John R. Houk, Blog Editor
© September 1, 2022
I posted yesterday some only-tip-of-the-iceberg information of the government lies (really science lies) that mRNA Jabs were safe and effective. Today’s post focuses on the LIE that the remedy Ivermectin is dangerous when the proven truth it is more than SAFE, it is also EFFECTIVE to combat the Chinese Virus – er I mean COVID-19. AND Ivermectin has massive medical uses for humans not just horses as the Big Pharma propagandists lied about.
I begin with a Rumble video which I found linked from a Steve Kirsch Substack post entitled, “The new ivermectin video is a must see.” I can’t figure out how to embed Rumble videos on my Substack, but the video is 13:38 minutes in length – not very long at all:
Rumble VIDEO: Ivermectin: The Truth
Posted by PlandemicSeriesOfficial
Published August 29, 2022
Just so you are aware Steve Kirsch is not the only person sharing science truth contradicting the science lies of the government, WND has found science studies upholding the efficacy of Ivermectin to battle COVID. My God people, IF you haven’t taken the unsafe and ineffective Jab, don’t start now! Ivermectin and other remedies are much safer and effective ESPECIALLY as early treatment! The WND article: “New ivermectin study shows 92% lower chance of COVID death.”
JRH 9/1/22
Thank you to those who have stepped up!
READER SUPPORTED! I need Readers willing to chip in $5 – $10 – $25 – $50 – $100. PLEASE I need your generosity. PLEASE GIVE to Help me be a voice for Liberty:
Big Tech Censorship is pervasive – Share voluminously on all social media platforms!
**************************
The new ivermectin video is a must see
This video is approved by Doctors Pierre Kory and Paul Marik and many others. The video is NOT approved by the FDA, the CDC, the NIH, CNN, or the White House. Producer: Mikki Willis, Length: 15 min.
By Steve Kirsch
September 1, 2022
Ivermectin: The Truth is an amazing film, less than 15 minutes long! I highly recommend this film. Watch it and share it.
Pierre Kory, Paul Marik, Peter McCullough, Robert Malone, Chris Martenson, Richard Bartlett, and Mike Yeadon all appear. My name appears briefly at 11:45 in the video. Still trying to get that debate with the mainstream “experts.”
Screen Capture Ivermectin Documentary
The Ivermectin film is free.
If you’d like to sponsor Plandemic3, you can donate here.
CNN “COVID expert” Leana Wen
Leana Wen appears briefly in this video (at the beginning and near the end) saying “we know it doesn’t work.” She’s total blue pill. If you feel the same way about Lena as I do, you’ll want to watch this excellent Leana Wen takedown video by Kim Iversen. It’s awesome.
The world would be a better place if Kim Iversen was the authority being promoted on CNN instead of Lena Wen.
[Blog Editor: Substack does embed Youtube videos, ergo here’s the Iverson “takedown”. The first 6-minutes are blatant science lies then takedown:
Youtube VIDEO: Kim Iversen: Pandemic Authoritarian Dr. Leana Wen WARNS Others To NOT Be Like Her
Posted by Kim Iversen
Posted on Aug 16, 2022
P.S. Kim should write a book on “How I avoid being censored by YouTube.” She walks as close to the line as you can get. I don’t know how she does it.
Fluvoxamine
Just a footnote here since I was heavily involved in funding the research on fluvoxamine, another highly effective drug for treating COVID. If you take just 50mg of fluvoxamine twice a day for 2 weeks, most everyone avoids long-haul COVID symptoms due to the anti-inflammatory properties of this drug (Prozac also works).
They did the same thing to fluvoxamine as they did with ivermectin. They used the excuse that the US Phase 3 trial was halted for futility as a reason for not recommending the drug, but they never pointed out that the futility was that very few people in the placebo group were being hospitalized because the variants had gotten so mild and people were likely taking ivermectin, so they had no “comparison group” and they did a horrible job at recruiting (we spent gobs of money sending them leads and their enrollment % was horrible).
This doesn’t mean the drug doesn’t work. These are the kinds of games these people play.
Here’s what the reference cited by the NIH said:
- The Data Safety Monitoring Board(DSMB) for the study recommended an early stop for futility due to a low case rate and difficulty recruiting patients.
Here’s how the NIH deliberately twisted the facts to make it look like the drug didn’t work:
- The subsequent STOP COVID 2, a Phase 3 randomized controlled trial (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT04668950) that enrolled >700 participants in the United States and Canada, was stopped for futility by a data safety monitoring board after lower than expected case rates and treatment effect were observed.
© 2022 Steve Kirsch
+++++++++++++++++++++++
New ivermectin study shows 92% lower chance of COVID death
Protection increases with increased usage of politically charged drug
By Art Moore
August 31, 2022
A large study on the impact of using ivermectin as a prophylaxis for COVID-19 found that regular users of the drug experienced up to a 92% reduction in mortality compared to those who did not.
Brazilian research scientist Dr. Flavio A. Cadegiani said via Twitter that his study in his home country showed a “dose-response effect,” meaning that “the more you used, the more protection you had.”
He observed that people who use ivermectin regularly every 15 days for at least six to eight weeks had up to a 92% reduction in mortality.
Cadegiani conducted a previous study of drug that evaluated whether its use could impact COVID-19 infection and mortality rates.
Last fall, esteemed epidemiologist Dr. Harvey Risch of Yale Medical School was among scientists and physicians who said in Senate testimony that thousands of lives could have been saved if treatments such as ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine had not been suppressed.
In April, after noticing that the word ivermectin was trending on Twitter amid Elon Musk’s move to buy the company, the FDA reprised its disingenuous “horse dewormer” smear of the drug as a treatment for COVID-19.
“Hold your horses, y’all. Ivermectin may be trending, but it still isn’t authorized or approved to treat COVID-19,” said a post on the FDA’s Twitter account.
The reference to horses played on the explosion last fall of media articles and social media posts mocking people who treated COVID-19 with the drug as ignorant rubes who were sneaking into farms or patronizing Tractor Supply stores in quest of “horse dewormer.”
During the pandemic, Twitter and other social media platforms censored positive mention of ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine despite the countless testimonies and dozens of studies from around the world showing the drugs to be effective in treating COVID-19.
A follow-up FDA post said: “Also, a reminder that a study showed it didn’t actually work against COVID.”
Dr. Pierre Kory, who has testified to the Senate of the effectiveness of ivermectin against COVID-19, fired back.
“You are not a horse, you are not a cow, you are Big Pharma’s ass,” he tweeted.
The FDA, he wrote, was “messaging BS” by citing “one corrupt study” while ignoring 82 trials, including 33 randomized controlled trials with 129,000 patients from 27 countries that show “massive benefits” of ivermectin in treating COVID-19.
“Stop lying man, people are dying,” he wrote, adding the hashtag “earlytreatmentworks.”
In an article published in April for the Brownstone Institute, Kory wrote that it’s “a tried-and-true tactic with effective and dastardly results” for “Big Pharma and other well-financed interests” to sponsor purportedly impartial medical trials “aimed at discrediting cheaper generic alternatives.’
“Ignoring the flaws in the methodology, the media runs wild with the desired narrative, which is amplified by a well-orchestrated public relations effort,” he wrote.
Kory cited as an example the newly reported clinical trial from Brazil known as “TOGETHER,” which he said ostensibly aimed at studying the effectiveness of ivermectin to treat COVID.
Among the flaws was the lack of explicit exclusion criteria for trial participants on ivermectin, meaning both trial groups had access to the same drug. Further, the treatment window was set for only three days, which didn’t allow for adequate dosing, and the trial was conducted during the massive gamma variant surge, which was one of the most virulent and deadly COVID variants.
“The dosage of the trial was far lower than everyday Brazilian clinicians were prescribing patients at the time to match the strength of the strain,” Kory pointed out.
“In spite of these and other readily apparent shortcomings, the nation’s leading media gobbled up the results. ‘Ivermectin Didn’t Reduce Covid-19 Hospitalizations in Largest Trial to Date’ blared the Wall Street Journal, while a New York Times headlined announced, ‘Ivermectin Does Not Reduce Risk of Covid Hospitalization, Large Study Finds.'”
Meanwhile, social media platforms stifled conversations while California pushed potentially precedent-setting legislation to punish doctors “who dare question phony studies,” threatening loss of a medical license.
A similar study of ivermectin “of far larger size, conducted by investigators without any conflicts of interest, found the drug led to massive reductions in Covid infection, hospitalization and mortality—yet it received virtually no media coverage.”
Kory said that ending “this cycle of perpetual disinformation requires revamping our dysfunctional drug approval process.”
“An independent board free of pharma industry conflicts must be established to oversee trials for re-purposed medicines,” he said. “Recommendations should be based on trials designed by impartial experts and actual results, not the desired ones, and policymakers or prescribers who ignore the findings should be held accountable.”
And academia and the regulatory agencies must be reminded, he said, “that observational trials data – wherein a sample of population who take a drug are compared to those who do not – is equally valid at informing policy.”
“Randomized controlled trials can yield useful information, but their complexity, costs, and delays to treatment lead to errors and effectively shut out low-cost drugs from the approval process, regardless of their efficacy,” he said.
Art Moore, co-author of the best-selling book “See Something, Say Nothing,” entered the media world as a PR assistant for the Seattle Mariners and a correspondent covering pro and college sports for Associated Press Radio. He reported for a Chicago-area daily newspaper and was senior news writer for Christianity Today magazine and an editor for Worldwide Newsroom before joining WND shortly after 9/11. He earned a master’s degree in communications from Wheaton College.
© 2022 WND
The Conservative-Patriot Christian Right 
Reblogged this on boudica.us.
LikeLike