John R. Houk, Blog Editor
(c) December 19, 2020
I am EXTREMELY displeased the crimes perpetrated Dem-Marxists, a huge majority of America’s Media (once known as the Free Press or Mainstream Media), RINOSs, Establishment so-called Conservatives AND Cowardly once respected Republicans have publicly acquiesced to a political coup that if proceeds to its perceived conclusion will terminate the Republic of the United States of America. A Republic once a shining beacon of Liberty and Freedom on a hill of Christian Principles. A Creepy-Crooked Joe (and eventual Commie Kamala) Administration left unchecked will complete Obama’s fundamental transformation of America.
TO BE CLEAR that transformation will terminate Christian Liberty and tenets, steal your guns once guaranteed as a citizen vehicle against corrupt government by America’s Founders, AND establish all manner Socio-Political Cultural Humanist Socialist-Marxist State control over every single person’s life and destiny.
President Trump still has vehicles to prevent or at least stall this treasonous future. To date – I have only heard rumors and speculation Trump will act. Rumors and speculation DO NOT fill me with confidence.
If Trump fails to act, are there enough Americans committed to the legacy of our Founding Fathers’ legacy to rise up as they did to THROW OFF government tyranny?
The Dem-Marxist and Cultural Marxists think not believing their Communist dawn will rise in the East under the globalist direction of the Chinese Communist Party. The very CCP that set the conditions for American treason by unleashing their CCP-COVID Virus on the world allowing closet Marxists to by-pass Representative governments with totalitarian rules that definitely violated the U.S. Constitution. I suspect other Western nations had their Constitutional laws by-passed as well.
Americans used to Liberty are not used to be Sheeple herded by Big Brother’s all-seeing-Big-Tech-Commie-Eye. If President fails to use the apparatus at his disposal (even temporarily suspending the Constitution to protect the Constitution), WHAT WILL YOU DO about this Dem-Marxist coup?
Below is some lengthy information and Trump speculated options you will not read or hear about from any source dedicated to Dem-Marxist propaganda meant to guide compliant Sheeple. (Come back to read a few times – it’s that long.)
I need your generosity via – credit cards, check cards
& debit cards are accepted by my PayPal account:
Please Support NCCR
Or support by getting in the Coffee from home business making yourself extra cash – OR just buy some FEEL GOOD coffee, that includes immune boosting products. Big Tech Censorship is pervasive – Share voluminously on all social media platforms!
[Good info with ads] Bitchute VIDEO: TRUMP URGED TO DECLARE MARTIAL LAW AS CONGRESS POISED TO BLOCK ELECTORS!!!
Posted by Free Your Mind – EUMELs Media Library
December 17th, 2020 23:14 UTC
🇺🇸 All credit to “Dr. Steve Turley” – Original video: http://bitly.ws/aQ2f
2020 Election Fraud Is CCP ‘Assassin’s Mace’: Patrick Byrne
Patrick Byrne on Dec. 15, 2020. (Otabius Williams/The Epoch Times.)
By SIMON VEAZEY AND JAN JEKIELEK
Originally Posted December 16, 2020
Updated: December 18, 2020
Election fraud is the secret “assassin’s mace” of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) that has long confounded security hawks, according to tech billionaire and entrepreneur Patrick Byrne, who back in August assembled a cyber intelligence team to analyze the U.S. voting system.
“For 10 years or more, there have been references to a coming ‘assassin’s mace’ in the Chinese literature—where they take out the United States with one stroke,” Byrne told The Epoch Times’ “American Thought Leaders” program. “The national security community in the United States has been trying to figure this out: Is it their new aircraft carrier? Is that the hypersonic missile? Is it this, that, is it an EMP?”
“I don’t think so,” he told host Jan Jekielek. “The one stroke that takes the United States out is what we’re experiencing right now.”
The 2020 vote involved “massive election fraud,” he says. “Not voter fraud, but election fraud.”
Byrne has been a driving force in the research for lawsuits filed by attorneys Lin Wood and Sidney Powell. He has also been working together with ASOG, the company that recently carried out the forensic audit on voting machines in Antrim County, Michigan.
Byrne said he started investigations back in August, and that as a result, he anticipated the very irregularities which he later observed in the November election.
He says his team of online security experts now believes Chinese developers are “under the hood” of the software that has infiltrated at least two of the main voting systems in the United States.
Suppliers of such election software and systems involved in the U.S. election have responded to allegations of voting irregularities with consistent denial that their systems can be manipulated or that they have any such connection to foreign governments.
‘Reverse-engineering the Coup’
Byrne described the election as a soft coup.
“We are basically reverse-engineering this coup,” said Byrne, in reference to his team of 30-40 people.
Byrne says that he fell in with cyber experts who had been looking at election manipulation since 2018 when they were hired as part of a blue-ribbon commission set up to examine potential election fraud in Texas.
“That group has had two years to really reverse engineer what the rest of America has had a couple of weeks to understand,” he said. “They had already figured out really about a dozen different ways you could defeat an election or hack an election—in a broad sense of hack, not necessarily just electronic cyber guys hacking.”
According to Byrne, they found cheating was possible “at an industrial level, in terms of generating hundreds of thousands of fake votes.”
Byrne says the pattern of manipulation can be identified through examining three key points—what he calls “three buckets of facts.”
“One bucket is understanding the systems themselves and how they were built: the functionality that was built into them and the vulnerabilities that exist.”
The second bucket, he says, relates to how the election process played out. “[In the event of fraud] you would expect people to have certain experiences when they either go in and vote or if they volunteer and work in the precincts.”
A Georgia Republican Party poll watcher looks over voting machine transporters being stored at the Fulton County Election Preparation Center in Atlanta, Ga., on Nov. 4, 2020. (Jessica McGowan/Getty Images)
He gives the examples of vote tabulating being shut down, of poll watchers being denied entry, and of the video of election workers pulling out cases of ballots from under a table after observers had gone home and then scanning them.
The third bucket, he says, is the extreme statistical outliers that would be thrown up by such a manipulation process.
“Things like that happened—these statistical outliers: Having 123,000 votes in a row going to one candidate; or in Pennsylvania, I believe it was 580,000 votes got processed that were 99.4 percent for Biden… and they came through exactly when all the Republicans had been told they had to leave.”
“They’re on the order of you winning the Powerball lottery this week, and next week and the week after—and that happening in dozens of places around America at the same time.”
“When you put those three different narratives together, they also just come together perfectly. They all reinforce each other.”
Traced to China
Byrne says that the manipulation of the voting systems can be traced back to China.
“There’s a chain of command basically from China through Iran to Cuba and Venezuela,” he said. “The Chinese are funding Smartmatic through the Panamanian division of Smartmatic, but it bounces through Venezuela.”
“There is code buried within the Dominion machines that has been turned up that seems to show Chinese provenance.”
“There are Chinese developers under the hood of this stuff back in China who are actually getting their software into the Smartmatic systems which have infiltrated at least two of the main voting systems used domestically.”
Smartmatic’s headquarters located in Boca Rotan, Fla., on Dec. 2, 2020. (The Epoch Times)
“I say this as a guy who loves China,” he adds. “I speak Chinese, I have a great affection for China and the Chinese people—but I’m not such a big fan of the CCP.”
Smartmatic says its products were used only in one LA county in the U.S. 2020 election and has consistently denied any claims of wrongdoing or involvement in voter or election fraud past or present. It says it has no involvement with any governments or political parties or with Dominion.
Dominion Voting Systems has also consistently denied any wrongdoing or vulnerabilities in its systems and said that it does not use software owned by Smartmatic and that it has no ownership ties to the governments of China, Cuba, or Venezuela. Dominion products are used in 28 states.
Byrne, however, says that software created by Smartmatic went through a series of corporate mergers, acquisitions, divestments, and licensing agreements before ending up in at least two of the main commercial voting systems being used in the United States, including Dominion. “Its genetic lineage [goes] back to the software,” he says.
A number of other analysts have signed affidavits to the same effect.
Dominion has also come under scrutiny for its ownership structure after its parent company raised funds with the help of a Swiss bank before the 2020 U.S. presidential election. The transaction, peculiar in several ways, has led some to speculate that a Chinese entity could be an indirect investor in the company.
Byrne says that stealing the national election doesn’t require cheating across the board. “There are six counties that you need to steal. If you steal these six counties around the country, that flips the six states they’re in, which flips the electoral college votes that come with them, which flips the nation,” he said. “You’ve got to take six places and cheat like crazy there.”
He says that some online security experts, who he describes as white hat hackers, say that they would give the election systems a rating of just one or two out of 10 for security.
Follow Simon on Twitter: @SPVeazey
Follow Jan on Twitter: @JanJekielek
Copyright © 2000 – 2020 – The Epoch Times
‘Theft By A Thousand Cuts’ Report Conclusive On Election Fraud, Slams Media Cover Up
By RAHEEM KASSAM AND NATALIE WINTERS
December 17, 2020
A new report detailing massive fraud plaguing the 2020 election alleges there was a widespread, “theft by a thousand cuts” strategy “across six dimensions and six battleground states.” The report cites comprehensive evidence, and blasts the media for its failure to cover the matter accurately.
In the report, Peter Navarro, also a White House Trade Adviser, outlines a “coordinated strategy to effectively stack the election deck against the Trump-Pence ticket” occurring in Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin.
The full report is embedded at the bottom of this article.
SUMMARY [Voter Fraud Chart 1]
The Navarro Report also notes how President Trump’s leads in Georgia, Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Wisconsin were reversed by “a flood of mail-in and absentee ballots”:
A TRUMP RED TIDE TURNS BIDEN BLUE. [Voter Fraud Chart 2]
The report explains how “outright voter fraud,” including “the large-scale manufacturing of fake ballots, bribery, and dead voters” and “ballots cast by ineligible voters such as felons and illegal aliens, ballots counted multiple times, and illegal out-of-state voters,” plagued swing states:
OUTRIGHT VOTER FRAUD IN THE 2020 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION [Voter Fraud Chart 3]
Navarro also alleges that “‘ballot mishandling” via a “lack of adequate voter ID check,” “signature matching abuses,” “backdating of ballots,” a “broken chain of custody,” and more jeopardized election results:
BALLOT MISHANDLING IN THE BATTLEGROUND STATES [Voter Fraud Chart 4]
Contestable process fouls, such as the “abuse of poll watchers and observers,” allowing improperly registered people to vote, and illegal ballot curing also plagued every swing state:
CONTESTABLE PROCESS FOULS IN THE BATTLEGROUND STATES [Voter Fraud Chart 5]
All six states also violated the Equal Protection Clause by carrying out varying standards for ballot curing, poll watcher treatment, and certification of in-person and mail-in ballots:
EQUAL PROTECTION CLAUSE VIOLATIONS IN THE SIX BATTLEGROUND STATES [Voter Fraud Chart 6]
Machines used to conduct elections also contributed to the fraud, experiencing “large-scale inaccuracies together with inexplicable vote switching and vote surges, often in favor Joe Biden”:
2020 VOTING MACHINE IRREGULARITIES [Voter Fraud Chart 7]
Citing excessively high voter turnout, unusual vote surges, and statistically unlikely results given counties’ partisan history and voting registration, Navarro also highlights statistical anomalies infecting battleground states:
STATISTICAL ANOMALIES IN THE BATTLEGROUND STATES [Voter Fraud Chart 8]
Navarro concludes, “the weight of evidence and patterns of irregularities uncovered in this report are such that it is irresponsible for anyone – especially the mainstream media – to claim that there is “no evidence” of fraud or irregularities.”
Raheem Kassam is the Editor in Chief of the National Pulse. Natalie Winters is a Senior Writing Fellow.
[Blog Editor: Numerous supporters of President Trump have urged Martial Law or some kind of temporary or partial suspension of the Constitution rightly perceiving corruption in all Branches of government are cooperating with this Marxist Coup. Retired Air Force Lt. Gen Thomas McInerney has called for Martial Law to address Election Coup. Unjustly persecuted retired Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn has been calling for Martial Law:
VIDEO: Targeted by the deep state: Flynn tells all
Posted by Newsmax TV
1.72M subscribers – Dec 17, 2020
Here is an examination of the details found in the above video:
Flynn: Trump Needs To Seize Voting Machines, Could Use “Military Capabilities” To “Rerun” Elections In Swing States; By Ian Schwartz; Real Clear Politics; 12/17/20
Since the Courts all the way up to SCOTUS have refused to even examine the tons of Election Fraud, independent lawyers such as Lin Wood called for Martial Law probably due to Courts continuously refusing to look at evidence:
Attorney Lin Wood, patriot group, call on Trump to use wartime executive powers like Lincoln did and order new, fair elections under military authority; By JD Heyes; Originally Natural News – cross posted at The Daily Coin; 12/4/20
A good description of how martial law could work is by Stephen B. Meister on the JamesFetzer.org website:]
Case for President Trump Invoking Insurrection Act to Restore Election Integrity
Posted by James Fetzer
December 9, 2020
During the presidency of Thomas Jefferson, the Tenth Congress enacted the Insurrection Act of 1807, which was then signed by Jefferson into law, to foil the plot of Revolutionary War hero Aaron Burr—following the destruction of his political career after he shot and killed Alexander Hamilton in a duel—to raise an army to establish his own dynasty in what was then the Louisiana Territory.
The Insurrection Act empowers the president of the United States to deploy U.S. military and federalized National Guard troops to suppress civil disorder, insurrection, and rebellion. Section 252 of the Act, states:
“Whenever the President considers that unlawful obstructions, combinations, or assemblages, or rebellion against the authority of the United States, make it impracticable to enforce the laws of the United States in any State by the ordinary course of judicial proceedings, he may call into Federal service such of the militia of any State, and use such of the armed forces, as he considers necessary to enforce those laws or to suppress the rebellion.”
Generally, the U.S. military remains free of civil conflicts on U.S. soil, as no one wants U.S. armed forces using physical force against U.S. civilians. Indeed, when President Donald Trump threatened to invoke the Insurrection Act, and send the National Guard in response to the George Floyd riots, including, for example, to address Seattle’s failure to restore law and order over the so-called “autonomous zone,” then-Defense Secretary Mark Esper openly stated his disagreement with the president.
Ultimately, President Trump did not then invoke the Insurrection Act. But considering the possibility of the Act’s invocation now, to address “unlawful obstructions” to an attempt to verify ballots, and an “insurrection” surrounding the 2020 election generally, two powerful distinctions must at the outset be noted: (1) Esper is no longer Defense Secretary, Trump having fired and replaced him with Christopher Miller, the director of the National Counterterrorism Center, and (2) troops could be deployed to take control over ballots and voting machines in swing states, not to suppress and disperse rioting civilians.
The president’s invocation of the Insurrection Act is not a declaration of martial law. The Constitution is not suspended. The writ of habeas corpus is not suspended. The president would be using troops to enforce the law, not override it.
To understand the case for Trump’s potential invocation of the Insurrection Act, we must consider more broadly the 2020 election and surrounding historical circumstances.
Election Integrity Was Shattered by Numerous Badges of Fraud
At law, fraud is often proved by what are known as “badges of fraud”—telltale signs that a fraud has taken place—short of positive proof of the actual fraud, because fraudsters have a tendency of covering their tracks.
Case in point: Harry Markopolos. At least 7 years before the lid was blown off the $65 billion Ponzi scheme run by Bernie Madoff, Harry Markopolos, a money fund manager, blew the whistle on Madoff’s decades-long Ponzi scheme. Markopolos’ “proof” was a single compelling badge of fraud: in his words, Madoff’s “impossibly smooth” returns over decades. Markopolos, who made investments for a living, knew no one could have such a consistent record, with no downturns, no volatility, and for so many years on end. Markopolos published a book titled “No One Would Listen,” remarking, after exposure of Madoff’s enormous Ponzi scheme, “the math was so compelling.”
Badges of Fraud in the 2020 Election: The ‘Math Is So Compelling’
- Consider now—away from the mountains of direct evidence of voter fraud—the “math” involved in the 2020 election:
- Shortly after midnight (eastern), President Trump was leading in all six of the swing states still in issue: Michigan, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, Georgia, Arizona, and Nevada, and had racked up, apart from those six states, 232 electoral votes to Biden’s 227.
- During the early morning hours of Nov. 4, not one or two, but all six states flipped for Biden.
- The early-morning-Nov. 4 “blue-shift” took place only in the six swing states (nowhere else), through a series of “spikes,” almost entirely consisting of mailed ballots (made possible due to radical changes in voting laws following the CCP virus pandemic), in which Biden received the vast majority of the votes. According to an analysis published through substack, these spikes include:
- “An update in Michigan listed as 6:31 a.m. Eastern Time on Nov. 4, 2020, which shows 141,258 votes for Joe Biden and 5,968 votes for Donald Trump”
- “An update in Wisconsin listed as 3:42 a.m. Central Time on Nov. 4, 2020, which shows “143,379 votes for Joe Biden and 25,163 votes for Donald Trump”
- “A vote update in Georgia listed at 1:34 a.m. Eastern Time on Nov. 4, 2020, which shows 136,155 votes for Joe Biden and 29,115 votes for Donald Trump”
- “An update in Michigan listed as of 3:50 a.m. Eastern Time on Nov. 4, 2020, which shows 54,497 votes for Joe Biden and 4,718 votes for Donald Trump”
- Those four spikes yielded 426,241 Biden votes but only 64,964 Trump votes.
- Somehow Biden did very poorly in all parts of the country except, only and exactly, where it mattered. Out of the 3,000 counties in the United States, 19 so-called “bellwether” counties have had a perfect record, since 1980, of voting for the winner. Donald Trump won 18 of these 19 counties. For example, Vigo County, Indiana, and Valencia County, New Mexico, each have perfect records voting for picking the winning candidate since the 1952 election famously gotten wrong by the Chicago Tribune, which ran a cover declaring “Dewey Defeats Truman.” Barack Obama won these two bellwether counties in 2008, yet Trump handily defeated Biden in both and 16 other bellwether counties.
- In 2008, Obama garnered 69,498,516 votes, the most ever until Biden slashed his record with over 80 million votes in 2020, yet, Trump this year won the highest share of non-white voters of any Republican since 1960: Roughly one-quarter of non-white voters cast their ballots for Trump, according to an Edison exit poll.
- Trump improved his 2016 performance (just shy of 63 million votes) by 20 percent in 2020 (over 74 million votes). No incumbent president in U.S. history has ever improved his original performance that much and lost. For example, Barack Obama garnered 3.5 million fewer votes in 2012, yet won a second term.
In sum: six swing states were won by Trump on Election Day, and all six shifted to Biden by virtue of early morning Nov. 4 spikes in mailed-in ballots overwhelmingly favoring Biden; but somehow Biden did not win elsewhere in the country; Trump won nearly all (18 of 19) of the historically accurate bellwether counties; Biden, campaigning from his basement, after obvious signs of cognitive decline and the hugely damaging Hunter Biden scandal breaking, running with a vice-presidential candidate who had to drop out of the race at 5 percent of the vote, somehow topped Obama, the first black U.S. president, by over 10 million votes, even though Trump won more of the non-white vote than any GOP candidate in the last 60 years.
As Markopolos said of Madoff’s Ponzi scheme, the “math was so compelling” but no one would listen. The same is true of the 2020 election.
Mountains of Proof of Fraud
Aside from these compelling badges of fraud, mountains of direct evidence of widespread voter fraud have been uncovered:
- Radical change to universal mail-in ballots—a weaponization of the CCP virus pandemic.
- Dramatic ease of mail-in restrictions.
- A dramatic drop in mailed ballot rejection rates.
- Sworn affidavit of “perfect black bubbles” filled in on mailed ballots.
- Sworn affidavits of ballots counted multiple times.
- Refusal of election authorities to perform simple signature checks on mailed ballots.
- Sworn affidavits of mailed ballots backdated.
- Sworn affidavits of “pristine ballots.”
- Sworn testimony of a Pennsylvania trucker concerning massive numbers of ballots shipped from Babylon, New York to Pennsylvania.
- Ballots from out-of-state voters.
- Ballots from voters listing fraudulent addresses.
- Poll watchers denied access in violation of the law.
- Video evidence of cases of hidden ballots.
On top of the badges of fraud, compelling math, and actual proof of voter fraud, powerful evidence has emerged that the Dominion vote-counting software, in use in 28 states, has been compromised:
- Sworn testimony that Dominion is linked to Smartmatic, which was allegedly developed at the request of Hugo Chavez to ensure his election victories.
- Evidence that in many cases the Dominion machines were connected to the internet and thus vulnerable to hacking, including by foreign actors.
- Evidence that Dominion machines were not “hardened” (secured against hacking).
- Evidence that Dominion components were made in China.
Election Officials Are Partisan Political Hacks
No objective observer would contend that the election officials are anything but partisan political hacks. They have no interest in a fair and honest election and are only concerned with a Biden win, no matter how fraudulently procured.
Sadly, this sort of hyper-partisanship has extended to elected officials, including some Democratic governors, such as Pennsylvania’s Tom Wolfe, who has shown he’s set on certifying Pennsylvania’s fraudulent results—which now have Biden winning despite a nearly 800,000 vote Trump lead on Election Day, and despite mountains of evidence of fraud.
Courts Demonstrate Reluctance to Intervene
Many court cases have been started in response to the widespread voter fraud, some by the president and others by disenfranchised voters represented by independent lawyers and lawyers who work for public interest groups.
In some cases, the courts have, tragically, operated as partisan appendages of the Democratic executive branches of state governments. For example, the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, in a split 4–3 decision, overrode the GOP-majority controlled Pennsylvania Legislature’s duly enacted law setting 8 p.m. on Election Day as the deadline for mail-in ballots. That decision was a brazen violation of the U.S. Constitution, as Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has already suggested, which grants the state legislatures the exclusive authority to determine the manner of selecting electors.
In other cases, courts have demonstrated a reluctance to get involved. While I don’t agree with this approach, it’s understandable given the separation of powers inherent to our constitutional republic. Many judges simply don’t want to tell the executive branch of a state government how to run their elections even if they see compelling evidence of rampant fraud.
Can Biden Run Out the Clock?
The Electors’ Clause of the U.S. Constitution grants each state legislature the exclusive power to decide the “manner” in which the state’s presidential electors are chosen. That means the state legislatures have the constitutional power to select Trump-pledged electors if they believe a fraudulent vote was certified or to disavow the Biden-pledged electors certified by the state’s governor.
What’s less clear is whether the state lawmakers can do either at any time up until the Jan. 20 inauguration, or whether they are foreclosed from doing so after the Electoral College is convened, which this year will be held on Dec. 14. The Electoral College date is set by Congressional statute, not by the Constitution, and to the extent that statute, as applied, constrains constitutional powers of the state lawmakers, it may be adjudged unconstitutional by the Supreme Court.
Still, in the absence of timely clarification from the Supreme Court, the state lawmakers may be persuaded that they lack a constitutional power they truly possess, or they just may be frustrated in exercising that power by Democratic governors refusing to call a special session of the state legislature.
President Trump: Election System Under ‘Coordinated Assault and Siege,’ Left Wants ‘Communism’
While being careful never to say he will resist a peaceful transition of power, the president in a pre-recorded speech—he dubbed the “most important” he has ever made—declared that our election system was under “coordinated assault and siege.”
Later, the president proposed “landmark election reform” and overhaul of election security systems, but that would only occur if and after Republicans won the Senate, and presupposes a Trump victory.
Speaking at his recent rally supporting the GOP candidates in the Georgia Senate run-off (businesswoman Sen. Kelly Loeffler (R-Ga.) and former business executive Sen. David Perdue (R-Ga.)), Trump said, “These people want to go further than socialism, they want to go into a communistic form of government, and I have no doubt about it.” The president warned “as Chuck Schumer said rather infamously, ‘First we take Georgia, then we take America.’”
The DOJ and FBI Have Demonstrated a Reluctance to Get Involved
Although the Department of Justice (DOJ), through special counsel Robert Mueller, and the FBI, spent years and interviewed over 500 witnesses to investigate the phony Russia-Trump collusion hoax, Attorney General William Barr took a few weeks to go out of his way to state to the press that he had not found evidence of voter fraud on a scale that would overturn the result.
According to the president’s lawyer, Rudy Giuliani, the FBI is “missing in action.” Of course, it strains credulity that the DOJ could possibly have conducted any sort of real investigation into a national election involving 150 million voters in anywhere near the timeframe Barr took to make his comments.
64 Pennsylvania Lawmakers Send Letter to Congress Asking Congress to Void Biden Electors
In light of the profound evidence of fraud in Pennsylvania (whereby Trump’s 800,000 vote Election Day lead was overcome), including the unlawful blocking of GOP poll watchers, one trucker’s shocking testimony regarding a delivery of thousands of ballots from Bethpage, New York, to Pennsylvania, and the Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s unconstitutional and hyper-partisan overriding of the Pennsylvania Legislature’s 8 p.m. Election Day deadline for mailed ballots, 64 Pennsylvania state senators, representatives, and members-elect of the General Assembly, including Speaker of the House Bryan Cutler and majority leader Kerry Benninghoff, issued a letter (pdf) on Dec. 4 asking Pennsylvania’s congressional delegation to object to the 20 Electoral College votes certified by Gov. Tom Wolf for Biden.
Mainstream Media and Social Media Have Been Corrupt Co-conspirators
No objective person would say the mainstream media and social media, have been journalistically objective. Indeed, no objective person would deny they have been active co-conspirators in stealing the election.
Long before Election Day, Twitter and Facebook were aggressively suppressing factual articles adverse to Biden, including Twitter’s having blocked the New York Post’s breaking news story about the contents of the Hunter Biden laptop, and later having shut down the Post’s Twitter account for weeks. The New York Post was founded in 1801 by Alexander Hamilton. Texas Sen. Ted Cruz (R) railed against Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey.
The mainstream and social media also repeatedly suppressed news of Biden’s mental acuity and frequent stunning gaffes.
Mainstream media voting polls suppressed Trump voters by reporting a Biden win was a foregone conclusion.
On Election Day, the mainstream media displayed obvious bias calling states for Biden prematurely and delaying interminably calling Trump’s victories in Florida, Texas, Ohio, and South Carolina. Even former conservative cable news outlet Fox News shamefully called Arizona for Biden on Election Day, when no objective observer would have done so.
Almost all news outlets “called” the election weeks ago, and repeatedly refer to Biden as “the president-elect.” Very few outlets—The Epoch Times the most notable—have refused to call the election while six swing states remain in dispute.
The actions of the media and social media are more than bias, they amount to the active and substantial assistance of a co-conspirator. Consider this recent gem from the New York Times in a supposed hard news story, the clear object of which is to stop the lawmakers and the courts from considering the evidence of fraud:
“The final days of the Trump presidency have taken on the stormy elements of a drama more common to history or literature than a modern White House. His rage and detached-from-reality refusal to concede defeat evoke images of a besieged overlord in some distant land defiantly clinging to power rather than going into exile or an erratic English monarch imposing his version of reality on his cowed court.”
Biden, Empty-Vessel Instrumentality of Insurrection?
Few objective voters could or would even try to make a case for Biden truly possessing the leadership abilities to serve as the leader of the free world.
Biden graduated at the very bottom of his law school class. He has held political office for 47 years with virtually no accomplishments to speak of. He was forced to withdraw from the 1987 presidential race after admitting to plagiarism, and lost to Obama in 2008.
Biden is on tape bragging about having successfully threatened the president of Ukraine into firing a prosecutor who was investigating the Ukrainian company Burisma, which had employed his son Hunter, for over $50,000 a month, and Ukraine knuckled under, fired the prosecutor, and dropped the investigation.
Shortly before the election, the Hunter Biden laptop scandal broke, during which evidence emerged that Hunter had taken millions from the Chinese Communist Party, which emails allegedly show he committed to share with his father, the “big guy.”
What Biden really offers, everyone knows, is a pliable empty vessel that the left can do with what they please. He serves as a figurehead and nothing more.
While this alone is not a reason to overturn the election, it draws a highlighter through the risk of civil war, because it makes Biden’s fraudulent election part of a broader scheme—i.e., an insurrection.
US Polls Show Half US Voters Believe the Election Was Stolen; Foreign Press and Officials Have Openly Recognized Widespread US Voter Fraud
A Rasmussen poll shows that 47 percent of U.S. voters believe “Democrats stole votes or destroyed pro-Trump ballots in several states to ensure that Biden would win.” This is a staggering result. It’s one thing for voters to say they have no confidence in the winner. It’s another for them to say the election was stolen. And, I believe, like the “shy Trump” voter, the true percentage of voters who believe the election was stolen has to be much higher. Indeed it’s hard to understand how any well-informed Democrat could come to any other conclusion.
President Trump has claimed he has been privately called by many foreign leaders who have expressed similar sentiments.
Australia’s Sky News has repeatedly reported aggressively on the obvious fraud in the U.S. election.
A Compelling Case That an Insurrection Is Unfolding Before Our Eyes
The confluence of events now evident, it can be cogently argued, presents a compelling case for the president’s invocation of the Insurrection Act.
On the one hand, there’s a statistically impossible election outcome coupled with vast evidence (over 1,000 sworn affidavits) demonstrating specific voter fraud and vote-counting software and hardware—designed for communists to permit voter fraud through voter-intention changing algorithms—containing Chinese components and using foreign-based servers, connected to the internet.
And, on the other hand—following a nearly four-year-long attempted non-violent coup (including the bogus Mueller investigation and failed impeachment attempt)—there’s a conspiracy unfolding in the days following Election Day of political hacks, corrupt and complicit news and social media outlets, and partisan or gun-shy courts, working together to bring about a massive, fraudulent post-Election Day “blue-shift” only where it mattered, and the conspirators then collaboratively “running out the clock” without the truth about election fraud ever having been determined.
Add in to the equation an electorate at least half of which (likely far more) see the election as having been stolen, foreign leaders saying the same, and formerly mainstream Democrats threatening to pack the Court, end the filibuster, make D.C. and Puerto Rico into states, and finally to pack the electorate through amnesty for millions of illegal aliens, all for the purpose of achieving a one-party communist totalitarian state, and it’s no longer a stretch to say that the country is facing a coordinated insurrection that presents an existential threat to the republic.
The outcomes are binary: Either some combination of the courts and the state legislatures will take steps that result in either a Trump win or a contingent election in the House, which Trump then wins, or the statistical anomalies and proof of voter fraud is never addressed because the conspirators run out the clock, and Biden wins.
Either outcome is fraught with danger. If Trump wins by either overturning election results in court, or through a contingent election following state lawmakers’ sending dueling electors or simply disavowing their own election results, Democrats, including radical groups such as Antifa, could, and likely would, revolt openly and violently.
Conversely, if Biden successfully runs out the clock, and the fraudulent results are certified, without any real audits having taken place or the evidence addressed or explained, the silent majority is not likely to remain silent a moment longer. Trump supporters could take the streets, and violence doubtless would erupt.
Either way, massive property damage and deaths would ensue. The CCP virus would likely spike further.
If U.S. election integrity is not restored, the standing of the United States as the greatest democracy the world has ever known would come to an immediate end. We could never again wag our finger at the likes of communist China, Venezuela, or Cuba, because we could be guilty of exactly the same rigged elections.
On the other hand, if election integrity is restored, the risk of civil war could be averted, and our international stature could be salvaged—no matter who is determined to be the winner.
What Would Invocation of the Insurrection Act to Restore Election Integrity Look Like?
As students of U.S. history know, in 1878 Congress enacted the Posse Comitatus Act aimed at preventing federal troops from interfering with elections in the Southern states during the period of Reconstruction following the end of the Civil War.
But the Posse Comitatus Act did not repeal the above-quoted section 252 of the Insurrection Act. Regardless, Trump could invoke the Insurrection Act surgically, not to redo the election in all 50 states, or even in the six swing states in dispute.
Instead, he could simply invoke the Insurrection Act to have U.S. armed forces seize control of crucial electoral evidence—ballots, envelopes, and Dominion voting machines and servers—and order the military to conduct an immediate and thorough forensic audit of the votes, so that all lawful ballots are counted, and all unlawful ballots are disqualified, in strict accordance with prevailing state law.
Notably, this would be a very surgical and non-tactical use of the armed forces. No force would be used against any U.S. citizens. The armed forces would merely be taking hold of crucial evidence before it’s destroyed or otherwise tampered with, and running an independent forensic audit to both determine lawful versus unlawful ballots—again in strict accordance with prevailing state law—and to manually count those ballots. Given our experiences of the last four years, neither the DOJ nor FBI should be anywhere near this process. They simply cannot be trusted.
The object of such a surgical military intervention would be to take the burden off the struggling courts and state legislatures to make sure all legal votes were counted and no illegal votes were counted—in the six involved states. The president would presumably pledge to be bound by the results of the military audit. Hopefully, Joe Biden would as well.
The object of the military intervention would be to stop the insurrection, which very well may involve foreign actors given the voting machine vulnerabilities, prevent the disenfranchisement of lawful voters, and restore the U.S. voters’ (and the world’s) confidence in the integrity of U.S. elections.
Without this limited military intervention, a cloud would hang over whomever is ultimately elected president, and the United States could never again complain, on the world stage, of a rigged communist election.
Invocation of the Insurrection Act Could Force the Supreme Court’s Hand, and That’s a Good Thing
Were the president to invoke the Insurrection Act in this or some similar surgical manner, that would doubtless spawn lawsuits by Biden and the Democrats. Some or at least one of these lawsuits would undoubtedly make its way to the Supreme Court. The high court would then have two interesting options:
- Decide in favor of Trump on some of his challenges, but rule that his invocation of the Insurrection Act was an unconstitutional infringement of the states legislatures’ powers under Article II, Section 1, to control the manner of choosing their electors, or
- Decline to consider either Trump’s challenge to the election or his invocation of the Insurrection Act, effectively leaving all parties where they stand.
Interestingly, option 1 could have the effect of empowering those state legislatures—moved by the evidence of fraud at the legislative hearings—to “de-certify” a Biden win in their states or to send a dueling set of electors.
In other words, invoking the Insurrection Act would serve as a test to the power of the state legislatures under the Electors’ Clause and, therefore, could—even if it were overturned by SCOTUS—prove instrumental in un-stealing the 2020 election.
Stephen B. Meister is a lawyer and an opinion writer. Twitter @StephenMeister. Opinions expressed here are his own, not his firm’s.
Copyright © jamesfetzer.org All rights reserved.
[Blog Editor: Georgette Walrath provides specifics on President Trump’s Executive Order 13848 signed in 2018 that the President’s supporters are clamoring for Martial Law to end political election crimes that ALL three Branches of Government are failing to prevent.]
Get Ready: There’s A Reason Trump Isn’t Worried… And It All Boils Down To 13848 E.O.
A very important thing happened during Trump’s “most important speech” last week… and this brilliant man always knew what was coming.
December 12, 2020 1:15 PM
UPDATED 12/13/20 4:55 PM
Have you wondered why President Trump doesn’t seem defeated or worried about the recent legal set backs?
Sure, we know that China has bought and sold our American legislators and many judges… and President Trump knows that too.
But, there’s something that only a few people are talking about that is the key to this whole election rig: Executive Order 13848.
Understand that Donald Trump is not an idiot. In fact, he’s a brilliantly shrewd man. He was elected because he garnered more support than these election riggers ever suspected… it was a miracle in 2016… and he’s about to be put back in office because of another.
Sure, it would have been great if the Supreme Court had intervened, but it wasn’t really a hope.
The Constitution carefully lays out that method for rejecting an election rig, and we must all pray that the uncompromised representatives in Washington D.C. are forced to do their duty… but because of Chinese corruption, President Trump has always had a fall back plan to save the nation.
He wrote it very carefully in 2018…. And his “most important speech” carefully fulfilled the requirements.
Bear with me, this is a lot of information to understand, but it’s so worth it. And it explains why Lin Wood and Sidney Powell are warning of jail time for these crooked politicians… and why President Trump is not defeated.
Beach Broadcast explained on November 15 about this executive order and what is happening:
The crooked election thugs are not just crooks, they are financially done! Foreigner involved in election interference are included!
This EO and a recent EO covers EVERYTHING…and I mean EVERYTHING! Including donations to any of these election thugs.
Does this mean that the thug AG’s and SOS that changed their state laws/rules get this punishment? What about those that ditched the ballots / changed the votes/ or fed the machines with fake ballots and ballot harvesting?
Or what about the people that got ballots under the name of their dead cats / dogs and we always know, dead people always vote democrat.
Prior to President Trump taking office, our votes did not matter for decades, the crooked politicians decided for us! We never ever had a voice in the matter, until 2016 happened and the power and will of the American people fought so hard and it caused the greatest government shakedown ever!
Think about this, we were competing with foreign voters, illegals voting, ballot harvesting, election fraud and President Trump still won! Does that mean he won by more than 12M popular votes (NSA numbers are 57M for the witch – includes dogs, cats, deceased ppl and illegals / 70M for President Trump).
Trump-Clinton 2016 Election Results Revisited
According the desperate media that is fighting for their lives and freedom have declared creepy criminal Joe as the Criminal Elect President! Then they recently changed it to Projected Winner. They will play their dirty games but…what happened on Friday, Sidney Powell, Lin Wood, Louise Gohmert, and Mike Pompeo were all sending strong messages about the fate of Joe and the Election thugs.
These thugs are going to throw everything they can now, because they will more than likely have a brand new home waiting for them.
President Trump was pushing for justice reform. Many people that have committed a misdemeanor were serving years in prison while the real crooks in government, were getting away with murder. Not any more.
Was President Trump sending these thugs a huge message and was he clearing the path to get new inmates in prison? Remember, the 4 low profile people that got charged with felonies, they are facing 6 months to 99 years in prison. How about all the Antifa and BLM thugs? They need room for those pink hat soy boys / girls!
EO 13848 Signed 9/12/2018 imposes certain Sanctions of Foreign Interference in an USA Election:
EO 13848 extended from 9/12/2020 to 9/12/2021:
Brand New EO quietly signed on 11/10/2020 on CCP Involvement and how the DOD / DHS plays a vital role in this EO:
Trades, securities trading, etc. in connection with the CCP or CC Military is prohibited. Effective 11/11/2020 – 11/11/2021. Even donations are prohibited. Remember when Biden’s received $3.5M from the Russian Mayor’s Billionaire wifey? Then monies were transferred to Hunter’s company and many others and Loser Barry turned a blind eye to the sanction avoidance scam. According to this recent EO, that cannot be done!
TERMINATIONS WERE NECESSARY
Now these DOD and DHS Terminations make so much more sense to enforce the above referenced EO’s:
DOD and DHS Terminations screen capture 1
DOD and DHS Terminations screen capture 2
CISA has Terminations / Resignations as well…4 people gone!
Do you see it now? All those involved in ElectionFraudGate are going to suffer big time!
Secretary Pompeo knew and even said this at a Governor’s meeting last year!
Tweet Capture Pompeo Speaking Governors Assoc
Lin Wood knows too:
Sidney Powell Said this:
Sidney Powell Tweet screen capture
Now, check out the increased flights to GITMO:
VIDEO: 12/5/2020 – EO 13848 and NESARA! GITMO Flights are constant!
[Posted by BeachBroadcast
27.3K subscribers – Dec 5, 2020]
Merrilee Beazley explained how this all falls into place with the Speech President Trump gave on December 3:
Ask yourself this question: What was the purpose of yesterday’s White House speech about election fraud and vote rigging?
If you think it was all about Trump communicating to the people, think again. This speech was really about Trump communicating with Chris Miller and the DoD about foreign interference in the U.S. election while laying out the key national security justifications that are necessary to invoke what I’m calling the “national security option” for defending the United States against an attempted cyber warfare coup.
In this article, I present details from 10 USC, Section 394. Subtitle A, Part 1, Chapter 19, “Authorities concerning military cyber operations” as well as National Security Presidential Memoranda (NSPM) #13, covering “offensive cyber operations.” See below. In today’s Situation Update (Dec. 3rd), I lay out all the details of how Trump just invoked the legal framework — and national security provisions — necessary to allow the Secretary of Defense (Chris Miller) to activate military processes that lead to a tactical takedown of domestic enemies and active traitors. Here’s the full podcast for Dec. 3rd. Tomorrow’s podcast (Dec. 4th) will provide even more details on the NSPM and other efforts put in place by Trump’s DOD intelligence team to trap the Democrats in acts of treason and warfare against America. Brighteon.com/85eb594a-046e-48b7-989d-25a1d868ba67
Decoding President Trump’s Dec. 2nd speech
Consider what Trump said in yesterday’s speech. You can watch the full speech here, but if you don’t know what to listen for, you’ll miss all the important language. About 95% of this speech was filler. Only 5% really matters, as I detail below:
First, he lays out that he has a sworn oath to defend the United States Constitution against the wartime “siege” that’s under way: As President I have no higher duty than to defend the laws and the constitution of the United States. That is why I am determined to protect our election system, which is now under coordinated assault and siege. He then explains that the vote was criminally rigged with “fraud” (which is a crime) and that it’s now time to overturn the election results and correct them: Millions of votes were cast illegally in the swing states alone, and if that’s the case, the results of the individual swing states must be overturned, and overturned immediately.
Then he explains that China was part of this entire plan from the very beginning, via their engineering and launching of the coronavirus, which Democrats used to justify mass mail-in ballots which were used to steal the election. This statement specifically invoked national security elements of our defense protocols: The Democrats has this election rigged right from the beginning. They used the pandemic as an excuse to mail out tens of millions of ballots, which led to a big part of the fraud… and there is no one happier than China. Trump then calls for a “full forensic audit,” which can obviously only take place under military authority, since the local elections officials are corrupt, fraudulent criminals.
He explains this himself: Dramatically eroding the integrity of our elections was the Democrats’ number one priority. For a simple reason: They wanted to steal the 2020 presidential election. All of the Democrat efforts to expand mail-in balloting laid the groundwork for the systematic and pervasive fraud that occurred in this election. Then, about 30 minutes into the speech, he invokes legal language that clearly references Trump’s Sep. 12, 2018 executive order which describes remedies for foreign interference in U.S. elections. Here’s what Trump says: The only conceivable reason why you would block commonsense measures to verify legal eligibility for voting, is you are trying to encourage, enable, solicit or carry out fraud. It is important for Americans to understand that these destructive changes to our election laws were NOT a necessary response to the pandemic. The pandemic simply gave the Democrats an excuse to do what they were trying to do with many many years. Note carefully the phrase, “…trying to encourage, enable, solicit or carry out fraud.”
Where have we heard something very similar before? In the 2018 EO, which describes who will be subjected to having all their assets seized by the United States government — and note that this applies to corporations, individuals, partnerships and even non-profits: (emphasis added) Sec. 2. a (ii) to have materially assisted, sponsored, or provided financial, material, or technological support for, or goods or services to or in support of, any activity described in subsection (a)(i) Sec. 2. a (i) to have directly or indirectly engaged in, sponsored, concealed, or otherwise been complicit in foreign interference in a United States election; Thus, Trump just invoked the 2018 EO and sent an undeniable signal to Chris Miller at the DoD (as well as many other groups) that the Democrats, the treasonous media and the complicit Big Tech giants have all engaged in concealing, advocating or supporting “foreign interference” in the U.S. election.
Treason, rendition flights and military tribunals
What is the remedy for such actions of treason against the United States? Under existing U.S. law, it’s a felony crime to try to rig votes. Under military law during a time of war, it’s treason. And under the 2018 EO, each of the entities engaging in this behavior will have all their assets seized by the U.S. Treasury. Translated into plain language, this means that Twitter, Facebook, CNN, the Washington Post, Google, MSNBC, etc., are all now able to be completely seized, shut down or taken over by the Trump administration, as they all engaged in the defined behaviors outlined in the 2018 EO, which Trump just cited. Consider that as I list all the evidence that Trump’s attorneys and DoD “white hat” team members now possess, much of which will surely be presented to SCOTUS, most likely by Sidney Powell, once one of her cases reaches that level of the judicial system:
- CIA director Gina Haspel admitting to election interference in a full confession which has now been acquired. (This is covered in the Dec. 3rd Situation Update podcast, above.)
- Dominion executives confessing to engineering backdoors into the systems, which has also been acquired.
- Packet analysis results from “white hats” who intercepted all the real-time vote rigging traffic, which includes the specific instructions from CIA servers to add the hundreds of thousands of votes in real time to Dominion tabulation machines in swing states. This is now publicly confirmed by Col. Phil Waldron.
- Log files and software evidence from the seized CIA servers in Frankfurt, which provides physical and intellectual proof that the CIA inserted hundreds of thousands of votes into the Dominion tabulation machines.
All this evidence exists right now. Trump has it all. His speech lays the official groundwork that can now be cited by other officials (namely, in the DoD and Treasury, which runs the US Secret Service), in order to justify their own initiation of orders for further arrests, rendition flights and wartime activities necessary to defend the United States of America against foreign enemies who are waging cyber warfare against the United States.
10 USC 394: Authorities concerning military cyber operations
In case you’re wondering whether the U.S. military under Trump really has the authorization to respond to acts of cyber warfare with coordinated conventional military actions, read 10 USC, Section 394. Subtitle A, Part 1, Chapter 19, which is available via uscode.house.gov: (I’m bolding the especially important sections): §394. Authorities concerning military cyber operations (a) In General.-The Secretary of Defense shall develop, prepare, and coordinate; make ready all armed forces for purposes of; and, when appropriately authorized to do so, conduct, military cyber activities or operations in cyberspace, including clandestine military activities or operations in cyberspace, to defend the United States and its allies, including in response to malicious cyber activity carried out against the United States or a United States person by a foreign power. (b) Affirmation of Authority.- Congress affirms that the activities or operations referred to in subsection (a), when appropriately authorized, include the conduct of military activities or operations in cyberspace short of hostilities (as such term is used in the War Powers Resolution (Public Law 93–148; 50 U.S.C. 1541 et seq.)) or in areas in which hostilities are not occurring, including for the purpose of preparation of the environment, information operations, force protection, and deterrence of hostilities, or counterterrorism operations involving the Armed Forces of the United States. (c) Clandestine Activities or Operations. – A clandestine military activity or operation in cyberspace shall be considered a traditional military activity for the purposes of section 503(e)(2) of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3093(e)(2)). f) Definitions.-In this section: (1) The term “clandestine military activity or operation in cyberspace” means a military activity or military operation carried out in cyberspace, or associated preparatory actions, authorized by the President or the Secretary that- (A) is marked by, held in, or conducted with secrecy, where the intent is that the activity or operation will not be apparent or acknowledged publicly; and (B) is to be carried out- (i) as part of a military operation plan approved by the President or the Secretary in anticipation of hostilities or as directed by the President or the Secretary; (ii) to deter, safeguard, or defend against attacks or malicious cyber activities against the United States or Department of Defense information, networks, systems, installations, facilities, or other assets; or (iii) in support of information related capabilities.
Trump announced “offensive cyber operations” just one week after signing his Sep 12, 2018 Executive Order
As you ponder all the implications of that, note carefully that just 8 days after President Trump signed his September 12, 2018 executive order, the Trump administration announced the launch of “offensive cyber operations” against foreign enemies. This was reported by the Washington Post, which explained, “The strategy incorporates a new classified presidential directive that replaced one from the Obama administration… It allows the military and other agencies to undertake cyber operations intended to protect their systems and the nation’s critical networks.” What would be considered “offensive cyber operations?” Kraken, of course.
The 305th military intelligence battalion. Of course, just 8 days earlier, President Trump had designated elections infrastructure as “critical infrastructure.” So now the pieces fit. The circle is complete. The election theft was cyber warfare against critical U.S. infrastructure. This authorizes all kinds of national security activities, such as using U.S. Army Special Forces units to raid the CIA server farm in Frankfurt, which took place shortly after the election. Also in 2018, President Trump had authorized the National Security Presidential Memoranda (NSPM) #13, covering “offensive cyber operations.” Here’s a list of all the NSPMs, but notably, “offensive cyber operations” is a secret and is not publicly shown. In fact, the Trump administration fought to keep this document hidden from Congress, given that in 2018, the House was run by Pelosi and other treasonous actors who had just pulled off the 2018 cyber attack on the U.S. elections infrastructure, stealing dozens of House seats in order to “win” a majority in the House, from which Adam Schiff could launch his impeachment scheme to try to remove Trump from power.
Trump was able to prevent the House from reading NSPM #13 for 17 months, according to Fifth Domain, which reported: “On a bipartisan basis some of us sent a letter to the Trump administration demanding that they share with, at least some of the leadership on the Armed Services Committees, the rules of engagement for certain cyber contingencies,” Rep. Mac Thornberry, R-Texas, said at the time. “The Obama folks did give us that information, the Trump people changed it, but then they were reluctant to show us.”
What we now know is that Trump was planning the 2020 election sting / cyber warfare “trap” in 2018, and that these cyber warfare response protocols were intentionally kept from Congress for as long as possible while plans were put in place to catch the Democrats stealing the next election (the 2020 election). I will discuss this in greater detail in tomorrow’s Situation Update (Dec. 4th), which will be posted at the HRR channel on Brighteon.com: https://www.brighteon.com/channels/hrreport Rest assured, what we now know with absolute certainty is that Trump, Miller, Cohen-Watnick and other key players put the cyber warfare infrastructure in place in 2018 that would allow them to unleash a domestic military response to arrest, detain and prosecute all those who were complicit in the attack on America. The patriots, in other words, really are in charge. And they planned all this since 2018, putting in place the framework to trigger the appropriate national security resources once the Democrats took the bait and tried to steal the 2020 election. GITMO must be getting close to full capacity at this point, with lots more detainees on their way.
The mass arrests are coming. Trump is in charge, and the Dems who know what’s really happening are beyond terrified. They know they’ve been caught. Some will be charged with treason. Many will face military tribunals. A few will likely be executed after found guilty of treason.
So, patriots…. Pray.
Pray that Congress does its job, the job they by-God have been elected to do, so that the military solution will not have to be carried out.
However, if it does come to this… be ready. Stock up on supplies, get ready to hunker down, because evil will not surrender without a fight.
Disclaimer: These actions are suspected, not personally verified. But, knowing this option is available, considering the current state of the country, makes many people glad that Trump is still in charge.
©2017 Conservative Daily Post. All rights reserved.
One thought on “Commie and Criminal Election Interference”
Reblogged this on boudica.us.