John R. Houk, Blog Editor
© May 15, 2022
The online alternative news site THE EXPOSÉ posted an article (https://expose-news.com/2022/05/15/vaccinated-people-emitting-mac-addresses/) with a sure to controversial video which I am uploading to my Bitchute Channel. The original video title is “corona2inspect-asuntomac-en” but I’m changing the title to reflect THE EXPOSÉ article: “Vaccinated People Emitting MAC Addresses; What’s Causing This Phenomenon?”
Controversy lay in the suggestion the mRNA experimental Jab contains a nano substance that is WIFI compatible. If you do a search on any Search Engine (from the top Leftist engine [e.g., Google] to some of the so-called neutral Search Engines), you will quickly run into a majority of citings the mRNA jabs have no graphene oxide in it according to the revelation of Spanish researcher.
AND YET interestingly, a version of graphene from late 2021 through early 2022 is now being touted as a miracle biomedical delivery system using this title: “Graphene Oxide Hydrogels” (or some sort of nano-hydrogen composition).
So in spite of the mRNA Graphene Oxide denials, why all of a sudden all the science talk of using some form of Graphene Oxide emerging in biomedicine?
The early Graphene Oxide claims of discovery was that it was toxic and potentially lethal. Current science is touting Graphene Oxide as a nano-biomedical delivery system for medicines in general not just the mRNA Jab.
So what if Graphene Oxide is not lethal and its presence was hidden because Big Pharma simply was unsure about lethality? BUT NOW public science is all excited about the delivery potential nano-biomedical solutions, BUT are the control-freak WEF Globalist scientists viewing a tracking and/or transhumanist aspect of Graphene Oxide Hydrogels in human subjects?
I know and realize it’s all very speculative. BUT THINK ABOUT the WEF’s transhumanist aspirations for controlling human beings and the ever increasing science excitement surrounding Graphene Oxide Hydrogel nano-biomedical delivery systems before dismissing completely THE EXPOSÉ article and video as Science Fiction Conspiracy Theory thinking.
Just so you realize I’m not making this up as I go along. Here are some links reflecting early Graphene Oxide concerns, a Graphene Oxide denial, and current science excitement about Graphene Oxide nano-biomedical delivery systems THEN go to THE EXPOSÉ cross post:
- GRAPHENE OXIDE IN JABS, MASKS AND SWABS; Contributed by Alexandra Bruce; Forbidden Knowledge TV; 7/8/21
- Are COVID-19 Vaccines Mostly Graphene Oxide? Here’s What Experts Have to Say; By Mark Bustos; The Science Times; 7/11/21 03:22 AM EDT
- Debunked: No, Covid-19 vaccines do not contain graphene oxide; By Anthony King; TheJournal.ie; 8/30/21 6:15 AM [Blog Editor: Not exactly a resounding gotcha, but enough to issue a denial.]
- Graphene in Biotechnology; Authors: Alba Centeno, Amaia Zurutuza Elorza; MilliporeSigma; No Date
- Graphene Oxide Encapsulating Liquid Metal to Toughen Hydrogel; By Yijie Hu, Hao Zhuo, Yu Zhang, Haihong Lai, Jiwang Yi, Zehong Chen, Xinwen Peng, Xiaohui Wang, Chuanfu Liu, Runcang Sun, Linxin Zhong [Hmm… Not a linguistic expert, but sure looks Chinese to me]; Wiley Online Library – Advanced Functional Materials; First published – 9/17/21
- Utilising graphene to transform nanomedicine and health technology; By Professor Kostas Kostarelos; Innovation News Network; 2/8/22
AND NOW – THE EXPOSÉ!
READER SUPPORTED! I need Readers willing to chip in $5 – $10 – $25 – $50 – $100. I need your generosity. PLEASE GIVE to overcome research expenses:
Big Tech Censorship is pervasive – Share voluminously on all social media platforms!
Vaccinated People Emitting MAC Addresses; What’s Causing This Phenomenon?
Jabbed People Emit MAC Addresses
By RHODA WILSON
MAY 15, 2022 12:30pm
The phenomenon of MAC emissions from people “vaccinated” against Covid is an alarming fact that demonstrates a cause-and-effect relationship, Corona2Inspect wrote. Corona2Inspect has made a short video to explain how it is happening and what the possible effects could be. But before you get to the video at the end of this article, a bit of background to the contents of Covid injections as they relate to the MAC phenomenon.
There are three clear pieces of evidence that micro or nanotechnology related to nano-communication is in the Covid injections, Mik Andersen of Corona2Inspect explained during an interview with RichPlanet earlier this year.
The first is the detection of rectangular and quadrangular objects that respond to a morphology of micro or nano “bowtie antennae” or double and quadruple leaf “bowties”, which are explicitly collected in the scientific literature in the context of intracorporeal wireless nano communication networks for nanoelectronic devices.
The second evidence is the detection of objects with apparent circumscribed circuitry, with an important similarity to the demux circuits of nano routers, among other devices not yet identified, see the images obtained by La Quinta Columna and the New Zealand team of researchers.
Third, the location of graphic evidence of epitexial self-assembly based on synthetic or artificial DNA templates. A new test of synthetic DNA self-assembly and nanotechnology has recently been obtained, finding an exact match between the type of crystals that form in vaccines, compared to those observed in the scientific literature on DNA nanotechnology. This last finding is about to be published, and we hope that it ends up dispelling any doubts about it.
Mik Andersen further explained that Wireless nano communication networks for intracorporeal nanodevices have two clear goals.
The first is to monitor and collect data on the parameters, activity or neurological, cardiac and physiological data of the individual, facilitating their transmission to remote servers and databases, on the Internet, to form the Big Data and its analytics through artificial intelligence (“AI”) software.
The second is to interact with individuals, especially in the neural section and the human psyche.
MAC addresses are set up in memory circuits (we think also built with synthetic DNA and graphene). In this way, they receive the electromagnetic signals and automatically encode them into another simpler type of signal, called TS-OOK, with which the data is re-transmitted in binary to a next level in the topology, that is, the nano interface … The nano interface is another self-assembled electronic device that is capable of encoding TS-OOK binary data for transmission outside the body.
The nano interface transmits messages with very specific headers, where the MAC device is identified, the IP address to which the information is sent and the binary content with the information obtained by the nodes in the base of the topology. These messages have to be received by a ‘gateway’ – a mobile device or smartphone that has an Internet connection – which would be responsible for sending the message to its destination, without its owner knowing, remaining hidden in the data traffic. In other words, any mobile phone close to the vaccinated individual could be transmitting the data generated by the nanonetwork.
Mik Andersen also explained that the MAC addresses are not “always on.”
A vaccinated person does not always emit these MAC addresses, visible through the mobile phone’s Bluetooth receiver. This is described in the scientific literature, specifically in the DCCORONA and EECORONA wireless nano communication protocols. As indicated, one of the problems of nano communication networks is the limited energy they have to operate. This means that they are not always on, working, or signalling. It only happens when they receive signals from outside the body or when information is collected that must be transmitted.
Mik Andersen recommends watching a three-part documentary, ‘Brain Jabbed’, made by Richard Hall, host of RichPlanet TV, which explains many of the topics covered in his interview with RichPlanet. The first part of Brain Jabbed can be found by following this LINK.
Read more: RichPlanet’s interview with Mik Andersen and Covid vaccine analysis
In a recent video, Mik Anderson summarised the MAC address phenomenon. What could be causing it, what it consists of, what implications it has for the person and society, the role of MAC protocols in the network and more.
At the end of the video, a section has been dedicated to speculating about the possible uses based on those stated in scientific literature and the content confirmed and revealed in vaccines, graphene and derivatives.
As the topics discussed may be complex for most of us to understand, we have attached a copy of the video’s transcript which you may find useful.
PDF transcript of Corona2Inspect Video
After watching Corona2Inspect’s video below you may wish to test the MAC phenomenon for yourself using your smartphone. To enable you to do so, in the article ‘Summary of the MAC phenomenon and the intracorporeal network of nano communications’, Corona2Inspect gives the applications and MAC OIU finders to check if the MAC addresses your phone is detecting belong to any electronic device manufacturer. Below these instructions, Corona2Inspect has listed numerous scientific papers which you can use to conduct deeper research.
Bitchute version of VIDEO: JABBED PEOPLE EMITTING MAC ADDRESSES
[Posted by SlantRight2
First Published May 15th, 2022 18:48 UTC
Corona2Inspect: Summary of the MAC phenomenon and the intra-body nano-network of communications,
8 May 2022 (24 mins)
THE EXPOSÉ HOMEPAGE
ABOUT THE EXPOSÉ
One thought on “Might The Jab be a WEF Tracker?”
Reblogged this on boudica.us.