufactures and sells vaccines for food production and companion animals.

“As a leader in biologics, Merck Animal Health has built a robust portfolio of vaccines across all animal species,” stated Rick DeLuca, president, Merck Animal Health. “Combining Harrisvaccines’ R&D and portfolio of products with our strong capabilities and global reach will enable us to address even more devastating diseases that are impacting production animals and reinforce our commitment to the science of healthier animals.”

Harrisvaccines offers innovative technology and an important portfolio of vaccines, with a focus on production animals, an increasingly important segment as consumer demand for protein continues to grow worldwide. The company has a unique RNA Particle technology which represents a breakthrough in vaccine development. It also has a highly versatile production platform able to target a wide range of viruses and bacteria. Pathogens are collected from a farm and specific genes are sequenced and inserted into RNA particles, making safe, potent vaccines able to provide herd-specific protection.

This pioneering system is rapidly adaptable to new disease challenges and was instrumental in producing the first conditionally licensed vaccine to help control Porcine Epidemic Diarrhea Virus (PEDv), a deadly virus that has killed more than eight million piglets since suddenly emerging in the U.S. in 2013.

Read that last paragraph again. Slowly.

Sometime before 2015, the USDA issued a conditional license for a mRNA vaccine for use in pigs for Porcine Epidemic Diarrhea Virus (PEDv), information about this product can be found at

Basically something akin to an emergency use authorization was issued around 2014 or 2015. Just like with the mRNA COVID-19 vaccine, full licensure was not granted but the conditional license remains in place. Is this a strategy to circumvent the USDA vaccine licensing and/or authorization process?

To conclude:

Like with the BioNtech’s veterinary mRNA vaccine development, Merck’s development of an mRNA vaccine product started years ago. For Merck, it may have begun in earnest in 2015 with the acquisition of Harris Vaccine.


IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY (grant summary page)

Non Technical Summary

Bovine respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is a significant viral pathogens of young cows that is a key component of the respiratory disease complex and often leads to secondary bacterial pneumonia. Prefusion F has recently shown to be highly efficacious in barrier housed RSV challenged cows. However, the difficulty in generating prefusion F along with the cost of its production are a hurdle for adoption to the farm. RSV immunity also tends to wane quickly and given the complications of field or pen raised cattle and their stressors and other circulating diseases, and a protein vaccine may not prove highly efficacious in the real world. Here, we will test a novel mRNA vaccine system we have developed that substantially lowers the price point for production animals and may lead to more thermal stable transcripts compatible with vaccinating on the farm. The use of an alternative delivery system rather than lipid nanoparticles will also lower the vaccine costs. We expect to demonstrate efficacy of the vaccine platform using mice at first as proof of principle before switching to a full cow vaccination and challenge system in year 2. Our overall goal is to test a novel mRNA system for inducing immunological protection from bovine RSV infection. We hypothesize that a prefusion F mRNA delivered continuously by vaccine implant will lead to prolonged and robust cellular and antibody immunity. Here, we will optimize our vaccine further and then test for potential correlates of protection to examine for in eventually challenged cows.

Research into mRNA vaccine livestock vaccines in New Zealand and Australia continues with governmental fast-track approval.

NSW fast tracks mRNA FMD and Lumpy Skin Disease vaccines (in cattle)

The NSW Government has taken another step towards fast tracking the world first mRNA vaccines for Foot and Mouth Disease (FMD) and Lumpy Skin Disease, inking a deal with US biotechnology company Tiba Biotech

A Foot and Mouth Disease mRNA Vaccine Deal Has Been Signed Between the NSW Government and US Company Tiba Biotech

Finally, inquiring minds want to know… what is Pfizer up to?

Pfizer animal health goes by the name Zoetis.

Zoetis clearly does not make its animal vaccine developmental stages known to the public. Internet searches do not reveal much inside the workings of Zoetis, in terms of mRNA vaccines. However, we can safely assume that development of mRNA vaccines and therapeutics for “animal health” are underway – so stay tuned.

Zoetis Screen Capture (Malone)

Finally, there are mRNA vaccines for COVID-19 for wildlife that have been developed and authorized for distribution by the USDA.

Black-footed ferret COVID-19 vaccination seems to be working

The Wildlife Society, Feb 18, 2021

After finding similar species can be infected, researchers quickly began to increase safety protocols at zoos and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s National Black-footed Ferret Conservation Center in Colorado, the main source of the captive-breeding and release program for the federally endangered species.

“They have done a magnificent job in keeping those animals safe,” said Tonie Rocke, a research scientist with the USGS National Wildlife Health Center who works with ferrets.

But U.S. Geological Survey researchers who also study black-footed ferrets had learned about recent studies in mice and hamsters, demonstrating safety and efficacy of vaccination against COVID-19 using purified viral protein. They decided to try something similar on a handful of ferrets this past May and June.

The vaccine used in ferrets is different — it’s a simplified version of the Moderna or Pfizer vaccinations now being used for humans — and it’s based on a similar protein, said Rocke.

Under the authority of the USFWS, the scientists could test the solution on a handful of ferrets in a process that is much quicker than the extensive approvals needed for commercial vaccination for humans like the Pfizer or Moderna inoculations.

The isolated ferrets that had received this trial vaccination produced antibodies against the coronavirus.

Unfortunately, I could find no updates to this program and whether it was expanded into other wildlife populations.

Again, something akin to an emergency use authorization was issued for this experimental vaccine. Just like with the mRNA COVID-19 vaccine and the RNA porcine vaccine above, full licensure was not granted but it appears that the conditional license remains in place. I raise the question again, is this a USDA and/or corporate strategy to circumvent the USDA vaccine licensing and/or authorization process?

The issue being of course, that there is no mechanism for “right to know” of animal health vaccine development.

There were news stories in 2020 that mRNA vaccine(s) were being developed for COVID/SARS-CoV-2 for administration to livestock and companion animals. However, the lack of updates suggest that these plans may have been scrapped with the new, less virulent variants.

Who is Robert Malone is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

© 2023 Robert W Malone, MD


Youtube VIDEO: Is mRNA Entering our Food Supply?

Posted by Larry the guy from Michigan

Posted on Jan 16, 2023

On January 11, 2023, Dr Robert Malone, co-inventor of the mRNA process, published a post on his substack where he offered several citations and quotations about RNA animal vaccines being developed and deployed by major pharmaceutical companies, and warning that through such animals, genetically adjusted meat products are entering the human food supply. I react, as well as sharing a warning given to Christians more than 100 years ago suggesting that eventually it would be prudent to abandon meat as a food source.

Larry Kirkpatrick also offers the Open Hands audio Podcast twice a week at, which addresses he rapid increase in soft totalitarianism enveloping our world.

He has been engaged in pastoral ministry since 1994, serving several congregations. He has authored books including Real Grace for Real People, and Cleanse and Close. He has been plenary speaker at symposiums and a presenter on several continents. He presently serves as pastor of the Fremont and Muskegon MI Seventh-day Adventist churches. Every morning he shares short Bible devotionals for those who want to start their day with God.

[Blog Editor: In case of Youtube censorship, this video can be watched HERE:]


Government and Big Pharma plan to taint food supply by injecting animals with mRNA vaccines

Dairy Cattle Grazing

By Arsenio Toledo

January 18, 2023

Natural News

(Natural News) The government and Big Pharma companies are planning to taint the nation’s food supply, specifically by injecting animals with mRNA vaccines.

Dr. Robert Malone, the inventor of mRNA vaccination technology, noted that information on this new development is sparse because mRNA vaccine use for “animal health” or for other aspects in the veterinary markets is difficult to track until either the company developing this or agencies like the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) release information on the product’s development.

Furthermore, neither the USDA nor the National Institutes of Health have a mechanism for tracking the potential release of new vaccinations, drugs or other biologics for the animal market. (Related: The US meat supply may soon be widely contaminated with mRNA proteins from biotech “vaccines.”)

Some of the earliest evidence of Big Pharma developing mRNA vaccines for animals came from press releases.

In 2016, Bayer partnered with Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) vaccine developer BioNTech to create “first-in-class mRNA vaccines and therapeutics for animal health indications.” Bayer and BioNTech followed this up with another statement claiming that they are collaborating on cutting-edge technology to develop new solutions to protect the health of companion and farm animals.

“They are injecting animals with these [mRNA vaccines] and are planning on doing a lot more than that,” warned Attorney Thomas Renz. “Do we want gene therapy injections into animals? More importantly, if they do put that in there, what is the likelihood of transmissibility to humans?”

mRNA vaccinations extremely deadly for animals

Since 2016, more and more news has been coming out of Big Pharma companies developing veterinary mRNA vaccines and animals being subjected to mRNA trials. One such trial from Australia featured a 17.5 percent death rate for cattle.

The incident occurred in the Australian state of New South Wales, where a cattle farmer was forced by the authorities to vaccinate 200 heads of cattle with mRNA vaccines. Thirty-five of those cattle died instantly.

Dylan Eleven, writing for Principia Scientific, noted that the surviving members of this herd of cows have already had their DNA altered by the mRNA vaccines.

Furthermore, Eleven warned that the food supply of Australia may already have been infected. Details are scant, but it is strongly suggested that the animal trial involved dairy cows. This means their milk has already been altered, along with other dairy products produced by the surviving herd, including butter, yogurt, cheese and meat.

“Please take the time to urgently warn others,” wrote Eleven. “Literally consuming dairy would be like a vaccine, and that goes for cheese and other food products that have dairy including cheese, pizzas and sandwiches.”

Eleven further warned people to be cautious of consuming cow meat products, especially if people are not certain where they come from.

“My hope is that we find a way to deal with this,” said Renz. “But the key here is that we’ve got to keep pushing the truth out because unfortunately, we can’t count on our federal government to do anything legal or ethical.”

Learn more about the dangers of mRNA vaccines at

Watch this episode of “Another Renz Rant” as Attorney Thomas Renz talks about mRNA vaccines infecting the food supply.

[Blog Editor: Natural News uses the Brighteon Video Platform for the Thomas Renz video in the post. For my embed purposes, I’m using Bitchute below.]


[Posted by Thomas Renztomrenz

First Published January 16th, 2023 14:35 UTC


This video is from the Thomas Renz channel on

More related stories:

mRNA vaccines for animals and livestock have arrived – get ready for a transgenic meat supply laced with spike protein.

If mRNA is now being found in breast milk, then COVID “vaccine” safety claims are lies.

LETHAL INJECTIONS: 18% of cattle DIE immediately following mRNA “vaccination.”

Study finds 84% increase in incidence of cardiac-related DEATH among men under 40 following mRNA vaccination.

Scientists look to create chimeric mRNA vaccines that can be deployed through food.

Sources include:

This site is part of the Natural News Network © 2022 All Rights Reserved. 




FEBRUARY 4, 2023

Musings from the Lunatic Farmer

Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s DEFENDER has done us all a wonderful service by shining the light on the plethora of pharmaceutical efforts to create mRNA vaccines for livestock.  I won’t reiterate all the companies and initiatives outlined in that report.           

The important thing to realize is that the popular backlash against off-the-shelf livestock antibiotic use came to a halt in 2021; these medications now require a veterinarian’s prescription. Of course, plenty of unscrupulous veterinarians, working for industrial corporate companies, can write these in-house.   And within the industry, almost nobody believes rampant antibiotic use posed any threats to humans.  Their silo is simple:  make cows grow faster.  Or chickens or pigs or whatever.  Plenty of livestock is still getting antibiotics.

When Bill Clinton was elected president and hired a French chef who promised “free range chicken” the conservative talk-show and former presidential candidate Pat Buchanan interviewed me for his show.  His first question:  “What is different between your pastured chickens and the ones in regular industry houses?” 

My quick reply:  “Mine don’t do drugs.” 

Pat:  “Why do they use drugs?” 

Me:  “To make them grow faster . . .” 

He interrupted (as talk radio hosts are wont to do):  “What could possibly be wrong with making something grow faster?” 

Folks, cancer is a fast growth.  This idea that nature has no balance, that no ecological boundaries exist, that life manipulation and re-arrangement has no limiting protocols, is endemic in food-as-machine thinking.  While consumer advocates celebrated a great victory by supposedly reducing antibiotic use in livestock, it fired up the vaccine industry. Have we traded the devil for the witch? 

Post-covid, we now know that perhaps mRNA injections have more negative side effects than antibiotics.  Like a lot of things, the higher the tech and the less accessible for the average person, the more catastrophic the side effects if things go awry.  In other words, herbal remedies for covid would never cause myocardial infarction—heart attacks for most of us.           

The livestock vaccine industry is exploding, much of it financed by taxpayer money through government initiatives.  In other words, without taxpayer subsidies, these things would develop much slower.  But as it is, public money stolen from you and me through confiscatory taxes is like throwing rum at a pirate.  It makes them go wild.

Will the unintended consequences of mRNA injections in livestock be worse than MRSA and Cdiff, the most prominent superbugs created by antibiotic resistance?  Nobody knows.  Nature often doesn’t issue its progress report immediately.  It takes awhile.  Just like it takes awhile to know whether your parenting skills yielded kids that don’t go to jail. 

Delayed reaction is baked into a lot of things, including technology and certainly including manipulative instruments below the cellular level.  We’re not talking here about salves and ointments.  How about instead of creating a $30 billion per year livestock mRNA industry, we create a livestock sector that’s fundamentally healthy, with a robust immune system?  Doesn’t that sound like a better investment? 

What we need is every fan of Robert F. Kennedy Jr. to refuse to take their grandchildren to McDonald’s.  Surely we can suffer a bit of inconvenience by refusing to patronize entities that think health comes out of an mRNA jab. If the 37 percent of the U.S. population that refused the covid jab would boycott all industrial food, it would completely collapse the industrial food complex.  That’s certainly not as big a sacrifice as facing a death squad. 

If you had $30 billion a year to invest in healthy livestock each year, how would you spend it?

© 2018 [Joel needs to update his copyright me-thinks]JOEL SALATIN. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

Musings from the Lunatic Farmer HOMEPAGE

Author: oneway2day

I am a Neoconservative Christian Right blogger. I also spend a significant amount of time of exposing theopolitical Islam.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: